Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | The Company and a Summary of Its Significant Accounting Policies The Company Sequenom, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary Sequenom Center for Molecular Medicine LLC, doing business as Sequenom Laboratories (collectively the “Company”), is a pioneering genetic testing company dedicated to women’s health through the development of innovative products and services. The Company serves patients and physicians by providing early patient management information. The Company develops and commercializes innovative molecular diagnostics testing services that serve the women’s health market and is developing products and services for the oncology market. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Sequenom, Inc. should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the interim statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, which include all wholly owned subsidiaries, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or any other period(s). Segment and Geographic Information The Company evaluates segment reporting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 280 during each reporting period, including evaluating the reporting package reviewed by the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, or CODM. As of March 31, 2016 , the Company concluded it operates in a single operating segment and a single reporting unit as a provider of innovative diagnostic testing services based on the financial information available and that is evaluated regularly by the CODM in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company currently derives its diagnostic services revenue from domestic and international customers by providing testing services in its laboratory located in San Diego, California. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 , 5.4% and 4.4% of diagnostic services revenue was recognized from international customers, respectively. The Company also generates license revenue through the Company’s Pooled Patents Agreement, or Pooled Patents Agreement, with Illumina, Inc., or Illumina, discussed in further detail below. The Company has limited visibility into the revenue reported by Illumina to the Company. For the portion of the Company’s license revenue recognized from the Pooled Patents Agreement that is derived from Illumina partners or licensees, the Company does not have the ability to determine whether the license revenue was derived from domestic or international sources. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. An example of the Company’s significant accounting estimates that may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than others include revenue recognition. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates and assumptions. Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenue from diagnostic services from providing laboratory-developed tests, or LDTs, primarily for the detection of specific fetal abnormalities or other genetic conditions, as well as through the Pooled Patents Agreement and others who have licensed the Company’s technology. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the nature of the fee charged for the services delivered, whether there are existing contractual arrangements, and historical payment patterns. In determining when to record revenue, the Company evaluates collectability and considers whether there is sufficient history to reliably estimate a payor’s payment patterns. Revenue is deferred for fees received before earned. Diagnostic services revenue is derived from providing testing services in the Company’s laboratory, which are reimbursed through arrangements with third-party payors and amounts patients self-pay or through contractual arrangements (client bill). Diagnostic services revenue for third-party payors is recognized upon cash collection until a reliable estimate of the amount that would be ultimately collected from such payor for the test and the above criteria have been met, at which time revenue is recognized on an accrual basis. Third-party payors include commercial payors, such as health insurance companies, health maintenance organizations and government payors, such as Medicare and Medicaid in the United States. Client bill revenue is primarily recognized on an accrual basis and includes laboratories and customers with whom the Company has a contractual agreement where they will pay for the test upon delivery of the test results to the ordering physicians. The Company generally bills third-party payors upon delivery of a test result to the ordering physician following completion of a test. Patients have responsibility for out-of-pocket costs for amounts not covered by their insurance carrier and the Company bills the patient directly for these amounts in the form of co-pays and deductibles in accordance with their insurance carrier and health plans. Revenue from patients, through co-payments or through cash based service offerings, are recognized on a cash basis. Some payors may not cover the test as ordered by the physician under their reimbursement policies. Consequently, the Company pursues reimbursement on a case-by-case basis. From time to time, the Company receives requests for refunds of payments, generally due to overpayments made by third-party payors. Upon becoming aware of a refund request, the Company establishes an accrued liability for tests covered by the refund request until such time as the Company determines whether or not a refund is due. License arrangements with third-party partners may involve multiple elements and the Company evaluates the agreements to determine whether each deliverable represents a separate unit of accounting. A deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has stand-alone value to the customer. Items are considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the item on a stand-alone basis. Consideration is allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables based on their relative selling price. The relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of selling price or third-party evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the deliverable. Such amounts are recognized as revenue when each unit is delivered. If the delivered element does not have stand-alone value without one of the undelivered elements in the arrangement, the elements are combined and accounted for as a single unit of accounting. Such amounts are recognized as revenue when the last deliverable of the combined units is delivered. Recurring revenue generated under license or royalty arrangements, including the Pooled Patents Agreement with Illumina, is recognized in the period reported by the partner or licensee and when the revenue recognition criteria have been met. Pooled Patents Agreement In December 2014, the Company entered into the Pooled Patents Agreement with Illumina. Pursuant to the Pooled Patents Agreement, a patent pool was established that is global in nature and combines the noninvasive prenatal testing, or NIPT, patents controlled by the Company and Illumina. Under the Pooled Patents Agreement, both the Company and its sublicensees and Illumina and its sublicensees pay a per-test fee into the pool for NIPT tests, which is then shared between the Company and Illumina. The Company recognizes license revenue in the period reported by its partners and Illumina and in certain cases this can result in a delay in recognizing revenue up to one quarter from the period in which the test was performed. As of March 31, 2016 , there were 46 licensees to the patent pool, including Illumina’s affiliate, Verinata Health, Inc., or Verinata, and Sequenom Laboratories. Cost of Revenues Cost of revenues include the cost of materials, direct labor (including laboratory and service personnel), equipment and infrastructure expenses associated with processing blood and other samples, quality control analyses, shipping charges to transport samples, and license and test fees, including those owed to Illumina as specified in the Pooled Patents Agreement. Infrastructure expenses include allocated facility occupancy and information technology costs. Costs associated with performing testing services are recorded as tests are processed. Costs recorded for sample processing and shipping charges represent the cost of all the tests processed during the period regardless of whether revenue is recognized with respect to that test. Royalties for licensed technology calculated on a per test basis or as a percentage of product revenue and fixed annual payments relating to the launch and commercialization of LDTs are recorded as license fees in cost of revenues at the time product revenue is recognized or in accordance with other contractual obligations. Concentration of Risks Financial instruments, which potentially are a concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of cash equivalents, marketable securities, and accounts receivable. The exposure to credit loss is limited by placing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities with U.S. financial institutions. Additionally, the Company has established guidelines regarding diversification of investments and their maturities, which are designed to maintain principal and maximize liquidity. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the Company’s large and diverse customer base. The Company considers ordering physicians and client laboratories to be its customers. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 , one customer represented more than 10% of total revenue, accounting for $5.6 million , or 14.8% , of total revenue during that period. No single customer accounted for over 10% of total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . Additionally, hundreds of third-party payors have reimbursed the Company for one or more of its tests. At a third-party payor level, no single payor represented more than 10% of total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2016 or 2015 . The Company requires raw materials and devices of appropriate quality and reliability, which meet applicable regulatory requirements, that currently are available from a limited number of sources and in certain cases a single source of supply. Consequently, in the event that supplies are delayed or interrupted for any reason, it could impair the Company’s ability to develop and produce services, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Net (Loss) Income Per Share Basic net (loss) income per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the net income, plus interest charges during the period applicable to the Company’s convertible senior notes, divided by the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive common shares from outstanding stock options, restricted shares, employee stock purchases, warrants and convertible senior notes. Potential dilutive common shares were calculated using the treasury stock method and represent incremental shares issuable upon exercise of the Company’s outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock and warrants. Potential dilutive common shares for convertible senior notes were calculated using the if-converted method. For periods in which the Company incurs a loss, the interest charges during the period are not added back to net loss and the potentially dilutive shares are not considered in the calculation of net loss per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive. A summary of information used to compute basic and diluted net earnings per share is shown below (in thousands, except per share data): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015 Net (loss) income for basic earnings per share $ (13,449 ) $ 14,284 Interest on convertible senior notes — 1,884 Net (loss) income for diluted earnings per share $ (13,449 ) $ 16,168 Weighted-average common shares outstanding 118,859 117,737 Dilutive effect of common share equivalents — 28,905 Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share 118,859 146,642 Net (loss) income per basic share $ (0.11 ) $ 0.12 Net (loss) income per diluted share $ (0.11 ) $ 0.11 Common stock equivalents that could potentially reduce net income per common share in the future that were not included in the determination of diluted net (loss) income per common share, as their effects were antidilutive, are as follows (in thousands): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015 Shares underlying Convertible Senior Notes 28,088 — Options to purchase common stock 14,436 9,032 Restricted stock units not yet vested and released 5,816 41 Warrants to purchase common stock 200 200 Total 48,540 9,273 Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The ASU creates a single source of revenue guidance for companies in all industries. The new standard provides guidance for all revenue arising from contracts with customers and affects all entities that enter into contracts to provide goods or services to their customers, unless the contracts are within the scope of other accounting standards. It also provides a model for the measurement and recognition of gains and losses on the sale of certain nonfinancial assets. This guidance, as amended, must be adopted using either a full retrospective approach for all periods presented or a modified retrospective approach and will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and creates Topic 842, “Leases.” The new topic supersedes Topic 840, “Leases,” and increases transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requires disclosures of key information about leasing arrangements. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 mandates a modified retrospective transition method. The Company is currently assessing the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs . The ASU is the result of the FASB’s simplification initiative intended to improve GAAP by reducing costs and complexity while maintaining or enhancing the usefulness of related financial statement information. The ASU specifies that debt issuance costs related to a note shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the face amount of the note. The ASU became effective for interim and annual periods on January 1, 2016. The ASU required the Company to reclassify its capitalized debt issuance costs previously recorded as assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the ASU, the Company reclassified debt issuance costs of $1.0 million from “other current assets and prepaid expenses” and $1.0 million from “other assets” to “long-term debt and obligations, less current portion” as of December 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2016, $1.8 million of debt issuance costs were recorded as a direct reduction of the long-term debt amounts. The ASU had no effect on the Company’s results of operations or liquidity. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory , which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory. It replaces the current lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost or net realizable value test. The standard is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted and the new guidance must be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements upon adoption. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . The ASU includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Specifically, the ASU allows entities to withhold an amount up to the employees’ maximum individual tax rate in the relevant jurisdiction without resulting in liability classification of the award and allowing forfeitures to be either estimated, as required today, or recognized when they occur. The new guidance will be effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects the guidance could impact its accounting and reporting and is currently assessing the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements. |