BGF Industries 10-Q 2007 Q2 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

Commission file number 333-72321

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	56-1600845
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3802 Robert Porcher Way

Greensboro, N.C. 27410

(Address of principal executive offices)

336-545-0011

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨    Accelerated Filer  ¨     Non-Accelerated Filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

There is no established trading market for the Common Stock of the Registrant. All shares of Common Stock are held by an affiliate of the Registrant. As of August 14, 2007, there were 1,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006	3
	Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)	4
	Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)	5
	Notes to Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Overview and Trends Affecting Our Business	16
	Critical Accounting Policies	17
	Results of Operations	17
	Balance Sheets	19
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	19
	Commitments and Contingencies	21
	Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	23
	Outlook for the Remainder of 2007	24
	Related Party Transactions	24
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements	24
	Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5.	Other Information	27
Item 6.	Exhibits	27

EXPLANATORY NOTE

BGF Industries, Inc. voluntarily files periodic reports with the SEC solely for the purpose of complying with Section 3.20 of the indenture governing its Senior Subordinated Notes. Because there are fewer than 300 holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes, the Company is no longer required by the federal securities laws to file such reports. Additionally, because it is not required to file such reports, the Company is not an “issuer” for purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

2

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands)

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,488		$	3,644
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for returns and doubtful accounts of $701 and $575, respectively		20,730			15,552
Inventories		28,250			30,328
Other current assets		540			787
Assets held for sale		245			245
Total current assets		56,253			50,556
Net property, plant and equipment		28,729			29,338
Deferred income taxes		1,465			1,230
Other noncurrent assets, net		2,133			2,530
Total assets	$	88,580		$	83,654
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	11,619		$	7,993
Accrued liabilities		10,901			11,194
Deferred tax liability		1,465			1,230
Current portion of long-term debt		1,200			1,200
Total current liabilities		25,185			21,617
Long-term debt, net of discount of $272 and $356, respectively		87,542			88,100
Finance obligation		2,848			2,818
Postretirement benefit and pension obligations		2,629			4,240
Long-term tax liability		899			—
Total liabilities		119,103			116,775
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholder’s deficit:
Common stock, $1.00 par value. Authorized 3,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,000 shares		1			1
Capital in excess of par value		34,999			34,999
Accumulated deficit		(65,523	)		(68,121	)
Total stockholder’s deficit		(30,523	)		(33,121	)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s deficit	$	88,580		$	83,654

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

3

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(dollars in thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Net sales	$	50,752		$	46,323		$	98,616		$	92,222
Cost of goods sold		42,676			38,519			84,171			76,275
Gross profit		8,076			7,804			14,445			15,947
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2,765			3,409			5,571			6,365
Operating income		5,311			4,395			8,874			9,582
Interest expense		2,696			2,789			5,395			5,585
Other (income), net		(41	)		(12	)		(111	)		(14	)
Income before income taxes		2,656			1,618			3,590			4,011
Income tax expense		1,095			162			1,185			162
Net income and total comprehensive income	$	1,561		$	1,456		$	2,405		$	3,849

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

4

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,405		$	3,849
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		2,185			2,402
Amortization		429			420
Amortization of discount on notes		84			84
(Gain) on disposal of equipment		(33	)		(59	)
Noncash interest on finance obligation		30			27
Change in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net		(5,177	)		(4,986	)
Inventories		2,078			(693	)
Current income tax refundable		(1,068	)		—
Other current assets		247			(115	)
Other assets		(32	)		(36	)
Accounts payable		3,626			1,429
Accrued liabilities		776			42
Postretirement benefit and pension obligations		(1,611	)		817
Other liabilities		1,091			—
Net cash provided by operating activities		5,030			3,181
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(1,626	)		(810	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		83			68
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,543	)		(742	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Book overdraft		—			(886	)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		—			13,600
Payments on revolving credit facility		—			(11,600	)
Payments on term loan		(643	)		(644	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(643	)		470
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		2,844			2,909
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,644			—
Cash and cash equivalent at end of period	$	6,488		$	2,909
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	4,639		$	4,815
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	199		$	334
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
Property and equipment financed in accounts payable	$	26		$	100

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in thousands)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of BGF Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of items of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair statement of results of operations have been included. Operating results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of BGF Industries, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in the facts and circumstances could have a significant impact on the resulting financial statements. The critical accounting policies that affect the Company’s more complex judgments and estimates are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and in this Report under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies.”

2. Liquidity and Financial Condition

The Company had net income of $2,405 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and a $30,523 stockholder’s deficit as of June 30, 2007. In the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company had net income of $6,961 and had a $33,121 stockholder’s deficit as of December 31, 2006.

On June 6, 2003, the Company entered into a five year financing arrangement (the “WFF Loan”) with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (“WFF”). See Note 9 for details regarding this arrangement.

The Company’s continued existence is dependent upon several factors including its ability to continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow to fund its operations and interest payments on its Senior Subordinated Notes and its ability to continue to meet its financial covenants and make required payments under the WFF Loan. (See Note 9.) While the Company’s performance to date in 2007 has enabled it to meet its financial obligations, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sustain its current level of operations. The Company continues to evaluate its current business plan in light of the current market conditions.

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Supplies	$	1,638		$	1,702
Raw materials		3,352			4,599
Stock-in-process		4,154			3,617
Finished goods		21,240			22,602
Total inventories—gross		30,384			32,520
Less: writedowns		(2,134	)		(2,192	)
Total inventories—net	$	28,250		$	30,328

6

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

4. Other Current Assets

Other current assets consist of the following:

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Prepaid Insurance	$	188	$	267
Miscellaneous non-trade receivables		311		502
Other		41		18
Total other current assets	$	540	$	787

Miscellaneous non-trade receivables includes $280 and $337 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, due from the Town of Altavista as reimbursement in the storm water phase of the Company’s environmental remediation and $0 and $72 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, due from an insurance claim. The remaining balances of $31 and $93 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, are made up of affiliated and miscellaneous employee advances.

5. Assets Held for Sale

In September 2004, the Company’s board made the decision to hold for sale the land and building of the South Hill heavyweight fabrics facility. In June 2006, the Company made the decision to hold for sale equipment at the same facility. As of December 31, 2006, the equipment that was held for sale was either sold or written down as an asset impairment. The remaining assets have a net book value as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 of $245 and have been classified as a current asset on the balance sheets.

On February 26, 2007, the Company entered into a real estate contract (the “contract”) to sell its South Hill, VA heavyweight fabrics facility. The contract provides for (i) a selling price of $340, (ii) a renewal term of December 31, 2013 for the lease of its warehousing and non woven manufacturing facility in Altavista, VA and (iii) a sixty-day due diligence period for the buyer prior to closing. In April 2007, the contract was amended to extend the due diligence period by thirty days. In July 2007, the contract was amended to extend the due diligence period by an additional sixty days. No assurance can be given at this point that the proposed transaction will close under the above disclosed terms or at all.

6. Net Property, Plant and Equipment

Net property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Land	$	2,879		$	2,879
Buildings		38,043			37,981
Machinery and equipment		83,594			82,851
Gross property, plant and equipment		124,516			123,711
Less: accumulated depreciation		(95,787	)		(94,373	)
Net property, plant and equipment	$	28,729		$	29,338

7

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

7. Other Noncurrent Assets, Net

Other noncurrent assets, net consist of the following:

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Debt issuance costs	$	5,648		$	5,645
Accumulated amortization		(4,663	)		(4,240	)
		985			1,405
Security deposits		515			525
Other noncurrent assets		633			600
Total other noncurrent assets, net	$	2,133		$	2,530

Debt issuance costs are being amortized over the lives of the respective debt instruments.

Amortization of deferred financing charges of $212 and $423 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and $210 and $420 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, has been included in interest expense.

8. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
Interest	$	3,980	$	3,996
Environmental		213		2,218
Profit Sharing		711		1,288
Payroll		1,094		547
Other employee benefits, including current portion of deferred compensation		3,039		1,603
Medical benefits		652		622
Due to affiliated companies		880		—
Other		332		920
Total accrued liabilities	$	10,901	$	11,194

Environmental Matters. The Company is in the final phases of an Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)-supervised self-implementing remediation program at its Altavista facility. The remediation program has been conducted under EPA rules at 40 C.F.R. §761.61, promulgated under the Toxic Substances Control Act, that set forth self-implementing cleanup standards for certain contamination by polychlorinated biphenyls, or “PCBs.” PCBs were discovered at the Altavista facility during a 1998 environmental site assessment, and the EPA was notified. These PCBs were initially identified in the area of the former location of a heat transfer oil tank that the previous owner of the facility had removed before Porcher Industries acquired the Company in 1988. A 1998 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment revealed PCB contamination in several areas inside the plant and on its roof, in the soil, in the sanitary and storm sewers within the plant, in groundwater, and in the surface waters to which the storm sewers drain. In addition, testing confirmed that measurable quantities of PCBs may have migrated into the Town of Altavista’s water treatment plant. Interim measures were taken in 1999 and 2000, and have been taken periodically since then, to control PCB migration and minimize exposure.

In 2003, the Company submitted to the EPA a final Site Characterization Report, or “SCR,” documenting the assessment of the property and the site’s drainage ditch. In May 2004, the EPA approved the SCR. A draft cleanup plan was submitted to the EPA in September 2004 and a final proposed remediation plan was provided to the EPA for its review in December 2005. The EPA approved the plan in May 2006.

The remediation plan was generally designed to achieve PCB levels in remaining soils within the area covered by the plan at or below 25 parts per million (ppm), which is consistent with standards set forth in the EPA rules for “low occupancy” sites. The remediation plan covered property owned by the Company and off-site areas owned by third parties, including the portion of the

8

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

8. Accrued Liabilities – (Continued)

drainage ditch running from the property off-site to the western edge of adjacent railroad tracks. The portion of the drainage ditch east of the railroad tracks was not included within the scope of the voluntary cleanup. Although this eastern portion of the drainage ditch generally exhibited significantly lower PCB levels than were present in the western portion of the drainage ditch, the exclusion of this area means that soils and/or sediments with PCBs above 25 ppm will remain in this area even after completion of the plan.

The cleanup was divided into a storm water management phase, a soil remediation phase, and a post-cleanup reconstruction phase. The storm water management phase was completed during the second quarter of 2006. The Company requested reimbursement from the Town of Altavista for 80% of the costs borne in this project as the scope of work centers primarily on site utilities. The Town of Altavista agreed to a total reimbursement of $396 which is to be paid in equal installments over the next seven years. Payments began in January 2007. A discounted receivable of $280 has been recorded at June 30, 2007. The soil remediation phase of the cleanup started in November 2006 and was completed in March 2007. The reconstruction phase has begun following completion of the soil remediation. The Company plans to place deed restrictions on the Altavista property, including restrictions limiting the property’s use consistent with a “low occupancy area” within the meaning of the EPA rules.

The implementation of the remediation plan has not completely eliminated PCBs from the area subject to the plan; as noted above, the plan is designed to achieve PCB levels in remaining soils at or below 25 ppm. Further, the remediation plan itself provided for contingencies under which PCBs would remain in place above 25 ppm. While future EPA and/or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) enforcement actions could potentially require further cleanup of the site, the Company’s voluntary remediation program has lessened the likelihood of such enforcement actions.

A reserve of $2,098 for the environmental issues at the Altavista facility was recorded at December 31, 2006 which reflected the accepted bid from the contractor for the soil remediation work of $2,321 plus $150 estimated additional expenses to be incurred for testing and post-cleanup reconstruction. The reserve was reduced by expenses incurred through December 2006 of $373. During the first six months of 2007, the reserve has been increased by $510 to reflect changes in estimated costs due to the quantity of soil being removed. Expenses incurred during the six months ending June 30, 2007 were $2,515 which reduced the reserve balance at June 30, 2007 to $93. Remediation costs are estimates, subject to the EPA’s comments on the remediation plan and to other factors that may arise in the remediation process. Contingencies that may affect the accuracy of these estimates include:

• The portion of the drainage ditch east of the railroad tracks is outside the scope of the self-implemented cleanup. There has been no indication whether the State of Virginia or the EPA will seek to require the Company to undertake work in this drainage ditch. No cleanup plan or estimate for this work has been developed.

• The construction estimates are inherently based on assumptions about the total quantity of soil to be removed and disposed, as bids are based on unit costs for removal, transportation, and disposal. The extensive SCR was used as a basis for estimating quantities of soil to be excavated, transported, and deposited in proper landfills, but verification sampling upon excavation will be necessary and it is possible that greater quantities of impacted soil than are currently estimated will require removal. Transportation and disposal costs are approximately two-thirds of the estimated cost of the project. Accordingly, a material increase in the quantity of soil removed in excess of the currently-estimated amounts would correspondingly materially increase the cleanup cost.

• Utilities may exist in and around the dig site that could be damaged. While all efforts will be made to avoid damaging utilities, any such damage may cause part or all work at the plant to be suspended until such utilities can be restored. While not adding greatly to the project cost, the indirect cost of such an interruption through lost revenue could be material.

Completion of the remediation plan has addressed impacted soils at the site but will not preclude possible further action by the EPA under other environmental statutes and rules or by Virginia. The Company is aware that the DEQ is calculating Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for pollutants in water bodies. Samples have been taken for PCBs over large expanses of the Staunton River into which the storm water discharges. It is not certain whether DEQ’s sampling may result in additional claims regarding areas downstream of the Company’s property including in the portion of the drainage ditch east of the railroad track or in the Staunton River.

9

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

8. Accrued Liabilities – (Continued)

In addition, a 1998 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment at the Cheraw, South Carolina facility revealed reportable levels of chlorinated solvents and hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. The contamination resulted from the previous owner’s printing operations. Assessment and cleanup are regulated by South Carolina’s Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”). Upon review of the data with DHEC, it was determined that chlorinated solvent residuals constitute the sole remediation concern. With DHEC oversight and approval, the Company is pursuing a Monitored Natural Attenuation strategy, which includes periodic groundwater monitoring. Work includes semi-annual monitoring and reporting. Recent tests show reduced levels of solvent concentrations. The Company may review the data again with DHEC and recommend reducing the frequency of testing to annually to reduce costs. No action other than continued monitoring for this facility is anticipated at this time. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had a reserve of $120 for the above-described environmental issues at the Cheraw facility.

As these environmental cleanups progress, the Company may need to revise the reserves for Altavista and Cheraw but it is unable to derive a more precise estimate at this time, as actual costs remain uncertain. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be required to respond to its environmental issues on a more immediate basis and that such response, if required, will not result in significant cash outlays that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

Other employee benefits. In 2006, the Company approved a management bonus of $1,327 which was paid during the first quarter of 2007.

Current contribution to retirement plan. In order to continue to provide all distribution options allowed by the defined benefit plan, the Company accelerated its 2006 contributions and paid $2,200 into the plan on July 16, 2007. (See Note 11).

Due to affiliated companies.The amount due affiliated companies of $880 consists primarily of income taxes payable under a tax sharing arrangement.

9. Debt

Debt consists of the following:

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
WFF Loan:
Term loan	$	5,114	$	5,756
Revolver		—		—
Senior Subordinated Notes, net of unamortized discount of $272 and $356, respectively		83,628		83,544
Total debt		88,742		89,300
Current Maturities		1,200		1,200
Long-term debt	$	87,542	$	88,100

On June 6, 2003, the Company obtained the WFF Loan. This arrangement provided for a maximum revolver credit line of $40,000 with a letter of credit sub-line of $4,000, an inventory sub-line of $15,000, and a term loan sub-line of $6,000, of which the principal was amortized over sixty months.

On April 4, 2005, the Company executed an amendment to the WFF Loan to increase its total borrowing availability by approximately $5,000. The amendment was deemed to be effective as of March 31, 2005. The amendment provided for the following: (1) reduced the maximum facility size to $25,000; (2) reloaded the term loan back to the lesser of $6,000 or 70% of the orderly liquidation value of eligible equipment; (3) increased the advance rate on finished goods inventory from 45% to 55%; (4) reduced the Excess Availability to $1,000 at all times; and (5) released the $550 environmental reserve previously in place.

On October 31, 2005, the Company executed an amendment to the WFF Loan to increase its cap on capital expenditures to $3,500 annually. The amendment was deemed effective as of June 30, 2005.

10

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

9. Debt – (Continued)

On December 1, 2006, the Company entered an amendment to the WFF Loan. The amendment provided for the following: (1) increased the maximum facility size to $27,000; (2) reloaded the term loan back to $6,000; (3) increased the maximum revolver credit line to $21,000; (4) increased the minimum EBITDA requirements for financial covenants to not less than $15,000 calculated on a trailing 12 month basis; (5) reduced the spread on interest rates by approximately 100 basis points; and (6) increased the annual cap on capital expenditures to $4,500.

The WFF Loan, as amended, has a maximum revolver credit line of $21,000 with a letter of credit sub-line of $4,000, an inventory sub-line of $10,000 and a term loan of $6,000, of which the principal was fully funded at the amendment date and is being amortized over 60 months.

WFF has a first priority, perfected security interest in our assets. The WFF Loan provides for the following: (1) a borrowing base with advance rates on eligible accounts receivable and eligible finished goods and raw materials inventory of 85%, 55% and 35%, respectively, with inventory to be capped at the lesser of the eligible inventory calculation, $10,000 or 80% times the percentage of the book value of our inventory that is estimated to be recoverable upon liquidation; (2) borrowing rates of LIBOR + 2.25% or the Wells Fargo Prime Rate (RR) + 0.00% for the revolver if the trailing twelve months EBITDA exceeds $20,000 with a 25 basis points increase if the trailing twelve months EBITDA exceeds $17,000 but is less than or equal to $20,000 and a further 25 basis points increase if the trailing twelve months EBITDA is less than or equal to $17,000; (3) borrowing rates of LIBOR + 2.5% or RR + .25% for the term loan with, at all times, a minimum rate of 5% for both facilities; (4) certain financial covenants including (i) a minimum excess availability at all times, (ii) a minimum trailing twelve month EBITDA level and (iii) a $4,500 cap on annual capital expenditures; and (5) an early termination fee.

In addition to the covenant requirements set forth above, the WFF Loan does not allow the Company to pay dividends or distributions on its outstanding capital stock (including to its parent) and limits or restricts the Company’s ability to incur additional debt, repurchase securities, make certain prohibited investments, create liens, transfer or sell assets or merge or consolidate without the consent of the lender. The WFF Loan permits the lenders to accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest upon certain events of default, including failure to make required payments of principal and interest when due, uncured violations of the material covenants under the WFF Loan or if an event of default exists under the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes that would permit the trustee or holders to accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued unpaid interest with respect to the Senior Subordinated Notes.

The WFF Loan proceeds are used to finance ongoing working capital, capital expenditures, and general corporate needs of the Company and retire other outstanding debt. The WFF Loan is guaranteed by the Company’s parent, NVH, Inc. and two of NVH, Inc.’s subsidiaries, Glass Holdings LLC and BGF Services, Inc. As of June 30, 2007, amounts outstanding under the WFF Loan totaled $5,114, which consisted solely of $5,114 under the term loan. As of December 31, 2006, amounts outstanding under the WFF Loan totaled $5,756, which consisted solely of $5,756 under the term loan. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had exercised its LIBOR Rate option on $4,500 of its borrowings on the term loan. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had not exercised its LIBOR Rate option on any of its borrowings on the term loan or the revolver. The interest rate as of June 30, 2007 on the outstanding amounts under the LIBOR options on the term loan was 7.82%. The interest rate as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 on the amounts outstanding under the Wells Fargo Prime Rate portion of the term loan was 8.5%.

Availability under the revolver at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $17,370 and $14,651, respectively. This availability has been reduced by a reserve to allow for the annual interest payments on the Senior Subordinated Notes. The reserve for interest payments is increased by $165 a week in 2007 and 2006, and is reset to $0 when such payment is made. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the total outstanding reserves amounted to $4,135 and $3,969, respectively.

The Senior Subordinated Notes bear interest at a rate of 10.25%, which is payable semi-annually in January and July through the maturity date of January 15, 2009. The original amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes issued was $100,000, of which $83,900 in face amount remains outstanding, as a result of repurchases made by the Company in 2003, 2004 and 2005.

On June 23, 2005, the Company purchased $2,850 (face value) of Senior Subordinated Notes for $2,765 plus accrued interest of $128. This transaction resulted in a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $50.

In 2004, the Company purchased $9,000 (face value) of Senior Subordinated Notes for $8,740 plus accrued interest of $264. This

11

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

9. Debt – (Continued)

transaction resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $224. The Senior Subordinated Notes purchase was funded by a combination of cash provided by operations and borrowings under the WFF Loan.

The indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes does not allow the Company to pay dividends or distributions on its outstanding capital stock (including to its parent) and limits or restricts the Company’s ability to incur additional debt, repurchase securities, make certain prohibited investments, create liens, transfer or sell assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, issue or sell stock of a subsidiary or merge or consolidate without the consent of the trustee or a certain percentage of the holders. In particular, the Company is prohibited from incurring additional debt or making certain additional investments unless it maintains a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of greater than 2.0 to 1.0. The indenture permits the trustee or the holders of 25% or more of the Senior Subordinated Notes to accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest upon certain events of default, including failure to make required payments of principal and interest when due, uncured violations of the material covenants under the indenture or if lenders accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued unpaid interest due to an event of default with respect to at least $5,000 of other debt of the Company, such as the WFF Loan.

The fair value of the Senior Subordinated Notes as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $82,642 and $81,383, respectively.

The Company has been in compliance with all of the covenants and ratios under the WFF Loan and the indenture governing its Senior Subordinated Notes for all periods presented.

10. Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 was 33.01% and 4.04%, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate is due to the utilization of tax attributes previously subject to a full valuation allowance along with state taxes. On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. As a result the Company has recognized an adjustment of $193 in retained earnings for unrecognized tax benefits and recorded a long-term tax liability of $873 representing unrecognized tax benefits, penalties and interest as of January 1, 2007. As of June 30, 2007, the similar total long-term tax liability under FIN 48 is $899. (See note 14—Recent Accounting Pronouncements.) All of the unrecognized tax benefit would affect our effective tax rate if recognized.

11. Employee Benefits

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees. Participating employees are required to contribute to the pension plan.

The Company also has a postretirement benefit plan that covers substantially all of its employees. Upon the completion of the attainment of age fifty-five and ten years of continuous service, an employee may elect to retire. Employees eligible to retire may receive postretirement health benefits through age sixty-five, including medical and dental coverage.

Net periodic pension costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30											For the Six Months Ended June 30
	Pension Benefits						Post-retirement Benefits					Pension Benefits						Post-retirement Benefits
	2007			2006			2007			2006		2007			2006			2007			2006
Net periodic pension cost:
Service cost	$	320		$	343		$	19		$	33	$	660		$	685		$	38		$	65
Interest cost		395			353			21			34		785			707			42			69
(Expected return on plan assets)		(435	)		(370	)		—			—		(889	)		(740	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			2			(10	)		—		—			3			(20	)		—
Recognized net actuarial (gain) or loss		45			60			(1	)		6		64			120			(2	)		11
Total net periodic pension cost	$	325		$	388		$	29		$	73	$	620		$	775		$	58		$	145

12

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

11. Employee Benefits – (Continued)

There are no expected required employer contributions for the defined benefit plan for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Expected net employee contributions for the postretirement benefit plan for the year ended December 31, 2007 are $128.

12. Segment Information

The Company operates in one business segment that manufactures specialty woven and non-woven fabrics for use in a variety of industrial and commercial applications. The Company’s principal market is the United States. The nature of the markets, products, production processes and distribution methods are similar for many of the Company’s products.

Net sales by geographic area are presented below, with sales based on the location of the customer. The Company does not have any long-lived assets outside the United States.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007			2006
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
United States	$	46,857	$	42,943	$	89,267		$	86,836
Foreign		3,895		3,380		9,349			5,386
							��
	$	50,752	$	46,323	$	98,616		$	92,222

13. Commitments and Contingencies

As discussed in Note 8, the Company has environmental exposures associated with two of its manufacturing facilities.

Health Care Costs. Based on publicly available data, the Company currently expects health care costs to increase significantly for the foreseeable future, which will further increase its general and administrative costs and reduce its net income. Furthermore, because the average age of the Company’s employees and other covered persons is generally higher than other companies, the Company believes that it may be potentially exposed to relatively higher health care costs each year, particularly to the extent that it is responsible for covering catastrophic health care costs up to the maximum annual coverage of $125 per covered person. In addition, because the Company has a relatively small number of employees and a limited amount of annual net income, the occurrence of even a small amount of such catastrophic costs during any period would have a magnifying adverse impact on its net income during such period. As a result of the foregoing, even though the Company has undertaken and will continue to undertake a variety of measures to control increased health care costs, it is likely that its net income will decline in the future due to such expected increased costs unless otherwise offset by increased revenues or lower costs in other areas.

Pension Plan Costs. Substantially all of our eligible employees have also elected to participate in our defined benefit pension plan. Because pension obligations are ultimately settled in future periods, the determination of our annual pension expense and pension liabilities is subject to estimates and assumptions, such as the discount rate, which are reviewed annually and are based on current rates and trends. Due to historically low interest rates, we have had to make higher cash contributions to maintain the funded status of this plan. We expect this trend may continue in the future, which we would fund using cash flows from operations or borrowings under the WFF Loan. We cannot predict whether investment returns will be sufficient to fund all of our future retirement benefits. To the extent our pension plan assets are not sufficient to fund future retirement benefits for our employees, the average age of which is relatively higher than other companies, we would be required to fund any shortfall using cash generated by our operations. Furthermore, at any time, the federal laws governing pension plans or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended in a manner that could increase our pension plan costs and liabilities.

From time to time, the Company is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, however, that the ultimate resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Operating Leases.The Company leases facilities and equipment under operating lease agreements. Generally, these leases contain renewal options under cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense amounted to $260 and $553 for the

13

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

13. Commitments and Contingencies – (Continued)

three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $276 and $550 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Under the terms of non-cancelable operating leases, the Company is committed to the following future minimum lease payments at June 30, 2007:

Fiscal Year
2007	822
2008	692
2009	378
2010	362
Thereafter	1,216

We and certain of our affiliates (collectively referred to as the “Porcher Group”) have agreed to amend and restate the terms of the supply agreement originally dated April 2, 2004 between the Porcher Group and AGY Holding Corp. Under the terms of this new agreement that became effective January 1, 2007, we have an economic incentive, but not an obligation, to purchase yarn from AGY.

14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 provides guidance relative to the recognition, derecognition and measurement of tax position for financial statement purposes. Historically, we accounted for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, based on whether we determined that our tax position is “probable” of being sustained under current tax law, as well as an analysis of potential outcomes under a given set of facts and circumstances. FIN 48 requires that tax positions be sustainable based on a “more likely than not” standard under current tax law benefit recognition, and adjusted to reflect the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized an adjustment of $193 in retained earnings for unrecognized income tax benefits. The recognition of this benefit resulted in an increase to the opening balance of retained earnings. The total unrecognized tax benefits, penalties, and interest as of January 1, 2007 are as follows:

Unrecognized tax benefits	$	589
Penalties		228
Interest		56
Total FIN 48 liability at adoption	$	873

As of June 30, 2007, the total liability recorded under FIN 48 was $899. The total unrecognized tax benefits, penalties, and interest as of June 30, 2007 are as follows:

Unrecognized tax benefits	$	609
Penalties		234
Interest		56
Total FIN 48 liability at June 30, 2007	$	899

This amount has been classified as Long-Term Tax Liabilities on the Balance Sheet. All of the unrecognized tax benefit above would affect our effective tax rate if recognized.

FIN 48 requires that penalties and interest be accrued as appropriate for uncertain tax positions. It is our policy to classify penalties and interest as part of Income Tax Expense on the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The tax years 2003-2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

14

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of NVH, Inc.)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(dollars in thousands)

14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements – (Continued)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on their balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 also requires additional disclosures in the notes to financial statements. For the Company, SFAS No. 158 is effective as of the end of fiscal 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 158 on its financial statements. However, based on the current funded status of our defined benefit pension and postretirement medical plans, the Company would be required to increase its total liability by $4,389 for pension and postretirement medical benefits, which would result in an estimated decrease to stockholder’s equity of approximately $2,940, net of taxes, in the Company’s balance sheet. This estimate may vary from the actual impact of implementing SFAS No. 158. The ultimate amounts recorded are highly dependent on a number of assumptions, including the discount rates in effect at December 31, 2007, the actual rate of return on our pension assets for 2007 and the tax effects of the adjustment. Changes in these assumptions since the Company’s last measurement date could increase or decrease the expected impact of implementing SFAS No. 158 in the financial statements at December 31, 2007.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any of SFAS 159 on its financial statements.

15. Related Party Transactions

The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Porcher Industries, S.A. through NVH, Inc., a U.S. holding company. In July, 2004, our previous parent, Glass Holdings Corp., converted to a limited liability company and subsequently distributed its stock in the Company to NVH, Inc., a 100% owned subsidiary of Nouveau Verre Holdings, Inc., which is a 100% owned subsidiary of Porcher Industries, S.A. Porcher Industries owned a 15% interest in AGY Holding Corp., a major supplier of the Company, through Nouveau Verre Holdings, LLC, a 100% subsidiary of Nouveau Verre Holdings, Inc. In April 2006, AGY Holding Corp. was sold to a private equity investment firm. As a result, Porcher Industries no longer retains an interest in AGY Holding Corp. Glass Holdings LLC owns 100% of BGF Services, Inc. The Company has ongoing financial, managerial and commercial agreements with Porcher Industries, S.A., NVH, Inc. and other wholly-owned subsidiaries of NVH, Inc., as well as other affiliates of Porcher Industries, S.A. Mr. Robert Porcher, our former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns a controlling interest in Porcher Industries and Mr. Philippe Porcher, our current Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer also owns an interest in Porcher Industries. For more information as of December 31, 2006, see “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We pay management fees to BGF Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Glass Holdings LLC, that cover the periodic management services of certain Porcher Industries employees and the full time services of Philippe Dorier, our Chief Financial Officer. We also reimburse BGF Services for the costs associated with automobiles provided to Messrs. Philippe Porcher and Dorier. In connection with these arrangements with BGF Services, we incurred expenses of $420 during the six months ended June 30, 2007. BGF Services does not derive a profit from this arrangement and therefore these terms cannot be considered comparable to those that would be provided to third parties.

Porcher Industries and its French parent company provide general management and strategic planning advice to us in exchange for management fees that reimburse these companies for a portion of the compensation of Robert Porcher, Philippe Porcher and other employees who allocate their time among us and other Porcher Industries affiliates. In 2006, we incurred $600 in management fees for such services; however, we have not and do not expect to pay these management fees in 2007.

We purchase semi-finished and finished products from Porcher Industries and its affiliates. We purchased $805 of these products in the first six months of 2007. We sell finished goods and occasionally unfinished goods directly to Porcher Industries and its affiliates. In the first six months of 2007, we billed Porcher Industries and its affiliates $191 for these goods.

The Company is the guarantor of an executive’s deferred compensation agreement with a subsidiary of Glass Holdings LLC.

15

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements with respect to our operations, industry, financial condition and liquidity. These statements reflect our assessment of a number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors set forth in this Quarterly Report. An additional statement made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and summarizing certain of the principal risks and uncertainties inherent in our business is included herein under the caption “Disclosure Regarding Forward- Looking Statements.” You are encouraged to read this statement carefully.

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and related notes, and with our audited financial statements and related notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 set forth in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview and Trends Affecting Our Business

Our business focuses on the production of value-added specialty woven fabrics, non-woven fabrics and parts made from glass, carbon, and aramid yarns. Our products are a critical component in the production of a variety of electronic, filtration, composite, insulation, protective, construction and commercial products. Our glass fiber fabrics are used by our customers in printed circuit boards, which are integral to virtually all advanced electronic products, including computers and cellular telephones. Our products are also used by our customers to strengthen, insulate and enhance the dimensional stability of hundreds of products that they make for their own customers in various markets, including aerospace, transportation, construction, power generation and oil refining. In line with our strategy of continued new product development, we realized 12.4% of our sales in the first six months of 2007 from products that are new within the last three years.

Results of Operations. Management believes that some of our products, particularly electronic fabrics, are viewed as commodities by our customers. These products face increased competition from foreign manufacturers, particularly in Asia, that can manufacture similar products that are competitive with ours at significantly lower costs than we can. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly difficult to push prices higher with respect to these products, which reduces our overall revenues and results in lower profitability, particularly as our operating costs continue to rise. While this commoditization trend is generally limited to our electronic fabrics currently, we expect that some of our other products will be viewed in the future as commodities as Asian manufacturers ramp up production of these other goods, which will also put further pricing pressure on our overall sales.

Since we sell our products primarily in the United States, economic conditions in the U.S., particularly in sectors such as the automotive, electronics, construction and aviation industries, will significantly affect our revenues for the foreseeable future. Direct imports of glass fiber fabrics into the U.S. have been increasing and the relocation of a large segment of the electronics industry to Asia has impacted demand for domestically produced glass fiber fabrics used in printed circuit boards. This movement of production outside of North America has significantly reduced demand for certain types of our products, particularly electronic fabrics, by our U.S. manufacturing customers.

From time to time, our industry also experiences excess manufacturing capacity, which results in excessive supply of our products. During these periods when supply exceeds demand, pricing for our products tends to fall and results in lower revenues and lower profitability.

Based on publicly available data, we currently expect health care costs to increase significantly for the foreseeable future, which will further increase our general and administrative costs and reduce our net income. Furthermore, because the average age of our employees and other covered persons is generally higher than other companies, we believe that the Company may be potentially exposed to relatively higher health care costs each year, particularly to the extent we are responsible for covering catastrophic health care costs up to the maximum annual coverage of $0.1 million per covered person. In addition, because we have a relatively small number of employees and a limited amount of annual net income, the occurrence of even a small amount of such catastrophic costs during any period would have a magnifying adverse impact on our net income during such period. As a result of the foregoing, even though we have undertaken and will continue to undertake a variety of measures to control increased health care costs, it is likely that our net income will decline in the future due to such expected increased costs unless otherwise offset by increased revenues or lower costs in other areas.

Substantially all of our eligible employees have also elected to participate in our defined benefit pension plan. Because pension obligations are ultimately settled in future periods, the determination of our annual pension expense and pension liabilities is subject to estimates and assumptions, such as the discount rate, which are reviewed annually and are based on current rates and trends. Due to historically low interest rates, we have had to make higher cash contributions to maintain the funded status of this plan. We expect this trend may continue in the future, which we would fund using cash flows from operations or borrowings under the WFF Loan. We cannot predict whether investment returns will be sufficient to fund all of our future retirement benefits. To the extent our pension plan assets are not sufficient to fund future retirement benefits for our employees, the average

16

age of which is relatively higher than other companies, we would be required to fund any shortfall using cash generated by our operations. Furthermore, at any time, the federal laws governing pension plans or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended in a manner that could increase our pension plan costs and liabilities.

Liquidity and Financial Condition. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and borrowings under our financing arrangements. Our future need for liquidity will arise primarily from required payments on our outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes and the WFF Loan and the funding of capital expenditures and working capital requirements. If we experience lower net income in the future, we will generate correspondingly lower cash flows from operations and therefore be required to fund more of our short-term liquidity obligations using additional borrowings under the WFF Loan. If our operating cash flow is not sufficient to meet required payment obligations under our Senior Subordinated Notes and the WFF Loan or we are unable to comply with financial ratios and other covenants under those debt instruments, we would likely not be able to borrow any further amounts under the WFF Loan, which could adversely affect our ability to fund our operations and capital expenditures, and our lenders, including the holders of our Senior Subordinated Notes, could accelerate our outstanding debt.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Changes in the facts and circumstances could have a significant impact on the resulting financial statements. The critical accounting policies that affect our more complex judgments and estimates are described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our historical results of operations as a percentage of net sales:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold	84.1	%	83.1	%	85.4	%	82.7	%
Gross profit	15.9	%	16.9	%	14.6	%	17.3	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	5.5	%	7.4	%	5.6	%	6.9	%
Operating income	10.4	%	9.5	%	9.0	%	10.4	%
Interest expense	5.3	%	6.0	%	5.5	%	6.1	%
Other (income), net	(.1	)%	—		(.1	)%	—
Income before income taxes	5.2	%	3.5	%	3.6	%	4.3	%
Income tax expense	2.1	%	0.3	%	1.2	%	0.2	%
Net income	3.1	%	3.2	%	2.4	%	4.1	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006

Net Sales. Net sales increased $4.4 million, or 9.6%, to $50.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $46.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Sales of our composite fabrics, which are used in various applications including structural aircraft parts and interiors, have represented approximately 31.4% and 33.3% of our total net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Sales of these fabrics increased $0.5 million, or 3.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006 as a result of increased purchases of composite fabrics across the board by North American customers who produce goods for U.S.-based aircraft manufacturers.

Sales of our filtration fabrics, which are used by industrial customers to control emissions into the environment, have represented approximately 20.9% and 19.0% of our total net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Sales of these fabrics increased $1.7 million, or 19.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. This increase is due primarily to a higher value product mix.

Sales of protective fabrics, which are used in various ballistics applications including personal and vehicle armor, represented 18.4 % and 14.1% of our total net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Sales of these products increased $2.8 million, or 42.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006 due to a price increase and continued increased purchases by customers who supply the U.S. military.

17

Sales of our insulation fabrics, which are used for high temperature products, represented approximately 6.7% of our net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 6.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Sales of insulation fabrics increased $0.5 million, or 18.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006 due primarily to increased sales to automotive customers.

Sales of our electronics fabrics, which are used in multi-layer and rigid printed circuit boards, coated fabrics and specialty electronic tapes represented approximately 14.5% of our total net sales over the past year as compared to 17.1% for the same time period in the prior year. Buyers of our electronic fabrics are primarily based in North America. Sales of electronic fabrics decreased $0.7 million, or 8.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006 due to lower market demand. Long-term sales of these fabrics will continue to be adversely affected by the movement of electronic industry production outside of North America to lower cost manufacturers in Asia who generally purchase fabrics from Asian suppliers.

Gross Profit Margins. Gross profit margins decreased to 15.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 16.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2006, due primarily to increased sales of products with higher selling prices but with lower gross margin percentages.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.6 million to $2.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from the three months ended June 30, 2006, due to decreased management fees and consulting fees paid to a financial advisor upon termination of its consulting agreement during the second quarter of 2006.

Operating Income. As a result of the aforementioned factors, operating income increased $0.9 million to $5.3 million, or 10.4% of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, from $4.4 million, or 9.5% of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $0.1 million to $2.7 million, or 5.3% of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $2.8 million, or 6.0% of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Income Tax Expense. The effective tax rates in the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were 41.23% and 4.04%, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate is due to the utilization of tax attributes previously subject to a full valuation allowance along with state taxes. As a result, income tax expense increased $0.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Net Income. As a result of the aforementioned factors, our net income increased $0.1 million to $1.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from a net income of $1.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

Net Sales. Net sales increased $6.4 million, or 6.9%, to $98.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $92.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Sales of our composite fabrics, which are used in various applications including structural aircraft parts and interiors, have represented approximately 31.9% and 32.4% of our total net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Sales of these fabrics increased $1.5 million, or 5.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 as a result of increased purchases of composite fabrics across the board by North American customers who produce goods for U.S.-based aircraft manufacturers.

Sales of our filtration fabrics, which are used by industrial customers to control emissions into the environment, have represented approximately 21.6% and 19.7% of our total net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Sales of these fabrics increased $3.0 million, or 16.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. This increase is due primarily to a higher value product mix and a price increase.

Sales of protective fabrics, which are used in various ballistics applications including personal and vehicle armor, represented 16.9% of our total net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase over prior year’s 14.4% of total net sales. Sales of these products increased $3.3 million, or 24.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to a price increase and continued increased purchases by customers who supply the U.S. military to support activities in the Middle East.

Sales of our insulation products, which are used for high temperature applications, represented approximately 6.5% of our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 6.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Sales of insulation

18

fabrics increased $0.9 million, or 15.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 due primarily to increased sales to automotive customers.

Sales of our electronics fabrics, which are used in multi-layer and rigid printed circuit boards, coated fabrics and specialty electronic tapes represented approximately 14.9% of our total net sales over the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 17.3% for the same time period in the prior year. Sales of electronic fabrics decreased $1.5 million, or 9.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to decreased demand in the U.S. market in the first six months of 2007. Long-term sales of these fabrics will continue to be adversely affected by the movement of electronic industry production outside of North America, such as to lower cost manufacturers in Asia who generally purchase fabrics from Asian suppliers.

Gross Profit Margins. Gross profit margins decreased to 14.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 17.3% in the six months ended June 30, 2006, due primarily to increased sales of products with higher selling prices but with lower gross margin percentages as well as non-recurring items and a lower capacity utilization during the first quarter.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.8 million to $5.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from the six months ended June 30, 2006, due primarily to decreased management fees and consulting fees paid to a financial advisor upon termination of its consulting agreement during the first six months of 2006.

Operating Income. As a result of the aforementioned factors, operating income decreased $0.7 million to $8.9 million, or 9.0% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, from $9.6 million, or 10.4% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $0.2 million to $5.4 million, or 5.5% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $5.6 million, or 6.1% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 was 33.01% and 4.04%, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate is due to the utilization of tax attributes previously subject to a full valuation allowance along with state taxes. As a result, income tax expense increased $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Net Income. As a result of the aforementioned factors, our net income decreased $1.4 million to $2.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from a net income of $3.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Balance Sheets

Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable increased $5.2 million, or 33.3%, from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007. This increase was a result of the increased sales in the first six months of 2007.

