Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation RGC Resources, Inc. is an energy services company primarily engaged in the sale and distribution of natural gas. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RGC Resources, Inc. ("Resources" or the "Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Roanoke Gas Company; Diversified Energy Company; and RGC Midstream, LLC. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly Resources' financial position as of December 31, 2018 and the results of its operations, cash flows, comprehensive income and changes in stockholders' equity for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 . The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2018 are not indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019 as quarterly earnings are affected by the highly seasonal nature of the business and weather conditions generally result in greater earnings during the winter months. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and condensed notes are presented as permitted under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to those rules, certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading. Therefore, the condensed consolidated financial statements and condensed notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018 . The September 30, 2018 balance sheet was included in the Company’s audited financial statements included in Form 10-K. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018 . Newly adopted and newly issued accounting standards are discussed below. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year income statements to be consistent with the current year presentation by moving cost of gas - utility and cost of sales - non utility under the operating expenses caption. This reclassification makes the Company's income statement presentation consistent with industry peers. Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) that affects any entity that enters into contracts with customers for the transfer of goods or services or transfer of non-financial assets. This guidance supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies the performance obligation. Subsequently issued ASUs provided additional guidance to assist in the implementation of the new revenue standard. The standard is effective for the Company's annual reporting period ending September 30, 2019 and interim periods within that annual period. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 and all amendments in the quarter ended December 31, 2018. Consistent with the modified retrospective adoption method, prior reporting period results remain unchanged and reported in accordance with ASC 605. As it relates to the Company’s contracts to deliver natural gas to customers, the guidance in ASC 606 is consistent with the guidance in ASC 605; therefore, the modified retrospective approach resulted in no cumulative catch-up to retained earnings. Furthermore, there was no significant impact to revenues recognized for the quarter ended December 31, 2018 and no significant changes to the Company’s related business processes, systems or internal controls over financial reporting because of the new guidance. See Note 2 for further information related to the new standard. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . The ASU enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of the financial statements with more useful information through several provisions, including the following: (1) requires equity investments, excluding investments accounted for under the equity method, be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, (3) eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (4) requires entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, and (5) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The Company adopted the ASU for the quarter ended December 31, 2018. The new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The ASU leaves the accounting for leases mostly unchanged for lessors, with the exception of targeted improvements for consistency; however, the new guidance requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with terms of more than 12 months. The ASU also revises the definition of a lease as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Consistent with current GAAP, the presentation and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee will primarily depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. In contrast, the new ASU requires both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. In addition, the new guidance includes quantitative and qualitative disclosure requirements to aid financial statement users in better understanding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new guidance is effective for the Company for the annual reporting period ending September 30, 2020 and interim periods within that annual period. Early adoption is permitted. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, which provides a practical expedient that allows entities the option of not evaluating existing land easements under the new lease standard for those easements that were entered into prior to adoption. New or modified land easements will require evaluation on a prospective basis. The Company has completed its inventory of leases and does not currently expect the new gudiance to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits . The primary objective of this guidance is to improve the financial statement presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs; however, it also changes which cost components are eligible for capitalization. The amendments in the ASU require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and, if a subtotal for income from operations is presented, outside of income from operations. The Company adopted the new guidance effective October 1, 2018. As a result, the Company now presents the other components of net periodic benefit costs outside of operations under the category of "other income (expense), net" in the condensed consolidated income statement. As the new guidance related to the expense classification was implemented on a retrospective basis, adjustments were made to the prior period financial statements as follow: Three Months Ended December 31, 2017 As Previously Reported Effect of Change As Adjusted Operations and maintenance $ 3,197,111 $ 30,633 $ 3,227,744 Total operating expenses 15,080,927 30,633 15,111,560 Operating income 3,675,124 (30,633 ) 3,644,491 Other income (expense), net (16,132 ) 30,633 14,501 Income before income taxes $ 3,195,158 $ — $ 3,195,158 In addition, the ASU allows only the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. Previously, the Company included all components of net periodic benefit costs for capitalization. Management has had discussions with its state regulators regarding the adoption of this ASU for regulatory purposes. The regulatory body has not taken a position on the change in capitalization requirements for these benefit costs and will evaluate the impact of this ASU on a case by case basis. The Company adopted the capitalization change prospectively on October 1, 2018. If the regulatory body ultimately determines that changes to the capitalization of these retirement benefits is not appropriate for regulatory purposes, the Company may have to establish regulatory assets or liabilities for those costs or benefits excluded from capitalization under this ASU. The adoption of this new guidance does not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting For Hedging Activities . The ASU is meant to simplify recognition and presentation guidance in an effort to improve financial reporting of cash flow and fair value hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities. This is achieved through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships, as well as changes to the presentation of hedge results. The new guidance is effective for the Company for the annual reporting period ending September 30, 2020 and interim periods within that annual period. Early adoption is permitted. Management has not completed its evaluation of the new guidance; however, it does not currently expect the new guidance to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20) - Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans . This ASU modifies disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The new guidance is effective for the Company for the annual reporting period ending September 30, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. Management has not completed its evaluation of the new guidance; however, the ASU only modifies disclosure requirements and will not effect financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract . This ASU reduces the complexity of accounting for costs of implementing a cloud computing service arrangement and aligns the following requirements to capitalize implementation costs: 1) those incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract, and 2) those incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software, including hosting arrangements that include an internal software license. The new guidance is effective for the Company for the annual reporting period beginning October 1, 2020. Management has not completed its evaluation of the new guidance; however, it believes the new guidance will change the future treatment of certain contracts by allowing related implementation costs to be capitalized and amortized over time, rather than directly expensed. Management does not currently expect the new guidance to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standard-setting bodies are not currently applicable to the Company or are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |