1. |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
____________________
FORM 10-Q
____________________
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2009
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from ___________ to ____________
____________________
Commission File No.
000-25809
____________________
Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc.
(Name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-8046599 | |
State of Incorporation | IRS Employer Identification No. | |
1010 N. Central Avenue | ||
Glendale, California 91202 | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) | ||
(818) 507-4617 | ||
(Issuer’s telephone number) |
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer o, an accelerated filer o, a non-accelerated filer o, or a smaller reporting company x.
1
APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FILING
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I | ||
FINANCIAL INFORMATION | PAGE | |
Item 1. | Financial Statements - Unaudited | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet As of April 30, 2009 and January 31, 2009 and January 31, 2009 | 3 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 | 4 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 | 5 | |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 6-16 | |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 17 |
Item 4. | Control and Procedures. | 18 |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 19 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and the Use of Proceeds | 19 |
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities | 19 |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 19 |
Item 5. | Other Information | 19 |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 19 |
2
PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. | |||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||
(UNAUDITED) |
April 30, | January 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 59,220 | $ | 84,161 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 269,248 | 255,665 | ||||||
Due from affiliate | 2,050 | 2,050 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 17,963 | 25,025 | ||||||
Total current assets | 348,481 | 366,901 | ||||||
Property and equipment - net | 36,992 | 47,330 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 385,474 | $ | 414,232 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT: | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 56,280 | $ | 65,141 | ||||
Shares to be issued | 378,500 | 284,000 | ||||||
Convertible notes payable | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Convertible notes payable-related party | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||||||
Current portion of loan | 46,081 | 41,782 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 513,862 | 423,923 | ||||||
Loan | 144,442 | 156,218 | ||||||
Convertible notes payable-related party | 75,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 733,304 | 655,141 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIT): | ||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $.001 and $0.0001 per share; 5,000,000 and | ||||||||
25,000,000 shares authorized, respectively; none issued | - | - | ||||||
Common Stock, par value $.001 and $0.0001, 100,000,000 shares authorized, | ||||||||
25,870,220 shares issued and outstanding | 25,870 | 25,870 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest | 228,115 | 228,115 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 550,058 | 550,058 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (1,151,873 | ) | (1,044,951 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' deficit | (347,830 | ) | (240,909 | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | $ | 385,474 | $ | 414,232 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | |||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008 | |||
(UNADITED) |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
REVENUES | $ | 501,183 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Cost of services - physician practice salaries, benefits and other | 419,554 | - | ||||||
General and administrative | 172,562 | 83,134 | ||||||
Depreciation | 10,338 | - | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 602,455 | 83,134 | ||||||
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | (101,272 | ) | (73,134 | ) | ||||
OTHER EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Interest expense | 4,849 | - | ||||||
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | (106,121 | ) | (73,134 | ) | ||||
Provision for Income Tax | 800 | - | ||||||
NET LOSS | $ | (106,921 | ) | $ | (73,134 | ) | ||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 13,492 | - | ||||||
Net loss attributable to Apollo Medical Holding, Inc. | $ | (120,413 | ) | $ | (73,134 | ) | ||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING, | ||||||||
BASIC AND DILUTED | 25,870,220 | 20,933,490 | ||||||
*BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||
*Weighted average number of shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share is the same | ||||||||
since the effect of dilutive securities is anti-dilutive. | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
4
APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. | ||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||||||||||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008 | ||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) |
Three months ended April 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | ||||||||
(used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (106,921 | ) | $ | (73,134 | ) | ||
Depreciation | 10,338 | - | ||||||
Bad debt expense | 462 | - | ||||||
Shares to be issued for services | 94,500 | - | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (14,045 | ) | - | |||||
Prepaid expenses | 7,062 | - | ||||||
Due from related party | - | 1,600 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (8,860 | ) | 53 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (17,465 | ) | (71,481 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Property and Equipment | - | - | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Payments of notes payable | (7,477 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock for cash | 305,000 | |||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (7,477 | ) | 305,000 | |||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS | (24,941 | ) | 233,519 | |||||
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE | 84,161 | 44,352 | ||||||
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE | $ | 59,220 | $ | 277,871 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||||||||
Interest paid during the quarter | $ | 2,582 | $ | - | ||||
Taxes paid during the quarter | $ | 1,600 | $ | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
(FORMERLY SICLONE INDUSTRIES, INC.)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Description of Business |
Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. operates as a medical management holding company that focuses on managing the provision of hospital-based medicine through a wholly owned subsidiary-management company, Apollo Medical Management, Inc. (“AMM”). Through AMM, the Company manages an affiliated medical group, which presently consists of ApolloMed Hospitalists (“AMH”). AMM operates as a Physician Practice Management Company (PPM) and is in the business of providing management services to Physician Practice Companies (PPC) under Management Service Agreements.
