Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-34849
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of | 52-2056410 (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) | |
1919 North Lynn Street | ||
Arlington, Virginia | 22209 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(571) 303-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Not applicable
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated Filerþ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filero | Smaller Reporting Companyo | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yeso Noþ
Based upon the closing price of the registrant’s common stock as of June 30, 2010, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $900,233,048*.
There were 34,350,011 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 25, 2011.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List hereunder the following documents incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K into which the document is incorporated:
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2011 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after year-end are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
* | Solely for purposes of this calculation, all executive officers and directors of the registrant and all shareholders reporting beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the registrant’s common stock are considered to be affiliates. |
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
56 | ||||||||
56 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
Exhibit 21.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 23.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
Forward-looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks or uncertainties materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, the results of The Corporate Executive Board Company and its consolidated subsidiaries may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to any projections of revenues, margins, expenses, provision for income taxes, earnings, cash flows, share repurchases, acquisition synergies, foreign currency exchange rates or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including the execution of cost reduction programs and restructuring plans; any statements concerning expected development, performance or market share relating to products or services; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements include, among others, our dependence on renewals of our membership-based services, the sale of additional programs to existing members and our ability to attract new members, our potential failure to adapt to member needs and demands, our potential inability to attract and retain a significant number of highly skilled employees, risks associated with the results of restructuring plans, fluctuations in operating results, our potential inability to protect our intellectual property, our potential exposure to loss of revenues resulting from our unconditional service guarantee, exposure to litigation related to our content, various factors that could affect our estimated income tax rate or our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, changes in estimates, assumptions or revenue recognition policies used to prepare our consolidated financial statements, our potential inability to make, integrate and maintain acquisitions and investments, and the amount and timing of the benefits expected from acquisitions and investments, our potential inability to implement, maintain, upgrade and effectively operate our technology and information infrastructure, our potential inability to effectively manage the risks associated with our international operations, including the risk of foreign currency exchange fluctuations, our potential inability to effectively anticipate, plan for and respond to changing economic and financial markets conditions, especially in light of ongoing uncertainty in the worldwide economy and possible volatility of our stock price. These and other factors are discussed more fully in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. We assume no obligation and do not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
Item 1. | Business. |
Our Company
The Corporate Executive Board Company enables superior business outcomes by delivering authoritative data, tools, best practices research, and peer insights to the leaders of the world’s great enterprises. We primarily deliver these products and services to a global client base through annual, fixed-fee membership subscriptions. At December 31, 2010, our member network included executives and professionals from more than 50 countries and 5,200 institutions, including approximately 94% of the Fortune 100 and 85% of the Fortune 500.
Our member network is integral to our business. Close relationships with our members enable us to deliver superior business insights, solutions, and analytics that support executives and professionals during their careers. Over time, our data sets expand, thereby strengthening the power of our products and services and the member network.
Our Products and Services
We provide executives and professionals with critical insights, data, and tools to enable their most important decisions and provide solutions to their biggest challenges. To fully support these business leaders, our products and services focus on five corporate functions. These corporate functions, which we consider our end markets, are:
• | Finance and Strategy |
3
Table of Contents
• | Human Resources |
• | Information Technology |
• | Legal and Compliance; and |
• | Sales, Marketing, and Communications |
We serve executives and professionals in these corporate functions across a wide range of industries. In addition to these corporate functions, we serve operational business leaders in the financial services industry and government agencies through insights, tools, and peer collaboration designed to drive effective executive decision making. Our products and services are designed to enable business leaders to focus effort, move quickly, equip teams, and act with confidence by addressing six enduring executive challenges:
• | Assessing Key Performance Trends and Risks |
• | Benchmarking Performance and Plans |
• | Establishing Innovative Operating Approaches |
• | Organizing and Managing Critical Talent |
• | Driving Alignment and Support for Change |
• | Navigating Leadership Transitions |
Our authoritative insights cover critical topics such as cost savings, risk management, employee engagement, communications, and corporate governance. We continue to expand our portfolio of products and services with new offerings for existing clients and extend our presence into new market opportunities such as government agencies, companies in the Asia-Pacific region, and developing markets.
Below is a summary of the products and services we provide to members:
• | Proven Best Practices; Research and Insights. We analyze and document corporate best practices for significant and pressing issues that members confront. Through our proprietary research, we identify key economic leverage points and isolate high return-on-investment solutions for members to implement. We deliver this research through various channels, including Web-based resources, interactive workshops, live meetings, and published studies. |
• | Executive Networking. We provide networking opportunities for peer executives and professionals within our membership. Services include online peer discussion groups, as well as on-request advice, feedback, and perspective from peer interaction with other leading executives at both in-person and virtual events. |
• | Peer Benchmarks.We create and maintain benchmarking assets with information from peer executives across industries covering information such as organizational structures, costs and productivity, as well as member experience and service quality. In 2010, we maintained or created more than 600 benchmarking data sets that helped executives and professionals norm their plans and performance. |
• | Decision and Diagnostic Tools.We provide members with tools and analysis that enable decision-making and improve performance. For example, our “World Class Performance” diagnostic tool allows a member executive to understand how other executives assess the performance of their own departments. In 2010, we maintained or created more than 100 analytical tools. |
• | Advisory Support.We deliver a proprietary on-site executive education curriculum to executives and their teams supported with e-learning resources. In 2010, to provide a deeper and more robust layer of support to executives and professionals, we continued to invest in additional executive advisor capacity to advise members on pressing business concerns and connect our insights to member challenges. |
• | Live and Online Learning Events.We connect members to networks of peer executives and professionals across industries and geographies. These networks operate through in-person meetings and Web and email-based platforms. In 2010, these networks supported approximately 700 virtual events for more than 62,000 participants and 700 live meetings for more than 12,000 attendees worldwide. In certain corporate functions, such as HR, Finance, IT, and Legal, the curriculum is accredited to meet professional continuing education requirements. |
4
Table of Contents
Our Business Strategy
Our strategy is to help senior executives drive corporate performance by equipping them with the actionable insights, analytic tools, and advisory support they need to quickly and confidently focus efforts that achieve performance excellence in their roles. In 2010, as the global economy began to recover, we concentrated on continuing to drive member retention and cross sales by improving the member experience. In 2011, we plan to continue these efforts while making key investments in our operations to position the business for solid, sustainable growth. We intend to implement this strategy through the following efforts:
1. | Create Uniquely Valuable Insights into Corporate Performance. Research, insights, and best practices are the core of our business. We seek authoritative and relevant ideas that help executives drive corporate performance at their functional level and within their roles. All of our products and services have strong intellectual property at their foundation. In 2010, our research teams produced outstanding content across all of our practice areas, including insights into managing employee engagement capital and long-term productivity, driving sales force performance, reshaping the corporate IT function, managing investment for growth coming out of the severe global recession, as well as strategies for measuring and managing corporate integrity in an increasingly global business environment. In 2011, our research teams will continue to create authoritative and uniquely valuable insight into members’ decisions and work. We will also focus on continuing to build unique data assets and globalizing our research assets with additional investment in coverage of emerging markets. |
2. | Drive Loyalty, Growth, and Brand Strength through High Value Member Engagement. Our experience tells us that the quality and number of member interactions correlates strongly with renewals and cross sales. We leverage both our service and technology infrastructure to create this high-value engagement and build a strong corporate brand through these quality interactions. In 2010, we completed the global rollout of a new integrated account management model to provide more streamlined service experiences and took advantage of opportunities to raise our profile with key users by putting more energy into public thought leadership and limited advertising placements. In 2011, we intend to selectively add capacity to our sales teams and focus on driving increasing levels of productivity from our commercial teams through additional staff training and support. |
3. | Invest Globally in Key Markets.Extending our existing insights and products to more companies around the world is a core component of our growth strategy. Achieving greater penetration levels in our growth markets also strengthens a competitive strength as our data, insights, and tools become ever more global in scope. In 2010, we continued our investment in the middle market platform, expanded our offerings for government agencies, and continued the expansion of our Asia-Pacific operations, opening an office in Singapore and adding more staff to our Australia office, to better serve members in the region. In 2011, we plan to continue our strategy of ensuring our offerings are highly relevant for these new markets by making additional market-level investments in middle market, government, and Asia-Pacific, as well as our operations in Continental Europe. |
4. | Leverage Technology and Service to Deliver Innovative Products. Launching renewable and scalable new services and products that tightly link our assets with members’ work and decisions is a core component of our growth strategy. As necessary, we may also acquire and integrate acquired companies to add key capabilities or assets for these services and products. In 2010, we made investments to enhance our technology platform, including the rollout of new member-facing Websites and development of online functional anatomies. We launched several new products in 2010, including the Legal Leadership Academy and the Risk Integration Strategy Council, and in 2011, we launched the IT Leadership Exchange. In 2010, we acquired Iconoculture, Inc. (“Iconoculture”), a consumer research and advisory company, which delivers comprehensive consumer insights to Fortune 1000 corporations and agencies quickly and cost effectively. We acquired Iconoculture to strengthen our Sales and Marketing offerings. In 2011, we plan to invest in enhancements to our technology, develop and launch new products, and selectively acquire assets to strengthen our current businesses. |
5
Table of Contents
Our Pricing
We believe that we offer a lower-priced alternative to traditional professional, information, and advisory services. For the majority of our products and services, membership is for one year, typically payable at the beginning of the contract term. The average subscription price was $28,685 at December 31, 2010, compared to $28,552 at December 31, 2009. Actual subscription price varies by program and may be further adjusted based on a member’s revenue or headcount. We offer discounted pricing schedules and modified terms for members that purchase a large number of memberships. In 2010, no single member accounted for more than 0.5% of consolidated revenues.
Most products and services offer a service guarantee, which allows members to request a refund of the fee in the event that they terminate their membership prior to the completion of their membership term. Under the service guarantee, refunds are provided on a pro-rata basis relative to the remaining membership term. In 2010, members requested refunds for 119 memberships out of almost 15,585 sold or renewed, or 0.8% of all memberships, compared to 1.6% in 2009. We believe that the decline in the rate of refund reflects the value that we provide to members through our products and services, as well as the movement toward a more stable economic outlook.
Certain of our products, such as Performance Analytics, Leadership Academies, and Toolbox.com, have pricing models that are different from our core products and services:
• | Performance Analytics delivers data and analytics to support improved performance of executives and their teams. Some elements of the product set are available on a customized fee basis. |
• | Leadership Academies provide access, for an annual per participant fee, to training and development services that include skills diagnostic reports, learning portal access, classroom-based development sessions, Webinars, and virtual office hours with faculty. |
• | Toolbox.com provides knowledge on information technology, human resources, and finance topics free of charge to users. Toolbox.com revenues principally are generated through advertisements and lead generation campaigns posted to the online community portals. |
Our Competition
Our industry is highly competitive. We believe that our differentiators include the quality and size of the member network, quality of research and analysis, effectiveness of advice, price, breadth of data assets, accessibility of data assets, service levels, and range and scope of product and service offerings. We believe that we provide members with significant value at a lower cost than either an internal research effort or an external consulting contract.
We compete with firms that offer customized information and professional service products, such as traditional consulting firms, benchmarking firms, research and data analytics firms, and training and development firms. These companies offer a variety of products and services, including market research, performance data, analysis, implementation services, networking opportunities, and educational programs. We believe these competitors, in general, charge more for their products and services than we do. We also compete against entities such as trade associations, nonprofit organizations, and research and database companies. We believe that these competitors offer less detailed and lower-priced research and fewer networking opportunities and educational services. Our direct competitors generally compete with us in a single decision support center, a single corporate function (e.g., information technology), and/or in a specific industry.
6
Table of Contents
The Advisory Board Company serves the health-care industry and educational institutions with products and services that are similar to what we provide on a cross-industry basis. In February 2010, we extended a collaboration agreement with The Advisory Board Company, entered into in 2007, to enhance services to members and explore new product development opportunities. To advance these efforts, which require the companies to share proprietary information, the agreement includes a limited non-competition provision.
Our Employees
We employ individuals from top undergraduate and graduate programs, as well as experienced talent from outside our Company, who often have functional, industry, academic, or consulting expertise. Our success depends on our ability to attract, develop, engage, and retain outstanding talent, including in the sales, service, and marketing functions. We believe that we offer compelling career paths, opportunities for professional development, and competitive compensation. We compete for employees with numerous information and professional services providers, many of which are significantly larger than we are and, we believe, have greater resources than we do.
At December 31, 2010, we employed 1,879 staff members, an increase of 8% versus December 31, 2009. Of this employee base, 1,382 were located in the United States and Canada (primarily in Arlington, Virginia), 220 were located in England, 215 were located in India, and 62 were located in Australia and Singapore. None of our employees is represented by a collective bargaining arrangement.
We believe that our relations with our employees remain favorable, despite the reductions in our staff in 2009. In 2010, we continued to enhance our communications, performance management, recruiting, and on-boarding protocols in an effort to retain talent with the capabilities required to perform effectively in light of increasing geographic, market, role, and product diversity.
Our Sales & Marketing Efforts
We sell products and services in more than 50 countries. We generally sell our products and services as a package, which enables executives and professionals to obtain the greatest value from our products and services, as well as from our global member network. Generally, and including in 2010, our largest renewal and sales booking rates coincide with corporate budgeting cycles in the first and fourth quarters of each year.
In 2010, we completed the global implementation of a relationship-driven account management structure. Implemented in North America in 2009, the new commercial model simplifies the member interface, improves sales team understanding of member needs, enhances our sales roles, and facilitates focus on our large company members. This model, which aligns with member preferences and is supported by continued investments in our technology platforms, has improved member loyalty, existing account growth, new account acquisitions, and sales team efficiency. We implemented the model in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in Europe in 2010.
In 2010, we invested resources in expanding our marketing capability. We drove consistency in messaging to our member base through enhanced sales collateral, increased our presence as a thought leader by sharing advice and insights through traditional media, and extended our Web presence through social media outlets. We also made inaugural investments in corporate awareness advertising with focused advertisements in global newspapers and magazines. In 2011, we intend to invest further in these areas as we seek to increase awareness of the Corporate Executive Board brand.
We maintain and actively defend our portfolio of trademarks and rely on nondisclosure and confidentiality arrangements with employees, members, and third-parties, as well as copyright, trademark, trade secret, and other laws, to protect our proprietary rights in our products, services, and other proprietary information.
Financial Information on Geographic Areas
For information regarding revenues related to our operations in the United States and foreign countries, see Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
Corporate Information
The Corporate Executive Board Company is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1997. We are a publicly traded company with common stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “EXBD.”
Our executive offices are located at 1919 North Lynn Street, Arlington, Virginia, 22209. Our telephone number is (571) 303-3000. Our Website is www.executiveboard.com. The information contained on our Website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge, through our Website (follow the “Investors” link to the “Shareholder Information” link, then “SEC Filings”) our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material was electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board of Directors committee charters (including the charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee) and Code of Conduct for Officers, Directors and Employees also are available at that same location on our Website.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
The following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition to the risks discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial could, in the future, materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and financial results.
Continuing uncertainty in the global economy and the financial markets could adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Continuing global economic uncertainty and financial market instability, as well as the impact of the recent recession and the risk of a prolonged period of weak or uncertain economic and business conditions, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. These conditions also could materially impact our members and prospective members, including our large accounts, causing them to defer purchasing their first product; defer, reduce, or not increase the volume of memberships they purchase from us in the future; or terminate existing memberships under our service guarantee. These conditions also could materially impact our vendors causing them to go out of business entirely or be unable or unwilling to meet their commitments to us. If we are unable to successfully anticipate or adapt to uncertain or changing economic and financial markets conditions, we may be unable to effectively plan for and respond to those changes, and our business could be adversely affected. In addition, the continuing global economic uncertainty could reduce the overall demand for professional information services as global companies and government entities continue to manage purchasing, departmental budgets, and company-wide discretionary spending. While we market and sell our products throughout the year, a significant percentage of our new business and renewal bookings historically have taken place in the first and fourth quarters of the year. Significant economic uncertainty during these time periods could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our current and future financial results.
We may continue to anticipate downward pressure on our operating margins.
We have worked aggressively to align our cost structure with our revenue profile. In 2009, we implemented a range of expense management activities, including the elimination of lower-performing programs, workforce reductions, discretionary expense controls, and real estate subleases. While total bookings, new business, cross-sales, and renewal bookings improved in 2010, and we expect them to continue to improve in 2011, investments in headcount and other select areas such as sales, marketing and product development, as well as the addition of acquired companies, continue to apply downward pressure to margins. As a result, we anticipate these factors will combine with the lag between Contract Value growth and revenue growth to apply continued pressure on operating margins in the near-term.
8
Table of Contents
We may fail to attract new members to our programs, obtain renewals from existing members, or sell additional programs to existing members.
