Exhibit 95
Mine Safety Disclosures
The following disclosures are provided pursuant to Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which require certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate coal mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Mine Act). The disclosures reflect United States (U.S.) mining operations only, as the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K do not apply to our mines operated outside the U.S.
Mine Safety Information. Whenever the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) believes that a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard, or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation which describes the violation and fixes a time within which the operator must abate the violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until hazards are corrected. Whenever MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the violation that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed and, as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes vacated. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the company and mine. Since MSHA is a branch of the U.S. Department of Labor, its jurisdiction applies only to our U.S. mines. As such, the mine safety disclosures that follow contain no information for our Australian mines.
The table that follows reflects citations and orders issued to us by MSHA during the three months ended March 31, 2012, as reflected in our systems. Due to timing and other factors, our data may not agree with the mine data retrieval system maintained by MSHA. The proposed assessments for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were taken from the MSHA system as of April 25, 2012.
Additional information follows about MSHA references used in the table.
• | Section 104 Citations: The total number of violations received from MSHA under section 104 of the Mine Act, which includes citations for health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to a serious injury if left unabated. |
• | Section 104(b)Orders: The total number of orders issued by MSHA under section 104(b) of the Mine Act, which represents a failure to abate a citation under section 104(a) within the period of time prescribed by MSHA. This results in an order of immediate withdrawal from the area of the mine affected by the condition until MSHA determines that the violation has been abated. |
• | Section 104(d)Citations and Orders: The total number of citations and orders issued by MSHA under section 104(d) of the Mine Act for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory health or safety standards. |
• | Section 104(e) Notices: The total number of notices issued by MSHA under section 104(e) of the Mine Act for a pattern of violations that could contribute to mine health or safety hazards. |
• | Section 110(b)(2)Violations: The total number of flagrant violations issued by MSHA under section 110(b)(2) of the Mine Act. |
• | Section 107(a)Orders: The total number of orders issued by MSHA under section 107(a) of the Mine Act for situations in which MSHA determined an imminent danger existed. |
• | Proposed MSHA Assessments: The total dollar value of proposed assessments from MSHA. |
• | Fatalities: The total number of related fatalities. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Section 104 Citations | Section 104(b) Orders | Section 104(d) Citations and Orders | Section 104(e) Potential Pattern of Violations | Section 110(b)(2) Violations | Section 107(a) Orders | ($) Proposed MSHA Assessments | ||||||||||||||||||
Mine(1) | Fatalities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Western U.S. Mining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Caballo | 8 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4.9 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Kayenta | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | 17.5 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Lee Ranch | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.3 | — | ||||||||||||||||
North Antelope Rochelle | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Rawhide | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | 18.5 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Twentymile (Foidel Creek) | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Midwestern U.S. Mining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Air Quality | 160 | — | 2 | — | — | — | 142.1 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Bear Run | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.0 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cottage Grove (Wildcat Hills-Cottage Grove Pit) | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.2 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Francisco Surface(2) | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Francisco Underground | 138 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 75.7 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Gateway | 172 | — | 1 | — | — | — | 153.4 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Gateway Preparation Plant | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Viking - Corning | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | 8.8 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Wildcat Hills Underground | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | 24.8 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Willow Lake Central Preparation Plant | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.3 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Willow Lake Portal | 208 | — | — | — | — | — | 262.4 | — |
(1) | The definition of mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting coal, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and coal preparation facilities. Also, there are instances where the mine name per the MSHA system differs from the mine name utilized by us. Where applicable, we have parenthetically listed the name of the mine per the MSHA system. Also, all mines are listed alphabetically within each of our U.S. mining segments. |
(2) | Mine was closed as of March 31, 2012. |
On November 19, 2010, we received a written notice from MSHA that a potential pattern of violations existed at our Willow Lake Mine. On March 15, 2011, the Willow Lake Mine was notified by MSHA that it will not be considered for a Pattern of Violation notice pursuant to section 104(e)(1) of the Mine Act as a result of the mine’s progress during the evaluation period. On November 30, 2011, Willow Lake received a written notice from MSHA that a potential pattern of violations exists. In January 2012, MSHA began a complete inspection of the mine, which was completed on March 8, 2012. On March 15, 2012, we received notice from MSHA that, as a result of the inspection, Willow Lake will not be considered for a Pattern of Violation notice pursuant to section 104(e)(1) of the Mine Act.
Pending Legal Actions. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the Commission) is an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act. These cases may involve, among other questions, challenges by operators to citations, orders and penalties they have received from MSHA, or complaints of discrimination by miners under section 105 of the Mine Act. The following is a brief description of the types of legal actions that may be brought before the Commission.
• | Contests of Citations and Orders — A contest proceeding may be filed with the Commission by operators, miners or miners’ representatives to challenge the issuance of a citation or order issued by MSHA. |
• | Contests of Proposed Penalties (Petitions for Assessment of Penalties) — A contest of a proposed penalty is an administrative proceeding before the Commission challenging a civil penalty that MSHA has proposed for the violation contained in a citation or order. |
• | Complaints for Compensation — A complaint for compensation may be filed with the Commission by miners entitled to compensation when a mine is closed by certain withdrawal orders issued by MSHA. The purpose of the proceeding is to determine the amount of compensation, if any, due miners idled by the orders. |
• | Complaints of Discharge, Discrimination or Interference — A discrimination proceeding is a case that involves a miner’s allegation that he or she has suffered a wrong by the operator because he or she engaged in some type of activity protected under the Mine Act, such as making a safety complaint. |
• | Temporary Reinstatement Proceedings — Temporary reinstatement proceedings involve cases in which a miner has filed a complaint with MSHA stating he or she has suffered discrimination and the miner has lost his or her position. |
• | Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Dispute Proceedings — ERP dispute proceedings are cases brought before the Commission when an operator is issued a citation because it has not agreed to include a certain provision in its ERP. |
The table that follows presents information by mine regarding pending legal actions before the Commission at March 31, 2012. Each legal action is assigned a docket number by the Commission and may have as its subject matter one or more citations, orders, penalties or complaints.
Pending Legal Actions | Legal Actions Initiated During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | Legal Actions Resolved During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||
Number of Pending Legal Actions as of March 31, 2012 | Pre-Penalty Contests of Citations/Orders | Contests of Penalty Assessment | ||||||||
Mine(1) | ||||||||||
Western U.S. Mining | ||||||||||
Kayenta | 6 | 3 | 3 | — | — | |||||
North Antelope Rochelle | 10 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 3 | |||||
Rawhide | 4 | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | |||||
Twentymile (Foidel Creek) | 26 | — | 26 | 3 | 3 | |||||
Midwestern U.S. Mining | ||||||||||
Air Quality | 32 | 5 | 27 | — | 3 | |||||
Air Quality South Wash Plant | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | |||||
Cottage Grove (Wildcat Hills-Cottage Grove Pit) | — | — | — | — | 2 | |||||
Francisco Surface (2) | 2 | — | 2 | — | — | |||||
Francisco Underground | 7 | 1 | 6 | — | — | |||||
Gateway | 21 | 15 | 6 | — | 5 | |||||
Midwest Repair Facility (Columbia Maintenance Services) | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | |||||
Somerville Central | 2 | — | 2 | — | — | |||||
Vermilion Grove (Riola Complex Vermilion Grove Portal) (2) | 3 | — | 3 | — | — | |||||
Viking - Corning | — | — | — | — | 1 | |||||
Wildcat Hills Underground | 3 | 1 | 2 | — | — | |||||
Willow Lake Portal | 79 | 35 | 44 | 8 | 7 |
(1) | The definition of mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting coal, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and coal preparation facilities. Also, there are instances where the mine name per the MSHA system differs from the mine name utilized by us. Where applicable, we have parenthetically listed the name of the mine per the MSHA system. Also, all mines are listed alphabetically within each of our U.S. mining segments. |
(2) | Mine was closed as of March 31, 2012. |