On June 13, 2008, Siclone Industries, Inc. (“Siclone”), Apollo Acquisition Co., Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Siclone (“Acquisition”), Apollo Medical Management, Inc. (“Apollo Medical”) and the shareholders of Apollo Medical entered into an agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Apollo Medical merged with and into Acquisition. The former shareholders of Apollo Medical received 20,933,490 shares of Siclone’s common stock in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Apollo Medical.
The acquisition of Apollo Medical is accounted for as a reverse acquisition under the purchase method of accounting since the shareholders of Apollo Medical obtained control of the consolidated entity. Accordingly, the reorganization of the two companies is recorded as a recapitalization of Apollo Medical, with Apollo Medical being treated as the continuing operating entity. The historical financial statements presented herein will be those of Apollo Medical. The continuing entity retained January 31 as its fiscal year end. The financial statements of the legal acquirer are not significant; therefore, no pro forma financial information is submitted.
On July 1, 2008, the continuing entity (i.e., the combined entity of Acquisition and Apollo Medical) changed its name to Apollo Medical Management, Inc. (AMM). On July 3, 2008, Siclone changed its name to Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. Following the merger, the Company is headquartered in Glendale, California.
On August 1, 2008, AMM completed negotiations and executed a formal Management Services Agreement with ApolloMed Hospitalists (“AMH”), under which AMM will provide management services to AMH. The Agreement is effective as of August 1, 2008 and will allow AMM, which operates as a Physician Practice Management Company, to consolidate AMH, which operates as a Physician Practice, in accordance with EITF 97-2, Application of FASB Statement No. 94 and APB Opinion No. 16 to Physician Management Entities and Certain Other Entities with Contractual Management Agreements. The Management Services Agreement was amended on March 20, 2009, to allow for the calculation of the fee on a monthly basis with payment of the calculated fee each month. AMH is controlled by Dr. Hosseinion and Dr. Vazquez, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively.
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
6
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Apollo in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. The statements consist solely of the management company, Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. prior to August 1, 2008. Commencing with the Company’s third quarter on August 1, 2008, and concurrent with the execution of the Management Services Agreement, the statements reflect the consolidation of AMM and AMH , in accordance with EITF 97-2, Application of FASB Statement No. 94 and APB Opinion No. 16 to Physician Management Entities and Certain Other Entities with Contractual Management Agreements . In management’s opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the results of the interim periods are reflected herein. Operating results for the three month period ended April 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of future financial results.
The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted by Form 10-Q and do not contain all of the information that is included in the annual financial statements and notes of the Company. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes presented herein should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements of financial position for assets and liabilities qualifying as financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Credit and Supply Risk
The Company’s case rate and capitation revenues, reported by Apollo’s affiliate, AMH, are governed by contractual agreements with medical groups/IPA’s and hospitals. As a result, receivables from this business are generally fully collected. The Company does face issues related to the timing of these collections, and the Company must assess the level of earned but uncollected revenue to which it is entitled at each period end. The Company does face collection issues with regard to its fee-for-service revenues. One is the estimation of the amount to be received from each billing since the Company invoices on a Medicare schedule and each of many providers remits payment on a reduced schedule. The Company has to estimate the amount it will ultimately receive form each billing and properly record revenue. With a wide variety of contract terms and providers, the Company’s revenue is not concentrated or dependent on a specific contract. No individual contract with our clients provides more than 20 percent of reported revenues.
7
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement will not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” The scope of this Statement is limited to financial guarantee insurance (and reinsurance) contracts, as described in this Statement, issued by enterprises included within the scope of Statement 60. Accordingly, this Statement does not apply to financial guarantee contracts issued by enterprises excluded from the scope of Statement 60 or to some insurance contracts that seem similar to financial guarantee insurance contracts issued by insurance enterprises (such as mortgage guaranty insurance or credit insurance on trade receivables). This Statement also does not apply to financial guarantee insurance contracts that are derivative instruments included within the scope of FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement will not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Values When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides guidance on (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The FSP also amends certain disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 157 to require, among other things, disclosures in interim periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective prospectively beginning April 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard, but would not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (FSP 115-2). This FSP modifies the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities and changes the existing impairment model for such securities. The FSP also requires additional disclosures for both annual and interim periods with respect to both debt and equity securities. Under the FSP, impairment of debt securities will be considered other-than-temporary if an entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (3) does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis (even if the entity does not intend to sell). The FSP further indicates that, depending on which of the above factor(s) causes the impairment to be considered other-than-temporary, (1) the entire shortfall of the security’s fair value versus its amortized cost basis or (2) only the credit loss portion would be recognized in earnings while the remaining shortfall (if any) would be recorded in other comprehensive income. FSP 115-2 requires entities to initially apply the provisions of the standard to previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities existing as of the date of initial adoption by making a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment potentially reclassifies the noncredit portion of a previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt security held as of the date of initial adoption from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. This pronouncement is effective April 1, 2009. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
8
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP essentially expands the disclosure about fair value of financial instruments that were previously required only annually to also be required for interim period reporting. In addition, the FSP requires certain additional disclosures regarding the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. These additional disclosures will be required beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of these additional disclosures.
Stock-based compensation
On October 17, 2006 the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” As of the date of this report the Company has no stock based incentive plan in effect.
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial accounting standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), “Earnings per share”. SFAS No. 128 superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15). Net income (loss) per share for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 128. Basic net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank representing Company’s current operating account
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes Case Rate and Capitation revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, service has been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonable assured. Fee for Service revenues are recorded at amounts reasonably assured to be collected. The determination of reasonably assured collections is based on historical Fee for Service collections as a percent of billings. The provisions are adjusted to reflect actual collections in subsequent periods.
The estimation and the reporting of patient responsibility revenues is highly subjective and depends on the payer mix, contractual reimbursement rates, collection experiences, judgment and other factors. The Company’s fee arrangements are with various payers, including managed care organizations, hospitals, insurance companies, individuals, Medicare and Medicaid.
9
3. Uncertainty of ability to continue as a going concern
The Company's financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $1,151,873 as of April 30, 2009. Cash Flows used in Operating Activities for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was $17,464.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The Company’s need for working capital is a key issue for management and necessary for the Company to meet its goals and objectives. The Company is actively pursuing additional capitalization opportunities. Management believes that the above actions will allow the Company to continue operations through the next fiscal year.
4. Accounts Receivable
Accounts Receivable is stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided for those accounts receivable considered to be uncollectible, based upon historical experience and management's evaluation of outstanding accounts receivable at each quarter end. As of April 30, 2009, Accounts Receivable totals $269,248, net of a provision for bad debt expense of $11,927, and represents amounts invoiced by AMH. Accounts receivable was $255,665, net of the provision for bad debt expense of $11,465, on January 31, 2009.
5. Due from affiliate
Due from affiliate totals $2,050 and represents amounts due from AMA, an unconsolidated Affiliate of the Company as of April 30, 2009 and January 31, 2009. ..
6. Prepaid expenses
Prepaid expenses of $17,963 and $25,025 as of April 30, 2009 and January 31, 2009, respectively, are amounts prepaid for medical malpractice insurance and Director’s and Officer’s insurance.
7. Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment consists of the following as of :
10
April 30, 2009 | January 31, 2009 | |||||||
Computers | $ | 13,912 | $ | 13,912 | ||||
Software | 138,443 | 138,443 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 50,815 | 50,815 | ||||||
Gross Property and Equipment | 203,170 | 203,170 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (166,178 | ) | (155,840 | ) | ||||
Net Property and Equipment | $ | 36,992 | $ | 47,330 |
Depreciation expense was $10,337 and $0 for the three month periods ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
8. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following as of:
April 30, 2009 | January 31, 2009 | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 30,599 | $ | 30,599 | ||||
Accrued interest | 2,776 | 507 | ||||||
Accrued professional fees | 16,000 | 20,267 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and income taxes | 8,905 | 13,768 | ||||||
Total | $ | 56,280 | $ | 65,141 |
9. Shares to be Issued
Shares to be issued consist of the following:
April 30, 2009 | January 31, 2009 | |||||||
Accrued shares to be issued for note conversion | $ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||
Accrued shares to be issued for services | 178,500 | 84,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 378,500 | $ | 284,000 |
11
As of April 30, 2009, 266,667 shares were not yet issued for note conversions and 661,111 shares are to be issued for the services rendered through April 30, 2009.
10. Convertible Notes Payable
During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company received $210,000 proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes payable. The convertible notes bear interest at 10% and are due twelve months from the date of issuance ranging from October 7, 2008 to December 12, 2008. In connection with the convertible notes, the Company issued 140,000 warrants to the note holders with an exercise price of $1.50. There were no issuances of Convertible Notes, or attached warrants, in the first quarter of 2009.
The Company recorded value of warrants using the Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: Stock price $0.27, Expected life of 3 years, Risk free bond rate of 1.05% to 2.00% and volatility of 44% to 61%. Based on the assumptions used the Company recorded the fair value of warrants amounting to $379 which was fully amortized as interest expense during year ended January 31, 2009. |
As of January 31, 2009, the Company received the conversion notice from the note holders to convert $200,000 of notes into shares of the Company’s common stock. This amount is included in the Shares to be Issued Liabilities and the remaining $10,000 is shown as Convertible Notes payable on the accompanying financial statements.
The Company recorded interest expense of $2,268, related to Convertible Notes in the quarter ended April 30, 2009 and zero for April 30, 2008.
11. Convertible Notes Payable-Related Party
During the year ended January 31, 2008, the Company received $23,000 proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes payable to relatives of the CEO of the Company. The convertible notes bear interest at 10% and are due twelve months from December 25, 2008. In connection with the convertible notes, the Company issued 15,333 warrants to the note holders with an exercise price of $1.50. The Company recorded value of warrants of $ 68 using the Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: Stock price $0.27, Expected life of 3 years, Risk free bond rate of 1.14% and volatility of 49%.
The Company received $70,000 proceeds from the issuance of notes payable to the father of the Company’s CEO. The note was due and payable in full no later than October 1, 2008, carried no interest rate, and the Company was obligated to pay an origination fee of $5,000 at the time of payoff. The note was extended by verbal agreement on its expiration date with no change in terms. On January 24, 2009, the Company formalized the note extension with the father of the Company’s CEO. Under the terms of the new note, the $5,000 origination fee was added to the note, the due date was extended to March 31, 2011, the interest rate was set at eight 8% and the note is initially convertible into 214,285 shares of common stock. The Company has the right to redeem the note at a 105 percent premium any time prior to the due date on March 31, 2011.
12
12. Notes payable
There were no additions to Notes Payable in the quarter ended April 30 , 2009.
During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company borrowed $125,000 on June 13, 2008 from a non-related party. The note bears no interest rate and was due and payable in full on July 2, 2008. The note was paid off as of October 31, 2008. The Company recorded a penalty of $6,250 during the nine months ended October 31, 2008 due to late payment.
Also, during the third quarter, the Company borrowed $125,000 on September 24, 2008 under a note. This note bore an interest rate of 15 percent and was due and payable in full on October 22, 2008. The note obligated the Company for an origination fee of $10,000 and reimbursement of legal fees totaling $1,500 and issuance of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The note, along with the origination fee and legal reimbursement, was paid off in full on October 20, 2008.
13. Related Party Transactions
During the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company generated revenue of $56,491 and $10,000, respectively, by providing management services to ApolloMed Hospitalists (AMH), an affiliated company with common ownership interest. Commencing August 1, 2008, the management services fee income reported by AMM was eliminated in consolidation against similar costs recorded at AMH.
The Company borrowed $70,000 on a short-term promissory note in the quarter ended July 2008 from a related party of the Chief Executive officer of the Company. The $70,000 note was due and payable in full no later than October 1, 2008, carries no interest rate, and the Company was obligated to pay an origination fee of $5,000 at the time of payoff. The note was extended by verbal agreement on its expiration date with no change in terms. On January 24, 2009, the Company formalized the note extension. Under the terms of the new note, the $5,000 origination fee was added to the note, the due date was extended to March 31, 2011, the interest rate was set at eight (8) percent and the note is initially convertible into 214,285 shares of common stock. The Company has the right to redeem the note at a 105 percent premium prior to March 31, 2011. (Note 11)
Also, during the fourth quarter 2009, the Company issued Convertible Notes in amounts aggregating to $23,000 to two relatives of Warren Hosseinion, the Company’s CEO (Note 11).
14. Loan
13
The Company, through AMH, has a SBA line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank. The loan was established on January 5, 2006, provided a total available credit of $200,000 and had a final maturity date of February 10, 2009. The interest rate is the bank’s prime rate plus 2. The loan is collateralized by all machinery, equipment, furniture, accounts, inventory and general intangibles of AMH and personally guaranteed by the CEO of the Company.
On February 3, 2009, the Company’s SBA line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank was, by mutual agreement, converted into a four-year fully amortizable loan. The credit line was reduced to $198,000. The interest rate remained at the bank’s prime rate 5.25% plus 2 percentage points and the maturity date was extended to February 10, 2013 and all collateral and guarantor remained unchanged.
As of April 30, 2009, the outstanding balance against this facility was $190,523, with $46,081 in current portion. Interest expense of $2,582 related to the SBA loan was recorded during the quarter ended April 30, 2009.
The Company also has an overdraft facility with Wells Fargo Bank. This facility is attached to the AMH bank account and provides up to $70,000 of overdraft and short-term borrowing capacity. Draws under the facility carry an 8 percent interest rate. The Company has not utilized this facility.
15. Non-Controlling Interest
The Company recorded AMH ownership interest in the accompanied financial statements as Non-Controlling Interest amounting to $228,115 during the year ended January 31, 2009. No addition has been recorded during the quarter ended April 30, 2009.
16. Stockholder’s Equity
The Company did not issue any shares or warrants in the quarter ended April 30, 2009.
During the period from February 1, 2007 to July 31, 2007, Apollo Medical issued 364,000 shares to investors for a total cash value $182,000. As part of issuance of shares for cash the Company granted 91,000 stock warrants to investors. During the period from February 1, 2008 to July 31, 2008, Apollo Medical issued 670,000 shares to investors for a total cash value $335,000. As part of issuance of shares for cash the Company granted 167,500 stock warrants to investors.
As the result of the merger on June 13, 2008, the former shareholders of Apollo Medical received 20,933,490 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Apollo Medical. Certain former shareholders of Apollo Medical received 470,470 warrants in exchange for warrants granted to them in previous fund raising.
During the three month period ended October 31, 2008, the Company issued 268,687 shares for legal, accounting and investment advisory services provided to the Company. The Company also issued 50,000 shares as financing fee on a note payable.
On October 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Board of Director’s Agreement with Suresh Nihalani. The Company issued a stock award of 400,000 shares to Mr. Nihalani, under the terms of the Director’s Agreement, which shares will be issued ratably over a thirty-six month period commencing December 2008. During the year ended January 2009, Mr. Nihalani was issued 11,111 shares under this agreement.
14
Warrants outstanding:
Aggregate intrinsic value | Number of warrants | |||||||
Outstanding at January 31, 2009 | $ | — | 625,803 | |||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||
Exercised | — | — | ||||||
Cancelled | — | — | ||||||
Outstanding at April 30, 2009 | $ | — | 625,803 |
Exercise Price | Warrants outstanding | Weighted average remaining contractual life | Warrants exercisable | Weighted average exercise price | ||||||||||||
$ | 1.10 | 470,470 | 1.54 | 470,470 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||
$ | 1.50 | 155,333 | 0.76 | 155,333 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||||
625,803 | 2.30 | 625,803 |
17. Commitments and Contingency
On March 15, 2009, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Kaneohe Advisors LLC (Kyle Francis) under which Mr. Francis would become the Company’s Executive Vice President, Business Development and Strategy. Under the terms of the Agreement, Mr. Francis will be paid $8,000 per month, of which $2,000 will be paid in cash and $6,000 will be deferred. In addition, Mr. Francis received 350,000 shares of restricted stock at the date of the Agreement and is entitled to 350,000 additional restricted shares on the first and second anniversaries of the Agreement, provided the Agreement is not terminated .. The initial 350,000 shares, along with 50,000 shares granted to Mr. Francis in the year ended January 2009, have been accrued as shares to be issued as a liability in the accompanying financial statements.
On September 4, 2008, Apollo Medical Management, Inc. executed an employment agreement with Jilbert Issai, M.D., to provide services as Senior Vice President. The agreement is for an initial one-year term with provision for successive one-year periods. Under the agreement, Doctor Issai is entitled to a nominal salary and may be granted options to purchase an aggregate of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $.10 per share when and if the Company is to adopt a stock compensation plan.
15
The Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with Stonecreek Associates, Inc. on October 27, 2008, under which Stonecreek will provide investment advisory services to the Company. Apollo is obligated to pay a fee to Stonecreek on completion of any debt or equity financing. The agreement terminated on March 31, 2009.
On October 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Board of Director’s Agreement with Suresh Nihalani. The Company will issue a stock award of 400,000 shares to Mr. Nihalani, under the terms of the Director’s Agreement, which shares will be issued ratably over a thirty-six month period commencing December 2008. The shares will be released to Mr. Nihalani on a monthly basis during his tenure as a Director. The distribution of shares will continue as long as Mr. Nihalani serves on the Board, but will cease when Mr. Nihalani is no longer is a Director. Mr. Nihalani was issued 11,111 shares under this agreement in the year ended January 31, 2009. In addition, 11,111 shares have been accrued as shares to be issued as a liability in the accompanying financial statements
The Company received a claim for $250,000 relating to amounts purportedly owed by the Company as a result of the initial reverse acquisition transaction. This dispute relates to the initial letter dated June 3, 2008. The terms of the letter of intent call for, among other things, the payment of cash of $250,000 within 60 days of closing. The letter of intent states, however, that it is intended to serve as a memorandum of the Parties current discussions, and that a definitive transaction agreement will follow. The letter of intent further states that both parties acknowledge that all provisions of the letter of intent are non binding, and that no contract or agreement providing for a transaction shall be deemed to exist unless and until a final agreement has been negotiated and executed. The final merger agreement that was executed contains a clause that it is the “entire agreement” and thus supersedes all previous agreements including the letter of intent; moreover, management contends that there are no additional amounts owed under the final merger agreement. The Company has not accrued for any amount asserted in the above claim as the attorney of the Company has advised that the claim is in its early stage and the outcome of this matter could not be predicted at this stage.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended April 31, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended April 31, 2008
Revenues
Apollo reported revenues of $501,183 for the quarter ended April 2009, compared to revenues of $10,000 in the comparable quarter ended April 2008. Prior to the Management Services Agreement executed on August 1, 2008, the Company could only report the management fees charged to its affiliate, AMH. Subsequent to August 1, 2008, revenues represent the billings by AMH under the various fee structures from health plans, medical groups/IPA’s and hospitals. Management fee revenues have been eliminated subsequent to August 1, 2008.
Cost of Services
16
Cost of Services was $419,554 for the three months ended April 2009, compared to Cost of Services of $ 0 for the corresponding three months ended April 2008. Cost of Services includes the payroll and consulting costs of the physicians, all payroll related costs, costs for all medical malpractice insurance and physician privileges. |
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative expenses were $172,562 for the three months ended April 30, 2009, compared to General and Administrative expenses of $83,134 reported in the comparable three months of April 30, 2008. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded non-cash compensation expenses totaling $94,500, related to the issuance of shares for service. There were no comparable non-cash expenses in the first quarter of 2008. |
Loss from Operations
The Company reported a Loss from Operations of $101,272 for the three month period ended April 30, 2009, compared to a Loss from Operations of $73,134 for the comparable three months ended April 30, 2008. The increased loss of $28,138 from 2008 to 2009 was due to the high costs of service relative to the revenues generated from the Company’s contracts, as the Company has not yet achieved economies of scale in its activities. In addition, the loss from operations in the quarter ended April 2009 was further impacted by compensation and consulting costs. The Loss from Operations in the quarter ended April 2008 was due to the fact that the low level of management Fee income was insufficient to cover the costs of services and administrative costs in this formative year.
Net Loss
A net loss of $106,921 was reported for the three months ended April 30, 2009 verses a net loss of $73,134 for the three months ended April 30, 2008. The increased loss of $33,787 was primarily due to non-cash compensation costs incurred in the quarter just ended.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At April 30, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $59,220, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $84,161 at the beginning of the fiscal year at January 31, 2009. Short-term borrowings totaled $79,081 at April 30, 2009, compared to $74,782 as of January 31, 2009. The Company had no short-term borrowings at January 31, 2008. Long-term borrowings totaled $219,442 as of April 30, 2009, compared to long-term borrowings of $231,218 on January 31, 2009.
.
Net cash used in operating activities totaled a $17,464 for the three months ended April 30, 2009, compared to $71,481 for the comparable three months ended April 30, 2008. The significantly larger operating loss, including the $250,000 paid and expensed on the Siclone Merger, was primarily responsible for the increase in the negative operating cash flow.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
17
The Company does not hold any derivative instruments and does not engage in any hedging activities.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a. | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. |
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of April 30, 2009. Management has identified the following three material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over financial reporting:
1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.
2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.
3. We do not have review and supervision procedures for financial reporting functions. The review and supervision function of internal control relates to the accuracy of financial information reported. The failure to review and supervise could allow the reporting of inaccurate or incomplete financial information. Due to our size and nature, review and supervision may not always be possible or economically feasible. Management evaluated the impact of our significant number of audit adjustments, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.
Based on the foregoing materials weaknesses, we have determined that, as of April 30, 2009, the effectiveness of our controls and procedures over financial accounting and reporting are insufficient. The Company is taking steps to improve the timeliness and accuracy of its financial information, including the hiring of additional employees to facilitate proper segregation of duties. It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
18
b. Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter (i.e., the three-month period ended April 30, 2009) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company was not a party to any legal proceedings as of April 30, 2009 and is not aware of any pending legal actions.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The Company did not sell any Equity Securities during the periods covered by this filing.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended April 30, 2008.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to the vote of securities holders during the period ended April 30, 2008.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | Description | |
31.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. | |
31.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. | |
32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. | |
32.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
19
SIGNATURES
APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. | ||
Dated: June 12, 2009 | By: | /s/ Warren Hosseinion |
Warren Hosseinion | ||
Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Dated: June 12, 2009 | By: | /s/ A. Noel DeWinter |
A. Noel DeWinter | ||
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer | ||
20