[ING FUNDS LOGO]
March 9, 2007
Mr. Brion Thompson
Division of Investment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549
RE: | | ING Equity Trust (“Registrant”) |
| | File No. 333-140325 |
Dear Mr. Thompson:
The Registrant is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in this filing. Further, the Registrant recognizes that the Staff’s comments, or changes to disclosure in response to the Staff’s comments, does not foreclose the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from taking any action with respect to the filing. Lastly, if, to our knowledge, an inquiry or investigation is currently pending or threatened by the SEC and if the SEC subsequently, in order to protect its investigative position, so requests, the Registrant will not assert Staff comments with respect to the inquiry or investigation as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the SEC or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. This representation should not be construed as confirming that there is, or is not, in fact, any inquiry or investigation currently pending or threatened.
Please direct any questions or additional comments you may have concerning this letter to the undersigned at 480-477-2666. Thank you.
Regards,
/s/ Huey P. Falgout, Jr. | |
Huey P. Falgout, Jr. | |
Counsel | |
ING U.S. Legal Services | |
| |
Attachments | |
| |
cc: | Jeffrey S. Puretz |
| Christopher D. Christian |
| Dechert LLP |
| | |

| 1775 I Street, N.W. |
Washington, DC 20006-2401 |
+1 202 261 3300 Main |
+1 202 261 3333 Fax |
www.dechert.com |
|
|
CHRISTOPHER D. CHRISTIAN |
|
christopher.christian@dechert.com |
+1 202 261 3321 Direct |
+1 202 261 3333 Fax |
March 12, 2007
Brion Thompson
Division of Investment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: ING Equity Trust – ING Value Choice Fund
(File No. 333-140325)
Dear Mr. Thompson:
This letter responds to comments that you provided to me via telephone conversations on February 27, 2007 and March 1, 2007, in connection with your review of the Registration Statement filed on Form N-14 on behalf of ING Value Choice Fund (the “Acquiring Fund”), a series of ING Equity Trust (the “Registrant”), on January 30, 2007. The comments, and the Registrant’s responses, are as follows:
I. GENERAL PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS COMMENTS
1. Comment. Page 1. Under the section “Introduction,” please inform us whether the Acquiring Fund intends to incorporate by reference its current prospectus dated September 30, 2006 (“Prospectus”). If so, please note that General Instruction G to Form N-14 requires the Prospectus to accompany the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and be sent to investors. If the Registrant does not intend to incorporate by reference, please confirm that the information required by Item 5 of Form N-14 is included in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, including the disclosure required by Items 2, 3, 4(a) and (b) and 5 through 9 of Form N-1A.
Response. The Registrant does not intend to incorporate by reference the Acquiring Fund’s prospectus. We confirm that the Proxy Statement/Prospectus complies with Item 5 of Form N-14.
2. Comment. Page 16. Please provide, if possible, a table showing the Acquiring Fund’s average annual total return pursuant to Item 5 of Form N-14 and Item 2 of Form N-1A.
U.S. Austin Boston Charlotte Harrisburg Hartford New York Newport Beach Palo Alto Philadelphia Princeton San Francisco Washington DC EUROPE Brussels London Luxembourg Munich Paris
Response. In response to your comment, the Registrant will include the bar chart and performance information required by Item 5 of Form N-14 and Item 2 of Form N1-A on an unaudited basis in the definitive filing.
3. Comment. Page 16. If Registrant intends to include composite performance for the Acquiring Fund’s sub-adviser, Tradewinds Global Investors, LLC (“Sub-Adviser”), please move the composite presentation of the Sub-Adviser’s performance under the section “Sub-Advisers” on page 29.
Response. The disclosure in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus has been revised in response to your comment. The marked pages reflecting the change are attached as Exhibit A.
4. Comment. Page 16. In the performance composite for the Sub-Adviser entitled “Performance of Similar Small/Mid Cap Value Accounts Managed by Tradewinds,” please revise the disclosure or substantiate why each account in the composite has “substantially” similar investment objectives, strategies and policies as that of the Acquiring Fund.
Response. The disclosure in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus has been revised in response to your comment. A marked page reflecting the change is attached as Exhibit B.
5. Comment. Page 17. Please explain why in footnote 1 the performance results from November 1, 2006 though February 28, 2006 represent the performance of an affiliate of the Sub-Adviser given the guidance provided by the Staff in Nicolas-Applegate Mutual Funds, SEC No-Action Letter (Aug. 6, 1996) (“Nicolas-Applegate”).
Response. Effective March 1, 2006, Nuveen Investments Inc., parent company of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, organized an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, Tradewinds Global Investors, LLC (“Tradewinds”). As a result, sub-advisory responsibilities for the Acquiring Fund were transferred to Tradewinds. We note, however, that the portfolio management team did not change for the Acquiring Fund as a result of this restructuring. As such, we believe that the use of performance information in the composite complies with the guidance provided by the Staff in Nicolas-Applegate. Pursuant to Nicolas-Applegate, a mutual fund may include non-required information in additional what Form N-1A requires, if “such information is not incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading” and does not, “by virtue of its nature, quantity, or manner of presentation, obscure or impede the understanding of the information that is required to be included.” Since the Acquiring Fund is a relatively new fund, the Registrant has included performance information in the composite to demonstrate the historical performance of the current portfolio management team, which management believes is a significant consideration in assisting shareholders in making an informed decision about the Reorganization.
6. Comment. Page 28. Under the section “Board Considerations,” please provide a greater discussion of the factors that the Board of Trustees of ING MidCap Value Fund and ING SmallCap Value Fund (each an “Acquired Fund”) considered when recommending the reorganization of each Acquired Fund with and into the Acquiring Fund (the “Reorganization”).
Response. The disclosure in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus has been revised in response to your comment. Marked pages reflecting the changes is attached as Exhibit C.
2
II. MISCELLANEOUS
7. Comment. Please provide the Staff with a “Tandy Letter” with respect to the Form N-14.
Response. The requested representation letter is attached.
III. ACCOUNTING COMMENTS
A. PROSPECTUS
8. Comment. Page 4. Under the section “Summary,” please include in the summary fee table a cross-reference to the “Annual Fund Operating Expenses” table on page 22 that complies with Item 3 of Form N-14 and Item 3 of Form N-1A.
Response. The disclosure in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus has been revised in response to your comment. Marked pages reflecting the change are attached as Exhibit D.
9. Comment. Page 26. Please clarify the disclosure under the section “Sale of Securities Prior to Closing” to denote that both of the Acquired Funds will liquidate all or a significant portion of their assets if shareholders approve the Reorganization.
Response. The disclosure in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus has been revised in response to your comment. A marked page reflecting the change is attached as Exhibit E.
10. Comment. Please provide the Staff with an explanation of why the Acquired Funds will liquidate all or a significant portion of their portfolio securities since the Acquired Funds appear to be compatible with the Acquiring Fund.
Response. The Board of the Trustees was informed by ING Investments, LLC, the investment adviser to each Fund, that there was not substantial overlap in the portfolio holdings of the Acquired Funds and the Acquiring Fund despite each Fund having the same investment objective. In addition, ING Investments, LLC informed the Board that the preferred approach to effectuate each Reorganization was to liquidate a significant portion of the portfolio securities of each Disappearing Fund. The Board of Trustees considered the potential tax consequences and other costs to shareholders of the realignment of each Acquired Fund with the Acquiring Fund. The Board considered the costs of such liquidation and determined that such costs should be borne by shareholders of the respective Acquired Fund prior to the closing of the Reorganization. The Board considered these costs in relation to the potential benefits to shareholders of each Acquired Fund from the respective Reorganization.
11. Comment. Page 3. Under the “Summary” section, if the transactions costs and taxes resulting from the proposed reorganization will be significant, please disclose it more prominently and include this fact.
3
Response. The disclosure in the Proxy/Statement Prospectus has been revised in response to your comment. A marked page reflecting the changes is attached as Exhibit F.
12. Comment. Page 26. Please provide the Staff with an explanation of why the transaction is expected to be a “tax-free” reorganization pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in light of the liquidation of all or a significant portion of the Acquired Funds’ portfolio securities prior to the closing of the Reorganization.
Response. If shareholders approve either Reorganization, it is anticipated that the Acquired Fund will liquidate a significant portion of its portfolio securities prior to the closing to effectuate the Reorganization. Such a liquidation will entail transaction costs and may result in the realization of taxable gains or losses to the respective Acquired Fund shareholders. The respective Acquired Fund will not dispose of assets to an extent or in a manner, however, that would jeopordize the tax-free nature of the Reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
B. PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. Comment. In the “Statement of Operations” table, please clarify the format of the footnotes relating to the foreign tax disclosure and the name of the Acquiring Fund.
Response. The disclosure has been revised in response to your comment. A marked page reflecting the change is attached as Exhibit G.
