Panolam Industries International 10-Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to               

Commission file number  333-78569

PANOLAM INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	52-2064043
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

20 Progress Drive

Shelton, Connecticut 06484

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(203) 925-1556

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  xYes   o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  o  Yes   o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  o  Yes   x  No

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of August 10, 2009 was 200.

Panolam Industries International, Inc.

Index to Quarterly Report on

Form 10-Q

		Page No.
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	39
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	40
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	41
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	41
Item 6.	Exhibits	41

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PANOLAM INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,347		$	43,452
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $4,918 at June 30, 2009 and $5,978 at December 31, 2008	19,139			14,193
Inventories	50,025			55,136
Other current assets	18,887			18,575
Total current assets	133,398			131,356
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – Net	208,942			218,330
INTANGIBLE ASSETS – Net	48,735			52,083
DEBT ACQUISITION COSTS – Net	6,208			7,057
OTHER ASSETS	1,401			3,457
TOTAL	$	398,684		$	412,283
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	6,774		$	6,913
Accrued liabilities	26,680			19,585
Current portion of long-term debt	343,997			343,937
Total current liabilities	377,451			370,435
LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT PORTION	9			13
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES	55,839			61,498
OTHER LIABILITIES	7,428			8,216
Total liabilities	440,727			440,162
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 15)
STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT:
Common stock, $0.01 par value – 200 authorized, 200 issued and outstanding	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	81,746			81,528
Accumulated deficit	(121,856		)	(104,434		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,933		)	(4,973		)
Total stockholder’s deficit	(42,043		)	(27,879		)
TOTAL	$	398,684		$	412,283

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

PANOLAM INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
NET SALES	$	67,018		$	99,331		$	130,929		$	200,513
COST OF GOODS SOLD	57,142			79,285			113,297			161,024
GROSS PROFIT	9,876			20,046			17,632			39,489
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES	10,151			13,282			20,541			26,027
INDEFINITE LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGE	—			—			1,589			—
OTHER EXPENSES	2,273			—			4,360			—
(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS	(2,548		)	6,764			(8,858		)	13,462
INTEREST EXPENSE	6,955			6,922			13,188			14,799
INTEREST INCOME	(34		)	(86		)	(116		)	(172		)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE	(9,469		)	(72		)	(21,930		)	(1,165		)
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE	(2,089		)	342			(4,508		)	(292		)
NET LOSS	$	(7,380	)	$	(414	)	$	(17,422	)	$	(873	)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

PANOLAM INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(17,422	)	$	(873	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	15,247			14,977
Indefinite lived intangible asset impairment charge	1,589			—
Deferred income tax benefit	(4,089		)	(1,158		)
Amortization of debt acquisition costs	849			907
Stock based compensation expense	218			245
Other	(735		)	66
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(4,862		)	(5,212		)
Inventories	5,378			(2,898		)
Other current assets	446			1,864
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	6,672			263
Income taxes payable/receivable	(653		)	3,371
Other	(401		)	(398		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	2,237			11,154
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(489		)	(2,190		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(489		)	(2,190		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long-term debt	(6		)	(2,024		)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility	—			5,000
Payment of amount due to Panolam Holdings Co.	—			(2,482		)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(6		)	494
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	153			(122		)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	1,895			9,336
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - Beginning of period	43,452			10,744
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - End of period	$	45,347		$	20,080
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash payments for interest	$	3,235		$	14,049
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds	234			(2,534		)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

PANOLAM INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

1.   BUSINESS

Panolam Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”) designs, manufactures and distributes decorative laminates, primarily thermally fused melamine panels (“TFMs”) and high-pressure laminate sheets (“HPLs”), throughout the United States and Canada.  The Company markets its products through independent distributors and directly to kitchen and bathroom cabinet, furniture, store fixtures and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”).  The Company wholly-owns the following companies:

·Panolam Industries, Ltd.

·Panolam Industries, Inc.

·Pioneer Plastics Corporation (“Pioneer”)

·Nevamar Holding Corp. (“Nevamar”)

The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 and the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements included herein have been included.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements and the related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures at the date of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, discounts and rebates, inventories, income taxes and long-lived assets. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and current market conditions and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management considers the Company’s policies on revenue recognition, adjustments for slow moving and obsolete inventories, potentially uncollectible accounts receivable, accruals for customer rebates, income taxes, intangible assets and long-lived assets to be critical accounting policies due to estimates, assumptions, and application of judgment involved in each. The Company has evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure through August 14, 2009, which was the date the Company filed this Form 10-Q with the SEC.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty regarding its ability to continue as a going concern. This assumes a continuation of operations and the realization of assets and liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Company had net losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 of $17,422 and $121,656, respectively.  The net loss for

6

the six months ended June 30, 2009 resulted primarily from a reduction in sales volume given the current economic conditions, coupled with continuing fixed costs, and also included a $1,589 trade name impairment charge and $4,360 in other expenses related primarily to legal and financial advisor fees incurred in connection with the Company’s efforts to restructure its debt obligations. The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was principally attributable to $96,691 of goodwill impairment and $24,921 of trade name impairments taken during the year as well as a high ratio of fixed costs, including the interest costs on its debt and depreciation expense. The Company also had a stockholder’s deficit of $42,043 at June 30, 2009 and $27,879 at December 31, 2008. As discussed in Note 9, “Debt and Capital Lease Obligations,” as of June 30, 2009 and as of December 31, 2008, the Company was not in compliance with all of its financial and reporting covenants under its senior credit facility,  (the “Credit Facility”), which constitutes a default. As a result, the lenders have the ability to accelerate the Company’s obligations to make payments under the Credit Facility and, in the event there was availability under the revolver, the Company would not be permitted to borrow funds until its noncompliance is cured or waived by the lenders.

On February 27, 2009, the Company received a notice of default from the agent for the lenders under its Credit Facility due to the Company’s failure to comply with certain financial and reporting covenants. On March 31, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) with its lenders pursuant to which the lenders agreed to forbear exercising any rights and remedies under the Credit Facility relating to these defaults, including their right to accelerate the Company’s payment obligations under the Credit Facility, until the earlier of (i) June 30, 2009, (ii) the occurrence of an event of default under the Forbearance Agreement or (iii) the fulfillment of all obligations under the Forbearance Agreement and the Credit Facility and the termination of the Credit Facility. The Forbearance Agreement, which expired by its terms on June 30, 2009, required the Company to deliver to the lenders under the Credit Facility, on or before June 30, 2009, an excess cash flow payment related to the year ended December 31, 2008.  The Company did not make that excess cash flow payment and, furthermore, did not make the regularly-scheduled June interest payment on either the term loan or the revolver portions of the Credit Facility, which non-payments constitute defaults under the Forbearance Agreement.  On July 1, 2009, the Company received a letter from the agent under the Credit Facility notifying the Company of its defaults under the Forbearance Agreement and reserving the lenders’ rights related to all defaults.  As a result of the termination of the Forbearance Agreement, the lenders under the Credit Facility again have the ability to accelerate all of the Company’s payment obligations under the Credit Facility, which amount to $194,440 as of June 30, 2009.

The terms of the Forbearance Agreement prohibited the Company from, among other things, paying the April 1, 2009 interest payment on its 10.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “Notes”) and the Company did not make that payment.  Its failure to make that interest payment is a default under the indenture governing the Notes and entitles the indenture trustee or the holders of 25% of the Notes, after a thirty-day grace period that ended on May 1, 2009 and upon delivery of proper notice to the Company, to accelerate the Company’s payment obligations under the Notes.  The indenture trustee informed the holders of the Notes of the payment default and of the event of default by letters dated April 9, 2009 and May 7, 2009, respectively. Acceleration of the Company’s payment obligations under the Notes would be an additional event of default under the Credit Facility. Based on these acceleration rights under the Credit Facility and the Notes, the Company reclassified $343,937 from long-term debt to current debt as of December 31, 2008.  The current portion of long-term debt was $343,997 as of June 30, 2009. As such, the Company had a working capital deficiency of $244,053 as of June 30, 2009 and $239,079 as of December 31, 2008.

On July 27, 2009, the Company reached a tentative agreement with lenders holding approximately seventy-three percent (73%) of the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness under the Credit Facility and noteholders holding two-thirds in principal amount of the Notes (collectively, the “Consenting Holders”) with respect to a restructuring of the Company’s indebtedness.  The Company is in active discussions with the Consenting Holders regarding the process for implementing the proposed restructuring, which remains subject to final documentation.  The Company expects to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course during and following the proposed restructuring.

In the event that the proposed restructuring is not completed and most or all of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility and Notes become due and payable, the Company would be unable to fund its payment obligations. The Company has not received any acceleration notice related to these financing arrangements; however, given the current negative conditions in its industry and the economy generally and the credit markets in particular, the Company cannot give any assurance that it will be successful in reaching a definitive agreement on the proposed restructuring or finding alternative financing arrangements. The Company has engaged financial and legal advisors to provide assistance in these discussions, but the Company may be compelled to file for bankruptcy protection.

As a result of these factors, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

7

2.   NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS No. 168”). Upon adoption, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) established by SFAS No. 168 will become the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.  All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the ASC will become non-authoritative.  SFAS No. 168 is effective for interim and annual financial periods beginning after September 15, 2009.  The Company is in the process of evaluating SFAS No. 168 and does not expect it will have a significant impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”). SFAS No. 165 seeks to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 introduces the concept of financial statements being “available to be issued”, and requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued.  SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 during the second quarter of Fiscal 2009. See Note 1 for the disclosure required under SFAS No. 165.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) opinion 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”), which requires an entity to provide interim disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments within the scope of SFAS 107 and to include disclosures related to the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating those instruments. The Company adopted this FSP during the second quarter of 2009. The impact of this FSP related only to disclosures regarding the fair value of the Company’s debt and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 expands the current disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133, such that entities must now provide enhanced disclosures on a quarterly basis regarding how and why the entity uses derivatives; how derivatives and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and how derivatives and related hedged items affect the entity’s financial position, performance and cash flow. Pursuant to the transition provisions of this statement, the Company adopted SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 and the statement did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosure about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP FAS No. 132(R)-1”) which amends SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003) Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106. FSP FAS no. 132(R)-1 requires more detailed disclosures about the assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan and is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating FSP FAS No. 132(R)-1 and will adopt the required disclosures for the year ending December 31, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS No. 160”) including an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which addresses the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. To accomplish this, this Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase and how the acquirer determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The Company is required to apply SFAS No. 141(R) to any acquisition made after January 1, 2009.

8

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2 (“FSP 157-2”) that partially deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. Other than this deferred portion, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 in 2008 and it did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the deferral of FSP 157-2 on January 1, 2009, and such adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3.   INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
Raw materials	$	22,917	$	23,798
Work in process	5,418		5,557
Finished goods	21,690		25,781
	$	50,025	$	55,136

4.   OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Other current assets consist of:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
Income taxes receivable	$	6,101	$	5,327
Deferred income taxes – current (see note 11)	4,613		4,728
Prepaid insurance	1,076		2,557
Other current assets	7,097		5,963
	$	18,887	$	18,575

5.   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Land	$	4,941		$	4,896
Buildings and improvements	62,670			61,552
Machinery and equipment	227,178			226,087
Construction in process	2,324			2,334
	297,113			294,869
Accumulated depreciation	(88,171		)	(76,539		)
	$	208,942		$	218,330

Depreciation expense was $6,874 and $13,389 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, versus $6,696 and $12,939 for the comparable prior year periods. Depreciation expense related to the Company’s manufacturing processes and administrative functions is included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations in cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively. Capital leases of $20 and $15 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are included in machinery and equipment. As a result of testing for recoverability during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded an

9

impairment charge of $5,165 related to its fixed assets located at the Norcross, Georgia facility. There were no fixed asset impairment charges recorded in the first six months of 2009.

6.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, (“SFAS No. 142”) on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested for impairment at least on an annual basis. The Company’s previously recorded goodwill was fully impaired during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The Company performs an annual impairment test related to its indefinite lived intangible assets, which consist primarily of trademarks and tradenames at December 31, or more frequently should conditions that could affect fair value change significantly. Due to continued weakness in the economy, the Company determined that the indefinite lived tradenames should be tested for impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As a result of such interim test, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1,589. The remaining fair value of the indefinite lived tradenames immediately following the impairment was $9,600, which serves as the new cost basis for the asset. A portion of the Company’s tradenames are recorded on the books and records of its Canadian subsidiary and as a result of the fluctuation in the foreign exchange rates used to translate the Canadian balance sheet into U.S. dollars, the consolidated value of the indefinite lived tradenames was $9,712 at June 30, 2009. The Company has determined that, following the guidance of EITF Issue No. 02-7, “Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets,” all of the indefinite-lived tradenames should be tested for impairment as a single unit because they were acquired in a single acquisition and are used together in the Company’s marketing, sales and branding efforts. The Company adopted FSP 157-2 as disclosed in Note 2, and as a result applied the measurement of fair value under SFAS No. 157 to the tradename. The Company considered all relevant valuation techniques that could be obtained without incurring undue cost and effort, and concluded that a discounted relief-from-royalty approach provided the most reliable measure of fair value. The relief-from-royalty method involves determining the present value of the royalty savings associated with the ownership or possession, as opposed to licensing, of the trademarks. The Company used three inputs in applying approach (i) projected future sales; (ii) assumed royalty rate; and (iii) discount rate. As a result, the measurement is based significantly on internal projections, and the Company considered this fair value to be Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy under FAS 157. There were no tradename impairment charges recorded in the second quarter of 2009.

The Company accounts for finite-lived intangible assets under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”). These assets are grouped with other long-lived assets and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their respective carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company groups these assets for testing, with other assets and liabilities, at their lowest level of identifiable cash flows. Assessment for possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of the long-lived asset group from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. No impairment charges related to finite lived intangible assets were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Intangible assets, net include the following:

	June 30, 2009					December 31, 2008
	Gross Carrying Value		AccumulatedAmortization		AmortizationLives (Years)	GrossCarryingValue		AccumulatedAmortization		AmortizationLives (Years)
Patents and trademarks	$	9,134	$	3,144	3, 12, 14	$	9,134	$	2,752	3, 12, 14
Key customer lists	43,574		10,723		15	43,574		9,270		15
Other	1,517		1,335		3, 10	1,493		1,297		3, 10
Trademarks and tradenames with indefinite useful lives	9,712		—		—	11,201		—		—
	$	63,937	$	15,202		$	65,402	$	13,319

Amortization expense was $915 and $1,858 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $1,018 and $2,038 for the comparable prior year periods.  Expected amortization expense for the remainder of 2009 through 2013 is as follows:

10

2009	$	1,830
2010	3,660
2011	3,660
2012	3,660
2013	3,660

7.   DEBT ACQUISITION COSTS

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the debt acquisition costs and accumulated amortization were as follows:

	June 30, 2009					December 31, 2008
	Gross Carrying Value		AccumulatedAmortization		AmortizationLives (Years)	GrossCarryingValue		AccumulatedAmortization		AmortizationLives (Years)
Debt acquisition costs	$	14,967	$	8,759	7	$	14,967	$	7,910	7

Amortization of debt acquisition costs was $425 and $849 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, versus $425 and $907 for the comparable prior year periods. The amortization of debt acquisition costs is included in interest expense.

8.   ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
Salaries, wages and employee benefits	$	6,347	$	5,635
Interest	13,100		4,058
Customer rebates	1,590		2,240
Insurance	494		2,026
Freight	640		827
Other	4,509		4,799
	$	26,680	$	19,585

9.   DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Long-term debt consists of:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Senior Subordinated Notes, due 2013, face amount $151,000 less discount of $528 at June 30, 2009 and $590 at December 31, 2008, bearing interest at 10.75%	$	150,472		$	150,410
Senior Secured Term Loan, maturing 2012, bearing interest at June 30, 2009 of 5.00% and 3.22% at December 31, 2008	167,586			167,586
Revolver borrowings, bearing interest at June 30, 2009 of 4.50%	25,928			25,928
Capitalized lease obligations and other	20			26
	344,006			343,950
Current portion	(343,997		)	(343,937		)
	$	9		$	13

Senior Subordinated Notes—The Company issued the Notes on September 30, 2005.  Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1; interest payments commenced on April 1, 2006.  The Notes will mature on October 1, 2013.  The Company capitalized a total of $5,420 of financing fees that are being amortized over the life of the Notes.  The Notes are guaranteed by all of the Company’s subsidiaries including Nevamar, but

11

not including Panolam Industries, Ltd. (the Canadian subsidiary).  These guarantees are joint and several and full and unconditional.

Senior Secured Term Loan and Revolving Credit Loan—In September 2005, the Company entered into the Credit Facility, which originally provided for an aggregate committed amount of up to $155,000 consisting of two tranches; a $135,000 term loan and a $20,000 revolving loan. In March 2006, the term loan was increased to $215,000 and the revolving Credit Facility was increased to $30,000. The term and revolver borrowings may be designated as base rate or Eurodollar rate borrowings, as defined, plus an applicable interest margin. The applicable interest margin on the revolver is reset quarterly based upon certain ratios as defined in the Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $25,928 in revolver borrowings. The outstanding revolver borrowings as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 reflect a decision made by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2008 to borrow its remaining availability under the revolving credit facility due to the uncertainty in both the economy and the credit markets and in order to have as much liquidity as possible to respond to further downturns in the business. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had letters of credit issued for workers’ compensation claims in an aggregate amount of $4,072 outstanding under the Credit Facility. The term loan portion of the Credit Facility is for 7 years and the revolving loan portion is for 5 years. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s term and revolving credit loans at June 30, 2009, without undue cost and effort.

The original quarterly repayment amount of the term loan facility was $338 with the balance due at September 30, 2012. Subsequent to the March 2006 amendment of the Credit Facility, the repayment of the principal amount of the amended term loan facility was scheduled to be paid in quarterly installments of $538 beginning March 31, 2006 with the balance of the principal due on September 30, 2012. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company prepaid $20,000 and $24,539 of its term loan balance, respectively, and during the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company prepaid an additional $2,000 of its term loan balance. The Company has not made any prepayments in the six months ended June 30, 2009. As a result of the prepayments, and assuming no acceleration of its payment obligations, the Company is no longer required to make any repayment of future principal installments until September 30, 2012, the loan maturity date. Under the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, which expired on June 30, 2009, an excess cash flow payment related to the year ended December 31, 2008 and calculated in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility was due on or before June 30, 2009. The Company did not deliver the excess cash flow payment and, furthermore, did not make the regularly-scheduled June interest payments on either the term loan or the revolver portions of the Credit Facility. The interest rate on the term loan facility was 5.00% at June 30, 2009. In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, effective July 1, 2009, the Company will be required to pay interest on its Credit Facility borrowings at a default interest rate equivalent to a rate that is 2.00% per annum in excess of the rate that would otherwise be payable.

The Credit Facility covenants limit, among other things, the Company’s ability to incur debt, pay dividends, change its capital structure, make guarantees, assume liens, and dispose of assets. These covenants include requirements for the Company to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 4.5 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.25 as of June 30, 2009, as well as an annual maximum capital expenditures limitation of $8,000 for 2009. The Credit Facility also contains certain customary events of default, which in some instances are subject to grace periods. As of June 30, 2009, the Company was not in compliance with certain financial and reporting covenants including its leverage and interest coverage covenants under its Credit Facility, which constitutes a default. As a result, the lenders under the Credit Facility have the ability to accelerate the Company’s obligations to make payments under the Credit Facility and, in the event there was availability under the revolver, the Company would not be permitted to borrow funds until the noncompliance is cured or waived by the lenders.

On February 27, 2009, the Company received a notice of default from the agent for the lenders under its Credit Facility due to the Company’s failure to comply with certain financial and reporting covenants. On March 31, 2009, the Company entered into the Forbearance Agreement with its lenders pursuant to which the lenders agreed to forbear exercising any rights and remedies under the Credit Facility relating to these defaults, including their right to accelerate the Company’s payment obligations under the Credit Facility, until the earlier of (i) June 30, 2009, (ii) the occurrence of an event of default under the Forbearance Agreement or (iii) the fulfillment of all obligations under the Forbearance Agreement and the Credit Facility and the termination of the Credit Facility. The Forbearance Agreement, which expired by its terms on June 30, 2009, required the Company to deliver to the lenders under the Credit Facility, on or before June 30, 2009, an excess cash flow payment related to the year ended December 31, 2008.  The Company did not make that excess cash flow payment and, furthermore, did not make the regularly-scheduled June interest payment on either the term loan or the revolver portions of the Credit Facility, which non-payments constitute defaults under the Forbearance Agreement.  On July 1, 2009, the Company received a letter

12

from the agent under the Credit Facility notifying the Company of its defaults under the Forbearance Agreement and reserving the lenders’ rights related to all defaults.  As a result of the termination of the Forbearance Agreement, the lenders under the Credit Facility again have the ability to accelerate all of the Company’s payment obligations under the Credit Facility, which amount to $194,440 as of June 30, 2009.

The terms of the Forbearance Agreement prohibited the Company from, among other things, paying the April 1, 2009 interest payment on the Notes and the Company did not make that payment. Its failure to make that interest payment is a default under the indenture governing the Notes and entitles the indenture trustee or the holders of 25% of the Notes, after a thirty-day grace period that ended on May 1, 2009 and upon delivery of proper notice to the Company, to accelerate the Company’s payment obligations under the Notes.  The indenture trustee informed the holders of the Notes of the payment default and of the event of default by letters dated April 9, 2009 and May 7, 2009, respectively. Acceleration of the Company’s payment obligations under the Notes would be an additional event of default under the Credit Facility. Based on these acceleration rights under the Credit Facility and the Notes, the Company reclassified $343,937 from long-term debt to current debt as of December 31, 2008. The current portion of long-term debt was $343,997 as of June 30, 2009. As such, the Company had a working capital deficiency of $244,053 as of June 30, 2009 and $239,079 as of December 31, 2008.

The indenture governing the Company’s Notes also contains a number of covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified or preferred stock, pay dividends or make other equity distributions, repurchase or redeem capital stock, make investments or other restricted payments, sell assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, create liens or consolidate or merge with or into other companies, and the ability of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to the Company. Future principal debt payments are expected to be paid with cash flow generated by operations. On March 30, 2009, the agent for the lenders under the Credit Facility provided the Company with a “blockage notice” directing the Company not to make an April 1, 2009 interest payment on the Notes. The Company did not make that payment, which is a default under the Notes, and, as a result, the indenture trustee and the holders of 25% of the Notes currently have, upon delivery of proper notice, the right to accelerate the Company’s payment obligations under the Notes. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes at June 30, 2009, without undue cost and effort.

On July 27, 2009, the Company reached a tentative agreement with the Consenting Holders with respect to a restructuring of the Company’s indebtedness.  The Company is in active discussions with the Consenting Holders regarding the process for implementing the proposed restructuring, which remains subject to final documentation.  The Company expects to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course during and following the proposed restructuring.

In the event that the proposed restructuring is not completed and most or all of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility and Notes become due and payable, the Company would be unable to fund its payment obligations. The Company has not received any acceleration notice related to these financing arrangements; however, given the current negative conditions in its industry and the economy generally and the credit markets in particular, the Company cannot give any assurance that it will be successful in reaching a definitive agreement on the proposed restructuring or finding alternative financing arrangements. The Company has engaged financial and legal advisors to provide assistance in these discussions, but the Company may be compelled to file for bankruptcy protection.

The Company has used the funds under the Credit Facility, together with the proceeds from the Notes and capital contribution, to fund the retirement of the Company’s previously outstanding first and second lien loans, to repay the shareholders of its predecessor company and for working capital requirements, permitted encumbrances, capital expenditures, its acquisition of Nevamar and other general corporate purposes.

At June 30, 2009, the Company’s future debt principal payments are scheduled as follows and are based on the original terms and conditions of the Company’s Credit Facility and Notes. This schedule does not reflect the condition that if the debt holders chose to accelerate the obligations, all amounts shown below would be due and payable in 2009:

2009	$	—
2010	25,928
2011	—
2012	167,586
2013	150,472
	$	343,986

The future principal payments on the Notes due in 2013 are net of the unamortized discount of $528.

13

At June 30, 2009, future capital lease payments, including an immaterial amount of interest, are as follows:

2009	$	11
2010	9
	$	20

10.  EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Nevamar Pension Plan—Nevamar established the Retirement Plan of Nevamar Company, LLC (the “U.S. Plan”), a noncontributory defined benefit plan, on July 1, 2002. The U.S. Plan was established as a result of the spin-off of Nevamar from International Paper Company (“IP”). The U.S. Plan covers only employees covered under the collective bargaining agreements maintained and negotiated at facilities in Odenton, Maryland; Hampton, South Carolina; Franklin, Virginia; and Waverly, Virginia.

All participants in the U.S. Plan immediately preceding the spin-off from IP were credited with service under the IP Pension Plan as of June 30, 2002 for the following purposes: eligibility to participate, vesting, benefit accrual and eligibility for early retirement and other subsidies. However, the benefit payable to each participant under the U.S. Plan was offset by the amount of benefit payable under the IP Pension Plan. For all other participants eligibility begins after reaching age 21 and the completion of a year of service except for employees at the Franklin location who were eligible immediately upon hire. Normal retirement age is 65. Benefits for each of the applicable locations are based on a formula, as defined in the U.S. Plan, and length of service. The funding policy is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. This plan was curtailed on May 24, 2004.

Canadian Pension Plan—Through October 1998, the Company maintained a defined benefit pension plan covering certain Canadian employees (the “International Plan”) at which time the Company transferred certain participants into a defined contribution plan. The participants remaining in the defined benefit plan subsequent to October 1998 continue to participate in such plan. This plan covers certain Canadian employees; the participants remaining in the defined benefit plan subsequent to October 1998 continue to participate in the plan.

Other Postretirement Benefit Plan—The Company maintains noncontributory life insurance and medical plans that cover all Canadian employees with over 20 years of service.

The following is a summary, based on the most recent actuarial valuations, of the Company’s net cost for pension benefits and other benefits for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

	Pension Plans						Other Post-Retirement Benefits
	Three months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009		2008
Service cost	$	67		$	78		$	8	$	9
Interest cost	209			182			21		28
Expected return on plan assets	(246		)	(225		)	—		—
Amortization and foreign currency translation	24			18			—		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	54		$	53		$	29	$	37

The following is a summary, based on the most recent actuarial valuations, of the Company’s net cost for pension benefits and other benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

14

	Pension Plans						Other Post-Retirement Benefits
	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009		2008
Service cost	$	130		$	156		$	16	$	19
Interest cost	408			363			40		48
Expected return on plan assets	(480		)	(448		)	—		—
Amortization and foreign currency translation	49			35			—		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	107		$	106		$	56	$	67

The Company’s investment strategy for pension plan assets includes diversification to minimize interest and market risks, and generally does not involve the use of derivative financial instruments.  Plan assets are rebalanced periodically to maintain target asset allocations.  Maturities of investments are not necessarily related to the timing of expected future benefit payments, but adequate liquidity to make immediate and medium term benefit payments is ensured.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, 49% of the pension plan assets of the U.S. Plan were invested in equity securities and 51% were invested debt securities.

Contributions—The Company’s funding policy for its defined benefit plans is to contribute amounts determined annually on an actuarial basis to provide for current and future benefits in accordance with federal law and other regulations.  The Company expects to contribute approximately $1,092 to its pension plans and $63 to its other postretirement benefit plans in 2009.

Defined Contribution Plans—The Company also sponsors defined contribution plans that are available to substantially all employees.  The Company contributes cash amounts, based upon a percentage of employee contributions, ranging from 1% to 3% of the employees’ pay.  The amount expensed for the Company match was zero and $187 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, versus $329 and $651 for the comparable prior year periods. In March 2009, the Company suspended the funding of the Company’s matching portion of the cash contribution due to its current budgetary constraints.

11.  INCOME TAXES

The Company’s provision for income taxes is comprised of a current and deferred portion. The current income tax provision is calculated based on estimates as if tax returns for the current year are being filed. The Company provides for deferred income taxes resulting from temporary differences between financial and taxable income. These differences arise primarily from depreciation, amortization, reserves and accruals. In determining future taxable income, the Company is responsible for assumptions utilized including the amount of state, federal and international pre-tax operating income, and the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates the Company is using to manage its businesses.

Income taxes are provided during interim periods based on the estimated effective tax rate for the full fiscal year. The Company records a cumulative adjustment to the tax provision in an interim period in which a change in the estimated annual effective tax rate is determined.

The Company has not provided for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its Canadian subsidiary, as the Company’s present intent is to permanently reinvest these amounts.

The Company regularly assesses the potential outcomes of both ongoing examinations and future examinations for the current and prior years in order to ensure the Company’s provision for income taxes is adequate. The Company believes that adequate accruals have been provided for all years in which the statutes of limitations is still open.

The Company’s income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) as well as other state and international taxing authorities. The IRS has completed its examinations of the Company’s

15

federal income tax returns for all years through 2004. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S., state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by taxing authorities for years before 2002. At this time, the Company is currently under audit by various state taxing authorities and in addition, the Company is currently undergoing an IRS exam for the 2007 tax year. The Company is reasonably certain that its unrecognized tax benefits will not decrease within the next twelve months.

The income tax benefit for the first six months of 2009 and 2008 was at an effective tax rate of 20.6% and 25.0%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first six months of 2009 as compared to the rate for the first six months of 2008 is primarily the result of the Company’s application of a full valuation allowance against the U.S. tax benefit generated in the first six months of 2009 due to the uncertainty about the Company’s ability to generate sufficient income in the future to realize the benefit. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily as a result of the full valuation allowance applied against the U.S. tax benefit generated and the losses generated by the Company’s Canadian subsidiary being taxed at a rate lower than the U.S. statutory rate.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, (“SFAS No. 109”) and provides guidance on classification and disclosure requirements for tax contingencies.  FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a return.  The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 and did not recognize a change in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits as a result of implementing FIN 48. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits including interest at June 30, 2009 was approximately $3,155.

The Company includes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and statutory income tax penalties in its provision (benefit) for income taxes. The total amount of accrued interest reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of the first six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $1,533.

12.  COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

Total comprehensive (loss) income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is summarized as follows:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net loss	$	(7,380	)	$	(414	)	$	(17,422	)	$	(873	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	4,757			1,034			3,040			(3,486		)
	$	(2,623	)	$	620		$	(14,382	)	$	(4,359	)

13.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company pays an annual management fee of $1,500 and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses to Genstar Capital LLC and The Sterling Group, which control the Company’s parent, Panolam Holdings II Co. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, no management fees were paid and $750 was accrued for management fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, $937 was paid and $188 was accrued for management fees.

On March 31, 2009, the Company entered into the Forbearance Agreement with its lenders pursuant to which the lenders agreed to forbear exercising any rights and remedies under the Credit Facility relating to these defaults, including their right to accelerate the Company’s payment obligations under the Credit Facility, until the earlier of (i) June 30, 2009, (ii) the occurrence of an event of default under the Forbearance Agreement or (iii) the fulfillment of all obligations under the Forbearance Agreement and the Credit Facility and the termination of the Credit Facility. The terms of the Forbearance Agreement, which expired on June 30, 2009, prohibited the Company from, among other things, paying Genstar Capital LLC and The Sterling Group the management fee.  The Company has no plans to pay the accrued management fees to Genstar Capital LLC or The Sterling Group in the forseeable future.

16

14.  STOCK OPTIONS

On September 30, 2005, the Company instituted the Panolam Holdings Co. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”). The compensation committee of the Board of Directors administers this Plan, and at least two non-employee directors must be on the committee. The purpose of the Plan is to attract, retain and motivate the Company’s executives and its management employees. The Committee is authorized to approve the grant of any one or combination of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units and cash. On September 30, 2005, the Company granted stock options to an executive officer and management personnel to purchase 15,556 shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at a price of $500 per share. Through June 30, 2009, 4,889 of these stock options have been forfeited. These options vest ratably over 5 years. The Company’s policy is to issue shares to satisfy stock option exercises.

On October 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payments (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), using fair-value based measurement of accounting. Upon adoption, the Company selected the modified prospective method. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recognized compensation expense of $218 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and $245 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Such compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The tax benefit related to this expense was $84 and $93, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there was $653 and $965 respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense relating to outstanding options. The amount at June 30, 2009 will be amortized over the remaining vesting period associated with each grant, and the weighted average expected amortization period is approximately 1.4 years.

Stock option activity and the related changes that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is summarized as follows:

	Outstanding				Exercisable
	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, December 31, 2008	13,945		$	513	7,917		$	505
Granted	—		—		—		—
Exercised	—		—		—		—
Forfeited	(1,778	)	500		(1,067	)	500
Vested	N/A		—		300		625
Outstanding, June 30, 2009	12,167		$	515	7,150		$	510

The Company uses the Black-Scholes Merton option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of share-based awards. The key assumptions for this valuation method include the expected term of the option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, exercise price and forfeiture rate.  In determining the fair value of its share-based awards, the Company has assumed no forfeitures and as a result expects the awards to vest ratably over the five year vesting period.  Many of these assumptions are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. The Company did not grant any stock options during the first six months of 2009. At June 30, 2009, the Company’s outstanding stock options had weighted average remaining contractual terms of 6.4 years and the outstanding stock options that are exercisable had weighted average remaining contractual terms of 6.3 years.

Term — This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding.  Options granted have a maximum term of 10 years. The Company utilizes the simplified method to calculate expected term. An increase in the expected term will increase compensation expense.

Volatility — This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate.  Volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options of a company’s shares, historical volatility of a company’s shares, and other factors, such as expected changes in volatility arising from planned changes in a company’s business operations. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense. As the Company does not have a history of trading from which to determine its volatility, the historical stock price volatility of 14

17

public companies whose lines of business are considered similar to the Company were analyzed, focusing on the stock price trading history of those 14 companies for the years prior to the grant date.

Risk-Free Interest Rate — This is the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of the grant having a term equal to the expected term of the option.  An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.

Dividend Yield — The Company has no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.  An increase in the dividend yield would decrease compensation expense.

15.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

During 2006, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Nevamar, was named a defendant in numerous workers’ compensation claims filed on behalf of current and former employees at the Hampton, South Carolina facility alleging injury in the course of employment due to alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified chemicals. Under the ownership of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, the Hampton, South Carolina facility manufactured asbestos-based products until approximately 1975. In 2004 and 2005, Nevamar, Westinghouse and IP settled 10 workers’ compensation claims related to alleged asbestos exposure. Under a 2005 agreement with IP, Nevamar’s liability for workers compensation claims related to alleged exposure to asbestos brought by employees hired before July 1, 2002, was capped at 15% of any damages it shares with IP until Nevamar has paid an aggregate of $700 at which point the Company would have no responsibility for any additional shared damages.

On November 21, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with IP to settle all of these workers’ compensation claims for a cash sum including any related claims that are filed by any person who was previously employed, was currently employed or became employed by Nevamar on or before December 31, 2008 for a cash payment in an amount that had been fully reserved for by the Company. Employees hired by Nevamar after December 31, 2008 and who file claims related to alleged exposure to asbestos are not covered by this settlement agreement. The Company paid the settlement amount in November 2008.

The Company’s Auburn, Maine, facility is subject to a Compliance Order by Consent (“COC”) dated May 5, 1993, issued by the State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) with regard to unauthorized discharges of hazardous substances into the environment. The Company and the previous owners, named in the COC, are required to investigate and, as necessary, remediate the environmental contamination at the site. Because the unauthorized discharges occurred during the previous ownership, the previous owners have agreed to be responsible for compliance with the COC. The previous owners have completed and submitted to the State for its review a risk assessment. The financial obligation of the previous owners to investigate and or remediate is unlimited except with regard to a portion of the land at the Company’s Auburn, Maine, facility, which is capped at $10,000. The Company has recorded a liability of $709 and $710 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, for site remediation costs in excess of costs assumed by the previous owners. The Company could incur additional obligations in excess of the amount accrued and the Company’s recorded estimate may change over time. The Company expects this environmental issue to be resolved within the next five to ten years.

The Company is party to other litigation matters involving ordinary and routine claims incidental to its business. The Company cannot estimate with certainty its ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to such pending litigation matters. However, the Company believes, based on its examination of such matters, its ultimate costs with respect to such matters, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

16.  SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has determined its operating segments in a manner that reflects how the chief operating decision maker currently reviews the results of the Company’s business. The Company has two reportable segments, decorative laminates and other.  Decorative laminates manufactures and distributes decorative laminates, primarily TFM and HPL, for use in a wide variety of residential and commercial indoor surfacing applications.  This segment accounted for approximately 84% of the Company’s total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and approximately 87% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company’s other segment includes the production and marketing of a variety of specialty resins for industrial uses, custom treated and chemically prepared decorative

18

overlay papers and a variety of other industrial laminates including the Company’s fiber reinforced plastic product known as FRP. The other segment, net of the corporate/eliminations accounted for approximately 16% of the Company’s total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 13% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The amount of net sales reflected in the corporate/eliminations column in the tables below primarily represents the elimination of the intercompany sales of the other segment to the decorative laminate segment. The other amounts reflected in this column related to expenses, capital expenditures, impairment charges and total assets are associated with the Company’s corporate office. Certain corporate expenses are generally not allocated to specific operating segments and are accordingly reflected in the corporate/eliminations column in the tables below.

The Company uses the following key information in evaluating the performance of each segment:

	As of June 30, 2009 and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Decorative Laminates		Other		Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	56,431	$	12,173	$	(1,586	)	$	67,018
Gross profit	8,201		1,675		—			9,876
Income (loss) from operations	4,269		1,258		(8,075		)	(2,548		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	6,086		934		769			7,789
Other expenses	—		—		2,273			2,273
Capital expenditures	155		2		128			285
Total assets	252,870		47,655		98,159			398,684
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Decorative Laminates		Other		Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	86,192	$	14,774	$	(1,635	)	$	99,331
Gross profit	18,744		1,302		—			20,046
Income (loss) from operations	13,423		799		(7,458		)	6,764
Depreciation and amortization expense	6,061		857		796			7,714
Capital expenditures	715		262		25			1,002
	As of June 30, 2009 and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Decorative Laminates		Other		Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	110,155	$	23,611	$	(2,837	)	$	130,929
Gross profit	14,469		3,163		—			17,632
Income (loss) from operations	5,296		2,282		(16,436		)	(8,858		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	11,878		1,857		1,512			15,247
Indefinite lived intangible asset impairment charge	1,249		37		303			1,589
Other expenses	—		—		4,360			4,360
Capital expenditures	306		37		146			489
Total assets	252,870		47,655		98,159			398,684
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Decorative Laminates		Other		Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	173,859	$	30,036	$	(3,382	)	$	200,513
Gross profit	36,378		3,111		—			39,489
Income (loss) from operations	25,267		2,154		(13,959		)	13,462
Depreciation and amortization expense	11,675		1,727		1,575			14,977
Capital expenditures	1,427		603		160			2,190

19

Net sales by geographic area for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
United States	$	55,428	$	81,271	$	107,724	$	164,240
Canada	10,651		17,052		21,443		33,646
Other	939		1,008		1,762		2,627
	$	67,018	$	99,331	$	130,929	$	200,513

No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales for any of the above periods.

Long-lived assets by geographic area were as follows:

	June 30,2009		December 31, 2008
United States	$	194,683	$	210,464
Canada	70,603		70,463
	$	265,286	$	280,927

20

17.  SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Notes issued September 30, 2005 by the Company are guaranteed by Panolam Industries, Inc., Pioneer Plastics Corporation and Nevamar Holding Corp. Supplemental consolidating condensed financial statements for the parent company, subsidiary guarantors and the non-guarantor company are presented below. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of the consolidating presentation. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries, intercompany balances and intercompany transactions. The income tax expense (benefit) that is reflected in the Parent Company column on the consolidating condensed statements of operations for the periods presented also includes the income tax expense (benefit) that pertains to the Subsidiary Guarantors.

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheets June 30, 2009
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Company		Eliminations			Total
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,189		$	(1,645	)	$	803	$	—		$	45,347
Accounts receivable, net	—			16,711			2,428		—			19,139
Inventories	—			44,527			5,498		—			50,025
Other current assets	10,284			2,826			5,777		—			18,887
Total current assets	56,473			62,419			14,506		—			133,398
Property, plant and equipment, net	1,418			139,617			67,907		—			208,942
Intangible assets, net	30,185			16,378			2,172		—			48,735
Debt acquisition costs, net	6,208			—			—		—			6,208
Other assets	877			—			524		—			1,401
Intercompany receivables	—			221,841			25,764		(247,605		)	—
Investment in subsidiaries	513,321			—			—		(513,321		)(a)	—
Total	$	608,482		$	440,255		$	110,873	$	(760,926	)	$	398,684
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S(DEFICIT) EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	477		$	4,666		$	1,631	$	—		$	6,774
Accrued liabilities	17,704			7,417			1,559		—			26,680
Current portion of long-term debt	343,986			11			—		—			343,997
Total current liabilities	362,167			12,094			3,190		—			377,451
Long-term debt, less current portion	—			9			—		—			9
Deferred income taxes	40,753			—			15,086		—			55,839
Other liabilities	—			2,368			5,060		—			7,428
Intercompany payables	247,605			—			—		(247,605		)	—
Total liabilities	650,525			14,471			23,336		(247,605		)	440,727
Total stockholder’s (deficit) equity	(42,043		)	425,784			87,537		(513,321		)(a)	(42,043		)
Total	$	608,482		$	440,255		$	110,873	$	(760,926	)	$	398,684

(a)  Elimination of investment in subsidiaries.

21

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheets December 31, 2008
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Company		Eliminations			Total
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,684		$	(1,093	)	$	2,861	$	—		$	43,452
Accounts receivable, net	568			12,113			1,512		—			14,193
Inventories	—			50,142			4,994		—			55,136
Other current assets	10,559			3,533			4,483		—			18,575
Total current assets	52,811			64,695			13,850		—			131,356
Property, plant and equipment, net	1,471			148,839			68,020		—			218,330
Intangible assets, net	31,753			17,924			2,406		—			52,083
Debt acquisition costs, net	7,057			—			—		—			7,057
Other assets	3,420			—			37		—			3,457
Intercompany receivables	—			199,219			23,534		(222,753		)	—
Investment in subsidiaries	501,151			—			—		(501,151		)(a)	—
Total	$	597,663		$	430,677		$	107,847	$	(723,904	)	$	412,283
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	169		$	5,594		$	1,150	$	—		$	6,913
Accrued liabilities	12,223			6,063			1,299		—			19,585
Current portion of long-term debt	343,926			11			—		—			343,937
Total current liabilities	356,318			11,668			2,449		—			370,435
Long-term debt, less current portion	—			13			—		—			13
Deferred income taxes	46,471			—			15,027		—			61,498
Other liabilities	—			2,509			5,707		—			8,216
Intercompany payables	222,753			—			—		(222,753		)	—
Total liabilities	625,542			14,190			23,183		(222,753		)	440,162
Total stockholder’s (deficit) equity	(27,879		)	416,487			84,664		(501,151		)(a)	(27,879		)
Total	$	597,663		$	430,677		$	107,847	$	(723,904	)	$	412,283

(a)  Elimination of investment in subsidiaries.

22

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non- Guarantor Company			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	55,779	$	12,037		$	(798	)	$	67,018
Cost of goods sold	—			45,050		12,890			(798		)	57,142
Gross profit (loss)	—			10,729		(853		)	—			9,876
Selling, general and administrative expenses	5,515			3,982		654						10,151
Other expenses	2,273			—		—			—			2,273
Income (loss) from operations	(7,788		)	6,747		(1,507		)	—			(2,548		)
Interest expense	6,954			1		—			—			6,955
Interest income	(33		)	—		(1		)	—			(34		)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit and equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(14,709		)	6,746		(1,506		)	—			(9,469		)
Income tax benefit	(557		)	—		(1,532		)	—			(2,089		)
Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(14,152		)	6,746		26			—			(7,380		)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	6,772			—		—			(6,772		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	(7,380	)	$	6,746	$	26		$	(6,772	)	$	(7,380	)

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non- Guarantor Company			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	79,275	$	20,570		$	(514	)	$	99,331
Cost of goods sold	—			59,668		20,131			(514		)	79,285
Gross profit	—			19,607		439			—			20,046
Selling, general and administrative expenses	7,170			5,152		960			—			13,282
Income (loss) from operations	(7,170		)	14,455		(521		)	—			6,764
Interest expense	6,922			—		—			—			6,922
Interest income	(76		)	—		(10		)	—			(86		)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(14,016		)	14,455		(511		)	—			(72		)
Income taxes	249			—		93			—			342
Income (loss) before equity in net income of subsidiaries	(14,265		)	14,455		(604		)	—			(414		)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	13,851			—		—			(13,851		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	(414	)	$	14,455	$	(604	)	$	(13,851	)	$	(414	)

23

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non- Guarantor Company			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	108,201	$	23,893		$	(1,165	)	$	130,929
Cost of goods sold	—			89,931		24,531			(1,165		)	113,297
Gross profit	—			18,270		(638		)	—			17,632
Selling, general and administrative expenses	11,467			8,067		1,007						20,541
Indefinite lived intangible asset impairment charge	303			953		333						1,589
Other expenses	4,360			—		—			—			4,360
Income (loss) from operations	(16,130		)	9,250		(1,978		)	—			(8,858		)
Interest expense	13,187			1		—			—			13,188
Interest income	(114		)	—		(2		)	—			(116		)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit and equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(29,203		)	9,249		(1,976		)	—			(21,930		)
Income tax benefit	(2,700		)	—		(1,808		)	—			(4,508		)
Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(26,503		)	9,249		(168		)	—			(17,422		)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	9,081			—		—			(9,081		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	(17,422	)	$	9,249	$	(168	)	$	(9,081	)	$	(17,422	)

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors		Non- Guarantor Company			Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	—		$	158,876	$	42,671		$	(1,034	)	$	200,513
Cost of goods sold	—			120,395		41,663			(1,034		)	161,024
Gross profit	—			38,481		1,008			—			39,489
Selling, general and administrative expenses	13,637			10,473		1,917			—			26,027
Income (loss) from operations	(13,637		)	28,008		(909		)	—			13,462
Interest expense	14,798			1		—			—			14,799
Interest income	(147		)	—		(25		)	—			(172		)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(28,288		)	28,007		(884		)	—			(1,165		)
Income taxes (benefit)	317			—		(609		)	—			(292		)
Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	(28,605		)	28,007		(275		)	—			(873		)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries	27,732			—		—			(27,732		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	(873	)	$	28,007	$	(275	)	$	(27,732	)	$	(873	)

24

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Company			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(17,422	)	$	9,249		$	(168	)	$	(9,081	)	$	(17,422	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,457			9,952			3,838						15,247
Indefinite lived intangible asset impairment charge	303			953			333						1,589
Deferred income tax benefit	(2,968		)	—			(1,121		)				(4,089		)
Amortization of debt acquisition costs	849			—			—						849
Stock based compensation expense	218			—			—						218
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	(9,081		)	—			—			9,081			—
Other	19			(4		)	(750		)				(735		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	568			(4,598		)	(832		)				(4,862		)
Inventories	—			5,615			(237		)				5,378
Other current assets	121			707			(382		)				446
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	5,789			259			624						6,672
Income taxes payable	(2		)	—			(651		)				(653		)
Other	—			26			(427		)				(401		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(20,149		)	22,159			227			—			2,237
Cash flows from investing activities:
Intercompany receivable/payable, net	24,803			—			—			(24,803		)	—
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(147		)	(133		)	(209		)				(489		)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	24,656			(133		)	(209		)	(24,803		)	(489		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt	(2		)	(4		)	—						(6		)
Intercompany receivable/payable, net	—			(22,574		)	(2,229		)	24,803			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(2		)	(22,578		)	(2,229		)	24,803			(6		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	—			—			153			—			153
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	4,505			(552		)	(2,058		)	—			1,895
Cash and cash equivalents–beginning of period	41,684			(1,093		)	2,861			—			43,452
Cash and cash equivalents–end of period	$	46,189		$	(1,645	)	$	803		$	—		$	45,347

25

	Panolam Industries International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Parent Company			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non- Guarantor Company			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(873	)	$	28,007		$	(275	)	$	(27,732	)	$	(873	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,505			9,368			4,104						14,977
Deferred income tax benefit	(71		)	—			(1,087		)				(1,158		)
Amortization of debt acquisition costs	907			—			—						907
Stock based compensation expense	245			—			—						245
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	(27,732		)	—			—			27,732			—
Other	(129		)	(43		)	238						66
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	1,230			(5,278		)	(1,164		)				(5,212		)
Inventories	—			(2,469		)	(429		)				(2,898		)
Other current assets	1,441			417			6						1,864
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(2,429		)	2,629			63						263
Income taxes payable	3,735			—			(364		)				3,371
Other	—			(141		)	(257		)				(398		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(22,171		)	32,490			835			—			11,154
Cash flows from investing activities:
Intercompany receivable/payable, net	30,844			—			—			(30,844		)	—
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(160		)	(1,657		)	(373		)				(2,190		)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	30,684			(1,657		)	(373		)	(30,844		)	(2,190		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt	(2,015		)	(9		)	—						(2,024		)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility	5,000			—			—						5,000
Payment of amount due to Panolam Holdings Co.	(2,482		)	—			—						(2,482		)
Intercompany receivable/payable, net	—			(30,824		)	(20		)	30,844			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	503			(30,833		)	(20		)	30,844			494
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	—			—			(122		)				(122		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	9,016			—			320			—			9,336
Cash and cash equivalents–beginning of period	9,202			(2,553		)	4,095			—			10,744
Cash and cash equivalents–end of period	$	18,218		$	(2,553	)	$	4,415		$	—		$	20,080

*       *      *      *     *

26

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and the notes to those condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. In addition, the following discussion may be understood more fully by reference to our consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009. The statements in the discussion and analysis regarding our expectations for the performance of our business, our liquidity and capital resources and the other non-historical statements in the discussion and analysis are forward looking statements. Our actual results may differ from those contained in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please see “Forward Looking Statements” at the end of this Item 2 for a discussion of important factors that could cause results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward looking statements contained herein.

Overview

We are a leading designer, manufacturer and distributor of decorative laminates in the United States and Canada. Our products, which are marketed under the Panolam, Pluswood, Nevamar and Pionite brand names, are used in a wide variety of commercial and residential indoor surfacing applications, including kitchen and bath cabinets, furniture, store fixtures and displays, and other specialty applications. Our decorative laminate product offerings also include a fiber reinforced laminate product (“FRL”). In addition to decorative laminates, we manufacture and distribute industrial laminate products, including Conolite and Panolam FRP (“FRP”). We produce and market a selection of specialty resins for industrial uses, such as powdered paint, adhesives and melamine resins for decorative laminate production, custom treated and chemically prepared decorative overlay papers for HPL and TFM, and a variety of other industrial laminate products such as aircraft cargo liners and bowling lanes.

We are the only vertically integrated North American manufacturer of both HPL and TFM (with the exception of particle board production in our TFM business where we purchase approximately 50% of our needs), and we design, manufacture and distribute our products throughout our principal markets. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 we generated net sales of $366.7 million and $130.9 million, respectively. During each of these periods, our decorative laminate products comprised approximately 87% and 84% of our net sales, respectively. For additional information regarding our results of operations by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, please see note 16 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

We offer an array of decorative and industrial laminate products from premium to commodity grades at a broad range of prices. HPL, TFM, FRL, Leatherlam, FRP, and our engineered laminates are utilized as durable and economical look-alike substitutes for natural surfacing materials such as wood, stone and ceramic tile. HPL is used in surfacing applications requiring greater surface wear and impact resistance than applications using TFM. FRL, a proprietary product, is used in surfacing applications requiring greater surface wear, impact resistance and fire prevention than applications using HPL. FRP is used in the building, trucking and recreational, or RV, markets. A typical customer or end user of decorative overlays might utilize HPL, TFM, FRL, FRP or Leatherlam for different surfaces of the same project. Our TFM products consist of a standard palette of over 150 colors, patterns and wood grains. Our HPL products consist of a standard palette of approximately 500 colors, patterns and wood grains.

We market and distribute our decorative laminate products through a geographically diverse network of approximately 300 independently owned and operated distributors. For many of our distributors, we are their exclusive supplier of HPL, TFM or other decorative laminates. In addition, we sell to approximately 700 national and regional original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, who buy proprietary designs and customized versions of our products directly. Our products are supported by a dedicated in-house sales force and customer service team.

We suffered net losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $17.4 million and $121.7 million, respectively.  The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 resulted primarily from a reduction in sales volume given the current economic conditions, coupled with continuing fixed costs, and also included a trade name impairment charge of $1.6 million and $4.4 million in other expenses related primarily to legal and financial advisor fees incurred in connection with the Company’s efforts to restructure

27

its debt obligations.  The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was principally attributable to impairment charges related to goodwill and trade names taken during the year as well as our high ratio of fixed costs, including the interest costs on our debt and our depreciation expense.  We also had a stockholder’s deficit of approximately $42.0 million at June 30, 2009 and approximately $27.9 million at December 31, 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, in light of the weakening economy and our concerns about the troubled credit markets, we borrowed the full amount available under the revolver tranche of the Credit Facility. As a result, we had approximately $45.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $194.4 million in principal and interest outstanding under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2009.

On February 27, 2009, we received a notice of default from the agent for the lenders under our Credit Facility due to our failure to comply with certain financial and reporting covenants. On March 31, 2009, we entered into the Forbearance Agreement with our lenders pursuant to which the lenders agreed to forbear exercising any rights and remedies under the Credit Facility relating to these defaults, including their right to accelerate our payment obligations under the Credit Facility, until the earlier of (i) June 30, 2009, (ii) the occurrence of an event of default under the Forbearance Agreement or (iii) the fulfillment of all obligations under the Forbearance Agreement and the Credit Facility and the termination of the Credit Facility. The Forbearance Agreement, which expired by its terms on June 30, 2009, required us to deliver to the lenders under the Credit Facility, on or before June 30, 2009, an excess cash flow payment related to the year ended December 31, 2008.  We did not make that excess cash flow payment and, furthermore, we did not make the regularly-scheduled June interest payment on either the term loan or the revolver portions of the Credit Facility, which non-payments constitute defaults under the Forbearance Agreement.  On July 1, 2009, we received a letter from the agent under the Credit Facility notifying us of the defaults under the Forbearance Agreement and reserving the lenders’ rights related to all defaults.  As a result of the termination of the Forbearance Agreement, the lenders under the Credit Facility again have the ability to accelerate all of our payment obligations under the Credit Facility, which amount to $194.4 million as of June 30, 2009.

The terms of the Forbearance Agreement prohibited us from, among other things, paying the April 1, 2009 interest payment on the Notes and we did not make that payment.  Our failure to make that interest payment is a default under the indenture governing the Notes and entitles the holders of 25% of the Notes, after a thirty-day grace period that ended on May 1, 2009 and upon delivery of proper notice to us, to accelerate the our payment obligations under the Notes. The indenture trustee informed the holders of the Notes of the payment default and of the event of default by letters dated April 9, 2009 and May 7, 2009, respectively.  Acceleration of our payment obligations under the Notes would be an additional event of default under the Credit Facility. Based on these acceleration rights under the Credit Facility and the Notes, we reclassified approximately $343.9 million from long-term debt to current debt as of December 31, 2008. The current portion of long-term debt was approximately $344.0 million as of June 30, 2009. As such, we had a working capital deficiency of $244.1 million as of June 30, 2009 and $239.1 million as of December 31, 2008.

On July 27, 2009, we reached a tentative agreement with the Consenting Holders with respect to a restructuring of our indebtedness.  We believe that consummation of a successful restructuring is critical to our continued viability, and we are in active discussions with the Consenting Holders regarding the process for implementing the proposed restructuring, which remains subject to final documentation.  We expect to continue to operate our business in the ordinary course during and following the proposed restructuring.

In the event that the proposed restructuring is not completed and most or all of our obligations under the Credit Facility and Notes become due and payable, we would be unable to fund our payment obligations. We have not received any acceleration notice related to these financing arrangements; however, given the current negative conditions in our industry and the economy generally and the credit markets in particular, we cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in reaching a definitive agreement on the proposed restructuring or finding alternative financing arrangements. We have engaged financial and legal advisors to provide assistance in these discussions, but we may be compelled to file for bankruptcy protection.

Factors Affecting Our Results

Revenue

We generate our revenue primarily from the sale of our decorative laminates and, to a lesser extent, specialty resins, industrial laminates and decorative overlay papers in the United States and Canada. In recent periods, consistent with our continuing strategy, we have concentrated on selling finished laminated end products for their proprietary designs rather than marketing treated papers that could ultimately be used to compete against our own finished laminated products. Our focus is on high-end premium grades, such as abstract and wood grain patterned laminates that command higher prices and generate higher profit margins. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, approximately 91% of our HPL sales and 64% of our TFM sales were premium grade.

28

We have historically experienced higher sales in the second and third quarters of each year compared with the first and fourth quarters due primarily to seasonal fluctuations in demand. However, in 2008 the second, third and fourth quarter sales were lower than the first quarter sales due primarily to soft market conditions resulting from the deteriorating general economy. This slowdown in sales has continued into 2009 and we expect it to continue during the rest of the year. Also, from time to time, we have curtailed manufacturing operations to make necessary repairs and to maintain efficiencies during slowdowns in order flow.

Changes in our revenues from sales of our decorative laminates and industrial laminate products from period to period are affected by the following, among other factors:

·changes in general economic conditions and the availability of financing that affect the construction industry, since reductions in construction activity can materially reduce the demand for decorative laminates, as it has in recent quarters;

·changes in the design preferences and the discretionary spending power of commercial and residential consumers who ultimately purchase our products primarily in connection with renovations, expansions and upgrades;

·changes in prices, including those resulting from cost increases, which may be on a delayed basis following any cost increases, and those changes implemented for competitive reasons; and

·our ability to successfully develop and launch new designs and products.

Cost of Goods Sold

Our cost of goods sold consists primarily of raw materials, most of which is paper, raw particle board and resin, and energy costs for oil, natural gas and electricity, which generally are variable, and to a lesser extent, direct labor and overhead. Our costs of sales are directly affected by changes in prices for these raw materials, as well as by changes in energy costs and oil prices which affect the price of the petroleum based products that we use to manufacture resins. Recently, the prices of certain of these raw materials have increased and may continue to increase in the future. While we generally attempt to pass along increased raw material prices to our customers in the form of price increases, there may be a time delay between the increased raw material prices and our ability to increase the selling prices of our products, or we may be unable to increase the prices of our products due to pricing pressure, decreased demand or other factors, particularly in our TFM product line where we have been unable to pass all of the price increases through to our customers for competitive reasons. Similarly, we have instituted certain surcharges on our customers from time to time to reflect increases in our transportation or distribution costs.

Gross Profit

Our gross profit has decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2009 in comparison to the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in gross profit is primarily the result of the decreased sales volume experienced in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of weakened economic conditions. The decreased sales volume in the six months ended June 30, 2009 had the effect of increasing the ratio of fixed overhead expenses to sales and as a result negatively impacted the gross profit margin. In addition, certain raw material costs, especially for chemicals, were higher on average during the six months ended June 30, 2009 than in the same period in 2008. The negative impact on gross profit in the six months ended June 30, 2009 resulting from lower sales volume and higher raw material costs was partially offset by aggressive cost containment measures, including significant headcount reductions. We include certain costs such as distribution costs in our selling, general and administrative expenses. Accordingly, our gross profit may not be comparable to other companies that include such costs in their cost of goods sold.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of all costs incurred in connection with the sales and marketing of our products, including distribution and warehousing costs and all administrative costs. The major items included in sales and marketing expenses are:

·costs associated with employees in our sales, marketing and customer service departments, including both fixed salaries and bonuses typically based on agreed targets;

29

·advertising costs; and

·warehousing costs related to our distribution centers.

Changes in sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of our revenue may be affected by a number of factors, including changes in sales prices and / or volumes, as higher sales prices and / or volumes enable us to spread the fixed portion of our sales and marketing expenses over higher sales revenue. Sales and marketing expenses may increase from time to time due to advertising or marketing expenses associated with new product or enhanced product introductions and promotions and higher commissions paid to our sales force for achieving certain targets.

Administrative expenses include management salary, payroll and benefit costs, stock-based compensation expense, rent, legal and environmental compliance fees and other administrative and overhead costs. Administrative expenses also include management fees to Genstar Capital and The Sterling Group.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation costs relate to the depreciation of property, plant and equipment. For financial reporting purposes, we calculate depreciation on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of each class of asset. Depreciation expense related to our manufacturing processes and administrative functions is included in the consolidated statement of operations in cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively.

Amortization costs relate to the amortization of intangible assets, which consist primarily of key customer lists, patents and trademarks. We calculate amortization on a straight-line basis, over the expected useful life of the asset, with each identifiable asset assessed individually. Key customer lists, patents and trademarks are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. These useful lives generally range from three to fifteen years.

Interest Expense/Interest Income

Interest expense consists of interest on our outstanding indebtedness and the amortization of debt acquisition costs and other financial income and expenses. Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on cash balances in our bank accounts.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense is incurred at the U.S. federal, foreign and state levels. We are subject to taxation primarily in two jurisdictions, the United States and Canada. The effective tax rate in the first six months of 2009 was approximately 20.6% compared to 25.0% for the first six months of 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first six months of 2009 as compared to the rate for the first six months of 2008 is primarily the result of our application of a full valuation allowance against the U.S. tax benefit generated in the first six months of 2009 due to the uncertainty about our ability to generate sufficient income in the future to realize the benefit. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily as a result of the full valuation allowance applied against the U.S. tax benefit generated and the losses generated by the Company’s Canadian subsidiary being taxed at a rate lower than the U.S. statutory rate.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures at the date of our condensed consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and current market conditions and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates, however, routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information, and actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management considers our policies on revenue recognition, adjustments for slow moving and obsolete inventories,

30

potentially uncollectible accounts receivable, accruals for customer rebates, income taxes, intangible assets and long-lived assets and stock options to be critical accounting policies due to estimates, assumptions, and application of judgment involved in each.

Actual results may differ from management’s estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

Our intangible assets are comprised primarily of trademarks and tradenames with indefinite useful lives, definite lived intangible assets related to patents and trademarks, and key customer lists that are currently being amortized. We account for the impairment of indefinite lived tradenames in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and account for the impairment of finite lived intangibles assets and other long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

We perform an annual impairment test related to our indefinite lived intangible assets at December 31, or more frequently should conditions that could affect fair value change significantly.  We performed impairment testing related to goodwill and indefinite lived tradenames as of December 31, 2008, which led to impairment charges of $96.7 million and $24.9 million for goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets, respectively. As a result, goodwill was written down to zero.  Due to continued weakness in the economy, we determined that the indefinite lived tradenames should be tested for impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and, as a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.6 million.  We did not record an impairment charge during the three months ended June 30, 2009.

We have determined that under the guidance of EITF Issue No. 02-7, “Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets,” all of the indefinite lived tradenames should be tested for impairment as a single unit because the indefinite lived tradenames were acquired in a single acquisition, and are used together in the our marketing, sales and branding efforts. The impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the assets to the recorded carrying value of the assets. We utilized a variation of the income approach referred to as the “relief-from-royalty” method to determine the estimated fair value of the indefinite lived intangible asset or tradename. The relief-from-royalty method involves determining the present value of the royalty savings associated with the ownership or possession, as opposed to licensing, of the trademarks. The key assumptions used in estimating the royalty savings for impairment testing included the discount rate, royalty rate and future sales projections. The discount rate was determined utilizing a weighted average cost of capital approach based on our industry and peer group, and adjusted for company-specific risk factors. Royalty rates are established by us utilizing independent market research for similar tradename licensing transactions. The rates are periodically updated when facts and circumstances indicate a change. The future sales projections were determined based on current budgets and are reflective of our current expectations as to sales, including the effects of the current economic conditions.

The discount rate used in calculating the impairment charge taken in the first quarter of 2009 was 17%; a one percentage point change in the discount rate would have had the effect of increasing or decreasing the impairment charge by $0.4 million.  The average royalty rate used in calculating the impairment charge taken in the first quarter of 2009 was 1%; a 10% change in the royalty rate used would have had the effect of increasing or decreasing the impairment charge by approximately $1.0 million.  A 10% change in projected sales would have had the effect of increasing or decreasing the impairment charge by $0.8 million.

We believe that our estimates are appropriate in the circumstances. The relief-from-royalty valuation methodology and calculations used in the 2008 and March 31, 2009 impairment testing are consistent with prior years.

We perform an impairment test of finite lived assets, which consist of amortizing tradenames, customer lists, patents, and plant property and equipment (“PP&E”), when an event occurs or there is a change in circumstances that indicates that the carrying value of the long lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life of the asset has changed.  We recorded a fixed asset impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $5.2 million related to our Norcross, Georgia plant, which produces TFM products. We did not record impairment charges related to finite lived fixed or intangible assets during the three months or six months ended June 30, 2009.

31

We group the finite lived assets for testing, with other assets and liabilities, at their lowest level of identifiable cash flows. For PP&E and patents, the lowest level of cash flows is the operating location, and for customer lists and tradenames, is a group of operating locations that all derive a shared benefit from those intangible assets. We use undiscounted cash flow projections to calculate the recoverable value of long lived assets to determine if the assets are impaired. Our approach is based on the future projected EBITDA results, by operating location, which approximates cash flows. The financial projections include forecasted sales, operating costs and other relevant factors that were determined based on current budgets and include assumptions for the current economic conditions and their impact on our operating locations. A 10% increase or decrease in the projected EBITDA results used during testing would not have resulted in any impairment charge for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

We believe that our estimates are appropriate in the circumstances. The valuation methodologies and calculations used in the 2008 impairment testing of long lived assets are consistent with prior years.

Results of Operations

Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008

Net Sales

Net sales were $67.0 million and $130.9 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $99.3 million and $200.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of approximately 33% and 35% in the second quarter and six month period, respectively. In local currencies, net sales for 2009 declined approximately 31% and 32% in the second quarter and six month period, respectively. The decrease in sales in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to lower HPL sales, which declined approximately 33% and 31% during the respective periods and TFM sales, which declined approximately 42% in both respective periods. The decline in HPL and TFM sales resulted primarily from the continued slowdown in the residential housing and credit markets as well as the decline in the overall general economy. Currency translation as it relates to our Canadian operation had the effect of decreasing sales in the first six months of 2009 by approximately $4.7 million when compared to foreign exchange for the six months ended June 30, 2008. In addition to decreases in demand, we continue to experience increased pricing pressure with respect to certain of our TFM and HPL products.

Sales of decorative laminates were $56.4 million and $110.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $86.2 million and $173.9 million for the same periods in 2008. Sales of decorative laminates, which includes both TFM and HPL (approximately 84% of net sales), decreased approximately 35% and 37% in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 2008.

Sales of other products, net of the intercompany sales eliminations, principally specialty resins, decorative overlay papers and industrial laminates, were $10.6 million and $20.7 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $13.1 million and $26.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. Other product sales (approximately 16% of net sales) decreased approximately 19% in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and decreased approximately 22% in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods in 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, specialty resins accounted for approximately 5% of our total sales, while industrial and other specialty laminates, and decorative overlay papers accounted for approximately 8% and 1% of our sales, respectively.

Our net sales for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 were adversely impacted by weakness in the U.S. economy generally and by the sharp slowdown in residential and commercial construction, particularly the residential housing and credit markets that occurred in 2008 and has continued during 2009. Our products are incorporated into new buildings and homes, as well as buildings and homes being refurnished or remodeled. As the construction and housing industries are extremely weak, we have experienced less demand for our products. Our HPL and TFM products are most affected by these adverse market conditions.  We believe that economic conditions will remain extremely challenging in the near term, and that demand for our products will likely continue to decline as a result, which would negatively impact our net sales, profitability and cash flows as well as our ability to comply with the covenants set forth in our Credit Facility or covenants in any replacement financing.  In addition to decreases in demand, we have experienced increased pressure on pricing from our competitors, particularly our

32

more vertically integrated TFM competitors.  If this trend continues, our net sales and profitability could continue to decline.

Gross Profit

The gross profit margin as a percentage of net sales declined to approximately 15% and 13% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 from approximately 20% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in our gross profit margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily attributable to decreased sales volume of our HPL and TFN products resulting from weakened economic conditions. The decreased sales volume in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 had the effect of increasing the ratio of fixed overhead expenses to sales, which negatively impacted the gross profit margin. In addition, certain raw material costs, especially for chemicals, were higher on average during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 than in the comparable 2008 periods. The negative impact on gross profit in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 resulting from the lower sales volume and higher raw material costs was partially offset by aggressive cost containment measures, including significant headcount reductions. We include certain costs such as distribution costs in our selling, general and administrative expenses. Accordingly, our gross profit may not be comparable to other companies that include such costs in their costs goods sold.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses, which primarily consist of sales and marketing expenses, were $10.2 million and $20.5 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $13.3 million and $26.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily attributable to aggressive cost containment including headcount reductions, and consolidation of the sales and marketing functions and other synergies realized through the consolidation of the operations of Panolam and Nevamar. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately 15% and 16% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to approximately 13% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in this percentage in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily attributable to the lower sales volume in both periods.

Interest Expense

Interest expense, which includes the amortization of debt acquisition costs, was $7.0 million and $13.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $6.9 million and $14.8 million for the same periods in 2008. The decrease in interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods in 2008 is primarily attributable to lower average interest rates offset in part by higher average debt levels resulting from the borrowings under the revolver portion of our Credit Facility made in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Income Taxes

Income tax provision in the six months ended June 30, 2009 was a benefit of $4.5 million as compared to a tax benefit of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The effective tax rate in the first six months of 2009 was 20.6% compared to 25.0% for the first six months of 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first six months of 2009 as compared to the rate for the first six months of 2008 is primarily the result of our application of a full valuation allowance against the U.S. tax benefit generated in the first six months of 2009 due to the uncertainty about our ability to generate sufficient income in the future to realize the benefit. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily as a result of the full valuation allowance applied against the U.S. tax benefit generated and the losses generated by the Company’s Canadian subsidiary being taxed at a rate lower than the U.S. statutory rate.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $7.4 million compared to net loss of $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of approximately $7.0 million. The increase in net loss is primarily attributable to lower net sales, which were partially offset by decreases in the cost of goods sold due to lower sales volume, in the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008, as well as to other administrative expenses related to our efforts to restructure our debt in the three months ended June 30, 2009, which were also partially offset by decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses and income taxes.

33

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $17.4 million compared to net loss of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of approximately $16.5 million. The increase in net loss is primarily attributable to lower net sales, which were partially offset by decreases in the cost of goods sold due to lower sales volume, in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, as well as to a trade name impairment charge and other administrative expenses related to our efforts to restructure our debt in the six months ended June 30, 2009, which were also partially offset by decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses, interest expense and income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We require working capital to reinvest in our business and to repay or continue prepaying our indebtedness. Our total capital expenditures were approximately $3.4 million in 2008 and, assuming we can restructure our indebtedness and continue operations, we anticipate total capital expenditures to approximate $4.0 million in 2009, of which $0.5 million was incurred in the first six months and approximately $3.5 million is expected to be incurred during the remainder of 2009.

The principal sources of cash to fund our liquidity needs are cash provided by operating activities and cash provided by borrowings under our Credit Facility. Restrictive covenants in our debt agreements restrict our ability to pay dividends and make other distributions. Specifically, the Credit Facility restricts us from making payments of dividends or distributions, including to Panolam Holdings, subject to certain exceptions. Under certain circumstances we are permitted to pay dividends or distributions from our consolidated excess cash flow provided that, after giving effect to the dividend or distribution, we have a consolidated leverage ratio (calculated as a ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter) not exceeding 3.75 to 1.00. Our Credit Facility also requires us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio (4.50 to 1.00 as of the end of each quarter ending during fiscal year 2009) that decreases over time and to limit the amount of our capital expenditures in any fiscal year. As of June 30, 2009, our consolidated leverage ratio was in excess of the permitted maximum amount at 9.83 to 1.00. The Credit Facility further requires us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio (2.25 to 1.00 as of the end of each quarter during fiscal year 2009) that increases over time. As of June 30, 2009, our minimum interest coverage ratio was below the required minimum at 1.18 to 1.00. For the calculation of these ratios, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt Covenant Ratios” and for a discussion of the potential acceleration and restructuring of our indebtedness, see “Overview.”

The indenture governing our Notes also restricts us from making payments of dividends or distributions, subject to certain exceptions, unless, among other things, all such payments are less than 50% of our consolidated net income for the period from October 1, 2005 to the most recently ended fiscal quarter at the time of the payment. Given the defaults under the Credit Facility and Notes, we have accrued, but not paid, management fees to Genstar Capital LLC and the Sterling Group during 2009. On March 30, 2009, the agent for the lenders under the Credit Facility provided us with a “blockage notice” directing us not to make an April 1, 2009 interest payment on the Notes. We did not make that payment, which is a default under the Notes, and, as a result, the indenture trustee and the holders of 25% of the Notes currently have the right, upon delivery of proper notice, to accelerate our payment obligations under the Notes.

When cash generated from our operations is sufficient, we may apply portions of our excess cash towards the repayment of our long-term debt. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we prepaid long-term debt of approximately $2.0 million, but we did not make any prepayments during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Analysis of Cash Flows and Working Capital

Cash provided by operating activities was $2.2 million and $11.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The decrease in cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily reflects an increase of $16.5 million in net loss and a net decrease of $2.0 million in the add back of non-cash expenses, including depreciation and amortization, the indefinite lived intangible asset impairment charge, amortization of debt acquisition costs, stock-based compensation expense and deferred taxes , all of which was partially offset by a $9.5 million decrease in the non-cash components of working capital. The increase in net loss of $16.5 million included approximately $4.4 million in other expenses that were paid in the first six months of 2009 related to legal and financial advisor fees incurred in connection with our efforts to restructure our debt obligations. The net change in non-cash components of working capital decreased approximately $9.5 million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to the first six months of

34

2008, primarily due to decreases in accounts receivable and inventories of $0.3 million and $8.3 million, respectively, and an increase of $6.4 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, all of which were offset in part by a increase in other current assets of $1.4 million and a decrease of $4.0 million in income taxes payable. The decrease in cash related to other current assets is primarily attributable to retainer fees paid to both legal and financial advisors related to our debt restructuring efforts. The slower growth in net working capital assets in 2009 is primarily attributable to the weaker business environment described above and improved working capital management.

Cash used in investing activities was $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 is related to a decrease in capital spending of $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Cash used in financing activities was six thousand dollars for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to a cash inflow of $0.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the net cash provided by financing activities resulted primarily from a $5.0 million draw down under our revolving credit facility offset in part by $2.0 million in term debt prepayments and the settlement of the subordinated notes with the former owners of Nevamar for $2.5 million, which included approximately $0.1 million in legal and bank fees.

Our Credit Facility, which became effective on September 30, 2005, initially consisted of a $135.0 million senior secured single draw seven-year term loan facility, and a $20.0 million senior secured five-year revolving credit facility.  In March 2006, the term loan was increased to $215.0 million and the revolving credit facility was increased to $30.0 million. We prepaid $2.0 million, $20.0 million and $24.5 million of the term loan in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, but made no prepayments during the six months ended June 30, 2009.  We had $25.9 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.  Our outstanding revolver borrowings as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 reflect a decision in the fourth quarter of 2008 to borrow our remaining availability under the revolving loan tranche of our Credit Facility due to the weakening economy and our concerns about the troubled credit markets.  At June 30, 2009, the interest rate on the revolver borrowings was at an annual rate of 4.50%. In addition, we had letters of credit issued in respect of workers’ compensation claims in an aggregate amount of $4.1 million, which also reduces our availability under the revolving portion of our Credit Facility.

Borrowings under our Credit Facility bear interest at our option at either adjusted LIBOR plus an applicable margin or the alternate base rate plus an applicable margin.  The interest rates on borrowings under our revolving credit facility are subject to adjustment based on our leverage. At June 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, the interest rate on the term loan facility was at annual rates of 5.00% and 3.22%, respectively. In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, effective July 1, 2009, we will be required to pay interest on our Credit Facility borrowings at a default interest rate equivalent to a rate that is 2% per annum in excess of the rate that would otherwise be payable. Our Credit Facility requires us to meet a maximum total leverage ratio of 4.50 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.25 as of June 30, 2009 and an annual maximum capital expenditures limitation of $8.0 million for 2009. As of June 30, 2009, our consolidated leverage ratio was in excess of the permitted maximum amount at 9.83 to 1.00; our minimum interest coverage ratio was below the required minimum at 1.18 to 1.00, and our annual capital expenditures were $0.5 million.  For the calculation of our debt covenant ratios, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt Covenant Ratios.” In addition, the Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated debt and engage in certain other activities customarily restricted in such agreements. The Credit Facility also contains certain customary events of default, some of which are subject to grace periods.  As of June 30, 2009, we were not in compliance with certain financial and reporting covenants including our leverage and interest coverage covenants under our Credit Facility, which constitutes a default.  As a result, the lenders under the Credit Facility have the ability to accelerate our obligations to make payments under the Credit Facility and, in the event there was availability under the revolver, we would not be permitted to borrow funds until the noncompliance is cured or waived by the lenders.

On February 27, 2009, we received a notice of default from the agent for our lenders under our Credit Facility due to our failure to comply with certain financial and reporting covenants.  On March 31, 2009, we entered into the Forbearance Agreement with our lenders pursuant to which the lenders agreed to forbear exercising any rights and remedies under the Credit Facility relating to these defaults, including their right to accelerate our payment

35

obligations under the Credit Facility, until the earlier of (i) June 30, 2009, (ii) the occurrence of an event of default under the Forbearance Agreement or (iii) the fulfillment of all obligations under the Forbearance Agreement and the Credit Facility and the termination of the Credit Facility. The Forbearance Agreement, which expired by its terms on June 30, 2009, required us to deliver to the lenders under the Credit Facility, on or before June 30, 2009, an excess cash flow payment related to the year ended December 31, 2008.  We did not make that excess cash flow payment and, furthermore, we did not make the regularly-scheduled June interest payment on either the term loan or the revolver portions of the Credit Facility, which non-payments constitute defaults under the Forbearance Agreement.  On July 1, 2009, we received a letter from the agent under the Credit Facility notifying us of the defaults under the Forbearance Agreement and reserving the lenders’ rights related to all defaults.  As a result of the termination of the Forbearance Agreement, the lenders under the Credit Facility again have the ability to accelerate all of our payment obligations under the Credit Facility, which amount to $194.4 million as of June 30, 2009.

The terms of the Forbearance Agreement prohibited us from, among other things, paying the April 1, 2009 interest payment on the Notes and we did not make that payment. Our failure to make that interest payment is a default under the indenture governing the Notes and entitles the indenture trustee or the holders of 25% of the Notes, after a thirty-day grace period that ended on May 1, 2009 and upon delivery of proper notice to us, to accelerate our payment obligations under the Notes.  The indenture trustee informed the holders of the Notes of the payment default and of the event of default by letters dated April 9, 2009 and May 7, 2009, respectively. Acceleration of our payment obligations under the Notes would be an additional even of default under the Credit Facility. Based on these acceleration rights under the Credit Facility and the Notes, we reclassified approximately $343.9 million from long-term debt to current debt as of December 31, 2008. The current portion of long-term debt was approximately $344.0 million as of June 30, 2009. As such, we had a working capital deficiency of approximately $244.1 million as of June 30, 2009 and approximately $239.1 million as of December 31, 2008.

The indenture governing our Notes also contains a number of covenants that restrict our ability to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified or preferred stock, pay dividends or make other equity distributions, repurchase or redeem capital stock, make investments or other restricted payments, sell assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, create liens or consolidate or merge with or into other companies, and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to us. Given the defaults under the Credit Facility and Notes, we have accrued, but not paid, management fees to Genstar Capital LLC and The Sterling Group during 2009. On March 30, 2009, the agent for the lenders under the Credit Facility provided us with a “blockage notice” directing us not to make an April 1, 2009 interest payment on the Notes.  We did not make that payment, which is a default under the Notes, and, as a result, the indenture trustee and the holders of 25% of the Notes currently have the right, upon delivery of proper notice, to accelerate our payment obligations under the Notes.

On July 27, 2009, we reached a tentative agreement with the Consenting Holders with respect to a restructuring of our indebtedness.  We believe that consummation of a successful restructuring is critical to our continued viability, and we are in active discussions with the Consenting Holders regarding the process for implementing the proposed restructuring, which remains subject to final documentation.  We expect to continue to operate our business in the ordinary course during and following the proposed restructuring.

In the event that the proposed restructuring is not completed and most or all of our obligations under the Credit Facility and Notes become due and payable, we would be unable to fund our payment obligations.  We have not received any acceleration notice related to these financing arrangements; however, given the current negative conditions in our industry and the economy generally and the credit markets in particular, we cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in reaching a definitive agreement on the proposed restructuring or finding alternative financing arrangements.  We have engaged financial and legal advisors to provide assistance in these discussions, but we may be compelled to file for bankruptcy protection.

Debt Covenant Ratios

As previously discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” our Credit Facility requires us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio that decreases over time and to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio that increases over time.  We have set forth below the calculations of those ratios as of June 30, 2009.  Certain components of these ratios, Consolidated EBITDA and Consolidated Cash Interest Expense, are non-GAAP measures of operating performance.  We believe the presentation of the calculation of our debt covenant ratios, which impact compliance with our obligations under our Credit Facility, is useful tool for investors to evaluate our performance and liquidity position.  Consolidated EBITDA and Consolidated Cash Interest Expense should be seen as complementary to, and not a substitute for, loss from operations and interest expense, respectively, each in accordance with GAAP.

The “Consolidated Leverage Ratio” is a ratio of (i) total net debt to (ii) Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the consecutive four fiscal quarters ending on such day. Total net debt is defined as total debt net of cash. At June 30, 2009,

36

total net debt was equal to $298.7 million. As of June 30, 2009, our Consolidated Leverage Ratio was 9.83 to 1.00, which is greater than the permitted maximum of 4.50 to 1.00.

“Consolidated EBITDA” is defined under our Credit Facility as earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other charges as specified in the Credit Facility. “Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA” is computed by taking the Consolidated EBITDA amount and adding back the amounts recorded for management fee expense related to our sponsors and stock based compensation expense. Below is a reconciliation of net loss to Consolidated EBITDA and to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA as used in the calculation of our Consolidated Leverage Coverage Ratio as of June 30, 2009:

	Six months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended December 31, 2008			Twelve months ended June 30, 2009
Net Loss	$	(17.4	)	$	(120.8	)	$	(138.2	)
Addbacks:
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense	(4.5		)	(21.0		)	(25.5		)
Interest Income	(.1		)	(.3		)	(.4		)
Interest Expense	13.2			14.6			27.8
Depreciation and Amortization Expense	15.2			16.3			31.5
Impairment Charges	1.6			126.8			128.4
Other Expenses	4.4			.4			4.8
Consolidated EBITDA	$	12.4		$	16.0		28.4
Management Fee Expense	.4			1.1			1.5
Stock Based Compensation Expense	.2			.3			.5
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA	$	13.0		$	17.4		$	30.4

The “Interest Coverage Ratio” is a ratio of (i) Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to (ii) Consolidated Cash Interest Expense.  As of June 30, 2009, our interest coverage ratio was 1.18 to 1.00, which is less than the required minimum of 2.25 to 1.00. “Consolidated Cash Interest Expense” is defined under our Credit Facility as interest expense for the period, excluding interest not payable in cash.  Below is reconciliation of interest expense to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense as used in the calculation of our Interest Coverage Ratio as of June 30, 2009:

	Six months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended December 31, 2008			Twelve months ended June 30, 2009
Total Interest Expense	$	13.2		$	14.6		$	27.8
Less:
Interest Expense not Paid in Cash	(.8		)	(.9		)	(1.7		)
Interest Income	(.1		)	(.3		)	(.4		)
Consolidated Cash Interest Expense	$	12.3		$	13.4		$	25.7

Off Balance Sheet Obligations

We have no off-balance-sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

37

Regulatory Compliance

We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign (Canadian) laws, regulations and ordinances pertaining, among other things, to the quality and the protection of the environment and human health and safety and that require us to devote substantial time and resources in an effort to maintain continued compliance. There can be no assurance that judicial or administrative proceedings seeking penalties or injunctive relief will not be brought against us for alleged non-compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations relating to matters as to which we are currently unaware. In addition, changes to such regulations or the enactment of new regulations in the future could require us to undertake capital improvement projects or to cease or curtail certain operations or could otherwise substantially increase the capital requirements, operating expenses and other costs associated with compliance. We believe we have adequately provided for costs related to our ongoing obligations with respect to known environmental liabilities. Expenditures related to environmental liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 did not have a material effect on our financial condition or cash flows. Such expenditures are related to the costs to maintain general compliance at our facilities. The majority of the costs include staffing and training expenses, permitting and emission based fees, testing and analytical fees and waste disposal fees.

Our Auburn, Maine facility is subject to a COC, dated May 5, 1993, issued by the State of Maine DEP, with regard to unauthorized discharges of hazardous substances into the environment. We, along with the previous owners, are named in the COC, and are required to investigate and, as necessary, remediate the environmental contamination at the site. Because the unauthorized discharges occurred during the previous ownership, the previous owners have agreed to be responsible for compliance with the COC. The nature and extent of remediation has not yet been determined. The financial obligation of the previous owners to investigate and/or remediate is unlimited except with regard to a portion of the land known as “area 2” at our Auburn, Maine facility, which is capped at $10.0 million. We have recorded a liability of $0.7 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for site remediation costs in excess of costs assumed by the previous owners. We could incur additional obligations in excess of the amount accrued and our recorded estimate may change over time. We expect this environmental issue to be resolved within the next five to ten years.

Legal Proceedings

We are party to certain litigation matters involving ordinary and routine claims incidental to the business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to such pending litigation matters. However, we believe, based on our examination of such matters, our ultimate costs with respect to such matters, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning the conditions in our industry, our operations, our economic performance and financial condition, including, in particular, statements relating to our business and strategy .  The words “may,” “might,” “should,” “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “believe” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and information although not all forward-looking statements include these identifying words. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. These forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions by our management that, although we believe to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain and subject to a number of risks and uncertainties.

In particular, our business might be affected by uncertainties affecting the decorative overlay industry and the construction industry generally as well as the following, among other factors:

·our ability to refinance, replace or restructure our Credit Facility on favorable terms or at all;

·general economic, financial and political conditions, including downturns affecting the decorative overlay or construction industries or the residential housing and credit markets;

·our ability to comply with financial covenants contained in our Credit Facility or any replacement indebtedness and our ability to obtain waivers to cure any noncompliance;

38

·our ability to obtain necessary financing to continue operations;

·limitations and restrictions on the operation of our business contained in the documents governing our indebtedness;

·changes in consumer preferences and discretionary spending;

·increases in raw material costs, including oil prices, which in some instances may not be passed on to customers;

·availability of raw materials and other commodities used to produce our products;

·competitive pressures, including new product developments or changes in competitors’ pricing;

·our ability to manage our growth and expansion, including recent acquisitions and any acquisitions we might undertake in the future;

·our ability to develop innovative new products;

·our ability to generate cash flows to service our substantial indebtedness and invest in the operation of our business;

·our dependence upon our key executives and other key employees;

·possible environmental liabilities resulting from our use of toxic or hazardous materials in connection with our manufacturing operations;

·our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, brands and proprietary technology;

·fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. and Canada; and

·our ability to effectively and efficiently maintain internal control procedures that are compliant with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 in a timely fashion and the possibility of increased operating costs associated with making any necessary changes.

Additional factors that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include those discussed under “Risk Factors” included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009.  All forward-looking statements are based upon information available to us on the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in general economic conditions and interest rate fluctuations. In the normal course of business, we also have foreign currency risks associated with our Canadian operations. There is also risk related to commodity price changes for items such as particleboard, medium density fiber-board, or MDF, and raw paper. In addition, we have exposure to changes in energy related costs for natural gas, heating oil and electricity. Many of the resins and chemicals used to produce our resins are petroleum based and therefore subject to the same market fluctuations as energy costs. We are also subject to surcharges by trucking companies due to the increased fuel costs. We employ established purchasing policies and procedures to manage our exposure to these risks. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading, speculative or other purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on net income and cash flow and to lower overall borrowing cost.

39

Amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility bear interest at our option at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or at an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin. These interest rates can fluctuate based on market rates. Based on the outstanding amount of our variable rate indebtedness at June 30, 2009, a 10% change in the interest rates at June 30, 2009 would have the effect of increasing or decreasing interest expense by approximately $1.0 million. Potential interest rate impact would also be affected by utilization of the revolving loan. In accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, effective July 1, 2009, we will be required to pay interest on our Credit Facility borrowings at a default interest rate equivalent to a rate that is 2.00% per annum in excess of the rate that would otherwise be payable.

The net amounts paid or received and net amounts accrued through the end of the accounting period are included in interest expense. Interest expense also includes the amortization of debt acquisition costs.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We have a Canadian subsidiary, Panolam Industries, Ltd., that has a manufacturing facility in Canada that sells to both Canadian and U.S. customers and purchases from both Canadian and U.S. suppliers. Our Canadian subsidiary operates within its local economic environment and utilizes its own operating cash flow to fund its operation. The Canadian subsidiary’s sales tend to be evenly split between U.S. and Canadian customers but shift depending on market demand; however, a greater percentage of raw materials purchases are in local currency. As a result, when the Canadian dollar strengthens, expenses increase as a percent of sales when reported in U.S. dollars. Conversely, when the Canadian dollar weakens it has the opposite effect. At the same time the Canadian foreign exchange rate fluctuations require revaluation of the Canadian subsidiary’s balance sheet resulting in foreign currency translation exchange gains or losses being charged or credited to other comprehensive income or (loss) on the balance sheet. We do not enter into any derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded $0.2 million of expense related to net foreign exchange transaction and revaluation adjustments, compared to $0.1 million of income recorded in the same period last year. At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $5.1 million of unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustments and at June 30, 2009 we had approximately $2.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustments included in stockholder’s deficit. There can be no assurances that the Canadian foreign exchange rate will not fluctuate adversely in the future and the potential risk for translation losses is not quantifiable.

Commodity Pricing Risk

We purchase commodities for our products such as paper, resins (and the chemicals used in making resins), wood furnish (used in the production of particleboard), raw particleboard and MDF. We also purchase other commodities, such as natural gas, heating oil and electricity. These commodities are generally purchased pursuant to contracts or at market prices established with the vendor, and we are subject to risks on the pricing of these commodities. We do not engage in hedging activities for these commodities.

Credit Concentration Risk

We sell HPLs and TFMs to various distributors and OEMs and we extend credit to our customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition. We review our trade accounts receivable balances for collectibility whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be collectible and provide currently for any unrealizable amounts. At June 30, 2009, we had uncollateralized accounts receivable from five nonaffiliated customers approximating 14% of total gross accounts receivable balances.  Sales to these five nonaffiliated customers were approximately 8% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, no single customer represented more than 10% of our sales or accounts receivable.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2009.  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and

40

procedures were effective in ensuring that information to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We continually seek ways to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our internal controls over financial reporting, resulting in frequent process refinement.  However, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal period to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.            Legal Proceedings

None

Item 1A.          Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to our risk factors as disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009.

Item 3.             Defaults Upon Senior Securities

As of June 30, 2009, we were not in compliance with certain financial and reporting covenants including our leverage and interest coverage covenants under our Credit Facility, which constitutes a default. We are also in default of the Forbearance Agreement related to the Credit Facility. For further information, please see Note 9 (“Debt and Capital Lease Obligations”) to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

We did not make the April 1, 2009 interest payment on our Notes. Our failure to make that interest payment is a default under the indenture governing the Notes and entitles the indenture trustee or the holders of 25% of the Notes, after a thirty-day grace period that ended on May 1, 2009 and upon delivery of proper notice to us, to accelerate our obligations under the Notes. The amount of the payment due was $8.1 million and there is, as of the date of this filing, a total arrearage of approximately $12.2 million.  For further information, please see Note 9 (“Debt and Capital Lease Obligations”) to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 6.            Exhibits —

EXHIBIT NUMBER	EXHIBIT TITLE
10.1	Forbearance Agreement by and between Panolam Holdings II Co, Panolam Industries International, Inc., the Requisite Lenders and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, dated March 31, 2009.*
31.1	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14; as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14; as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

41

* Incorporated herein by reference to Panolam Industries International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

PANOLAM INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	By:	/s/ Vincent S. Miceli
		Vincent S. Miceli
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Signatory, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:August 14, 2009

42