AMERITRANS CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Information at and for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited)
1.
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Financial Statements
The consolidated balance sheet of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (“Ameritrans”, the “Company”, “our”, “us”, or “we”) as of March 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management and the board of directors of the Company (“Management” and “Board of Directors”), the accompanying conso lidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary to summarize fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Commission.
Organization and Principal Business Activity
Ameritrans Capital Corporation is a Delaware closed-end investment company formed in 1998, which, among other activities, makes loans and investments with the goal of generating both current income and capital appreciation. Through our subsidiary, Elk Associates Funding Corporation (“Elk”), we make loans to finance the acquisition and operation of small businesses as permitted by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”). Ameritrans also makes loans to and invests in opportunities that Elk has historically been unable to make due to SBA restrictions. Ameritrans makes loans which have primarily been secured by real estate mortgages or, in the case of corporate loans, generally are senior within the capital structure. We also make equity investments which have primarily been in income producing real estate properties, or in real estate construction projects.
Elk provides long-term loans to businesses eligible for investments by small business investment companies (each an “SBIC”) under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended. Elk makes loans for financing the purchase or continued ownership of businesses that qualify for funding as small concerns under SBA Regulations.
Both Ameritrans and Elk are registered as business development companies, or “BDCs,” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Accordingly, Ameritrans and Elk are subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act governing the operation of BDCs. Both companies are managed by their executive officers under the supervision of their Boards of Directors.
The Company categorizes its investments into five categories: 1) Taxicab Medallion finance; 2) Corporate Loans; 3) Commercial Loans; 4) Life Settlement Contracts; and 5) Equity Investments. For a more detailed description of these investment categories please see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, filed with the Commission by the Company on September 29, 2008, which is available on the Company’s web site atwww.ameritranscapital.com.
Change in Financial Statement Presentation
Effective for the year ended June 30, 2008, and the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2009, the Company has revised its financial statements to be presented in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X as an investment company. Due to the revised format, the Company made certain reclassifications of amounts previously reported in its prior period statements to conform to the current presentation. Although the reclassifications resulted in changes to certain line items in the previously filed financial statements, the overall effect of the reclassifications noted below did not impact total stockholder’s equity (or net assets available). Below are the primary items affected by the reclassifications made:
·
Unrealized gains and losses previously reported as part of “other comprehensive income (loss), net” were reclassified to “net unrealized gains (losses) on investments” in the statement of operations. The effect of such reclassification also changed previously reported amounts available to common shareholders.
·
Gains and losses on sales of investments previously reported as part of “total investment income, net” in the statement of operations were reclassified to “net realized gains (losses) on investments.”
·
Net write-off and depreciation on interest and loans receivable, previously reported as part of “total operating expenses” in the statement of operations were reclassified to “net unrealized gains (losses) on investments” and “net realized gains (losses) on investments.”
The change in format also resulted in the statement of stockholders’ equity essentially being replaced with the statement of changes in net assets available, which is now presented. In addition, the schedule of investments has been expanded and certain other disclosures were added, such as the “financial highlights.” We believe the changes noted above conform to the filing format for the Company, as a BDC, and will provide a meaningful representation of the Company’s operations going forward.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ameritrans, Elk Capital Corporation (“ECC”), Elk and Elk’s wholly owned subsidiary, EAF Holding Corporation (“EAF”). All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
ECC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ameritrans, which may engage in lending and investment activities similar to its parent. Since its inception, ECC has had no operations provided however, in April 2009, ECC took title to a foreclosed piece of real estate.
EAF began operations in December 1993 and owns and operates certain real estate assets acquired in satisfaction of defaulted loans by Elk debtors. At March 31, 2009 EAF was not operating any assets.
Investment Valuations
The Company’s loans receivable, net of participations and any unearned discount are considered investment securities under the 1940 Act and are recorded at fair value. As part of fair value methodology, loans are valued at cost, adjusted for any unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Since no ready market exists for these loans, the fair value is determined in good faith by Management, and approved by the Board of Directors. In determining the fair value, Management and the Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of the borrower, the adequacy of the collateral, individual credit risks, historical loss experience, and the relationships between current and projected market rates and portfolio rates of interest and maturities. Foreclosed properties, which represent collateral received from defaulted borrowers, are valued similarly.
Loans are considered “non-performing” once they become 90 days past due as to principal or interest. The value of past due loans are periodically determined in good faith by Management, and if, in the judgment of Management, the amount is not collectible and the fair value of the collateral is less than the amount due, the value of the loan may be reduced to reflect its fair value.
Equity investments (common stock and warrants, including certain controlled subsidiary portfolio investments) and investment securities are recorded at fair value.
The Company records the investment in life insurance policies at fair value, represented as cost, plus or minus unrealized appreciation or depreciation. The fair value of the investment in life settlement contracts has no ready market and is determined in good faith by Management, and approved by the Board of Directors, based on secondary market conditions, policy characteristics and actuarial life expectancy, including health evaluations.
Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuations, the Company’s estimates of the values of the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and the differences could be material.
Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which expands the application of fair value accounting for investments (see Note 2).
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a Regulated Investment Company (“RIC”) under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). A RIC generally is not taxed at the corporate level to the extent its income is distributed to its stockholders. In order to qualify as a RIC, a company must pay out at least 90 percent of its net taxable investment income to its stockholders as well as meet other requirements under the Code. In order to preserve this election for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, the Company intends to make the required distributions to its stockholders, therefore, no provision for federal income taxes has been provided.
The Company is subject to certain state and local franchise taxes, as well as related minimum filing fees assessed by state taxing authorities. Such taxes and fees are included in “Other administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of operations in each of the fiscal years presented.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make extensive use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the fair value of the Company’s investments.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing current net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the effect of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants. The difference between reported basic and diluted weighted average common shares results from the assumption that all dilutive stock options and warrants outstanding were exercised. For the periods presented, the effect of common stock equivalents has been excluded from the diluted calculation since the effect would be antidilutive.
Dividends
Dividends and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders are recorded on the record date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is generally based upon the earnings estimated by Management. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed at least annually, although the Company may decide to retain such capital gains for investment.
On June 30, 2008, the Board of Directors approved and adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of distributions in the Company’s common stock, $.0001 par value (the “Common Stock”) on behalf of common stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if the Board of Directors authorizes, and the Company declares, a cash dividend, then those stockholders who have not “opted out” of the dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash dividends automatically reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock, rather than receiving the cash dividends. The Company has not yet implemented this plan.
Income Recognition
Interest income, including interest on loans in default, is recorded on an accrual basis and in accordance with loan terms to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company recognizes interest income on loans classified as non-performing only to the extent that the fair market value of the related collateral exceeds the specific loan balance. Loans that are not fully collateralized and in the process of collection are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the judgment of Management, the collectability of interest and principal is doubtful.
Stock Options
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (“SFAS No. 123R”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans effective January 1, 2006, and accordingly, the Company will expense these grants as required. Stock-based employee compensation costs in the form of stock options will be reflected in net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations for grants made including and subsequent to January 1, 2006 only, since there were no unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005, using the fair values established by usage of the Black-Scholes option pricing model, expensed over the vesting period of the underlying option. Previously, the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for all the plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized under these plans as the Company followed the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure.”
The Company elected the modified prospective transition method for adopting SFAS No. 123R. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123R apply to all new awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. The compensation cost is then recognized over the vesting period of the options.
Presentation of Prior Period Data
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period data to the current presentation.
2.
Investments
Loans Receivable
Loans are considered non-performing once they become 90 days past due as to principal or interest. The Company had loans which are considered non-performing in the amount of $4,856,738and $2,850,939 as of March 31, 2009 and, in the case of Commercial Loans, June 30, 2008, respectively. These loans are either fully or substantially collateralized and are usually personally guaranteed by the debtor. Included in the total non-performing loans is $780,150and $175,008 at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, which is no longer accruing interest since the loan principal and accrued interest exceed the estimated collateral value. The following table sets forth certain information regarding performing and non-performing loans as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008:
| | |
| March 31, 2009 | June 30, 2008 |
| | |
Loans receivable | $ 24,943,843 | $ 55,211,397 |
Performing loans | 20,087,105 | 52,360,458 |
|
|
|
Non-performing loans | $ 4,856,738 | $ 2,850,939 |
| | |
Non-performing loans:
Accrual | $ 4,076,588 | $ 2,675,931 |
Nonaccrual | 780,150 | 175,008 |
|
|
|
| $ 4,856,738 | $ 2,850,939 |
The Company has pledged its loans receivable and all other assets of the Company as collateral for its lines of credit. (see Note 4)
On October 29, 2008, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the Company’s taxicab medallion portfolio to Medallion Financial Corp. and Medallion Bank, pursuant to that certain loan portfolio sale and purchase agreement dated as of July 16, 2008, as amended October 17, 2008 and October 20, 2008 (the “Loan Purchase Agreement”). Ameritrans utilized cash on hand and all of the net proceeds from this transaction in the amount of $25,883,820 to fully pay down its existing bank indebtedness. Except for costs in the amount of approximately $340,000, relating to disposal of the assets, there was no gain or loss realized on this transaction as the taxi medallion portfolio was sold at par value. The Loan Purchase Agreement was approved by the Company’s shareholders on August 26, 2008.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company’s loan portfolio had decreased by approximately $31,000,000 or 51% from June 30, 2008. This was primarily due to the sale of substantially all of the Company’s taxicab medallion portfolio, partially offset by a small increase in corporate loans. As such, the Company expects significantly lower interest income until new loans are added to the portfolio.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company has accrued approximately $100,000 in professional fees which it anticipates will be paid upon execution of an investment advisory agreement to be submitted to shareholders for approval.
Investments by Industry
Investments by industry consist of the following as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008:
| | |
| Percentage of Portfolio at |
| March 31, 2009 | June 30, 2008 |
| | |
Assisted Living Facilities |
3.2% | 1.5% |
Boston Taxicab Medallions | 0.1% | 7.7% |
Broadcasting/Telecommunications | 6.8% | 3.3% |
Chicago Taxicab Medallions | 0.3% | 29.2% |
Commercial Construction | 11.8% | 7.6% |
Construction and Predevelopment | 6.3% | 1.9% |
Debt Collection | 1.9% | 1.1% |
Education | 3.5% | - |
Gaming | 4.8% | 3.3% |
Gasoline Distribution | 2.3% | 1.2% |
Laundromat | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Life Insurance Settlement | 9.3% | 4.8% |
Manufacturing | 14.8% | 4.9% |
Miami Taxicab Medallions | 0.9% | 13.2% |
Office Water Systems | 2.0% | 1.1% |
Printing/Publishing | 6.6% | 3.0% |
Processing Control Instruments | 7.6% | 4.8% |
Residential Mortgages | 2.1% | 1.1% |
Restaurant/Food Service | 8.8% | 5.7% |
Sanitaryware Distributor | 4.1% | 0.9% |
Industries less than 1% | 1.5% | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Life Settlement Contracts
In September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with an unaffiliated entity to purchase previously issued life insurance policies owned by unrelated individuals. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company was designated as nominee to maintain possession of the policies and process transactions related to such policies until the policies are subsequently sold or paid off. The Company is entitled to receive monthly payments from the unaffiliated entity equal to a twelve percent (12%) annual return on the amount of funds paid by the Company and outstanding. Proceeds from the sale of the policies are to be distributed, net of direct expenses, as defined in the agreement.
As of March 31, 2009, the carrying value of amounts invested was $2,670,708, which represents the amount paid to cover first year and any subsequent period premiums for seven (7) life insurance policies with an aggregate face value of $30,750,000. Premiums on the policies must be paid by either the Company or the unaffiliated entity, until the policies are sold in order to keep the policies in full force. As of March 31, 2009, the unaffiliated entity had paid the premiums on the policies in the aggregate amount of $513,903,which was the unaffiliated entity’s principal carrying value. If an insured dies before the policy is resold, 50% of the death benefit proceeds of the policy will be paid to the insured party’s family, and the other 50% of the death benefit proceeds will be paid to the Company, to be distributed in accordance with the terms of the agreem ent. The terms of the agreement with the third party presently entitles the Company to sell the policies at any time, in its sole discretion, provided however, that in order to effectuate any such sales the Company may need to obtain additional documentation from the insured or the record owner(s) of each policy. Since September 11, 2008, the unaffiliated entity made certain of the life insurance premium payments voluntarily amounting to a total of $513,903, however, the Company no longer expects the unaffiliated entity to make such payments on any of the policies for the life expectancy of the insured. The approximate future minimum premiums due for each of the next five (5) years and in the aggregate thereafter, based on current life expectancy of the insurers, are as follows:
| |
Year Ending
June 30 | Policy Premiums |
| |
2009 (three months) | $ 342,000 |
2010 | 1,368,000 |
2011 | 1,368,000 |
2012 | 1,368,000 |
2013 | 1,368,000 |
Thereafter | 7,131,000 |
| |
| $ 12,945,000 |
On December 16, 2008, the Company sold one policy for $474,860. There was no gain or loss realized on this transaction as the policy sale price was equal to the carrying value of such policy.
On April 2, 2009, the Company learned that the unaffiliated manager of its life insurance joint venture had been charged with securities fraud by the SEC. The SEC obtained a court order freezing the assets of the manager and other entities with which he was involved, including Vibrant Capital Corp. (“Vibrant”), the corporate entity acting as the Company’s partner in its life settlement venture. As of April 14, 2009, a trustee and a receiver were appointed to operate Vibrant. As of March 1, 2009, the Company has stopped accruing the twelve percent (12%) annual return on funds paid by the Company and outstanding, that the Company is entitled to receive from Vibrant. Ameritrans is presently working with the trustee and receiver to determine the impact, if any, of these SEC actions on its investment in this business venture and on its rights, interests and obligati ons in connection therewith.
Fair Value of Investments
Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”), which expands application of fair value accounting. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 determines fair value to be the price that would be received for an investment in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 requires the Company to assume that the portfolio investment is sold in a principal market to market participants, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous marke t that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with SFAS 157, the Company has considered its principal market as the market in which the Company exits its portfolio investments with the greatest volume and level of activity. SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In accordance with SFAS 157, these inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
·
Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.
·
Level 2 – Valuations of similar assets or liabilities based on quoted prices in markets that are active or inactive for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
·
Level 3 – Valuations based on unobservable inputs for similar items and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, we continue to employ the valuation policy approved by our board of directors that is consistent with SFAS 157 (see Note 1). Consistent with our valuation policy, we evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading (or any markets in which securities with similar attributes are trading), in determining fair value. Our valuation policy considers the fact that because there is not a readily available market value for most of the investments in our portfolio, the fair value of the investments must typically be determined using unobservable inputs.
Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded it.
In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned.
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments as of March 31, 2009:
| | | | |
|
| Fair Value Measurements Using |
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Investments | $28,572,333 | $7,671 | $ - | $28,564,662 |
The following table presents changes in investments that use Level 3 inputs for the nine months ended March 31, 2009:
| |
| Nine months ended March 31, 2009 |
Balance as of June 30, 2008 | $ 59,577,474 |
Net unrealized losses | (339,932) |
Net purchases, sales or redemptions | (30,672,880) |
Net transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | - |
Balance as of March 31, 2009 | $ 28,564,662 |
As of March 31, 2009, the net unrealized loss on the investments that use Level 3 inputs was $766,437.
3.
Debentures Payable to SBA
At March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008 debentures payable to the SBA consisted of subordinated debentures with interest payable semiannually, as follows:
| | | | | |
Issue Date | Due Date | % Interest Rate | March 31, 2009 | June 30,
2008 |
Annual Amount of Interest and User Fees |
| |
| | | |
July 2002 | September 2012 | 4.67 (1) | $ 2,050,000 | $ 2,050,000 | $ 113,488 |
December 2002 | March 2013 | 4.63 (1) | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 164,880 |
September 2003 | March 2014 | 4.12 (1) | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 249,300 |
February 2004 | March 2014 | 4.12 (1) | 1,950,000 | 1,950,000 | 97,227 |
| |
| | | |
| |
| $ 12,000,000 | $ 12,000,000 | $ 624,895 |
(1)
Elk is also required to pay an additional annual user fee of 0.866% on these debentures.
Under the terms of the subordinated debentures, Elk may not repurchase or retire any of its capital stock or make any distributions to its stockholders other than dividends out of retained earnings (as computed in accordance with SBA regulations) without the prior written approval of the SBA.
4.
Notes Payable
Banks
At June 30, 2008, the Company had loan agreements with three (3) banks for lines of credit aggregating $40,000,000 of which $28,095,697 was outstanding under these lines. The lines bore interest at the lower of either the reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.5% or the banks’ prime rates minus 0.50%. The bank lines were scheduled to mature on or about October 30, 2008. On October 29, 2008, following the closing of the sale of substantially all of the taxi medallion loan portfolio (see Note 2) the Company paid the banks in full all principal and accrued interest due on the three lines.
At March 31, 2009, the Company had credit lines with three (3) banks for lines of credit aggregating $1,000,000 of which $700,000 was outstanding under these lines. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding bank debt at March 31, 2009 was approximately 4.5% which represents an interest rate of 1% above the prime rate of interest designated by each bank. Any outstanding indebtedness pursuant to these credit lines was due and payable on or before April 30, 2009.
On April 28, 2009, the Company repaid the entire principal balance in the amount of $228,000 on one of its banks lines, and extended the credit lines with the two (2) other banks. On April 30, 2009, the Company extended until October 31, 2009, one credit line with a principal balance of $352,000 with an annual interest rate floor of 4.50%. In connection with such extension, the Company purchased a Certificate of Deposit for $250,000 for thirty (30) days and pledged such Certificate of Deposit as additional collateral. The Company is required to reduce said balance to $250,000 by May 30, 2009. On April 29, 2009, the Company extended until July 1, 2009, the outstanding balance on the other credit line in the amount of $120,000, at an annual interest rate of 4.10%. In connection with such extension, the Company purchased a Certificate of Deposit for $120,000 which matures on July 1, 2009, and pledged such Certificate of Deposit as additional collateral.
It is not presently contemplated that the Company will request to continue any lines of credit thereafter with its existing banks. Pursuant to the terms of the current agreements, the Company is required to comply with certain covenants and conditions, as defined in the agreements. The Company has pledged its loans receivable and all other assets as collateral for its lines of credit. Pursuant to the SBA agreement and an “intercreditor agreement” among the Company’s banks and the SBA, the SBA agreed to subordinate the SBA Debentures outstanding in favor of the banks. In accordance with the loan documentation with the SBA and the banks, the Company must also comply with maintaining overall debt levels within a formula based upon the performance of its loan portfolio according to a “borrowing base” which is submitted periodically for review to the SBA and the banks. The Company was in compliance with the terms and conditions of the “borrowing base” at March 31, 2009.
Related Party Loans
In July 2007, the Company received three loans totaling $500,000 from three related parties also to facilitate the funding of new loans receivable. The loan principal was due and payable within 30 days of demand and bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum. Payments of interest only were due and payable on the first of each month. At March 31, 2009 there were no loans to related parties outstanding. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, interest paid on the loans was $2,689and $26,419, respectively.
5.
Dividends to Stockholders
The following table sets forth the dividends declared by the Company on its Common Stock and Preferred Stock in each of the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2009
| | | | |
| Dividend Per Share | Declaration Date | Record Date | Payment Date |
Preferred Dividends: | | | | |
Third Quarter (January 1, 2009 – March 31, 2009) | $ .28125 | 03/20/09 | 03/31/09 | 04/15/09 |
Second quarter (October 1, 2008-December 31, 2008) | $ .28125 | 12/12/08 | 12/31/08 | 01/15/09 |
First quarter (July 1, 2008-September 30, 2008) | $ .28125 | 09/29/08 | 10/09/08 | 10/15/08 |
Total Preferred Stock Dividends declared | $ .84375 | | | |
For the nine months ended March 31, 2008
| | | | |
| Dividend Per Share | Declaration Date | Record Date | Payment Date |
Preferred Dividends: | | | | |
Third Quarter (January 1, 2008 – March 31, 2008) | $ .28125 | 03/18/08 | 03/31/08 | 04/15/08 |
Second quarter (October 1, 2007-December 31, 2007) | $ .28125 | 12/17/07 | 12/28/07 | 01/15/08 |
First quarter (July 1, 2007-September 30, 2007) | $ .28125 | 09/17/07 | 09/28/07 | 10/15/07 |
Total Preferred Stock Dividends declared | $ .84375 | | | |
| | | | |
Common Dividends: | | | | |
Second quarter (October 1, 2007-December 31, 2007) | $ 0.01 | 2/13/08 | 2/25/08 | 3/12/08 |
First quarter (July 1, 2007-September 30, 2007) | $ 0.01 | 11/7/07 | 11/19/07 | 12/12/07 |
Total Common Stock dividends declared | $ 0.02 | | | |
6.
Related Party Transactions
The Company paid $25,429 and $50,025 to a law firm related to officers and directors of the Company (the “Law Firm”) for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for legal services provided.
Total occupancy costs under existing leases and overhead cost reimbursement agreements paid to the Law Firm and to another entity in which an officer of the Company has a financial interest amounted to $215,107 and $199,211 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company entered into an at-will consulting arrangement with an individual who is considered a related person of the Company. An aggregate of $0 and $7,000 was paid to such person for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively for such consulting services. The consulting arrangement was terminated as of June 30, 2008.
The Company utilized a relative of an officer of the Company to perform part-time administrative services. This individual was paid on a per hour basis for administrative work performed for the Company. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the individual was paid an aggregate of $9,085 and $12,240, respectively. Such person did not perform any services nor was he compensated since October 24, 2008.
The Company pays printing fees to a company partially owned by an officer of the Company. An aggregate of $9,255 and $5,668 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was paid for these services.
Also see Note 4 for related party loan transactions.
7.
Commitments and Contingencies
Interest Rate Swap
In October, 2005, the Company entered into two (2) interest rate swap transactions for $5,000,000 each, to hedge against an upward movement in interest rates relating to outstanding bank debt. The swap transaction which expired October 15, 2007 provided for a fixed rate of 6.20%, and the swap transaction which expired October 14, 2008 provided for a fixed rate of 6.23%. If the Company’s floating borrowing rate (the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.5%) fell below the fixed rate, the Company was obligated to pay the bank the differences in rates. If the Company’s floating borrowing rate rose above the fixed rate, the bank was obligated to pay the Company the differences in rates. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred additional net interest expense (benefit) of $32,973 and $(15,403) respectively, due to the fluctuation of interest rates under t hese agreements. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had no interest rate swaps outstanding.
8.
Stock Option Plans
Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan
An employee stock option plan (the “1999 Employee Plan”) was adopted by the Ameritrans Board, including a majority of the non-interested directors, and approved by a vote of the stockholders, in order to link the personal interests of key employees to the Company’s long-term financial success and the growth of stockholder value. Subsequent amendments to the 1999 Employee Plan were approved by the stockholders in January 2002 and June 2007. The amendments increased the number of shares reserved under the plan to 300,000 shares.
The 1999 Employee Plan authorizes the grant of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for the purchase of up to 300,000 shares (subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar capital changes) of Common Stock to the Company’s employees. By adopting the 1999 Employee Plan, the Board believes that the Company will be better able to attract, motivate, and retain as employees people upon whose judgment and special skills the Company’s success in large measure depends. As of March 31, 2009, options to purchase an aggregate of 291,850 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, with 271,850 shares fully vested and 8,150 shares of Common Stock were available for future award under the Employee Plan.
The 1999 Employee Plan is administered by the 1999 Employee Plan Committee of the Board, which is comprised solely of non-employee directors (who are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 152(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and “disinterested persons” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). The committee can make such rules and regulations and establish such procedures for the administration of the 1999 Employee Plan as it deems appropriate. Should the Company enter into an advisory agreement, which provides for incentive compensation, the Company anticipates that it will terminate the 1999 Employee Plan.
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
A stock option plan for non-employee directors (the “Director Plan”) was adopted by the Ameritrans Board and approved by a vote of the stockholders, in order to link the personal interests of non-employee directors to the Company’s long-term financial success and the growth of stockholder value. The Director Plan is substantially identical to, and the successor to, a non-employee director stock option plan adopted by the Board of Elk and approved by its stockholders in September 1998. Ameritrans and Elk submitted an application for, and received on August 31, 1999, an exemptive order relating to these plans from the SEC. The Director Plan was amended by the Board on November 14, 2001, and approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting on January 18, 2002. The amendment is still subject to the approval of the Commission. The amendment (i) increases th e number of shares reserved under the plan from 75,000 to 125,000 and (ii) authorizes the automatic grant of an option to purchase up to 1,000 shares at the market value at the date of grant to each eligible director who is re-elected to the Board.
The total number of shares for which options may be granted from time to time under the Director Plan is 75,000 shares, which will be increased to 125,000 shares upon Commission approval of the Amended Director Plan. As of March 31, 2009, options to purchase an aggregate of 49,462 shares were issued and outstanding with 35,574 fully vested under the Director Plan. The Director Plan is administered by a committee of directors who are not eligible to participate in the Director Plan. On May 6, 2009, a member of the Board received an automatic grant of options to purchase up to 25,538 shares of Common Stock of the Company pursuant to the Director Plan. The options vest one year from the date of grant, and are exercisable for five (5) years from the grant date at an exercise price of $1.78 per share. Should the Company enter into an advisory agreement, which provides for i ncentive compensation, the Company anticipates that it will terminate the Director Plan.
Options Granted and Canceled
On October 10, 2008, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Employee Plan Committee, granted certain employees options to purchase up to an aggregate of 133,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company exercisable at $2.36 per Share which vested immediately on the date of grant.
After adoption of SFAS 123(R) (see Note 1), the fair value of the options granted amounted to $185,253 at March 31, 2009 and $141,668 at June 30, 2008, which is reflected as stock options outstanding in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Compensation expense related to options vested for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $59,213 and $68,974, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, total deferred compensation related to unvested options was $25,293, which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately two years.
The following tables summarize information about the transactions of both stock plans as of March 31, 2009:
| | |
| Stock Options |
| Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share |
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30, 2008 | 208,312 | $5.14 |
| - | - |
Granted | 133,000 | 2.36 |
Canceled | - | - |
Expired | - | - |
Exercised | - | - |
| | |
Options outstanding at March 31, 2009 | 341,312 | $4.06 |
| | | | | |
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable |
Range of Exercise Prices | Number Outstanding at March 31, 2009 | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number Exercisable at March 31, 2009 | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
| | |
| |
$4.50-$4.95 | 29,425 | .58 years | $4.70 | 29,425 | $4.70 |
$5.56-$6.12 | 29,425 | 1.75 years | $5.81 | 29,425 | $5.81 |
$3.60 | 13,888 | 4.14 years | $3.60 | - | $3.60 |
$6.25 | 16,000 | .79 years | $6.25 | 16,000 | $6.25 |
$5.28 | 80,000 | 4.16 years | $5.28 | 60,000 | $5.28 |
$5.30 | 9,433 | 2.73 years | $5.30 | 9,433 | $5.30 |
$4.50 | 20,000 | 3.53 years | $4.50 | 20,000 | $4.50 |
$4.93 | 10,141 | 3.11 years | $4.93 | 10,141 | $4.93 |
$2.36 | 133,000 | 4.53 years | $2.36 | 133,000 | $2.36 |
|
| | |
| |
$2.36-$6.25 | 341,312 | 3.52 years | $4.06 | 307,424 | $4.00 |
9.
Financial Highlights
| | | |
| Nine months Ended March 31, 2009 | Nine months Ended March 31, 2008 | Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
| | | |
Net share data | | | |
Net asset value at the beginning of the period | $ 5.06 | $ 5.32 | $ 5.32 |
Net investment income (loss) | (0.50) | 0.05 | (0.01) |
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments | (0.23) | (0.11) | (0.14) |
Net decrease in net assets from operations | (0.73) | (0.06) | (0.15) |
Net change in net assets from capital share transactions | - | - | 0.01 |
Distributions to stockholders(4) | (0.07) | (0.09) | (0.12) |
Total decrease in net asset value | (0.80) | (0.15) | (0.26) |
Net asset value at the end of the period | $ 4.26 | $ 5.17 | $ 5.06 |
Per share market value at beginning of period | $ 3.01 | $ 5.21 | $ 5.21 |
Per share market value at end of period | $ 1.96 | $ 3.62 | $ 3.01 |
Total return (1) | (32.6%) | (28.8%) | (39.9%) |
Ratios/supplemental data | | | |
Average net assets (2)(in 000’s) | $ 15,824 | $ 17,816 | $ 17,622 |
Total expense ratio (3) | 40.1% | 34.9% | 35.8% |
Net investment income (loss) to average net assets(5) | (14.1%) | 1.2% | (.26%) |
(1)
Total return is calculated by dividing the change in market value of a share of common stock during the year, assuming the reinvestment of dividends on the payment date, by the per share market value at the beginning of the year.
(2)
Average net assets excludes capital from preferred stock.
(3)
Total expense ratio represents total expenses divided by average net assets annualized for interim periods.
(4)
Amount represents total dividends on both common and preferred stock divided by weighted average shares.
(5)
Annualized for interim periods.
10.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FSP No. 115-2,Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP No. 115-2”), which was issued to make the guidance on other-than-temporary impairment more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. FSP 115-2 requires significant additional disclosures for both annual and interim periods, including the amortized cost basis of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt, the methodology and key imports used to measure the credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment, and a roll forward of amounts recognized in earnings for securities by major security type. FSP No. 115-2 amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115,Account ing for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“SFAS No. 115”) and FSP No. 115-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments to require that entities identify major security classes consistent with how the securities are managed based on the nature and risks of the security, and also expands, for disclosure purposes, the list of major security types identified in SFAS No. 115. FSP No. 115-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FSP No. 157-4”), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157 when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased and also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP No. 157-4 amends SFAS No. 157 to require entities to disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value together with any changes in valuation techniques and related inputs during the period. FSP No. 157-4 also requires reporting entities to define major categoriesfor both debt and equity securities to be majo r security types as described in paragraph 19 of SFAS No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. This requires entities to provide disclosures on a more disaggregated basis than previously had been required under SFAS No. 157. FSP No. 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-3 — Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, or FSP 157-3. FSP 157-3 provides an illustrative example of how to determine the fair value of a financial asset in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 does not change the fair value measurement principles set forth in SFAS 157 (see Note 2 for a description of SFAS 157). Since adopting SFAS 157 in July 2008, our process for determining the fair value of our investments has been, and continues to be, consistent with the guidance provided in the example in FSP 157-3. As a result, the adoption of FSP 157-3 did not affect our process for determining the fair value of our investments and did not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures on derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced disclosures will discuss (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption encouraged. The Company does not anticipate a material impact, if any, to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary by clarifying that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity. It requires that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions and any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and shall be applied prospectively, except for the pr esentation and disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”) which supersedes SFAS No. 141 and establishes principles and requirements on how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date fair value, as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 141R also requires certain disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination will generally be expensed as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective prospectively to business combinations in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We do not believe that this pronouncement will have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated Financial Statements and Notes therewith appearing in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, filed with the Commission by the Company on September 29, 2008 and which is available on the Company’s web site at www.ameritranscapital.com.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assts, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by the application of our accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008. While all accounting policies affect the financial statements, certain accounting policies may be viewed as critical to us. Critical accounting policies are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the financial statements and results of operations and that require our management’s most subjective or complex judgments or estimates, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.
Change in Financial Statement Presentation
Effective for the year ended June 30, 2008, and the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2009, the Company has revised its financial statements to be presented in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X as an investment company. Due to the revised format, the Company made certain reclassifications of amounts previously reported in its prior period statements in order to conform to the current year presentation. Although the reclassifications resulted in changes to certain line items in the previously filed financial statements, the overall effect of the reclassifications noted below did not impact total stockholder’s equity (or net assets available). Below are the primary items affected by the reclassifications made:
·
Unrealized gains and losses previously reported as part of “other comprehensive income (loss), net” were reclassified to “net unrealized gains (losses) on investments” in the statement of operations. The effect of such reclassification also changed previously reported amounts available to common shareholders.
·
Gains and losses on sales of investments previously reported as part of “total investment income, net” in the statement of operations were reclassified to “net realized gains (losses) on investments.”
·
Net write-off and depreciation on interest and loans receivable, previously reported as part of “total operating expenses” in the statement of operations were reclassified to “net unrealized gains (losses) on investments” and “net realized gains (losses) on investments.”
The change in format also resulted in the statement of stockholders’ equity essentially being replaced with the statement of changes in net assets available, which is now presented. In addition, the schedule of investments has been expanded and certain other disclosures were added, such as the “financial highlights.” We believe the changes noted above conform to the filing format for the Company, as a BDC, and will provide a meaningful representation of the Company’s operations going forward.
Investment Valuations
The Company’s loans receivable, net of participations and any unearned discount are considered investment securities under the 1940 Act and are recorded at fair value. As part of fair value methodology, loans are valued at cost adjusted for any unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Since no ready market exists for these loans, the fair value is determined in good faith by Management, and approved by the Board of Directors. In determining the fair value, the Company and Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of borrower, the adequacy of the collateral, individual credit risks, historical loss experience, and the relationships between current and projected market rates and portfolio rates of interest and maturities. Foreclosed properties, which represent collateral received from defaulted borrowers, are valued similarly.
Loans are considered “non-performing” once they become 90 days past due as to principal or interest. The value of past due loans are periodically determined in good faith by Management, and if, in the judgment of Management, the amount is not collectible and the fair value of the collateral is less than the amount due, the value of the loan will be reduced to fair value.
Equity investments (common stock and warrants, including certain controlled subsidiary portfolio investments) and investment securities are recorded at fair value.
The Company records the investment in life insurance policies at fair value, represented as cost, plus or minus unrealized appreciation or depreciation. The fair value of the investment in life settlement contracts have no ready market and are determined in good faith by Management, and approved by the Board of Directors, based on secondary market conditions, policy characteristics and actuarial life expectancy, including health evaluations.
Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuations, the Company’s estimates of the values of the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and the differences could be material.
Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which expands the application of fair value accounting for investments.
Assets Acquired in Satisfaction of Loans
Assets acquired in satisfaction of loans are carried at the lower of the net value of the related foreclosed loan or the estimated fair value less cost of disposal. Losses incurred at the time of foreclosure are charged to the unrealized depreciation on loans receivable. Subsequent reductions in estimated net realizable value are charged to operations as losses on assets acquired in satisfaction of loans.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make extensive use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the fair value of the Company’s investments.
Income Recognition
Interest income, including interest on loans in default, is recorded on an accrual basis and in accordance with loan terms to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company recognizes interest income on loans classified as non-performing only to the extent that the fair market value of the related collateral exceeds the specific loan balance. Loans that are not fully collateralized and in the process of collection are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the judgment of Management, the collectability of interest and principal is doubtful.
Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings in the course of its daily operations from enforcement of its rights in disputes pursuant to the terms of various contractual arrangements. In this connection, the Company assesses the likelihood of any adverse judgment or outcome to these matters as well as a potential range of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserve required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters.
General
Ameritrans acquired Elk on December 16, 1999. Elk is an SBIC that has been operating since 1980, making loans to (and, to a limited extent, investments in) small businesses, who qualify under SBA Regulations. Most of Elk’s business historically consisted of originating and servicing loans collateralized by New York City, Boston, Chicago and Miami taxi medallions, but Elk also makes loans to and investments in other diversified businesses. Historically, Elk’s earnings derived primarily from net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets (consisting of business loans), and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities (consisting of indebtedness to Elk’s banks and subordinated debentures issued to the SBA). Net interest income is a function of the net interest rate spread, which is the difference between the average yield earned on i nterest-earning assets and the average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the average balance of interest-earning assets as compared to interest-bearing liabilities. Unrealized depreciation on loans and investments is recorded when Elk adjusts the value of a loan to reflect Management’s estimate of the fair value, as approved by the Board of Directors.
The principal measure of our financial performance is the net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations which includes net investment income (loss) and net realized and unrealized gain (loss). Net investment income (loss) is the difference between our income from interest, dividends, fees, and other investment income and our operating expenses. Net realized gain (loss) on investments, is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated cost. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Set forth below is a discussion of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Total Investment Income
Investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $655,000 and $1,583,000, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in income producing assets due to the sale of substantially all of the Company’s taxicab medallion portfolio, partially offset by a higher net interest spread on assets outstanding.
Investment income for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $3,086,000 and $4,822,000, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in income producing assets due to the sale of substantially all of the Company’s taxicab medallion portfolio, partially offset by a higher net interest spread on assets outstanding.
Investment income is primarily dependent on the size, composition and credit quality of our investment portfolio. Generally, our debt securities portfolio is expected to generate predictable, recurring interest income in accordance with the contractual terms of each loan. Corporate equity securities may or may not pay a dividend and may increase in value for which a gain may be recognized; generally such dividend payments and gains are less predictable than interest income on our loan portfolio.
Expenses
Total expenses forthe three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $1,274,000 and $1,580,000, respectively.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, which includes SBA and bank indebtedness, was $160,895 and $585,469, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the elimination of substantially all of the Company’s bank debt following the sale of its taxicab medallion portfolio (see Notes 2 and 4 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements).
Approximately $487,000 and $506,000, respectively, of expenses were attributable to employment compensation, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. This decline of approximately 3.8% was due to the reduction in the number of employees offset by increases in contractual salaries and cost of employee benefits.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, other expenses included approximately $360,000 for professional fees as compared to $154,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This increase of 134% was due to increased expenses associated with the implementation of Sarbanes Oxley controls, increases in accounting fees, audit fees, consulting fees, and legal expenses. For the three months ending March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 Sarbanes Oxley fees were $20,861 and $0 respectively. Accounting fees were $75,400 and $19,075 respectively. This increase was mainly due to the addition of an outside consultant for accounting services in lieu of the prior comptroller position that was eliminated in October 2008. Audit and audit related fees were $85,179 and $49,050 respectively. The increase in these fees was due to a change in the scope of services provided. Legal fees were $129,148 and $86 ,089 respectively. This increase was due primarily to fees associated with compliance with SEC regulations. Consulting fees were approximately $49,000 and $0 respectively. These fees are associated with the sourcing and servicing of loans on our senior corporate loan area.
Approximately $205,000 and $272,000 respectively, of expenses were attributable to other administrative expenses, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. This decline of 24% was due to general cost controls and the elimination of certain expenses associated with the taxicab loan portfolio.
Total expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $4,760,000 and $4,668,000 respectively.
Interest expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, which includes SBA and bank indebtedness, was $914,269 and $1,869,357, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the elimination of substantially all of the Company’s bank debt following the sale of its taxicab medallion portfolio (see Notes 2 and 4 in the accompanying consolidated financial statement).
Approximately $1,759,000 and $1,396,000, respectively, of expenses were attributable to employment compensation, for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. This increase of approximately 26% was due to increases in contractual salaries and cost of employee benefits and by a one-time payment to an employee during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, but also partially offset by a reduction in number of employees.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, other expenses included approximately $1,200,000 for professional fees as compared to $503,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. This increase of 236% was due to increased expenses associated with the implementation of Sarbanes Oxley controls, increases in legal expenses, accounting fees, audit fees, and consulting fees. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 fees related to Sarbanes Oxley controls were $229,617 and $17,704, respectively. Accounting fees were $181,988 and $66,125, respectively. This increase was mainly due to the addition of an outside consultant for accounting services. Audit and audit related fees were $257,979 and $137,850 respectively. The increase in fees was due to a change in the scope of services provided. Legal fees were $430,976 and $280,329 respectively. This increase was due primarily to fees associated with compliance with SEC regulations.
Approximately $672,000 and $700,000, respectively, of expenses were attributable to other administrative expenses, for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. This decrease of 4% was due to general cost controls and the elimination of certain expenses associated with the taxicab loan portfolio.
Interest and compensation expense are generally expected to be our largest expenses each period. Interest expense is dependent on the average outstanding principal balance on our revolving credit facility and the base index rate for the period. Compensation expense includes base salaries, bonuses, stock compensation, employee benefits and employer related payroll costs.
Net Unrealized Depreciation on Investments
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, our total investments had an increase in net unrealized depreciation of $98,664 and $2,093, respectively. Of this amount, $128,576 was due to the reduction in fair value of loans outstanding and $12,000 was due to the amortization of discount on loans. Of this amount, approximately $120,000 was due to a write down in principal and interest on one loan, partially offset by unrealized gain related to amortization on certain corporate loans.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, our total investments had an increase in net unrealized depreciation of approximately $353,074, primarily due to adjusting equity investment to fair value.
Net Decrease in Stockholders’ Equity Resulting From Operations
The net decrease in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $851,981 and $2,749,465, respectively, or $0.83 per share. This decrease was due to the significantly reduced revenue that resulted from the sale of substantially all the Company’s medallion portfolio, which has not yet been fully offset by the reduction of costs or the replacement of new interest bearing assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has funded its operations through private and public placements of its securities, bank financing, the issuance to the SBA of its subordinated debentures and internally generated funds.
At June 30, 2008, the Company had loan agreements with three (3) banks for lines of credit aggregating $40,000,000 of which $28,095,697 was outstanding under these lines. The lines bore interest at the lower of either the reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.5% or the banks’ prime rates minus 0.50%. The bank lines were scheduled to mature on or about October 30, 2008. On October 29, 2008, following the closing of the sale of substantially all of the taxi medallion loan portfolio (see Note 2) the Company paid the banks in full all principal and accrued interest due on the three lines.
At March 31, 2009, approximately 94% of the Company’s indebtedness was due to debentures issued to the SBA with fixed rates of interest plus user fees resulting in rates ranging from 4.99% to 5.54% whereas approximately 6% of Elk’s indebtedness was represented by indebtedness to its banks and other lenders with variable rates ranging from 3.5% to 5%. At March 31, 2009, the Company had available $1,000,000 of credit lines from its banks, of which $300,000 was available to draw down as of that date, subject to limitations imposed by its borrowing base agreement with its banks and the SBA, the statutory and regulatory limitations imposed by the SBA and the availability of funds. As of April 28, 2009, the Company repaid the entire principal balance in the amount of $228,000 on one of its banks lines. On April 29, 2009 and April 30, 2009, the Company continued the outstanding balan ces with two of its banks by extending the credit lines of $352,000 and $120,000, respectively (see Note 4 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements) subject to limitations imposed by its borrowing base agreement with its banks and the SBA, the statutory and regulatory limitations imposed by the SBA and the availability of funds.
In September 2006, the Company invested in life settlement contracts which require the Company to continue premium payments to keep the policies in force through the insured’s life expectancy, or until such time the policies are sold. From and after March 31, 2009, premium payments due through the life expectancy of the insured are approximately $5,814,000 over the next five years and $7,131,000 thereafter.
Loan amortization and prepayments also provide a source of funding for the Company. Prepayments on loans are influenced significantly by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
The Company will distribute at least 90% of its investment company taxable income and, accordingly, will continue to rely upon external sources of funds to finance growth. To provide the funds necessary for expansion, Management expects to raise additional capital and has applied to the SBA to obtain additional SBA debentures. In December 2008, the Company applied to the SBA for loans in the aggregate amount of $15,000,000. There can be no assurances that such additional financing will be available on acceptable terms to the Company or at all.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 10 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a summary of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation or liquidity.
ITEM 1.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company’s business activities contain elements of risk. The Company considers the principal types of risk to be fluctuations in interest rates and portfolio valuations. The Company considers the management of risk essential to conducting its businesses. Accordingly, the Company’s risk management systems and procedures are designed to identify and analyze the Company’s risks, to set appropriate policies and limits and to continually monitor these risks and limits by means of reliable administrative and information systems and other policies and programs.
The Company values its portfolio at fair value as determined in good faith by the Company’s Board of Directors in accordance with the Company’s valuation policy. Unlike certain lending institutions, the Company is not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the Company must value each individual investment and portfolio loan on a quarterly basis. The Company records unrealized depreciation on investments and loans when it believes that an asset has been impaired and full collection is unlikely. Without a readily ascertainable market value, the estimated value of the Company’s portfolio of investments and loans may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if there existed a ready market for the investments. The Company adjusts the valuation of the portfolio quarterly to reflect the Board of Directors 6; estimate of the current fair value of each component of the portfolio. Any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in the Company’s statement of operations as net unrealized depreciation on investments.
In addition, the illiquidity of our loan portfolio and investments may adversely affect our ability to dispose of loans at times when it may be advantageous for us to liquidate such portfolio or investments. Also, if we were required to liquidate some or all of the investments in the portfolio, the proceeds of such liquidation might be significantly less than the current value of such investments. Because we borrow money to make loans and investments, our net operating income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we loan and invest these funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our interest income. As interest rates rise, our interest costs increase, decreasing the net interest rate spread we receive and thereby adverse ly affect our profitability. Although we intend to continue to manage our interest rate risk through asset and liability management, including the use of interest rate swaps, general rises in interest rates will tend to reduce our interest rate spread in the short term.
Assuming that the balance sheet were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate sensitivity, a hypothetical immediate 1% increase in interest rates would have resulted in an additional net increase in net assets from operations of $148,949 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. This is comprised of a 1% change in two components, loans receivable of $154,199 at variable interest rate terms, and $5,250 for bank debt subject to variable market rates. This hypothetical does not take into account interest rate floors or caps on the Company’s loan receivable portfolio. No assurances can be given however, that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated by these estimates.
ITEM 2.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act. Our Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2009. Further, this evaluation included enhancements to our internal control over financial reporting that have not materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
IMPORTANT FACTORS RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The matters discussed in this Quarterly Report, as well as in future oral and written statements by Management of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, that are forward-looking statements are based on current Management expectations that involve substantial risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “proj ects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new investments, achieve certain margins and levels of profitability, the availability of additional capital, and the ability to maintain certain debt to asset ratios. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Quarterly Report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans or objectives will be achieved. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report include but are not limited to statements as to:
·
our future operating results;
·
our business prospects and the prospects of our existing and prospective portfolio companies;
·
the impact of investments that we expect to make;
·
our informal relationships with third parties;
·
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;
·
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
·
our expected financings and investments;
·
our regulatory structure and tax treatment;
·
our ability to operate as a BDC and a RIC; and
·
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report.
9
PART I. OTHER INFORMATION
INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. Certain information previously disclosed in Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are incorporated by reference into Part II of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceeding. From time to time, the Company is engaged in various legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of the Company’s Management and based upon the advice of legal counsel, there is no proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of Management threatened, which in the event of an adverse decision would result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Part I, Item 1A – “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, describes important factors that could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or future results and cause our results of operations to differ materially from those indicated, projected or implied by forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company; additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operation results and cause our operating results to differ materially from those indicated, projected or implied by forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time.
There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Default upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The Exhibits filed as part of this report on Form 10-Q are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such Exhibits, which Exhibit index is incorporated by reference.
Exhibit Index
(a)
Exhibits
10.1
Line letter for $352,000 line of credit dated April 30, 2009 between Elk Associates Funding Corp. and Israel Discount Bank of New York. (attached hereto)
10.2
Assignment of Time Deposit dated April 30, 2009 between Elk Associates Funding Corp. and Israel Discount Bank of New York. (attached hereto)
10.3
Demand grid promissory note dated April 30, 2009 issued to Israel Discount Bank of New York. (attached hereto)
10.4
Fixed rate promissory note dated April 29, 2009 issued to Bank Leumi USA in the amount of $120,000, and pledge and assignment of bank deposits/accounts dated April 29, 2009. (attached hereto)
31.1
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (attached hereto)
31.2
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (attached hereto)
32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (attached hereto)
32.2
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (attached hereto)
(All other items of Part II are inapplicable)
10
AMERITRANS CAPITAL CORPORATION
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERITRANS CAPITAL CORPORATION
Dated: May 15, 2009
By:/s/ Michael Feinsod
Michael Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer and President
11
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
DISCLOSURE IN THE REGISTRANT’S QUARTERLY REPORT
I, Michael Feinsod, Chief Executive Officer, and President of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the “report”);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principle;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: May 15, 2009
By:
/s/ Michael Feinsod
Michael Feinsod
President and Chief Executive Officer
12
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
DISCLOSURE IN THE REGISTRANT’S QUARTERLY REPORT
I, Gary C. Granoff, Chief Financial Officer, and Chairman of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the “report”);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principle;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: May 15, 2009
By:
/s/ Gary C. Granoff
Gary C. Granoff
Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
13
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
By:/s/ Michael Feinsod
Michael Feinsod
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2009
14
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
By:/s/ Gary C. Granoff
Gary C. Granoff
Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
May 15, 2009
15