We derive most of our revenues from annual memberships for our products and services. Revenue growth depends on our ability to attract prospects to their first membership, sustain a high renewal rate of existing memberships, and sell additional products and services to existing members. Attracting prospects, renewing members, and selling additional products and services to existing members depends upon our ability to understand and anticipate market and pricing trends and members’ needs, deliver high-quality and timely advice to members, and deliver products and services that are more desirable than those of our competition. Failure to achieve new member additions to deliver acceptable member renewal rate levels, or to cross-sell additional memberships to existing members at the level we forecast, could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
We may experience difficulty collecting membership fees as a result of operating conditions at our member institutions resulting from current economic conditions.
While we believe we have a stable member base and have experienced strong collections in the past, if economic weakness continues in geographies where we have members, we may experience increased turnover in our member base, including reductions in members’ commitments to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we cannot predict how the strength or duration of the continuing global economic weakness may negatively impact our members’ ability to pay us on a timely basis or at all. Payment delinquencies at higher rates than we have estimated would adversely affect our operating results.
If we do not retain members for the duration of their membership terms, we would suffer a loss of future revenues due to our service guarantee.
We offer a service guarantee to most members under which a member may request a refund of the membership fee for a research program. When available, refunds are provided on a proportionate basis relative to the unused period of the membership term. Requests for refunds by a significant number of our members could adversely affect our financial results and future growth. We cannot predict the duration of the continuing economic weakness, which may cause more members to request refunds. Failure to retain members for the duration of their membership term at the level we forecast could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
We may have difficulty anticipating member needs and demands, providing relevant support and advice, and developing new, profitable products and services.
Our products and services provide insights, information, and advice to business executives and professionals. Our continuing and future success depends upon our ability to anticipate changing market trends and adapt our research, analysis, advice, new product development, pricing, and sales and service model to the evolving needs of our members, including in new and developing industries, business sectors, government entities, and geographies, and by maintaining and upgrading our technology and information infrastructure. The industries, business sectors, government entities, and geographies that we serve undergo frequent changes, including the introduction of new products and the obsolescence of old products, shifting strategies and market positions of major industry participants, and changing objectives and expectations of users of members’ products and services. This environment presents significant challenges to our ability to provide our members with current and timely research and analysis on issues of importance and to develop new products. In addition, our members’ needs and demands with respect to how they access our products and services (including a potential increasing desire for the availability of online products and services) and how we manage the member relationship may change significantly over time. Accordingly, we continue to fund the development of new products and services, including for new geographies, and we have invested in improvements to our technology and information management infrastructure and our sales and service model to better serve our new and existing members. If the new products and services we have developed are not timely or relevant, or if we fail to or are unsuccessful in our efforts to optimize our technology and information management infrastructure, and therefore do not serve members in a manner that meets their evolving needs, we may experience increased member turnover, lower new business and renewal bookings, and decreased cross-sales of additional products to existing members, which would adversely affect our financial results and future growth.
9
Table of Contents
Our restructuring plans during the recent recession may have unanticipated negative results.
We announced restructuring plans in the fourth quarter of 2008 and in the second quarter of 2009 due to the severe global recession. These restructuring plans reduced our workforce; realigned our products and services, including consolidation or retirement of certain products, to focus on five corporate decision centers and industries we serve; and implemented an integrated approach to account management. Our restructuring plans involved significant changes to our business and operations, which created risk and uncertainty. While the intent of the restructuring plans was to enhance our product and service offerings, strengthen our relations with existing and prospective members, revise our sales and service model, and improve our efficiency as an organization, the intended benefits may take longer to realize than we projected. We may not have identified the appropriate products to consolidate or retire, and additional consolidation and/or retirement may be required. We may not have identified the appropriate products to focus on or invest in, and adjustments to our areas of focus and investment may be required. The plans may adversely affect our relationships with existing and prospective members, causing them to defer joining their first program, reduce the number of programs they join, cancel or choose not to renew existing memberships, or terminate their memberships before the end of the term under our service guarantee. If we do not realize the intended benefits of the restructuring, or if the restructuring has other negative effects, our business, financial results, and reputation may be harmed.
We may not compete successfully and, as a result, may experience reduced or limited demand for our products and services.
The information, professional services, research, networking, and advisory services industry is a highly competitive industry with low barriers to entry, numerous substitute products and services, and many differentiators, including quality and size of the member network, pricing, quality of research and analysis, breadth of databases, and range and scope of product and service offerings. We compete against traditional consulting firms, information services firms, training and development firms, trade associations, nonprofit organizations, and research and database companies. We also compete against providers of free content over the Internet and through other delivery channels. In order to compete successfully and achieve our growth targets, we must successfully serve new and existing members with current products and services while developing and investing in new and competitive products and services for U.S. and international members. Our failure to compete effectively with our competitors, both in terms of the quality and scope of our products and services, and in terms of price, could adversely affect our financial results and future growth.
Continued weakness, consolidation, and business failures, and increased and uncertain regulation, in the financial services industry may cause us to lose additional members or limit the growth of our existing members in that industry.
A number of our products and services provide insights and information to business leaders in the financial services industry. The financial services industry has experienced turmoil, consolidation, business failures, business contraction, reduced profitability, and increased and uncertain regulation since the second half of 2007. At December 31, 2010, approximately 21% of our Contract Value was attributable to members in the financial services industry, which includes commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions, credit card issuers, mutual fund companies, consumer credit lenders, brokerage houses, private and trust banks and insurance companies. The instability, consolidation, business failures, business contraction, reduced profitability, and increased and uncertain regulation have resulted, and are expected to continue to result, in a reduction in the number of members and prospective members from the financial services industry. Additional uncertainty, consolidation, business failures, business contraction, reduced profitability, and increased and uncertain regulation in the financial services industry could adversely affect our financial results and future growth.
Our international operations involve financial, legal, regulatory, business, operational, and geopolitical risks that differ from or are in addition to those faced by our U.S. operations.
We are continuing to scale our infrastructure to support our businesses outside the United States, with offices in several foreign countries, including in the United Kingdom, Canada, India, Australia, Singapore, and Germany. We sell our membership programs in approximately 50 foreign countries, and those international sales accounted for approximately 32% of our revenues in 2010. Our international operations involve financial, legal, regulatory, business, operational, and geopolitical risks that differ from or are in addition to those faced by our U.S. operations. These risks include cultural and language differences; limited brand recognition relative to existing and established competitors; difficulties in developing products and services tailored to the needs of members outside the U.S., including in emerging markets; difficulties in serving members outside the U.S., including in emerging markets; difficulties in managing overseas operations; higher operating costs; restrictions on the repatriation of earnings; differing accounting principles and standards; differing economic conditions and market fluctuations; potentially adverse tax consequences; different and potentially less stable political and operational environments for our employees and our members; catastrophic events that could interrupt or adversely affect operations; less favorable employment laws that could affect our relations with our employees; different legal requirements, compliance obligations, and regulatory systems; and different data security and privacy rules. Our failure to manage our international operations and business effectively could adversely affect our operating results, limit growth, and damage our reputation.
10
Table of Contents
We are subject to foreign currency risk.
Our international operations subject us to risks related to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. Prices for our products are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, even when sold outside the United States. However, many of the costs associated with our international operations are denominated in local currencies. For our foreign subsidiaries, monetary balance sheet and related income statement accounts, representing claims receivable or payable in a fixed number of foreign currency units regardless of changes in exchange rates, are re-measured at the current exchange rate with exchange gains and losses recorded in income. Non-monetary balance sheet items and related income statement accounts, which do not result in a fixed future cash inflow or outflow of foreign currency units, are re-measured at their historical exchange rates. As a consequence, if the U.S. dollar weakens against the foreign currencies in countries where we have foreign operations (which include the United Kingdom, India, Australia, Singapore, and Germany), our operating costs in those countries would increase (on a U.S. dollar basis) and reduce our earnings. We use financial instruments, primarily cash flow hedging instruments, to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency commitments related to our operations in the United Kingdom. The maximum length of time of these hedging contracts is 12 months. Although we believe that our foreign exchange hedging policies are reasonable and prudent under the circumstances, they may only partially offset any adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates, especially if these changes are extreme and occur over a short period of time.
Our global transition to an integrated account management model may have unanticipated negative results or take longer than anticipated to realize the intended benefits.
In 2009 and 2010, we integrated our sales and service model, including in Europe, to increase individual member impact. While we integrated the sales and service functions to strengthen our relations with existing and prospective members and deliver greater value to them from our products and services, we may not realize some or any of these intended benefits, or it may take longer than anticipated to realize the intended benefits, including in Europe. The integrated sales and service model may adversely affect our relationships with existing and prospective members, causing them to defer joining their first program, reduce the number of programs they join, cancel or choose not to renew existing memberships, or terminate their memberships before the end of the term under our service guarantee. Our transition to an integrated account management model continues to require our sales and service staff to learn additional or new skills, roles, and responsibilities. Our failure to adequately train employees for new account management roles could result in a failure to achieve our sales goals, which could adversely affect our financial results. It also could reduce employee morale and productivity.
Our acquisitions involve financial, operational, human resources, and business risks that differ from or are in addition to those faced by our existing operations.
We may make acquisitions that bring us capabilities and intellectual properties that address gaps in member needs and workflows. The acquisitions generally do not result in immediate material changes to our revenues and earnings, however, these acquisitions could require significant capital infusions. We may seek to obtain additional cash to fund potential acquisitions by selling equity or debt securities or by securing a bank credit facility. Depending on the prevailing market conditions at the time we seek to obtain any such additional capital, we may be unable to obtain the necessary funds on terms acceptable to us or at all. In addition, any issuance of equity or convertible debt securities may be dilutive to existing shareholders.
Our acquisitions involve financial, operational, human resources, business, legal, and regulatory risks that differ from or are in addition to those faced by our ongoing U.S. operations, including: difficulties and costs of integrating and maintaining the operations, personnel, technologies, products, vendors, and information systems of the companies we acquire; assumption of potential unknown risks and liabilities; difficulties achieving the target synergies, efficiencies, and cost savings; failure to retain key personnel and members; the acquisition of products with lower margins than our existing products; entry into and ongoing management of new geographical or product markets; exposure under arrangements such as earn-outs, employment agreements, and other acquisition-related agreements; the diversion of financial and management resources; and the integration of a different set of products and services into our existing operations. As a result of these risks, we may not be able to achieve the expected benefits, which could adversely affect our operating results and limit future growth. Acquisitions may involve additional costs and could result in increased debt or contingent liabilities, adverse tax consequences, additional stock-based compensation expense, and the recording of amortization of amounts related to certain purchased intangible assets, any of which could adversely impact our results of operations.
11
Table of Contents
We make estimates and assumptions in connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, and any changes to those estimates and assumptions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we use certain estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors. Our most critical accounting estimates are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we make certain estimates, including decisions related to provisions for revenue, income taxes and other contingencies. While we believe that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances, they are subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
As we implement Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13 for arrangements with multiple deliverables, our reported revenues could decline or we could be forced to make changes in our products offerings or business practices.
Under current accounting literature, our program offerings are a single unit of accounting and service revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis (SAB 104). Effective January 1, 2011, there is new guidance for revenue recognition of arrangements with multiple deliverables under ASU 2009-13 that focuses on the separability of deliverables. ASU 2009-13 modifies the criteria applied to determine if a program offering with multiple deliverables should be considered as a single unit of accounting, or as a multiple element arrangement with more than one unit of accounting. We currently expect that approximately 5% to 10% of 2011 sales will not be recognized ratably across the membership periods, rather it will be recognized upon delivery of services, or related deliverables, or upon completion of the membership period, both of which may be subsequent to 2011.
We may be subject to additional impairment losses due to potential declines in the fair value of our assets.
As a result of acquisitions and capital expenditures, we have goodwill, intangible assets, and fixed assets on our balance sheets. We test goodwill, intangible assets, and fixed assets for impairment on a periodic basis as required, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The events or changes that could require us to test our goodwill, intangible assets, and fixed assets for impairment include a reduction in our stock price and market capitalization, changes in estimated future cash flows, changes in rates of growth in our industry or in any of our reporting units, and ceasing to use portions of our existing leased office space.
The potential for goodwill impairment is increased during a period of economic uncertainty. To the extent we acquire a company at a negotiated price based on anticipated future performance, subsequent market conditions may result in the acquired business performing at a lower level than was anticipated at the time of the acquisition. Any of these charges would reduce our reported results of operations and could cause the price of our common stock to decline. A slow recovery in the U.S. or global economy may result in declining performance that would require us to examine our goodwill for potential additional impairment. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.
In 2010, we concluded that indicators of impairment were present and that goodwill and intangible asset amounts recorded for the Toolbox.com subsidiary were impaired. We therefore recorded an impairment charge of approximately $12.6 million. In 2008, we incurred an impairment charge of $27.4 million related to Toolbox.com. We will continue to evaluate the carrying value of our remaining goodwill, intangible assets, and fixed assets, and if we determine in the future that there is a potential further impairment, we may be required to record additional losses, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
We may be unable to attract and retain highly skilled management and employees.
Our continued and future success depends upon our ability to hire, train, and retain highly skilled management and employees, particularly senior leaders, research analysts, and sales staff. We may continue to adjust compensation packages to remain competitive, and we expect to continue to experience intense competition for our professional personnel from our competitors, particularly as the economy continues to stabilize in the United States and Europe. If we fail to attract, train, and retain a sufficient number of highly skilled management and employees in the future, our financial results and future growth could be adversely affected.
12
Table of Contents
We may fail to implement, maintain, upgrade, and operate our technology and information infrastructure, including our management of member data and our development and integration of new products and platforms, to meet changing legal and regulatory requirements.
We serve our global membership through a technology and information management infrastructure. Among other functions, we use our technology and information management infrastructure, as well as the technology and information management infrastructure of vendors, to develop, promote, sell, service, store, and deliver our products and services to members; as well as to bill, collect, and make payments related to our products and services. Our failure to make capital expenditures in this infrastructure and to leverage the infrastructure in order to meet our internal operational and business needs, and to address information security, privacy, data management, business continuity, and other concerns with our infrastructure and the infrastructure of our vendors, both in the United States and internationally, could adversely affect our results of operations, development of new products, delivery of existing products, future performance, and reputation. In many countries and in individual states within the United States, the rules governing information security, privacy, and related concerns are evolving and vary across regions. Our failure to optimize the use of the technology and information infrastructure, or to address the evolving regulatory environment governing our use of technology and information could adversely affect our operating results, limit our future growth, and harm our reputation. Our failure to protect our technology and information infrastructure from natural disasters, power loss, malicious and negligent actions by employees or third parties, and other failures, could result in interruptions to our business and operations, which could materially affect our financial results, future growth, and reputation.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property.
We rely on nondisclosure and confidentiality arrangements with employees, members, and third-parties, as well as copyright, trademark, trade secret, and other laws, to protect our proprietary rights in our products, services, and other proprietary information. We cannot assure that the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights will be adequate to deter negligent or intentional misappropriation of our intellectual property or confidential information, or that we will be able to detect unauthorized uses and take timely and effective steps to enforce our rights. If substantial and material unauthorized uses of our proprietary products and services were to occur, we would be required to engage in costly and time-consuming litigation to enforce our rights. We cannot assure you that we would prevail in such litigation. If others were able to use our intellectual property, our ability to charge our fees for our products and services would be adversely affected.
We may be exposed to litigation.
As a publisher and distributor of original research and analysis, a user of third-party content, and an on-line content provider through Toolbox.com and other services, we face potential liability for trademark and copyright infringement and other claims based on the material we publish. Additionally, from time to time we are subject to litigation related to our normal business operations, including employment-related actions brought by former employees. Any such litigation, regardless of the merits and whether or not resulting in a judgment against us, could subject us to reputational harm and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Unanticipated changes in our tax provision, the adoption of new U.S. tax legislation or exposure to additional income and other tax liabilities could affect our profitability.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, there could be changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; or changes in the relevant tax, accounting, and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. We are subject to audits in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income tax against us. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
13
Table of Contents
We are exposed to interest rate fluctuations that could have a negative impact on our financial results or condition.
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our portfolio of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, which is intended to protect principal and liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash held at various financial institutions. Marketable securities consist primarily of Washington, D.C. tax exempt bonds. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit ratings related to the cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. Our portfolio is subject to interest rate risk as investments mature and are reinvested at current market interest rates. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments to adjust our investment portfolio risk or income profile. In an environment of generally low interests rates, as currently exists, we will likely realize lower interest income on our investments, which will reduce our overall earnings.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
Item 2. | Properties. |
Our headquarters are located in Arlington, Virginia. The terms of the lease contain provisions for rental and operating expense escalations. Our facilities accommodate research, marketing and sales, information technology, administrative, graphic and editorial services and operations personnel. At December 31, 2010, our leases for office space consist of:
Location | Square feet | Lease Expiration | ||||||
Arlington, Virginia | 625,000 | 2028 | ||||||
London, England | 79,000 | 2018 | ||||||
Chicago, Illinois | 52,000 | 2018 | ||||||
Gurgaon, India | 48,000 | 2013 | ||||||
San Francisco, California | 28,000 | 2017 | ||||||
Needham, Massachusetts | 20,000 | 2011 | ||||||
Rochester, New York | 13,000 | 2013 | ||||||
Scottsdale, Arizona | 9,000 | 2014 | ||||||
Sydney, Australia | 7,600 | 2013 | ||||||
Minneapolis, Minnesota | 7,100 | 2013 | ||||||
West Chester, Pennsylvania | 6,000 | 2011 | ||||||
Singapore | 6,000 | 2014 | ||||||
Toronto, Canada | 4,000 | 2011 |
We believe that our existing and planned facilities will be adequate for our current needs and additional facilities are available for lease to meet any future needs. We sublease approximately 203,000 square feet of our headquarters to unaffiliated third parties. These subleases expire in 2013 and 2028. We have also entered into an additional sublease beginning in 2011 and expiring in 2028 for 128,000 square feet of our headquarters. We also sublease 25,000 square feet at two other facilities.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
From time to time, we are subject to litigation related to normal business operations. The Company vigorously defends itself in litigation and is not currently a party to, and our property is not subject to, any legal proceedings likely to materially affect our financial results.
Item 4. | Removed and Reserved. |
14
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Market Information, Holders and Dividends
Our common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “EXBD.” At January 19, 2011, there were 41 stockholders of record. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market in 2009 and through August 2010 and the New York Stock Exchange for the remainder of 2010 and cash dividends declared per common share.
High | Low | Dividends | ||||||||||
2010 | ||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 28.65 | $ | 19.58 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||
Second quarter | 33.50 | 26.17 | 0.11 | |||||||||
Third quarter | 33.49 | 24.94 | 0.11 | |||||||||
Fourth quarter | 39.22 | 29.66 | 0.11 | |||||||||
2009 | ||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 23.59 | $ | 12.35 | $ | 0.44 | ||||||
Second quarter | 21.69 | 13.84 | 0.10 | |||||||||
Third quarter | 27.18 | 16.50 | 0.10 | |||||||||
Fourth quarter | 26.83 | 20.81 | 0.10 |
We expect to continue paying regular quarterly cash dividends, although there is no assurance as to future dividends because they depend on future earnings, capital requirements, and financial condition. In February 2011, the Board of Directors declared a first quarter 2011 cash dividend of $0.15 per common share.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered equity securities in 2010.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
A summary of the share repurchase activity for the fourth quarter of 2010 is as follows:
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Approximate $ | |||||||||||||||
Average | Purchased as | Value of Shares | ||||||||||||||
Total | Price | Part of | That May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Number of | Paid Per | Publicly | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Share | Announced Plans | Under the Plans | |||||||||||||
October 1, 2010 to October 31, 2010 (1) | 306 | $ | 36.02 | 306 | $ | 21,080,850 | ||||||||||
November 1, 2010 to November 30, 2010 | — | — | — | 21,080,850 | ||||||||||||
December 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 | — | — | — | 21,080,850 | ||||||||||||
Total | 306 | 306 | $ | 21,080,850 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Amounts relate to the effect of employees using common stock received from the exercise of share-based awards to satisfy the statutory minimum federal and state withholding requirements generated from the exercise of such awards. In effect, the Company repurchased, at fair market value, a portion of the common stock received by employees upon exercise of their awards. |
Repurchases may continue to be made from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions. No minimum number of shares has been fixed. We fund our share repurchases with cash on hand and cash generated from operations.
15
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data. The selected financial data presented below has been derived from our consolidated financial statements which have been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. You should read the selected financial data presented below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, the notes to our consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per-share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 438,907 | $ | 442,906 | $ | 558,352 | $ | 532,716 | $ | 460,623 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services | 155,769 | 147,019 | 179,950 | 183,088 | 164,022 | |||||||||||||||
Member relations and marketing | 123,890 | 126,023 | 161,670 | 150,032 | 122,177 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 60,871 | 59,415 | 76,120 | 71,984 | 59,629 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,462 | 22,991 | 21,631 | 15,573 | 10,381 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss | 12,645 | — | 27,449 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 11,518 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs | — | 8,568 | 8,006 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 373,637 | 375,534 | 474,826 | 420,677 | 356,209 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 65,270 | 67,372 | 83,526 | 112,039 | 104,414 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 3,140 | 6,246 | (5,438 | ) | 16,049 | 24,318 | ||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 68,410 | 73,618 | 78,088 | 128,088 | 128,732 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 28,047 | 27,989 | 33,291 | 47,501 | 49,561 | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 40,363 | $ | 45,629 | $ | 44,797 | $ | 80,587 | $ | 79,171 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share-basic | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 2.20 | $ | 1.99 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic | 34,256 | 34,111 | 34,205 | 36,666 | 39,712 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per share-diluted | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 2.17 | $ | 1.94 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted | 34,553 | 34,293 | 34,329 | 37,159 | 40,721 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.20 |
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 123,462 | $ | 76,210 | $ | 76,103 | $ | 144,356 | $ | 487,287 | ||||||||||
Total assets | 510,149 | 423,195 | 446,192 | 544,772 | 736,055 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred revenues | 251,200 | 222,053 | 264,253 | 323,395 | 308,671 | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 82,816 | 50,277 | 22,609 | 67,547 | 317,865 |
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Operating Data (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Membership programs | 51 | 44 | 52 | 48 | 42 | |||||||||||||||
Member institutions | 5,271 | 4,812 | 5,114 | 4,711 | 3,739 | |||||||||||||||
Total membership subscriptions | 15,585 | 13,790 | 15,747 | 16,349 | 14,190 | |||||||||||||||
Average subscriptions per member institution (1) | 2.96 | 2.87 | 3.08 | 3.47 | 3.80 | |||||||||||||||
Client renewal rate (2) | 83 | % | 78 | % | 84 | % | 90 | % | 92 | % | ||||||||||
Contract Value (in thousands) (3) | $ | 447,051 | $ | 393,737 | $ | 487,107 | $ | 526,386 | $ | 475,653 | ||||||||||
Average subscription price | $ | 28,685 | $ | 28,552 | $ | 30,714 | $ | 32,196 | $ | 33,519 |
(1) | Also known as “cross-sell ratio,” represents the average across all subscription memberships, including the traditional large company market average of 3.41, 3.30, 3.63, 4.03, and 4.15 and the middle market average of 1.88, 1.79, 1.58, 1.44 and 1.1 in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
(2) | For the year then ended. Client renewal rate is defined as the percentage of member institutions renewed, adjusted to reflect reductions in member institutions resulting from mergers and acquisitions of members. The client renewal rate was 88% and 83% for our traditional large company market and 74% and 70% for the middle market in 2010 and 2009, respectively. | |
(3) | For the year then ended. Contract Value (“Contract Value”) is defined as the aggregate annualized revenues attributed to all agreements in effect at a given date without regard to the remaining duration of any such agreement. |
16
Table of Contents
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The tables below include financial measures of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, and Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, which are non-GAAP financial measures provided as a complement to the results provided in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The term “EBITDA” refers to a financial measure that we define as earnings before interest income, net, depreciation and amortization, and provision for income taxes. The term “Adjusted EBITDA” refers to a financial measure that we define as earnings before interest income, net, depreciation and amortization, provision for income taxes, impairment loss, costs associated with exit activities, restructuring costs, and gain on acquisition. The term “Adjusted net income” refers to net income excluding the after tax effects of impairment loss, costs associated with exit activities, restructuring costs, and gain on acquisition. “Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share” refers to net income per diluted share, excluding the per share after-tax effects of impairment loss, costs associated with exit activities, restructuring costs, and gain on acquisition.
These non-GAAP measures may be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but they should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. We intend to continue to provide these non-GAAP financial measures as part of our future earnings discussions and, therefore, the inclusion of these non-GAAP financial measures will provide consistency in our financial reporting. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to GAAP results is provided below.
We believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income and Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share are relevant and useful supplemental information for our investors. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for internal budgeting and other managerial purposes, when publicly providing our business outlook and as a measurement for potential acquisitions. A limitation associated with EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is that they do not reflect the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and intangible assets used in generating revenues in our business. Management evaluates the costs of such tangible and intangible assets through other financial measures such as capital expenditures. Management compensates for these limitations by also relying on the comparable GAAP financial measure of income from operations, which includes depreciation and amortization.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per-share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 40,363 | $ | 45,629 | $ | 44,797 | $ | 80,587 | $ | 79,171 | ||||||||||
Interest income, net | (1,526 | ) | (1,787 | ) | (4,268 | ) | (14,937 | ) | (23,566 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,462 | 22,991 | 21,631 | 15,573 | 10,381 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 28,047 | 27,989 | 33,291 | 47,501 | 49,561 | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA | 87,346 | 94,822 | 95,451 | 128,724 | 115,547 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss | 12,645 | — | 27,449 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 11,518 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs | — | 8,568 | 8,006 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Gain on acquisition | — | (680 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 99,991 | $ | 114,228 | $ | 130,906 | $ | 128,724 | $ | 115,547 | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 22.8 | % | 25.8 | % | 23.4 | % | 24.2 | % | 25.1 | % | ||||||||||
Adjusted net income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 40,363 | $ | 45,629 | $ | 44,797 | $ | 80,587 | $ | 79,171 | ||||||||||
Adjustments, net of tax | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss | 7,789 | — | 17,073 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 7,141 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs | — | 5,312 | 4,804 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Gain on acquisition | — | (422 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted net income | $ | 48,152 | $ | 57,660 | $ | 66,674 | $ | 80,587 | $ | 79,171 | ||||||||||
Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share | ||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP earnings per diluted share | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 2.17 | $ | 1.94 | ||||||||||
Adjustments, net of tax | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss | 0.23 | — | 0.50 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 0.20 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs | — | 0.16 | 0.14 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Gain on acquisition | — | (0.01 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share | $ | 1.40 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.94 | $ | 2.17 | $ | 1.94 | ||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Selected Financial Data and our annual audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements and risk factors, see Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Operating results for Toolbox.com and other operating segments do not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure; thus, the Company has one reportable segment.
Executive Overview
Our focus for 2010 was to drive large company member loyalty through high value engagement, invest globally in our strongest brands, improve the member experience with enhanced technology and analytic platforms, and elevate member performance with product innovation. Our objectives for 2010 were not only to return us to solid levels of Contract Value growth, but to lay the groundwork for healthy, sustainable growth. We met both of these objectives in 2010 and, in 2011, our objective is to begin building on what we believe is a strong foundation for long-term profitable growth. To do that, we must both leverage and reinforce our strengths in content and member relationships, and at the same time, invest in the development of new markets and new offerings to meet emerging member needs.
We have seen and expect to continue to see encouraging returns from focus on our priorities and from sound execution by our teams; however, the direction of the global recovery remains uncertain. While we are finding that companies are increasingly focusing on forward-looking priorities, areas where we can and do add significant value, we are seeing companies continue to control expenditures amid ongoing uncertainty. Still, by linking research and data to urgent member work and decisions, our teams are driving positive solid progress on sales and renewal outcomes.
Contract Value was $447.1 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of 13.5% compared to $393.7 million at December 31, 2009. This increase includes $13.7 million related to our acquisition of Iconoculture in May 2010. Other factors included improved cross-sales of large corporate memberships and an increase in the purchase of memberships by middle market clients. As previously discussed, growth from these factors was offset to some degree by reductions in Contract Value as a result of discontinued programs. The average cross-sell ratio was 2.96, reflecting cross-sell ratios of 3.41 for the traditional large corporate market and 1.88 for middle market members.
In 2010, net income was $40.4 million, Adjusted net income was $48.2 million, diluted earnings per share was $1.17, and Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $1.40. Our 2010 results reflect improvements in new business and renewal bookings as the global economy began to recover and we realized initial returns from the operational changes we made beginning in 2009. The benefits of the expense management activities taken in 2009 were offset by investments in new market opportunities, product development activities, increased commercial capacity, and the additions of Iconoculture and Tower Group. In addition, we recognized an impairment loss for the Toolbox.com reporting unit. As a result, our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins were 19.9% and 22.8%, respectively.
We anticipate improving sales, cross sales, and renewal activity throughout 2011 and into the future. However, we expect margins to remain at current levels given the lag between Contract Value growth and revenue growth and our intention to invest in additional opportunities to drive growth in our business. We believe that the favorable characteristics of our business — a renewable revenue stream, fast cash conversion cycle, scalable cost structure, and low capital intensity — remain intact.
18
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified the following policies as critical to our business and the understanding of our results of operations. This is not a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. Our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and may require the application of significant judgment by management. As a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying those policies, management uses judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical experience, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our members, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. For a more detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. Our critical accounting policies include:
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized when (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, (2) the fee is fixed and determinable, (3) services have been rendered and payment has been contractually earned, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues from membership subscriptions are recognized ratably over the term of the related subscription, which generally is 12 months. Membership fees generally are billable, and revenue recognition begins, when a member agrees to the terms of the membership and fees receivable and the related deferred revenue are recorded upon the commencement of the agreement or collection of fees, if earlier. Certain membership fees are billed on an installment basis. Members generally may request a refund of their membership fees, which is provided on a pro-rata basis relative to the length of the remaining membership term, under our service guarantee.
Advertising and content related revenues from Toolbox.com are recognized as the services are provided.
Allowance for uncollectible revenue
We record an allowance for uncollectible revenue, as a reduction in revenues, based upon management’s analysis and estimates as to the collectability of membership fees receivable, which generally is not the result of a members’ ability to pay. Revenues under membership agreements are generally recognized ratably over the membership period, typically 12 months. Accordingly, the allowance for uncollectible revenue is recorded against the amount of revenues that have been recognized under the contracts that are deemed uncollectible. Membership fees receivable that have not been recognized as revenues are recorded in deferred revenues. As part of our analysis, we examine our collections history, the age of the receivables in question, any specific member collection issues that we have identified, general market conditions, member concentrations and current economic and industry trends. Membership fees receivable balances are not collateralized.
Income taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. The realization of deferred tax assets is contingent upon the generation of future taxable income. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce such deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be ultimately realized. We provided a valuation allowance of $7.5 million at December 31, 2010 for the estimated loss of Washington, D.C. tax credits, which resulted from our move to Virginia in 2008, and state deferred tax assets, consisting of state tax credits in Virginia.
In determining the provision for income taxes, we analyze various factors, including projections of our annual earnings, tax jurisdictions in which the earnings will be generated, and the impact of state, local, and foreign income taxes. We file income tax returns in U.S. federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local tax examinations in major tax jurisdictions for periods prior to 2007.
Goodwill and intangible assets
As the result of acquisitions, we record any excess purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired as goodwill. A preliminary allocation of the purchase price to tangible and intangible net assets acquired is based upon a preliminary valuation, and our estimates and assumptions may be subject to change. Intangible assets consist primarily of technology and member relationships. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 2 to 20 years.
19
Table of Contents
We test our goodwill for impairment annually on October 1, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred, by comparing its fair value to its carrying value. We have concluded that our reporting units used to assess goodwill impairment are the same as our operating segments. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in the performance of the acquired business, adverse market conditions, and a variety of other circumstances. If we determine that impairment has occurred, we record a write-down of the carrying value and as an operating expense in the period the determination is made. Although we believe goodwill is appropriately stated in our consolidated financial statements, changes in strategy or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and require an adjustment to the recorded balance.
The determination of the fair value of individual reporting units is based upon the average of an income approach (discounted cash flow method) and a market approach (guideline company method). These models require us to make various judgmental estimates and assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, discount factors, and valuation multiples. Our discounted cash flow model is prepared by forecasting anticipated cash flows over an initial five year period plus a terminal value discounted to their present value using an appropriate rate of return. The guideline company method is prepared by applying revenue and EBITDA multiples of certain publicly traded companies to the reporting unit financial results. Our estimates are based upon our historical experience, our current knowledge from our commercial relationships, and available external information about future trends.
In 2010, we concluded there were impairment indicators relating to our Toolbox.com reporting unit based on a combination of factors (including the current economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenue). We completed an impairment test at September 1, 2010 and concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts were impaired. The total impairment loss recognized in 2010 was $12.6 million. This non-cash charge did not impact our liquidity position or cash flows.
Long-lived assets, including intangibles
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The test for recoverability is made using an estimate of the undiscounted expected future cash flows and, if required, the impairment loss is measured as the amount that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the asset’s fair value if the asset is not recoverable. At December 31, 2010, we have not identified any instances where the carrying values of our long-lived assets were not recoverable.
Deferred incentive compensation
Direct incentive compensation paid to our employees related to the negotiation of new and renewal memberships is deferred and amortized over the term of the related memberships.
Operating leases
We have non-cancelable operating lease agreements for our offices with original lease periods expiring between 2011 and 2028. We are committed to pay a portion of the related operating expenses and real estate taxes under these lease agreements. Certain of these leases have escalating rent payment provisions. We recognize rent expense under operating leases on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease, including free-rent periods. Lease incentives, relating to allowances provided by landlords, are amortized over the term of the lease as a reduction of rent expense. We recognize sublease income on a straight-line basis over the term of the sublease, including free rent periods and escalations, as a reduction of rent expense. Costs associated with acquiring a subtenant, including broker commissions and tenant allowances, are amortized over the sublease term as a reduction of sublease income.
Share-based compensation
Share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date of the share-based awards based on their fair value, and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. The grant date fair value of restricted stock units is measured by reducing the share price at that date by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid during the requisite vesting period. The grant date fair value of stock appreciation rights is calculated using a lattice valuation model. Determining the fair value of share-based awards is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including the term of the share-based awards, risk-free interest rates over the vesting period, expected dividend rates, the price volatility of our stock and estimated forfeiture rates of the awards. Fair value and forfeiture rate estimates are based on assumptions we believe to be reasonable. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.
20
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
We generate the majority of our revenues through memberships that provide access to our products and services, which are delivered through several channels. Memberships, which principally are annually renewable agreements, are primarily payable by members at the beginning of the contract term. Billings attributable to memberships for our products and services initially are recorded as deferred revenues and then generally are recognized on a ratable basis over the membership contract term, which typically is 12 months. Generally, a member may request a refund of its membership fee during the membership term under our service guarantee. Refunds are provided on a pro-rata basis relative to the remaining term of the membership.
Our operating costs and expenses consist of:
• | Cost of services, which represents the costs associated with the production and delivery of our products and services, consisting of compensation, including share-based compensation, for research personnel, in-house faculty, and product advisors; the organization and delivery of membership meetings, seminars, and other events; ongoing product development costs; production of published materials, costs of developing and supporting our membership Web platform and digital delivery of products and services; and associated support services. |
• | Member relations and marketing, which represents the costs of acquiring new members and the costs of account management, consisting of compensation, including sales incentives and share-based compensation; travel and entertainment expenses; recruiting and training of personnel; sales and marketing materials; and associated support services, as well as the costs of maintaining our member relationship management software (“CRM”). |
• | General and administrative, which represents the costs associated with the corporate and administrative functions, including human resources and recruiting, finance and accounting, legal, management information systems, facilities management, business development and other. Costs include compensation, including share-based compensation; third-party consulting and compliance expenses; and associated support services. |
• | Depreciation and amortization, consisting of depreciation of our property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, capitalized software and Web site development costs and the amortization of intangible assets. |
Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
Contract Value
Contract Value increased 13.5% to $447.1 million at December 31, 2010 from $393.7 million at December 31, 2009 and decreased 19.2% in 2009 from $487.1 million at December 31, 2008.
In 2010, Contract Value increased $53.4 million due to: improved cross-sales to existing large corporate members, the acquisition of Iconoculture, and increased sales to middle market clients. The total number of member institutions increased 9.5% to 5,271 at December 31, 2010 from 4,812 at December 31, 2009. The total number of membership subscriptions increased 13.0% to 15,585 at December 31, 2010 from 13,790 at December 31, 2009. The average subscription price at December 31, 2010 increased 0.5% to $28,685 from $28,552 at December 31, 2009.
In 2009, the largest driver of the $93.4 million decrease in Contract Value was reduced memberships from some large company members, as evidenced by the decrease in the cross-sell ratio, decreased new bookings due to macro-economic conditions, and anticipated Contract Value losses of $29 million from programs that we retired or consolidated in 2009. The total number of member institutions decreased 5.9%, to 4,812 at December 31, 2009 from 5,114 at December 31, 2008. The total number of membership subscriptions decreased 12.4% to 13,790 at December 31, 2009 from 15,747 at December 31, 2008. The average subscription price at December 31, 2009 decreased 7.0% to $28,552 from $30,714 at December 31, 2008.
21
Table of Contents
Revenues
Revenues decreased 0.9% to $438.9 million in 2010 from $442.9 million in 2009 and decreased 20.7% in 2009 from $558.4 million in 2008.
In 2010, revenues were affected by the recent macro-economic environment as represented by the decrease in Contract Value across 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. The lower booking volume in 2009 and the resulting decrease in deferred revenues at December 31, 2009 resulted in lower revenues in 2010. The acquisition of Iconoculture in the second quarter of 2010 accounted for approximately 2% of our total 2010 revenue. We also recognized a full year of revenue for Tower Group in 2010 versus only one quarter in 2009, accounting for approximately 3% of our total 2010 revenue.
In 2009, both lower deferred revenues from 2008 and lower bookings throughout 2009 contributed to the decrease in revenues. The decrease in bookings was due to the factors described in Contract Value above.
Costs and expenses
Declines in share-based compensation, facilities expense, additional costs from the businesses we acquired and the impact of changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar to the British Pound all contributed to year-over-year variances in costs and expenses. These items are allocated to Cost of services, Member relations and marketing, and General and administrative expenses. We discuss these major components of costs and expenses on an aggregated basis below:
• | Share-based compensation decreased $3.3 million from 2009 to 2010 and $1.8 million from 2008 to 2009. The decrease in 2010 was primarily a result of a decrease in the total fair value of awards granted in 2010 compared to awards granted in 2006 (which completed vesting in the first quarter of 2010). The decrease in 2009 was primarily a result of a decrease in the fair value of new share-based awards granted as a result of declines in the trading price of our common stock. |
• | Facilities expense decreased $5.2 million from 2009 to 2010 and $9.6 million from 2008 to 2009. The decrease in 2010 was primarily due to the impact of a sublease of a portion of our headquarters facility, which began in the third quarter of 2009. The decrease in 2009 was primarily due subleases of a portion of our headquarters and the consolidation of the Washington, D.C. office locations into our new headquarters in the first quarter of 2008. In 2008, we also recorded $6.0 million of moving-related costs, including $3.0 million associated with overlapping office leases in conjunction with the move to our new headquarters. |
• | In October 2009, we acquired 100% of the equity interests of Tower Group and in May 2010, we acquired 100% of the equity interests of Iconoculture. These two businesses increased our total costs and expenses by $15.0 million in 2010. |
• | Our expenses are also impacted by currency fluctuations, primarily in the value of the British Pound compared to the U.S. dollar. The value of the British Pound versus the U.S. dollar was approximately $0.02 lower, on average, across 2010 compared to 2009 and approximately $0.30 lower, on average, across 2009 compared to 2008. Costs incurred for foreign subsidiaries will fluctuate based upon changes in foreign currency rates in addition to other operational factors. We enter into cash flow hedges for our UK subsidiary to mitigate foreign currency risk, which offsets a portion of the impact foreign currency fluctuations have on costs and expenses. |
Cost of services
Cost of services increased 6.0% to $155.8 million in 2010 from $147.0 million in 2009 and decreased 18.3% in 2009 from $180.0 million in 2008.
22
Table of Contents
In 2010, the increase of $8.8 million was primarily due to a $6.2 million increase in variable compensation due to improved operating results and an increase of $5.8 million in third party consulting fees. Additionally, health benefits increased $0.9 million and travel and entertainment expenses increased $0.8 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in share-based compensation of $2.7 million, allocated facilities costs of $1.7 million, and compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes, of $1.2 million. The decrease in compensation and related costs was primarily a result of reductions in headcount related to our restructuring plans, and were partially offset by increased headcount relating to the re-investments in our product research and delivery teams and the acquisitions of both Tower Group and Iconoculture.
In 2009, the decrease of $33.0 million was primarily due to a $21.0 million reduction in compensation and related costs, including salaries, payroll taxes, incentives, and share-based compensation expense. The primary cause of the decrease in compensation was headcount reductions related to the restructuring plans announced in 2008 and 2009. Additional decreases included member meeting costs of $6.5 million, travel and entertainment costs of $4.2 million, facilities expense of $4.1 million, and printing costs of $1.5 million. The decrease in Cost of services also benefited from strength of the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound as discussed above. These decreases were partially offset by a $3.6 million increase in deferred compensation expense and $2.1 million of expenses from Tower Group, primarily related to compensation related costs.
Member relations and marketing
Member relations and marketing decreased 1.7% to $123.9 million in 2010 from $126.0 million in 2009 and decreased 22.1% in 2009 from $161.7 million in 2008.
In 2010, the decrease of $2.1 million was primarily due to a $2.6 million decrease in allocated facilities costs. Additionally, compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes, decreased $1.5 million and third party consulting fees, related primarily to our CRM implemented in 2009, decreased $0.9 million. The primary cause of the decrease in compensation and related costs was headcount reductions related to the restructuring plans, partially offset by headcount increases related to the acquisitions of both Tower Group and Iconoculture. These decreases were partially offset by increases in incentives of $1.7 million, advertising costs of $1.0 million, and travel and entertainment expenses of $0.6 million.
In 2009, the decrease of $35.7 million was primarily due to a $26.4 million reduction in compensation and related costs, including salaries, payroll taxes, and incentives. The primary cause of the decrease in compensation was headcount reductions related to the restructuring plans announced in 2008 and 2009. Additional decreases included travel and entertainment expenses of $6.8 million and facilities expense of $4.3 million. The decrease in Member relations and marketing also benefited from strength of the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound as discussed above. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.6 million increase in external consulting fees related to our purchase and implementation of a new CRM and a $1.6 million increase in deferred compensation expense.
General and administrative
General and administrative increased 2.5% to $60.9 million in 2010 from $59.4 million in 2009 and decreased 21.9% in 2009 from $76.1 million in 2008.
In 2010, the increase of $1.5 million was primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in variable compensation. Additionally, employee placement fees increased $0.9 million, compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes, increased $0.5 million, and third party consulting fees and charitable contributions increased $0.5 million each. These increases were offset by a $1.3 million decrease in taxes, primarily related to state property tax and potential sales tax accruals, a $1.1 million benefit from an adjustment to the fair value estimate of the Iconoculture earnout liability, a decrease in allocated facilities costs of $0.8 million and a decrease in share-based compensation of $0.5 million.
In 2009, the decrease of $16.7 million was primarily due to a $5.7 million decrease in compensation and related costs, including salaries, payroll taxes and incentives; and a $4.7 million decrease in external consulting fees, primarily information technology related. The primary cause of the decrease in compensation was headcount reductions related to the restructuring plans announced in 2008 and 2009. The primary cause of the decrease in external consulting fees was costs incurred in 2008 relating to infrastructure investments related to the build out of our headquarters. Additional decreases included travel and entertainment expenses of $2.3 million, employee placement fees and signing bonuses of $2.3 million and facilities costs of $1.3 million. The decrease in General and administrative also benefited from strength of the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound as discussed above. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.7 million increase in deferred compensation expense.
23
Table of Contents
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased 10.9% to $20.5 million in 2010 from $23.0 million in 2009 and increased 6.5% in 2009 from $21.6 million in 2008.
In 2010, the decrease of $2.5 million was primarily due to lower depreciation as a result of the completion of depreciable lives for assets purchased as part of the buildout of our headquarters and fixed assets and leasehold improvements disposed of in the second quarter of 2009 as part of our costs associated with exit activities. The decrease in depreciation was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in amortization primarily due to the intangible assets of Iconoculture.
In 2009, the increase of $1.4 million was primarily due to the full year’s effect of depreciating the 2008 capital expenditures, primarily relating to leasehold improvements for our headquarters placed into service in the first and second quarters of 2008. Amortization of intangible assets remained relatively unchanged from 2008 to 2009.
Impairment loss
In the third quarter of 2010, based on a combination of factors (including the economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenues), we concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts previously recorded for our Toolbox.com reporting unit were impaired. The total impairment loss recognized in 2010 was $12.6 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, based on a combination of factors (including the economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenues), we concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts previously recorded for the 2007 acquisition of Toolbox.com were impaired. The total impairment loss recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 was $27.4 million.
Costs associated with exit activities
In June 2009, we ceased using and entered into a sublease agreement for a portion of our headquarters. In addition, we ceased using a portion of two other facilities, whereby we sublet a portion of one facility and are attempting to sublease a portion of the other facility. We incurred a total pre-tax charge of $11.5 million, substantially all of which was non-cash, primarily related to the impairment of leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment at our headquarters.
These actions advanced our ongoing transition to an integrated account management model, which reduced the need for space in our headquarters and other existing facilities, because we are locating sales and service staff closer to members. In addition, these actions represented another step in our efforts to align operating expenses more closely with our outlook, in light of economic conditions, and to redirect resources to areas with a greater potential for future growth. We believe existing facilities will be adequate for our current needs and additional facilities are available for lease at advantageous terms to meet any future needs.
Restructuring Costs
In October 2009, we acquired the stock of Tower Group. As part of our integration plans, we initiated a workforce reduction plan whereby approximately ten Tower Group employees were offered severance and related termination benefits. Restructuring costs associated with this action were $1.2 million.
In the second quarter of 2009, we committed to a separation plan (the “2009 Plan”), initially offering additional benefits for employees electing to voluntarily separate, for which approximately 155 employees submitted resignations effective beginning July 24, 2009. The 2009 Plan, which has concluded, was part of our continuing efforts to align expenses more closely with our outlook and to accelerate the placement of resources in areas that we believe have a greater potential for future growth. The 2009 Plan was not offered to executive officers, critical staff, and most sales staff. Pre-tax restructuring charges for the 2009 Plan were $7.8 million, most of which was associated with severance and related termination benefits. The annualized pre-tax savings associated with these restructuring activities were expected to be approximately $15 million.
24
Table of Contents
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we committed to a plan of workforce reductions to restructure our business to align expenses more closely with our revenue outlook, in light of continued economic turmoil in the U.S. and global economy, and to redirect resources to areas that we believe have a greater potential for future growth. This restructuring included a reduction of approximately 15% of our workforce; a realignment of products and services, including consolidation or retirement of certain products, to focus on five corporate decision centers and industries we serve; and the implementation of a new, integrated approach to prospect and member account management. We recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8.0 million for these actions in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2009, most of which was associated with severance and related termination benefits. The annualized pre-tax savings associated with these restructuring activities were expected to be approximately $31 million.
We do not expect to incur any significant additional costs under the plans.
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net decreased in 2010 to income of $3.1 million from income of $6.2 million in 2009 and increased in 2009 from expense of $5.4 million in 2008.
In 2010, Other income (expense), net was primarily comprised of a $1.7 million increase in the fair value of deferred compensation plan assets and $1.5 million of interest income.
In 2009, Other income (expense), net was primarily comprised of $2.7 million related to an increase in deferred compensation plan assets, $1.8 million of interest income, a $1.1 million foreign currency re-measurement gain, and a $0.7 million gain on acquisition. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower investment returns for cash and cash equivalents in a lower interest rate environment and decreased levels of marketable securities.
In 2008, Other income (expense), net was comprised of interest income of $4.3 million, including a realized gain on the sale of marketable securities, offset by a $1.8 million write-down of a cost method investment, a $3.4 million foreign currency re-measurement loss, and $4.5 million related to a decrease in deferred compensation plan assets. The decrease in interest income, net was primarily due to decreased levels of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities and lower investment returns in a lower interest rate environment.
Provision for income taxes.
We recorded a Provision for income taxes of $28.0 million, $28.0 million and $33.3 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Changes in the effective tax rate from 2009 to 2010 and from 2008 to 2009 were primarily related to changes in unrealized currency translation gains/losses recognized for book purposes, permanently nondeductible expenses recognized for book purposes, and changes in the reserve for contingencies.
In 2010, our effective income tax rate was 41.0%, as opposed to the Federal statutory rate of 35%, primarily due to state income taxes and an increase in the reserve for contingencies.
In 2009, our effective income tax rate was 38.0%, as opposed to the Federal statutory rate of 35%, primarily due to the effects of unrealized currency translation gains recognized for book purposes, a reduced amount of permanently nondeductible expenses, state tax credits, and state income taxes.
In 2008, our effective income tax rate was 42.6%, as opposed to the Federal statutory rate of 35%, primarily due to the effects of unrealized currency translation losses recognized for book purposes, an increase in the state effective rate due to the move to Virginia, as well as an increase to the valuation allowance related to certain state deferred tax assets, and state income taxes.
Net deferred tax assets were $61.6 million and $46.9 million at December 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively. We will need to generate approximately $148.6 million of future taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010.
25
Table of Contents
Deferred tax assets related to most accrued expenses and deferred revenues are expected to reverse within one year. Deferred tax assets related to share based compensation are expected to reverse over five years. Deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards are expected to reverse over eleven years. Deferred tax assets related to goodwill, intangible assets and operating leases are expected to reverse over periods up to seventeen years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows generated from operating activities are our primary source of liquidity. In 2009, we worked aggressively to align our cost structure with a lower revenue profile by implementing a range of expense management activities, including the elimination of lower-performing programs, workforce reductions, discretionary expense controls, and real estate subleases. We had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $123.5 million and $76.2 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities balances and operating cash flows will be sufficient to support operations, capital expenditures, and the payment of dividends, as well as potential share repurchases during the next 12 months. Our future cash flows will depend on many factors, including our rate of Contract Value growth and selective investments to expand our brands and enhance technology. Also, we may make investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, which could also require us to seek additional financing.
In May 2010, we completed the acquisition of Iconoculture. We acquired 100% of the equity interests of Iconoculture for an initial cash payment of $16.2 million, less cash acquired totaling $7.2 million, plus a working capital adjustment of $4.0 million paid in July 2010. We also will be required to pay an additional $1.5 million on April 1, 2011, less any amounts that we are entitled to retain to reimburse us for any losses that are subject to indemnification by the sellers under the terms of the acquisition agreement. Additional consideration may be payable on April 1, 2011 if Iconoculture’s financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2010 meets specified targets. The estimate of the fair value of this liability is $1.9 million at December 31, 2010. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration of $24.2 million was preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. We allocated $9.2 million to intangible assets with a weighted average amortization period of 4.5 years and $11.0 million to goodwill.
Cash flows from operating activities.
Membership subscriptions, which principally are annually renewable agreements, generally are payable by members at the beginning of the contract term. Historically, the combination of revenue growth, profitable operations, and advance payments of membership subscriptions has resulted in net cash flows provided by operating activities. Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $85.1 million, $28.6 million, and $85.2 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
In 2010, the increase of $56.5 million in cash flows provided by operations was primarily due to higher sales bookings during the year (collection of cash before recognition of revenue) as evidenced by an increase of $22.4 million in deferred revenues in 2010, net of deferred revenue acquired, compared to a decrease of $47.5 million in 2009.
In 2009, the decrease of $56.6 million in cash flows provided by operations was primarily attributable to decreases in bookings late in 2008 and throughout 2009 when compared to prior periods. Membership fees receivable, net decreased $34.3 million at December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007, which impacted cash collections in 2009.
We made income tax payments of $39.4 million, $32.7 million, and $55.2 million 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, and expect to continue making tax payments in future periods. We made payments under restructuring plans of $3.5 million, $12.4 million and $0.4 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cash flows from investing activities.
Our cash management, acquisition, and capital expenditure strategies affect cash flows from investing activities. Net cash flows provided by investing activities were $0.1 million and $11.5 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. In 2008, net cash flows used in investing activities were $16.3 million.
26
Table of Contents
In 2010, we generated $22.4 million from maturities of marketable securities and used $8.3 million for capital expenditures, primarily on technology infrastructure and additional office space buildouts. Additionally, we used $13.0 million for the Iconoculture acquisition, which includes an initial payment of $9.0 million, net of cash acquired, and a working capital payment of $4.0 million. An additional $1.0 million was utilized for an equity method investment.
In 2009, we generated $14.4 million from maturities of marketable securities and $5.2 million from the acquisition of businesses. We used $7.1 million for capital expenditures, primarily on technology infrastructure, and $1.0 million for a cost method investment.
In October 2009, we acquired 100% of the equity interests of Tower Group to supplement our existing financial services products. As part of the acquisition, we agreed to assume certain obligations that might otherwise have been resolved prior to consummating the transaction. In return, the seller agreed to leave assets on the balance sheet to settle those obligations.
In 2008, we used $42.5 million in investing activities for capital expenditures, including furniture, fixtures and equipment and leasehold improvements primarily related to the build-out of our headquarters. The build-out was complete at December 31, 2008. In addition, we acquired two companies totaling $10.0 million, net of cash acquired. These activities were offset by $36.5 million of net proceeds from maturities and sales of marketable securities.
In October and December 2008, we acquired 100% of the equity interests of two companies that supplement our existing product offerings in two corporate decision centers by providing access to proprietary data assets. The total purchase price for both acquisitions was $10.0 million, net of cash acquired, which was allocated to the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. We allocated $5.6 million to intangible assets with a weighted average amortization period of eight years and $6.7 million was allocated to goodwill. The purchase price for one of the acquisitions may be increased if certain performance targets are met in each of the three annual periods ending December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011. We currently do not expect to pay any additional purchase price based on the achievement of these performance targets.
We estimate that capital expenditures to support our infrastructure will range from $8.0 to $10.0 million in 2011.
Cash flows from financing activities.
Net cash flows used in financing activities were $14.5 million, $24.6 million, and $100.3 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
In 2010, the $10.1 million decrease in cash flows used in financing activities was primarily the result of the decrease in our quarterly dividend in the second quarter of 2009. Our quarterly dividend was $0.44 in the first quarter of 2009 and $0.10 in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2009. We raised our dividend per share to $0.11 in the first quarter of 2010. Additionally, we repurchased $1.2 million of our shares in 2010 compared to $0.1 million in 2009. These repurchases were the result of employees using common stock received from the exercise of share-based awards to satisfy the statutory minimum federal and state withholding requirements generated from the exercise of such awards.
In 2009, dividend payments were $25.2 million and we repurchased approximately five thousand shares of our common stock for $0.1 million. The quarterly dividend was decreased from $0.44 to $0.10 per share in the second quarter of 2009 and increased to $0.11 per share in the first quarter of 2010. Proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan were $0.7 million.
In 2008, dividend payments were $59.9 million and we repurchased 1.0 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $41.8 million. Proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan were $1.4 million. In addition, we received $0.1 million from the exercise of common stock options.
At December 31, 2010, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $6.4 million for security deposits related to certain office leases. The letters of credit expire at various times from January 2011 through September 2011, but will automatically extend for another year from their expiration dates. To date, no amounts have been drawn on these agreements.
In February 2011, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share for the first quarter of 2011.
27
Table of Contents
Contractual obligations
The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations at December 31, 2010 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:
Payments due by period (in thousands) at December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | YE 2011 | YE 2012 | YE 2013 | YE 2014 | YE 2015 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 601,294 | $ | 35,069 | $ | 35,385 | $ | 35,402 | $ | 35,118 | $ | 35,493 | $ | 424,827 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation liability | 19,466 | 2,013 | 1,783 | 1,254 | 595 | 414 | 13,407 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase commitments | 6,688 | 4,914 | 1,673 | 101 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 627,448 | $ | 41,996 | $ | 38,841 | $ | 36,757 | $ | 35,713 | $ | 35,907 | $ | 438,234 | ||||||||||||||
Sublease receipts by period (in thousands) at December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | YE 2011 | YE 2012 | YE 2013 | YE 2014 | YE 2015 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subleases receipts | $ | 279,559 | $ | 9,932 | $ | 13,883 | $ | 14,238 | $ | 13,382 | $ | 14,954 | $ | 213,170 |
Operating lease obligations include scheduled rent increases for our headquarters of 1.85% per year through 2017, and 2% per year thereafter. Purchase commitments primarily relate to information technology and infrastructure contracts.
Not included in the table above are unrecognized tax benefits of $2.6 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet financing or other arrangements with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships (such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities) established for purposes of facilitating off-balance sheet financing or other debt arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risks that could impact our financial position and results of operations.
Interest rate risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our portfolio of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, which is designed for safety of principal and liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily comprised of cash held in demand deposit accounts at various financial institutions. Marketable securities consist primarily of Washington, D.C. tax exempt bonds. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit ratings related to cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. This portfolio is subject to inherent interest rate risk as investments mature and are reinvested at current market interest rates. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments to adjust our portfolio risk or income profile. A hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates would not have a material impact on our results of operations or cash flows.
28
Table of Contents
The following table provides the principal (notional) amount by expected maturity of our available-for-sale marketable securities at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Thereafter | Total | 12/31/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
Marketable securities | $ | 9,845 | $ | 3,700 | $ | 6,425 | $ | — | $ | 19,970 | $ | 20,964 | ||||||||||||
Average effective interest rate | 4.24 | % | 4.25 | % | 4.59 | % | — |
Foreign currency risk
Our international operations subject us to risks related to currency exchange fluctuations. Prices for our products are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, even when sold to members that are located outside the United States. Many of the costs associated with our operations located outside the United States are denominated in local currencies. As a consequence, increases in local currencies against the U.S. dollar in countries where we have foreign operations would result in higher operating costs and, potentially, reduced earnings. We use forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedging instruments, to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent with our cost reimbursement agreement with our UK subsidiary. A forward contract obligates us to exchange a predetermined amount of U.S. dollars to make an equivalent British Pound payment equal to the value of such exchange. The maximum length of time over which we hedge our exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 12 months.
The functional currency of substantially all of our wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. For these foreign subsidiaries, monetary balance sheet and related income statement accounts, representing claims receivable or payable in a fixed number of foreign currency units regardless of changes in exchange rates, are re-measured at the current exchange rate with exchange gains and losses recorded in income. Non-monetary balance sheet items and related income statement accounts, which do not result in a fixed future cash inflow or outflow of foreign currency units, are re-measured at their historical exchange rates. In 2010 and 2009, we recorded foreign currency translation gains totaling $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, which are included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income. A hypothetical 10% adverse movement in British Pounds would result in additional expense of approximately $4 million.
29
Table of Contents
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
Report of Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and include amounts based on management’s estimates and judgments.
Management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the framework inInternal Control - - Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon the evaluation under this framework, management concluded with reasonable assurance that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
Our control environment is the foundation for our system of internal control over financial reporting and is reflected in our Code of Conduct for Officers, Directors and Employees. It sets the tone of our organization and includes factors such as integrity and ethical values. Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by formal policies and procedures that are reviewed, modified and improved as changes occur in business conditions and operations.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised solely of outside directors, meets periodically with members of management and the independent auditors to review and discuss internal control over financial reporting and accounting and financial reporting matters. The independent registered public accounting firm reports to the Audit Committee and accordingly has full and free access to the Audit Committee at any time.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.
/s/ Thomas L. Monahan III | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
February 28, 2011 | ||
/s/ Richard S. Lindahl | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
February 28, 2011 |
30
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Corporate Executive Board Company
The Corporate Executive Board Company
We have audited The Corporate Executive Board Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Corporate Executive Board Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, The Corporate Executive Board Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Corporate Executive Board Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 of The Corporate Executive Board Company and subsidiaries, and our report dated February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 28, 2011
February 28, 2011
31
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Corporate Executive Board Company
The Corporate Executive Board Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Corporate Executive Board Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Corporate Executive Board Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The Corporate Executive Board Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 28, 2011
February 28, 2011
32
Table of Contents
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 102,498 | $ | 31,760 | ||||
Marketable securities | 10,114 | 18,666 | ||||||
Membership fees receivable, net | 141,322 | 125,716 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 18,727 | 7,989 | ||||||
Deferred incentive compensation | 15,710 | 9,721 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 10,388 | 9,584 | ||||||
Total current assets | 298,759 | 203,436 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 43,524 | 39,744 | ||||||
Marketable securities | 10,850 | 25,784 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 83,140 | 89,462 | ||||||
Goodwill | 29,266 | 27,129 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 13,828 | 12,246 | ||||||
Other non-current assets | 30,782 | 25,394 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 510,149 | $ | 423,195 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 52,439 | $ | 48,764 | ||||
Accrued incentive compensation | 40,719 | 27,975 | ||||||
Deferred revenues | 251,200 | 222,053 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 344,358 | 298,792 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 679 | 867 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 82,296 | 73,259 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 427,333 | 372,918 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 43,533,802 and 43,313,597 shares issued and 34,322,055 and 34,147,008 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively | 435 | 433 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 409,558 | 401,629 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 300,030 | 274,718 | ||||||
Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income | 1,714 | 1,181 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 9,211,747 and 9,166,589 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively | (628,921 | ) | (627,684 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 82,816 | 50,277 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 510,149 | $ | 423,195 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
33
Table of Contents
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 438,907 | $ | 442,906 | $ | 558,352 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||
Cost of services | 155,769 | 147,019 | 179,950 | |||||||||
Member relations and marketing | 123,890 | 126,023 | 161,670 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 60,871 | 59,415 | 76,120 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,462 | 22,991 | 21,631 | |||||||||
Impairment loss | 12,645 | — | 27,449 | |||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 11,518 | — | |||||||||
Restructuring costs | — | 8,568 | 8,006 | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 373,637 | 375,534 | 474,826 | |||||||||
Income from operations | 65,270 | 67,372 | 83,526 | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 3,140 | 6,246 | (5,438 | ) | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 68,410 | 73,618 | 78,088 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 28,047 | 27,989 | 33,291 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 40,363 | $ | 45,629 | $ | 44,797 | ||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.31 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.30 | ||||||
Dividends per share | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 1.76 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 34,256 | 34,111 | 34,205 | |||||||||
Diluted | 34,553 | 34,293 | 34,329 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
34
Table of Contents
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 40,363 | $ | 45,629 | $ | 44,797 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (11,628 | ) | (255 | ) | (22,064 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of marketable securities premiums, net | 357 | 691 | 695 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation | 7,490 | 10,751 | 12,525 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements | (942 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,462 | 22,991 | 21,631 | |||||||||
Impairment loss | 12,645 | — | 27,449 | |||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 11,518 | — | |||||||||
Gain on acquisition | — | (680 | ) | — | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Membership fees receivable, net | (13,231 | ) | 3,622 | 36,112 | ||||||||
Deferred incentive compensation | (5,989 | ) | 2,900 | 2,923 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (446 | ) | (91 | ) | 2,283 | |||||||
Other non-current assets | (5,387 | ) | (9,525 | ) | 6,375 | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (2,792 | ) | (18,533 | ) | 11,053 | |||||||
Accrued incentive compensation | 12,744 | 2,387 | (6,210 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred revenues | 22,413 | (47,512 | ) | (60,548 | ) | |||||||
Other liabilities | 9,036 | 4,681 | 8,211 | |||||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | 85,095 | 28,574 | 85,232 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (8,322 | ) | (7,052 | ) | (42,483 | ) | ||||||
Cost method investment | — | (1,000 | ) | (386 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | (13,957 | ) | 5,173 | (10,005 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of marketable securities | — | — | (12,489 | ) | ||||||||
Sales and maturities of marketable securities | 22,381 | 14,409 | 49,024 | |||||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | 102 | 11,530 | (16,339 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options | 436 | — | 100 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan | 451 | 725 | 1,419 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements | 942 | — | — | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury shares | (1,237 | ) | (87 | ) | (41,842 | ) | ||||||
Payment of dividends | (15,051 | ) | (25,196 | ) | (59,941 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flows used in financing activities | (14,459 | ) | (24,558 | ) | (100,264 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 70,738 | 15,546 | (31,371 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 31,760 | 16,214 | 47,585 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 102,498 | $ | 31,760 | $ | 16,214 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
Table of Contents
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010
(In thousands, except share amounts)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
elements of other | Annual | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | Additional | Retained | comprehensive | Treasury | comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | paid-in-capital | earnings | income (loss) | stock | Total | income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 34,993,581 | $ | 431 | $ | 383,636 | $ | 269,429 | $ | (194 | ) | $ | (585,755 | ) | $ | 67,547 | $ | 80,833 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of common stock options and release of restricted stock units | 46,125 | 1 | 100 | — | — | — | 101 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan | 39,730 | — | 1,419 | — | — | — | 1,419 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 12,525 | — | — | — | 12,525 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect of share-based compensation | — | — | (2,246 | ) | — | — | — | (2,246 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury shares | (1,035,684 | ) | — | — | — | — | (41,842 | ) | (41,842 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for- sale marketable securities, net of tax | — | — | — | — | 208 | — | 208 | 208 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency hedge | — | — | — | — | (333 | ) | — | (333 | ) | (333 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | 374 | — | 374 | 374 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends | — | — | — | (59,941 | ) | — | — | (59,941 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 44,797 | — | — | 44,797 | 44,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | 34,043,752 | 432 | 395,434 | 254,285 | 55 | (627,597 | ) | 22,609 | $ | 45,046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon the release of restricted stock units | 59,782 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan | 48,448 | 1 | 724 | — | — | — | 725 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 10,751 | — | — | — | 10,751 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect of share-based compensation | — | — | (5,280 | ) | — | — | — | (5,280 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury shares | (4,974 | ) | — | — | — | — | (87 | ) | (87 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for- sale marketable securities, net of tax | — | — | — | — | (195 | ) | — | (195 | ) | (195 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency hedge | — | — | — | — | 1,341 | — | 1,341 | 1,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | (20 | ) | — | (20 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends | — | — | — | (25,196 | ) | — | — | (25,196 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 45,629 | — | — | 45,629 | 45,629 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 34,147,008 | 433 | 401,629 | 274,718 | 1,181 | (627,684 | ) | 50,277 | $ | 46,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of common stock options and release of restricted stock units | 198,537 | 2 | 434 | — | — | — | 436 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan | 21,668 | — | 451 | — | — | — | 451 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 7,490 | — | — | — | 7,490 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect of share-based compensation | — | — | (446 | ) | — | — | — | (446 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury shares | (45,158 | ) | — | — | — | — | (1,237 | ) | (1,237 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for- sale marketable securities, net of tax | — | — | — | — | (460 | ) | — | (460 | ) | (460 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency hedge | — | — | — | — | 109 | — | 109 | 109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | 884 | — | 884 | 884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends | — | — | — | (15,051 | ) | — | — | (15,051 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 40,363 | — | — | 40,363 | 40,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 34,322,055 | $ | 435 | $ | 409,558 | $ | 300,030 | $ | 1,714 | $ | (628,921 | ) | $ | 82,816 | $ | 40,896 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
Table of Contents
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Description of operations
The Corporate Executive Board Company (the “Company”) provides essential information by analyzing and disseminating the most successful practices from its global network of members. The Company drives corporate performance through a network of executives and business professionals by providing actionable insights, analytical tools, and advisory support to quickly and confidently focus efforts on what executives and their teams need to know, and do, next. The Company provides its members with the authoritative and timely decision support they need to elevate company performance and excel in their careers. For an annual fee, members of each program and service have access to an integrated set of products and services, including best practices studies, executive education, customized analysis, proprietary databases and decision support tools. The Company also generates advertising and content-related revenues through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Toolbox.com, Inc. (“Toolbox.com”).
Note 2. Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These accounting principles require the Company to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. The Company believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which it relies are reasonable based upon information available to the Company at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, the Company’s financial statements will be affected.
Foreign currency
The functional currency of substantially all of the Company’s wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. For these foreign subsidiaries, monetary balance sheet and related income statement accounts, representing claims receivable or payable in a fixed number of foreign currency units regardless of changes in exchange rates, are re-measured at the current exchange rate, with exchange gains and losses recorded in income. Non-monetary balance sheet items and related income statement accounts, which do not result in a fixed future cash inflow or outflow of foreign currency units, are re-measured at their historical exchange rates. In 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded foreign currency translation gains totaling $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, which are included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
For one of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, the functional currency is the local currency. For this subsidiary, the translation of its foreign currency into U.S. dollars is performed for assets and liabilities using current foreign currency exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using average foreign currency exchange rates during the period. Capital accounts are translated at historical foreign currency exchange rates. Translation gains and losses are included in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Adjustments that arise from foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in a currency other than the local currency are included in Other income (expense), net on the consolidated statements of income.
37
Table of Contents
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance is primarily comprised of cash held in demand deposit accounts at various financial institutions. Investments with maturities of more than three months of purchase are classified as marketable securities. At December 31, 2010 the Company’s marketable securities consisted primarily of Washington, D.C. tax exempt bonds. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s marketable securities consisted primarily of U.S. Treasury notes and Washington, D.C. tax exempt bonds. The Company classifies its marketable securities as available-for-sale, which are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. The net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale marketable securities are excluded from net income and are included within accumulated elements of comprehensive income (loss). The specific identification method is used to compute the realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities. The Company may elect not to hold these marketable securities to maturity and may elect to sell these securities at any time.
Allowance for uncollectible revenue
The Company records an allowance for uncollectible revenue, as a reduction in revenues, based upon management’s analysis and estimates as to the collectability of membership fees receivable, which generally is not the result of a members’ ability to pay. Revenues under membership agreements are generally recognized ratably over the membership period, typically 12 months. Accordingly, the allowance for uncollectible revenue is recorded against the amount of revenues that have been recognized under the contracts that are deemed uncollectible. Membership fees receivable that have not been recognized as revenues are recorded in deferred revenues. As part of its analysis, the Company examines its collections history, the age of the receivables in question, any specific member collection issues that it has identified, general market conditions, member concentrations and current economic and industry trends. Membership fees receivable balances are not collateralized.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment consists of furniture, fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements, capitalized computer software and Web site development costs. Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation expense. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term. Capitalized software and Web site development costs are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Goodwill
As the result of acquisitions, the Company records any excess purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired as goodwill. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually on October 1, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred, by comparing its fair value to its carrying value. The Company has concluded that its reporting units used to assess goodwill impairment are the same as its operating segments. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in the performance of the acquired business, adverse market conditions, and a variety of other circumstances. If it is determined that impairment has occurred, the Company records a write-down of the carrying value as an operating expense in the period the determination is made. Although the Company believes goodwill is appropriately stated in its consolidated financial statements, changes in strategy or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and require an adjustment to the recorded balance.
The determination of the fair value of individual reporting units is based upon the average of an income approach (discounted cash flow method) and a market approach (guideline company method). These models require the Company to make various judgmental estimates and assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, discount factors, and valuation multiples.
In 2010 and 2008, the Company concluded there were impairment indicators relating to its Toolbox.com reporting unit and recognized an impairment loss in each of these years (see Note 9).
38
Table of Contents
Intangible assets, net
Intangible assets consist primarily of technology and member relationships. These assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 2 to 20 years. The gross carrying amount of intangible assets was $34.4 million and $26.9 million and accumulated amortization was $20.6 million and $14.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense was $5.9 million, $5.7 million, and $5.8 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. In 2010 and 2008, the Company recorded an impairment loss for intangible assets of $3.1 million and $4.5 million, respectively (see Note 9). The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the succeeding five years ended 2011 through 2015 is $3.8 million, $3.5 million, $2.6 million, $1.9 million, and $0.7 million, respectively.
Recovery of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The test for recoverability is made using an estimate of the undiscounted expected future cash flows and, if required, the impairment loss is measured as the amount that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the asset’s fair value if the asset is not recoverable.
In 2009, the Company incurred costs associated with exit activities and recorded a charge of $11.5 million primarily related to the impairment of leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment at its Arlington, Virginia headquarters.
Fair value of financial instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, membership fees receivable, investments in variable insurance products for the Company’s deferred compensation plan, forward currency contracts, and accounts payable. The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments approximates their fair value. In 2008, the Company recorded a $1.8 million other than temporary impairment loss for a cost method investment.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized when (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, (2) the fee is fixed and determinable, (3) services have been rendered and payment has been contractually earned, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues from membership subscriptions are recognized ratably over the term of the related subscription, which generally is 12 months. Membership fees generally are billable, and revenue recognition begins, when a member agrees to the terms of the membership and fees receivable and the related deferred revenue are recorded upon the commencement of the agreement or collection of fees, if earlier. Certain membership fees are billed on an installment basis. Members generally may request a refund of their membership fees, which is provided on a pro-rata basis relative to the length of the remaining membership term, under a service guarantee.
Advertising and content related revenues from Toolbox.com are recognized as the services are provided.
Deferred incentive compensation
Direct incentive compensation paid to the Company’s employees related to the negotiation of new and renewal memberships is deferred and amortized over the term of the related memberships.
Operating leases
The Company recognizes rent expense under operating leases on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease, including free-rent periods. Lease incentives, relating to allowances provided by landlords, are amortized over the term of the lease as a reduction of rent expense. The Company recognizes sublease income on a straight-line basis over the term of the sublease, including free rent periods and escalations, as a reduction of rent expense. Costs associated with acquiring a subtenant, including broker commissions and tenant allowances, are amortized over the sublease term as a reduction of sublease income.
Share-based compensation
The Company has several share-based compensation plans. These plans provide for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units and incentive bonuses to employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date of the share-based awards based on their fair value, and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, net of an estimated forfeiture rate.
39
Table of Contents
The grant date fair value of restricted stock units is measured by reducing the share price at that date by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid during the requisite vesting period. The grant date fair value of stock appreciation rights is calculated using a lattice valuation model. Determining the fair value of share-based awards is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including the term of the share-based awards, risk-free interest rates over the vesting period, expected dividend rates, the price volatility of the Company’s stock and estimated forfeiture rates of the awards. Fair value and forfeiture rate estimates are based on assumptions the Company believes to be reasonable. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.
Advertising expense
The costs of designing and preparing advertising material are recognized throughout the production process. Communication costs, including magazine and newspaper space, radio time, and distribution, are recognized when the communication takes place. Advertising expense in 2010 and 2009 was $1.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Income taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. The realization of deferred tax assets is contingent upon the generation of future taxable income. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce such deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be ultimately realized.
Concentration of credit risk and sources of revenues
Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of membership fees receivable, cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities. Concentration of credit risk with respect to membership fees receivable is limited due to the large number of members and their dispersion across many different industries and countries worldwide. However, the Company may be exposed to a declining membership base in periods of unforeseen market downturns, severe competition, or international developments. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the membership base and related membership fees receivable and establishes allowances for potential credit losses.
The Company’s international operations subject it to risks related to currency exchange fluctuations. Prices for the Company’s products and services are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, even when sold to members that are located outside the United States. Many of the costs associated with the Company’s operations located outside the United States are denominated in local currencies. The Company uses forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedging instruments, to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent with its cost reimbursement agreement with its UK subsidiary. A forward contract obligates the Company to exchange a predetermined amount of U.S. dollars to make an equivalent British Pound payment equal to the value of such exchange. The maximum length of time over which the Company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 12 months.
The Company maintains a portfolio of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, which is designed for safety of principal and liquidity. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit ratings related to cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income
Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income included within stockholders’ equity consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Unrealized gains, net of tax, for available-for-sale marketable securities | $ | 416 | $ | 876 | ||||
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax, for forward currency contracts | 60 | (49 | ) | |||||
Cumulative translation adjustment | 1,238 | 354 | ||||||
Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income | $ | 1,714 | $ | 1,181 | ||||
40
Table of Contents
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding during the period increased by the dilutive effect of potential common shares outstanding during the period. The number of potential common shares outstanding has been determined in accordance with the treasury stock method to the extent they are dilutive. Common share equivalents consist of common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding share-based compensation awards. A reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average common shares outstanding is as follows (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 34,256 | 34,111 | 34,205 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive shares outstanding | 297 | 182 | 124 | |||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 34,553 | 34,293 | 34,329 | |||||||||
In 2010, 2009, and 2008, 2.45 million, 3.15 million, and 3.46 million shares, respectively, related to share-based compensation awards have been excluded from the calculation of the effect of dilutive shares outstanding shown above because their impact would be anti-dilutive.
Note 3. Recent accounting pronouncements
Recently adopted
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance requiring additional disclosures for significant transfers between Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and clarifications to existing fair value disclosures related to the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. The adoption of this new accounting guidance in 2010 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Not yet adopted
In January 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to require additional disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of Level 3 fair value measurements. This new accounting guidance will be effective on January 1, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new accounting guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for revenue recognition with multiple deliverables that is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. This new accounting guidance will be effective on January 1, 2011 and it eliminates the residual method under the current guidance and replaces it with the “relative selling price” method when allocating revenue in a multiple deliverable arrangement. The selling price for each deliverable shall be determined using vendor specific objective evidence of selling price, if it exists, otherwise third-party evidence of selling price shall be used. If neither exists for a deliverable, the vendor shall use its best estimate of the selling price for that deliverable. After adoption, this guidance will also require expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The Company’s memberships are sold with multiple elements with the majority of all service offerings being consistently available throughout the membership period. The Company currently expects that approximately 5% to 10% of 2011 sales will not be recognized ratably across the membership periods, rather it will be recognized upon delivery of services, or related deliverables, or upon completion of the membership period, both of which may be subsequent to 2011.
41
Table of Contents
Note 4. Acquisitions
2010 Acquisition
In May 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of Iconoculture, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Iconoculture”). Iconoculture provides comprehensive consumer insights and effective strategic marketing advisory services and project support to an established customer base. The Company acquired 100% of the equity interests of Iconoculture for an initial cash payment of $16.2 million, less cash acquired totaling $7.2 million, plus a working capital adjustment of $4.0 million paid in July 2010. The Company also will be required to pay an additional $1.5 million on April 1, 2011, less any amounts that the Company is entitled to retain to reimburse it for any losses that are subject to indemnification by the sellers under the terms of the acquisition agreement. Additional consideration may be payable on April 1, 2011 if Iconoculture’s financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2010 meets certain specified targets. The estimate of the fair value of this liability at the acquisition date was $3.0 million. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company changed its fair value estimate of the liability to $1.9 million and recorded the change in estimate as a reduction in General and administrative expense. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration was $24.2 million and was preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. The Company allocated $9.2 million to intangible assets with a weighted average amortization period of 4.5 years and $11.0 million to goodwill.
2009 Acquisition
In October 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the equity interest of The Tower Group, Inc. (“Tower Group”) to supplement its existing financial services products. As part of the acquisition, the Company agreed to assume certain obligations that might otherwise have been resolved prior to consummating the transaction. In return, the seller agreed to leave assets on the balance sheet to settle those obligations. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.7 million gain, which is included in Other income (expense), net.
2008 Acquisitions
In October and December 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the equity interests of two companies that supplement its existing product offerings. The total purchase price for both acquisitions was $10.0 million, net of cash acquired, which was allocated to the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. The Company allocated $5.6 million to intangible assets with a weighted average amortization period of eight years and $6.7 million to goodwill. The purchase price for one of the acquisitions may be increased if certain performance targets are met during 2011.
Note 5. Fair value measurements
Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There is a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
• | Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. |
42
Table of Contents
The Company has segregated all assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the tables below (in thousands):
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||
as of | Fair Value Measurements Using | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | Fair Value Hierarchy | |||||||||||||||
2010 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 102,498 | $ | 102,498 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Debt securities issued by the District of Columbia | 20,964 | 20,964 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Variable insurance products held in a Rabbi Trust | 14,905 | — | 14,905 | — | ||||||||||||
Forward currency exchange contracts | 232 | $ | — | 232 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Forward currency exchange contracts | 113 | — | 113 | — | ||||||||||||
Contingent consideration — Iconoculture | $ | 1,900 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,900 |
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||
as of | Fair Value Measurements Using | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | Fair Value Hierarchy | |||||||||||||||
2009 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 31,760 | $ | 31,760 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Debt securities issued by the District of Columbia | 31,859 | 31,859 | — | — | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities | 12,591 | 12,591 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Variable insurance products held in a Rabbi Trust | 13,612 | — | 13,612 | — | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Forward currency exchange contracts | $ | 173 | $ | — | 173 | $ | — |
The fair value of variable insurance products held in a Rabbi Trust are based on actuarial estimates derived from various observable market inputs. The fair value for foreign currency exchange contracts are based on bank quotations for similar instruments using models with market-based inputs.
The fair value estimate of the Iconoculture contingent consideration was $2.6 million at the date of acquisition. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date, including changes arising from events that occurred after the acquisition date, such as changes in the Company’s estimate of performance achievements and discount rates, are recognized in earnings in periods when the estimated fair value changes. The following table represents a reconciliation of the change in the liability:
Contingent | ||||
Consideration | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | $ | — | ||
Addition of Iconoculture contingent consideration | 2,634 | |||
Accretion | 366 | |||
Fair value change | (1,100 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | $ | 1,900 | ||
Certain assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is impairment). The Company recorded fair value adjustments relating to the Iconoculture contingent consideration described above and the Toolbox.com impairment (see Note 9). All such fair value measurements are included in the level 3 fair value hierarchy.
43
Table of Contents
Note 6. Marketable securities
The aggregate fair value, amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale marketable securities are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||
Washington D.C. tax exempt bonds | $ | 20,964 | $ | 20,265 | $ | 699 | $ | — | ||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury notes | $ | 12,591 | $ | 12,542 | $ | 49 | $ | — | ||||||||
Washington D.C. tax exempt bonds | 31,859 | 30,462 | 1,397 | — | ||||||||||||
$ | 44,450 | $ | 43,004 | $ | 1,446 | $ | — | |||||||||
The following table summarizes marketable securities maturities (in thousands):
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Fair | Amortized | |||||||
Value | Cost | |||||||
Less than one year | $ | 10,114 | $ | 9,928 | ||||
Matures in 1 to 5 years | 10,850 | 10,337 | ||||||
Marketable securities | $ | 20,964 | $ | 20,265 | ||||
Note 7. Membership fees receivable
Membership fees receivable consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Billed | $ | 106,784 | $ | 99,273 | ||||
Unbilled | 36,327 | 28,929 | ||||||
143,111 | 128,202 | |||||||
Allowance for uncollectible revenue | (1,789 | ) | (2,486 | ) | ||||
Membership fees receivable, net | $ | 141,322 | $ | 125,716 | ||||
Note 8. Property and equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment | $ | 47,592 | $ | 42,671 | ||||
Leasehold improvements | 77,924 | 77,120 | ||||||
Computer software and Web site development costs | 24,916 | 20,289 | ||||||
150,432 | 140,080 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (67,292 | ) | (50,618 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 83,140 | $ | 89,462 | ||||
Depreciation expense was $14.6 million, $17.3 million, and $15.8 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
44
Table of Contents
Note 9. Goodwill and intangible assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Beginning of year | $ | 27,129 | $ | 26,392 | ||||
Goodwill acquired | 11,453 | 628 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 205 | 109 | ||||||
Impairment loss | (9,521 | ) | — | |||||
End of year | $ | 29,266 | $ | 27,129 | ||||
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company concluded there were impairment indicators relating to its Toolbox.com reporting unit based on a combination of factors (including the current economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenue). The Company completed an impairment test at September 1, 2010 and concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts were impaired. The total pre-tax impairment loss recognized in 2010 was $12.6 million ($9.5 million related to goodwill and $3.1 million related to intangible assets).