Inventory. Inventory decreased $2.1 million, or 6.9%, from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007. This was mainly due to an increase in purchases of inventory at year-end in order to guarantee availability of product and to take advantage of lower costs prior to anticipated price increases. Sales and manufacturing volumes increased in the first six months of 2007.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased $3.3 million, or 17.4%, from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in trade payables, employee benefits and amounts due an affiliated company for income taxes, offset by a decrease in property tax accruals and the environmental reserve.

Long-term Tax Liability. Long-term tax liabilities were $0.9 million and $0.0 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The liability is a result of adopting the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and represents unrecognized tax benefits, penalties, and interest as of June 30, 2007. See Note 10.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and borrowings under our financing arrangements. Our future need for liquidity will arise primarily from interest payments on our $83.6 million Senior Subordinated Notes ($83.9 million net of unamortized discount of $0.3 million), principal and interest payments on the WFF Loan, and the funding of capital expenditures and working capital requirements. There are no mandatory payments of principal on the Senior Subordinated Notes scheduled prior to their maturity in January 2009. Based upon our current and anticipated levels of operations, we believe, but cannot guarantee, that our cash flows from operations, combined with availability under the WFF Loan, will be adequate to meet

19

our liquidity needs for the next twelve months. However, this forward-looking statement is subject to risks and uncertainties. See “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included below.

On June 6, 2003, we entered into the WFF Loan with WFF. The WFF Loan is guaranteed by our parent, NVH, Inc., BGF Services, Inc. and Glass Holdings LLC. The WFF Loan proceeds are used to finance ongoing working capital, capital expenditures, and general corporate needs as well as retire other outstanding debt. The WFF Loan matures on the earlier of February 28, 2010 or the date that is 180 days prior to the maturity date of the Senior Subordinated Notes. Because the Senior Subordinated Notes are scheduled to mature on January 15, 2009, we expect to be required to refinance the WFF Loan no later than July 18, 2008. We have not reserved funds to repay amounts outstanding under the WFF Loan by July 18, 2008.

On April 4, 2005, the Company executed an amendment to the WFF Loan to increase its total borrowing availability by approximately $5.0 million. The amendment was deemed to be effective as of March 31, 2005. The amendment provided for the following: (1) reduced the maximum facility size to $25.0 million; (2) reloaded the term loan back to the lesser of $6.0 million or 70% of the orderly liquidation value of eligible equipment; (3) increased the advance rate on finished goods inventory from 45% to 55%; (4) reduced the Excess Availability to $1.0 million at all times; and (5) released the $0.6 million environmental reserve previously in place.

On October 31, 2005, the Company executed an amendment to the WFF Loan to increase its cap on capital expenditures to $3.5 million annually. The amendment was deemed effective as of June 30, 2005.

On December 1, 2006, the Company entered an amendment to the WFF Loan. The amendment provided for the following: (1) increased the maximum facility size to $27.0 million; (2) reloaded the term loan back to $6.0 million; (3) increased the maximum revolver credit line to $21.0 million; (4) increased the minimum EBITDA requirements for financial covenants to not less than $15.0 million calculated on a trailing 12 month basis; (5) reduced the spread on interest rates by approximately 100 basis points; and (6) increased the annual cap on capital expenditures to $4.5 million.

The WFF Loan, as amended, has a maximum revolver credit line of $21.0 million with a letter of credit sub-line of $4.0 million, an inventory sub-line of $10.0 million and a term loan of $6.0 million, of which the principal was fully funded at the amendment date and is being amortized over 60 months.

WFF has a first priority, perfected security interest in our assets. The WFF Loan provides for the following: (1) a borrowing base with advance rates on eligible accounts receivable and eligible finished goods and raw materials inventory of 85%, 55% and 35%, respectively, with inventory to be capped at the lesser of the eligible inventory calculation, $10.0 million or 80% times the percentage of the book value of our inventory that is estimated to be recoverable upon liquidation; (2) borrowing rates of LIBOR + 2.25% or the Wells Fargo Prime Rate (RR) + 0.00% for the revolver if the trailing twelve months EBITDA exceeds $20.0 million with a 25 basis points increase if the trailing twelve months EBITDA exceeds $17.0 million but is less than or equal to $20.0 million and a further 25 basis points increase if the trailing twelve months EBITDA is less than or equal to $17.0 million; (3) borrowing rates of LIBOR + 2.5% or RR + .25% for the term loan with, at all times, a minimum rate of 5% for both facilities; (4) certain financial covenants including (i) a minimum excess availability at all times, (ii) a minimum trailing twelve month EBITDA level and (iii) a $4.5 million cap on annual capital expenditures; and (5) an early termination fee.

In addition to the covenant requirements set forth above, the WFF Loan does not allow the Company to pay dividends or distributions on its outstanding capital stock (including to its parent) and limits or restricts the Company’s ability to incur additional debt, repurchase securities, make certain prohibited investments, create liens, transfer or sell assets or merge or consolidate without the consent of the lender. The WFF Loan permits the lenders to accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest upon certain events of default, including failure to make required payments of principal and interest when due, uncured violations of the material covenants under the WFF Loan or if an event of default exists under the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes that would permit the trustee or holders to accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued unpaid interest with respect to the Senior Subordinated Notes.

The WFF Loan proceeds are used to finance ongoing working capital, capital expenditures, and general corporate needs of the Company and retire other outstanding debt. As of June 30, 2007, amounts outstanding under the WFF Loan totaled $5.1 million which consisted solely of $5.1 under the term loan. As of December 31, 2006, amounts outstanding under the WFF Loan totaled $5.8 million which consisted solely of $5.8 million under the term loan. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had exercised its LIBOR Rate option on $4.5 million of its borrowings on the term loan. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had not exercised its LIBOR Rate option on any of its borrowings on the term loan or the revolver. The interest rate as of June 30, 2007 on the outstanding amounts under the LIBOR options on the term loan was 7.82%. The interest rate as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 on the amounts outstanding under the Wells Fargo Prime Rate portion of the term loan was 8.5%.

20

Availability under the revolver at June 30, 2007 and July 30, 2007 was $17.4 million and $17.1 million, respectively. This availability has been reduced by a reserve to allow for the annual interest payments on the Senior Subordinated Notes. The reserve for interest payments is increased by $0.2 million a week in 2007 and 2006, and is reset to $0 when such payment is made. As of June 30, 2007 and July 30, 2007, the total outstanding reserves amounted to $4.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

The Senior Subordinated Notes bear interest at a rate of 10.25%, which is payable semi-annually in January and July through the maturity date of January 15, 2009. The indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes does not allow the Company to pay dividends or distributions on its outstanding capital stock (including to its parent) and limits or restricts the Company’s ability to incur additional debt, repurchase securities, make certain prohibited investments, create liens, transfer or sell assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, issue or sell stock of a subsidiary or merge or consolidate without the consent of the trustee or a certain percentage of the holders. In particular, the Company is prohibited from incurring additional debt or making certain additional investments unless it maintains a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of greater than 2.0 to 1.0. The indenture permits the trustee or the holders of 25% or more of the Senior Subordinated Notes to accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest upon certain events of default, including failure to make required payments of principal and interest when due, uncured violations of the material covenants under the indenture or if lenders accelerate payment of the outstanding principal and accrued unpaid interest due to an event of default with respect to at least $5.0 million of other debt of the Company, such as the WFF Loan.

The fair value of the Senior Subordinated Notes as of June 30, 2007 and July 31, 2007 was $82.6 million and $79.7 million, respectively.

The Company has been in compliance with all of the covenants and ratios under the WFF Loan and the indenture governing its Senior Subordinated Notes for all periods presented. However, this forward-looking statement is subject to risks and uncertainties. See “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included below.

In order to reduce future cash interest payments, as well as future amounts due at maturity or upon redemption, we or our affiliates may, from time to time, purchase our Senior Subordinated Notes for cash in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Although our financing agreement with WFF limits our ability to purchase such securities if the securities are trading at greater than 80% of their face value, we believe that WFF would likely consent to spot purchases at a higher price, although no assurances can be made.

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities.Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and was primarily the result of a decrease in net income and an increase in working capital.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $1.5 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively, due primarily to the purchases of property, plant and equipment.

Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities.Net cash used in financing activities was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared with net cash provided in financing activities of $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and was primarily the result of a decrease in the borrowings on the revolving credit facility.

Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Matters. The Company is in the final phases of an Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)-supervised self-implementing remediation program at its Altavista facility. The remediation program has been conducted under EPA rules at 40 C.F.R. §761.61, promulgated under the Toxic Substances Control Act, that set forth self-implementing cleanup standards for certain contamination by polychlorinated biphenyls, or “PCBs.” PCBs were discovered at the Altavista facility during a 1998 environmental site assessment, and the EPA was notified. These PCBs were initially identified in the area of the former location of a heat transfer oil tank that the previous owner of the facility had removed before Porcher Industries acquired the Company in 1988. A 1998 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment revealed PCB contamination in several areas inside the plant and on its roof, in the soil, in the sanitary and storm sewers within the plant, in groundwater, and in the surface waters to which the storm sewers drain. In addition, testing confirmed that measurable quantities of PCBs may have migrated into the Town of Altavista’s water treatment plant. Interim measures were taken in 1999 and 2000, and have been taken periodically since then, to control PCB migration and minimize exposure.

In 2003, the Company submitted to the EPA a final Site Characterization Report, or “SCR,” documenting the assessment of the property and the site’s drainage ditch. In May 2004, the EPA approved the SCR. A draft cleanup plan was submitted to the EPA in September 2004 and a final proposed remediation plan was provided to the EPA for its review in December 2005. The EPA approved the plan in May 2006.

21

The remediation plan was generally designed to achieve PCB levels in remaining soils within the area covered by the plan at or below 25 parts per million (ppm), which is consistent with standards set forth in the EPA rules for “low occupancy” sites. The remediation plan covered property owned by the Company and off-site areas owned by third parties, including the portion of the drainage ditch running from the property off-site to the western edge of adjacent railroad tracks. The portion of the drainage ditch east of the railroad tracks was not included within the scope of the voluntary cleanup. Although this eastern portion of the drainage ditch generally exhibited significantly lower PCB levels than were present in the western portion of the drainage ditch, the exclusion of this area means that soils and/or sediments with PCBs above 25 ppm will remain in this area even after completion of the plan.

The cleanup was divided into a storm water management phase, a soil remediation phase, and a post-cleanup reconstruction phase. The storm water management phase was completed during the second quarter of 2006. The Company requested reimbursement from the Town of Altavista for 80% of the costs borne in this project as the scope of work centers primarily on site utilities. The Town of Altavista agreed to a total reimbursement of $0.4 million which is to be paid in equal installments over the next seven years. Payments began in January 2007. A discounted receivable of $0.3 million has been recorded at June 30, 2007. The soil remediation phase of the cleanup started in November 2006 and was completed in March 2007. The reconstruction phase has begun following completion of the soil remediation. The Company plans to place deed restrictions on the Altavista property, including restrictions limiting the property’s use consistent with a “low occupancy area” within the meaning of the EPA rules.

The implementation of the remediation plan has not completely eliminated PCBs from the area subject to the plan; as noted above, the plan is designed to achieve PCB levels in remaining soils at or below 25 ppm. Further, the remediation plan itself provided for contingencies under which PCBs would remain in place above 25 ppm. While future EPA and/or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) enforcement actions could potentially require further cleanup of the site, the Company’s voluntary remediation program has lessened the likelihood of such enforcement actions.

A reserve of $2.1 million for the environmental issues at the Altavista facility was recorded at December 31, 2006 which reflected the accepted bid from the contractor for the soil remediation work of $2.3 million plus $0.2 million estimated additional expenses to be incurred for testing and post-cleanup reconstruction. The reserve was reduced by expenses incurred through December of $0.4 million. During the first quarter of 2007, the reserve has been increased by $0.5 million to reflect changes in estimated costs due to the quantity of soil being removed. Expenses incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $2.5 million which reduced the reserve balance at June 30, 2007 to $0.1 million. Remediation costs are estimates, subject to the EPA’s comments on the remediation plan and to other factors that may arise in the remediation process. Contingencies that may affect the accuracy of these estimates include:

• The portion of the drainage ditch east of the railroad tracks is outside the scope of the self-implemented cleanup. There has been no indication whether the State of Virginia or the EPA will seek to require the Company to undertake work in this drainage ditch. No cleanup plan or estimate for this work has been developed.

• The construction estimates are inherently based on assumptions about the total quantity of soil to be removed and disposed, as bids are based on unit costs for removal, transportation, and disposal. The extensive SCR was used as a basis for estimating quantities of soil to be excavated, transported, and deposited in proper landfills, but verification sampling upon excavation will be necessary and it is possible that greater quantities of impacted soil than are currently estimated will require removal. Transportation and disposal costs are approximately two-thirds of the estimated cost of the project. Accordingly, a material increase in the quantity of soil removed in excess of the currently-estimated amounts would correspondingly materially increase the cleanup cost.

• Utilities may exist in and around the dig site that could be damaged. While all efforts will be made to avoid damaging utilities, any such damage may cause part or all work at the plant to be suspended until such utilities can be restored. While not adding greatly to the project cost, the indirect cost of such an interruption through lost revenue could be material.

Completion of the remediation plan has addressed impacted soils at the site but will not preclude possible further action by the EPA under other environmental statutes and rules or by Virginia. The Company is aware that the DEQ is calculating Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for pollutants in water bodies. Samples have been taken for PCBs over large expanses of the Staunton River into which the storm water discharges. It is not certain whether DEQ’s sampling may result in additional claims regarding areas downstream of the Company’s property including in the portion of the drainage ditch east of the railroad track or in the Staunton River.

In addition, a 1998 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment at the Cheraw, South Carolina facility revealed reportable levels

22

of chlorinated solvents and hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. The contamination resulted from the previous owner’s printing operations. Assessment and cleanup are regulated by South Carolina’s Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”). Upon review of the data with DHEC, it was determined that chlorinated solvent residuals constitute the sole remediation concern. With DHEC oversight and approval, the Company is pursuing a Monitored Natural Attenuation strategy, which includes periodic groundwater monitoring. Work includes semi-annual monitoring and reporting. Recent tests show reduced levels of solvent concentrations. The Company may review the data again with DHEC and recommend reducing the frequency of testing to annually to reduce costs. No action other than continued monitoring for this facility is anticipated at this time. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had a reserve of $0.1 million for the above-described environmental issues at the Cheraw facility.

As these environmental cleanups progress, the Company may need to revise the reserves for Altavista and Cheraw but it is unable to derive a more precise estimate at this time, as actual costs remain uncertain. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be required to respond to its environmental issues on a more immediate basis and that such response, if required, will not result in significant cash outlays that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

Health Care Costs. Based on publicly available data, we currently expect health care costs to increase significantly for the foreseeable future, which will further increase our general and administrative costs and reduce our net income. Furthermore, because the average age of our employees and other covered persons is generally higher than other companies, we believe that the Company may be potentially exposed to relatively higher health care costs each year, particularly to the extent we are responsible for covering catastrophic health care costs up to the maximum annual coverage of $0.1 million per covered person. In addition, because we have a relatively small number of employees and a limited amount of annual net income, the occurrence of even a small amount of such catastrophic costs during any period would have a magnifying adverse impact on our net income during such period. As a result of the foregoing, even though we have undertaken and will continue to undertake a variety of measures to control increased health care costs, it is likely that our net income will decline in the future due to such expected increased costs unless otherwise offset by increased revenues or lower costs in other areas.

Pension Plan Costs. Substantially all of our eligible employees have also elected to participate in our defined benefit pension plan. Because pension obligations are ultimately settled in future periods, the determination of our annual pension expense and pension liabilities is subject to estimates and assumptions, such as the discount rate, which are reviewed annually and are based on current rates and trends. Due to historically low interest rates, we have had to make higher cash contributions to maintain the funded status of this plan. We expect this trend may continue in the future, which we would fund using cash flows from operations or borrowings under the WFF Loan. We cannot predict whether investment returns will be sufficient to fund all of our future retirement benefits. To the extent our pension plan assets are not sufficient to fund future retirement benefits for our employees, the average age of which is relatively higher than other companies, we would be required to fund any shortfall using cash generated by our operations. Furthermore, at any time, the federal laws governing pension plans or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended in a manner that could increase our pension plan costs and liabilities.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. On February 13, 2007, a significant customer of the Company filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code. As a result, the Company as of June 30, 2007 has fully reserved the accounts receivable balance of $0.3 million for this customer which is included in its allowance for doubtful accounts.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For information regarding our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006, see our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

We and certain of our affiliates (collectively referred to as the “Porcher Group”) have agreed to amend and restate the terms of the supply agreement originally dated April 2, 2004 between the Porcher Group and AGY Holding Corp. Under the terms of this new agreement that became effective January 1, 2007, we have an economic incentive, but not an obligation, to purchase yarn from AGY.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (‘FIN 48”), which provides guidance relative to the recognition, derecognition and measurement of tax position for financial statement purposes. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we have recognized a long-term liability of $0.9 million as of June 30, 2007, representing unrecognized tax benefits, penalties and interest.

23

Outlook for the Remainder of 2007

The following section contains forward-looking statements about our plans, strategies and prospects during the remainder of 2007. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Such statements are based on our current plans and expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that exist in our operations and our business environment that could render actual outcomes and results materially different from those predicted. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements set forth under, “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Looking ahead for the remainder of 2007:

• Sales trends during July 2007 were comparable to the first six months of 2007. Although no assurances can be given, we expect sales to be slightly higher for the full year in 2007.

• We plan to continue our efforts to maintain an inventory level consistent with sales. However, there can be no assurance that sales will continue at this same level during the remainder of 2007.

Related Party Transactions

The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Porcher Industries, S.A. through NVH, Inc., a U.S. holding company. The Company has ongoing financial, managerial and commercial agreements and arrangements with Porcher Industries, S.A., NVH, Inc. and wholly-owned subsidiaries of NVH, Inc., as well as other affiliates of Porcher Industries, S.A. For more information regarding these relationships, see “Note 15—Related Party Transactions.”

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No .48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 provides guidance relative to the recognition, derecognition and measurement of tax position for financial statement purposes. Historically, we accounted for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” based on whether we determined that our tax position is “probable” of being sustained under current tax law, as well as an analysis of potential outcomes under a given set of facts and circumstances. FIN 48 requires that tax positions be sustainable based on a “more likely than not” standard under current tax law benefit recognition, and adjusted to reflect the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized an adjustment of $0.2 million in retained earnings for unrecognized income tax benefits. The recognition of this benefit resulted in an increase to the opening balance of retained earnings. The total unrecognized tax benefits, penalties, and interest as of January 1, 2007 are as follows:

Unrecognized tax benefits	$	0.6	million
Penalties		0.2	million
Interest		0.1	million
Total FIN 48 liability at adoption	$	0.9	million

As of June 30, 2007, the total liability recorded under FIN 48 was $899. The total unrecognized tax benefits, penalties, and interest as of June 30, 2007 are as follows:

Unrecognized tax benefits	$	0.6	million
Penalties		0.2	million
Interest		0.1	million
Total FIN 48 liability at June 30, 2007	$	0.9	million

This amount has been classified as Long-Term Tax Liabilities on the Balance Sheet. All of the unrecognized tax benefit above would affect our effective tax rate if recognized.

FIN 48 requires that penalties and interest be accrued as appropriate for uncertain tax positions. It is our policy to classify penalties and interest as part of Income Tax Expense on the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The tax years 2003-2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

24

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on their balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 also requires additional disclosures in the notes to financial statements. For the Company, SFAS No. 158 is effective as of the end of fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 158 on its financial statements. However, based on the current funded status of our defined benefit pension and postretirement medical plans, the Company would be required to increase its total liability by $4.4 million for pension, which would result in an estimated decrease to stockholder’s equity of approximately $2.9 million, net of taxes, in the Company’s balance sheet. This estimate may vary from the actual impact of implementing SFAS No. 158. The ultimate amounts recorded are highly dependent on a number of assumptions, including the discount rates in effect at December 31, 2007, the actual rate of return on our pension assets for 2007 and the tax effects of the adjustment. Changes in these assumptions since the Company’s last measurement date could increase or decrease the expected impact of implementing SFAS No. 158 in the financial statements at December 31, 2007.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, of SFAS 159 on its financial statements.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the information in this Quarterly Report may contain forward-looking statements. These statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Such statements are based on our current plans and expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that exist in our operations and our business environment that could render actual outcomes and results materially different from those predicted. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the following important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements:

• As a result of our significant debt, we may not be able to meet our obligations or obtain additional financing for capital expenditures or other beneficial activities.

• We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt obligations, including making required payments on the Senior Subordinated Notes.

• Because the WFF Loan is senior to and will mature prior to the Senior Subordinated Notes, we may not have enough assets left to pay the holders of our Senior Subordinated Notes.

• The indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes limits our ability to incur additional debt, transfer or sell assets, and merge or consolidate.

• Market downturns could reduce the demand for our products.

• We compete in highly competitive markets and recent competition from Asia has reduced demand for our electronic glass fiber fabrics and increased supply, which could result in lower sales.

• Changes in military funding could adversely affect sales of protective fabrics.

• Our operating performance is dependent upon a limited number of customers. A decrease in business from major customers could reduce cash available to make required payments under the Senior Subordinated Notes.

• If we are not able to keep up with technological advances in the markets we serve or if our competitors introduce cost-effective alternatives to our products, we could experience declining sales or a loss of customers.

• Our products may be viewed as commodities by our customers, which could lead to increased competition from foreign manufacturers.

• In-sourcing of fabric manufacturing by our customers would reduce the demand for our products.

• We may experience a decline in the supply of raw materials, which means we could have to pay higher prices for raw materials or we could be delayed in making our products.

• Costs with respect to our ongoing environmental cleanup projects and monitoring projects at our Altavista and Cheraw facilities could be higher than anticipated, which would reduce our cash available to make required payments under our Senior Subordinated Notes.

25

• We may be responsible for safety and health costs that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in less cash available to make required payments under the Senior Subordinated Notes.

• Our operations are subject to various hazards that may cause personal injury or property damage and increase our operating costs.

• Health care expenses could be higher than anticipated, which would reduce our future net income.

• Funding requirements of our pension plan could be higher than anticipated, which would reduce our future net income and liquidity.

• Ongoing compliance with increasingly complex regulations governing companies that make voluntary filings with the SEC could increase our future selling, general and administrative expenses.

• Conflicts of interest with our controlling equity holder could result in changes in our business that adversely affects our financial condition and results of operations.

This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is not intended to be exhaustive. You should also review the other cautionary statements we make in this Quarterly Report and in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting for us, are expressly qualified in their entirety by our cautionary statements.

We do not have, and expressly disclaim, any obligation to release publicly any updates or changes in our expectations or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The effects of potential changes in interest rates are discussed below. Our market risk discussion includes “forward-looking statements” and represents an estimate of possible changes in fair value that would occur assuming hypothetical future movements in interest rates. These disclosures are not precise indicators of expected future losses, but only indicators of reasonably possible losses. As a result, actual future results may differ materially from those presented. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Our financing arrangements are subject to market risks. Our Senior Subordinated Notes bear a 10.25% fixed interest rate and our WFF Loan is subject to interest rate risk. Our financial instruments are not currently subject to commodity price risk. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates on borrowings under our WFF Loan. The WFF Loan bears interest based on LIBOR or prime. When deemed appropriate, our risk management strategy is to use derivative financial instruments, such as swaps, to hedge interest rate exposures. We do not enter into derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

The fair value of the Senior Subordinated Notes as of June 30, 2007 and July 31, 2007 was approximately $82.6 million and $79.7 million, respectively. If the interest rate on borrowings under our WFF Loan as of June 30, 2007 is 100 basis points higher or lower during the next 12 months, our interest rate expense would be increased or decreased $0.1 million. As of June 30, 2007, we were not party to any derivative financial instruments.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our annual and periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, our President and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2007.

26

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5. Other Information

As reported in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, all shares of our issued and outstanding common stock are held by NVH, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nouveau Verre Holdings, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Porcher Industries, S.A. The purpose of the information set forth in this section is to describe a transaction involving Nouveau Verre Holdings LLC (“NVH LLC”), which is a distinct and separate subsidiary of Nouveau Verre Holdings, Inc. The information contained herein has been provided to us by NVH LLC and we assume no responsibility for its accuracy nor any duty to update or correct such information after the date hereof.

NVH LLC was previously the owner of 150,000 shares of common stock of AGY Holding Corp. Pursuant to the terms of a recent merger between AGY Holding Corp. and KAGY Holding Company Inc., all shares of AGY Holding Corp. owned by NVH LLC were converted into the right to receive cash in three installments. The first installment was paid to NVH LLC upon consummation of the merger in an amount of $21.8 million. The second installment of $0.5 million was paid during the third quarter of 2006. The third installment of $1.4 million was paid during the second quarter of 2007 upon the release of an indemnification escrow established pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.

We are not directly or indirectly a party to this transaction. As a result, this transaction has not had, nor will it have, any impact on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act

27

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

BGF INDUSTRIES, INC.

/s/ Philippe R. Dorier

Philippe R. Dorier

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ James R. Henderson

James R. Henderson

President

Date: August 14, 2007

28