Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Concentration of Risk The Company’s customers are primarily utilities and their small business customers. During 2015 and 2014, revenue generated under four utility programs represented 69% and 78% of the Company’s consolidated revenue, respectively. The Company purchases its materials from a variety of suppliers and continues to seek out alternate suppliers for critical components so that it can be assured that its sales will not be interrupted by the inability of a single supplier to deliver product. During 2015, two suppliers were responsible for 68% and 15% of the Company’s purchases, respectively, while during 2014 two suppliers were responsible for 48% and 13% of the Company’s purchases, respectively. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents in accounts with financial institutions in excess of the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company monitors the financial stability of these institutions regularly and management does not believe there is significant credit risk associated with deposits in excess of federally insured amounts. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that it believes to be uncollectible. If actual collections experience changes, revisions to the allowance may be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to it, the Company believes its allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate. However, actual write-offs might exceed the recorded allowance. The following is a summary of changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands): Year ended December 31, 2015 2014 Balance at the beginning of the period $ $ Additions charged to costs and expenses Amounts written-off ) ) Balance at the end of the period $ $ Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined utilizing the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Properties & Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Building Improvements 3 - 10 years Office equipment 3 - 5 years Furniture 5 - 10 years Transportation equipment 3 - 5 years Software 3 – 5 years Long-Lived Assets We evaluate our long-lived assets periodically for impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those items. Our cash flow estimates are based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions. The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value. Our estimates of fair value represent our best estimate based on industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions. Goodwill Goodwill represents the purchase price in excess of the fair value of assets acquired in business combinations. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” requires the Company to assess goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually in the absence of an indicator of possible impairment and immediately upon an indicator of possible impairment. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company undertook an assessment of its goodwill for possible impairment and concluded that the fair value of the continuing business, based on the discounted current value of the estimated future cash flows, exceeded the carrying value, indicating that the goodwill was not impaired. The Company considered various factors in determining the fair value of its business, including discounted cash flows from projected earnings, values for comparable companies and the market price of its common stock. It will continue to monitor for any impairment indicators such as underperformance of projected earnings, net book value compared to market capitalization, declining stock price and significant adverse economic and industry trends. In the event that the business does not achieve projected results, or as the result of changes in facts of circumstances, the Company could incur an additional goodwill impairment charge in a future period. Revenue Recognition The Company provides energy efficient solutions that focus on the different uses of energy, including lighting and electrical, mechanical and HVAC, and refrigeration. These solutions consist of product sales and installation services. Customers purchase solutions individually or combined. When purchased individually, the Company recognizes revenue when performance is complete, typically when the products have been installed. When purchased together, the Company recognizes revenue as installation occurs in accordance with the arrangement. Unbilled Accounts Receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet represents revenue earned on completed installations for which the customer has not been invoiced as well as the cost of products that have been shipped to the customer but not installed. Customer Deposits in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet, represent deposits received from customers in advance of related project installation. During 2015, the Company determined that completed contract revenue recognition was appropriate. The impact of the change in the current year was immaterial. Unbilled Accounts Receivable As of December 31, 2015, the Company had customer projects underway for which it had recognized revenue but not yet invoiced the customer. The Company records this unbilled revenue as a current asset titled “Unbilled Accounts Receivable.” The Company had Unbilled Accounts Receivable of $6.5 million and $7.4 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Advertising, Marketing and Promotional Costs Expenditures on advertising, marketing and promotions are charged to operations in the period incurred and totaled $1.2 million and $161 thousand for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable earnings. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be realized. Net Loss Per Share The Company computes loss per share under ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share.” This statement requires presentation of two amounts: basic and diluted loss per share. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share would include all common stock equivalents unless anti-dilutive. For periods when such inclusion would not be anti-dilutive, the Company uses the treasury method to calculate the diluted earnings per share. The treasury stock method assumes that the Company uses the proceeds from the exercise of in-the-money options and warrants to repurchase common stock at the average market price for the period. Options and warrants are only dilutive when the average market price of the underlying common stock exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants. The Company has not included the outstanding options, warrants, preferred stock or convertible debt as common stock equivalents when calculating the diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2015 or 2014, because the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants and convertible debt that is not included in the basic and diluted loss per share available to common stockholders: December 31, 2015 2014 Weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options Weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants Weighted average shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred stock Weighted average shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debt Total Fair Value Measurements U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The fair value of interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 at December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company is required by U.S. GAAP to record certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. The guidance in ASC 815 required that the Company mark the value of its Derivative Liability — Related Party (See Note 10) to market and recognize the change in valuation in its statement of operations each reporting period. Determining the Derivative Liability — Related Party to be recorded required the Company to develop estimates to be used in calculating the fair value. Since the Derivative Liability — Related Party does not trade in an active securities market, the Company considers this to be a Level 3 measurement. See Note 10 for a description of the manner in which the fair value was calculated. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts. The fair value of the long-term debt — related party, also approximates fair value, as the debt was originated in 2015 and the Company believes its credit rating and prevailing market rates are comparable at December 31, 2015. Share-based Compensation The Company has a stock incentive plan that provides for stock-based employee compensation, including the granting of stock options and shares of restricted stock, to certain key employees. The Company follows the guidance of ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” which requires companies to record stock compensation expense for equity-based awards granted, including stock options and restricted stock unit grants, over the service period of the equity-based award based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The following are the components of the Company’s stock compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively: 2015 2014 Stock Options $ $ ) Restricted Stock Employee Stock Purchase Plan Total Stock Compensation Expense $ $ Please refer to Notes 21, 22 and 23 for additional information regarding share-based compensation expense. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 will require organizations that lease assets—referred to as “lessees”—to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP—which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet—the new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 provides guidance concerning certain matters involving the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance does not alter the basic framework for classifying debt instruments held as financial assets. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted, with some exceptions. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In November 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” ASU 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in a classified statement of financial position. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2015-17 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts With Customers.” ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing guidance on revenue recognition under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled for those goods or services using a defined five-step process. More judgment and estimates may be required to achieve this principle than under existing GAAP. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect upon initial adoption recognized at the date of adoption which includes additional footnote disclosures. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method of adoption. In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. FASB issued the ASU to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs, and to align with other existing FASB guidance. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |