QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration Nos. 333-123631 and 333-123631-01
PROSPECTUS | | ![GRAPHIC](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B3/0001047469-05-009538/g74414.jpg) |
NSP HOLDINGS L.L.C.
NSP HOLDINGS CAPITAL CORP.
EXCHANGE OFFER FOR
$92,000,000
113/4% SENIOR PAY IN KIND NOTES DUE 2012
We are offering to exchange:
up to $92,000,000 of our new 113/4% Senior Pay in Kind Notes due 2012, series B
for
a like amount of our outstanding 113/4% Senior Pay in Kind Notes due 2012.
Material Terms of Exchange Offer
- •
- The terms of the exchange notes to be issued in the exchange offer are substantially identical to the outstanding notes, except that the transfer restrictions and registration rights relating to the outstanding notes will not apply to the exchange notes.
- •
- The exchange notes will be issued by NSP Holdings L.L.C. and NSP Holdings Capital Corp. on a joint and several basis.
- •
- There is no existing public market for the outstanding notes or the exchange notes. We do not intend to list the exchange notes on any securities exchange or seek approval for quotation through any automated trading system.
- •
- You may withdraw your tender of notes at any time before the expiration of the exchange offer. We will exchange all of the outstanding notes that are validly tendered and not withdrawn.
- •
- The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 5, 2005, unless extended.
- •
- The exchange of notes will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
- •
- The exchange offer is not subject to any condition other than that it not violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the Staff of the SEC.
- •
- We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
For a discussion of certain factors that you should consider before participating in this exchange offer, see "Risk Factors" beginning on page 11 of this prospectus.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved the notes to be distributed in the exchange offer, nor have any of these organizations determined that this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
April 6, 2005
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or represent anything to you other than the information contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations.
Until July 5, 2005, all dealers that, buy, sell or trade the exchange notes, whether or not participating in the exchange offer, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This requirement is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments and subscriptions.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | Page
|
---|
CURRENCIES AND EXCHANGE RATES | | ii |
MARKET, RANKING AND OTHER DATA | | ii |
TRADEMARKS | | ii |
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | ii |
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY | | 1 |
RISK FACTORS | | 11 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | | 25 |
EXCHANGE OFFER | | 26 |
USE OF PROCEEDS | | 33 |
CAPITALIZATION | | 34 |
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA | | 35 |
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA | | 39 |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | | 42 |
BUSINESS | | 55 |
MANAGEMENT | | 73 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS | | 82 |
PRINCIPAL EQUITYHOLDERS | | 88 |
DESCRIPTION OF OTHER OBLIGATIONS | | 90 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES | | 98 |
BOOK-ENTRY, DELIVERY AND FORM | | 138 |
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS | | 141 |
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION | | 146 |
LEGAL MATTERS | | 147 |
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | | 147 |
AVAILABLE INFORMATION | | 147 |
INCORPORATED INFORMATION
This prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about the company that is not included in or delivered with this prospectus. This information is available free of charge to security holders upon written or oral request to: Norcross Safety Products L.L.C., attn: Chief Financial Officer, 2211 York Road, Suite 215, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, phone (630) 572-5715. To ensure timely delivery, you should request any information no later than five business days prior to the expiration of the exchange offer.
i
CURRENCIES AND EXCHANGE RATES
References in this prospectus to "dollars" or "$" are to the currency of the United States. References to "euros" or "E" are to the currency of the European Union. References in this prospectus to "Canadian dollars" or "C$" are to the currency of Canada. Except as otherwise stated herein, conversions of non-dollar currencies to dollars in the financial statements and the other information included herein have been calculated, for statement of operations purposes, on the basis of average exchange rates over the related periods and, for balance sheet purposes, on the date thereof. Conversions of the closing date indebtedness and cash on hand for Kächele-Cama Latex GmbH ("KCL") are based on the exchange rate on July 29, 2003, the date of its acquisition. As of July 29, 2003, E1.00 was equivalent to $1.15.
MARKET, RANKING AND OTHER DATA
Unless otherwise indicated, the market, ranking and other similar data contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding our being a leader and one of the largest participants in our industry and regarding the breadth of our product offering, are based upon our management's knowledge of and experience in the markets in which we operate, and upon information from independent industry publications, including Frost & Sullivan. None of the independent industry publications was prepared on our or our affiliates' behalf and Frost & Sullivan has not consented to the inclusion of any data from its reports, nor have we sought their consent. While management believes this data and its estimates and beliefs based on such data, to be reasonable, market, ranking and other similar data is subject to change and cannot always be verified with complete certainty due to limits on the availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties inherent in any statistical survey of market size. In addition, consumption patterns and customer preferences can and do change.
TRADEMARKS
North™,Morning Pride™,Ranger™,Servus™,Pro-Warrington™,Salisbury™ andTotal Fire Group™ are some of our trademarks. Other brand names or trademarks appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unless otherwise indicated, the pro forma financial data presented in this prospectus for year ended December 31, 2004 gives pro forma effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC Partners Fund, L.P., or "CIVC," and the application of the net proceeds as described under "Use of Proceeds," as if these transactions had occured on January 1, 2004. The pro forma balance sheet data presented in this prospectus gives pro forma effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and the application of the net proceeds as described under "Use of Proceeds" as if these transactions had occurred on December 31, 2004.
ii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary contains basic information about this exchange offer. It likely does not contain all the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of this exchange offer, we encourage you to read this entire document and the other documents to which we refer you. In this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, we refer to NSP Holdings L.L.C. as "NSP Holdings," NSP Holdings Capital Corp. as "NSP Capital" and to NSP Holdings and NSP Capital collectively as the "Issuers." NSP Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of NSP Holdings. NSP Holdings conducts all of its business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Norcross Safety Products L.L.C., which we refer to as "Norcross," and its subsidiaries. References to "we," "our," "us," "NSP" and the "Company" refer collectively to NSP Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, including NSP Capital.
Our Company
We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded products in the fragmented personal protection equipment industry. We manufacture and market a full line of personal protection equipment for workers in the general industrial, fire service and utility/high voltage industries.
We are one of the largest participants in the personal protection equipment industry with 2,673 employees in 29 facilities worldwide. We market and sell our products through three distinct sales forces dedicated to our target segments. We manufacture or assemble the majority of the products we sell. Approximately 81% of our net sales in 2004 were to customers in North America, with the remainder to customers primarily in Europe and Africa.
We classify our diverse product offerings into three primary operating segments:
General Industrial. We offer a diverse portfolio of leading products for a wide variety of industries, including the manufacturing, agriculture, automotive, construction, food processing and pharmaceutical industries and the military, under theNorth, Ranger andServus brand names. Our product offering is one of the broadest in the personal protection equipment industry. We sell our general industrial products primarily through industrial distributors.
Fire Service. We manufacture and market one of the broadest lines of personal protection equipment for the fire service segment, offering firefighters head-to-toe protection. Our products include bunker gear, fireboots, helmets, gloves and other accessories. We market our products under ourTotal Fire Group umbrella, using the brand names ofMorning Pride, Ranger, Servus andPro-Warrington. We sell our fire service products primarily through specialized fire service distributors.
Utility/High Voltage. We manufacture and market a broad line of personal protection equipment for the utility/high voltage service segment under theServus andSalisbury brands. Our products include linemen equipment, gloves, sleeves and footwear. We sell our utility/high voltage products through specialized distributors and direct to utilities and electrical contractors.
NSP Holdings is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. NSP Capital is a Delaware corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 2211 York Road, Suite 215, Oak Brook, Illinois, 60523, and our telephone number is (630) 572-5715.
1
Corporate Structure
The following chart illustrates our company structure and principal indebtedness assuming that the offering of the outstanding notes had occurred on December 31, 2004:
![GRAPHIC](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B3/0001047469-05-009538/g883293.jpg)
- (1)
- Our senior credit facility consists of: (i) a U.S. revolving credit facility, which provides for $30.0 million of borrowings; (ii) a Canadian revolving credit facility, which provides for C$10.0 million of borrowings; and (iii) a $97.7 million term loan. We had approximately $36.9 million of borrowing availability under the revolving credit facilities as of December 31, 2004.
- (2)
- 97/8% senior subordinated notes due 2011, or the "97/8% senior subordinated notes," of $152.5 million in aggregate principal amount are shown net of $0.9 million original issue discount.
- (3)
- Other indebtedness and capitalized leases consists of: (i) seller notes in the amount of $1.6 million; (ii) KCL term debt of $0.5 million; and (iii) capitalized lease obligations in the amount of $0.2 million. In addition, our European subsidiaries have additional revolving credit facilities available of E3.1 million.
2
Summary of the Exchange Offer
The Initial Offering of Outstanding Notes | | We sold the outstanding notes on January 7, 2005 to Credit Suisse First Boston LLC. We refer to this party in this prospectus as the "initial purchaser." The initial purchaser subsequently resold the outstanding notes: (i) to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A; or (ii) outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S, each as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
Registration Rights Agreement | | Simultaneously with the initial sale of the outstanding notes, the issuers entered into a registration rights agreement for the exchange offer. In the registration rights agreement, the issuers agreed, among other things, to use reasonable best efforts to file a registration statement with the SEC and to commence and complete this exchange offer within 240 days of issuing the outstanding notes. The exchange offer is intended to satisfy your rights under the registration rights agreement. After the exchange offer is complete, you will no longer be entitled to any exchange or registration rights with respect to your outstanding notes. |
The Exchange Offer | | We are offering to exchange the exchange notes, which have been registered under the Securities Act, for your outstanding notes, which were issued on January 7, 2005 in the initial offering. In order to be exchanged, an outstanding note must be properly tendered and accepted. All outstanding notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn will be exchanged. We will issue exchange notes promptly after the expiration of the exchange offer. |
Resales | | We believe that the exchange notes issued in the exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by you without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act provided that: |
| | • | the exchange notes are being acquired in the ordinary course of your business; |
| | • | you are not participating, do not intend to participate, and have no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate, in the distribution of the exchange notes issued to you in the exchange offer; and |
| | • | you are not an affiliate of ours. |
| | If any of these conditions are not satisfied and you transfer any exchange notes issued to you in the exchange offer without delivering a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act or without an exemption from registration of your exchange notes from these requirements, you may incur liability under the Securities Act. We will not assume, nor will we indemnify you against, any such liability. |
| | | |
3
| | Each broker-dealer that is issued exchange notes in the exchange offer for its own account in exchange for outstanding notes that were acquired by that broker-dealer as a result of market-marking or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of the exchange notes. A broker-dealer may use this prospectus for an offer to resell, resale or other retransfer of the exchange notes issued to it in the exchange offer. |
Record Date | | We mailed this prospectus and the related exchange offer documents to registered holders of outstanding notes on April 6, 2005. |
Expiration Date | | The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, May 5, 2005, unless we decide to extend the expiration date. |
Conditions to the Exchange Offer | | The exchange offer is not subject to any condition other than that the exchange offer not violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC. |
Procedures for Tendering Outstanding Notes | | If you wish to tender your notes for exchange in this exchange offer, you must transmit to the exchange agent on or before the expiration date either: |
| | • | an original or a facsimile of a properly completed and duly executed copy of the letter of transmittal, which accompanies this prospectus, together with your outstanding notes and any other documentation required by the letter of transmittal, at the address provided on the cover page of the letter of transmittal; or |
| | • | if the notes you own are held of record by The Depository Trust Company, or "DTC," in book-entry form and you are making delivery by book-entry transfer, a computer-generated message transmitted by means of the Automated Tender Offer Program System of DTC, or "ATOP," in which you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal and which, when received by the exchange agent, forms a part of a confirmation of book-entry transfer. As part of the book-entry transfer, DTC will facilitate the exchange of your notes and update your account to reflect the issuance of the exchange notes to you. ATOP allows you to electronically transmit your acceptance of the exchange offer to DTC instead of physically completing and delivering a letter of transmittal to the notes exchange agent. |
| | | |
4
| | In addition, you must deliver to the exchange agent on or before the expiration date: |
| | • | a timely confirmation of book-entry transfer of your outstanding notes into the account of the notes exchange agent at DTC if you are effecting delivery of book-entry transfer, or |
| | • | if necessary, the documents required for compliance with the guaranteed delivery procedures. |
Special Procedures for Beneficial Owners | | If you are the beneficial owner of book-entry interests and your name does not appear on a security position listing of DTC as the holder of the book-entry interests or if you are a beneficial owner of outstanding notes that are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and you wish to tender the book-entry interest or outstanding notes in the exchange offer, you should contact the person in whose name your book-entry interests or outstanding notes are registered promptly and instruct that person to tender on your behalf. |
Withdrawal Rights | | You may withdraw the tender of your outstanding notes at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time on May 5, 2005. |
Federal Income Tax Considerations | | The exchange of outstanding notes will not be a taxable event for United States federal income tax purposes. |
Use of Proceeds | | We will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of exchange notes pursuant to the exchange offer. We will pay all of our expenses incident to the exchange offer. |
Exchange Agent | | Wilmington Trust Company is serving as the exchange agent in connection with the exchange offer. |
5
Summary of Terms of the Exchange Notes
The form and terms of the exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the outstanding notes, except that the exchange notes will be registered under the Securities Act. As a result, the exchange notes will not bear legends restricting their transfer and will not contain the registration rights and liquidated damage provisions contained in the outstanding notes. The exchange notes represent the same debt as the outstanding notes. Both the outstanding notes and the exchange notes are governed by the same indenture. Unless the context otherwise requires, we use the term "notes" in this prospectus to collectively refer to the outstanding notes and the exchange notes.
Issuers | | NSP Holdings L.L.C. and NSP Holdings Capital Corp. |
Securities Offered | | $92,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 113/4% Senior Pay in Kind Notes due 2012, Series B. |
Maturity Date | | January 1, 2012. |
Interest Payments | | Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing July 1, 2005. Through and including the interest payment date of January 1, 2010, accrued interest on all notes then outstanding will be payable, at our option, in cash or in the form of additional notes. |
Guarantees | | None. |
Ranking | | The notes will be senior unsecured obligations of the Issuers on a joint and several basis. The notes rank: |
| | • | pari passu in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of NSP Holdings, |
| | • | senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Issuers, |
| | • | effectively subordinated to all existing and future secured obligations of NSP Holdings, including the NSP Holdings' senior secured guarantee of the senior credit facility of Norcross and its subsidiaries, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations, and |
| | • | structurally subordinated to all existing and future obligations (including trade payables) of Norcross and its subsidiaries. |
| | As of December 31, 2004, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the January 2005 offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and our use of proceeds therefrom, we would have had approximately $353.6 million of outstanding indebtedness and the notes would have ranked effectively junior in right of payment to approximately $329.1 million of liabilities, including trade payables of Norcross and its subsidiaries (excluding intercompany liabilities and guarantees). |
| | | |
6
Optional Redemption | | At any time prior to July 1, 2006, we may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus the Make Whole Premium (as defined under "Description of the Notes") and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. |
| | We may redeem any of the notes at any time on or after July 1, 2006, in whole or in part, in cash, at the redemption prices described in this prospectus, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. |
| | At any time prior to July 1, 2006, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued under the indenture with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 1113/4% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. We may make that redemption only if, after the redemption, at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of notes issued under the indenture remains outstanding. |
| | See "Description of the Notes — Redemption — Optional Redemption upon Equity Offerings." |
Mandatory Partial Redemption | | On July 1, 2010, if any notes are outstanding, we are required to redeem, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption, a principal amount of notes sufficient to ensure that the notes are not treated for tax purposes as "Applicable High Yield Discount Obligations." This redemption provision is intended to ensure the ongoing deductibility of interest by the Company. See "Description of the Notes — Redemption — Mandatory Partial Redemption." |
Change of Control | | If we experience a Change of Control (as defined under "Description of the Notes — Change of Control Offer"), we will be required to make an offer to repurchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. |
Certain Covenants | | The indenture under which the outstanding notes were issued will govern the exchange notes. The indenture restricts our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: |
| | • | incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
| | • | pay dividends or make other distributions to our stockholders; |
| | • | purchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; |
| | • | make investments; |
| | • | create liens; |
| | | |
7
| | • | incur restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to us; |
| | • | sell assets, including capital stock of our subsidiaries; |
| | • | consolidate or merge with or into other companies or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and |
| | • | engage in transactions with affiliates. |
| | These covenants are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions. See "Description of the Notes — Certain Covenants." |
Risk Factors
Investing in the notes involves substantial risks. See "Risk Factors" for a discussion of certain risks of participating in the exchange offer.
8
Summary Historical Financial and Other Data
The following table presents summary historical consolidated statement of operations, balance sheet and other data for the periods presented and should only be read in conjunction with the "Selected Historical Financial and Other Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical financial data for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, have been derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
| | (dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 323,509 | | $ | 372,524 | | $ | 440,280 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 205,655 | | | 240,408 | | | 281,924 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Gross profit | | | 117,854 | | | 132,116 | | | 158,356 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selling | | | 30,440 | | | 36,877 | | | 41,901 | |
| Distribution | | | 15,177 | | | 18,550 | | | 22,452 | |
| General and administrative | | | 31,075 | | | 34,011 | | | 41,721 | |
| Amortization of intangibles | | | 3,239 | | | 2,583 | | | 517 | |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment charge | | | 2,785 | | | — | | | — | |
| Restructuring and merger-related charges | | | 9,269 | | | — | | | — | |
| Strategic alternatives | | | — | | | — | | | 616 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 91,985 | | | 92,021 | | | 107,207 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 25,869 | | | 40,095 | | | 51,149 | |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense (1)(2)(3) | | | 23,374 | | | 33,454 | | | 35,962 | |
| Interest income | | | (122 | ) | | (117 | ) | | (213 | ) |
| Other, net | | | (305 | ) | | (1,002 | ) | | 1,539 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes and minority interest | | | 2,922 | | | 7,760 | | | 13,861 | |
Income tax expense | | | 7,901 | | | 1,843 | | | 3,195 | |
Minority interest | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | | (4,979 | ) | | 5,920 | | $ | 10,641 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Preferred unit dividends (1) | | | 11,991 | | | 12,973 | | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Net loss attributable to common unit holders | | $ | (16,970 | ) | $ | (7,053 | ) | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Other Financial Data and Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA (4) | | $ | 44,791 | | $ | 53,849 | | $ | 61,956 | |
Adjusted EBITDA (4) | | | 47,576 | | | 53,432 | | | 63,471 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 18,617 | | | 12,749 | | | 12,371 | |
Capital expenditures | | | 7,197 | | | 7,432 | | | 6,423 | |
Net cash interest expense (5) | | | 20,212 | | | 23,200 | | | 20,387 | |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (6) | | | 1.1 | x | | 1.3 | x | | 1.4 | x |
| | As of December 31, 2004
| |
---|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end): | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 35,731 | |
| Working capital | | | 120,526 | |
| Total assets | | | 389,191 | |
| Total members' deficit | | | (75,097 | ) |
- (1)
- Beginning January 1, 2004, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 150, the yield on NSP Holdings' preferred units is recorded as interest expense and the preferred units are classified on NSP Holdings' balance sheet as long-term obligations. For the year ended December 31, 2004, accrued and unpaid yield on the preferred units was $13.5 million. For all periods prior to January 1, 2004, the yield is recorded below net income as preferred unit dividend and the preferred units were recorded on NSP Holdings' balance sheet between debt and equity. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Limited Liability Company Agreement" for a description of the preferred units.
9
- (2)
- Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a $5.2 million write-off of deferred financing fees, a $2.1 million write-off of original issue discount and a prepayment penalty of $2.9 million associated with the refinancing of our senior credit facility and senior subordinated debt refinancing.
- (3)
- Interest expense includes non-cash interest expense of $3.0 million, $2.9 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, reflecting the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount.
- (4)
- "EBITDA" is net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. "Adjusted EBITDA" is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude (i) charges for strategic alternatives, (2) a non-cash impairment charge taken with regard to our former subsidiary located in Zimbabwe and (3) gain or loss on sale of property, plant and equipment. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or cash flow from operations, as determined by GAAP, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are included in this prospectus because they are a basis upon which we assess our liquidity position and because we believe that they present useful information to investors regarding a company's ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. This belief is based on our negotiations with our lenders who have indicated that the amount of indebtedness we will be permitted to incur will be based, in part, on measures similar to our EBITDA and our Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not take into account our working capital requirements, debt service requirements and other commitments and, accordingly, are not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available for discretionary use.
- The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA with EBITDA, net (loss) income and net cash provided by operating activities for the periods indicated:
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Adjusted EBITDA (a) | | $ | 47,576 | | $ | 53,432 | | $ | 63,471 | |
(Subtract) add: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Strategic alternatives (b) | | | — | | | — | | | (616 | ) |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment (c) | | | (2,785 | ) | | — | | | — | |
| Gain (loss) on sale of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | 417 | | | (899 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| EBITDA | | | 44,791 | | | 53,849 | | | 61,956 | |
Subtract: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense, net (d) | | | (23,252 | ) | | (33,337 | ) | | (35,749 | ) |
| Income tax expense | | | (7,901 | ) | | (1,843 | ) | | (3,195 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization expense (e) | | | (18,617 | ) | | (12,749 | ) | | (12,371 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | | (4,979 | ) | | 5,920 | | | 10,641 | |
Add (subtract): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 18,617 | | | 12,749 | | | 12,371 | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 2,024 | | | 2,191 | | | 1,777 | |
| Amortization of original issue discount | | | 1,016 | | | 662 | | | 92 | |
| (Gain) loss on sales of fixed assets | | | — | | | (417 | ) | | 899 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | 5,716 | | | 154 | | | 583 | |
| Minority interest | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| Non-cash interest | | | — | | | — | | | 13,493 | |
| Write-off of deferred financing costs | | | — | | | 7,284 | | | — | |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment charge | | | 2,072 | | | — | | | — | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | (1,236 | ) | | (6,844 | ) | | (9,970 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 23,230 | | $ | 21,696 | | $ | 29,911 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (a)
- In addition to the non-cash charges added back in calculating EBITDA, we incurred restructuring and merger-related charges of $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
- (b)
- We incurred costs associated with exploring strategic alternatives of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. These costs related to a possible sale of the company.
- (c)
- Due to adverse political and economic conditions in Zimbabwe, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $2.8 million, equivalent to our net investment, with regard to the impairment of our former Zimbabwe subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2002.
- (d)
- Interest expense, net is calculated as interest expense minus interest income.
- (e)
- Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes $6.3 million of non-cash charges relating to accelerated depreciation in connection with the write-off of long-lived assets.
- (5)
- Net cash interest expense is defined as interest expense minus interest income adjusted to exclude (i) write-offs of and the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount and (ii) accrued and unpaid yield on NSP Holdings' preferred units. See footnotes (1), (2) and (3), above.
- (6)
- In calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of (loss) income before income taxes and minority interest plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred financing fees and original issue discount, and the portion of rental expense deemed attributable to interest.
10
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below as well as the other information contained in this prospectus when deciding whether to participate in the exchange offer. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business operations. In such case, you may lose all or part of your original investment.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Because there is no public market for the notes, you may not be able to resell your notes.
The exchange notes will be registered under the Securities Act, but will constitute a new issue of securities with no established trading market, and there can be no assurance as to:
- •
- the liquidity of any trading market that may develop;
- •
- the ability of holders to sell their exchange notes; or
- •
- the price at which the holders would be able to sell their exchange notes.
If a trading market were to develop, the exchange notes might trade at higher or lower prices than their principal amount or purchase price, depending on many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the market for similar debentures and our financial performance.
We understand that the initial purchasers presently intend to make a market in the notes. However, they are not obligated to do so, and any market-making activity with respect to the notes may be discontinued at any time without notice. In addition, any market-making activity will be subject to the limits imposed by the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may be limited during the exchange offer or the pendency of an applicable shelf registration statement. There can be no assurance that an active trading market will exist for the notes or that any trading market that does develop will be liquid.
In addition, any holder of outstanding notes who tenders in the exchange offer for the purpose of participating in a distribution of the exchange notes may be deemed to have received restricted securities, and if so, will be required to comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction. For a description of these requirements, see "Exchange Offer."
Your outstanding notes will not be accepted for exchange if you fail to follow the exchange offer procedures and, as a result, your notes will continue to be subject to existing transfer restrictions and you may not be able to sell your outstanding notes.
We will not accept your notes for exchange if you do not follow the exchange offer procedures. We will issue exchange notes as part of this exchange offer only after a timely receipt of your outstanding notes, a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal and all other required documents. Therefore, if you want to tender your outstanding notes, please allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery. If we do not receive your notes, letter of transmittal and other required documents by the expiration date of the exchange offer, we will not accept your notes for exchange. We are under no duty to give notification of defects or irregularities with respect to the tenders of outstanding notes for exchange. If there are defects or irregularities with respect to your tender of notes, we may not accept your notes for exchange. For more information, see "Exchange Offer."
11
If you do not exchange your outstanding notes, your outstanding notes will continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions and you may not be able to sell your outstanding notes.
We did not register the outstanding notes, nor do we intend to do so following the exchange offer. Outstanding notes that are not tendered will therefore continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions and may be transferred only in limited circumstances under the securities laws. If you do not exchange your outstanding notes, you will lose your right to have your outstanding notes registered under the federal securities laws. As a result, if you hold outstanding notes after the exchange offer, you may not be able to sell your outstanding notes.
Risks Relating to the Notes
NSP Holdings is a holding company with no business operations or assets other than the equity interests it holds in its subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries do not guarantee the Issuers' obligations under the notes and do not have any obligation with respect to the notes.
NSP Holdings is a holding company with no business operations or assets other than the equity interests it holds in its subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries do not guarantee the Issuers' obligations under the notes and do not have any obligation with respect to the notes. Consequently, NSP Holdings will be dependent on dividends and other payments from its subsidiaries, none of which have guaranteed the notes, to make payments of principal and, when they elect to or are required to pay interest in cash, interest on the notes. The notes are the several obligations of the Issuers, but NSP Capital was formed in connection with the offering of the outstanding notes and has no assets and no operations and is prohibited from engaging in any business activities, except in connection with the issuance of the notes. NSP Holdings' subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities, and they have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay the amounts due under the notes or to make any funds available to pay those amounts, whether by dividend, distribution, loan or other payments. You will not have any direct claim on the cash flows or assets of NSP Holdings' subsidiaries other than NSP Capital.
The terms of our existing debt agreements significantly restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to make dividends to NSP Holdings. Because NSP Holdings has no independent assets or operations, it may therefore not be able to make payments on the notes.
The terms of the senior credit facility significantly restrict Norcross from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to NSP Holdings. Further, the terms of the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes significantly restrict Norcross and our other subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to NSP Holdings, except for taxes and ordinary course corporate operating expenses. We cannot assure you that the agreements governing the current and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries will permit our subsidiaries to provide the Issuers with sufficient dividends, distributions or loans to make the mandatory partial redemption of the notes on July 1, 2010 or to fund the cash interest payments on the notes that are required to begin thereafter. The ability of our subsidiaries to make dividends and other payments to the Issuers will depend on their cash flows and earnings which, in turn, will be affected by all of the factors discussed in these "Risk Factors."
Given the restrictions in our existing debt instruments, we currently anticipate that, in order to pay the principal amount of the notes at maturity or to repurchase the notes upon a change of control as defined in the indentures governing the notes, we will be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as refinancing our indebtedness at or before maturity, selling our equity securities or the equity securities or assets of Norcross, seeking capital contributions or loans from our affiliates or reducing or delaying business activities and capital expenditures. None of our affiliates is required to make any capital contributions, loans or other payments to us with respect to our obligations on the notes. There can be no assurance that any of the foregoing actions could be effected on satisfactory terms, or at all, or that any of the foregoing actions would enable us to refinance our indebtedness or pay the principal amount or interest of the notes or that any of such actions would be permitted by the terms of the
12
indentures governing the notes or any debt instruments of our subsidiaries then in effect. See "Description of Other Obligations."
To service our indebtedness, we require a significant amount of cash, the availability of which depends on many factors beyond our control. If we cannot service our indebtedness, we may not be able to satisfy our obligations under the notes.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the notes, and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future from our operations. Our ability to generate cash is, to a certain extent, subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available to us under our senior credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, including the notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. As of December 31, 2004, the current portion (due within one year) of our debt service payments, which includes principal and interest, was approximately $34.9 million. We intend to service these obligations through our future cash flows from operations. If our future cash flow from operations and other capital resources are insufficient to pay our obligations as they mature or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay our business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt, including the notes, on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including our senior credit facility and the notes, on satisfactory terms or at all.
The notes are structurally subordinated to the debt and liabilities of our subsidiaries and are effectively subordinated to any of our secured debt.
Generally, claims of creditors of a subsidiary, including trade creditors, will have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of the subsidiary over the claims of creditors of its parent company. Your rights under the notes, therefore, will be structurally subordinated to those of the creditors of our subsidiaries. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency, you may receive less, ratably, than holders of debt of our subsidiaries and other liabilities, including, in all likelihood, the claims of the holders of the 97/8% senior subordinated notes and the lenders under the senior credit facility. As of December 31, 2004, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and application of the net proceeds, our subsidiaries would have had $329.1 million of indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, and the notes would have been effectively subordinated to such indebtedness and other liabilities.
In addition, holders of the secured debt of Norcross will have claims that are prior to your claims as a holder of the notes, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that debt. We guarantee the obligations of Norcross under its senior credit facility and secure our guarantee with substantially all of our assets, including the stock of Norcross. In addition, the senior credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the equity securities of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets and 65% of the equity securities of, or equity interest in, certain of our foreign subsidiaries. If we become insolvent or are liquidated, or if payment under the senior credit facility is not made, the lenders would be entitled to exercise the remedies of a secured lender. Accordingly, these lenders will have a secured claim against the pledged assets of Norcross and will have priority with respect to those assets over any other claim for payment, including any claim of NSP Holdings for amounts invested in Norcross. In such event, it is possible that there would be no assets remaining after payment to these lenders from which claims to the holders of the notes could be satisfied. As of December 31, 2004, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and the application of the net proceeds, there was outstanding $98.9 million of senior secured debt, and approximately
13
$36.9 million was available for borrowing as additional senior secured debt under our revolving credit facilities.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the notes.
After giving effect to the issuance of the notes, we have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2004, on a pro forma basis, our total debt, total capitalization, and ratio of total debt to total capitalization were as follows:
| | As of December 31, 2004 Pro Forma
| |
---|
| | (dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
113/4% senior pay in kind notes | | $ | 92,000 | |
113/4% senior pay in kind notes issued to CIVC | | | 8,000 | |
Other senior debt | | | 98,855 | |
| |
| |
| Total senior debt | | | 198,855 | |
97/8% senior subordinated notes (1) | | | 151,590 | |
Other subordinated debt | | | 3,121 | |
| |
| |
| Total debt | | | 353,566 | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred units | | | 74,310 | |
Members' deficit | | | (77,597 | ) |
| |
| |
| Total capitalization | | $ | 350,279 | |
Ratio of total debt to total capitalization | | | 100.9 | % |
- (1)
- 97/8% senior subordinated notes of $152.5 million in aggregate principal amount are shown net of $0.9 million of original issue discount.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:
- •
- make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes;
- •
- increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
- •
- require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, expansion through acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
- •
- limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
- •
- place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
- •
- limit our ability, among other things, to borrow additional funds.
Our substantial indebtedness may make it difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under the senior credit facility. If we cannot satisfy our obligations under the senior credit facility, our senior lenders could declare a default. A default, if not waived or cured, could result in an acceleration of our indebtedness and a foreclosure on our assets. A foreclosure would make it extremely difficult for us to operate as a going concern. In addition, a default, if not cured or waived, may permit the acceleration of our other indebtedness.
14
Despite current indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks described above.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the indenture governing the notes do not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. Our senior credit facility permits borrowings of up to $30.0 million and C$10.0 million and revolving credit facilities at our European subsidiaries permits borrowings of up to E3.1 million and all of those borrowings rank senior to the notes. As of December 31, 2004, $36.9 million was available for future borrowings under the revolving credit facility and E3.1 million available under our European credit facilities. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify. All of those borrowings would be secured, and as a result, would be effectively senior to the notes and further, because they represent debt of one of our subsidiaries, the borrowings would be structurally senior to the notes. If we incur any additional indebtedness that ranks equally with the notes, the holders of that debt will be entitled to share ratably with the holders of the notes in any proceeds distributed in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or other winding-up of us. This may have the effect of reducing the amount of proceeds paid to you.
Our subsidiaries may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of their indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy their obligations under such indebtedness, which may not be successful.
Our subsidiaries' ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance their debt obligations depends on our subsidiaries' financial condition and operating performance, which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our subsidiaries will generate sufficient cash flow from operations sufficient to permit them to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on their indebtedness. If our subsidiaries, cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund their debt services obligations, our subsidiaries may be forced to restructure or refinance their indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets, obtain additional capital or reduce or delay business activities and capital expenditures. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit our subsidiaries to meet their scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of such operating results and resources, they could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet their debt services and other obligations. The senior credit facility, the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes and the indenture governing the notes significantly restrict our subsidiaries' ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from the disposition. Our subsidiaries may not be able to consummate these dispositions or to obtain the proceeds which could be realized from them and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations when due.
If our subsidiaries default on their obligations to pay their indebtedness, we may not be able to make principal payments on the notes.
If our subsidiaries are unable to generate sufficient cash flow and are otherwise unable to obtain funds necessary to meet required payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on their indebtedness, or if they otherwise fail to comply with the various covenants, including financial and operating covenants, in their debt instruments, we or they could be in default under the terms of such debt instruments. In the event of such default, the holders of such indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, the lenders under the senior credit facility could elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, cease making further loans and institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. Any of the foregoing could prevent us from paying principal and interest on the notes and substantially decrease the market value of the notes.
15
The notes indenture, the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes and the senior credit facility contain financial and other restrictive covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things:
- •
- incur additional debt or issue preferred stock;
- •
- pay dividends and make distributions on, or redeem or repurchase, capital stock;
- •
- issue stock of subsidiaries;
- •
- make investments;
- •
- create liens;
- •
- enter into transactions with affiliates;
- •
- enter into sale-leaseback transactions;
- •
- merge or consolidate; and
- •
- transfer and sell assets.
Events beyond our control can affect our ability to comply with these covenants. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our debts. We cannot be certain that we will have funds available to remedy these defaults. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be certain that we will have sufficient funds available to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us or at all. We may incur other indebtedness in the future that may contain financial or other covenants more restrictive than those applicable to the senior credit facility, the notes indenture or the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes.
The notes are not secured by any assets, while our obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by liens on substantially all of our assets. Under certain circumstances, note holders may receive less, ratably, than our secured lenders.
The notes are not secured by any collateral. However, our obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by liens on substantially all of our assets. Therefore, in a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization or similar proceeding relating to us or our property, holders of the notes will participate in the assets remaining after we have paid all of our secured debt. In any of these cases, we may not have sufficient funds to pay all of our creditors and the holders of notes may receive less, ratably, than the holders of our secured debt.
The senior credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including leverage and interest coverage ratios. If we fail to comply with these financial covenants, a default could be declared, and the senior lenders could accelerate our repayment obligations.
The senior credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios. Those ratios include: a fixed charge coverage ratio of EBITDA less capital expenditures over fixed charges for the period, an interest coverage ratio of EBITDA over interest expense for the period, a senior leverage ratio of senior debt over EBITDA for the period, and a total leverage ratio of total debt over EBITDA for the period. The specific ratios we are required to maintain change over time.
If we fail to maintain these ratios and the failure is not cured, the senior lenders could declare a default under the senior credit facility, accelerate our payment obligations and foreclose on our assets. A foreclosure would make it extremely difficult for us to operate as a going concern. In addition, a default, if not cured or waived, may permit the acceleration of our other indebtedness. We may not
16
have funds available to remedy these defaults. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds available to pay the accelerated indebtedness or the ability to refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us or at all.
We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the change of control offer required by the indenture.
Upon the occurrence of certain specific kinds of change of control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. However, it is possible that we will not have sufficient funds at the time of the change of control to make any required repurchases or that restrictions in our senior credit facility will not allow such repurchases. A change in control can be the basis for the declaration of an event of default under our senior credit facility, which, if not waived, accelerates our obligations under the credit agreement and, under the terms of the indenture, we would be prohibited from making, and the trustee from accepting, any payment with respect to the notes until the senior indebtedness was paid in full. If we do not repay all borrowings under our senior credit facility or obtain a consent of our lenders under our senior credit facility to repurchase the notes, we will be prohibited from purchasing the notes. Our failure to purchase tendered notes would constitute a default under the indenture governing the notes, which, in turn, would constitute a default under our senior credit facility. In addition to the outstanding notes, as of December 31, 2004 we had $253.8 million of indebtedness outstanding that is payable in full at the option of the payees upon a change of control.
Also, we could in the future enter into transactions, including acquisitions, refinancings or other recapitalizations or highly leveraged transactions, that would not constitute a change of control under the indenture, but that could increase the amount of indebtedness outstanding at such time or adversely affect our capital structure or credit ratings. See "Description of the Notes—Change of Control Offer."
Federal and state statutes allow courts, under specific circumstances, to void the notes and require note holders to return payments received from us.
Under the federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer laws, the notes could be voided, or claims in respect of the notes could be subordinated to all of our other debts if, among other things, at the time we incurred the indebtedness evidenced by the notes we received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the incurrence of such indebtedness; and
- •
- were insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of such incurrence; or
- •
- were engaged in a business or transaction for which our remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or
- •
- intended to incur, or believed that we would incur, debts beyond our ability to pay such debts as they matured.
The measures of insolvency for purposes of these fraudulent transfer laws will vary depending upon the law applied in any proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer has occurred. Generally, however, we would be considered insolvent if:
- •
- the sum of our debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair saleable value of all of our assets; or
- •
- the present fair saleable value of our assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay our probable liability on our existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they became absolute and mature; or
- •
- we could not pay our debts as they became due.
17
On the basis of historical financial information, recent operating history and other factors, we believe we are not insolvent, do not have unreasonably small capital for the business in which we are engaged and have not incurred debts beyond our ability to pay such debts as they mature. We cannot assure you, however, as to what standard a court would apply in making these determinations or that a court would agree with our conclusions in this regard.
NSP Capital was formed in connection with the offering of the outstanding notes and has no assets and no operations and is prohibited from engaging in any business activities, except in connection with the issuance of the notes. You should therefore not rely upon NSP Capital in evaluating whether to participate in the exchange offer.
Interest on the notes is payable with additional notes, which may produce tax consequences adverse to holders.
At our option, interest on the notes will be payable in additional notes. Consequently, holders of notes generally will be required to include amounts in income for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the principal amount of all additional notes issued in lieu of cash interest payments on the notes, even though no cash income will be received at the time of such payments. See "Certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences" for a more detailed discussion of this and other tax consequences that may arise from holding the notes.
The exchange notes are new securities for which there currently is no market. Although the initial purchaser of the outstanding notes has informed us that it intends to make a market in the exchange notes it is not obligated to do so and any such market making may be discontinued at any time without notice. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the development or liquidity of any market for the exchange notes. The exchange notes are expected to be eligible for trading by qualified buyers in the PORTAL market. We do not intend to apply for listing of the exchange notes on any securities exchange or for quotation through The Nasdaq National Market.
In addition, the liquidity of, and trading market for, the exchange notes may also be adversely affected by general declines in the market for similar securities. Such a decline may adversely affect such liquidity and trading markets independent of our financial performance and prospects.
We intend to use $33.1 million of the net proceeds from the offering of the outstanding notes for general corporate purposes. See "Use of Proceeds." Our management, however, has not designated a specific use for these net proceeds and has broad discretion over their use, including potential acquisitions and/or distributions to our unit holders. Our management may allocate the net proceeds differently than investors in the offering of the notes would prefer, or we may not maximize our return on the net proceeds. The indenture permits us to use the proceeds to make distributions to our unit holders in the future, at our discretion.
Risks Relating to our Business
If we are unable to retain senior executives and other qualified professionals our growth may be hindered, which could negatively impact our results of operations and our ability to make payments on the notes.
Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain qualified managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for these types of personnel is intense. We may be
18
unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the personnel we require to conduct and expand our operations successfully. Our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to attract, hire, train and retain qualified personnel. Our success also depends to a significant extent on the continued service of our management team. The loss of any member of the management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. The competitive pressures faced by us could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The personal protection equipment market is highly competitive, with participants ranging in size from small companies focusing on single types of safety products, to large multinational corporations which manufacture and supply many types of safety products. Our main competitors vary by region and product. We believe that participants in this industry compete primarily on the basis of product characteristics (such as functional performance, design and style), price, brand name recognition and service. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do and our cash flows from operations could be adversely affected by competitors' new product innovations and pricing changes made by us in response to competition from existing or new competitors. Individual competitors have advantages and strengths in different sectors of the industry, in different products and in different areas, including manufacturing and distribution systems, geographic market presence, customer service and support, breadth of product, delivery time, costs of labor and price. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors and the competitive pressures faced by us could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. See "Business—Competition."
Many of our products are subject to existing regulations and standards, changes in which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our net sales may be materially and adversely affected by changes in safety regulations and standards covering industrial workers, firefighters and utility workers in the United States and Canada, including safety regulations of the Occupational Safety & Health Administration ("OSHA") and standards of the National Fire Protection Agency ("NFPA"), the American National Standards Institute ("ANSI") and the American Society for Testing of Materials ("ASTM"). Our net sales could also be adversely affected by a reduction in the level of enforcement of such regulations. Changes in regulations could reduce the demand for our products or require us to reengineer our products, thereby creating opportunities for our competitors.
A reduction in the spending patterns of government agencies could materially and adversely affect our net sales.
We sell a significant portion of our products in the United States and Canada to various governmental agencies. In addition, a portion of our products are sold to government agencies through fixed price contracts awarded by competitive bids submitted to state and local agencies. Many of these governmental agency contracts are awarded on an annual basis. Accordingly, notwithstanding our long-standing relationship with various governmental agencies, we may lose our contracts with such agencies to lower bidders in the competitive bid process. Moreover, the terms and conditions of such sales and the government contract process are subject to extensive regulation by various federal, state and local authorities in the United States and Canada.
19
In most markets in which we compete, there are frequent introductions of new products and product line extensions. If we fail to introduce successful new products, we may lose market position and our financial performance may be negatively impacted.
If we are unable to identify emerging consumer and technological trends, maintain and improve the competitiveness of our products and introduce these products on a global basis, we may lose market position, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Continued product development and marketing efforts have all the risks inherent in the development of new products and line extensions, including development delays, the failure of new products and line extensions to achieve anticipated levels of market acceptance and the cost of failed product introductions.
Our international operations are subject to various uncertainties and a significant reduction in international sales of our products could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our international operations are subject to various political, economic and other uncertainties which could adversely effect our business. A significant reduction of our international business due to any of these risks would adversely affect our revenues. In 2004, approximately 33% of our net sales were outside the United States. These risks include:
- •
- unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
- •
- currency exchange rate fluctuations;
- •
- changes in trade policy or tariff regulations;
- •
- customs matters;
- •
- longer payment cycles;
- •
- higher tax rates and potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on repatriating earnings and the threat of "double taxation";
- •
- additional tax withholding requirements;
- •
- intellectual property protection difficulties;
- •
- difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;
- •
- complications in complying with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, many of which conflict with United States laws;
- •
- costs and difficulties in integrating, staffing and managing international operations; and
- •
- strains on financial and other systems to properly administer VAT and other taxes.
In addition, foreign operations involve uncertainties arising from local business practices, cultural considerations and international political and trade tensions. For example, in 2002, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge with regard to our former Zimbabwe subsidiary due to adverse economic and political conditions. In addition, a portion of our manufacturing and outsourcing relationships involve China. If we are unable to successfully manage the risks associated with expanding our global business or to adequately manage operational fluctuations internationally, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We have in the past and may in the future restructure some of our operations, including our recently acquired subsidiaries. In such circumstances, we may take actions that would result in a charge related to discontinued operations, thereby reducing our earnings. These restructurings have or may be undertaken to realign our subsidiaries, eliminate duplicative functions, rationalize our operating
20
facilities and products, and reduce our staff. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $9.3 million related to a restructuring plan to exit certain manufacturing facilities and move certain hand operations to China. Additionally, on January 1, 2002 we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life be tested at least annually for impairment. We carry a very significant amount of goodwill and intangible assets and SFAS No. 142 requires us to perform an annual assessment for possible impairment. As of December 31, 2004, we had goodwill of approximately $132.7 million. We do not anticipate that our goodwill will be impaired for the year ended December 31, 2005. If we determine our goodwill to be impaired, the resulting non-cash charge could be substantial.
We may be unable to successfully execute or effectively integrate acquisitions, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
One of our key operating strategies is to selectively pursue acquisitions. Acquisitions involve a number of risks including:
- •
- failure of the acquired businesses to achieve the results we expect;
- •
- diversion of our management's attention from operational matters;
- •
- our inability to retain key personnel of the acquired businesses;
- •
- risks associated with unanticipated events or liabilities;
- •
- the potential disruption of our existing business; and
- •
- customer dissatisfaction or performance problems at the acquired businesses.
If we are unable to integrate or successfully manage any business that we may acquire in the future, we may not realize anticipated cost savings, improved manufacturing efficiencies and revenue growth, which may result in reduced profitability or operating losses. In addition, we expect to face competition for acquisition candidates, which may limit the number of our acquisition opportunities and may lead to higher acquisition prices. Moreover, acquisitions of businesses may require additional debt financing, resulting in additional leverage. The covenants in our senior credit facility and the indentures governing our notes may further limit our ability to complete acquisitions. The realization of all or any of the risks described above could materially and adversely affect our reputation and our results of operations.
Our continued success depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, our sales could be materially and adversely affected.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, maintain trade secret protection and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. We have been issued patents and have registered trademarks with respect to many of our products, but our competitors could independently develop similar or superior products or technologies, duplicate any of our designs, trademarks, processes or other intellectual property or design around any processes or designs on which we have or may obtain patents or trademark protection. In addition, it is possible that third parties may have or acquire licenses for other technology or designs that we may use or desire to use, so that we may need to acquire licenses to, or to contest the validity of, such patents or trademarks of third parties. Such licenses may not be made available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, and we may not prevail in contesting the validity of third party rights.
In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who have access to them, such as our employees, through contractual arrangements. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of
21
any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, our sales could be materially adversely affected. See "Business—Intellectual Property."
We do not have long-term contracts with many of our customers and they may terminate their relationship with us at any time, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
A significant portion of our contracts are not long-term contacts and are terminable at will by either party. If a significant number of our customers choose to terminate their contracts or to not renew their contracts with us upon expiration, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims arising from the claimed failure of our products to prevent the types of personal injury or death against which they are designed to protect. We have not experienced any material uninsured losses due to product liability claims, but it is possible that we could experience material losses in the future.
In particular, as of December 31, 2004, our North Safety Products subsidiary, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such business were named as a defendant in approximately 847 lawsuits involving respirators manufactured and sold by it or its predecessors. We are also monitoring an additional 11 lawsuits in which we feel that North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses may be named as defendants. Collectively, these 858 lawsuits represent approximately 26,000 (excluding spousal claims) plaintiffs. Approximately 91% of these lawsuits involve plaintiffs alleging injury resulting from exposure to silica dust, with the remainder alleging injury from exposure to other dust particles, including asbestos. These lawsuits typically allege that the purported injuries resulted in part from respirators that were negligently designed and/or manufactured. The defendants in these lawsuits are often numerous, and include, in addition to respirator manufacturers, employers of the plaintiffs and manufacturers of sand (used in sand blasting) and asbestos. We acquired our North Safety Products subsidiary on October 2, 1998 from Siebe plc. In connection with the acquisition, Siebe, which was subsequently merged with BTR plc (now known as "Invensys plc"), contractually agreed to indemnify us for any losses, including costs of defending claims, resulting from respiratory products manufactured or sold prior to our acquisition of North Safety Products in October 1998.
In addition, our North Safety Products subsidiary is contractually entitled to indemnification from Norton Company, an affiliate of Saint-Gobain, which owned the North Safety Products business prior to Invensys. Pursuant to a December 14, 1982 asset purchase agreement, Siebe Norton, Inc., a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Norton Company, acquired the assets of Norton's Safety Products Division and the stock of this company was in turn acquired by Siebe Gorman Holdings PLC. Under the terms of the Agreement, Siebe Norton, Inc. did not assume any liability for claims relating to products shipped by Norton Company prior to the closing date. Moreover, Norton Company covenanted in the Agreement to indemnify Siebe Norton and its successors and assigns against any liability resulting from or arising out of any state of facts, omissions or events existing or occurring on or before the closing date, including, without limitation, any claims arising in respect of products shipped by Norton Company or any of its affiliates prior to the closing date. Siebe Norton, whose name was subsequently changed to Siebe North Inc., was subsequently acquired by us as part of the 1998 acquisition of the North Safety Products business from Invensys.
Despite these indemnification agreements, we could potentially be liable for these losses or claims relating to products manufactured prior to the October 1998 acquisition date if Invensys fails to meet its obligations to indemnify us and we could potentially be liable for these losses and claims relating to
22
products sold prior to January 10, 1983 if both Invensys and Norton fail to meet their obligations to indemnify us. We could also be liable if the alleged exposure involved the use of a product manufactured by us after our October 1998 acquisition of the North Safety Products business. Invensys is currently handling the defense of all of the cases in which North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses have been named as defendants. We are jointly with Invensys handling the defense of all of the cases which allege exposure including periods pre and post October 1998. We will individually handle the defense of all cases with exclusive post October 1998 exposure, however, we have not been involved in a case with exclusive post October 1998 exposure to date. As of December 31, 2004, Invensys has sent us requests for reimbursement totaling $120,726, relating to settled cases in which Invensys claims that the period of alleged exposure included periods after October 1998. To date, we have not reimbursed Invensys for these claims, as we are currently pursuing negotiations regarding the allocation of costs and the determination of the alleged exposure periods. Based on information provided to us by Invensys, we believe that Invensys has made payments with respect to settlement of these claims of $477,206 in 2002, $660,510 in 2003 and $938,083 in 2004. Separately, we and Invensys settled one unusual case for $65,000 in which our settlement share was $45,000 (our net contribution after insurance proceeds was $25,000).
Consistent with the current environment being experienced by companies involved in silica and asbestos-related litigation, there has been an increase in the number of asserted claims that could potentially involve us. Based upon information provided to us by Invensys, we believe activity related to these lawsuits was as follows for the periods indicated:
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Beginning lawsuits | | 363 | | 306 | | 680 | |
New lawsuits | | 185 | | 537 | | 372 | |
Settlements | | (134 | ) | (46 | ) | (46 | ) |
Dismissals | | (108 | ) | (117 | ) | (148 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Ending lawsuits | | 306 | | 680 | | 858 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plaintiffs have asserted specific dollar claims in less than a quarter of the approximately 847 cases pending as of December 31, 2004 in which North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses have been named as defendants. A majority of jurisdictions prohibit specifying damages in tort cases such as these, and most of the remaining jurisdictions do not require such specification. In those cases in which plaintiffs choose to assert specific dollar amounts in their complaints, brought in states that permit such pleading, the amounts claimed are typically not meaningful as an indicator of a company's potential liability. This is because (1) the amounts claimed typically bear no relation to the level of the plaintiff's injury, (2) the complaints typically assert claims against numerous defendants, and (3) many cases are brought on behalf of plaintiffs who have not suffered any medical injury, and, ultimately, are resolved without any payment or payment of a small fraction of the damages initially claimed. Of the 847 complaints maintained in our records, 669 do not specify the amount of damages sought, 32 generally allege damages in excess of $50,000, four allege compensatory damages in excess of $50,000 and an unspecified amount of punitive damages, 78 allege compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $25,000, two generally allege damages in excess of $100,000, 19 allege compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $50,000, 31 generally allege damages of $15.0 million, one generally alleges damages not to exceed $290.0 million, one alleges compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $10,000, one alleges compensatory and punitive damages, each in excess of $15,000, one alleges punitive damages in excess of $25,000, one alleges punitive damages in excess of $50,000, two generally allege damages in excess of $15,000, two generally allege damages in excess of $25,000, one generally alleges damages in excess of $4,000 and two allege compensatory and punitive damages each in excess of $15.0 million. We currently do not have access to the complaints to the previously mentioned additional 11 cases we are monitoring, and therefore do not know whether these cases allege specific damages, or if so, the
23
amount of such damages, but are in the process of seeking to obtain such information. Due to the reasons noted above and to the indemnification arrangements benefiting us, we do not believe that the damage amounts specified in these complaints are a meaningful factor in any assessment of our potential liability.
Bankruptcy filings of companies with asbestos and silica-related litigation could increase our cost over time. If we were found liable in these cases and either Invensys or Norton Company failed to meet their indemnification obligations to us or the suit involved products manufactured by us after our October 1998 acquisition of North Safety Products, it would have a material adverse effect on our business. For more information, see "Business—Legal Proceedings."
Also, in the event any of our products prove to be defective, we could be required to recall or redesign such products. We maintain insurance against product liability claims (with the exception of asbestosis and silicosis cases, for which coverage is not commercially available), but it is possible that our insurance coverage will not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us or that such coverage will not be adequate for liabilities actually incurred. A successful claim brought against us in excess of available insurance coverage, or any claim or product recall that results in significant expense or adverse publicity against us, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are subject to various environmental laws and any violation of these laws could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing discharges to air and water, handling and disposal practices for solid and hazardous wastes, hazardous substance contamination and the maintenance of a safe workplace. These laws impose penalties for noncompliance and liability for response costs and certain damages resulting from past and current spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous materials. We could incur substantial costs as a result of noncompliance with or liability pursuant to these environmental laws and to attain and maintain compliance with evolving regulatory requirements under environmental laws. Environmental laws continue to evolve and we may be subject to more stringent environmental laws in the future. If more stringent environmental laws are enacted, these future laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. See "Business—Environmental Matters."
The interests of our controlling equityholders could conflict with those of the holders of the notes.
Equityholders of NSP Holdings that individually hold greater than 5% of a class of its voting securities, taken as a group, hold a total of 79.9% of its outstanding voting equity. See "Principal Equityholders." Pursuant to our Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, which we refer to as our "limited liability company agreement," the CIBC/Argosy Group (defined below) has the right to appoint three of the possible six members of NSP Holdings' board of managers. These appointees have the authority to make decisions affecting our capital structure, including the issuance of additional indebtedness and the making of distributions. Argosy Safety Products L.P.'s ("Argosy") limited partners include individuals who are employees of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC").
Our limited liability company agreement may be amended by the vote of the holders of the majority of its voting equity, so long as the amendment is also approved by John Hancock Life Insurance Company ("John Hancock") and Hancock Mezzanine Partners L.P. (collectively, the "Hancock Group"), on the one hand, and Argosy, CIBC and CIBC's affiliates (collectively, the "CIBC/Argosy Group"), on the other hand. Therefore, these entities, acting together, have sufficient voting power to amend our limited liability company agreement.
Entities associated with some of our principal equityholders are lenders under our senior credit facilities. These entities may lend to us on a senior basis in the future. NSP Holdings' principal equityholders may pursue transactions that could enhance their investments while involving risks to your interests. The interests of these entities could conflict with the interests of the holders of the notes.
24
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make "forward-looking statements" throughout this prospectus. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we "believe," "expect" or "anticipate" will occur, and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be correct, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described in this prospectus will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). You should read this prospectus completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We will not update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation will change in the future.
Whether actual results will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including:
- •
- our high degree of leverage and significant debt service obligations;
- •
- the impact of current and future laws and governmental regulations affecting us or our product offerings;
- •
- the impact of governmental spending;
- •
- our ability to retain existing customers, maintain key supplier status with those customers with which we have achieved such status and obtain new customers;
- •
- the highly competitive nature of the personal protection equipment industry;
- •
- any future changes in management;
- •
- acceptance by consumers of new products we develop or acquire;
- •
- the importance and costs of product innovation;
- •
- unforeseen problems associated with international sales, including gains and losses from foreign currency exchange and restrictions on the efficient repatriation of earnings;
- •
- the unpredictability of patent protection and other intellectual property issues;
- •
- cancellation of current orders;
- •
- the outcome of pending product liability claims and the availability of indemnification for those claims; and
- •
- general risks associated with the personal protection equipment industry.
We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in "Risk Factors." In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. When you consider these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these risk factors and other cautionary statements in this prospectus.
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
25
EXCHANGE OFFER
Purpose and Effect of the Exchange Offer
The Issuers and the initial purchaser entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the outstanding notes on January 7, 2005. Under the registration rights agreement, the issuers have agreed to:
- •
- file a registration statement within 120 days after the issue date of the outstanding notes enabling holders thereof to exchange the privately placed outstanding notes for publicly registered exchange notes with identical terms;
- •
- use our reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective within 210 days after the issue date of the outstanding notes;
- •
- use our reasonable best efforts to complete the exchange offer within 240 days after the issue date of the outstanding notes; and
- •
- use our reasonable best efforts to file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the notes if we cannot effect an exchange offer within the time periods listed above and in other circumstances.
We will pay additional interest on the notes for the periods described below if:
- •
- we do not file the required registration statement on time;
- •
- the SEC does not declare the required registration statement effective on time;
- •
- the exchange offer is not consummated or a shelf registration statement is not declared effective on time; or
- •
- the shelf registration statement is declared effective but shall later become unusable in connection with resales of the notes during the periods specified in the registration rights agreement.
You will not have any remedy other than liquidated damages on the notes if we fail to meet the deadlines listed above, which we refer to as a registration default. When there is a registration default, the interest rate of the notes will increase by one-quarter of one percent per year for the first 90-day period. The interest rate (as so increased) will increase by an additional one-quarter of one percent each subsequent 90-day period until all registration defaults have been cured, up to an aggregate maximum increase in the interest rate equal to one percent (1%) per annum. Following the cure of all registration defaults, the accrual of additional interest will cease and the interest rate will revert to the original rate.
Terms of the Exchange Offer
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal, we will accept any and all outstanding notes validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date of the exchange offer. We will issue $1 principal amount of exchange notes in exchange for each $1 principal amount of outstanding notes accepted in the exchange offer. Any holder may tender some or all of its outstanding notes pursuant to the exchange offer. However, outstanding notes may be tendered only in integral multiples of $1.
The form and terms of the exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the outstanding notes except that:
- •
- the exchange notes bear a Series B designation and a different CUSIP Number from the outstanding notes;
26
- •
- the exchange notes have been registered under the Securities Act and hence will not bear legends restricting the transfer thereof; and
- •
- the holders of the exchange notes will not be entitled to certain rights under the registration rights agreement, including the provisions providing for an increase in the interest rate on the outstanding notes in certain circumstances relating to the timing of the exchange offer, all of which rights will terminate when the exchange offer is terminated.
The exchange notes will evidence the same debt as the outstanding notes and will be entitled to the benefits of the indenture relating to the outstanding notes.
The exchange offer is for $92,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes that were outstanding as of the date of this prospectus. We have fixed the close of business on March 31, 2005 as the record date for the exchange offer for purposes of determining the persons to whom this prospectus and the letter of transmittal will be mailed initially. CIVC owns an additional $8.0 million of notes that will not be exchanged for exchange notes in the exchange offer.
Holders of outstanding notes do not have any appraisal or dissenters' rights under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or the indenture relating to the notes in connection with the exchange offer. We intend to conduct the exchange offer in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder.
We will be deemed to have accepted validly tendered outstanding notes when, as and if we have given oral or written notice thereof to the exchange agent. The exchange agent will act as agent for the tendering holders for the purpose of receiving the exchange notes from us.
If any tendered outstanding notes are not accepted for exchange because of an invalid tender, the occurrence of specified other events set forth in this prospectus or otherwise, the certificates for any unaccepted outstanding notes will be returned, without expense, to the tendering holder thereof promptly following the expiration date of the exchange offer.
Holders who tender outstanding notes in the exchange offer will not be required to pay brokerage commissions or fees or, subject to the instructions in the letter of transmittal, transfer taxes with respect to the exchange of outstanding notes pursuant to the exchange offer. We will pay all charges and expenses, other than transfer taxes in certain circumstances, in connection with the exchange offer. See "—Fees and Expenses."
Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendments
The term "expiration date" will mean 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 5, 2005, unless we, in our sole discretion, extend the exchange offer, in which case the term "expiration date" will mean the latest date and time to which the exchange offer is extended.
In order to extend the exchange offer, we will make a press release or other public announcement, notify the exchange agent of any extension by oral or written notice and will mail to the registered holders an announcement thereof, each prior to 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled expiration date.
We reserve the right, in our sole discretion, (1) to delay accepting any outstanding notes, to extend the exchange offer or to terminate the exchange offer if any of the conditions set forth below under "—Conditions" have not been satisfied, by giving oral or written notice of any delay, extension or termination to the exchange agent or (2) to amend the terms of the exchange offer in any manner. Such decision will also be communicated in a press release or other public announcement prior to 9:00 a.m., New York City time on the next business day following such decision. Any announcement of delay in acceptance, extension, termination or amendment will be followed as promptly as practicable by oral or written notice thereof to the registered holders.
27
Interest on the Exchange Notes
The exchange notes will bear interest from their date of issuance at a rate of 113/4% per year, payable semi-annually on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing July 1, 2005. Interest on each exchange note will accrue from January 7, 2005. Such interest will be paid with the first interest payment on the exchange notes on July 1, 2005. Holders of the exchange notes will not receive any interest on outstanding notes tendered and accepted for exchange.
Procedures for Tendering
Only a holder of outstanding notes may tender outstanding notes in the exchange offer. To tender in the exchange offer, a holder must complete, sign and date the letter of transmittal, or a facsimile thereof, have the signatures thereon guaranteed if required by the letter of transmittal or transmit an agent's message in connection with a book-entry transfer, and mail or otherwise deliver the letter of transmittal or the facsimile, together with the outstanding notes and any other required documents, to the exchange agent prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. To be tendered effectively, the outstanding notes, letter of transmittal or an agent's message and other required documents must be completed and received by the exchange agent at the address set forth below under "—Exchange Agent" prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. Delivery of the outstanding notes may be made by book-entry transfer in accordance with the procedures described below. Confirmation of the book-entry transfer must be received by the exchange agent prior to the expiration date.
The term "agent's message" means a message, transmitted by a book-entry transfer facility to, and received by, the exchange agent forming a part of a confirmation of a book-entry, which states that the book-entry transfer facility has received an express acknowledgment from the participant in the book-entry transfer facility tendering the outstanding notes that the participant has received and agrees: (1) to participate in ATOP; (2) to be bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal; and (3) that we may enforce the agreement against the participant.
By executing the letter of transmittal, each holder will make to us the representations set forth therein.
The tender by a holder and our acceptance thereof will constitute an agreement between the holder and us in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal or agent's message.
The method of delivery of outstanding notes and the letter of transmittal or agent's message and all other required documents to the exchange agent is at the election and sole risk of the holder. As an alternative to delivery by mail, holders may wish to consider overnight or hand delivery service. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to assure delivery to the exchange agent before the expiration date. No letter of transmittal or outstanding notes should be sent to us. Holders may request their respective brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or nominees to effect the above transactions for them.
Any beneficial owner whose outstanding notes are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and who wishes to tender should contact the registered holder promptly and instruct the registered holder to tender on the beneficial owner's behalf. See "Instructions to Registered Holder and/or Book-Entry Transfer Facility Participant from Beneficial Owner" included with the letter of transmittal.
Signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the case may be, must be guaranteed by a member of the Medallion System unless the outstanding notes tendered pursuant to the letter of transmittal are tendered (1) by a registered holder who has not completed the box entitled "Special Delivery Instructions" on the letter of transmittal or (2) for the account of a member firm of the Medallion System. In the event that signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal,
28
as the case may be, are required to be guaranteed, the guarantee must be by a member firm of the Medallion System.
If the letter of transmittal is signed by a person other than the registered holder of any outstanding notes listed in this prospectus, the outstanding notes must be endorsed or accompanied by a properly completed bond power, signed by the registered holder as the registered holder's name appears on the outstanding notes with the signature thereon guaranteed by a member firm of the Medallion System.
If the letter of transmittal or any outstanding notes or bond powers are signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, offices of corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, the person signing should so indicate when signing, and evidence satisfactory to us of its authority to so act must be submitted with the letter of transmittal.
We understand that the exchange agent will make a request promptly after the date of this prospectus to establish accounts with respect to the outstanding notes at DTC for the purpose of facilitating the exchange offer, and subject to the establishment thereof, any financial institution that is a participant in DTC's system may make book-entry delivery of outstanding notes by causing DTC to transfer the outstanding notes into the exchange agent's account with respect to the outstanding notes in accordance with DTC's procedures for the transfer. Although delivery of the outstanding notes may be effected through book-entry transfer into the exchange agent's account at DTC, unless an agent's message is received by the exchange agent in compliance with ATOP, an appropriate letter of transmittal properly completed and duly executed with any required signature guarantee and all other required documents must in each case be transmitted to and received or confirmed by the exchange agent at its address set forth below on or prior to the expiration date, or, if the guaranteed delivery procedures described below are complied with, within the time period provided under the procedures. Delivery of documents to DTC does not constitute delivery to the exchange agent.
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility, including time of receipt, acceptance of tendered outstanding notes and withdrawal of tendered outstanding notes will be determined by us in our sole discretion, which determination will be final and binding. We reserve the absolute right to reject any and all outstanding notes not properly tendered or any outstanding notes our acceptance of which would, in the opinion of our counsel, be unlawful. We also reserve the right in our sole discretion to waive any defects, irregularities or conditions of tender as to particular outstanding notes, provided however that, to the extent such waiver includes any condition to tender, we will waive such condition as to all tendering holders. Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer, including the instructions in the letter of transmittal, will be final and binding on all parties. Unless waived, any defects or irregularities in connection with tenders of outstanding notes must be cured within the time we determine. Although we intend to notify holders of defects or irregularities with respect to tenders of outstanding notes, neither we, the exchange agent nor any other person will incur any liability for failure to give the notification. Tenders of outstanding notes will not be deemed to have been made until the defects or irregularities have been cured or waived. Any outstanding notes received by the exchange agent that are not properly tendered and as to which the defects or irregularities have not been cured or waived will be returned by the exchange agent to the tendering holders, unless otherwise provided in the letter of transmittal, promptly following the expiration date.
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures
Holders who wish to tender their outstanding notes and (1) whose outstanding notes are not immediately available, (2) who cannot deliver their outstanding notes, the letter of transmittal or any other required documents to the exchange agent or (3) who cannot complete the procedures for book-entry transfer, prior to the expiration date, may effect a tender if:
- (A)
- the tender is made through a member firm of the Medallion System;
29
- (B)
- prior to the expiration date, the exchange agent receives from a member firm of the Medallion System a properly completed and duly executed Notice of Guaranteed Delivery by facsimile transmission, mail or hand delivery setting forth the name and address of the holder, the certificate number(s) of the outstanding notes and the principal amount of outstanding notes tendered, stating that the tender is being made thereby and guaranteeing that, within three New York Stock Exchange trading days after the expiration date, the letter of transmittal or facsimile thereof together with the certificate(s) representing the outstanding notes or a confirmation of book-entry transfer of the outstanding notes into the exchange agent's account at DTC, and any other documents required by the letter of transmittal will be deposited by the member firm of the Medallion System with the exchange agent; and
- (C)
- the properly completed and executed letter of transmittal of facsimile thereof, as well as the certificate(s) representing all tendered outstanding notes in proper form for transfer or a confirmation of book-entry transfer of the outstanding notes into the exchange agent's account at DTC, and all other documents required by the letter of transmittal are received by the exchange agent within three New York Stock Exchange trading days after the expiration date.
Upon request to the exchange agent, a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery will be sent to holders who wish to tender their outstanding notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures set forth above.
Withdrawal of Tenders
Except as otherwise provided in this prospectus, tenders of outstanding notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.
To withdraw a tender of outstanding notes in the exchange offer, a telegram, telex, letter or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal must be received by the exchange agent at its address set forth in this prospectus prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date of the exchange offer. Any notice of withdrawal must:
- (1)
- specify the name of the person having deposited the outstanding notes to be withdrawn;
- (2)
- identify the outstanding notes to be withdrawn, including the certificate number(s) and principal amount of the outstanding notes, or, in the case of outstanding notes transferred by book-entry transfer, the name and number of the account at DTC to be credited;
- (3)
- be signed by the holder in the same manner as the original signature on the letter of transmittal by which the outstanding notes were tendered, including any required signature guarantees, or be accompanied by documents of transfer sufficient to have the trustee with respect to the outstanding notes register the transfer of the outstanding notes into the name of the person withdrawing the tender; and
- (4)
- specify the name in which any outstanding notes are to be registered, if different from that of the person depositing the outstanding notes to be withdrawn.
All questions as to the validity, form and eligibility, including time of receipt, of the notices will be determined by us, which determination will be final and binding on all parties. Any outstanding notes so withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of the exchange offer and no exchange notes will be issued with respect thereto unless the outstanding notes so withdrawn are validly retendered. Any outstanding notes which have been tendered but which are not accepted for exchange will be returned to the holder thereof without cost to the holder promptly after withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the exchange offer. Properly withdrawn outstanding notes may be retendered by following one of the procedures described above under "—Procedures for Tendering" at any time prior to the expiration date.
30
Conditions
Notwithstanding any other term of the exchange offer, we will not be required to accept for exchange, or exchange notes for, any outstanding notes, and may, prior to the expiration of the exchange offer, terminate or amend the exchange offer as provided in this prospectus before the acceptance of the outstanding notes, if:
- (1)
- any action or proceeding is instituted or threatened in any court or by or before any governmental agency with respect to the exchange offer which we reasonably believe might materially impair our ability to proceed with the exchange offer or any material adverse development has occurred in any existing action or proceeding with respect to us or any of our subsidiaries; or
- (2)
- any law, statute, rule, regulation or interpretation by the Staff of the SEC is proposed, adopted or enacted, which we reasonably believe might materially impair our ability to proceed with the exchange offer or materially impair the contemplated benefits of the exchange offer to us; or
- (3)
- any governmental approval has not been obtained, which approval we reasonably believe to be necessary for the consummation of the exchange offer as contemplated by this prospectus.
If we determine in our reasonable discretion that any of the conditions are not satisfied, we may (1) refuse to accept any outstanding notes and return all tendered outstanding notes to the tendering holders, (2) extend the exchange offer and retain all outstanding notes tendered prior to the expiration of the exchange offer, subject, however, to the rights of holders to withdraw the outstanding notes (see "—Withdrawal of Tenders") or (3) waive the unsatisfied conditions with respect to the exchange offer and accept all properly tendered outstanding notes which have not been withdrawn.
Exchange Agent
Wilmington Trust Company has been appointed as exchange agent for the exchange offer. Questions and requests for assistance, requests for additional copies of this prospectus or of the letter of transmittal and requests for Notice of Guaranteed Delivery should be directed to the exchange agent addressed as follows:
By Overnight Courier or Registered/Certified Mail: Wilmington Trust Company DC-1626 Processing Unit P.O. Box 8861 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-8861 | | By Hand Prior to 4:30 p.m., New York City time: Wilmington Trust Company Corporate Capital Markets 1100 North Market Street Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19890-1626 |
Facsimile Transmission: (302) 636-4145
For Information Telephone: (302) 636-6470 |
Delivery to an address other than set forth above will not constitute a valid delivery.
Fees and Expenses
We will bear the expenses of soliciting tenders. The principal solicitation is being made by mail; however, additional solicitation may be made by telegraph, telecopy, telephone or in person by our and our affiliates' officers and regular employees.
31
We have not retained any dealer-manager in connection with the exchange offer and will not make any payments to brokers, dealers or others soliciting acceptances of the exchange offer. We will, however, pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will reimburse it for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with these services.
We will pay the cash expenses to be incurred in connection with the exchange offer. Such expenses include fees and expenses of the exchange agent and trustee, accounting and legal fees and printing costs, among others.
Accounting Treatment
The exchange notes will be recorded at the same carrying value as the outstanding notes, which is face value, as reflected in our accounting records on the date of exchange. Accordingly, we will not recognize any gain or loss for accounting purposes as a result of the exchange offer. The expenses of the exchange offer will be deferred and charged to expense over the term of the exchange notes.
Consequences of Failure to Exchange
The outstanding notes that are not exchanged for exchange notes pursuant to the exchange offer will remain restricted securities. Accordingly, the outstanding notes may be resold only:
- (1)
- to us upon redemption thereof or otherwise;
- (2)
- so long as the outstanding notes are eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A, to a person inside the United States whom the seller reasonably believes is a qualified institutional buyer within the meaning of Rule 144A under the Securities Act in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A, in accordance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act, or pursuant to another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, which other exemption is based upon an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to us;
- (3)
- outside the United States to a foreign person in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 904 under the Securities Act; or
- (4)
- pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act,
in each case in accordance with any applicable securities laws of any state of the United States.
Resale of the Exchange Notes
With respect to resales of exchange notes, based on interpretations by the Staff of the SEC set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties, we believe that a holder or other person who receives exchange notes, whether or not the person is the holder, other than a person that is our affiliate within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act, in exchange for outstanding notes in the ordinary course of business and who is not participating, does not intend to participate, and has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate, in the distribution of the exchange notes, will be allowed to resell the exchange notes to the public without further registration under the Securities Act and without delivering to the purchasers of the exchange notes a prospectus that satisfies the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act. However, if any holder acquires exchange notes in the exchange offer for the purpose of distributing or participating in a distribution of the exchange notes, the holder cannot rely on the position of the Staff of the SEC expressed in the no-action letters or any similar interpretive letters, and must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction, unless an exemption from registration is otherwise available. Further, each broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own account in exchange for outstanding notes, where the outstanding notes were acquired by the broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the exchange notes.
32
USE OF PROCEEDS
This exchange offer is intended to satisfy certain of our obligations under the registration rights agreement. We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the exchange notes. In consideration for issuing the exchange notes contemplated in this prospectus, we will receive outstanding notes in like principal amount, the form and terms of which are the same as the form and terms of the exchange notes, except as otherwise described in this prospectus.
We used the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the outstanding notes and the notes issued to CIVC, which total $100.0 million, as follows (in millions):
Sources: | | | |
| Outstanding notes | | $ | 92.0 |
| Notes issued to CIVC | | | 8.0 |
| |
|
| | Total sources | | $ | 100.0 |
| |
|
Uses: | | | |
| Payments to holders of preferred units (1) | | $ | 60.0 |
| Distribution to certain members of senior management (2) | | | 2.5 |
| Estimated fees and expenses (3) | | | 4.4 |
| Cash on hand (4) | | | 33.1 |
| |
|
| | Total uses | | $ | 100.0 |
| |
|
- (1)
- We used approximately $60.0 million of the proceeds of the issuance of the outstanding notes to make a payment in respect of preferred units, approximately $58.0 million of which were payments in respect of accrued preferred yield and approximately $2.0 million of which was used to return a portion of the original capital contribution made by holders of our preferred units. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Payments to Holders of Preferred Units."
- (2)
- See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Amendment of NSP Holdings' Limited Liability Company Agreement in Connection with the Issuance of the Notes."
- (3)
- Our estimated fees and expenses include $0.2 million that was paid to CIVC as compensation for financial advisory services rendered by CIVC to us in connection with the issuance of the outstanding notes.
- (4)
- We intend to use the remainder of the approximately $33.1 million in net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions and/or distributions to our unit holders.
33
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of December 31, 2004 on an actual basis and on a pro forma basis giving effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and the application of the net proceeds. You should read this table in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. See "Use of Proceeds," "Selected Historical Financial and Other Data," "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data," and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
| | As of December 31, 2004
| |
---|
| | Actual
| | Pro Forma
| |
---|
| | (dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 35,731 | | $ | 68,831 | |
| |
| |
| |
Debt: | | | | | | | |
| Senior credit facilities | | | | | | | |
| | Revolving credit facilities (1) | | | — | | | — | |
| | Term loan | | | 97,725 | | | 97,725 | |
| Outstanding notes | | | — | | | 92,000 | |
| Notes issued concurrently to CIVC | | | — | | | 8,000 | |
| Other senior debt and capitalized leases (2) | | | 1,130 | | | 1,130 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | Total senior debt | | | 98,855 | | | 198,855 | |
| 97/8% senior subordinated notes (3) | | | 151,590 | | | 151,590 | |
| Other subordinated debt (4) | | | 3,121 | | | 3,121 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | Total subordinated debt | | | 154,711 | | | 154,711 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | Total debt | | | 253,566 | | | 353,566 | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred units | | | 134,310 | | | 74,310 | |
Members' deficit | | | (75,097 | ) | | (77,597 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | Total capitalization | | $ | 312,779 | | $ | 350,279 | |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- Our senior credit facility includes a United States revolving credit facility, which provides for $30.0 million of borrowings, and a Canadian revolving credit facility, which provides for C$10.0 million of borrowings. In addition, our European operations have additional revolving credit facilities available of E3.1 million.
- (2)
- Other senior debt and capitalized leases consists of: (a) two seller notes in an aggregate amount of $0.5 million issued by North Safety Products Europe B.V. to the former owners of Arbin Veiligheid B.V. ("Arbin"), which are secured by that company's accounts receivable and a portion of its fixed assets; (b) KCL term debt of $0.5 million; and (c) capitalized lease obligations in the amount of $0.2 million. Amounts outstanding under the KCL term debt and the Arbin seller notes have been translated into United States dollars using a rate of $1.36=E1.00, the rate on December 31, 2004. On March 25, 2005, the rate was $1.30=E1.00. See "Description of Other Obligations—Other Debt Obligations."
- (3)
- 97/8% senior subordinated notes of $152.5 million in aggregate principal amount are shown net of $0.9 million of original issue discount.
- (4)
- Other subordinated debt consists of: (a) a $0.4 million subordinated seller note to the former owners of Morning Pride; (b) a $2.0 million subordinated seller note to the former owners of The Muck Boot Company ("Muck Boot"); and (c) a $0.7 million subordinated seller note to the former owners of Arbin. Amounts outstanding under the Arbin subordinated seller note have been translated into United States dollars using a rate of $1.36=E1.00, the rate on December 31, 2004. On March 25, 2005, the rate was $1.30=E1.00. See "Description of Other Obligations—Other Debt Obligations."
34
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below is unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data for NSP Holdings. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet gives effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and the application of the net proceeds as described under "Use of Proceeds" as if these transactions had occurred on December 31, 2004. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 give pro forma effect to the offering of the outstanding notes, the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC and the application of the net proceeds as described under "Use of Proceeds" as if these transactions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 has been derived from applying the pro forma adjustments described in the accompanying notes. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 has been derived from applying the pro forma adjustments described in the accompanying notes. The pro forma consolidated statements of operations are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been achieved had the offering of the outstanding notes been consummated at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2004 and should not be construed as representative of future operations.
You should read the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data in conjunction with our audited and unaudited consolidated historical financial statements and the related notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
35
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
Assets Current assets:
| | NSP Holdings
| | Adjustments
| | Pro Forma
| |
---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 35,731 | | $ | 33,100 | (1) | $ | 68,831 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | | | 61,167 | | | — | | | 61,167 | |
| Inventories | | | 82,532 | | | — | | | 82,532 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | 60 | | | — | | | 60 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 3,183 | | | — | | | 3,183 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | 182,673 | | | 33,100 | | | 215,773 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | | 51,809 | | | — | | | 51,809 | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 9,960 | | | 4,400 | (2) | �� | 14,360 | |
Goodwill, net | | | 132,662 | | | — | | | 132,662 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | | 6,256 | | | — | | | 6,256 | |
Other noncurrent assets | | | 5,831 | | | — | | | 5,831 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | $ | 389,191 | | $ | 37,500 | | $ | 426,691 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities and members' deficit | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 17,871 | | | — | | $ | 17,871 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | 29,024 | | | — | | | 29,024 | |
| Current maturities of long-term obligations | | | 15,252 | | | — | | | 15,252 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | 62,147 | | | — | | | 62,147 | |
Pension, postretirement, and deferred compensation | | | 22,923 | | | — | | | 22,923 | |
Long-term obligations | | | 238,314 | | | 100,000 | (3) | | 338,314 | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred units | | | 134,310 | | | (60,000 | )(3) | | 74,310 | |
Other noncurrent liabilities | | | 1,653 | | | — | | | 1,653 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 4,799 | | | — | | | 4,799 | |
Minority interest | | | 142 | | | — | | | 142 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 402,141 | | | 40,000 | | | 442,141 | |
Members' deficit: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class E units | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Common units: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A units | | | 38,676 | | | — | | | 38,676 | |
| | Class C units | | | 188 | | | — | | | 188 | |
| | Class D units | | | 1,248 | | | — | | | 1,248 | |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (118,739 | ) | | (2,500 | )(1) | | (121,239 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 3,529 | | | — | | | 3,529 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total members' deficit | | | (75,097 | ) | | (2,500 | ) | | (77,597 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities and members' deficit | | $ | 389,191 | | $ | 37,500 | | $ | 426,691 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.
36
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
| | NSP Holdings
| | Adjustments
| | Pro Forma
| |
---|
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | | $ | 440,280 | | $ | — | | $ | 440,280 | |
| Cost of goods sold | | | 281,924 | | | — | | | 281,924 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Gross profit | | | 158,356 | | | — | | | 158,356 | |
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Selling | | | 41,901 | | | — | | | 41,901 | |
| | Distribution | | | 22,452 | | | — | | | 22,452 | |
| | General and administrative | | | 41,721 | | | — | | | 41,721 | |
| | Amortization of intangibles | | | 517 | | | — | | | 517 | |
| | Strategic alternatives | | | 616 | | | — | | | 616 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Total operating expenses | | | 107,207 | | | — | | | 107,207 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Income from operations | | | 51,149 | | | — | | | 51,149 | |
| Other expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest expense | | | 35,962 | | | 12,723 (6,150 | (4) )(5) | | 42,535 | |
| | Interest income | | | (213 | ) | | — | | | (213 | ) |
| | Other, net | | | 1,539 | | | — | | | 1,539 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest | | | 13,861 | | | (6,573 | ) | | 7,288 | |
| Income tax expense | | | 3,195 | | | — | | | 3,195 | |
| Minority interest | | | 25 | | | — | | | 25 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 10,641 | | $ | (6,573 | ) | $ | 4,068 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.
37
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(dollars in thousands)
- (1)
- Reflects the issuance of $92,000 of notes in the offering of the outstanding notes and the $8,000 of notes issued to CIVC. The application of the proceeds therefrom are as follows:
Payments to holders of preferred units | | $ | 60,000 |
Distribution to certain members of senior management | | | 2,500 |
Fees and expenses | | | 4,400 |
Cash on hand | | | 33,100 |
| |
|
| | $ | 100,000 |
| |
|
- (2)
- Represents the capitalization of estimated deferred financing fees related to the issuance of the notes.
- (3)
- Represents the following:
Issuance of $92,000 of notes in the offering of the outstanding notes | | $ | 92,000 | |
Issuance of $8,000 of notes to CIVC | | | 8,000 | |
Payments to holders of preferred units | | | (60,000 | ) |
| |
| |
| | $ | 40,000 | |
| |
| |
- (4)
- Represents increase in interest expense to reflect issuance of the notes as follows:
| |
|
---|
Increase in semi-annual PIK interest on the $100.0 million notes at 113/4% (including $8.0 million of notes issued to CIVC) | | $ | 12,095 |
Increase in amortization of deferred financing fees related to the notes | | | 628 |
| |
|
| | $ | 12,723 |
| |
|
- (5)
- Represents the following:
| |
| |
---|
Reduction of dividends related to reduction in balance of $60,000 of preferred units at 10.0% (semi-annual) | | $ | (6,150 | ) |
38
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following table presents selected historical consolidated statements of operations, balance sheet and other data for the periods presented and should only be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical financial data for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, have been derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
| | (dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 313,053 | | $ | 317,950 | | $ | 323,509 | | $ | 372,524 | | $ | 440,280 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 205,751 | | | 204,927 | | | 205,655 | | | 240,408 | | | 281,924 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 107,302 | | | 113,023 | | | 117,854 | | | 132,116 | | | 158,356 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selling | | | 31,496 | | | 30,876 | | | 30,440 | | | 36,877 | | | 41,901 | |
| Distribution | | | 14,630 | | | 15,383 | | | 15,177 | | | 18,550 | | | 22,452 | |
| General and administrative | | | 26,705 | | | 28,404 | | | 31,075 | | | 34,011 | | | 41,721 | |
| Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles | | | 11,810 | | | 10,902 | | | 3,239 | | | 2,583 | | | 517 | |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment charge | | | — | | | — | | | 2,785 | | | — | | | — | |
| Restructuring and merger-related charges | | | 3,488 | | | 1,683 | | | 9,269 | | | — | | | — | |
| Strategic alternatives | | | — | | | 3,108 | | | — | | | — | | | 616 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 88,129 | | | 90,356 | | | 91,985 | | | 92,021 | | | 107,207 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 19,173 | | | 22,667 | | | 25,869 | | | 40,095 | | | 51,149 | |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense (1)(2)(3) | | | 34,100 | | | 27,785 | | | 23,374 | | | 33,454 | | | 35,962 | |
| Interest income (4) | | | (799 | ) | | (3,708 | ) | | (122 | ) | | (117 | ) | | (213 | ) |
| Other, net | | | 464 | | | 178 | | | (305 | ) | | (1,002 | ) | | 1,539 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest | | | (14,592 | ) | | (1,588 | ) | | 2,922 | | | 7,760 | | | 13,861 | |
Income tax expense | | | 1,722 | | | 2,320 | | | 7,901 | | | 1,843 | | | 3,195 | |
Minority interest | | | 422 | | | 435 | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | | (16,736 | ) | | (4,343 | ) | | (4,979 | ) | | 5,920 | | $ | 10,641 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Preferred unit dividends (1) | | | 9,358 | | | 11,421 | | | 11,991 | | | 12,973 | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Net loss attributable to common unit holders | | $ | (26,094 | ) | $ | (15,764 | ) | $ | (16,970 | ) | $ | (7,053 | ) | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Other Financial Data and Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA (5) | | $ | 39,219 | | $ | 41,849 | | $ | 44,791 | | $ | 53,849 | | $ | 61,956 | |
Adjusted EBITDA (5) | | | 39,219 | | | 44,957 | | | 47,576 | | | 53,432 | | | 63,471 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 20,932 | | | 19,795 | | | 18,617 | | | 12,749 | | | 12,371 | |
Capital expenditures | | | 5,590 | | | 6,933 | | | 7,197 | | | 7,432 | | | 6,423 | |
Net cash interest expense (6) | | | 28,128 | | | 24,586 | | | 20,212 | | | 23,200 | | | 20,387 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | | (3,221 | ) | | 17,759 | | | 23,230 | | | 21,696 | | | 29,911 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (33,524 | ) | | (1,769 | ) | | (17,728 | ) | | (25,611 | ) | | (6,378 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 34,915 | | | (14,009 | ) | | (6,819 | ) | | 13,753 | | | (8,621 | ) |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (7) | | | — | | | — | | | 1.1 | x | | 1.3 | x | | 1.4 | x |
Balance Sheet Data (at period end): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 822 | | $ | 1,769 | | $ | 1,762 | | $ | 16,341 | | $ | 35,731 | |
Working capital | | | 79,126 | | | 79,251 | | | 24,155 | | | 103,804 | | | 120,526 | |
Total assets | | | 358,501 | | | 314,969 | | | 307,208 | | | 362,718 | | | 389,191 | |
Long-term obligations | | | 261,201 | | | 228,019 | | | 219,071 | | | 258,248 | | | 253,566 | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred units | | | 89,160 | | | 100,581 | | | 114,583 | | | 120,817 | | | 134,310 | |
Total members' deficit | | | (51,518 | ) | | (70,004 | ) | | (93,738 | ) | | (89,241 | ) | | (75,097 | ) |
39
- (1)
- Beginning January 1, 2004, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 150, the yield on NSP Holdings' preferred units is recorded as interest expense and the preferred units are classified on NSP Holdings' balance sheet as long-term obligations. For the year ended December 31, 2004, accrued and unpaid yield on the preferred units was $13.5 million. For all periods prior to January 1, 2004, the yield is recorded below net income as preferred unit dividend and the preferred units were recorded on NSP Holdings' balance sheet between debt and equity. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Limited Liability Company Agreement" for a description of the preferred units.
- (2)
- Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a $5.2 million write-off of deferred financing fees, a $2.1 million write-off of original issue discount and a prepayment penalty of $2.9 million associated with the refinancing of our senior credit facility and senior subordinated debt refinancing. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2000 includes a $2.6 million write-off of deferred financing fees related to the refinancing of our senior subordinated debt.
- (3)
- Interest expense includes non-cash interest expense of $2.6 million, $2.9 million, $3.0 million, $2.9 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, reflecting the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount.
- (4)
- Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2001 includes the forgiveness of $3.4 million of accrued interest from a seller note related to the settlement of a purchase price dispute with the seller.
- (5)
- "EBITDA" is net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. "Adjusted EBITDA" is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude (1) charges for strategic alternatives, (2) a non-cash impairment charge taken with regard to our former subsidiary located in Zimbabwe and (3) gain or loss on the sale of property, plant and equipment. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or cash flow from operations, as determined by GAAP, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are included in this prospectus because they are a basis upon which we assess our liquidity position and because we believe that they present useful information to investors regarding a company's ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. This belief is based on our negotiations with our lenders who have indicated that the amount of indebtedness we will be permitted to incur will be based, in part, on measures similar to our EBITDA and our Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not take into account our working capital requirements, debt service requirements and other commitments and, accordingly, are not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available for discretionary use.
40
- The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA with EBITDA, net (loss) income and net cash provided by operating activities for the periods indicated:
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
| | (dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Adjusted EBITDA (a) | | $ | 39,219 | | $ | 44,957 | | $ | 47,576 | | $ | 53,432 | | $ | 63,471 | |
(Subtract) add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Strategic alternatives (b) | | | — | | | (3,108 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (616 | ) |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment charge (c) | | | — | | | — | | | (2,785 | ) | | — | | | — | |
| Gain (loss) on sale of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 417 | | | (899 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EBITDA | | | 39,219 | | | 41,849 | | | 44,791 | | | 53,849 | | | 61,956 | |
Subtract: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense, net (d) | | | (33,301 | ) | | (24,077 | ) | | (23,252 | ) | | (33,337 | ) | | (35,749 | ) |
| Income tax expense | | | (1,722 | ) | | (2,320 | ) | | (7,901 | ) | | (1,843 | ) | | (3,195 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization expense (e) | | | (20,932 | ) | | (19,795 | ) | | (18,617 | ) | | (12,749 | ) | | (12,371 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | | (16,736 | ) | | (4,343 | ) | | (4,979 | ) | | 5,920 | | | 10,641 | |
Add (subtract): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 20,932 | | | 19,795 | | | 18,617 | | | 12,749 | | | 12,371 | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 1,763 | | | 1,867 | | | 2,024 | | | 2,191 | | | 1,777 | |
| Amortization of original issue discount | | | 858 | | | 1,014 | | | 1,016 | | | 662 | | | 92 | |
| (Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (417 | ) | | 899 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | (230 | ) | | — | | | 5,716 | | | 154 | | | 583 | |
| Minority interest | | | 422 | | | 370 | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| Non-cash interest | | | 1,584 | | | (3,390 | ) | | — | | | — | | | 13,493 | |
| Write-off of deferred financing costs | | | 2,552 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,284 | | | — | |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment charge | | | — | | | — | | | 2,072 | | | — | | | — | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | (14,366 | ) | | 2,446 | | | (1,236 | ) | | (6,844 | ) | | (9,970 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | $ | (3,221 | ) | $ | 17,759 | | $ | 23,230 | | $ | 21,696 | | $ | 29,911 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (a)
- In addition to the non-cash charges added back in calculating EBITDA, we incurred restructuring and merger-related charges of $3.5 million, $1.7 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.
- (b)
- We incurred costs associated with exploring strategic alternatives of $3.1 million and $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2004, respectively. These costs related to exploring various strategic options and were expensed when we decided to terminate the process. The costs for the year ended December 31, 2001 related to an unsuccessful acquisition attempt, while the costs for the year ended December 31, 2004 related to a possible sale of the company.
- (c)
- Due to adverse political and economic conditions in Zimbabwe, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $2.8 million, equivalent to our net investment, with regard to the impairment of our former Zimbabwe subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2002.
- (d)
- Interest expense, net is calculated as interest expense minus interest income.
- (e)
- Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes $6.3 million of non-cash charges relating to accelerated depreciation in connection with the write-off of long-lived assets.
- (6)
- Net cash interest expense is defined as interest expense minus interest income adjusted to exclude (i) write-offs of and the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount, (ii) forgiveness of accrued interest, and (iii) accrued and unpaid yield on NSP Holdings' preferred units. See footnotes (1), (2), (3) and (4), above.
- (7)
- In calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of (loss) income before income taxes and minority interest plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred financing fees and original issue discount, and the portion of rental expense deemed attributable to interest. For the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, our earnings were insufficient to cover our fixed charges by $14,592 and $1,588, respectively.
41
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Historical Financial and Other Data" and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Some of the statements set forth below and elsewhere in this prospectus include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Overview
We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded products in the fragmented personal protection equipment industry. We manufacture and market a full line of personal protection equipment for workers in the general industrial, fire service and utility/high voltage industries. We sell our products under trusted, long-standing and well-recognized brand names, includingNorth,Morning Pride,Ranger,Servus,Pro-Warrington andSalisbury. Our broad product offering includes, among other things, respiratory protection, protective footwear, hand protection, bunker gear and linemen equipment.
We classify our diverse product offerings into three primary operating segments:
General Industrial. We offer a diverse portfolio of leading products for a wide variety of industries, including manufacturing, agriculture, automotive, construction, food processing and pharmaceutical industries and the military, under theNorth,Ranger andServus brand names. Our product offering is one of the broadest in the personal protection equipment industry and includes respiratory protection, protective footwear, hand protection, eye, head and face protection, first aid, hearing protection and fall protection. We sell our general industrial products primarily through industrial distributors.
Fire Service. We manufacture and market one of the broadest lines of personal protection equipment for the fire service segment, offering firefighters head-to-toe protection. Our products include bunker gear, fireboots, helmets, gloves and other accessories. We market our products under ourTotal Fire Group umbrella, using the brand names ofMorning Pride,Ranger,Servus andPro-Warrington. We are the vendor of choice for many of the largest fire departments in North America. We sell our fire service products primarily through specialized fire service distributors.
Utility/High Voltage. We manufacture and market one of the broadest lines of personal protection equipment for the utility/high voltage service segment under theSalisbury andServus brands. Our products, including linemen equipment, gloves, sleeves and footwear, are designed to protect workers from up to 40,000 volts of electricity. All of our products either meet or exceed the applicable standards of ANSI and ASTM. We distribute our utility/high voltage products through specialized distributors and direct to utilities and electrical contractors.
Acquisition History
We have made three acquisitions since January 1, 2002. As a result, comparability of periods has been affected by these acquisitions.
In January 2002, we acquired the assets of The Muck Boot Company ("Muck Boot") for $3.3 million, comprised of $1.3 million of cash and a $2.0 million subordinated seller note. We are also obligated to make royalty payments to the sellers of Muck Boot until December 31, 2006 based upon the achievement of specified net sales targets. These payments amount to 3.5% to 7% of net sales. We made royalty payments of $0.2 million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
42
In December 2002, we acquired the stock of Arbin for E6.3 million, comprised of E3.8 million of cash and E2.5 million of senior and subordinated seller notes. In addition, we are also obligated to make royalty payments to the sellers of Arbin until December 31, 2008 in amounts ranging from 3% to 8% of net sales achieved by Arbin in excess of E5.3 million per year. We made royalty payments of $64,000 and $34,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
In July 2003, we acquired the stock of Kächele-Cama Latex GmbH ("KCL") for $20.1 million, including the assumption of $0.2 million of KCL's net indebtedness and acquisition costs of $1.1 million. The sellers of KCL are eligible to receive royalty payments of up to E0.25 million per year through 2005 based upon the achievement of certain cumulative net sales targets. The net sales targets for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 were not achieved. However, the E0.5 million could be funded in 2005 if cumulative net sales targets are achieved.
Restructuring Plans
During 2002, we formulated and implemented a restructuring plan in our general industrial segment to exit the medical products business located in Cranston, Rhode Island and close certain hand protection product plants located in Tijuana, Mexico; Tallmadge, Ohio and Charleston, South Carolina and move production to China. We decided to exit the medical products business at that time, because our medical products business primarily served one customer, who decided to manufacture the product in-house. We closed our hand protection plant to increase profitability of certain low margin product lines. We incurred restructuring and merger-related charges associated with the plan of $9.3 million, comprised of a $6.3 million non-cash expense relating to accelerated depreciation charges on long-lived assets to be abandoned; $1.3 million in severance costs; $1.7 million in facility closure and other exit costs. The exit of the medical products business was completed in 2002. The shut-down of the Tallmadge, Ohio facility was completed in 2003 and we successfully completed the closure of the Charleston, South Carolina and Tijuana, Mexico plants in 2004. As of December 31, 2004, the Company is not expecting additional charges to earnings related to the restructuring. We do not expect any material cash payments related to the restructuring after December 31, 2004.
Critical Accounting Policies
Certain of our accounting policies as discussed below require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate estimates and assumptions for calculating amounts to record in our financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions, impacting our reported results of operations and financial position. However, we do not believe the differences between the actual amounts and our estimates will be material to our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Certain accounting policies, however, are considered to be critical in that they are most important to the depiction of our financial condition and results of operations and their application requires management's most subjective judgment in making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivables based on a combination of factors. We regularly analyze our significant customer accounts and, when we become aware of a specific customer's inability to meet its financial obligations to us, we record a specific reserve for bad debts to reduce the related receivable to the amount we reasonably believe is collectible. We also record allowances for all other customers based on a variety of factors including the length of time the receivables are past due, the financial health of the customer, macroeconomic considerations and historical experience. Historically, our allowance for doubtful accounts has been adequate to cover our bad debts. If circumstances related to specific customers change, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted. However, due to our diverse customer
43
base and lack of credit concentration, we do not believe our estimates would be materially impacted by changes in our assumptions.
Inventory. We perform a detailed assessment of inventory which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing and quality issues. Based on this analysis, we record adjustments to inventory for excess, obsolescence or impairment when appropriate to reflect inventory at net realizable value. Historically, our inventory reserves have been adequate to reflect our inventory at net realizable values. Revisions to our inventory adjustments to record additional reserves may be required if actual demand, component costs or product life cycles differ from our estimates. However, due to our diverse product lines and end user markets, we do not believe our estimates would be materially impacted by changes in our assumptions.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles. Purchase accounting requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price to the fair market value of the assets purchased and liabilities assumed. We have accounted for our acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS No. 142), we performed a goodwill impairment test on the amount of goodwill during the fiscal fourth quarter 2002, 2003, and 2004. To test for impairment, we determined the fair value of each of the reporting units by benchmarking trading and acquisition multiples of comparable personal protection equipment companies. This analysis is based upon comparable companies as determined by management and data from sources of publicly available information available at the time of preparation. In making these projections, we considered the markets it was addressing, the competitive environment and its advantages. In addition, we performed a macro assessment of the overall likelihood that we would achieve the multiple selected for valuation and performed sensitivity analysis under different multiple assumptions. Based on the results of the first step of the annual goodwill impairment test, we determined that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded their carrying amounts and, therefore, no goodwill impairment existed. As a result, the second step of the annual goodwill impairment test was not required to be completed. We will continue to perform a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis and on an interim basis, if certain conditions exist. Factors we consider important which could result in changes to our estimates include underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and declines in acquisition and trading multiples. Due to our diverse end user base, brand name recognition and non-discretionary product demand, we do not believe our future operating results will vary significantly relative to our historical and projected future operating results. Additionally, we do not believe a decline in acquisition and trading multiples will affect the results of our impairment test as we use the lower end of the range of multiples when performing our impairment testing.
Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate our long-lived assets on an ongoing basis. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the related asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the asset is determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Our estimates of future cash flows could be impacted if we underperform relative to historical or projected future operating results. However, due to our diverse product lines and end user markets, we do not believe our estimates would be materially impacted by changes in our assumptions.
Other Contingencies. In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships, product liability claims, trademark rights and a variety of other matters. We record contingent liabilities resulting from claims against us when it is
44
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. We disclose contingent liabilities when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the recorded liability. Estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, in some cases including judgments about the potential actions of third party claimants and courts. Therefore, actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. Currently, we believe we have established appropriate reserves for our pending legal proceedings and claims. However, if actual or estimated probable future losses exceed our recorded liability for such claims, we would record additional charges during the period in which the actual loss or change in estimate occurred.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth our results of operations in dollars and as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004. The data for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 have been derived from our audited historical consolidated financial statements.
| | Year Ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Net sales: | | | | | | | | | | |
| General industrial | | $ | 223,727 | | $ | 258,969 | | $ | 310,357 | |
| Fire service | | | 58,342 | | | 70,335 | | | 78,881 | |
| Utility/high voltage | | | 41,440 | | | 43,220 | | | 51,042 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Total net sales | | | 323,509 | | | 372,524 | | | 440,280 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 205,655 | | | 240,408 | | | 281,924 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 117,854 | | | 132,116 | | | 158,356 | |
Operating expenses | | | 91,985 | | | 92,021 | | | 107,207 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations: | | | | | | | | | | |
| General industrial | | | 8,995 | | | 22,306 | | | 31,112 | |
| Fire service | | | 10,532 | | | 13,248 | | | 14,972 | |
| Utility/high voltage | | | 10,424 | | | 9,078 | | | 11,148 | |
| Corporate | | | (4,082 | ) | | (4,537 | ) | | (6,083 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Total income from operations | | | 25,869 | | | 40,095 | | | 51,149 | |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | 23,374 | | | 33,454 | | | 35,962 | |
| Interest income | | | (122 | ) | | (117 | ) | | (213 | ) |
| Other, net | | | (305 | ) | | (1,002 | ) | | 1,539 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes and minority interest | | | 2,922 | | | 7,760 | | | 13,861 | |
Income tax expense | | | 7,901 | | | 1,843 | | | 3,195 | |
Minority interest | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | | (4,979 | ) | | 5,920 | | $ | 10,641 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Preferred unit dividends | | | 11,991 | | | 12,973 | | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Net loss attributable to common unit holders | | $ | (16,970 | ) | $ | (7,053 | ) | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
45
| | Year Ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Net sales: | | | | | | | |
| General industrial | | 69.2 | % | 69.5 | % | 70.5 | % |
| Fire service | | 18.0 | % | 18.9 | % | 17.9 | % |
| Utility/high voltage | | 12.8 | % | 11.6 | % | 11.6 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Total net sales | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Cost of goods sold | | 63.6 | % | 64.5 | % | 64.0 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | 36.4 | % | 35.5 | % | 36.0 | % |
Operating expenses | | 28.4 | % | 24.7 | % | 24.4 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations: | | | | | | | |
| General industrial | | 2.8 | % | 6.0 | % | 7.1 | % |
| Fire service | | 3.3 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.4 | % |
| Utility/high voltage | | 3.2 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % |
| Corporate | | (1.3 | )% | (1.2 | )% | (1.4 | )% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Total income from operations | | 8.0 | % | 10.8 | % | 11.6 | % |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | 7.2 | % | 9.0 | % | 8.2 | % |
| Interest income | | (0.0 | )% | (0.0 | )% | (0.0 | )% |
| Other, net | | (0.1 | )% | (0.3 | )% | 0.3 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes and minority interest | | 0.9 | % | 2.1 | % | 3.1 | % |
Income tax expense | | 2.4 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.7 | % |
Minority interest | | — | | (0.0 | )% | 0.0 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | (1.5 | )% | 1.6 | % | 2.4 | % |
| | | | | |
| |
Preferred unit dividends | | 3.7 | % | 3.5 | % | | |
| |
| |
| | | |
Net loss attributable to common unit holders | | (5.2 | )% | (1.9 | )% | | |
| |
| |
| | | |
Year ended December 31, 2004 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003
Net sales. Net sales increased by $67.8 million, or 18.2%, from $372.5 million in 2003 to $440.3 million in 2004. In our general industrial segment, net sales increased by $51.4 million, or 19.8%, from $259.0 million in 2003 to $310.4 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to: higher overall net sales in the United States of $15.6 million, reflecting higher footwear shipments of $5.7 million, increased government contract shipments of $5.7 million and strong overall market demand in addition to an increase in activity of products sold through the domestic preparedness channel; favorable exchange rates, which had an impact of $11.5 million; the impact of the acquisition of KCL in July 2003, which contributed incremental net sales of $19.0 million, and organic growth in our European and African operations of $4.9 million. In our fire service segment, net sales increased by $8.6 million, or 12.2%, from $70.3 million in 2003 to $78.9 million in 2004 reflecting strong domestic market demand and shipments to Iraq under a contract awarded in 2004. In our utility/high voltage segment, net sales increased by $7.8 million, or 18.1%, from $43.2 million in 2003 to $51.0 million in 2004 primarily driven by strong overall market demand, new product introductions, and shipments related to hurricane activity in the southeastern United States.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $26.3 million, or 19.9%, from $132.1 million in 2003 to $158.4 million in 2004, primarily due to the $67.8 million, or 18.2%, increase in net sales. Our gross profit margin of 36.0% in 2004 was favorable to the 35.5% gross profit margin in 2003, primarily due to improvements in our general industrial and fire service segments. In our general industrial segment,
46
gross profit increased by $20.2 million, or 21.9%, from $92.2 million in 2003 to $112.4 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to: the impact of the acquisition of KCL, which contributed $7.4 million of incremental gross profit; favorable exchange rates which had an impact of $4.0 million; higher gross profit in the United States of $6.9 million, reflecting the $15.6 million increase in net sales and improved manufacturing efficiencies; and increases in Europe and Africa in part due to the organic net sales increases. Included in the general industrial segment gross profit were a $4.1 million and $1.2 million increase to the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory and a $0.2 million decrease and a $0.8 million increase to the LIFO provisions in 2004 and 2003, respectively. In our fire service segment, gross profit increased by $3.1 million, or 13.2%, from $23.0 million in 2003 to $26.1 million in 2004, primarily due to the $8.6 million, or 12.2%, increase in net sales. In our utility/high voltage segment, gross profit increased by $3.0 million, or 17.7%, from $16.8 million in 2003 to $19.8 million in 2004, primarily due to the $7.8 million, or 18.1%, increase in net sales, which was partially offset by unfavorable product mix and higher manufacturing expenses.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased by $15.2 million, or 16.5%, from $92.0 million in 2003 to $107.2 million in 2004. In our general industrial segment, operating expenses increased by $11.4 million, or 16.3%, from $69.9 million in 2003 to $81.3 million in 2004, as lower amortization of intangibles of $2.1 million was more than offset by higher other operating expenses of $13.5 million due to: incremental KCL operating expenses of $4.8 million; higher exchange rates, which had an impact of $3.0 million; higher payroll and other administrative costs; and increased variable distribution and selling expenses associated with the $51.4 million, or 19.8%, increase in net sales. In 2004, we recorded a $1.25 million liability and charge to operating expenses to establish a reserve for respiratory claims. This reserve represents a reasonable estimate of our probable and estimable liabilities for product claims alleging injury resulting from exposure to silica dust and other dust particles, including asbestos, as determined by us in consultation with an independent consultant. In addition, we recorded a $1.3 million credit to operating expenses reflecting a reduction of our product liability reserve related to our fall protection products sold in Canada. This adjustment represents our current expectations of the liability based on information available. In our fire service segment, operating expenses increased $1.3 million, or 13.5%, from $9.8 million in 2003 to $11.1 million in 2004, primarily due to additional payroll and variable selling and distribution expenses associated with the $8.6 million, or 12.2%, increase in net sales. In our utility/high voltage segment, operating expenses increased by $0.9 million, or 11.8%, from $7.8 million in 2003 to $8.7 million in 2004, primarily due to higher selling and distribution expenses associated with the $7.8 million, or 18.1%, increase in net sales. Our corporate expense increased $1.6 million, or 34.1%, primarily due to $0.6 million of expenses associated with exploring strategic alternatives and higher payroll and administrative expenses including costs associated with public reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley Act related compliance requirements.
Income from operations. Income from operations increased by $11.0 million, or 27.6%, from $40.1 million in 2003 to $51.1 million in 2004. As a percentage of net sales, income from operations increased from 10.8% in 2003 to 11.6% in 2004. In our general industrial segment, income from operations increased by $8.8 million, or 39.5%, from $22.3 million in 2003 to $31.1 million in 2004, primarily due to higher net sales of $51.4 million, or 19.8%. In our fire service segment, income from operations increased by $1.8 million, or 13.0%, from $13.2 million in 2003 to $15.0 million in 2004, primarily due to the $8.6 million, or 12.2%, increase in net sales. In our utility/high voltage segment, income from operations increased by $2.0 million, or 22.8%, from $9.1 million in 2003 to $11.1 million in 2004, primarily due to higher net sales of $7.8 million, or 18.1%. Our corporate expenses increased $1.6 million, or 34.1%, primarily due to $0.6 million of expenses associated with exploring strategic alternatives and higher payroll and administrative expenses including costs associated with public reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley Act related compliance requirements.
Included in income from operations in 2004 and 2003 were depreciation and amortization expenses of $12.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $9.9 million, $0.4 million,
47
$1.5 million and $0.6 million were attributable to the general industrial, fire service, utility/high voltage segments and corporate, respectively, in 2004 and $10.6 million, $0.3 million, $1.2 million and $0.6 million were attributable to these segments and corporate in 2003.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased by $2.5 million, or 7.5%, from $33.5 million in 2003 to $36.0 million in 2004. Included in interest expense in 2003 is $10.2 million attributable to the $5.2 million write-off of deferred financing fees, the $2.1 million write-off of original issue discount, and the $2.9 million prepayment penalty associated with the senior credit facility and senior subordinated debt financings. During 2004, we implemented SFAS No. 150, which required us to classify $13.5 million of preferred unit dividends as interest expense in 2004. Excluding the charges and prepayment penalty in 2003 and the preferred unit dividends in 2004, interest expense decreased by $0.7 million as lower weighted average interest rates were partially offset by higher debt levels associated with our senior subordinated notes financing.
Other, net. Other, net increased by $2.5 million primarily due to the $1.3 million net effect of a $0.4 million gain in 2003 and $0.9 million loss in 2004 recorded on the sale of property, plant and equipment and an increase in unrealized foreign exchange losses.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense increased by $1.4 million, from $1.8 million in 2003 to $3.2 million in 2004, primarily due to higher foreign income tax expense, including incremental KCL income tax expense of $0.6 million.
Net income. Net income increased by $4.7 million, or 79.7%, from $5.9 million in 2003 to $10.6 million in 2004. This was the result of the reasons discussed above.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Net sales. Net sales increased by $49.0 million, or 15.2%, from $323.5 million in 2002 to $372.5 million in 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in net sales of our general industrial and fire service products. In our general industrial segment, net sales increased by $35.3 million, or 15.8%, from $223.7 million in 2002 to $259.0 million in 2003. This increase was primarily due to: increases in government footwear and hand protection contract shipments of $9.8 million, reflecting higher government orders; favorable exchange rates, which had an impact of $10.6 million; and the impact of the acquisitions of Arbin in December 2002 and KCL in July 2003, which contributed incremental net sales of $6.7 and $10.9 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $5.1 million decline in net sales from our medical products business, which was closed at the end of 2002. In our fire service segment, net sales increased by $12.0 million, or 20.6%, from $58.3 million in 2002 to $70.3 million in 2003, reflecting strong market demand in part due to comprehensive marketing efforts. In our utility/high voltage segment, net sales increased by $1.8 million, or 4.3%, from $41.4 million in 2002 to $43.2 million in 2003 primarily driven by new product introductions of $0.9 million.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $14.2 million, or 12.1%, from $117.9 million in 2002 to $132.1 million in 2003, primarily due to the $49.0 million, or 15.2%, increase in net sales. Our gross profit margin of 35.5% in 2003 was lower than the 36.4% gross profit margin in 2002. In our general industrial segment, gross profit increased by $10.6 million, or 13.0%, from $81.6 million in 2002 to $92.2 million in 2003. This increase was primarily due to the impact of the acquisitions of Arbin and KCL, which contributed a combined $6.5 million of incremental gross profit, favorable exchange rates which had an impact of $3.7 million, and other increases in net sales, particularly the increase in government contract shipments. Partially offsetting these increases were incremental pension expense of $1.1 million, increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory of $1.2 million, and an increase in the LIFO provision of $0.8 million. In our fire service segment, gross profit increased by $4.3 million, or 22.8%, from $18.8 million in 2002 to $23.1 million in 2003, primarily due to the $12.0 million, or
48
20.6% increase in net sales and additional fixed cost absorption from the increase in net sales volume. In our utility/high voltage segment, gross profit decreased by $0.7 million, or 3.7%, from $17.5 million in 2002 to $16.8 million in 2003, primarily due to higher overall manufacturing costs and incremental pension expense of $0.4 million.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses were consistent at $92.0 million in 2003 and 2004. In our general industrial segment, operating expenses decreased by $2.7 million, or 3.7%, from $72.6 million in 2002 to $69.9 million in 2003. Operating expenses in 2002 included a $2.8 million non-cash charge related to the impairment of our Zimbabwe subsidiary and restructuring and merger-related charges of $9.3 million. Excluding these charges, operating expenses increased $9.4 million due to: incremental Arbin and KCL operating expenses of $4.4 million; higher exchange rates, which had an impact of $2.8 million and higher administrative payroll and selling expenses. In addition, included in operating expenses in the general industrial segment were amortization of intangibles of $3.2 million in 2002 and $2.6 million in 2003. In our fire service segment, operating expenses increased $1.6 million, or 19.0% from $8.2 million in 2002 to $9.8 million in 2003, primarily due to additional payroll and variable selling expenses associated with the $12.0 million, or 20.6%, increase in net sales. In our utility/high voltage segment, operating expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 9.9%, from $7.1 million in 2002 to $7.8 million in 2003, primarily due to higher general and administrative payroll expenses and increased selling costs. Our corporate expense increased $0.4 million, or 11.1%, primarily due to higher payroll and professional fee expenses.
Income from operations. Income from operations increased by $14.2 million, or 55.0%, from $25.9 million in 2002 to $40.1 million in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to the increase in income from operations in our general industrial and fire service segments, which offset a decline in income from operations in our utility/high voltage segment. As a percentage of net sales, income from operations increased from 8.0% in 2002 to 10.8% in 2003. In our general industrial segment, income from operations increased by $13.3 million, or 148.0%, from $9.0 million in 2002 to $22.3 million in 2003, primarily due to: higher net sales of $35.3 million, or 15.8%, in 2003 and the $2.8 million non-cash Zimbabwe impairment charge and the $9.3 million of restructuring and merger-related charges incurred in 2002. In our fire service segment, income from operations increased by $2.7 million, or 25.8%, from $10.5 million in 2002 to $13.2 million in 2003, primarily due to the $12.0 million, or 20.6%, increase in net sales. In our utility/high voltage segment, income from operations decreased by $1.3 million, or 12.9%, from $10.4 million in 2002 to $9.1 million in 2003, primarily due to higher manufacturing expenses and incremental pension expense. Our corporate expenses increased $0.4 million, or 11.1%, primarily due to higher payroll and professional fee expenses.
Included in income from operations in 2003 and 2002 were depreciation and amortization expenses of $12.7 million and $18.6 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $10.6 million, $0.3 million, $1.2 million and $0.6 million were attributable to the general industrial, fire service, utility/high voltage segments and corporate, respectively, in 2003 and $16.6 million, $0.3 million, $1.1 million and $0.6 million were attributable to these segments and corporate in 2002.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased by $10.1 million, or 43.1%, from $23.4 in 2002 to $33.5 million in 2003. Of this increase, $10.2 million is attributable to the $5.2 million write-off of deferred financing fees, the $2.1 million write-off of original issue discount and the $2.9 million prepayment penalty associated with the senior credit facility and senior subordinated debt financings.
Other, net. Other, net decreased $0.7 million, from $0.3 million in 2002 to $1.0 million in 2003 primarily due to a $0.4 million gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense decreased by $6.1 million, or 76.7%, from $7.9 million in 2002 to $1.8 million in 2003, primarily as a result of providing a valuation allowance of $5.7 million related to deferred tax assets in 2002 due to continued operating losses and the expected timing of the
49
reversal of deferred tax assets related to certain U.S. subsidiaries which are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes.
Net (loss) income. Net (loss) income increased by $10.9 million, from $(5.0) million in 2002 to $5.9 million in 2003. This was the result of the reasons discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically used internal cash flow from operations, commercial borrowings on our lines of credit, seller notes, investments from our equityholders and capital markets transactions to fund our operations, acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital requirements.
In 2004 and 2003, cash provided by operating activities was $29.9 million and $21.7 million, respectively. The $8.2 million increase was primarily attributable to the $11.0 million increase in income from operations, which was offset by an increase in working capital in part due to higher net sales of $67.8 million.
In 2003 and 2002, cash provided by operating activities was $21.7 million and $23.2 million, respectively. The $1.5 million decrease reflects the $14.2 million increase in income from operations, which was offset by an increase in working capital, primarily due to higher inventory levels of $12.1 million in part due to pending government contract shipments, the higher net sales volume and higher exchange rates.
Historically, our principal uses of cash have been capital expenditures, acquisitions and working capital. In 2004, we made royalty payments to the sellers of Muck Boot and Arbin totaling $0.7 million and received proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment of $0.7 million.
During 2003, we acquired KCL for $18.0 million, made royalty payments to the sellers of Muck Boot and Arbin totaling $0.7 million, and received proceeds from the sale of plant, property and equipment of $0.6 million.
During 2002, we acquired The Muck Boot Company for $3.3 million, Arbin for $7.1 million, and made royalty payments to the sellers of Muck Boot of $0.2 million.
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, our capital expenditures were $7.2 million, $7.4 million, and $6.4 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2004, we had working capital of $120.5 million and cash of $35.7 million. Included in working capital is a $12.2 million excess cash flow sweep payment on our senior credit facility calculated in accordance with the terms of the agreement. This amount will be repaid in the first quarter of 2005. We maintain inventory levels sufficient to satisfy customer orders on demand, with generally a three month supply on hand. Bunker gear is an exception and is generally made to order. Our accounts receivable terms are generally 30 days, net.
In 2004, net cash used in financing activities was $8.6 million, representing payments for deferred financing costs of $0.9 million, payments on long-term debt obligations of $4.8 million, and tax distributions to members of $2.9 million.
In 2003, net cash provided by financing activities was $13.8 million, representing payments of deferred financing fees of $13.7 million; retirement of our previous senior credit facility, junior subordinated notes and previous senior subordinated notes and other debt payments of $252.0 million; combined cash funded for the purchase of warrants and preferred units and tax distributions to members of $7.3 million; offset by borrowings under our senior credit facility, junior subordinated notes and 97/8% senior subordinated notes and other borrowings of $286.5 million.
In 2002, net cash used for financing activities was $6.8 million, including debt repayments under our prior revolving credit facility of $11.4 million and repayment of $3.1 million of senior and
50
subordinated debt obligations, offset by $4.6 million borrowed to fund the Muck Boot and Arbin acquisitions in the form of senior and subordinated seller notes and $3.0 million of net proceeds from equity capital contributions used to fund the Arbin acquisition.
On March 21, 2003, we entered into a senior credit facility which provides for aggregate borrowings by us of $160.0 million and C$10.0 million, consisting of (1) a $30.0 million U.S. revolving credit facility; (2) a C$10.0 million Canadian revolving credit facility; and (3) a $130.0 million term loan. As of December 31, 2004, there was approximately $97.7 million of outstanding indebtedness under the senior credit facility and approximately $36.9 million of available borrowings under the revolving facilities. We used the proceeds of our senior credit facility to refinance our existing senior credit facility and for general corporate purposes, including working capital, refinancings, acquisitions, investments and capital expenditures. We used $30.0 million of the net proceeds of our senior subordinated notes to repay a portion of the term loan.
As of December 31, 2004, borrowings under the senior credit facility bore interest at a weighted average rate of 4.92%. Prior to March 20, 2008, we may borrow, repay and reborrow under the revolving facilities without payment of penalty or premium. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments totaling $1.3 million per annum, with the remainder due on March 20, 2009. All of the domestic borrowers' obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by a pledge of all our equity securities and the equity securities of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets and 65% of the equity securities of, or equity interest in, each of our foreign subsidiaries. All of the obligations under the senior credit facility are guaranteed by all of our present and future domestic subsidiaries, and all of the Canadian borrower's obligations under the senior credit facility are guaranteed by all of our present and future Canadian subsidiaries.
Our senior credit facility contains, and the indenture governing the notes contains, numerous restrictive covenants, including, among other things, covenants that limit our ability to incur indebtedness, use our assets as security in other transactions, make fundamental changes to our capital structure, dispose of assets, pay dividends, make capital expenditures, enter into transactions with affiliates and enter into sales and leaseback transactions. In addition, our senior credit facility requires us to meet specified financial ratios and tests.
On August 13, 2003, the Company issued $152.5 million of 97/8% senior subordinated notes and received gross proceeds of $151.5 million. The proceeds were primarily used to: (i) repay principal and interest and repurchase warrants related to our previous senior subordinated notes, (ii) repay $30.0 million of principal related to the term loan, (iii) repay principal on the junior subordinated notes used to finance the KCL acquisition, (iv) purchase preferred units of NSP Holdings from certain members of management and (v) pay fees and expenses.
In connection with the offering of the Company's 97/8% senior subordinated notes we amended our senior credit facility to provide for the incurrence of such notes. The amendment also modified certain of the covenants under our senior credit facility.
On January 7, 2005, we issued $100,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 11.75% senior pay in kind notes due 2012. We used approximately $60.0 million of the proceeds of the offering to make payments in respect of our preferred units, approximately $58.0 million of which were payments in respect of accrued preferred yield and approximately $2.0 million of which were used to return a portion of the original capital contribution made by holders of our preferred units.
We acquired KCL on July 29, 2003 for $20.1 million, including the assumption of $0.2 million of KCL's net indebtedness and acquisition costs of $1.1 million. We financed this acquisition with cash on hand of $9.8 million, borrowings under our revolving credit facility of $5.0 million and the issuance of $5.1 million in junior subordinated notes, which notes were repaid with the proceeds of the senior subordinated notes offering.
51
In January 2002, we acquired the assets of Muck Boot for $3.3 million. We financed the Muck Boot acquisition with $1.3 million of cash on hand and a $2.0 million subordinated seller note. In December 2002, we acquired the stock of Arbin for E6.3 million, consisting of E3.8 million of cash and E2.5 million of senior and subordinated seller notes. Our equityholders invested $3.0 million of additional equity to fund the Arbin acquisition.
We believe that our existing cash balances, internal cash flows and borrowings under the revolving portions of our senior credit facility will provide us with sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet our current and future financial obligations, including funding our operations, debt service and capital expenditures. Our future operating performance will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our future cash flow from operations and other capital resources are insufficient to pay our obligations as they mature or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay our business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt. We cannot assure you that we would be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, the terms of our existing and future indebtedness may limit our ability to pursue any of these alternatives.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our pro forma contractual obligations and commitments, as of December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
| | Payment Due by Period
|
---|
Contractual Obligations
| | Total
| | Less than 1 year
| | 1-3 years
| | 3-5 Years
| | More than 5 years
|
---|
Long-term debt obligations (1) | | $ | 353,359 | | $ | 15,120 | | $ | 4,502 | | $ | 81,447 | | $ | 252,290 |
Capital lease obligations | | | 207 | | | 132 | | | 75 | | | — | | | — |
Interest payments (1) | | | 224,988 | | | 19,646 | | | 38,796 | | | 34,995 | | | 131,551 |
Preferred units (1) | | | 184,808 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 184,808 |
Operating lease obligations | | | 16,990 | | | 4,927 | | | 6,822 | | | 3,572 | | | 1,669 |
Purchase obligations (2) | | | 34,244 | | | 34,244 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 4,741 | | | 4,741 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | $ | 819,337 | | $ | 78,810 | | $ | 50,195 | | $ | 120,014 | | $ | 570,318 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Reflects the impact of the January 7, 2005 issuance of $100,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 11.75% senior pay in kind notes due 2012 and the approximately $60.0 million of payments in respect of preferred units.
- (2)
- Purchase obligations exclude our accounts payable of $17.9 million and include open purchase orders of $33.8 million and all other contractual obligations of $0.4 million pursuant to which we are obligated to purchase good or services.
52
Effect of Inflation
Inflation has generally not been a material factor affecting our business. Our general operating expenses, such as wages and salaries, employee benefits and materials and facilities costs, are subject to normal inflationary pressures.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("Statement 123(R)"). Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("Statement 123"), supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and amends FASB Statement No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows." Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values (i.e., pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition). Statement 123(R) is effective for public companies (excluding small business issuers as defined in Regulation S-B) at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of Statement 123(R) will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest rates. Our policy is to not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We may enter into financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates.
Interest rate swaps are entered into as a hedge of underlying debt instruments to change the characteristics of the interest rate from variable to fixed without actually changing the debt instrument. Therefore, these interest rate swap agreements convert outstanding floating rate debt to fixed rate debt for a period of time. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair market value, but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely for floating rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.
At December 31, 2004, we had total debt and obligations under capital leases of $253.6 million. This debt is comprised of fixed rate debt of $153.4 million and floating rate debt of $100.2 million. The pre-tax earnings and cash flow impact in 2004 resulting from a one percentage point increase in interest rates on our variable rate debt would be approximately $1.0 million, holding other variables constant.
A portion of our net sales was derived from manufacturing operations in Canada, Holland, Germany, Mexico, the Caribbean and South Africa. The results of operations and financial position of our foreign operations are principally measured in their respective currency and translated into United States dollars. The effects of foreign currency fluctuations in these countries are somewhat mitigated by the fact that expenses are generally incurred in the same currency in which revenues are generated. The reported income of these subsidiaries will be higher or lower depending on a weakening or strengthening of the United States dollar against the respective foreign currency.
A portion of our assets is based in our foreign operations and are translated into United States dollars at foreign currency exchange rates in effect as of the end of each period, with the effect of such translation reflected as a separate component of members' deficit. Accordingly, our consolidated
53
members' deficit will fluctuate depending upon the weakening or strengthening of the United States dollar against the respective foreign currency.
Our strategy for management of currency risk relies primarily upon conducting our operations in a country's respective currency and may, from time to time, also involve hedging programs intended to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations. Management believes the effect of a one percentage point increase in the strength of the Canadian dollar and Euro relative to the U.S. dollar from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004 would have resulted in a $47,000 and $68,000 increase in our income from operations, respectively. During 2004, the Canadian dollar and Euro strengthened approximately 7% and 9% relative to the U.S. dollar, respectively.
54
BUSINESS
Company Overview
We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded products in the fragmented personal protection equipment industry. We manufacture and market a full line of personal protection equipment for workers in the general industrial, fire service and utility/high voltage industries. Our broad product offering includes, among other things, respiratory protection, protective footwear, hand protection, bunker gear and linemen equipment for utility workers.
We sell our products under trusted, long-standing and well-recognized brand names, includingNorth, Morning Pride, Ranger, Servus, Pro-Warrington andSalisbury. We believe these brand names have a strong reputation for excellence in protecting workers from hazardous and life-threatening environments, which is a key purchasing variable for personal protection equipment. We believe our brand names, reputation, history of developing innovative products and comprehensive line of high quality, differentiated products have enhanced our relationships with our distributors and end-users. These factors have enabled us to achieve strong market share positions in key product lines. In addition, the non-discretionary and consumable nature of our products provides us with stable and recurring revenues.
We are one of the largest participants in the personal protection equipment industry with 2,673 employees in 29 facilities worldwide. We market and sell our products through three distinct sales forces dedicated to our target segments. Our sales representatives work closely with third-party distributors, while simultaneously calling on end-users to generate demand for our products. We manufacture or assemble the majority of the products we sell. Approximately 81% of our net sales in 2004 were to customers in North America, with the remainder to customers primarily in Europe and Africa. We generated net sales of $323.5 million, $372.5 million and $440.3 million, and Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in footnote 4 to "Prospectus Summary—Summary of Historical Financial and Other Data") of $47.6 million, $53.4 million and $63.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively.
We classify our diverse product offerings into three primary operating segments:
General Industrial. We offer a diverse portfolio of leading products for a wide variety of industries, including the manufacturing, agriculture, automotive, construction, food processing and pharmaceutical industries and the military, under theNorth,Ranger andServus brand names. Our product offering is one of the broadest in the personal protection equipment industry and includes respiratory protection, protective footwear, hand protection, eye, head and face protection, first aid, hearing protection and fall protection. We sell our general industrial products primarily through industrial distributors. Our general industrial segment generated net sales of $223.7 million, $259.0 million and $310.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
Fire Service. We manufacture and market one of the broadest lines of personal protection equipment for the fire service segment, offering firefighters head-to-toe protection. Our products include bunker gear, fireboots, helmets, gloves and other accessories. We market our products under ourTotal Fire Group umbrella, using the brand names ofMorning Pride, Ranger, Servus andPro-Warrington. We are widely known for developing innovative equipment; for example, our bunker gear alone has more than 100 patented features and our urban search and rescue products are certified by third-party testing labs as meeting all of the requirements of the NFPA and other regulatory bodies. We are the vendor of choice for many of the largest fire departments in North America. We sell our fire service products primarily through specialized fire service distributors. Our fire service segment generated net sales of $58.3 million, $70.3 million and $78.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
55
Utility/High Voltage. We manufacture and market a broad line of personal protection equipment for the utility/high voltage service segment under theServus andSalisbury brands. Our products, including linemen equipment, gloves, sleeves and footwear, are designed to protect workers from up to 40,000 volts of electricity. All our products either meet or exceed the applicable standards of the ANSI and the ASTM. We sell our utility/high voltage products through specialized distributors and direct to utilities and electrical contractors. Our utility/high voltage segment generated net sales of $41.4 million, $43.2 million and $51.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
Business Strengths
Market Leadership with Trusted, Long-Standing and Well-Recognized Brand Names. We are a market leader in the personal protection equipment industry with strong market share positions in many product lines, such as protective footwear, first aid, bunker gear, fireboots, utility hand/sleeve protection and certain niche products for the general industrial respiratory and hand protection markets. End-users have a strong preference for equipment from recognized manufacturers with a proven track record of producing quality products because the products protect workers from hazardous and life-threatening environments. Our high quality products and brands have assisted us in cultivating a loyal customer base and developing leading positions in many of our markets. We believe that the strength of our trusted, long-standing and well-recognized brands provides us with a significant competitive advantage.
Broad, High Quality Product Offering. We believe that we market one of the broadest offerings of personal protection equipment in the industry, including the most comprehensive line of personal protection equipment for firefighters and utility workers. Our ensemble of firefighter protective products provides us with a significant competitive advantage, positioning us as a "one-stop" provider of choice. Our overall product line breadth makes us a desirable partner for our distributors relative to many small, niche manufacturers who generally produce a single product or product line. We believe we are also well-known for developing innovative new products to extend and augment our broad product line.
Diverse End Markets and Customer Base. We are a leader in the general industrial, fire service and utility/high voltage segments of the personal protection equipment industry, with a highly diverse portfolio of products across these markets. We believe that the diversity of our end markets helps mitigate the effect of an economic downturn in any particular industry or geographic area. We serve end-users across a wide array of industries, including the manufacturing, agriculture, automotive, food processing, pharmaceutical, construction, petrochemical, nuclear, fishing, biotech, fire service and utility industries and the military. Our end markets are further diversified given we target numerous niches within each industry. Our customer base is similarly diverse, with our top ten customers accounting for approximately 18.5% of our 2004 net sales.
Strategic Relationships with Leading Distributors. We enjoy close relationships with most of the personal protection equipment industry's largest distributors as a result of our strong brands and broad product offering. Moreover, as distributors seek to concentrate purchases among key vendors, we believe our overall status with this class of customers will continue to benefit from the size and scope of our product offering. We have earned key vendor status with a number of the largest industrial safety distributors as well as the largest maintenance, repair and operations equipment distributors in North America. Key vendor status is characterized by joint business planning, privileged access to distributor salespeople, increased willingness by distributors to adopt new products, preferential placement in catalogs and increased advertising and promotional support.
Stable and Recurring Revenue Stream. We believe a significant portion of demand for our products is non-discretionary, as many of our products are designed to protect workers from bodily harm in hazardous and life-threatening work environments, and in many cases are required by government or
56
industry regulatory bodies. This leads to consistent purchasing patterns as end-users must maintain their protective equipment regardless of economic conditions. Moreover, many personal protection products such as respiratory filters and certain hand and footwear products, require frequent repurchases to maintain required safety levels due to single use or limited life spans. In addition, certain of our products are employed in applications where the end-user's preference for a trusted and well-recognized brand exceeds pricing as the primary variable in the purchasing decision, allowing us to achieve higher margins on the sales of such products.
High Barriers to Entry. We believe that it is difficult for new competitors to penetrate our markets due to: (1) end-users' reluctance to switch to an unknown supplier for life-protecting products; (2) the proprietary technology and processes required to manufacture quality products that comply with the demanding safety standards set by government and standard-setting entities such as OSHA, the NFPA, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health ("NIOSH"), ANSI and ASTM; (3) the patents and patent rights we hold on the intellectual property used in our products; (4) distributors' increasing preference for vendors with broad product offerings; (5) many products being highly specialized and requiring customization for each end-user; and (6) the strong preference of many customers, including the United States government, firefighters and industries influenced by labor unions, for products that are "Made in the USA," limiting the potential impact of foreign competition.
Significant Cash Flow. We generate substantial cash flow, and our manufacturing operations require relatively modest capital investment. We generated Adjusted EBITDA of $53.4 million and $63.5, while incurring capital expenditures of $7.4 million and $6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. See footnote 4 to "Prospectus Summary— Summary Historical Financial and Other Data" for a reconciliation of cash flows from operations to Adjusted EBTIDA. We believe our cash flow provides us with a substantial degree of operating flexibility beyond servicing our debt, allowing us to fund our growth initiatives. As of December 31, 2004, the current portion (due within one year) of our debt service payments, which includes principal and interest, was approximately $34.9 million. In addition, we currently have available manufacturing capacity in the majority of our facilities to increase production without incurring significant incremental capital expenditures.
Experienced Management Team. We have an experienced and incentivized senior management team. President and Chief Executive Officer Robert A. Peterson and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer David F. Myers, Jr. have managed NSP since its formation in June 1995. The management team is credited with successfully improving operations and increasing income from operations in each of the years since the Company's inception in 1995. In addition, we have an experienced divisional management team, many of whom are members of the industry's primary standard-setting and oversight organizations, including the NFPA, ANSI, ASTM, the Industrial Safety Equipment Association and the Fire and Emergency Manufacturers and Services Association.
Business Strategy
We are executing a targeted business strategy designed to capitalize on our well-known brand names, strong customer relationships and expertise in developing innovative products, while continually improving our operational efficiency. Specifically, our business strategy includes the following:
Continue to Expand Market Leadership Positions. We intend to further expand our market leadership positions by continuing to capitalize on our trusted, long-standing and well-recognized brand names, our strong customer relationships and our expertise in developing innovative products and by continuing to pursue strategic acquisitions. This strategy has enabled us to achieve leading positions in many product lines, such as protective footwear, first aid, bunker gear, fireboots, utility hand/sleeve protection and certain niche products for the general industrial respiratory and hand protection markets.
57
Further Develop Relationships with End-Users. Our salesforce, in addition to marketing to our distributor customers, invests a significant amount of time educating our end-users on specific features and benefits of our products. Increased end-user awareness of, and appreciation for, the highly engineered nature of our products helps create significant "pull-through" demand with our distributors, which in turn increases our sales. In addition, our continuing efforts with our end-users help us to continue building brand name recognition and trust.
Capitalize on Industry Trends. With our broad product offering, we are well-positioned to capitalize on the recent global trend towards increased spending in support of domestic preparedness. Increased government and private-sector spending creates significant opportunities, especially regarding nuclear, biological and chemical protection, bunker gear and respiratory protection products. We have already benefited from increased annual spending by fire departments and received significant orders from the United States and Israeli governments for products appropriate for use in responding to terrorist attacks. In addition, we operate a plant in Charleston, South Carolina dedicated to producing gloves that protect against nuclear, biological and chemical hazards utilizing a highly technical manufacturing process. We believe that we are one of only two manufacturers in North America with the process knowledge and ability to produce such gloves.
Continue to Maximize Operational Efficiencies. In the last five years we have streamlined our operations by: (1) closing six manufacturing facilities, (2) consolidating sales and marketing functions, (3) eliminating redundant administrative functions, and (4) reducing manufacturing costs by increasing levels of automation and outsourcing production where appropriate to low-cost providers. For a discussion of our restructuring plans and the related risks, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Restructuring Plans" and "Risks Factors—Risks Relating to our Business—We may incur restructuring or impairment charges that would reduce our earnings." Going forward, we intend to effect further cost reductions through identified plant consolidations and continuing to outsource manufacturing of certain products, primarily those with high labor content and for which "Made in the U.S.A." is not an important purchasing variable, to countries with lower labor costs.
Continue to Develop Innovative Products. We believe that meaningful opportunities exist to generate incremental sales through new product development, as we have demonstrated with successful product introductions in each of our markets. For example, recent successful new products and innovations include a revolutionary "comfort-fit" respirator (CFR-1), for which we were awarded the 2002 Commitment to Worker Safety Award by Compliance Magazine, and a Real-Time End-of-Life-Service Indicator for respiratory cartridges. We have also sought to further drive demand at the end-user level through product innovations that increase the comfort of our existing products, such as our lightweight bunker gear. We also seek to capitalize on opportunities to expand our product line into higher margin niche markets, such as our development of the first urban search and rescue garment certified to meet the requirements of the NFPA. Our introduction of our ER 1000 escape respirator is designed to provide protection in emergency situations such as terrorist attacks and industrial accidents. Our dedicated team of product development professionals is currently focused on new product introductions responsive to domestic preparedness initiatives, including further extensions of our nuclear, biological and chemical protection products.
Pursue Opportunistic Acquisitions. The personal protection equipment industry is highly fragmented and characterized by many small, single product manufacturers. We intend to continue to selectively pursue acquisitions that will add complementary product offerings, provide access to new geographic markets and distribution channels and expand our technological capabilities. In the last five years, we have successfully completed the acquisitions of five complementary personal protection equipment companies, in each case expanding our product offering, capitalizing on significant revenue synergies and leveraging our dedicated sales force and strong distributor relationships. In addition to
58
successfully identifying complementary tuck-in acquisitions at attractive purchase prices, we have historically been able to implement significant cost-saving initiatives.
Industry Overview
The worldwide personal protection equipment industry is highly fragmented with few market participants offering a broad line of products. Demand for personal protection equipment has been relatively stable, as purchases of these products are generally non-discretionary due to their use in protecting workers from bodily harm in hazardous and life-threatening work environments and as a result of government and industry regulations mandating their use. Furthermore, many of our products have limited life spans due to normal course wear-and-tear or because they are one-time use products by design, which results in consistent replacement and recurring revenues for industry participants.
In recent years, several trends have reshaped the market for personal protection equipment, including the following:
Heightened Compliance and Commitment to Worker Safety. Demand for personal protection equipment is driven largely by regulatory standards and recognition by companies of the economic and productivity benefits of a safer workplace. Regulatory bodies and standard-setting entities, such as OSHA, NIOSH, the NFPA, ANSI and ASTM, require and enforce businesses' compliance with worker safety regulations and establish strict performance and product design requirements for personal protection equipment. Similarly, while the required standards for worker protection are generally lower outside of North America and parts of Western Europe, many countries have been increasing safety regulations in recent years, creating opportunities for manufacturers to increase sales internationally. In addition, the litigious environment in which companies operate drives many businesses to provide personal protection equipment for their employees and in some cases causes businesses to provide more personal protection equipment than is mandated.
Industrial Distributor Trends. The general industrial distribution channel has experienced consolidation over the past several years as distributors have attempted to realize economies of scale. In addition, product procurement trends have shown that distributors are increasing their purchases from large, multi-product vendors, thereby simplifying the management of their supply chain, reducing their procurement costs and improving their selling efficiency. Distributors, therefore, have an explicit preference for vendors with broad product offerings and comprehensive services, including consolidated shipping and invoicing, direct marketing to end-users and salesforce training.
Focus on Domestic Preparedness. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and other incidences of terrorism worldwide, governments have significantly increased their focus and their spending on preparedness for conventional and nuclear, biological and chemical attacks. The United States government, for example, created a separate cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security and allocated significant funding to further its mission. The 2004 budget for the Department of Homeland Security was $36.2 billion, which represents a 7.4% increase in funding over 2003. The budget request for 2005 is $40.2 billion. One of the Department's top priorities is to insure that our nation is prepared to respond to incidents throughout our country and therefore it budgeted $5.9 billion for Emergency Preparedness and Response, an increase of 16.0% ($838.0 million) over 2003.
Company History
Our predecessor company began operations in 1923 and later became the safety products division of Norcross Footwear, Inc. In June 1995, Norcross Footwear, Inc. transferred substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the division to Norcross in a recapitalization transaction. At that time, Robert A. Peterson and David F. Myers, Jr. were hired as our senior managers and they, with the
59
financial support of an investor group consisting of the CIBC/Argosy Group and John Hancock, acquired a controlling interest in Norcross. At our formation, we had annual net sales of approximately $38.0 million. In April 1998, the investor group purchased Norcross Footwear, Inc.'s remaining interest in Norcross.
In September 1998, NSP Holdings was formed to effect the acquisition by Norcross of the stock of various entities affiliated with Siebe plc, now known as Invensys plc, including North Safety Products, Ltd., James North (Africa) Pty. Ltd., Industries-Schutz-Produkte GmbH and Siebe North Holdings Corp. To execute this transaction, NSP Holdings entered into a Unit Purchase and Exchange Agreement whereby the unit holders of Norcross exchanged their equity interests in Norcross for equity interests in NSP Holdings. Norcross then canceled the Class A units and issued 100 new units to NSP Holdings. As a result of these transactions, NSP Holdings became the sole unit holder of Norcross. In addition, NSP Holdings issued Class A, C and D common units and preferred units for cash consideration which was contributed to Norcross. This transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization because there was no change in control.
In 1998, we acquired Morning Pride, a leading manufacturer of bunker gear and helmets for firefighters; North Safety Products, Inc., a leading provider of general industrial and utility/high voltage safety products; and Pro-Warrington, a leading marketer of leather fireboots.
We acquired the stock of Arkon, as of January 1, 2000, for $35.9 million, comprised of $32.1 million in cash and $3.8 million in a subordinated seller note. In addition, we agreed to pay the sellers of Arkon up to C$5.0 million over the course of the four years following the sale based upon the achievement of specified EBITDA targets. As of December 31, 2004, there were no longer any obligations to the sellers. Arkon was a leading Canadian manufacturer in the general industrial market. We integrated Arkon's existing facilities and brands with those of North Safety Products. Our equityholders invested approximately $19.8 million of additional equity to partially fund the acquisition.
In June 2000, we acquired the stock of Safety 4 for $2.1 million, comprised of $1.3 million in cash and a $0.8 million subordinated seller note. Safety 4 developed and marketed patented, chemical resistant hand protection products.
In January 2002, we acquired the assets of Muck Boot for $3.3 million, comprised of $1.3 million in cash and a $2.0 million subordinated seller note. We are also obligated to make royalty payments to the sellers of Muck Boot until December 31, 2006 based upon the achievement of specified net sales targets. These payments amount to 3.5% to 7.0% of net sales. We made royalty payments of $0.2 million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Muck Boot develops and markets protective footwear.
In December 2002, we acquired the stock of Arbin for E6.3 million, comprised of E3.8 million in cash and E2.5 million of senior and subordinated seller notes. In addition, we are also obligated to make royalty payments to the sellers of Arbin until December 31, 2008 in amounts ranging from 3% to 8% of net sales achieved by Arbin in excess of E5.3 million per year. We made royalty payments of $64,000 and $34,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Arbin is a Holland-based manufacturer of respiratory products that are a key complement to our product offering for industrial users and strengthen our domestic preparedness-related offerings. Our existing equityholders invested $3.0 million of additional equity to partially fund the acquisition.
In July 2003, we acquired the stock of KCL for $20.1 million including the assumption of KCL's net indebtedness of $0.2 million. We financed this acquisition with $9.8 million of cash on hand, borrowings under our senior credit facility of $5.0 million and the issuance of $5.1 million of junior subordinated notes, which notes were repaid with the proceeds of the offering of 97/8% senior subordinated notes. The sellers of KCL will also be eligible to receive royalty payments of up to E0.25 million per year through 2005 based upon the achievement of certain cumulative net sales targets. The net sales targets
60
for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 were not achieved; however, the E0.5 million payment could be funded in 2005 if cumulative net sales targets are achieved. KCL is a German-based manufacturer and marketer of liquid-proof and cut-resistant gloves for a variety of industries.
Operating Structure
Our operations are organized into three primary operating segments: general industrial, fire service and utility/high voltage. Each segment has a sales force, a marketing team, manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities and customer service functions.
The following table sets forth the percentage of our net sales generated by each of our operating segments for each of the three year periods ended December 31, 2004. The data for the three year periods ended December 31, 2004 has been derived from our audited historical consolidated financial statements.
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
Segment
| |
---|
| 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
General Industrial | | 69.2 | % | 69.5 | % | 70.5 | % |
Fire Service | | 18.0 | % | 18.9 | % | 17.9 | % |
Utility/High Voltage | | 12.8 | % | 11.6 | % | 11.6 | % |
Principal Products
We market one of the broadest offerings of personal protection equipment in the industry. The following is a brief description of each of our principal product categories, organized by each of our three primary operating segments:
General Industrial. Our general industrial products include respiratory protection, protective footwear, hand protection, eye, head and face protection, first aid, fall protection and hearing protection.
Respiratory Protection. Our respiratory product offering is one of the broadest and deepest in the industry and includes disposable and reusable masks and face-pieces, filtration cartridges, self-contained breathing apparatuses and airline respirators. We produce respirators for use in a variety of applications, including protection against dust, fumes, volatile chemicals, micro-organisms, fibers, odors, mists and gases. Our traditional strength is in air purifying systems, which utilize filtering cartridges as opposed to the fresh oxygen provided by a self-contained breathing apparatus. Our 7700 Series half-mask face-piece is among the world's best selling face-pieces due to its superior fit and comfort. As a result of our introduction of a revolutionary "comfort-fit" respirator (CFR-1), we were awarded the Commitment to Worker Safety Award in 2002 fromCompliance Magazine, an industry publication. Our acquisition of Arbin added both nuclear, biological and chemical protection cartridges and powered air purifying respirators to our respiratory product offering.
Protective Footwear. Protective footwear is required in areas with the potential for falling objects, objects piercing the sole, electrical hazards, hazardous materials, chemicals and extreme temperatures. We produce rubber, injection molded and other footwear to protect against such threats, using a variety of techniques for diverse applications, including meat and food processing, chemical processing, commercial fishing, agricultural work, construction and cold storage. With our origins as a footwear company, we have long held dominant positions within the footwear segments of the personal protection equipment industry through ourRanger andServus brands. We believe we are the largest manufacturer of both neoprene safety and hand-laid rubber protective footwear for the general industrial market in North America. We believe we are the only U.S. footwear provider currently under contract with the United States government for overshoe protection against chemical and biological threats.
61
Hand Protection. Hand protection is required for workers exposed to hazardous substances, vulnerable to severe cuts, abrasions or chemical burns, and exposed to extreme temperatures. We manufacture gloves designed to protect workers against each of these threats and for a variety of specific applications, including use in material handling and controlled environments. Our products range from basic protection provided by imported cotton gloves to highly-engineered, patented gloves designed to withstand dangerous chemicals present in many workplaces.
Eye, Head and Face Protection. We offer a wide variety of non-prescription protective eyewear and face shields that through innovative design and state of the art materials offer what we believe to be a high degree of optical quality, comfort and fit. Many of our products are offered with coatings that provide anti-fog, anti-scratch, anti-UV or anti-static protection. Our hard hats and accessories provide comfortable and dependable head protection, featuring stylish, lightweight shell designs, suspension height adjustment and comfort padding.
First Aid. We market a wide range of products, including unitized and bulk first aid supplies, nonprescription medicinals, dermatologicals, eye wash and body flush. Regulations require that first aid products be available to workers throughout the workplace, thereby creating stable demand for first aid kits.
Fall Protection. We manufacture and market harnesses, lanyards, confined space retrieval equipment and engineered fall protection systems. This product category often requires customized solutions to meet end-user needs.
Hearing Protection. We manufacture and market a broad line of both disposable and reusable hearing protection products used in a variety of industries. All of our hearing protection products are designed to be as comfortable as possible while protecting against hazardous noise in the workplace. Many of these products are tested for us at an independent third party National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program certified laboratory.
Fire Service. Our fire service products include bunker gear, fireboots, helmets, gloves and other accessories.
Bunker Gear. Bunker gear is protective clothing worn by firefighters that must meet the strict design specifications set by the NFPA, including resistance to heat and fire, chemicals, viruses and tears. All of our bunker gear meets or exceeds the NFPA's or other regulatory specifications. Bunker gear is made-to-order, with custom measurements for each firefighter. We sell bunker gear under theMorning Pride brand name, which has been in existence since 1921 and has high distributor and end-user loyalty.Morning Pride products are made with proprietary designs, are protected by more than 100 patents, and use state-of-the-art materials such as Kevlar™, W.L. Gore's Crosstech™, PBI™, Nomex Omega™ and P-84™. Our sales force traditionally has been successful in influencing fire departments to specify items for which we have a patent, such as a bunker gear tail that extends protection below the waistline. Our unique, patented and field-tested features, such as dead air panels, liner inspection ports and heat channel knee technologies, combined with our awareness of end-users' needs for function and comfort, differentiate our bunker gear from that of our competitors. These proprietary designs and specialized materials have allowed us to improve the performance of bunker gear products and have significantly increased the growth rate of our sales of these products.
Fireboots. Fireboots typically must meet the strict design specifications set by the NFPA, including specifications for heat and flame resistance, compression, sole puncture resistance, electrical hazards and water protection. Leather fireboots are generally lighter in weight and provide firefighters with increased comfort and agility. Rubber fireboots are hand-made using state-of-the-art specialized materials such as Kevlar™, which is more durable than felt, the traditional fireboot material, and they also provide enhanced wear and flame resistance. Over the last five years, either
62
Ranger,Servus orPro-Warrington fireboots have been selected by virtually every major metropolitan fire department in the United States.
Helmets, Gloves and Other Accessories. Helmets, gloves and other firefighting accessories typically must meet the strict design specifications set by the NFPA and other regulatory bodies, including those noted above for bunker gear as well as impact resistance, force transmission dissipation and burst strength. These products are made using state-of-the-art specialized materials such as the Fyrglass fiberglass helmet shell, which offers improved strength while being lightweight. Unique features, such as bloodborne pathogen interface capable technologies, differentiate our products from those of our competitors. Over the last decade, we have been selected as the vendor of choice to supply helmets, gloves and other accessories to numerous major metropolitan fire departments in the United States.
Utility/High Voltage. Our utility/high voltage products include linemen equipment, gloves, sleeves and footwear.
Linemen Equipment. Linemen equipment encompasses an array of products that enable utility workers to work with "live" electrical wires. These products are designed to protect against up to 40,000 volts of electricity. Products include insulating blankets, grounding equipment, linehose and covers, and guards that protect the worker, valuable equipment and reduce or eliminate outages. Our products are required to meet ANSI and ASTM standards.
Gloves, Sleeves and Footwear. We manufacture insulating gloves, sleeves and dielectric footwear, which are a lineman's first line of defense against electrical hazards. These products also must meet ANSI and ASTM standards.
Manufacturing Processes
The majority of our net sales are from products manufactured or assembled by us, with the remainder sourced from a variety of low-cost vendors. The majority of our manufacturing occurs in the United States, though many low volume or hand-fabricated products are assembled in China, Mexico and the Caribbean. See "—Facilities."
We manufacture our general industrial products using a variety of techniques. Respirators and cartridges are injection molded from silicon or plastics. Our protective footwear products serving the general industrial market are manufactured using a variety of methods, including hand-laid rubber, dipped neoprene latex, slush and injection molding. We use automated glove knitters as well as hand-sewn processes in our work glove product offering. Head protection products are injection molded from high density polyethylene. Eye and ear protection products are molded and assembled by us. First aid products are bought and packaged. Fall protection products are cut and sewn.
We manufacture bunker gear through a made-to-order process, as both pants and coats are constructed to meet an end-user's individual specifications. Outer-shell and liner fabrics are cut, assembled with other components, including pockets, hardware, trim and lettering, and extensively inspected to ensure quality control. In 2000, we significantly increased our capacity in this regard at our Dayton, Ohio facility, and installed Gerber material cutters and a Gerber mover, which automates the handling of bunker gear materials. Every fire service product we sell meets or exceeds the standards of the NFPA or other regulatory bodies. Rubber fireboots are assembled by both hand-laid and automated dipping techniques.
We manufacture our utility/high voltage service and hand protection products using a variety of techniques. We manufacture our chemical-resistant and electrical insulating gloves and sleeves using a multiple layering process of polymer dissolved in organic solvents. These processes are relatively automated and operate in closely controlled environments. Other chemical-resistant and coated fabric gloves are manufactured with water-based latex polymers. We manufacture utility linemen products,
63
other than gloves, using injection, transfer or compression molding of natural and synthetic polymers. In 2000, we increased our utility linemen glove production capacity by more than 50% by adding a second dedicated facility in Charleston, South Carolina. The manufacturing processes utilize extensive in-line and post-manufacturing quality assurance because these products are designed to protect workers from hazardous and life-threatening environments.
Customers
The majority of our sales are to specialty industrial, fire service and utility distributors. The balance of our products are sold directly to end-users. None of our customers account for more than 10% of our net sales.
Our general industrial products are utilized in a variety of industries, including the manufacturing, agriculture, automotive, construction, food processing, pharmaceutical, construction, petrochemical, nuclear, fishing, and biotechnology industries and the military. The primary end-users of our fire service products are professional fire departments and the primary end-users of our utility high/voltage products are utility companies.
Set forth below is a summary of our net sales by geographic region for 2002, 2003 and 2004.
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
Region
| |
---|
| 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
United States | | 74.8 | % | 70.5 | % | 66.9 | % |
Canada | | 15.7 | | 14.9 | | 13.7 | |
Europe | | 6.7 | | 11.2 | | 15.5 | |
Other | | 2.8 | | 3.4 | | 3.9 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Total | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
In general, we do not experience a significant backlog of customer orders. We do, however, have a backlog of orders from certain customers, such as the United States government, who tend to order products less frequently and in greater quantities, and our fire service customers, who tend to custom order products which require greater lead time. The timing of these orders results in some backlog variability. As of December 31, 2004, there was approximately $36.4 million of such backlog that management believed to be firm as compared to $32.7 million of backlog as of December 31, 2003. The majority of this backlog will ship by the first quarter of 2005.
Competition
The personal protection equipment market is highly competitive, with participants ranging in size from small companies focusing on a single type of personal protection equipment to large multinational corporations which manufacture and supply many types of personal protection equipment. Our main competitors vary by region and product. We believe that participants in this industry compete primarily on the basis of product characteristics (such as functional performance, comfort and durability), price, brand name trust and recognition and service. Set forth below is a brief summary of our most significant competitors by operating segment.
64
General Industrial. Bacou-Dalloz SA.; 3M; Mine Safety Appliances Company; Ansell Occupational Healthcare; LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.; Aearo Corporation; Pac-Kit Safety Equipment Co.; and Scott Technologies.
Fire Service. Bacou-Dalloz SA; Mine Safety Appliances Company; Globe Manufacturing Company; Lion Apparel, Inc.; LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.; and E.D. Bullard Co., Inc.
Utility/High Voltage. A.B. Chance Company; Hastings Fiber Glass Products, Inc.; and The White Rubber Corporation.
We believe we compete favorably within each of our operating segments as a result of the breadth of our product offering, high product quality and strong brand trust and recognition.
Sales and Marketing
We maintain a distinct sales force for each of our three operating segments. While the majority of our sales are through distributors, we have developed and employ a sales and marketing strategy designed to drive demand at both the distributor and the end-user levels. As part of this strategy, our sales forces call on the end-users of our products in their respective segments to generate demand using a "pull-through" effect whereby end-users of our products seek out our brands from distributors. One way our dedicated sales forces achieves this pull-through effect is by educating both distributors and end-users on the specific performance characteristics of our products, which provides significant positive differentiation relative to competing products. Customer training and education is particularly important with respect to our fire service and utility/high voltage products, which tend to be more technical in their design and use. Our product research and development teams work closely with our dedicated sales forces. By working closely with the end-users of our products, our sales forces gain valuable insight into our customers' preferences and needs and the ways in which we can further differentiate our products from those of our competitors.
We created targeted sales campaigns designed around our domestic preparedness offering, including respiratory, hand protection and protective footwear. Leveraging our breadth of applicable products, we present end-users with comprehensive protection against nuclear, biological and chemical threats. Target customers include governments, hospitals, police and other "first responders." We have received orders from the United States and Israeli governments for products appropriate for use in responding to terrorist attacks.
Distribution Channels
Our products are sold through three distinct distribution channels:
General Industrial. We distribute our general industrial products primarily through specialized personal protection equipment and general industrial distributors, as well as maintenance, repair and operations equipment distributors for whom personal protection equipment products are a core line of business. Vendor relationships with distributors tend to be non-exclusive. Our customer base includes national, regional and local distributors. Some of our key distributors, many of whom carry our full general industrial product line, include W.W. Grainger, Airgas, Fisher Scientific International and Vallen Corporation. In addition, selected footwear products are distributed through work-wear retailers. These retailers primarily serve farmers and agricultural workers. Our average relationship with our key general industrial customers is in excess of ten years.
Fire Service. The fire service segment's primary channel of distribution is through specialized fire service distributors. As a result of the breadth of our product offering and our reputation for quality, we have long-standing relationships with the premier fire service distributors in the United States, many
65
of whom carry our products exclusively. Our average relationship with our largest ten fire service distributors is in excess of ten years.
Utility/High Voltage. The utility/high voltage segment primarily markets its products through specialized distributors and directly to utilities and electrical contractors. Sales to utilities are typically made pursuant to one-year contracts, while sales to distributors are typically open-ended purchase contracts. As a result of the breadth of our product offering and our reputation for quality, the utility/high voltage segment has long-standing relationships with many large utilities and the premier utility/high voltage service distributors. Our average relationship with our largest ten utility/high voltage customers is in excess of ten years.
Intellectual Property
It is our policy to protect our intellectual property through a range of measures, including trademarks, patents and confidentiality agreements. We own and use trademarks and brand names to identify ourselves as a proprietary source of certain goods. The following brand names of certain of our products and product lines are registered in the United States:North, Morning Pride, Ranger, Servus, Pro-Warrington and Salisbury. Certain of our fire service products are marketed under the registered trademarkTotal Fire Group.
Whenever possible, our intellectual property rights are protected through the filing of applications for and registrations of trademarks and patents. OurMorning Pride line of products, for example, is protected by more than 100 patents, including patents for such unique features as dead air panels, liner inspection ports and heat channel knee technologies. We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets for the protection of certain intellectual property rights, which trade secrets are also material to our business. We protect our trade secrets by requiring certain of our employees, consultants and other suppliers, customers, agents and advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or other relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed by, or made known to, the individual or entity during the course of the relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not to be disclosed to third parties except under certain limited circumstances. See "Risk Factors—Our continued success depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, our sales could be materially and adversely affected."
Raw Materials and Suppliers
The primary raw materials we use in the manufacture of our products include natural rubber, PVC, fabrics, nitrile, latex, moisture barriers and knitting yarns. We purchase these materials both domestically and internationally, and we believe our supply sources are both well established and reliable. We have close vendor relationship programs with the majority of our key raw material suppliers. Although we generally do not have long-term supply contracts, we have not experienced any significant problems in obtaining adequate raw materials.
66
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had 2,673 full-time employees throughout the world. The following sets forth the number of employees by operating segment:
Operating Segment
| | Number of Employees
|
---|
General Industrial | | 2,117 |
Fire Service | | 313 |
Utility/High Voltage | | 240 |
Corporate | | 3 |
| |
|
| Total | | 2,673 |
| |
|
Approximately 559 of our 2,188 North American employees are represented by various unions, and the majority of our 485 European and African employees are represented by unions. We believe we have maintained good relationships with our unionized employees and we have not experienced any material disruptions in operations on account of our employees in the past five years.
Facilities
We conduct our operations through 29 primary facilities, nine of which are owned. We believe we have sufficient capacity in the majority of our facilities to support the projected growth in our business for the next five years.
We manufacture respiratory and hearing products in Cranston, Rhode Island. In this facility, we have implemented lean manufacturing and Six Sigma process improvements and continue to invest in automated equipment. The Cranston facility also serves as a centralized distribution center for the general industrial segment in the United States.
We manufacture fireboots and other protective footwear in our Rock Island, Illinois and Nashua, New Hampshire facilities. Our 110,000 square foot distribution center for protective footwear products is located in Davenport, Iowa, approximately five miles from the Rock Island, Illinois manufacturing plant, facilitating timely delivery of customer orders.
We manufacture bunker gear in a leased facility in Dayton, Ohio. We expanded the capacity of this facility and installed Gerber material cutters and a sophisticated Gerber mover in 2000, which automated the handling of bunker gear materials and significantly improved the productivity of the division.
We assemble our first aid products at our Mexicali, Mexico facility, utilizing lower cost labor for kit packaging. Products manufactured in Mexicali are distributed through our Reno, Nevada warehouse and our Cranston distribution facility.
Linemen gloves are manufactured at our two plants in Charleston, South Carolina, one of which was converted in 2000 from an industrial hand protection plant to expand capacity by more than 50%. Linemen sleeves are currently manufactured in our Addison, Illinois facility. We are in the process of closing the Addison, Illinois facility and moving manufacturing to our Charleston, South Carolina plant. Other products serving the utility/high voltage service market, including line equipment, are manufactured at our Chicago, Illinois facility.
We operate a plant in Charleston, South Carolina dedicated to nuclear, biological and chemical resistant gloves, utilizing a highly technical manufacturing process. As we are one of only two manufacturers in the United States with the process knowledge to produce such gloves, the United States Department of Defense historically paid us to maintain the facility on standby for potential production for the military. Beginning in 2002, the government mobilized the facility by ordering
67
significant quantities of nuclear, biological and chemical resistant gloves for shipment beginning in 2002 and continuing through 2005. Additionally, we have received orders from the government of Israel for the same product.
We operate several other hand protection facilities for the general industrial market. Our Maiden, North Carolina facility manufactures knitted and coated hand protection products, while butyl and dry-box hand protection lines are manufactured at our Clover, South Carolina facility. In Eichenzell, Germany, we manufacture and distribute a variety of liquid-proof and cut-resistant gloves in a 115,000 square foot owned facility.
In our Toronto, Canada facility, we manufacture our fall protection product line. In our Rawdon, Canada and Montreal, Canada facilities, we produce numerous general industrial products, including eye, ear and head protection. Canadian distribution is coordinated through our Montreal facility and an additional facility in Edmonton, Canada.
Due to the nature of product use, quality systems are of paramount importance. The vast majority of our United States plants are, or will become shortly, certified to the ISO 9000:2000 standard.
68
The following table sets forth a list of our primary facilities:
Facility (1)
| | Products
| | Locations
| | Approx. Sq. Ft.
| | Owned/ Leased
|
---|
General Industrial: | | | | | | �� | | |
| Offices & manufacturing facility | | Footwear (2) | | Rock Island, IL | | 340,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Respiratory, Hearing, First Aid | | Cranston, RI | | 240,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Various | | Montreal, Canada | | 128,000 | | Leased |
| Warehouse | | Footwear | | Davenport, IA | | 110,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Hand Protection | | Eichenzell, Germany | | 115,000 | | Owned |
| Offices & warehouse | | Hand Protection | | Eichenzell, Germany | | 13,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Fall Protection, Various | | Middleberg, Holland | | 75,000 | | Leased |
| Manufacturing facility | | Hand Protection | | Clover, SC | | 63,000 | | Owned |
| Manufacturing facility | | Respiratory, First Aid Products | | Mexicali, Mexico | | 57,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & laboratory | | Hand Protection | | Charleston, SC | | 52,000 | | Owned |
| Manufacturing facility | | Hand Protection | | Maiden, NC | | 51,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Various | | New Germany, South Africa | | 43,000 | | Owned |
| Manufacturing facility | | Hand Protection | | Charleston, SC | | 43,000 | | Owned |
| Manufacturing facility | | Footwear | | Nashua, NH | | 38,000 | | Leased |
| Warehouse | | Various | | Middleberg, Holland | | 35,000 | | Leased |
| Manufacturing facility | | Hearing, Head Protection | | Rawdon, Canada | | 30,000 | | Owned |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Respiratory | | Venlo, Holland | | 30,000 | | Leased |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Fall Protection | | Etobicoke, Canada | | 28,000 | | Leased |
| Warehouse | | Various | | Reno, NV | | 24,000 | | Leased |
| Offices & warehouse | | Various | | Islando, South Africa | | 23,000 | | Leased |
| Offices & warehouse | | Various | | Edmonton, Canada | | 37,000 | | Leased |
| Manufacturing facility | | Hand Protection | | Ostrava, Czech Republic | | 20,000 | | Owned |
Fire Service: | | | | | | | | |
| Offices, manufacturing facility, laboratory & warehouse | | Various | | Dayton, OH | | 56,000 | | Leased |
Utility/High Voltage: | | | | | | | | |
| Manufacturing facility | | Linemen Equipment | | Chicago, IL | | 92,000 | | Owned |
| Offices, manufacturing facility & warehouse | | Linemen Equipment | | Skokie, IL | | 44,000 | | Leased |
| Manufacturing facility (3) | | Linemen Sleeves | | Addison, IL | | 26,000 | | Leased |
| Offices & manufacturing facility | | Linemen Gloves | | Charleston, SC | | 54,000 | | Owned |
| Warehouse | | Linemen Gloves | | Charleston, SC | | 44,000 | | Leased |
Other: | | | | | | | | |
| Executive Suite | | Not applicable | | Oak Brook, IL | | 2,500 | | Leased |
- (1)
- Excludes a facility in Tallmadge, Ohio, which has been closed, and a facility in Budapest, Hungary which is part of an equity method investment.
- (2)
- Also produces fireboots for the fire service segment and dielectric footwear for the utility/high voltage segment.
- (3)
- Manufacturing operations are currently in the process of being moved to our Charleston, South Carolina facility.
69
Environmental Matters
As with all manufacturers, our facilities and operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign environmental requirements. We do not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition as a result of our efforts to comply with, or our liabilities under, these requirements. We will, from time to time, incur costs to attain or maintain compliance with evolving regulatory requirements under environmental law, but do not currently expect any such costs to be material.
We were required by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control ("DHEC") to conduct a RCRA Facility Investigation pursuant to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA") at our glove manufacturing plant in Charleston, South Carolina. Based upon soil and groundwater assessment work conducted in connection with such investigation, we have proposed to DHEC that conditions of soil and groundwater contamination at the Charleston site be addressed through a "monitored natural attenuation" approach. DHEC has not yet responded to our most recent proposal and additional investigation or cleanup may be required in the future. We do not currently expect the liability associated with this matter to be material.
Our Clover, South Carolina facility is subject to the "corrective action" requirements of RCRA, requiring investigation and potentially cleanup of areas of the Clover site where regulated wastes have historically been managed. Such investigation is being conducted by (and at the sole expense of) Invensys plc, a successor to Siebe plc, the former owner of North Safety Products, pursuant to an Administrative Order from the United States Environmental Protective Agency dated September 29, 1988. Completion of such investigation and any related cleanup is the contractual responsibility of Invensys and we do not currently expect to incur material liability in connection with this matter. In the unlikely event that Invensys does not continue to fulfill its contractual obligations, we could incur costs in connection with this matter. We do not currently expect such costs to be material.
We have been named as a potentially responsible party under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") with regard to waste disposal in the 1980s at the Seaboard Chemical Corporation site in Jamestown, North Carolina. Wastes sent by North Safety Products, now part of NSP, to the Seaboard Chemical Corporation site are believed to comprise less than 1% of the total volume of all wastes sent to the site. Because liability under CERCLA is strict (i.e., without regard to the lawfulness of the disposal) and retroactive, and under some circumstances joint and several, we may incur liability with respect to other historical disposal locations in the future. We do not currently expect our share of the liability, if any, for the Seaboard site or for other such sites to be material.
Legal Proceedings
As of December 31, 2004, our North Safety Products subsidiary, along with its predecessors and/or the former owners of such business were named as defendants in approximately 847 lawsuits involving respirators manufactured and sold by it or its predecessors. We are also monitoring an additional 11 lawsuits in which we feel that North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses may be named as defendants. Collectively, these 858 lawsuits represent approximately 26,000 (excluding spousal claims) plaintiffs. Approximately 91% of these lawsuits involve plaintiffs alleging injury resulting from exposure to silica dust, with the remainder alleging injury from exposure to other dust particles, including asbestos. These lawsuits typically allege that the purported injuries resulted in part from respirators that were negligently designed and/or manufactured. The defendants in these lawsuits are often numerous, and include, in addition to respirator manufacturers, employers of the plaintiffs and manufacturers of sand (used in sand blasting) and asbestos. We acquired our North Safety Products subsidiary on October 2, 1998 from Siebe plc. In connection with the acquisition, Siebe, which was subsequently merged with BTR plc (now known as "Invensys plc"), contractually agreed to indemnify us for any losses, including costs of defending claims, resulting from respiratory products manufactured or sold prior to our acquisition of North Safety Products in October 1998.
70
In addition, our North Safety Products subsidiary is contractually entitled to indemnification from Norton Company, an affiliate of Saint-Gobain, which owned the North Safety Products business prior to Invensys. Pursuant to a December 14, 1982 asset purchase agreement, Siebe Norton, Inc., a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Norton Company, acquired the assets of Norton's Safety Products Division and the stock of this company was in turn acquired by Siebe Gorman Holdings PLC. Under the terms of the Agreement, Siebe Norton, Inc. did not assume any liability for claims relating to products shipped by Norton Company prior to the closing date. Moreover, Norton Company covenanted in the Agreement to indemnify Siebe Norton and its successors and assigns against any liability resulting from or arising out of any state of facts, omissions or events existing or occurring on or before the closing date, including, without limitation, any claims arising from products shipped by Norton Company or any of its affiliates prior to the closing date. Siebe Norton, whose name was subsequently changed to Siebe North Inc., was subsequently acquired by us as part of the 1998 acquisition of the North Safety Products business from Invensys.
Despite these indemnification arrangements, we could potentially be liable for losses or claims relating to products manufactured prior to the October 1998 acquisition date if Invensys fails to meet its obligations to indemnify us and we could potentially be liable for losses and claims relating to products sold prior to January 10, 1983 if both Invensys and Norton fail to meet their obligations to indemnify us. We could also be liable if the alleged exposure involved the use of a product manufactured by us after our October 1998 acquisition of the North Safety Products business. Invensys is currently handling the defense of all of the cases prior to October 1998 in which North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses have been named as defendants. We are jointly with Invensys handling the defense of all of the cases which allege exposure including periods pre and post October 1998. We will individually handle the defense of all cases with exclusive post October 1998 exposure, however, we have not been involved in a case with exclusive post October 1998 exposure to date. As of December 31, 2004, Invensys has sent us requests for reimbursement totaling $120,726, relating to settled cases in which Invensys claims that the period of alleged exposure included periods after October 1998. To date, we have not reimbursed Invensys for these claims, as we are currently pursuing negotiations regarding the allocation of costs and the determination of the alleged exposure periods. Based on information provided to us by Invensys, we believe that Invensys has made payments with respect to settlement of these claims of $477,206 in 2002, $660,510 in 2003 and $938,083 in 2004. Separately, we and Invensys settled one unusual case for $65,000 in which our settlement share was $45,000 (our net contribution after insurance proceeds was $25,000).
Consistent with the current environment being experienced by companies involved in silica and asbestos-related litigation, there has been an increase in the number of asserted claims that could potentially involve us. Based upon information provided to us by Invensys, we believe activity related to these lawsuits was as follows for the periods indicated:
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Beginning lawsuits | | 363 | | 306 | | 680 | |
New lawsuits | | 185 | | 537 | | 372 | |
Settlements | | (134 | ) | (46 | ) | (46 | ) |
Dismissals | | (108 | ) | (117 | ) | (148 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Ending lawsuits | | 306 | | 680 | | 858 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plaintiffs have asserted specific dollar claims in less than a quarter of the approximately 847 cases pending as of December 31, 2004 in which North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses have been named as defendants. A majority of jurisdictions prohibit specifying damages in tort cases such as these, and most of the remaining jurisdictions do not require such specification. In those cases in which plaintiffs choose to assert specific dollar amounts in their complaints, brought in states that permit such pleading, the amounts claimed are typically not meaningful as an indicator of a company's potential liability. This is because (1) the amounts claimed
71
typically bear no relation to the level of the plaintiff's injury, (2) the complaints typically assert claims against numerous defendants, and (3) many cases are brought on behalf of plaintiffs who have not suffered any medical injury, and, ultimately, are resolved without any payment or payment of a small fraction of the damages initially claimed. Of the 847 complaints maintained in our records, 669 do not specify the amount of damages sought, 32 generally allege damages in excess of $50,000, four allege compensatory damages in excess of $50,000 and an unspecified amount of punitive damages, 78 allege compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $25,000, two generally allege damages in excess of $100,000, 19 allege compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $50,000, 31 generally allege damages of $15.0 million, one generally alleges damages not to exceed $290.0 million, one alleges compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $10,000, one alleges compensatory and punitive damages, each in excess of $15,000, one alleges punitive damages in excess of $25,000, one alleges punitive damages in excess of $50,000, two generally allege damages in excess of $15,000, two generally allege damages in excess of $25,000, one generally alleges damages in excess of $4,000 and two allege compensatory and punitive damages each in excess of $15.0 million. We currently do not have access to the complaints with respect to the previously mentioned additional 11 monitored cases, and therefore do not know whether these cases allege specific damages, and if so, the amount of such damages, but are in the process of seeking to obtain such information. Due to the reasons noted above and to the indemnification arrangements benefiting us, we do not believe that the damage amounts specified in these complaints are a meaningful factor in any assessment of our potential liability.
Bankruptcy filings of companies with asbestos and silica-related litigation could increase our cost over time. If we were found liable in these cases and either Invensys or Norton failed to meet its indemnification obligations to us or the suit involved products manufactured by us after our October 1998 acquisition of North Safety Products, it would have a material adverse effect on our business.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded a $1.25 million liability and charge to operating expenses to establish a reserve for respiratory claims, which remains outstanding as of December 31, 2004. This reserve represents a reasonable estimate of our probable and estimable liabilities for product claims alleging injury resulting from exposure to silica dust and other dust particles, including asbestos, as determined by us in consultation with an independent consultant. We have determined that a five year projection of claims and defense costs is the most reasonable approach. However, it is possible that we may incur liabilities in excess of the amounts currently reserved. This reserve will be re-evaluated periodically and additional charges or credits will be recorded to operating expenses as additional information becomes available.
We are not otherwise involved in any material lawsuits. We historically have not been required to pay any material liability claims. We maintain insurance against product liability claims (with the exception of asbestosis and silicosis cases, for which coverage is not commercially available), but it is possible that our insurance coverage will not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us or that such coverage will not be adequate for liabilities actually incurred. In connection with the North Safety Products acquisition, we recorded a $2.5 million reserve for potential uninsured product liability claims of North Safety Products for periods prior to October 1998. This reserve was established at the date of acquisition and relates to potential claims primarily associated with fall protection products sold in Canada. Through December 2003, we incurred charges of approximately $0.2 million against this reserve, which reduced the reserve balance to $2.3 million. During 2004, we reduced this reserve to $1.0 million to reflect our current expectations of the liability based on information available and recorded a $1.3 million credit to operating expenses. This reserve is re-evaluated periodically, and additional charges or credits will be recorded to operating expenses as additional information becomes available.
It is possible that we may incur liabilities in an amount in excess of amounts currently reserved. However, taking into account currently available information, historical experience, and our indemnification from Invensys, but recognizing the inherent uncertainties in the projection of any future events, we believe that these suits or claims should not result in final judgments or settlements in excess of our reserve.
72
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Members of the Board of Managers
Our executive officers and the members of our board of managers as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Name
| | Age
| | Position(s) held
|
---|
Robert A. Peterson | | 48 | | President and Chief Executive Officer, Member of the board of managers |
David F. Myers, Jr. | | 42 | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, Member of the board of managers |
Charles S. Ellis | | 56 | | President—United States General Industrial |
Claude L. Roberge | | 64 | | President—Canada and European General Industrial |
William L. Grilliot | | 55 | | President—Fire Service |
Volker H. Laitsch | | 64 | | President—KCL |
Kenneth R. Martell | | 56 | | Vice President and General Manager—Utility/High Voltage |
Stephen J. Blewitt | | 44 | | Member of the board of managers |
Jay R. Bloom | | 49 | | Member of the board of managers |
Edward Levy | | 41 | | Member of the board of managers |
Marcus D. Wedner | | 41 | | Member of the board of managers |
Set forth below is a brief description of the business experience of each of our executive officers and the members of the board of managers.
Robert A. Peterson. Mr. Peterson has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since our formation in June 1995, and he also serves on the board of managers. Previously, from 1984 to 1991, Mr. Peterson held various senior positions at Farley Industries, a diversified group of manufacturing companies with sales in excess of $2.5 billion and, from 1992 to 1993, was President of Wright Line, a technical furniture company. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Peterson was involved in strategic planning consulting for Farley Industries and Merchant Partners. He is also a CPA and a former manager of Ernst & Young. Mr. Peterson also is a director of Actuant Corporation.
David F. Myers, Jr. Mr. Myers has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary since our formation in June 1995, and he also serves on the board of managers as an appointee of the CIBC/Argosy Group. Previously he was with Morris Anderson & Associates, a leading turnaround consulting firm, providing advisory services and serving as interim chief financial officer to companies with sales ranging from $50.0 million to $2.0 billion. Mr. Myers started his career at Ernst & Young in the corporate finance/restructuring consulting practice. Mr. Myers is a CPA.
Charles S. Ellis. Mr. Ellis has served as our President—U.S. General Industrial since June 2001. Mr. Ellis was previously at Thomas and Betts Corporation, where he served as president for the Lighting and Utility Division, a $320 million global business. Prior to joining Thomas and Betts in 1996, Mr. Ellis was President and COO of Elastimold, a division of Eagle Corp. He also worked for Westinghouse Electrical Corporation in a variety of positions over 17 years. In connection with the retirement of Mr. Roberge described below, effective December 31, 2004 Mr. Ellis assumed responsibility for the Canadian and European division of our general industrial segment (except for our German subsidiary, Kächele-Came Latex GmbH, which reports directly to Mr. Peterson) and serves as our President—General Industrial.
73
Claude L. Roberge. Mr. Roberge, until his retirement, effective December 31, 2004, served as our President—Canada and European General Industrial since our February 2000 acquisition of Arkon. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Roberge was President and CEO of Arkon. Prior to that, Mr. Roberge was Vice President of Marketing for Arkon from 1986 to 1995. On September 30, 2004, in connection with his retirement, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Roberge providing that Mr. Roberge's responsibilities, remuneration and employee benefits remained in effect until December 31, 2004, after which time and continuing through December 31, 2005, he will act as a consultant to North Safety Products Limited.
William L. Grilliot. Mr. Grilliot has served as our President—Fire Service since our acquisition of Morning Pride in August of 1998. Mr. Grilliot was the co-owner of Morning Pride during the 20 years prior to its acquisition. Mr. Grilliot serves as a Captain and is Treasurer of the West Milton, Ohio Fire Department and has been active in the department for 16 years. He is also the industry representative on the NFPA Supervising Technical Correlating Committee.
Volker H. Laitsch. Mr. Laitsch has served as our President—KCL since our acquisition of KCL in July, 2003. Mr. Laitsch has served as managing director of KCL since 1994. From 1989 to 1993 he served as Deputy Chairman of the Board of Hertel AG, Nurnberg. Mr. Laitsch has held executive positions with Paguag GmbH & Company, Rigips GmbH, Bodenwerder and ASV Stubbe GmbH, Vlotho.
Kenneth R. Martell. Mr. Martell has served as our Vice President and General Manager—Utility/High Voltage since August 1999. Mr. Martell has more than 30 years of manufacturing expertise. Prior to joining us, he was an executive vice president and general manager of the Plews/Eddelman division of Stant Corporation He has held executive positions at Epicor Industries, Parker Hannifin and American Can Corporation.
Stephen J. Blewitt. Mr. Blewitt has served as a member of the board of managers since June 2001 as an appointee of John Hancock and Hancock Mezzanine Partners L.P. Mr. Blewitt is a Senior Managing Director in the Bond & Corporate Finance Group of John Hancock and has been employed by John Hancock since 1982. Mr. Blewitt is also President of Hancock Mezzanine Advisors LLC, a subsidiary of John Hancock, and the managing member of the general partner of three funds that invest primarily in mezzanine debt securities. Mr. Blewitt is also a director of SafeGuard Health Enterprises, Inc., Medical Resources, Inc. and Utilimaster, Inc. Mr. Blewitt serves as one of the three members of our Audit Committee, and is one of our designated Audit Committee Financial Experts.
Jay R. Bloom. Mr. Bloom has served as a member of the board of managers since December 2001 as an appointee of the CIBC/Argosy Group. Mr. Bloom is a founder and managing partner of Trimaran Capital Partners, a private investment firm. He is also a vice-chairman of CIBC World Markets Corp. and co-head of the CIBC Argosy Merchant Banking Funds. Prior to joining CIBC in 1995, Mr. Bloom was a founder and managing director of The Argosy Group L.P. Mr. Bloom currently serves on the board of directors of PrimeCo Wireless Communications, LLC, Transportation Technologies Industries, Inc., Freightcar Americas Inc., Norcraft Companies, L.P., and Education Services of America, Inc. Mr. Bloom serves as one of the three members of our Audit Committee, and is one of our designated Audit Committee Financial Experts.
Edward Levy. Mr. Levy has served as a member of the board of managers since June 1998 as an appointee of the CIBC/Argosy Group. Mr. Levy had been a Managing Director of CIBC World Markets Corp. since August 1995, and co-head of CIBC World Markets Corp.'s Leveraged Finance Group since June 2001 until December 31, 2004. From February 1990 to August 1995, Mr. Levy was a Managing Director of Argosy Group, L.P., an investment banking firm. Mr. Levy is also a director of Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc.
Marcus D. Wedner. Mr. Wedner has served as a member of the board of managers since July 2003. Mr. Wedner joined Continental Illinois Venture Corp. in 1988 and is currently a partner with
74
CIVC Partners, LLC, the general partner of CIVC Partners Fund, L.P. ("CIVC"). Mr. Wedner is the CIVC appointee to the board of managers. Mr. Wedner is a director of TransWestern Publishing Company, L.P., EPIC Technologies, LLC, and K & K Screw Products, LLC. Prior to joining CIVC, Mr. Wedner was a sales manager and interactive services product manager for Pacific Bell. Mr. Wedner serves as one of the members of our Audit Committee, and is one of our designated Audit Committee Financial Experts.
There are no family relationships between any of our executive officers or directors.
Employment Agreements
Robert A. Peterson. Norcross entered an employment agreement, dated as of January 1, 2002, with Mr. Peterson, pursuant to which Mr. Peterson is to serve as our Chief Executive Officer and President for a period of five years. Under the terms of this agreement, Mr. Peterson is entitled to receive a base salary of $386,925, subject to increases as merited and to reflect changes in the cost of living. Mr. Peterson is also entitled to a $700 per month automobile allowance, reimbursement for reasonable expenses, participation in whatever benefit programs Norcross has in place for its employees who are not members of a collective bargaining unit (on a basis commensurate with his position) and four calendar weeks of vacation per year. In addition, Mr. Peterson is also eligible to receive a bonus, targeted at 90% of his base salary, based upon the achievement by Norcross of performance criteria determined by our board of managers and agreed to by Mr. Peterson.
Mr. Peterson's employment is subject to early termination in the event of his death or disability or in the event that either he or Norcross elect to terminate his employment. In the event his employment is terminated by Norcross for cause or by Mr. Peterson without good reason (each as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Peterson will be entitled to his base salary and benefits for the period ending on the termination date and any unpaid bonus for any year ending prior to the year in which such termination occurs. In the event that his employment is terminated (1) by Norcross without cause, (2) by him for good reason, (3) due to his death or disability, or (4) due to Norcross not offering, at least 90 days prior to the end of the term of his employment, to continue his employment for a period of at least two years, Mr. Peterson will be entitled to his base salary and benefits for the period ending on the termination date, any unpaid bonus for any year ending prior to the year in which such termination occurs, a pro rata bonus and (except in the event of termination due to his death) his base salary and benefits for a period of two years. Salary and benefits payable to Mr. Peterson due to Norcross having elected not to continue his employment after the expiration of the initial five year term, will be offset by any payments or benefits received by Mr. Peterson in the second year following such termination as a result of his having obtained new employment. Any amounts due to Mr. Peterson shall be paid as if he had not been terminated, except that in the event that Mr. Peterson terminated his employment due to a change in control, such amounts shall be paid in a lump sum within 10 days of his resignation, in an amount discounted to present value at a rate of 7% per year.
This employment agreement is also subject to non-solicitation, non-competition and confidentiality provisions that are customary, other than a provision allowing Mr. Peterson to solicit the employment of his personal assistant and Mr. Myers in the event that Mr. Peterson's employment with Norcross is terminated.
Also on January 1, 2002, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Peterson pursuant to which he was made eligible for certain additional bonuses in recognition of his work performance. Under the terms of the letter agreement, Mr. Peterson was entitled to receive cash bonuses in the amount of $219,099 on each of December 23, 2002 and 2003. In addition, Mr. Peterson is also eligible to receive an additional bonus in the amount of $1,752,789 on the earlier of December 31, 2016 or the occurrence of certain events including (1) a sale of Norcross, (2) a public offering generating $50.0 million or more, (3) a change of control, which is defined as any transaction after which the John Hancock Group or the CIBC/Argosy Group do not have the power to elect a majority of the board of managers, (4) our election to repurchase Mr. Peterson's equity securities pursuant to the terms of our limited liability company agreement, and (5) one day prior to the maturity date of the management loans made
75
by us to Mr. Peterson. In the event that this bonus had become payable prior to the payment of the bonuses payable on December 23, 2002 and 2003, such bonuses would also have become due and payable at that time. Mr. Peterson will lose his eligibility to receive these bonuses and will have to repay any such bonuses already received in certain circumstances, including upon termination for cause or violation of the non-compete, non-solicitation or confidentiality provisions of the letter agreement.
David F. Myers, Jr. Norcross entered an employment agreement, dated as of January 1, 2002, with Mr. Myers, pursuant to which he is to serve as our Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President on substantially the same terms as those contained in Mr. Peterson's employment agreement, except that (1) his base salary was initially set at $286,538 and (2) the non-solicitation provision contained in the agreement provides an exception allowing Mr. Myers to solicit the employment of Mr. Peterson.
Also on January 1, 2002, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Myers pursuant to which he was made eligible for certain additional bonuses in recognition of his work performance. The terms of the letter agreement entered into with Mr. Myers are substantially the same as those contained in the letter agreement entered into with Mr. Peterson, except that the bonuses payable on December 23, 2002 and 2003 are in the amount of $135,184 and the bonus payable on the earlier of December 31, 2016 or the occurrence of certain events is in the amount of $1,081,475.
Volker H. Laitsch. Pursuant to a management service contract, dated August 12, 1994, between KCL and Volker H. Laitsch, Mr. Laitsch was appointed as sole managing director of KCL. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Laitsch receives a monthly salary and is eligible to receive a yearly bonus in an amount equal to 5% of KCL's net income before corporate tax and possible surtaxes, plus all bonus payments based on income, municipal trade tax and extraordinary expenses that have been incurred by KCL voluntarily or by resolution of KCL's shareholders minus remunerations for supervisory and consultation board members. The minimum annual bonus amount is DM 50,000, which is payable in December of each year. The remaining portion of the annual bonus, if any, is determined by a shareholders resolution and is payable no later than the end of May of the succeeding calendar year.
The initial term of Mr. Laitsch's contract ended on December 31, 1998 and it has since automatically renewed twice for successive four year periods; provided, however, that Mr. Laitsch's employment automatically terminates upon his 65th birthday (June 30, 2005). Unless Mr. Laitsch is terminated for cause, KCL is required to pay his compensation (salary and bonus) through the remainder of the term. Mr. Laitsch's management service contract includes a non-compete clause only for the duration of the employment.
KCL is also required to provide Mr. Laitsch with (i) three month's paid illness leave, (ii) life insurance (DM 300,000) and disability insurance (DM 600,000), (iii) a pension in the amount of DM 3,500 per month, see "Compensation of Executive Officers—Pension Plans", (iv) use of company car with all expenses paid and (v) 30 days of vacation.
Charles S. Ellis. Our subsidiary, North Safety Products, Inc., entered into an employment agreement, dated as of June 25, 2001, with Mr. Ellis, pursuant to which he serves as President of North Safety Products, Inc.'s United States industrial division. Under the terms of this agreement, Mr. Ellis is entitled to receive a base salary of $250,000. Mr. Ellis is also entitled to participate in all employee benefits plans for which senior executives of North Safety Products, Inc. are eligible and three calendar weeks of vacation per year. In addition, Mr. Ellis is eligible to receive a bonus targeted at 75% of his base salary. In the event that Mr. Ellis is terminated without cause he is entitled to severance pay equal to 150% of one year's base salary, payable over one year, provided that he enters into a release agreement satisfactory to North Safety Products, Inc. This employment agreement also contains customary non-solicitation and non-competition provisions.
Claude L. Roberge. On September 30, 2004, in connection with his retirement from Norcross, our subsidiary, North Safety Products Limited entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Roberge.
76
Pursuant to the terms of this consulting agreement, Mr. Roberge's responsibilities, remuneration and employee benefits remained in effect until December 31, 2004, after which time and continuing through December 31, 2005, he will act as a consultant to, but will no longer have operational responsibility or authority for, North Safety Products Limited or its affiliates. Mr. Roberge will continue to receive his current salary and employee benefits during 2005 unless terminated for cause, but will not be eligible for any bonus for that period. This agreement also contains customary non-solicitation and non-competition provisions. The consulting agreement supercedes in its entirety the employment agreement, dated as of February 17, 2000, between Arkon Safety Equipment Inc. and Mr. Roberge pursuant to which Mr. Roberge agreed to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Arkon Safety Equipment Inc. for a term of four years and was entitled to receive a base salary of not less than C$332,000 per year and an incentive bonus targeted at 30% of his base salary at the end of each fiscal year.
Compensation of Executive Officers
The following table shows the compensation for 2002, 2003 and 2004 of our Chief Executive Officer and our next four most highly compensated executive officers performing our policy making functions (the "Named Executive Officers"):
| | Annual Compensation
| |
| |
---|
Name and Principal Position
| | Year
| | Salary
| | Bonus
| | Other Annual Compensation (1)
| | All Other Compensation
| |
---|
Robert A. Peterson President and Chief Executive Officer | | 2004 2003 2002 | | $
| 468,000 425,000 386,925 | | $
| 382,118 639,065 471,354 | | $
| 34,076 33,873 31,288 | | $
| 7,040 6,540 6,148 | (2) (2) (2) |
David F. Myers, Jr. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary | | 2004 2003 2002 | | | 324,500 295,000 268,540 | | | 265,235 425,962 310,259 | | | 24,084 23,924 22,098 | | | 7,040 6,540 6,148 | (3) (3) (3) |
Volker H. Laitsch (4) President—KCL | | 2004 2003 | | | 190,026 72,230 | | | 160,715 28,863 | | | — — | | | 62,100 — | (5)
|
Charles S. Ellis President—United States General Industrial | | 2004 2003 2002 | | | 265,020 258,750 256,057 | | | 25,000 120,000 110,000 | | | — — — | | | 8,540 7,540 41,520 | (6) (6) (7) |
Claude L. Roberge (8) President—Canada and European General Industrial | | 2004 2003 2002 | | | 295,825 267,651 223,311 | | | 67,071 117,096 55,738 | | | — — — | | | 11,141 9,639 8,600 | (9) (9) (9) |
- (1)
- Includes amounts reimbursed during the fiscal year for the payment of taxes.
- (2)
- Includes matching payments of $5,500, $6,000 and $6,500 to our 401(k) plan and payment of life insurance premiums of $648, $540 and $540 for 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively.
- (3)
- Includes matching payments of $5,500, $6,000 and $6,500 to our 401(k) plan and payment of life insurance premiums of $648, $540 and $540 for 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively.
- (4)
- Amounts paid to Mr. Laitsch have been translated into United States dollars at a rate of $1.129= E1.00, the average exchange rate during the year ended December 31, 2003 and at a rate of $1.242=E1.00, the average exchange rate during the year ended December 31, 2004. Compensation amounts for the year ended December 31, 2003 reflect payments from the July 2003 acquistion date of KCL.
- (5)
- Includes life and disability insurance premiums of $62,100 for 2004.
- (6)
- Includes a matching payment of $7,000 and $8,000 to our 401(k) plan and payment of life insurance premiums of $540 and $540 for 2003 and 2004, respectively.
- (7)
- Includes payment of relocation expenses of $34,980, a matching payment of $6,000 to our 401(k) plan and payment of life insurance premiums of $540.
- (8)
- Amounts paid to Mr. Roberge have been translated into United States dollars at a rate of $0.637 = C$1.00, the average exchange rate during the year ended December 31, 2002, at a rate of $0.714=C$1.00, the average exchange rate during the year ended December 31, 2003 and at a rate of $0.768=C$1.00, the average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2004. As described above, Mr. Roberge retired from his position as President—Canada and European General Industrial as of December 31, 2004, after which time and continuing through December 31, 2005 he will act as a consultant to us.
- (9)
- Reflects Registered Retirement Savings Plan contributions of $8,600, $9,639 and $11,141 for 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively.
77
Option/UAR Exercises
The following table provides information on the Named Executive Officers' exercises of options to purchase common units and UARs in 2004 and the value of unexercised options and UARs at December 31, 2004.
| | Shares Acquired on Exercise (A) Options (B) UARs
| |
| | Number of Unexercised (A) Options (B) UARs at 12/31/04
| | Value ($) of Unexercised In-The-Money (A) Options (B) UARs at 12/31/04 (1)
|
---|
| | Value ($) Realized
|
---|
Name
| | Exercisable
| | Unexercisable
| | Exercisable
| | Unexercisable
|
---|
Robert A. Peterson | | (A)— (B)— | | $ | — | | 156,820 70,248 | | 0 0 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
David F. Myers, Jr. | | (A)— (B)— | | | — | | 98,797 42,151 | | 0 0 | | | — | | | — |
Volker H. Laitsch | | (A)— (B)— | | | — | | 0 0 | | 0 0 | | | — — | | | — — |
Charles S. Ellis | | (A)— (B)— | | | — | | 0 140,000 | | 0 0 | | | — | | | — |
Claude L. Roberge | | (A)— (B)— | | | — | | 10,413 0 | | 0 0 | | | — | | | — |
- (1)
- During 2004, none of our options or UARs were in-the-money.
Pension Plans
Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. Employees' Pension Plan. Mr. Ellis participates in the Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. Employees' Pension Plan (the "NSP Pension Plan"), a non-contributory, tax-qualified defined benefit plan which provides covered employees with a minimum retirement benefit. Benefits under the NSP Pension Plan are calculated based on (1) the employee's average monthly compensation for the five consecutive calendar years for which the participant's aggregate compensation was greatest and (2) the employee's years of credited service. Compensation covered by the NSP Pension Plan includes total cash compensation required to be reported on Form W-2, plus any compensation deferred under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, plus any compensation reductions under a plan pursuant to Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code. The following table shows the estimated annual pensions that persons in specified categories would have received under the NSP Pension Plan if they had retired on January 1, 2004 at the age of 65. These amounts are not subject to deduction for Social Security benefits. The table assumes the retiree has selected a straight-life annuity commencing at age 65.
| | Annual Pension After Specified Years of Credited Service
|
---|
Average Annual Compensation For the 5 Years
|
---|
| 10 Years
| | 15 Years
| | 20 Years
| | 25 Years
| | 30 Years
| | 35 Years
|
---|
$ | 100,000 | | $ | 12,961 | | $ | 19,442 | | $ | 25,923 | | $ | 32,403 | | $ | 38,884 | | $ | 45,365 |
| 125,000 | | | 16,711 | | | 25,067 | | | 33,423 | | | 41,778 | | | 50,134 | | | 58,490 |
| 150,000 | | | 20,461 | | | 30,692 | | | 40,923 | | | 51,153 | | | 61,384 | | | 71,615 |
| 175,000 | | | 24,211 | | | 36,317 | | | 48,423 | | | 60,528 | | | 72,634 | | | 84,740 |
| 200,000 | | | 27,961 | | | 41,942 | | | 55,923 | | | 69,903 | | | 83,884 | | | 97,866 |
| 225,000 | | | 31,711 | | | 47,567 | | | 63,423 | | | 79,278 | | | 95,134 | | | 110,990 |
| 250,000 | | | 35,461 | | | 53,192 | | | 70,923 | | | 88,653 | | | 106,384 | | | 124,115 |
| 300,000 | | | 42,961 | | | 64,442 | | | 85,923 | | | 107,403 | | | 128,884 | | | 150,365 |
| 400,000 | | | 57,961 | | | 86,942 | | | 115,923 | | | 144,903 | | | 173,884 | | | 202,865 |
| 450,000 | | | 65,461 | | | 98,192 | | | 130,923 | | | 163,653 | | | 196,384 | | | 229,115 |
| 500,000 | | | 72,961 | | | 109,442 | | | 145,923 | | | 182,403 | | | 218,884 | | | 255,365 |
Mr. Ellis' average annual compensation for purposes of the NSP Pension Plan would be the combined amount listed under salary and bonus shown in the Compensation of Executive Officers table above.
78
North Safety Products Benefit Restoration Plan. Mr. Ellis also participates in a non-contributory, non-qualified, unfunded defined benefit plan (the "Restoration Plan"). The Restoration Plan is open to all participants in the NSP Pension Plan whose benefits are limited by the Internal Revenue Code or those employees selected by resolution of our board of managers. The objective of the Restoration Plan is to pay a supplemental benefit equal to the maximum benefit amount that the participant would have received under the NSP Retirement Plan if (1) there were no limitations on the maximum benefits payable under either of the plans and (2) if certain Internal Revenue Code limitations did not apply.
Benefits are payable under the Restoration Plan only to the extent that the benefits calculated under the plan exceed the total monthly benefits that are otherwise payable to the participant under the NSP Pension Plan. The benefits calculated under the Restoration Plan equal the greater of:
- •
- 1.0% of the participant's average final monthly compensation, plus 0.5% of the participant's average final monthly compensation in excess of "covered compensation," multiplied by years and partial years of credited service. Covered compensation equals the average of the contribution and benefit bases in effect under Section 230 of the Social Security Act for each year in the 35 year period ending with the year in which the participant attains Social Security retirement age, not to exceed 35 years; or
- •
- 1.67% of the participant's average final monthly compensation multiplied by years and partial years of credited service, less 1.67% of the participants primary social security benefit multiplied by his years of service and full months of credited service, not to exceed 35 years.
The estimated credited years of service for Mr. Ellis was 4 years as of December 31, 2004.
KCL Pension Plan. Pursuant to the terms of his management services contract with KCL, Mr. Laitsch is entitled to a pension in the amount of DM 3,500 per month and a widow pension of 60% of the pension. Mr. Laitsch is also entitled to a disability pension of 60% of the pension.
Board of Managers Members' Compensation
Managers are not entitled to any compensation for serving on our board of managers.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
NSP Holdings' compensation committee is comprised of Messrs. Peterson, Bloom and Blewitt. Mr. Peterson is our President and Chief Executive Officer. We have made certain loans to Mr. Peterson to allow Mr. Peterson to purchase equity in NSP Holdings. Mr. Peterson received payments of approximately $2.0 million in connection with the issuance of the notes offered in the offering as a result of distributions with respect to his preferred units and the distribution to be made to senior management. "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Payments to Holders of Preferred Units," and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Amendment of NSP Holdings' Limited Liability Company Agreement in Connection with the Issuance of the Notes."
Unit Appreciation Rights Plan
In order to provide additional financial incentives to our management, certain members of our management are eligible to participate in a Unit Appreciation Rights Plan, which became effective on January 1, 1997. Participation in the plan is open to certain key individuals selected by NSP Holdings' board of managers. A member of NSP Holdings' board of managers who participates in the plan may not vote on any question pertaining to himself or herself.
Once selected by our board of managers, an individual remains a participant in the plan until his or her employment is terminated. Following the end of each fiscal year, our board of managers may
79
recommend new participant allocations. A participant's appreciation rights in the plan vest over a period of four years, but are fully vested upon a sale or initial public offering of the Company, termination of the plan, or the participant's death or disability if such occurs while in the service of the Company.
Upon termination of service for cause, as defined in the plan, all of a participant's appreciation rights terminate, whether vested or un-vested. Upon a participant's termination of service other than for cause, the exit value of his or her appreciation rights are fixed on such date. Generally, payment with respect to appreciation rights is deferred until the participant's death, disability, or 65th birthday, at which time he or she is entitled to the lesser of the exit value or the market value of the appreciation rights. However, at any time following a participant's termination of service but before his or her death, disability, or 65th birthday, he or she may demand and receive payment for all vested appreciation rights exercisable based on their exit value. At any time following a participant's termination of service, we also have the option to pay the participant the exit value of all vested appreciation rights then exercisable.
Upon an initial public offering or a sale of the Company for cash, notes and/or publicly-traded securities, the appreciation rights will be redeemed. In the event of a merger in which we remain in control, the appreciation rights will remain in place subject to appropriate dilution. However, in the event of a sale or an initial public offering of the Company that is not for cash, notes and/or publicly-traded securities, we may choose to liquidate the appreciation rights for cash. Nothing contained in the plan obligates us to retain any plan participant as an employee or interferes with our right to discharge any participant at any time. Nor does the plan interfere with any participant's right to terminate at any time his or her employment or service relationship with the Company.
Equity Option Agreements
Robert A. Peterson. We entered into an option agreement, dated February 17, 2000, with Mr. Peterson pursuant to which Mr. Peterson was granted an option to purchase 156,820 Class C Common Units at an exercise price of $5.89 per unit. The option expires upon the earlier of (1) February 17, 2010 or (2) the occurrence of a liquidity event if the option is not exercised within twenty days of receiving notice of such liquidity event from us as required under the agreement.
David F. Myers, Jr. We entered into an option agreement, dated February 17, 2000, with Mr. Myers pursuant to which Mr. Myers was granted an option to purchase 98,797 Class C Common Units at an exercise price of $5.89 per unit. The option expires upon the earlier of (1) February 17, 2010 or (2) the occurrence of a liquidity event if the option is not exercised within twenty days of receiving notice of such liquidity event from us as required under the agreement.
William L. Grilliot and Mary I. Grilliot. We entered into an option agreement, dated as of July 31, 1998 and amended on September 30, 1998, with Mr. Grilliot and Ms. Grilliot pursuant to which the Grilliots have been granted an option to purchase a total of 21,124 Class A Common Units at an exercise price of $2.10 per unit and 21,124 preferred units at an exercise price of $3.90 per unit. The options expire on July 31, 2008.
Claude L. Roberge. We entered into an option agreement, dated February 17, 2000, with Mr. Roberge pursuant to which Mr. Roberge was granted an option to purchase 10,413.3 Class A Common Units at an exercise price of $5.89 per unit. The option expires upon the earlier of (1) December 31, 2009 or (2) the occurrence of a liquidity event if the option is not exercised within 20 days of receiving notice of such liquidity event from us as required under the agreement.
80
Class E Unit Purchase Agreements
Robert A. Peterson. We entered into a Class E Unit Purchase Agreement, dated April 16, 2004, with Mr. Peterson pursuant to which Mr. Peterson made a capital contribution to us in the amount of $514.29 in exchange for 514.2857 Class E Common Units. 12.50% of the Class E Common Units were immediately vested, and an additional 6.25% of the Class E Common Units vest at the end of each calendar quarter. The Class E Common Units vest upon the occurrence of a liquidity event and vest for an additional six calendar quarters if Mr. Peterson is terminated without cause. The Class E Common Units are forfeited completely if Mr. Peterson is terminated for cause or if Mr. Peterson breaches the noncompete and nonsolicitation provisions of our limited liability company agreement. In the event that Mr. Peterson's employment is terminated for any reason other than for cause, we will have the option to repurchase the Class E Common Units. The agreement also provides that, upon the occurrence of a liquidity event, if the aggregate consideration to be paid to Mr. Peterson in respect of his options and appreciation rights under the Unit Appreciation Rights Plan is less than $930,000 in the aggregate, we will pay Mr. Peterson the difference between $930,000 and the amount paid in respect of options and appreciation rights.
David F. Myers, Jr. We entered into a Class E Unit Purchase Agreement, dated April 16, 2004, with Mr. Myers pursuant to which Mr. Myers made a capital contribution to us in the amount of $342.86 in exchange for 342.8571 Class E Common Units. 12.50% of the Class E Common Units were immediately vested, and an additional 6.25% of the Class E Common Units vest at the end of each calendar quarter. The Class E Common Units vest upon the occurrence of a liquidity event and vest for an additional six calendar quarters if Mr. Myers is terminated without cause. The Class E Common Units are forfeited completely if Mr. Myers is terminated for cause or if Mr. Myers breaches the noncompete and nonsolicitation provisions of our limited liability company agreement. In the event that Mr. Myers' employment is terminated for any reason other than for cause, we will have the option to repurchase the Class E Common Units. The agreement also provides that, upon the occurrence of a liquidity event, if the aggregate consideration to be paid to Mr. Myers in respect of his options and appreciation rights under the Unit Appreciation Rights Plan is less than $570,000 in the aggregate, we will pay Mr. Myers the difference between $570,000 and the amount paid in respect of options and appreciation rights.
Charles S. Ellis, Kenneth R. Martell and William Grilliot. We entered into a Class E Unit Purchase Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, with each of Mr. Ellis, Mr. Martell and Mr. Gilliot pursuant to which each of these executives made a capital contribution to us in exchange for Class E Common Units. Mr. Ellis received 42.8571 Class E Common Units, Mr. Martell received 28.5714 Class E Common Units and Mr. Grilliot received 42.8571 Class E Common Units. 12.50% of the Class E Common Units were immediately vested, and an additional 6.25% of the Class E Common Units vest at the end of each calendar quarter. The Class E Common Units vest upon the occurrence of a liquidity event and vest for an additional six calendar quarters if the executive is terminated without cause. The Class E Common Units are forfeited completely if the executive is terminated for cause or if the executive breaches the noncompete and nonsolicitation provisions of our limited liability company agreement. In the event that the executive's employment is terminated for any reason other than for cause, we will have the option to repurchase the Class E Common Units.
81
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Payments to Holders of Preferred Units
We used approximately $60.0 million of the proceeds of the offering of the notes and the concurrent issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC to make payments in respect of our preferred units, approximately $58.0 million of which were payments in respect of accrued preferred yield and approximately $2.0 million of which were used to return a portion of the original capital contribution made by holders of our preferred units. The following table sets forth the payments made to certain of our directors, executive officers and holders of five percent or more of a class of our voting common units.
Name
| | Aggregate Payment
|
---|
Argosy | | $ | 3,778,190 |
CIBC | | | 12,080,314 |
Hancock Group | | | 23,890,478 |
CIVC | | | 8,789,493 |
Robert A. Peterson | | | 478,995 |
David F. Myers, Jr. | | | 292,903 |
William Grilliot | | | 104,009 |
The payment for each preferred unit consisted of the accrued preferred yield on the preferred unit and a portion of the original capital contribution made on the preferred unit that had not been previously returned to the holder. The preferred units were initially sold to the holders thereof at a price of $10.93 per unit.
Payment to CIVC
In connection with the issuance of the notes, we paid an advisory fee to CIVC in the amount of $240,000.
Purchase of Notes by CIVC and Related Registration Rights Agreement
CIVC purchased $8.0 million of notes concurrently with the offering at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof. In connection with such purchase, we entered into a registration rights agreement with CIVC relating to the $8.0 million of notes issued to CIVC.
Amendment of NSP Holdings' Limited Liability Company Agreement in Connection with the Issurance of the Notes
In connection with the issuance of the notes, the holders of our equity securities amended our limited liability company agreement to permit Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers to receive distributions in respect of their common units. In addition to the ratable payments made with respect to their preferred units as described above under "—Payments to Holders of Preferred Units," Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers received distributions in respect of their common units in the amount of $1,525,000 and $975,000, respectively. Our other holders of common units did not receive a ratable distribution in respect of their common units. The amounts distributed to Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers will reduce future distributions to them in respect of their common units, preferred units and Class E Common Units but will not reduce any other contractual rights to payment they may have, including under NSP Holdings' unit appreciation rights plan and unit option agreements.
Limited Liability Company Agreement
Our Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated February 26, 2004 provides that all aspects of the management and direction of the Company are the responsibility
82
of its managers. There may be between three and six managers. So long as the CIBC/Argosy Group, which includes Argosy, CIBC, CIBC WMV Inc., CIBC WMC Inc., CIBC Wood Gundy Ventures, Inc. and Co-Investment Merchant Fund 2, L.L.C., owns at least 15% of our outstanding common units, and so long as we have not completed an initial public offering, the CIBC/Argosy Group has the right to appoint three of our managers. So long as the Hancock Group owns at least 15% of our outstanding common units, and so long as we have not completed an initial public offering, the members holding a majority of the common units held by the Hancock Group have the right to appoint one of our managers. So long as CIVC shall own at least 13% of our outstanding common units, and so long as NSP Holdings has not completed an initial public offering, CIVC has the right to appoint one of our managers. Any remaining managers may be appointed by the holders of our Class A and Class C Common Units. Jay Bloom, Edward Levy and David F. Myers, Jr. are the managers appointed by the CIBC/Argosy Group. Stephen Blewitt is an appointee of the Hancock Group, and Marcus Wedner is an appointee of CIVC. In the event that Mr. Myers ceases to be a manager, his replacement shall be appointed by the CIBC/Argosy Group, subject to the approval of the members holding the majority of the common units held by the Hancock Group.
The limited liability company agreement authorizes us to issue Class A Common Units, Class B Common Units, Class C Common Units, Class D Common Units, Class E Common Units and preferred units. The managers may issue Class E Common Units to any employee of the Company, subject to the approval of Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers, in each case for so long as he is an officer of the Company; which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, that without the prior consent of the holders of the majority of the Class E Common Units, the managers may not issue more than 1,000 Class E Common Units.
Distributions on the Company's units have the following order of preference:
- 1.
- to the holders of the preferred units until they have received payment of the entire amount of the unpaid preferred yield;
- 2.
- to the holders of the preferred units until they have received a return of their original capital contribution with respect to the preferred units that, when combined with the amount paid pursuant to item 1 above, shall equal $125,000,000;
- 3.
- to (A) the holders of vested Class E Common Units in an amount equal to 7%, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the number of vested Class E Common Units and the denominator of which shall be 1,000 (the "Class E Multiple"), multiplied by the lesser of (x) the amount available for distribution under this item 3 and (y) the portion of the original capital contribution made by the preferred unit holders with respect to the preferred units that has not previously been returned, and (B) to the holders of the preferred units until the entire amount of their original capital contribution with respect to the preferred units has been returned;
- 4.
- to (A) the holders of the common units (other than the Class E Common Units) pro rata, and (B) to the holders of vested Class E Common Units in such an amount that the vested Class E Common Unit holders shall have received an amount equal to 7%, multiplied by the Class E Multiple, of the amount distributed under this item 4 to the non-Class E common unit holders.
The Class A Common Units and Class C Common Units are the only classes of our equity securities with voting rights.
Subject to certain exceptions, the holders of our equity securities have preemptive rights with regard to further issuances of our equity securities, which entitle them to participate pro rata in such issuances, based upon their ownership of our common units (other than Class E Common Units). Generally, each class of common units (other than Class E Common Units) is freely convertible into any other class of common units. However, members who are employees of the Company may not convert their Class C Common Units, and members who are subject to the Bank Holding Company Act
83
may only convert their units into a Class A Common Units and may do so only under certain limited circumstances, such as a change of control.
We are obligated under the terms of our limited liability company agreement to redeem all of our preferred units on September 30, 2013 or upon a change of control, if sooner, at a redemption price equal to the then unpaid preferred yield and the portion of the original capital contribution made on the preferred units that has not previously been returned. At our election, we may redeem the preferred units prior to September 30, 2013 in exchange for a note in the amount of the redemption price, due September 30, 2013, or upon a change of control, if sooner. This note will accrue interest daily and compound semiannually at a rate of 10% per year.
The limited liability company agreement generally prohibits the transfer of our equity securities by the holders of those securities other than in certain limited circumstances, such as pursuant to a public offering, a sale of the company, the withdrawal of a member, or the termination of the employment of a member who is an employee of the Company. In certain situations, the Company, followed by the Hancock Group and the CIBC/Argosy Group, followed in turn by the remaining members, shall have a right of refusal on the securities to be transferred.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the limited liability company agreement, members who are employees of the Company have agreed that, for a period of 24 months following the termination of his or her membership, he or she will not be an officer, director, agent, employee, consultant of, or have a greater than 5% equity interest in, a business that engages in the manufacturing and/or marketing of personal protection equipment. Such members have also agreed, for a like period of time, not to solicit any of our customers, partners, vendors or strategic alliance partners or to employ or solicit for employment any of our employees, consultants or independent contractors.
Issuance of Previous Senior Subordinated Notes and Warrants
In February 2000, Norcross Safety Products L.L.C., North Safety Products, Inc. and Morning Pride Manufacturing L.L.C. issued $95.0 million of previous senior subordinated notes, guaranteed by all of their domestic subsidiaries, primarily to replace existing indebtedness. John Hancock, a holder of approximately 39.6% of our voting equity interests, along with entities for which it acts as portfolio advisor, held $25.0 million of such notes. These notes bore interest at 13%, payable quarterly, would have matured on August 17, 2005 and rankedpari passu with our other subordinated indebtedness. We used the proceeds of the offering of 97/8% senior subordinated notes to repay these notes, plus accrued interest of $2.6 million and a prepayment premium of $2.9 million.
In conjunction with the February 2000 issuance of previous senior subordinated notes, we issued 405,352.40 warrants. Each warrant entitled the holder to receive, upon exercise of the warrant and payment of the $0.001 per warrant exercise price, one Class A Common Unit of NSP Holdings and 0.9495716 preferred units of NSP Holdings. These warrants were issued to the holders of the notes, including John Hancock and entities for which John Hancock acts as portfolio advisor, which were issued warrants to purchase 106,671.7 Class A Common Units and 101,283.8 preferred units. We repurchased the warrants in connection with the offering of 97/8% senior subordinated notes and John Hancock and entities for which John Hancock acts as portfolio advisor received $1.4 million in connection therewith.
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the February 2000 issuance of senior subordinated notes and warrants, we entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of our members, including John Hancock, Hancock Mezzanine Partners L.P., Argosy, CIVC, CIBC WMV Inc., Mr. Peterson, Mr. Myers and Mr. Grilliot. Under the terms of the agreement, the CIBC/Argosy Group and the Hancock Group have the right, subject to specified conditions, to require us, after we have made an initial public offering of our equity securities, to register any or all of their common units (or such securities that have been issued
84
with respect to their common units) under the Securities Act on Form S-1, a "long-form registration," or on Form S-2 or Form S-3, a "short-form registration." In case of either a long-form registration or short-form registration, registration shall be at our expense. We are not required, however, to effect any such registration during any lock-up period imposed by an underwriter in an underwritten public offering. All holders of registrable securities are entitled to request inclusion of such securities in any registration under the Securities Act, subject to customary exceptions and cut-backs.
In connection with all such registrations, we have agreed to indemnify all holders of registrable securities against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Certain members of our board of managers are affiliated with the Hancock Group, CIBC, Argosy and CIVC. See "—Limited Liability Company Agreement."
Repurchases of Preferred Units of NSP Holdings
We used a portion of the proceeds of the offering of 97/8% senior subordinated notes to repurchase preferred units from Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers, resulting in aggregate payments to Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers of $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Issuance of Junior Subordinated Notes to Finance KCL Acquisition
We partially financed our acquisition of KCL through the issuance of $5.1 million in aggregate principal amount of junior subordinated notes. These notes were issued to certain of our existing equityholders, including to John Hancock, Argosy, certain CIBC affiliates and CIVC, in an aggregrate principal amount of approximately $4.9 million. We repaid these junior subordinated notes with the proceeds of the offering of 97/8% senior subordinated notes.
Certain members of our board of managers are affiliated with the Hancock Group, CIBC, Argosy and CIVC. See "—Limited Liability Company Agreement."
Management Loans
In October 1998, in connection with the acquisition of North Safety Products, Ltd.; James North (Africa) Pty. Ltd.; Industrie-Schutz-Produkte GmbH; and Siebe North Holdings Corp., certain members of our management entered into nonrecourse promissory notes with us in order to raise the capital necessary to purchase our Class C Common Units. Members of management to whom such loans were made include Mr. Peterson ($617,698) and Mr. Myers ($379,446). As of December 31, 2004, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers owed $494,158 and $303,557, respectively, on these notes.
In February 2000, in connection with our acquisition of Arkon, certain members of our management entered into nonrecourse promissory notes with us in order to raise the capital necessary to purchase our Class A Common Units and preferred units. Members of management to whom such loans were made include Mr. Peterson ($556,671) and Mr. Myers ($345,142). As of December 31, 2004, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Myers owed $445,337 and $276,113, respectively, on these notes.
All of these notes are non-interest bearing and mature on the earlier of (1) December 31, 2016, (2) the sale of the Company, (3) the sale by the borrower of any of the units collateralizing the note, (4) the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, (5) a public offering by the Company of its units or warrants or (6) a default under the terms of the note. Prepayment of these loans must be made by the borrowers in the amount of 40% of any supplemental bonuses they receive and 100% of any distributions paid on, or proceeds from the sale of, the borrower's Class A Common Units. The October 1998 notes are collateralized by certain of the Class A Common Units of the borrowers and the February 2000 notes are collateralized by certain of the Class A Common Units and preferred units of the borrowers.
85
Seller Notes
Morning Pride Subordinated Seller Note. In connection with the acquisition of Morning Pride in August 1998, our wholly owned subsidiary, Morning Pride Manufacturing L.L.C. issued a $2.9 million subordinated seller note to William L. Grilliot, our President—Fire Service and the President of Morning Pride, and his wife Mary I. Grilliot, a Vice President of Morning Pride. The note is an unsecured subordinated promissory note guaranteed by Norcross. The note accrues interest at a rate equal to the prime rate plus 200 basis points and is payable quarterly in arrears. Principal is payable in 20 consecutive quarterly payments of $146,200 commencing October 1, 2000. All unpaid principal and accrued but unpaid interest is due July 1, 2005. The note may be prepaid at any time without penalty and the payees may demand prepayment of the note in the event of a change of control. The note rankspari passu with Norcross's other subordinated indebtedness.
Arkon Subordinated Seller Note. In connection with the acquisition of Arkon in February 2000, we issued a C$5.5 million subordinated seller note. Claude L. Roberge, our President—Canada and European General Industrial, controls an entity that had a 26.0% interest in this note. The note bore interest at the Canadian prime rate, with interest payable quarterly. The note was repaid in September 2004. This note was an unsecured obligation that rankedpari passu with existing and future subordinated indebtedness of NSP Holdings. Payments servicing this debt were made from Norcross to NSP Holdings subject to compliance with covenants within our senior credit facility.
Family Relationships
William L. Grilliot, our President—Fire Service, is the husband of Mary I. Grilliot, the Vice President of our Morning Pride Manufacturing L.L.C. Mrs. Grilliot was paid an aggregate salary and bonus of $247,885 for her services during the year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, Mrs. Grilliot received $104,009 from the payment in respect of her preferred units in connection with the issuance of the notes.
Equity Contributions
Arkon Acquisition. In February 2000, we acquired the stock of Arkon for $35.9 million. Our equityholders invested $19.8 million of additional equity to partially fund this acquisition. Of this additional equity, the following of our officers and directors and our principal equityholders purchased the number of both Class A Common Units and preferred units indicated at a price of $5.86 and $10.93 per unit, respectively: Mr. Peterson—33,101; Mr. Myers—20,523; Mr. Grilliot—4,359 (including 2,179 units acquired by his wife, Mary I. Grilliot); Argosy—29,548; John Hancock—451,667 (including 168,146 units acquired by Hancock Mezzanine Partners L.P.); CIBC—257,179 (including 257,179 units acquired by CIBC WMV Inc.); and CIVC—168,146.
Arbin Acquisition. In December 2002, we acquired the stock of Arbin for E6.3 million. Our equityholders invested $3.0 million of additional equity to partially fund this acquisition. Of this additional equity, the following of our officers and directors and principal equityholders purchased the number of Class A Common Units and preferred units indicated at a price of $5.86 and $10.93 per unit, respectively: Mr. Peterson—4,984 Class A Common Units and 2,846 preferred units; Mr. Myers—3,090 Class A Common Units and 1,742 preferred units; Mr. Grilliot—609 Class A Common Units and 623 preferred units (including 304 Class A Common Units and 311 preferred units acquired by his wife, Mary I. Grilliot); Argosy—10,618 Class A Common Units and 10,867 preferred units; John Hancock—101,099 Class A Common Units and 103,466 preferred units; and CIBC—47,013 Class A Common Units and 48,113 preferred units (including 4,701 Class A Common Units and 4,811 preferred units acquired by Co-Investment Merchant Fund 2, L.L.C. and 42,312 Class A Common Units and 43,302 preferred units acquired by CIBC WMV Inc.).
Certain members of our board of managers are affiliated with the Hancock Group, CIBC, Argosy and CIVC. See "—Limited Liability Company Agreement."
86
Real Property Leases
Morning Pride Manufacturing L.L.C. leases a facility in Dayton, Ohio from American Firefighters Cooperative, Inc., a corporation controlled by William L. Grilliot, our President—Fire Service. The initial term of the lease ended on February 28, 2005 and was extended through April 30, 2009. The base rent is $347,816 per year, payable in monthly installments. In addition, we must also pay American Firefighters Cooperative, Inc. the actual amount of all real estate taxes, and all general and special assessments of every kind, as additional rent during the term of the lease. The annual rent paid in each of 2004, 2003, and 2002 was $341,834, $354,834 and $366,320, respectively.
If the lease expires or is terminated at any time prior to July 1, 2010, we must reimburse American Firefighters Cooperative, Inc. an amount equal to the number of months remaining in the rental term multiplied by $1,206.
CIBC
CIBC owns 20.6% of our Class A Common Units and has 20% of the voting power. See "Principal Equityholders." Three of our six managers, David F. Myers, Jr., Jay R. Bloom and Edward Levy, were appointed by the CIBC/Argosy Group. Jay R. Bloom is an employee of CIBC World Markets Corp., a subsidiary of CIBC. Edward Levy, until December 31, 2004, was also an employee of CIBC World Markets Corp. CIBC World Markets Corp. was an initial purchaser of the 97/8% senior subordinated notes and received $2.1 million in underwriting fees and had its expenses paid by us. CIBC is a lender under the senior credit facility, under which CIBC has received approximately $2.4 million in fees to date since the closing of the facility in March 2003.
On October 4, 2004, we entered into the Third Amendment our Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Third Amendment (1) reduced the interest rate by 1% on all existing term loans provided under the credit agreement, (2) increased the limit on acquisitions we are permitted to make under the credit agreement from $75 million to $100 million and eliminates the per acquisition limitation and (3) provides that in the event that we further reduce the interest rate on our existing term loans under the credit agreement during the next year (other than pursuant to a refinancing or an amendment and restatement of the credit agreement or the incurrence of additional term loans at a lower rate pursuant to new commitments as currently provided in the credit agreement), we (i) will pay to the holders of our term loans a 1% fee to such term loan lenders who consent to the reduction in interest rate and (ii) may replace non-consenting lenders with consenting lenders so long as the non-consenting lenders are paid 101% of the amount outstanding under a term loan to such lender that does not consent to the interest rate reduction and is subsequently replaced as a term loan lender of the registrant during the year following the effective date of the Third Amendment. We paid a fee of $200,000 to CIBC for arranging the Third Amendment.
On December 29, 2004, we entered into the Fourth Amendment of the credit agreement. The Fourth Amendment (1) permitted our parent company, NSP Holdings, together with its wholly owned subsidiary, NSP Holdings Capital Corp. to issue their 11.75% senior pay in kind notes and (2) increased the amount of cash expenses permitted to be paid to NSP Holdings by its subsidiaries from $600,000 to $1,000,000. We paid a fee of $8,225 to CIBC for consenting to the Fourth Amendment.
87
PRINCIPAL EQUITYHOLDERS
Our authorized equity capital consists of five classes of common units, designated as Class A Common Units, Class B Common Units, Class C Common Units, Class D Common Units and Class E Common Units, and one class of preferred units. As of December 31, 2004, we had the following units issued and outstanding (in each case, rounded to the nearest unit): 7,265,805 Class A Common Units, zero Class B Common Units, 184,523 Class C Common Units, 212,018 Class D Common Units, 986 Class E Common Units and 7,381,922 preferred units. Our preferred units and Class E Common Units have a preference on distributions as discussed in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Limited Liability Company Agreement." The Class A Common Units and Class C Common Units are the only classes of units entitled to vote on matters submitted to a vote of the members. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, the Class A Common Units and Class C Common Units vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a vote of the members, including the election of members of the board of managers.
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the equity ownership of the Company as of December 31, 2004 by: (1) each person or entity known by us to beneficially own five percent or more of a class of our voting common units, (2) each of the Named Executive Officers and all members of our board of managers and (3) all members of our board of managers and our executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise stated, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities beneficially owned by it or him as set forth opposite its or his name. Beneficial ownership of the common units listed in the table has been determined in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
Directors, Officers, and Principal Equityholders
| | Class
| | Number of Units
| | Percent of Class
| | Percent of Voting Power(1)
| |
---|
Principal Equityholders | | | | | | | | | |
Hancock Group 200 Clarendon Street Boston, MA 02117 | | Class A | | 2,948,677 | (2) | 40.6 | % | 39.6 | % |
CIBC 425 Lexington Ave, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10017 | | Class A | | 1,493,453 | (3) | 20.6 | | 20.0 | |
CIVC 234 S. LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60697 | | Class A | | 1,060,091 | | 14.6 | | 14.2 | |
Argosy 425 Lexington Ave., 3rd Floor New York, NY 10017 | | Class A | | 452,281 | | 6.2 | | 6.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
88
Directors and Officers(4) | | | | | | | | | |
Robert A. Peterson | | Class A Class C Class E | | 121,412 249,082 514 | (5)
| 1.7 73.0 52.1 | | 4.9 | |
David F. Myers, Jr. | | Class A Class C Class E | | 74,356 156,922 343 |
(6)
| 1.0 55.4 34.8 | | 3.1 | |
Charles S. Ellis | | Class E | | 43 | | 4.4 | | | |
Claude L. Roberge | | Class A | | 10,413 | (7) | 0.1 | | 0.1 | |
Stephen J. Blewitt | | Class A | | 2,948,677 | (2) | 40.6 | | 39.6 | |
Jay R. Bloom | | Class A | | 808,618 | (8) | 11.1 | | 10.9 | |
Edward Levy | | Class A | | 575,908 | (9) | 7.9 | | 7.7 | |
Marcus D. Wedner | | Class A | | 1,060,091 | (10) | 14.6 | | 14.2 | |
All directors and officers as a group (10 persons) | | Class A Class C Class��E | | 5,194,410 406,004 971 | (11) (12)
| 71.2 92.2 98.4 | | 72.4 | |
- (1)
- Includes voting power with respect to Class A Common Units and Class C Common Units on a combined basis.
- (2)
- Includes 1,888,586 Class A Common Units held of record by John Hancock and 1,060,091 Class A Common Units held of record by Hancock Mezzanine Partners L.P. Mr. Blewitt is a Senior Managing Director of John Hancock, and as such may be deemed to beneficially own the units held by these entities. Mr. Blewitt disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities in which he does not have a pecuniary interest.
- (3)
- Includes 1,112,646 Class A Common Units held of record by CIBC WG Argosy Merchant Fund 1, LP, 257,179 Class A Common Units held of record by CIBC WMV Inc. and 123,628 Class A Common Units held of record by CIBC Co-Investment Merchant Fund 2, L.L.C.
- (4)
- The address of each director and officer is c/o Norcross Safety Products L.L.C., 2211 York Road, Suite 215, Oak Brook, IL 60521.
- (5)
- Includes options to acquire 156,820 Class C Common Units.
- (6)
- Includes options to acquire 98,797 Class C Common Units.
- (7)
- Includes options to acquire 10,413 Class A Common Units.
- (8)
- Mr. Bloom may be deemed to beneficially own all 452,281 Class A Common Units owned of record by Argosy; all 297,315 Class A Common Units owned of record by Caravelle Private Investment Corporation; and all 59,022 Class A Common Units owned of record by Caravelle Norcross Investment Corporation. Mr. Bloom disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities in which he does not have a pecuniary interest.
- (9)
- Mr. Levy may be deemed to beneficially own all 452,281 Class A Common Units held of record by Argosy and all 123,627 Class A Common Units held of record by CIBC Co-Investment Merchant Fund 2, L.L.C. Mr. Levy disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities in which he does not have a pecuniary interest.
- (10)
- Mr. Wedner is a Partner of CIVC Partners, LLC, the general partner of CIVC. Mr. Wedner may be deemed to beneficially own all units owned by CIVC. Mr. Wedner disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities in which he does not have a pecuniary interest.
- (11)
- Includes options to acquire 31,537 Class A Common Units.
- (12)
- Includes options to acquire 255,617 Class C Common Units.
89
DESCRIPTION OF OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Senior Credit Facility
General. In March 2003, Norcross, North Safety Products Inc. and Morning Pride Manufacturing L.L.C. (collectively, the "U.S. Borrowers") and North Safety Products Ltd. (the "Canadian Borrower" and collectively with the U.S. Borrowers, the "Borrowers") entered into a senior credit facility with CIBC, Fleet National Bank and other lenders. The senior credit facility provides for aggregate borrowings by the Borrowers of $160.0 million and C$10.0 million, consisting of (1) a $30.0 million United States revolving credit facility; (2) a C$10.0 million Canadian revolving credit facility; and (3) a $130.0 million term loan. We used the proceeds of this senior credit facility to refinance existing senior indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital, refinancings, acquisitions, investments and capital expenditures.
Interest Rates. Borrowings under the United States revolver and the term loan bear interest at a rate per annum equal to our choice of (a) an alternate base rate (which is equal to the higher of (i) the rate of interest publicly announced by Fleet National Bank as its prime rate in effect and (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%), plus an applicable margin, or (b) the Eurodollar rate (as defined in the senior credit facility), plus an applicable margin.
Borrowings under the Canadian revolver bear interest at a rate per annum equal to our choice of (a) the Canadian prime rate (which is the higher of (i) the rate of interest publicly announced by CIBC as its prime rate in effect and (ii) the CDOR rate plus 0.50%) plus an applicable margin, or (b) the applicable CDOR rate for bankers' acceptances, plus an applicable margin.
The applicable margins with respect to the revolvers are (a) 2.50% in the case of alternate base rate loans and Canadian prime rate loans and (b) 3.50% in the case of Eurodollar rate loans and bankers' acceptance rate loans. With respect to the term loan, the applicable margin is (a) 1.75% in the case of alternate base rate loans and (b) 2.75% in the case of Eurodollar rate loans. The margins applicable to the revolvers adjust on a sliding scale based on the total leverage ratio of Norcross and its subsidiaries. The weighted average interest rate under our senior credit facility was 4.92% at December 31, 2004.
Security and Guarantees. All of the United States Borrowers' obligations under the senior credit facility are secured by a pledge of all of Norcross's equity securities and the equity securities of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, substantially all of its tangible and intangible assets and 65% of the equity securities of, or equity interest in, certain of its foreign subsidiaries. All of the obligations under the senior credit facility are guaranteed by NSP Holdings and all of Norcross's present and future domestic subsidiaries, and all of the Canadian Borrower's obligations under the senior credit facility are guaranteed by all of our present and future Canadian subsidiaries.
The senior credit facility contains certain customary covenants, including:
- •
- affirmative covenants requiring Norcross to provide certain financial statements to its lenders and to pay its material obligations when due, maintain its legal existence, keep its material properties in good working order and condition, provide certain notices to its lenders, comply in all material respects with environmental laws and maintain at all times ratings for its senior credit facilities;
- •
- restrictive covenants, including limitations on other indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, asset sales, restricted payments, capital expenditures, investments, prepayments, transactions with affiliates, sales and leasebacks, negative pledges, and leases and other matters customarily restricted in loan agreements; and
90
- •
- financial covenants requiring Norcross to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of EBITDA less capital expenditures over fixed charges for the period, a minimum interest coverage ratio of EBITDA over interest expense for the period, a maximum senior leverage ratio of senior debt over EBITDA for the period, and a maximum total leverage ratio of total debt over EBITDA for the period. The thresholds for these financial ratios are adjusted periodically. Through the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, it was required to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 5.25x, through the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2005, it is required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.10x and, through the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2005, it is required to maintain a maximum senior leverage ratio of 2.25x and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.15x. Through the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2006, it is required to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.00x.
The senior credit facility was amended on July 24, 2003 to facilitate the acquisition of KCL, the issuance of the 97/8% senior subordinated notes and the uses of proceeds of the offering of 97/8% senior subordinated notes. The total leverage ratio was amended to permit increased leverage and the senior leverage ratio was amended to lower the permitted ratio. In addition, the amendments increased the amount of indebtedness permitted to be owed by a foreign subsidiary to Norcross or a domestic guarantor from $10.0 million to $15.0 million; permitted any subsidiary of KCL to pay pro rata dividends to shareholders; permitted Norcross to acquire KCL and permitted it to make investments equal to the investments in any joint venture in existence on the date of the KCL acquisition; and increased the amount of the baskets for future permitted acquisitions from $50.0 million to $75.0 million in aggregate and from $20.0 million to $35.0 million with respect to any individual acquisition.
The senior credit agreement was amended on September 29, 2003 to reduce the interest rate by 0.5% on all existing term loans provided under the senior credit facility.
The senior credit facility was amended on October 4, 2004. The third amendment (1) reduced the interest rate by 1% on all existing term loans provided under the senior credit facility, (2) increased the limit on acquisitions Norcross is permitted to make under the senior credit agreement from $75.0 million to $100.0 million and eliminated the per acquisition limitation and (3) provided that in the event that Norcross further reduces the interest rate on its existing term loans under the senior credit facility during the next year (other than pursuant to a refinancing or an amendment and restatement of the senior credit facility or the incurrence of additional term loans at a lower rate pursuant to new commitments as currently provided in the senior credit facility), it (1) will pay to the holders of its term loans a 1.0% fee to such term loan lenders who consent to the reduction in interest rate and (2) may replace non-consenting lenders with consenting lenders under certain circumstances.
In connection with the issuance of the notes, Norcross entered into a fourth amendment to the senior credit facility. The fourth amendment permits the issuance of the notes by NSP Holdings and increases the amount of cash expenses permitted to be paid to NSP Holdings by its subsidiaries from $600,000 to $1,000,000. Norcross paid its lenders 0.10% a fee for consenting to the fourth amendment.
Events of Default. Norcross's senior credit facility contains customary events of default, including, but not limited to, failure to pay interest, principal or fees when due, any material inaccuracy of any representation or warranty, failure to comply with covenants, material cross default, insolvency, bankruptcy events, material judgments, ERISA events, change of control, change in nature of business, failure to maintain first priority perfected security interest, invalidity of guarantee, and loss of subordination. Certain of the defaults are subject to exceptions, materiality qualifiers and baskets.
Maturity. Prior to the maturity date, revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed without penalty or premium. The revolvers are available until March 20, 2008. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments of $1.3 million commencing June 30, 2003, with the remainder due on March 20, 2009.
91
Commitment Fees. Norcross will pay a commitment fee to the lenders, which is calculated at a rate per annum based on a percentage of the difference between committed amounts and amounts actually borrowed under the revolving credit facilities. The commitment fee will be 0.75% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears. If the drawn amount of either revolver is greater than 50.0% of the respective commitment, the commitment fee will be reduced to 0.50% per annum. The commitment fees are subject to adjustment based upon Norcross's total leverage ratio.
Voluntary and Mandatory Prepayments. Voluntary prepayments of amounts outstanding under the senior credit facility are permitted at any time, without premium or penalty. However, if prepayment is made with respect to a Eurodollar rate loan and the prepayment is made on a date other than an interest payment date, Norcross must pay a fee to compensate the lenders for losses incurred as a result of the prepayment.
Norcross is required to prepay amounts outstanding under the senior credit facility in an amount equal to:
- •
- 100% of the net proceeds from certain asset sales by it, subject to certain reinvestment provisions and limited exceptions or from the payment of any insurance claim with respect to any of its assets;
- •
- up to 75% of excess cash flow, as defined in the senior credit facility;
- •
- 100% of the net proceeds from the issuance of any equity or debt by it, subject to certain exceptions; and
- •
- 100% of insurance proceeds, subject to reinvestment provisions.
Included in the current maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2004 is a $12.2 million excess cash flow sweep payment on the term loan calculated in accordance with the terms of the senior credit facility.
Increase in Facilities. At Norcross's and the administrative agent's mutual discretion, Norcross may request on not more than two occasions prior to March 20, 2005 that the principal amount of borrowings under its senior credit facility be increased in an amount not to exceed $50.0 million in the aggregate, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions contained in its senior credit facility and the willingness of its lenders (or any new lenders) to make such loans.
97/8% Senior Subordinated Notes
Norcross and Norcross Capital Corp. ("Norcross Capital") issued the 97/8% senior subordinated notes under an indenture dated August 13, 2003. The terms of these 97/8% senior subordinated notes are as follows:
- •
- Principal Amount—$152,500,000 ($151,600,000 net of $900,000 original issue discount).
- •
- Maturity—August 15, 2011.
- •
- Interest Rate—97/8%.
- •
- Interest Payments—Every six months on February 15 and August 15.
- •
- Optional Redemption—the 97/8% senior subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity at our option at any time on or after August 15, 2007, at a premium declining to par in 2010.
- •
- Offer to Purchase—Upon a change of control, we are required to make an offer to purchase the 97/8% senior subordinated notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount. We may also be required to make an offer to purchase the 97/8% senior subordinated notes if we sell
92
Guarantees. Norcross's and Norcross Capital's obligations under the 97/8% senior subordinated notes are guaranteed by all of the domestic subsidiaries of Norcross.
Covenants. The indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of Norcross and Norcross Capital to:
- •
- make investments and other restricted payments,
- •
- incur additional debt,
- •
- issue preferred stock of their subsidiaries,
- •
- enter into transactions with affiliates,
- •
- create liens,
- •
- sell assets or assets of their subsidiaries or
- •
- enter into mergers and consolidations.
Restrictions on Dividends, Distributions or other Payments to NSP Holdings. Defined terms used below have meanings substantially identical to the terms used in the Description of the Notes in this prospectus.
The indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes contains covenants that will restrict the ability of NSP Holdings' subsidiaries to make dividend distributions or other payments to NSP Holdings.
Norcross will not make, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, make, any Restricted Payment, unless:
- (a)
- no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of or immediately after giving effect to such Restricted Payment;
- (b)
- immediately before, and after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, Norcross could incur $1.00 of additional Indebtedness under the Coverage Ratio Exception; and
- (c)
- immediately after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, the aggregate of all Restricted Payments declared or made after the Issue Date (excluding payments made pursuant to clauses (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (l) and (n) of the next paragraph and 50% of the payments made pursuant to clause (j) of the next paragraph) does not exceed the sum of:
- (i)
- 50% of the Consolidated Net Income accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period) from March 31, 2003 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter prior to the date of such Restricted Payment (or, in case such Consolidated Net Income shall be a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), plus
- (ii)
- 100% of the aggregate Net Proceeds and the fair market value of securities or other property received by Norcross from the issue or sale, after the Issue Date, of Capital
93
Stock of Norcross (other than Disqualified Capital Stock or Capital Stock of Norcross issued to any Subsidiary of Norcross) or any Indebtedness or other securities of Norcross that have been converted or exercised or exchanged for Capital Stock of Norcross (other than Disqualified Capital Stock), plus
- (iii)
- without duplication of any amounts included in clause (ii) above, 100% of the aggregate net proceeds of any equity contribution received by Norcross from a holder of Norcross's Capital Stock (excluding, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), any net cash proceeds from a Equity Offering to the extent used to redeem the notes in compliance with the provisions set forth in "Section 7(b)—Optional Redemption upon Equity Offerings" of the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes), plus
- (iv)
- to the extent not included in the calculation of Consolidated Net Income referred to in subclause (i) above, an amount equal to, without duplication:
- (1)
- 100% of the cash return of capital with respect to any Investment received by Norcross or any Restricted Subsidiary upon the sale or other disposition of any Investment (other than a Permitted Investment) made by Norcross or any Restricted Subsidiary since the Issue Date, plus
- (2)
- the net reduction in Investments (other than Permitted Investments) in any Person resulting from dividends, repayments of loans or advances or other transfers of assets subsequent to the Issue Date, in each case to Norcross or any Restricted Subsidiary from such Person, plus
- (3)
- the portion (proportionate to Norcross's equity interest in such Subsidiary) of the cash return of capital in respect of the net assets of such Unrestricted Subsidiary at the time such Unrestricted Subsidiary is designated, or liquidated or merged into, a Restricted Subsidiary,
provided, however, that the sum of clauses (1), (2) and (3) above shall not exceed the aggregate amount of all such Investments made subsequent to the Issue Date.
For purposes of determining under this clause (c) the amount expended for Restricted Payments, cash distributed shall be valued at the face amount thereof and property other than cash shall be valued at its fair market value determined, in good faith, by the Board of Managers of Norcross.
As of December 31, 2004, the amount that would have been available for Restricted Payments pursuant to this clause (c) would have been $18.5 million.
The provisions of this covenant shall not prohibit:
- (a)
- the payment of any dividend or other distribution within 60 days after the date of declaration thereof, if at such date of declaration such dividend or other distribution would comply with the provisions of the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes,
- (b)
- the repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement of any shares of Capital Stock of Norcross or subordinated Indebtedness by conversion into, or by or in exchange for, shares of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock), or out of the Net Proceeds of a capital contribution or sale (other than to a Subsidiary of Norcross) of other shares of Capital Stock of Norcross within 30 days (other than Disqualified Capital Stock),
- (c)
- the redemption or retirement of Indebtedness of Norcross subordinated in right of payment to the notes in exchange for, by conversion into or out of the Net Proceeds of an incurrence of Indebtedness (other than any Indebtedness owed to a Subsidiary) of Norcross within 30 days that is contractually subordinate in right of payment to the notes to at least the same extent as the subordinated Indebtedness being redeemed or retired,
94
- (d)
- the retirement of any shares of Disqualified Capital Stock by conversion into, or by exchange for, shares of Disqualified Capital Stock, or out of the Net Proceeds of a sale (other than to a Subsidiary of Norcross) of other shares of Disqualified Capital Stock within 30 days,
- (e)
- so long as no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, at the time of or immediately after giving effect to such payment, the purchase, redemption or other acquisition for value (or any dividend or distribution made by Norcross to Norcross's direct or indirect parent to fund such purchase, redemption or acquisition) of shares of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock) or options on such shares of Capital Stock of Norcross or Norcross's direct or indirect parent held by officers or employees or former officers or employees (or their estates or beneficiaries under their estates) of Norcross or NSP Holdings or any of their respective Subsidiaries upon the death, disability, retirement or termination of employment of such current or former officers or employees;provided, that the aggregate cash consideration paid, or distributions or payments made, for all such repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests shall not exceed in any calendar year $2.0 million (with unused amounts in any calendar year being carried over to succeeding calendar years (without giving effect to the following proviso)) or $7.5 million in the aggregate from and after the Issue Date;provided, further that such amount in any calendar year may be increased by (i) the amount of the cash proceeds from the sale of Capital Stock of Norcross or its direct or indirect parent (to the extent the proceeds are contributed to the capital of Norcross, its direct or indirect parent) to members of management, directors, employees or consultants of Norcross and its Subsidiaries that occurs after the Issue Date and (ii) the cash proceeds of any "key man" life insurance policies used to make such repurchases,
- (f)
- the defeasance, redemption, repurchase or other acquisition of subordinated Indebtedness of Norcross or any Restricted Subsidiary with the net cash proceeds from an incurrence of Refinancing Indebtedness,
- (g)
- repurchases of Capital Stock deemed to occur upon the cashless exercise of stock options and warrants,
- (h)
- the payment of dividends, other distributions, loans, advances or other amounts by Norcross to its direct or indirect parent to pay corporate overhead (including salaries and other compensation of employees) incurred in the ordinary course of business, up to an aggregate under this clause (h) of $1.0 million per fiscal year plus any bona fide indemnification claims made by directors or officers of NSP Holdings,
- (i)
- the declaration and payment of dividends to NSP Holdings, or the making of loans in amounts required for such party to pay:
- (i)
- franchise taxes and other fees, taxes and expenses required to maintain its corporate existence, and
- (ii)
- federal, state and local income taxes, to the extent such income taxes are attributable to the income of NSP Holdings;provided, however, that in each case the amount of such payments in any fiscal year does not exceed the amount that NSP Holdings would be required to pay in respect of federal, state and local taxes for such fiscal period were NSP Holdings to pay such taxes as a stand alone taxpayer,
- (j)
- distributions by Norcross to NSP Holdings the proceeds of which are used by NSP Holdings to make Permitted Tax Distributions,
- (k)
- dividends by Norcross to NSP Holdings;provided, that (i) the proceeds thereof are used to make payments required under the Management Side Letter Agreements, (ii) each such officer shall, immediately following his receipt thereof, utilize the portion of such payment
95
remaining after deducting therefrom the maximum amount of Federal, state and local income taxes that he would be required to pay with respect to such payment to repay to NSP Holdings the principal amount of the Management Notes and (iii) NSP Holdings shall, immediately following its receipt of the payments referred to in clause (ii) above, contribute the entire amount thereof to the capital of Norcross,
- (l)
- so long as no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing or would result therefrom, Norcross may pay dividends to NSP Holdings in amounts sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the Arkon Note and on up to $25.0 million of senior unsecured notes that may be issued by NSP Holdings, without subsidiary guarantees, with an interest rate not to exceed 12.5% per annum, payable-in-kind from their date of issuance until the five year anniversary of such date (each as in effect on the date of issuance thereof without giving effect to any amendments or other modifications thereto) when and as (and only when and as) the same becomes due and payable,
- (m)
- payments to enable Norcross or NSP Holdings to make payments to holders of their Capital Stock in lieu of fractional shares of their Capital Stock,
- (n)
- dividends by Norcross to NSP Holdings to permit the consummation of certain transactions, including (i) the repurchase of warrants to purchase NSP Holdings equity outstanding on the Issue Date, (ii) the repurchase of the Preferred Stock of NSP Holdings from management and/or payment of bonuses to management in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,550,000, and (iii) the repayment of the $5.0 million of subordinated notes incurred in connection with the acquisition of KCL, plus accrued interest, and the repayment by Norcross of its 13% senior subordinated notes due August 17, 2005, plus accrued interest and prepayment penalties,
- (o)
- the declaration and payment of dividends to holders of any class or series of Preferred Stock issued in compliance with the "Section 4.19—Limitation on Preferred Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries" of the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes,
- (p)
- dividends by Norcross to NSP Holdings to permit NSP Holdings to pay principal or interest owing in respect of any Indebtedness incurred by NSP Holdings following the Issue Date to finance the acquisition of assets of another Person (whether through the direct purchase of assets or the Capital Stock of any Person owning such assets) used or useful in businesses similar or ancillary to the business of Norcross and contributed to Norcross or a Wholly-Owned Restricted Subsidiary ("Holdco Seller Notes");provided, that at the time of the issuance of such Holdco Seller Notes Norcross could have incurred (i) Indebtedness with the same terms as the Holdco Seller Notes and (ii) at least a $1.00 of additional Indebtedness under the Coverage Ratio Exception assuming that Norcross had incurred such Indebtedness instead of NSP Holdings, and
- (q)
- so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5.0 million since the date of the indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes.
Events of Default. The indenture governing the 97/8% senior subordinated notes contain customary events of default with respect to Norcross and each of its subsidiaries.
Other Debt Obligations
Morning Pride Subordinated Seller Note. In connection with the acquisition of Morning Pride in August 1998, our wholly owned subsidiary, Morning Pride Manufacturing L.L.C. issued a $2.9 million subordinated seller note to William L. Grilliot, our President—Fire Service and the President of Morning Pride, and his wife Mary I. Grilliot, a Vice President of Morning Pride. The note is an
96
unsecured subordinated promissory note guaranteed by Norcross. The note accrues interest at a rate equal to the prime rate plus 200 basis points and is payable quarterly in arrears. Principal is payable in 20 consecutive quarterly payments of $146,200 commencing October 1, 2000. All unpaid principal and accrued but unpaid interest is due July 1, 2005. The note may be prepaid at any time without penalty and the payees may demand prepayment of the note in the event of a change of control. The note rankspari passu with Norcross's other subordinated indebtedness. As of December 31, 2004, there was $0.4 million outstanding under this note.
Muck Boot Subordinated Seller Note. In connection with the acquisition of Muck Boot in January 2002, Norcross issued a $2.0 million Muck Boot subordinated seller note. This note accrues interest at the published prime rate and all principal and accrued interest are due at maturity in January 2007. The note rankspari passu with Norcross's existing and future subordinated indebtedness. As of December 31, 2004 there was $2.0 million outstanding under this note. In addition, there was accrued interest of $0.3 million outstanding under this note.
Arbin Seller Notes. In connection with the acquisition of Arbin in December 2002, we issued three separate seller notes totaling E2.5 million. There is a E1.5 million unsecured subordinated note issued by North Safety Products Ltd. ("North Canada"), which rankspari passu with Norcross's existing and future subordinated indebtedness. There is a E0.6 million note issued by North Safety Products Europe B.V. ("North Europe"), which is secured by certain European fixed assets of North Europe. The third note, in the amount of E0.4 million, also was issued by North Europe and is secured by accounts receivable of North Europe. Each note carries an annual interest rate of 5.5%, and the principal is payable in three equal annual installments starting in 2003. As of December 31, 2004, there was an aggregate amount outstanding of E0.8 million on these notes.
European Debt. In connection the acquisition of KCL in July 2003, Norcross assumed term loans of approximately E1.8 million. As of December 31, 2004, there was approximately E0.3 million outstanding on these term loans. Additionally, revolving credit facilities of KCL and North Safety Products Europe B.V. permit borrowings of up to E3.1 million.
97
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES
You can find definitions of certain terms used in the following summary under "—Certain Definitions" and throughout this description. For purposes of this "Description of the Notes," the term "we" or the "Company" means NSP Holdings L.L.C. and not any of its Subsidiaries, and "NSPH Capital" means NSP Holdings Capital Corp. and, together with the Company, the "Issuers." "Norcross" means Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. and "Norcross Operating Companies" means Norcross and its Subsidiaries. Unless otherwise required by the context, references in this description to the "notes" include the notes issued to the initial purchaser in a private transaction that was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Notes, which have been registered under the Securities Act.
We and NSPH Capital issued the notes under an indenture (the "Indenture"), dated as of January 7, 2005, among the Issuers and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee"). The following is a summary of the material terms and provisions of the notes. It does not include all of the provisions of the Indenture. We urge you to read the Indenture because it defines your rights. The terms of the notes include those stated in the Indenture and those made part of the Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, as in effect on the date of the Indenture. A copy of the Indenture may be obtained from the Issuers by any Holder or prospective investor upon request.
Brief Description of the Notes
The notes:
- •
- are general unsecured obligations of the Company and NSPH Capital, on a joint and several basis;
- •
- are senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated Indebtedness of the Issuers;
- •
- arepari passu in right of payment to all existing and future senior Indebtedness of the Company;
- •
- are effectively subordinated to all existing and future secured obligations of the Company, including the Company's senior secured guarantee of the Senior Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations; and
- •
- are structurally subordinated to all existing and future obligations (including trade payables) of the Norcross Operating Companies.
All of our Subsidiaries are currently "Restricted Subsidiaries." However, under the circumstances described below in the definition of "Unrestricted Subsidiary," we are permitted to designate certain of our Subsidiaries as "Unrestricted Subsidiaries." Unrestricted Subsidiaries will not be subject to many of the restrictive covenants in the Indenture.
The registered Holder of a note is treated as the owner of it for all purposes. Only registered Holders have rights under the Indenture and the registration rights agreement.
Any notes that remain outstanding after completion of the exchange offer, together with the Exchange Notes (as defined in the Indenture) issued in the exchange offer, will be treated as a single class for all purposes under the Indenture, including waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase.
Ranking; Holding Company Structure
The Indebtedness evidenced by the notes is unsecured and rankspari passu in right of payment to the senior Indebtedness of the Issuers. The Indenture permits us to incur additional senior
98
Indebtedness. The Company and its Subsidiaries may incur other Indebtedness in the future, including secured Indebtedness.
The Company is a holding company with limited assets and operates its business through its Subsidiaries. Any right of the Company and its creditors, including Holders, to participate in the assets of any of the Company's Subsidiaries upon any liquidation or administration of any such Subsidiary will be subject to the prior claims of the creditors of such Subsidiary, including, but not limited to, secured claims and claims under the Senior Credit Facility and the Existing Norcross Notes. The claims of creditors of the Company, including the claims of Holders of notes, is effectively subordinated to all existing and future third-party Indebtedness and liabilities, including trade payables, of the Norcross Operating Companies. As of December 31, 2004, on a pro forma basis assuming we had completed the offering of the notes and the issuance of $8.0 million of notes to CIVC, the Issuers would have had total senior Indebtedness of approximately $198.9 million and the Norcross Operating Companies would have had total Indebtedness and liabilities, including trade payables, of $329.1 million.
Maturity, Interest and Principal
The Issuers issued $92.0 million in aggregate principal amount of notes in the offering and $8.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes to CIVC. Additional notes may be issued from time to time, subject to the limitations set forth under "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Additional Indebtedness," and additional notes may also be issued in payment of interest as described below. We initially issued notes in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000;provided, however, that additional notes issued in payment of interest (when issued in payment of interest, "PIK Notes"), will be issued in denominations of $1.00 and integral multiples of $1.00. References to the "notes" shall mean, collectively, the PIK Notes and any additional notes.
The notes will mature on January 1, 2012. The notes will bear interest at a rate of 113/4% per annum, which will be payable semiannually in arrears on each January 1 and July 1, commencing July 1, 2005. We will make interest payments to the persons who are Holders at the close of business on the immediately preceding December 15 and June 15, respectively. Interest on the notes will accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the most recent date to which interest has been paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. Through and including the interest payment date of January 1, 2010, accrued interest on all notes then outstanding will be payable, at the Company's option, in cash or in the form of PIK Notes. On and after the interest payment to be made on July 1, 2010, accrued interest will be payable solely in cash. Any payment of interest in the form of PIK Notes shall be deemed to be payment in full to the same extent as if it were paid in cash.
Redemption
Optional Redemption with Make Whole Payment. At any time prior to July 1, 2006, the notes may be redeemed in whole or in part at the option of the Company, upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days' prior notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus the Make Whole Premium and any accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the applicable redemption date.
Optional Redemption. On one or more occasions on and after July 1, 2006, we may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), if redeemed during the periods listed below:
Period
| | Percentage
| |
---|
July 1, 2006—June 30, 2007 | | 103 | % |
July 1, 2007—June 30, 2008 | | 102 | % |
thereafter | | 100 | % |
99
In addition, we must pay all accrued and unpaid interest in cash on the notes redeemed.
Optional Redemption upon Equity Offerings. On one or more occasions before July 1, 2006, we may use the Net Proceeds of one or more Equity Offerings to redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of the notes at a redemption price of 111.75% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon in cash;provided, that:
- (1)
- at least 65% of the original principal amount of the notes (including any Exchange Notes) remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of any such redemption; and
- (2)
- any such redemption occurs not more than 90 days following the closing of such Equity Offering.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Issuers may, from time to time, acquire the notes in the open market or by undertaking a tender offer for the notes at any time, subject to the terms of the Indenture and applicable securities laws.
Mandatory Partial Redemption
On July 1, 2010, if any notes are outstanding, the Company will be required to redeem, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the notes so redeemed, a principal amount of notes (the "Mandatory Principal Redemption Amount") sufficient to ensure that the notes are not treated under the Code as "Applicable High Yield Discount Obligations" for the ongoing deductibility of interest by the Company. The Mandatory Principal Redemption Amount will be calculated as (i) the excess of the aggregate principal amount of all notes outstanding on July 1, 2010, over the original principal amount of notes issued on the Issue Date, less (ii) an amount equal to one year's simple uncompounded interest on the aggregate original principal amount of notes issued on the Issue Date. The Mandatory Principal Redemption Amount will be applied as a partial redemption of each note outstanding. Assuming that (1) all interest payments prior to July 1, 2010, have been made with PIK Notes, (2) no Additional Interest has been paid and (3) no other redemptions of notes have occurred prior to July 1, 2010, the Mandatory Principal Redemption Amount would be $69.3 million out of an aggregate principal amount of notes then outstanding of approximately $172.1 million.
Selection and Notice of Redemption
In the event that we choose to redeem less than all of the notes, selection of the notes for redemption will be made by the Trustee either:
- (1)
- in compliance with the requirements of the principal national securities exchange, if any, on which such notes are listed; or
- (2)
- on apro rata basis or by lot or by such method as the Trustee shall deem fair and appropriate.
If a partial redemption is made with the proceeds of a Equity Offering, the Trustee will select the notes or portion thereof only on apro rata basis or on as nearly apro rata basis as practicable, unless such method is prohibited. Notice of redemption will be mailed by first-class mail at least 30 but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each Holder at its registered address. On and after any redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on the notes or portions thereof called for redemption unless we fail to redeem any such note.
Certain Covenants
The Indenture contains, among others, the following covenants.
100
Limitation on Additional Indebtedness
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly, incur any Indebtedness (including Acquired Indebtedness) other than Permitted Indebtedness.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) the Company and any Restricted Subsidiary may incur Indebtedness (including Acquired Indebtedness), if after giving effect to the incurrence of such Indebtedness and the receipt and application of the proceeds thereof, the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of the Company is at least 2.0 to 1 (the "Company Coverage Ratio Exception") and (2) notwithstanding that the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries may not be entitled to incur Indebtedness pursuant to clause (1) above, Norcross and any of its Restricted Subsidiaries are entitled to incur Indebtedness (including Acquired Indebtedness), if after giving effect to the incurrence of such Indebtedness and the receipt and application of the proceeds thereof, the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of Norcross is at least 2.0 to 1 (the "Norcross Coverage Ratio Exception").
Limitation on Restricted Payments
The Company will not make, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, make, any Restricted Payment, unless:
- (a)
- no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of or immediately after giving effect to such Restricted Payment;
- (b)
- if the Restricted Payment is made by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than Norcross and any of its Restricted Subsidiaries), immediately before, and after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, the Company could incur $1.00 of additional Indebtedness under the Company Coverage Ratio Exception or, if the Restricted Payment is made by Norcross or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, immediately before, and after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, Norcross could incur $1.00 of additional Indebtedness under the Norcross Coverage Ratio Exception; and
- (c)
- immediately after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, the aggregate of all Restricted Payments declared or made after the Issue Date (excluding payments made pursuant to clauses (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) of the next paragraph and 50% of the payments made pursuant to clause (i) of the next paragraph) does not exceed the sum of:
- (i)
- if the Restricted Payment is made by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than Norcross and its Restricted Subsidiaries), 50% of the Consolidated Net Income of the Company accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period) from the Issue Date to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter prior to the date of such Restricted Payment (or, in case such Consolidated Net Income shall be a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), or, if the Restricted Payment is made by Norcross or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, 50% of the Consolidated Net Income of Norcross accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period) from March 31, 2003 to the end of the most recent quarter prior to the date of such Restricted Payment (or, in case such Consolidated Net Income shall be a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit); plus
- (ii)
- 100% of the aggregate Net Proceeds and the fair market value of securities or other property received by the Company from the issue or sale, after the Issue Date, of Capital Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Capital Stock or Capital Stock of the Company issued to any Subsidiary of the Company) or any Indebtedness or other securities of the Company that have been converted or exercised or exchanged for Capital Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Capital Stock), plus
101
- (iii)
- without duplication of any amounts included in clause (ii) above, 100% of the aggregate net proceeds of any equity contribution received by the Company from a holder of the Company's Capital Stock (excluding, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), any net cash proceeds from a Equity Offering to the extent used to redeem the notes in compliance with the provisions set forth under "—Redemption—Optional Redemption upon Equity Offerings"), plus
- (iv)
- to the extent not included in the calculation of Consolidated Net Income referred to in subclause (i) above, an amount equal to, without duplication:
- (1)
- 100% of the cash return of capital with respect to any Investment received by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary upon the sale or other disposition of any Investment (other than a Permitted Investment) made by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary since the Issue Date, plus
- (2)
- the net reduction in Investments (other than Permitted Investments) in any Person resulting from dividends, repayments of loans or advances or other transfers of assets subsequent to the Issue Date, in each case to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary from such Person, plus
- (3)
- the portion (proportionate to the Company's equity interest in such Subsidiary) of the cash return of capital in respect of the net assets of such Unrestricted Subsidiary at the time such Unrestricted Subsidiary is designated, or liquidated or merged into, a Restricted Subsidiary,
provided, however, that the sum of clauses (1), (2) and (3) above shall not exceed the aggregate amount of all such Investments made subsequent to the Issue Date.
For purposes of determining under this clause (c) the amount expended for Restricted Payments, cash distributed shall be valued at the face amount thereof and property other than cash shall be valued at its fair market value determined, in good faith, by the Board of Directors of the Company.
The provisions of this covenant shall not prohibit:
- (a)
- the payment of any dividend or other distribution within 60 days after the date of declaration thereof, if at such date of declaration such dividend or other distribution would comply with the provisions of the Indenture,
- (b)
- the repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement of any shares of Capital Stock of the Company or subordinated Indebtedness by conversion into, or by or in exchange for, shares of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock), or out of the Net Proceeds of a capital contribution or sale (other than to a Subsidiary of the Company) of other shares of Capital Stock of the Company within 30 days (other than Disqualified Capital Stock),
- (c)
- the redemption or retirement of Indebtedness of the Company subordinated in right of payment to the notes in exchange for, by conversion into or out of the Net Proceeds of an incurrence of Indebtedness (other than any Indebtedness owed to a Subsidiary) of the Company within 30 days that is contractually subordinate in right of payment to the notes to at least the same extent as the subordinated Indebtedness being redeemed or retired,
- (d)
- the retirement of any shares of Disqualified Capital Stock by conversion into, or by exchange for, shares of Disqualified Capital Stock, or out of the Net Proceeds of a sale (other than to a Subsidiary of the Company) of other shares of Disqualified Capital Stock within 30 days,
- (e)
- so long as no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, at the time of or immediately after giving effect to such payment, the purchase, redemption or other
102
acquisition for value of shares of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock) or options on such shares of Capital Stock of the Company held by officers or employees or former officers or employees (or their estates or beneficiaries under their estates) of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries upon the death, disability, retirement or termination of employment of such current or former officers or employees;provided, that the aggregate cash consideration paid, or distributions or payments made, for all such repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests shall not exceed in any calendar year $2.0 million (with unused amounts in any calendar year being carried over to succeeding calendar years (without giving effect to the following proviso)) or $7.5 million in the aggregate from and after the Issue Date;provided, further that such amount in any calendar year may be increased by (i) the amount of the cash proceeds from the sale of Capital Stock of the Company (to the extent the proceeds are contributed to the capital of the Company) to members of management, directors, employees or consultants of the Company and its Subsidiaries that occurs after the Issue Date and (ii) the cash proceeds of any "key man" life insurance policies used to make such repurchases,
- (f)
- the defeasance, redemption, repurchase or other acquisition of subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary with the net cash proceeds from an incurrence of Refinancing Indebtedness,
- (g)
- repurchases of Capital Stock deemed to occur upon the cashless exercise of stock options and warrants,
- (h)
- Restricted Payments (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Restricted Payments made on the Issue Date) in an aggregate amount not to exceed the net proceeds to the Company from the notes issued on the Issue Date,
- (i)
- Permitted Tax Distributions by the Company,
- (j)
- payments required under the Management Side Letter Agreements,provided that each such officer shall, immediately following his receipt thereof, utilize the portion of such payment remaining after deducting therefrom the maximum amount of federal, state and local income taxes that he would be required to pay with respect to such payment to repay to the Company the principal amount of the Management Notes,
- (k)
- payments to enable the Company to make payments to holders of its Capital Stock in lieu of fractional shares of its Capital Stock,
- (l)
- the declaration and payment of dividends to holders of any class or series of Preferred Stock issued in compliance with the covenant "Limitation on Preferred Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries," and
- (m)
- so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5.0 million since the date of the Indenture.
Not later than the date of making any Restricted Payment, the Company shall deliver to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate stating that such Restricted Payment is permitted and setting forth the basis upon which the calculations required by this covenant "Limitation on Restricted Payments" were computed, which calculations may be based upon the Company's latest available financial statements and, to the extent that the absence of a Default or an Event of Default is condition to the making of such Restricted Payment, that no Default or Event of Default exists and is continuing and no Default or Event of Default will occur immediately after given effect to any Restricted Payments.
103
Limitation on Liens
The Company will not create, incur or otherwise cause or suffer to exist or become effective any Liens of any kind, other than Permitted Liens, upon any property or asset of the Company (including any shares of stock or debt of any Restricted Subsidiary), now owned or hereafter acquired, unless:
- (a)
- if such Lien secures Indebtedness that ispari passu with the notes, then the notes are secured on an equal and ratable basis with the obligations so secured until such time as such obligation is no longer secured by a Lien; or
- (b)
- if such Lien secures Indebtedness that is subordinated to the notes, then the notes are secured on a senior basis to the obligations so secured until such time as such subordinated obligation is no longer secured by a Lien.
Limitation on Guarantees of Company Indebtedness
The Company will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to Guarantee any Indebtedness of the Company or to secure any Indebtedness of the Company with a Lien on the assets of such Restricted Subsidiary, unless contemporaneously therewith (or prior thereto) effective provision is made to Guarantee or secure the notes, as the case may be, on an equal and ratable basis with such Guarantee or Lien for so long as such Guarantee or Lien remains effective; provided, however, that any Guarantee by a Restricted Subsidiary of subordinated Indebtedness of the Company shall be subordinated and junior in right of payment to the contemporaneous Guarantee of the notes by such Restricted Subsidiary; provided further, however, that the Company shall not permit a Restricted Subsidiary to Guarantee any Capital Stock of the Company.
Limitation on Transactions with Affiliates
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into, amend or suffer to exist any transaction or series of related transactions that are similar or part of a common plan (including, without limitation, the sale, purchase, exchange or lease of assets, property or services) with any Affiliate (each, an "Affiliate Transaction") or extend, renew, waive or otherwise materially amend or modify the terms of any Affiliate Transaction entered into prior to the Issue Date unless:
- (a)
- such Affiliate Transaction is between or among the Company and /or its Restricted Subsidiaries; or
- (b)
- the terms of such Affiliate Transaction are at least as favorable as the terms that could be obtained by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, in a comparable transaction made on an arm's-length basis between unaffiliated parties.
In any Affiliate Transaction involving an amount or having a fair market value in excess of $2.5 million that is not permitted under clause (a) above, the Company must obtain a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company certifying that such Affiliate Transaction complies with clause (b) above. In any Affiliate Transaction involving an amount or having a fair market value in excess of $7.5 million that is not permitted under clause (a) above (other than any sale by the Company of its Capital Stock that is not Disqualified Capital Stock), the Company must obtain a written opinion as to the fairness of such a transaction from an independent accounting, appraisal or investment banking firm of national reputation in the United States.