The Company utilized the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and the market approach (guideline company method and the transaction method) in the determination of the fair value. Significant assumptions included: expected revenue growth rates, reporting unit profit margins, and working capital levels; a discount rate of 19%; and a terminal value based upon long-term growth assumptions. The expected future revenue growth rates and profit margins were determined after taking into consideration historical revenue growth rates and profit margins, the Company’s assessment of future market potential, and the Company’s expectations of future business performance.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, based on a combination of factors (including the economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenues), the Company concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts previously recorded for the 2007 acquisition of Toolbox.com were impaired. We utilized the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and the market approach (guideline company method and the transaction method) in the determination of the fair value of Toolbox.com. The total impairment loss recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 was $27.4 million ($22.9 million related to goodwill and $4.5 million related to intangible assets).
Note 10. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 6,115 | $ | 7,411 | ||||
Advanced membership payments received | 16,149 | 10,995 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 30,175 | 30,358 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 52,439 | $ | 48,764 | ||||
Note 11. Other liabilities
Other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Deferred compensation | $ | 11,215 | $ | 9,890 | ||||
Lease incentives | 31,619 | 33,588 | ||||||
Deferred rent benefit — long term | 23,079 | 19,459 | ||||||
Other | 16,383 | 10,322 | ||||||
Total other liabilities | $ | 82,296 | $ | 73,259 | ||||
45
Table of Contents
Note 12. Derivative instruments and hedging
The Company’s international operations are subject to risks related to currency exchange fluctuations. Prices for the Company’s products and services are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, including products and services sold to members that are located outside the United States. Many of the costs associated with the Company’s operations located outside the United States are denominated in local currencies. As a consequence, increases in local currencies against the U.S. dollar in countries where the Company has foreign operations would result in higher effective operating costs and, potentially, reduced earnings. The Company uses forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedging instruments, to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent with its cost reimbursement agreements with its United Kingdom subsidiary. A forward contract obligates the Company to exchange a predetermined amount of U.S. dollars to make equivalent Pound Sterling (“GBP”) payments equal to the value of such exchanges.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 12 months. The forward contracts are recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Changes in the fair value measurements of the derivative instruments are reflected as adjustments to other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and/or current earnings. The notional amount of outstanding forward contracts was $18.9 million at December 31, 2010.
The fair value of all derivative instruments, which are designated as hedging instruments, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 232 | $ | — | ||||
Liability | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 113 | $ | 173 |
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments on the Company’s consolidated statements of income is shown in the table below (in thousands):
Location of Loss Reclassified from | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified | Amount of Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Accumulated OCI into Income | from Accumulated OCI into Income | Derivatives in cash flow | Recognized in OCI on Derivative | |||||||||
(Effective portion) | (Effective portion) | hedging relationships | (Effective portion) | |||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2010 | Year ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||
Cost of services | $ | 3 | Forward currency | $ | 190 | |||||||
Member relations and marketing | 4 | Contracts | ||||||||||
General & Administrative | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Location of Loss Reclassified from | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified | Amount of Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Accumulated OCI into Income | from Accumulated OCI into Income | Derivatives in cash flow | Recognized in OCI on Derivative | |||||||||
(Effective portion) | (Effective portion) | hedging relationships | (Effective portion) | |||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2009 | Year ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
Cost of services | $ | (1,052 | ) | Forward currency | $ | 168 | ||||||
Member relations and marketing | (780 | ) | Contracts | |||||||||
General & Administrative | (401 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (2,233 | ) | |||||||||
46
Table of Contents
Note 13. Stockholders’ equity and share-based compensation
Share-based compensation
Under share-based compensation plans, the Company may grant employees, directors and consultants options to purchase common stock, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock units. Options are rights to purchase common stock of the Company at the fair market value on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights are equity settled share-based compensation arrangements whereby the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that will ultimately be issued is based upon the appreciation of the Company’s common stock and the number of awards granted to an individual. Restricted stock units are equity settled share-based compensation arrangements of a number of shares of the Company’s common stock. Holders of options and stock appreciation rights do not participate in dividends until after the exercise of the award. Restricted stock unit holders do not participate in dividends nor do they have voting rights until the restrictions lapse.
Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and adjusted, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The forfeiture rate is based on historical experience. Share-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, for only those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of four years. When estimating forfeitures, the Company considers voluntary termination behaviors as well as trends of actual forfeitures. In 2010, the Company decreased its estimated forfeiture rate to 14%. In 2009, the Company increased its estimated forfeiture rate from 14% to 16%.
The Company recognized total share-based compensation costs of $7.5 million, $10.8 million and $12.5 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. These amounts are allocated to Cost of services, Member relations and marketing, and General and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. The total income tax benefit for share-based compensation arrangements was $3.0 million, $4.3 million and $5.0 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2010, $14.7 million of total estimated unrecognized share-based compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years.
Equity incentive plans
The Company issues awards under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (the “2004 Plan”) and the Directors’ Stock Option Plan, adopted in 1998 (the “Directors’ Plan’’) (together “the Plans’’). All regular employees, directors and consultants are eligible to receive equity awards. The Plans provide for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units and incentive bonuses. The 2004 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 6.3 million shares of common stock, plus any shares subject to outstanding awards under prior equity compensation plans up to an aggregate maximum of 9.4 million shares. The terms of the awards granted under the Plans, including vesting, forfeiture, and post termination exercisability are set by the plan administrator, subject to certain restrictions. The contractual term of equity awards ranges from 4 to 10 years. The Company had 2.2 million shares available for issuance under the Plans at December 31, 2010.
Restricted stock units
The following table summarizes the changes in restricted stock units:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Weighted Average | Number | Weighted Average | Number | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||
of Restricted | Grant Date Fair | of Restricted | Grant Date Fair | of Restricted | Grant Date Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Units | Value | Stock Units | Value | Stock Units | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonvested, beginning of year | 655,792 | $ | 15.17 | 133,196 | $ | 60.18 | 101,268 | $ | 84.03 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 403,310 | 25.76 | 665,059 | 10.72 | 70,235 | 36.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (43,536 | ) | 13.08 | (81,940 | ) | 19.42 | (13,045 | ) | 68.56 | |||||||||||||||
Vested | (183,109 | ) | 20.09 | (60,523 | ) | 59.60 | (25,262 | ) | 85.26 | |||||||||||||||
Nonvested, end of year | 832,457 | $ | 19.33 | 655,792 | $ | 15.17 | 133,196 | $ | 60.18 | |||||||||||||||
47
Table of Contents
Stock appreciation rights
The following assumptions were used to value grants of stock appreciation rights:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 4.30 | % | — | 4.31 | % | |||||||
Dividend yield | 1.50 | % | — | 3.86 | % | |||||||
Expected life of option (in years) | 4.8 | — | 5.1 | |||||||||
Expected volatility (calculated historically) | 42 | % | — | 35 | % | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value of share-based compensation awards granted | $ | 11.05 | $ | — | $ | 7.37 |
The following table summarizes the changes in stock appreciation rights:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Number of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Weighted | Stock | Weighted | Stock | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Appreciation | Average | Appreciation | Average | Appreciation | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Rights | Exercise Price | Rights | Exercise Price | Rights | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 1,351,698 | $ | 64.51 | 1,848,263 | $ | 66.16 | 1,293,319 | $ | 83.82 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 60,000 | 30.01 | — | — | 816,507 | 40.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (122,625 | ) | 62.64 | (496,565 | ) | 70.81 | (261,563 | ) | 74.80 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of year | 1,289,073 | $ | 63.08 | 1,351,698 | $ | 64.51 | 1,848,263 | $ | 66.16 | |||||||||||||||
Vested or expected to vest, end of year | 1,136,816 | $ | 64.71 | 1,089,856 | $ | 65.39 | 1,270,404 | $ | 69.22 | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable, end of year | 860,271 | $ | 70.73 | 604,176 | $ | 74.04 | 383,237 | $ | 87.38 | |||||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of our common stock for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the closing price. The vested stock appreciation rights outstanding did not have any intrinsic value at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The following table summarizes the characteristics of stock appreciation rights at December 31, 2010:
Stock Appreciation Rights Outstanding | Stock Appreciation Rights Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Average | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Exercise | Contractual | |||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Shares | Price | Life-Years | Shares | Price | Life-Years | ||||||||||||||||||
$30.01 – $45.74 | 589,506 | $ | 40.05 | 4.40 | 268,886 | $ | 41.19 | 4.08 | ||||||||||||||||
66.60 – 76.00 | 435,552 | 73.35 | 3.31 | 327,370 | 73.36 | 3.31 | ||||||||||||||||||
97.56 – 97.56 | 264,015 | 97.56 | 2.19 | 264,015 | 97.56 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
$30.01 – $97.56 | 1,289,073 | $ | 63.08 | 3.58 | 860,271 | $ | 70.73 | 3.21 | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock options
The following table summarizes the changes in common stock options:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Number | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
of Options | Exercise Price | of Options | Exercise Price | of Options | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 1,202,717 | $ | 53.03 | 1,803,027 | $ | 52.75 | 2,198,953 | $ | 53.28 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (56,002 | ) | 55.83 | (600,310 | ) | 52.19 | (326,869 | ) | 61.14 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised | (23,850 | ) | 27.37 | — | — | (69,057 | ) | 29.74 | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of year | 1,122,865 | $ | 53.44 | 1,202,717 | $ | 53.03 | 1,803,027 | $ | 52.75 | |||||||||||||||
Vested or expected to vest, end of year | 1,122,865 | $ | 53.44 | 1,202,717 | $ | 53.03 | 1,701,917 | $ | 51.97 | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable, end of year | 1,122,865 | $ | 53.44 | 1,202,717 | $ | 53.03 | 1,580,902 | $ | 50.89 | |||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010, the Company had common stock options outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 201,375 shares with an exercise price below the quoted price of its stock, resulting in an aggregate intrinsic value of $1.1 million. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value of common stock options outstanding and exercisable was $0. The total intrinsic value of common stock options exercised in 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $0.1 million, $0, and $0.9 million, respectively.
48
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the characteristics of options at December 31, 2010:
Options Outstanding and Exercisable | ||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||
Average | Remaining | |||||||||||
Range of Exercise | Exercise | Contractual | ||||||||||
Prices | Shares | Price | Life-Years | |||||||||
$31.00 – $36.81 | 201,375 | $ | 32.28 | 1.71 | ||||||||
45.10 – 64.30 | 393,115 | 46.37 | 0.70 | |||||||||
64.88 – 89.70 | 528,375 | 66.76 | 1.25 | |||||||||
$31.00 – $89.70 | 1,122,865 | $ | 53.44 | 1.14 | ||||||||
Share Repurchases
Repurchases may continue to be made from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions. No minimum number of shares has been fixed. The Company funds its share repurchases with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. In 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company repurchased approximately 45,000, 5,000, and 1.0 million shares, respectively, of its common stock at a total cost of $1.2 million, $0.1 million, and $41.8 million, respectively. The remaining share repurchase authorization was $21.1 million at December 31, 2010.
Dividends
The Company funds its dividend payments with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. In February 2011, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share. The dividend is payable on March 31, 2011 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2011. In 2010, the Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.11 per share for each quarter of 2010.
Preferred stock
The Company had 5.0 million shares of preferred stock authorized with a par value of $0.01 per share at December 31, 2010 and 2009. No shares were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Note 14. Costs associated with exit activities
In June 2009, the Company ceased using and entered into a sublease agreement for a portion of its headquarters facility. Also in 2009, the Company ceased using a portion of two other facilities. The Company has sublet a portion of one facility and is attempting to sublease a portion of the other facility. The Company incurred a total pre-tax charge of $11.5 million in 2009 primarily related to the impairment of leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment.
Note 15. Restructuring costs
As part of the Company’s plans to integrate Tower Group, the Company initiated a workforce reduction plan (“Tower Group Plan”) whereby approximately ten Tower Group employees were offered severance agreements subsequent to the acquisition. Restructuring costs associated with this action were $1.2 million, consisting of severance and related termination benefits.
49
Table of Contents
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company committed to a separation plan (the “2009 Plan”), initially offering additional benefits for employees electing to voluntarily separate, for which approximately 155 employees submitted resignations effective beginning July 24, 2009. The 2009 Plan, which has concluded, is part of the Company’s continuing efforts (as previously reported) to align its expenses more closely with its outlook and to accelerate the placement of resources in areas that management believes have a greater potential for future growth. The 2009 Plan was not offered to executive officers, critical staff, and most sales staff of the Company. Pre-tax restructuring charges for the 2009 Plan were originally estimated to be approximately $7.8 million, most of which was associated with severance and related termination benefits.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company committed to a plan (the “2008 Plan”) of workforce reductions to restructure its business. The restructuring included a reduction of approximately 15% of the Company’s workforce at that time; a realignment of products and services, including consolidation or retirement of certain products, to focus on five corporate decision centers and industries we serve; and the implementation of a new, integrated approach to prospect and member account management. Pre-tax restructuring charges for the 2008 Plan were originally estimated to be approximately $9.3 million, most of which was associated with severance and related termination benefits. The Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The Company does not expect to incur any significant additional costs under the 2008 Plan, 2009 Plan, or Tower Group Plan.
Tower | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | Group | ||||||||||
Plan | Plan | Plan | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ | 7,607 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Costs incurred | 1,253 | 7,808 | 1,162 | |||||||||
Cash payments | (7,089 | ) | (5,292 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||
Change in estimate | (1,239 | ) | (44 | ) | — | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 532 | 2,472 | 1,109 | |||||||||
Cash payments | (498 | ) | (1,843 | ) | (1,109 | ) | ||||||
Change in estimate | (34 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | $ | — | $ | 629 | $ | — | ||||||
Note 16. Income taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Current tax expense | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 31,158 | $ | 20,914 | $ | 42,607 | ||||||
State and local | 8,244 | 6,035 | 9,639 | |||||||||
Foreign | 273 | 1,295 | 1,865 | |||||||||
Total current | 39,675 | 28,244 | 54,111 | |||||||||
Deferred tax (benefit) expense | ||||||||||||
Federal | (8,214 | ) | 1,077 | (19,535 | ) | |||||||
State and local | (3,141 | ) | (949 | ) | (841 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | (273 | ) | (383 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||||
Total deferred | (11,628 | ) | (255 | ) | (20,820 | ) | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 28,047 | $ | 27,989 | $ | 33,291 | ||||||
In 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company made cash payments for income taxes of $39.4 million, $32.7 million and $55.2 million, respectively.
50
Table of Contents
The components of Income before provision for income taxes were as follows:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
U.S. sources | $ | 67,962 | $ | 69,600 | $ | 74,002 | ||||||
Non-U.S. sources | 448 | 4,018 | 4,086 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 68,410 | $ | 73,618 | $ | 78,088 | ||||||
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income taxes determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax statutory rate to income before provision for income taxes as follows:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.3 | |||||||||
Foreign income tax | (0.3 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency loss | — | (0.6 | ) | 1.7 | ||||||||
Permanent differences and credits, net | (0.9 | ) | (1.0 | ) | 1.0 | |||||||
Reserve for tax contingencies | 2.2 | — | — | |||||||||
Effective tax rate | 41.0 | % | 38.0 | % | 42.6 | % | ||||||
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consist of the following (certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation, in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets | ||||||||
Share-based compensation | $ | 14,700 | $ | 14,529 | ||||
Goodwill and intangibles | 14,736 | 11,498 | ||||||
Accrued incentive compensation | 14,403 | 10,070 | ||||||
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | 14,598 | 8,189 | ||||||
Operating leases and lease incentives | 13,012 | 13,671 | ||||||
Accruals and reserves | 1,204 | 1,729 | ||||||
Deferred compensation plan | 3,493 | 3,893 | ||||||
Deferred revenues | 2,398 | 525 | ||||||
Other | 922 | 1,614 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 79,466 | 65,718 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (7,493 | ) | (9,091 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | 71,973 | 56,627 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||||
Deferred incentive compensation | 5,853 | 3,882 | ||||||
Depreciation | 1,636 | 2,846 | ||||||
Other | 2,912 | 3,033 | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 10,401 | 9,761 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net | $ | 61,572 | $ | 46,866 | ||||
In estimating future tax consequences, Accounting Standards Codification 740 generally considers all expected future events in the determination and valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was primarily related to state tax credit carryforwards from the District of Columbia described below. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2009 also included state net operating loss carryforwards and a capital loss carryforward. The net change in the valuation allowance was a decrease of $1.6 million and an increase of $0.9 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company has approximately $5.5 million of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards available as a result of the acquisition of Iconoculture. These carryforwards will be available to offset future income through 2031. The use of these net operating loss carryforwards may be limited.
51
Table of Contents
The Company generated net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are available to offset future state taxable income through 2030. The Company recorded a $0.2 million and $0.2 million valuation allowance related to these net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the subsidiary to which these net operating loss carryforwards are related converted from a corporation to a limited liability company. As a result of this conversion, the valuation allowances against the state net operating loss carryforwards were determined to be no longer necessary as the losses will be available to offset income generated by the Company.
