Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses | 5. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES The loan portfolio consists of various types of loans and is categorized by major type as follows: June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Residential mortgage loans held for sale $ 39,516 $ 80,959 Commercial and industrial 4,227,102 3,205,595 Real estate: Construction, land development and other land loans 2,033,037 2,064,167 1-4 family residential (includes home equity) 4,582,554 4,306,452 Commercial real estate (includes multi-family residential) 6,550,086 6,556,285 Farmland 429,963 495,558 Agriculture 182,731 185,297 Consumer and other 423,001 398,271 Total loans held for investment, excluding Warehouse Purchase Program 18,428,474 17,211,625 Warehouse Purchase Program 2,557,183 1,552,762 Total loans, including Warehouse Purchase Program $ 21,025,173 $ 18,845,346 Concentrations of Credit. Most of the Company’s lending activity occurs within the states of Texas and Oklahoma. Commercial real estate loans, 1-4 family residential loans and construction, land development and other land loans make up 71.3% of the Company’s total loan portfolio, excluding Warehouse Purchase Program loans, at June 30, 2020. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, excluding Warehouse Purchase Program loans, there were no concentrations of loans related to any single industry in excess of 10% Related Party Loans. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, loans outstanding to directors, officers and their affiliates totaled $4.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively. All transactions between the Company and such related parties are conducted in the ordinary course of business and made on the same terms and conditions as similar transactions with unaffiliated persons. An analysis of activity with respect to these related party loans is as follows: As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2020 As of and for the year ended December (Dollars in thousands) Beginning balance on January 1 $ 4,152 $ 1,923 New loans 810 1 Transfers — 2,500 Repayments (109 ) (272 ) Ending balance $ 4,853 $ 4,152 Nonperforming Assets and Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans. The Company has several procedures in place to assist it in maintaining the overall quality of its loan portfolio. The Company has established underwriting guidelines to be followed by its officers, including requiring appraisals on loans collateralized by real estate. The Company also monitors its delinquency levels for any negative or adverse trends. Nevertheless, the Company’s loan portfolio could become subject to increasing pressures from deteriorating borrower credit due to general economic conditions. The Company generally places a loan on nonaccrual status and ceases accruing interest when the payment of principal or interest is delinquent for 90 days, or earlier in some cases, unless the loan is in the process of collection and the underlying collateral fully supports the carrying value of the loan. With respect to potential problem loans, an evaluation of the borrower’s overall financial condition is made to determine the need, if any, for possible writedowns or appropriate additions to the allowance for credit losses. An aging analysis of past due loans, segregated by category of loan, is presented below: June 30, 2020 Loans Past Due and Still Accruing 30-89 Days 90 or More Days Total Past Due Loans Nonaccrual Loans Current Loans Total Loans (Dollars in thousands) Construction, land development and other land loans $ 13,846 $ 8,287 $ 22,133 $ 2,243 $ 2,008,661 $ 2,033,037 Warehouse Purchase Program loans — — — — 2,557,183 2,557,183 Agriculture and agriculture real estate (includes farmland) 3,008 — 3,008 769 608,917 612,694 1-4 family (includes home equity) (1) 9,098 43 9,141 29,642 4,583,287 4,622,070 Commercial real estate (includes multi-family residential) 7,881 319 8,200 15,129 6,526,757 6,550,086 Commercial and industrial 12,085 25 12,110 15,057 4,199,935 4,227,102 Consumer and other 3,915 17 3,932 64 419,005 423,001 Total $ 49,833 $ 8,691 $ 58,524 $ 62,904 $ 20,903,745 $ 21,025,173 December 31, 2019 Loans Past Due and Still Accruing 30-89 Days 90 or More Days Total Past Due Loans Nonaccrual Loans Current Loans Total Loans (Dollars in thousands) Construction, land development and other land loans $ 16,470 $ — $ 16,470 $ 1,142 $ 2,046,555 $ 2,064,167 Warehouse Purchase Program loans — — — — 1,552,762 1,552,762 Agriculture and agriculture real estate (includes farmland) 466 — 466 103 680,286 680,855 1-4 family (includes home equity) (1) 43,884 441 44,325 24,413 4,318,673 4,387,411 Commercial real estate (includes multi-family residential) 10,669 — 10,669 12,714 6,532,902 6,556,285 Commercial and industrial 7,249 — 7,249 16,809 3,181,537 3,205,595 Consumer and other 1,708 — 1,708 62 396,501 398,271 Total $ 80,446 $ 441 $ 80,887 $ 55,243 $ 18,709,216 $ 18,845,346 (1) Includes $39.5 million and $81.0 million of residential mortgage loans held for sale at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated: June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Nonaccrual loans (1) (2) $ 62,904 $ 55,243 Accruing loans 90 or more days past due 8,691 441 Total nonperforming loans 71,595 55,684 Repossessed assets 187 323 Other real estate 6,160 6,936 Total nonperforming assets $ 77,942 $ 62,943 Nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate 0.37 % 0.33 % Nonperforming assets to total loans, excluding Warehouse Purchase Program loans, and other real estate 0.42 % 0.36 % (1) Includes troubled debt restructurings of $13.6 million as of both June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. (2) There were no nonperforming or troubled debt restructurings of warehouse lines of credit or Warehouse Purchase Program loans for the periods presented. The Company had $77.9 million in nonperforming assets at June 30, 2020 compared with $62.9 million at December 31, 2019. Nonperforming assets were 0.37% of total loans and other real estate at June 30, 2020 compared with 0.33% of total loans and other real estate at December 31, 2019. If interest on nonaccrual loans had been accrued under the original loan terms, approximately $1.4 million and $1.2 million would have been recorded as income for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company had $62.9 million in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2020 compared with $37.3 million at June 30, 2019. Acquired Loans. Acquired loans were preliminarily recorded at fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology that considers, among other things, interest rates, projected default rates, loss given default, and recovery rates. During the valuation process, the Company identified purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) and Non-PCD loans in the acquired loan portfolios. Loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration at acquisition for which it was probable that the Company would not be able to collect all contractual amounts due were accounted for as PCD. PCD loan identification considers the following factors: payment history and past due status, debt service coverage, loan grading, collateral values and other factors that may indicate deterioration of credit quality since origination. Non-PCD loan identification considers the following factors: account types, remaining terms, annual interest rates or coupons, current market rates, interest types, past delinquencies, timing of principal and interest payments, loan to value ratios, loss exposures and remaining balances. Accretion of purchased yield discounts on PCD loans will be based on future cash flows, taking into account contractual maturities. Accretion of purchased discounts on Non-PCD loans will be recognized on a level-yield basis based on contractual maturity of individual loans. PCD Loans. The recorded investment in PCD loans included in the consolidated balance sheet and the related outstanding balance as of the dates indicated are presented in the table below. The outstanding balance represents the total amount owed as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 . June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) PCD loans: Outstanding balance $ 290,189 $ 410,785 Discount (1) (22,565 ) (167,320 ) (2) Recorded investment $ 267,624 $ 243,465 (1) ASU 2016-13 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. (2) Includes $131.8 million in PCD loans credit discount. Changes in the accretable yield for acquired PCD loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Balance at beginning of period $ 29,460 $ 1,234 $ 35,654 $ 1,534 Adjustments (274 ) 17 (449 ) 36 Accretion charge-offs (354 ) — (354 ) — Accretion (6,267 ) (347 ) (12,286 ) (666 ) Balance at June 30, $ 22,565 $ 904 $ 22,565 $ 904 Income recognition on PCD loans is subject to the timing and amount of future cash flows. PCD loans for