14. Comment. Under the “Schedule of Investments,” please indicate which securities are expected to sold to align the portfolios of the Acquired Funds with the Acquiring Fund.
Response. The Registrant will denote on the “Schedule of Investments” the securities that will be sold prior to or shortly after the Reorganization. Marked pages reflecting the change are attached as Exhibit H.
* * *
If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 202-261-3321.
Sincerely, | |
| |
/s/ Christopher D. Christian | | |
Christopher D. Christian | |
| | |
4
Attachments
cc: | Robin Nesbitt |
| ING Investments, LLC |
| |
| Jeffrey S. Puretz |
| Dechert LLP |
5
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS
Form of Organization
Each Fund is a diversified series of ING Equity Trust, an open-end, management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. ING Equity Trust is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of ten members. For more information on the history of ING Equity Trust, see each Fund’s SAI.
Advisers
ING Investments, an Arizona limited liability company, serves as the investment adviser to each of the Funds. ING Investments has overall responsibility for the management of the Funds. ING Investments provides or oversees all investment advisory and portfolio management services for each Fund, and assists in managing and supervising all aspects of the general day-to-day business activities and operations of the Funds, including custodial, transfer agency, dividend disbursing, accounting, auditing, compliance and related services.
ING Investments is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser. ING Investments is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep. ING Groep is one of the largest financial services organizations in the world with approximately 113,000 employees. Based in Amsterdam, ING Groep offers an array of banking, insurance and asset management services to both individual and institutional investors. ING Investments began investment management in April 1995 and serves as investment adviser to registered investment companies as well as structured finance vehicles.
As of June 30, 2006, ING Investments managed over $46 billion in assets. The principal address of ING Investments is 7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258. ING Investments receives a monthly fee for its services based on the average daily net assets of each of the Funds.
Sub-Advisers
ING Investments has engaged a sub-adviser to provide the day-to-day management of each Fund. ING Investments is responsible for monitoring the investment programs and performance of the sub-adviser. Under the terms of the sub-advisory agreements, the agreement can be terminated by either ING Investments or a Fund’s Board. In the event a sub-advisory agreement is terminated, the sub-adviser may be replaced subject to any regulatory requirements or ING Investments may assume day-to-day investment management of the Funds.
For information regarding the basis for the Board’s approval of portfolio management relationships, please refer to the annual shareholder report, dated May 31, 2006, for the Funds. ING Investments has full investment discretion and ultimate authority to make all determinations with respect to the investment of the Funds’ assets and the purchase and sale of portfolio securities.
As noted in the section "Summary" above, Value Choice Fund is externally sub-advised by Tradewinds and David Iben, who will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the combined Fund after the Reorganizations and will manage the combined Fund under the same investment objective and strategies as Value Choice Fund; each Disappearing Fund is sub-advised by Brandes. For more information on the sub-adviser for the Surviving Fund, please see the "Shareholder Guide" on page C-11. The table below is designed to show you how a composite of similar mid-cap value investment accounts managed by Tradewinds performed over various periods in the past.
The Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite is a composite of the performance of all actual fee-paying, fully discretionary small/mid cap value accounts having at least $2 million in net assets under management managed by Tradewinds for at least one month or 90% invested prior to the beginning of a calendar quarter beginning November 1, 2000. Each account in the composite has investment objectives, policies and strategies that are similar to those of Value Choice Fund. The accounts included in the composite may include separate accounts, registered mutual funds, private investments funds and other client accounts.
The table below shows the returns for the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite compared with the Russell Midcap® Value Index and the Russell Midcap® Index on an annual basis as of December 31 of prior years. This information is designed to demonstrate the historical track record of Tradewinds. It does not indicate how Value Choice Fund has performed or will perform in the future. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
28
Annual Total Returns(1)
(As of December 31 each year)
| | Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite % (with no sales charge)(2) | | Russell MidCap® Value Index(3)(%) | | Russell MidCap® Index(4)(%) | |
2005 | | 20.12 | % | 12.65 | % | 12.65 | % |
2004 | | 29.52 | % | 23.71 | % | 20.22 | % |
2003 | | 47.99 | % | 38.07 | % | 40.06 | % |
2002 | | 6.56 | % | (9.65 | )% | (16.18 | )% |
2001 | | 14.63 | % | 2.33 | % | (5.62 | )% |
2000 (11/1/00)(5) | | 10.03 | % | 7.40 | % | (2.07 | )% |
(1) | | Performance results from November 1, 2000 through February 28, 2006, represent the performance of the previous sub-adviser, NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Tradewinds’ affiliate. |
(2) | | Reflects the deduction of the maximum applicable Class A sales charge of 5.75%. |
(3) | | The Russell Midcap® Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell Midcap companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. It includes the reinvestment of dividends and distributions, but does not reflect fees, brokerage commissions or other expenses of investing. |
(4) | | The Russell Midcap® Index is an unmanaged index that measures the 800 smallest companies out of the 1,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalizations of the Russell Index. It includes the reinvestment of dividends and distributions, but does not reflect fees, brokerage commissions or other expenses of investing. |
(5) | | Index returns are for the period beginning November 1, 2000. |
Except to the extent performance in the first column of the Average Annual Total Returns table has been adjusted to reflect the application of the maximum Class A sales charge, the performance reflected in the composite has not been calculated in compliance with the AIMR-PPS® and GIPS®, which differ from the method used by the SEC.
The net annual total returns for the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite were calculated on an asset-weighted, total return basis, including reinvestment of all dividends, interest and income, realized and unrealized gains or losses, brokerage commissions and execution costs, advisory and custodial fees, and any applicable foreign withholding taxes, without provision for federal and state income taxes, if any. The first column of performance numbers under the Average Annual Total Returns table reflects the deduction of the maximum front-end sales charge of the Class A shares of Value Choice Fund (5.75%) from a hypothetical investment made in the first year of the one-year, three-year, five-year and ten-year periods, respectively. The Annual Total Returns table for the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite does not reflect the deduction of any sales loads, which would have reduced those performance numbers. The accounts in the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite do not pay the same expenses that mutual funds pay and are not subject to the diversification rules, tax restrictions and investment limits under the 1940 Act or Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Consequently, the performance results for the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite could have been adversely affected if the institutional private accounts included in the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite had been regulated as investment companies under the federal securities laws. The aggregate returns of the accounts in the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite may not reflect the returns of any particular account managed by Tradewinds.
Distributor
ING Funds Distributor, LLC (the “Distributor”), whose address is 7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258-2034, is the principal distributor for the Funds and is a member of the NASD.
To obtain information about NASD member firms and their associated persons, you may contact the NASD at www.nasdr.com or the NASD BrokerCheck Hotline at 1-800-289-9999. An investment brochure describing the Public Disclosure Program is available from the NASD.
Dividends and Other Distributions
Each Fund generally distributes most or all of its net earnings in the form of dividends and capital gain distributions. Each Fund distributes capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. Dividends and distributions of each Fund are automatically reinvested in additional shares of the respective Class of the particular Fund, unless the shareholder elects to receive distributions in cash.
If a Reorganization Agreement is approved by shareholders of a Disappearing Fund, then as soon as practicable before the Closing Date, the Disappearing Fund will pay its shareholders a cash distribution of substantially all undistributed net investment income and undistributed realized net capital gains.
29
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS
Form of Organization
Each Fund is a diversified series of ING Equity Trust, an open-end, management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. ING Equity Trust is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of ten members. For more information on the history of ING Equity Trust, see each Fund’s SAI.
Advisers
ING Investments, an Arizona limited liability company, serves as the investment adviser to each of the Funds. ING Investments has overall responsibility for the management of the Funds. ING Investments provides or oversees all investment advisory and portfolio management services for each Fund, and assists in managing and supervising all aspects of the general day-to-day business activities and operations of the Funds, including custodial, transfer agency, dividend disbursing, accounting, auditing, compliance and related services.
ING Investments is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser. ING Investments is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep. ING Groep is one of the largest financial services organizations in the world with approximately 113,000 employees. Based in Amsterdam, ING Groep offers an array of banking, insurance and asset management services to both individual and institutional investors. ING Investments began investment management in April 1995 and serves as investment adviser to registered investment companies as well as structured finance vehicles.
As of June 30, 2006, ING Investments managed over $46 billion in assets. The principal address of ING Investments is 7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258. ING Investments receives a monthly fee for its services based on the average daily net assets of each of the Funds.
Sub-Advisers
ING Investments has engaged a sub-adviser to provide the day-to-day management of each Fund. ING Investments is responsible for monitoring the investment programs and performance of the sub-adviser. Under the terms of the sub-advisory agreements, the agreement can be terminated by either ING Investments or a Fund’s Board. In the event a sub-advisory agreement is terminated, the sub-adviser may be replaced subject to any regulatory requirements or ING Investments may assume day-to-day investment management of the Funds.
For information regarding the basis for the Board’s approval of portfolio management relationships, please refer to the annual shareholder report, dated May 31, 2006, for the Funds. ING Investments has full investment discretion and ultimate authority to make all determinations with respect to the investment of the Funds’ assets and the purchase and sale of portfolio securities.
As noted in the section "Summary" above, Value Choice Fund is externally sub-advised by Tradewinds and David Iben, who will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the combined Fund after the Reorganizations and will manage the combined Fund under the same investment objective and strategies as Value Choice Fund; each Disappearing Fund is sub-advised by Brandes. For more information on the sub-adviser for the Surviving Fund, please see the "Shareholder Guide" on page C-11. The table below is designed to show you how a composite of similar mid-cap value investment accounts managed by Tradewinds performed over various periods in the past.
The Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite is a composite of the performance of all actual fee-paying, fully discretionary small/mid cap value accounts having at least $2 million in net assets under management managed by Tradewinds for at least one month or 90% invested prior to the beginning of a calendar quarter beginning November 1, 2000. Each account in the composite has investment objectives, policies and strategies that are similar to those of Value Choice Fund. The accounts included in the composite may include separate accounts, registered mutual funds, private investments funds and other client accounts.
The table below shows the returns for the Tradewinds Small/Mid Cap Value Composite compared with the Russell Midcap® Value Index and the Russell Midcap® Index on an annual basis as of December 31, of prior years. This information is designed to demonstrate the historical track record of Tradewinds. It does not indicate how Value Choice Fund has performed or will perform in the future. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Board Considerations
In approving the Reorganizations, based upon their evaluation of all relevant information, the Board of Trustees considered that, following each Reorganization, shareholders of each Disappearing Fund will be invested in a professionally-managed portfolio that seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests in value-oriented securities. In addition, the Board considered the following, among other factors, in recommending the proposed transaction:
| · | The terms and conditions of the Reorganizations, including the potential benefits to shareholders of the Funds. |
| | |
| · | The historical performance of the Disappearing Funds and the Surviving Fund in relation to each other and their relevant benchmark indices. |
| | |
| · | The similarities and differences between the investment objectives, policies and restrictions of each Disappearing Fund with the Surviving Fund. In particular, the Board took into account the comparability of each Disappearing Fund with the Surviving Fund, including the value orientation of each Fund. The Board also considered the potential tax consequences and other costs to shareholders of the realignment of each Disappearing Fund with the Surviving Fund. The Board was informed by ING Investments that the preferred approach to effectuate each Reorganization was to liquidate all, or a significant portion of, the portfolio securities of each Disappearing Fund. The Board considered the costs of such liquidation and determined that such costs should be borne by shareholders of the respective Disappearing Fund prior to the Closing. The Board considered these costs in relation to the potential benefits to shareholders of each Disappearing Fund from the respective Reorganization. |
| | |
| · | The direct and indirect federal income taxation consequences of the Reorganizations on Fund shareholders, including that each Reorganization is intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a tax-free Reorganization. |
| | |
| · | The fees or expenses that will be borne directly or indirectly by the Funds in connection with the Reorganizations. In particular, the Board considered that ING Investments (or its affiliate) will bear half the cost of the Reorganizations and the Disappearing Funds will bear the other half of the expenses relating to the proposed Reorganizations. |
| | |
| · | The recent outflows experienced by the Disappearing Funds. |
| | |
| · | That the interest of existing shareholders of the Funds will not be diluted as a result of the Reorganizations. |
| | |
| · | The effects of the Reorganizations on annual Fund operating expenses and shareholder fees and services, including the gross and net expense ratios of the Disappearing Funds and the Surviving Fund before the Reorganizations and the estimated expense ratio of the combined Fund after the Reorganizations on a pro forma basis. The Board also considered the written expense limitation agreement in place between ING Investments and Value Choice Fund and approved extending the expense limitation agreement for the Surviving Fund if either Reorganization is approved by shareholders until August 1, 2009. |
| | |
| · | The relative annual rates of advisory fees payable by the Disappearing Funds and the Surviving Fund. The Board considered that the Surviving Fund will have a slightly higher management fee, but each proposed Reorganization is expected to result in the same or lower expenses for all Classes of each Disappearing Fund. |
| | |
| · | Whether participation in the Reorganizations is in the best interests of Fund shareholders. |
| | |
| · | The alternatives available to the Disappearing Funds. |
The Board of Trustees also considered the future potential benefits to ING Investments in that its costs to administer the Funds may be reduced if the Reorganizations are approved.
The Trustees of each Disappearing Fund recommend that shareholders approve the Reorganizations with Value Choice Fund.
Tax Considerations
Each Reorganization is intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368 of the Code. Accordingly, pursuant to this treatment, neither the Disappearing Funds nor their shareholders, nor the Surviving Fund nor its shareholders, are expected to recognize any gain or loss for federal income tax purposes from the transactions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreements. As a condition to the closing of the Reorganizations, the Funds will receive an opinion from the law firm of Dechert LLP to the effect that each Reorganization will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. That opinion will be based in part upon certain assumptions and upon certain representations made by the Funds.
Immediately prior to the Reorganizations, each Disappearing Fund will pay a dividend or dividends which, together with all previous dividends, will have the effect of distributing to its shareholders all of each Disappearing Fund’s investment company taxable income for taxable years ending on or prior to each Reorganization (computed without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) and all of its net capital gain, if any, realized in taxable years ending on or prior to each Reorganization (after reduction for any available capital loss carryforward). Such dividends will be included in the taxable income of each Disappearing Fund’s shareholders.
As of November 30, 2006, MidCap Value Fund and SmallCap Value Fund did not have any capital loss carryforwards. Value Choice Fund had accumulated no capital loss carryforwards. After the Reorganization, the losses of each Disappearing Fund generally will be available to Value Choice Fund to offset its capital gains, although a portion of the amount of these losses that may offset Value Choices Fund’s capital gains in any given year will be limited due to this Reorganization. The ability of Value Choice Fund to absorb losses in the future depends upon a variety of factors that cannot be known in advance, including the existence of capital gains against which these losses may be offset. In addition, the benefits of any of these various capital loss carryforwards currently are available only to pre-reorganization shareholders of each Fund. After the Reorganization, however, these benefits will inure to the benefit of all post-reorganization shareholders of Value Choice Fund.
Expenses of the Reorganizations
ING Investments (or its affiliate) will bear half the cost of the Reorganizations.�� The Disappearing Funds will bear the other half of the expenses relating to the proposed Reorganizations, including, but not limited to, costs associated with preparation of each Registration Statement, printing and distributing the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and proxy materials, legal fees, accounting fees, securities registration fees, and expenses of holding the Special Meeting. Of the expenses of the Reorganizations allocated to the Funds, each Fund will bear a pro rata portion based on its relative net asset value immediately before Closing.
27
EXHIBIT D
· the proposed Reorganizations are designed to reduce a redundancy in the ING Fund complex, thereby eliminating inefficiencies arising from having similar portfolios in the same fund group and confusion about overlapping funds;
· each Reorganization is intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization; accordingly, pursuant to this treatment, neither the Disappearing Funds nor their shareholders, nor the Surviving Fund nor its shareholders, are expected to recognize any gain or loss for federal income tax purposes from the transactions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreements;
· if shareholders approve either Reorganization, it is anticipated that each Disappearing Fund will liquidate all, or a significant portion of, its portfolio securities prior to the Closing to effectuate the Reorganization; such a liquidation will entail transaction costs and may result in the realization of taxable gains or losses to the respective Disappearing Fund shareholders;
· each Disappearing Fund, each which commenced operations on February 1, 2002, has a longer record of performance than the Surviving Fund, which commenced operations on February 1, 2005;
· Class Q Shareholders of each Disappearing Fund will experience different fees and expenses upon becoming Class A shareholders of the Surviving Fund*; however, the net expenses (1.50% for MidCap Value Fund vs. 1.50% for Value Choice Fund and 1.65% for SmallCap Value Fund vs. 1.50% for Value Choice Fund) will be the same or lower for Class Q shareholders after the Reorganization and the transition to Class A shares; Class Q shareholders will not be subject to a sales load in connection with future purchases of Class A shares of the Surviving Fund after the Reorganizations and the transition to Class A shares; and
· the Surviving Fund will have a slightly higher management fee (1.00% for the Surviving Fund versus 0.94% for each Disappearing Fund); however, the proposed Reorganization is expected to result in the same or lower net operating expenses per share for all Classes of each Disappearing Fund.