Upon moving its headquarters to Arlington, Virginia, the Company became eligible to receive the Major Business Facilities Job Tax Credit (“JTC”). The JTC was measured in 2009 based on the number of full-time jobs that were created or relocated to Virginia. The amount of the credit measured in 2009 was $1.0 million. This credit can be applied against Virginia state income taxes in 2009 and 2010. Virginia law requires this credit to be recaptured and refunded to the extent average levels of employment decrease during the five years following the measurement of the credit. The Company has estimated $0.1 million and $0.3 million of this credit were recaptured at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and a valuation allowance was recorded in this amount against the tax credit carryforward.
The Company has Washington D.C. tax credit carryforwards resulting in a deferred tax asset of $7.4 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These credits expire in years 2011 through 2017. The Company recorded a $7.4 million valuation allowance related to these credit carryforwards at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries amounted to $18.2 million, $15.2 million and $15.1 million at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested; accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes has been provided thereon. Upon repatriation of those earnings, in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation; however, unrecognized foreign tax credit carryforwards would be available to reduce some portion of the U.S. liability.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefit is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of the year | $ | 592 | $ | 427 | ||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 79 | 32 | ||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years | 1,912 | 177 | ||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years | — | — | ||||||
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations | (20 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||
Settlements | — | — | ||||||
Balance at end of the year | $ | 2,563 | $ | 592 | ||||
The Company files income tax returns in U.S. federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to tax examinations in major tax jurisdictions for periods prior to 2007. The Company’s unrecognized tax benefit liability would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized, except for $1.2 million of tax credits that would be available to offset this liability. Interest and penalty expense recognized related to uncertain tax positions amounted to $0.5 million, $0.2 million, and $0.1 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total accrued interest and penalties at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses. The Company elects to classify accrued interest and penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits in its income tax provision.
The Company has unrecognized tax benefits relating to items of income which are expected to reverse in 2011 upon filing of the Company’s 2010 income tax returns. The range of decrease is expected to be between $1.4 million and $1.8 million.
Note 17. Employee benefit plans
Defined contribution 401(k) plan
The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan (the “Plan”) in which the Company’s employees participate. Pursuant to the Plan, all employees who have reached the age of 21 are eligible to participate. The Company provides a discretionary contribution equal to 50% of an employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 6% of base salary. The Company’s matching contribution is subject to a four-year vesting schedule of 25% per year beginning one year from the employee’s date of hire, and that an employee must be employed by the Company on the last day of a Plan year in order to vest in the Company’s contribution for that year. Company contributions to the Plan were $2.9 million, $3.1 million, and $4.0 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
52
Table of Contents
Employee stock purchase plan
The Company sponsors an employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”) for all eligible employees. Under the ESPP, employees authorize payroll deductions from 1% to 10% of their eligible compensation to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The total shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance under the ESPP is 1,050,000. Under the plan, shares of the Company’s common stock may be purchased over an offering period, typically three months, at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or last day of the applicable offering period. In 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company issued 21,668 shares, 48,448 shares, and 39,730 shares of common stock, respectively. At December 31, 2010, approximately 750,000 shares were available for issuance.
Deferred compensation plan
The Company has a Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for certain employees and members of the Board of Directors to provide an opportunity to defer compensation on a pre-tax basis. The Deferred Compensation Plan provides for deferred amounts to be credited with investment returns based upon investment options selected by participants from alternatives designated from time to time by the plan administrative committee. Investment earnings associated with the Deferred Compensation Plan’s assets are included in Other income, net while changes in individual participant account balances are recorded as compensation expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Plan also allows the Company to make discretionary contributions at any time based on individual or overall Company performance, which may be subject to a different vesting schedule than elective deferrals, and provides that the Company will make up any 401(k) plan match that is not credited to the participant’s 401(k) account due to his or her participation in the Plan. The Company has established a rabbi trust to hold assets utilized by the Company to pay benefits under the Plan. The Company did not make any discretionary contributions to the Plan in 2010, 2009, and 2008.
Note 18. Commitments and contingencies
Operating leases
The Company leases office facilities that expire on various dates through 2028. Generally, the leases carry renewal provisions and rental escalations and require the Company to pay executory costs such as taxes and insurance.
In May 2010, the Company amended and restated the sublease agreement entered into in June 2009 with a third party to exercise the extension clause contained in the original sublease from October 2021 through January 2028, which terminates with the Company's existing lease in January 2028. The Company also sublet additional space from November 2011 through January 2028 and from October 2014 through January 2028. The amended and restated sublease also contains an expansion option for additional square footage, which may be exercised at the subtenant's discretion, from October 2014 through January 2028. Total non-cancelable sublease payments over the term will be $283.8 million. The subtenant will be required to pay its pro rata portion of any increases in building operating expenses and real estate taxes.
Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases and future minimum receipts under subleases, excluding executory costs, are as follows at December 31, 2010:
Payments due and sublease receipts by period (in thousands) at December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | YE 2011 | YE 2012 | YE 2013 | YE 2014 | YE 2015 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 601,294 | $ | 35,069 | $ | 35,385 | $ | 35,402 | $ | 35,118 | $ | 35,493 | $ | 424,827 | ||||||||||||||
Subleases receipts | 279,559 | 9,932 | 13,883 | 14,238 | 13,382 | 14,954 | 213,170 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total net lease obligations | $ | 321,735 | $ | 25,137 | $ | 21,502 | $ | 21,164 | $ | 21,736 | $ | 20,539 | $ | 211,657 | ||||||||||||||
The Company completed the tenant build-out of its headquarters in 2008. The total cost of the build-out was approximately $100 million, of which approximately $40 million was paid by the landlord through lease incentives. In 2007, approximately $32 million of the lease incentives were paid directly to vendors and was excluded from the statement of cash flows as a non-cash investing activity. The remaining $8 million of lease incentives was received by the Company in September 2008 and was included in cash flows from operations. The lease incentives are being amortized over the term of the lease (through 2028) as a reduction of rent expense.
Other
At December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $6.4 million to provide security deposits for certain office space leases. The letters of credit expire in the period from January 2011 through September 2011, but will automatically extend for another year from their expiration dates unless the Company terminates them. To date, no amounts have been drawn on these agreements.
From time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to normal business operations. The Company vigorously defends itself in litigation and is not currently a party to, and the Company’s property is not subject to, any legal proceedings likely to materially affect the Company’s financial results.
The Company continues to evaluate potential tax exposure relating to sales and use, payroll, income and property tax laws, and regulations for various states in which the Company sells or supports its goods and services. Accruals for potential contingencies are recorded by the Company when it is probable that a liability has been incurred, and the liability can be reasonably estimated. As additional information becomes available, changes in the estimates of the liability are reported in the period that those changes occur. The Company accrued a liability of $3.0 million and $3.9 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, relating to certain sales and use tax regulations for states in which the Company sells or supports its goods and services.
53
Table of Contents
Note 19. Segments and geographic areas
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker of an enterprise. Operating results for certain operating segments do not meet the quantitative thresholds individually or in the aggregate for separate disclosure; thus, the Company has one reportable segment.
The Company has net sales and long-lived assets, consisting of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, in the following geographic areas (in thousands):
United States | Europe | Other countries | Total | |||||||||||||
2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 297,381 | $ | 69,755 | $ | 71,771 | $ | 438,907 | ||||||||
Long-lived assets | 112,366 | 4,876 | 8,992 | 126,234 | ||||||||||||
2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 293,994 | $ | 77,573 | $ | 71,339 | $ | 442,906 | ||||||||
Long-lived assets | 112,932 | 5,843 | 10,062 | 128,837 | ||||||||||||
2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 382,705 | 98,828 | $ | 76,819 | $ | 558,352 | |||||||||
Long-lived assets | 136,280 | 14,730 | 1,781 | 152,791 |
Note 20. Quarterly financial data (unaudited)
Unaudited summarized quarterly financial data is as follows (in thousands, except per-share amounts):
2010 Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 100,175 | $ | 109,577 | $ | 112,113 | $ | 117,042 | ||||||||
Impairment loss | — | — | 12,645 | — | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 79,899 | 89,885 | 103,789 | 100,064 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 20,276 | 19,692 | 8,324 | 16,978 | ||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 19,818 | 18,903 | 11,449 | 18,240 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 11,633 | $ | 10,980 | $ | 6,989 | $ | 10,761 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.31 |
2009 Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 117,440 | $ | 110,695 | $ | 106,819 | $ | 107,952 | ||||||||
Costs associated with exit activities | — | 11,518 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Restructuring costs | 944 | 4,244 | 2,327 | 1,053 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 95,740 | 106,596 | 84,900 | 88,298 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 21,700 | 4,099 | 21,919 | 19,654 | ||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 21,790 | 8,243 | 22,746 | 20,839 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 13,072 | $ | 4,946 | $ | 14,177 | $ | 13,434 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.39 |
54
Table of Contents
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during that quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
See Report of Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the attestation report issued by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, on effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting in Item 8.
Item 9B. | Other Information. |
None.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
The following information is included in the Company’s Proxy Statement related to its 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the Company’s fiscal year end of December 31, 2010 (the “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference:
• | Information regarding directors of the Company who are standing for reelection and any persons nominated to become directors of the Company |
• | Information regarding executive officers of the Company |
55
Table of Contents
• | Information regarding the Company’s Audit Committee and designated “audit committee financial experts” |
• | Information on the Company’s code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, also known as the “Code of Conduct for Officers, Directors and Employees,” and on the Company’s corporate governance guidelines |
• | Information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:
• | Information regarding the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers |
• | Information regarding the Company’s compensation of its directors |
• | The report of the Company’s Compensation Committee |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:
• | Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and executive officers |
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2010.
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||
Number Of | ||||||||||||
Securities To Be | Number of Securities | |||||||||||
Issued Upon | Remaining Available | |||||||||||
Exercise Of | Weighted-Average | For Future Issuances under | ||||||||||
Outstanding | Exercise Price Of | Equity Compensation Plans | ||||||||||
Options, Warrants | Outstanding Options, | (Excluding Securities | ||||||||||
Plan Category | And Rights | Warrants And Rights | Reflected In Column (A)) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | 3,024,295 | $ | 60.41 | 2,222,780 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (1) | 220,100 | 40.48 | — | |||||||||
Total | 3,244,395 | $ | 58.59 | 2,222,780 | ||||||||
(1) | In March 2002, the Company adopted the 2002 Non-Executive Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2002 Plan’’), which was not approved by stockholders. In December 2006, the Company further amended the 2002 Plan to address new guidance regarding equity restructurings under new accounting rules relating to share based compensation. The 2002 Plan provided for the issuance of up to 7,300,000 shares of common stock under stock options or restricted stock grants. Any person who is an employee or prospective employee of the Company was eligible for the grant of awards under the 2002 Plan, unless such person is an officer or director of the Company. The terms of awards granted under the 2002 Plan, including vesting, forfeiture and post termination exercisability are set by the plan administrator, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the 2002 Plan. The common stock options granted under the 2002 Plan generally become exercisable 25% per year beginning one year from the date of grant and expire between March 2011 and March 2013. With stockholder approval of the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan in July 2004, the 2002 Plan was suspended and no new grants will be made under the 2002 Plan. Stockholder approval of the 2004 Plan terminated the Company’s ability to issue awards for 4,497,625 shares that at that time remained available under the 2002 Plan. |
56
Table of Contents
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
None.
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services. |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the information provided under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services’’ of our Proxy Statement.
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. |
(1) | The following financial statements of the registrant and reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in Item 8 hereof: |
Report of Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting, | ||||
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009, | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
(2) | Except as provided below, all schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission either have been included in the consolidated financial statements or are not required under the related instructions, or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted. | |
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. |
(3) | The exhibits listed below are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K. |
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |
3.1 | Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 1999 (Registration No. 333-5983).) | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 from the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2009.) | |
4.1 | Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 1999 (Registration No. 333-5983).) | |
10.1 | The Corporate Executive Board Company Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, adopted on October 31, 1997, as amended and restated in February 1999. (Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 1999 (Registration No. 333-74145).) * |
57
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |
10.2 | Amended Directors’ Stock Plan and Standard Terms and Conditions for Director Non-qualified Stock Options. (Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 1999 (Registration No. 333-74145).) * | |
10.3 | 1999 Stock Option Plan and Standard Terms and Conditions for 1999 Stock Option Plan Incentive Stock Options. (Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 1999 (Registration No. 333-74145).) * | |
10.4 | Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated June 23, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000.) | |
10.5 | 2001 Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2001 (Registration No. 333-67238).) * | |
10.6 | 2002 Non-Executive Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21.3 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2002.) * | |
10.7 | 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended June 14, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2007.) * | |
10.8 | Form of term sheet for director non-qualified stock options. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2001.) * | |
10.9 | The Corporate Executive Board Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, effective January 1, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2008)* | |
10.10 | Standard Terms and Conditions for Restricted Stock Units under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and form of Term Sheet for Restricted Stock Units. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006.) * | |
10.11 | Standard Terms and Conditions for Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights under the 1999 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan, 2002 Non-Executive Stock Incentive Plan and the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and form of Term Sheet for Stock Appreciation Rights. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 from the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006.) * | |
10.12 | Employment Agreement, dated May 19, 2006, between The Corporate Executive Board Company and Thomas L. Monahan III. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2006.) * | |
10.13 | Agreement Concerning Exclusive Services, Confidential Information, Business Opportunities, Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Work Product, dated August 20, 1997, between the Company’s predecessor and Thomas L. Monahan III. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 from the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2006.) | |
10.14 | Amendments to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 2002 Non-Executive Stock Incentive Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Option Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Directors’ Stock Plan, adopted December 22, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2006.) * |
58
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |
10.15 | Collaboration Agreement, dated February 6, 2007, with The Advisory Board Company, as extended on February 4, 2010 (Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this agreement.) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 from the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007.) | |
10.16 | Form of Employer Protection Agreement, revised February 12, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 from the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007.) | |
10.17 | Amendments, adopted February 21, 2007, to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 from the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007.) * | |
10.18 | Form of Indemnity Agreement between The Corporate Executive Board Company and its directors, officers, and certain designated executives. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2007.) | |
10.19 | Form of Change in Control Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2008.) * | |
10.20 | Revised Form of Employer Protection Agreement, adopted February 12, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2009.) | |
10.21 | Revised Standard Terms and Conditions for Restricted Stock Units under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and form of Term Sheet for Restricted Stock Units. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2009.)* | |
10.22 | Revised Standard Terms and Conditions for Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights under 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and form of Term Sheet for Stock Appreciation Rights. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2009.)* | |
10.23 | Extension letter, dated February 4, 2010, to the Collaboration Agreement with The Advisory Board Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2009.) | |
10.24 | Glenn Tobin Agreement and Release, dated February 4, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2009.)* | |
10.25 | Severance Program — Corporate Leadership Team, adopted January 8, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 from the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2009.) * | |
10.26 | Separation Agreement — Richard S. Lindahl, dated April 29, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2009.) * | |
10.27 | Form of Indemnity Agreement between The Corporate Executive Board Company and its directors, officers, and certain designated executives. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2011.) * | |
14.1 | Code of Conduct For Directors, Executives and Employees (Restated as of August 5, 2010). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2010.) | |
21.1 | List of the Subsidiaries of The Corporate Executive Board Company. † | |
23.1 | Consent of Ernst and Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. † | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. † | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. † |
59
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description of Exhibit | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. † | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document† | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document† | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document† | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document† | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document† |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
† | Filed herewith. |
60
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Corporate Executive Board Company
The Corporate Executive Board Company
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of The Corporate Executive Board Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and have issued our report thereon dated February 28, 2011 (included elsewhere in this Form 10-K). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15 (2) of this Form 10-K. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
Baltimore, Maryland
February 28, 2011
February 28, 2011
61
Table of Contents
Schedule
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(In thousands)
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(In thousands)
Additions | ||||||||||||||||||||
Charged to | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Additions | Provision | Deductions | |||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Charged to | for Income | from | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||
of Year | Revenues | Taxes | Reserve | End of Year | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for uncollectible revenue | $ | 2,486 | $ | 5,882 | $ | — | $ | 6,579 | $ | 1,789 | ||||||||||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | 9,091 | — | — | 1,598 | 7,493 | |||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for uncollectible revenue | $ | 4,931 | $ | 5,820 | $ | — | $ | 8,265 | $ | 2,486 | ||||||||||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | 8,211 | — | 888 | 8 | 9,091 | |||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for uncollectible revenue | $ | 1,748 | $ | 15,629 | $ | — | $ | 12,446 | $ | 4,931 | ||||||||||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | 7,878 | — | 800 | 467 | 8,211 |
62
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized dated as of February 28, 2011.
The Corporate Executive Board Company
By: | /s/ Thomas L. Monahan III | |||
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 28, 2011 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity indicated.
Signature | Title | |
/s/ Thomas L. Monahan III | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
/s/ Richard S. Lindahl | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | |
/s/ Gregor S. Bailar | Director | |
/s/ Stephen M. Carter | Director | |
/s/ Gordon J. Coburn | Director | |
/s/ L. Kevin Cox | Director | |
/s/ Nancy J. Karch | Director | |
/s/ Daniel O. Leemon | Director | |
/s/ Jeffrey R. Tarr | Director |
63