The foregoing provisions will not apply to:
- (a)
- any Restricted Payment that is not prohibited by the provisions described under "—Limitation on Restricted Payments" contained herein;
104
- (b)
- fees and compensation paid to, the reimbursement of expenses incurred by, and indemnity provided on behalf of, officers, directors, employees or consultants of the Company, any Restricted Subsidiary as determined in good faith by the Company's Board of Directors or senior management and any employment agreement or other compensation arrangements or agreements involving such persons;
- (c)
- any agreement as in effect as of the Issue Date or any amendment thereto or any transaction contemplated thereby (including pursuant to any amendment thereto) or in any replacement agreement thereto so long as any such amendment or replacement agreement is not more disadvantageous to the Holders in any material respect than the original agreement as in effect on the Issue Date;
- (d)
- any transaction permitted by the Indenture under the provision "—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets";
- (e)
- any commercial banking, lending or investment banking arrangements made with the Permitted Holders or Affiliates of the Permitted Holders on arm's length terms, including the purchase of $8.0 million of notes from the Issuers by CIVC and the receipt by CIVC of an advisory fee on the Issue Date;
- (f)
- the payment of reasonable and customary management, consulting and advisory fees and related expenses up to a maximum of $1.0 million per year;
- (g)
- the payment of reasonable and customary advisory, closing and transaction fees and related expenses (excluding the management fee referred to in clause (f) above) including, but not limited to, in connection with acquisitions, divestitures and financings by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary and approved by the Board of Directors in good faith;
- (h)
- transactions with suppliers or other purchasers for the sale or purchase of goods in the ordinary course of business that, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, are on terms at least as favorable as might reasonably have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party;
- (i)
- issuance of Capital Stock or Indebtedness for cash or non-cash consideration that is otherwise permitted under the Indenture to any Person; and
- (j)
- transactions with a Person that is an Affiliate of the Company solely because the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries owns Capital Stock in such Person;provided, that no Affiliate of the Company (other than a Restricted Subsidiary) owns Capital Stock in such Person.
Limitation on Certain Asset Sales
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, consummate an Asset Sale unless:
- (a)
- The Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, receives consideration at the time of such sale or other disposition at least equal to the fair market value thereof; and
- (b)
- not less than 75% of the consideration received by the Company or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, is in the form of cash or Temporary Cash Investments.
For purposes of clause (b) above, the following shall be deemed to be cash:
- (1)
- the amount (without duplication) of any Indebtedness (other than subordinated Indebtedness) of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary that is either (i) expressly assumed by the transferee in such Asset Sale and with respect to which the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, is unconditionally released by the holder of such Indebtedness
105
If the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary engages in an Asset Sale, the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary shall, no later than 435 days following the consummation thereof, apply an amount equal to all or any of the Asset Sale Proceeds therefrom as follows:
- (1)
- to repay Indebtedness of Norcross or any Restricted Subsidiary;provided,however, that any such repayment shall result in a permanent reduction of the commitments thereunder in an amount equal to the principal amount so repaid; and/or
- (2)
- to repay Indebtedness of a Wholly-Owned, Foreign Restricted Subsidiary from the proceeds of an Asset Sale by such Wholly-Owned, Foreign Restricted Subsidiary; and/or
- (3)
- to acquire assets, including Capital Stock or other securities purchased in connection with the acquisition of Capital Stock or property of another Person, used or useful in businesses similar or ancillary to the business of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary as conducted at the time of such Asset Sale,provided that such acquisition of assets occurs prior to the 436th day following receipt of such Asset Sale Proceeds (the "Reinvestment Date").
The amount of Available Asset Sale Proceeds not applied or invested as provided in this paragraph will constitute "Excess Proceeds." When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds equals or exceeds $10.0 million (at which time, the entire unutilized Excess Proceeds, and not just the amount in excess of $10.0 million, shall be applied as required pursuant to this paragraph), the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest from all Holders an aggregate principal amount of notes equal to the amount of such Excess Proceeds (an "Excess Proceeds Offer") in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Indenture.
If an Excess Proceeds Offer is not fully subscribed, the Company may retain the portion of the Excess Proceeds not required to repurchase notes and use such portion for general corporate purposes not otherwise prohibited by the Indenture, and such retained portion will not be considered in the calculation of Excess Proceeds with respect to any subsequent offer to purchase notes. Upon completion of each such Excess Proceeds Offer, the amount of Excess Proceeds will be reset at zero.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this covenant, if at the time the Company would be required to make an Excess Proceeds Offer the Company does not have access to the applicable Excess Proceeds as a result of a restriction permitted by the covenant described under "—Limitations on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries", then the Company shall have no obligation to make the Excess Proceeds offer to the holders of notes.
If the Company is required to make an Excess Proceeds Offer, the Company shall mail, within 10 days following the Reinvestment Date, a notice to the Holders stating, among other things:
- (a)
- that such Holders have the right to require the Company to apply the Excess Proceeds to repurchase such notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of purchase;
- (b)
- the purchase date, which shall be no earlier than 30 days and not later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed;
106
- (c)
- the instructions, determined by the Company, that each Holder must follow in order to have such notes repurchased; and
- (d)
- the calculations used in determining the amount of Excess Proceeds to be applied to the repurchase of such notes.
In the event of the transfer of substantially all of the property and assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries as an entirety to a Person in a transaction permitted under "—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets" below, the successor Person will be deemed to have sold the properties and assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries not so transferred for purposes of this covenant, and must comply with the provisions of this covenant with respect to such deemed sale as if it were an Asset Sale.
The Company will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of notes pursuant to an Excess Proceeds Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the "Asset Sale" provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the "Asset Sale" provisions of the Indenture by virtue thereof.
Limitation on Preferred Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries
The Company will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to issue any Preferred Stock, except Preferred Stock to the Company or a Wholly-Owned Restricted Subsidiary, or permit any Person, other than the Company or a Wholly-Owned Restricted Subsidiary, to hold any such Preferred Stock unless the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary would be entitled to incur or assume Indebtedness under the covenant described under "—Limitation on Additional Indebtedness" in an aggregate principal amount equal to the aggregate liquidation value of the Preferred Stock to be issued.
Limitation on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create or otherwise cause or suffer to exist or become effective any encumbrance or restriction on the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to
107
108
Limitation on Conduct of Business
The Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries will not engage in any businesses which are not the same, similar, ancillary, related to or constitutes a reasonable extension of the businesses in which the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries are engaged in on the Issue Date. The Company shall at all times directly own 100% of the Capital Stock of Norcross.
NSPH Capital will not engage in any business or activities other than as necessary to (1) to maintain its corporate existence and (2) to perform its obligations under the notes, the Exchange Notes, the Indenture and the Registration Rights Agreement.
Limitation on Sale and Lease-Back Transactions
The Company will not and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, enter into any Sale and Lease-Back Transaction unless:
- (a)
- the consideration received in such Sale and Lease-Back Transaction is at least equal to the fair market value of the property sold,
- (b)
- the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as applicable, could incur the Attributable Indebtedness in respect of such Sale and Lease-Back Transaction in compliance with the covenant described under "—Limitation on Additional Indebtedness," and
- (c)
- any proceeds are applied in accordance with the covenant described under "—Limitation on Certain Asset Sales."
Payments for Consent
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid any consideration, whether by way of interest, fee or otherwise, to any Holder of any notes for or as an inducement to any consent, waiver or amendment of any of the terms or provisions of the Indenture or the notes unless such consideration is offered to be paid or agreed to be paid to all Holders which so consent, waive or agree to amend in the time frame set forth in solicitation documents relating to such consent, waiver or agreement.
Change of Control Offer
Within 30 days of the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Company shall notify the Trustee in writing of such occurrence and shall make an offer to purchase (the "Change of Control Offer") the outstanding notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof together with any accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the Change of Control Payment Date (as hereinafter defined) (such applicable purchase price being hereinafter referred to as the "Change of Control Purchase Price") in accordance with the procedures set forth in this covenant; provided, however, that notwithstanding the Change of Control, the Company will not be obligated to offer to purchase the notes pursuant to this covenant if, prior to the time the Company would be required to offer to purchase the notes as a result of the Change of Control, the Company has mailed the requisite irrevocable notice to redeem all of the outstanding notes pursuant to the provision described under "Optional Redemption."
Within 30 days of the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Company also shall:
- (a)
- cause a notice of the Change of Control Offer to be sent at least once to the Dow Jones News Service or similar business news service in the United States; and
109
- (b)
- send by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the Trustee and to each Holder, at the address appearing in the register maintained by the Registrar of the notes, a notice stating:
- (i)
- that the Change of Control Offer is being made pursuant to this covenant and that all notes tendered will be accepted for payment, and otherwise subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein;
- (ii)
- the Change of Control Purchase Price and the purchase date (which shall be a business day no earlier than 30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed (the "Change of Control Payment Date");
- (iii)
- that any note not tendered will remain outstanding and continue to accrue interest;
- (iv)
- that, unless the Company defaults in the payment of the Change of Control Purchase Price, any notes accepted for payment pursuant to the Change of Control Offer shall cease to accrue interest after the Change of Control Payment Date;
- (v)
- that Holders accepting the offer to have their notes purchased pursuant to a Change of Control Offer will be required to surrender the notes, with the form entitled "Option of Holder to Elect Purchase" on the reverse of the note completed, to the Paying Agent at the address specified in the notice prior to the close of business on the business day preceding the Change of Control Payment Date;
- (vi)
- that Holders will be entitled to withdraw their acceptance if the Paying Agent receives, not later than the close of business on the third business day preceding the Change of Control Payment Date, a telegram, telex, facsimile transmission or letter setting forth the name of the Holder, the principal amount of the notes delivered for purchase, and a statement that such Holder is withdrawing his election to have such notes purchased;
- (vii)
- that Holders whose notes are being purchased only in part will be issued new notes equal in principal amount to the unpurchased portion of the notes surrendered,provided, that each note purchased and each such new note issued shall be in an original principal amount in denominations in integral multiples of $1.00;
- (viii)
- any other procedures that a Holder must follow to accept a Change of Control Offer or effect withdrawal of such acceptance; and
- (ix)
- the name and address of the Paying Agent.
On the Change of Control Payment Date, the Company shall, to the extent lawful:
- (a)
- accept for payment notes or portions thereof tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;
- (b)
- deposit with the Paying Agent money sufficient to pay the purchase price of all notes or portions thereof so tendered; and
- (c)
- deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee notes so accepted together with an Officers' Certificate stating the notes or portions thereof tendered to the Company.
The Paying Agent shall promptly mail to each Holder so accepted payment in an amount equal to the purchase price for such notes, and the Company shall execute and issue and the Trustee shall promptly authenticate and mail to such Holder, a new note equal in principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the notes surrendered;provided, that each such new note shall be issued in an original principal amount in denominations in integral multiples of $1.00.
Prior to complying with any of the procedures of this "Change of Control" covenant, but in any event within 30 days following any Change of Control, the Company covenants to
110
- (1)
- repay in full all obligations and terminate all commitments under or in respect of all senior Indebtedness or any Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary the terms of which prohibit the purchase by the Company of the notes upon a Change of Control in compliance with the terms of this covenant or offer to repay in full all obligations and terminate all commitments under or in respect of all such Indebtedness and repay the Indebtedness owed to each such lender who has accepted such offer; or
- (2)
- obtain the requisite consents under all such senior Indebtedness or Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary to permit the repurchase of the notes as described above.
The Company must first comply with the covenant described in the preceding sentence before they shall be required to purchase notes in the event of a Change of Control;provided, that the Company's failure to comply with the covenant described in the preceding sentence will constitute an Event of Default described in clause (3) under "Events of Default" below if not cured within 60 days after the notice required by such clause. As a result of the foregoing, a Holder may not be able to compel the Company to purchase the notes unless the Company is able at the time to refinance all of the obligations under or in respect of the Senior Credit Facility or obtain requisite consents under the Senior Credit Facility. Failure by the Company to make a Change of Control Offer when required by the Indenture constitutes a default under the Indenture and, if not cured within 60 days after notice, constitutes an Event of Default.
The Indenture requires that (A) if either the Company or any Subsidiary thereof has issued any outstanding (i) Indebtedness that is subordinate in right of payment to the notes; or (ii) Preferred Stock, and the Company or any Subsidiary is required to make a change of control offer or to make a distribution with respect to such subordinated Indebtedness or Preferred Stock in the event of a change of control, the Company shall not consummate any such offer or distribution with respect to such subordinated Indebtedness or Preferred Stock until such time as the Company shall have paid the Change of Control Purchase Price in full to the Holders that have accepted the Company's Change of Control Offer and shall otherwise have consummated the Change of Control Offer made to Holders and (B) the Company will not issue Indebtedness that is subordinate in right of payment to the notes or Preferred Stock with change of control provisions requiring the payment of such Indebtedness or Preferred Stock prior to the payment of the notes in the event of a Change in Control under the Indenture.
The Company will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the "Change of Control" provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the "Change of Control" provisions of the Indenture by virtue thereof.
The Company will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon a Change of Control if a third party makes a Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer by the Company and purchases all of the notes validly tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of Control Offer.
111
Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets
The Company will not consolidate with, merge with or into, or transfer all or substantially all of its assets (as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in one transaction or a series of related transactions) to, any Person unless:
- (a)
- the Company shall be the continuing Person, or the Person (if other than the Company) formed by such consolidation or into which the Company is merged or to which the properties and assets of the Company are transferred shall be a corporation, limited liability company or limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia and shall expressly assume, by a supplemental Indenture, executed and delivered to the Trustee, in form reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee, all of the obligations of the Company under the notes and the Indenture, and the obligations under the Indenture shall remain in full force and effect;provided, that at any time the Company or its successor is a limited partnership or a limited liability company, there shall be a co-issuer of the notes that is a corporation;
- (b)
- immediately before and immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing; and
- (c)
- immediately after giving effect to such transaction and the use of any net proceeds therefrom, the Company or such Person could incur at least $1.00 of additional Indebtedness, other than Permitted Indebtedness, under the Company Coverage Ratio Exception;
provided, that the foregoing shall not prohibit a Restricted Subsidiary from merging into or transferring all or part of its properties and assets to the Company or another Restricted Subsidiary.
In connection with any consolidation, merger or transfer of assets contemplated by this provision, the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to the Trustee, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee, an Officers' Certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that such consolidation, merger or transfer and the supplemental Indenture in respect thereto comply with this provision and that all conditions precedent herein provided for relating to such transaction or transactions have been complied with.
Events of Default
The following events are defined in the Indenture as "Events of Default":
- (1)
- default in payment of any principal of, or premium, if any, on the notes whether at maturity, upon acceleration or redemption or otherwise;
- (2)
- default for 30 days in payment of any interest on the notes;
- (3)
- default by the Issuers or any Guarantor in the observance or performance of any other covenant in the notes or the Indenture for 30 days after written notice from the Trustee or the Holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding (except in the case of a default with respect to the "—Change of Control" or "—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets" covenant which will constitute an Event of Default with such notice requirement but without such passage of time requirement);
- (4)
- default in the payment at final maturity (after giving effect to any applicable grace period) of principal in an aggregate amount of $10.0 million or more with respect to any Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary thereof, or the acceleration of any such Indebtedness aggregating $10.0 million or more, which default shall not be cured, waived or postponed pursuant to an agreement with the holders of such Indebtedness within 30 days
112
The Indenture provides that the Trustee may withhold notice to the Holders of any default (except in payment of principal or premium, if any, or interest on the notes) if the Trustee considers it to be in the best interest of the Holders to do so.
The Indenture provides that if an Event of Default, other than an Event of Default resulting from certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, shall have occurred and be continuing, then the Trustee by notice to the Company or the Holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding by written notice to the Company and the Trustee may declare to be immediately due and payable the entire principal amount of all the notes then outstanding plus accrued but unpaid interest to the date of acceleration and such amounts shall become immediately due and payable;provided, that after such acceleration but before a judgment or decree based on such acceleration is obtained by the Trustee, the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes may, under certain circumstances, rescind and annul such acceleration if all existing Events of Default, other than nonpayment of accelerated principal, premium, if any, or interest that has become due solely because of the acceleration, have been cured or waived as provided in the Indenture.
In case an Event of Default resulting from certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization shall occur, the principal, premium, if any, and interest amount with respect to all of the notes shall be due and payable immediately without any declaration or other act on the part of the Trustee or the Holders.
The Holders of a majority in principal amount of the notes then outstanding shall have the right to waive any existing default or compliance with any provision of the Indenture or the notes and to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee, subject to certain limitations specified in the Indenture.
No Holder of any note will have any right to institute any proceeding with respect to the Indenture or for any remedy thereunder, unless such Holder shall have previously given to the Trustee written notice of a continuing Event of Default and unless also the Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes shall have made written request and offered indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee to institute such proceeding as a Trustee, and unless the Trustee shall not have received from the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes a direction inconsistent with such request and shall have failed to institute such proceeding within 60 days. However, such limitations do not apply to a suit instituted on such note on or after the respective due dates expressed in such note.
113
Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
The Indenture provides that the Issuers may elect either
- (a)
- to defease and be discharged from any and all obligations with respect to the notes, except for the obligations to register the transfer or exchange of such notes, to replace temporary or mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen notes, to maintain an office or agency in respect of the notes and to hold monies for payment in trust ("defeasance"); or
- (b)
- to be released from their obligations with respect to the notes under some of the covenants contained in the Indenture and described above under "Certain Covenants" ("covenant defeasance")
upon the deposit with the Trustee (or other qualifying Trustee), in trust for such purpose of money and/or United States government obligations which through the payment of principal and interest in accordance with their terms will provide money, in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the notes, on the scheduled due dates therefor or on a selected date of redemption in accordance with the terms of the Indenture. Such a trust may only be established if, among other things,
(1) in the case of defeasance, the Issuers have delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel:
(i) to the effect that neither the trust nor the Trustee will be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and
(ii) describing either (x) a private ruling concerning the notes or a published ruling of the Internal Revenue Service or (y) since the date of the Indenture, there has been a change in the applicable federal income tax law, in either case of (x) or (y), to the effect that Holders or persons in their positions will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of such deposit, defeasance and discharge and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amount and in the same manner and at the same times, as would have been the case if such deposit, defeasance and discharge had not occurred;
(2) in the case of covenant defeasance, the Issuers have delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel confirming that the Holders or persons in their positions will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of such deposit, defeasance and discharge and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amount and in the same manner and at the same times, as would have been the case if such deposit, covenant defeasance and discharge had not occurred;
(3) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing on the date of such deposit or insofar as Events of Default from bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization events are concerned;
(4) such defeasance or covenant defeasance will not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a Default under, the Indenture or any other material agreement or instrument to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound;
(5) the Issuers have delivered to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate stating that the deposit was not made by the Company with the intent of preferring the Holders over any other creditors of the Company or with the intent of defeating, hindering, delaying or defrauding any other creditors of the Company or others;
114
(6) the Issuers have delivered to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent provided for or relating to the defeasance or the covenant defeasance have been complied with;
(7) the Issuers have delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel to the effect that
(i) the trust funds will not be subject to any rights of holders of Indebtedness, including, without limitation, those arising under the Indenture, and
(ii) assuming no intervening bankruptcy occurs and that no Holder is an insider of the Issuers, after the 91st day following the deposit, the trust funds will not be subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally; and
(8) other customary conditions precedent are satisfied.
Satisfaction and Discharge
The Indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further effect (except as to surviving rights or registration of transfer or exchange of the notes, as expressly provided for in the Indenture) as to all outstanding notes when:
(1) either:
(a) all the notes authenticated and delivered (except lost, stolen or destroyed notes which have been replaced or paid and notes for whose payment money has been deposited in trust or segregated and held in trust by the Issuers and thereafter repaid to the Issuers or discharged from such trust) have been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation; or
(b) all notes not delivered to the Trustee for cancellation have become due and payable and the Issuers have irrevocably deposited or caused to be deposited with the Trustee funds in an amount sufficient to pay and discharge the entire Indebtedness on the notes not delivered to the Trustee for cancellation, for principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the notes to the date of deposit together with irrevocable instructions from the Issuers directing the Trustee to apply such funds to the payment thereof at maturity or redemption, as the case may be;
(2) the Issuers have paid all other sums payable under the Indenture by the Company; and
(3) the Issuers have delivered to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate and an opinion of counsel stating that all conditions precedent under the Indenture relating to the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture have been complied with.
Modification of Indenture
From time to time, the Issuers and the Trustee may, without the consent of Holders, amend the Indenture or the notes or supplement the Indenture for certain specified purposes, including providing for uncertificated notes in addition to certificated notes, and curing any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency, or making any other change that does not adversely affect the rights of any Holder. The Indenture contains provisions permitting the Issuers and the Trustee, with the consent of Holders of at least a majority in principal amount of the outstanding notes, to modify or supplement the Indenture
115
or the notes, except that no such modification shall, without the consent of each Holder affected thereby,
- (a)
- reduce the amount of notes whose Holders must consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver to the Indenture or the notes;
- (b)
- reduce the rate of or change the time for payment of interest, including defaulted interest, on any note;
- (c)
- reduce the principal of or premium on or change the stated maturity of any note;
- (d)
- make any note payable in money other than that stated in the note or change the place of payment from New York, New York;
- (e)
- change the amount or time of any payment required by the notes or reduce the premium payable upon any redemption of notes, or change the time before which no such redemption may be made;
- (f)
- waive a default in the payment of the principal of, interest on or redemption payment with respect to any note;
- (g)
- after the Issuers' obligation to purchase notes arises thereunder, amend, change or modify in any material respect the obligation of the Issuers to make and consummate a Change of Control Offer in the event of a Change of Control or make and consummate an Excess Proceeds Offer with respect to any Asset Sale that has been consummated or modify any of the provisions or definitions with respect thereto;
- (h)
- take any other action otherwise prohibited by the Indenture to be taken without the consent of each Holder affected thereby;
- (i)
- affect the ranking of the notes or the Guarantees, if any, in a manner adverse to the Holders; or
- (j)
- release any Guarantor from any of its obligations under its Guarantee or the Indenture otherwise than in accordance with the terms of the Indenture.
Reports to Holders
Whether or not the Company is subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, it will continue to furnish the information required thereby to the Holders and, after completion of the exchange offer, to the Commission. The Indenture provides that even if the Company is entitled under the Exchange Act not to furnish such information to the Commission or to the Holders, it will nonetheless continue to furnish such information to the Commission (unless the Commission will not accept such a filing) and the Holders; provided, however, that all information that has been posted to the Commission's EDGAR system shall be deemed to have been provided to the Trustee and Holders; provided, further, that such requirement shall be satisfied prior to commencement of the exchange offer or the effectiveness of the shelf registration statement by the filing with the SEC of the exchange offer registration statement and/or shelf registration statement, to the extent any such registration statement contains substantially the same financial information as would be required to be filed by the Issuers if they were subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Compliance Certificate
The Issuers will deliver to the Trustee on or before 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year an Officers' Certificate stating whether or not the signers know of any Default or Event of Default that has occurred. If they do, the certificate will describe the Default or Event of Default and its status.
116
Methods of Receiving Payments on the Notes
The Issuers will make all principal, premium and interest payments on the notes at the office or agency of the Paying Agent and Registrar within the City and State of New York unless the Issuers elect to make interest payments by check mailed to the Holders at their address set forth in the register of Holders or by wire transfer to an account designated by each Holder. The Trustee will initially act as Paying Agent and Registrar. The Issuers may change the Paying Agent or Registrar without prior notice to the Holders, and the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may act as Paying Agent or Registrar.
The Trustee
The Trustee under the Indenture is the Registrar and Paying Agent with regard to the notes. The Indenture provides that, except during the continuance of an Event of Default, the Trustee will perform only such duties as are specifically set forth in the Indenture. During the existence of an Event of Default, the Trustee will exercise such rights and powers vested in it under the Indenture and use the same degree of care and skill in its exercise as a prudent person would exercise under the circumstances in the conduct of such person's own affairs.
Transfer and Exchange
Holders may transfer or exchange the notes in accordance with the Indenture. The Registrar under the Indenture may require a Holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents, and to pay any taxes and fees required by law or permitted by the Indenture. The Registrar is not required to transfer or exchange any note selected for redemption. Also, the Registrar is not required to transfer or exchange any note for a period of 15 days before selection of the notes to be redeemed.
The registered Holder of a note may be treated as the owner of it for all purposes.
No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees, Incorporators and Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator or stockholder of the Issuers or Guarantors, if any, as such, shall have any liability for any obligations of the Issuers and the Guarantors, if any, under the notes, the Indenture, the Guarantees, if any, or for any claim based upon, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation. Each holder of notes by accepting a note waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for issuance of the notes. The waiver may not be effective to waive liabilities under the federal securities laws.
Certain Definitions
Set forth below is a summary of certain of the defined terms used in the covenants contained in the Indenture. We refer you to the Indenture for the full definition of all such terms as well as any other capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is provided.
"Acquired Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of a Person (including an Unrestricted Subsidiary) existing at the time such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or assumed in connection with the acquisition of assets from such Person and, in each case, whether or not incurred by such Person in connection with, or in anticipation or contemplation of, such Person becoming a Restricted Subsidiary through such merger, consolidation or acquisition.
"Affiliate" of any specified Person means any other Person which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified Person. For the purposes of this definition, "control" (including, with correlative meanings, the terms "controlling," "controlled by" and "under common control with"), as used with respect to any Person,
117
means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise.
"Affiliated Senior Lender" means an Affiliate of a direct or indirect beneficial owner of Common Stock of the Company that (i) is a lender under the Senior Credit Facility on the Issue Date or (ii) is ordinarily engaged in the business of lending on a senior basis.
"Argosy" means Argosy-Safety Products L.P. and its Affiliates.
"Asset Acquisition" means
(1) an Investment by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company in any other Person pursuant to which such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, or is merged with or into the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company or
(2) the acquisition by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company of the assets of any Person (other than a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company) which constitute all or substantially all of the assets of such Person or comprise any division or line of business of such Person or any other Properties or assets of such Person other than in the ordinary course of business.
"Asset Sale" means any direct or indirect sale, issuance, conveyance, assignment, transfer, lease or other disposition (including any Sale and Lease-Back Transaction), other than to the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, in any single transaction or series of related transactions of:
- (i)
- any Capital Stock of or other equity interest in any Restricted Subsidiary (other than any nominal interest required to be held by a third party in order to satisfy a legal requirement);
- (ii)
- all or substantially all the assets of any division, business segment or comparable line of business of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary; or
- (iii)
- any other assets of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary outside of the ordinary course of business of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Asset Sale" shall not include:
- (a)
- a transfer that constitutes a Permitted Investment or a Restricted Payment permitted by the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments";
- (b)
- a transfer, sale or other disposition pursuant to any foreclosure of assets or other remedy provided by applicable law by a creditor of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary with a Lien on such assets, if such Lien is permitted under the Indenture;
- (c)
- a transfer involving only Temporary Cash Investments or inventory in the ordinary course of business;
- (d)
- any transfer, sale or other disposition of inventory or damaged, worn-out or obsolete equipment in the ordinary course of business;
- (e)
- the lease or sublease of any real or personal property in the ordinary course of business;
- (f)
- any transfer, sale or other disposition of Capital Stock or Indebtedness or other securities of an Unrestricted Subsidiary;
- (g)
- a transfer, sale or other disposition of assets having a fair market value and a sale price of less than $1.0 million; and
- (h)
- the sale of North Safety Products (Africa) (Pty) Ltd. and its Subsidiaries.
118
"Asset Sale Proceeds" means, with respect to any Asset Sale,
- (a)
- cash received by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary from such Asset Sale (including cash received as consideration for the assumption of liabilities incurred in connection with or in anticipation of such Asset Sale), after:
- (i)
- provision for all income or other taxes measured by or resulting from such Asset Sale (including the fees and expenses of converting non-cash proceeds into cash),
- (ii)
- payment of all brokerage commissions, underwriting and other fees and expenses related to such Asset Sale, (including the fees and expenses of converting non-cash proceeds into cash),
- (iii)
- provision for minority interest holders in any Restricted Subsidiary as a result of such Asset Sale, and
- (iv)
- deduction of appropriate amounts to be provided by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary as a reserve, in accordance with GAAP, against any liabilities associated with the assets sold or disposed of in such Asset Sale and retained by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary after such Asset Sale, including, without limitation, severance, healthcare, pension and other post-employment benefit liabilities and liabilities related to environmental matters or against any indemnification obligations associated with the assets sold or disposed of in such Asset Sale; and
- (b)
- promissory notes and other non-cash consideration received by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary from such Asset Sale or other disposition or cash proceeds placed in escrow from such Asset Sale or other disposition upon the liquidation or conversion of such notes or non-cash consideration into cash or release of the escrowed cash proceeds.
"Attributable Indebtedness" in respect of a Sale and Lease-Back Transaction means, as at the time of determination, the present value of the total obligations (discounted at the imputed interest rate in such transaction) of the lessee for rental payments during the remaining term of the lease included in such Sale and Lease-Back Transaction (including any period for which such lease has been extended).
"Available Asset Sale Proceeds" means, with respect to any Asset Sale, the aggregate Asset Sale Proceeds from such Asset Sale that have not been applied in accordance with clause (1) or (2) of the second paragraph of "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Certain Asset Sales" and that have not been the basis for an Excess Proceeds Offer in accordance with the terms set forth in "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Certain Asset Sales."
"Board of Directors" means:
- (a)
- in the case of a Person that is a limited partnership, the board of directors of its corporate general partner or any committee authorized to act therefor (or, if the general partner is itself a limited partnership, the board of directors of such general partner's corporate general partner or any committee authorized to act therefor);
- (b)
- in the case of a Person that is a corporation, the board of directors of such Person or any committee authorized to act therefor, and
- (c)
- in the case of any other Person, the board of directors, board of managers, management committee or similar governing body or any authorized committee thereof responsible for the management of the business and affairs of such Person.
"Capital Stock" means, with respect to any Person, any and all shares, interests, participations or other equivalents (however designated and whether or not voting) of capital stock, partnership interests or any other participation, right or other interest in the nature of an equity interest in such Person or
119
any option, warrant or other security convertible into or exercisable for any of the foregoing;provided, that Capital Stock shall not include appreciation rights plans.
"Capitalized Lease Obligations" means Indebtedness represented by obligations under a lease that is required to be capitalized for financial reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP, and the amount of such Indebtedness shall be the capitalized amount of such obligations determined in accordance with GAAP.
A"Change of Control" means the occurrence of one or more of the following events:
- (a)
- any Person (including a Person's Affiliates and associates), other than a Permitted Holder, becomes the beneficial owner (directly or indirectly) (as defined under Rule 13d-3 or any successor rule or regulation promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of the total voting or economic power directly or indirectly of the Common Stock of the Company; or
- (b)
- any Person (including a Person's Affiliates and associates), other than a Permitted Holder, becomes the beneficial owner (directly or indirectly) of more than 35% of the total voting power of the Common Stock of the Company;provided that, this clause (b) will not constitute a "Change of Control" if (i) no Permitted Holder has sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of more than 50% of the Common Stock of the Company owned (directly or indirectly) by it on the Issue Date (other than to another Permitted Holder), (ii) the Permitted Holders beneficially own in the aggregate (directly or indirectly) a greater percentage of the total voting power (directly or indirectly) of the Common Stock of the Company than such other Person and (iii) the Permitted Holders have the right or ability by voting power, contract or otherwise to elect or designate for election a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company; or
- (c)
- there shall be consummated any consolidation or merger of the Company in which the Company is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which the Common Stock of the Company would be converted into cash, securities or other property, other than a merger or consolidation of such issuer in which the beneficial owners of the Common Stock of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the consolidation or merger hold, directly or indirectly, at least a majority of the Common Stock of the surviving corporation immediately after such consolidation or merger; or
- (d)
- during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board of Directors of the Company (together with any new directors whose election by such Board of Directors or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of the Company has been approved by a majority of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or recommendation for election was previously so approved) cease to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company; or
- (e)
- the approval by the holders of Capital Stock of the Company of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company (whether or not otherwise in compliance with the provisions of the Indenture); or
- (f)
- to the extent there are any outstanding Existing Norcross Notes, a "Change of Control" (as defined in the Existing Norcross Indenture) shall have occurred; or
- (g)
- the failure at any time by the Company to beneficially own (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, 100% of the Capital Stock of Norcross (except to the extent Norcross is merged with and into the Company in accordance with the terms of the Indenture).
120
"CIBC" means CIBC WMV Inc. and CIBC Co-Investment Merchant Fund 2, L.L.C. and their respective Affiliates.
"CIBC/Argosy Group" means CIBC, Caravelle Private Investment Corporation, Caravelle Norcross Investment Corporation and Argosy and their respective Affiliates, collectively.
"CIVC" means CIVC Partners Fund, L.P. and its Affiliates.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
"Commission" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
"Common Stock" of any Person means all Capital Stock of such Person that is generally entitled to:
- (a)
- vote in the election of directors of such Person; or
- (b)
- if such Person is not a corporation, vote or otherwise participate in the selection of the governing body, partners, managers or others that will control the management and policies of such Person.
"Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio" means, with respect to any Person, the ratio of EBITDA of such Person during the four full fiscal quarters for which financial statements are available (the "Four Quarter Period") ending on or prior to the date of the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (the "Transaction Date") to Consolidated Fixed Charges of such Person for the Four Quarter Period. In addition to and without limitation of the foregoing, for purposes of this definition, "EBITDA" and "Consolidated Fixed Charges" will be calculated after giving effect on apro forma basis for the period of such calculation to
(1) the incurrence or repayment of any Indebtedness of such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or the issuance or redemption or other repayment of Preferred Stock of any such Restricted Subsidiary (and the application of the proceeds thereof) giving rise to the need to make such calculation and any incurrence or repayment of other Indebtedness and, in the case of any Restricted Subsidiary, the issuance or redemption or other repayment of Preferred Stock (and the application of the proceeds thereof), other than the incurrence or repayment of Indebtedness in the ordinary course of business for working capital purposes pursuant to working capital facilities, occurring during the Four Quarter Period or at any time subsequent to the last day of the Four Quarter Period and on or prior to the Transaction Date, as if such incurrence or repayment or issuance or redemption or other repayment, as the case may be (and the application of the proceeds thereof), occurred on the first day of the Four Quarter Period calculated on a basis consistent with Regulation S-X under the Securities Act as in effect and applied as of the Issue Date; provided that if such Indebtedness is revolving Indebtedness, the amount of Indebtedness deemed to be outstanding for such period shall be the average outstanding amount of such Indebtedness during such period; and
(2) any asset sales or Asset Acquisitions (including, without limitation, any Asset Acquisition giving rise to the need to make such calculation as a result of such Person or one of its Restricted Subsidiaries (including any Person who becomes a Restricted Subsidiary as a result of the Asset Acquisition) incurring, assuming or otherwise being liable for Acquired Indebtedness and also including any EBITDA (provided that such EBITDA will be included only to the extent that Consolidated Net Income would be includable pursuant to the definition of "Consolidated Net Income") (including anypro forma expense and cost reductions calculated on a basis consistent with Regulation S-X of the Exchange Act) attributable to the assets which are the subject of the Asset Acquisition or asset sale during the Four Quarter Period) occurring during the Four Quarter Period or at any time subsequent to the last day of the Four Quarter Period and on or prior to the Transaction Date, as if such
121
If such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries directly or indirectly guarantees Indebtedness of a third Person, the preceding sentence will give effect to the incurrence of such guaranteed Indebtedness as if such Person or any Restricted Subsidiary of such Person had directly incurred or otherwise assumed such guaranteed Indebtedness. Furthermore, in calculating "Consolidated Fixed Charges" for purposes of determining the denominator (but not the numerator) of this "Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio,"
(1) interest on outstanding Indebtedness determined on a fluctuating basis as of the Transaction Date and which will continue to be so determined thereafter will be deemed to have accrued at a fixed rate per annum equal to the rate of interest on such Indebtedness in effect on the Transaction Date;
(2) if interest on any Indebtedness actually incurred on the Transaction Date may optionally be determined at an interest rate based upon a factor of a prime or similar rate, a eurocurrency interbank offered rate, or other rates, then the interest rate in effect on the Transaction Date will be deemed to have been in effect during the Four Quarter Period; and
(3) notwithstanding clause (1) above, interest on Indebtedness determined on a fluctuating basis, to the extent such interest is covered by one or more agreements in respect of Hedging Obligations, will be deemed to accrue at the rate per annum resulting after giving effect to the operation of such agreements.
"Consolidated Fixed Charges" means, with respect to any Person, for any period, the sum, without duplication, of
"Consolidated Interest Expense" means, with respect to any Person, for any period,
- (a)
- the aggregate amount of interest that, in conformity with GAAP, would be set forth opposite the caption "interest expense" or any like caption on an income statement for such Person and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, including, but not limited to:
- (i)
- imputed interest included in Capitalized Lease Obligations,
- (ii)
- all net commissions, discounts and other fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and bankers' acceptance financing,
- (iii)
- the net effect of all payments made or received pursuant to Hedging Obligations,
122
- (iv)
- amortization of other financing fees and expenses,
- (v)
- the interest portion of any deferred payment obligation,
- (vi)
- amortization of discount or premium, if any, and
- (vii)
- all other non-cash interest expense (other than (A) interest amortized to cost of sales, (B) one-time write-offs of debt issuance costs and (C) accretion of any unpaid yield on the Company's Preferred Stock),
plus, without duplication;
- (b)
- all net capitalized interest for such period and all interest incurred or paid under any guarantee of Indebtedness (including a guarantee of principal, interest or any combination thereof) of any Person, plus the amount of all dividends or distributions paid on Disqualified Stock (other than dividends paid or payable in shares of Capital Stock of the Company), less the amortization of deferred financing costs associated therewith.
"Consolidated Net Income" means, with respect to any Person, for any period, the aggregate of the Net Income of such Person and its Subsidiaries for such period, on a consolidated basis, determined in accordance with GAAP;provided,however, that:
- (a)
- the Net Income of any Person (the "other Person") in which the Person in question or any of its Subsidiaries has less than a 100% interest, if such interest does not cause the net income of such other Person to be consolidated into the net income of the Person in question in accordance with GAAP, shall be included only to the extent of the amount of dividends or distributions paid to the Person in question or the Subsidiary;
- (b)
- the Net Income of any Subsidiary of the Person in question that is subject to any restriction or limitation on the payment of dividends or the making of other distributions, other than pursuant to the notes or the Indenture or as otherwise permitted under the covenant described under "—Limitation on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries," shall be excluded to the extent of such restriction or limitation (except that (i) amounts actually paid to the Company prior to the effectiveness of the restriction or limitation shall not be excluded and (ii) amounts that are subject to restrictions that are permitted by clause (i) of the covenant described under "—Limitations on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries" shall not be excluded);
- (c)
- any net gain or loss resulting from an Asset Sale (without regard to the $1.0 million limitation set forth in the definition thereof) by the Person in question or any of its Subsidiaries other than in the ordinary course of business shall be excluded;
- (d)
- extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, including any related tax effects on the Company, shall be excluded (including, without limitation, (i) severance, relocation and other non-recurring restructuring costs, (ii) any non-recurring costs and expenses incurred in connection with the offering of the notes and the transactions contemplated in connection therewith and (iii) gains or losses from the sale of North Safety Products (Africa) (Pty) Ltd. and its Subsidiaries);
- (e)
- income or loss attributable to discontinued operations (including, without limitation, operations disposed of during such period whether or not such operations were classified as discontinued) shall be excluded;
- (f)
- in the case of an acquiree of the referent Person by consolidation or merger or as a transferee of the referent Person's assets, any earnings of the successor corporation prior to such consolidation, merger or transfer of assets shall be excluded;
123
- (g)
- the cumulative effect of a change in GAAP will be excluded;
- (h)
- non-cash charges relating to employee benefit or other management compensation plans of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or any non-cash compensation charge arising from any grant of stock, stock options or other equity-based awards of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (excluding in each case any non-cash charge to the extent that it represents an accrual of or reserve for cash expenses in any future period or amortization of a prepaid cash expense incurred in a prior period or any non-cash expense representing accrued unpaid yield on the Company's Preferred Stock), in each case, to the extent that such non-cash charges are deducted in computing such Consolidated Net Income will be excluded;
- (i)
- any reversal pursuant to GAAP of an accrual of or reserve for cash expenses that were deducted in computing Consolidated Net Income under clause (h) above will be included; and
- (j)
- the payments made to members of the Company's management as of the Issue Date in an amount not to exceed $4.2 million will be excluded.
"Default" means any condition or event that is, or with the passing of time or giving of any notice expressly required under the Indenture (or both), would be, an Event of Default.
"Disqualified Capital Stock" means any Capital Stock of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary thereof which, by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is convertible or for which it is exchangeable at the option of the Holder), or upon the happening of any event:
- (a)
- matures on or prior to the maturity date of the notes, for cash or securities constituting Indebtedness; or
- (b)
- is mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or otherwise, on or prior to the maturity date of the notes, for cash or securities constituting Indebtedness; or
- (c)
- is redeemable at the option of the holder thereof, in whole or in part, on or prior to the maturity date of the notes, for cash or securities constituting Indebtedness;
provided, that Capital Stock of the Company that is held by a current or former employee of the Company subject to a put option and/or a call option with the Company triggered by the termination of such employee's employment with the Company and/or the Company's performance shall not be deemed to be Disqualified Capital Stock solely by virtue of such call option and/or put option.
Without limitation of the foregoing, Disqualified Capital Stock shall be deemed to include: (i) any Preferred Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary and (ii) any Preferred Stock of the Company, with respect to either of which, under the terms of such Preferred Stock, by agreement or otherwise, such Restricted Subsidiary or the Company is obligated to pay current dividends or distributions in cash during the period prior to the maturity date of the notes;provided, however, that Preferred Stock of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary thereof that is issued with the benefit of provisions requiring a change of control offer to be made for such Preferred Stock in the event of a change of control of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, which provisions have substantially the same effect as the provisions of the Indenture described under "Change of Control," shall not be deemed to be Disqualified Capital Stock solely by virtue of such provisions.
"Domestic" means, with respect to any entity, an entity incorporated or otherwise organized or existing under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or any territory or possession of the United States.
124
"EBITDA" means, for any Person, for any period, an amount equal to:
- (a)
- the sum of:
- (i)
- Consolidated Net Income for such period, plus
- (ii)
- the provision or benefit for taxes for such period based on income or profits to the extent such income or profits were included in computing Consolidated Net Income and any provision for taxes utilized in computing net loss under clause (i) hereof, plus
- (iii)
- Consolidated Interest Expense for such period, plus
- (iv)
- depreciation for such period on a consolidated basis, plus
- (v)
- amortization of intangibles for such period on a consolidated basis, plus
- (vi)
- expenses associated with exploring strategic alternatives prior to the Issue Date as reported in Norcross's reports filed with the Commission, plus
- (vii)
- any other non-cash items reducing Consolidated Net Income for such period, minus
- (b)
- all non-cash items increasing Consolidated Net Income for such period, all for such Person and its Subsidiaries determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP;
provided,however, that, for the purposes of calculating EBITDA during any fiscal quarter, cash income from a particular Investment, other than in a Subsidiary which under GAAP is consolidated), of such Person shall be included only:
- (i)
- if cash income has been received by such Person with respect to such Investment; or
- (ii)
- if the cash income derived from such Investment is attributable to Temporary Cash Investments.
"Equity Offering" means an offering by the Company of shares of its Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock) (however designated and whether voting or non-voting) and any and all rights, warrants or options to acquire such Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock).
"Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Exchange Notes" means the exchange notes to be exchanged for the notes pursuant to a registered offer with terms substantially identical in all material respects to the notes.
"Existing Norcross Indenture" means the Indenture dated as of August 13, 2003 among Norcross, the guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee.
"Existing Norcross Notes" means the 97/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 issued on August 13, 2003 pursuant to the Existing Norcross Indenture.
"fair market value" means, with respect to any asset or property, the price which could be negotiated in an arm's-length, free market transaction, for cash, between a willing seller and a willing and able buyer, neither of whom is under undue pressure or compulsion to complete the transaction. Fair market value will be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company acting reasonably and in good faith and shall be evidenced by a board resolution of such Board of Directors.
"Foreign" means, with respect to any entity, an entity that is not incorporated or otherwise organized or existing under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or any territory or possession of the United States.
"GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied as in effect in the United States on the date of the Indenture. For purposes of the Indenture, the term "consolidated"
125
with respect to any Person shall mean such Person consolidated with its Restricted Subsidiaries and shall not include any Unrestricted Subsidiary.
"Guarantee" means any guarantee of the obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the notes by a Guarantor in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. When used as a verb, "Guarantee" shall have a corresponding meaning.
"Guarantor" means any Person that incurs a Guarantee of the notes;provided that upon the release and discharge of such Person from its Guarantee in accordance with the Indenture, such Person shall cease to be a Guarantor.
"Hedging Obligations" shall mean any interest, foreign currency rate or commodity price swap, cap, collar, option, hedge, forward rate or other similar agreement or arrangement designed to fix or hedge interest rates, currency exchange rates or commodity price risk, in each case, not for speculative purposes.
"Holder" means a Person in whose name a note is registered on the Registrar's books.
"incur" means, with respect to any Indebtedness or other obligation of any Person, without duplication, to create, issue, incur (by conversion, exchange or otherwise), assume, guarantee or otherwise become liable in respect of such Indebtedness or other obligation or the recording, as required pursuant to GAAP or otherwise, of any such Indebtedness or other obligation on the balance sheet of such Person (and "incurrence," "incurred," "incurrable" and "incurring" shall have meanings correlative to the foregoing);provided, that a change in the accounting policies of the Company that are in accordance with GAAP that result in an obligation of such Person that exists at such time becoming Indebtedness shall not be deemed an incurrence of such Indebtedness.
"Indebtedness" means (without duplication), with respect to any Person, any indebtedness at any time outstanding, secured or unsecured, contingent or otherwise, that is for borrowed money (whether or not the recourse of the lender is to the whole of the assets of such Person or only to a portion thereof), or evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments or representing the balance deferred and unpaid of the purchase price of any property (excluding, without limitation, any balances that constitute accounts payable or trade payables or liabilities arising from advance payments or customer deposits for goods and services sold by the Company and other accrued liabilities arising in the ordinary course of business) if and to the extent any of the foregoing indebtedness would appear as a liability upon a balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with GAAP, and shall also include, to the extent not otherwise included:
- (a)
- any Capitalized Lease Obligations;
- (b)
- obligations secured by a Lien to which the property or assets owned or held by such Person is subject, whether or not the obligation or obligations secured thereby shall have been assumed;provided,however, that if such obligation or obligations shall not have been assumed, the amount of such indebtedness shall be deemed to be the lesser of the principal amount of the obligation or the fair market value of the pledged property or assets;
- (c)
- guarantees of (or obligations with respect to letters of credit supporting) items of other Persons which would be included within this definition for such other Persons, whether or not such items would appear upon the balance sheet of the guarantor;
- (d)
- all obligations for the reimbursement of any obligor on any letter of credit, banker's acceptance or similar credit transaction;provided, that in the case of any such letters of credit, the items for which such letters of credit provide credit support are those of other Persons which would be included within this definition for such other Persons;
126
- (e)
- in the case of the Company, Disqualified Capital Stock of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary thereof; and
- (f)
- obligations of any such Person under any Hedging Obligations applicable to any of the foregoing, if and to the extent such Hedging Obligations would appear as a liability upon a balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The amount of Indebtedness of any Person at any date shall be the outstanding balance at such date of all unconditional obligations as described above and, with respect to contingent obligations, the maximum liability reasonably expected to be incurred upon the occurrence of the contingency giving rise to the obligation,provided:
- (a)
- that the amount outstanding at any time of any Indebtedness issued with original issue discount is the principal amount of such Indebtedness less the remaining unamortized portion of the original issue discount of such Indebtedness at such time as determined in conformity with GAAP; and
- (b)
- that Indebtedness shall not include any liability for federal, state, local or other taxes.
For the avoidance of doubt, "Indebtedness" of any Person shall not include: current trade payables incurred in the ordinary course of business and payable in accordance with customary practices; deferred tax obligations; minority interest; uncapitalized interest; non-interest bearing installment obligations and accrued liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business; and obligations of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to contracts for, or options, puts or similar arrangements relating to, the purchase of raw materials or the sale of inventory at a time in the future entered into in the ordinary course of business.
"Investments" means, directly, or indirectly, any advance (other than advances to customers in the ordinary course of business that are recorded as accounts receivable on the balance sheet of the lender), loan or capital contribution to (by means of transfers of property to others, payments for property or services for the account or use of others or otherwise), the purchase of any stock, bonds, notes, debentures, partnership or joint venture interests or other securities of, the acquisition, by purchase or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business or assets or stock or other evidence of beneficial ownership of, any Person or the making of any investment in any Person. Investments shall exclude extensions of trade credit on commercially reasonable terms in accordance with normal trade practices and any acquisition or purchase of Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
"Issue Date" means the date of original issuance of the notes offered hereby.
"John Hancock" means John Hancock Life Insurance Company and Hancock Mezzanine Partners, L.P. and their respective Affiliates.
"Lien" means, with respect to any property or assets of any Person, any mortgage or deed of trust, pledge, hypothecation, assignment, deposit arrangement (other than advance payments or customer deposits for goods and services sold by the Company in the ordinary course of business), security interest, lien, charge, easement, encumbrance, preference, priority, or other security agreement or preferential arrangement of any kind or nature whatsoever on or with respect to such property or assets (including without limitation, any Capitalized Lease Obligation, conditional sales, or other title retention agreement having substantially the same economic effect as any of the foregoing).
"Make Whole Premium" means with respect to a note at any applicable redemption date the greater of:
- (i)
- 1.0% of the then-outstanding principal amount of such note; and
- (ii)
- the excess of
127
- (A)
- the present value of (1) the redemption price of such note at July 1, 2006plus (2) all required interest payments due on such note through and including July 1, 2006, computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, over
- (B)
- the then-outstanding principal amount of such note.
"Management Notes" means the promissory notes of certain current officers of Norcross issued to the Company prior to the Issue Date for the sole purpose of purchasing equity of the Company and not to exceed the principal amount of $1,900,000 at any one time outstanding.
"Management Side Letter Agreements" means the Letter Agreements dated January 1, 2002 between the Company and each of David F. Myers, Jr. and Robert A. Peterson, as in existence on the Issue Date with payments made thereunder not to exceed in the aggregate $3,188,547 (subject to adjustment based upon prevailing tax rates).
"Net Income" means, with respect to any Person for any period, the net income (loss) of such Person determined in accordance with GAAP and before the reduction in respect of preferred stock dividends.
"Net Proceeds" means:
- (a)
- in the case of any sale of Capital Stock by or equity contribution to any Person, the aggregate net proceeds received by such issuer, after payment of expenses, commissions, taxes and the like incurred in connection therewith, whether such proceeds are in cash or in property (valued at the fair market value thereof at the time of receipt), and
- (b)
- in the case of any exchange, exercise, conversion or surrender of outstanding securities of any kind for or into shares of Capital Stock of such Person which is not Disqualified Capital Stock, the fair market value of such outstanding securities on the date of such exchange, exercise, conversion or surrender (plus any additional amount required to be paid by the Holder to such Person upon such exchange, exercise, conversion or surrender, less any and all payments made to the Holders,e.g., on account of fractional shares and less all expenses incurred by such Person in connection therewith).
"Norcross" means Norcross Safety Products L.L.C.
"Officers' Certificate" means, with respect to any Person, a certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer, the President or any Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer or any Treasurer of such Person that shall comply with applicable provisions of the Indenture and delivered to the Trustee.
"Permitted Holders" means the CIBC/Argosy Group, CIVC and John Hancock.
"Permitted Indebtedness" means:
- (a)
- Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company arising under or in connection with the Senior Credit Facility in an amount at any time outstanding not to exceed $140.0 million in aggregate principal amount, of which up to C$10.0 million in aggregate principal amount may be in Canadian dollars, which amount shall be reduced by any mandatory prepayments actually made thereunder required as a result of any Asset Sale or similar sale of assets (to the extent, in the case of payments of revolving credit Indebtedness, that the corresponding commitments have been permanently reduced) and any scheduled amortization payments actually made thereunder;
- (b)
- Indebtedness under the notes (including the Exchange Notes) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the total of $100.0 million and the related Guarantees, if any, (including the guarantees, if any, of the Exchange Notes)plus the principal amount of PIK Notes issued
128
129
For purposes of determining compliance with "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Additional Indebtedness," in the event that an item of Indebtedness meets the criteria of more than one of the categories of Permitted Indebtedness described in clauses (a) through (o) above or is entitled to be incurred pursuant to the Company Coverage Ratio Exception (or if incurred by Norcross, the Norcross Coverage Ratio Exception), the Company shall classify such item of Indebtedness on the date of its incurrence, or later reclassify such item of Indebtedness, in any manner that complies with the covenant "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Additional Indebtedness." Notwithstanding the foregoing, Indebtedness outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility on the Issue Date shall be deemed to have been incurred under clause (a) above. The maximum amount of Indebtedness that the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary may incur pursuant to this definition will not be deemed to be exceeded solely as the result of fluctuations in the exchange rates of currencies. In determining the amount of Indebtedness outstanding under one of the clauses above, the outstanding principal amount of any particular Indebtedness of any Person shall be counted only once and any obligation of such Person or any other Person arising under any guarantee, Lien, letter of credit or similar instrument supporting such Indebtedness shall be disregarded so long as it is permitted to be incurred by the Person or Persons incurring such obligation. Accrual of interest, accretion or amortization of original issue discount, the payment of interest on any Indebtedness in the form of additional Indebtedness with the same terms, and the payment of dividends on Disqualified Capital Stock in the form of additional shares of the same class of Disqualified Capital Stock will not be deemed to be an incurrence of Indebtedness or an issuance of Disqualified Capital Stock for purposes of the covenant described above under "Certain Covenants—Limitations on Additional Indebtedness."
"Permitted Investments" means, for any Person, Investments made on or after the date of the Indenture consisting of:
- (a)
- Investments by the Company, or by a Restricted Subsidiary thereof, in the Company (for any purpose permitted by the Indenture) or a Restricted Subsidiary, including any repurchase or acquisition of any notes issued under the Indenture;
- (b)
- Temporary Cash Investments;
- (c)
- Investments by the Company, or by a Restricted Subsidiary thereof, in a Person, if as a result of such Investment
- (i)
- such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary,
- (ii)
- such Person is merged, consolidated or amalgamated with or into, or transfers or conveys substantially all of its assets to, or is liquidated into, the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary thereof, or
- (iii)
- such business or assets are owned by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary;
- (d)
- an Investment that is made by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary thereof in the form of any stock, bonds, notes, debentures, partnership or joint venture interests or other securities that are issued by a third party to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary solely as partial consideration for the consummation of an Asset Sale that is otherwise permitted under the covenant described under "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Certain Asset Sales";
- (e)
- Investments consisting of
- (i)
- purchases and acquisitions of inventory, supplies, materials and equipment, in each case in the ordinary course of business, or
130
- (ii)
- licenses or leases of intellectual property and other assets, in each case in the ordinary course of business;
- (f)
- Investments consisting of
- (i)
- loans and advances to employees for travel, relocation and business expenses in the ordinary course of business not to exceed $500,000 in the aggregate at any one time outstanding, and
- (ii)
- prepaid expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business;
- (g)
- without duplication, Investments consisting of Indebtedness permitted pursuant to clause (d) under the definition of Permitted Indebtedness;
- (h)
- Investments of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary under any Hedging Obligations;
- (i)
- Investments consisting of endorsements for collection or deposit in the ordinary course of business;
- (j)
- Investments consisting of Loans to officers and employees for the sole purpose of purchasing equity of the Company, secured with the equity purchased therewith and not to exceed $3.5 million at any time outstanding;
- (k)
- Investments existing on the Issue Date and any amendment, modification, restatement, supplement, extension, renewal, refunding, replacement or refinancing, in whole or in part, thereof;
- (l)
- Investments in securities of trade creditors or customers received pursuant to any plan of reorganization or similar arrangement upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of such trade creditors or customers;
- (m)
- any guarantees of any Permitted Indebtedness or any Indebtedness incurred under the Company Coverage Ratio Exception or the Norcross Coverage Ratio Exception, as applicable;
- (n)
- Investments useful in businesses similar or ancillary to the business of the Company acquired solely in exchange for the issuance of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock) of the Company or Norcross; or
- (o)
- Investments in an aggregate amount, as valued at the time each such Investment is made, not exceeding $10.0 million for all such Investments from and after the Issue Date;provided, that the amount available for Investments to be made pursuant to this clause (p) shall be increased from time to time to the extent any return on capital is received by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary on any Permitted Investment previously made in reliance on this clause (o).
"Permitted Liens" means
- (a)
- Liens on property or assets of, or any equity interests in or secured debt of, any Person existing at the time such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or at the time such Person is merged into the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;provided, that such Liens
- (i)
- are not incurred in connection with, or in contemplation of, such Person becoming a Restricted Subsidiary or merging into the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, and
- (ii)
- do not extend to or cover any property, assets, Capital Stock or Indebtedness other than those of such Person at the time such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or is merged into the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;
131
- (b)
- Liens securing Refinancing Indebtedness that is incurred to refinance any Indebtedness that has been secured by a Lien permitted under the Indenture;provided, that any such Lien does not extend to or cover any Property, shares or debt other than the Property, shares or debt securing the Indebtedness so refunded, refinanced or extended;
- (c)
- Liens in favor of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;
- (d)
- Liens to secure Purchase Money Indebtedness and Capitalized Lease Obligations that are permitted under the Indenture;provided, that
- (i)
- with respect to any Purchase Money Indebtedness, any such Lien is created solely for the purpose of securing Indebtedness representing, or incurred to finance, refinance or refund, the cost (including sales and excise taxes, installation and delivery charges and other direct costs of, and other direct expenses paid or charged in connection with, such purchase, construction or improvement) of such Property,
- (ii)
- with respect to any Purchase Money Indebtedness, the principal amount of the Indebtedness secured by such Lien does not exceed 100% of such costs, and
- (iii)
- such Lien does not extend to or cover any Property other than the item of Property that is the subject of such Purchase Money Indebtedness or Capitalized Lease Obligation, as the case may be, and any improvements on such item;
- (e)
- Liens for taxes, assessments or governmental charges that are not yet due or payable or are within any applicable grace period or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings;
- (f)
- Liens securing Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Facility and Liens securing Indebtedness of Restricted Subsidiaries;
- (g)
- Liens existing on the Issue Date to the extent and in the manner such Liens are in effect on the Issue Date and any renewals or extensions thereof on terms no more restrictive and secured by the same collateral on the Issue Date;
- (h)
- Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business in connection with worker's compensation, unemployment insurance or other forms of government insurance or benefits, or to secure the performance of letters of credit, bids, tenders, statutory obligations, surety and appeal bonds, leases, government contracts, rent and other similar obligations (other than obligations for borrowed money) entered into in the ordinary course of business;
- (i)
- any attachment or judgment Lien not constituting an Event of Default under the Indenture that is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP (if so required);
- (j)
- Liens arising from the filing, for notice purposes only, of financing statements in respect of operating leases;
- (k)
- Liens consisting of restrictions on the transfer of securities, pursuant to applicable federal and state securities laws;
- (l)
- interests of lessors and licensors under leases and licenses to which the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries is a party;
- (m)
- with respect to any real property occupied by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, all easements, rights of way, licenses and similar encumbrances on or defects of title that do not materially impair the use of such property for its intended purposes;
132
- (n)
- Liens imposed by law that are incurred in the ordinary course of business and do not secure Indebtedness for borrowed money, such as carriers', warehousemen's, mechanics', landlords', materialmen's, employees', laborers', employers', suppliers', banks', repairmen's and other like Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business for sums not yet delinquent or being contested in good faith, if such reserve or other appropriate provision, if any, as shall be required by GAAP shall have been made in respect thereof;
- (o)
- terminable or short-term leases or permits for occupancy, in each case entered into in the ordinary cause of business, which leases or permits expressly grant to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary the right to terminate them at any time on not more than six months' notice and do not individually or in the aggregate interfere with the operation of the business of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary or individually or in the aggregate impair the use (for its intended purpose) or the value of the property subject thereto;
- (p)
- bankers' Liens, rights of setoff and other similar Liens existing solely with respect to cash and Temporary Cash Investments on deposit in one or more accounts maintained by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary;
- (q)
- Liens securing Hedging Obligations;
- (r)
- pledges of or Liens on raw materials or on manufactured products as security for any drafts or bills of exchange drawn in connection with the importation of such raw materials or manufactured products;
- (s)
- Liens in favor of issuers of surety, performance, judgment, appeal and like bonds or letters of credit issued in the ordinary course of business;
- (t)
- any obligations or duties affecting any property of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary to any municipality or public authority with respect to any franchise, grant, license or permit that do not materially impair the use of such property for the purposes for which it is held;
- (u)
- Liens on any property in favor of governmental bodies to secure partial, progress, advance or other payments pursuant to any contract or statute, not yet due and payable;
- (v)
- Liens encumbering deposits made to secure obligations arising from statutory, regulatory, contractual or warranty requirements; and
- (w)
- Liens securing Indebtedness of Foreign Restricted Subsidiaries permitted to be incurred in accordance with the Indenture.
"Permitted Tax Distributions" means the payment of any Tax Distributions (as defined in the limited liability agreement of the Company, as in effect on the Issue Date), to permit direct or indirect beneficial owners of shares of Capital Stock of the Company to pay federal, state or local income tax liabilities arising from income of the Company and attributable to them solely as a result of the Company and any intermediate entity through which the holder owns such shares being a limited liability company, partnership or similar entity for federal income tax purposes.
"Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or government (including any agency or political subdivision thereof).
"Preferred Stock" means any Capital Stock of a Person, however designated, which entitles the holder thereof to a preference with respect to dividends, distributions or liquidation proceeds of such Person over the holders of other Capital Stock issued by such Person.
133
"Property" of any Person means all types of real, personal, tangible, intangible or mixed property owned by such Person whether or not included in the most recent consolidated balance sheet of such Person and its Subsidiaries under GAAP.
"Purchase Money Indebtedness" means any Indebtedness incurred by a Person to finance, within 180 days from incurrence, the cost, including the cost of construction, of an item of Property acquired or improved in the ordinary course of business, the principal amount of which Indebtedness does not exceed the sum of
- (a)
- 100% of such cost; and
- (b)
- reasonable fees and expenses of such Person incurred in connection therewith.
"Refinancing Indebtedness" means Indebtedness that refunds, refinances or extends any Indebtedness of the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries (including Indebtedness that refinances Refinancing Indebtedness) permitted to be incurred by the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the Indenture (other than pursuant to clauses (a), (d), (e), (g) (h), (j)-(o) of the definition of Permitted Indebtedness), but only to the extent that:
- (a)
- the Refinancing Indebtedness is subordinated to the notes to at least the same extent as the Indebtedness being refunded, refinanced or extended, if at all;
- (b)
- either (i) the Refinancing Indebtedness is scheduled to mature after the maturity date of the notes; or (ii) the Refinancing Indebtedness has a weighted average life to maturity at the time such Refinancing Indebtedness is incurred that is equal to or greater than the weighted average life to maturity of the portion of the Indebtedness being refunded, refinanced or extended that is scheduled to mature on or prior to the maturity date of the notes;
- (c)
- such Refinancing Indebtedness is in an aggregate principal amount that is equal to or less than the sum of:
- (i)
- the aggregate principal amount then outstanding under the Indebtedness being refunded, refinanced or extended,
- (ii)
- the amount of accrued and unpaid interest, if any, and premiums owed, if any, not in excess of preexisting prepayment provisions on such Indebtedness being refunded, refinanced or extended, and
- (iii)
- the amount of fees, expenses and costs related to the incurrence of such Refinancing Indebtedness; and
- (d)
- such Refinancing Indebtedness is incurred by a Person at the same level in the corporate structure as the Person that initially incurred the Indebtedness being refunded, refinanced or extended, except that the Company may incur Refinancing Indebtedness to refund, refinance or extend Indebtedness of any Wholly-Owned Restricted Subsidiary.
"Restricted Payment" means any of the following:
- (a)
- the declaration or payment of any dividend or any other distribution or payment on Capital Stock of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary or any payment made to the direct or indirect holders (in their capacities as such) of Capital Stock of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary other than:
- (i)
- dividends or distributions payable solely in Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock) or in options, warrants or other rights to purchase Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock);
134
- (ii)
- in the case of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of the Company, dividends or distributions payable to the Company or to a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of the Company; and
- (iii)
- in the case of non-Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of the Company,pro rata dividends or distributions payable to the other holders of the same class of Capital Stock of such non-Wholly-Owned Subsidiary.
- (b)
- the purchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for value of any Capital Stock of the Company (other than Capital Stock owned by the Company or a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of the Company, excluding Disqualified Stock) or any option, warrants or other rights to purchase such Capital Stock;
- (c)
- the making of any principal payment on, or the purchase, defeasance, repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for value, prior to any scheduled maturity, scheduled repayment or scheduled sinking fund payment, of any Indebtedness that is subordinate in right of payment to the notes other than subordinated Indebtedness acquired or repaid in anticipation of satisfying a scheduled sinking fund obligation, principal installment or final maturity (in each case due within one year of the date of acquisition);
- (d)
- the making of any Investment in any Person other than a Permitted Investment;
- (e)
- any designation of a Restricted Subsidiary as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, valued at the fair market value of the net assets of such Restricted Subsidiary on the date of designation; and
- (f)
- forgiveness of any Indebtedness of an Affiliate of the Company (other than a Restricted Subsidiary) to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary.
For purposes of determining the amount expended for Restricted Payments, cash distributed or invested shall be valued at the face amount thereof and property other than cash shall be valued at its fair market value.
"Restricted Subsidiary" means a Subsidiary of the Company other than an Unrestricted Subsidiary and includes all of the Subsidiaries of the Company existing as of the Issue Date. The Board of Directors of the Company may designate any Unrestricted Subsidiary or any Person that is to become a Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary if immediately after giving effect to such action (and treating any Acquired Indebtedness as having been incurred at the time of such action), the Company could have incurred at least $1.00 of additional Indebtedness under the Company Coverage Ratio Exception.
"Rule 144A" means Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act.
"Sale and Lease-Back Transaction" means any arrangement with any Person providing for the leasing by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of any real or tangible personal Property, which Property has been or is to be sold or transferred by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary to such Person in contemplation of such leasing.
"Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Senior Credit Facility" means the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 20, 2003, among Norcross, Norcross's Subsidiaries, the lenders party thereto in their capacities as lenders thereunder, Fleet National Bank, as administrative agent, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, as Canadian Lender, together with the related documents thereto (including, without limitation, any guarantee agreements and security documents), in each case as such agreements and documents may be amended (including any amendment and restatement thereof), supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, including any agreement extending the maturity of, refinancing, replacing or otherwise restructuring (including increasing the amount of available borrowings thereunder, adding Restricted Subsidiaries of Norcross as additional borrowers or guarantors
135
thereunder or replacing or refinancing such Indebtedness with notes, debentures or other securities issued under an indenture or similar agreement) all or any portion of the Indebtedness under such agreement or any successor or replacement agreement and whether by the same or any other agent, lender or group of lenders.
"Significant Subsidiary" with respect to any Person, means any Restricted Subsidiary of such Person that satisfies the criteria for a "significant subsidiary" set forth in Rule 1.02(w) of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act.
"Subsidiary" of any specified Person means any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, association or other business entity, whether now existing or hereafter organized or acquired,
- (a)
- in the case of a corporation, of which more than 50% of the total voting power of the Capital Stock entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any contingency) to vote in the election of directors, officers or Trustees thereof is held by such first-named Person or any of its Subsidiaries; or
- (b)
- in the case of a partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, association or other business entity, with respect to which such first-named Person or any of its Subsidiaries has the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such entity by contract or otherwise or if in accordance with GAAP such entity is consolidated with the first-named Person for financial statement purposes.
"Temporary Cash Investments" means
- (a)
- Investments in marketable, direct obligations issued or guaranteed by the United States of America, or of any governmental agency or political subdivision thereof, maturing within 365 days of the date of purchase;
- (b)
- Investments in certificates of deposit, eurodollar time deposits, bankers' acceptances or overnight bank deposits issued by a bank organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state thereof or the District of Columbia, in each case having capital, surplus and undivided profits totaling more than $500.0 million and rated at least A by Standard & Poor's Rating Agency and A-2 by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., maturing within 365 days of purchase;
- (c)
- repurchase obligations with a term of not more than seven days for underlying securities of the types described in clauses (a) and (b) above entered into with any financial institution meeting the qualifications specified in clause (b) above;
- (d)
- commercial paper having a rating no lower than "A-2" from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or "P2" from Standard & Poor's Rating Services and in each case maturing within 12 months after the date of acquisition; or
- (e)
- Investments not exceeding 365 days in duration in money market funds that invest substantially all of such funds' assets in the Investments described in the preceding clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d); or
- (f)
- in the case of Foreign Subsidiaries, substantially similar instruments to those set forth in (a) through (e) above.
"Treasury Rate" means the yield to maturity at the time of computation of United States Treasury securities with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H. 15(519) which has become publicly available at least two Business Days prior to the redemption date or, if such Statistical Release is no longer published, any publicly available source or similar market data) most nearly equal to the period from the redemption date to July 1, 2006;
136
provided, however, that if the period from the redemption date to July 1, 2006 is not equal to the constant maturity of a United States Treasury security for which a weekly average yield is given, the Treasury Rate shall be obtained by linear interpolation (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth of a year) from the weekly average yields of United States Treasury securities for which such yields are given, except that if the period from the redemption date to July 1, 2006 is less than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year shall be used.
"Unrestricted Subsidiary" means
- (a)
- any Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary and
- (b)
- any Subsidiary of the Company that is classified after the Issue Date as an Unrestricted Subsidiary by a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company;provided, that a Subsidiary organized or acquired after the Issue Date may be so classified as an Unrestricted Subsidiary only if such classification is in compliance with the covenant set forth under "Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments."
The Trustee shall be given prompt notice by the Company of each resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company under this provision, together with a copy of each such resolution adopted.
"Wholly-Owned" means, with respect to a Subsidiary of a specified Person, any Subsidiary (or, if such specified Person is the Company, a Restricted Subsidiary), all of the outstanding voting securities (other than directors' qualifying shares) of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by such Person.
137
BOOK-ENTRY, DELIVERY AND FORM
The Exchange Notes will be represented by one or more notes in registered, global form without interest coupons (collectively, the "Global Notes"). The Global Notes will be deposited upon issuance with the trustee as custodian for The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), in New York, New York or Wilmington, Delaware and registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, in each case for credit to an account of a direct or indirect participant as described below.
Except as set forth below, the Global Notes may be transferred, in whole but not in part, only to another nominee of DTC or to a successor of DTC or its nominee. Beneficial interests in the Global Notes may not be exchanged for notes in certificated form except in the limited circumstances described below. See "—Exchange of Book-Entry Notes for Certificated Notes."
The notes may be presented for registration of transfer and exchange at the offices of the Registrar.
Depository Procedures
DTC has advised us that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company created to hold securities for its participating organizations (collectively, the "Participants") and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of transactions in those securities between the Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of the Participants. The Participants include securities brokers and dealers (including the initial purchaser), banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Access to DTC's system is also available to other entities such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly (collectively, the "Indirect Participants"). Persons who are not Participants may beneficially own securities held by or on behalf of DTC only through the Participants or the Indirect Participants. The ownership interest and transfer of ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each security held by or on behalf of DTC are recorded on the records of the Participants and the Indirect Participants.
DTC has also advised us that pursuant to procedures established by it, (a) upon deposit of the Global Notes, DTC will credit the accounts of Participants designated by the initial purchaser with portions of the principal amount of the Global Notes and (b) ownership of such interests in the Global Notes will be shown on, and the transfer of ownership thereof will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to the Participants) or by the Participants and the Indirect Participants (with respect to other owners of beneficial interests in the Global Notes).
Investors in the Global Notes may hold their interests therein directly through DTC, if they are Participants in such system, or indirectly through organizations (including Euroclear and Clearstream) which are Participants in such system. Investors may also hold interests in the Global Notes through organizations other than Euroclear and Clearstream that are Participants in the DTC system. Euroclear and Clearstream will hold interests in the Global Notes on behalf of their participants through their respective depositories, which in turn will hold such interests in the Global Notes customers' securities accounts in their respective names on the books of DTC. All interests in a Global Note, including those held through Euroclear or Clearstream, may be subject to the procedures and requirements of DTC. Those interests held through Euroclear or Clearstream may also be subject to the procedures and requirements of such system.
The laws of some states require that certain persons take physical delivery in definitive form of securities that they own. Consequently, the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a Global Note to such persons may be limited to that extent. Because DTC can act only on behalf of the Participants, which in turn act on behalf of the Indirect Participants and certain banks, the ability of a person having beneficial interests in a Global Note to pledge such interests to persons or entities that do not
138
participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take actions in respect of such interests, may be affected by the lack of a physical certificate evidencing such interests.
Except as described below, owners of interests in the Global Notes will not have notes registered in their names, will not receive physical delivery of notes in certificated form and will not be considered the registered owners or holders thereof under the Indenture for any purpose.
Payments in respect of the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on a Global Note registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be payable to DTC or its nominee in its capacity as the registered holder under the Indenture. Under the terms of the Indenture, we and the trustee will treat the persons in whose names the notes, including the Global Notes, are registered as the owners thereof for the purpose of receiving such payments and for any and all other purposes whatsoever. Consequently, none of us, the initial purchaser, the trustee nor any of our agents or the agent of the initial purchaser or the trustee has or will have any responsibility or liability for (i) any aspect or accuracy of DTC's records or any Participant's or Indirect Participant's records relating to the beneficial ownership or (ii) any other matter relating to the actions and practices of DTC or any of the Participants or the Indirect Participants.
DTC has advised us that its current practice, upon receipt of any payment in respect of securities such as the notes (including principal and interest), is to credit the accounts of the relevant Participants with the payment on the payment date, in amounts proportionate to their respective holdings in principal amount of beneficial interests in the relevant security as shown on the records of DTC. Payments by the Participants and the Indirect Participants to the beneficial owners of notes will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will not be the responsibility of DTC, the trustee or us. Neither we nor the trustee will be liable for any delay by DTC or any of the Participants in identifying the beneficial owners of the notes, and we and the trustee may conclusively rely on and will be protected in relying on instructions from DTC or its nominee as the registered owner of the Global Notes for all purposes.
Except for trades involving only Euroclear and Clearstream participants, interests in the Global Notes will trade in DTC's Same-Day Funds Settlement System and secondary market trading activity in such interests will therefore settle in immediately available funds, subject in all cases to the rules and procedures of DTC and the Participants.
Transfers between Participants in DTC will be effected in accordance with DTC's procedures and will be settled in same-day funds. Transfers between accountholders in Euroclear and Clearstream will be effected in the ordinary way in accordance with their respective rules and operating procedures.
Cross-market transfers between the accountholders in DTC, on the one hand, and directly or indirectly through Euroclear or Clearstream accountholders, on the other hand, will be effected through DTC in accordance with DTC's rules on behalf of Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, by its respective depository; however, such cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, by the counterparty in such system in accordance with the rules and procedures and within the established deadlines (Brussels time) of such system. Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its respective depository to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving interests in the relevant Global Note in DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear and Clearstream accountholders may not deliver instructions directly to the depositories for Euroclear or Clearstream.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a Euroclear or Clearstream accountholder purchasing an interest in a Global Note from an accountholder in DTC will be credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream participant, during the
139
securities settlement processing day (which must be a business day for Euroclear or Clearstream) immediately following the settlement date of DTC. Cash received in Euroclear or Clearstream as a result of sales of interests in a Global Note by or through a Euroclear or Clearstream accountholder to a Participant in DTC will be received with value on the settlement date of DTC but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream cash account only as of the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream following DTC's settlement date.
DTC has advised us that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction of one or more Participants to whose account with DTC interests in the Global Notes are credited and only in respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of the notes as to which such Participant or Participants has or have given such direction. However, if any of the events described under "—Exchange of Book Entry Notes for Certificated Notes" occurs, DTC reserves the right to exchange the Global Notes for legended notes in certificated form and to distribute such notes to its Participants.
The information in this section concerning DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream and their book-entry systems has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable, but we take no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
Although DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have agreed to the foregoing procedures to facilitate transfers of interests in the Global Notes among accountholders in DTC and accountholders of Euroclear and Clearstream, they are under no obligation to perform or to continue to perform such procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued at any time. None of us, the initial purchaser or the trustee nor any or our agents or the agent of the initial purchaser or the trustee will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their respective participants, indirect participants or accountholders of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.
Exchange of Book-Entry Notes for Certificated Notes
A Global Note is exchangeable for definitive notes in registered certificated form if (i) DTC (x) notifies us that it is unwilling or unable to continue as depository for the Global Note and we thereupon fail to appoint a successor depository or (y) has ceased to be a clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act, (ii) we notify the trustee in writing that we elect to cause issuance of notes in certificated form, or (iii) there shall have occurred and be continuing a Default or an Event of Default with respect to the notes. In all cases, certificated notes delivered in exchange for any Global Note or beneficial interests therein will be registered in the names, and issued in any approved denominations, requested by or on behalf of DTC (in accordance with its customary procedures) and will bear the restrictive legend described in "Notice to Investors" unless we determine otherwise in compliance with applicable law.
140
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of certain material United States federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the notes, but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all the potential tax considerations. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Treasury Department regulations promulgated or proposed thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as of the date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. This summary is limited to the tax consequences of those persons who are original beneficial owners of the notes, who purchase notes at their original issue price for cash and who hold such notes as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code ("Holders"). This summary does not purport to deal with all aspects of United States federal income taxation that might be relevant to particular Holders in light of their particular investment circumstances or status, nor does it address specific tax consequences that may be relevant to particular persons (including, for example, financial institutions, broker-dealers, insurance companies, partnerships or other pass-through entities, expatriates, tax-exempt organizations and persons that have a functional currency other than the United States Dollar or persons in special situations, such as those who have elected to mark securities to market or those who hold notes as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated investment). In addition, this summary does not address United States federal alternative minimum tax consequences or consequences under the tax laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction. We have not sought any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached in this summary, and we cannot assure you that the IRS will agree with such statements and conclusions.
This summary is for general information only. Prospective purchasers of the notes are urged to consult their tax advisors concerning the United States federal income taxation and other tax consequences to them of acquiring, owning and disposing of the notes, as well as the application of state, local and foreign income and other tax laws.
For purposes of the following summary, a "U.S. Holder" is a holder that is (i) a citizen or individual resident of the United States; (ii) a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of the source or (iv) a trust, if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust's administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all its substantial decisions or if a valid election to be treated as a U.S. person is in effect with respect to such trust. A "Non-U.S. Holder" is a Holder that is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes.
A partnership for United States federal income tax purposes is not subject to income tax on income derived from holding the notes. A partner of the partnership may be subject to tax on such income under rules similar to the rules for U.S. Holders or non-U.S. Holders depending on whether (i) the partner is a U.S. or a non-U.S. person, and (ii) the partnership is or is not engaged in a United States trade or business to which income or gain from the notes is effectively connected. If you are a partner of a partnership acquiring the notes, you should consult your tax advisor about the United States tax consequences of holding and disposing of the notes.
United States Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders
The notes will be issued with original issue discount ("OID") equal to the difference between their issue price and their stated redemption price at maturity. The issue price of the notes will equal the first price at which a substantial amount of the notes are sold for money.
141
The stated redemption price at maturity of the notes is the sum of all amounts payable with respect to the notes, whether denominated as principal or interest (other than qualified stated interest payments). Qualified stated interest generally means stated interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or other property (other than additional debt instruments of issuer) at least annually at a single fixed rate (or at certain qualifying variable rates). Because interest on the notes is not unconditionally payable in cash or other property (other than additional debt instruments of issuer) at least annually, none of the stated interest with respect to the notes will be qualified stated interest. Consequently, all of the stated interest payments on a note (including any additional debt instruments of issuer, if any, issued in respect with respect to a note) will be included in the stated redemption price at maturity of such note for U.S. federal income tax purposes and must be accrued by a U.S. holder pursuant to the original issue discount rules, as described below.
Generally, U.S. Holders will be required to include the OID in ordinary income for U.S. federal income tax purposes as it accrues regardless of when cash payments attributable to such income are received (and regardless of whether the U.S. Holder is a cash or accrual method taxpayer). OID will generally be treated as interest income to the U.S. Holder and will accrue on a constant yield-to-maturity basis over the life of the notes.
The amount of OID accruing with respect to any note will be the sum of the "daily portions" of OID with respect to such note for each day during the taxable year in which a U.S. Holder owns a note ("accrued OID"). The daily portion is determined by allocating to each day in any "accrual period" a pro rata portion of the OID allocable to that accrual period. An accrual period may be of any length and may vary in length over the term of a note, provided that each accrual period is no longer than one year and each scheduled payment of principal or interest occurs either on the final day or on the first day of an accrual period. The amount of OID accruing during any full accrual period with respect to a note will be equal to: (i) the "adjusted issue price" of such note at the beginning of that accrual period, multiplied by (ii) the yield to maturity of such note. The yield to maturity is the discount rate which, when used in computing the present value of all principal and interest payments to be made under a note, produces an amount equal to the note's issue price.
OID allocable to a final accrual period is the difference between the amount payable at maturity and the adjusted issue price at the beginning of the final accrual period. If all accrual periods are of equal length, except for an initial short accrual period, the amount of OID allocable to the initial short accrual period may be computed under any reasonable method. The adjusted issue price of a note at the beginning of its first accrual period will be equal to its issue price. The adjusted issue price at the beginning of any subsequent accrual period will be equal to (i) the adjusted issue price at the beginning of the preceding accrual period, plus (ii) the amount of OID accrued during the preceding accrual period, minus (iii) cash payments made on the note during the preceding accrual period.
Payments received by a U.S. Holder upon the mandatory redemption of a portion of each note in 2010 will be treated as tax-free payments of a portion of the then accrued OID with respect to such note in its entirety (including the portion of the note not redeemed).
Upon the sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of a note, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the sum of cash plus the fair market value of all other property received on such disposition (except to the extent such cash or property is attributable to accrued but unpaid interest, which is treated as interest as described above) and (ii) such Holder's adjusted tax basis in the note. A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in a note generally will equal the cost of the note to such Holder plus unpaid OID accrued with respect to the note.
Except to the extent attributable to accrued market discount, as discussed below, gain or loss recognized on the disposition of a note generally will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of such disposition, the U.S. Holder's holding period for the note is
142
more than twelve months. The maximum federal long-term capital gain rate is 15% for noncorporate U.S. Holders and 35% for corporate U.S. Holders. The deductibility of capital losses by U.S. Holders is subject to limitations.
Interest accruing on the notes will be payable, at issuer's option, in cash or in the form of additional notes. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, payment of interest in the form of additional notes is not considered a payment made on the original notes, and additional notes issued as payment of interest will be aggregated with the original note and treated as a single debt instrument for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The above discussion therefore assumes that the sale, exchange, retirement, or other disposition of a note by a U.S. Holder is a disposition of such single debt instrument (i.e., is a disposition of such holder's interest in the original note and any additional notes received with respect thereto). If, contrary to such assumption, the sale, exchange, retirement, or other disposition of the original note or any additional notes received with respect thereto occurs in separate transactions, although not free from doubt, a U.S. Holder would likely be required to allocate the adjusted issue price of such holder's note (which, as described above, is treated as a single debt instrument for U.S. federal income tax purposes) between the original note and any additional notes received with respect thereto in proportion to their relative principal amounts. In such case, a U.S. Holder's holding period in any additional notes with respect to an original note would likely be identical to the holder's holding period for the original note with respect to which the additional notes were received. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of disposing of the original note and any additional notes received with respect thereto in separate transactions.
Market Discount and Acquisition Premium
A United States Holder who purchases a note at a "market discount" that exceeds a statutorily definedde minimis amount will be subject to the "market discount" rules of the Code. A United States Holder who purchases a note at a premium will be subject to the bond premium amortization rules of the Code.
In general, "market discount" would be calculated as the excess of a note's issue price, within the meaning of section 1273 of the Code, over its purchase price. If a United States Holder purchases a note at a "market discount," any gain on sale of that note attributable to the United States Holder's unrecognized accrued market discount would generally be treated as ordinary income to the United States Holder. In addition, a United States Holder who acquires a debt instrument at a market discount may be required to defer a portion of any interest expense that otherwise may be deductible on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase or carry the debt instrument until the United States Holder disposes of the debt instrument in a taxable transaction. Instead of recognizing any market discount upon a disposition of a note and being required to defer any applicable interest expense, a United States Holder may elect to include market discount in income currently as the discount accrues. The current income inclusion election, once made, applies to all market discount obligations acquired on or after the first day of the first taxable year in which the election applies, and may not be revoked without the consent of the IRS.
In the event that a note is treated as purchased at a premium, that premium will be amortizable by a United States Holder as an offset to interest income (with a corresponding reduction in the United States Holder's tax basis) on a consent yield basis if the United States Holder elects to do so. This election will also apply to all other debt instruments held by the United States Holder during the year in which the election is made and to all debt instruments acquired after that year.
143
The exchange of notes for registered notes in the exchange offer will not constitute a material modification of the terms of the notes and thus will not constitute a taxable event for U.S. Holders. Consequently, a U.S. Holder will not recognize gain upon receipt of registered notes in exchange for notes in the exchange offer, the U.S. Holder's basis in the registered note received in the exchange offer will be the same as its basis in the corresponding notes immediately before the exchange and the U.S. Holder's holding period in the registered notes will include its holding period in the original notes.
United States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders
Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, payments of principal and interest on the notes by us or any of our agents to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to United States federal withholding tax, provided that such payments are not effectively connected with the conduct of a United States trade or business and:
(1) the Non-U.S Holder does not, directly or indirectly, actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total combined interest in our capital or profits;
(2) the Non-U.S. Holder is not a controlled foreign corporation for United States federal income tax purposes that is related to us directly or indirectly through equity security ownership;
(3) the Non-U.S. Holder is not a bank described in Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code; and
(4) either (a) the beneficial owner of the notes certifies to us or our agent on IRS Form W-8BEN (or a suitable substitute form or successor form), under penalties of perjury, that it is not a "U.S. person" (as defined in the Code) and provides its name and address, or (b) a securities clearing organization, bank or other financial institution that holds customers' securities in the ordinary course of its trade or business (a "financial institution") and holds the notes on behalf of the beneficial owner certifies to us or our agent, under penalties of perjury, that such a statement has been received from the beneficial owner by it or by a financial institution between it and the beneficial owner and furnishes us with a copy thereof (the "Portfolio Interest Exemption").
If a Non-U.S. Holder cannot satisfy the requirements of the Portfolio Interest Exemption, payments of interest made to such Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to a 30% withholding tax unless the beneficial owner of the note provides us or our agent, as the case may be, with a properly executed:
(1) IRS Form W-8BEN (or successor form) claiming an exemption from, or reduction in, withholding under a tax treaty (a "Treaty Exemption"), or
(2) IRS Form W-8ECI (or successor form) stating that interest paid on the note is not subject to withholding tax because it is United States trade or business income to the beneficial owner (in which case such interest will be subject to regular graduated United States tax rates as described below).
The certification requirement described above also may require a non-U.S. Holder that provides an IRS form, or that claims a Treaty Exemption, to provide its United States taxpayer identification number.
We suggest that you consult your tax advisor about the specific methods for satisfying these requirements. A claim for exemption will not be valid if the person receiving the applicable form has actual knowledge that the statements on the form are false.
If interest on the note is effectively connected with a United States trade or business of the beneficial owner, the Non-U.S. Holder, although exempt from the withholding tax described above, will
144
be subject to United States federal income tax on such interest on a net income basis in the same manner as if it were a U.S. Holder. In addition, if such Holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, subject to adjustments. For this purpose, interest on a note which is effectively connected with a United States trade or business will be included in such foreign corporation's earnings and profits.
No withholding of United States federal income tax will be required with respect to any gain or income realized by a Non-U.S. Holder upon the sale, exchange or disposition of a note (except with respect to accrued and unpaid interest, which would be treated as interest as discussed above).
A Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to United States federal income tax on gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of a note unless (a) the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 or more days in the taxable year of the disposition and certain other conditions are met, (b) the Non-U.S. Holder is subject to tax pursuant to the provisions of United States tax law applicable to certain United States expatriates or (c) such gain or income is effectively connected with a United States trade or business. U.S. Holders should consult with their advisors as to the effect on them of such legislation.
The exchange of notes for registered notes in the exchange offer will not constitute a taxable event for a Non-U.S. Holder.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
For each calendar year in which the notes are outstanding, we are required to provide the IRS with certain information, including the beneficial owner's name, address and taxpayer identification number, the aggregate amount of interest paid to that beneficial owner during the calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any. This obligation, however, does not apply with respect to certain payments to U.S. Holders, including corporations and tax-exempt organizations, provided that they establish entitlement to an exemption.
In the event that a U.S. Holder subject to the reporting requirements described above fails to supply its correct taxpayer identification number in the manner required by applicable law or underreports its tax liability, we, our agents or paying agents or a broker may be required to "backup" withhold a tax at a rate of 28% of each payment of interest and principal (and premium or liquidated damages, if any) on the notes. This backup withholding is not an additional tax and may be refunded or credited against the U.S. Holder's United States federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Under current Treasury Regulations, United States backup withholding tax will not apply to payments on a note or proceeds from the sale of a note payable to a Non-U.S. Holder if the statement described in "United States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders—Payment of Interest" is duly provided by such Holder or the Holder otherwise establishes an exemption, provided that the payor does not have actual knowledge that the Holder is a U.S. person or that the conditions of any claimed exemption are not satisfied. Certain information reporting may still apply to interest payments even if an exemption from backup withholding is established.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a non-U.S. Holder will be allowed as a refund or a credit against such non-U.S. Holder's United States federal income tax liability, provided that the requisite procedures are followed.
145
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each participating broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such exchange notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a participating broker-dealer in connection with resales of exchange notes received by it in exchange for outstanding notes where such outstanding notes were acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that for a period of one year after the expiration date, we will make this prospectus, as amended or supplemented, available to any participating broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sales of the exchange notes by participating broker-dealers. Exchange notes received by participating broker-dealers for their own account pursuant to the exchange offer may be sold from time to time in one or more transactions in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of options on the exchange notes or a combination of such methods of resale, at market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices or negotiated prices. Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or to or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in the form of commissions or concessions from any such participating broker-dealer and/or the purchasers of any such exchange notes. Any participating broker-dealer that resells the exchange notes that were received by it for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer and any broker or dealer that participates in a distribution of such exchange notes may be deemed to be an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act and any profit on any such resale of exchange notes and any commissions or concessions received by any such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities Act. The letter of transmittal states that by acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a prospectus, a participating broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act.
For a period of one year after the expiration date we will promptly send additional copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to this prospectus to any participating broker-dealer that requests such documents in the letter of transmittal.
Prior to the exchange offer, there has not been any public market for the outstanding notes. The outstanding notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and will be subject to restrictions on transferability to the extent that they are not exchanged for exchange notes by holders who are entitled to participate in this exchange offer. The holders of outstanding notes, other than any holder that is our affiliate within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act, who are not eligible to participate in the exchange offer are entitled to certain registration rights, and we may be required to file a shelf registration statement with respect to their outstanding notes. The exchange notes will constitute a new issue of securities with no established trading market. We do not intend to list the exchange notes on any national securities exchange or to seek the admission thereof to trading in the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System. The initial purchaser has advised us that it currently intends to make a market in the exchange notes. Such market making activity will be subject to the limits imposed by the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and may be limited during the exchange offer and the pendency of any shelf registration statements. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that an active public or other market will develop for the exchange notes or as to the liquidity of the trading market for the exchange notes. If a trading market does not develop or is not maintained, holders of the exchange notes may experience difficulty in reselling the exchange notes or may be unable to sell them at all. If a market for the exchange notes develops, any such market may be discontinued at any time.
146
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the exchange notes and other legal matters, including the tax-free nature of the exchange, will be passed upon on our behalf by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, a partnership that includes professional corporations.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The consolidated financial statements of NSP Holdings L.L.C. as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, appearing in this prospectus have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333-123631) with respect to the securities being offered hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules. You should refer to the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules, for further information about use and the securities being offered hereby. Statements we make in this prospectus about certain contracts or other documents are not necessarily complete. When we make such statements, we refer you to the copies of the contracts or documents that are filed as exhibits to the registration statement because those statements are qualified in all respects by reference to those exhibits. As described below, the registration statement, including exhibits and schedules is on file at the offices of the SEC and may be inspected without charge.
We are not currently subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act. We have agreed that, whether or not we are required to do so by the rules and regulations of the SEC, for so long as any of the notes remain outstanding, we will furnish to the holders of the notes and file with the SEC, unless the SEC will not accept the filing, following the consummation of the exchange offer: (1) all quarterly and annual financial information that would be required to be contained in a filing with the SEC on Forms 10-Q and 10-K if we were required to file those forms, including a "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and, with respect to the annual information only, a report by our certified independent accountants and (2) all current reports that would be required to be filed with the SEC on Form 8-K if we were required to file such reports. You may read and copy any reports we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. All reports filed with the SEC will be available on the SEC's web site at http://www.sec.gov.
If you make a request for such information in writing, we will provide you, without charge, a copy of such reports, proxy statements and other information. Any such request should be directed to: NSP Holdings L.L.C., 2211 York Road, Suite 215, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.
147
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | Page
|
---|
NSP Holdings L.L.C. | | |
| Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004: | | |
| | Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | F-2 |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets | | F-3 |
| | Consolidated Statements of Operations | | F-4 |
| | Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members' Deficit | | F-5 |
| | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | F-6 |
| | Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-7 |
Kächele-Cama Latex GmbH | | |
| Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the seven months ended July 31, 2002 and 2003: | | |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets | | F-32 |
| | Consolidated Statements of Income | | F-33 |
| | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | F-34 |
| | Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-35 |
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Members
NSP Holdings L.L.C.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NSP Holdings L.L.C. (a Delaware Limited Liability Company) as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members' deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NSP Holdings L.L.C. at December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 25, 2005
F-2
NSP HOLDINGS L.L.C.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in Thousands)
| | December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 16,341 | | $ | 35,731 | |
| Accounts receivable, less allowance of $2,493 and $2,063 in 2003 and 2004, respectively | | | 53,291 | | | 61,167 | |
| Inventories | | | 80,828 | | | 82,532 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | 30 | | | 60 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 3,833 | | | 3,183 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | 154,323 | | | 182,673 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | | 56,213 | | | 51,809 | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 10,832 | | | 9,960 | |
Goodwill, net | | | 130,032 | | | 132,662 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | | 5,641 | | | 6,256 | |
Other noncurrent assets | | | 5,677 | | | 5,831 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | $ | 362,718 | | $ | 389,191 | |
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities and members' deficit | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 18,236 | | $ | 17,871 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | 27,849 | | | 29,024 | |
| Current maturities of long-term obligations | | | 4,434 | | | 15,252 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | 50,519 | | | 62,147 | |
Pension, postretirement, and deferred compensation | | | 24,318 | | | 22,923 | |
Long-term obligations | | | 253,814 | | | 238,314 | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred units | | | — | | | 134,310 | |
Other noncurrent liabilities | | | 430 | | | 1,653 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 1,937 | | | 4,799 | |
Minority interest | | | 124 | | | 142 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 280,623 | | | 402,141 | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred units | | | 120,817 | | | — | |
Members' deficit: | | | | | | | |
| Class E units | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Common units: | | | | | | | |
| | Class A units | | | 38,676 | | | 38,676 | |
| | Class C units | | | 188 | | | 188 | |
| | Class D units | | | 1,248 | | | 1,248 | |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (126,437 | ) | | (118,739 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | | (2,916 | ) | | 3,529 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total members' deficit | | | (89,241 | ) | | (75,097 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities and members' deficit | | $ | 362,718 | | $ | 389,191 | |
| |
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
NSP HOLDINGS L.L.C.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in Thousands)
| | Year ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Net sales | | $ | 323,509 | | $ | 372,524 | | $ | 440,280 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 205,655 | | | 240,408 | | | 281,924 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 117,854 | | | 132,116 | | | 158,356 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selling | | | 30,440 | | | 36,877 | | | 41,901 | |
| Distribution | | | 15,177 | | | 18,550 | | | 22,452 | |
| General and administrative | | | 31,075 | | | 34,011 | | | 41,721 | |
| Amortization of intangibles | | | 3,239 | | | 2,583 | | | 517 | |
| Restructuring and merger related charges | | | 9,269 | | | — | | | — | |
| Strategic alternatives | | | — | | | — | | | 616 | |
| Zimbabwe subsidiary impairment charge | | | 2,785 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 91,985 | | | 92,021 | | | 107,207 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 25,869 | | | 40,095 | | | 51,149 | |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | 23,374 | | | 33,454 | | | 35,962 | |
| Interest income | | | (122 | ) | | (117 | ) | | (213 | ) |
| Other, net | | | (305 | ) | | (1,002 | ) | | 1,539 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes and minority interest | | | 2,922 | | | 7,760 | | | 13,861 | |
Income tax expense | | | 7,901 | | | 1,843 | | | 3,195 | |
Minority interest | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | | (4,979 | ) | | 5,920 | | $ | 10,641 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
Preferred unit dividends | | | 11,991 | | | 12,973 | | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Net loss attributable to common unit holders | | $ | (16,970 | ) | $ | (7,053 | ) | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
NSP HOLDINGS L.L.C.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS' DEFICIT
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Units)
| | Class E
| | Class A
| | Class C
| | Class D
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Accumulated Deficit
| | Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
| |
| |
---|
| | Units
| | Amount
| | Units
| | Amount
| | Units
| | Amount
| | Units
| | Amount
| | Total
| |
---|
Balance at January 1, 2002 | | — | | $ | — | | 7,087,090 | | $ | 37,558 | | 184,523 | | $ | — | | 212,018 | | $ | 1,248 | | $ | (101,921 | ) | $ | (6,889 | ) | $ | (70,004 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,615 | | | 1,615 | |
Minimum pension liability | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (9,557 | ) | | (9,557 | ) |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | (4,979 | ) | | — | | | (4,979 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (12,921 | ) |
Capital contributions | | — | | | — | | 178,714 | | | 1,050 | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,050 | |
Management loans | | — | | | — | | — | | | 34 | | — | | | 94 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 128 | |
Dividends on preferred units | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | (11,991 | ) | | — | | | (11,991 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | — | | | — | | 7,265,804 | | | 38,642 | | 184,523 | | | 94 | | 212,018 | | | 1,248 | | | (118,891 | ) | | (14,831 | ) | | (93,738 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 12,123 | | | 12,123 | |
Minimum pension liability | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (208 | ) | | (208 | ) |
Net income | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | 5,920 | | | — | | | 5,920 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,835 | |
Management loans | | — | | | — | | — | | | 34 | | — | | | 94 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 128 | |
Dividends on preferred units | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | (12,973 | ) | | — | | | (12,973 | ) |
Distributions to members | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | (493 | ) | | — | | | (493 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2003 | | — | | | — | | 7,265,804 | | | 38,676 | | 184,523 | | | 188 | | 212,018 | | | 1,248 | | | (126,437 | ) | | (2,916 | ) | | (89,241 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,492 | | | 7,492 | |
Minimum pension liability | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,047 | ) | | (1,047 | ) |
Net income | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | 10,641 | | | — | | | 10,641 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,086 | |
Capital contributions | | 986 | | | 1 | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
Distributions to members | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | (2,943 | ) | | — | | | (2,943 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2004 | | 986 | | $ | 1 | | 7,265,804 | | $ | 38,676 | | 184,523 | | $ | 188 | | 212,018 | | $ | 1,248 | | $ | (118,739 | ) | $ | 3,529 | | $ | (75,097 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
NSP HOLDINGS L.L.C.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in Thousands)
| | Year ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Operating activities | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (4,979 | ) | $ | 5,920 | | $ | 10,641 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | | | 9,033 | | | 10,166 | | | 11,854 | |
| Accelerated depreciation on long lived assets to be abandoned | | | 6,345 | | | — | | | — | |
| Amortization of intangibles | | | 3,239 | | | 2,583 | | | 517 | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 2,024 | | | 2,191 | | | 1,777 | |
| Amortization of original issue discount | | | 1,016 | | | 662 | | | 92 | |
| Write off of deferred financing costs | | | — | | | 7,284 | | | — | |
| (Gain) loss on sale of property, plant, and equipment | | | — | | | (417 | ) | | 899 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | 5,716 | | | 154 | | | 583 | |
| Minority interest | | | — | | | (3 | ) | | 25 | |
| Noncash interest | | | — | | | — | | | 13,493 | |
| Impairment of investment in Zimbabwe | | | 2,072 | | | — | | | — | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Accounts receivable | | | (4,081 | ) | | (698 | ) | | (7,876 | ) |
| | Inventories | | | (1,158 | ) | | (12,118 | ) | | (1,704 | ) |
| | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (473 | ) | | (443 | ) | | 650 | |
| | Other noncurrent assets | | | 402 | | | (395 | ) | | (627 | ) |
| | Accounts payable | | | 191 | | | 2,474 | | | (365 | ) |
| | Accrued expenses | | | 5,869 | | | 3,208 | | | 1,175 | |
| | Pension, postretirement, and deferred compensation | | | (308 | ) | | 1,335 | | | (2,442 | ) |
| | Other noncurrent liabilities | | | (1,662 | ) | | (294 | ) | | 1,223 | |
| | Other | | | (16 | ) | | 87 | | | (4 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 23,230 | | | 21,696 | | | 29,911 | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired | | | (10,531 | ) | | (18,757 | ) | | (691 | ) |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment | | | (7,197 | ) | | (7,432 | ) | | (6,423 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment | | | — | | | 578 | | | 736 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (17,728 | ) | | (25,611 | ) | | (6,378 | ) |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | | | |
Payments for deferred financing costs | | | (44 | ) | | (13,711 | ) | | (904 | ) |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 4,564 | | | 286,539 | | | — | |
Payments of debt | | | (3,099 | ) | | (221,011 | ) | | (4,775 | ) |
Net repayments under revolving credit facility | | | (11,429 | ) | | (30,960 | ) | | — | |
Proceeds from capital contribution | | | 3,000 | | | — | | | 1 | |
Repayment of management loans | | | 189 | | | 189 | | | — | |
Purchase of warrants | | | — | | | (5,250 | ) | | — | |
Purchase of preferred units | | | — | | | (1,550 | ) | | — | |
Distributions to members | | | — | | | (493 | ) | | (2,943 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (6,819 | ) | | 13,753 | | | (8,621 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 1,310 | | | 4,741 | | | 4,478 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | (7 | ) | | 14,579 | | | 19,390 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 1,769 | | | 1,762 | | | 16,341 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | $ | 1,762 | | $ | 16,341 | | $ | 35,731 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Noncash financing: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred unit dividends | | | 11,991 | | | 12,973 | | | — | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
NSP HOLDINGS L.L.C.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2003, AND 2004
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Units and Per Unit Data)
1. Formation of NSP Holdings L.L.C. and Acquisitions
NSP Holdings L.L.C. (Holdings), operates as a limited liability company in accordance with the Limited Liability Act of the State of Delaware. Holdings was formed on September 25, 1998, to acquire, through its subsidiary, Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (NSP and collectively with Holdings, the Company), the stock of various entities affiliated with Invensys, formerly Siebe plc (Siebe), including North Safety Products, Ltd., James North (Africa) Pty. Ltd., Industrie-Schutz-Produkte GmbH, and Siebe North Holdings Corp. (collectively, North). To execute this transaction, Holdings entered into a Unit Purchase and Exchange Agreement whereby the unit holders of NSP exchanged their equity interests in NSP for equity interests in Holdings. NSP then canceled its Class A units and issued 100 new units to Holdings. As a result of these transactions, Holdings became the sole unit holder of NSP. In addition, Holdings issued Class A common units, Class C common units, Class D common units, and preferred units for cash consideration of $82,600, of which $75,000 was contributed to NSP. The transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization as there was no change in control.
The Company is a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of branded products in the personal protection equipment industry. The Company manufactures and markets a full line of personal protection equipment for workers in the general industrial, fire service, and utility/high voltage industries.
In January 2002, the Company acquired certain assets of the Muck Boot Company (Muck Boot), a designer and marketer of specialty boots, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,254, which includes a subordinated seller note of $2,000 (see Note 5). In addition to the total consideration above, the Company is obligated to pay contingent consideration payments, which are subject to Muck Boot achieving certain net sales targets as defined, on an annual basis through the year-end December 31, 2006. Contingent consideration in the amount of $227, $559, and $657 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively, was recorded as additional purchase price by the Company. In connection with the acquisition, approximately $2,984 of the purchase price was allocated to definite-lived intangible assets, which are being amortized over 15 years.
In December 2002, the Company acquired the stock of Arbin Veiligheid B.V. (Arbin) for $7,050, which includes $2,564 in senior and subordinated seller notes (see Note 5). Arbin is a Holland-based manufacturer of respiratory products. In addition to the total consideration above, the Company is obligated to make contingent consideration payments, which are subject to Arbin achieving certain net sales, as defined, on an annual basis through the year-end December 31, 2008. Contingent consideration in the amount $58 and $34 was recorded as additional purchase price for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The amount of excess purchase price over fair value of assets acquired in the Arbin acquisition was approximately $4,800. The Company believes the acquisition of Arbin will broaden its respiratory product line.
On July 29, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the common stock of Kächele-Cama Latex GmbH (KCL), a German-based manufacturer and marketer of liquid-proof and cut-resistant gloves for a variety of industries, for $20,127, including net debt assumed of $171 and acquisition costs of $1,121. The sellers of KCL will also be eligible to receive royalty payments of up to E250 per year over the next three years based on the achievement of certain cumulative net sales targets. The net sales targets for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 were not achieved; however, the E500 payment could be funded in 2005 if cumulative net sales targets are achieved. The Company financed this acquisition with $9,882 of cash on hand, $5,000 of borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility, and the issuance of
F-7
$5,074 of junior subordinated notes. The Company believes the acquisition of KCL will increase its penetration of the European personal protection equipment market.
The allocation of the purchase price is summarized below:
Trade receivables | | $ | 3,292 | |
Inventory | | | 5,842 | |
Property, plant, and equipment | | | 10,378 | |
Customer relationships (eight-year life) | | | 1,812 | |
Trade names and trademarks (indefinite life) | | | 616 | |
Other assets and liabilities, net | | | (1,683 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (4,329 | ) |
| |
| |
Fair value of net assets acquired | | | 15,928 | |
Excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) | | | 4,199 | |
| |
| |
Total consideration | | $ | 20,127 | |
| |
| |
The following table presents the pro forma net sales and net (loss) income of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, assuming the acquisition of KCL had occurred on January 1, 2002:
| | Year ended December 31
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
|
---|
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 345,413 | | $ | 389,687 |
Pro forma net (loss) income | | | (4,124 | ) | | 7,046 |
The acquisitions described above were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting; accordingly, the results of operations for the acquisitions have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since their respective dates of acquisition.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NSP Holdings L.L.C. and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Due to adverse economic conditions in Zimbabwe, which impacted the Company's ability to control its subsidiary located in Zimbabwe, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $2,785 with regard to the impairment of the net assets of the Zimbabwe subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company sold its Zimbabwe subsidiary and received $216 of consideration.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
F-8
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist principally of trade receivables. Credit risk with respect to trade receivables is limited due to the diversity of customers comprising the Company's customer base. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains sufficient allowances for potential credit losses. The Company evaluates the collectibility of its accounts receivable based on the length of time the receivable is past due and the anticipated future write-offs based on historical experience. The Company's policy is to not charge interest on trade receivables after the invoice becomes past due. A receivable is considered past due if payments have not been received within agreed-upon invoice terms.
Revenue Recognition
Sales and related cost of sales are recognized when products are shipped to the customer.
Freight-Out Costs
The Company records freight-out costs in distribution expenses. Such amounts were $7,212, $8,697, and $10,224 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories valued at first in, first out (FIFO) cost accounted for approximately 67% and 69% of the Company's inventories at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. All other inventories are valued using last in, first out (LIFO) cost.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Equipment under capital leases is stated at the present value of minimum lease payments or fair value at the inception of the leases, whichever is lower. Depreciation is determined by using the straight-line method over the estimated remaining useful lives of the assets. Equipment held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset, with the related amortization expense included in depreciation expense.
The useful lives of plant and equipment for the purpose of computing book depreciation are as follows:
Buildings and improvements | | 10 to 25 years |
Machinery and equipment | | 5 to 15 years |
Dies and tooling | | 3 to 15 years |
Furniture and fixtures | | 3 to 13 years |
Computers and office equipment | | 3 to 7 years |
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent capitalized fees and expenses associated with obtaining financing. The costs are being amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the
F-9
interest method, over the period of the related financing. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs at December 31, 2003 and 2004, was $1,112 and $2,889, respectively.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
The Company has performed the required annual impairment test during the fiscal fourth quarter 2003 and 2004, and has determined that goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives were not impaired.
The following table summarizes goodwill by segment:
| | General Industrial
| | Fire Service
| | Utility/ High Voltage
| | Total
|
---|
Balance as of January 1, 2003 | | $ | 113,400 | | $ | 9,387 | | $ | — | | $ | 122,787 |
Goodwill acquired during the year | | | 2,100 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,100 |
Effect of foreign currency translation | | | 5,145 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,145 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2003 | | | 120,645 | | | 9,387 | | | — | | | 130,032 |
Goodwill acquired during the year | | | 34 | | | — | | | — | | | 34 |
Adjustments to fair value of assets acquired | | | 2,249 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,249 |
Effect of foreign currency translation | | | 347 | | | — | | | — | | | 347 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004 | | $ | 123,275 | | $ | 9,387 | | $ | — | | $ | 132,662 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
The Company's other intangible assets with finite lives consist of trade names and trademarks and customer relationships, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over 8 to 15 years. The Company's other intangible assets with indefinite lives consist of $604 and $730 related to trade names and trademarks as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
The following table summarizes other intangible assets with finite lives:
| | December 31, 2003
| | December 31, 2004
|
---|
| | Gross Carrying Amount
| | Accumulated Amortization
| | Total
| | Gross Carrying Amount
| | Accumulated Amortization
| | Total
|
---|
Trade names and Trademarks | | $ | 3,770 | | $ | (418 | ) | $ | 3,352 | | $ | 4,427 | | $ | (698 | ) | $ | 3,729 |
Customer relationships | | | 1,778 | | | (93 | ) | | 1,685 | | | 2,147 | | | (350 | ) | | 1,797 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | $ | 5,548 | | $ | (511 | ) | $ | 5,037 | | $ | 6,574 | | $ | (1,048 | ) | $ | 5,526 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-10
Future amortization expense for other intangible assets held as of December 31, 2004, is as follows:
2005 | | $ | 577 |
2006 | | | 577 |
2007 | | | 577 |
2008 | | | 577 |
2009 | | | 577 |
Thereafter | | | 2,641 |
| |
|
| | $ | 5,526 |
| |
|
Income Taxes
The Company is a limited liability company, and as such, income is allocated to, and included in the individual return of its unit holders. Certain of the Company's subsidiaries are corporations which are subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes and foreign entities, which are also subject to their respective foreign income tax reporting requirements (collectively, C corporations). The income tax provision is computed as if each of the C corporations were filing a separate return in its respective jurisdiction.
Deferred income taxes are recognized by the C corporations for the difference in reporting of certain assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. These temporary differences are determined by applying enacted statutory rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets which are not likely to be realized. Deferred income taxes are not provided on the unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries because it has been the practice, and it is the intention, of the Company to continue to reinvest these earnings in the businesses outside the United States. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $2,351, $2,577, and $3,021 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation
The accounts of foreign operations are measured using local currency as the functional currency. For those operations, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the end of period exchange rates and income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates. Net adjustments resulting from such translation are accumulated as a separate component of other comprehensive (loss) income included in members' deficit. The accumulated balance of the foreign currency translation adjustments included as a component of the accumulated other comprehensive income amounted to $6,849 and $14,342 as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
F-11
Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets on an ongoing basis. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the related asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the asset is determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, the Senior Credit Facility, notes payable, and the New Senior subordinated notes (see Note 5). The fair values of the Company's financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values at December 31, 2003 and 2004. The Company estimates the fair value of its obligations using the discounted cash flow method with interest rates currently available for similar obligations.
Insurance
Employee medical costs are insured under commercial excess policies. The Company covers the cost of such coverages up to certain retention limits. Insurance claim reserves for employee medical costs represent the estimated amounts necessary to settle outstanding claims, including claims that are incurred but not reported, based on the facts in each case and the Company's experience with similar cases. These estimates are continually reviewed and updated, and any resulting adjustments are reflected in current operations.
The liability related to medical self-insurance was $2,071 and $2,282 as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Medical self-insurance expense was approximately $6,313, $5,325, and $6,270 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The Company has issued unit options and accounts for the unit options in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). In accordance with APB 25, compensation expense is recognized based upon the excess of fair value of the underlying unit over the option exercise price on the measurement date, the date at which both the exercise price and the number of units to be issued are known. The Company has elected to continue to measure compensation expense under the provisions of APB 25; however, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), an estimate of the fair value of the unit options has been made by the Company to determine the pro forma effect on earnings had the provisions of SFAS 123 been applied in the financial statements.
Use of Estimates in the Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-12
Reclassifications
Certain account balances have been reclassified from the prior year to conform with current-year presentation.
3. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
| | December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Land | | $ | 4,508 | | $ | 4,234 | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 15,166 | | | 15,115 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 53,881 | | | 55,539 | |
Dies and tooling | | | 12,358 | | | 13,822 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 4,501 | | | 4,331 | |
Computers and office equipment | | | 15,350 | | | 17,118 | |
Construction in progress | | | 945 | | | 2,017 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 106,709 | | | 112,176 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | (50,496 | ) | | (60,367 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | $ | 56,213 | | $ | 51,809 | |
| |
| |
| |
Machinery and equipment includes assets under capital leases with a gross amount of $647 and accumulated amortization of $291.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
| | December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
At FIFO cost: | | | | | | | |
| Raw materials | | $ | 21,187 | | $ | 21,726 | |
| Work in process | | | 9,010 | | | 10,419 | |
| Finished goods | | | 52,512 | | | 52,045 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 82,709 | | | 84,190 | |
Adjustment to LIFO cost | | | (1,881 | ) | | (1,658 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | $ | 80,828 | | $ | 82,532 | |
| |
| |
| |
F-13
5. Debt
The Company's debt consists of the following:
| | December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Revolving credit facilities | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Term loan | | | 99,025 | | | 97,725 | |
Senior subordinated notes | | | 152,500 | | | 152,500 | |
European term loans | | | 1,215 | | | 469 | |
Arbin Seller Notes | | | 837 | | | 454 | |
Subordinated seller notes | | | 5,334 | | | 3,121 | |
Capital lease obligations | | | 339 | | | 207 | |
Unamortized discount on senior subordinated notes | | | (1,002 | ) | | (910 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 258,248 | | | 253,566 | |
Less: Current maturities of long-term obligations | | | 4,434 | | | 15,252 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | $ | 253,814 | | $ | 238,314 | |
| |
| |
| |
On March 21, 2003, the Company entered into a new Senior Credit Facility with a group of banks and financial institutions. Under the initial terms of this agreement, the Company can borrow up to $160,000 in the United States and approximately $8,300 in Canada ($10,000 Canadian). The Senior Credit Facility consisted of a $30,000 revolving credit facility and a $130,000 term loan in the United States, and a Canadian $10,000 revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2004, the interest rate was 4.92% for the term loan. These borrowings replaced the existing senior credit facility of the Company. The Company recorded a $1,270 million charge to interest expense for the write-off of deferred financing fees associated with the senior credit facility financing for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Outstanding borrowings on the U.S. and Canadian revolvers are due on March 20, 2008, whereas the term loan borrowings are due in 24 consecutive quarterly installments which commenced on June 30, 2003. The 24 installments are payable as follows: installments 1-23 at $325 each and installment 24 at $92,525. The U.S. revolver and the term loan bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate equal to: (i) the Eurodollar rate, plus the applicable borrowing margin, or (ii) the higher of the published prime rate of Fleet Bank or the Federal Funds rate as quoted by Fleet Bank, plus1/2 of 1% (the ABR), plus the applicable borrowing margin, as defined in the Senior Credit Facility. The applicable borrowing margin for the U.S. revolver is between 1.50% and 2.50% for the ABR loans and between 2.50% and 3.50% for the Eurodollar loans, in each case based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined. The applicable borrowing margin for the term loan is 1.75% for the ABR loans and 2.75% for the Eurodollar loans. The Canadian revolver bears interest at (i) the Canadian prime rate published by the Canadian Bank of Commerce (CIBC), plus applicable borrowing margin or (ii) a draft drawn by CIBC, plus applicable borrowing margin.
The U.S. revolver also provides for the issuance of letters of credit of up to $5,000 or in an amount which, when added to the aggregate outstanding principal amount under the revolver, will not exceed $30,000. The Canadian revolver provides for the issuance of letters of credit of up to Canadian $1,000 or in an amount which, when added to the aggregate outstanding principal amount under the revolver, will not exceed Canadian $10,000. At December 31, 2004, total letters of credit outstanding
F-14
were $1,367 under the U.S. revolver and the Company had unused credit available of $28,633 and $8,300 under the U.S. revolver and Canadian revolver, respectively.
Included in current maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2004 is a $12,160 excess cash follow sweep payment on the term loan calculated in accordance with the terms of the Senior Credit Facility.
In 2000, the Company issued $95,000 of senior subordinated notes and repaid the principal and interest related to the previous senior subordinated notes. The senior subordinated notes bore interest at 13%, and contained detachable warrants for 5% of the fully diluted equity ownership of Holdings. The Company recorded a $5,596 discount on the senior subordinated notes related to the warrants issued by Holdings.
On August 13, 2003, the Company issued $152,500 of 9.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the New Senior Subordinated Notes) and received gross proceeds of $151,465. The proceeds were primarily used to: (i) repay principal and interest and repurchase warrants related to the $95,000 of senior subordinated notes, (ii) repay $30,000 of principal related to the term loan, (iii) repay principal on the junior subordinated notes used to finance the KCL acquisition, (iv) purchase preferred units of NSP Holdings L.L.C. from certain members of management and (v) pay fees and expenses. The Company recorded a $8,914 charge to interest expense for the write-off of deferred financing fees and original issue discount and a prepayment penalty associated with the $95,000 of senior subordinated notes for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The Company's Senior Credit Facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company's property and assets. The New Senior subordinated notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company that are subordinate to borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility, Europe term loans and Arbin Seller Notes. The Senior Credit Facility and the New Senior Subordinated Notes are guaranteed by the Company's domestic subsidiaries and by Holdings.
The Senior Credit Facility and New Senior subordinated notes contain certain covenants restricting the Company's ability to: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) dispose of property or issue capital stock, (iii) declare or pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock, (iv) make capital expenditures, (v) make loans or investments, (vi) prepay, amend, or otherwise alter debt and other material agreements, (vii) transact with affiliates, and (viii) engage in sale and leaseback transactions. The Company is also subject to certain financial covenants including the maintenance of minimum interest and fixed charge coverage ratios and senior and total leverage ratios.
The Company issued an unsecured $2,924 seller note in connection with one of its acquisitions, of which $439 is outstanding at December 31, 2004. The seller note bears interest at Citibank, N.A.'s prime rate, plus 2% (7.25% at December 31, 2004) with interest payable quarterly. Principal is payable in 20 consecutive quarterly payments of approximately $146 on January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year and commenced on October 1, 2000. All unpaid principal and accrued interest is due July 1, 2005.
In connection with an acquisition, Holdings issued an unsecured Canadian $5,470 seller note (Arkon Note) of which Canadian $1,367 (U.S. $1,056) was outstanding at December 31, 2003. This seller note bore interest at the CIBC Canadian prime rate (4.5% as of December 31, 2003), with interest payable quarterly. The outstanding principal on the Arkon Note was paid during the year ended December 31, 2004.
F-15
In connection with the Muck Boot acquisition, the Company issued a seller note totaling $2,000. This note is an unsecured obligation and bears interest at Wall Street Journal Prime (5.25% at December 31, 2004). Outstanding principal and accrued interest on the seller note is payable in January 2007.
In connection with the Arbin acquisition, the Company issued three seller notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $2,564. Two notes in the amount of $1,026, of which $454 is outstanding at December 31, 2004, bear interest at 5.5% and are partially secured by the fixed assets and accounts receivable of North's European operations. The third note in the amount of $1,538, of which $682 is outstanding at December 31, 2004, bears interest of 5.5% and is unsecured. Outstanding principal and accrued interest is payable on an annual basis in three equal installments that began December 2003.
The seller notes, except for the partially secured Arbin notes, which are senior, rank equally with other subordinated indebtedness.
In connection with the acquisition of KCL in July 2003, we assumed term loans of approximately $2,079. As of December 31, 2004, there was approximately $469 outstanding on these term loans. The loans bear interest ranging from 4.6% to 5.7%, with scheduled maturities through 2010. Additionally, revolving credit facilities of KCL and North Safety Products Europe B.V. permit borrowings of up to E3,090, of which E3,090 was available at December 31, 2004.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2004, are as follows:
2005 | | $ | 15,252 |
2006 | | | 1,333 |
2007 | | | 3,244 |
2008 | | | 1,198 |
2009 | | | 80,249 |
Thereafter | | | 152,290 |
| |
|
| | $ | 253,566 |
| |
|
Interest paid during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, was approximately $20,334, $20,418, and $20,599, respectively.
6. Income Taxes
Certain of the Company's subsidiaries are subject to foreign and U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. The components of "(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest," for the C corporations subject to foreign and U.S. federal, state and local income taxes consist of U.S. (losses) income of $(10,460), $(840), and $11,078 and foreign income of $4,369, $3,971, and $6,107 for years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.
F-16
The income tax expense on loss (benefit) before income taxes and minority interest consists of the following:
| | Year ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Current: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 207 | |
| State | | | 535 | | | 638 | | | 171 | |
| Foreign | | | 1,796 | | | 1,359 | | | 3,230 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current provision | | | 2,331 | | | 1,997 | | | 3,608 | |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | | | 5,570 | | | — | | | — | |
| State | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Foreign | | | — | | | (154 | ) | | (413 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total deferred expense (benefit) | | | 5,570 | | | (154 | ) | | (413 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income tax expense | | $ | 7,901 | | $ | 1,843 | | $ | 3,195 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The income tax expense differs from the amount of income tax benefit computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to income before income taxes and minority interest. A reconciliation of the difference is as follows:
| | Year ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Income tax expense at statutory federal tax rate | | $ | 1,023 | | $ | 2,716 | | $ | 4,851 | |
Adjustment for limited liability company income included in the return of unit holders | | | (3,324 | ) | | (1,651 | ) | | 1,154 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
C corporation income tax (benefit) expense at statutory federal tax rate | | | (2,301 | ) | | 1,065 | | | 6,005 | |
Decrease (increase) resulting from: | | | | | | | | | | |
| State and local taxes, net of federal benefit | | | 150 | | | (14 | ) | | 110 | |
| Foreign subsidiaries' tax rate differences | | | 111 | | | 218 | | | (353 | ) |
| Change in valuation allowance—U.S. | | | 9,534 | | | 386 | | | (3,711 | ) |
| Change in valuation allowance—Foreign | | | 137 | | | 76 | | | 415 | |
| Nondeductible depreciation, amortization, and other expenses | | | (35 | ) | | (104 | ) | | (149 | ) |
| Other | | | 305 | | | 216 | | | 878 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income tax expense | | $ | 7,901 | | $ | 1,843 | | $ | 3,195 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The reconciliation above excludes increases in the valuation allowance of $3,799 and $407 recorded against deferred tax assets related to comprehensive losses on the Company's pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
F-17
The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
| | December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | |
| United States net operating loss carryforwards | | $ | 17,181 | | $ | 13,828 | |
| Foreign net operating loss | | | 1,271 | | | 1,317 | |
| Inventories—Principally obsolescence reserves | | | 1,567 | | | 2,566 | |
| Intangibles—Principally covenant not to compete | | | 4,224 | | | 3,598 | |
| Pensions and deferred compensation | | | 8,614 | | | 7,901 | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | 235 | | | 220 | |
| Other—Principally accruals | | | 2,561 | | | 2,633 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total deferred tax asset | | | 35,653 | | | 32,063 | |
Less: Valuation allowance | | | (31,743 | ) | | (28,854 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Net deferred tax asset | | | 3,910 | | | 3,209 | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant, and equipment | | | 3,125 | | | 6,042 | |
| LIFO reserve | | | 1,910 | | | 1,906 | |
| Interest on debt | | | 782 | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | 5,817 | | | 7,948 | |
| |
| |
| |
Net deferred tax liability | | $ | (1,907 | ) | $ | (4,739 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
The foreign net operating losses have no expiration date, while U.S. net operating losses expire beginning in 2018. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, including the foreign net operating losses, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. For the year ended December 31, 2002, due to the continued generation of operating losses and the expected timing of the reversal of certain deferred tax assets, it was determined to be most appropriate to increase the valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets. The increase in the valuation allowance increased the Company's income tax expense by $5,570 for the year ended December 31, 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company began to generate taxable income and utilized a portion of its net operating loss carryforward, which resulted in a decrease in the valuation allowance. The Company will continue to monitor its taxable income situation, and adjust the valuation allowance as appropriate.
Undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $12,882 at December 31, 2004. These earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes has been provided thereon. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.
Income taxes paid during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were $1,430, $1,201 and $1,327, respectively.
F-18
7. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors a tax-qualified, defined-benefit pension plan covering the majority of all U.S.-based employees. The pension plan's benefits are based on years of service, employment with the Company, retirement date, and compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. The Company's funding policy is to annually contribute amounts sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Additionally, North has two nonqualified defined-benefit pension plans covering certain former employees who were highly compensated.
The majority of the Company's U.S.-based employees are covered by postretirement health and life insurance benefit plans. The expected cost of these benefits is recognized during the years that employees render services. Retiree contributions are required depending on the year of retirement and the number of years of service at the time of retirement.
The following table sets forth the details of the funded status of the pension and post-retirement plans, the amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of financial position, the components of net periodic benefit cost, and the weighted-average assumptions used in determining these amounts:
| | Year ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| |
---|
Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of year | | $ | 53,142 | | $ | 1,469 | | $ | 59,527 | | $ | 1,400 | |
| Service cost | | | 1,365 | | | 27 | | | 1,566 | | | 26 | |
| Interest cost | | | 3,395 | | | 84 | | | 3,511 | | | 82 | |
| Benefits paid | | | (2,491 | ) | | (362 | ) | | (2,416 | ) | | (239 | ) |
| Actuarial loss | | | 4,116 | | | 182 | | | 2,506 | | | 171 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Benefit obligation at December 31 | | $ | 59,527 | | $ | 1,400 | | $ | 64,694 | | $ | 1,440 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Change in plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | $ | 27,662 | | $ | — | | $ | 31,520 | | $ | — | |
| Actual return on plan assets | | | 4,746 | | | — | | | 2,702 | | | — | |
| Employer contribution | | | 1,603 | | | 362 | | | 6,048 | | | 239 | |
| Benefits paid | | | (2,491 | ) | | (362 | ) | | (2,416 | ) | | (239 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 | | $ | 31,520 | | $ | — | | $ | 37,854 | | $ | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Reconciliation of amount recognized in the statement of financial position: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated benefit obligation | | $ | (54,264 | ) | $ | (1,400 | ) | $ | (58,877 | ) | $ | (1,440 | ) |
| Effect of salary projection | | | (5,263 | ) | | — | | | (5,817 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Projected benefit obligation | | | (59,527 | ) | | (1,400 | ) | | (64,694 | ) | | (1,440 | ) |
| Market value of assets | | | 31,520 | | | — | | | 37,854 | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Funded status | | | (28,007 | ) | | (1,400 | ) | | (26,840 | ) | | (1,440 | ) |
| Unrecognized actuarial loss | | | 15,028 | | | 1,057 | | | 16,630 | | | 1,142 | |
| Unrecognized prior service cost | | | 44 | | | 135 | | | 38 | | | 118 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net amount recognized at December 31 | | $ | (12,935 | ) | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 10,172 | | $ | (180 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued benefit liability | | $ | (22,744 | ) | $ | (208 | ) | $ | (21,023 | ) | $ | (180 | ) |
| Intangible asset | | | 44 | | | — | | | 38 | | | — | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 9,765 | | | — | | | 10,813 | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net amount recognized at December 31 | | $ | (12,935 | ) | $ | (208 | ) | $ | (10,172 | ) | $ | (180 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-19
| | Year ended December 31
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| |
---|
Change in accrued benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued benefit cost at beginning of year | | $ | 11,217 | | $ | 381 | | $ | 12,935 | | $ | 208 | |
| Net periodic benefit cost | | | 3,321 | | | 189 | | | 3,285 | | | 211 | |
| Contributions | | | (1,603 | ) | | (362 | ) | | (6,048 | ) | | (239 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Accrued benefit cost at December 31 | | $ | 12,935 | | $ | 208 | | $ | 10,172 | | $ | 180 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average assumptions used to determine year end benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | | | 6.00 | % | | 6.00 | % | | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase | | | 4.00 | % | | — | | | 4.00 | % | | — | |
| | 2003
| | 2004
| | 2005
| |
---|
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| |
---|
Components of net period benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | | $ | 1,147 | | $ | 27 | | $ | 1,365 | | $ | 27 | | $ | 1,566 | | $ | 26 | |
| Interest cost | | | 3,287 | | | 96 | | | 3,395 | | | 84 | | | 3,511 | | | 82 | |
| Expected return on plan assets | | | (2,645 | ) | | — | | | (2,303 | ) | | — | | | (2,683 | ) | | — | |
| Amortization of prior service cost | | | 36 | | | 17 | | | 5 | | | 18 | | | 5 | | | 18 | |
| Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss | | | 3 | | | 47 | | | 859 | | | 60 | | | 886 | | | 85 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net periodic expense | | $ | 1,828 | | $ | 187 | | $ | 3,321 | | $ | 189 | | $ | 3,285 | | $ | 211 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | | | 7.25 | % | | 7.25 | % | | 6.50 | % | | 6.50 | % | | 6.00 | % | | 6.00 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets | | | 8.75 | | | — | | | 8.50 | | | — | | | 8.50 | | | — | |
| Rate of compensation increase | | | 4.00 | | | — | | | 4.00 | | | — | | | 4.00 | | | — | |
The long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption is reviewed annually. An investment model is used to determine an expected rate of return based on current investment allocation. The investment model considers past performance and forward looking assumptions for each asset class based on current market indices, key economic indicators and assumed long-term rate of inflation. The long-term rate of return assumption is adjusted, as needed, such that it falls between the 25th and 75th percentile expected return generated from the model.
The Company's investment philosophy is to diversify the pension assets subject to a specified asset allocation policy. The Company rebalances the asset classes to stay within an acceptable range around the targeted allocation. The philosophy recognizes that the primary objective for the management of the assets is to maximize return commensurate with the level of risk undertaken. With the understanding that investment returns are largely uncertain from year to year, the basic return objective
F-20
is to be achieved over an averaging period no greater than three to five years in duration. The assets are invested in both indexed funds and actively managed funds, depending on the asset class.
The Company's plan asset allocation at December 31, 2003 and 2004, and target allocation for 2005, by asset category are as follows:
| | December 31
| | Target Allocation
| |
---|
| | 2003
| | 2004
| | 2005
| |
---|
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| | Pension Benefits
| | Post- Retirement Benefits
| |
---|
Equity securities | | 62 | % | — | % | 60 | % | — | % | 60 | % | — | % |
Debt securities | | 38 | % | — | % | 40 | % | — | % | 40 | % | — | % |
| | 100 | % | — | % | 100 | % | — | % | 100 | % | — | % |
Future expected benefit payments as of December 31, 2004, is as follows:
2005 | | $ | 3,040 |
2006 | | | 3,134 |
2007 | | | 3,220 |
2008 | | | 3,413 |
2009 | | | 3,575 |
Thereafter | | | 21,756 |
| |
|
| | $ | 38,138 |
| |
|
The Company expects 2005 contributions for pension and post-retirement benefits to be approximately $4,741.
The Company also sponsors defined-contribution plans covering substantially all of its U.S.-based employees. The Company's contribution to these plans ranges from 0% to 6% of a participant's salary. In addition, the Company may elect to make discretionary contributions to some of the plans. The amount expensed for various match provisions of the plans was $785, $829, and $907 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.
8. Members' Deficit
Unit Options
As of January 1, 2002, the Company had granted an aggregate of 21,124 options to purchase Class A units at $2.10 per unit, 31,239 options to purchase Class A units at $5.89 per unit, 313,640 options to purchase Class C units at $5.89 per unit, and 21,124 options to purchase preferred units at $3.90 per unit. Each issuance approximated fair market value at date of grant. The options were fully vested at the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. No options were issued, exercised, forfeited, or expired in 2002, 2003, and 2004.
F-21
Unit Appreciation Rights Plan
The Company has a unit appreciation rights plan (Rights Plan), whereby the Board of Managers or their designee may issue to key employees up to 476,700 of unit appreciation rights. As of December 31, 2004, 383,764 appreciation rights were outstanding. Individuals vest in appreciated rights over four years (first year: 10%; second year: 20%; third year: 30%; and fourth year: 40%). Vesting accelerates upon certain events, including a participant's death and the sale of the Company or an initial public offering. All appreciation rights are issued at fair market value at the date of grant. The Company recorded no compensation expense related to the grant appreciation rights during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Redeemable Preferred Units
In connection with the North acquisition on October 2, 1998, the Company received $57,329 in exchange for the issuance of redeemable preferred units. The preferred units accrue dividends at a semiannual compound rate of 10%. The preferred units are nonvoting and are mandatorily redeemable by the Company on September 30, 2013. In the event of any liquidation, sale, dissolution, or winding up of the affairs of the Company, holders of the preferred units shall be paid the redemption price, plus all accrued dividends before any payment to other unit holders.
In connection with the Arbin acquisition, the Company issued additional mandatorily redeemable preferred units for $1,950, respectively. These preferred units also accrue dividends at a semiannual compound rate of 10%, and are mandatorily redeemable by the Company on September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, $44,857 and $57,726, respectively, of dividends were accrued and unpaid.
Beginning January 1, 2004, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 150, the yield on the Company's preferred units is recorded as interest expense and the preferred units are classified on the Company's balance sheet as long-term liabilities. For all periods prior to January 1, 2004, the yield is recorded below net income as preferred unit dividend and the preferred units were recorded on the Company's balance sheet between debt and equity. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company classified $13,493 of preferred unit dividends as interest expense.
Class E Units
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000 Class E Units, which vest 6.25% quarterly. As of December 31, 2004, 986 Class E Units were issued to senior management of the Company for $1. The holders of Class E Units are entitled to distributions on the Company's units as defined in the Company's Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement. The units were vested 31.25% as of December 31, 2004.
Common Units
In addition to the preferred units and Class E Units, the Company's equity structure consists of Class A common units, Class B common units, Class C common units, and Class D common units. Class B common units and Class D common units are nonvoting. Common units are generally convertible into other classes of common units at the member's request, with certain restrictions based
F-22
on Class B and Class C unit holders, as defined. In connection with the Arbin acquisition, the Company issued Class A units for proceeds of $1,050.
Management Loans
In connection with the acquisition of North, certain members of management entered into nonrecourse promissory notes amounting to $1,086 in exchange for Class C common units of the Company. The notes are non-interest-bearing and mature on the earlier of December 31, 2016, the sale of the Company, or the occurrence of certain events, all as defined in the notes. The promissory notes are collateralized by the Class A and Class C common and all preferred units of the borrowers, and have been classified as reductions to members' deficit. In 2002 and 2003, $94 of this note amount was repaid.
In connection with an acquisition, certain members of management entered into nonrecourse promissory notes amounting to $1,108 in exchange for Class A common units and preferred units of the Company. The notes are non-interest-bearing and mature on the earlier of December 31, 2016, the sale of the Company, or the occurrence of certain events, all as defined in the notes. The promissory notes are collateralized by Class A common and preferred units of the borrowers and have been classified as reductions to members' deficit. In 2002 and 2003, $34 and $61 of this note amount was repaid, related to the Class A common units and preferred units, respectively. No amounts were repaid in 2004.
9. Lease Commitments
The Company leases various assets whose terms and conditions qualify the obligations for treatment as capital leases.
The Company also leases certain facilities under various noncancelable operating lease agreements. Future minimum lease payments under capital and noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2004, are as follows:
| | Capital Leases
| | Operating Leases
|
---|
2005 | | $ | 145 | | $ | 4,927 |
2006 | | | 77 | | | 4,050 |
2007 | | | — | | | 2,772 |
2008 | | | — | | | 2,140 |
2009 | | | — | | | 1,432 |
Thereafter | | | — | | | 1,669 |
| |
| |
|
Total minimum lease payments | | | 222 | | $ | 16,990 |
| | | | |
|
Less: Amount representing interest | | | 15 | | | |
| |
| | | |
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments | | | 207 | | | |
Less: Current portion of obligations under capital leases | | | 132 | | | |
| |
| | | |
Obligations under capital leases, excluding current installments | | $ | 75 | | | |
| |
| | | |
Rent expense was $4,844, and $5,102, and $5,513 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.
F-23
10. Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to various claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Most of these lawsuits and claims are product liability matters that arise out of the use of respiratory product lines manufactured by the Company's North Safety Products subsidiary. As of December 31, 2004, the Company's North Safety Products subsidiary, along with its predecessors and/or the former owners of such business were named as defendants in approximately 847 lawsuits involving respirators manufactured and sold by it or its predecessors. The Company is also monitoring an additional 11 lawsuits in which it feels that North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses may be named as defendants. Collectively, these 858 lawsuits represent a total of approximately 26,000 plaintiffs. Approximately 91% of these lawsuits involve plaintiffs alleging injury resulting from exposure to silica dust, with the remainder alleging injury resulting from exposure to other dust particles, including asbestos. These lawsuits typically allege that the purposed injuries resulted in part from respirators that were negligently designed or manufactured. Invensys plc ("Invensys"), formerly Siebe plc, is contractually obligated to indemnify the Company for any losses, including costs of defending claims, resulting from respiratory products manufactured or sold prior to the acquisition of North Safety Products in October 1998.
In addition, the Company's North Safety Products subsidiary is contractually entitled to indemnification from Norton Company, an affiliate of Saint-Gobain, which owned the North Safety Products business prior to Invensys. Pursuant to a December 14, 1982 asset purchase agreement, Siebe Norton, Inc., a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Norton Company, acquired the assets of Norton's Safety Products Division and the stock of this company was in turn acquired by Siebe Gorman Holdings PLC. Under the terms of the Agreement, Siebe Norton, Inc. did not assume any liability for claims relating to products shipped by Norton Company prior to the closing date. Moreover, Norton Company covenanted in the Agreement to indemnify Siebe Norton and its successors and assigns against any liability resulting from or arising out of any state of facts, omissions or events existing or occurring on or before the closing date, including, without limitation, any claims arising from products shipped by Norton Company or any of its affiliates prior to the closing date. Siebe Norton, whose name was subsequently changed to Siebe North Inc., was subsequently acquired by the Company as part of the 1998 acquisition of the North Safety Products business from Invensys.
Despite these indemnification arrangements, the Company could potentially be liable for losses or claims relating to products manufactured prior to the October 1998 acquisition date if Invensys fails to meet its obligations to indemnify the Company and the Company could potentially be liable for losses and claims relating to products sold prior to January 10, 1983 if both Invensys and Norton fail to meet their obligations to indemnify the Company. The Company could also be liable if the alleged exposure involved the use of a product manufactured by the Company after our October 1998 acquisition of the North Safety Products business. Invensys is currently handling the defense of all of the cases prior to October 1998 in which North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or former owners of such business have been named as defendants. The Company is jointly with Invensys handling the defense of all of the cases which allege exposure, including periods pre and post October 1998. The Company will individually handle the defense of all cases with exclusive post October 1998 exposure, however, it has not been involved in a case with exclusive post October 1998 exposure to date. As of December 31, 2004, Invensys has sent us requests for reimbursement totaling $120.7, relating to settled cases in which Invensys claims that the period of alleged exposure included periods after October 1998. Based on information provided to the Company by Invensys, the Company believes that Invensys has made
F-24
payments with respect to settlement of these claims of $477.2 in 2002, $660.5 in 2003, and $938.1 in 2004. The Company believes that Invensys has the ability to pay these claims based on its current financial position, as publicly disclosed by Invensys. Separately, the Company and Invensys settled one unusual case for $65 in which the Company's settlement share was $45 (the Company's net contribution after insurance proceeds was $25).
Consistent with the current environment being experienced by companies involved in silica and asbestos-related litigation, there has been an increase in the number of asserted claims that could potentially involve the Company. Based upon information provided to the Company by Invensys, the Company believes activity related to these lawsuits was as follows for the periods indicated:
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
| |
---|
Beginning lawsuits | | 363 | | 306 | | 680 | |
New lawsuits | | 185 | | 537 | | 372 | |
Settlements | | (134 | ) | (46 | ) | (46 | ) |
Dismissals | | (108 | ) | (117 | ) | (148 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Ending lawsuits | | 306 | | 680 | | 858 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Plaintiffs have asserted specific dollar claims in less than a quarter of the approximately 847 cases pending as of December 31, 2004 in which North Safety Products, its predecessors and/or the former owners of such businesses have been named as defendants. A majority of cases prohibit specifying damages in tort cases such as these, and most of the remaining jurisdictions do not require such specification. In those cases in which plaintiffs choose to assert specific dollar amounts in their complaints, brought in states that permit such pleading, the amounts claimed are typically not meaningful as an indicator of a company's potential liability. This is because (1) the amounts claimed typically bear no relation to the level of the plaintiff's injury, (2) the complaints typically assert claims against numerous defendants, and (3) many cases are brought on behalf of plaintiffs who have not suffered any medical injury, and, ultimately, are resolved without any payment or payment of a small fraction of the damages initially claimed. Of the 847 complaints maintained in the Company's records, 669 do not specify the amount of damages sought, 32 generally allege damages in excess of $50, four allege compensatory damages in excess of $50 and an unspecified amount of punitive damages, 78 allege compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $25, two generally allege damages in excess of $100, 19 allege compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $50, 31 generally allege damages of $15,000, one generally alleges damages not to exceed $290,000, one alleges compensatory damages and punitive damages, each in excess of $10, one alleges compensatory and punitive damages, each in excess of $15, one alleges punitive damages in excess of $25, one alleges punitive damages in excess of $50, two generally allege damages in excess of $15, two generally allege damages in excess of $25, one generally alleges damages in excess of $4, and two allege compensatory and punitive damages, each in excess of $15,000. The Company currently does not have access to the complaints with respect to the previously mentioned additional 11 monitored cases, and therefore do not know whether these cases allege specific damages, or if so, the amount of such damages, but are in the process of seeking to obtain such information. Due to the reasons noted above and to the indemnification arrangements benefiting the Company, it does not believe that the damage amounts specified in these complaints are a meaningful factor in any assessment of the Company's potential liability.
F-25
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a $1,250 liability and charge to operating expenses to establish a reserve for respiratory claims, which remains outstanding as of December 31, 2004. This reserve represents a reasonable estimate of the Company's probable and estimable liabilities for claims alleging injury resulting from exposure to silica dust and other dust particles, including asbestos as determined by the Company in consultation with an independent consultant. The Company has determined that a five-year projection of claims and defense costs is the most reasonable approach. However, it is possible that the Company may incur liabilities in excess of the amounts currently reserved. This reserve will be re-evaluated periodically and additional charges or credits will be recorded to operating expenses as additional information becomes available.
The Company is not otherwise involved in any material lawsuits. The Company historically has not been required to pay any material liability claims. The Company maintains insurance against product liability claims (with the exception of asbestosis and silicosis cases, for which coverage is not commercially available), but it is possible that its insurance coverage will not continue to be available on terms acceptable to the Company or that such coverage will not be adequate for liabilities actually incurred. In connection with the North Safety Products acquisition, the Company recorded a $2,500 reserve for potential uninsured product liability claims of North Safety Products for periods prior to October 1998. The reserve was established at the date of acquisition and relates to potential claims primarily associated with fall protection products sold in Canada. Through December 31, 2003, the Company incurred charges of $200 against this reserve, which reduced the balance to $2,300. During 2004, the Company reduced this reserve to $1,000 to reflect its current expectations of the liability based on information available and recorded a $1,300 credit to operating expenses. This reserve is re-evaluated periodically, and additional charges or credits will be recorded to operating expenses as additional information becomes available.
It is possible that the Company may incur liabilities in an amount in excess of amounts currently reserved. However, taking into account currently available information, historical experience, and the Company's indemnification from Invensys, but recognizing the inherent uncertainties in the projection of any future events, the Company believes that these suits or claims should not result in final judgments or settlements in excess of its reserve.
11. Restructuring and Merger-Related Charges
During 2002, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to exit the medical products business located in Cranston, Rhode Island and close certain hand protection plants located in Tijuana, Mexico, Tallmadge, Ohio and Charleston, South Carolina and move production to China. The Company decided to exit the medical products business at that time, because the medical products business primarily served one customer, who decided to manufacture the product in-house. The Company closed its hand protection plant to increase profitability of certain low margin product lines. This restructuring resulted in the termination of approximately 105 employees who worked at these operations. The Company incurred restructuring and merger-related charges associated with the plan of $9,297, comprised of $6,345 non-cash expense relating to accelerated depreciation charges on long-lived assets to be abandoned; $1,242 in severance costs; and $1,710 in facility closure and other exit costs. The exit of the medical business was completed in 2002. The shut-down of the Tallmadge, Ohio facility was completed in 2003 and the Company completed the closure of the Charleston, South Carolina and Tijuana, Mexico plants in 2004. The restructuring liability is classified within the accrued expenses caption on the consolidated balance sheet.
F-26
A rollforward of the restructuring liability is as follows:
| | Balance at January 1, 2003
| | Payments
| | Other
| | Balance at December 31, 2003
| | Payments
| | Other
| | Balance at December 31, 2004
|
---|
Severance and relocation costs | | $ | 1,187 | | $ | (734 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 453 | | $ | (367 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 86 |
Facility exit and closure costs | | | 1,700 | | | (387 | ) | | 32 | | | 1,345 | | | (928 | ) | | 35 | | | 452 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | $ | 2,887 | | $ | (1,121 | ) | $ | 32 | | $ | 1,798 | | $ | (1,295 | ) | $ | 35 | | $ | 538 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
12. Strategic Alternatives
The Company had previously announced that it was in the process of exploring strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the Company. A decision was made by the Company in 2004 to terminate this process and therefore it has expensed $616 in associated costs (primarily consisting of professional service fees) for the year ended December 31, 2004. These costs are reflected in operating expenses as strategic alternatives.
13. Related Party Transactions
The Company leases a facility in Dayton, Ohio from American Firefighters Cooperative, Inc., a corporation controlled by William L. Grilliot, President—Fire Service. The initial term of the lease ended on February 28, 2005, and was extended through April 30, 2009. The base rent is $348 per year, payable in monthly installments. In addition, the Company must also pay American Firefighters Cooperative, Inc. all general and special assessments of every kind, as additional rent during the term of the lease. The annual rent paid was $353, $354 and $366 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.
14. Segment Data
The Company has three reporting segments: general industrial, fire service, and utility/high voltage. General Industrial offers products to a wide variety of industries, including manufacturing, agriculture, automotive, food processing and pharmaceutical industries and the military, under theNorth,Servus andRanger brand names. The product offering includes respiratory protection, protective footwear, hand protection, eye, head and face protection, first aid, hearing protection and fall protection. The Company sells its general industrial products primarily through industrial distributors. Fire Service offers personal protection equipment for the fire service segment, providing firefighters head-to-toe protection. The product offering includes bunker gear, helmets, gloves and fireboots. The Company markets its products under theTotal Fire Group umbrella, using the brand names ofMorning Pride,Ranger,Servus andPro-Warrington. The Company sells its fire service products primarily through specialized fire service distributors. Utility/High Voltage offers personal protection equipment for the utility/high voltage service segment under theSalisbury andServus brands. The product offering includes gloves, sleeves, footwear and linemen equipment. The Company distributes its utility/high voltage products through specialized distributors and direct to utilities and electrical contractors.
F-27
The following table presents information about the Company by segment:
| | General Industrial
| | Fire Service
| | Utility/High Voltage
| | Corporate
| | Eliminations
| | Total
|
---|
Year ended December 31, 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales—third parties | | $ | 223,727 | | $ | 58,342 | | $ | 41,440 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 323,509 |
Net sales—intersegment | | | 8,441 | | | — | | | 262 | | | — | | | (8,703 | ) | | — |
Income from operations | | | 8,995 | | | 10,532 | | | 10,424 | | | (4,082 | ) | | — | | | 25,869 |
Restructuring and merger-related charges | | | 9,269 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,269 |
Interest expense | | | 23,078 | | | 214 | | | — | | | 82 | | | — | | | 23,374 |
Income tax expense | | | 7,729 | | | 66 | | | — | | | 106 | | | — | | | 7,901 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 16,558 | | | 334 | | | 1,116 | | | 609 | | | — | | | 18,617 |
Purchase of plant, property and equipment | | | 5,889 | | | 642 | | | 666 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,197 |
Year ended December 31, 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales—third parties | | | 258,969 | | | 70,335 | | | 43,220 | | | — | | | — | | | 372,524 |
Net sales—intersegment | | | 9,349 | | | — | | | 30 | | | — | | | (9,379 | ) | | — |
Income from operations | | | 22,306 | | | 13,248 | | | 9,078 | | | (4,537 | ) | | — | | | 40,095 |
Interest expense | | | 33,238 | | | 134 | | | — | | | 82 | | | — | | | 33,454 |
Income tax expense | | | 1,600 | | | 85 | | | — | | | 158 | | | — | | | 1,843 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 10,611 | | | 367 | | | 1,161 | | | 610 | | | — | | | 12,749 |
Purchase of plant, property and equipment | | | 6,040 | | | 592 | | | 800 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,432 |
Total assets | | | 347,335 | | | 27,654 | | | 18,199 | | | 100,089 | | | (130,559 | ) | | 362,718 |
Year ended December 31, 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales—third parties | | | 310,357 | | | 78,881 | | | 51,042 | | | — | | | — | | | 440,280 |
Net sales—intersegment | | | 9,684 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (9,684 | ) | | — |
Income from operations | | | 31,112 | | | 14,972 | | | 11,148 | | | (6,083 | ) | | — | | | 51,149 |
Strategic alternatives | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 616 | | | — | | | 616 |
Interest expense | | | 22,385 | | | 52 | | | — | | | 13,525 | | | — | | | 35,962 |
Income tax expense | | | 2,734 | | | 238 | | | — | | | 223 | | | — | | | 3,195 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,868 | | | 413 | | | 1,482 | | | 608 | | | — | | | 12,371 |
Purchase of plant, property and equipment | | | 5,028 | | | 480 | | | 915 | | | — | | | — | | | 6,423 |
Total assets | | | 355,332 | | | 29,185 | | | 18,465 | | | 116,768 | | | (130,559 | ) | | 389,191 |
F-28
15. Product Line Data
The following table presents net sales of the Company by product line:
| | Year ended December 31
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| | 2004
|
---|
Protective footwear | | $ | 70,882 | | $ | 88,490 | | $ | 97,256 |
Hand protection | | | 64,657 | | | 78,822 | | | 111,739 |
Eye, head and face | | | 27,862 | | | 32,526 | | | 36,672 |
Respiratory | | | 44,252 | | | 49,299 | | | 51,364 |
Protective garments | | | 43,417 | | | 53,250 | | | 60,321 |
First aid | | | 11,168 | | | 11,715 | | | 13,456 |
Hearing protection | | | 7,649 | | | 7,396 | | | 7,869 |
Fall protection | | | 9,182 | | | 11,281 | | | 13,007 |
Lineman equipment | | | 22,047 | | | 24,200 | | | 28,248 |
Other | | | 22,393 | | | 15,545 | | | 20,348 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | $ | 323,509 | | $ | 372,524 | | $ | 440,280 |
| |
| |
| |
|
16. Geographic Data
The following table presents information about the Company by geographic area:
| | United States
| | Europe
| | Canada
| | Africa
| | Total Foreign
| | Consolidated
|
---|
Year ended December 31, 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 241,450 | | $ | 21,811 | | $ | 51,192 | | $ | 9,056 | | $ | 82,059 | | $ | 323,509 |
Year ended December 31, 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | | 262,645 | | | 41,823 | | | 55,553 | | | 12,503 | | | 109,879 | | | 372,524 |
Long-lived assets | | | 42,649 | | | 17,751 | | | 6,465 | | | 524 | | | 24,740 | | | 67,389 |
Year ended December 31, 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | | 294,605 | | | 68,357 | | | 60,296 | | | 17,022 | | | 145,675 | | | 440,280 |
Long-lived assets | | | 38,480 | | | 18,236 | | | 6,376 | | | 662 | | | 25,274 | | | 63,754 |
17. Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The following tables contain selected unaudited consolidated statements of operations information for each quarter of 2003 and 2004. The Company believes that the following information reflects all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods
F-29
presented. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
| | Year ended December 31, 2003
|
---|
| | Quarter ended December 31
| | Quarter ended September 27
| | Quarter ended June 28
| | Quarter ended March 29
|
---|
Net sales | | $ | 102,690 | | $ | 93,022 | | $ | 90,997 | | $ | 85,815 |
Gross profit | | | 34,352 | | | 33,596 | | | 33,266 | | | 30,902 |
Net income (loss) | | | 6,653 | | | (6,779 | ) | | 3,915 | | | 2,131 |
| | Year ended December 31, 2004
|
---|
| | Quarter ended December 31
| | Quarter ended October 2
| | Quarter ended July 3
| | Quarter ended April 3
|
---|
Net sales | | $ | 109,694 | | $ | 114,508 | | $ | 107,005 | | $ | 109,073 |
Gross profit | | | 39,898 | | | 39,712 | | | 38,380 | | | 40,366 |
Net income | | | 2,246 | | | 2,837 | | | 1,676 | | | 3,882 |
18. Subsequent Events
On January 7, 2005, Holdings and NSP Holdings Capital Corp. issued $100,000 of 11.75% Senior Paid in Kind Notes due 2012, as co-issuers on a joint and several basis. NSP Holdings Capital Corp. is a 100% owned finance subsidiary of Holdings with no assets or operations. None of Holdings' other subsidiaries will guarantee the 11.75% Senior Paid in Kind Notes.
Holdings used approximately $60,000 of the proceeds of the offering to make payments in respect of its preferred units, approximately $58,000 of which were payments in respect of accrued preferred yield and approximately $2,000 of which were used to return a portion of the original capital contribution made by holders of its preferred units.
F-30
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH
SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2002 AND 2003
F-31
KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)
| | December 31, 2002
| | July 31, 2003
|
---|
Assets | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | E | 1,294 | | E | 1,658 |
| Accounts receivable, less allowance of E108 and E194 in 2002 and 2003, respectively | | | 1,859 | | | 2,860 |
| Inventories | | | 5,012 | | | 5,075 |
| Deferred income taxes | | | 24 | | | 24 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 122 | | | 193 |
| |
| |
|
Total current assets | | | 8,311 | | | 9,810 |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | | 5,501 | | | 5,757 |
Investment in affiliated entities | | | 727 | | | 885 |
Receivables from affiliated entities | | | 137 | | | 203 |
Other noncurrent assets | | | 204 | | | 205 |
| |
| |
|
Total assets | | E | 14,880 | | E | 16,860 |
| |
| |
|
Liabilities and members' equity | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | E | 673 | | E | 454 |
| Accrued expenses | | | 2,340 | | | 3,207 |
| Revolving credit facilities | | | 12 | | | 310 |
| Current maturities of long-term debt | | | 231 | | | 251 |
| |
| |
|
Total current liabilities | | | 3,256 | | | 4,222 |
Pension and post-retirement | | | 238 | | | 264 |
Long-term debt | | | 1,393 | | | 1,245 |
Deferred income taxes | | | 717 | | | 777 |
Minority interest | | | 101 | | | 110 |
| |
| |
|
| | | 2,449 | | | 2,396 |
Members' equity: | | | | | | |
| Contributed capital | | | 4,602 | | | 4,602 |
| Retained earnings | | | 4,563 | | | 5,636 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 10 | | | 4 |
| |
| |
|
Total members' equity | | | 9,175 | | | 10,242 |
| |
| |
|
Total liabilities and members' equity | | E | 14,880 | | E | 16,860 |
| |
| |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-32
KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)
| | Seven months ended July 31,
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| |
---|
Net sales | | E | 14,179 | | E | 15,196 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 9,855 | | | 9,979 | |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 4,324 | | | 5,217 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
| Selling | | | 1,280 | | | 1,610 | |
| Distribution | | | 715 | | | 763 | |
| General and administrative | | | 1,130 | | | 1,315 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 3,125 | | | 3,688 | |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 1,199 | | | 1,529 | |
Other expense (income): | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | 78 | | | 64 | |
| Interest income | | | (7 | ) | | (8 | ) |
| Income from investment in affiliated entities | | | (167 | ) | | (212 | ) |
| Other, net | | | 53 | | | (94 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes and minority interest | | | 1,242 | | | 1,779 | |
Income tax expense | | | 508 | | | 694 | |
Minority interest | | | 5 | | | 12 | |
| |
| |
| |
Net income | | E | 729 | | E | 1,073 | |
| |
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-33
KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)
| | Seven months ended July 31,
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
| |
---|
Operating activities | | | | | | | |
Net income | | E | 729 | | E | 1,073 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | | | 464 | | | 575 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | — | | | 60 | |
| Income from investment in affiliated entities | | | (167 | ) | | (212 | ) |
| Minority interest | | | 5 | | | 12 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| | Accounts receivable | | | (814 | ) | | (1,001 | ) |
| | Inventories | | | 885 | | | (63 | ) |
| | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 83 | | | (71 | ) |
| | Receivables from affiliated entities | | | 50 | | | (67 | ) |
| | Other noncurrent assets | | | (10 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| | Accounts payable | | | (692 | ) | | (219 | ) |
| | Accrued expenses | | | 814 | | | 867 | |
| | Pension and post-retirement | | | 36 | | | 26 | |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 1,383 | | | 979 | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment | | | (642 | ) | | (831 | ) |
Dividends from investment in affiliated entities | | | 79 | | | 54 | |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (563 | ) | | (777 | ) |
Financing activities | | | | | | | |
Payments of debt | | | (113 | ) | | (128 | ) |
Net (borrowings) repayments under revolving credit facilities | | | (440 | ) | | 298 | |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (553 | ) | | 170 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 3 | | | (8 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 270 | | | 364 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 378 | | | 1,294 | |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | E | 648 | | E | 1,658 | |
| |
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-34
KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2002 AND 2003
(Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Kächele-Cama Latex GmbH (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of adjustments of a normal and recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations have been included. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for any other interim period or for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003. The financial statements presented should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002.
On July 29, 2003, the Company was acquired by Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. for US$18,835, and the assumption of US$2,080 of the Company's indebtedness and US$1,909 of cash on hand. The sellers of the Company will also be eligible to receive royalty payments of up to E250 per year over the next three years based upon the achievement of certain cumulative net sales targets.
2. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
| | December 31, 2002
| | July 31, 2003
|
---|
Raw materials | | E | 931 | | E | 1,125 |
Work in process | | | 816 | | | 787 |
Finished goods | | | 3,265 | | | 3,163 |
| |
| |
|
| | E | 5,012 | | E | 5,075 |
| |
| |
|
3. Debt
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt at July 31, 2003, are as follows:
2004 | | E | 251 |
2005 | | | 269 |
2006 | | | 214 |
2007 | | | 109 |
2008 | | | 111 |
Thereafter | | | 542 |
| |
|
| | E | 1,496 |
| |
|
Interest paid during the seven months ended July 31, 2002 and 2003, was approximately E50 and E44, respectively.
4. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the seven months ended July 31, 2002 and 2003 amounted to E731 and E1,127, respectively.
F-35
![GRAPHIC](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B3/0001047469-05-009538/g74414.jpg)
QuickLinks
TABLE OF CONTENTSCURRENCIES AND EXCHANGE RATESMARKET, RANKING AND OTHER DATATRADEMARKSPRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATIONPROSPECTUS SUMMARYRISK FACTORSFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSEXCHANGE OFFERUSE OF PROCEEDSCAPITALIZATIONUNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATASELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATAMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSBUSINESSMANAGEMENTCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONSPRINCIPAL EQUITYHOLDERSDESCRIPTION OF OTHER OBLIGATIONSDESCRIPTION OF THE NOTESBOOK-ENTRY, DELIVERY AND FORMCERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONSPLAN OF DISTRIBUTIONLEGAL MATTERSINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMAVAILABLE INFORMATIONINDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2002 AND 2003KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)KÄCHELE-CAMA LATEX GMBH NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2002 AND 2003 (Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)