which the Company is accruing interest income are not considered non-performing or impaired. The adoption of ASU 2016-13, “ Financial Instruments-Credit-Losses (ASC Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments Non-PCD Loans. The recorded investment in Non-PCD loans included in the consolidated balance sheet and the related outstanding balance as of the dates indicated are presented in the table below. The outstanding balance represents the total amount owed as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. June 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Non-PCD loans: Outstanding balance $ 5,117,679 $ 6,102,540 Discount (69,860 ) (110,130 ) Recorded investment $ 5,047,819 $ 5,992,410 Changes in the discount accretion for Non-PCD loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 2019 2020 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Balance at beginning of period $ 87,613 $ 13,359 $ 110,130 $ 14,833 Adjustments 312 — 312 — Accretion charge-offs (66 ) — (120 ) — Accretion (17,999 ) (880 ) (40,462 ) (2,354 ) Balance at June 30, $ 69,860 $ 12,479 $ 69,860 $ 12,479 Credit Quality Indicators. As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio and methodology for calculating the allowance for credit losses, management assigns and tracks loan grades to be used as credit quality indicators. The following is a general description of the loan grades used: Grade 1— Credits in this category have risk potential that is virtually nonexistent. These loans may be secured by insured certificates of deposit, insured savings accounts, U.S. Government securities and highly rated municipal bonds. Grade 2— Credits in this category are of the highest quality. These borrowers represent top rated companies and individuals with unquestionable financial standing with excellent global cash flow coverage, net worth, liquidity and collateral coverage. Grade 3— Credits in this category are not immune from risk but are well protected by the collateral and paying capacity of the borrower. These loans may exhibit a minor unfavorable credit factor, but the overall credit is sufficiently strong to minimize the possibility of loss. Grade 4— Credits in this category are considered to be of acceptable credit quality with moderately greater risk than Grade 3 and receiving closer monitoring. Loans in this category have sources of repayment that remain sufficient to preclude a larger than normal probability of default and secondary sources are likewise currently of sufficient quantity, quality, and liquidity to protect the Company against loss of principal and interest. These borrowers have specific risk factors, but the overall strength of the credit is acceptable based on other mitigating credit and/or collateral factors and can repay the debt in the normal course of business. Grade 5— Credits in this category constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk; however, the factors do not rise to a level of substandard. These credits have potential weaknesses and/or declining trends that, if not corrected, could expose the Company to risk at a future date. These loans are monitored on the Company’s internally-generated watch list and evaluated on a quarterly basis. Grade 6— Credits in this category are considered “substandard” but “non-impaired” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Loans in this category have well-defined weakness that, if not corrected, could make default of principal and interest possible. Loans in this category are still accruing interest and may be dependent upon secondary sources of repayment and/or collateral liquidation. Grade 7— Credits in this category are deemed “substandard” and “impaired” pursuant to regulatory guidelines. As such, the Company has determined that it is probable that less than 100% of the contractual principal and interest will be collected. These loans are individually evaluated for a specific reserve and will typically have the accrual of interest stopped. Grade 8— Credits in this category include “doubtful” loans in accordance with regulatory guidance. Such loans are no longer accruing interest and factors indicate a loss is imminent. These loans are also deemed “impaired.” While a specific reserve may be in place while the loan and collateral is being evaluated, these loans are typically charged down to an amount the Company estimates is collectible. Grade 9— Credits in this category are deemed a “loss” in accordance with regulatory guidelines and have been charged off or charged down. The Company may continue collection efforts and may have partial recovery in the future. The following table presents loans by risk grade and category of loan at June 30, 2020. Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans Total (Dollars in thousands) Construction, Land Development and Other Land Loans Grade 1 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 27 $ — $ — $ 27 Grade 2 — — — 88 132 281 — — 501 Grade 3 345,184 702,893 417,348 116,076 38,311 74,496 120,229 1,637 1,816,174 Grade 4 6,435 16,742 33,221 113,509 7,056 13,771 9,682 — 200,416 Grade 5 — — — 4 — 2,910 — — 2,914 Grade 6 — — — — — 2,202 — — 2,202 Grade 7 — — 1,118 — — 390 734 — 2,242 Grade 8 — — — — — — — — — Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans — 1,305 — 397 — 6,859 — — 8,561 Total $ 351,619 $ 720,940 $ 451,687 $ 230,074 $ 45,499 $ 100,936 $ 130,645 $ 1,637 $ 2,033,037 Agriculture and Agriculture Real Estate (includes Farmland) Grade 1 $ 695 $ 380 $ 308 $ 255 $ 103 $ 526 $ 10,100 $ — $ 12,367 Grade 2 10 — — 355 — 1,591 40 — 1,996 Grade 3 68,790 90,926 71,576 49,393 57,106 110,608 75,452 1,252 525,103 Grade 4 8,750 9,697 4,798 3,083 5,099 22,535 5,912 — 59,874 Grade 5 1,654 3,419 1,130 — — 648 2,043 — 8,894 Grade 6 1,468 — 59 — 186 184 — — 1,897 Grade 7 — 353 32 — 4 357 — — 746 Grade 8 — — — — — — — — — Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans — 217 — — — 1,294 — 306 1,817 Total $ 81,367 $ 104,992 $ 77,903 $ 53,086 $ 62,498 $ 137,743 $ 93,547 $ 1,558 $ 612,694 1-4 Family (includes Home Equity) (1) Grade 1 $ 98 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 98 Grade 2 — 71 121 728 260 11,068 1,335 — 13,583 Grade 3 644,503 909,952 610,756 532,702 512,549 1,114,277 139,042 5,022 4,468,803 Grade 4 1,980 12,884 18,229 13,841 10,496 38,260 2,722 138 98,550 Grade 5 — 164 — 1,258 232 4,082 — — 5,736 Grade 6 85 42 3 328 — 2,165 — 32 2,655 Grade 7 — 1,746 986 2,887 3,159 13,590 3,587 — 25,955 Grade 8 — — — — — 99 — — 99 Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans — — — — 251 5,300 1,040 — 6,591 Total $ 646,666 $ 924,859 $ 630,095 $ 551,744 $ 526,947 $ 1,188,841 $ 147,726 $ 5,192 $ 4,622,070 Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans Total (Dollars in thousands) Commercial Real Estate (includes Multi-Family Residential) Grade 1 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Grade 2 5,743 2,008 — 7,480 193 4,980 — — 20,404 Grade 3 188,791 1,035,743 1,022,056 1,037,919 641,974 1,432,384 73,808 40,429 5,473,104 Grade 4 13,295 34,582 114,906 149,851 157,957 391,781 13,272 345 875,989 Grade 5 — — 2,164 12,888 12,575 14,521 — — 42,148 Grade 6 7,928 175 1,250 26 3,218 8,165 1,500 — 22,262 Grade 7 21 — — 16 14,796 210 — — 15,043 Grade 8 — — — — — — — — — Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans — 15,329 5,094 27,440 — 53,273 — — 101,136 Total $ 215,778 $ 1,087,837 $ 1,145,470 $ 1,235,620 $ 830,713 $ 1,905,314 $ 88,580 $ 40,774 $ 6,550,086 Commercial and Industrial Grade 1 $ 1,379,014 $ 8,123 $ 7,034 $ 3,487 $ 1,597 $ 7,345 $ 20,344 $ 23 $ 1,426,967 Grade 2 999 155 1,137 1,530 1,442 1,132 21,124 62,772 90,291 Grade 3 173,841 331,439 226,143 116,920 111,163 185,271 792,523 263,799 2,201,099 Grade 4 10,170 53,041 22,132 29,046 11,293 50,492 66,940 28,947 272,061 Grade 5 3,057 16,813 476 157 297 2,359 7,568 114 30,841 Grade 6 101 243 2,492 206 1,266 2,254 23,442 650 30,654 Grade 7 — 570 367 110 649 12,963 31,650 1,449 47,758 Grade 8 — — — — 10 — — — 10 Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans 790 28,991 8,280 11,746 3,582 1,715 49,350 22,967 127,421 Total $ 1,567,972 $ 439,375 $ 268,061 $ 163,202 $ 131,299 $ 263,531 $ 1,012,941 $ 380,721 $ 4,227,102 Consumer and Other Grade 1 $ 26,314 $ 10,550 $ 5,938 $ 4,882 $ 2,519 $ 6,334 $ 1,518 $ 3 $ 58,058 Grade 2 2,345 10,763 418 38,306 233 1,402 1,185 — 54,652 Grade 3 33,702 54,277 36,175 18,500 7,721 30,553 75,869 338 257,135 Grade 4 478 4,219 964 77 109 2,084 11,057 4 18,992 Grade 5 — — 68 18 — — 10,402 — 10,488 Grade 6 — 1,534 — — — — — — 1,534 Grade 7 — 32 8 6 (5 ) 3 — — 44 Grade 8 — — — — — — — — — Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans — — — 1,880 — 3,800 16,418 — 22,098 Total $ 62,839 $ 81,375 $ 43,571 $ 63,669 $ 10,577 $ 44,176 $ 116,449 $ 345 $ 423,001 Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans Total (Dollars in thousands) Warehouse Purchase Program Grade 1 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Grade 2 — — — — — — — — — Grade 3 2,557,183 — — — — — — — 2,557,183 Grade 4 — — — — — — — — — Grade 5 — — — — — — — — — Grade 6 — — — — — — — — — Grade 7 — — — — — — — — — Grade 8 — — — — — — — — — Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans — — — — — — — — — Total $ 2,557,183 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 2,557,183 Total Grade 1 $ 1,406,121 $ 19,053 $ 13,280 $ 8,624 $ 4,219 $ 14,232 $ 31,962 $ 26 $ 1,497,517 Grade 2 9,097 12,997 1,676 48,487 2,260 20,454 23,684 62,772 181,427 Grade 3 4,011,994 3,125,230 2,384,054 1,871,510 1,368,824 2,947,589 1,276,923 312,477 17,298,601 Grade 4 41,108 131,165 194,250 309,407 192,010 518,923 109,585 29,434 1,525,882 Grade 5 4,711 20,396 3,838 14,325 13,104 24,520 20,013 114 101,021 Grade 6 9,582 1,994 3,804 560 4,670 14,970 24,942 682 61,204 Grade 7 21 2,701 2,511 3,019 18,603 27,513 35,971 1,449 91,788 Grade 8 — — — — 10 99 — — 109 Grade 9 — — — — — — — — — PCD Loans 790 45,842 13,374 41,463 3,833 72,241 66,808 23,273 267,624 Total $ 5,483,424 $ 3,359,378 $ 2,616,787 $ 2,297,395 $ 1,607,533 $ 3,640,541 $ 1,589,888 $ 430,227 $ 21,025,173 (1) Includes $39.5 million of residential mortgage loans held for sale at June 30, 2020. Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans. The allowance for credit losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for credit losses. Management has established an allowance for credit losses which it believes is adequate as of June 30, 2020 for estimated losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance for credit losses is affected by the following: (1) charge-offs of loans that occur when loans are deemed uncollectible and decrease the allowance, (2) recoveries on loans previously charged off that increase the allowance and (3) provisions for credit losses charged to earnings that increase the allowance or provision releases returned to earnings that decrease the allowance. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio and consideration of the factors listed below, management presents a quarterly review of the allowance for credit losses to the Bank’s Board of Directors, indicating any change in the allowance since the last review and any recommendations as to adjustments in the allowance. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make determinations with respect to the allowance for credit losses, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions or the borrower’s performance differ from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. The Company’s allowance for credit losses on loans consists of two components: (1) a specific valuation allowance based on probable losses on specifically identified loans and (2) a general valuation allowance based on historical loan loss experience, general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company. In setting the specific valuation allowance, the Company follows a loan review program to evaluate the credit risk in the total loan portfolio and assigns risk grades to each loan. Through this loan review process, the Company maintains an internal list of impaired loans, which along with the delinquency list of loans, helps management assess the overall quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. All loans that have been identified as impaired are reviewed on a quarterly basis in order to determine whether a specific reserve is required. For certain impaired loans, the Company allocates a specific loan loss reserve primarily based on the value of the collateral securing the impaired loan in accordance with ASC Topic 326-20, “ Financial Instruments - Credit Losses . ” The specific reserves are determined on an individual loan basis. Loans for which specific reserves are provided are excluded from the general valuation allowance described below. In connection with this review of the loan portfolio, the Company considers risk elements attributable to particular loan types or categories in assessing the quality of individual loans. Some of the risk elements include: • for 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including a consideration of the debt to income ratio and employment and income stability, the loan to value ratio, and the age, condition and marketability of collateral; • for commercial real estate loans and multifamily residential loans, the debt service coverage ratio (income from the property in excess of operating expenses compared to loan payment requirements), operating results of the owner in the case of owner-occupied properties, the loan to value ratio, the age and condition of the collateral and the volatility of income, property value and future operating results typical of properties of that type; • for construction, land development and other land loans, the perceived feasibility of the project including the ability to sell developed lots or improvements constructed for resale or the ability to lease property constructed for lease, the quality and nature of contracts for presale or prelease, if any, experience and ability of the developer and loan to value ratio; • for commercial and industrial loans, the operating results of the commercial, industrial or professional enterprise, the borrower’s business, professional and financial ability and expertise, the specific risks and volatility of income and operating results typical for businesses in that category and the value, nature and marketability of collateral; • for the Warehouse Purchase Program, the capitalization and liquidity of the mortgage banking client, the operating experience, the client’s satisfactory underwriting of purchased loans and the consistent timeliness by client of loan resale to investors; • for agriculture real estate loans, the experience and financial capability of the borrower, projected debt service coverage of the operations of the borrower and loan to value ratio; and • for non-real estate agriculture loans, the operating results, experience and financial capability of the borrower, historical and expected market conditions and the value, nature and marketability of collateral. In addition, for each category, the Company considers secondary sources of income and the financial strength and credit history of the borrower and any guarantors. In determining the amount of the general valuation allowance, management considers factors such as historical lifetime loan loss experience, concentration risk of specific loan types, the volume, growth and composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, current economic conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasted economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay and the value of collateral, the evaluation of the Company’s loan portfolio through its internal loan review process, general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company and other relevant factors in accordance with ASC Topic 326, “ Financial Instruments – Credit Losses.” The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses on loans by category of loan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories. Construction, Land Development and Other Land Loans Agriculture and Agriculture Real Estate (includes Farmland) 1-4 Family (includes Home Equity) Commercial Real Estate (includes Multi-Family Residential) Commercial and Industrial Consumer and Other Total (Dollars in thousands) Allowance for credit losses: Three Months Ended Balance March 31, 2020 $ 28,741 $ 5,769 $ 23,539 $ 61,403 $ 180,097 $ 27,657 $ 327,206 Provision for credit losses 11,115 1,126 9,533 16,804 (18,007 ) (10,571 ) 10,000 Charge-offs — (32 ) (145 ) — (12,678 ) (1,121 ) (13,976 ) Recoveries 6 35 94 — 472 368 975 Net charge-offs 6 3 (51 ) — (12,206 ) (753 ) (13,001 ) Balance June 30, 2020 $ 39,862 $ 6,898 $ 33,021 $ 78,207 $ 149,884 $ 16,333 $ 324,205 Six Months Ended Beginning balance, prior to adoption of ASC 326 $ 14,654 $ 2,971 $ 15,277 $ 12,332 $ 40,445 $ 1,790 $ 87,469 Impact of adoption ASC 326 14,075 2,797 8,267 48,990 139,624 26,785 240,538 Provision for credit losses 11,115 1,126 9,533 16,804 (18,007 ) (10,571 ) 10,000 Charge-offs — (62 ) (175 ) — (13,289 ) (2,437 ) (15,963 ) Recoveries 18 66 119 81 1,111 766 2,161 Net charge-offs 18 4 (56 ) 81 (12,178 ) (1,671 ) (13,802 ) Balance June 30, 2020 $ 39,862 $ 6,898 $ 33,021 $ 78,207 $ 149,884 $ 16,333 $ 324,205 Allowance for credit losses: Three Months Ended Balance March 31, 2019 $ 16,192 $ 3,284 $ 14,455 $ 11,590 $ 39,059 $ 1,511 $ 86,091 Provision for credit losses (299 ) 578 (61 ) 575 (710 ) 717 800 Charge-offs (19 ) (54 ) (16 ) — (125 ) (905 ) (1,119 ) Recoveries 12 8 5 1 953 255 1,234 Net charge-offs (7 ) (46 ) (11 ) 1 828 (650 ) 115 Balance June 30, 2019 $ 15,886 $ 3,816 $ 14,383 $ 12,166 $ 39,177 $ 1,578 $ 87,006 Six Months Ended Balance December 31, 2018 $ 15,582 $ 3,693 $ 14,135 $ 11,220 $ 40,223 $ 1,587 $ 86,440 Provision for credit losses 311 (1,109 ) 256 944 (155 ) 1,253 1,500 Charge-offs (63 ) (64 ) (22 ) — (2,082 ) (1,797 ) (4,028 ) Recoveries 56 1,296 14 2 1,191 535 3,094 Net charge-offs (7 ) 1,232 (8 ) 2 (891 ) (1,262 ) (934 ) Balance June 30, 2019 $ 15,886 $ 3,816 $ 14,383 $ 12,166 $ 39,177 $ 1,578 $ 87,006 Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures. The allowance also includes estimates of expected credit losses over the contractual period in which there is exposure to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on the commitments expected to fund. The estimate of commitments expected to fund is informed by historical analysis looking at utilization rates. The expected credit loss rates applied to the commitments expected to fund is informed by the general valuation allowance utilized for outstanding balances with the same underlying assumptions and drivers. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $29.9 million in allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposure, compared with $5.6 million as of December 31, 2019. This allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposure is a separate line item on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $1.77 billion in commitments expected to fund. Troubled Debt Restructurings. The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and (2) the creditor has granted a concession. Concessions may include interest rate reductions or below market interest rates, principal forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules and other actions intended to minimize potential losses. Under ASC Topic 310-40 “ the Company evaluates all loan modifications to identify whether the restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, the Company had $13.6 million and $14.3 million, in outstanding troubled debt restructurings. The following table presents information regarding the recorded investment of loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings during the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 2019 Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment (Dollars in thousands) Troubled Debt Restructurings Construction, land development and other land loans — $ — $ — — $ — $ — Agriculture and agriculture real estate (includes farmland) — — — — — — 1-4 Family (includes home equity) 1 23 13 — — — Commercial real estate (includes multi-family residential) — — — — — — Commercial and industrial — — — 1 14,783 14,258 Consumer and other — — — — — — Total 1 $ 23 $ 13 1 $ 14,783 $ 14,258 As of June 30, 2020, there have been no defaults on any loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings during the preceding twelve months. Default is determined at 90 or more days past due. The modifications generally relate to extending the amortization periods of the loans, which includes loans modified during bankruptcy. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company added one loan totaling $23 thousand as a new troubled debt restructuring, of which $13 thousand remained outstanding at June 30, 2020. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company added one loan totaling $14.8 million as a new troubled debt restructuring, of which $14.3 million remained outstanding at June 30, 2019. The Company did not grant principal reductions on any restructured loans at the time of modification. These modifications did not have a material impact on the Company’s determination of the allowance for credit losses. Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), banks may elect to deem that loan modifications do not result in troubled debt restructurings if they are (1) related to the novel strain of coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”); (2) executed on a loan that was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019; and (3) executed between March 1, 2020, and the earlier of (A) 60 days after the date of termination of the COVID-19 national emergency declaration by the President of the United States or (B) December 31, 2020. Additionally, other short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief are not troubled debt restructurings under ASC Subtopic 310-40 and federal banking agencies’ interagency guidance. These modifications include short-term (e.g., up to six months) modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or delays in payment that are insignificant. Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented. T he Company's troubled debt restructurings noted above do not include loans that are short-term modifications related to COVID-19 . |