The gross and net operating expenses before and after the Reorganizations, expressed as an annual percentage of the average daily net asset value per share for Class A, Class B, Class C, Class I and Class Q shares of each Fund as of November 30, 2006, as adjusted per contractual changes, are as follows*:
Gross Expenses Before the Reorganizations
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q | |
MidCap Value Fund | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.50 | % |
SmallCap Value Fund | | 1.72 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.47 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.65 | % |
Value Choice Fund | | 1.56 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.31 | % | 1.25 | % | N/A | |
Net Expenses Before the Reorganizations (After Fee Waiver)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q | |
MidCap Value Fund | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.50 | % |
SmallCap Value Fund | | 1.72 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.47 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.65 | % |
Value Choice Fund(1) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.19 | % | N/A | |
After the Reorganizations: MidCap Value Fund only into Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q** | |
Gross estimated expenses of Surviving Fund | | 1.56 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.31 | % | 1.31 | % | N/A | |
Net estimated expenses of Surviving Fund (After Fee Waiver)(2) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | N/A | |
After the Reorganizations: SmallCap Value Fund only into Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q** | |
Gross estimated expenses of Surviving Fund | | 1.61 | % | 2.36 | % | 2.36 | % | 1.34 | % | N/A | |
Net estimated expenses of Surviving Fund (After Fee Waiver)(2) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.23 | % | N/A | |
4
After the Reorganizations: Both Funds into Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q** | |
Gross estimated expenses of Surviving Fund | | 1.58 | % | 2.33 | % | 2.33 | % | 1.33 | % | N/A | |
Net estimated expenses of Surviving Fund (After Fee Waiver)(2) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | N/A | |
(1) ING Investments has entered into a written expense limitation agreement with Value Choice Fund, under which it will limit expenses of the Fund, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage and extraordinary expenses, subject to possible recoupment by ING Investments within three years. The expense limits will continue through at least October 1, 2007. The expense limitation agreement is contractual and shall renew automatically for one-year terms, unless ING Investments provides written notice of termination of the expense limitation agreement within ninety (90) days of the end of the then current term or upon termination of the investment management agreement. Pursuant to this expense limitation agreement, the expense limits for Value Choice Fund are 1.50%, 2.25%, 2.25% and 1.25% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Class I shares, respectively, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage and extraordinary expenses. The Board of Trustees has approved extending the expense limitation agreement for the Surviving Fund if either Reorganization is approved by shareholders until October 1, 2009. There is no assurance that the expense limitation agreement will remain in effect after this date.
(2) Net Expenses after the Reorganization do not reflect short-term nonrecurring reorganization expenses. For more information, see “Comparison of Fees and Expenses - Annual Fund Operating Expenses.”
* For a complete description and comparison of the fees for the Surviving Fund and each Disappearing Fund and pro forma fees giving effect to the proposed transaction, see “Comparison of Fees and Expenses – Annual Fund Operating Expenses.”
** Class Q shares currently have a lower front-end sales charge than Class A shares. Class Q shareholders of each Disappearing Fund that are transitioned to Class A shares of the Surviving Fund in the Reorganization are not subject to sales charges on future purchases of Class A shares of the Surviving Fund for the life of their account.
Approval of each Reorganization Agreement requires the affirmative vote, if a quorum is present, of a majority of the shares voted in person or by proxy. The holders of a majority of outstanding shares present in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of the shareholders.
After careful consideration, the Board of Trustees of Each Disappearing Fund unanimously approved the proposed ReorganizationS. The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposed ReorganizationS.
5
EXHIBIT E
You would pay the following expenses if you did not redeem your shares:
| | MidCap Value Fund | | SmallCap Value Fund | |
| | 1 Year | | 3 Years | | 5 Years | | 10 Years | | 1 Year | | 3 Years | | 5 Years | | 10 Years | |
Class B* | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,205 | | $ | 2,396 | | $ | 250 | | $ | 770 | | $ | 1,316 | | $ | 2,621 | |
Class C | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,205 | | $ | 2,586 | | $ | 250 | | $ | 770 | | $ | 1,316 | | $ | 2,806 | |
| | Value Choice Fund | | Value Choice Fund Pro Forma: the MidCapValue Fund Only** | |
| | 1 Year | | 3 Years | | 5 Years | | 10 Years | | 1 Year | | 3 Years | | 5 Years | | 10 Years | |
Class B* | | $ | 228 | | $ | 716 | | $ | 1,230 | | $ | 2,453 | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,218 | | $ | 2,443 | |
Class C | | $ | 228 | | $ | 716 | | $ | 1,230 | | $ | 2,641 | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,218 | | $ | 2,631 | |
| | Value Choice Fund Pro Forma: SmallCap Value Fund Only** | | Value Choice Fund Pro Forma: the Funds Combined** | |
| | 1 Year | | 3 Years | | 5 Years | | 10 Years | | 1 Year | | 3 Years | | 5 Years | | 10 Years | |
Class B*(1) | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,229 | | $ | 2,482 | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,222 | | $ | 2,459 | |
Class C(1) | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,229 | | $ | 2,669 | | $ | 228 | | $ | 703 | | $ | 1,222 | | $ | 2,646 | |
(1) | The examples reflect the contractual expense limits for the one- and three-year period and the first three years of the five- and ten-year periods. |
* | The ten-year calculations for Class B shares assume conversion of the Class B shares to Class A shares at the end of the eighth year following the date of purchase. |
** | Estimated. |
*** | Class Q shares of each Disappearing Fund will convert to Class A shares of the Surviving Fund in the Reorganization. |
Sale of Securities Prior to Closing
If shareholders approve either Reorganization, it is anticipated that each Disappearing Fund will liquidate all, or a significant portion of, its portfolio securities prior to the Closing to effectuate the Reorganization. Such a liquidation will entail transaction costs and may result in the realization of taxable gains or losses to the respective Disappearing Fund shareholders. It is anticipated that the Disappearing Fund will engage a transition manager (or alternatively ING Investments or the Sub-Adviser) to liquidate the securities of the Disappearing Fund, as instructed by the Board, in a manner that is in the best interest of shareholders of the Disappearing Fund. Following the liquidation, each Disappearing Fund may temporarily invest up to 100% of its assets in either (i) high quality debt securities, including short-term money market instruments; or (ii) futures or other derivatives to permit investors to have exposure to the equity markets. To the extent that the Disappearing Fund invests in these instruments, it will not be pursuing its investment objective by investing in equity securities.
Shareholders should review the discussion in “Tax Considerations” below and consult their tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of the respective Reorganization in light of their individual circumstances.
Key Differences in Rights of the Shareholders of each Disappearing Fund and the Surviving Fund
Each Fund is organized as a series of ING Equity Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, and is governed by the same Declaration of Trust. As such, there are no key differences in the rights of shareholders of the Funds.
25
EXHIBIT F
· the proposed Reorganizations are designed to reduce a redundancy in the ING Fund complex, thereby eliminating inefficiencies arising from having similar portfolios in the same fund group and confusion about overlapping funds;
· each Reorganization is intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization; accordingly, pursuant to this treatment, neither the Disappearing Funds nor their shareholders, nor the Surviving Fund nor its shareholders, are expected to recognize any gain or loss for federal income tax purposes from the transactions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreements;
· if shareholders approve either Reorganization, it is anticipated that each Disappearing Fund will liquidate all, or a significant portion of, its portfolio securities prior to the Closing to effectuate the Reorganization; such a liquidation will entail transaction costs and may result in the realization of taxable gains or losses to the respective Disappearing Fund shareholders;
· each Disappearing Fund, each which commenced operations on February 1, 2002, has a longer record of performance than the Surviving Fund, which commenced operations on February 1, 2005;
· Class Q Shareholders of each Disappearing Fund will experience different fees and expenses upon becoming Class A shareholders of the Surviving Fund*; however, the net expenses (1.50% for MidCap Value Fund vs. 1.50% for Value Choice Fund and 1.65% for SmallCap Value Fund vs. 1.50% for Value Choice Fund) will be the same or lower for Class Q shareholders after the Reorganization and the transition to Class A shares; Class Q shareholders will not be subject to a sales load in connection with future purchases of Class A shares of the Surviving Fund after the Reorganizations and the transition to Class A shares; and
· the Surviving Fund will have a slightly higher management fee (1.00% for the Surviving Fund versus 0.94% for each Disappearing Fund); however, the proposed Reorganization is expected to result in the same or lower net operating expenses per share for all Classes of each Disappearing Fund.
The gross and net operating expenses before and after the Reorganizations, expressed as an annual percentage of the average daily net asset value per share for Class A, Class B, Class C, Class I and Class Q shares of each Fund as of November 30, 2006, as adjusted per contractual changes, are as follows*:
Gross Expenses Before the Reorganizations
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q | |
MidCap Value Fund | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.50 | % |
SmallCap Value Fund | | 1.72 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.47 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.65 | % |
Value Choice Fund | | 1.56 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.31 | % | 1.25 | % | N/A | |
Net Expenses Before the Reorganizations (After Fee Waiver)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q | |
MidCap Value Fund | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.50 | % |
SmallCap Value Fund | | 1.72 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.47 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.65 | % |
Value Choice Fund(1) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.19 | % | N/A | |
After the Reorganizations: MidCap Value Fund only into Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q** | |
Gross estimated expenses of Surviving Fund | | 1.56 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.31 | % | 1.31 | % | N/A | |
Net estimated expenses of Surviving Fund (After Fee Waiver)(2) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.25 | % | N/A | |
After the Reorganizations: SmallCap Value Fund only into Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited)
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class Q** | |
Gross estimated expenses of Surviving Fund | | 1.61 | % | 2.36 | % | 2.36 | % | 1.34 | % | N/A | |
Net estimated expenses of Surviving Fund (After Fee Waiver)(2) | | 1.50 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 1.23 | % | N/A | |
4
EXHIBIT G
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS for the twelve months ended November 30, 2006 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | ING Value | |
| | ING | | ING | | ING | | | | Choice Fund | |
| | MidCap Value | | SmallCap Value | | Value Choice | | Pro Forma | | Pro Forma | |
| | Fund | | Fund | | Fund* | | Adjustments | | Combined | |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends, net of foreign taxes withheld# | | $ | 835,485 | | $ | 724,835 | | $ | 791,438 | | | | $ | 2,351,758 | |
Interest | | 67,362 | | 44,045 | | 1,010,750 | | | | 1,122,157 | |
Securities lending income | | 178,195 | | 348,083 | | 36,218 | | | | 562,496 | |
Total investment income | | 1,081,042 | | 1,116,963 | | 1,838,406 | | — | | 4,036,411 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment management fees | | 924,035 | | 721,960 | | 764,799 | | 71,771 | (A) | 2,482,565 | |
Distribution and service fees: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 108,864 | | 91,092 | | 117,853 | | 130 | (B) | 317,939 | |
Class B | | 257,823 | | 159,281 | | 63,712 | | | | 480,816 | |
Class C | | 265,251 | | 221,368 | | 217,468 | | | | 704,087 | |
Class Q | | 35 | | 95 | | — | | (130 | )(B) | — | |
Transfer agent fees: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 68,411 | | 59,490 | | 50,306 | | 56 | (B) | 178,263 | |
Class B | | 40,543 | | 26,273 | | 6,716 | | | | 73,532 | |
Class C | | 41,711 | | 36,236 | | 23,399 | | | | 101,346 | |
Class I | | 2,075 | | 105 | | 518 | | | | 2,698 | |
Class Q | | 18 | | 33 | | — | | (56 | )(B) | (5 | ) |
Administrative service fees | | 97,114 | | 74,660 | | 76,479 | | | | 248,253 | |
Shareholder reporting expense | | 31,994 | | 37,710 | | 14,881 | | (17,425 | )(C) | 67,160 | |
Registration fees | | 74,085 | | 61,400 | | 50,038 | | (33,870 | )(C) | 151,653 | |
Professional fees | | 21,036 | | 22,310 | | 6,248 | | (10,840 | )(C) | 38,754 | |
Custody and accounting expense | | 15,372 | | 11,421 | | 14,976 | | (6,700 | )(C) | 35,069 | |
Trustee fees | | 5,871 | | 5,475 | | 1,389 | | (2,835 | )(C) | 9,900 | |
Offering expense | | — | | — | | 10,009 | | | | 10,009 | |
Interest expense | | 4,020 | | 8,989 | | — | | | | 13,009 | |
Miscellaneous expense | | 6,765 | | 9,415 | | 5,300 | | (4,045 | )(C) | 17,435 | |
Total expenses | | 1,965,023 | | 1,547,313 | | 1,424,091 | | (3,944 | ) | 4,932,483 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net waived and reimbursed/recouped fees | | — | | — | | (66,178 | ) | (264,500 | )(A) | (330,678 | ) |
Brokerage commission recapture | | (7,738 | ) | (3,776 | ) | (20,222 | ) | — | | (31,736 | ) |
Net expenses | | 1,957,285 | | 1,543,537 | | 1,337,691 | | (268,444 | ) | 4,570,069 | |
Net investment income (loss) | | (876,243 | ) | (426,574 | ) | 500,715 | | 268,444 | | (533,658 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | 3,242,903 | | (3,828,541 | ) | 3,869,182 | | | | 3,283,544 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments | | 10,526,755 | | 8,321,801 | | 16,975,055 | | | | 35,823,611 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments | | 13,769,658 | | 4,493,260 | | 20,844,237 | | | | 39,107,155 | |
Increase in net assets resulting from operations | | $ | 12,893,415 | | $ | 4,066,686 | | $ | 21,344,952 | | $ | 268,444 | | $ | 38,573,497 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
# Foreign taxes | | $ | 8,835 | | $ | 2,158 | | $ | 23,880 | | $ | — | | $ | 34,873 | |
* | | Formerly known as ING MidCap Value Choice Fund. |
(A) | | Reflects adjustment in expenses due to effects of new contractual rates. |
(B) | | Reflects adjustment in expenses due to merging Class Q into Class A. |
(C) | | Reflects adjustment in expenses due to elimination of duplicative services. |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
EXHIBIT H
PORTFOLIOS OF INVESTMENTS as of November 30, 2006
ING MidCap Value Fund | | ING SmallCap Value Fund | | ING Value Choice Fund(A) | | ING Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited) | | | | | | ING MidCap Value Fund | | ING SmallCap Value Fund | | ING Value Choice Fund | | ING Value Choice Fund Pro Forma (Unaudited) | |
Share | | | | | | Value | | |
COMMON STOCK: | | | | | | | | | 81.0% | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Aerospace/Defense: | | 0.1 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 16,000 | | 16,000 | @ | Orbital Sciences Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 289,920 | | 289,920 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 289,920 | | 289,920 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Agriculture: | | 0.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 600 | | 600 | | Archer—Daniels—Midland Co. | | | | — | | — | | 21,060 | | 21,060 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 21,060 | | 21,060 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Auto Manufacturers: | | 0.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 64,600 | | — | | 64,600 | | Wabash National Corp.** | | | | — | | 949,620 | | — | | 949,620 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 949,620 | | — | | 949,620 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Auto Parts & Equipment: | | 10.9 | % | | | | | | | | |
99,060 | | 104,470 | | — | | 203,530 | | American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. | | | | 1,812,798 | | 1,911,801 | | — | | 3,724,599 | |
196,910 | | 149,467 | | — | | 346,377 | L | ArvinMeritor, Inc.** | | | | 3,408,512 | | 2,587,274 | | — | | 5,995,786 | |
133,700 | | 120,270 | | — | | 253,970 | | Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.** | | | | 1,768,851 | | 1,591,172 | | — | | 3,360,023 | |
381,310 | | 261,100 | | — | | 642,410 | @, L | Dana Corp.** | | | | 625,348 | | 428,204 | | — | | 1,053,552 | |
1,010,570 | | — | | — | | 1,010,570 | @, L | Delphi Corp.** | | | | 2,496,108 | | — | | — | | 2,496,108 | |
177,155 | | 98,169 | | — | | 275,324 | @,L | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. | | | | 2,985,062 | | 1,654,148 | | — | | 4,639,210 | |
93,400 | | 65,390 | | — | | 158,790 | L | Lear Corp. | | | | 2,890,730 | | 2,023,821 | | — | | 4,914,551 | |
— | | — | | 20,800 | | 20,800 | @@ | Magna International, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 1,598,688 | | 1,598,688 | |
— | | 104,090 | | — | | 104,090 | | Superior Industries International** | | | | — | | 2,053,696 | | — | | 2,053,696 | |
284,915 | | 269,850 | | — | | 554,765 | @,L | Visteon Corp.** | | | | 2,290,717 | | 2,169,594 | | — | | 4,460,311 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 18,278,126 | | 14,419,710 | | 1,598,688 | | 34,296,524 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Banks: | | 1.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
22,000 | | 105,590 | | — | | 127,590 | @@,L | First Bancorp.** | | | | 220,440 | | 1,058,012 | | — | | 1,278,452 | |
75,300 | | — | | — | | 75,300 | @@, L | Popular, Inc.** | | | | 1,332,810 | | — | | — | | 1,332,810 | |
337,900 | | 106,080 | | — | | 443,980 | @@ | W Holding Co., Inc.** | | | | 2,074,706 | | 651,331 | | — | | 2,726,037 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 3,627,956 | | 1,709,343 | | — | | 5,337,299 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Chemicals: | | 3.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 24,600 | | 24,600 | | Aceto Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 209,100 | | 209,100 | |
372,160 | | 15,200 | | — | | 387,360 | | Chemtura Corp. | | | | 3,602,509 | | 147,136 | | — | | 3,749,645 | |
147,430 | | — | | — | | 147,430 | @,L | Huntsman Corp.** | | | | 2,566,756 | | — | | — | | 2,566,756 | |
— | | — | | 119,800 | | 119,800 | @ | Mosaic Co. | | | | — | | — | | 2,551,740 | | 2,551,740 | |
— | | 49,330 | | 26,600 | | 75,930 | | Sensient Technologies Corp. | | | | — | | 1,175,534 | | 633,878 | | 1,809,412 | |
— | | 143,620 | | — | | 143,620 | | Wellman, Inc.** | | | | — | | 505,542 | | — | | 505,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 6,169,265 | | 1,828,212 | | 3,394,718 | | 11,392,195 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Coal: | | 0.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 34,100 | | 34,100 | | Peabody Energy Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 1,568,941 | | 1,568,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,568,941 | | 1,568,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Commercial Services: | | 1.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
73,550 | | — | | — | | 73,550 | | Deluxe Corp.** | | | | 1,810,801 | | — | | — | | 1,810,801 | |
— | | 33,440 | | — | | 33,440 | | Kelly Services, Inc.** | | | | — | | 974,442 | | — | | 974,442 | |
— | | — | | 29,200 | | 29,200 | @@, L | Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 1,569,132 | | 1,569,132 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 1,810,801 | | 974,442 | | 1,569,132 | | 4,354,375 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Cosmetics/Personal Care: | | 0.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 5,900 | | 5,900 | @@ | Kao Corp. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 1,591,630 | | 1,591,630 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,591,630 | | 1,591,630 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Computers: | | 3.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
181,487 | | — | | — | | 181,487 | @ | BISYS Group, Inc.** | | | | 2,176,029 | | — | | — | | 2,176,029 | |
705,400 | | 907,960 | | — | | 1,613,360 | @,L | Gateway, Inc.** | | | | 1,340,260 | | 1,725,124 | | — | | 3,065,384 | |
33,980 | | — | | — | | 33,980 | @ | Synopsys, Inc.** | | | | 868,189 | | — | | — | | 868,189 | |
445,730 | | — | | — | | 445,730 | @ | Unisys Corp.** | | | | 3,213,713 | | — | | — | | 3,213,713 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 7,598,191 | | 1,725,124 | | — | | 9,323,315 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Distribution/Wholesale: | | 0.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 8,800 | | 8,800 | L | CDW Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 620,400 | | 620,400 | |
— | | — | | 25,400 | | 25,400 | @ | Tech Data Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 1,062,228 | | 1,062,228 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,682,628 | | 1,682,628 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Diversified Financial Services: | | 1.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 151,900 | | 151,900 | @@ | Acom Co., Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 1,434,878 | | 1,434,878 | |
— | | 127,250 | | — | | 127,250 | @@ | Doral Financial Corp.** | | | | — | | 515,363 | | — | | 515,363 | |
— | | — | | 123,900 | | 123,900 | @@ | Promise Co., Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 2,131,861 | | 2,131,861 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 515,363 | | 3,566,739 | | 4,082,102 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Electric: | | 5.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 18,700 | | 18,700 | | Alliant Energy Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 727,430 | | 727,430 | |
— | | — | | 15,000 | | 15,000 | | Ameren Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 820,650 | | 820,650 | |
— | | — | | 19,100 | | 19,100 | | American Electric Power Co., Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 792,841 | | 792,841 | |
— | | — | | 150,000 | | 150,000 | @@, L | Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras SA ADR | | | | — | | — | | 1,594,080 | | 1,594,080 | |
— | | — | | 45,600 | | 45,600 | L | DTE Energy Co. | | | | — | | — | | 2,147,304 | | 2,147,304 | |
206,859 | | — | | — | | 206,859 | @ | Dynegy, Inc.** | | | | 1,395,617 | | — | | — | | 1,395,617 | |
— | | — | | 24,500 | | 24,500 | @@ | Energias de Portugal SA ADR | | | | — | | — | | 1,160,810 | | 1,160,810 | |
— | | — | | 24,600 | | 24,600 | | Idacorp, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 983,754 | | 983,754 | |
— | | — | | 6,300 | | 6,300 | @@ | Korea Electric Power Corp. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 135,387 | | 135,387 | |
162,000 | | — | | — | | 162,000 | L, X | Mirant Corp. | | | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
— | | — | | 15,400 | | 15,400 | @,L | NRG Energy, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 876,568 | | 876,568 | |
— | | — | | 61,600 | | 61,600 | | PNM Resources, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 1,891,120 | | 1,891,120 | |
— | | — | | 1,100 | | 1,100 | L | Progress Energy, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 52,547 | | 52,547 | |
— | | — | | 160,500 | | 160,500 | | Puget Energy, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 3,986,820 | | 3,986,820 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 1,395,617 | | — | | 15,169,311 | | 16,564,928 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Electronics: | | 4.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
219,680 | | 223,780 | | — | | 443,460 | @, L | Kemet Corp.** | | | | 1,614,648 | | 1,644,783 | | — | | 3,259,431 | |
— | | — | | 12,900 | | 12,900 | @ | OSI Systems, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 244,971 | | 244,971 | |
— | | — | | 88,100 | | 88,100 | @, @ @, #, L | Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. GDR | | | | — | | — | | 1,571,264 | | 1,571,264 | |
774,810 | | 207,150 | | — | | 981,960 | @ | Sanmina–SCI Corp. | | | | 2,866,797 | | 766,455 | | — | | 3,633,252 | |
1,081,072 | | 145,390 | | — | | 1,226,462 | @ | Solectron Corp. | | | | 3,599,970 | | 1,052,624 | | — | | 4,652,594 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 8,081,415 | | 3,463,862 | | 1,816,235 | | 13,361,512 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Engineering & Construction: | 0.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 48,800 | | 48,800 | @ | Shaw Group, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 1,458,632 | | 1,458,632 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,458,632 | | 1,458,632 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Environmental Control: | | 0.8 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 185,000 | | 185,000 | @,L | Allied Waste North America, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 2,345,800 | | 2,345,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 2,345,800 | | 2,345,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Food: | | 9.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 111,400 | | — | | 111,400 | L | Chiquita Brands International, Inc. | | | | — | | 1,593,020 | | — | | 1,593,020 | |
170,530 | | 101,610 | | — | | 272,140 | | Del Monte Foods Co. | | | | 1,925,284 | | 1,147,177 | | — | | 3,072,461 | |
— | | 212,460 | | — | | 212,460 | @ | Interstate Bakeries | | | | — | | 594,888 | | — | | 594,888 | |
— | | — | | 27,200 | | 27,200 | | Kroger Co. | | | | — | | — | | 583,712 | | 583,712 | |
91,741 | | — | | — | | 91,741 | L | Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. | | | | 2,341,230 | | — | | — | | 2,341,230 | |
59,980 | | — | | — | | 59,980 | L | Safeway, Inc. | | | | 1,847,984 | | — | | — | | 1,847,984 | |
— | | — | | 108,500 | | 108,500 | | Sara Lee Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 1,798,930 | | 1,798,930 | |
— | | — | | 143,200 | | 143,200 | @ | Smithfield Foods, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 3,777,616 | | 3,777,616 | |
48,173 | | — | | 65,611 | | 113,784 | | Supervalu, Inc. | | | | 1,650,407 | | — | | 2,247,833 | | 3,898,240 | |
153,400 | | — | | 426,100 | | 579,500 | | Tyson Foods, Inc. | | | | 2,437,526 | | — | | 6,770,729 | | 9,208,255 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 10,202,431 | | 3,335,085 | | 15,178,820 | | 28,716,336 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Forest Products & Paper: | | 3.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 153,400 | | 153,400 | | Bowater, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 3,344,120 | | 3,344,120 | |
— | | — | | 61,300 | | 61,300 | @, L | Buckeye Technologies, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 719,662 | | 719,662 | |
— | | — | | 350,400 | | 350,400 | @, @@, L | Domtar, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 2,515,872 | | 2,515,872 | |
— | | — | | 170,800 | | 170,800 | | Wausau–Mosinee Paper Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 2,555,168 | | 2,555,168 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 9,134,822 | | 9,134,822 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Hand/Machine Tools: | | 0.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 57,120 | | — | | 57,120 | | LS Starrett Co** | | | | — | | 891,643 | | — | | 891,643 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 891,643 | | — | | 891,643 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Healthcare–Services: | | 1.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 50,200 | | 50,200 | @, L | Apria Healthcare Group, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 1,253,494 | | 1,253,494 | |
549,240 | | — | | — | | 549,240 | @, L | Tenet Healthcare Corp. | | | | 3,894,112 | | — | | | | 3,894,112 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 3,894,112 | | — | | 1,253,494 | | 5,147,606 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Home Builders: | | 0.9 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 143,729 | | — | | 143,729 | | Coachmen Industries, Inc.** | | | | — | | 1,575,270 | | — | | 1,575,270 | |
