Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| | |
(Mark One) | | |
ý | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
|
Commission File No. 001-11155
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 23-1128670 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2 North Cascade Avenue, 2nd Floor | | |
Colorado Springs, CO (Address of principal executive offices) | | 80903 (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(719) 442-2600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer ý | | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of May 1, 2010: 10,639,234 shares of common stock, $2.50 par value.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| | PAGE | |
---|
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | | 3 | |
| ITEM 1 | | — | | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | | 3 | |
| ITEM 1 | | — | | NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | | 8 | |
| ITEM 2 | | — | | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | | | 28 | |
| ITEM 3 | | — | | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | | | 38 | |
| ITEM 4 | | — | | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | | | 38 | |
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION | | | 39 | |
| ITEM 1 | | — | | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | | | 39 | |
| ITEM 1A | | — | | RISK FACTORS | | | 39 | |
| ITEM 2 | | — | | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | | | 40 | |
| ITEM 3 | | — | | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | | | 40 | |
| ITEM 6 | | — | | EXHIBITS | | | 41 | |
SIGNATURES | | | 42 | |
EXHIBIT INDEX | | | 43 | |
Table of Contents
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Westmoreland Coal Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 17,760 | | $ | 10,519 | |
| Receivables: | | | | | | | |
| | Trade | | | 49,873 | | | 46,393 | |
| | Contractual third-party reclamation receivables | | | 8,314 | | | 7,257 | |
| | Other | | | 4,058 | | | 3,162 | |
| | | | | |
| | | 62,245 | | | 56,812 | |
| Inventories | | | 27,373 | | | 25,871 | |
| Reclamation deposits | | | 4,664 | | | — | |
| Other current assets | | | 6,980 | | | 6,047 | |
| | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 119,022 | | | 99,249 | |
| | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment: | | | | | | | |
| Land and mineral rights | | | 83,694 | | | 83,694 | |
| Capitalized asset retirement cost | | | 125,828 | | | 134,821 | |
| Plant and equipment | | | 489,906 | | | 486,238 | |
| | | | | |
| | | 699,428 | | | 704,753 | |
| Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | (259,037 | ) | | (248,569 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Net property, plant and equipment | | | 440,391 | | | 456,184 | |
Advanced coal royalties | | | 2,954 | | | 3,056 | |
Reclamation deposits, less current portion | | | 69,087 | | | 73,067 | |
Restricted investments and bond collateral | | | 47,137 | | | 48,188 | |
Contractual third-party reclamation receivables, less current portion | | | 82,683 | | | 74,989 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 2,459 | | | 2,341 | |
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $7.4 million and $6.8 million at March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively | | | 8,264 | | | 8,781 | |
Other assets | | | 6,521 | | | 6,873 | |
| | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 778,518 | | $ | 772,728 | |
| | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
Westmoreland Coal Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Current installments of long-term debt | | $ | 39,871 | | $ | 41,089 | |
| Revolving lines of credit | | | 17,700 | | | 16,400 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses: | | | | | | | |
| | Trade | | | 40,383 | | | 39,264 | |
| | Production taxes | | | 26,900 | | | 24,510 | |
| | Workers' compensation | | | 1,028 | | | 1,031 | |
| | Postretirement medical benefits | | | 14,501 | | | 14,501 | |
| | SERP | | | 306 | | | 306 | |
| | Deferred revenue | | | 10,862 | | | 8,760 | |
| | Asset retirement obligations | | | 16,675 | | | 15,513 | |
| | Other current liabilities | | | 13,389 | | | 12,851 | |
| | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 181,615 | | | 174,225 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current installments | | | 191,651 | | | 197,206 | |
Revolving lines of credit, less current installments | | | 3,800 | | | — | |
Workers' compensation, less current portion | | | 10,140 | | | 10,188 | |
Excess of pneumoconiosis benefit obligation over trust assets | | | 1,133 | | | 786 | |
Postretirement medical benefits, less current portion | | | 175,133 | | | 175,722 | |
Pension and SERP obligations, less current portion | | | 25,122 | | | 26,827 | |
Deferred revenue, less current portion | | | 82,758 | | | 84,243 | |
Asset retirement obligations, less current portion | | | 228,826 | | | 229,102 | |
Intangible liabilities, net of accumulated amortization $8.2 million at March 31, 2010, and $7.7 million at December 31, 2009, respectively | | | 9,868 | | | 10,300 | |
Other liabilities | | | 11,250 | | | 5,928 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 921,296 | | | 914,527 | |
| | | | | |
Shareholders' deficit: | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock of $1.00 par value | | | | | | | |
| | | Authorized 5,000,000 shares; | | | | | | | |
| | | Issued and outstanding 160,129 shares at March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 | | | 160 | | | 160 | |
Common stock of $2.50 par value | | | | | | | |
| | | Authorized 30,000,000 shares; | | | | | | | |
| | | Issued and outstanding 10,619,309 shares at March 31, 2010, and 10,345,927 shares at December 31, 2009 | | | 26,547 | | | 25,864 | |
Other paid-in capital | | | 93,854 | | | 91,432 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (31,562 | ) | | (31,223 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (229,070 | ) | | (226,215 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total Westmoreland Coal Company shareholders' deficit | | | (140,071 | ) | | (139,982 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (2,707 | ) | | (1,817 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total deficit | | | (142,778 | ) | | (141,799 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit | | $ | 778,518 | | $ | 772,728 | |
| | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
Westmoreland Coal Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands, except per share data)
| |
---|
Revenues | | $ | 126,439 | | $ | 121,798 | |
Cost, expenses and other: | | | | | | | |
| Cost of sales | | | 97,677 | | | 97,727 | |
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 11,392 | | | 10,732 | |
| Selling and administrative | | | 9,976 | | | 10,740 | |
| Heritage health benefit expenses | | | 3,915 | | | 6,983 | |
| Loss on sales of assets | | | 71 | | | 18 | |
| Other operating income | | | (1,906 | ) | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | 121,125 | | | 126,200 | |
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 5,314 | | | (4,402 | ) |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | (5,723 | ) | | (5,836 | ) |
| Interest income | | | 410 | | | 887 | |
| Other income (loss) | | | (3,836 | ) | | 3,607 | |
| | | | | |
| | | (9,149 | ) | | (1,342 | ) |
| | | | | |
Loss before income taxes | | | (3,835 | ) | | (5,744 | ) |
| Income tax benefit from operations | | | (90 | ) | | (455 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss | | | (3,745 | ) | | (5,289 | ) |
| Less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | (890 | ) | | — | |
| | | | | |
Net loss attributable to the Parent company | | | (2,855 | ) | | (5,289 | ) |
| Less preferred stock dividend requirements | | | 340 | | | 340 | |
| | | | | |
Net loss applicable to common shareholders | | $ | (3,195 | ) | $ | (5,629 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net loss per share applicable to common shareholders: | | | | | | | |
| Basic and diluted | | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (0.59 | ) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | |
| Basic and diluted | | | 10,521 | | | 9,608 | |
Net loss (from above) | | $ | (3,745 | ) | $ | (5,289 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, pension | | | (68 | ) | | 652 | |
| Amortization of accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, postretirement medical benefits | | | 228 | | | 1,799 | |
| Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | | | (499 | ) | | (1,005 | ) |
| | | | | |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (4,084 | ) | $ | (3,843 | ) |
| | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
Westmoreland Coal Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Deficit and Comprehensive Loss
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | Other Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Accumulated Deficit | | Non- controlling Interest | | Total Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Balance at December 31, 2008 (160,129 preferred shares and 9,690,018 common shares outstanding) | | $ | 160 | | $ | 24,223 | | $ | 96,196 | | $ | (128,461 | ) | $ | (209,716 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (217,598 | ) |
| Cumulative effect of adoption ofASC 815-40 | | | — | | | — | | | (9,847 | ) | | — | | | 10,846 | | | — | | | 999 | |
| Common stock issued as compensation (255,909 shares, less 100,000 shares forfeited) | | | — | | | 391 | | | 2,180 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,571 | |
| Contributions of Company stock to pension plan assets (500,000 shares) | | | — | | | 1,250 | | | 2,903 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,153 | |
| Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (27,345 | ) | | (1,817 | ) | | (29,162 | ) |
| Tax effect of other comprehensive income gains | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (17,062 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (17,062 | ) |
| Adjustment to accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, pension | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,459 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (1,459 | ) |
| Amortization of accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, pension | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,845 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,845 | |
| Amortization of accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, postretirement medical benefits | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,079 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,079 | |
| Effect of pension plan freeze | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,670 | | | — | | | — | | | 10,670 | |
| Effect of postretirement medical benefit plan amendments | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 95,313 | | | — | | | — | | | 95,313 | |
| Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 852 | | | — | | | — | | | 852 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 68,076 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2009 (160,129 preferred shares and 10,345,927 common shares outstanding) | | | 160 | | | 25,864 | | | 91,432 | | | (31,223 | ) | | (226,215 | ) | | (1,817 | ) | | (141,799 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock issued as compensation (120,882 shares) | | | — | | | 302 | | | 1,061 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,363 | |
| Common stock options exercised (2,500 shares) | | | — | | | 6 | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 8 | |
| Contributions of Company stock to pension plan assets (150,000 shares) | | | — | | | 375 | | | 1,359 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,734 | |
| Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,855 | ) | | (890 | ) | | (3,745 | ) |
| Amortization of accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, pension | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (68 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (68 | ) |
| Amortization of accumulated actuarial losses and transition obligations, postretirement medical benefits | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 228 | | | — | | | — | | | 228 | |
| Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (499 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (499 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2010 (160,129 preferred shares and 10,619,309 common shares outstanding) | | $ | 160 | | $ | 26,547 | | $ | 93,854 | | $ | (31,562 | ) | $ | (229,070 | ) | $ | (2,707 | ) | $ | (142,778 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
Westmoreland Coal Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,745 | ) | $ | (5,289 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| | Provision for obsolete inventory | | | (415 | ) | | — | |
| | Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 11,392 | | | 10,732 | |
| | Accretion of asset retirement obligation and receivable | | | 3,003 | | | 2,494 | |
| | Non-cash tax benefits | | | — | | | (559 | ) |
| | Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities, net | | | 85 | | | 88 | |
| | Share-based compensation | | | 1,363 | | | 272 | |
| | Loss on sales of assets | | | 71 | | | 18 | |
| | Non-cash interest expense | | | 388 | | | 355 | |
| | Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 523 | | | 391 | |
| | Loss (gain) on impairment and sales of investment securities | | | (659 | ) | | 488 | |
| | Loss (gain) on derivative instruments | | | 4,515 | | | (4,058 | ) |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| | Receivables, net | | | (3,866 | ) | | 8,932 | |
| | Inventories | | | (1,087 | ) | | (2,005 | ) |
| | Excess of pneumoconiosis benefit obligation over trust assets | | | 347 | | | (16 | ) |
| | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 3,770 | | | (5,044 | ) |
| | Deferred revenue | | | 617 | | | 6,176 | |
| | Accrual for workers' compensation | | | (51 | ) | | (124 | ) |
| | Asset retirement obligation | | | (1,875 | ) | | 311 | |
| | Accrual for postretirement medical benefits | | | (361 | ) | | 2,632 | |
| | Pension and SERP obligations | | | (39 | ) | | 1,146 | |
| | Other assets and liabilities | | | (680 | ) | | 480 | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 13,296 | | | 17,420 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | |
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | (4,337 | ) | | (7,886 | ) |
| Change in restricted investments and bond collateral and reclamation deposits | | | (592 | ) | | (2,428 | ) |
| Net proceeds from sales of assets | | | 379 | | | 23 | |
| Proceeds from the sale of investments | | | 1,119 | | | 381 | |
| Receivable from customer for property and equipment purchases | | | (510 | ) | | (371 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (3,941 | ) | | (10,281 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | |
| Change in book overdrafts | | | 890 | | | 462 | |
| Repayments of long-term debt | | | (8,112 | ) | | (11,954 | ) |
| Borrowings on revolving lines of credit | | | 28,400 | | | 15,146 | |
| Repayments of revolving lines of credit | | | (23,300 | ) | | (7,000 | ) |
| Exercise of stock options | | | 8 | | | — | |
| | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (2,114 | ) | | (3,346 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 7,241 | | | 3,793 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 10,519 | | | 39,941 | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 17,760 | | $ | 43,734 | |
| | | | | |
Non-cash transactions: | | | | | | | |
| | Capital leases | | $ | 866 | | $ | 1,564 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include accounts of Westmoreland Coal Company, or the Company, and its subsidiaries and controlled entities. The Company's current principal activities, all conducted within the United States, are the production and sale of coal from its mines in Montana, North Dakota and Texas, and the ownership of the Roanoke Valley power plants, or ROVA, in North Carolina. The Company's activities are primarily conducted through wholly owned subsidiaries, which generally have obtained separate financing. All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company's Absaloka Mine is owned by its subsidiary, Westmoreland Resources, Inc., or WRI. The right to mine coal at the Absaloka Mine has been subleased to an affiliated entity whose operations the Company controls. The Beulah, Jewett, Rosebud, and Savage Mines are owned through the Company's subsidiary, Westmoreland Mining LLC, or WML.
These quarterly consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, or 2009 Form 10-K. The accounting principles followed by the Company are set forth in the Notes to the Company's consolidated financial statements in its 2009 Form 10-K. Most of the descriptions of the accounting principles and other footnote disclosures previously made have been omitted in this report so long as the interim information presented is not misleading.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and require use of management's estimates. The financial information contained in this Form 10-Q is unaudited, but reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods shown. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has violated a debt covenant, has a working capital deficit, and has a net capital deficiency. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments that might result from uncertainty about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
WML did not comply with its original leverage covenant requirements as of March 31, 2010; however, WML obtained a waiver for its anticipated March 31, 2010 violation during 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the waiver, WML had to meet certain conditions, including a revised leverage covenant. WML met the March 31, 2010 waiver covenant requirements and has classified WML's debt as long term. WRI was not in compliance with the amended net worth requirement contained in its Business Loan Agreement at April 30, 2010 and does not expect to meet this requirement for at least the next twelve months. The Company has therefore classified WRI's $11.4 million term debt as a current liability. WRI's non-compliance with this loan covenant triggers a cross default on the Company's convertible notes and, as a result, the Company has classified $11.7 million of its convertible note debt as a current liability. See Note 5 for additional information on covenant non-compliance.
8
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Continued)
The Company is a holding company (the "Parent") and conducts its operations through subsidiaries, which generally have obtained separate financing. The Company has significant cash requirements to fund its ongoing heritage health benefit costs, pension contributions, and corporate overhead expenses. The principal sources of cash flow to the Parent are distributions from its principal operating subsidiaries. Both WML and ROVA have a credit agreement that contains covenants applicable to that subsidiary, some of which impose timing and other restrictions on the ability of such subsidiary to contribute funds to the Company in the form of dividends. Based on ROVA's debt service requirements, the Company does not anticipate a dividend from ROVA for the foreseeable future, as ROVA's operating cash will be used to fund its debt. The WRI agreement permits dividends to be paid by WRI to the Parent with fewer restrictions, allowing more flexibility in the timing and amount of dividends.
The primary factors impacting the Company's liquidity include:
- •
- The Company's heritage health benefit obligations are funded by distributions from its operating subsidiaries. The Company's heritage health benefit costs consist of payments for various types of postretirement medical benefits. The Company significantly reduced its heritage health benefit obligations in 2009 through plan amendments and by entering into an agreement to modernize the method by which prescription drugs are provided to retirees.
- •
- Pension obligations are funded by both corporate and the Company's subsidiary operations. Funds contributed to the pension plans by the Company's subsidiaries reduce distributions available to the Parent. Although, one of the Company's pension plans was frozen in 2009, the Company is still required to make significant contributions to the plans. Under certain circumstances, the Company is able to make a portion of these contributions in the form of Company stock.
- •
- The Company's significant level of debt and related restrictions under current debt agreements limits the ability of its subsidiaries, WML and ROVA, to pay dividends to the Parent.
- •
- The Company anticipates that, as it permits additional areas for its mines during the remainder of 2010 to provide for on-going operations, its bonding requirements will increase significantly and the cash collateral requirements will increase as well.
As a result of a decrease in the Company's heritage health benefit costs, ability to access funds from WRI's revolving line of credit and an increase in WRI's term debt, the Company anticipates that its cash from operations and available borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements for the foreseeable future, although by a small margin. The Company's projections assume the following:
- •
- a significant increase in tons delivered and an increase in power segments profits in 2010 (following coal customer shutdowns in the second and third quarters of 2009 and an unanticipated shutdown at ROVA in the fourth quarter of 2009);
- •
- WRI's lender will not require prepayment or accelerate the repayment schedule of its term debt or revolving line of credit (as a result of a net worth covenant non-compliance); and
- •
- WRI's renewal of its revolving line of credit prior to its November 18, 2010 expiration.
9
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Continued)
The Company does not currently expect to rely on proceeds from sales of assets or securities or other capital-raising transactions in order to satisfy its liquidity needs during the remainder of 2010.
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued authoritative guidance which prescribes a qualitative model for identifying whether a company has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, or VIE. The model identifies two primary characteristics of a controlling financial interest: (1) provides a company with the power to direct significant activities of the VIE, and (2) obligates a company to absorb losses of and/or provides rights to receive benefits from the VIE. This guidance requires a company to reassess on an ongoing basis whether it holds a controlling financial interest in a VIE. A company that holds a controlling financial interest is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and is required to consolidate the VIE. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or the consolidation of its VIE entity.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which requires additional disclosures and clarifies certain existing disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2010. However, none of the specific additional disclosures were applicable at March 31, 2010.
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Coal | | $ | 1,305 | | $ | 1,158 | |
Materials and supplies | | | 26,653 | | | 25,713 | |
Reserve for obsolete inventory | | | (585 | ) | | (1,000 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total | | $ | 27,373 | | $ | 25,871 | |
| | | | | |
10
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
4. RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS AND BOND COLLATERAL
The Company's restricted investments and bond collateral consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Coal Segment: | | | | | | | |
| Westmoreland Mining—debt reserve account | | $ | 5,064 | | $ | 5,064 | |
| Reclamation bond collateral: | | | | | | | |
| | Rosebud Mine | | | 12,464 | | | 12,462 | |
| | Absaloka Mine | | | 9,111 | | | 9,228 | |
| | Jewett Mine | | | 1,752 | | | 1,502 | |
| | Beulah Mine | | | 1,270 | | | 1,270 | |
Power Segment: | | | | | | | |
| Debt protection account | | | 6,148 | | | 8,104 | |
| Ash reserve account | | | 601 | | | 600 | |
| Repairs and maintenance account | | | 267 | | | — | |
Corporate Segment: | | | | | | | |
| Workers' compensation bonds | | | 6,195 | | | 6,118 | |
| Postretirement medical benefit bonds | | | 4,265 | | | 3,840 | |
| | | | | |
Total restricted investments and bond collateral | | $ | 47,137 | | $ | 48,188 | |
| | | | | |
For all of its restricted investments and bond collateral accounts, the Company can select investment options for the funds and receives the investment returns on these investments. Funds in the restricted investment and bond collateral accounts are not available to meet the Company's cash needs.
These accounts include held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts calculated on the effective interest method. Interest income is recognized when earned. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported inAccumulated other comprehensive loss.
The Company's carrying value and estimated fair value of its restricted investments and bond collateral at March 31, 2010, are as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 34,165 | | $ | 34,165 | |
Time deposits | | | 7,016 | | | 7,016 | |
Held-to-maturity securities | | | 3,139 | | | 3,442 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | | 2,817 | | | 2,817 | |
| | | | | |
| | $ | 47,137 | | $ | 47,440 | |
| | | | | |
The Company recorded a $0.1 million gain during the first quarter of 2010 on the sale of available-for-sale securities held as restricted investments and bond collateral.
11
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
4. RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS AND BOND COLLATERAL (Continued)
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and fair value of held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Amortized cost | | $ | 3,139 | |
Gross unrealized holding gains | | | 303 | |
| | | |
Fair value | | $ | 3,442 | |
| | | |
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities are as follows at March 31, 2010:
| | | | | | | |
| | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Due in five years or less | | $ | 628 | | $ | 692 | |
Due after five years to ten years | | | 731 | | | 787 | |
Due in more than ten years | | | 1,780 | | | 1,963 | |
| | | | | |
| | $ | 3,139 | | $ | 3,442 | |
| | | | | |
The cost basis, gross unrealized holding gains and fair value of available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Cost basis | | $ | 2,566 | |
Gross unrealized holding gains | | | 251 | |
| | | |
Fair value | | $ | 2,817 | |
| | | |
12
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
5. LINES OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
The amounts outstanding under the Company's lines of credit and long-term debt consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Total Debt Outstanding | |
---|
| | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Westmoreland Mining: | | | | | | | |
| Revolving line of credit | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Term debt | | | 125,000 | | | 125,000 | |
| Capital lease obligations | | | 22,572 | | | 22,360 | |
| Other term debt | | | 528 | | | 1,463 | |
Westmoreland Resources, Inc.: | | | | | | | |
| Revolving line of credit | | | 17,700 | | | 16,400 | |
| Term debt | | | 11,400 | | | 12,000 | |
| Capital lease obligations | | | 9,346 | | | 9,864 | |
ROVA: | | | | | | | |
| Revolving line of credit | | | 3,800 | | | — | |
| Term debt | | | 50,170 | | | 55,575 | |
| Debt premiums | | | 758 | | | 880 | |
Corporate: | | | | | | | |
| Convertible notes | | | 17,646 | | | 17,258 | |
| Debt discount | | | (5,898 | ) | | (6,105 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total debt outstanding | | | 253,022 | | | 254,695 | |
| Less current portion | | | (57,571 | ) | | (57,489 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total debt outstanding, less current portion | | $ | 195,451 | | $ | 197,206 | |
| | | | | |
The following table presents aggregate contractual debt maturities of all long-term debt and the lines of credit at March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
| | | | |
Remainder of 2010 | | $ | 29,775 | |
2011 | | | 25,013 | |
2012 | | | 32,332 | |
2013 | | | 54,000 | |
2014 | | | 33,936 | |
Thereafter | | | 83,106 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 258,162 | |
Less: debt discount | | | (5,140 | ) |
| | | |
Total debt | | $ | 253,022 | |
| | | |
In the three months ended March 31, 2010, WML repaid $1.6 million of its capital lease and other term debt. WML entered into capital lease agreements in the amount of $0.9 million for the three
13
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
5. LINES OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)
months ended March 31, 2010. The weighted average interest rate for WML's capital leases and other term debt was 7.58% and 6.37% at March 31, 2010, respectively.
The available balance on the $25.0 million revolving line of credit at March 31, 2010, was $23.1 million. The revolving line of credit supports a $1.9 million letter of credit which reduces the available balance.
WML's lending arrangements contain, among other conditions, events of default and various affirmative and negative covenants. As a result of customer outages in 2009, WML did not comply with its original leverage ratio covenant as of March 31, 2010. In 2009, WML received waivers for the anticipated March 31, 2010 non-compliance provided WML met certain conditions, including a revised leverage ratio covenant. WML met the March 31, 2010 waiver covenant requirements and believes it will meet all waiver covenant requirements for at least the next twelve months and, therefore, has classified its debt as long term.
Westmoreland Resources, Inc.
In the three months ended March 31, 2010, WRI repaid $1.1 million of its outstanding term debt and capital lease obligations. WRI did not enter into any capital lease agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The weighted average interest rate for WRI's capital leases was 7.59% at March 31, 2010. Interest on WRI's term debt and its revolving line of credit was 7.0% and 6.0% at March 31, 2010, respectively.
The balance outstanding on WRI's $20.0 million revolving line of credit at March 31, 2010 was $17.7 million. At March 31, 2010, the WRI revolving line of credit had unused borrowings of $2.3 million. The maturity date for this revolving line of credit is November 18, 2010.
WRI's Business Loan Agreement requires it to comply with numerous covenants and minimum financial ratio requirements primarily related to debt coverage, tangible net worth, capital expenditures, and its operations. Primarily as a result of unfavorable market conditions driving decreases in tonnages sold, WRI was not in compliance with the amended net worth requirement contained in its Business Loan Agreement at April 30, 2010. As a result of the non-compliance, WRI's lender increased the interest rate 1% on both the revolving line of credit and term debt. The Company believes it will not be able to meet the covenant requirement for at least the next twelve months and therefore has classified WRI's term debt of $11.4 million as a current liability. The Company expects to meet all covenant requirements contained in the Business Loan Agreement during 2010, with the exception of the net worth requirement.
In the three months ended March 31, 2010, ROVA repaid $5.4 million of its outstanding fixed rate term debt. The weighted average interest rate on the fixed rate term debt was 9.97% at March 31, 2010.
ROVA's $6.0 million revolving line of credit had an outstanding balance of $3.8 million and unused borrowings of $2.2 million at March 31, 2010. Interest on the revolving loan is payable quarterly at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.375% (1.63% per annum at March 31, 2010).
14
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
5. LINES OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)
The fixed rate term debt and the revolving line of credit are secured by a pledge of the quarterly cash distributions from ROVA. ROVA is required to comply with numerous loan covenants primarily related to interest and fixed charge coverage and its operations. As of March 31, 2010, ROVA was in compliance with such covenants.
The Company paid interest in kind on its 9% senior secured convertible notes through the issuance of $0.4 million of additional notes during the three months ended March 31, 2010. This resulted in an additional 38,831 shares of common stock being issuable on conversion of the convertible notes at a conversion price of $10.00 per share, bringing the total to 1,764,640 shares at March 31, 2010.
The note purchase agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants. The notes may be declared immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of certain events of default, and the notes are immediately due and payable without declaration upon the occurrence of other events of default. As discussed above, WRI's non-compliance with loan covenants triggers a cross default on the Company's convertible notes and it has therefore classified $11.7 million of its convertible notes as a current liability.
6. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFITS
The Company provides pension benefits to qualified full-time employees pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. The Company froze one of its pension plans in 2009.
The Company incurred net periodic benefit costs of providing pension benefits as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | | $ | 196 | | $ | 673 | |
| Interest cost | | | 1,606 | | | 1,279 | |
| Expected return on plan assets | | | (1,299 | ) | | (822 | ) |
| Amortization of deferred items | | | 228 | | | 652 | |
| | | | | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 731 | | $ | 1,782 | |
| | | | | |
As part of the WML refinancing, the Company is required by loan covenants to ensure that by September 15th of each year, the value of its pension assets are at least 90% of each of the plan's year end actuarially determined pension liability.
The Company contributed $0.4 million in cash and $1.7 million in Company stock to its retirement plans in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company expects to make approximately $8.7 million of pension plan contributions during the remainder of 2010 in order to meet its
15
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
6. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFITS (Continued)
September 15th funding requirement. A significant portion of these contributions is expected to be made in the form of Company stock.
The Company provides postretirement medical benefits to retired employees and their dependents, mandated by the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 and pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. The Company also provides these benefits to qualified full-time employees pursuant to collective bargaining agreements.
The Company incurred net periodic benefit costs of providing postretirement medical benefits as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | | $ | 141 | | $ | 224 | |
| Interest cost | | | 2,752 | | | 4,186 | |
| Amortization of deferred items | | | (68 | ) | | 1,799 | |
| | | | | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 2,825 | | $ | 6,209 | |
| | | | | |
The following table shows the net periodic medical benefit costs that relate to current operations and former mining operations:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Former mining operations | | $ | 2,518 | | $ | 5,645 | |
Current operations | | | 307 | | | 564 | |
| | | | | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 2,825 | | $ | 6,209 | |
| | | | | |
The costs for the former mining operations are included inHeritage health benefit expenses and the costs for current operations are included as operating expenses.
The Company expects to pay approximately $9.3 million for postretirement medical benefits during the remainder of 2010, net of Medicare Part D reimbursements. A total of $4.1 million was paid in the three months ended March 31, 2010, net of Medicare Part D reimbursements.
On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA, was signed into law, potentially impacting the Company's costs to provide healthcare benefits to its retired employees. The PPACA has both short-term and long-term implications on healthcare benefit plan standards. Implementation of this legislation is planned to occur in phases, with plan standard changes taking effect beginning in 2010, but to a greater extent with the 2011 benefit plan year and extending through 2018.
16
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
6. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFITS (Continued)
Plan standard changes that could affect the Company in the short term include raising the maximum age for covered dependents to receive benefits, the elimination of lifetime dollar limits per covered individual and restrictions on annual dollar limits per covered individual, among other standard requirements. Plan standard changes that could affect us in the long term include a tax on "high cost" plans (excise tax) and the elimination of annual dollar limits per covered individual, among other standard requirements.
The Company is currently analyzing this legislation to determine the full extent of the impact of the required plan standard changes on its employee healthcare plans and the resulting costs. Beginning in 2018, the PPACA will impose a 40% excise tax on employers to the extent that the value of their healthcare plan coverage exceeds certain dollar thresholds. The Company anticipates that certain government agencies will provide additional regulations or interpretations concerning the application of this excise tax. Until these regulations or interpretations are published, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the impact of the excise tax on the Company's future healthcare costs or postretirement medical benefit obligation. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2010, the Company has not made any changes to its assumptions used to determine its postretirement medical benefit obligation. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of the PPACA in future periods as additional information and guidance becomes available.
The PPACA also amended previous legislation related to black lung, providing automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and providing changes to the legal criteria used to assess and award claims. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these changes on its current population of beneficiaries and claimants and the effect on potential future claims. As of March 31, 2010, the Company was not able to estimate the impact of this legislation on its obligations due to the lack of claims experience under the new legislation. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of the PPACA in future periods as additional information and guidance becomes available.
7. HERITAGE HEALTH BENEFIT EXPENSES
The captionHeritage health benefit expenses used in the Consolidated Statements of Operations refers to costs of benefits the Company provides to its former mining operation employees. The components of these expenses are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Health care benefits | | $ | 2,676 | | $ | 6,055 | |
Combined benefit fund payments | | | 756 | | | 802 | |
Workers' compensation benefits | | | 136 | | | 141 | |
Black lung benefits (credit) | | | 347 | | | (15 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 3,915 | | $ | 6,983 | |
| | | | | |
17
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
7. HERITAGE HEALTH BENEFIT EXPENSES (Continued)
The decrease in heritage health benefit expenses was primarily due to the agreement the Company entered into to modernize the method by which prescription drugs are provided to retirees and the elimination of postretirement medical benefits for non-represented employees.
8. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS, CONTRACTUAL THIRD-PARTY RECLAMATION RECEIVABLES, AND RECLAMATION DEPOSITS
The asset retirement obligations, contractual third-party reclamation receivables, and reclamation deposits for each of the Company's mines and ROVA at March 31, 2010, are summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset Retirement Obligations | | Contractual Third- Party Reclamation Receivables | | Reclamation Deposits | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Rosebud | | $ | 121,621 | | $ | 21,839 | | $ | 73,751 | |
Jewett | | | 68,850 | | | 68,850 | | | — | |
Absaloka | | | 33,000 | | | 308 | | | — | |
Beulah | | | 18,845 | | | — | | | — | |
Savage | | | 2,508 | | | — | | | — | |
ROVA | | | 677 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 245,501 | | $ | 90,997 | | $ | 73,751 | |
| | | | | | | |
Changes in the Company's asset retirement obligations were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of period | | $ | 244,615 | | $ | 222,708 | |
Accretion | | | 4,792 | | | 4,358 | |
Liabilities settled | | | (3,906 | ) | | (1,384 | ) |
| | | | | |
Asset retirement obligations, end of period | | | 245,501 | | | 225,682 | |
Less current portion | | | (16,675 | ) | | (17,136 | ) |
| | | | | |
Asset retirement obligations, less current portion | | $ | 228,826 | | $ | 208,546 | |
| | | | | |
The Company has recognized an asset of $91.0 million as contractual third-party reclamation receivables, representing the present value of customer obligations to reimburse the Company for reclamation expenditures at the Company's Rosebud, Jewett and Absaloka Mines.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company increased itsContractual third-party reclamation receivables by $9.0 million due to a customer reclamation claim settlement. A corresponding decrease was recorded toCapitalized asset retirement cost.
18
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
8. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS, CONTRACTUAL THIRD-PARTY RECLAMATION RECEIVABLES, AND RECLAMATION DEPOSITS (Continued)
The Company's reclamation deposits will be used to fund final reclamation activities. The Company's carrying value and estimated fair value of its reclamation deposits at March 31, 2010, are as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 36,109 | | $ | 36,109 | |
Held-to-maturity securities | | | 19,797 | | | 21,257 | |
Time deposits | | | 15,629 | | | 15,629 | |
Available-for-sale securities | | | 2,216 | | | 2,216 | |
| | | | | |
| | $ | 73,751 | | $ | 75,211 | |
| | | | | |
The Company recorded a $0.6 million gain during the first quarter 2010 on the sale of available-for-sale securities held as reclamation deposits.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses and fair value of held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Amortized cost | | $ | 19,797 | |
Gross unrealized holding gains | | | 1,482 | |
Gross unrealized holding losses | | | (22 | ) |
| | | |
Fair value | | $ | 21,257 | |
| | | |
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2010, are as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Due within one year | | $ | 377 | | $ | 377 | |
Due in five years or less | | | 2,394 | | | 2,524 | |
Due after five years to ten years | | | 5,753 | | | 6,079 | |
Due in more than ten years | | | 11,273 | | | 12,277 | |
| | | | | |
| | $ | 19,797 | | $ | 21,257 | |
| | | | | |
The cost basis, gross unrealized holding gains and fair value of available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Cost basis | | $ | 2,000 | |
Gross unrealized holding gains | | | 216 | |
| | | |
Fair value | | $ | 2,216 | |
| | | |
19
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
9. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives, derivatives that qualify for the normal purchase normal sale exception, or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. All derivative financial instruments, except for derivatives that qualify for the normal purchase normal sale exception, are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings if they are not eligible for hedge accounting or other comprehensive income if they qualify for cash flow hedge accounting.
A Binomial Lattice model was used to obtain the fair value of the conversion feature in the Company's convertible debt instrument using the following assumptions at March 31, 2010:
| | | | | |
| Stock Price | | Bond Yield | |
---|
| $12.62 | | | 6.86 | % |
A Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to obtain the fair value of the Company's warrant using the following assumptions at March 31, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Number of Shares included in Warrant | | Dividend Yield | | Volatility | | Risk-Free Rate | | Expected Life (in years) |
---|
173,410 | | None | | | 44 | % | | 0.24 | % | Less than 1 |
The fair value of outstanding derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Instruments | | Balance Sheet Location | | March 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
---|
Convertible debt—conversion feature | | Other liabilities | | $ | 4,623 | | $ | — | |
Warrant | | Other liabilities | | | 24 | | | 30 | |
The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | Statement of Operations Location | |
---|
Derivative Instruments | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
Convertible debt—conversion feature | | Other income (loss) | | $ | (4,521 | ) | $ | 3,841 | |
Warrant | | Other income (loss) | | | 6 | | | 217 | |
The $4.6 million increase in the value of the conversion feature was primarily due to the increased price of the Company's common stock in the first quarter of 2010.
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. See Notes 4, 8 and 9 for additional disclosures related to fair value measurements.
20
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy, as defined below, gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
- •
- Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
- •
- Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
- •
- Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The table below sets forth, by level, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value at March 31, 2010 | |
---|
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale investments included in Restricted investments and bond collateral | | $ | 2,817 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,817 | |
| Available-for-sale investments included in Reclamation deposits | | | 2,216 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,216 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Total assets | | $ | 5,033 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 5,033 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Convertible debt—conversion feature | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 4,623 | | $ | 4,623 | |
| Warrant | | | — | | | — | | | 24 | | | 24 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Total liabilities | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 4,647 | | $ | 4,647 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes the change in the fair values of the derivative instrument liabilities categorized as Level 3:
| | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Beginning balance | | $ | 30 | |
Additional debt discount | | | 102 | |
Change in fair value | | | 4,515 | |
| | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 4,647 | |
| | | |
21
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The Company calculates the fair value of its debt by using discount rate estimates based on interest rates as of March 31, 2010. The estimated fair values of the Company's debt with fixed interest rates, excluding conversion feature values, are as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
December 31, 2009 | | $ | 192,608 | | $ | 201,352 | |
March 31, 2010 | | $ | 191,477 | | $ | 200,958 | |
11. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company has outstanding Series A Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock on which cumulative dividends of $2.125 per share are payable quarterly. The quarterly dividends, which are accumulated through and including April 1, 2010, amount to $18.9 million in the aggregate ($118.15 per preferred share or $29.54 per Depositary Share). Under the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Company can redeem preferred shares at any time for the redemption value of $25.00 plus accumulated dividends paid in cash (a total of $22.9 million); however, the Company's convertible note purchase agreement prohibits the Company from paying dividends on or redeeming preferred or common stock so long as the convertible notes are outstanding.
At March 31, 2010, the subsidiaries of the Parent had approximately $103.8 million of net assets that were not available to be transferred to the Parent in the form of dividends, loans, or advances due to restrictions contained in the credit facilities of these subsidiaries.
12. RESTRICTED STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS, AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS (SARs)
The Company recognized compensation expense from share-based arrangements shown in the following table:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Recognition of fair value of restricted stock , stock options, and stock appreciation rights over vesting period | | $ | 225 | | $ | (158 | ) |
Contributions of stock to the Company's 401(k) plan | | | 1,138 | | | 430 | |
| | | | | |
Total share-based compensation expense | | $ | 1,363 | | $ | 272 | |
| | | | | |
22
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
12. RESTRICTED STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS, AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS (SARs) (Continued)
A summary of restricted stock award activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Shares | | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | | Unamortized Compensation Expense | |
---|
Non-vested at December 31, 2009 | | | 96,558 | | $ | 8.36 | | $ | | |
Non-vested at March 31, 2010 | | | 96,558 | | $ | 8.36 | | $ | 592,139 | (1) |
| | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Expected to be recognized over the next three years.
Information with respect to stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Unamortized Compensation Expense | |
---|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | | | 354,224 | | $ | 18.73 | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (2,500 | ) | $ | 3.38 | | | | | | 19,888 | | | | |
Expired or forfeited | | | (500 | ) | $ | 21.40 | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 | | | 351,224 | | $ | 18.83 | | | 5.2 | | $ | 38,413 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at March 31, 2010 | | | 252,385 | | $ | 17.83 | | | 4.0 | | $ | 38,413 | | $ | 733,577 | (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Expected to be recognized over the next two years.
23
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
12. RESTRICTED STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS, AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS (SARs) (Continued)
Information with respect to stock appreciation rights, or SARs, activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | SARs | | Weighted Average Base Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Unamortized Compensation Expense | |
---|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | | | 155,334 | | $ | 21.91 | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 | | | 155,334 | | $ | 21.91 | | | 5.3 | | $ | — | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SARs exercisable at March 31, 2010 | | | 152,247 | | $ | 21.85 | | | 5.3 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,678 | (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Expected to be recognized over the next two months.
13. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share have been computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders includes the adjustment for net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by including the dilutive effect of common stock that would be issued assuming conversion or exercise of outstanding convertible notes, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and warrants. No such items were included in the computation of diluted loss per share in the three months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009, because the Company incurred a loss from operations in each of these periods and the effect of inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The table below shows the number of shares that were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive to the calculation:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Convertible debt shares | | | 1,765 | | | 1,614 | |
Restricted stock, stock options, SARs, and warrant shares | | | 776 | | | 746 | |
| | | | | |
Total shares excluded from diluted shares calculation | | | 2,541 | | | 2,360 | |
| | | | | |
14. INCOME TAX
The PPACA reduces the tax benefits available to an employer that receives the Medicare Part D subsidy beginning in years ending after December 31, 2010. As a result of the PPACA, employers that receive the Medicare Part D subsidy will recognize the deferred tax effects of the reduced deductibility of the postretirement prescription drug coverage in the period the PPACA was enacted. On March 30,
24
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
14. INCOME TAX (Continued)
2010, a companion bill, the Reconciliation Act, was signed into law. The Reconciliation Act reduces the effect of the PPACA on affected employers by deferring for two years (until years ending after December 31, 2012) the reduced deductibility of the postretirement prescription drug coverage. Accounting for income taxes requires that the effect of adjusting the deferred tax asset for the elimination of this deduction be included in income from continuing operations. However, entities that have a full valuation allowance for this deferred tax asset would recognize a related decrease in the valuation allowance. As the Company has a full valuation allowance against its related deferred tax asset, this change in tax law regarding the Medicare Part D subsidy will not have an effect on the Company's income from continuing operations. The effect of this change in tax law is a reduction of $7.2 million of the Company's deferred tax assets with a corresponding decrease in its valuation allowance. In addition, this change in the tax deduction does not affect the pre-tax expense or corresponding liability for postretirement prescription drug benefits.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $0.6 million due to a non-cash income tax benefit related to gains recorded within other comprehensive income during the first quarter of 2009. Generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, require all items be considered, including items recorded in other comprehensive income, in determining the amount of tax benefit that results from a loss from continuing operations that should be allocated to continuing operations. In accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded a tax benefit on its loss from continuing operations, which was exactly offset by income tax expense on other comprehensive income.
15. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment information is based on a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon the Company's internal organization and reporting of revenue and operating income.
The Company's operations are classified into four segments: coal, power, heritage and corporate. Certain reclassifications of 2009 segment information have been made to conform to the 2010 presentation.
Summarized financial information by segment is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Coal | | Power | | Heritage | | Corporate | | Consolidated | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | | $ | 103,550 | | $ | 22,889 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 126,439 | |
| Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | | | 8,757 | | | 2,536 | | | — | | | 99 | | | 11,392 | |
| Operating income (loss) | | | 7,352 | | | 4,172 | | | (4,255 | ) | | (1,955 | ) | | 5,314 | |
| Total assets | | | 538,886 | | | 220,127 | | | 11,247 | | | 8,258 | | | 778,518 | |
| Capital expenditures | | | 3,829 | | | 68 | | | — | | | 440 | | | 4,337 | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | | $ | 99,953 | | $ | 21,845 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 121,798 | |
| Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | | | 8,190 | | | 2,450 | | | — | | | 92 | | | 10,732 | |
| Operating income (loss) | | | 2,321 | | | 2,981 | | | (7,825 | ) | | (1,879 | ) | | (4,402 | ) |
| Total assets | | | 555,609 | | | 239,127 | | | 6,463 | | | 10,696 | | | 811,895 | |
| Capital expenditures | | | 7,603 | | | 273 | | | — | | | 10 | | | 7,886 | |
25
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
15. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
A reconciliation of segment income (loss) from operations to loss before income taxes follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Income (loss) from operations | | $ | 5,314 | | $ | (4,402 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (5,723 | ) | | (5,836 | ) |
Interest income | | | 410 | | | 887 | |
Other income (loss) | | | (3,836 | ) | | 3,607 | |
| | | | | |
Loss before income taxes | | $ | (3,835 | ) | $ | (5,744 | ) |
| | | | | |
16. CONTINGENCIES
In 2002, the Company was served by former stockholders of Montana Power in the U.S. District Court in Billings, Montana in a case styledMcGreevey et al. v. Montana Power Company et al. The plaintiff stockholders are seeking, among other things, to rescind the sale by Entech, a subsidiary of Montana Power, of its coal business to the Company and to compel the Company to hold the related coal business in trust for the stockholders. The plaintiffs contend that they were entitled to approve the sale by Entech to the Company even though they were not direct stockholders of Entech. On April 20, 2006, a Memorandum and Order was entered by the court staying the case while it awaited a decision from the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the Entech bankruptcy case on two key issues. Although the stay remains in place, the Delaware bankruptcy court ruled that the claims the plaintiffs asserted against the officers and directors of Touch America belong to the Touch America trustees and not the Montana Power stockholders. The Montana court, aware of this ruling, arranged a mediated settlement conference to attempt to revive, in some form, the tentative settlement reached over two years ago. An agreement has been reached by the various parties in the litigation that resolve and settle all pending issues. The settlement agreements release the Company without any liability or financial contribution. A hearing has been set for May 20, 2010 at which the Company expects the court to approve the settlement agreement, resulting in a dismissal of the case.
Western Energy Company, or WECO, received a claim dated October 16, 2008, from the six Colstrip Unit 3&4 buyers seeking a refund of approximately $9.9 million for alleged inappropriate charges. In subsequent claim revisions, the customers increased the refund claim to $21.0 million. The buyers assert that they were charged for base reclamation work in Area C of the Rosebud Mine when those charges were actually for final reclamation, which would be WECO's responsibility under the terms of the coal supply agreement. The refund sought by the buyers includes alleged overpayments for final reclamation work plus taxes, royalties and interest on that overpayment.
At December 31, 2009, the Company recorded $6.5 million toOther current liabilities and reducedRevenues by the same amount for this claim. In addition,Cost of sales was reduced by $1.7 million and a corresponding $1.7 million recorded inOther current assets for prepaid production taxes and royalties.
26
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
16. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
On March 30, 2010, the Company reached a settlement with the Colstrip Unit 3&4 buyers, which reflected the amounts recorded in the Company's financial statements at December 31, 2009. A $4.7 million payment was made in April 2010 related to this settlement.
27
Table of Contents
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "seeks," "believes," "estimates," "expects" and similar references to future periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding our expected increase in tons of coal to be delivered, an expected decrease in heritage health benefit expenses, cash payments and administrative costs, anticipated compliance with debt covenants and waiver agreement requirements, an expected decrease in pension expenses due to the pension freeze, an expected increase in our restricted investments and bond collateral, court approval of the McGreevy litigation settlement agreement and our expectation that our cash from operations and available borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet our working capital and bonding requirements, planned capital expenditures and debt payments for the foreseeable future.
Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include political, economic, business, competitive, market, weather and regulatory conditions and the following:
- •
- changes in our postretirement medical benefit, pension and black lung obligations and the impact of the recently enacted health care legislation;
- •
- inability to expand or continue current coal operations due to limitations in obtaining bonding capacity for new mining permits;
- •
- our ability to maintain compliance with debt covenant and waiver agreement requirements; or in cases of non-compliance with our debt covenants, that our lenders will not accelerate payment schedules and our ability to obtain waivers, if necessary;
- •
- the inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us due to restrictions in our debt arrangements or reductions in planned coal deliveries;
- •
- the structure of ROVA's contracts with its lenders, coal suppliers and the power purchaser, which could dramatically affect the overall profitability of ROVA;
- •
- the effect of prolonged maintenance or unplanned outages at our operations or those of our major power generating customers;
- •
- future legislation and changes in regulations, governmental policies and taxes, including those aimed at reducing emissions of elements such as mercury, sulfur dioxides, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter or greenhouse gases; and
- •
- the other factors that are described in "Risk Factors" herein and under Part II, Item 1A and under Part I, Item 1A of the 2009 Form 10-K.
Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speaks only as of the date on which it was made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time-to-time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
28
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Overview
Westmoreland Coal Company is an energy company whose operations include five surface coal mines in Montana, North Dakota and Texas and two coal-fired power-generating units with a total capacity of 230 megawatts in North Carolina. We sold 24.3 million tons of coal in 2009. Our two principal operating segments are our coal segment and our power segment, in addition to two non-operating segments.
We are a holding company and conduct our operations through subsidiaries, which generally have obtained separate financing. We have significant cash requirements to fund our ongoing heritage health benefit costs, pension contributions, and corporate overhead expenses. The principal sources of cash flow to us are distributions from our principal operating subsidiaries. Both WML and ROVA have a credit agreement that contains covenants applicable to that subsidiary, some of which restrict the ability of such subsidiary to contribute funds to us in the form of dividends. The WRI agreement permits dividends to be paid by WRI to us with fewer restrictions, allowing more flexibility in the timing and amounts of dividends.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA was enacted, potentially impacting our costs to provide healthcare benefits to our active and retired employees and benefits related to black lung. The PPACA has both short-term and long-term implications on healthcare benefit plan standards. Implementation of this legislation is planned to occur in phases, with plan standard changes taking effect beginning in 2010, but to a greater extent with the 2011 benefit plan year and extending through 2018.
Plan standard changes that could affect us in the short term include raising the maximum age for covered dependents to receive benefits, the elimination of lifetime dollar limits per covered individual and restrictions on annual dollar limits per covered individual, among other standard requirements. Plan standard changes that could affect us in the long term include a tax on "high cost" plans (excise tax) and the elimination of annual dollar limits per covered individual, among other standard requirements.
We are currently analyzing this legislation to determine the full extent of the impact of the required plan standard changes on our employee healthcare plans and the resulting costs. Beginning in 2018, the PPACA will impose a 40% excise tax on employers to the extent that the value of their healthcare plan coverage exceeds certain dollar thresholds. We anticipate that certain government agencies will provide additional regulations or interpretations concerning the application of this excise tax. Until these regulations or interpretations are published, we are unable to reasonably estimate the impact of the excise tax on our future healthcare costs or postretirement medical benefit obligation. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2010, we have not made any changes to our assumptions used to determine our postretirement medical benefit obligation.
The PPACA reduces the tax benefits available to an employer that receives the Medicare Part D subsidy beginning in years ending after December 31, 2010. As a result of the PPACA, employers that receive the Medicare Part D subsidy will recognize the deferred tax effects of the reduced deductibility of the postretirement prescription drug coverage in the period the PPACA was enacted. Also in March 2010, a companion bill, the Reconciliation Act, was signed into law. The Reconciliation Act reduces the effect of the PPACA on affected employers by deferring for two years (until years ending after December 31, 2012) the reduced deductibility of the postretirement prescription drug coverage. Accounting for income taxes requires that the effect of adjusting the deferred tax asset for the elimination of this deduction be included in income from continuing operations. However, entities that
29
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
have a full valuation allowance for this deferred tax asset would recognize a related decrease in the valuation allowance. As we have a full valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset, this change in tax law regarding the Medicare Part D subsidy will not have an effect on our income from continuing operations. In addition, this change in the tax deduction does not affect the pre-tax expense or corresponding liability for postretirement prescription drug benefits.
The PPACA also amended previous legislation related to black lung, providing automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and providing changes to the legal criteria used to assess and award claims. We are currently evaluating the impact of these changes on our current population of beneficiaries and claimants and the effect on potential future claims. As of March 31, 2010, we were not able to estimate the impact of this legislation on our obligations due to the lack of claims experience under the new legislation.
We will continue to evaluate the impact of the PPACA in future periods as additional information and guidance becomes available.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Items that Affect Comparability of Our Results
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our results have included items that do not relate directly to ongoing operations. The income (expense) components of these items were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Fair value adjustment on derivatives and related amortization of debt discount (pre-tax) | | $ | (4,824 | ) | $ | 3,823 | |
| | | | | |
Tax effect of other comprehensive income gains | | $ | — | | $ | 559 | |
| | | | | |
Items recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010
- •
- We recorded an expense of $4.5 million resulting from the mark-to-market accounting of the conversion feature in our convertible notes with $0.3 million of interest expense of a related debt discount.
Items recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2009
- •
- We recorded income of $4.0 million resulting from the mark-to-market accounting of the conversion feature in our convertible notes and a decrease in the value of our warrant offset with $0.2 million of interest expense of a related debt discount.
- •
- We recorded an income tax benefit of $0.6 million related to a tax effect of other comprehensive income gains.
30
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Our first quarter 2010 revenues increased to $126.4 million compared with $121.8 million in the first quarter of 2009. This increase was primarily driven by a $3.6 million increase in our coal segment revenues largely due to price increases under existing coal supply agreements and the start of new agreements; including the new cost-plus contract with our Rosebud Mine's Unit 1&2 buyers. In addition, our power segment revenues increased $1.0 million related to an increase in megawatt hours sold.
Our first quarter 2010 net loss applicable to common shareholders decreased to $3.2 million compared with a $5.6 million loss in the first quarter of 2009. Excluding the $4.8 million of first quarter 2010 expense and the $4.4 million of first quarter 2009 income discussed inItems that Affect Comparability of Our Results, our net loss decreased by $11.6 million. The primary factors, in aggregate, driving this decrease in net loss were:
- •
- A $5.0 million increase in our coal segment operating income. This increase was primarily driven by the price increases and new agreements described above and income from our Indian Coal Tax Credit monetization transaction;
- •
- A $3.7 million decrease in heritage costs primarily due to the agreement we entered into to modernize the method by which prescription drugs are provided to our retirees and the elimination of postretirement medical benefits for our non-represented employees. In addition, our selling and administrative costs decreased due to significant expenses incurred in the first quarter of 2009 related to our heritage cost containment efforts. These decreases were offset with an unfavorable change in the valuation of our Black Lung liabilities due to changes in discount rates;
- •
- A $1.2 million increase in our power segment operating income resulting primarily from increased megawatt hours sold and decreased maintenance expenses as a result of a planned outage which occurred in the first quarter of 2009;
- •
- A $0.9 million favorable noncontrolling interest adjustment driven by losses from a partially owned consolidated subsidiary; and
- •
- A $0.8 million increase in other income primarily due to gains on sales of securities during the first quarter of 2010.
Coal Segment
The following table shows comparative coal revenues, operating income and sales volume and percentage changes between periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| |
| |
| | Increase / (Decrease) | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | | $ | | % | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Revenues | | $ | 103,550 | | $ | 99,953 | | $ | 3,597 | | | 3.6 | % |
Operating income | | | 7,352 | | | 2,321 | | | 5,031 | | | 216.8 | % |
Tons sold—millions of equivalent tons | | | 6.3 | | | 6.7 | | | (0.4 | ) | | (6.0 | )% |
31
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Our first quarter 2010 coal revenues increased to $103.6 million, compared with $100.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. Despite a slight decrease in tons sold; our coal revenues still increased primarily due to price increases under existing coal supply agreements and the start of new agreements, including the new cost-plus contract with our Rosebud Mine's Unit 1&2 buyers.
Our coal segment's operating income was $7.4 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to operating income of $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2009. This $5.0 million increase was primarily due to the price increases and new agreements described above and from $1.1 million of first quarter 2010 earnings recognized from our Indian Coal Production Tax Credit monetization transaction.
The following table shows comparative power revenues, operating income, production and percentage changes between periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| |
| |
| | Increase / (Decrease) | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | | $ | | % | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Revenues | | $ | 22,889 | | $ | 21,845 | | $ | 1,044 | | | 4.8 | % |
Operating income | | | 4,172 | | | 2,981 | | | 1,191 | | | 40.0 | % |
Megawatts hours—thousands | | | 435 | | | 397 | | | 38 | | | 9.6 | % |
Our first quarter 2010 power segment revenues increased to $22.9 million compared to $21.8 million in the first quarter 2009. This increase is primarily from increased megawatt hours sold as a result of a planned outage occurring in the first quarter of 2009. A comparable outage will occur during the second quarter of 2010.
Our power segment's operating income increased to $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. This $1.2 million increase was primarily from increased megawatt hours sold and decreased maintenance expenses as a result of the first quarter of 2009 planned outage.
32
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The following table shows comparative detail of the heritage segment's operating expenses and percentage changes between periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| |
| |
| | Increase / (Decrease) | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | | $ | | % | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Health care benefits | | $ | 2,676 | | $ | 6,055 | | $ | (3,379 | ) | | (55.8 | )% |
Combined benefit fund payments | | | 756 | | | 802 | | | (46 | ) | | (5.7 | )% |
Workers' compensation benefits | | | 136 | | | 141 | | | (5 | ) | | (3.5 | )% |
Black lung benefits (credits) | | | 347 | | | (15 | ) | | 362 | | | 2,413.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total heritage health benefit expenses | | | 3,915 | | | 6,983 | | | (3,068 | ) | | (43.9 | )% |
Selling and administrative costs | | | 340 | | | 842 | | | (502 | ) | | (59.6 | )% |
Interest income (expense), net | | | 48 | | | 25 | | | 23 | | | 92.0 | % |
Other income | | | 97 | | | — | | | 97 | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Heritage segment operating loss | | $ | 4,110 | | $ | 7,800 | | $ | (3,690 | ) | | (47.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Our first quarter 2010 heritage operating expenses were $4.1 million compared to $7.8 million in the first quarter of 2009. This decrease of $3.7 million was primarily due to the agreement we entered into to modernize the method by which prescription drugs are provided to our retirees and the elimination of postretirement medical benefits for our non-represented employees. In addition our selling and administrative costs decreased due to significant expenses in the first quarter of 2009 related to our heritage cost containment efforts. These decreases were offset with an unfavorable change in the valuation of our Black Lung liabilities due to changes in discount rates.
Our corporate segment's operating expenses of $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2010 remained virtually unchanged from the first quarter of 2009.
Our other expense for the first quarter of 2010 increased to $9.1 million compared with $1.3 million of expense for the first quarter of 2009. Excluding the $8.6 million impact of the fair value adjustment on derivative and related amortization of debt discount discussed inItems that Affect Comparability of Our Results, our other expense decreased $0.8 million. This decrease was primarily due to gains on sales of securities during the first quarter of 2010.
Our first quarter 2010 income tax benefit was $0.1 million compared with $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2009. Excluding the $0.6 million tax effect of other comprehensive income gains discussed inItems that Affect Comparability of our Results, our income tax benefit remained virtually unchanged.
33
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
We have suffered recurring losses from operations, have violated a debt covenant, have a working capital deficit, and have a net capital deficiency. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments that might result from uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern.
WRI did not comply with its amended net worth requirement contained in its Business Loan Agreement at April 30, 2010 and does not expect to meet this requirement for at least the next twelve months. We have therefore classified WRI's $11.4 million term debt as a current liability. WRI's non-compliance with loan covenants triggers a cross default on our convertible notes and as a result, we have classified $11.7 million of our convertible note debt as a current liability.
As a result of a decrease in our heritage health benefit costs, our ability to access funds from WRI's revolving line of credit and an increase in WRI's term debt; we anticipate that our cash from operations and available borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, although by a small margin. Our projections assume the following:
- •
- a significant increase in tons delivered and an increase in our power segments profits in 2010 (following coal customer shutdowns in the second and third quarters of 2009 and also an unanticipated shutdown at ROVA in the fourth quarter of 2009);
- •
- WRI's lender will not require prepayment or accelerate the repayment schedule of its term debt or revolving line of credit (as a result of a net worth covenant non-compliance); and
- •
- WRI's renewal of its associated revolving line of credit prior to its November 18, 2010 expiration.
We do not currently expect to rely on proceeds from sales of assets or securities or other capital-raising transactions in order to satisfy our liquidity needs during the remainder of 2010.
Our primary sources of cash include sales of our coal and power production to customers and borrowings under our credit facilities or other financing arrangements. We generally satisfy our working capital requirements and fund capital expenditures and debt-service obligations through cash generated from operations or borrowings under our credit facilities.
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2010 included (in thousands):
| | | | |
WML | | $ | 7,840 | |
ROVA | | | 6,065 | |
Westmoreland Risk Management | | | 3,295 | |
Westmoreland Coal Company (Parent) | | | 504 | |
Other | | | 56 | |
| | | |
Total consolidated cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 17,760 | |
| | | |
34
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Amounts outstanding, availability and average borrowings under the revolving lines of credit of our subsidiaries, at March 31, 2010, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Line of Credit | | Amounts Outstanding | | Letters of Credit | | Availability | | Average 2010 Borrowings | |
---|
| | (In millions)
| |
---|
WML | | $ | 25.0 | | $ | — | | $ | 1.9 | | $ | 23.1 | | $ | — | |
WRI | | | 20.0 | | | 17.7 | | | — | | | 2.3 | | | 15.5 | |
ROVA | | | 6.0 | | | 3.8 | | | — | | | 2.2 | | | 2.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 51.0 | | $ | 21.5 | | $ | 1.9 | | $ | 27.6 | | $ | 18.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The cash at WML and ROVA are available to us through quarterly distributions. However, the loan agreements of WML and ROVA require debt service accounts and impose timing and other restrictions on the ability of ROVA and WML to distribute funds to us. Based on ROVA's debt service requirements, we do not anticipate a dividend from ROVA for the foreseeable future, as ROVA's operating cash will be used to fund its debt. Additionally, the WML and ROVA revolving lines of credit are only available to fund the operations of those respective subsidiaries. WRI can distribute cash drawn from its revolving line of credit to us through dividends. Because the WRI loan agreement imposes fewer restrictions on the ability of WRI to make distributions to us, WRI has been a significant source of liquidity for us. The cash at Westmoreland Risk Management, our captive insurance subsidiary, is available to us through dividends, subject to maintaining a statutory minimum level of capital, which was $0.1 million at March 31, 2010.
The primary factors impacting our liquidity include:
- •
- Our heritage health benefit obligations are funded by distributions from our operating subsidiaries. Our heritage health benefit costs consist of payments for various types of postretirement medical benefits. We significantly reduced our heritage health benefit obligations in 2009 through plan amendments and by entering into an agreement to modernize the method by which prescription drugs are provided to retirees.
Our pension obligations are funded by both corporate and our subsidiary operations. Funds contributed to the pension plans by our subsidiaries reduce distributions available to us. Although, one of our pension plans was frozen in 2009, we are still required to make significant contributions to our plans. Under certain circumstances, we are able to make a portion of these contributions in the form of Company stock.
35
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
| | | | | | | |
| | Year-to-date 2010 | | Remainder of 2010 Expected | |
---|
| | (In millions)
| |
---|
Postretirement medical benefits | | $ | 4.1 | | $ | 9.3 | |
Pension contributions(1) | | | 2.1 | | | 8.7 | |
CBF premiums | | | 0.8 | | | 2.2 | |
Workers' compensation benefits | | | 0.2 | | | 0.8 | |
- (1)
- Of the 2010 pension contribution, $1.7 million was made through the contribution of Company stock.
- •
- Our significant level of debt and limitations under current debt agreements limits the ability of our subsidiaries, WML and ROVA, to pay dividends to us.
- •
- We anticipate that, as we permit additional areas for our mines during the remainder of 2010 to continue our operations, our bonding requirements will increase significantly and the cash collateral requirements will increase as well.
Historical Sources and Uses of Cash
The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of activities:
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
---|
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 13,296 | | $ | 17,420 | |
Investing activities | | | (3,941 | ) | | (10,281 | ) |
Financing activities | | | (2,114 | ) | | (3,346 | ) |
Cash Flow from Operations
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $4.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cash receipts decreased in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to a scheduled decrease in the payments ROVA collects from its customer. This decrease was offset with increased cash receipts from our Indian Coal Tax Credit monetization transaction and decreased heritage costs.
Cash used in investing activities decreased $6.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Additions to property, plant and equipment in the first three months of 2010 were $4.3 million compared to $7.9 million for the same period of 2009, which primarily contributed to the decrease in investing cash used.
Cash used in financing activities decreased by $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of $3.0 million in net debt repayments in the first three months of 2010 compared to $3.8 million of net debt repayments for the same period of 2009.
36
Table of Contents
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Our working capital deficit at March 31, 2010, decreased by $12.4 million to approximately $62.6 million compared to a $75.0 million deficit at December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of a $7.2 million increase in our cash and cash equivalents during the first three months of 2010. The increase in cash and cash equivalents resulted from an increase in ROVA's cash at March 31, 2010, due to the large cash outlays required by ROVA during the fourth quarter of 2009 for its planned and unplanned outages. Also, in the first quarter of 2010, $4.7 million ofReclamation deposits were transferred to current portion, regarding the settlement of the customer reclamation claims at WECO. The settlement payment was made in April 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit and performance or surety bonds. Surety bonds and letters of credit are issued by financial institutions to third parties to assure the performance of our obligations relating to reclamation, workers' compensation obligations, postretirement medical benefit obligations, and other obligations. Liabilities related to these arrangements are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets, and we do not expect any material adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements.
There were no material changes to our off-balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Our off-balance sheet arrangements are discussed inManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2009 Form 10-K.
Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Part I—Item 1—Financial Statements" for a description of recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our consolidated financial statements.
37
Table of Contents
ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In addition to the other quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in this report, you should see Item 7A of our 2009 Form 10-K. There have been no other material changes in our exposure to market risk since December 31, 2009.
ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management has evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding our required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
Additionally, there have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to material affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
38
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Please refer to the information contained in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings of our 2009 Form 10-K, which is responsive to this Item 1 and is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material developments with respect to our legal proceedings previously disclosed in our 2009 Form 10-K except as described in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS
We have disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in our 2009 Form 10-K the risk factors that we believe materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Except as provided below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in the 2009 Form 10-K and the other information set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should be aware that these risk factors and other information may not describe every risk facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and or operating results.
Recent healthcare legislation could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA was enacted, potentially impacting our costs to provide healthcare benefits to our eligible active and retired employees and benefits related to black lung. The PPACA has both short-term and long-term implications on benefit plan standards. Implementation of this legislation is planned to occur in phases, with plan standard changes taking effect beginning in 2010, but to a greater extent with the 2011 benefit plan year and extending through 2018.
In the short term, our healthcare costs could increase due to raising the maximum age for covered dependents to receive benefits, changes to benefits for occupational disease related illnesses, the elimination of lifetime dollar limits per covered individual and restrictions of annual dollar limits per covered individual, among other standard requirements. In the long term, our healthcare costs could increase due to a tax on "high cost" plans (excise tax) and the elimination of annual dollar limits per covered individual, among other standard requirements.
We are currently analyzing this legislation to determine the full extent of the impact of the required plan standard changes on our employee healthcare plans and the resulting costs. Beginning in 2018, the PPACA will impose a 40% excise tax on employers to the extent that the value of their healthcare plan coverage exceeds certain dollar thresholds. We anticipate that certain government agencies will provide additional regulations or interpretations concerning the application of this excise tax. Until these regulations or interpretations are published, we are unable to reasonably estimate the impact of the excise tax on our future healthcare costs or postretirement medical benefit obligation. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2010, we have not made any changes to our assumptions used to determine our postretirement benefit obligation. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the PPACA in future periods as additional information and guidance becomes available.
39
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)
While we anticipate that costs to provide healthcare to eligible active employees and certain retired employees will increase in future years, it is uncertain at this time how significant the increase will be. It is unknown what future changes will be implemented to the healthcare legislation, but the current legislation and any future laws could materially affect the cost to provide healthcare benefits for all employers, including us.
The PPACA also contained an amendment to the Black Lung Benefits Act, or BLBA, which reinstated provisions that were removed from the BLBA in 1981. The amendment provides that an eligible miner can be awarded total disability benefits if he can prove he worked 15 or more years in or around coal mines and has a totally disabling respiratory impairment. In addition, the amendment also provides for an automatic survivor benefit to be paid upon the death of a miner with an awarded federal black lung claim without the requirement to prove that the miner's death was due to black lung disease. Both amendments are retroactive and applicable to claims filed as of January 1, 2005 and could result in currently pending claimants being awarded benefits back to a start date that may be as far back as January 2, 2005. These amendments could give rise to increases in liabilities for claims from prior periods of time for retroactive costs, an increase in the number of claimants who are awarded benefits resulting in an increase in future funding requirements and an increase in administrative fees, including legal expenses, as a result of reviewing and defending an increased number of benefit claims. In addition, while we periodically perform evaluations of our black lung liability, using assumptions regarding rates of successful claims, discount factors, benefit increases and mortality rates, among others; we have no claims experience to currently determine the potential increase in black lung liability due to the application of these new amendments. If the number or severity of claims increases, or we are required to accrue or pay additional amounts because the claims prove to be more severe than our current assumptions; our profitability could be immediately impacted and ultimately our liquidity could be adversely affected if the black lung liability ultimately increases beyond the amounts in our black lung trust to pay for black lung benefits.
ITEM 2
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On January 12, 2010, we made a contribution of 100,000 shares of common stock to the employee pension plans (the "Plans"), valued at $10.95 per share or $1,095,000 in the aggregate. On March 5 and March 8, 2010, we made a contribution of 50,000 shares of common stock to the Plans, valued at 40,000 shares at $12.84 per share and 10,000 shares at $12.47 per share or approximately $638,300 in the aggregate. The shares of common stock were contributed to the Plans in lieu of cash contributions in private placement transactions made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the contributions.
ITEM 3
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
The Company has accumulated but unpaid dividends on its preferred stock through and including April 1, 2010, in the amount of $18.9 million in the aggregate ($118.15 per preferred share or $29.54 per Depositary Share). The Company is prohibited from paying preferred stock dividends because there are statutory restrictions limiting the payment of preferred stock dividends under Delaware law, the state in which the Company is incorporated. Under Delaware law, the Company is permitted to pay preferred stock dividends only to the extent that shareholders' equity exceeds the par value of the
40
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)
preferred stock (which par value was $160,129 at March 31, 2010). In addition, pursuant to our outstanding convertible note purchase agreement, dividends may not be paid until such time as the notes are paid in full.
ITEM 6
EXHIBITS
| | | |
| 31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
| 31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
| 32 | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
41
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY |
Date: May 10, 2010 | | /s/ KEVIN A. PAPRZYCKI
Kevin A. Paprzycki Chief Financial Officer (A Duly Authorized Officer) |
42
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Incorporated by Reference | |
|
---|
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Filed Herewith |
---|
| 31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 32 | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | | | | | | | | | | X |
43