— | | — | | 29,400 | | 29,400 | | Levitt Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 366,324 | | 366,324 | |
— | | 200,900 | | — | | 200,900 | @ | National RV Holdings, Inc.** | | | | — | | 683,060 | | — | | 683,060 | |
— | | — | | 11,100 | | 11,100 | @@ | Sekisui House Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 168,053 | | 168,053 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 2,258,330 | | 534,377 | | 2,792,707 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Home Furnishings: | | 0.9 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 49,290 | | — | | 49,290 | | La–Z–Boy, Inc.** | | | | — | | 580,636 | | — | | 580,636 | |
13,904 | | 11,968 | | — | | 25,872 | | Whirlpool Corp.** | | | | 1,186,011 | | 1,020,870 | | — | | 2,206,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 1,186,011 | | 1,601,506 | | — | | 2,787,517 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Household Products/Wares: | | 1.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
89,670 | | 61,700 | | — | | 151,370 | L | American Greetings Corp. | | | | 2,135,043 | | 1,469,077 | | — | | 3,604,120 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2,135,043 | | 1,469,077 | | — | | 3,604,120 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Insurance: | | 2.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 4,200 | | 4,200 | | AON Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 149,856 | | 149,856 | |
60,000 | | — | | — | | 60,000 | @,L | Conseco, Inc.** | | | | 1,193,400 | | — | | — | | 1,193,400 | |
— | | 24,213 | | — | | 24,213 | | Kansas City Life Insurance Co.** | | | | — | | 1,247,938 | | — | | 1,247,938 | |
— | | 109,428 | | — | | 109,428 | @ | KMG America Corp.** | | | | — | | 919,195 | | — | | 919,195 | |
63,070 | | 76,310 | | — | | 139,380 | | Phoenix Cos., Inc.** | | | | 1,018,581 | | 1,232,407 | | — | | 2,250,988 | |
— | | 105,107 | | — | | 105,107 | @ | PMA Capital Corp. | | | | — | | 932,299 | | — | | 932,299 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2,211,981 | | 4,331,839 | | 149,856 | | 6,693,676 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Leisure Time: | | 0.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 84,346 | | — | | 84,346 | @ | K2, Inc.** | | | | — | | 1,140,358 | | — | | 1,140,358 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 1,140,358 | | — | | 1,140,358 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Machinery–Diversified: | | 3.8 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 158,700 | | 158,700 | @, L | AGCO Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 4,956,201 | | 4,956,201 | |
— | | — | | 2,700 | | 2,700 | | Alamo Group, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 62,208 | | 62,208 | |
83,220 | | 31,166 | | — | | 114,386 | | Briggs & Stratton Corp. | | | | 2,254,430 | | 844,287 | | — | | 3,098,717 | |
— | | — | | 3,800 | | 3,800 | @@, L | CNH Global NV | | | | — | | — | | 109,440 | | 109,440 | |
— | | — | | 15,700 | | 15,700 | | Lindsay Manufacturing Co. | | | | — | | — | | 540,865 | | 540,865 | |
— | | — | | 700 | | 700 | @@ | Metso Oyj | | | | — | | — | | 32,424 | | 32,424 | |
— | | 147,256 | | 37,600 | | 184,856 | @, L | Tecumseh Products Co | | | | — | | 2,341,370 | | 609,496 | | 2,950,866 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2,254,430 | | 3,185,657 | | 6,310,634 | | 11,750,721 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Media: | | 2.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
56,730 | | — | | — | | 56,730 | | McClatcby Co. | | | | 2,363,939 | | — | | — | | 2,363,939 | |
78,140 | | — | | — | | 78,140 | L | New York Times Co.** | | | | 1,886,300 | | — | | — | | 1,886,300 | |
— | | — | | 54,900 | | 54,900 | @,L | Scholastic Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 1,829,268 | | 1,829,268 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 4,250,239 | | — | | 1,829,268 | | 6,079,507 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Mining: | | 10.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 158,400 | | 158,400 | @@ | Alumina Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 3,169,584 | | 3,169,584 | |
— | | — | | 109,050 | | 109,050 | @@,L | Anglogold Ashanti Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 5,258,391 | | 5,258,391 | |
— | | — | | 326,800 | | 326,800 | @,L | Apex Silver Mines Ltd. | | | | — | | — | | 5,725,536 | | 5,725,536 | |
— | | — | | 12,200 | | 12,200 | @,@ @, L | Banro Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 153,720 | | 153,720 | |
— | | — | | 77,495 | | 77,495 | @@ | Barrick Gold Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 2,436,443 | | 2,436,443 | |
— | | — | | 508,200 | | 508,200 | @,@ @, L | Bema Gold Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 2,759,526 | | 2,759,526 | |
— | | — | | 64,100 | | 64,100 | @,@@ | Crystallex International Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 238,452 | | 238,452 | |
— | | — | | 79,600 | | 79,600 | @,@ @, L | Eldorado Gold Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 445,760 | | 445,760 | |
— | | — | | 84,700 | | 84,700 | @,@@ | Entree Gold, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 127,897 | | 127,897 | |
— | | — | | 14,400 | | 14,400 | @,@@ | Gammon Lake Resources, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 218,736 | | 218,736 | |
— | | — | | 11,600 | | 11,600 | @@, L, X | Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 289,420 | | 289,420 | |
— | | — | | 215,500 | | 215,500 | @,@ @, L | Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. | | | | — | | — | | 1,991,220 | | 1,991,220 | |
— | | — | | 174,000 | | 174,000 | @,@@ | Lahir Gold Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 4,247,340 | | 4,247,340 | |
— | | — | | 215,200 | | 215,200 | @,@@ | Newcrest Mining Ltd. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 4,398,451 | | 4,398,451 | |
— | | — | | 47,800 | | 47,800 | @,@@ | Orezone Resources, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 72,178 | | 72,178 | |
— | | — | | 2,500 | | 2,500 | @@ | Nexen, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 31,532,654 | | 31,532,654 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Oil & Gas: | | 0.0 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 137,025 | | 137,025 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 137,025 | | 137,025 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Oil & Gas Services: | | 0.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 29,400 | | 29,400 | @@, L | Technip SA ADR | | | | — | | — | | 2,073,876 | | 2,073,876 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 2,073,876 | | 2,073,876 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Retail: | | 0.8 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 44,600 | | — | | 44,600 | @ | Cost Plus, Inc.** | | | | — | | 480,342 | | — | | 480,342 | |
— | | 12,631 | | — | | 12,631 | @ | Jo–Ann Stores, Inc.** | | | | — | | 249,210 | | — | | 249,210 | |
— | | 151,210 | | — | | 151,210 | | Pier 1 Imports, Inc.** | | | | — | | 1,005,547 | | — | | 1,005,547 | |
— | | 87,060 | | — | | 87,060 | @ | Sharper Image Corp.** | | | | — | | 843,611 | | — | | 843,611 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 2,578,710 | | — | | 2,578,710 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Semiconductors: | | 1.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
134,129 | | 110,610 | | — | | 244,739 | @,L | Agere Systems, Inc.** | | | | 2,403,592 | | 1,982,131 | | — | | 4,385,723 | |
— | | 324,700 | | — | | 324,700 | @ | ESS Technology** | | | | — | | 386,393 | | — | | 386,393 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2,403,592 | | 2,368,524 | | — | | 4,772,116 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Software: | | 0.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | 231,600 | | — | | 231,600 | @ | Borland Software Corp.** | | | | — | | 1,225,164 | | — | | 1,225,164 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | 1,225,164 | | — | | 1,225,164 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Telecommunications: | | 4.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
488,610 | | 283,410 | | — | | 772,020 | @,L | 3Com Corp.** | | | | 2,047,276 | | 1,187,488 | | — | | 3,234,764 | |
— | | 426,016 | | — | | 426,016 | @ | Adaptec, Inc.** | | | | — | | 1,857,430 | | — | | 1,857,430 | |
460,580 | | 197,293 | | — | | 657,873 | @ | Cincinnati Bell, Inc.** | | | | 2,081,822 | | 891,764 | | — | | 2,973,586 | |
— | | — | | 40,500 | | 40,500 | @@ | KT Corp. ADR | | | | — | | — | | 1,028,700 | | 1,028,700 | |
266,100 | | 182,210 | | — | | 448,310 | @,L | Utstarcom, Inc.** | | | | 2,362,965 | | 1,618,023 | | — | | 3,980,988 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 6,492,063 | | 5,554,705 | | 1,028,700 | | 13,075,468 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Transportation: | | 2.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 83,600 | | 83,600 | | CSX Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 2,997,896 | | 2,997,896 | |
— | | — | | 34,100 | | 34,100 | L | Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. | | | | — | | — | | 809,875 | | 809,875 | |
— | | — | | 59,500 | | 59,500 | @@ | Navies Maritime Holdings, Inc. | | | | — | | — | | 314,160 | | 314,160 | |
— | | — | | 82,500 | | 82,500 | @@ | Stolt-Nielsen SA ADR | | | | — | | — | | 2,532,747 | | 2,532,747 | |
— | | — | | 7,769 | | 7,769 | @@, L | TNT NV ADR | | | | — | | — | | 326,065 | | 326,065 | |
— | | — | | 5,700 | | 5,700 | | Union Pacific Corp. | | | | — | | — | | 515,964 | | 515,964 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 7,496,707 | | 7,496,707 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Water: | | 0.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 27,900 | | 27,900 | @@,L | Cia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo | | | | — | | — | | 837,000 | | 837,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 837,000 | | 837,000 | |
| | | | | | | | Total Common Stock | | | | 81,991,273 | | 55,526,274 | | 113,570,667 | | 251,088,214 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 93,568,597 | | 64,755,124 | | 95,194,910 | | 253,518,631 | |
WARRANTS: | | | | | | | | | 0.1% | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Electric: | | 0.1 | % | | | | | | | | |
14,097 | | — | | — | | 14,097 | | Mirant Corp.** | | | | 169,164 | | — | | — | | 169,164 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Warrants | | | | 169,164 | | — | | — | | 169,164 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 502,410 | | — | | — | | 502,410 | |
Principal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amount | | | | | Value | |
CONVERTIBLE BONDS: | | | | | | | | | 5.0% | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Aerospace/Defense: | | 1.1 | % | | | | | | | | |
$ — | | $ | — | | $ 3,820,000 | | $ 3,820,000 | C | EDO Corp., 4.000%, due 11/15/25 | | | | $ — | | $ — | | $ 3,624,225 | | $ 3,624,225 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 3,624,225 | | 3,624,225 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Airlines: | | 0.6 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 1,820,000 | | 1,820,000 | C, L | JetBlue Airways Corp., 3.500%, due 07/15/33 | | | | — | | — | | 1,747,200 | | 1,747,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,747,200 | | 1,747,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Computers: | | 0.1 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 290,000 | | 290,000 | C | Quantum Corp., 4.375%, due 08/01/10 | | | | — | | — | | 262,813 | | 262,813 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 262,813 | | 262,813 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Electrical Components & Equipment | | 0.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 2,639,100 | | 2,639,100 | C | GrafTech International Ltd., 1.625%, due 01/15/24 | | | | -— | | — | | 2,187,154 | | 2,187,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 2,187,154 | | 2,187,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Electronics: | | 0.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 172,000 | | 172,000 | C | FEI Co., 5.500%, due 08/15/08 | | | | — | | — | | 171,785 | | 171,785 | |
— | | — | | 488,000 | | 488,000 | C | SCI Systems, Inc., 3.000%, due 03/15/07 | | | | — | | — | | 485,560 | | 485,560 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 657,345 | | 657,345 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Environmental Control: | | 0.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 1,141,000 | | 1,141,000 | C | Allied Waste North America, Inc., 4.250%, due 04/15/34 | | | | — | | — | | 1,091,081 | | 1,091,081 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,091,081 | | 1,091,081 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Media: | | 0.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 2,022,000 | | 2,022,000 | C | EchoStar Communications Corp., 5.750%, due 05/15/08 | | | | — | | — | | 2,062,440 | | 2,062,440 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 2,062,440 | | 2,062,440 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Mining: | | 0.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 379,000 | | 379,000 | @@,C | Apex Silver Mines Ltd., 2.875%, due 03/15/24 | | | | — | | — | | 335,415 | | 335,415 | |
— | | — | | 862,000 | | 862,000 | C | Coeur d'Alene Mines Corp., 1.250%, due 01/15/24 | | | | — | | — | | 860,923 | | 860,923 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,196,338 | | 1,196,338 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Semiconductors: | | 0.6 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 655,000 | | 655,000 | C | Axcelis Technologies, Inc., 4.250%, due 01/15/07 | | | | — | | — | | 654,383 | | 654,383 | |
— | | — | | 845,000 | | 845,000 | | Credence Systems Corp., 1.500%, due 05/15/08 | | | | — | | — | | 774,231 | | 774,231 | |
— | | — | | 180,000 | | 180,000 | C | International Rectifier Corp., 4.250%, due 07/15/07 | | | | — | | — | | 179,325 | | 179,325 | |
— | | — | | 356,000 | | 356,000 | C | Triquint Semiconductor, Inc., 4.000%, due 03/01/07 | | | | — | | — | | 355,110 | | 355,110 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 1,963,049 | | 1,963,049 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Telecommunications: | | 0.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
— | | — | | 617,000 | | 617,000 | C, L | Adaptec, Inc., 0.750%, due 12/22/23 | | | | — | | — | | 559,928 | | 559,928 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | — | | — | | 559,928 | | 559,928 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Convertible Bonds | | 5.0 | % | — | | — | | 15,351,573 | | 15,351,573 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | — | | — | | 14,764,020 | | 14,764,020 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Long-Term Investments | | | | 82,160,437 | | 55,526,274 | | 128,922,240 | | 266,608,951 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 94,071,007 | | 64,755,124 | | 109,958,930 | | 268,785,061 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHORT—TERM INVESTMENTS: | | | | | | | 27.9% | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | U.S. Government Agency Obligation | | 11.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
1,765,000 | | 219,000 | | 33,718,000 | | 35,702,000 | | Federal Home Loan Bank, 4.980%, due 12/01/06 | | | | 1,764,756 | | 218,970 | | 33,713,336 | | 35,697,062 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total U.S. Government Agency Obligation | | | | 1,764,756 | | 218,970 | | 33,713,336 | | 35,697,062 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 1,764,756 | | 218,970 | | 33,713,336 | | 35,697,062 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Securities Lending CollateralCC: | | 16.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
24,719,658 | | — | | 25,802,088 | | 50,521,746 | | The Bank of New York Institutional Cash Reserve Fund | | | | 24,719,658 | | — | | 25,802,088 | | 50,521,746 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Securities Lending Collateral | | | | 24,719,658 | | — | | 25,802,088 | | 50,521,746 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 24,719,658 | | — | | 25,802,088 | | 50,521,746 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Short-Term Investments | | | | 26,484,414 | | 218,970 | | 59,515,424 | | 86,218,808 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 26,484,414 | | 218,970 | | 59,515,424 | | 86,218,808 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total Investments in Securities | | 114.0 | % | 108,644,851 | | 55,745,244 | | 188,437,664 | | 352,827,759 | |
| | | | | | | | (Cost $) | | | | 120,555,421 | | 64,974,094 | | 169,474,354 | | 355,003,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Other Assets and Liabilities - Net | | (14.0 | ) | (24,777,793 | ) | 1,614,171 | | (20,224,340 | ) | (43,387,762 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Net Assets (Prior Pro Forma Adjustments) | | 100.0 | % | 83,867,058 | | 57,359,415 | | 168,213,524 | | 309,439,997 | |
| | | | | | | | Pro Forma Adjustments | | | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Net Assets (After Pro Forma Adjustments) | | 100.0 | % | 83,867,058 | | 57,359,415 | | 168,213,524 | | 309,439,997 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(A) | Formerly known as ING MidCap Value Choice Fund. | | | | | | | | | | |
@ | Non-income producing security | | | | | | | | | | |
@@ | Foreign Issuer | | | | | | | | | | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt | | | | | | | | | | |
GDR | Global Depositary Receipt | | | | | | | | | | |
# | Securities with purchases pursuant to Rule 144A, under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be resold subject to that rule except to qualified institutional buyers. These securities have been determined to be liquid under the guidelines established by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees. | | | | | | | | | | |
C | Bond may be called prior to maturity date. | | | | | | | | | | |
cc | Securities purchased with cash collateral for securities loaned. | | | | | | | | | | |
L | Loaned security, a portion or all of the security is on loan at November 30, 2006. | | | | | | | | | | |
X | Fair value determined by ING Funds Valuation Committee appointed by the Funds' | | | | | | | | | | |
| Board of Directors/Trustees. | | | | | | | | | | |
* | Cost for federal income tax purposes is | | | $ | 120,555,421 | | $ | 65,297,796 | | $ | 169,564,708 | | $ | 355,417,925 | |
| Net unrealized appreciation/depreciation consists of: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Unrealized Appreciation | | | $ | 5,652,833 | | $ | 5,633,283 | | $ | 19,900,633 | | $ | 31,186,749 | |
| Gross Unrealized Depreciation | | | (17,563,403 | ) | (15,185,835 | ) | (1,027,677 | ) | $ | (33,776,915 | ) |
| Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation | | | $ | (11,910,570 | ) | $ | (9,552,552 | ) | $ | 18,872,956 | | $ | (2,590,166 | ) |
** | If the Reorganization is approved, the portfolio security is expected to be sold prior to the Reorganization. | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | | | | | | | | | | | |