UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
| | |
(Mark One)
| | |
o | | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
| | |
|
or |
| | |
| | |
þ | | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
| | |
| | |
| | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
|
| | |
|
or |
| | |
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
| | |
| | |
| | For the transition period from to |
or |
| | |
| | |
o | | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
| | |
| | |
| | Date of event requiring this shell company report to
|
| | |
Commission file number 0-25670
Abbey National plc
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
England
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regent’s Place, London NW1 3AN, England
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. None
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
7.95% Term Subordinated Securities due October 26, 2029
Subordinated Guarantee by Abbey National plc of the 8.963% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Limited Partnership Interests issued by Abbey National Capital LP 1 and Abbey National Capital LP 11
Subordinated Guarantee by Abbey National plc of the 8.963% Non-Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities issued by Abbey National Capital Trust 1 and Abbey National Capital Trust 11
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
| | |
103/8% Non-cumulative Preference Shares of nominal value £1 each | | 200,000,000 |
85/8% Non-cumulative Preference Shares of nominal value £1 each | | 125,000,000 |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer þ
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
o U.S. GAAP þ International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
o Other
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Business Review and Forward-looking Statements
Chief Executive’s Review
Overview & Business Update
Abbey had a good year in 2007, the third year of successful restructuring under Santander. We delivered strong results in challenging market conditions and achieved all the 2007 targets as set out at the time of Santander’s acquisition.
Underlying our results was a robust performance in mortgages and savings, where we improved our new business market share whilst continuing to manage margin and growth successfully, a strategy we have had in place since 2006. We also delivered a very good performance in areas where we see great opportunities for profitable growth, such as investments, bank accounts and credit cards.
The Partenon implementation, one of the UK’s largest IT projects undertaken to date, is an important part of our plans to improve service quality, increase customer loyalty and enhance efficiency. During 2007, many of our core products were migrated onto the new platform and we are now reaching the final stages of the project. In 2008, we will complete the migration and continue the development and training of the sales force to maximise the benefits of the new system.
We were also proud to join Santander in celebrating its 150th anniversary during 2007 and our operations continued to be further integrated into the Santander Group. Abbey Financial Markets was rebranded as Santander Global Banking & Markets reflecting the closer relationship the UK operations now have with the global division. In our Wealth Management division we have made a significant investment to upgrade our IT capability and we have also entered into a joint venture with Santander Private Banking to further develop our private banking offering in the UK, leveraging Group capabilities and expertise. Santander Asset Management contributed to the strong uplift in our investment sales and has played an important part in strengthening our investment product range. During 2007, Santander launched a new credit card business leveraging Abbey’s branch distribution in the UK. We also launched a project to accelerate growth in our business banking and mid-corporate banking capabilities.
Overall, Abbey continues to make strong progress in its ambition to become a full service commercial bank and its ability to leverage Santander’s global presence is an important part of these plans in the United Kingdom.
Key Financial Highlights
Our financial performance was in line with our targets, as we improved our trading profit before tax by 30%, increased our revenues by 6.6% and further reduced our trading cost:income ratio to below 50%. This ratio is now broadly in line with the sector compared to 73% at the time of Abbey’s acquisition by Santander in 2004.
The financial targets set for 2007 at the time of acquisition were all achieved; our cost base has been reduced by over £300m since 2004 and our revenues have grown by well over the original £150m target. We have also reported double-digit operating jaws for the third consecutive year.
Summary highlights:
| | |
> | | Personal Financial Services trading profit before tax (management’s preferred profit measure, described in the Business Review – Summary on page 10) increased by £254m to £1,104m compared to £850m in 2006, with each business division delivering robust growth; |
> | | Personal Financial Services trading income was 6.6% higher, within the targeted range of between 5% and 10%. Retail Banking income benefited from robust asset growth of 8%, in challenging market conditions, and Abbey’s continued focus on effective margin management for both mortgages and customer deposits; |
> | | A further reduction in Personal Financial Services trading expenses of 3.8%; and |
> | | Credit quality remained strong, with the average loan to value (LTV) on new business and stock remaining low at 64% (FY 2006: 61%) and 45% (FY 2006: 45%) respectively. Less than 5% of stock has an LTV of greater than 90%, and Abbey has no net exposure to sub-prime mortgage lending. Further information about the current credit environment is contained in the Risk Management Report on page 46. |
Abbey is exceptionally well positioned to deal with the recent difficult credit conditions through our relationship with Santander, one of the world’s largest and best capitalised banks with a strong focus on retail banking. Our resilient retail balance sheet performance in the second half of 2007 reflects our strong retail funding mix, which is around 60% deposit based and 10% short term funded.
2
Business Review and Forward-looking Statements
Chief Executive’s Review continued
Outlook
We are building on our retail banking strengths by developing strongly into other areas like business banking, mid-corporate banking and wealth management, and our vision is now to become the ‘best commercial bank in the UK’. Retail Banking will always remain core to Abbey’s revenues, but it is important that we take advantage of new opportunities to capture growth in different markets and customer segments. The strategic projects mentioned above are an important part of our plans, as are the five key themes we set out last year. In 2008, we will place a greater focus on our five themes to achieve our vision. This means:
| | |
> | | Better service and ‘value for money’ for our customers – making use of Partenon and our improved cost position, improving sales productivity and improving service levels; |
> | | Further improvements in efficiency – allowing us to reinvest the money we save in the business; |
> | | Increased customer loyalty – encouraging our customers to buy more from us as they have better ‘value for money’ products; |
> | | Better teamwork – leveraging both global and local expertise and capabilities; and |
> | | More focus on meritocracy – making sure we recognise and reward people for their performance. |
Conclusion
Over the past three years we have worked with the support of Santander to develop a strong platform for growth in the United Kingdom. I believe the foundations are now firmly in place and we are in a strong position to achieve our ambition of becoming the best commercial bank in the UK. I expect Abbey to continue to outperform our UK peers, driven by higher growth in revenues and jaws combined with a sound risk approach. The Abbey team look forward to another successful year in 2008, as a key part of the Santander group, and becoming a stronger competitor in the United Kingdom.
António Horta-Osório
Chief Executive
3
Business Review and Forward-looking Statements
Forward-looking Statements
Abbey may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| | |
| | |
> | | projections or expectations of revenues, costs, profit (or loss), earnings (or loss) per share, dividends, capital structure or other financial items or ratios; |
> | | statements of plans, objectives or goals of Abbey or its management, including those related to products or services; |
> | | statements of future economic performance; and |
> | | statements of assumptions underlying such statements. |
Words such as ‘believes’, ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘intends’, ‘aims’, ‘plans’, ‘targets’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements cannot be objectively verified, are speculative and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. Abbey cautions readers that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements made by Abbey or on Abbey’s behalf. Some of these factors are considered in detail in the Risk Management section on page 33 and the Risk Factors section on page 130 and may include:
| | |
> | | inflation, interest rate, exchange rate, market and monetary fluctuations; |
> | | the effect of, and changes to, regulation and government policy; |
> | | the effects of market conditions and extent of economic activity in the geographic and business areas in which Abbey conducts business; |
> | | the effects of competition in the geographic and business areas in which Abbey conducts operations; |
> | | changes in consumer spending, saving and borrowing habits in the United Kingdom and in other countries in which Abbey conducts operations; |
> | | the effects of changes in laws, regulations, taxation or accounting standards or practices, or the effects of the interpretation of laws by the courts; |
> | | the ability to increase market share and control expenses; |
> | | the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of Abbey and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users; |
> | | acquisitions and disposals; |
> | | technological changes; |
> | | the possibility of foreign exchange controls, expropriation, nationalisation or confiscation of assets in countries in which Abbey conducts operations; |
> | | lack of liquidity in wholesale funding markets in periods of economic and political crisis; |
> | | consumer perception as to the continuing availability of credit and price competition; and |
> | | Abbey’s success at managing the risks of the foregoing. |
Abbey cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. When relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to Abbey, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and events. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and are based on the knowledge, information available and views taken on the date on which they are made; such knowledge, information and views may change at any time. Abbey does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Written forward-looking statements may appear in documents filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Annual Report, reports to shareholders and other communications. The US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains a safe harbour for forward-looking statements on which Abbey relies in making such disclosures.
4
Business and Financial Review
Business Overview
This Business and Financial Review contains forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in such forward-looking statements. See “Forward-looking Statements” on page 4.
General
Abbey National plc (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiaries (together, ‘Abbey’ or the ‘Group’) operate primarily in the UK, under UK law and regulation and are part of Banco Santander, S.A.. Abbey is a significant financial services provider in the UK, being the third largest residential mortgage lender and one of the largest savings brands, operating across the full range of personal financial services.
The principal executive office and registered office of Abbey National plc and Abbey National Treasury Services plc is Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regent’s Place, London NW1 3AN. Abbey’s telephone number is +44 (0) 870-607-6000. The designated agent for service of process on Abbey in the United States is CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10011. Please see “Business and Financial Review – Tangible fixed assets” for further information regarding Abbey’s properties.
Summary history
The Abbey National Building Society (‘the Society’) was formed in 1944 with the merger of two long-standing building societies. In 1988, Abbey National plc was incorporated as a bank and in 1989 the Society transferred business to Abbey National plc as part of the conversion and listing on the London Stock Exchange. In 2003, the brand name was shortened to Abbey. A list of Abbey National plc’s principal subsidiaries and their country of incorporation can be found on page 97.
On 12 November 2004, Banco Santander Central Hispano, S.A.(which changed its name to Banco Santander, S.A. on 13 August 2007) completed the acquisition of the entire issued ordinary share capital of Abbey National plc, implemented by means of a scheme of arrangement under Section 425 of the Companies Act 1985, making Abbey National plc a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Santander S.A. Banco Santander S.A. is one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalisation. Founded in 1857, Santander has approximately 69 million customers, over 11,000 branches and a presence in over 40 countries.
Corporate purpose and strategy
Abbey’s purpose is to maximise value for its shareholder, Banco Santander S.A., by focusing on offering a full commercial banking service in the UK. With the continuing support of Santander, Abbey aims to be the best commercial bank in the UK.
Executive Responsibility
Abbey’s management structure is headed by António Horta-Osório, Chief Executive, and consists of a number of business and support divisions. The business divisions consist of:
| | |
> | | Retail Banking– offers residential mortgages, savings and banking and other personal financial products to customers throughout the United Kingdom. This division is headed by António Horta-Osório. Alison Brittain, appointed an Executive Director on 2 January 2008, is responsible for the Retail Distribution channel as well as business banking, premium banking and e-commerce, while Ricky Okey is responsible for the Intermediary channel. |
> | | Global Banking & Markets– provides financial markets sales, trading and risk management services, as well as manufacturing retail structured products. This division is headed by Jaime Astarloa. |
> | | Corporate Banking– offers banking services principally to small and mid-sized UK companies. It also contains specialised businesses and operations in run down. This division is headed by Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Sola. |
> | | Wealth Management– offers private banking services, self-invested personal pension plans, a WRAP service and other specialist banking services. This division is headed by Antonio Lorenzo. |
The support divisions consist of:
| | |
> | | Retail Products and Marketing– responsible for integrating and gaining the maximum value from Abbey’s products, marketing and brand communications to serve Abbey’s customers better. This division is headed by Nathan Bostock. |
> | | Human Resources– responsible for delivering the human resources strategy and personnel support. It also includes the learning function. This division is headed by Nathan Bostock. |
> | | Manufacturing– responsible for all information technology, cost control and operations activity (including service centres). This division is headed by Juan Olaizola. |
> | | Risk– responsible for ensuring that the Board and senior management team of Abbey are provided with an appropriate risk policy and control framework, and to report any material risk issues to the Risk Committee and the Board. Juan Colombás is the Chief Risk Officer, Retail and Corporate Banking, and John Hennessy is the Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale. |
> | | Internal Audit– responsible for supervising the compliance, effectiveness and efficiency of Abbey’s internal control systems to manage its risks. This division is headed by Jorge de la Vega. |
In addition there are a number of corporate units – Legal, Secretariat, Compliance, Communications and Universities (which report to Karen Fortunato); Complaints and Service Quality (which report to Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Sola); Group Infrastructure, which includes Asset & Liability Management, Group Capital and Funding (which reports to Nathan Bostock); and Finance (which reports to Antonio Lorenzo).
5
Business and Financial Review
Business Overview continued
Competition
Competitive environment, future trends and outlook
Abbey’s main competitors are established UK banks, building societies and other financial services providers such as insurance companies, supermarket chains and large retailers. The market is competitive, driven largely by market incumbents. Management is confident of Abbey’s strength and potential to continue growing despite the level of competition and challenging conditions in some of its core personal financial services markets.
Personal Financial Services (‘PFS’)
The overview of Personal Financial Services below reflects the reporting structure in place during 2007 in accordance with which the segmental information in the Business and Financial Review - Personal Financial Services section has been presented.
Retail Banking
Retail Banking consists of residential mortgages, savings, banking and consumer credit, cahoot, general insurance, Abbey Business and asset management.
Residential Mortgages
Abbey is the third largest provider of residential mortgages in the UK measured by outstanding balances, providing mortgage loans for house purchases as well as home improvement loans to new and existing mortgage customers. Mortgage loans are offered in two payment types. Repayment mortgages require both principal and interest to be repaid in monthly instalments over the life of the mortgage. Interest-only mortgages require monthly interest payments and the repayment of principal at the end of the mortgage term (which can be arranged via a number of investment products including Individual Savings Accounts and pension policies, or by the sale of the property).
Abbey’s mortgage loans are usually secured by a first mortgage over property and are typically available over a 25-year term, with no minimum term. Variable rate products charge interest at variable rates determined at the discretion of Abbey by reference to the general level of market interest rates and competitive forces in the UK mortgage market. Fixed rate products offer a predetermined interest rate, generally fixed for between two and five years, after which they bear interest at standard variable rates. A significant proportion of new mortgage business is through trackers, which track the Bank of England base rate, normally with an incentive period for the first two to five years, and flexible mortgages, allowing the customer to vary their monthly payments, or take payment holidays, within predetermined criteria. In line with the rest of the UK market, a significant proportion of mortgages are prepaid at the end of the fixed or incentive period.
Savings
Abbey provides a wide range of retail savings accounts, including on-demand accounts, notice accounts, investment accounts and Individual Savings Accounts. Interest rates on savings in the UK are primarily set with reference to the general level of market interest rates and the level of competition for such funds.
Banking and Consumer Credit
Abbey offers a range of personal banking services including current accounts, credit cards and unsecured personal loans. Credit scoring is used for initial lending decisions on these products and behavioural scoring is used for certain products for further lending. Abbey launched its new credit card range in the UK in the first half of 2007 through Santander’s global cards division. Previously, Abbey’s principal credit card offering was delivered through a strategic alliance with MBNA Europe Bank Limited, which was responsible for taking the credit risk and managing the credit card base.
cahoot
cahoot is Abbey’s separately branded, e-commerce retail banking and financial services provider.
General Insurance
The range of non-life insurance products distributed by Abbey includes property (buildings and contents) and payment protection. Residential home insurance remains the primary type of policy sold and is offered to customers through the branch network, Internet and over the telephone, as well as being sold by mortgage intermediaries, often at the time that a mortgage is being taken out.
Abbey Business
Abbey Business offers a range of banking services to small businesses in the UK.
Asset Management
On 31 December 2006, Abbey sold 100% of its asset management businesses to Santander Asset Management UK Holdings Limited, an indirect subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A., for a total cash consideration of £134m. The asset management companies sold were Abbey National Asset Managers Limited (now called Santander Asset Management UK Limited), Abbey National PEP & ISA Managers Limited, Abbey National Unit Trust Managers Limited (now called Santander Unit Trust Managers UK Limited) and Inscape Investments Limited (now called Santander Portfolio Management UK Limited). Retail Banking earns a commission on products sold through its relationship with Santander Asset Management.
6
Business and Financial Review
Business Overviewcontinued
Global Banking & Markets
Global Banking & Markets is structured into three business areas: Rates, Credit Markets, and Equity. Rates and Credit Markets cover sales and trading activity for fixed income derivatives and credit derivatives, respectively. Given the recent lack of activity in the credit markets, the decision was made to close the credit derivatives business and consolidate its activities in Spain with the equivalent Santander business area. This is with effect from 1 January 2008. Equity comprises the Equity Derivatives, Property Derivatives and Short Term Markets areas. Equity and residential property derivatives activities include the manufacture of structured products sold to retail customers both by Abbey and by other financial institutions. Short Term Markets runs the securities lending/borrowing and repurchase agreement (‘repo’) businesses and retains a US branch for funding purposes. Since the year end, the decision has been taken to close the US securities financing business. It is expected that this will be completed in the first half of 2008.
Corporate Banking
Corporate Banking provides a range of banking services principally to small and mid-sized UK companies in a variety of sectors including Real Estate, Social Housing, Education, Health and Communities, and Financial Services. It provides funding and a range of treasury services via Global Banking & Markets. It also plans to provide investment, trade finance and supply chain solutions. It is also responsible for Porterbrook, a train leasing business, and the run down of Motor Finance and Insurance Funding Solutions.
Wealth Management
Wealth Management consists of Abbey International and Abbey’s majority interest in Santander Private Banking UK Limited. On 17 December 2007, Abbey sold 49% of its shareholding in Santander Private Banking UK Limited (consisting of James Hay, Cater Allen and Abbey Sharedealing) to Santander PB UK (Holdings) Limited, a direct subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A., for a total cash consideration of £203m. The companies affected were Cater Allen Limited, Abbey Stockbrokers Limited, James Hay Holdings Limited, and their subsidiaries.
Abbey International
Abbey National International Limited uses the Abbey International brand. Its office is in Jersey, with a focus on attracting deposits by offering a range of savings accounts denominated in sterling, US dollars and euro.
James Hay
James Hay provides administration services for self-invested pension plans and the WRAP portfolio management product. Its services are provided to end customers mainly via Independent Financial Advisers and branded financial service providers.
Cater Allen
Cater Allen Limited, trading as Cater Allen Private Bank, provides products to assist with the finance requirements of individuals and businesses. The business attracts clients by marketing to introducers, including Independent Financial Advisers.
Abbey Sharedealing
Abbey Stockbrokers Limited, trading as Abbey Sharedealing, provides a direct share trading service for customers. Customers buy and sell shares on their account with the help of the dealers at Abbey Sharedealing. No advice is provided and all trades are on an execution only basis.
Group Infrastructure
Group Infrastructure consists of Asset and Liability Management activities, Group Capital and Funding. Asset and Liability Management is responsible for managing the Group’s structural liquidity. This includes Abbey’s capital management activities and medium and long-term funding, including Abbey’s structured covered bond and securitisation programmes. It manages Abbey Retail’s product and structural exposure to interest rates and, in that role, is a link between the Retail Banking and other Global Banking and Markets areas. Asset and Liability Management recommends and helps to implement Board, Asset and Liability Management Committee and Risk Committee policies for all aspects of balance sheet management – formulating guidance for, and monitoring, the overall balance sheet shape, including maturity profile.
Abbey National plc and Abbey National Treasury Services plc have registered various shelf facilities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See also Balance Sheet Business Review – Sources of Liquidity on page 30.
Sold Life Businesses
In 2006, Abbey sold its entire life insurance business to Resolution plc for cash consideration of approximately £3.6bn. The principal life companies sold were Scottish Mutual Assurance plc, Scottish Provident Limited and Abbey National Life plc, as well as the two offshore life companies, Scottish Mutual International plc and Scottish Provident International Life Assurance Limited.
Portfolio Business Unit (‘PBU’)
The PBU comprised a number of businesses, assets and portfolios that were inconsistent with Abbey’s strategy, and were sold during 2005 or transferred to Corporate Banking. From the end of 2005, no businesses are part of this segment.
7
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Summary
The results discussed below are not necessarily indicative of Abbey’s results in future periods. The following information contains certain forward-looking statements. See “Forward-looking Statements” on page 4. The following discussion is based on and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report and Accounts.
Executive summary
Abbey has prepared this Business and Financial Review in a manner consistent with the way management views Abbey’s business as a whole. As a result, Abbey presents the following key sections to the Business and Financial Review:
| | |
> | | Business Review Summary– this contains an explanation of the basis of Abbey’s results and any potential changes to that basis in the future; a summary Income Statement with commentary; a summary Income Statement analysed between Personal Financial Services, the Sold Life Businesses and the Portfolio Business Unit; a summary of the nature of adjustments between Abbey’s statutory basis of accounting (as described in the Accounting Policies section on pages 68 to 82) and Abbey’s management basis of accounting (known as the “trading” basis); and a description of key performance indicators; |
> | | Personal Financial Services– this contains a summary of the results, and commentary thereon, by Income Statement line item on a trading basis for each segment. Additional information is provided for the Retail Banking segment due to its significance to Abbey’s results; |
> | | Sold Life Businesses and Portfolio Business Unit– this contains a summary of the results and commentary thereon on a trading basis of the life insurance businesses sold in 2006 and the non-core businesses sold in 2005; |
> | | Other Material Items– this contains information about the statutory to trading basis adjustments; and |
> | | Balance Sheet Business Review– this contains an analysis of Abbey’s balance sheet, including: |
| | > | | Capital disclosures– this contains an analysis of Abbey’s capital needs and availability; |
| | > | | Off-Balance Sheet disclosures– this contains a summary of Abbey’s off-balance sheet arrangements, their business purpose, and importance to Abbey; and |
| | > | | Liquidity disclosures– this contains an analysis of Abbey’s sources and uses of liquidity and cash flows. |
Basis of results presentation
The Group’s business is managed and reported on the basis of the following segments:
| | |
> | | Retail Banking; |
> | | Global Banking & Markets; |
> | | Corporate Banking; |
> | | Wealth Management; |
> | | Group Infrastructure; |
> | | Sold Life Businesses; and |
> | | Portfolio Business Unit. |
In 2007, the Financial Markets business was renamed Santander Global Banking & Markets (‘Global Banking & Markets’), the Corporate Banking business was managed and reported separately from the rest of the Global Banking & Markets business, and the short-term funding revenue was transferred from Global Banking & Markets to Group Infrastructure. In addition, the 2005 and 2006 results of the asset management businesses that were sold in 2006 have been reclassified from Wealth Management to Retail Banking. The segmental analysis of our results for 2006 and 2005 has been amended to reflect these changes. In this report, the Retail Banking, Global Banking & Markets, Corporate Banking, Wealth Management and Group Infrastructure segments are referred to as the Personal Financial Services businesses.
Critical factors affecting results
Critical accounting policies and areas of significant management judgement
The preparation of Abbey’s Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amount of income and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates its estimates and judgements on an ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates and judgements on historical experience and on other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Estimates and judgements that are considered important to the portrayal of Abbey’s financial condition including, where applicable, quantifications of the effects of reasonably possible ranges of such estimates and judgements are set out in the Accounting Policies in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Profit on disposal of Group undertakings
Profits / (losses) of £7m (2006: £(223)m, 2005: £62m) were made on the disposal of Group undertakings during the year. In addition, profits of £105m (2006: nil, 2005: nil) were made on the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiary undertakings.
Significant acquisitions and disposals
The 2007 results have been materially impacted by the disposals of businesses, as described in the Business Review – Other Material Items, and Notes 11 and 44 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. There were no significant acquisitions.
Current and future accounting developments under IFRS
Details can be found in the Accounting Policies on page 68 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Summarycontinued
Group Summary
Summarised consolidated statutory income statement and selected ratios
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,172 | |
Non-interest income | | | 1,283 | | | | 1,242 | | | | 1,183 | |
|
Total operating income | | | 2,782 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,355 | |
|
Administrative expenses | | | (1,369) | | | | (1,420) | | | | (1,577) | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | (205) | | | | (215) | | | | (195) | |
|
Total operating expenses excluding provisions and charges | | | (1,574) | | | | (1,635) | | | | (1,772) | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (344) | | | | (344) | | | | (218) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | (63) | | | | (3) | |
|
Total operating provisions and charges | | | (344) | | | | (407) | | | | (221) | |
|
Profit on continuing operations before tax | | | 864 | | | | 428 | | | | 362 | |
Tax on profit on continuing operations | | | (179 | ) | | | (115) | | | | (108) | |
|
Profit for the year from continuing operations | | | 685 | | | | 313 | | | | 254 | |
(Loss) / profit for the year from discontinued operations | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | 166 | |
|
Profit for the year | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (%) | | | 7.3% | | | | 8.0% | | | | 10.0% | |
Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%) | | | 5.4% | | | | 5.6% | | | | 6.6% | |
Closing risk weighted assets | | | 68,562 | | | | 62,942 | | | | 55,972 | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
Profit on continuing operations before tax of £864m increased from £428m in 2006. Material movements by line include:
| | |
> | | Net interest income of £1,499m compared to £1,228m in 2006 increased by £271m. Retail Banking income benefited from robust asset growth of 8% in challenging market conditions, and Abbey’s continued focus on effective margin management for both mortgages and customer deposits. Overall the Retail Banking spread improved by 2 basis points. Net interest income also benefited from the full year impact of earnings from proceeds from the sale of the life insurance businesses in 2006. |
> | | Non-interest income of £1,283m compared to £1,242m in 2006 increased by £41m. The increase relates to the uplift in revenues within Global Banking & Markets despite difficult trading conditions in the second half of the year restricting transaction flow. In addition, 2007 has benefited from the increase in the profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries, partially offset by higher losses from hedging and other mark-to-market variances compared to 2006. Retail banking fee income declined slightly. |
> | | Administrative expenses of £1,369m (2006: £1,420m) decreased by £51m driven by on-going cost reduction activity. |
> | | Depreciation and amortisation of £205m (2006: £215m) decreased by £10m due to lower asset write-downs. |
> | | Impairment losses on loans and advances were unchanged at £344m, with reduced exposure to unsecured lending, particularly internet-sourced lending, being offset by increases elsewhere reflecting the deterioration in market conditions. Credit quality overall remains sound. |
> | | Provisions for other liabilities and charges net to £nil compared to £63m in 2006, principally due to the stay in complaints relating to unauthorised overdraft charges pending a decision on legal proceedings in the High Court of England and Wales to resolve legal uncertainties concerning the level, fairness and lawfulness of unauthorised overdraft charges, as described in Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
2006 compared to 2005
Profit on continuing operations before tax of £428m increased from £362m in 2005. Material movements by line include:
| | |
> | | Net interest income of £1,228m compared to £1,172m in 2005 increased by £56m. The increase relates in part to earnings on the proceeds from the sale of the life businesses in 2006. The remaining movement was largely due to higher Retail Banking income driven by growth in retail lending assets and stable retail spreads being offset by the reduction in income from asset financing operations and other businesses, which are being run-down. |
> | | Non-interest income of £1,242m compared to £1,183m in 2005 increased by £59m. The increase relates primarily to the uplift in revenues within Global Banking & Markets due to the benefits of favourable market conditions and increased external business. |
> | | Administrative expenses of £1,420m (2005: £1,577m) decreased by £157m. The reduction largely reflects the benefits of the cost reduction programme with the majority of the savings relating to employment costs driven by a headcount reduction of approximately 2,000 in 2006 (excluding the reduction reflecting the impact of the sale of the life insurance businesses). In addition, the 2005 administrative expenses included misselling costs of £70m. |
> | | Depreciation and amortisation of £215m compared to £195m in 2005 increased by £20m due to the timing of asset additions in 2005. |
> | | Impairment losses on loans and advances of £344m compared to £218m in 2005 increased by £126m. The growth was partly driven by strengthening of the coverage ratio and in part by the maturing nature of the unsecured personal loan portfolio, including portfolios that are no longer open to new business, with some deterioration in quality. The remaining increase was mainly due to mortgage-related charges increasing modestly from a very low base relative to the total book. |
> | | Provisions for other liabilities and charges of £63m compared to £3m in 2005 increased by £60m due to provisions for misselling remediation payments to customers. |
9
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Summary continued
(Loss) / profit for the year from discontinued operations of £(245)m (2005: £166m) comprises the profit of the discontinued operations of £19m (2005: £166m) and a loss on sale of £264m. The decrease in profit reflects the sale of the life insurance business in the third quarter of 2006, together with an increased level of lapses on with-profits bonds in 2006 prior to the sale, and an impairment charge of £69m on intangible assets. The loss on sale principally reflects the discount to embedded value that is normal in sales of life insurance businesses.
Summarised consolidated statutory income statement analysed between Personal Financial Services, Sold Life Businesses and the Portfolio Business Unit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | Sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sold | | | | | | | |
| | PFS | | | Life | | | PBU | | | Total | | | PFS | | | Life | | | PBU | | | Total | | | PFS | | | Life | | | PBU | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,499 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,228 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,166 | | | | – | | | | 6 | | | | 1,172 | |
Non-interest income | | | 1,283 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,283 | | | | 1,242 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,242 | | | | 1,122 | | | | – | | | | 61 | | | | 1,183 | |
|
Total operating income | | | 2,782 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,782 | | | | 2,470 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,288 | | | | – | | | | 67 | | | | 2,355 | |
|
Administrative expenses | | | (1,369) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,369) | | | | (1,420) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,420) | | | | (1,576) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (1,577) | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | (205) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (205) | | | | (215) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (215) | | | | (194) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (195) | |
|
Total operating expenses excluding provisions and charges | | | (1,574) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,574) | | | | (1,635) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,635) | | | | (1,770) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (1,772) | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (344) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (344) | | | | (344) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (344) | | | | (218) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (218) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (63) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (63) | | | | (11) | | | | – | | | | 8 | | | | (3) | |
|
Total operating provisions and charges | | | (344) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (344) | | | | (407) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (407) | | | | (229) | | | | – | | | | 8 | | | | (221) | |
|
Profit on continuing operations before tax | | | 864 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 864 | | | | 428 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 428 | | | | 289 | | | | – | | | | 73 | | | | 362 | |
Tax on profit on continuing operations | | | (179) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (179) | | | | (115) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (115) | | | | (106) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (108) | |
|
Profit for the year on continuing operations | | | 685 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 685 | | | | 313 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 313 | | | | 183 | | | | – | | | | 71 | | | | 254 | |
Profit / (loss) for the year on discontinued operations | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | – | | | | 166 | | | | – | | | | 166 | |
|
Profit / (loss) for the year | | | 685 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 685 | | | | 313 | | | | (245) | | | | – | | | | 68 | | | | 183 | | | | 166 | | | | 71 | | | | 420 | |
|
Adjustments between the statutory basis and the trading basis
Abbey’s Board reviews discrete financial information for each of its segments that includes measures of operating results and assets. The segments are managed primarily on the basis of their results, which are measured on a “trading” basis. The trading basis differs from the statutory basis as a result of the application of various adjustments, as presented below. Management considers that the trading basis provides the most appropriate way of reviewing the performance of the business. The adjustments arise principally in the ongoing Personal Financial Services businesses. The adjustments are:
| | |
> | | Reorganisation and other costs– Comprise implementation costs in relation to the strategic change and cost reduction process, as well as certain remediation administration expenses and credit provisions. Management needs to understand the underlying drivers of the cost base that will remain after these exercises are complete, and does not want this view to be clouded by these costs, which are managed independently. |
> | | Depreciation of operating lease assets– The operating lease businesses are managed as financing businesses and, therefore, management needs to see the margin earned on the businesses. Residual value risk is separately managed. As a result the depreciation is netted against the related income. |
> | | Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries– These profits are excluded from the results to allow management to understand the underlying performance of the business. In 2007, these consisted of the profit on the sale of 49% of James Hay, Cater Allen and Abbey Sharedealing, and small recoveries on certain other transactions. In 2006, the profit on the sale of the Asset Management businesses was similarly excluded. |
> | | Hedging and certain other mark-to-market variances– The Balance Sheet and Income Statement are subject to mark-to-market volatility including from the accounting for elements of derivatives deemed under IFRS rules to be ineffective as hedges. Where appropriate, such volatility is separately identified to enable management to view the underlying performance of the business. |
> | | Capital and other charges– Principally comprise internal nominal charges for capital invested in the Group’s businesses. Management implemented this charge to assess if capital is invested effectively. |
For a detailed explanation of these items, please refer to the “Other Material Items” section of the Business and Financial Review.
10
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Summarycontinued
Key performance indicators
Key performance indicators relevant to the Group during the years ended, and as at, 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005 are set out below. This information describes the key measures used by management in assessing the success of the business against its strategies and objectives.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Key performance indicator | | Note | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
|
PFS trading revenues | | | 1 | | | | £2,615m | | | | £2,452m | | | | £2,334m | |
PFS trading cost:income ratio | | | 2 | | | | 49.7% | | | | 55.0% | | | | 61.3% | |
Profit for the year | | | 3 | | | | £685m | | | | £68m | | | | £420m | |
Retail Banking spread | | | 4 | | | | 1.48% | | | | 1.46% | | | | 1.45% | |
Total number of employees | | | 5 | | | | 15,236 | | | | 16,395 | | | | 20,642 | |
Mortgage market share | | | 6 | | | | 9.3% | | | | 9.4% | | | | 9.7% | |
|
1. | | PFS trading revenues comprise net interest income and non-interest income of the Personal Financial Services businesses. Discussion and analysis of this data is set out in the Business Review – Personal Financial Services on pages 15 and 16. |
|
| | |
2. | | The PFS trading cost:income ratio is defined as trading expenses divided by trading income of the Personal Financial Services businesses. Discussion and analysis of trading income and expenses is set out in the Business Review – Personal Financial Services on pages 15 to 18. Further information about the calculation of the PFS trading cost:income ratio is contained in Selected Financial Data on page 127. |
|
| | |
3. | | Profit for the year is the statutory consolidated profit after tax for the year. Discussion and analysis of this data is set out in the Group Summary in this Business Review – Summary section on pages 9 and 10. |
| | |
|
4. | | Retail banking spread is defined as interest received (mortgage, unsecured personal loans and overdraft interest) divided by interest earning assets, less interest payable (savings, and in-credit bank accounts) divided by interest bearing liabilities. Discussion and analysis of this data is set out in the Business Review – Personal Financial Services on pages 12 to 18. |
| | |
|
5. | | Total number of employees is measured at the year-end and calculated on a full-time equivalent basis. As part of the planning process, headcount targets are set for each division and reviewed on a monthly basis. Further information about employees on a segmental basis is contained in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| | |
|
6. | | Mortgage market share represents the value of the Group’s mortgage asset as a percentage of the total value of mortgages in the UK market, and is measured at the year-end. Discussion and analysis of this data is set out in the Business Review – Personal Financial Services on pages 13 and 14. |
11
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Services
This section contains a summary of the results, and commentary thereon, by Income Statement line item on a trading basis for each segment within the Personal Financial Services businesses, together with reconciliations from the trading basis to the statutory basis. Additional information is provided on the adjustments between the trading basis and the statutory basis in the Business Review – Other Material Items.
Personal Financial Services profit before tax by segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Retail | | | Banking & | | | Corporate | | | Wealth | | | Group | | | | |
| | Banking | | | Markets | | | Banking | | | Management | | | Infrastructure | | | Total | |
31 December 2007 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,615 | | | | – | | | | (34) | | | | 70 | | | | (152) | | | | 1,499 | |
Non-interest income | | | 645 | | | | 260 | | | | 127 | | | | 34 | | | | 50 | | | | 1,116 | |
|
Total trading income | | | 2,260 | | | | 260 | | | | 93 | | | | 104 | | | | (102) | | | | 2,615 | |
Total trading expenses | | | (996) | | | | (107) | | | | (30) | | | | (61) | | | | (105) | | | | (1,299) | |
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (239) | | | | – | | | | 29 | | | | (2 | ) | | | – | | | | (212) | |
|
Trading profit / (loss) before tax | | | 1,025 | | | | 153 | | | | 92 | | | | 41 | | | | (207) | | | | 1,104 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Reorganisation and other costs | | | (139) | | | | (6) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (132) | | | | (278) | |
– Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 5 | | | | – | | | | 105 | | | | 110 | |
– Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (72) | | | | (72) | |
– Capital and other charges | | | (81) | | | | – | | | | (8) | | | | 19 | | | | 70 | | | | – | |
|
Profit / (loss) from continuing operations before tax | | | 805 | | | | 147 | | | | 89 | | | | 59 | | | | (236) | | | | 864 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Retail | | | Banking & | | | Corporate | | | Wealth | | | Group | | | | |
| | Banking | | | Markets | | | Banking | | | Management | | | Infrastructure | | | Total | |
31 December 2006 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,466 | | | | – | | | | (46) | | | | 62 | | | | (146) | | | | 1,336 | |
Non-interest income | | | 648 | | | | 240 | | | | 125 | | | | 32 | | | | 71 | | | | 1,116 | |
|
Total trading income | | | 2,114 | | | | 240 | | | | 79 | | | | 94 | | | | (75) | | | | 2,452 | |
Total trading expenses | | | (1,005) | | | | (93) | | | | (41) | | | | (58) | | | | (152) | | | | (1,349) | |
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (273) | | | | – | | | | 27 | | | | – | | | | (5) | | | | (251) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | – | | | | (2) | |
|
Trading profit / (loss) before tax | | | 836 | | | | 147 | | | | 65 | | | | 34 | | | | (232) | | | | 850 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Reorganisation and other costs | | | (133) | | | | (9) | | | | – | | | | (5) | | | | (151) | | | | (298) | |
– Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 41 | | | | 41 | |
– Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | (8) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (37) | | | | (45) | |
– Capital and other charges | | | (44) | | | | – | | | | (4) | | | | 15 | | | | (87) | | | | (120) | |
|
Profit / (loss) from continuing operations before tax | | | 651 | | | | 138 | | | | 61 | | | | 44 | | | | (466) | | | | 428 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Retail | | | Banking & | | | Corporate | | | Wealth | | | Group | | | | |
| | Banking | | | Markets | | | Banking | | | Management | | | Infrastructure | | | Total | |
31 December 2005 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,332 | | | | – | | | | (25) | | | | 60 | | | | (50) | | | | 1,317 | |
Non-interest income | | | 608 | | | | 205 | | | | 107 | | | | 26 | | | | 71 | | | | 1,017 | |
|
Total trading income | | | 1,940 | | | | 205 | | | | 82 | | | | 86 | | | | 21 | | | | 2,334 | |
Total trading expenses | | | (1,121) | | | | (90) | | | | (41) | | | | (63) | | | | (116) | | | | (1,431) | |
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (207) | | | | – | | | | (10) | | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | (218) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (14) | | | | – | | | | (11) | |
|
Trading profit / (loss) before tax | | | 615 | | | | 115 | | | | 31 | | | | 8 | | | | (95) | | | | 674 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Reorganisation and other costs | | | (196) | | | | (5) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (13) | | | | (216) | |
– Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (21) | | | | (18) | |
– Capital and other charges | | | (37) | | | | – | | | | (7) | | | | 14 | | | | (121) | | | | (151) | |
|
Profit / (loss) from continuing operations before tax | | | 385 | | | | 110 | | | | 24 | | | | 20 | | | | (250) | | | | 289 | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
> | | Personal Financial Services trading profit before tax of £1,104m increased by £254m on the previous year (2006: £850m). Trading income was 6.6% higher and within the targeted range. There was a further reduction in trading expenses of 3.8% in 2007 with headcount 1,159 full time equivalents lower than 31 December 2006. Trading profit before tax benefited from positive trading income and cost trends and lower credit provisions. |
|
> | | Retail Banking trading profit before tax increased by £189m to £1,025m (2006: £836m) driven by a 7% increase in trading income and lower expenses and credit provisions. Trading income benefited from robust asset growth of 8% in challenging market conditions, and Abbey’s continued focus on effective margin management for both mortgages and customer deposits. Trading provisions have decreased due to the lower unsecured asset and are partially offset by a slight increase in mortgage provisions from historic low levels. |
|
> | | Global Banking & Markets trading profit before tax increased by £6m to £153m (2006: £147m). Trading income has increased slightly with profits from the closeout of customer trades offsetting the effects of difficult market conditions in the second half of the year. |
12
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Servicescontinued
> | | Corporate Banking trading profit before tax increased by £27m to £92m (2006: £65m) reflecting lower trading costs from the run down of asset financing operations and a reduced net interest charge due to lower Porterbrook project and maintenance funding costs. In addition, new Corporate Banking business streams contributed positively. |
|
> | | Wealth Management trading profit before tax increased by £7m to £41m (2006: £34m) reflecting higher trading income and broadly stable costs. Trading income has improved as a result of higher deposits in Cater Allen and improved margins in both Cater Allen and Abbey International. |
|
> | | Group Infrastructure trading loss before tax decreased by £25m to £207m (2006: £232m) reflecting a small decrease in net interest income due to base rate changes more than offset by a reduction in unallocated central costs. |
2006 compared to 2005
> | | Personal Financial Services trading profit before tax of £850m increased by £176m on the previous year (2005: £674m). Trading income was 5% higher, and was within the targeted range of 5% – 10% for the first year of the 3-year plan. This represents a significant improvement in performance after a number of years of revenue decline and a flat performance in 2005. There was a further reduction in trading expenses of over 5% in 2006 with headcount approximately 2,000 full time equivalents lower than 31 December 2005 (excluding the impact of the sale of the life insurance businesses). Positive trading income and cost trends were offset by increased credit provisions driven largely by the maturing of the unsecured loan portfolio. |
|
> | | Retail Banking trading profit before tax increased by £221m to £836m (2005: £615m) reflecting lower trading costs, due to the cost reduction programme, and higher trading income resulting from growth in customer loans, stable Retail spreads and increased volumes in mortgage, investments and bank accounts. Trading income and cost trends were offset by increased credit provisions. The growth was partly driven by strengthening of the coverage ratio and in part by the maturing nature of the unsecured personal loan portfolio with some deterioration in quality. Mortgage related charges also increased modestly from a very low base relative to the overall book. |
|
> | | Global Banking & Markets trading profit before tax increased by £32m to £147m (2005: £115m). The increase was due to higher trading revenues in both Derivative and Structured Products and Short Term Financing businesses. |
|
> | | Corporate Banking trading profit before tax increased by £34m to £65m (2005: £31m). 2006 included a provision release of £27m primarily in relation to asset financing operations compared to a charge of £10m in 2005. This was partially offset by lower revenues following the run down of asset-financing operations and other businesses. |
|
> | | Wealth Management trading profit before tax increased by £26m to £34m (2005: £8m). Trading income increased, driven by higher customer deposits in Cater Allen, improved margins in both Cater Allen and Abbey International and increased sales in James Hay. The remaining increase related primarily to a lower closed office charge made in 2006. |
|
> | | Group Infrastructure trading loss before tax increased by £137m to £232m (2005: £95m). Net interest income was adversely impacted by base rate changes on central funding in 2006, which were more than offset by benefits reported in Retail Banking and Wealth Management under the Group’s transfer pricing arrangements. In addition, trading expenses increased due to additional unallocated central costs. |
Personal Financial Services business flows
Business flows relating to the Personal Financial Services businesses are set out below. These flows are used by management to assess the sales performance of Abbey, both absolutely and relative to its peers, and to inform management of product trends in the Personal Financial Services market.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
|
Mortgages: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross mortgage lending | | £35.6bn | | £32.6bn | | £27.6bn |
Capital repayments | | £26.9bn | | £24.8bn | | £24.6bn |
Net mortgage lending | | £8.8bn | | £7.8bn | | £3.0bn |
Mortgage stock: | | £110.5bn | | £101.7bn | | £93.9bn |
– Abbey retail | | £105.0bn | | £96.7bn | | £89.9bn |
– Housing Association(1) | | £5.5bn | | £5.0bn | | £4.0bn |
Market share – gross mortgage lending(2) | | | 9.8 | % | | | 9.4 | % | | | 9.6 | % |
Market share – capital repayments(2) | | | 10.5 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 12.5 | % |
Market share – net mortgage lending(2) | | | 8.1 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 3.3 | % |
Market share – mortgage stock(2) | | | 9.3 | % | | | 9.4 | % | | | 9.7 | % |
Retail deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net deposit flows | | £3.2bn | | £1.1bn | | £2.8bn |
Deposit stock | | £65.2bn | | £62.0bn | | £60.9bn |
|
Investment and pensions annual premium income | | | £1,669m | | | £1,224m | | | £1,058m |
|
Protection annual premium income | | | £47m | | | £71m | | | £82m |
|
Banking: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank account openings (000’s) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Abbey retail | | | 400 | | | 425 | | | 359 |
– Other | | | 30 | | | 28 | | | 27 |
|
| | | 430 | | | 453 | | | 386 |
Bank account liability | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Abbey retail | | £5.5bn | | £5.3bn | | £4.8bn |
– Other | | £4.8bn | | £4.5bn | | £4.1bn |
|
| | £10.3bn | | £9.8bn | | £8.9bn |
|
13
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Servicescontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
|
Gross unsecured personal lending: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Abbey retail | | £0.9bn | | £1.5bn | | £1.3bn |
– Other, including cahoot | | £0.1bn | | £0.8bn | | £0.8bn |
|
| | £1.0bn | | £2.3bn | | £2.1bn |
Unsecured lending asset(3): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Abbey retail | | £2.5bn | | £2.7bn | | £2.3bn |
– Other, including cahoot | | £0.8bn | | £1.4bn | | £1.4bn |
|
| | £3.3bn | | £4.1bn | | £3.7bn |
|
Credit card sales (000’s) | | | 261 | | | 112 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Housing Association mortgages are classified within the Corporate Banking segment. This excludes contingent liabilities and commitments. See Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(2) | | Market shares are estimated internally, based on information from the Bank of England and The Council of Mortgage Lenders (“CML”). |
|
(3) | | Comprises unsecured personal loans, credit cards and overdrafts. |
2007 compared to 2006
Mortgages
Gross mortgage lending of £35.6bn, 9% higher, with an estimated market share of 9.8% benefiting from a range of initiatives. During the year, we launched a new affordability criteria to help first time buyers and launched the Premier Homebuyer Solution, which remains a market leading mortgage for movers offering them free legal and valuation fees.
Retail Deposits and Investments
Total net customer deposit flows of £3.2bn were significantly higher than 2006 due to a stronger product range which includes a number of savings accounts linked to investment products. Performance also benefited from a continued focus on branch-based savings and changes in incentive schemes. In addition, we have launched a range of new standalone savings accounts including “50+ Saver” and “Direct ISA”, plus our innovative linked Super account range, including the “Super Bond” launched in July 2007. The September 2007 campaign, led by our market leading “8.1% Super Bond” and “Super ISA” proved highly successful.
Investment sales were up 36% driven by a focus on retention and improved sales processes. Sales of structured growth products were up significantly as a result of the “Super Savings” propositions and tactical products which was recognised by the Moneyfacts award of ‘Best Structured Products’ provider.
Protection
Protection annual premium income sales were down in comparison to 2006, largely driven by the termination of the intermediary protection sales agreement with Resolution plc.
Banking
Abbey continued to attract adult and switcher customers with adult account openings increasing by 8% and we continue to be a net gainer of switcher accounts against other major UK retail banks. This performance was supported by the new Formula 1 campaign, which was launched at the end of June 2007 and the 8% Bank Account launch in November 2007 featuring Lewis Hamilton. In total, bank account openings of 430,000 were slightly lower than 2006.
Unsecured Personal Lending
Total gross UPL lending decreased by 57% reflecting reduced unsecured personal lending through the Internet sales channel. Abbey has been taking a cautious approach to lending with the objective to continue generating value whilst minimising risk. We continue to focus new lending mix towards existing customers and through the branch sales channel.
Credit Card Sales
During the second half of the year, Santander also launched a new credit card business leveraging Abbey’s branch distribution in the UK. Early performance has been positive, with card openings up 134% benefiting from an attractive headline rate, promotional activity and sales focus through the branch channel.
2006 compared to 2005
Mortgages
Gross mortgage lending of £32.6bn (2005: £27.6bn), around 18% higher, with an estimated market share of 9.4% (2005: 9.6%). During the year Abbey improved its service levels in mortgages and developed its product range in order to capture growth in the expanding and higher margin non-standard segments. Abbey increased sales of Flexible mortgages (up over 60%) and, in the latter part of the year, Abbey improved the first time buyer proposition and launched a new buy-to-let offering. Mortgage capital repayments of £24.8bn (2005: £24.6bn) were modestly ahead of 2005, while the estimated share of capital repayments fell to 10.5%, in part reflecting retention initiatives, compared to 12.5% in 2005. Net mortgage lending of £7.8bn (2005: £3.0bn) was up over 100% from 2005 whilst continuing to balance growth and market share with a focus on profitability.
14
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Servicescontinued
Retail Deposits and Investments
Total net customer deposit flows of £1.1bn (2005: £2.8bn) were lower than 2005 impacted by the re-pricing of low / negative margin accounts that was put in place in the second quarter of 2006. This again confirmed our focus on managing volume and profitability, and was in part offset by increased investment sales up 16%. Abbey maintained its competitive position with attractive instant access branch and internet accounts, with inflows of over £1.8bn in key acquisition accounts. In terms of investment sales, Abbey had an improved tax season and sales of Inscape were up 24%. Abbey also increased its sales capacity through the recruitment of additional investment advisors.
Protection
Protection annual premium income sales were down in comparison to 2005, in part reflecting the competitive market trends.
Banking
Bank account openings of 453,000 (2005: 386,000) were up 17%. This was an improvement on the uplift of 10% reported in the first half of 2006, with switcher openings up by 114%. Performance has benefited from the “High Interest” current account offer and the “grass is greener” campaign in the second half of 2006. In total, the volume of accounts increased by 6%, with bank account liability balances up by 10% on 2005.
Unsecured Personal Lending
Gross unsecured personal lending was 10% higher, with branch lending up by 66% from a low base. Performance was boosted by improved branch technology, and the latter part of the year saw a marked improvement in the new business margins to ensure a better profitability profile. As a result, Abbey branded balances grew by 18% and as we moved into 2007, our focus was increasingly on growing this business through our existing customers.
Personal Financial Services trading net interest income by segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Retail Banking | | | 1,615 | | | | 1,466 | | | | 1,332 | |
Corporate Banking | | | (34) | | | | (46) | | | | (25) | |
Wealth Management | | | 70 | | | | 62 | | | | 60 | |
Group Infrastructure | | | (152) | | | | (146) | | | | (50) | |
|
PFS trading net interest income | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,336 | | | | 1,317 | |
|
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Capital and other charges | | | – | | | | (108) | | | | (151) | |
|
PFS net interest income | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,166 | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
Retail Banking net interest income increased by £149m to £1,615m (2006: £1,466m), due largely to growth in savings and banking balances combined with improved margins resulting from strong margin management given base rate increases. Retail Banking net interest income also benefited from robust asset growth of 8% in challenging market conditions, albeit offset by lower asset spreads. Competitive pressures impacted the mortgage spread albeit with improved new business margins in the latter part of the year. Growth in Abbey Business also contributed materially – both in terms of deposits and commercial mortgages. In total, the Retail Banking spread was robust given market conditions, increasing 2bps from 146bps to148bps.
Corporate Banking net interest income charge improved by £12m to £(34)m (2006: £(46)m) reflecting a reduced cost of funding in asset financing operations and growth in the Real Estate Finance and other new corporate business portfolios.
Wealth Management net interest income increased by £8m to £70m (2006: £62m), reflecting higher liability balances in Cater Allen as a result of improved sales performance and higher cash balances under administration in James Hay. This was supported by improved margins in both Cater Allen and Abbey International.
Group Infrastructure net interest income charge decreased by £6m to £(152)m (2006: £(146)m) in part due to the increased spread between the base rate and LIBOR.
2006 compared to 2005
Retail Banking net interest income increased by £134m to £1,466m (2005: £1,332m), due largely to growth in customer loans and stable retail spreads. Retail lending balances were up 9% compared to 2005, driven by an increase in mortgage and unsecured lending balances. Growth in unsecured lending balances was driven through the Abbey brand. Throughout the second half of 2006, the business continued to balance growth and profitability, resulting in slower growth in retail deposits. Retail spreads were stable relative to 2005 with a widening of retail liability spreads being partially offset by competitive pressure impacting asset spreads in the latter part of 2006.
Corporate Banking net interest income decreased by £21m to £(46)m (2005: £(25)m). The decrease is due to the reduction in asset financing operations and other businesses which are in the process of being run down.
Wealth Management net interest income increased slightly to £62m (2005: £60m), reflecting higher liability balances in Cater Allen as a result of improved sales performance. This was supported by improved margins in both Cater Allen and Abbey International.
Group Infrastructure net interest income decreased by £96m to £(146)m (2005: £(50)m). Net interest income was adversely impacted by base rate changes on central funding, which were more than offset by benefits reported in Retail Banking and Wealth Management under the Group’s transfer pricing arrangements. The remaining movement related to the non-recurrence of gains on the unwind of external capital hedges in 2005.
15
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Servicescontinued
Personal Financial Services trading non-interest income by segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Retail Banking | | | 645 | | | | 648 | | | | 608 | |
Global Banking & Markets | | | 260 | | | | 240 | | | | 205 | |
Corporate Banking | | | 127 | | | | 125 | | | | 107 | |
Wealth Management | | | 34 | | | | 32 | | | | 26 | |
Group Infrastructure | | | 50 | | | | 71 | | | | 71 | |
|
PFS trading non-interest income | | | 1,116 | | | | 1,116 | | | | 1,017 | |
|
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Depreciation of operating lease assets | | | 129 | | | | 130 | | | | 123 | |
– Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | (72) | | | | (45) | | | | (18) | |
– Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | 110 | | | | 41 | | | | – | |
|
PFS non-interest income | | | 1,283 | | | | 1,242 | | | | 1,122 | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
Retail Banking trading non-interest income decreased slightly to £645m (2006: £648m) due largely to lower current account charges and redemption fees offset by benefits from the contribution of new credit card sales and growth in both investments and protection.
Global Banking & Markets non-interest income was ahead of prior year at £260m (2006: £240m) delivering robust growth in 2007, despite difficult trading conditions. The Rates business increased revenue substantially, as a result of successful trading strategies and the benefit of closer, effective integration with other parts of Abbey and Santander Global Banking & Markets worldwide. The Equity business, the largest business within Global Banking & Markets benefited from the closeout of customer trades offsetting the effects of difficult market conditions in the second half.
Corporate Banking non-interest income was broadly in line with 2006 at £127m (2006: £125m) as improved contributions from existing businesses more than offset the impact of those in run down.
Wealth Management non-interest income was slightly ahead of 2006 at £34m (2006: £32m), due largely to the sale of two properties by Abbey International and higher fees in James Hay.
Group Infrastructure non-interest income decreased by £21m to £50m (2006: £71m), largely due to lower earnings from short term funding.
2006 compared to 2005
Retail Banking trading non-interest income increased by £40m in 2006 to £648m (2005: £608m) due largely to increased volumes in mortgage, investments and bank accounts, as well as a fourth quarter benefit from an uplift in commissions from the new distribution agreement with Resolution.
Global Banking & Markets non-interest income increased by £35m to £240m (2005: £205m) due to stronger sales of retail structured products and increased trading activity in Property Derivatives.
Corporate Banking non-interest income increased by £18m to £125m (2005: £107m) due to reduced costs on asset financing operations.
Wealth Management non-interest income increased slightly to £32m (2005: £26m) due to higher sales in James Hay. The rebranding of the SIPP (self-invested personal pension schemes) and WRAP portfolio management products helped lift sales in James Hay.
Group Infrastructure non-interest income of £71m (2005: £71m) was in line with the previous year as increased earnings from short term funding offset mark to market losses.
Personal Financial Services total trading expenses by segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Retail Banking | | | 996 | | | | 1,005 | | | | 1,121 | |
Global Banking & Markets | | | 107 | | | | 93 | | | | 90 | |
Corporate Banking | | | 30 | | | | 41 | | | | 41 | |
Wealth Management | | | 61 | | | | 58 | | | | 63 | |
Group Infrastructure | | | 105 | | | | 152 | | | | 116 | |
|
PFS total trading expenses | | | 1,299 | | | | 1,349 | | | | 1,431 | |
|
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Reorganisation and other costs | | | 146 | | | | 144 | | | | 216 | |
– Depreciation of operating lease assets | | | 129 | | | | 130 | | | | 123 | |
–Capital and other charges | | | – | | | | 12 | | | | – | |
|
PFS expenses | | | 1,574 | | | | 1,635 | | | | 1,770 | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
During 2007 the cost reduction programme put in place at the time of acquisition of Abbey by Santander made further progress and trading expenses of £1,299m in 2007 were 4% lower than the previous year (2006: £1,349m).
Retail Banking trading expenses of £996m showed a modest decrease of £9m (2006: £1,005m) where further benefits of the cost reduction programme marginally outweighed the inflationary effect on costs, and costs associated with an increased number of customer facing roles.
16
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Servicescontinued
Global Banking & Markets trading expenses of £107m showed an increase compared to 2006 of £14m (2006: £93m), largely due to strategic growth of the business and higher performance related payments.
Corporate Banking trading expenses of £30m were £11m lower the previous year (2006: £41m), which was largely driven by the run down of the Motor Finance business.
Wealth Management trading expenses of £61m, were slightly higher than the previous year (2006: £58m) driven by higher employment costs in James Hay reflecting growth plans.
Group Infrastructure trading expenses of £105m were £47m lower than the previous year (2006: £152m) due to lower central costs following on-going cost reduction activity and the non-recurrence of trading expenses indirectly related to the life insurance businesses and other entities sold during 2006.
2006 compared to 2005
A cost reduction programme targeting cost savings of £300m by the end of 2007 was put in place at the time of the acquisition of Abbey by Santander. During 2006 this programme made further progress and trading expenses of £1,349m in 2006 were over 5% lower than the previous year (2005: £1,431m). The majority of the cost savings related to employment expenses. In total, over 2,000 roles were removed from the business during the year excluding the effects of the sale of the Life insurance businesses.
Global Banking & Markets trading expenses of £93m were slightly higher than previous year (2005: £90m). The movement was due largely to savings from the cost reduction programme being more than offset by increased investment in the sales and marketing teams and performance related payments.
Corporate Banking trading expenses of £41m were in line with the previous year (2005: £41m).
Wealth Management trading expenses of £58m were £5m lower than the previous year (2005: £63m). As with the other operating divisions, Wealth Management benefited from cost savings resulting from the cost reduction programme implemented at the time of the acquisition of Abbey by Santander.
Group Infrastructure trading expenses of £152m were £36m higher than the previous year (2005: £116m) due to additional central costs.
Personal Financial Services trading impairment losses on loans and advances by segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Retail Banking | | | 239 | | | | 273 | | | | 207 | |
Corporate Banking | | | (29) | | | | (27) | | | | 10 | |
Wealth Management | | | 2 | | | | – | | | | 1 | |
Group Infrastructure | | | – | | | | 5 | | | | – | |
|
PFS trading impairment losses on loans and advances | | | 212 | | | | 251 | | | | 218 | |
|
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Reorganisation and other costs | | | 132 | | | | 93 | | | | – | |
|
PFS impairment losses on loans and advances | | | 344 | | | | 344 | | | | 218 | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
Trading impairment losses on loans and advances reduced by £39m to £212m (2006: £251m), driven by a lower provisions charge in Retail Banking as a result of reduced exposure to unsecured lending, particularly internet-sourced lending. The provisions on mortgages saw a slight increase from historic lows, reflecting current economic conditions, although the credit quality of the mortgage portfolio remains strong.
Corporate Banking provision releases of £29m (2006: £27m) reflected the better than anticipated performance of the run-down portfolios, a trend also seen in 2006.
2006 compared to 2005
Trading impairment losses on loans and advances increased by £33m to £251m (2005: £218m), driven by a higher provisions charge in Retail Banking, partly offset by reductions of provisions in Corporate Banking. The growth was partly driven by strengthening of the coverage ratio and in part by the deterioration and maturing nature of the unsecured personal loan portfolio. Retail Banking provisions also increased in part due to mortgage related charges increasing modestly from a very low base relative to the overall book.
Corporate Banking recorded provision releases following the run down of asset financing and other businesses.
Personal Financial Services non-performing loans
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Total non-performing loans (“NPLs”) | | | 892 | | | | 826 | | | | 882 | |
|
Total loans and advances to customers (excluding trading assets) | | | 118,399 | | | | 109,035 | | | | 100,267 | |
Total provisions (on a statutory basis) | | | 551 | | | | 536 | | | | 394 | |
NPLs as a % of loans and advances | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.76% | | | | 0.88% | |
|
Provisions as a % of NPLs | | | 61.77% | | | | 64.89% | | | | 44.67% | |
|
In 2007, the value of non-performing loans increased to £892m (2006: £826m) and non-performing loans as a percentage of loans and advances decreased to 0.75% (2006: 0.76%). During the year the coverage of non-performing loans was lower at 61.77% (2006: 64.89%), as the mix of non-performing asset changes, with more weighting towards mortgages where the coverage will be lower due to the security held.
17
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Personal Financial Servicescontinued
In 2006, the value of non-performing loans decreased to £826m (2005: £882m) and non-performing loans as a percentage of loans and advances decreased to 0.76% (2005: 0.88%). During the year Abbey strengthened its coverage of non-performing loans to 64.89% (2005: 44.67%), which is a reflection of the change in macro-economic factors such as interest rates. The credit quality of the mortgage book remains strong.
Personal Financial Services trading provisions for other liabilities and charges by segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Retail Banking | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3) | |
Wealth Management | | | – | | | | 2 | | | | 14 | |
|
PFS trading provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | 2 | | | | 11 | |
|
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Reorganisation and other costs | | | – | | | | 61 | | | | – | |
|
PFS provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | 63 | | | | 11 | |
|
In 2007, there were no net provisions for other liabilities and charges. Misselling remediation provisions were £nil (2006: £61m) with remediation costs being charged directly to non-trading expenses in 2007.
In 2006, Wealth Management trading provisions for other liabilities and charges of £2m were down from £14m in 2005. 2006 consisted of a further charge of £2m related to closure of the Isle of Man offices, down from £14m during the previous year.
18
Business and Financial Review
Business Review – Sold Life Businesses and Portfolio Business Unit
Sold Life Businesses
In 2006, Abbey sold its entire life insurance business to Resolution for cash consideration of approximately £3.6bn. The principal life companies sold were Scottish Mutual Assurance plc, Scottish Provident Limited and Abbey National Life plc, as well as the two offshore life companies, Scottish Mutual International plc and Scottish Provident International Life Assurance Limited.
The life insurance business qualifies as discontinued operations. The results, and loss on sale, of the discontinued operations were as follows:
Sold Life Businesses summarised income statement
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Trading income | | | – | | | | 116 | | | | 231 | |
Operating expenses | | | – | | | | (73) | | | | (151) | |
Impairment losses on intangible assets | | | – | | | | (69) | | | | – | |
|
Trading profit before tax | | | – | | | | (26) | | | | 80 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Capital and other charges | | | – | | | | 120 | | | | 154 | |
|
Profit before tax | | | – | | | | 94 | | | | 234 | |
Taxation expense | | | – | | | | (75) | | | | (68) | |
|
Profit of discontinued operations | | | – | | | | 19 | | | | 166 | |
Loss on sale of discontinued operations before and after tax | | | – | | | | (264) | | | | – | |
|
Profit / (loss) for the year from discontinued operations | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | 166 | |
|
Trading income
There was no trading income in 2007 as the businesses were sold in 2006. In 2006, trading income of £116m was £115m lower than the previous year (2005: £231m), primarily reflecting the sale of the life insurance business in the third quarter of 2006, together with an increased level of lapses on with-profits bonds in 2006 prior to the sale.
Operating expenses
There were no operating expenses in 2007 as the businesses were sold in 2006. In 2006, operating expenses of £73m were £78m lower than the previous year (2005: £151m), primarily reflecting the sale of the business in the third quarter of 2006, and the successful continuation of Group wide cost reduction initiatives.
Impairment losses on intangible assets
There were no impairment losses on intangible assets in 2007 as the businesses were sold in 2006. In 2006, an impairment charge of £69m on intangible assets was recognised as a result of the classification of the life insurance businesses as held for sale prior to their eventual sale.
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
The loss on sale principally reflects the discount to embedded value that is normal in sales of life insurance businesses. The existence of a discount reflects a potential buyer’s use of higher discount rates than an existing owner to reflect a buyer’s inherent uncertainty over assumptions and the potential for adverse lapse experience after a change in ownership.
Portfolio Business Unit (‘PBU’)
The Portfolio Business Unit comprised a number of businesses, assets and portfolios that were inconsistent with Abbey’s strategy to focus on Personal Financial Services, and were sold during 2005. From the end of 2005, there were no businesses, assets or portfolios remaining within this segment.
PBU trading profit before tax
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Trading income | | | – | | | | – | | | | 70 | |
Operating expenses | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | – | | | | 8 | |
|
Trading profit before tax | | | – | | | | – | | | | 76 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Capital and other charges | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3) | |
|
Profit before tax | | | – | | | | – | | | | 73 | |
|
19
Business and Financial Review
Other Material Items
Adjustments between the statutory basis and the trading basis
Abbey’s Board reviews discrete financial information for each of its segments that includes measures of operating results and assets, which are measured on a “trading” basis. The trading basis differs from the statutory basis as a result of the application of various adjustments, as presented below, and described in the Business Review – Summary. Management considers that the trading basis provides the most appropriate way of reviewing the performance of the business.
The adjustments arise principally in the ongoing Personal Financial Services businesses. Where similar costs were incurred in the Portfolio Business Unit businesses or the Sold Life Businesses, management typically no longer adjusts their results for previous periods for these items, as those businesses have now been sold. However, due to the importance of these adjustments, the consolidated amounts are presented below, together with an analysis of the total amount into the businesses in which they were incurred unless the entire amount arose in the Personal Financial Services businesses.
The trading adjustments consist of:
Reorganisation and other costs
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost reduction programme | | | (109) | | | | (134) | | | | (158) | |
Asset write-downs | | | – | | | | (18) | | | | (5) | |
Credit provisions | | | (132) | | | | (93) | | | | – | |
Misselling remediation administration costs | | | (37) | | | | (61) | | | | (70) | |
|
| | | (278) | | | | (306) | | | | (233) | |
|
These costs comprise implementation costs in relation to the strategic change and cost reduction process, certain credit provisions taken centrally, as well as remediation administration costs in respect of product misselling. Of the total reorganisation and other costs of £278m (2006: £306m, 2005: £233m), £278m (2006: £298m, 2005: £216m) was adjusted in the Personal Financial Services businesses, and £nil (2006: £8m, 2005: £17m) in the Sold Life Businesses.
2007 compared to 2006
Total reorganisation and other costs of £278m decreased £28m compared to the previous period (2006: £306m).
Cost reduction programme related expenses of £109m decreased by £25m compared to the previous period (2006: £134m) reflecting the more advanced stage of the programme.
Non-trading credit provisions of £132m increased £39m compared to the previous period (2006: £93m). In accordance with IFRS, the charge for credit provisions adjusts the balance sheet provisions to the level that management deems adequate to absorb actual and inherent losses in Abbey’s loan portfolio from homogeneous portfolios of assets and individually identified loans, as described more fully in the Risk Management Report – Provisions on loans and advances to customers, and in the Accounting Policies in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The required charge is generally determined using statistical techniques developed on previous experience and on projections of current market conditions to the time the loss is expected to crystallise. For management reporting purposes, the total charge is then split between the charge that would be required based on conditions that persist at the balance sheet date, and the adjustment to that charge in order to reflect the change in conditions when the loss is expected to crystallise. The charge that would be required based on conditions that persist at the balance sheet date is used in the day to day running of the business, and is therefore included in provisions on the trading basis. The adjustment is excluded from the results on a trading basis and is classified as non-trading. The charge in 2006 largely related to loan portfolios that are no longer open to new business.
Misselling remediation administration costs reduced to £37m (2006: £61m) reflecting lower levels of complaints activity in relation to endowments due to the continuing effect of time barring, and in relation to unauthorised overdraft charges due to the stay in complaints relating to unauthorised overdraft charges pending a decision on legal proceedings in the High Court of England and Wales to resolve legal uncertainties concerning the level, fairness and lawfulness of unauthorised overdraft charges, as described in Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2006 compared to 2005
Total reorganisation and other costs of £306m increased £73m compared to the previous period (2005: £233m).
Cost reduction programme related expenses of £134m decreased by £24m compared to the previous period (2005: £158m) reflecting the advanced stage of the programme.
Asset write-downs of £18m increased £13m compared to the previous period (2005: £5m), reflecting higher write-downs resulting from the restructure of the business.
Credit provisions of £93m largely related to loan portfolios that are no longer open to new business. Misselling remediation costs of £61m decreased by £9m (2005: £70m) after a detailed review of potential remediation costs.
Hedging and certain other mark-to-market variances
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
| | | (72) | | | | (45) | | | | (18) | |
|
The Balance Sheet and Income Statement are subject to a certain amount of mark-to-market volatility including from the accounting for elements of derivatives deemed under IFRS rules to be ineffective as hedges.
20
Business and Financial Review
Other Material Itemscontinued
2007 compared to 2006
In 2007, the impact of this volatility of £(72)m (2006: £(45)m) was due to decreasing asset credit spreads, with hedging variances representing an insignificant amount.
2006 compared to 2005
In 2006, the impact of this volatility was £(45)m (2005: £(18)m), due largely to greater market movements, including interest rates, than in the previous period.
Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
| | | 110 | | | | 41 | | | | – | |
|
These profits are excluded from the results to allow management to understand the underlying performance of the business. In 2007, these consisted of the profit on the sale of 49% of James Hay, Cater Allen and Abbey Sharedealing, and small recoveries on certain other transactions. In 2006, the profit on the sale of the Asset Management businesses was similarly excluded.
Capital and other charges
Capital charges principally comprise internal nominal charges for capital invested in the Group’s businesses. Management implemented this charge to assess if capital is invested effectively. On a consolidated basis, the total of these internal reallocations is nil. The change in allocation in Group Infrastructure compared to 2006 and 2005 is due to the impact of the sale of the life insurance businesses in 2006.
Legal proceedings
Abbey and its subsidiaries are party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, the ultimate resolution of which is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position or the results of operations of Abbey. In addition, Abbey is party to legal proceedings concerning unauthorised overdraft charges. See Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Material contracts
Abbey and its subsidiaries are party to various contracts in the ordinary course of business. For the three years ended 31 December 2007 there have been no material contracts entered into outside the ordinary course of business, except for the contract described below.
Abbey announced on 7 June 2006 that it had entered into an agreement to sell its entire life insurance business to Resolution for cash consideration of approximately £3.6bn. The sale completed in the third quarter of 2006. The principal life companies sold were Scottish Mutual Assurance plc, Scottish Provident Limited and Abbey National Life plc, as well as the two offshore life companies, Scottish Mutual International plc and Scottish Provident International Life Assurance Limited. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Audit fees
See Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
21
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Review
Throughout this section, references to UK and non-UK refer to the location of the office where the transaction is recorded.
Securities
The following table sets out the book and market values of securities at 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005. For further information, see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Trading portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK government | | | – | | | | 48 | | | | 2,700 | |
US treasury and other US government agencies and corporations | | | – | | | | – | | | | 22 | |
Other public sector securities | | | 3,722 | | | | 2,415 | | | | 350 | |
Bank and building society certificates of deposit | | | 9,679 | | | | 10,839 | | | | 18,647 | |
Other issuers: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Floating rate notes | | | 2,805 | | | | 298 | | | | 463 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 2 | | | | 75 | | | | 350 | |
Other asset-backed securities | | | 2,368 | | | | 1,584 | | | | 4,626 | |
Other | | | 10,255 | | | | 14,551 | | | | 4,396 | |
Ordinary shares and similar securities | | | 1,494 | | | | 2,754 | | | | 1,539 | |
|
| | | 30,325 | | | | 32,564 | | | | 33,093 | |
|
Available for sale securities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other issuers: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | – | |
Ordinary shares and similar securities | | | 32 | | | | 15 | | | | 13 | |
|
| | | 40 | | | | 23 | | | | 13 | |
|
Fair value through profit and loss | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK government | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,794 | |
US treasury and other US government agencies and corporations | | | – | | | | – | | | | 100 | |
Other public sector securities | | | – | | | | – | | | | 417 | |
Bank and building society certificates of deposit | | | 15 | | | | 15 | | | | 841 | |
Other issuers: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 4,093 | | | | 3,006 | | | | – | |
Other asset-backed securities | | | 1,460 | | | | – | | | | 343 | |
Other | | | 514 | | | | 302 | | | | 8,387 | |
Ordinary shares and similar securities | | | – | | | | – | | | | 11,670 | |
|
| | | 6,082 | | | | 3,323 | | | | 24,552 | |
|
Total | | | 36,447 | | | | 35,910 | | | | 57,658 | |
|
The following table sets forth the book and market values of securities of individual counterparties where the aggregate amount of those securities exceeded 10% of Abbey’s shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2007 as set out in the Consolidated Balance Sheet on page 64.
| | | | |
| | £m | |
|
Barclays Bank plc | | | 2,538 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc | | | 2,179 | |
HBOS plc | | | 1,792 | |
Celtic Residential Irish Mortgages Securitisation No. 13 Ltd | | | 1,394 | |
Hippototta No.3 plc | | | 1,360 | |
Her Majesty’s Government | | | 1,187 | |
Hippototta No.2 plc | | | 1,100 | |
HSBC Holdings plc | | | 886 | |
Government of Germany | | | 754 | |
Bank of Ireland | | | 609 | |
Credit Agricole SA | | | 588 | |
Societe Generale SA | | | 502 | |
Nationwide Building Society | | | 493 | |
Kingdom of Spain | | | 464 | |
Republic of Austria | | | 464 | |
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA | | | 448 | |
Republic of Italy | | | 435 | |
ING Groep NV | | | 401 | |
Santander Hipotecario 1 A (SHIPO) | | | 359 | |
Fondo de Titulizacion Hipotecaria Banesto | | | 353 | |
Fortis Bank NV/SA | | | 337 | |
|
22
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
UK government securities
The holdings of UK government securities (gilts) are primarily at fixed rates. Abbey’s assets and liabilities are predominantly floating rate (as described under ‘Risk Management – market risk’ included elsewhere in this Annual Report and Accounts), which is used as the benchmark for risk management. Fixed-rate securities (including gilts) are generally hedged into floating-rate, on either an individual or an aggregate basis within the overall management of the appropriate book.
US treasury and other US government agencies and corporations
This category comprises US treasury securities, mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by the US Government National Mortgage Association, the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (collectively, ‘Agency Mortgage Backed Securities’).
Other public sector securities
This category comprises issues by governments other than the US and UK governments, issues by supranationals and issues by UK public sector bodies. These are a mixture of fixed-rate and floating-rate securities.
Bank and building society certificates of deposit
Bank and building society certificates of deposit are fixed-rate securities with relatively short maturities. These are managed within the overall position for the relevant book.
Floating rate notes
Floating rate notes have simple risk profiles and are either managed within the overall position for the relevant book, or are hedged into one of the main currencies.
Mortgage-backed securities
This category comprises US mortgage-backed securities (other than Agency mortgage-backed securities) and European mortgage-backed securities. The non-agency mortgage-backed securities have similar characteristics to the agency mortgage-backed securities discussed above and are managed along with the agency mortgage-backed securities for market risk purposes. European mortgage-backed securities have prepayment risks but few have cap features.
Other asset-backed securities
This category comprises a range of mostly floating-rate asset-backed securities including home equity loans, commercial mortgages, car dealer, lease and credit card debtors and student loans. Some of the credit card debtors incorporate cap features.
Other securities
This category comprised mainly synthetic floating-rate notes (which are fixed-rate bonds packaged into floating-rate by means of swaps tailored to provide a match to the characteristics of the underlying bond), along with a number of structured transactions which were hedged, as appropriate, either on an individual basis or as part of the overall management of the books. The synthetic floating-rate notes comprised bonds issued by banks, financial institutions and corporations, the latter being largely guaranteed by banks and financial institutions.
Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to banks includes loans to banks and building societies and balances with central banks (excluding those balances which can be withdrawn on demand). The geographical analysis of loans and advances presented in the following table are based on the location of the office from which the loans and advances are made. The balances below include loans and advances to banks that are classified in the balance sheet as trading assets.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
UK | | | 12,066 | | | | 11,943 | | | | 8,060 | | | | 11,081 | |
Non-UK | | | 222 | | | | 93 | | | | 1,036 | | | | 670 | |
|
| | | 12,288 | | | | 12,036 | | | | 9,096 | | | | 11,751 | |
|
The table below for 2003 contains information prepared under UK GAAP, Abbey’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to information prepared under IFRS.
| | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | £m | |
|
UK | | | 6,219 | |
Non-UK | | | 936 | |
|
| | | 7,155 | |
|
The following table sets forth loans and advances to banks by maturity at 31 December 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | In more than | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | In more than | | | one year but | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | In not more | | | three months | | | not more | | | In more | | | | |
| | On | | | than three | | | but not more | | | than five | | | than five | | | | |
| | demand | | | months | | | than one year | | | years | | | years | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
UK | | | 740 | | | | 8,982 | | | | 1,317 | | | | – | | | | 1,027 | | | | 12,066 | |
Non-UK | | | 62 | | | | 160 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 222 | |
|
| | | 802 | | | | 9,142 | | | | 1,317 | | | | – | | | | 1,027 | | | | 12,288 | |
|
23
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
The following table sets forth loans and advances to banks by interest rate sensitivity at 31 December 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fixed rate | | | Variable rate | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Interest-bearing loans and advances to banks(1): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 1,735 | | | | 9,201 | | | | 10,936 | |
Non-UK | | | 43 | | | | 179 | | | | 222 | |
|
| | | 1,778 | | | | 9,380 | | | | 11,158 | |
|
(1) | | Excludes non interest-bearing accounts |
Loans and advances to customers
Abbey provides lending facilities primarily to personal customers in the form of mortgages secured on residential properties and a limited number of lending facilities to corporate customers. Purchase and resale agreements represent sale and repurchase activity with professional non-bank customers by the Global Banking & Markets short-term markets business. The geographical analysis of loans and advances presented in the following table is based on the location of the office from which the loans and advances are made. The balances below include loans and advances to customers that are classified in the balance sheet as trading assets.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
UK |
Advances secured on residential properties | | | 110,857 | | | | 102,096 | | | | 94,330 | | | | 91,164 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | 3,711 | | | | 5,427 | | | | 4,789 | | | | 4,520 | |
Other secured advances | | | 2,960 | | | | 2,305 | | | | 1,882 | | | | 1,793 | |
Corporate advances | | | 1,302 | | | | 666 | | | | 334 | | | | 1,030 | |
Unsecured personal advances | | | 3,263 | | | | 4,104 | | | | 3,845 | | | | 3,517 | |
Finance lease debtors | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | 3 | | | | 1,108 | |
|
| | | 122,093 | | | | 114,599 | | | | 105,183 | | | | 103,132 | |
|
Non-UK |
Advances secured on residential properties | | | 13 | | | | 19 | | | | 26 | | | | 14 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | 13,544 | | | | 14,375 | | | | 13,152 | | | | 6,737 | |
Other secured advances | | | 2 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Unsecured personal advances | | | 2 | | | | 35 | | | | 31 | | | | – | |
|
| | | 13,561 | | | | 14,429 | | | | 13,209 | | | | 6,751 | |
|
Total | | | 135,654 | | | | 129,028 | | | | 118,392 | | | | 109,883 | |
|
The table below for 2003 contains information prepared under UK GAAP, Abbey’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to information prepared under IFRS.
| | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | £m | |
|
UK |
Advances secured on residential properties | | | 73,481 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | 2,958 | |
Other secured advances | | | 2,938 | |
Corporate advances | | | 3,762 | |
Unsecured personal advances | | | 3,228 | |
Finance lease debtors | | | 2,558 | |
|
| | | 88,925 | |
|
Non-UK |
Advances secured on residential properties | | | 1,745 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | 6,414 | |
Other secured advances | | | 33 | |
Unsecured personal advances | | | 145 | |
Finance lease debtors | | | 15 | |
|
| | | 8,352 | |
|
Total | | | 97,277 | |
|
No single concentration of loans and advances, with the exception of advances secured on residential properties and corporate advances in the UK, as disclosed above, accounts for more than 10% of total loans and advances and no individual country, other than the UK and US, accounts for more than 5% of total loans and advances.
The following tables set forth loans and advances to customers by maturity and interest rate sensitivity at 31 December 2007. In the maturity analysis, overdrafts are included in the “on-demand” category. Advances secured by residential properties are included in the maturity analysis at their stated maturity; however, such advances may be repaid early. Abbey’s mortgage loans currently have an average life of six years depending on, among other factors, housing market conditions.
24
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | In more than | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | In more than | | | one year but | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | In not more | | | three months | | | not more | | | In more | | | | |
| | On | | | than three | | | but not more | | | than five | | | than five | | | | |
| | demand | | | months | | | than one year | | | years | | | years | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
UK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties | | | 3 | | | | 2,920 | | | | 1,909 | | | | 11,517 | | | | 94,508 | | | | 110,857 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | 2,838 | | | | 873 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 3,711 | |
Other secured advances | | | 1 | | | | 11 | | | | 36 | | | | 77 | | | | 2,835 | | | | 2,960 | |
Corporate advances | | | 76 | | | | 1,037 | | | | 19 | | | | 37 | | | | 133 | | | | 1,302 | |
Unsecured personal advances | | | 249 | | | | 233 | | | | 276 | | | | 1,591 | | | | 914 | | | | 3,263 | |
|
Total UK | | | 3,167 | | | | 5,074 | | | | 2,240 | | | | 13,222 | | | | 98,390 | | | | 122,093 | |
|
Non-UK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | 12 | | | | 13 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | – | | | | 13,544 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 13,544 | |
Other secured advances | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
Unsecured personal advances | | | 2 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2 | |
|
Total non-UK | | | 2 | | | | 13,544 | | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | 14 | | | | 13,561 | |
|
Total | | | 3,169 | | | | 18,618 | | | | 2,240 | | | | 13,223 | | | | 98,404 | | | | 135,654 | |
|
The interest rate sensitivity table below analyses loans between fixed rate and variable rate as at 31 December 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fixed rate | | | Variable rate | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
UK | | | 58,907 | | | | 63,186 | | | | 122,093 | |
Non-UK | | | 2 | | | | 13,559 | | | | 13,561 | |
|
| | | 58,909 | | | | 76,745 | | | | 135,654 | |
|
Abbey’s policy is to hedge all fixed-rate loans and advances to customers using derivative instruments, or by matching with other on-balance sheet interest rate exposures.
Provisions on loans and advances to customers
Details of Abbey’s provisioning policy, as well as an analysis of end-of-year provisions on loans and advances to customers, movements in provisions for bad and doubtful debts, and Group non-performing loans and advances are set out in the Risk Management Report on page 39.
Potential problem loans and advances
In Retail Banking, due to the homogenous nature of the loans, the assessment of impairment is undertaken on a collective basis through the use of statistical techniques. The collective assessment takes due consideration of the time in arrears, with higher times in arrears indicating a higher probability of the loans to go to possession. Individual assessments are only undertaken when the collateral on a secured residential loan is repossessed or on commercial loans, where the loan is overdue.
These techniques are equally used to establish the amount of provisions for bad and doubtful debts. In addition, Abbey’s policy of initiating prompt contact with customers in arrears, together with the nature of the security held, which in the case of advances secured on residential property has substantially increased in value over the life of the loans means that a significant proportion of non-performing loans will not result in a loss.
The categories of non-performing loans and advances, which are statistically most likely to result in losses are cases from 6 months to 12 months in arrears and 12 months or more in arrears. Losses on cases for which the property securing the loan has been taken into possession are evaluated individually with the amounts expected to be lost on realisation of the security being established with a high degree of certainty. The following table sets forth the values for each of these categories included in the non-performing loans and advances table above for each of the last five years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
6 months to 12 months in arrears | | | 163 | | | | 155 | | | | 172 | | | | 105 | |
12 months or more in arrears | | | 30 | | | | 27 | | | | 26 | | | | 15 | |
Properties in possession | | | 64 | | | | 42 | | | | 44 | | | | 18 | |
|
The table below for 2003 contains information prepared under UK GAAP, Abbey’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to information prepared under IFRS.
| | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | £m | |
|
6 months to 12 months in arrears | | | 62 | |
12 months or more in arrears | | | 44 | |
Properties in possession | | | 7 | |
|
25
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Potential credit risk elements in loans and advances
Interest continues to be accrued on all loans and the element of interest that is not anticipated to be recovered is derecognised. Interest income recognised on impaired loans is set out in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The income adjustment in respect of interest that is not anticipated to be recovered was £16m (2006: £15m, 2005: £18m).
Country risk exposure
Abbey has no exposure to countries currently experiencing liquidity problems.
Cross border outstandings
The operations of Abbey involve operations in non-local currencies. These cross border outstandings are controlled through a well-developed system of country limits, which are reviewed to avoid concentrations of transfer, economic or political risks. Cross border outstandings, which exclude finance provided within the Group, are based on the country of domicile of the borrower or guarantor of ultimate risk and comprise loans and advances to customers and banks, finance lease debtors, interest-bearing investments and other monetary assets denominated in currencies other than the borrower’s local currency.
Cross border outstandings exceeding 1% of total assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commercial, | |
| | As % | | | | | | | Banks and other | | | Governments | | | industrial and | |
| | of total | | | | | | | financial | | | and official | | | other private | |
| | assets | | | Total | | | institutions | | | institutions | | | sector entities | |
| | % | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 31 December 2007: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | | 1.19 | | | | 2,369 | | | | 2,369 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
At 31 December 2006: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | | 1.25 | | | | 2,395 | | | | 2,395 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
At 31 December 2005: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | | 1.55 | | | | 3,200 | | | | 3,200 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Cross border outstandings between 0.75% and 1% of total assets
At 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, Abbey had no cross border outstandings between 0.75% and 1% of total assets.
Tangible fixed assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Capital expenditure incurred during the year | | | 407 | | | | 230 | | | | 329 | |
|
Capital expenditure during each of the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005 was principally incurred by Retail Banking (mostly consisting of computer infrastructure, computer software and furniture and fittings for branches) and by Corporate Banking (consisting of operating lease assets). Details of capital expenditure contracted but not provided for in respect of tangible fixed assets are set out in Notes 23 and 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Abbey had 897 unique property interests at 31 December 2007 consisting of three freehold leases and 894 operating lease interests, occupying a total floor space of 417,583 square metres. The number of unique property interests owned by Abbey is more than the number of individual properties as Abbey has more than one interest in some properties. The majority of Abbey’s property interests are retail branches. Included in the above total are 23 properties that were not occupied by Abbey as at 31 December 2007. Of Abbey’s individual properties, 762 are located in the UK and six in Europe. There are no material environmental issues associated with the use of the above properties.
Abbey has four principal sites consisting of Abbey’s headquarters and Treasury operations; the banking back office and Human Resources functions; Wealth Management and the telephone distribution operations; and Credit Cards, Debt Management, Finance, Compliance and Marketing. These properties are held under operating leases. The registered office of Abbey is located at Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regent’s Place, London NW1 3AN.
Management believes its existing properties and those under construction, in conjunction with the operating lease arrangements in place with Mapeley Columbus Limited, are adequate and suitable for its business as presently conducted and to meet future business needs. All properties are adequately maintained.
Deposits
The following tables set forth the average balances of deposits by location for each of the three years ended 31 December 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average: year ended 31 December | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Deposits by banks | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 34,120 | | | | 29,713 | | | | 26,084 | |
Non-UK | | | 2,454 | | | | 1,981 | | | | 677 | |
|
| | | 36,574 | | | | 31,694 | | | | 26,761 | |
|
Deposits by customers (all interest bearing) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 64,676 | | | | 62,452 | | | | 63,999 | |
Non-UK | | | 3,401 | | | | 4,226 | | | | 6,080 | |
|
| | | 68,077 | | | | 66,678 | | | | 70,079 | |
|
26
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Deposits by customers
The following tables set forth the average balances of deposits by customers by type.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average: year ended 31 December | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
UK | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail demand deposits | | | 56,563 | | | | 54,529 | | | | 52,083 | |
Retail time deposits | | | 6,033 | | | | 6,089 | | | | 9,076 | |
Wholesale deposits | | | 2,080 | | | | 1,834 | | | | 2,840 | |
|
| | | 64,676 | | | | 62,452 | | | | 63,999 | |
|
Non-UK | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail demand deposits | | | 1,811 | | | | 1,490 | | | | 1,092 | |
Retail time deposits | | | 1,532 | | | | 1,144 | | | | 4,875 | |
Wholesale deposits | | | 58 | | | | 1,592 | | | | 113 | |
|
| | | 3,401 | | | | 4,226 | | | | 6,080 | |
|
| | | 68,077 | | | | 66,678 | | | | 70,079 | |
|
Retail demand and time deposits are obtained either through the branch network, cahoot or remotely (such as postal accounts). Retail demand and time deposits are also obtained outside the UK, principally through Abbey International. They are all interest bearing and interest rates are varied from time to time in response to competitive conditions.
Demand deposits
Demand deposits consist of savings and banking products. Savings products comprise Individual Savings Accounts, instant saver savings accounts, remote access accounts, such as those serviced by post, and a number of other accounts which allow the customer a limited number of notice-free withdrawals per year depending on the balance remaining in the account. These accounts are treated as demand deposits because the entire account balance may be withdrawn on demand without penalty as one of the notice-free withdrawals. Banking products consist of current accounts.
Time deposits
The main constituents of time deposits are notice accounts, which require customers to give notice of an intention to make a withdrawal, and bond accounts, which have a minimum deposit requirement. In each of these accounts, early withdrawal incurs an interest penalty.
Wholesale deposits
Wholesale deposits are those which either are obtained through the money markets or for which interest rates are quoted on request rather than being publicly advertised. These deposits are of fixed maturity and bear interest rates that reflect the inter-bank money market rates.
Short-term borrowings
The following tables set forth certain information regarding short-term borrowings (composed of deposits by banks, commercial paper and negotiable certificates of deposit) for each of the three years ended 31 December 2007. While deposits by banks are reported in the “Deposits” section above, they are also shown under “Short-term borrowings” because of their importance as a source of funding to Abbey.
Deposits by banks(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Year-end balance(2) | | | 27,555 | | | | 36,755 | | | | 27,478 | |
Average balance(3) | | | 36,574 | | | | 31,694 | | | | 26,761 | |
Maximum balance | | | 48,278 | | | | 37,485 | | | | 35,872 | |
|
(1) | | Abbey policy is to mark-to-market the majority of its deposits by banks balances including interest. Mark to market movements are recorded in net trading income rather than net interest income. As a result, it has not been possible to calculate either an average interest rate during the year or a year-end interest rate. |
|
(2) | | The year-end deposits by banks balance includes non-interest bearing items in the course of transmission of £786m (2006: £363m, 2005: £248m). |
|
(3) | | Average balances are based upon daily data for Abbey National Treasury Services plc and its subsidiaries and monthly data for all other operations. |
The balances above also include deposits by banks that are classified in the balance sheet as trading liabilities. At 31 December 2007, deposits by foreign banks amounted to £7,922m (2006: £15,040m, 2005: £9,281m).
Commercial paper(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Year-end balance | | | 7,283 | | | | 6,705 | | | | 6,009 | |
Average balance(2) | | | 6,610 | | | | 6,344 | | | | 2,891 | |
Maximum balance | | | 8,784 | | | | 7,308 | | | | 6,009 | |
|
(1) | | Abbey policy is to mark-to-market the majority of its commercial paper balances including interest. Mark to market movements are recorded in net trading income rather than net interest income. As a result, it has not been possible to calculate either an average interest rate during the year or a year-end interest rate. |
|
(2) | | Average balances are based upon daily data for Abbey National Treasury Services plc and its subsidiaries and monthly data for all other operations. |
27
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Abbey issues commercial paper generally in denominations of not less than $50,000, with maturities of up to 365 days. Commercial paper is issued by Abbey National Treasury Services plc and Abbey National North America LLP.
Negotiable certificates of deposit(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Year-end balance | | | 11,326 | | | | 10,832 | | | | 5,282 | |
Average balance(2) | | | 13,037 | | | | 7,644 | | | | 5,727 | |
Maximum balance | | | 14,821 | | | | 10,832 | | | | 6,670 | |
|
(1) | | Abbey policy is to mark-to-market the majority of its deposits by banks balances including interest. Mark to market movements are recorded in net trading income rather than net interest income. As a result, it has not been possible to calculate either an average interest rate during the year or a year-end interest rate. |
|
(2) | | Average balances are based upon daily data for Abbey National Treasury Services plc and its subsidiaries and monthly data for all other operations. |
Certificates of deposit and certain time deposits
The following table sets forth the maturities of Abbey’s certificates of deposit and other large wholesale time deposits from non-bank counterparties in excess of £50,000 (or the non-sterling equivalent of £50,000) at 31 December 2007. A proportion of Abbey’s retail time deposits also exceeds £50,000 at any given date; however, the ease of access and other terms of these accounts means that they may not have been in excess of £50,000 throughout 2007. Furthermore, the customers may withdraw their funds on demand upon payment of an interest penalty. For these reasons, no maturity analysis is presented for such deposits. See “Short-term borrowings” above for information on amounts of claims under issues of commercial paper.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | In more than three | | | In more than six | | | | | | | |
| | Not more than | | | months but not more | | | months but not more | | | In more than | | | | |
| | three months | | | than six months | | | than one year | | | one year | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Certificates of deposit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 4,935 | | | | 708 | | | | 321 | | | | 48 | | | | 6,012 | |
Non-UK | | | 2,838 | | | | 256 | | | | 2,220 | | | | – | | | | 5,314 | |
Wholesale time deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 2,433 | | | | 247 | | | | 44 | | | | 792 | | | | 3,516 | |
Non-UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
| | | 10,206 | | | | 1,211 | | | | 2,585 | | | | 840 | | | | 14,842 | |
|
At 31 December 2007, an additional £1,819m (2006: £2,367m) of wholesale deposits were repayable on demand.
Capital management and resources
Capital management and capital allocation
Abbey adopts a centralised capital management approach, based on an assessment of both regulatory requirements and the economic capital impacts of our businesses. Details of Abbey’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital, including the group capital table, can be found in Note 47 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital ratios
The following capital ratios are calculated in accordance with the Financial Services Authority’s interpretation of the techniques specified by the Basel Committee in 1988. They demonstrate that Abbey’s capital ratio exceeds both the Basel Committee minimum risk asset ratio of 8% and the Financial Services Authority’s set minimum capital ratio for Abbey. Abbey recognises the additional security inherent in Tier 1 capital, and so also presents a Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets ratio (the ‘Tier 1 ratio’). An Equity Tier 1 ratio (i.e. Tier 1 excluding preference shares) is also presented.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Banking book | | | 62,769 | | | | 56,853 | |
Trading book | | | 5,793 | | | | 6,089 | |
|
Total risk-weighted assets | | | 68,562 | | | | 62,942 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Capital ratios: | | | | | | | | |
|
Risk asset ratio (%) | | | 11.4 | | | | 12.6 | |
Tier 1 ratio (%) | | | 7.3 | | | | 8.0 | |
Equity Tier 1 ratio (%) | | | 5.4 | | | | 5.6 | |
|
Capital ratios reflect the inclusion of audited profits for the years ended 31 December 2007 and 31 December 2006 respectively.
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs)
In 2007, risk-weighted assets increased by £5.6bn. This was principally the result of secured and unsecured loan growth, purchase of mortgage and other asset backed securities and guarantees given to third parties, offset by two mortgage asset securitisation transactions in the first half of the year.
Basel II
Details of the revised capital adequacy regime are set out in Note 47 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
28
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, Abbey issues guarantees on behalf of customers. The significant types of guarantees are:
| | |
> | | It is normal in the UK to issue cheque guarantee cards to current account customers holding chequebooks, as retailers do not generally accept cheques without such form of guarantee. The guarantee is not automatic but depends on the retailer having sight of the cheque guarantee card at the time the purchase is made. The bank is liable to honour these cheques even where the customer doesn’t have sufficient funds in his account. The bank’s guarantee liability is in theory the number of cheques written and deposited with retailers multiplied by the amount guaranteed per cheque, which can be between £50 and £100. In practice most customers will only write cheques when they have funds in their account to meet the cheque, and cheques are frequently presented without the benefit of the cheque guarantee. On this basis management have assessed the risk with respect to this guarantee as highly remote and consider the risk of loss as part of the provisioning requirement on bank accounts. |
> | | Standby letters of credit also represent the taking on of credit on behalf of customers when actual funding is not required, normally because a third party is not prepared to accept the credit risk of Abbey’s customer. These are also included in the normal credit provisioning assessment alongside other forms of credit exposure. |
> | | Abbey, as is normal in such activity, gives representations, indemnities and warranties on the sale of subsidiaries and businesses. The maximum potential amount of any claims made against these is usually significantly higher than actual settlements. Appropriate provision is made with respect to management’s best estimate of the likely outcome, either at the time of sale, or subsequently if additional information becomes available. |
Further information regarding off-balance sheet arrangements can be found in the Risk Management Report – Impact of the Current Credit Environment on page 46. See Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding Abbey’s guarantees, commitments and contingencies. In the ordinary course of business, Abbey also enters into securitisation transactions as described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Holmes securitisation vehicles are consolidated. The mortgage assets continue to be administered by Abbey. The Holmes securitisation vehicles provide Abbey with an important source of long-term funding and also a regulatory capital benefit.
Liquidity disclosures
Liquidity risk is the potential that, although remaining in operation, Abbey does not have sufficient liquid financial resources to enable it to meet its obligations as they fall due, or can secure them only at excessive cost.
The Board is responsible for the liquidity management and control framework at Abbey and has approved key liquidity limits in setting Abbey’s liquidity risk appetite. Along with its internal Liquidity Risk Manual, which sets out the liquidity risk control framework and policy, Abbey abides by the “Sound Practices for Managing Liquidity in Banking Organisations” set out by the Basel Committee as its standard for liquidity risk management and control. Abbey also complies with the Financial Services Authority’s liquidity requirements, and has appropriate liquidity controls in place.
Analysis of cash flow movements
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net cash (outflow) from operating activities | | | (10,813) | | | | (13,086) | | | | (7,255) | |
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities | | | (196) | | | | 12 | | | | 2,034 | |
Net cash inflow from financing activities | | | 4,776 | | | | 1,758 | | | | 1,426 | |
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (6,233) | | | | (11,316) | | | | (3,795) | |
|
2007 compared to 2006
Net cash movements increased by £5,083m to a net cash outflow of £6,233m in 2007 as compared with a net cash outflow of £11,316m in 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash equivalents of £6,958m, driven by a decrease in trading debt securities, trading loans and advances to customers and trading loans and advances to banks with a maturity of less than three months. The movements are due to Cater Allen International Limited trading activity, which can fluctuate depending on its short term trading strategy.
Net cash flows from investing activities declined compared to 2006 due to additional cash outflows on the purchase of tangible fixed assets in relation to the Partenon project and construction of operating lease assets.
Net cash flows from financing activities increased compared to 2006 due to new issuances of mortgage-backed securities under Abbey’s securitisation programme. The effect was partially offset by redemption of securities issued by the securitisation vehicles. For further information on Abbey’s securitisation programme, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2006 compared to 2005
Net cash movements decreased by £7,521m to a net cash outflow of £11,316m in 2006 as compared with a net cash outflow of £3,795m in 2005. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cash equivalents of £12,088m, driven by a decrease in trading debt securities with a maturity of less than three months and an increase in trading deposits at banks with a maturity of less than three months. The movements are due to Cater Allen International Limited trading activity, which can fluctuate depending on its short term trading strategy.
Net cash flows from investing activities declined compared to 2005 due to a reduction in cash inflows on the disposal of subsidiaries, principally because 2005 included the proceeds from the sale of the Group’s entire portfolio of investment property, which was sold following the decision to stop investing in direct holdings of investment property.
Net cash flows from financing activities declined compared to 2005 due to significant scheduled redemptions of loan capital in 2006 that were not replaced due to the receipt of cash as a result of the sale of the life insurance subsidiaries.
29
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Sources of liquidity
Abbey has both wholesale and retail sources of funding and attracts them through a variety of entities. The retail sources primarily originate from the Retail Banking savings business. Although primarily callable, these funds provide a stable and predictable core of liquidity due to the nature of the retail accounts and the breadth of personal customer relationships.
Abbey’s wholesale funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography. Through the wholesale markets, Abbey has active relationships with over 500 counterparts across a range of sectors, including banks, central banks, other financial institutions, corporates and investment funds. Other sources of funding include collateralised borrowings, mortgage securitisations and long-term debt issuance. While there is no certainty regarding money market lines of credit extended to Abbey, they are actively managed as part of the ongoing business. Currently, no guaranteed lines of credit have been purchased, as they are not common in European banking practice.
The ability to sell assets quickly is also an important source of liquidity for Abbey. Abbey holds marketable investment securities, such as central bank, eligible government and other debt securities, which could be disposed of, either by entering into sale and repurchase agreements, or by being sold to provide additional funding should the need arise. Abbey also makes use of asset securitisation arrangements to provide alternative funding sources.
Under Abbey’s Liquidity Risk Policy, in the calculation of liquidity ratios, Abbey only relies on 95% of retail deposits with an allowance for up to 5% of such deposits being withdrawn at any time. With respect to wholesale deposits, for a period up to and including a month, there is no reliance on external wholesale deposits being renewed. These approaches are more conservative than would be expected based on historical experience with respect to these types of deposits.
Short-term funding is accessed through money market instruments, including time deposits, certificates of deposit and commercial paper. Medium to long-term funding is accessed primarily through the stand-alone bond markets. In addition Abbey utilises its euro and, separately, Securities and Exchange Commission-registered medium-term note programmes. The major debt issuance programmes managed by Abbey National Treasury Services plc on its own behalf, except for the US commercial paper programme which is managed for Abbey National North America LLC, a guaranteed subsidiary of Abbey, are set forth below:
| | | | | | | | |
Programme | | Outstanding at 31 December 2007 | | | Markets issued in | |
|
$15bn medium-term notes | | $14.5bn | | Europe |
$4bn commercial paper | | $2.4bn | | Europe |
$20bn commercial paper | | $12.2bn | | United States |
Euro 2bn structured notes programme | | Euro 0.3bn | | Europe |
Euro 12bn covered bond programme | | Euro 3.5bn | | Europe |
Euro 12bn covered bond programme | | £0.6bn | | Europe |
|
For further information on sources of liquidity, including developments during the year, see Risk Management Report – Liquidity Risk on page 47 and Risk Management Report – Impact of the Current Credit Environment on page 46.
Uses of liquidity
The principal uses of liquidity for Abbey are the funding of Retail Banking lending and investment securities, payment of interest expense, dividends paid to shareholders, and the repayment of debt. Abbey’s ability to pay dividends depends on a number of factors, including Abbey’s regulatory capital requirements, distributable reserves and financial performance.
Contractual obligations
The amounts and maturities of contractual obligations in respect of guarantees are described in Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Other contractual obligations are:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments due by period | |
| | Total | | | Less than 1 year | | | 1-3 years | | | 3-5 years | | | Over 5 years | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 27,555 | | | | 27,555 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Deposits by customers | | | 90,148 | | | | 86,073 | | | | 1,631 | | | | 1,262 | | | | 1,182 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 55,784 | | | | 24,226 | | | | 4,338 | | | | 1,178 | | | | 26,042 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 1,419 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,419 | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 4,732 | | | | – | | | | 393 | | | | 378 | | | | 3,961 | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | 979 | | | | 26 | | | | 53 | | | | 52 | | | | 848 | |
Operating lease obligations | | | 1,138 | | | | 101 | | | | 197 | | | | 199 | | | | 641 | |
Purchase obligations | | | 62 | | | | 62 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Total | | | 181,817 | | | | 138,043 | | | | 6,612 | | | | 3,069 | | | | 34,093 | |
|
The repayment terms of the debt securities may be accelerated in line with the covenants contained within the individual loan agreements. Details of deposits by banks and deposits by customers can be found in Notes 27 and 28 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Based on previous experience, it is Abbey’s expectation that the undated subordinated liabilities will continue to be outstanding for the foreseeable future. Abbey has entered into significant outsourcing contracts where, in some circumstances, there is no minimum specified spending requirement. In these cases, anticipated spending volumes have been included within purchase obligations. Under current conditions, Abbey’s working capital is expected to be sufficient for its present requirements and to pursue its planned business strategies.
30
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Interest rate sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity refers to the relationship between interest rates and net interest income resulting from the periodic repricing of assets and liabilities. The largest single administered rate items in the Abbey balance sheet are residential mortgages and retail deposits, the majority of which bear interest at variable rates. Abbey is able to mitigate the impact of interest rate movements on net interest income in Retail Banking by repricing separately the variable rate mortgages and variable rate retail deposits, subject to competitive pressures. Abbey also offers fixed-rate mortgages and savings products on which the interest rate paid by or to the customer is fixed for an agreed period of time at the start of the contract. Abbey manages the margin on fixed-rate products by the use of derivatives matching the fixed-rate profiles. The risk of prepayment is reduced by imposing early termination charges if the customers terminate their contracts early.
Abbey seeks to manage the risks associated with movements in interest rates as part of its management of the overall non-trading position. This is done within limits as described in the “Risk Management” section elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Changes in net interest income – volume and rate analysis
The following table allocates changes in interest income, interest expense and net interest income between changes in volume and changes in rate for the Group, including the Sold Life Businesses, for the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005. Volume and rate variances have been calculated on the movement in the average balances and the change in the interest rates on average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities. The variance caused by changes in both volume and rate has been allocated to rate changes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007/2006 | | | 2006/2005 | |
| | | | | Changes due to | | | | | | Changes due to | |
| | Total | | | Increase / (decrease): | | | Total | | | Increase / (decrease): | |
| | change | | | Volume | | | Rate | | | change | | | Volume | | | Rate | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Interest income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 69 | | | | 85 | | | | (16) | | | | (13) | | | | (59) | | | | 46 | |
Non-UK | | | (1) | | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (1) | | | | (1) | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | |
UK | | | 1,280 | | | | 390 | | | | 890 | | | | 255 | | | | 183 | | | | 72 | |
Non-UK | | | (2) | | | | (1) | | | | (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total interest income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 1,349 | | | | 475 | | | | 874 | | | | 242 | | | | 124 | | | | 118 | |
Non-UK | | | (3) | | | | (2) | | | | (1) | | | | (2) | | | | (1) | | | | (1) | |
|
| | | 1,346 | | | | 473 | | | | 873 | | | | 240 | | | | 123 | | | | 117 | |
|
Interest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 105 | | | | 157 | | | | (52) | | | | 52 | | | | 34 | | | | 18 | |
Deposits by customers – retail demand deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 429 | | | | 72 | | | | 357 | | | | 140 | | | | 85 | | | | 55 | |
Non-UK | | | 58 | | | | 8 | | | | 50 | | | | 14 | | | | 9 | | | | 5 | |
Deposits by customers – retail time deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (2) | | | | (3) | | | | 1 | | | | (14) | | | | (117) | | | | 103 | |
Non-UK | | | (2) | | | | 22 | | | | (24) | | | | (146) | | | | (161) | | | | 15 | |
Deposits by customers – wholesale deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (7) | | | | 10 | | | | (17) | | | | (47) | | | | (44) | | | | (3) | |
Non-UK | | | (63) | | | | (64) | | | | 1 | | | | 66 | | | | – | | | | 66 | |
Bonds and medium-term notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 668 | | | | 285 | | | | 383 | | | | (160) | | | | (107) | | | | (53) | |
Non-UK | | | 15 | | | | (13) | | | | 28 | | | | 262 | | | | – | | | | 262 | |
Dated and undated loan capital and other subordinated liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (60) | | | | (21) | | | | (39) | | | | (16) | | | | (87) | | | | 71 | |
Non-UK | | | (1) | | | | (8) | | | | 7 | | | | 11 | | | | 3 | | | | 8 | |
Other interest-bearing liabilities UK | | | (3) | | | | (10) | | | | 7 | | | | (5) | | | | (5) | | | | – | |
|
Total interest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 1,130 | | | | 490 | | | | 640 | | | | (50) | | | | (241) | | | | 191 | |
Non-UK | | | 7 | | | | (55) | | | | 62 | | | | 207 | | | | (149) | | | | 356 | |
|
| | | 1,137 | | | | 435 | | | | 702 | | | | 157 | | | | (390) | | | | 547 | |
|
Net interest income | | | 209 | | | | 38 | | | | 171 | | | | 83 | | | | 513 | | | | (430) | |
|
31
Business and Financial Review
Balance Sheet Business Reviewcontinued
Average balance sheet(1, 2)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Average | | | | | | | Average | | | Average | | | | | | | Average | | | Average | | | | | | | Average | |
| | balance | | | Interest | | | rate | | | balance | | | Interest | | | rate | | | balance | | | Interest | | | rate | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | % | | | £m | | | £m | | | % | | | £m | | | £m | | | % | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 3,731 | | | | 226 | | | | 6.06 | | | | 2,416 | | | | 157 | | | | 6.50 | | | | 3,694 | | | | 170 | | | | 4.60 | |
Non-UK | | | 30 | | | | 1 | | | | 3.99 | | | | 53 | | | | 2 | | | | 3.77 | | | | 76 | | | | 4 | | | | 5.25 | |
Loans and advances to customers(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 107,709 | | | | 6,815 | | | | 6.33 | | | | 100,627 | | | | 5,536 | | | | 5.50 | | | | 97,251 | | | | 5,281 | | | | 5.43 | |
Non-UK | | | 22 | | | | 1 | | | | 4.55 | | | | 51 | | | | 2 | | | | 3.92 | | | | 49 | | | | 2 | | | | 4.06 | |
Debt securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | 8 | | | | – | | | | 7.60 | | | | 1 | | | | – | | | | 0.00 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Total average interest-earning assets, interest income – banking | | | 111,500 | | | | 7,043 | | | | 6.32 | | | | 103,148 | | | | 5,697 | | | | 5.52 | | | | 101,070 | | | | 5,457 | | | | 5.40 | |
|
Provision for loan losses | | | (458) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (431) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (410) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Trading business | | | 68,612 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 60,780 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 53,154 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss | | | 9,152 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 18,336 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 27,612 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Non-interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 15,162 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 17,815 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 19,146 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Total average assets | | | 203,968 | | | | | | | | | | | | 199,648 | | | | | | | | | | | | 200,572 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Non-UK assets as a % of total | | | 0.03% | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.05% | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.06% | | | | | | | | | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (5,169) | | | | (199) | | | | 3.85 | | | | (1,938) | | | | (94) | | | | 4.85 | | | | (1,070) | | | | (42) | | | | 3.93 | |
Deposits by customers: retail demand(4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (56,563) | | | | (2,359) | | | | 4.17 | | | | (54,529) | | | | (1,930) | | | | 3.54 | | | | (52,083) | | | | (1,790) | | | | 3.49 | |
Non-UK | | | (1,811) | | | | (97) | | | | 5.36 | | | | (1,490) | | | | (39) | | | | 2.62 | | | | (1,092) | | | | (25) | | | | 2.29 | |
Deposits by customers: retail time(4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (6,033) | | | | (339) | | | | 5.62 | | | | (6,089) | | | | (341) | | | | 5.60 | | | | (9,076) | | | | (355) | | | | 3.91 | |
Non-UK | | | (1,532) | | | | (62) | | | | 4.05 | | | | (1,144) | | | | (64) | | | | 5.59 | | | | (4,875) | | | | (210) | | | | 4.31 | |
Deposits by customers: wholesale(4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (2,080) | | | | (71) | | | | 3.41 | | | | (1,834) | | | | (78) | | | | 4.25 | | | | (2,840) | | | | (125) | | | | 4.40 | |
Non-UK | | | (58) | | | | (3) | | | | 5.17 | | | | (1,592) | | | | (66) | | | | 4.15 | | | | (113) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Bonds and medium-term notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (27,776) | | | | (1,675) | | | | 6.03 | | | | (21,649) | | | | (1,007) | | | | 4.65 | | | | (23,847) | | | | (1,167) | | | | 4.89 | |
Non-UK | | | (5,293) | | | | (277) | | | | 5.23 | | | | (5,579) | | | | (262) | | | | 4.70 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Dated and undated loan capital and other subordinated liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK | | | (5,778) | | | | (388) | | | | 6.72 | | | | (6,067) | | | | (448) | | | | 7.38 | | | | (7,509) | | | | (464) | | | | 6.18 | |
Non-UK | | | (511) | | | | (45) | | | | 8.81 | | | | (613) | | | | (46) | | | | 7.50 | | | | (563) | | | | (35) | | | | 6.21 | |
Other interest-bearing liabilities UK | | | (825) | | | | (29) | | | | 3.52 | | | | (1,179) | | | | (32) | | | | 2.70 | | | | (1,359) | | | | (37) | | | | 2.70 | |
|
Total average interest-bearing liabilities, interest expense – banking | | | (113,429) | | | | (5,544) | | | | 4.89 | | | | (103,703) | | | | (4,407) | | | | 4.25 | | | | (104,427) | | | | (4,250) | | | | 4.09 | |
|
Trading business | | | (64,342) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (56,062) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (43,775) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss | | | (7,847) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (8,500) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (8,153) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Non-interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | (15,248) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (28,292) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (42,070) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Shareholders’ funds | | | (3,102) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3,091) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2,147) | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Total average liabilities and shareholders’ funds | | | (203,968) | | | | | | | | | | | | (199,648) | | | | | | | | | | | | (200,572) | | | | | | | | | |
|
Non-UK liabilities as a % of total | | | 4.51% | | | | | | | | | | | | 5.22% | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.31% | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets | | | – | | | | – | | | | 6.32 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 5.52 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 5.40 | |
Interest expense as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4.89 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4.25 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4.09 | |
Interest spread | | | | | | | | | | | 1.43 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1.27 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1.31 | |
Net interest margin | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1.34 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1.25 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1.19 | |
|
(1) | | Abbey National Treasury Services plc prepares averages using average daily balances. The rest of Abbey uses month end averages. These are representative of Abbey’s operations. |
|
(2) | | The ratio of average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended 31 December 2007 was 98.30% (2006: 99.46%, 2005: 96.78%). |
|
(3) | | Loans and advances to customers includes non-performing loans. See “Analysis of end-of-year provisions on loans and advances to customers” in the Risk Management section elsewhere in this Annual Report. |
|
(4) | | Demand deposits, time deposits and wholesale deposits are defined under “Deposits” above. |
32
Business and Financial Review
Risk Management
The Risk Management report contains audited financial information except principally for the discussion of Operational Risk on page 35 that, in accordance with the guidance in paragraph BC65 of IFRS 7, is unaudited.
Introduction
The management of risk is an integral part of all Abbey’s activities. Risk is defined as the uncertainty around Abbey’s ability to achieve its business objectives and execute its strategy effectively. Risk constitutes Abbey’s exposure to uncertainty and the consequent variability of return. Specifically, risk equates to the adverse impacts on profitability arising from different sources of uncertainty including Credit Risk (Retail), Credit Risk (Wholesale), Market Risk, Operational Risk, Securitisation Risk, Interest Rate Risk in the Banking book, Concentration Risk, Liquidity Risk, Reputational Risk, Strategic Risk, Pension Risk, Pro-cyclicality Risk and Regulatory Risk. Risk measurement is used to capture the source of the uncertainty and the magnitude of its potential effect on the profitability and solvency of Abbey. Effective risk management and control is therefore of fundamental importance to Abbey’s long-term success.
Understanding and controlling risk is a business imperative. Abbey’s Risk Framework ensures that risk is managed and controlled on behalf of shareholders, customers, depositors, employees and the firm’s regulators. Effective and efficient risk governance and oversight provide management with assurance that Abbey’s business activities will not be adversely impacted by risks that could have been reasonably foreseen. This in turn reduces the uncertainty of achieving Abbey’s strategic objectives.
Authority for Risk Management flows from the Abbey National plc Board of Directors to the Chief Executive and from him to specific individuals. Formal standing committees are maintained for effective management or oversight. Their authority is derived from the person they are intended to assist.
The Risk Division at Santander reports to the President of the Comision Delegada de Riesgos (‘Delegated Risk Committee’ or ‘CDR’).
Risk Governance Framework
The diagram above shows the Risk Governance Framework in operation in respect of risk management and oversight. The main elements of risk governance are as follows:
First tier of risk governance- risk management is provided by the Abbey Board. It approves Abbey’s risk appetite in consultation with Santander as appropriate, approves the strategy for managing risk and is responsible for Abbey’s system of internal control. The Abbey Board is supported by the Chief Executive and Executive Management, who have primary responsibility for understanding and identifying the risks generated by their lines of business and establishing a framework for managing those risks within the approved risk appetite of Abbey. In addition this is the responsibility of the Divisional Heads and central functions.
33
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
These functions provide technical support and advice to assist in the management and control of risk. Within this tier, there is a process for transaction review and approval within certain thresholds, discharged by the Credit Approval Committee. Transactions reviewed which exceed the threshold limits set are subject to prior review by Santander Risk before final approval by the Credit Approval Committee.
Risk Committee
This is a management committee, established under the authority of and chaired by the Chief Executive. The Risk Committee reviews risk issues, gives advice and recommendations to the Chief Executive, the Executive Committee (‘ExCo’) or other parties as appropriate as well as makes decisions on risk issues within its sphere of responsibility.
Second tier of risk governance– risk control is provided by the Abbey Board independently supported by the Risk Division.The role of the Chief Risk Officer (Retail & Corporate Banking), the Chief Risk Officer (Wholesale) (together the ‘Chief Risk Officers’) and Risk Division include development of risk measurement methodologies, risk approval, risk monitoring, risk reporting and escalation of risk issues in line with the relevant risk policy for all risks across all lines of Retail Banking, Global Banking & Markets, Corporate Banking and Wealth Management business.
Dedicated Business Risk Oversight Fora (ROF’s) advise and support the Chief Risk Officers in fulfilling their risk control responsibilities and help to ensure that risks are suitably understood, managed and controlled.
The Risk Division provides independent challenge to all business areas in respect of risk management and compliance with policies and advises the business when they are approaching the limits of Abbey’s risk appetite.
The Abbey Board, as supported by the Risk Division, is responsible for ensuring compliance with Group policies and limits imposed by Santander including:
| | |
> | | Group-wide risk policies; |
> | | Group-wide risk limits/parameters; |
> | | Approval processes relating to transactions that exceed local risk limits; |
> | | The systematic review of exposures to large clients, sectors, geographical areas and different risk types; and |
> | | Reporting to Santander |
Third tier of risk governance– risk assurance provides independent objective assurance on the effectiveness of the management and control of risk across all of Abbey. This is provided through the Non-Executive Directors, Internal Audit function and the Audit and Risk Committee.
Non-Executive Directors
The Non-Executive Directors are members of the Abbey Board who have a particular responsibility for constructively challenging and contributing to the development of strategy, scrutinising the performance of management in meeting agreed goals and objectives and monitoring reporting performance, and assuring themselves that the financial controls and systems of risk management are robust and defensible.
Internal Audit
The Internal Audit function supports the Audit and Risk Committee by providing independent and objective opinions on the effectiveness and integrity of the Group’s risk governance arrangements. It does this via a systematic programme of risk-based audits of the controls established and operated by the “first tier” risk management functions and those exercised by the “second tier” risk control functions.
The audit opinions and underlying rationale of findings and recommendations form the basis upon which the Audit and Risk Committee can take reasonable (but not absolute) assurance that the risk governance arrangements are fit for purpose and working properly. The Audit and Risk Committee also receive reports from management, the risk control functions and the external auditors to help them to discharge their risk governance oversight responsibilities.
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee is made up of Non-Executive Directors, and is a committee of the Abbey Board. The Committee has responsibility for:
| | |
> | | The oversight of the risk governance framework; |
> | | Review of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal and external audit process; |
> | | Review of control policies and procedures including regulatory compliance and financial reporting; |
> | | The identification, assessment and reporting of risks; and |
> | | The risk governance structure and associated compliance with risk control policies and procedures. |
Financial Instruments
By its nature the Group’s activities are principally related to the use of financial instruments including derivatives. The Group aims to lend monies predominately to retail borrowers at higher interest rates than fixed and floating rates paid for various periods on deposits from customers.
34
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The Group uses financial instruments to manage the structural balance sheet exposures that arise from its banking activities, in accordance with Risk policies and the Asset and Liability Management Committee’s direction. The Group also trades in financial instruments where it takes positions in traded and over the counter instruments, including derivatives, to take advantage of short-term market movements in the equity and bond markets and in currency and interest rates.
Basel II
In 2004, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued a revised capital adequacy framework for assessing the capital required to cover all of a financial institution’s business risks, which were incorporated into European Community Law via the Capital Requirements Directive in 2005. Abbey adopted this revised capital adequacy framework on a gradual basis from 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2008. Further information can be found in the Supervision and Regulation section on page 59 and in Note 47 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Risk Management
Operational Risk (unaudited)
Operational risk is the risk of loss to Abbey, resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. Such risks can materialise as frauds, process failures, system downtime or damage to assets due to fire, floods etc. When such risks materialise they have not only immediate financial consequences for the Group but also an effect on its business objectives, customer service, regulatory responsibilities and reputation. Operational risk exposures arise across the Group’s business divisions and operating segments, and are managed on a consistent basis.
Managing operational risk (unaudited)
Abbey undertakes extensive activity to minimise the impacts operational risks may have on business areas. In the UK, an independent central operational risk function has responsibility for establishing the framework within which these risks are managed and is aligned to operational risk experts within business areas to ensure consistent approaches are applied across Abbey. The primary purpose of the framework, which is approved by the Risk Committee, is to define and articulate the Abbey-wide policy, processes, roles and responsibilities. The framework incorporates industry practice and regulatory requirements, particularly those emanating from the Basel Committee, European Union Directives and the Financial Services Authority.
The day-to-day management of operational risk is the responsibility of business managers who identify, assess and monitor the risks, in line with the processes described in the framework. The operational risk function ensures that all key risks are regularly reported to Risk Fora, the Risk Committee and Board.
Key operational risk activity in 2007 risk (unaudited)
During 2007, the Group has continued to respond to the developing operational risk environment with coordinated responses.
Following many high profile customer data security lapses experienced by other organisations in the UK, Abbey has taken proactive steps to minimise similar risks. A corporate information security programme has been established which involves the strengthening of controls for the management of sensitive data and includes the implementation of encryption standards across the Group.
In line with the Financial Services Authority’s guidance and industry practice, the Group has crisis management and disaster recovery arrangements to ensure that critical business processes are maintained in the event of an unforeseen interruption. Insurance policies are also purchased to provide cover for a range of potential operational risk losses. In response to the increased threats of terrorism, flooding, and pandemic disasters, contingency strategies continue to be refined and key progress has included the development of dispersed contingency sites and automated system switch over facilities.
The Group continues to strengthen its point of sale compliance and control procedures to minimise risk and ensure favourable customer experiences. To this end, work is progressing with one of the largest IT implementations seen in the UK with the introduction of new automated systems which are already successfully operating in Santander.
The increased use of data analytics and modelling for fraud prevention continues to have an impact in reducing our exposure to third party fraud activity.
The other financial risks affecting the Group are addressed in the sections below. Risks are generally managed within the business division – or operating segment – in which they are originated, through tailored management policies. These risk exposures, measurement information and management policies are presented below by operating segment, being Retail Banking, Group Infrastructure, Corporate Banking, Global Banking & Markets, and Wealth Management. Abbey-wide risks, which do not originate in any single operating segment, apart from operational risk, which is discussed above, are described separately at the end of this Risk Management section. The risk exposure and management information relating to the holding company, Abbey National plc, principally arise in the Retail Banking division. The other operating segments principally operate in subsidiaries. In total the operating segments present the risk exposure and management policies of the Group.
Significant concentrations of credit risk
During 2007, Abbey’s most significant exposures to credit risk derive from the residential mortgage portfolio and unsecured personal lending businesses in Retail Banking, Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking. The residential mortgage portfolio comprises loans to private individuals secured against residential properties in the UK. This is a prime portfolio with total exposure of £105bn at 31December 2007.
35
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The Unsecured Personal Loan portfolio comprises unsecured loans to private individuals issued in the UK. Total exposure stood at £2.7bn at 31 December 2007. Although Global Banking & Markets’ operations are based mainly in the UK, it has built up exposures to various entities around the world and is therefore exposed to concentrations of risk related to geographic area. At 31 December 2007, 40% of Global Banking & Markets’ credit exposures were to counterparties from the United States, and 27% were to counterparties from the UK. 2% of Global Banking & Markets’ exposures were to countries that are not members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (‘OECD’). The remaining exposures were mainly to European counterparties. Geographical exposures are governed by country limits set according to the classification of the country (whether it is a developed OECD country or not), the rating of the country, its Gross Domestic Product and Abbey’s capital base.
Maximum exposure to credit risk
The following table presents the amount that best represents the Group’s estimated maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date without taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Trading assets | | | 32,378 | | | | 35,751 | |
Purchase and resale agreements | | | 24,049 | | | | 26,563 | |
Derivatives | | | 9,951 | | | | 8,336 | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 11,783 | | | | 8,713 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 112,147 | | | | 103,146 | |
Other | | | 6,762 | | | | 6,856 | |
|
Third party exposures(1) | | | 197,070 | | | | 189,365 | |
|
(1) | | In addition the Group is exposed to credit risk in respect of guarantees granted, loan commitments and stock borrowing and lending agreements. The estimated maximum exposure to credit risk is described in Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 111. |
In managing the gross exposures, the Group uses the policies and processes described in the credit risk sections below. Collateral is also held in the form of security over the mortgaged property.
Market risk
Market risk is the potential for loss of income or decrease in the value of net assets caused by movements in the levels and prices of financial instruments including interest rate and foreign currency risks.
Abbey accepts that market risk arises from its full range of activities. Abbey actively manages and controls market risk by limiting the adverse impact of market movements whilst seeking to enhance earnings within clearly defined parameters. The Market Risk Manual, which is reviewed and approved by the Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale on an annual basis, sets the framework under which market risks are managed and controlled. Business area policies, risk limits and mandates are established within the context of the Market Risk Manual. Executive directors are responsible for ensuring that they have sufficient expertise to manage the risks originated and retained with their business divisions. The business areas are responsible for ensuring that they have sufficient expertise to manage the risks associated with their operations. The independent Risk function, under the direction of the Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale ensures that risk-taking and risk control occur within the framework prescribed by the Manual. The Risk function also provides oversight of all risk- taking activities through a rigorous process of regular reviews.
Abbey ensures that exposure to market risks is measured and reported on an accurate and timely basis to senior management. In addition to the regular reporting for the purposes of active risk management, the Board also receives reporting of all significant market risk exposures on a monthly basis where actual exposure levels are measured against limits. Senior management recognise that different risk measures are required to best reflect the risks faced in different types of business activities. In measuring exposure to market risk, Abbey uses a range of complementary measures, covering both value and income as appropriate.
Risk Management in Retail Banking and Group Infrastructure
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that counterparties will not meet their financial obligations which may result in Abbey losing the principal amount lent, the interest accrued and any unrealised gains (less any security held). Credit risk occurs mainly in Abbey’s loan and investment assets, and in derivative contracts.
Managing credit risk
This includes residential mortgages and secured lending, personal and business banking.
Residential Mortgages and secured lending
Abbey lends on many types of property but only after a credit risk assessment of the borrower and an assessment of the property is undertaken. The systems used to manage and monitor the quality of the mortgage assets are reviewed regularly to ensure they perform as expected. Residential lending is subject to lending policy and lending authority levels, which are used to structure lending decisions to the same high standard across the retail network, a process further improved by mortgage credit scoring, underwriter accreditation and regular compliance reviews. Details concerning the prospective borrower and the mortgage are subject to a criteria-based decision-making process. Criteria for assessment include credit references, loan-to-value ratio, borrower status and the mortgage credit score. A responsible approach to lending is taken to ensure borrowers do not borrow more than they can afford.
36
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The majority of loans provided by Abbey are secured on UK properties. All properties must be permanent in construction; mobile homes are not generally acceptable. Abbey can provide a mortgage for the purchase of properties outside the UK where the property is a second home and the loan is secured on the main property located in the UK.
Prior to granting any first mortgage loan on a property, Abbey has the property valued by an approved and qualified surveyor, who may be an Abbey employee. The valuation is based on set Abbey guidelines. Normally, in the case of additional lending, when the total loan remains below 90% loan-to-value, the original property value is subject to indexation and no further survey is carried out. If the loan exceeds 90% loan-to-value, a revaluation is carried out by a qualified surveyor. In low risk re-mortgage cases where a reputable automated valuation is available and offers high confidence of an accurate valuation, this may substitute for a surveyor’s valuation.
Progressively stricter lending criteria are applied to mortgages above a loan-to-value of 75%. Only 3% of new secured loan advances in 2007 were made with a loan-to-value of more than 90%. Loans with higher loan-to-value ratios carry a higher risk due to the increased likelihood that liquidation of the collateral will not yield sufficient funds to cover the loan advanced and costs of liquidation. These loans generally attract higher margins as a result.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage credit quality | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
|
Loan-to-value analysis: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New business | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> 90% | | | 3% | | | | 4% | | | | 4% | |
75% – 90% | | | 45% | | | | 33% | | | | 29% | |
< 75% | | | 52% | | | | 63% | | | | 67% | |
Average (at inception) | | | 64% | | | | 61% | | | | 60% | |
Average loan-to-value of stock (indexed) | | | 46% | | | | 44% | | | | 45% | |
New business profile: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First-time buyers | | | 13% | | | | 11% | | | | 14% | |
Home movers | | | 37% | | | | 38% | | | | 37% | |
Remortgagers | | | 50% | | | | 51% | | | | 49% | |
Average earnings multiple | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 2.9 | |
|
There has been no significant deterioration of credit quality over the year, with most credit quality indicators remaining similar to or better than those reported in 2006. In particular:
| | |
> | | The average loan-to-value of new business has increased slightly during 2007 to 64%. |
> | | The average loan-to-value of existing business remained broadly level in 2007 at 46%. |
> | | The proportion of new business written with a high loan-to-value (greater than 90%) has remained low. |
Mortgage indemnity guarantee insurance and high loan-to-value fee
Mortgage indemnity guarantee (‘MIG’) insurance is an agreement between a lender and an insurance company to underwrite the amount of every mortgage advance that exceeds a certain loan-to-value ratio. Until and including 31 December 2001, Abbey required MIG policies for all mortgages that exceeded a loan-to-value ratio of 75%. Cover on all such policies was commuted effective from 14 October 2005. Risk arising from the commutation of these policies is borne by Abbey. In the Consolidated Financial Statements, fees charged to the customer to compensate for the additional risk of mortgage advances are deferred and taken to “Net Interest Income” in the Income Statement using the effective interest rate method. Abbey continues to charge customers high loan-to-value fees, which are credited to the Income Statement over the anticipated life of the loans.
Mortgage arrears and repossessions
Collections & Recoveries Department is responsible for all debt management initiatives on the secured portfolio for Retail Banking. Debt management strategies, which include negotiating repayment arrangements and concessions and debt counselling, can start as early as the day after a repayment is past due and will continue until legal action. Different collection strategies are applied to different segments of the portfolio subject to the perceived levels of risk for example, loan-to-value, collections score and account characteristics.
If the agreed repayment arrangement is not maintained, legal proceedings may be taken and may result in the property being taken into possession. Abbey sells the repossessed property at market price and uses the sale proceeds, net of costs, to pay off the outstanding value of the mortgage. The stock of repossessed properties held by Abbey varies according to the number of new possessions and the buoyancy of the housing market.
The following tables set forth information on UK residential mortgage arrears, and properties in possession, at 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005 for Abbey compared to the industry average as provided by the Council of Mortgage Lenders (‘CML’), as well as and the carrying amount of assets obtained as collateral.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Abbey(1)(2) | |
Mortgage arrears | | (Percentage of total mortgage loans by number) | |
|
31 to 60 days in arrears | | | | | | | | |
31 December 2005 | | | | | | | 1.33 | |
31 December 2006 | | | | | | | 1.19 | |
31 December 2007 | | | | | | | 1.48 | |
|
61 to 90 days in arrears | | | | | | | | |
31 December 2005 | | | | | | | 0.51 | |
31 December 2006 | | | | | | | 0.50 | |
31 December 2007 | | | | | | | 0.59 | |
|
37
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | CML(2) | |
| | Abbey | | | (unaudited) | |
| | (Percentage of total mortgage loans by number) | |
|
3 to 5 months in arrears | | | | | | | | |
31 December 2005 | | | 0.45 | | | | 0.61 | |
31 December 2006 | | | 0.42 | | | | 0.57 | |
31 December 2007 | | | 0.49 | | | | 0.62 | |
|
6 to 11 months in arrears | | | | | | | | |
31 December 2005 | | | 0.20 | | | | 0.34 | |
31 December 2006 | | | 0.17 | | | | 0.31 | |
31 December 2007 | | | 0.17 | | | | 0.35 | |
|
12 months or more in arrears | | | | | | | | |
31 December 2005 | | | 0.03 | | | | 0.13 | |
31 December 2006 | | | 0.03 | | | | 0.14 | |
31 December 2007 | | | 0.03 | | | | 0.13 | |
|
(1) | | Abbey data is not readily available for arrears less than 31 days |
|
(2) | | Council of Mortgage Lenders data is not available for arrears less than 3 months |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | CML | |
| | Abbey | | | (unaudited) | |
Properties in possession | | (Percentage of total mortgage loans by number) | |
|
31 December 2005 | | | 0.04 | | | | 0.05 | |
31 December 2006 | | | 0.04 | | | | 0.08 | |
31 December 2007 | | | 0.05 | | | | 0.10 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Carrying amount of assets obtained as collateral | | £m | | | | |
| | | | |
31 December 2005 | | | 44 | | | | | |
31 December 2006 | | | 43 | | | | | |
31 December 2007 | | | 64 | | | | | |
| | | | |
Abbey’s non-performing loans as a proportion of total loans increased from 0.64% in 2006 to 0.66% at 31 December 2007.
Restructured loans
Loans have been restructured or renegotiated by capitalising the arrears where customers in arrears have maintained an agreed monthly repayment for a period of five months. The value of capitalised arrears on loans that would have been impaired if the terms had not been renegotiated at 31 December 2007 were £12m.
Banking and Consumer Credit.Abbey uses many systems and processes to manage the risks involved in providing unsecured personal loans and overdraft lending or in granting bank account facilities. These include the use of application and behavioural scoring systems to assist in the granting of credit facilities as well as regular monitoring of scorecard performance and the quality of the unsecured lending portfolios.
Behavioural scoring examines the lending relationships that a customer has with Abbey and how the customer uses their bank account. This information generates a score that is used to assist in deciding the level of risk (in terms of overdraft facility amount, card facilities granted and preferred unsecured personal loan value) for each customer that Abbey is willing to accept. Individual customer scores are normally updated on a monthly basis. Abbey has successfully extended the use of behavioural scoring into other areas of the business, including the refinement of debt management strategies and bank account transaction processing.
cahoot.The processes used to manage credit risks are similar to those in the rest of Retail Banking. cahoot’s unsecured loan products ceased opening new loan accounts in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Personal Financial Services banking and unsecured personal loan arrears
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Total banking and unsecured personal loan arrears(1,2) | | | 134 | | | | 167 | | | | 126 | |
Total banking and unsecured personal loan asset | | | 3,119 | | | | 3,936 | | | | 3,749 | |
Banking and unsecured personal loan arrears as a % of asset | | | 4.30% | | | | 4.25% | | | | 3.40% | |
|
(1) | | Banking arrears are defined as customers whose borrowings exceed their overdraft by over £100. |
|
(2) | | Unsecured personal loan and credit card arrears are defined as the balances of accounts that are three or more months in arrears (> 4 instalments). |
Abbey Business
Business Banking provides a limited range of products to assist with the finance requirements of small businesses including overdrafts. Risk management policies are specific to and reflect the risks inherent in each product set. Approval processes for credit risk include the use of judgement, assisted by the use of probability of default and loss given default data, and the use of credit scoring. Business Banking operates within policies and authority levels approved by the Chief Risk Officer, Retail. Business Banking has a dedicated risk team, reflecting the desire for risk control to be close to the business needs and risks. Commercial Property Finance provides mortgages to borrowers on a range of mainly non-residential property. Agreed credit assessment criteria include serviceability ratios, loan-to-value ratios, and quality of tenants, with stress testing against interest rate movements. Concentration limits per borrower and business sector are also employed to ensure a balanced loan portfolio. The management of defaulting accounts and the repossession and sale of properties is handled by a dedicated function within the risk operation.
38
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The strategic plan to extend the customer proposition into the SME market is being supported by a dedicated workstream to build the robust and effective risk framework required to manage all risks within this market and throughout the risk cycle. The development of the risk framework is overseen by the Chief Risk Officer.
Provisions on loans and advances to customers
The charge for provisions on loans and advances to customers adjusts the balance sheet provisions to the level that management deems adequate to absorb actual and inherent losses in Abbey’s loan portfolio from homogeneous portfolios of assets and individually identified loans. A proportion of Abbey’s provisions on loans and advances to customers relate to loans and advances secured either by a first charge on residential property in the UK, or by other appropriate security depending on the nature of the loan. Abbey’s provisioning policy is as follows. Further information is set out in the Accounting Policies in the Consolidated Financial Statements:
| | |
> | | Observed provision– an observed provision is established for all past due loans after a specified period of repayment default where it is likely that some of the capital will not be repaid or recovered through enforcement of any applicable security. The length of the default period depends on the nature of the advance and is generally no more than three months. Once a loan misses a payment (breach of contractual terms) an assessment of the likelihood of collecting the principal and overdue payments is made. This assessment is generally made using statistical techniques developed on previous experience and on projections of current market conditions to the time the loss is expected to crystallise. These techniques estimate the propensity of loans to go to write off and as a separate exercise, the loss incurred on written off debt is monitored. For advances secured on residential property the propensity of loans to reach repossession is determined, with repossessed properties assessed on an individual basis through the use of external valuation, anticipated disposal costs and the current exposure. |
> | | Incurred but not yet observed provision– an incurred but not yet observed provision is made against loans, which have not missed a payment but are known from past experience to have deteriorated since the initial decision to lend was made. Based on historical evidence, the number of accounts likely to default in the future as a result of events present at the balance sheet date are identified through use of statistical techniques. From 1 January 2005, these statistical techniques were expanded and enhanced. In particular, further detailed examination is now performed on the losses that emerge over a defined period of time after the reporting date called the emergence period. This period is determined to ensure that only those accounts which have credit deterioration at the reporting date are captured and excludes accounts which will suffer credit deterioration after the reporting period. The emergence period is three months for unsecured lending and twelve months for secured lending. The provision methodology outlined for observed provisions is then applied to accounts identified as impaired in the performing portfolios. |
> | | Amounts written off– Unsecured loans are written off when all internal avenues of collecting the debt have failed and the debt is passed onto external collection agencies. On secured loans, the write off takes place on ultimate realisation of collateral value, or from claiming on any mortgage indemnity guarantee or other insurance. All write offs are on a case by case basis, taking account of the exposure at the date of write off, after accounting for the value from any collateral or insurance held against the loan. The write-off policy is regularly reviewed. |
Security is realised in accordance with Abbey’s internal debt management programme. Contact is made with customers at an early stage of arrears with counselling made available to achieve a realistic and sustainable repayment arrangement. Litigation and/or enforcement of security is usually carried out only when the steps described above have been undertaken without success. As a result of the write-off policy, the provisions will be made a significant time in advance of the related write-off on all products. The exception to this rule is the discovery of fraud, where the exposure is written off once full investigations have been completed and the probability of recovery is minimal. The time span between the discovery and write off will be a short period and may not result in a provision being raised.
Analysis of provisions on loans and advances to customers
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Observed provision | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 73 | | | | 45 | | | | 21 | | | | 9 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | 34 | | | | 75 | | | | 126 | | | | 148 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 249 | | | | 242 | | | | 158 | | | | 133 | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 67 | |
|
Total observed provisions | | | 356 | | | | 362 | | | | 305 | | | | 357 | |
|
Incurred but not yet observed provision | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 102 | | | | 60 | | | | 35 | | | | 58 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | 8 | | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | 3 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 85 | | | | 111 | | | | 54 | | | | 35 | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 14 | |
|
Total incurred but not yet observed provisions | | | 195 | | | | 174 | | | | 89 | | | | 110 | |
|
Total provisions | | | 551 | | | | 536 | | | | 394 | | | | 467 | |
|
39
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The table below for 2003 contains information prepared under UK GAAP, Abbey’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to information prepared under IFRS.
(The following table is unaudited).
| | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | £m | |
|
Specific | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 8 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | 36 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 171 | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | 161 | |
Advances secured on residential properties – non-UK | | | 17 | |
Other secured advances – non-UK | | | 26 | |
Unsecured personal advances – non-UK | | | 4 | |
|
Total specific provisions | | | 423 | |
|
General | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 165 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | 58 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 32 | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | 173 | |
Advances secured on residential properties – non-UK | | | 12 | |
Other secured advances – non-UK | | | 2 | |
|
Total general provisions | | | 442 | |
|
Total provisions | | | 865 | |
|
Movements in provisions for impairment losses on loans and advances
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Provisions at 31 December | | | 536 | | | | 394 | | | | 467 | | | | – | |
IFRS reclassifications | | | – | | | | – | | | | (40) | | | | – | |
Provisions at 1 January | | | 536 | | | | 394 | | | | 427 | | | | 865 | |
Disposal of subsidiary undertakings | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (70) | |
|
| | | 536 | | | | 394 | | | | 427 | | | | 795 | |
Amounts written off | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | (9) | | | | (11) | | | | (5) | | | | (2) | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | (25) | | | | (27) | | | | (36) | | | | (39) | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | (339) | | | | (205) | | | | (247) | | | | (136) | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (144) | |
|
| | | (373) | | | | (243) | | | | (288) | | | | (321) | |
Advances secured on residential properties – non-UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2) | |
Other secured advances – non-UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2) | |
|
Total amounts written off | | | (373) | | | | (243) | | | | (288) | | | | (325) | |
|
|
Observed provisions charged against profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 38 | | | | 35 | | | | 12 | | | | 3 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | (17) | | | | (25) | | | | 11 | | | | 155 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 346 | | | | 289 | | | | 221 | | | | 98 | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 71 | |
|
| | | 367 | | | | 299 | | | | 244 | | | | 327 | |
|
Advances secured on residential properties – non-UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | (1) | |
Unsecured personal advances – non-UK | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1 | |
|
Total observed provisions charged against profit | | | 367 | | | | 299 | | | | 241 | | | | 327 | |
|
Incurred but not yet observed provisions charged against profit | | | 21 | | | | 86 | | | | 14 | | | | (330) | |
|
Total provisions charged against profit (including discontinued operations) | | | 388 | | | | 385 | | | | 255 | | | | (3) | |
|
Provisions at the end of the year | | | 551 | | | | 536 | | | | 394 | | | | 467 | |
|
IFRS reclassifications related primarily to provisions on certain corporate loans in the Portfolio Business Unit segment.
Recoveries
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 16 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | 6 | | | | 7 | | | | 7 | | | | 8 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 36 | | | | 32 | | | | 27 | | | | 28 | |
|
Total amount recovered | | | 44 | | | | 41 | | | | 37 | | | | 52 | |
|
40
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The table below for 2003 contains information prepared under UK GAAP, Abbey’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to information prepared under IFRS.
(The following table is unaudited).
| | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | £m | |
|
Provisions at the beginning of the year | | | 746 | |
Disposal of subsidiary undertakings | | | (94) | |
|
| | | 652 | |
Amounts written off | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | (16) | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | (45) | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | (148) | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | (80) | |
|
| | | (289) | |
Advances secured on residential properties – non-UK | | | (10) | |
Other secured advances – non-UK | | | (10) | |
|
Total amounts written off | | | (309) | |
|
Recoveries | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 4 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 38 | |
|
Total amount recovered | | | 42 | |
|
Specific provisions charged against profit | | | | |
Advances secured on residential properties – UK | | | 5 | |
Other secured advances – UK | | | 52 | |
Unsecured personal advances – UK | | | 205 | |
Corporate advances – UK | | | 36 | |
|
| | | 298 | |
Advances secured on residential properties – non-UK | | | 4 | |
|
Total specific provisions charged against profit | | | 302 | |
|
General provisions charged against profit | | | 172 | |
|
Total provisions charged against profit | | | 474 | |
|
Exchange and other adjustments | | | 6 | |
|
Provisions at the end of the year | | | 865 | |
|
Group non-performing loans and advances(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Group non-performing loans and advances that are impaired | | | 296 | | | | 375 | | | | 314 | | | | 297 | |
Group non-performing loans and advances that are not impaired | | | 596 | | | | 451 | | | | 568 | | | | 844 | |
|
Total non-performing loans and advances(2) | | | 892 | | | | 826 | | | | 882 | | | | 1,141 | |
|
| | | % | | | | % | | | | % | | | | % | |
|
Non-performing loans and advances as a percentage of loans and advances to customers(3) | | | 0.66 | | | | 0.64 | | | | 0.74 | | | | 1.04 | |
Provision as a percentage of total non-performing loans and advances | | | 61.77 | | | | 64.89 | | | | 44.67 | | | | 40.93 | |
|
(1) | | Loans and advances are classified as non-performing typically when the counterparty fails to make payments when contractually due for three months or longer |
|
(2) | | All non-performing loans are UK |
|
(3) | | Loans and advances to customers includes trading assets and excludes finance leases |
In 2007, non-performing loans and advances as a percentage of loans and advances to customers (including trading assets and excluding finance leases) increased from 0.64% to 0.66%. This is a reflection of the mortgage performance normalising from the historic lows. This has also resulted in the NPL distribution changing, with more weight on mortgages that have a lower provision as a percentage of the asset, driving down the ratio from 64.89% to 61.77%.
In 2006, non-performing loans and advances as a percentage of loans and advances to customers (including trading assets and excluding finance leases) decreased from 0.74% to 0.64%. This reflected the continuing strength of the credit quality of Abbey’s loans, particularly on the secured mortgages. Provisions as a percentage of total non-performing loans and advances increased from 44.67% to 64.89% in 2006, which reflected the change in macro-economic factors such as interest rate rises.
In 2005, non-performing loans and advances as a percentage of loans and advances to customers (including trading assets and excluding finance leases) decreased from 1.04% to 0.74%. This was due to the sale of the majority of the wholesale lending book and to the run down of the Motor Finance and Litigation businesses. Provisions as a percentage of total non-performing loans and advances have increased from 40.93% to 44.67% in 2005. This movement is attributable to the sale of the majority of the wholesale lending book.
41
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
The table below for 2003 contains information prepared under UK GAAP, Abbey’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to information prepared under IFRS.
(The following table is unaudited).
| | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | £m | |
|
Accruing loans and advances on which a proportion of interest has been suspended and/or specific provision has been made: | | | | |
UK | | | 1,531 | |
Non-UK | | | 101 | |
|
| | | 1,632 | |
|
Accruing loans and advances 90 days overdue on which no interest has been suspended and on which no specific provision has been made: | | | | |
UK | | | 1,110 | |
Non-UK | | | 4 | |
|
| | | 1,114 | |
|
Non-accruing loans and advances: | | | | |
Non-UK | | | 30 | |
|
| | | 30 | |
|
Total non-performing loans and advances: | | | | |
UK | | | 2,641 | |
Non-UK | | | 135 | |
|
| | | 2,776 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | % | |
|
Non-performing loans and advances as a percentage of loans and advances to customers excluding finance leases | | | 3.25 | |
Provision as a percentage of total non-performing loans and advances | | | 31.15 | |
|
Interest income recognised on impaired loans amounted to £36m (2006: £32m, 2005: £31m).
Market risks in Retail Banking and Group Infrastructure
Most market risks arising from the Retail Banking, Corporate Banking, and Wealth Management divisions are transferred from the originating business to the Asset & Liability Management (‘ALM’) function within Group Infrastructure, where they can be managed in conjunction with exposures arising from the funding, liquidity or capital management activities of ALM. In Retail Banking and Group Infrastructure, market risks mainly arise through the provision of banking products and services to personal and corporate/business customers, as well as structural exposures arising in Abbey’s balance sheet. These risks impact Abbey’s current earnings and economic value.
The most significant market risks in Retail Banking and Group Infrastructure are interest rate and credit spread risks. Yield curve risk arises from the timing mismatch in the repricing of fixed and variable rate assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, as well as the investment of non-interest-bearing liabilities in interest-bearing assets. Credit spread risk arises principally on Group Infrastructure’s holdings of mortgage-backed securities. Basis risk arises, to the extent that the volume of administered variable rate assets and liabilities are not precisely matched, which exposes the balance sheet to changes in the relationship between administered rates and market rates.
Abbey is also exposed to risks arising from features in retail products that give customers the right to alter the expected cashflows of a financial contract. This creates prepayment risk, for example where customers may prepay loans before their contractual maturity. In addition, Abbey is exposed to product launch risk, for example where the customers may not take up the expected volume of new fixed rate mortgages or other loans.
Managing market risks in Retail Banking
The Asset and Liability Management Committee is responsible for managing Abbey’s overall balance sheet position. Natural offsets are used as far as possible to mitigate yield curve exposures but the overall balance sheet position is generally managed using derivatives that are usually transacted through Global Banking & Markets. The Treasurer is responsible for managing risks in accordance with the Asset and Liability Management Committee’s direction.
Risks are managed within limits approved either by the Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale or Santander’s Board Risk Committee, and within the risk control framework defined by the Market Risk Manual. The key risk limits relate to yield curve risk. They are:
| | |
> | | Net Interest Margin sensitivity: the sensitivity of annual net interest margin to an instantaneous and unexpected adverse 100 basis point parallel shock to the yield curve. |
> | | Market Value of Equity sensitivity: the sensitivity of the net present value of interest rate sensitive positions from an instantaneous and unexpected adverse 100 basis point parallel shock to the yield curve. |
These two measures provide complementary views of potential losses from interest rate movements. Market Value of Equity sensitivity provides a long-term view covering the present value of all future cashflows, whereas Net Interest Margin sensitivity considers only the impact on net interest margin over the next 12 months. Calculation of these two measures requires modelling of expected customer and other behaviours. These models are regularly reviewed and updated.
The following table shows the results of these measures as at 31 December 2007 and 2006:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest margin sensitivity (100 basis points adverse parallel shock) | | | (7) | | | | (4) | |
Market value of equity sensitivity (100 basis points adverse parallel shock) | | | (197) | | | | (139) | |
|
42
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
Derivatives
Derivative financial instruments (‘derivatives’) are contracts or agreements whose value is derived from one or more underlying indices or asset values inherent in the contract or agreement, which require no or little initial net investment and are settled at a future date. They include interest rate, cross-currency and equity related swaps, forward rate agreements, caps, floors, options and swaptions (see table below). Within Retail Banking (including Group Infrastructure), derivatives are used for economic hedging purposes.
All derivatives are classified as held at fair value through profit or loss. For accounting purposes, Abbey chooses to designate certain derivatives as in a hedging relationship if they meet specific criteria. The main hedging derivatives are interest rate and cross-currency swaps, which are used to hedge fixed-rate lending and structured savings products and medium-term note issuances, capital issuances and other capital markets funding. Derivative products that are combinations of more basic derivatives (such as swaps with embedded option features), or that have leverage features, may be used in circumstances where the underlying position being hedged contains the same risk features. In such cases the derivative used will be structured to match the risks of the underlying asset or liability. Exposure to market risk on such contracts is therefore economically hedged.
The following table summarises the activities undertaken within the Retail Banking segment, the related risks associated with such activities and the types of hedging derivatives used in managing such risks. Such risks may also be managed using on-balance sheet instruments as part of an integrated approach to risk management. Further information is contained in Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| | | | |
Activity | | Risk | | Type of hedge |
|
Management of the return on variable rate assets financed by shareholders’ funds and net non – interest-bearing liabilities. | | Reduced profitability due to falls in interest rates. | | Receive fixed interest rate swaps. |
|
Management of the basis between administered rate assets and liabilities and wholesale market rates. | | Reduced profitability due to adverse changes in the basis spread. | | Basis swaps. |
|
Management of repricing profile of wholesale funding. | | Reduced profitability due to adverse movement in wholesale interest rates when large volumes of wholesale funding are repriced. | | Forward Rate Agreements. |
|
Fixed rate lending and investments. | | Sensitivity to increases in interest rates. | | Pay fixed interest rate swaps. |
|
Fixed rate retail and wholesale funding. | | Sensitivity to falls in interest rates. | | Receive fixed interest rate swaps. |
|
Equity-linked retail funding. | | Sensitivity to increases in equity market indices. | | Receive equity swaps. |
|
Management of other net interest income on retail activities. | | Sensitivity of income to changes in interest rates. | | Interest rate swaps. |
|
Issuance of products with embedded equity options. | | Sensitivity to changes in underlying index and index volatility causing option exercise. | | Interest rate swaps combined with equity options. |
|
Lending, and issuance of, products with embedded interest rate options. | | Sensitivity to changes in underlying rate and rate volatility causing option exercise. | | Interest rate swaps plus caps/floors. |
|
Investment in, and issuance of, bonds with put/call features. | | Sensitivity to changes in rates causing option exercise. | | Interest rate swaps combined with swaptions(1)and other matched options. |
|
(1) | | A swaption is an option on a swap that gives the holder the right but not the obligation to buy or sell a swap. |
Risk Management in Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that counterparties will not meet their financial obligations resulting in Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking losing the monies lent or having to close out transactions prematurely, which may incur losses after realising collateral held. Credit risk arises by Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking making loans, investing in debt securities or other financial instruments or entering into financing transactions or derivative contracts.
Managing credit risk
The Board has approved a set of risk appetite limits to cover different types of risk, including credit risk, arising in Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking. Abbey’s credit risk appetite is measured and controlled by a maximum Economic Capital value, which is defined as the maximum level of unexpected loss that Abbey is willing to sustain over a one-year period. Within these limits, credit mandates and policies are approved to cover detailed industry, sector and product limits. All transactions falling within these mandates and policies are accommodated under credit limits approved by the appropriate credit authority. Specific approval is usually required by the Credit Approvals Committee (a specific committee established under the authority of the Chief Executive) for any transaction that falls outside the mandates.
Analysis of credit exposures and credit risk trends are provided each month to either the Santander Global Banking & Markets Risk Oversight Forum (for Global Banking & Markets) or the Corporate Banking Risk Oversight Forum (for Corporate Banking), with key issues escalated to the Risk Committee as required. Large Exposures (as defined by the Financial Services Authority) are reported quarterly to the Risk Committee and the Financial Services Authority.
Credit risk on derivative instruments is calculated using the potential future mark-to-market exposure of the instruments at a 95% statistical confidence level and adding this value to the current value. The resulting “loan equivalent” or credit risk is then included against credit limits, along with other non-derivative exposures.
In addition, there is a policy framework to enable the collateralisation of derivative instruments including swaps. If collateral is deemed necessary to reduce credit risk, the amount and nature of the collateral is determined by management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.
43
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
Corporate Banking has been targeted as an area for significant growth over the next few years, mainly in the area of structured lending to the Real Estate, Education and Health sectors. In addition there will be more modest growth in terms of lending to corporate counterparties in broadly the £500m to £2bn turnover range. Significant focus is being given to the control of credit risks within this expansion with, amongst other things, the development and implementation of robust Credit Policy Mandates and models covering both risk appetite and ratings.
Credit risk mitigation
(i) Netting arrangements
The Group restricts its credit risk by entering into transactions under industry standard agreements which facilitate netting of transactions in the jurisdictions where netting agreements are recognised and have legal force. The netting arrangements do not generally result in an offset of balance sheet assets and liabilities for accounting purposes, as transactions are usually settled on a gross basis. However, there is scope for the credit risk associated with favourable contracts to be reduced by netting arrangements embodied in the agreements to the extent that if an event of default occurs, all amounts with the counterparty under the specific agreement can be terminated and settled on a net basis. Derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions, stock borrowing / lending transactions and securities financing transactions are governed by industry standard agreements that facilitate netting.
(ii) Collateralisation
The Group also mitigates its credit risk to counterparties with which it transacts significant amounts of financial instruments through collateralisation, using industry standard collateral agreements. Under these agreements, net exposures with counterparties are collateralised with cash, securities or equities. Exposures and collateral are revalued daily and collateral is adjusted accordingly to reflect deficits/surpluses. Collateral taken must comply with Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking’s collateral parameters policy. This policy is designed to control the quality and concentration risk of collateral taken such that collateral held can be liquidated in a realistic time frame when a counterparty defaults. Cash collateral in respect of derivatives held at the year-end was £14m. Collateral obtained during the year in respect of purchase and resale agreements (including securities financing) is equal to at least 100% of the amount of the exposure.
Net exposure by credit rating of the issuer or counterparty
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
AAA | | | 11,033 | | | | 7,417 | |
AA | | | 18,959 | | | | 18,639 | |
A | | | 10,329 | | | | 11,023 | |
BBB | | | 4,801 | | | | 2,970 | |
BB | | | 1,408 | | | | 325 | |
B | | | 97 | | | | 11 | |
|
Total | | | 46,627 | | | | 40,385 | |
|
In the securities financing businesses, credit risk arises on both assets and liabilities and on both on and off balance sheet transactions. Consequently, the above credit risk exposure arises not only from the on balance sheet assets, the gross value of which is detailed below, but also from securities financing trades classified as liabilities and off balance sheet assets.
Market risk in Global Banking & Markets and Corporate Banking
Market risk-taking is performed within the framework established by the Market Risk Manual. A major portion of the market risk arises from exposures to changes in the levels of interest rates, equity markets and credit spreads. Interest rate exposure is generated from trading activities. Exposure to equity markets is generated by the creation and risk management of structured products by Global Banking & Markets for the Personal Financial Services market and trading activities. Credit spread exposure arises from credit risk management and trading activities within Global Banking & Markets.
Managing market risk in Global Banking & Markets
Risks are managed within limits approved by the Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale or Santander’s Board Risk Committee and within the risk control framework defined by the Market Risk Manual. For trading activities the primary risk exposures for Global Banking & Markets are interest rate, equity, credit spread and residual exposure to property indices. Interest Rate risks are managed via interest rate swaps, futures and options (caps, floors and swaptions). Equity risks are managed via equity stock, index futures, options and structured equity derivatives. Credit-spread risks are managed via credit derivatives (credit default swaps, total return swaps). Property Index risk is managed via insurance contracts and property derivatives.
To facilitate understanding and communication of different risks, risk categories have been defined. Exposure to all market risk factors is assigned to one of these categories. Abbey considers two categories:
Short-term liquid market riskcovers activities where exposures are subject to frequent change and could be closed out over a short-time horizon. Most of the exposure is generated by Global Banking & Markets.
Structural market riskincludes exposures arising as a result of the structure of portfolios of assets and liabilities, or where the liquidity of the market is such that the exposure could not be closed out over a short time horizon. The risk exposure is generated by features inherent in either a product or portfolio and normally presented over the life of the portfolio or product. Such exposures are a result of the decision to undertake specific business activities, can take a number of different forms, and are generally managed over a longer time horizon.
44
Business and Financial Review
Risk Managementcontinued
Global Banking & Markets operates within a market risk framework designed to ensure that it has the capability to manage risk in a well-controlled manner. A comprehensive set of policies, procedures and processes have been developed and implemented to identify, measure, report, monitor and control risk across Global Banking & Markets.
For trading activities the standardised risk measure adopted is Value at Risk calculated at a 95% confidence level over a one-day time horizon. On a daily basis, market risk factor sensitivities, Value at Risk measures and stress tests are produced, reported and monitored against limits for each major activity and at the aggregate Global Banking & Markets level. These limits are used to align risk appetite with the business’s risk-taking activities and are reviewed on a regular basis.
Early identification and measurement of risks are important elements of the risk management processes. Measurement of risks can involve the use of complex quantitative methods and mathematical principles to model and predict the changes in instruments and portfolio valuation. These methods are essential tools to understand the risk exposures.
Trading Risk
Trading risk exposure arises only in the Abbey National Treasury Services group. They are managed on a continuous basis, and are marked to market on a daily basis.
The following table shows the value at risk-based consolidated exposures for the major risk classes as at 31 December 2007, together with the highest, lowest and average exposures for the year. Exposures within each risk class reflect a range of exposures associated with movements in that financial market. For example, interest rate risks include the impact of absolute rate movements, movements between interest rate bases and movements in implied volatility on interest rate options. The range of possible statistical modelling techniques and assumptions mean these measures are not precise indicators of expected future losses, but are estimates of the potential change in the value of the portfolio over a specified time horizon and within a given confidence interval.
From time to time, losses may exceed the amounts stated where the movements in market rates fall outside the statistical confidence interval used in the calculation of the value at risk analysis. The 95% confidence interval, used as a standard across Abbey, means that the theoretical loss at a risk factor level is likely to be exceeded in one period in twenty. Abbey address this risk by monitoring stress-testing measures across the different business areas. For trading instruments the actual, average, highest and lowest value at risk exposures shown below are all calculated to a 95% level of confidence using a simulation of actual one day market movements over a one year period. The effect of historic correlations between risk factors is additionally shown below. The use of a one-day time horizon for all risks associated with trading instruments reflects the horizon over which market movements will affect the measured profit and loss of these activities.
The amounts below represent the potential change in market values of trading instruments. Since trading instruments are recorded at market value, these amounts also represent the potential effect on income.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Actual Exposure at 31 December | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Group trading instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate risks | | | 3.0 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.5 | |
Equity risks | | | 2.2 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 2.7 | |
Spread risks | | | 1.9 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 2.1 | |
Other risks(1) | | | 3.7 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 2.0 | |
|
Correlation offsets(2) | | | (2.3) | | | | (1.6) | | | | (1.6) | |
|
Total correlated one-day Value at Risk | | | 8.5 | | | | 5.4 | | | | 6.7 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Exposure for the year ended 31 December | |
| | Average exposure | | | Highest exposure | | | Lowest exposure | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Group trading instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate risks | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 3.7 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 1.4 | |
Equity risks | | | 2.4 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 3.7 | | | | 3.9 | | | | 5.2 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 2.0 | |
Spread risks | | | 0.9 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 2.3 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 1.4 | |
Other risks(1) | | | 2.6 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 1.9 | |
|
Correlation offsets(2) | | | (1.6) | | | | (1.7) | | | | (1.8) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Total correlated one-day Value at Risk | | | 6.0 | | | | 6.3 | | | | 7.6 | | | | 8.8 | | | | 7.4 | | | | 9.9 | | | | 4.1 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 5.6 | |
|
(1) | | Other risks include foreign exchange risk and property risk. |
|
(2) | | The highest and lowest exposure figures reported for each risk type did not necessarily occur on the same day as the highest and lowest total correlated one-day Value-at-Risk. A corresponding correlation offset effect cannot be calculated and is therefore omitted from the above table. |
Derivatives held for Trading Purposes
Global Banking & Markets is the only area of the Group actively trading derivative products and is additionally responsible for implementing most Group derivative hedging with the external market. For trading activities, Global Banking & Markets objectives are to gain value by:
| | |
> | | marketing derivatives to end users and hedging the resulting exposures efficiently; and |
> | | the management of trading exposure reflected on the Group’s balance sheet. |
Trading derivatives include interest rate, cross currency, equity, residential property and other index related swaps, forwards, caps, floors, swaptions, as well as credit default and total return swaps, equity index contracts and exchange traded interest rate futures and equity index options.
45
Business and Financial Review
Risk ManagementContinued
Credit Derivatives
The business traded in single-name credit derivatives and a limited number of portfolio credit derivative transactions. The credit derivatives’ trading function operated within the same framework as other trading functions. Risk limits were established and closely monitored.
Given the recent lack of activity in the credit markets, the decision was made to transfer the credit derivatives business and consolidate its activities with the equivalent Santander business area in Spain. This is with effect from 1 January 2008.
At 31 December 2007, the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold by the trading business were £21.7bn and £12.0bn, respectively. The mismatch between notional amounts is largely attributable to Abbey using credit derivative transactions hedged with securities positions. The majority of positions were matched. Consequently, the amount of retained credit risk contributed by the credit derivatives trading activity was small in the context of Abbey’s overall credit exposures.
Residual value risk
Residual value risk occurs when the value of a physical asset at the end of an operating lease potentially may be less than that required to achieve the anticipated return from the transaction. Managing residual value risk in Corporate Banking relates to trains and related rail assets managed by Porterbrook. An assessment of the revised residual value risk is undertaken each time a new lease is written or an existing lease renewed and extended. In addition an impairment review of the entire fleet is undertaken every six months, with impairment provisions being raised where appropriate.
Residual value risk is controlled through business area mandates, asset specific policies and delegated authorities agreed by the Risk Committee. In addition, impairment reviews are independently reviewed and signed-off by Abbey’s Risk Division, whilst Porterbrook also make a half-yearly presentation covering all types of risk (including residual value risk) to the relevant Abbey business area risk oversight forum.
Impact of the Current Credit Environment
Abbey has no significant exposure to the US sub-prime residential mortgage sector after taking into account credit protection from highly rated financial institutions. Details of Abbey's investing and lending arrangements with respect to this, Structured Investment Vehicles (‘SIVs’), and off balance sheet entities are set out below.
Investing activities
Protected exposures
Abbey does not hold any mortgage-backed securities whose underlying collateral is wholly or mainly sub-prime mortgages. Any exposures to securities which include small sub-prime elements, and exposures to monoline insurers are fully covered by credit default swap protection in excess of the mark to market value of the exposures. These credit default swaps are provided by highly rated investment banks and are governed by industry standard documentation.
Structured Investment Vehicles
Abbey has insignificant holdings in SIVs, nearly all of which have liquidity support provided by highly rated financial institutions.
Corporate Investment Portfolio
Abbey has acquired highly rated, European asset-backed securities (‘ABS’) and residential mortgage-backed securities. Abbey's corporate investment portfolio consists only of prime exposures and contains no sub-prime element.
Lending Activities
Abbey is a retail prime lender and has no appetite or product offering for any type of sub-prime business. Abbey's credit policy explicitly prohibits such lending and is specifically designed to ensure that any business written is responsible, affordable (both initially and an on-going basis) and of a good credit quality. Abbey's principal lending activities arise in the Retail Banking division. For further information, see Risk Management in Retail Banking and Group Infrastructure.
Exposure to Off Balance Sheet Entities sponsored by the Group
The only Special Purpose Entities (‘SPEs’) sponsored but not consolidated by the Group are SPEs which issue shares that back retail structured products. The Group’s arrangements with these entities comprise equity derivatives and a secondary market making service to those retail customers who wish to exit early from these products.
Risk Management in Wealth Management
Credit risk
Cater Allen provides a limited range of products to assist with the finance requirements of individuals and businesses. Risk management policies are specific to and reflect the risks inherent in each product set. Approval processes for credit risk include the use of judgement, assisted by the use of credit scoring and credit ratings. Cater Allen operates within policies and authority levels approved by the Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale. Cater Allen has a dedicated risk team, reflecting the desire for risk control to be close to the business needs and risks.
46
Business and Financial Review
Risk ManagementContinued
Cater Allen estimated exposure
The following table presents the amount that best represents Cater Allen’s estimated maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date without taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 |
| | £m | | | £m |
|
Loans and advances to customers | | | 3.7 | | | | 4.1 |
Other | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.3 |
|
Third party exposures | | | 4.0 | | | | 4.4 |
|
Abbey International
Abbey International’s office is in Jersey, with a focus on attracting deposits by offering a range of savings accounts denominated in sterling, US dollars and euro. There is no credit risk associated in taking deposits but there is market risk, which stems from:
> | | adverse movements in interest rates where the interest paid to the depositor is higher that the market rate. The most significant market risk is yield curve risk. This yield curve risk mitigated by re-pricing variable rate deposits; and |
> | | currency risk emanating from taking deposits in non-sterling currencies such as US dollars and euro. This is hedged through forward foreign exchange contracts and cross currency and foreign exchange swaps. |
James Hay
James Hay provides and offers administration services for self-invested personal pension schemes and the WRAP portfolio management product. Its services are provided to end customers mainly via independent financial advisers and branded financial service providers. There is no credit risk associated with this type of service.
Abbey Sharedealing
Abbey Sharedealing provides a direct share dealing service to customers and provides a share-trading platform for cahoot. Customers buy and sell shares on their account with the help of the dealers at Abbey Sharedealing. No advice is provided and all trades are on an execution only basis. As such there is no credit risk associated with this type of activity.
Market risk
Market risk arises from exposures to changes in the levels of interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity markets. Market risk arises through the provision of retail and other banking products and services, as well as structural exposures arising in the balance sheet of the entities in Wealth Management.
Managing market risk
Market risks in Wealth Management are substantially transferred from the original business to Asset & Liability Management (see page 42). Risks not transferred are managed within a series of market risk mandates, which set limits on the extent of market risk that may be retained. These limits are defined in terms of nominal amounts, sensitivity, earnings-at-risk or value-at-risk.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the potential that, although remaining solvent, Abbey does not have sufficient liquid financial resources to enable it to meet its obligations as they fall due, or can secure them only at excessive cost. Liquidity risk is a key risk faced by financial services organisations. The Board is responsible for the liquidity management and control framework at Abbey and has approved key liquidity limits in setting Abbey’s liquidity risk appetite. Along with its internal Liquidity Risk Manual, which sets out the liquidity risk control framework and policy, Abbey abides by the “Sound Practices for Managing Liquidity in Banking Organisations” set out by the Basel Committee as its standard for liquidity risk management and control.
Liquidity risk — current market conditions
During the second half of 2007, liquidity in the wholesale funding markets, in major currencies, came under unprecedented and prolonged stress. From Abbey’s perspective, whilst short-term unsecured money-market funding was continuously available, the residential mortgage securitisation and covered bond markets, which are important sources of funding, were effectively closed to new external issuances. However, Abbey benefited during this period both from the cautious proportion of retail assets that are funded in wholesale markets as well as having entered the period of market stress in a strong liquidity position. All internal liquidity ratios were maintained during this period.
47
Business and Financial Review
Risk ManagementContinued
Managing liquidity risk
Management of liquidity at Abbey, including the management of cash flows, raising funding, and managing liquid asset holdings, is the responsibility of the Chief Financial Officer. The active management of liquidity is undertaken by Asset and Liability Management within the framework of the Liquidity Risk Manual. The Asset and Liability Management Committee and the Risk Committee monitor Abbey’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The Board also receives a monthly update on key liquidity issues and Abbey’s liquidity position is reported to the Financial Services Authority on a monthly basis.
Abbey views the essential elements of liquidity management as controlling potential cash outflows, maintaining prudent levels of highly liquid assets and ensuring that access to funding is available from a diversity of sources. A comprehensive management and monitoring process, and a series of liquidity limits within which liquidity is managed, underpin these elements. For example, an excessive concentration in either liquid assets or contractual liabilities contributes to potential liquidity risk, appropriate limits have been defined under the Liquidity Risk Appetite. Management also monitors Abbey’s compliance with the Sterling Stock Liquidity limits set by the Financial Services Authority, which focus on ensuring that sterling cash liabilities due five days in advance can be met by realising liquid assets, with any excesses being reported to the Risk Committee and the Board. In addition to such limits, liquidity ratios also have trigger-review levels that require the Treasurer, Head of Asset and Liability Management, and Chief Risk Officer, Wholesale to initiate appropriate reviews of current exposure when such levels are exceeded.
The Liquidity Risk Manual has been designed to reduce the likelihood and impact of either firm specific or system-wide liquidity problems. Abbey intends to maintain sufficient liquid assets and marketable assets to meet the expected cash flow requirements of all its businesses, to ensure customer and counterparty confidence, and to be in a position to withstand liquidity pressures resulting from unexpected or exceptional circumstances.
While Abbey’s liquidity risk is consolidated and primarily controlled at the Abbey National Treasury Services plc company level, liquidity risk is also measured, monitored and controlled within the specific business area or the subsidiary where it arises. Management recognises that while the liquidity approach developed pursuant to the Liquidity Risk Manual is designed to reduce the likelihood of significant liquidity issues arising, the possibility of such events cannot be eliminated. Consequently, Abbey also operates a Liquidity Contingency Plan to manage and co-ordinate any actions that are required in order to mitigate the effects of a liquidity shortfall. The Liquidity Contingency Plan defines the circumstances under which the plan is activated, the management framework and notification procedures, and the key roles and responsibilities during the operation of the plan.
�� The Liquidity Contingency Plan becomes operational when the demand for cash, whether from demands for repayment, from wholesale funding or from retail deposits, overwhelms the normal liquidity management process. The circumstances that cause this to happen will tend to be sudden, unexpected events that trigger demands for cash that cannot be managed within the procedures, limits and controls defined in the Liquidity Risk Manual.
To be effective, the management of liquidity in a crisis must be timely, proactive and flexible enough to respond to a variety of different circumstances. The management structure for the Liquidity Contingency Plan, which is structured around a small team of individuals with the authority to agree, co-ordinate and implement actions that will control a volatile, dynamic situation, has two key elements:
> | | the Treasurer, Head of Asset and Liability Management, is responsible for the rapid assessment of the implications of a sudden, unexpected event on the day-to-day liquidity of Abbey, and for the decision to activate the Liquidity Contingency Plan; and |
|
> | | the liquidity crisis management team, under the chairmanship of the Chief Financial Officer, is the decision-making authority in the event of a liquidity crisis, and is responsible for implementing the Liquidity Contingency Plan. |
Liquidity risk measurement
Abbey uses net cash flows as a key measure of liquidity risk as they take into account contracted liabilities and contracted assets that have a defined maturity date. Such current cash outflows as well as expected future cash outflows are measured over key benchmark time periods and unexpected cash outflows arising from unexpected but plausible events, such as the withdrawal of a percentage of retail deposits at any point in time and the limited ability to renew wholesale deposits, are met through new borrowing, additional sales in the repo market and additional asset sales.
Liquid assets are normally measured at current market values, discounted to reflect transaction costs. Liquid assets may take time to liquidate, due to marketability issues and large position sizes, and may decrease in market value in times of adverse market movement. This expected liquidation time is measured over key benchmark time periods under prudent assumptions in relation to market conditions. The risk related to uncertain assumptions about the behavioural characteristics of assets and liabilities is also considered when measuring liquidity risk.
The ratio of discounted liquid assets that will be available to meet the cumulative liabilities falling due at key benchmark time periods is the principal liquidity measure. The liquidity gap is subject to regular stress testing based upon a range of assumptions.
Securitisation of assets
Through our residential mortgage backed securitisation programme we provide securitised prime retail mortgage products to a diverse investor base. There is little liquidity risk related to asset securitisations as the repayment of the securitised notes issued is financed by the expected maturity or repayment of the underlying securitised asset, which is recognised in the Liquidity Risk Manual. It is likely that securitisations issued to third parties and the sale and repurchase of Abbey’s own securitised assets (which constitute European Central Bank eligible collateral which in turn supports the Group’s current short-term funding program) will together represent a similar proportion of our overall funding in 2008 and 2009.
48
Business and Financial Review
Risk ManagementContinued
Maturities of financial liabilities
The table below analyses the maturities of the undiscounted cashflows relating to financial liabilities of the Group based on the remaining period to the contractual maturity date at the balance sheet date. Deposits by customers are largely made up of Retail Deposits. In particular the ‘Demand’ grouping includes current accounts and other variable rate savings products. The ‘Up to 3 months’ grouping largely constitutes wholesale funding of wholesale assets of a similar maturity. This table is not intended to show the liquidity of the Group.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group |
At 31 December 2007 | | | Demand | | | Up to 3 | | | 3-12 | | | 1-5 | | | Over 5 | | | |
| | | | | months | | | months | | | years | | | years | | | Total |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 416 | | | | 7,318 | | | | 257 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 7,991 |
Deposits by customers | | | 55,766 | | | | 8,541 | | | | 3,668 | | | | 1,920 | | | | 166 | | | | 70,061 |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 3 | | | | 502 | | | | 731 | | | | 4,855 | | | | 10,891 | | | | 16,982 |
Trading liabilities | | | 21,069 | | | | 28,973 | | | | 2,931 | | | | 1,409 | | | | 1,515 | | | | 55,897 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | – | | | | 1,598 | | | | 2,111 | | | | 3,647 | | | | 1,800 | | | | 9,156 |
Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | 8,696 | | | | 2,437 | | | | 8,433 | | | | 47,619 | | | | 67,185 |
Other borrowed funds | | | – | | | | 56 | | | | 80 | | | | 424 | | | | 3,394 | | | | 3,954 |
Subordinated liabilities | | | – | | | | 194 | | | | 223 | | | | 1,820 | | | | 5,456 | | | | 7,693 |
|
Total financial liabilities | | | 77,254 | | | | 55,878 | | | | 12,438 | | | | 22,508 | | | | 70,841 | | | | 238,919 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company |
At 31 December 2007 | | | Demand | | | Up to 3 | | | 3-12 | | | 1-5 | | | Over 5 | | | |
| | | | | months | | | months | | | years | | | years | | | Total |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 2,060 | | | | 14,635 | | | | 8,897 | | | | 36,497 | | | | 6,444 | | | | 68,533 |
Deposits by customers | | | 52,806 | | | | 7,332 | | | | 4,090 | | | | 10,088 | | | | 33,978 | | | | 108,294 |
Derivative financial instruments | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 94 | | | | 2,658 | | | | 2,752 |
Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | 4 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4 |
Other borrowed funds | | | – | | | | 45 | | | | 46 | | | | 245 | | | | 1,280 | | | | 1,616 |
Subordinated liabilities | | | – | | | | 205 | | | | 257 | | | | 1,999 | | | | 7,570 | | | | 10,031 |
|
Total financial liabilities | | | 54,866 | | | | 22,221 | | | | 13,290 | | | | 48,923 | | | | 51,930 | | | | 191,230 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group |
At 31 December 2006 | | Demand | | | Up to 3 | | | 3-12 | | | 1-5 | | | Over 5 | | | |
| | | | | months | | | months | | | years | | | years | | | Total |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 102 | | | | 6,554 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 6,656 |
Deposits by customers | | | 57,009 | | | | 5,569 | | | | 2,279 | | | | 1,267 | | | | 395 | | | | 66,519 |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 182 | | | | 146 | | | | 587 | | | | 3,720 | | | | 14,213 | | | | 18,848 |
Trading liabilities | | | 11,397 | | | | 37,456 | | | | 6,831 | | | | 1,999 | | | | 7 | | | | 57,690 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | 45 | | | | 511 | | | | 2,348 | | | | 4,538 | | | | 887 | | | | 8,329 |
Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | 5,707 | | | | 828 | | | | 5,840 | | | | 16,703 | | | | 29,078 |
Other borrowed funds | | | – | | | | – | | | | 255 | | | | – | | | | 1,335 | | | | 1,590 |
Subordinated liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 710 | | | | 3,995 | | | | 4,705 |
|
Total financial liabilities | | | 68,735 | | | | 55,943 | | | | 13,128 | | | | 18,074 | | | | 37,535 | | | | 193,415 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company |
At 31 December 2006 | | Demand | | | Up to 3 | | | 3-12 | | | 1-5 | | | Over 5 | | | |
| | | | | months | | | months | | | years | | | years | | | Total |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 3,487 | | | | 22,937 | | | | 2,377 | | | | 27,905 | | | | 4,417 | | | | 61,123 |
Deposits by customers | | | 55,765 | | | | 3,944 | | | | 1,617 | | | | 4,060 | | | | 14,718 | | | | 80,104 |
Derivative financial instruments | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 92 | | | | 1,742 | | | | 1,834 |
Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 4 |
Other borrowed funds | | | – | | | | – | | | | 255 | | | | – | | | | 830 | | | | 1,085 |
Subordinated liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 710 | | | | 4,511 | | | | 5,221 |
|
Total financial liabilities | | | 59,252 | | | | 26,881 | | | | 4,253 | | | | 32,767 | | | | 26,218 | | | | 149,371 |
|
Pension obligation risk
Abbey has statutory funding obligations as the sponsoring employer for a number of defined benefit staff pension schemes. The Schemes are managed by Independent Boards of Trustees in accordance with legislation and Trust deeds and rules, for the benefit of members. Abbey accepts that it is exposed to pension obligation risk that could give rise to an unexpected increase in Abbey’s obligations to fund the schemes, either because of a loss of net asset value or because of changes in legislation or regulatory action. The principal risks to the net asset value of the schemes are an increase in the value of the liabilities arising from adverse changes in the longevity experience of members, inflation, and scheme asset values, and asset returns being adversely affected by market movements.
Risk management
The Chief Financial Officer is responsible for managing Abbey’s exposure, in conjunction with the Trustees. Further details of the funding arrangements for the pension schemes can be found on page 109.
49
Report of the Directors
Directors
Board of Directors
As at 31 December 2007
Chairman
Lord Burns
Lord Burns (age 63) was appointed Joint Deputy Chairman on 1 December 2001 and Chairman on 1 February 2002. He is also Chairman of Glas Cymru Cyfyngedig (Welsh Water), Chairman of Marks and Spencer Group plc and a Non-Executive Director of Pearson plc and Banco Santander, S.A. His current professional roles include President of the Society of Business Economists, Fellow of the London Business School, Companion of the Institute of Management, President of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research and Vice President of the Royal Economic Society. He was formerly Permanent Secretary to the Treasury and chaired the Parliamentary Financial Services and Markets Bill Joint Committee. He was a Non-Executive Director of British Land plc (2000-2005) and Legal & General Group plc (1991-2001). He was also Chairman of the National Lottery Commission (2000-2001).
Executive directors
António Horta-Osório
Chief Executive
António Horta-Osório (age 44) was appointed Chief Executive on 21 August 2006. He was a Non-Executive Director of Abbey from 1 December 2004 until his appointment as Chief Executive. He joined Abbey from Banco Santander Totta in Portugal where he was Chief Executive Officer. He is also Executive Vice President of Banco Santander, S.A. and a member of its management committee as well as Non-Executive Chairman of Banco Santander Totta. He was previously Chief Executive Officer of Banco Santander Brasil. António started his career at Citibank Portugal, where he was head of Capital Markets and at the same time was an assistant professor at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa. He then worked for Goldman Sachs in New York and London, focusing on corporate finance activities in Portugal and, in 1993, joined Santander as Chief Executive Officer of Banco Santander de Negócios Portugal. He is a graduate in Management and Business Administration at Universidade Católica Portuguesa, has an MBA from INSEAD, where he was awarded the Henry Ford II Prize, and an AMP from Harvard Business School.
Nathan Bostock
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director, Retail Products & Marketing, Human Resources, Credit Cards and Insurance
Nathan Bostock (age 47) was appointed as an Executive Director on 22 February 2005. This followed his appointment to Abbey’s Executive Committee in November 2004. Nathan is currently Chief Financial Officer and his responsibilities include Group Infrastructure, (comprising Asset & Liability Management, Group Capital and Funding), Retail Products and Marketing, Human Resources, Credit Cards and Insurance. Nathan joined Abbey in November 2001 as Chief Operating Officer, Abbey National Treasury Services plc, with responsibility for finance, market risk and operations. Prior to joining Abbey, Nathan spent nine years (1992-2001) with The Royal Bank of Scotland plc where his roles included Director, Group Risk Management and Chief Operating Officer, Treasury and Capital Markets. Prior to joining The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Nathan was Head of Risk Analysis and Finance, Treasury and Interest Rate Derivatives (Europe) for Chase Manhattan Bank (1988 — 1992). He joined Chase Manhattan Bank in 1986 having previously worked for Coopers and Lybrand.
Miguel Bragança
Executive Director, Retail Products and Marketing (until 2 January 2008)
Miguel Bragança (age 41) was appointed Executive Director, Retail Products and Marketing on 26 September 2006. He was responsible for product management, marketing communication and customer relationship management until he relinquished his Executive directorship for a Non-Director position on 2 January 2008. Miguel was previously a member of the Board and Executive Committee of Banco Santander Totta in Portugal, with responsibility for Finance, Products and Marketing. Miguel joined the Santander Group in 1993, participating in the launch of Banco Santander de Negócios Portugal. Between 1996 and 2000, he was co-head of Santander Investment Brasil and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Banco Santander Brasil. Miguel started his career at Citibank Portugal in 1989, becoming a Resident Vice President. He is a graduate in Management and Business Administration at Universidade Católica Portuguesa and holds an MBA from INSEAD.
50
Report of the Directors
Directors continued
Non-Executive Directors
Juan Rodríguez Inciarte
Deputy Chairman
Juan Inciarte (age 55) was appointed Non-Executive Director on 1 December 2004. He joined Banco Santander, S.A. in 1985. After holding various positions, he was appointed to the Board of Directors in 1991, holding this office until 1999. He is currently Chief Executive of Santander Consumer Finance, S.A. and Executive Vice President of Banco Santander, S.A. In addition, he is a director of Compañia Española de Petróleos, NIBC Bank N.V., Banco Banif S.A., Vista Capital de Expansion S.A. and director and member of the Executive Committee of Sovereign Bancorp in the U.S. For several years he served on the Board of Directors of First Union Corporation (presently Wachovia) in the US, the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of San Paolo – IMI in Italy and the Boards of the Royal Bank of Scotland plc and National Westminster Bank plc (from 1998 – 2004). He is a member of the US-Spain Council and Fellow of The Chartered Institute of Bankers in Scotland.
José María Carballo
José María Carballo (age 63) was appointed Non-Executive Director on 1 December 2004. He is Chairman of La Unión Resinera Española, Chairman of Vista Desarrollo, Director of Vista Capital Expansion S.A. S.G.E.C.R., Director of Santander Real Estate S.A. S.G.I.I.C. and Director of Teleférico Pico del Teide S.A. He is also Vice President and Honorary Treasurer of the Iberoamerican Benevolent Society (UK). He was Executive Vice President of Banco Santander, S.A. from 1989 – 2001 and Chief Executive Officer of Banco Santander de Negocios from 1989 to 1993. Until 1989 he was Executive Vice President responsible for Europe at Banco Bilbao Vizcaya. He was also Executive Vice President of Banco de Bilbao in New York until 1983.
José María Fuster
José María Fuster (age 49) was appointed Non-Executive Director on 1 December 2004. He is Executive Vice President of Operations and Technology of Banesto and Chief Information Officer for Santander. He joined Banco Español de Crédito in 1998 and was appointed as Chief Information Officer of Banco Santander, S.A. in 2003. He is a director of ISBAN UK Limited. He started his professional career in IBM and Arthur Andersen as a consultant. In the financial services sector, he has worked for Citibank and National Westminster Bank plc.
Andrew Longhurst
Andrew Longhurst (age 68) was appointed Non-Executive Director on 28 January 2005. He was Chief Executive Officer of Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society (1982-1997). In 1995 Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society converted to a public limited company and was acquired by Lloyds Bank plc. He joined the main board of Lloyds Bank plc and oversaw the extension of Cheltenham & Gloucester’s mortgage operation into Lloyds Bank plc branches. In 1997 he was appointed Director, Customer Finance of Lloyds TSB Bank plc, having responsibility for the enlarged group’s mortgage, credit card and personal loan businesses and became Chairman of Cheltenham & Gloucester. In 1998, he retired from full time executive employment and joined the boards of The United Assurance Group Limited (Chairman 1998-2000), Thames Water Limited (1998-2000) and Hermes Focus Asset Management Limited (1998-present). He was Deputy Chairman of The Royal London Insurance Society Limited (2000-2002) following its acquisition of United Assurance Group Limited. He also served as Chairman of the Council of Mortgage Lenders (1994) and was a member of the Department of Trade and Industry’s taskforce on deregulation of financial services (1993).
Jorge Morán
Jorge Morán (age 43) joined Abbey in December 2005 initially as Chief Operating Officer until 21 August 2006, whereupon he became a Non-Executive Director. He is an Executive Vice President of Banco Santander, S.A. and a member of the group’s management committee. He is head of Santander’s Insurance division. Before joining Santander in 2002, he was Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Morgan Stanley for Spain and Portugal (2000 – 2002), where he was responsible for developing the company’s management strategy. Prior to this, he was also responsible for managing Morgan Stanley’s asset management and distribution network (1992 – 2000). Before joining Morgan Stanley, he was Director of Marketing at National Westminster Bank plc and Head of Product Development at Citibank España.
51
Report of the Directors
Directors continued
Rosemary Thorne
Rosemary Thorne (age 56) was appointed Non-Executive Director on 1 July 2006. She is also Senior Independent Director on the board of Virgin Radio Holdings Limited. She was Group Finance Director of Ladbrokes plc until April 2007, Non-Executive Director of Cadbury Schweppes plc until September 2007. Previously she was Group Financial Controller of Grand Metropolitan Public Limited Company (prior to its merger with Guinness plc to become Diageo plc) and spent almost eight years as the Group Finance Director of J Sainsbury plc. She joined the board of Bradford & Bingley in 1999 as Group Finance Director, initially working on its demutualisation and flotation, resulting in a place in the FTSE 100 in December 2000. She remained in this role for a further five years. She was a member of the Financial Reporting Council and Financial Reporting Review Panel for nine years and a member of The Hundred Group of Finance Directors Main Committee for fifteen years. She also sits on the Council of the University of Warwick and the Royal College of Art.
Keith Woodley
Keith Woodley (age 68) was appointed Non-Executive Director on 5 August 1996. He was made Senior Independent Non-Executive Director in April 1999 and was Deputy Chairman from 6 April 1999 until November 2004. He is a former Non-Executive Director of National and Provincial Building Society and a former partner of Deloitte Haskins & Sells. A past President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, he is Complaints Commissioner for the London Stock Exchange and a Council Member and Pro-Chancellor of the University of Bath.
Appointments post 31 December 2007
Executive Directors
Alison Brittain
Executive Director, Retail Distribution
Alison Brittain (age 43) was appointed Executive Director, Retail Distribution on 2 January 2008. She is responsible for Branch Distribution, Telephone Distribution, e-commerce, Business Banking, Premium Banking and Commercial Mortgages. She was previously Managing Director of Barclays Retail and Woolwich Retail Networks.
Non-Executive Directors
Miguel Bragança
Miguel Bragança (age 41) was appointed an Executive Director of Abbey on 26 September 2006 responsible for product management, marketing communication and customer relationship management. On 2 January 2008 Miguel Bragança relinquished his role as Executive Director of Abbey, following his decision to return to Banco Santander Totta, but he has remained as a Non-Executive Director of Abbey.
Auditors
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Stonecutter Court
1 Stonecutter Street
London EC4A 4TR
52
Report of the Directors
Directors’ Report
Corporate Structure
Abbey National plc is a wholly owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. and the ordinary shares of Abbey National plc are not traded on the London Stock Exchange. Banco Santander, S.A. is incorporated in Spain and has its registered office at Paseo de Pereda 9-12, Santander, Spain. Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides a list of the principal subsidiaries of Abbey National plc and the nature of each subsidiary’s business as well as details of branches.
Abbey National plc is subject to the listing rules of the UK Listing Authority, a division of the Financial Services Authority, because it has preference shares listed on the London Stock Exchange. As it does not have listed ordinary shares, Abbey National plc is exempt from the requirement to make certain disclosures that are normally part of the continuing obligations of listed companies in the UK. This exemption applies, among other things, to corporate governance and certain Directors’ remuneration disclosures.
Principal activities and business review
The principal activity of the Group continues to be the provision of an extensive range of Personal Financial Services. Abbey National plc is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Abbey National plc is required to set out in this report a fair review of the development and performance of the business of the Group during the year ended 31 December 2007 and of the position of the Group at the end of the year. The information that fulfils this requirement can be found in the Chief Executive’s Review on pages 2 and 3. The Chief Executive’s Review also contains a description of the likely future developments for the Group. When reading the Chief Executive’s Review, reference should be made to the Forward-looking Statements section on page 4.
Further information on the development and performance of the business of the Group, both at a consolidated level and analysed by division can be found in the following sections:
> | | An analysis of the Group’s development and performance during the year is contained in the Business Review – Summary on pages 8 to 11. |
|
> | | A further detailed analysis of the Personal Financial Services division is contained in the Business Review – Personal Financial Services on pages 12 to 18. |
|
> | | Further analyses of the Sold Life Businesses and the Portfolio Business Unit are contained in the Business Review – Sold Life Businesses and Portfolio Business Unit on page 19. |
Further information on the position of the Group at the end of the year can be found in the following sections:
> | | An analysis of the Personal Financial Services business flows is contained in the Business Review – Personal Financial Services on pages 13 and 14. |
|
> | | The Balance Sheet Business Review can be found on pages 22 to 32, including a review of capital management and resources on page 31, details of capital expenditure on page 26, off balance sheet arrangements on page 29, liquidity on pages 29 and 30, and contractual obligations on page 30. |
|
> | | The Group’s key performance indicators are described in the Business Review – Summary on page 11. |
Abbey National plc is also required to describe the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group. Financial risks are described in the Risk Management Report for each segment of the business by type of risk on pages 33 to 49, and material risk factors are described in the Risk Factors section on page 130.
Results and dividends
The results of the Group are discussed in the Principal activities and business review above. The Directors do not recommend the payment of a final dividend (2006: nil). An interim dividend of £200m for 2007 was declared on 26 June 2007 on Abbey National plc's ordinary shares in issue. This dividend was paid on 10 January 2008. A further interim dividend of £170m for 2007 was declared on 18 December 2007 on Abbey National plc's ordinary shares in issue and will be paid during the first half of 2008.
Directors
The members of Abbey National plc's board (the ‘Board’) at 31 December 2007 are named on pages 50 to 52. For each Director, the date of appointment is shown. As at 31 December 2007, the Board comprised a Chairman, three Executive Directors including the Chief Executive, and seven Non-Executive Directors. As at the date of publication of this report, the Board comprises a Chairman, three Executive Directors, including the Chief Executive, and eight Non-Executive Directors. The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are separated and clearly defined. The Chairman is primarily responsible for the working of the Board and the Chief Executive for the running of the business and implementation of Board strategy and policy. During 2007, no Directors resigned.
There have been some changes to the Board since 2007. Alison Brittain was appointed Executive Director, Retail Distribution on 2 January 2008. In addition, Miguel Bragança relinquished his Executive Directorship with effect from 2 January 2008. However, he has remained on the Board as a Non-Executive Director. Details of these changes are included on page 52.
Non-Executive Directors have been appointed for an indefinite term (other than Keith Woodley, Jorge Moran and Rosemary Thorne, who have all been appointed for a three year term after which their appointments may be extended upon mutual agreement). In accordance with Abbey National plc's Articles of Association, all of the Directors shall retire from office and face re-election at every Annual General Meeting. Abbey National plc's Articles of Association also require that a Director must retire at the first Annual General Meeting after their 70th birthday although such Director may be reappointed at the relevant Annual General Meeting.
When they were appointed, the appointments of António Horta-Osório, Miguel Bragança, Juan Rodríguez Inciarte, Jorge Morán, Jóse María Fuster and José María Carballo were all proposed by Banco Santander, S.A. Abbey may pay an Executive Director instead of allowing them to work during their notice period. Executive Directors’ service contracts do not provide for specific benefits on termination of employment.
53
Report of the Directors
Directors’ Report continued
Committees of the Board
The Board maintains one standing committee, which operates within written terms of reference.
Audit and Risk Committee
Membership of the Audit and Risk Committee is restricted to Non-Executive Directors. The Audit and Risk Committee’s primary tasks are to review the scope of external and internal audit, to receive reports from the external auditors, (currently Deloitte & Touche LLP) and the Chief Internal Auditor, and to review the preliminary results, interim information, annual financial statements and any other significant financial reports before they are presented to the Board, focusing in particular on accounting policies, compliance and areas of management judgement and estimates. The Committee’s scope also includes risk management and oversight and the review of the procedures in place for employees to raise concerns about possible wrongdoing in financial reporting and other matters. For a further discussion of the risk-control responsibilities of the Audit and Risk Committee, see the Risk Management section on page 33. The Audit and Risk Committee more generally acts as a forum for discussion of internal control issues and contributes to the Board’s review of the effectiveness of Abbey’s internal control and risk management systems and processes. The Audit and Risk Committee also conducts a review of the remit and reports of the Abbey and Santander internal audit functions, as well as their effectiveness, authority, resources and standing within Abbey and management’s response to their findings and recommendations. Abbey’s relationship with the external auditors and the experience and qualifications of the external auditors are monitored by the Audit and Risk Committee and external auditor’s audit plans and audit findings are reviewed by the Committee. A framework for ensuring auditor independence has been adopted which defines unacceptable non-audit assignments, pre-approval of acceptable non-audit assignments and procedures for approval of other non-audit assignments. The Committee may make any recommendations to the Board as it sees fit and the Chairperson of the Committee reports formally to the Board after each meeting.
The Chairperson, Rosemary Thorne has over 15 years of experience as Finance Director of FTSE 100 companies and was a member of the Financial Reporting Council, The Financial Reporting Review Panel and The Hundred Group of Finance Directors Main Committee. The Board has determined that Rosemary Thorne has the necessary qualifications and experience to qualify as an audit committee financial expert as defined for the purposes of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Board considers that she is independent in accordance with Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Rules.
The other members of the Audit and Risk Committee are Juan Rodríguez Inciarte, José María Carballo and Keith Woodley. Pursuant to SEC Rule 10A-3(c)(2), which provides a general exemption from the requirement to have an audit committee for subsidiaries that are listed on a national securities exchange or market where the parent satisfies the requirement of SEC Rule 10A-3, Abbey National plc is exempt from the requirements of SEC Rule 10A-3. According to SEC Rule 10A-3(c)(2), additional listings of an issuer’s securities are exempt from the audit committee requirements if the issuer is already subject to them as a result of listing any class of securities on any market subject to SEC Rule 10A-3. This exemption extends to listings of non-equity securities by a direct or indirect subsidiary that is consolidated or at least 50% beneficially owned by a parent company, if the parent is subject to the requirements as a result of the listing of a class of its equity securities. Consequently, as applied to the current shareholding structure of Abbey National plc, (as the wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A.), Abbey National plc is exempt from the audit committee requirements of SEC Rule 10A-3 since: (i) Abbey National plc is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A., (ii) Banco Santander, S.A., has equity securities listed on the NYSE and is therefore subject to SEC Rule 10A-3, and (iii) Abbey National plc does not have any equity securities listed on the NYSE or any other US national securities exchange.
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee was formally dissolved on 29 May 2007 following a review of its role within Abbey. Prior to this date, the Remuneration Committee was responsible for oversight of the remuneration of senior management within Abbey and its aim was to ensure that these arrangements supported Abbey’s business objectives. These responsibilities are now discharged by the Santander Appointments and Remuneration Committee.
Directors’ remuneration
The aggregate remuneration received by the Directors of Abbey in 2007 was:
| | | | |
| | £ |
|
Salaries and fees | | | 2,320,563 |
Performance-related payments | | | 5,676,331 |
Other taxable benefits | | | 5,976 |
Total remuneration excluding pension contributions | | | 8,002,870 |
Pension contributions | | | – |
Compensation for loss of office | | | – |
|
These totals exclude emoluments received by Directors in respect of their primary duties as Directors or Officers of Santander, in respect of which no apportionment has been made.
Medium-Term Incentive Plan
In 2007, no Executive Directors were granted conditional awards of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. under the Abbey National plc Medium-Term Incentive Plan (2006: no directors). Under the Abbey National plc Medium-Term Incentive Plan granted on 20 October 2005, certain Executive Directors, Other Key Management Personnel (as defined in Note 44 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and other nominated individuals were granted a conditional award of shares in Banco Santander, S.A.
54
Report of the Directors
Directors’ Report continued
The amount of shares participants will receive at the end of the three-year period depends on the performance of Abbey during this period. The performance conditions were set by the Remuneration Committee (dissolved on 29 May 2007) and were linked to Abbey’s three-year plan. Performance will be measured in two ways, half of the award depends on Abbey achieving an attributable profit target for the 2007 financial year, and the remainder depends on the achievement of a revenue target for the 2007 financial year.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In 2007, three Executive Directors were granted conditional awards of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. under the Santander Long-Term Incentive Plan for a total fair value of £1,444,058 (based on the closing share price on 31 December 2007 of Euro 14.79). Under the Santander Long-Term Incentive Plan granted on 31 December 2007, certain Executive Directors, Key Management Personnel (as defined in Note 44 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and other nominated individuals were granted a conditional award of shares in Banco Santander, S.A.. The amount of shares participants will receive throughout a three year period depends on the performance of Banco Santander, S.A. during this period. All awards under the Santander Long-Term Incentive Plan will depend on Santander’s Total Shareholder Return and Earnings Per Share performance against a competitor benchmark group. Provided performance conditions are met, 40% of the conditional award of shares will vest in July 2009 with the remaining 60% vesting in July 2010.
Remuneration of Highest Paid Director
In 2007, the remuneration, excluding pension contributions, of the highest paid Director was £3,292,207 (2006: £2,733,850) of which £2,496,331 (2006: £1,692,120) was performance related. There was no accrued pension benefit for the highest paid Director (2006: nil), other than that accrued by, or treated to be accrued by a Spanish subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. A conditional award of shares was made to the highest paid Director under the Long-Term Incentive Plan during the year.
Retirement Benefits
Defined benefit pension plans are provided to certain of Abbey’s employees. See Note 36 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the plans and the related costs and obligations. Retirement benefits are accruing for one director under a defined benefit scheme (2006: one) in respect of their qualifying services to Abbey.
Non-Executive Directors
Fees were paid to Non-Executive Directors in 2007 totalling £310,000 (2006: £287,732); this amount is included above in the table of Directors’ remuneration.
Directors’ Interests and Related Party Transactions
In 2007, loans were made to one member of Abbey’s Key Management Personnel, with a principal amount of £805,722 outstanding at 31 December 2007. No Directors had any loans in 2007. See Notes 43 and 44 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for disclosures of deposits and investments made and insurance policies entered into by the Directors, Key Management Personnel and their connected persons with Abbey at 31 December 2007. Note 44 to the Consolidated Financial Statements also includes details of other related party transactions.
In 2007, there were no other transactions, arrangements or agreements with Abbey National plc or its subsidiaries in which Directors or Key Management Personnel or persons connected with them had a material interest. No Director had a material interest in any contract of significance other than a service contract with Abbey National plc, or any of its subsidiaries, at any time during the year. No Director was interested in the shares of any company within the Group at any time during the year and no Director exercised or was granted any rights to subscribe for shares in any company within the Group. During 2007, no Directors exercised share options over shares in Banco Santander, S.A., the parent company of Abbey (2006: none).
Third Party Indemnities
Since 2005, Abbey has applied the provisions of the Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise) Act 2004 to issue enhanced indemnities to its Directors and to directors of its subsidiaries and certain companies against liabilities and associated costs which they could incur in the course of their duties for Abbey and those other companies. All of the indemnities remain in force as at the date of this Annual Report and Accounts. A copy of each of the indemnities is kept at the address shown on page 132.
Financial Instruments
The financial risk management objectives and policies of the Group; the policy for hedging each major type of forecasted transaction for which hedge accounting is used; and the exposure of the Group to price risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and cash-flow risk are outlined in the Risk Management Report on pages 33 to 49.
Pension Funds
The assets of the main pension schemes are held separately from those of Abbey and are under the control of the trustees of each scheme. Three of the Abbey pension schemes have a common corporate trustee which, at 31 December 2007, had nine directors, comprising six Abbey appointed directors and three member-elected directors.
The National and Provincial Pension Fund has a different corporate trustee, the Board of which at 31 December 2007 comprised three Abbey appointed directors, and three member-elected directors.
As at 31 December 2007 the Scottish Mutual Assurance plc Staff Pension Scheme had six trustees, of whom four are selected by Abbey (two of whom are members) and two are elected by eligible members.
55
Report of the Directors
Directors’ Report continued
In the case of the Scottish Provident Institution Staff Pension Fund, as at 31 December 2007 there were eight trustees, of whom five (one of whom is a member) are selected by Abbey and the remaining three are elected by eligible members.
Asset management of the schemes is delegated to a number of fund managers and the trustees receive independent professional advice on the performance of the managers.
Legal advice to the trustees of the various schemes is provided by external firms of solicitors. The audits of the pension schemes are separate from that of Abbey. The audits of the Amalgamated, Associated Bodies, Group and the National and Provincial Pension schemes are undertaken by Grant Thornton UK LLP. The audits of the Scottish Mutual Assurance plc Staff Pension Scheme and the Scottish Provident Institution Staff Pension Fund are undertaken by KPMG LLP. Further information is provided in Note 36 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Market Value of Land and Buildings
On the basis of a periodic review process, the estimated aggregate market value of the Company and its subsidiaries’ land and buildings was not significantly different from the fixed asset net book value of £56m, as disclosed in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. It is considered that, except where specific provisions have been made, the land and buildings have a value in use to the Group that exceeds the estimated market value, and the net book value is not impaired.
Disability
Abbey is committed to setting the industry standard in equality of access and quality of service for disabled people by embracing the spirit of the Disability Discrimination Act throughout its business operations. Abbey has processes in place to help recruit, develop and retain employees with disabilities.
Employee Involvement
Employee share ownership
In recognition of the Banco Santander, S.A. acquisition of Abbey, all employees were given 100 free shares in Banco Santander, S.A. on 15 February 2005. These shares were granted using an Inland Revenue approved Share Incentive Plan (‘SIP’). The free shares will be held in trust on the employees’ behalf for a minimum of three years.
In January 2006, Abbey introduced a Partnership Shares scheme, which also operates under the SIP umbrella. Employees are able to invest up to a maximum of £1,500 of pre-tax salary in Banco Santander, S.A. shares per tax year. These shares will be held in trust on the employees’ behalf.
In recognition of the Banco Santander, S.A. 150th Anniversary, all Abbey and Santander employees were given 100 free shares in Banco Santander, S.A. on 6 August 2007. These shares were granted under an existing SIP for Abbey employees and a new SIP was set up for UK-based Santander employees.
Communication
Abbey wants to involve and inform employees on matters that affect them. Abbey believes this is key to being successful and as such effective communication is vital. Abbey publishes a magazine every other month for employees, and almost all employees have access to the company intranet. Abbey also uses more traditional methods of communication, such as team meetings. All these channels are designed to keep employees fully informed of news and developments which may have an impact on them, and also to keep them up to date on financial, economic and other factors which affect Abbey’s performance. Abbey considers employees and asks for their opinions on a range of issues through regular departmental and company-wide opinion surveys.
Consultation
Abbey has over 30 years of trade union recognition through a partnership agreement with Advance (formerly called Abbey National Group Union or ANGU), the independent trade union that it recognises to act as the voice of Abbey employees. Advance is affiliated to the Trade Union Congress and operates from its own offices in Hertfordshire. Advance is involved in major initiatives, and Abbey consults them on significant proposals within the business. Consultation takes place at both national and local levels. Abbey holds regular Joint Consultative and Negotiating Committee meetings to enable collaborative working and ensure that communication is open and two-way.
Donations
The Abbey National Charitable Trust Limited supports disadvantaged people throughout the UK. In 2007, Abbey made total cash donations of £2,782,776 (2006: £2,164,441) to a wide range of charities which predominantly support projects addressing education, finance and regeneration issues.
Political contributions
No contributions were made for political purposes and no political expenditure was incurred.
Suppliers
Abbey has cost management and procurement policies that explicitly promote competitive tendering and dealing with suppliers in a fair and open manner. Abbey does not operate a single payment policy in respect of all classes of suppliers. Payment terms vary depending on the supplier and the type of spend, and the supplier is made aware of these before engagement.
56
Report of the Directors
Directors’ Report continued
Policy and practice on payment of creditors
It is Abbey’s policy to ensure payments are made in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed, except where the supplier fails to comply with those terms and conditions. Abbey’s practice on payment of creditors has been quantified under the terms of the Companies Act 1985 (Directors’ Report) (Statement of Payment Practice) Regulations 1997. Based on the ratio of the aggregate amounts owed to trade creditors at the end of the year to the aggregate amounts invoiced by suppliers during the year at 31 December 2007, trade creditor days for Abbey were 29 days (2006: 30 days).
Code of ethics
Abbey’s ethical policies are set out in “How we do business”. This document, which was established in 1999, and reviewed and updated by the Board in 2003, states that:
> | | Employees should raise concerns if they become aware that ethical policies and principles are not being followed; |
|
> | | Abbey values all employees as individuals and treats them as partners in the business; |
|
> | | Abbey treats customers fairly and delivers what it promises; |
|
> | | Abbey considers ethical and environmental concerns when investing Abbey assets; |
|
> | | Abbey is committed to adopting sound environmental management practices; and |
|
> | | Abbey expects suppliers to operate to high ethical standards. |
Abbey’s ethical policies include ethical investment guidelines, which are an integral part of the risk management processes for investment decision making. Procedures are also in place for employees to follow if they feel that there has been a breach of our ethical policies. “How we do business” can be read in full on the website at www.aboutabbey.com>Our Policies>how we do business.
Abbey also complies with the applicable code of ethics regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission arising from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Amongst other things, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act aims to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of information that companies disclose. It requires companies to disclose whether they have a code of ethics that applies to the Chief Executive and senior financial officers that promotes honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures; compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; prompt internal reporting of violations; and accountability for adherence to such a code of ethics. Abbey meets these requirements through “How we do business”, Abbey’s whistleblowing policy, the Financial Services Authority’s Principles for Businesses, and the Financial Services Authority’s Principles and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (together, the Code of Ethics), with which the Chief Executive and senior financial officers must comply. These include requirements to manage conflicts of interest appropriately and to disclose any information the Financial Services Authority may want to know about. Abbey provides a copy of its Code of Ethics to anyone, free of charge, on application to the address shown on page 132.
Going concern
The Directors confirm that they are satisfied that Abbey National plc and its subsidiaries have adequate resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt a going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Disclosure controls and procedures (Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002)
Abbey evaluated with the participation of Abbey’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of Abbey’s disclosure controls and procedures as of 31 December 2007. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon Abbey’s evaluation, the Chief Executive and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of 31 December 2007, Abbey’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Abbey in the reports that Abbey files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarised and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to Abbey’s management, including Abbey’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. There has been no change in Abbey’s internal control over financial reporting during Abbey’s 2007 fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect Abbey’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Internal control over financial reporting is a component of an overall system of internal control. The Group’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and as endorsed by the European Union. The Group’s internal control over financial reporting includes:
> | | Policies and procedures that relate to the maintenance of records that fairly and accurately reflect the transactions and disposition of assets. |
|
> | | Controls providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only as authorised by management. |
|
> | | Controls providing reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.
57
Report of the Directors
Directors’ Report continued
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the financial reporting of the Group. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2007 based on the criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (‘COSO’). Based on this assessment, Management believes that, as of 31 December 2007, the Group’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
Relevant Audit Information
Each of the Directors as at the date of approval of this report confirms that:
> | | so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which Abbey’s auditors are unaware; and |
|
> | | the Director has taken all steps that he/she ought to have taken as a Director to make himself/herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that Abbey’s auditors are aware of that information. |
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of Section 234ZA of the Companies Act 1985.
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. The Directors are required by the International Accounting Standards (‘IAS’) Regulation to prepare the group financial statements under IFRS, as adopted by the European Union, and have also elected to prepare the parent company financial statements in accordance with IFRS, as adopted by the European Union. The financial statements are also required by law to be properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. In addition, in order to meet certain US requirements, the Directors are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
International Accounting Standard 1 requires that financial statements present fairly for each financial year the Company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the International Accounting Standards Board’s ‘Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements’. In virtually all circumstances, a fair presentation will be achieved by compliance with all applicable IFRS. However, the Directors are also required to:
> | | properly select and apply accounting policies; |
|
> | | present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information; |
|
> | | provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance; and |
|
> | | make an assessment of the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. |
The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Auditors
Deloitte & Touche LLP have expressed their willingness to continue in office as auditors and a resolution to reappoint them will be proposed at Abbey National plc's forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
By order of the Board
Karen M Fortunato
Company Secretary and Head of Legal
4 March 2008
Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regent’s Place, London NW1 3AN
58
Report of the Directors
Supervision and Regulation
As a firm authorised by the Financial Services Authority, Abbey National plc is subject to UK financial services laws and regulations, which are discussed below. Recent significant regulatory developments, which will affect Abbey, are also highlighted below.
UK
In the UK, the Financial Services Authority is the single independent regulator for the regulation of deposit taking, investment business, mortgages and insurance. The Financial Services Authority was set-up by the Government and exercises statutory powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (‘FSMA’).
Abbey National plc, together with several of its subsidiaries, is authorised by the Financial Services Authority to carry on a range of regulated activities in the UK, which principally include mortgages, banking, insurance and investment business. The Financial Services Authority must adhere to four regulatory objectives, as prescribed in FSMA, which set out the parameters of regulation: market confidence; public awareness; the protection of consumers; and the reduction of financial crime. Based on these regulatory objectives, the Financial Services Authority has formulated an extensive handbook of rules and guidance to which authorised firms are subject.
Banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions in the UK are subject to a compensation scheme, namely, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (the ‘Scheme’). The Scheme covers claims made against authorised firms (or any participating EEA firms) where they are unable, or likely to be unable, to pay claims against them. In relation to deposits, the Scheme provides cover for 100% of the first £35,000 of a claim, with £35,000 being the maximum amount payable.
In respect of investments, the first 100% of the first £30,000 can be claimed plus 90% of the next £20,000, with £48,000 being the maximum amount payable. In relation to mortgage advice and arranging, the Scheme will pay 100% of the first £30,000 and 90% of the next £20,000, with £48,000 being the maximum amount payable. In addition, the Scheme also extends (up to various amounts) to certain long term and general insurance contracts, including general insurance advice and arranging.
European Union
Abbey is directly affected by laws emanating from the European Union,primarily through directives that must be implemented by the UK as a Member State of the European Union.
Regulatory Developments
There are a number of regulatory developments going through a regulatory consultation and implementation process including changes to the following, which may have some effect on Abbey’s business:
> | | The Scheme arrangements; |
|
> | | The changes to consumer credit regulation; |
|
> | | Capital adequacy and liquidity arrangements; and |
|
> | | Conduct of business arrangements such as those resulting from the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive |
Basel II
In the European Union, Basel II has been implemented by the Capital Requirements Directive (“CRD”) with effect from 1 January 2007. As part of the Group’s implementation of Basel II, Abbey has been successful in its application of the Banco de Españia and the Financial Services Authority to adopt the Retail Internal Ratings Approach “Retail IRB” and Advanced Internal Ratings Approach “AIRB” with effect from 1 January 2008. From 1 January 2008, Abbey Retail IRB and AIRB applies to approximately 85% of Abbey’s credit exposures classes including Residential Lending, Banking and Consumer Credit and certain lending portfolios in Abbey’s Corporate Banking and Global Banking & Markets divisions. Abbey and the Group have extensive internal loss data histories which have enabled it to build in-house credit rating models for these exposure classes. These models facilitate an appropriate risk sensitive approach to risk management and capital allocation.
Overall, Abbey expects that the adoption of Basel II will reduce Abbey’s capital resources requirement.
59
Financial Statements
Contents to Financial Statements
60
Financial Statements
This page is intentionally left blank
61
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Abbey National plc
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Abbey National plc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A., and its subsidiary undertakings (together, ‘the Abbey National Group’) at 31 December 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, recognised income and expense, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2007 and related notes, including the information in pages 33 to 49 of the Form 20-F (together “the financial statements”). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Abbey National Group management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Abbey National Group is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Abbey National Group’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Abbey National Group at 31 December 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2007, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as adopted for use in the European Union and IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors
London, United Kingdom
4 March 2008
62
Financial Statements
Consolidated Income Statement
For the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Notes | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Interest and similar income | | | 2 | | | | 7,043 | | | | 5,644 | | | | 5,419 | |
Interest expense and similar charges | | | 2 | | | | (5,544) | | | | (4,416) | | | | (4,247) | |
|
Net interest income | | | | | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,172 | |
|
Fee and commission income | | | 3 | | | | 785 | | | | 789 | | | | 751 | |
Fee and commission expense | | | 3 | | | | (90) | | | | (90) | | | | (107) | |
|
Net fee and commission income | | | | | | | 695 | | | | 699 | | | | 644 | |
Dividend income | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Net trading income | | | | | | | 260 | | | | 408 | | | | 471 | |
Other operating income, net | | | 4 | | | | 327 | | | | 134 | | | | 67 | |
|
Total operating income | | | | | | | 2,782 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,355 | |
|
Administration expenses | | | 5 | | | | (1,369) | | | | (1,420) | | | | (1,577) | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | 6 | | | | (205) | | | | (215) | | | | (195) | |
|
Total operating expenses excluding provisions and charges | | | | | | | (1,574) | | | | (1,635) | | | | (1,772) | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | 8 | | | | (344) | | | | (344) | | | | (218) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | | | | | – | | | | (63) | | | | (3) | |
|
Total operating provisions and charges | | | | | | | (344) | | | | (407) | | | | (221) | |
|
Profit on continuing operations before tax | | | | | | | 864 | | | | 428 | | | | 362 | |
Tax on profit on continuing operations | | | 9 | | | | (179) | | | | (115) | | | | (108) | |
|
Profit for the year from continuing operations | | | | | | | 685 | | | | 313 | | | | 254 | |
(Loss)/ profit for the year from discontinued operations | | | 11 | | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | 166 | |
|
Profit for the year | | | | | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | |
|
Attributable to: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity holders of the parent | | | | | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | |
|
The Notes on pages 83 to 125 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
63
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As at 31 December 2007 and 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | Notes | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 12 | | | | 1,038 | | | | 888 | |
Trading assets | | | 13 | | | | 56,427 | | | | 62,314 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 14 | | | | 9,951 | | | | 8,336 | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 15 | | | | 11,783 | | | | 8,713 | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 16 | | | | 3,441 | | | | 2,242 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 17 | | | | 112,147 | | | | 103,146 | |
Available for sale securities | | | 19 | | | | 40 | | | | 23 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | | | | | 217 | | | | – | |
Investment in associated undertakings | | | 21 | | | | 29 | | | | 22 | |
Intangible assets | | | 22 | | | | 90 | | | | 90 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 23 | | | | 528 | | | | 415 | |
Operating lease assets | | | 24 | | | | 2,164 | | | | 2,082 | |
Current tax assets | | | | | | | 197 | | | | 223 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 25 | | | | 665 | | | | 804 | |
Other assets | | | 26 | | | | 906 | | | | 2,507 | |
|
Total assets | | | | | | | 199,623 | | | | 191,805 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 27 | | | | 7,923 | | | | 6,656 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 28 | | | | 69,650 | | | | 66,519 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 14 | | | | 9,931 | | | | 10,218 | |
Trading liabilities | | | 29 | | | | 54,916 | | | | 57,604 | |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | 30 | | | | 7,538 | | | | 8,151 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 31 | | | | 35,712 | | | | 28,998 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 32 | | | | 1,419 | | | | 1,655 | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 33 | | | | 4,732 | | | | 5,020 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | | | | | – | | | | 174 | |
Other liabilities | | | 34 | | | | 2,337 | | | | 1,616 | |
Provisions | | | 35 | | | | 131 | | | | 180 | |
Current tax liabilities | | | | | | | 369 | | | | 300 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 25 | | | | 544 | | | | 564 | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | 36 | | | | 979 | | | | 1,034 | |
|
Total liabilities | | | | | | | 196,181 | | | | 188,689 | |
|
Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share capital | | | 38 | | | | 148 | | | | 148 | |
Share premium account | | | 38 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 1,857 | |
Retained earnings | | | 39 | | | | 1,339 | | | | 1,111 | |
|
| | | | | | | 3,344 | | | | 3,116 | |
Minority interest | | | 39 | | | | 98 | | | | – | |
|
Total shareholders equity | | | | | | | 3,442 | | | | 3,116 | |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | | | | | | 199,623 | | | | 191,805 | |
|
The Notes on pages 83 to 125 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Financial Statements on pages 63 to 125 were approved by the Board on 4 March 2008 and signed on its behalf by:
Nathan Bostock
Chief Financial Officer
64
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Recognised Income and Expense
For the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Notes | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Actuarial gains/(losses) on defined benefit pension plans | | | 36 | | | | (113) | | | | 219 | | | | (154) | |
Gains on available for sale securities | | | | | | | 19 | | | | 1 | | | | – | |
Gains on available for sale securities transferred to profit or loss on sale | | | | | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | | | | | | | (1) | | | | (9) | | | | 3 | |
Tax on items taken directly to equity | | | | | | | 9 | | | | (66) | | | | 46 | |
|
Net gain/(loss) recognised directly in equity | | | | | | | (87) | | | | 145 | | | | (105) | |
Profit for the year | | | | | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | |
|
Total recognised income and expense for the year | | | | | | | 598 | | | | 213 | | | | 315 | |
|
Effect of changes in accounting policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS transition adjustments at 1 January 2005: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | | | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (293) | |
|
| | | | | | | 598 | | | | 213 | | | | 22 | |
|
Attributable to: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity holders of the parent | | | | | | | 598 | | | | 213 | | | | 22 | |
|
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
For the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Notes | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net cash flow used in operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit for the year | | | | | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | |
Adjustments for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non cash items included in net profit | | | | | | | 1,307 | | | | 1,125 | | | | 273 | |
Change in operating assets | | | | | | | (12,411) | | | | (9,636) | | | | (11,541) | |
Change in operating liabilities | | | | | | | (785) | | | | (3,387) | | | | 3,645 | |
Income taxes paid | | | | | | | (5) | | | | (60) | | | | (132) | |
Effects of exchange rate differences | | | | | | | 396 | | | | (1,196) | | | | 80 | |
|
Net cash flow used in operating activities | | | 40 | | | | (10,813) | | | | (13,086) | | | | (7,255) | |
|
Net cash flows (used in)/from investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends received from associates | | | | | | | – | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | |
Investment in associates | | | | | | | (8) | | | | (1) | | | | (5) | |
Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed | | | 40 | | | | 5 | | | | 244 | | | | 845 | |
Disposal of non-controlling interest in subsidiaries | | | | | | | 203 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Purchase of tangible and intangible fixed assets | | | | | | | (407) | | | | (230) | | | | (329) | |
Proceeds from sale of tangible and intangible fixed assets | | | | | | | 8 | | | | 5 | | | | 190 | |
Proceeds from sale of investment properties | | | | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,332 | |
Sale/(purchase) of non-dealing securities | | | | | | | 3 | | | | (9) | | | | (2) | |
|
Net cash flow (used in)/from investing activities | | | | | | | (196) | | | | 12 | | | | 2,034 | |
|
Net cash flow from financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issue of loan capital | | | | | | | 13,363 | | | | 10,778 | | | | 4,351 | |
Repayment of loan capital | | | | | | | (8,587) | | | | (8,813) | | | | (2,925) | |
Dividends paid | | | | | | | – | | | | (207) | | | | – | |
|
Net cash flow from financing activities | | | | | | | 4,776 | | | | 1,758 | | | | 1,426 | |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | (6,233) | | | | (11,316) | | | | (3,795) | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | | | | | | | (3,847) | | | | 8,241 | | | | 11,259 | |
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | (725) | | | | (772) | | | | 777 | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | | | | | | | (10,805) | | | | (3,847) | | | | 8,241 | |
|
The Notes on pages 83 to 125 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
65
Financial Statements
Company Balance Sheet
As at 31 December 2007 and 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | Notes | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 12 | | | | 1,032 | | | | 888 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 14 | | | | 689 | | | | 646 | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 15 | | | | 7,500 | | | | 66 | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 16 | | | | 40,685 | | | | 41,711 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 17 | | | | 110,976 | | | | 103,249 | |
Available for sale securities | | | 19 | | | | 28 | | | | 12 | |
Investment in associated undertakings | | | 21 | | | | 33 | | | | 25 | |
Investment in subsidiary undertakings | | | 20 | | | | 5,053 | | | | 4,926 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 23 | | | | 501 | | | | 395 | |
Current tax asset | | | | | | | 190 | | | | 192 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 25 | | | | 620 | | | | 747 | |
Other assets | | | 26 | | | | 686 | | | | 744 | |
|
Total assets | | | | | | | 167,993 | | | | 153,601 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 27 | | | | 59,798 | | | | 61,123 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 28 | | | | 95,687 | | | | 80,104 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 14 | | | | 1,051 | | | | 681 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 31 | | | | – | | | | 4 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 32 | | | | 834 | | | | 1,082 | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 33 | | | | 5,352 | | | | 5,563 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | | | | | 3 | | | | 6 | |
Other liabilities | | | 34 | | | | 1,452 | | | | 1,027 | |
Provisions | | | 35 | | | | 100 | | | | 157 | |
Current tax liabilities | | | | | | | 137 | | | | 122 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 25 | | | | 6 | | | | – | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | 36 | | | | 982 | | | | 1,033 | |
|
Total liabilities | | | | | | | 165,402 | | | | 150,902 | |
|
|
Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share capital | | | 38 | | | | 148 | | | | 148 | |
Share premium account | | | 38 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 1,857 | |
Retained earnings | | | 39 | | | | 586 | | | | 694 | |
|
Total shareholders equity | | | | | | | 2,591 | | | | 2,699 | |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | | | | | | 167,993 | | | | 153,601 | |
|
The Notes on pages 83 to 125 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Financial Statements on pages 63 to 125 were approved by the Board on 4 March 2008 and signed on its behalf by:
Nathan Bostock
Chief Financial Officer
66
Financial Statements
Company Statement of Recognised Income and Expense
For the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Actuarial gains/(losses) on defined benefit pension plans | | | (116) | | | | 180 | | | | (152) | |
Gains on available for sale securities | | | 18 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Gains on available for sale securities transferred to profit or loss on sale | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Tax on items taken directly to equity | | | 10 | | | | (54) | | | | 46 | |
|
Net gain/(loss) recognised directly in equity | | | (89) | | | | 126 | | | | (106) | |
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | 351 | | | | (128) | | | | 691 | |
|
Total recognised income and expense for the year | | | 262 | | | | (2) | | | | 585 | |
Effect of changes in accounting policy | | | | | | | | | | | | |
IFRS transition adjustments at 1 January 2005: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | | – | | | | – | | | | (332) | |
|
| | | 262 | | | | (2) | | | | 253 | |
|
Attributable to: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity holders of the parent | | | 262 | | | | (2) | | | | 253 | |
|
Company Cash Flow Statement
For the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2007 | | | Restated(1) 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Notes | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net cash flow from/(used in) operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | | | | | 351 | | | | (128) | | | | 691 | |
Adjustments for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non cash items included in net profit | | | | | | | 446 | | | | 251 | | | | (108) | |
Change in operating assets | | | | | | | (8,761) | | | | (19,662) | | | | (8,338) | |
Change in operating liabilities | | | | | | | 24,391 | | | | 10,720 | | | | 1,938 | |
Income taxes (paid)/received | | | | | | | 48 | | | | 56 | | | | (8) | |
Effects of exchange rate differences | | | | | | | – | | | | (108) | | | | 122 | |
|
Net cash flow from/(used in) operating activities | | | 40 | | | | 16,475 | | | | (8,871) | | | | (5,703) | |
|
Cash flows from/(used) in investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase in investment in subsidiaries | | | | | | | (418) | | | | (54) | | | | – | |
Investment in associates | | | | | | | (8) | | | | (1) | | | | (5) | |
Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed | | | | | | | 415 | | | | 3,751 | | | | – | |
Disposal of non-controlling interest in subsidiary | | | | | | | 203 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Pre-acquisition dividends | | | | | | | – | | | | 197 | | | | – | |
Purchase of tangible and intangible fixed assets | | | | | | | (181) | | | | (179) | | | | (185) | |
Proceeds from sale of tangible and intangible fixed assets | | | | | | | – | | | | 3 | | | | 56 | |
Purchase of non-dealing securities | | | | | | | – | | | | (9) | | | | (3) | |
Proceeds from sale and redemption of non-dealing securities | | | | | | | 3 | | | | 269 | | | | 178 | |
|
Net cash flow from investing activities | | | | | | | 14 | | | | 3,977 | | | | 41 | |
|
Cash flows from/(used in) financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issue of loan capital | | | | | | | 65 | | | | – | | | | 554 | |
Repayment of loan capital | | | | | | | (641) | | | | (1,032) | | | | (458) | |
Dividends paid | | | | | | | – | | | | (207) | | | | – | |
|
Net cash flows from/(used in) financing activities | | | | | | | (576) | | | | (1,239) | | | | 96 | |
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | 15,913 | | | | (6,133) | | | | (5,566) | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | | | | | | | (21,217) | | | | (15,084) | | | | (9,518) | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | | | | | | | (5,304) | | | | (21,217) | | | | (15,084) | |
|
(1) | | A description of the restatement can be found in the Accounting policies on page 77. |
|
| | |
The Notes on pages 83 to 125 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
67
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies
International Financial Reporting Standards
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as approved by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’), interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (‘IFRIC’) of the IASB that, under European Regulations, are effective or available for early adoption at the Group’s reporting date. The Group has complied with IFRS as issued by the IASB in addition to complying with its legal obligation to comply with IFRS as adopted for use in the European Union.
Disclosures required by IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosure” relating to the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments can be found in the “Risk Management” section on pages 33 to 49 which form part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Developments
In 2007, the Group adopted the following new or revised IFRS:
a) | | The amendment to International Accounting Standard (‘IAS’) 1 “Capital Management” which requires that certain disclosures are made regarding the entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital. The Group’s capital management disclosures can be found in Note 47 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 122. |
|
b) | | IFRIC 9 “Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives” which requires that there should be no reassessment of whether an embedded derivative should be separated from the host contract after initial recognition, unless there have been changes to the contract. The adoption of IFRIC 9 had no impact on the Group’s profit or loss or financial position. The Group’s accounting policy for embedded derivatives can be found on page 72. |
|
c) | | IFRIC 10 “Interim Financial Reporting” which requires that an impairment loss recognised in an interim period on goodwill, investment in equity instruments and financial assets carried at cost, is not reversed. The Group’s accounting policy for impairment can be found on pages 73 and 74. |
|
d) | | Early adopted IFRS 8 “Operating Segments” for its consolidated financial statements. IFRS 8 requires a segmental analysis based on information used by management. The Group’s segmental disclosures can be found in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 83 to 86. |
The adoption of these amendments did not have a material impact on the Group’s profit or loss for the year or financial position at the year-end.
Future Developments
The Group has not yet adopted the following new or revised IFRS or Interpretations, which have been issued but which are not yet effective for the Group:
a) | | IAS 23 “Borrowing Costs” – On 29 March 2007, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 23 “Borrowing costs” which removes the option to expense borrowing costs incurred during the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset. The Group does not expect the adoption of the amendment to IAS 23 to have a material impact on the Group’s profit or loss or financial position. The amendment to IAS 23 is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. |
|
b) | | IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” – On 6 September 2007, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” which changes the way in which non-owner changes in equity are required to be presented. It also changes the titles of primary financial statements as they will be referred to in IFRS but does not require that these be renamed in an entity’s financial statements. The Group does not expect the adoption of the amendment to IAS 1 to have an impact on the financial statements. The amendment to IAS 1 is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. |
|
c) | | IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” – On 10 January 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” which clarifies and changes certain elements of accounting for a business combination, including measurement of contingent consideration, step acquisition and intangible assets and also widens the scope of this standard. There are also associated amendments to IAS 27, IAS 28 and IAS 31. The amendment to IFRS 3 is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. |
|
d) | | IFRIC 11 “IFRS 2 – Group and Treasury Share Transactions” – On 30 November 2006 IFRIC issued IFRIC 11 which requires that treasury share transactions are treated as equity-settled, and share-based payments involving equity instruments of the parent should be treated as equity-settled where the obligation is from the parent to the employee and cash-settled when the obligation is from the subsidiary to the employee. This is consistent with the Group’s current practice therefore the Group does not expect the adoption of IFRIC 11 to have a material impact on the Group’s profit or loss or financial position. IFRIC 11 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 March 2007. |
|
e) | | IFRIC 14 “IAS 19 – The Asset Ceiling” – On 5 July 2007 IFRIC issued IFRIC 14 which clarifies the effect of minimum funding requirements on the recognition of a defined benefit asset. The Group does not expect the adoption of IFRIC 14 to have a material impact on the Group’s profit or loss or financial position. IFRIC 14 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2008. |
Basis of preparation
The Financial Statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available for sale financial assets, financial assets and financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss and all derivative contracts.
68
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Consolidation
a) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries, which are those companies and other entities (including Special Purpose Entities) over which the Group, directly or indirectly, has power to govern the financial and operating policies, are consolidated. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are presently exercisable or presently convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity. The Company recognises investments in subsidiaries at cost less impairment.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and are no longer consolidated from the date that control ceases. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries. The cost of an acquisition is measured at the fair value of the assets given up, shares issued or liabilities undertaken at the date of acquisition, plus directly attributable acquisition costs. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the tangible and intangible net assets of the subsidiary acquired is recorded as goodwill. Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated; unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the cost cannot be recovered. The accounting reference date of the Company and its subsidiary undertakings is 31 December, with the exception of those leasing, investment, insurance and funding companies which, because of commercial considerations, have various accounting reference dates. The Financial Statements of these subsidiaries have been consolidated on the basis of interim Financial Statements for the period to 31 December.
b) Associates
Investments in associates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting and are initially recognised at cost. Under this method, the Group’s share of the post-acquisition profits or losses of associates is recognised in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is recognised in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the cost of the investment. The Company recognises investments in associates at cost less impairment.
Associates are entities in which the Group has between 20% and 50% of the voting rights, or over which the Group has significant influence, but which it does not control. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are presently exercisable or presently convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group has significant influence over another entity. Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the associates; unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. The Group’s investment in associates includes goodwill on acquisition. When the Group’s share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate the Group does not recognise further losses unless the Group has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associates.
Foreign currency translation
Items included in the Financial Statements of each entity of the Group are measured using the currency that best reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to that entity (‘the functional currency’). The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in Pounds Sterling, which is the functional currency of the parent.
Income statements and cash flows of foreign entities are translated into the Group’s reporting currency at average exchange rates for the year and their balance sheets are translated at the exchange rates ruling on 31 December. Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities are taken to shareholders’ equity. When a foreign entity is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement. The amount of exchange differences recognised in profit or loss on items not at fair value through profit or loss was £201m loss (2006: £1,021m gain).
Revenue recognition
(a) Interest Income and Expense
Income on financial assets that are classified as loans and receivables or available for sale, and interest expense on financial liabilities other than those at fair value through profit and loss are determined using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts the estimated future cash payments or receipts over the expected life of the instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the future cash flows are estimated after considering all the contractual terms of the instrument excluding future credit losses. The calculation includes all amounts paid or received by the Group that are an integral part of the overall return, direct incremental transaction costs related to the acquisition, issue or disposal of the financial instrument and all other premiums or discounts. Interest income on assets classified as loans and receivables or available for sale, interest expense on liabilities classified at amortised cost and interest income and expense on hedging derivatives are recognised in interest income and interest expense in the income statement.
(b) Fee and commissions income
Fees and commissions that are not an integral part of the effective interest rate are recognised when the service has been provided. For the asset management products, fee and commission income consists principally of distribution fees from mutual funds and structured products. Revenue from distribution fees and transfer agent fees is recognised as earned when the service has been provided.
69
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Portfolio and other management advisory and service fees are recognised based on the applicable service contracts. Asset management fees related to investment funds are recognised rateably over the period the service is provided. The same principle is applied for wealth management, financial planning and custody services that are continuously provided over an extended period of time.
(c) Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets and liabilities held for trading, and financial assets and financial liabilities designated as fair value through profit or loss are recorded at fair value. Changes in fair value of trading assets and liabilities including trading derivatives are recognised in the income statement as net trading income together with dividends and interest receivable and payable. Changes in fair value of assets and liabilities designated as fair value through profit or loss are recognised in other operating income together with dividends, interest receivable and payable and changes in fair value of derivatives managed in conjunction with these assets and liabilities. Changes in fair value of derivatives in a designated hedging relationship are recognised in other operating income.
Pensions and other post retirement benefits
Group companies have various pension schemes. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds as determined by periodic actuarial calculations. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that defines an amount of pension benefit to be provided, usually as a function of one or more factors such as age, years of service or compensation. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions as they fall due into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods.
The liability recognised in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date, less the fair value of plan assets. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. Full actuarial valuations of the Group’s principal defined benefit schemes are carried out every year. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates of high quality corporate bonds, which have terms to maturity approximating the terms of the related liability. The Group’s consolidated income statement includes the current service cost of providing pension benefits, the expected return on schemes’ assets net of expected administration costs, and the interest cost on the schemes’ liabilities. Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are taken directly to reserves and recognised in the statement of recognised income and expense. Past-service costs are charged immediately to the income statement, unless the changes are conditional on the employees remaining in service for a specified period of time, known as the vesting period. In this case, the past-service costs are amortised on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits become vested.
For defined contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. Once the contributions have been paid, the Group has no further payment obligations. The regular contributions constitute net periodic costs for the year in which they are due and as such are included in staff costs. Curtailment gains and losses on sold businesses that meet the definition of discontinued operations are included in operating expenses in profit or loss for the year from discontinued operations.
Share-based payments
The Group engages in cash settled and equity-settled share-based payment transactions in respect of services received from certain of its employees. Shares of the Group’s parent, Banco Santander, S.A. are purchased in the open market by the Group for the Executive Share Option Scheme, the Employee Sharesave scheme and awards granted under the Medium Term Incentive Plan or Banco Santander, S.A. or another group company for awards granted under the Long Term Incentive Plan to satisfy share options as they vest. The Executive Share Option scheme, the Employee Sharesave scheme and awards granted under the Medium Term Incentive Plan are accounted for as cash-settled share-based payment transactions. Awards granted under the Long Term Incentive Scheme are accounted for as equity-settled share-based payment transactions. Prior to the acquisition of Abbey by Banco Santander, S.A., share options were satisfied by issue of new Abbey shares. These options were accounted for as equity settled share-based payments. The fair value of the services received is measured by reference to the fair value of the shares or share options initially on the date of the grant and then subsequently at each reporting date. The cost of the employee services received in respect of the shares or share options granted is recognised in the income statement within administrative expenses, over the period that the services are received, which is the vesting period. A liability equal to the portion of the goods or services received is recognised at the current fair value determined at each balance sheet date for cash-settled, share-based payments. A liability equal to the amount to be reimbursed to Banco Santander, S.A. is recognised at the current fair value determined at the grant date for equity-settled share based payments. The fair value of the options granted under the Executive Share Option scheme, the Employee Sharesave scheme and awards granted under the Medium Term Incentive Plan is determined using an option pricing model, which takes into account the exercise price of the option, the current share price, the risk free interest rate, the expected volatility of the Banco Santander, S.A. share price over the life of the option, the dividend growth rate and other relevant factors.
The fair value of the awards granted for the Long Term Incentive Plan were valued by an independent expert at the grant date using an option pricing model, which takes into account the expected life of the options, interest rates, volatility of the Banco Santander, S.A. share price over the life of the option, exercise price, market price and dividends. Except for those that include terms related to market conditions, vesting conditions included in the terms of the grant are not taken into account in estimating fair value.
70
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of shares or share options included in the measurement of the cost of employee service so that ultimately, the amount recognised in the income statement reflects the number of vested shares or share options.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary/associate at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on the acquisition of subsidiaries is included in Intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisitions of associates is included as part of Investment in associates. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.
Other intangible assets are recognised if they arise from contracted or other legal rights or if they are capable of being separated or divided from the Group and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. The value of such intangible assets is amortised on a straight-line basis over the useful economic life of the assets in question, which ranges from 12 to 20 years. Other intangible assets are reviewed annually for impairment indicators and tested for impairment where indicators are present.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment include owner-occupied properties, office fixtures and equipment and computer software. Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. A review for indications of impairment is carried out at each reporting date. Gains and losses on disposal are determined by reference to the carrying amount and are reported in other operating income. Repairs and renewals are charged to the income statement when the expenditure is incurred.
Software development costs are capitalised when they are associated with identifiable and unique software products that are expected to provide future economic benefits and the cost of these products can be measured reliably. Internally developed software meeting these criteria and externally purchased software are classified in property, plant and equipment on the balance sheet. Costs associated with maintaining software programmes are expensed as incurred. Classes of property, plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their useful life as follows:
| | |
|
Owner-occupied properties | | Not exceeding 50 years |
Office fixtures and equipment | | 3 to 10 years |
Computer software | | 3 - 7 years |
|
Financial assets
The Group classifies its financial assets as: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables and available for sale financial assets. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition.
(a) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets are classified as fair value through profit or loss if they are either held for trading or otherwise designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. A financial asset is classified as held for trading if it is a derivative or it is acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near term, or forms part of a portfolio of financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of short-term profit taking.
In certain circumstances financial assets other than those that are held for trading are designated at fair value through profit or loss where this results in more relevant information because it significantly reduces a measurement inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or recognising the gains or losses on them on a different basis, where the assets are managed and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis, or where a financial asset contains one or more embedded derivatives which are not closely related to the host contract.
Trading assets, Derivative financial instruments and Financial assets designated at fair value are classified as fair value through profit or loss. They are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired or when the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
(b) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and which are not classified as available for sale or fair value through profit or loss. They arise when the Group provides money or services directly to a customer with no intention of trading the loan. Loans and receivables are initially recognised at fair value including direct and incremental transaction costs. They are subsequently valued at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. They are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership. Loans and advances to banks and Loans and advances to customers are all classified as amortised cost.
(c) Available for sale
Available for sale investments are non-derivative financial investments that are designated as available for sale and are not categorised into any of the other categories described. They are initially recognised at fair value including direct and incremental transaction costs. They are subsequently held at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are included as a separate component of equity until sale when the cumulative gain or loss is transferred to the income statement. Interest is determined using the effective interest method.
71
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Income on investments in equity shares and other similar interests is recognised in the income statement as and when dividends are declared and interest is accrued. Impairment losses and foreign exchange translation differences on monetary items are recognised in the income statement. The investments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. Available for sale securities are classified as available for sale.
(d) Held to maturity
Held to maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity that an entity has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Held to maturity investments are initially recognised at fair value including direct and incremental transaction costs. They are subsequently valued at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. They are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership. The Group does not hold any held to maturity financial assets.
Regular way purchases of financial assets
Regular way purchases of financial assets classified as loans and receivables are recognised on settlement date; all other regular way purchases are recognised on trade date. The assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities including derivatives are offset and the net amount reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Sale and repurchase agreements (including stock borrowing and lending)
Securities sold subject to a linked repurchase agreement (‘repos’) are retained in the Financial Statements as trading assets and the counterparty liability is included in amounts “Deposits by banks” or “Deposits by customers” within trading liabilities as appropriate. Securities purchased under agreements to resell (‘reverse repos’) are recorded as “Loans and advances to banks” or “Loans and advances to customers” within trading assets as appropriate. The difference between the sale and repurchase price is treated as trading income in the income statement. Securities lent to counterparties that are collateralised by cash are also retained in the balance sheet. Securities borrowing and lending transactions collateralised with other securities are not recognised in the balance sheet.
Derivative financial instruments
Transactions are undertaken in derivative financial instruments (‘derivatives’), which include interest rate, cross currency, equity, residential property and other index-related swaps, forwards, caps, floors, swaptions, as well as credit default and total return swaps, equity index contracts and exchange traded interest rate futures and equity index options. Derivatives are contracts or agreements whose value is derived from one or more underlying indices or asset values inherent in the contract or agreement, which require no or little initial net investment and are settled at a future date.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. Fair values are obtained from quoted market prices in active markets, including recent market transactions, and valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models and option pricing models as appropriate. All derivatives are carried as assets when fair value is positive and as liabilities when fair value is negative.
Certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments, such as the conversion option in a convertible bond, are treated as separate derivatives when their economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract and the hybrid contract is not carried at fair value through profit or loss. These embedded derivatives are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement. Contracts containing embedded derivatives are not subsequently reassessed for separation unless there has been a change in the terms of the contract which significantly modifies the cash flows.
Hedge accounting
The Group designates certain derivatives as hedging instruments of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or firm commitments (fair value hedge). Hedge accounting is used for derivatives designated in this way provided certain criteria are met.
At the time a financial instrument is designated as a hedge, the Group formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument(s) and hedged item(s). Documentation includes risk management objectives and the strategy in undertaking the hedge transaction, together with the methods that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedging relationship. Accordingly, the Group formally assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging derivatives have been and will be highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged items. A hedge is normally regarded as highly effective if, at inception and throughout its life, the Group can expect, and actual results indicate, that changes in the fair value of the hedged items are effectively offset by changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument, and actual results are within a range of 80% to 125%.
72
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
The Group discontinues hedge accounting when it is determined that: a derivative is not, or has ceased to be, highly effective as a hedge; when the derivative expires, or is sold, terminated, or exercised; or when the hedged item matures or is sold or repaid.
The hedge adjustment is classified in the balance sheet in the same category as the hedged item, unless it relates to a macro hedging relationship where the hedge adjustment is recognised as a macro hedge on the face of the balance sheet.
Changes in the fair value of the hedged risk and hedged item are recognised in other operating income. Hedge ineffectiveness represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative differ from changes in the fair value of the hedged item. Such gains and losses are recorded in current period earnings within other operating income. Gains and losses on components of a hedging derivative that are excluded from assessing hedge effectiveness are included in net trading income.
Securitisation transactions
The Group has entered into certain arrangements where undertakings have issued mortgage-backed securities or have entered into funding arrangements with lenders in order to finance specific loans and advances to customers. As the Group has retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the underlying assets, all such financial instruments continue to be held on the Group balance sheet, and a liability recognised for the proceeds of the funding transaction.
Impairment of financial assets
At each balance sheet date the Group assesses whether, as a result of one or more events occurring after initial recognition, there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets classified as available for sale or loans and receivables have become impaired. Evidence of impairment may include indications that the borrower or group of borrowers have defaulted, are experiencing significant financial difficulty, or the debt has been restructured to reduce the burden to the borrower.
(a) Financial assets carried at amortised cost
Impairment losses are assessed individually for the financial assets that are individually significant and individually or collectively for assets that are not individually significant. Balance sheet provisions are maintained at the level that management deems sufficient to absorb probable incurred losses in Abbey’s loan portfolio from homogeneous portfolios of assets and individually identified loans.
A provision for observed losses is established for all past due loans after a specified period of repayment default where it is probable that some of the capital will not be repaid or recovered through enforcement of any applicable security. Once a loan misses a payment (breach of contractual terms) an assessment of the likelihood of collecting the principal and overdue payments is made. This assessment is generally made using statistical techniques based on historic experience. These determinations are supplemented by various formulaic calculations and the application of management judgement.
For individually assessed assets, the Group measures the amount of the loss as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets and the present value of the estimated future cash flows from the asset or group of assets discounted at the original effective interest rate of the asset.
In making collective assessment for impairment, financial assets are assessed for each portfolio segmented by similar risk characteristics. For each risk segment, future cash flows from these portfolios are estimated through the use of historical loss experience. The historical loss experience is adjusted for current observable data, to reflect the effects of current conditions not affecting the period of historical experience, based on observable data. The loss is discounted at the effective interest rate, except where portfolios meet the criteria for short-term receivables. The unwind of the discount over time is reported through interest receivable within the income statement, with the provision reserves on the balance sheet increasing.
Loans that are part of a homogeneous pool of similar loans are placed on default status based on the number of months in arrears, which is determined through the number of missed payments or the number of months in collection. Loans that are not part of a homogeneous pool of similar loans are analysed based on the number of months in arrears on a case-by-case basis and are placed on default status when the probability of default is likely.
Generally, the length of time before an asset is placed on default status for provisioning is when one payment is missed. However, for assessing the level of non-performing asset repayment default depends on the nature of the collateral that secures the advances. On advances secured by residential or commercial property, the default period is three months. For advances secured by consumer goods such as cars or computers, the default period is less than three months, the exact period being dependent on the particular type of loan in this category.
On unsecured advances, such as personal term loans, the default period is generally four missed payments (three months in arrears). Exceptions to the general rule exist with respect to revolving facilities, such as bank overdrafts, which are placed on default upon a breach of the contractual terms governing the applicable account, and on credit card accounts where the default period is three months.
A provision for inherent losses is made for loan losses that have been incurred but have not been separately identified at the balance sheet date because the loan is not yet past due. An example of this situation is where a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties at the reporting date, e.g. due to loss of employment, although the borrower has not yet missed a payment. In these circumstances, an impairment loss had been incurred at the reporting date. The provision for inherent losses is determined on a portfolio basis based on management’s best estimate of the current position based on past experience adjusted by current trends. These statistical techniques involve the following (i) estimation of a period of time called the emergence period, which is discussed below, (ii) assessment of the number of accounts that go into arrears over the emergence period, and (iii) application of the provision methodology outlined for observed provisions to these accounts identified as impaired as a result of this exercise. Accounts that suffered credit deterioration after the reporting date are accordingly excluded from the statistical analysis.
73
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
The emergence period
This is the period which Abbey’s statistical analysis shows to be the period in which losses, that had been incurred but have not been separately identified at the balance sheet date, become evident as the loans turn into past due. Based on Abbey’s statistical analysis at 31 December 2007, the emergence period was three months for unsecured lending and twelve months for secured lending. The longer emergence period for secured lending reflects the fact that a customer is more likely to default on unsecured debt before defaulting on secured lending.
The factors considered in determining the length of the emergence period for unsecured lending are recent changes in customers’ debit/credit payment profiles and credit scores. The factors considered for secured lending are the frequency and duration of exceptions from adherence to the contractual payment schedule.
Once a financial asset or a group of financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, subsequent interest income continues to be recognised on an effective interest rate basis, though on the asset value after provisions have been deducted.
Impairment losses are recognised in the income statement and the carrying amount of the financial asset or group of financial assets is reduced by establishing an allowance for impairment losses. If in a subsequent period the amount of the impairment loss reduces and the reduction can be ascribed to an event after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance.
A write-off is made when all collection procedures have been completed and is charged against previously established provisions for impairment.
(b) Available for sale financial assets
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. In assessing whether assets are impaired, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost is considered evidence. The cumulative loss is measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss previously reported in the income statement and is removed from equity and recognised in the income statement.
If in a subsequent period, the fair value of a debt instrument classified as available for sale increases and the increase is due to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in the income statement (with objective evidence to support this), the impairment loss is reversed through the income statement.
Impairment of non-financial assets
At each balance sheet date, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances dictate, property plant and equipment and intangible assets are assessed for indicators of impairment. If indications are present, these assets are subject to an impairment review. Goodwill is subject to an impairment review as at the balance sheet date each year. The impairment review comprises a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset with its recoverable amount: the higher of the asset’s or cash-generating unit’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Net selling price is calculated by reference to the amount at which the asset could be disposed of in a binding sale agreement in an arm’s length transaction evidenced by an active market or recent transactions for similar assets. Value in use is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows obtainable as a result of the asset’s continued use, including those resulting from its ultimate disposal, at a market based discount rate on a pre tax basis.
The carrying values of fixed assets and goodwill are written down by the amount of any impairment and the loss is recognised in the income statement in the period in which it occurs. An impairment loss recognised in an interim period is not reversed at the balance sheet date. A previously recognised impairment loss relating to a fixed asset may be reversed in part or in full when a change in circumstances leads to a change in the estimates used to determine the fixed asset’s recoverable amount. The carrying amount of the fixed asset will only be increased up to the amount that would have been had the original impairment not been recognised. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. For conducting impairment reviews, cash generating units are the lowest level at which management monitors the return on investment on assets.
Leases
The Group as lessor – Operating lease assets are recorded at deemed cost and depreciated over the life of the asset after taking into account anticipated residual values. Operating lease rental income and depreciation is recognised on a straight-line basis over the life of the asset.
The Group as lessee – The Group enters into operating leases for the rental of equipment or real estate. Payments made under such leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. When an operating lease is terminated before the lease period has expired, any payment to be made to the lessor by way of penalty is recognised as an expense in the period in which termination takes place.
If the lease agreement transfers the risk and rewards of the asset, the lease is recorded as a finance lease and the related asset is capitalised. At inception, the asset is recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or fair value and depreciated over the estimated useful life. The corresponding rental obligations are recorded as borrowings. The aggregate benefit of incentives, if any, is recognised as a reduction of rental expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis.
74
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Insurance
In 2006, the Company sold its entire life insurance business, as described in Note 11. The following insurance accounting policies related to those businesses.
(a) Insurance and investment contract classification
The Group enters into insurance contracts and investment contracts.
Insurance contracts are those contracts which transfer significant insurance risk. Investment contracts are those contracts which carry no significant insurance risk.
A number of insurance and investment contracts contain a Discretionary Participation Feature (‘DPF’) which entitles the holder to receive, as a supplement to guaranteed benefits, additional benefits or bonuses that are likely to be a significant portion of the total contractual benefits and whose amount or timing is contractually at the discretion of the Group and based on the performance of specified assets. Contracts containing a discretionary participation feature are also referred to as participating or with-profits contracts.
For insurance and participating investment contracts, the group continues to use the embedded value basis of accounting used by banking groups, modified, as necessary to comply with the requirements of IFRS (‘IFRS embedded value’). Investment contracts that are non-participating are accounted for as financial instruments.
(b) Insurance and participating investment contracts
The majority of the life insurance contracts issued by the Group are long-term life insurance contracts. The Group also issues life assurance contracts to protect customers from the consequence of events (such as death, critical illness or disability) that would affect the ability of the customer or their dependants to maintain their current level of income. Guaranteed benefits paid on occurrence of the specified insurance event are either fixed or linked to the extent of the economic loss suffered by the policyholder.
Premiums received in respect of life insurance and participating investment contracts are recognised as revenue when due and shown before deduction of commission. Reassurance premiums are charged when they become payable.
Death claims are recognised on receipt of notifications. Maturities and annuity payments are recorded when contractually due. Surrenders are recorded on the earlier of the date paid or date the policy benefit (or part thereof) ceases to be included within the insurance and participating contract liabilities. Claims on participating business include bonuses payable. Claims payable include costs of settlement. Reinsurance recoveries are credited to match the relevant gross amounts.
Insurance and participating investment contract liabilities
Value of in-force life insurance business
The Group recognises as an asset the value of in-force life insurance business in respect of life insurance contracts and participating investment contracts. The asset, which represents the present value of future profits (‘PVFP’) expected to arise from these contracts, is determined by projecting the future surpluses and other net cash flows arising from life insurance contract and participating investment contract business written by the balance sheet date. The PVFP is determined using appropriate economic and actuarial assumptions excluding future investment margins, and is discounted at a rate which reflects the Group’s overall risk premium attributable to this business. The asset in the consolidated balance sheet and movements in the asset in the income statement are determined and shown on a gross of tax basis.
Liabilities are calculated as follows:
Liabilities – non-participating insurance contracts which are not unit linked:
A liability for contractual benefits that are expected to be incurred in the future is recorded when the premium is recognised. The liabilities of the Group’s non-profit life funds are calculated by estimating the future cash flows over the duration of the in-force policies and discounting them back to the valuation date allowing for probabilities of insured event occurrence. The liability will vary with movements in interest rates and with the cost of life insurance and annuity benefits which reflect changes in mortality rates. Assumptions are made in respect of all material factors affecting future cash flows, including future interest rates, mortality and costs. For conventional life and pensions business, the gross premium valuation method has been used.
Liabilities – non-participating insurance contracts which are unit linked:
Allocated premiums in respect of unit linked contracts that are either life insurance contracts or participating investment contracts are recognised as liabilities. These liabilities are increased or reduced by the change in the relevant unit prices over the period and include any amounts necessary to compensate the Group for services to be performed over future periods. They are reduced by policy administration fees, mortality charges, surrender charges and any withdrawals. The mortality charges deducted in each period from the policyholders as a group are considered adequate to cover the total death benefit claims that are expected to occur over the term of the contracts.
Liabilities – participating insurance and investment contracts:
Liabilities of the Group’s with-profits fund, including guarantees and options embedded within products written by that fund, are stated at their realistic values in accordance with the Financial Services Authority’s Realistic Capital regime. The measurement of insurance liabilities is calculated using stochastic methods and therefore reflects both the intrinsic and time value of guarantees and options embedded within products. Economic assumptions are calibrated to observed current market prices.
75
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Unallocated surplus liability
The Group has an obligation to pay policyholders a specified portion of all interest and realisable gains and losses arising from the assets backing participating contracts. Any amounts not yet determined as being due to policyholders are recognised as a liability, which is shown separately from other liabilities.
Liability adequacy test
At each balance sheet date liability adequacy tests are performed to ensure the adequacy of insurance and participating investment contract liabilities. In performing these tests current best estimates of future contractual cash flows and claims handling and administration expenses, as well as investment income from the assets backing such liabilities are used. Any deficiency is immediately charged to the income statement to establish an appropriate provision against these potential losses.
Embedded derivatives
Embedded derivative features contained within insurance contracts are accounted for at fair value and unrealised gains and losses arising on the embedded derivatives are reported in income. Where the risks and characteristics of embedded derivatives are not closely related to those of the host contract and the host contract is not carried at fair value the embedded derivatives are accounted for separately.
Reinsurance
The Group cedes reinsurance in the normal course of business. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers are estimated in a manner consistent with the amounts associated with the reinsured policies and in accordance with the reinsurance contract. Premiums ceded and benefits reimbursed are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a gross basis.
The Group regularly assesses its long-term reinsurance assets for impairment. A reinsurance asset is impaired if there is objective evidence that the Group may not receive all amounts due to it under the terms of the contract and that event has a reliably measurable impact on the amounts that the Group will receive from the reinsurer.
Insurance contracts and business combinations
For insurance contracts acquired in business combinations and portfolio transfers, intangible assets are recognised and are the capitalised value of the future profits that are expected to emerge for the benefit of the shareholders from the acquired business or portfolio transfer. The capitalised value is the actuarially determined fair value of the business calculated using a risk adjusted discount rate and the appropriate assumptions for mortality, morbidity, persistency, expenses and investment return.
Receivables and payables related to insurance and participating investment contracts
Receivables and payables are recognised when due. These include amounts due to and from agents, brokers and insurance contract holders.
(c) Non-participating investment contracts
All of the Group’s non-participating investment contracts are unit linked. These contracts are accounted for as financial liabilities whose value is contractually linked to the fair values of financial assets within the Group’s unitised investment funds. The value of the unit linked financial liabilities is determined using current unit prices multiplied by the number of units attributed to the contract holders at the balance sheet date. Their value is never less than the amount payable on surrender, discounted for the required notice period where applicable.
Premiums and claims
Premiums which are invested on behalf of non-participating investment contract holders and related claims are excluded from the income statement, with all movements in the contract holder liability and related assets recorded in the balance sheet.
Fee income
Revenue in relation to investment management and other related services provided in respect on non-participating investment contracts is recognised in the accounting period in which the services are rendered. These services comprise an indeterminate number of acts over the life of individual contracts. For practical purposes, the Group recognises these fees on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the contract.
Deferred acquisition costs
Directly incremental commissions that vary with and are related to either securing new or renewing existing non-participating investment contracts are capitalised as an intangible asset. This asset is subsequently amortised over the period of the provision of investment management services and is reviewed for impairment in circumstances where its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the asset is greater than the recoverable amount it is written down immediately. All other costs are recognised as expenses when incurred.
Income taxes, including deferred income taxes
The tax expense represents the sum of the income tax currently payable and deferred income tax.
Income tax payable on profits, based on the applicable tax law in each jurisdiction, is recognised as an expense in the period in which profits arise. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible.
76
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
The liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on income tax losses available to carry forward and on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the Financial Statements. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which the assets may be utilised as they reverse. Such deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill and the initial recognition of other assets (other than in a business combination) and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised based on rates enacted or substantially enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries except where the Group is able to control reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that it will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The Company reviews the carrying amount of deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date and reduces it to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred and current tax assets and liabilities are only offset when they arise in the same tax reporting group and where there is both the legal right and the intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Cash and cash equivalents
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise balances with less than three months’ maturity from the date of acquisition, including cash and non-restricted balances with central banks, treasury bills and other eligible bills, net loans and advances to banks, net securities financing amounts and short-term investments in securities.
In 2007, amounts in the Company’s cash flow statement for 2006 on page 67 were restated. The adjustment involved reclassifying £10,326m between Net cash flow from/(used in) operating activities (“Net increase/(decrease) in deposits by banks and deposits by customers”) and cash and cash equivalents (“Net non trading other cash equivalents’). The adjustment arose as a result of the re-analysis of the maturities of intercompany balances.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are initially recognised when the Group becomes contractually bound to the transfer of economic benefits in the future. Financial liabilities are classified as fair value through profit or loss if they are either held for trading or otherwise designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. A financial liability is classified as held for trading if it is a derivative or it is incurred principally for the purpose of selling or being unwound in the near term, or forms part of a portfolio of financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of short-term profit taking.
In certain circumstances financial liabilities other than those that are held for trading are designated at fair value through profit or loss where this results in more relevant information because it significantly reduces a measurement inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets and liabilities or recognising the gains or losses on them on a different basis, or where a financial liability contains one or more embedded derivatives which are not closely related to the host contract. These liabilities are initially recognised at fair value and transactions costs are taken directly to the income statement. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are included directly in the income statement. All other financial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value net of transaction costs incurred. They are subsequently stated at amortised cost and the redemption value recognised in the income statement over the period of the liability using the effective interest method.
Derivative financial instruments, Trading liabilities and Financial liabilities designated at fair value are classified as fair value through profit or loss. Deposits by banks, Deposits by customers, Debt securities in issue, Other borrowed funds and Subordinated liabilities are classified as amortised cost.
Borrowings
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, being the proceeds (fair value of consideration received) net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortised cost or fair value dependent on designation at initial recognition.
Preference shares, which carry a contractual obligation to transfer economic benefits, are classified as other financial liabilities and are presented in other borrowed funds. The dividends on these preference shares are recognised in the income statement as interest expense on an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method.
Share capital
Incremental external costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are deducted from equity net of related income taxes.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised for present obligations arising as consequences of past events where it is more likely than not that a transfer of economic benefits will be necessary to settle the obligation, and it can be reliably estimated.
When a leasehold property ceases to be used in the business, provision is made where the unavoidable costs of the future obligations relating to the lease are expected to exceed anticipated rental income. The net costs are discounted using market rates of interest to reflect the long-term nature of the cash flows.
77
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Provision is made for the anticipated cost of restructuring, including redundancy costs, when an obligation exists. An obligation exists when the Group has a detailed formal plan for restructuring a business, and has raised valid expectations in those affected by the restructuring and has started to implement the plan or announce its main features.
Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose existence will be confirmed only by certain future events or present obligations where the transfer of economic benefit is uncertain or cannot be reliably measured. Contingent liabilities are not recognised but are disclosed unless they are remote.
Financial guarantee contracts
The Group accounts for guarantees that meet the definition of a financial guarantee contract at fair value on initial recognition. In subsequent periods, these guarantees are measured at the higher of the initial fair value less cumulative amortisation and the amount that would be recognised as a provision as described in the Accounting Policies on page 77.
Dividends
Dividends on ordinary shares are recognised in equity in the period in which they are proposed.
Critical accounting policies and areas of significant management judgement
The preparation of the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the Financial Statements and the reported amount of income and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates its estimates and judgements on an ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates and judgements on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following estimates and judgements are considered important to the portrayal of the Group’s financial condition.
(a) Provisions for loans and advances
The Group estimates provisions for loans and advances with the objective of maintaining balance sheet provisions at the level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb actual losses (‘observed provisions’) and inherent losses (‘incurred but not yet observed provisions’) in the Group’s loan portfolio from homogeneous portfolios of assets and individually identified loans in connection with loans and advances to banks and loans and advances to customers. The calculation of provisions on impaired loans and advances is based on the likelihood of the asset being written off (or repossessed in the case of mortgage loans) and the estimated loss on such a write-off. These assessments are made using statistical techniques based on historic experience. These determinations are supplemented by various formulaic calculations and the application of management judgement.
The Group considers accounting estimates related to provisions for loans and advances “critical accounting estimates” because: (i) they are highly susceptible to change from period to period as the assumptions about future default rates and valuation of potential losses relating to impaired loans and advances are based on recent performance experience, and (ii) any significant difference between the Group’s estimated losses (as reflected in the provisions) and actual losses will require the Group to take provisions which, if significantly different, could have a material impact on its future income statement and its balance sheet. The Group’s assumptions about estimated losses are based on past performance, past customer behaviour, the credit quality of recent underwritten business and general economic conditions, which are not necessarily an indication of future losses.
Provisions for loans and advances, less amounts released and recoveries of amounts written off in previous years, are charged to the line item “Impairment losses on loans and advances” in the income statement. The provisions are deducted from the “Loans and advances to banks” and the “Loans and advances to customers” line items on the balance sheet. If the Group believes that additions to the provisions for such credit losses are required, then the Group records additional provisions for credit losses, which would be treated as a charge in the line item “Impairment losses on loans and advances” in the income statement.
The Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2007 include a provision charge for loans and advances in connection with retail lending for an amount equal to £371m. This provision increased reflecting higher default rates in the unsecured portfolios and increased reserving on the secured portfolio as a result of the interest rate rises. In calculating the retail lending provisions, principally within the Retail Banking segment, a range of outcomes was calculated based principally on management’s conclusions regarding the current economic outlook relative to historic experience. Had management used different assumptions regarding the current economic outlook, a larger or smaller provision for loans and advances would have resulted principally in the Retail Banking segment that could have had a material impact on the Group’s reported profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007. Specifically, if management’s conclusions as to the current economic outlook were different, but within the range of what management deemed to be reasonably possible economic outlooks, the provision charge for loans and advances principally in the Retail Banking segment could have decreased in 2007 from an actual provision charge of £371m (2006: £273m, 2005: £207m) by up to £163m (2006: £52m, 2005: £32m), with a potential corresponding increase in the Group’s profit before tax on continuing operations in 2007 of up to 19% (2006: 12%, 2005: 9%), or increased by up to £52m (2006: £6m, 2005: £45m), with a potential corresponding decrease in the Group’s profit before tax on continuing operations in 2007 of up to 6% (2006: 1%, 2005: 12%).
The actual provision charge of £371m (2006: £273m, 2005: £207m) in 2007 was based on what management estimated to be the most probable economic outlook within the range of reasonably possible assumptions.
78
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
(b) Valuation of financial instruments
Financial instruments that are classified at fair value through profit or loss (including those held for trading purposes) or available for sale, and all derivatives, are stated at fair value. The fair value of such financial instruments is the estimated amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.
Initial measurement
The best evidence of the fair value of a financial instrument at initial recognition is the transaction price unless the instrument is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable markets. Any difference between the transaction price and the value based on a valuation technique where the inputs are not based on data from observable current markets is not recognised in profit or loss on initial recognition. Subsequent gains or losses are only recognised to the extent that they arise from a change in a factor that market participants would consider in setting a price.
Subsequent measurement
Financial instruments valued using observable market prices
If a quoted market price in an active market available for an instrument, the fair value is calculated based on the market price.
Financial instruments valued using a valuation technique
In the absence of a quoted market price in an active market a valuation technique is used. Wherever possible, valuation parameters for each product are based on prices directly observable in active markets or that can be derived from directly observable market prices. Observable inputs include interest rates, credit risk, foreign currency exchange prices, commodity prices, equity prices, volatility, prepayment and the contract terms of the instrument. Pricing models use a mathematical methodology based on accepted financial theories and fair value is modelled using one or a combination of pricing models that are widely accepted in the financial services industry, taking into account the product type and its components.
The table below summarises the Group’s trading portfolios and other assets and liabilities held at fair value by valuation methodology at 31 December 2007:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Quoted | | Internal models based on | | | | |
| | | | prices in | | | market | | | data other | | | | | | Valuation |
| | | | active | | | observable | | | than market | | | | | | technique |
Balance sheet category | | | | markets | | | data | | | observable data | | | Total | | | |
| | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trading assets | | Loans and advances to banks | | | – | | | | 8,847 | | | | – | | | | 8,847 | | | A |
| | Loans and advances to customers | | | – | | | | 17,255 | | | | – | | | | 17,255 | | | A |
| | Debt securities | | | 19,118 | | | | 9,713 | | | | – | | | | 28,831 | | | A |
| | Equity securities | | | 1,494 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,494 | | | B |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | Exchange rate contracts | | | – | | | | 1,072 | | | | – | | | | 1,072 | | | C |
| | Interest rate contracts | | | 88 | | | | 6,368 | | | | – | | | | 6,456 | | | A |
| | Equity and credit contracts | | | 523 | | | | 1,782 | | | | 118 | | | | 2,423 | | | A B,C,D |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial assets at fair value | | Loans and advances to customers | | | – | | | | 5,575 | | | | 126 | | | | 5,701 | | | A |
| | Debt securities | | | – | | | | 1,693 | | | | 4,389 | | | | 6,082 | | | A,C,D |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale financial assets | | Debt securities | | | – | | | | 8 | | | | – | | | | 8 | | | A |
| | Equity securities | | | 12 | | | | 20 | | | | – | | | | 32 | | | B |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trading liabilities | | Deposits by banks | | | – | | | | 19,632 | | | | – | | | | 19,632 | | | A |
| | Deposits by customers | | | – | | | | 20,498 | | | | – | | | | 20,498 | | | A |
| | Short positions in securities | | | 2,252 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,252 | | | A |
| | Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | 12,534 | | | | – | | | | 12,534 | | | A |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities | | Exchange rate contracts | | | – | | | | 1,083 | | | | – | | | | 1,083 | | | C |
| | Interest rate contracts | | | – | | | | 6,626 | | | | – | | | | 6,626 | | | A |
| | Equity and credit contracts | | | 216 | | | | 1,858 | | | | 148 | | | | 2,222 | | | A,B,D |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities at fair value | | Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | 7,262 | | | | 276 | | | | 7,538 | | | A |
|
Valuation techniques
A. Fixed income securities and interest rate derivatives
Where the financial instrument is primarily sensitive to changes in interest rates, such as loans and advances to banks, loans and advances to customers, debt securities held, interest rate derivatives, deposits by banks, deposits by customers, short positions in securities and debt securities in issue, valuation is made using discounted cashflow techniques which reference yield curves derived from quoted interest rates in appropriate time bandings, which match the timings of the cashflows and maturities of the instruments. Additional market inputs are used to take into account such factors as bid-offer spread, foreign currency rates, credit risk, basis risk, volatility, liquidity of the market, prepayment and any other embedded optionality features such as caps or floors as appropriate. In these cases the inputs used are derived from observable market prices, such as prices for instruments with similar features or in comparable markets.
79
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
When it is not possible to derive an observable market valuation for a particular feature of an instrument, management uses judgement to determine the fair value of the particular feature. In exercising this judgement, a variety of tools are used including proxy observable data, historical data, and extrapolation techniques, although this is not a significant element of the valuation of the instruments as a whole, with the exception of UK House Price Index options, as described below.
B. Equity instruments
Where the financial instrument is primarily sensitive to changes in equity market prices such as equity securities and equity derivative contracts, valuation is made using equity option pricing models that are widely accepted in the financial services industry. Additional market inputs are used to take into account such factors as bid-offer spread, foreign currency rates, credit risk, volatility, correlation between indices and liquidity of the market as appropriate.
When it is not possible to derive a valuation for a particular feature of an instrument, management uses judgement to determine the fair value of the particular feature. In exercising this judgement, a variety of tools are used including proxy observable data, historical data, and extrapolation techniques. Extrapolation techniques take into account behavioural characteristics of equity markets that have been observed over time, and for which there is a strong case to support an expectation of a continuing trend in the future. Estimates are calibrated to observable market prices when they become available.
C. Exchange rate derivatives
Where the financial instrument is primarily sensitive to changes in foreign currency, such as exchange rate derivatives, valuation is made using derivative pricing models that are widely accepted in the financial services industry. Additional market inputs are used to take into account such factors as bid-offer spread, credit risk, implied volatility, correlation between indices and liquidity of the market as appropriate.
When it is not possible to derive a valuation for a particular feature of an instrument, management uses judgement to determine the fair value of the particular feature. In exercising this judgement, a variety of tools are used including proxy observable data, historical data, and extrapolation techniques.
D. Credit derivatives
Where the financial instrument is primarily sensitive to changes in credit spreads such as credit derivatives, valuation is made using a credit derivative pricing model which is widely accepted in the financial services industry. Additional market inputs are used to take into account such factors as bid-offer spread, correlation, and embedded optionality as appropriate.
When it is not possible to derive a valuation for a particular feature of an instrument, management uses judgement to determine the fair value of the particular feature. In exercising this judgement, a variety of tools are used including proxy observable data, historical data, and extrapolation techniques. For example, estimates of correlation for a basket of underlying credit names can be derived from observing similar correlations derived from traded credit indices.
The Group considers that the accounting estimate related to the valuation of financial assets and financial liabilities including derivatives where quoted market prices are not available is a “critical accounting estimate” because: (i) it is highly susceptible to change from period to period because it requires management to make assumptions about interest rates, volatility, exchange rates, the credit rating of the counterparty, valuation adjustments and specific features of the transactions and (ii) the impact that recognising a change in the valuations would have on the assets reported on its balance sheet as well as its net profit/(loss) could be material.
Changes in the valuation of financial assets and financial liabilities including derivatives where quoted market prices are not available are accounted for in the line item “Net trading income” and “Other operating income” in the income statement and the “Trading assets”, “Financial assets designated at fair value”, “Trading liabilities”, “Financial liabilities designated at fair value”, “Derivative financial instruments” and “Debt securities in issue” line items in the Group’s balance sheet.
Abbey trades in a wide variety of financial instruments in the major financial markets and therefore considers a range of interest rates, volatility, exchange rates, counterparty credit ratings, valuation adjustments and other similar inputs, all of which vary across maturity bands. These are chosen to best reflect the particular characteristics of each transaction. Had management used different assumptions regarding the interest rates, volatility, exchange rates, the credit rating of the counterparty, and valuation adjustments, a larger or smaller change in the valuation of financial assets and financial liabilities including derivatives where quoted market prices are not available would have resulted that could have had a material impact on the Group’s reported profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007. Due to the individual nature of these contracts, the Group does not believe generally it is appropriate to apply a global adjustment to management’s estimates, as it would not give a meaningful sensitivity with respect to financial instrument fair values based on data other than market prices. Sensitivities have been given with respect to key management estimates where they can be separately identified. Further information about sensitivities (including value-at-risk) to market risk arising from financial instrument trading activities can be found in the Risk Management Report on page 44.
Internal models based on information other than market data
The table below provides an analysis of financial instruments valued using internal models based on information other than market data together with the subsequent valuation technique used for each type of instrument. Each instrument is initially valued at transaction price:
80
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance | | Amount |
| | | | sheet value | | recognised in |
| | | | at 31 | | income |
| | | | December | | in |
Instrument | | Valuation technique | | 2007 | | 2007 |
| | | | £m | | £m |
|
1. Derivative assets – Equity and credit contracts | | These property derivatives are valued using a valuation model with Halifax's UK House Price Index (‘HPI’) volatility, HPI forward growth, HPI spot rate, and mortality as inputs to derive valuations. | | | | 98 | | 17 |
|
2. Derivative assets – Equity and credit contracts | | These property derivatives are valued using a valuation model with the HPI spot rate, HPI forward growth, and HPI volatility as inputs to derive valuations. | | | | 20 | | 11 |
|
3. Derivative assets – Exchange rate contracts | | These derivatives are valued using a valuation model with interest rates, foreign exchange rates and long-dated foreign exchange volatility as inputs to derive valuations. | | | | – | | 2 |
|
4. FVTPL – Loans and advances to customers | | These loans are valued using a valuation model with the HPI spot rate, HPI forward growth, HPI volatility, and mortality as inputs to derive valuations. | | | | 126 | | 12 |
|
5. FVTPL – Debt securities | | These debt securities are valued using a valuation model with the HPI spot rate, HPI forward growth, HPI volatility, and mortality as inputs to derive valuations | | | | 268 | | 33 |
|
6. FVTPL – Debt securities | | These prime AAA rated securities are valued using a valuation model with reference to the most relevant generic curve from a consensus pricing service, and an assumption with respect to the specific credit spread for that instrument as inputs to derive valuations. | | | | 4,121 | | 68 |
|
7. Derivative liabilities – Equity and credit contracts | | These derivatives are valued using a valuation model with the HPI spot rate, HPI forward growth, and HPI volatility as inputs to derive valuations | | | | (148) | | (14) |
|
8. FVTPL – Debt securities in issue | | These debt securities are valued using a valuation model with interest rates, foreign exchange rates and long-dated foreign exchange volatility as inputs to derive valuations. | | | | (276) | | (12) |
|
Sensitivity analysis
The impacts of changes in the valuation inputs that are assumptions rather than observable, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and the HPI spot rate, are shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Impact on profit or loss before tax | | | | | | | |
Input | | Assumed | | | Instrument 1 | | | Instrument 2 | | | Instrument 4 | | | Instrument 5 | | | Instrument 6 | | | Instrument 7 | |
| | change | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
HPI forward growth | | | 1 | % | | | 12 | | | | — | | | | 15 | | | | 14 | | | | n/a | | | | (11 | ) |
HPI volatility | | | 1 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | n/a | | | | — | |
Mortality | | 1 year | | | (1 | ) | | | n/a | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
Credit spread | | 10 basis points | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | 11 | | | | n/a | |
|
No sensitivities are presented for the FVTPL — debt securities in issue and related exchange rate derivatives as the terms of these instruments are fully matched. As a result, any changes in the valuation of the debt securities in issue would be exactly offset by an equal and opposite change in the valuation of the exchange rate derivatives. Excluding interest flows, which are based on market observable data, the loss recognised in the year on these FVTPL — debt securities in issue of £4m exactly offset the gain recognised in the year on the related exchange rate derivatives of £4m.
The amount that has yet to be recognised in the income statement that relates to the difference between the transaction price (i.e. the fair value at initial recognition) and the amount that would have arisen had valuation models using unobservable inputs been used on initial recognition, less amounts subsequently recognised, was as follows. This is calculated and reported on a portfolio basis:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | £m | | £m |
|
At 1 January | | 18
| | 32
|
Additions | | 27
| | –
|
Amortisation and releases | | –
| | (14)
|
|
At 31 December | | 45
| | 18
|
|
(c) Provisions for misselling
The Group estimates provisions for misselling with the objective of maintaining reserve levels believed by management to be sufficient to absorb current estimated probable losses in connection with compensation from customers who claim reimbursement of bank charges, and misselling of endowment policies and other products. The calculation of provisions for misselling is based on the estimated number of claims that will be received, of those, the number that will be upheld, and the estimated average settlement per case. These assessments are based on management’s estimate for each of these three factors. In certain instances, the extent to which the Group is required to uphold claims is driven by binding legal decisions or precedents, as described in Note 37 Contingent liabilities and commitments.
The Group considers accounting estimates related to misselling provisions “critical accounting estimates” because: (i) they are highly susceptible to change from period to period per the three factors above, and (ii) any significant difference between the Group’s estimated losses as reflected in the provisions and actual losses will require the Group to take provisions which, if significantly different, could have a material impact on its future income statement and its balance sheet. The Group’s assumptions about estimated losses are based on past claims uphold rates, past customer behaviour, and past average settlements, which are not necessarily an indication of future losses.
81
Financial Statements
Accounting Policies continued
Provisions for misselling are charged to the line item “Provisions for other liabilities and charges” in the income statement. The provision is included in the “Provisions” line item on the balance sheet. If the Group believes that additions to the misselling provision are required, then the Group records additional provisions, which would be treated as a charge in the line item “Provisions for other liabilities and charges” in the income statement.
The Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2007 include a provision charge for misselling in the Retail Banking segment for an amount equal to £nil (2006: £63m, 2005: £10m). In addition, in 2005 claims settled of £70m were charged to administrative expenses. The balance sheet provision decreased from £153m in 2006 to £95m in 2007, reflecting settlement of claims relating to endowments as well as movements on other products. In calculating the misselling provision within the Retail Banking segment, management’s best estimate of the provision was calculated based on conclusions regarding the number of claims that will be received, of those, the number that will be upheld, and the estimated average settlement per case. Had management used different assumptions regarding these factors, a larger or smaller provision for misselling would have resulted in the Retail Banking segment that could have had a material impact on the Group’s reported profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007.
Specifically, if management’s conclusions as to the number of claims that will be received, of those, the number that will be upheld, and the estimated average settlement per case were different, but within the range of what management deemed to be reasonably possible, the provision charge for misselling (excluding bank charges) in the Retail Banking segment could have decreased in 2007 by up to £29m (2006: £7m, 2005: £21m), with a potential corresponding increase in the Group’s profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007 of up to 3% (2006: 2%, 2005: 6%), or increased by up to £19m (2006: £40m, 2005: £65m), with a potential corresponding decrease in the Group’s profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007 of up to 2% (2006: 9%, 2005: 18%). The actual charge in 2007 was based on what management estimated to be the most probable number of claims that will be received, of those, the number that will be upheld, and the estimated average settlement per case within the range of reasonably possible outcomes. With respect to the reimbursement of bank charges, the legal and regulatory position is evolving and is currently unclear, as described in Note 37 Contingent liabilities and commitments. As a result, management are not able to quantify reliably a meaningful sensitivity or range of possible outcomes.
(d) Pensions
The Group operates a number of defined benefit pension schemes as described in Note 36 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The assets of the schemes are measured at their fair values at the balance sheet date. The liabilities of the schemes are estimated by projecting forward the growth in current accrued pension benefits to reflect inflation and salary growth to the date of pension payment, discounted to present value using the interest rate applicable to high-quality AA rated corporate bonds of the same currency and term as the scheme liabilities. Any surplus or deficit of scheme assets over liabilities is recognised in the balance sheet as an asset (surplus) or liability (deficit). An asset is only recognised to the extent that the surplus can be recovered through reduced contributions in the future or through refunds from the scheme. In determining the value of scheme liabilities, assumptions are made by management as to mortality, price inflation, discount rates, pensions increases, and earnings growth. Financial assumptions are based on market conditions at the balance sheet date and can generally be derived objectively. Demographic assumptions require a greater degree of estimation and judgement to be applied to externally derived data.
The Group considers accounting estimates related to pension provisions “critical accounting estimates” because: (i) they are highly susceptible to change from period to period, and (ii) any significant difference between the Group’s estimates of the scheme liabilities and actual liabilities could significantly alter the amount of the surplus or deficit recognised in the balance sheet and the pension cost charged to the income statement. The Group’s assumptions principally about mortality, but also about price inflation, discount rates, pensions increases, and earnings growth are based on past experience and current economic trends, which are not necessarily an indication of future experience.
Pension costs are charged to the line item “Administration expenses” in the income statement. The provision is included in the “Retirement benefit obligations” line item in the balance sheet. If the Group believes that increases to the pensions cost are required, then the Group records additional costs that would be treated as a charge in the line item “Administration expenses” in the income statement.
The Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2007 include current year service cost of £67m and a pension scheme deficit of £979m. The current year service cost of £67m (2006: £92m, 2005: £102m) and pension scheme deficit of £979m (2006: £1,034m, 2005: £1,380m) were reduced, reflecting reductions in scheme membership, salary reviews and changes in discount rates. In calculating the current year service cost and deficit, a range of outcomes was calculated based principally on management’s estimates regarding mortality, price inflation, discount rates, pensions increases, and earnings growth. Had management used different assumptions principally regarding mortality, but also price inflation, discount rate, pensions increases, and earnings growth, a larger or smaller charge for pension costs would have resulted that could have had a material impact on the Group’s reported profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007. Specifically, if management’s conclusions as to mortality, price inflation, discount rates, pensions increases, and earnings growth were different, but within the range of what management deemed to be reasonably possible conclusions, the charge for pension costs could have decreased in 2007 from an actual pension charge of £67m (2006: £92m, 2005: £102m) by up to £13m (2006: £8m, 2005: £5m), with a potential corresponding increase in the Group’s profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007 of up to 2% (2006: 2%, 2005: 1%), or increased by up to £7m (2006: £11m, 2005: £23m), with a potential corresponding decrease in the Group’s profit on continuing operations before tax in 2007 of up to 1% (2006: 3%, 2005: 5%). The actual current year service pension charge of £67m (2006: £92m, 2005: £102m) in 2007 was based on what management estimated to be the most probable mortality, price inflation, discount rates, pensions increases, and earnings growth within the range of reasonably possible values. In addition, if management’s conclusions as to mortality, price inflation, discount rates, pensions increases, and earnings growth were different, but within the range of what management deemed to be reasonably possible conclusions, the value of the deficit at the year end could have decreased in 2007 from an actual of £979m (2006: £1,034m, 2005: £1,380m) by up to £642m (2006: £717m, 2005: £740m), or increased by up to £507m (2006: £297m, 2005: £305m).
82
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements
1. Segments
The principal activity of the Group is financial services. The Group’s business is managed and reported on the basis of the following segments:
| | |
> | | Retail Banking |
> | | Global Banking & Markets |
> | | Corporate Banking |
> | | Wealth Management |
> | | Group Infrastructure |
> | | Sold Life Businesses |
> | | Portfolio Business Unit |
In 2007, the Financial Markets business was renamed Santander Global Banking & Markets (‘Global Banking & Markets’), the Corporate banking business was managed and reported separately from the rest of the Global Banking & Markets business, and short-term funding revenue was transferred from Global Banking & Markets to Group Infrastructure. In addition, the 2005 and 2006 results of the asset management businesses that were sold in 2006 have been reclassified from Wealth Management to Retail Banking. The segmental analysis for 2006 and 2005 has been amended to reflect these changes.
Abbey’s segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each business requires different technology and marketing strategies. Abbey has seven segments. Retail Banking offers a range of personal banking, savings and mortgage products and services. Global Banking & Markets provides financial markets sales, trading and risk management services, as well as manufacturing retail structured products. Corporate Banking offers banking services principally to small and mid-sized UK companies. It also contains specialised businesses and operations in run down. Wealth Management offers self-invested pension plans, WRAP products and specialist banking services. Group Infrastructure consists of Asset and Liability Management activities, Group Capital and Funding. The Sold Life Businesses offered a range of investment products such as pensions, investment bonds, with-profits bonds, structured products, unit trusts, and endowment life insurance policies, as well as a range of protection products such as term life insurance, critical illness cover and disability cover. The Portfolio Business Unit comprised a number of businesses, assets and portfolios that were inconsistent with Abbey’s strategy, and were sold during 2005. From the end of 2005, no businesses are part of this segment.
The segment information below is presented on the basis used by Abbey’s Board to evaluate performance, in accordance with IFRS 8. Abbey’s Board reviews discrete financial information for each of its segments, including measures of operating results and assets. The segments are managed primarily on the basis of their results, which are measured on a “trading” basis. The trading basis differs from the statutory basis (described in the Accounting Policies section on pages 68 to 82) as a result of the application of various adjustments. Management considers that the trading basis provides the most appropriate way of reviewing the performance of the business. The adjustments are:
| | |
> | | Reorganisation and other costs– Comprise implementation costs in relation to the strategic change and cost reduction process, as well as certain remediation administration expenses and credit provisions. Management needs to understand the underlying drivers of the cost base that will remain after these exercises are complete, and does not want this view to be clouded by these costs, which are managed independently. |
> | | Depreciation of operating lease assets– The operating lease businesses are managed as financing businesses and, therefore, management needs to see the margin earned on the businesses. Residual value risk is separately managed. As a result the depreciation is netted against the related income. |
> | | Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries– These profits are excluded from the results to allow management to understand the underlying performance of the business. In 2007, these consisted of the profit on the sale of 49% of James Hay, Cater Allen and Abbey Sharedealing, and small recoveries on certain other transactions. In 2006, the profit on the sale of the Asset Management businesses was similarly excluded. |
> | | Hedging and certain other mark-to-market variances– The Balance Sheet and Income Statement are subject to mark-to-market volatility including from the accounting for elements of derivatives deemed under IFRS rules to be ineffective as hedges. Where appropriate, such volatility is separately identified to enable management to view the underlying performance of the business. |
> | | Capital and other charges– Principally comprise internal nominal charges for capital invested in the Group’s businesses. Management implemented this charge to assess if capital is invested effectively. |
Transactions between the business segments are on normal commercial terms and conditions. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Internal charges and transfer pricing adjustments have been reflected in the performance of each business. Revenue sharing agreements are used to allocate external customer revenues to a business segment on a reasonable basis. Funds are ordinarily reallocated between segments, resulting in funding cost transfers disclosed in total trading income. Interest charged for these funds is based on the Group’s cost of capital.
Interest receivable and interest payable have not been reported separately. The majority of the revenues from the segments presented below are from interest and the Abbey Board relies primarily on net interest revenues to both assess the performance of the segment and to make decisions regarding allocation of segmental resources.
Segment assets and liabilities comprise operating assets and liabilities, being the majority of the balance sheet.
83
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
a) Segmental information
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global | | | | | | | Wealth | | | Group | | | Sold | | | Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Retail | | | Banking & | | | Corporate | | | Manage- | | | Infra- | | | Life | | | Business | | | | | | | Adjust- | | | Group | |
| | Banking | | | Markets | | | Banking | | | ment | | | structure | | | Businesses | | | Unit | | | Total | | | ments | | | Total | |
2007 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,615 | | | | – | | | | (34) | | | | 70 | | | | (152) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,499 | | | | – | | | | 1,499 | |
Non-interest income | | | 645 | | | | 260 | | | | 127 | | | | 34 | | | | 50 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,116 | | | | 167 | | | | 1,283 | |
|
Total trading income | | | 2,260 | | | | 260 | | | | 93 | | | | 104 | | | | (102) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,615 | | | | 167 | | | | 2,782 | |
|
Administration expenses | | | (937) | | | | (105) | | | | (30) | | | | (59) | | | | (105) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,236) | | | | (133) | | | | (1,369) | |
Depreciation/amortisation | | | (59) | | | | (2) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (63) | | | | (142) | | | | (205) | |
|
Total trading expenses | | | (996) | | | | (107) | | | | (30) | | | | (61) | | | | (105) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,299) | | | | (275) | | | | (1,574) | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (239) | | | | – | | | | 29 | | | | (2) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (212) | | | | (132) | | | | (344) | |
|
Trading profit / (loss) before tax | | | 1,025 | | | | 153 | | | | 92 | | | | 41 | | | | (207) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,104 | | | | (240) | | | | 864 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reorganisation and other costs | | | (139) | | | | (6) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (132) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (278) | | | | | | | | | |
Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 5 | | | | – | | | | 105 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 110 | | | | | | | | | |
Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (72) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (72) | | | | | | | | | |
Capital and other charges | | | (81) | | | | – | | | | (8) | | | | 19 | | | | 70 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | | | | | | |
|
Profit/(loss) from continuing operations before tax | | | 805 | | | | 147 | | | | 89 | | | | 59 | | | | (236) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 864 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Average number of staff | | | 13,269 | | | | 389 | | | | 166 | | | | 858 | | | | 221 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 14,903 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total assets | | | 114,306 | | | | 68,060 | | | | 9,357 | | | | 211 | | | | 7,689 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 199,623 | | | | – | | | | 199,623 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Impairment | | | Provisions | | | Profit on | |
| | Net | | | Non | | | | | | Depreciation | | | losses on | | | for other | | | continuing | |
| | Interest | | | interest | | | Administration | | | and | | | loans and | | | liabilities | | | ops before | |
| | income | | | income | | | expenses | | | amortisation | | | advances | | | and charges | | | tax | |
Adjustments comprise: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Reorganisation and other costs | | | – | | | | – | | | | (133) | | | | (13) | | | | (132) | | | | – | | | | (278) | |
Depreciation on operating lease assets | | | – | | | | 129 | | | | – | | | | (129) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | — | |
Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | – | | | | 110 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 110 | |
Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | – | | | | (72) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (72) | |
|
| | | – | | | | 167 | | | | (133) | | | | (142) | | | | (132) | | | | – | | | | (240) | |
|
Changes in interest and exchange rates mean that period on period comparisons of gross interest and other trading income and expense are not meaningful and therefore management only consider these items on a net basis. Similarly, management consider the trading income generated by each segment on the basis of the margin earned on the customer relationship. There is therefore no split which is meaningful of trading income between external customers and intra-Group. No analysis of total trading income from external customers and intra-Group is therefore presented.
84
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global | | | | | | | Wealth | | | Group | | | Sold | | | Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Retail | | | Banking & | | | Corporate | | | Manage- | | | Infra- | | | Life | | | Business | | | | | | | Adjust- | | | Group | |
| | Banking | | | Markets | | | Banking | | | ment | | | structure | | | Businesses | | | Unit | | | Total | | | ments | | | Total | |
2006 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,466 | | | | – | | | | (46) | | | | 62 | | | | (146) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,336 | | | | (108) | | | | 1,228 | |
Non-interest income | | | 648 | | | | 240 | | | | 125 | | | | 32 | | | | 71 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,116 | | | | 126 | | | | 1,242 | |
|
Total trading income | | | 2,114 | | | | 240 | | | | 79 | | | | 94 | | | | (75) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,452 | | | | 18 | | | | 2,470 | |
|
Administration expenses | | | (943) | | | | (92) | | | | (41) | | | | (55) | | | | (149) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,280) | | | | (140) | | | | (1,420) | |
Depreciation/amortisation | | | (62) | | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (69) | | | | (146) | | | | (215) | |
|
Total trading expenses | | | (1,005) | | | | (93) | | | | (41) | | | | (58) | | | | (152) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,349) | | | | (286) | | | | (1,635) | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (273) | | | | – | | | | 27 | | | | – | | | | (5) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (251) | | | | (93) | | | | (344) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (61) | | | | (63) | |
|
Trading profit / (loss) before tax | | | 836 | | | | 147 | | | | 65 | | | | 34 | | | | (232) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 850 | | | | (422) | | | | 428 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reorganisation and other costs | | | (133) | | | | (9) | | | | – | | | | (5) | | | | (151) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (298) | | | | | | | | | |
Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 41 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 41 | | | | | | | | | |
Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | (8) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (37) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (45) | | | | | | | | | |
Capital and other charges | | | (44) | | | | – | | | | (4) | | | | 15 | | | | (87) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (120) | | | | | | | | | |
|
Profit/(loss) from continuing operations before tax | | | 651 | | | | 138 | | | | 61 | | | | 44 | | | | (466) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 428 | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Average number of staff | | | 15,077 | | | | 420 | | | | 178 | | | | 1,309 | | | | 356 | | | | 1,917 | | | | – | | | | 19,257 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total assets | | | 105,214 | | | | 76,164 | | | | 7,495 | | | | 249 | | | | 2,683 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 191,805 | | | | – | | | | 191,805 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Impairment | | | Provisions | | | Profit on | |
| | Net | | | Non | | | | | | Depreciation | | | losses on | | | for other | | | continuing | |
| | Interest | | | interest | | | Administration | | | and | | | loans and | | | liabilities | | | ops before | |
| | income | | | income | | | expenses | | | amortisation | | | advances | | | and charges | | | tax | |
Adjustments comprise: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Reorganisation and other costs | | | – | | | | – | | | | (128) | | | | (16) | | | | (93) | | | | (61) | | | | (298) | |
Depreciation on operating lease assets | | | – | | | | 130 | | | | – | | | | (130) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Profit on part sale of PFS subsidiaries | | | – | | | | 41 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 41 | |
Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | – | | | | (45) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (45) | |
Capital and other charges | | | (108) | | | | – | | | | (12) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (120) | |
|
| | | (108) | | | | 126 | | | | (140) | | | | (146) | | | | (93) | | | | (61) | | | | (422) | |
|
85
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global | | | | | | | Wealth | | | Group | | | Sold | | | Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Retail | | | Banking & | | | Corporate | | | Manage- | | | Infra- | | | Life | | | Business | | | | | | | Adjust- | | | Group | |
| | Banking | | | Markets | | | Banking | | | ment | | | structure | | | Businesses | | | Unit | | | Total | | | ments | | | Total | |
2005 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,332 | | | | – | | | | (25) | | | | 60 | | | | (50) | | | | – | | | | 9 | | | | 1,326 | | | | (154) | | | | 1,172 | |
Non-interest income | | | 608 | | | | 205 | | | | 107 | | | | 26 | | | | 71 | | | | – | | | | 61 | | | | 1,078 | | | | 105 | | | | 1,183 | |
|
Total trading income | | | 1,940 | | | | 205 | | | | 82 | | | | 86 | | | | 21 | | | | – | | | | 70 | | | | 2,404 | | | | (49) | | | | 2,355 | |
|
Administration expenses | | | (1,058) | | | | (90) | | | | (41) | | | | (60) | | | | (116) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (1,366) | | | | (211) | | | | (1,577) | |
Depreciation/amortisation | | | (63) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (67) | | | | (128) | | | | (195) | |
|
Total trading expenses | | | (1,121) | | | | (90) | | | | (41) | | | | (63) | | | | (116) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (1,433) | | | | (339) | | | | (1,772) | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (207) | | | | – | | | | (10) | | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (218) | | | | – | | | | (218) | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (14) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 8 | | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | (3) | |
|
Trading profit / (loss) before tax | | | 615 | | | | 115 | | | | 31 | | | | 8 | | | | (95) | | | | – | | | | 76 | | | | 750 | | | | (388) | | | | 362 | |
Adjust for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reorganisation and other costs | | | (196) | | | | (5) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (13) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (216) | | | | | | | | | |
Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (21) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (18) | | | | | | | | | |
Capital and other charges | | | (37) | | | | – | | | | (7) | | | | 14 | | | | (121) | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | (154) | | | | | | | | | |
|
Profit/(loss) from continuing operations before tax | | | 385 | | | | 110 | | | | 24 | | | | 20 | | | | (250) | | | | – | | | | 73 | | | | 362 | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Average number of staff | | | 15,538 | | | | 500 | | | | 213 | | | | 1,179 | | | | 2,712 | | | | 2,255 | | | | – | | | | 22,397 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total assets | | | 94,302 | | | | 76,464 | | | | 6,724 | | | | 192 | | | | 629 | | | | 28,699 | | | | 24 | | | | 207,034 | | | | – | | | | 207,034 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Impairment | | | Provisions | | | Profit on | |
| | Net | | | Non | | | | | | Depreciation | | | losses on | | | for other | | | continuing | |
| | Interest | | | interest | | | Administration | | | and | | | loans and | | | liabilities | | | ops before | |
| | income | | | income | | | expenses | | | amortisation | | | advances | | | and charges | | | tax | |
Adjustments comprise: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Reorganisation and other costs | | | – | | | | – | | | | (211) | | | | (5) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (216) | |
Depreciation on operating lease assets | | | – | | | | 123 | | | | – | | | | (123) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Hedging and certain other mark to market variances | | | – | | | | (18) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (18) | |
Capital and other charges | | | (154) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (154) | |
|
| | | (154) | | | | 105 | | | | (211) | | | | (128) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (388) | |
|
b) Geographical information
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Total operating income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United Kingdom | | | 2,678 | | | | 2,370 | | | | 2,352 | |
Other | | | 104 | | | | 100 | | | | 3 | |
|
| | | 2,782 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,355 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets other than financial instruments and deferred tax assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United Kingdom | | | 2,809 | | | | 2,606 | | | | | |
Other | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | 2,811 | | | | 2,609 | | | | | |
| | | | |
86
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
2. Net interest income
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Interest and similar income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 227 | | | | 141 | | | | 73 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 6,747 | | | | 5,458 | | | | 5,287 | |
Other interest earning financial assets | | | 69 | | | | 45 | | | | 59 | |
|
Total interest and similar income | | | 7,043 | | | | 5,644 | | | | 5,419 | |
|
Interest expense and similar charges: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 200 | | | | 101 | | | | 9 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 2,905 | | | | 2,514 | | | | 2,578 | |
Debt securities in issue and other borrowed funds | | | 1,726 | | | | 1,269 | | | | 1,175 | |
Other interest bearing financial liabilities | | | 713 | | | | 532 | | | | 485 | |
|
Total interest expense and similar charges | | | 5,544 | | | | 4,416 | | | | 4,247 | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,172 | |
|
3. Net fee and commission income
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Fee and commission income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Insurance | | | 201 | | | | 200 | | | | 176 | |
Banking fees | | | 450 | | | | 473 | | | | 467 | |
Fund management fees | | | 134 | | | | 116 | | | | 108 | |
|
Total fee and commission income | | | 785 | | | | 789 | | | | 751 | |
|
Fee and commission expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other fees paid | | | 90 | | | | 90 | | | | 107 | |
|
Total fee and commission expense | | | 90 | | | | 90 | | | | 107 | |
|
Net fee and commission income | | | 695 | | | | 699 | | | | 644 | |
|
4. Other operating income, net
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Income from operating lease assets | | | 245 | | | | 243 | | | | 231 | |
Income on assets held at fair value through profit or loss | | | 368 | | | | 188 | | | | 241 | |
Expense on liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss | | | (382) | | | | (261) | | | | (318) | |
Gains/(losses) on derivatives managed with assets and liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss | | | (19) | | | | (27) | | | | (100) | |
Profit on sale of a non-controlling interest in subsidiary undertakings | | | 105 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Profit on sale of subsidiary undertakings | | | 7 | | | | 41 | | | | 60 | |
Profit on sale of fixed assets | | | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | |
Other | | | (2) | | | | (51) | | | | (51) | |
|
| | | 327 | | | | 134 | | | | 67 | |
|
5. Administration expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Staff costs: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wages and salaries | | | 529 | | | | 550 | | | | 610 | |
Social security costs | | | 42 | | | | 43 | | | | 53 | |
Pensions costs: – defined contribution plans | | | 7 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
– defined benefit plans | | | 62 | | | | 81 | | | | 92 | |
Other personnel costs | | | 77 | | | | 88 | | | | 97 | |
|
| | | 717 | | | | 766 | | | | 856 | |
Property, plant and equipment expenses | | | 191 | | | | 204 | | | | 189 | |
Information technology expenses | | | 195 | | | | 175 | | | | 151 | |
Other administrative expenses | | | 266 | | | | 275 | | | | 381 | |
|
| | | 1,369 | | | | 1,420 | | | | 1,577 | |
|
6. Depreciation and amortisation
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment excluding operating lease assets | | | 76 | | | | 85 | | | | 72 | |
Depreciation of operating lease assets | | | 129 | | | | 130 | | | | 123 | |
|
| | | 205 | | | | 215 | | | | 195 | |
|
87
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
7. Audit and other services
The fees for audit and other services payable to the Company’s auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, are analysed as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Audit fees: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of the Group’s annual accounts | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.1 | |
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors and its associates for the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | | | 1.8 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 3.6 | |
|
Total audit fees | | | 2.8 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 4.7 | |
|
Non-audit fees: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Other services pursuant to legislation | | | 1.4 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 2.1 | |
– Tax services | | | – | | | | 0.1 | | | | – | |
– Other services | | | 0.7 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 0.6 | |
|
Total non-audit fees | | | 2.1 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 2.7 | |
|
In 2006, fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of the Group’s annual accounts of £1.7m includes £0.6m related to the audit of entities that were disposed of during the year. In 2005, fees relating to the audit of these entities were included in fees payable to the Company’s auditors and its associates for the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation.
Other services pursuant to legislation relate to services carried out by the auditors in relation to statutory and regulatory filings of the Company and its associates. Of this category, £1.0m (2006: £0.3m) accords with the definition of “Audit fees” per U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission guidance, and the remaining £0.4m (2006: £1.2m) accords with the definition of “Audit related fees” per that guidance.
Tax services relate to compliance services on the Group’s tax affairs.
Other services relates to advice on accounting matters and accords with the definition of “Audit related fees” per U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission guidance.
No information technology, internal audit, valuation and actuarial, litigation, recruitment and remuneration or corporate finance services were provided by the external auditors during these years.
A framework for ensuring auditors’ independence has been adopted which defines unacceptable non-audit assignments, pre-approval of acceptable non-audit assignments and procedures for approval of other non-audit assignments by the Audit and Risk Committee. All services provided by the Group’s external auditors are either pre-approved or approved by the Committee.
8. Impairment losses/(recoveries) on loans and advances
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances to customers | | | 388 | | | | 385 | | | | 255 | |
Recoveries of loans and advances to customers | | | (44) | | | | (41) | | | | (37) | |
|
| | | 344 | | | | 344 | | | | 218 | |
|
9. Taxation expense
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Current tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UK corporation tax on profit of the year | | | 122 | | | | 41 | | | | 121 | |
Adjustments and reclassifications in respect of prior periods | | | (31) | | | | 120 | | | | (1) | |
|
Total current tax | | | 91 | | | | 161 | | | | 120 | |
|
Deferred tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current year | | | 68 | | | | 82 | | | | (20) | |
Adjustments and reclassifications in respect of prior periods | | | 20 | | | | (128) | | | | 8 | |
|
Total deferred tax | | | 88 | | | | (46) | | | | (12) | |
|
Tax on profit for the year | | | 179 | | | | 115 | | | | 108 | |
|
Domestic income tax is calculated at 30% (2006: 30%, 2005: 30%) of the estimated assessable profits for the year. The standard rate of UK corporation tax will reduce from 30% to 28% with effect from 1 April 2008. Taxation for other jurisdictions is calculated at the rates prevailing in the relevant jurisdictions.
88
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the basic tax rate of the parent as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Profit before tax | | | 864 | | | | 428 | | | | 362 | |
|
Tax calculated at a tax rate of 30% (2006: 30%, 2005: 30%) | | | 259 | | | | 128 | | | | 109 | |
Non taxable gain on sale of subsidiary undertakings | | | (33) | | | | (12) | | | | (7) | |
Non deductible preference dividends paid | | | 9 | | | | 17 | | | | 15 | |
Effect of non-allowable provisions and other non-equalised items | | | (10) | | | | 1 | | | | 44 | |
Underlying tax relief on overseas dividends | | | – | | | | – | | | | (51) | |
Non-taxable dividend income | | | (3) | | | | (5) | | | | (7) | |
Impairment of goodwill | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1) | |
Effect of non-UK profits and losses | | | (11) | | | | (4) | | | | (1) | |
Utilisation of capital losses for which credit not previously recognised | | | (11) | | | | (2) | | | | – | |
Effect of change in tax rate on deferred tax provision | | | (10) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Adjustment to prior year provisions | | | (11) | | | | (8) | | | | 7 | |
|
Income tax expense | | | 179 | | | | 115 | | | | 108 | |
|
In addition to the income tax expense charged to profit or loss, a deferred tax asset of £9m (2006: liability of £66m, 2005: asset of £46m) has been recognised in equity in the year. Further information about deferred income tax is presented in Note 25.
10. Profit / (loss) on ordinary activities after tax
The profit after tax of the Company attributable to the shareholders is £351m (2006: loss £128m, 2005 profit £691m). As permitted by Section 230 of the Companies Act 1985, the Company’s income statement has not been presented in these Consolidated Financial Statements.
11. Discontinued operations
In 2006, the Company sold its entire life insurance business to Resolution plc for cash consideration of approximately £3.6bn. The principal life companies sold were Scottish Mutual Assurance plc, Scottish Provident Limited and Abbey National Life plc, as well as the two offshore life companies, Scottish Mutual International plc and Scottish Provident International Life Assurance Limited. The life insurance businesses, which constituted the Sold Life Businesses segment, qualify as discontinued operations. The results, and loss on sale, of the discontinued operations were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Total income net of insurance claims | | | – | | | | 236 | | | | 385 | |
Total operating expenses | | | – | | | | (73) | | | | (151) | |
Impairment losses on intangible assets | | | – | | | | (69) | | | | – | |
|
Profit of discontinued operations before tax | | | – | | | | 94 | | | | 234 | |
Taxation expense | | | – | | | | (75) | | | | (68) | |
|
Profit of discontinued operations | | | – | | | | 19 | | | | 166 | |
Loss on sale of discontinued operations before and after tax | | | – | | | | (264) | | | | – | |
|
(Loss) / profit for the year from discontinued operations | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | 166 | |
|
12. Cash and balances with central banks
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cash in hand | | | 365 | | | | 334 | | | | 365 | | | | 334 | |
Balances with central banks | | | 673 | | | | 554 | | | | 667 | | | | 554 | |
|
| | | 1,038 | | | | 888 | | | | 1,032 | | | | 888 | |
|
89
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
13. Trading assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Loans and advances to banks | | | 8,847 | | | | 9,757 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 17,255 | | | | 19,993 | |
Debt securities | | | 28,831 | | | | 29,810 | |
Equity securities | | | 1,494 | | | | 2,754 | |
|
| | | 56,427 | | | | 62,314 | |
|
Debt securities can be analysed by type of issuer as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Issued by public bodies: | | | | | | | | |
– Government securities | | | 3,722 | | | | 2,463 | |
Issued by other issuers: | | | | | | | | |
– Bank and building society certificates of deposit | | | 9,679 | | | | 10,839 | |
Other debt securities | | | 15,430 | | | | 16,508 | |
|
| | | 28,831 | | | | 29,810 | |
|
Debt securities and equity securities can be analysed by listing status as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Debt securities: | | | | | | | | |
– Listed in the UK | | | 8,054 | | | | 3,508 | |
– Listed elsewhere | | | 11,064 | | | | 14,845 | |
– Unlisted | | | 9,713 | | | | 11,457 | |
|
| | | 28,831 | | | | 29,810 | |
|
Equity securities: | | | | | | | | |
– Listed in the UK | | | 965 | | | | 1,850 | |
– Listed elsewhere | | | 529 | | | | 904 | |
|
| | | 1,494 | | | | 2,754 | |
|
The Company has no trading assets (2006: nil).
14. Derivative financial instruments
All derivatives are required to be classified as held for trading and held at fair value through profit or loss. Derivatives are held for trading or for risk management purposes. Abbey chooses to designate certain derivatives as in a hedging relationship if they meet specific criteria.
Derivatives held for trading purposes
Global Banking & Markets is the only area of the Group actively trading derivative products and is additionally responsible for implementing Group derivative hedging with the external market. For trading activities, its objectives are to gain value by:
| | |
> | | Marketing derivatives to end users and hedging the resulting exposures efficiently; and |
> | | The management of trading exposure reflected on the Group’s balance sheet. |
Trading derivatives include interest rate, cross currency, equity, property and other index related swaps, forwards, caps, floors, swaptions, as well as credit default and total return swaps, equity index contracts and exchange traded interest rate futures and equity index options.
Derivatives held for risk management purposes
The main derivatives are interest rate and cross-currency swaps, which are used to hedge the Group’s exposure to interest rates and exchange rates. These risks are inherent in non-trading assets, liabilities and positions, including fixed-rate lending and structured savings products within the relevant operations throughout the Group, including medium-term note issues, capital issues and fixed-rate asset purchases.
The table in the risk management report on page 43 summarises activities undertaken by the Group, the related risks associated with such activities and the types of derivatives used in managing such risks. Such risks may also be managed using natural offsets within other on-balance sheet instruments as part of an integrated approach to risk management.
90
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
Derivative products which are combinations of more basic derivatives (such as swaps with embedded option features), or which have leverage features, may be used in circumstances where the underlying position being hedged contains the same risk features. In such cases, the derivative used will be structured to match the risks of the underlying asset or liability. Exposure to market risk on such contracts is therefore hedged. The fair values of derivative instruments held both for trading and hedging purposes are set out in the following tables. The tables below show the contract or underlying principal amounts, positive and negative fair values of derivatives analysed by contract. Contract or notional amounts indicate the volume of business outstanding at the balance sheet date and do not represent amounts of risk. The fair values represent the amount at which a contract could be exchanged in an arm’s length transaction, calculated at market rates at the balance sheet date.
Derivatives classified as held for trading or held for risk management purposes that have not been designated as in a hedging relationship are classified as derivatives held for trading in the table below. Derivatives that have been designated as in a hedging relationship are classified as derivatives held for fair value hedging below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2007 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for trading | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 28,386 | | | | 816 | | | | 823 | |
- Foreign exchange swaps and forwards | | | 21,524 | | | | 256 | | | | 260 | |
|
| | | 49,910 | | | | 1,072 | | | | 1,083 | |
|
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 436,212 | | | | 5,211 | | | | 5,724 | |
- Caps, floors and swaptions | | | 42,318 | | | | 649 | | | | 621 | |
- Futures (exchange traded) | | | 29,383 | | | | 88 | | | | – | |
- Forward rate agreements | | | 148,742 | | | | 76 | | | | 78 | |
|
| | | 656,655 | | | | 6,024 | | | | 6,423 | |
|
Equity and credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Equity index and similar products | | | 15,204 | | | | 847 | | | | 1,820 | |
- Equity index options (exchange traded) | | | 6,009 | | | | 556 | | | | 216 | |
- Credit default swaps and similar products | | | 35,588 | | | | 1,020 | | | | 186 | |
|
| | | 56,801 | | | | 2,423 | | | | 2,222 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for trading | | | 763,366 | | | | 9,519 | | | | 9,728 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2007 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for fair value hedging | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 2,425 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 39,629 | | | | 432 | | | | 203 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for fair value hedging | | | 42,054 | | | | 432 | | | | 203 | |
|
Total recognised derivative assets and liabilities | | | 805,420 | | | | 9,951 | | | | 9,931 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2007 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for trading | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 7,654 | | | | 25 | | | | 194 | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 48,531 | | | | 181 | | | | 343 | |
- Caps, floors and swaptions | | | 424 | | | | – | | | | 4 | |
|
| | | 48,955 | | | | 181 | | | | 347 | |
|
Equity and credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Equity index and similar products | | | 564 | | | | 120 | | | | 208 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for trading | | | 57,173 | | | | 326 | | | | 749 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2007 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for fair value hedging | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 998 | | | | 222 | | | | – | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 4,207 | | | | 141 | | | | 302 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for fair value hedging | | | 5,205 | | | | 363 | | | | 302 | |
|
Total recognised derivative assets and liabilities | | | 62,378 | | | | 689 | | | | 1,051 | |
|
91
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2006 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for trading | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 11,745 | | | | 182 | | | | 372 | |
- Foreign exchange swaps and forwards | | | 3,620 | | | | 1 | | | | 88 | |
|
| | | 15,365 | | | | 183 | | | | 460 | |
|
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 366,812 | | | | 5,125 | | | | 5,712 | |
- Caps, floors and swaptions | | | 42,244 | | | | 628 | | | | 555 | |
- Futures (exchange traded) | | | 37,850 | | | | 86 | | | | – | |
- Forward rate agreements | | | 68,250 | | | | 19 | | | | 20 | |
|
| | | 515,156 | | | | 5,858 | | | | 6,287 | |
|
Equity and credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Equity index and similar products | | | 23,262 | | | | 1,026 | | | | 2,337 | |
- Equity index options (exchange traded) | | | 5,282 | | | | 438 | | | | 220 | |
- Credit default swaps and similar products | | | 23,906 | | | | 104 | | | | 81 | |
|
| | | 52,450 | | | | 1,568 | | | | 2,638 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for trading | | | 582,971 | | | | 7,609 | | | | 9,385 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2006 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for fair value hedging | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 14,720 | | | | 102 | | | | 833 | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 24,919 | | | | 625 | | | | – | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for fair value hedging | | | 39,639 | | | | 727 | | | | 833 | |
|
Total recognised derivative assets and liabilities | | | 622,610 | | | | 8,336 | | | | 10,218 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2006 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for trading | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 829 | | | | 22 | | | | 36 | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 41,535 | | | | 190 | | | | 130 | |
- Caps, floors and swaptions | | | 253 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | |
|
| | | 41,788 | | | | 191 | | | | 134 | |
|
Equity and credit contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Equity index and similar products | | | 577 | | | | 66 | | | | 181 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for trading | | | 43,194 | | | | 279 | | | | 351 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Contract/ notional | | | Fair value | | | Fair value | |
2006 | | amount | | | assets | | | liabilities | |
Derivatives held for fair value hedging | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Exchange rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Cross-currency swaps | | | 1,398 | | | | 210 | | | | 24 | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Interest rate swaps | | | 4,119 | | | | 157 | | | | 306 | |
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities held for fair value hedging | | | 5,517 | | | | 367 | | | | 330 | |
|
Total recognised derivative assets and liabilities | | | 48,711 | | | | 646 | | | | 681 | |
|
Gains or losses arising from fair value hedges
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Gains/(losses): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On hedging instruments | | | (413) | | | | (600) | | | | 26 | | | | (174) | |
On the hedged items attributable to hedged risk | | | 449 | | | | 610 | | | | (28) | | | | 182 | |
|
Hedge ineffectiveness | | | 36 | | | | 10 | | | | (2) | | | | 8 | |
|
92
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
15. Financial assets designated at fair value
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Loans and advances to banks | | | – | | | | 37 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 5,701 | | | | 5,353 | | | | 54 | | | | 66 | |
Debt securities | | | 6,082 | | | | 3,323 | | | | 7,446 | | | | – | |
|
| | | 11,783 | | | | 8,713 | | | | 7,500 | | | | 66 | |
|
Financial assets are designated at fair value through profit or loss where this results in more relevant information because it significantly reduces a measurement inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring the assets or liabilities or recognising gains or losses on them on a different basis. The following assets have been designated at fair value through profit or loss:
(a) | | Loans and advances to customers, representing loans secured on residential property to housing associations. These would otherwise have been measured at amortised cost with the associated derivatives used to economically hedge the risk held for trading and measured at fair value through profit or loss. |
(b) | | Debt securities in issue representing holdings of asset-backed securities. They are managed, and their performance is evaluated, on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented investment strategy and information about them is provided internally on that basis to the Group’s key management personnel. |
The maximum exposure to credit risk on the financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss at the balance sheet date was £10,913m (2006: £8,091m) for the Group and £54m (2006: £66m) for the Company. The maximum exposure was mitigated by the Group having a charge over the residential properties in respect of lending to housing associations. Of the movement in the fair value of the loans and advances to banks, loans and advances to customers and debt securities an amount of £83m (2006: £nil) was due to changes in credit spreads.
Debt securities can be analysed by listing status as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Listed in the UK | | | 304 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Listed elsewhere | | | 5,510 | | | | 2,725 | | | | 7,446 | | | | – | |
Unlisted | | | 268 | | | | 598 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
| | | 6,082 | | | | 3,323 | | | | 7,446 | | | | – | |
|
16. Loans and advances to banks
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Placements with other banks | | | 1,801 | | | | 728 | | | | 1,171 | | | | 295 | |
Amounts due from parent | | | 1,640 | | | | 1,514 | | | | 1,018 | | | | 1,500 | |
Amounts due from subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 38,496 | | | | 39,916 | |
|
| | | 3,441 | | | | 2,242 | | | | 40,685 | | | | 41,711 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Repayable: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
On demand | | | 1,271 | | | | 294 | | | | 5,771 | | | | 1,210 | |
In not more than 3 months | | | 940 | | | | 194 | | | | 3,791 | | | | 3,109 | |
In more than 3 months but not more than 1 year | | | 204 | | | | 15 | | | | 3,822 | | | | 691 | |
In more than 1 year but not more than 5 years | | | – | | | | 239 | | | | 20,930 | | | | 22,129 | |
In more than 5 years | | | 1,026 | | | | 1,500 | | | | 6,371 | | | | 14,572 | |
|
| | | 3,441 | | | | 2,242 | | | | 40,685 | | | | 41,711 | |
|
17. Loans and advances to customers
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Advances secured on residential properties | | | 105,169 | | | | 96,918 | | | | 105,156 | | | | 96,899 | |
Corporate loans | | | 1,302 | | | | 353 | | | | 17 | | | | 7 | |
Finance leases | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | – | | | | 1 | |
Other secured advances | | | 2,962 | | | | 2,306 | | | | 2,889 | | | | 2,185 | |
Other unsecured advances | | | 3,265 | | | | 4,104 | | | | 3,258 | | | | 4,103 | |
Amounts due from subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 310 | | | | 677 | |
|
Loans and advances to customers | | | 112,698 | | | | 103,682 | | | | 111,630 | | | | 103,872 | |
|
Less: loan loss allowances | | | (551) | | | | (536) | | | | (654) | | | | (623) | |
|
Loans and advances to customers, net of loan loss allowances | | | 112,147 | | | | 103,146 | | | | 110,976 | | | | 103,249 | |
|
93
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Repayable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On demand | | | 331 | | | | 635 | | | | 291 | | | | 1,219 | |
In no more than 3 months | | | 1,657 | | | | 1,865 | | | | 610 | | | | 1,477 | |
In more than 3 months but not more than 1 year | | | 1,983 | | | | 2,362 | | | | 2,121 | | | | 2,432 | |
In more than 1 year but not more than 5 years | | | 12,725 | | | | 13,178 | | | | 12,681 | | | | 13,129 | |
In more than 5 years | | | 96,002 | | | | 85,642 | | | | 95,927 | | | | 85,615 | |
|
Loans and advances to customers | | | 112,698 | | | | 103,682 | | | | 111,630 | | | | 103,872 | |
|
Less: loan loss allowances | | | (551) | | | | (536) | | | | (654) | | | | (623) | |
|
Loans and advances to customers, net of loan loss allowances | | | 112,147 | | | | 103,146 | | | | 110,976 | | | | 103,249 | |
|
The loans and advances to customers in the above table have the following interest rate structures:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Fixed rate | | | 56,031 | | | | 35,398 | | | | 55,942 | | | | 35,141 | |
Variable rate | | | 56,667 | | | | 68,284 | | | | 55,688 | | | | 68,731 | |
Less: loan loss allowances | | | (551) | | | | (536) | | | | (654) | | | | (623) | |
|
| | | 112,147 | | | | 103,146 | | | | 110,976 | | | | 103,249 | |
|
Movement in loan loss allowances:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Loans secured | | | | | | | Other | | | Other | | | | |
| | on residential | | | Finance | | | secured | | | unsecured | | | | |
| | property | | | leases | | | advances | | | advances | | | Total | |
Group | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
As at 1 January 2007 | | | 105 | | | | 1 | | | | 76 | | | | 354 | | | | 536 | |
Charge/(release) to the income statement | | | 80 | | | | – | | | | (12) | | | | 320 | | | | 388 | |
Write offs | | | (9) | | | | (1) | | | | (24) | | | | (339) | | | | (373) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 176 | | | | – | | | | 40 | | | | 335 | | | | 551 | |
|
|
|
As at 1 January 2006 | | | 56 | | | | 3 | | | | 123 | | | | 212 | | | | 394 | |
Charge/(release) to the income statement | | | 60 | | | | – | | | | (22) | | | | 348 | | | | 386 | |
Write offs | | | (11) | | | | (2) | | | | (25) | | | | (206) | | | | (244) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 105 | | | | 1 | | | | 76 | | | | 354 | | | | 536 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Loans secured | | | Amounts | | | | | | | Other | | | Other | | | | |
| | on residential | | | due from | | | Finance | | | secured | | | unsecured | | | | |
| | property | | | subsidiaries | | | leases | | | advances | | | advances | | | Total | |
Company | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
As at 1 January 2007 | | | 105 | | | | 161 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | 352 | | | | 623 | |
Charge/(release) to the income statement | | | 80 | | | | (25) | | | | – | | | | 8 | | | | 316 | | | | 379 | |
Write offs | | | (9) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (1) | | | | (337) | | | | (348) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 176 | | | | 136 | | | | – | | | | 11 | | | | 331 | | | | 654 | |
|
|
|
As at 1 January 2006 | | | 48 | | | | 186 | | | | 3 | | | | 6 | | | | 210 | | | | 453 | |
Charge/(release) to the income statement | | | 60 | | | | (25) | | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | 374 | | | | 410 | |
Write offs | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | (2) | | | | (3) | | | | (232) | | | | (240) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 105 | | | | 161 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | 352 | | | | 623 | |
|
During 2006, with respect to unsecured loan books no longer open to new business, the maturity of the books enabled management to refine the estimates of the likelihood of the assets leading to loss and the loss thereby incurred.
18. Securitisation of assets
Loans and advances to customers include portfolios of residential mortgage loans, which are subject to non-recourse finance arrangements. These loans have been purchased by, or assigned to, special purpose securitisation companies (‘Securitisation Companies’), and have been funded primarily through the issue of mortgage-backed securities (‘Securities’). No gain or loss has been recognised as a result of these sales. These Securitisation Companies are consolidated and included in the Group financial statements as subsidiaries.
Abbey National plc makes use of a type of securitisation known as a master trust structure. In this structure, a pool of assets is assigned to a trust company by the asset originator, initially funded by the originator. A funding entity acquires beneficial interests in a share of the portfolios of assets with funds borrowed from qualifying special purpose entities, which at the same time issue asset-backed securities to third-party investors or Abbey National plc.
94
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
The purpose of the special purpose entities is to obtain diverse, low cost funding through the issue of asset-backed securities. The share of the pool of assets not purchased from the trust company by the funding entity is known as the beneficial interest of the originator. Using this structure, Abbey has assigned portfolios of residential mortgages and their related security to Holmes Trustees Limited, a trust company that holds the portfolios of mortgages on trust for Abbey and Holmes Funding Limited. Holmes Funding Limited acquires beneficial interests in the portfolios of mortgages with funds borrowed from the Securitisation Companies, Holmes Financing No.s 1, 6-10 plc and Holmes Master Issuer plc.
Abbey National plc and its subsidiaries are under no obligation to support any losses that may be incurred by the Securitisation Companies or holders of the Securities and do not intend to provide such further support. Holders of the Securities are only entitled to obtain payment of principal and interest to the extent that the resources of the Securitisation Companies are sufficient to support such payments, and the holders of the Securities have agreed in writing not to seek recourse in any other form.
Abbey National plc receives payments from the Securitisation Companies in respect of fees for administering the loans, and payment of deferred consideration for the sale of the loans. Abbey National plc has no right or obligation to repurchase the benefit of any securitised loan, except if certain representations and warranties given by Abbey National plc at the time of transfer are breached.
In March, June and December 2007, Holmes Funding Limited acquired, at book value, an additional beneficial interest in the trust property vested in Holmes Trustees Limited. This further beneficial interest of £18.8bn was acquired through borrowing from Holmes Master Issuer plc, which funded its advance to Holmes Funding Limited through the issue of mortgage backed securities. The £7.3bn of mortgage backed securities issued in December were acquired by Abbey National plc. It is intended that any future issues will continue to be made from Holmes Master Issuer plc. In October 2007 the remaining mortgage backed securities in issue in Holmes Financing (No. 2) plc were redeemed. The remaining share of the beneficial interest in residential mortgage loans held by Holmes Trustees Limited belongs to Abbey National plc, and amounts to £8.0bn at 31 December 2007.
The balances of assets securitised and non-recourse finance at 31 December 2007 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Gross assets securitised | | | Non-recourse finance | |
Securitisation company | | Closing date of securitisation | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Holmes Financing (No. 1) plc | | 26 July 2000 | | | 275 | | | | 275 | |
Holmes Financing (No. 6) plc | | 7 November 2002 | | | 546 | | | | 616 | |
Holmes Financing (No. 7) plc | | 26 March 2003 | | | 658 | | | | 658 | |
Holmes Financing (No. 8) plc | | 1 April 2004 | | | 2,003 | | | | 2,003 | |
Holmes Financing (No. 9) plc | | 8 December 2005 | | | 2,779 | | | | 2,779 | |
Holmes Financing (No. 10) plc | | 8 August 2006 | | | 3,200 | | | | 3,200 | |
Holmes Master Issuer plc – 2006/1 | | 28 November 2006 | | | 2,618 | | | | 2,618 | |
Holmes Master Issuer plc – 2007/1 | | 28 March 2007 | | | 4,301 | | | | 5,672 | |
Holmes Master Issuer plc – 2007/2 | | 20 June 2007 | | | 5,855 | | | | 5,855 | |
Holmes Master Issuer plc – 2007/3 | | 21 December 2007 | | | 7,259 | | | | 7,259 | |
Beneficial interest in Holmes Trustees Limited | | | | | | | 7,954 | | | | – | |
|
| | | | | | | 37,448 | | | | 30,935 | |
|
The gross assets securitised represent the interest in the trust property held by Holmes Funding Limited related to the debt issued by the securitisation companies. The beneficial interest in Holmes Trustees Limited represents the proportion of the funds required to be retained in the trust as part of the master structure trust agreement.
The securitisation vehicles have placed cash deposits totalling £1.4bn, which have been accumulated to finance the redemption of a number of securities issued by the securitisation companies. The securitisation companies’ contractual interest in advances secured on residential property is therefore reduced by this amount. Abbey National plc does not own directly, or indirectly, any of the share capital of any of the above securitisation companies or their parents.
A summarised aggregated income statement for the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005 and a summarised aggregated balance sheet at 31 December 2007 and 2006 for the above companies are set out below:
Income statement for the year ended 31 December
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Securitisation companies | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 35 | | | | 21 | | | | 22 | |
Other operating income/(expenses) | | | 35 | | | | 67 | | | | (50) | |
Administrative expenses | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | (2) | |
Impairment losseson loans and advances | | | (8) | | | | (4) | | | | (3) | |
Taxation expense | | | (17) | | | | (25) | | | | 9 | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | 44 | | | | 59 | | | | (24) | |
|
95
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
Balance sheet as at 31 December
| | | | | | | | |
| | Securitisation companies | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Derivative financial instruments | | | 866 | | | | 169 | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 2,375 | | | | 2,767 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 29,569 | | | | 15,189 | |
Other assets | | | 11 | | | | 3 | |
|
Total assets | | | 32,821 | | | | 18,128 | |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 743 | | | | 410 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 588 | | | | 712 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 31,357 | | | | 16,941 | |
Other liabilities | | | 47 | | | | 23 | |
|
Total liabilities | | | 32,735 | | | | 18,086 | |
Retained earnings | | | 86 | | | | 42 | |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | | 32,821 | | | | 18,128 | |
|
Issues under the Euro 12bn covered bond programme are not included in the tables above. For more information, see Note 31.
19. Available for sale securities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Debt securities | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
Equity securities | | | 32 | | | | 15 | | | | 20 | | | | 4 | |
|
| | | 40 | | | | 23 | | | | 28 | | | | 12 | |
|
Maturities of debt securities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Due in more than one year but not more than 5 years | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
|
All debt securities in issue are unlisted, have fixed coupons and comprise other debt securities issued by non-public bodies.
Equity securities do not bear interest. Equity securities can be analysed by listing status as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Listed in the UK | | | 12 | | | | 13 | | | | – | | | | 2 | |
Listed elsewhere | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | – | | | | 1 | |
Unlisted | | | 20 | | | | 1 | | | | 20 | | | | 1 | |
|
| | | 32 | | | | 15 | | | | 20 | | | | 4 | |
|
The movement in available for sale securities can be summarised as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2007 | | | 23 | | | | 12 | |
Disposals (sale and redemption) | | | (2) | | | | (2) | |
Movement in fair value | | | 19 | | | | 18 | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 40 | | | | 28 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2006 | | | 13 | | | | 272 | |
Additions | | | 9 | | | | 9 | |
Disposals (sale and redemption) | | | – | | | | (269) | |
Movement in fair value | | | 1 | | | | – | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 23 | | | | 12 | |
|
96
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
20. Investment in subsidiary undertakings
Investments in subsidiaries are held at cost subject to impairment. The movement in shares in Group undertakings was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Cost | | | Impairment | | | Net book value | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2007 | | | 5,148 | | | | (222) | | | | 4,926 | |
Additions | | | 418 | | | | – | | | | 418 | |
Disposals | | | (353) | | | | 29 | | | | (324) | |
Write-back of impairments | | | – | | | | 33 | | | | 33 | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 5,213 | | | | (160) | | | | 5,053 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost | | | Impairment | | | Net book value | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2006 | | | 9,895 | | | | (1,205) | | | | 8,690 | |
Additions | | | 54 | | | | (2) | | | | 52 | |
Disposals | | | (4,801) | | | | 965 | | | | (3,836) | |
Write-back of impairments | | | – | | | | 20 | | | | 20 | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 5,148 | | | | (222) | | | | 4,926 | |
|
On 17 December 2007, Abbey National plc sold 100% of its shareholdings in James Hay, Cater Allen and Abbey Sharedealing to Santander Private Banking UK Limited, at the time of the transaction a 100% owned direct subsidiary of Abbey National plc, for a total cash consideration of £414m. The companies sold were Cater Allen Limited, Abbey Stockbrokers Limited, Abbey Stockbrokers (Nominees) Limited, James Hay Holdings Limited, James Hay Wrap Managers Limited, James Hay Insurance Company Limited, James Hay Administration Company Limited, James Hay Pension Trustees Limited and Sarum Trustees Limited. Subsequently, on 17 December 2007, Abbey National plc sold 49% of its shareholding in Santander Private Banking UK Limited to Santander PB UK (Holdings) Limited, a direct subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. for a total cash consideration of £203m.
In 2006, Abbey sold its entire life insurance business to Resolution plc for cash consideration of approximately £3.6bn. The principal life companies sold were Scottish Mutual Assurance plc, Scottish Provident Limited and Abbey National Life plc, as well as the two offshore life companies, Scottish Mutual International plc and Scottish Provident International Life Assurance Limited.
On 31 December 2006, Abbey National plc sold its entire asset management businesses to Santander Asset Management UK Holdings Limited, an indirect subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. for a total cash consideration of £134m. The asset management companies sold were Abbey National Asset Managers Limited (now called Santander Asset Management UK Limited), Abbey National PEP & ISA Managers Limited, Abbey National Unit Trust Managers Limited (now called Santander Unit Trust Managers UK Limited) and Inscape Investments Limited (now called Santander Portfolio Management UK Limited).
The principal subsidiaries of Abbey National plc at 31 December 2007 are shown below. The Directors consider that to give full particulars of all subsidiary undertakings would lead to a statement of excessive length. In accordance with Section 231(5) of the Companies Act 1985, the following information relates to those subsidiary undertakings whose results or financial position, in the opinion of the Directors, principally affect the results of the Group. Full particulars of all subsidiary undertakings will be annexed to the Company’s next annual return in accordance with Section 231(6)(b) of the Companies Act 1985.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Country of incorporation | |
Principal subsidiary | | Nature of business | | | | % Interest held | | or registration | |
|
Abbey National Treasury Services plc | | Treasury operations | | | 100% | | | England & Wales |
Abbey National International Limited* | | Personal finance | | | 100% | | | Jersey |
Cater Allen International Limited* | | Securities financing | | | 100% | | | England & Wales |
Cater Allen Limited* | | Bank, deposit taker | | | 51% | | | England & Wales |
Abbey National North America LLC* | | Funding | | | 100% | | | United States |
Abbey National Securities Inc* | | Securities financing | | | 100% | | | United States |
Porterbrook Leasing Company Limited* | | Leasing | | | 100% | | | England & Wales |
|
| | |
* | | Held indirectly through subsidiary companies. |
All the above companies are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company holds directly or indirectly 100% of the issued ordinary share capital of its principal subsidiaries, except for Cater Allen Limited as described above. All companies operate principally in their country of incorporation or registration. Abbey National Treasury Services plc also has a branch office in the US and the Cayman Islands. Abbey National plc has branches in the Isle of Man and Northern Ireland. Abbey National International Limited has a branch in the Isle of Man.
97
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
21. Investment in associated undertakings
The movement in interests in associated undertakings was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2007 | | | 22 | | | | 25 | |
Additional investment | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
Share of results | | | (1) | | | | – | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 29 | | | | 33 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2006 | | | 24 | | | | 24 | |
Additional investment | | | 19 | | | | 19 | |
Capital reduction | | | (18) | | | | (18) | |
Dividends received | | | (3) | | | | – | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 22 | | | | 25 | |
|
The principal associated undertakings at 31 December 2007 were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Country of | | Assets | | | Liabilities | | | Income | | | Expense | | | % interest | |
Name and nature of business | | incorporation | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | held | |
|
PSA Finance plc, personal finance | | England and Wales | | | 8 | | | | (1) | | | | (4) | | | | 1 | | | | 50.0 | |
Santander Consumer (UK) plc, consumer finance | | England and Wales | | | 592 | | | | (542) | | | | (34) | | | | 39 | | | | 49.9 | |
|
The principal associated undertakings at 31 December 2006 were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Country of | | Assets | | | Liabilities | | | Income | | | Expense | | | % interest | |
Name and nature of business | | incorporation | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | held | |
|
PSA Finance plc, personal finance | | England and Wales | | | 7 | | | | (3) | | | | (6) | | | | 2 | | | | 50.0 | |
Santander Consumer (UK) plc, consumer finance | | England and Wales | | | 400 | | | | (360) | | | | (28) | | | | 32 | | | | 49.9 | |
|
All associated undertakings are unlisted and have a year-end of 31 December. PSA Finance plc has a branch registered in Northern Ireland.
22. Intangible assets
a) Goodwill
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January | | | 112 | | | | 776 | |
Disposals | | | – | | | | (664) | |
|
At 31 December | | | 112 | | | | 112 | |
|
Accumulated impairment | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January | | | 22 | | | | 640 | |
Impairment losses | | | – | | | | 46 | |
Disposals | | | – | | | | (664) | |
|
At 31 December | | | 22 | | | | 22 | |
|
Net book value | | | 90 | | | | 90 | |
|
Impairment of Goodwill
During 2007 there was no impairment of goodwill (2006: £46m, 2005: nil). In 2006, the impairment was recognised upon classification of the life insurance businesses as held for sale on announcement of the sale in June 2006. Impairment testing in respect of goodwill is performed annually and comprises a comparison of the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit with its recoverable amount: the higher of the cash-generating unit’s net selling price and its value in use. Net selling price is calculated by reference to the amount at which the asset could be disposed of in a binding sale agreement in an arm’s length transaction evidenced by an active market or recent transactions for similar assets. Value in use is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows obtainable as a result of the asset’s continued use, including those resulting from its ultimate disposal, at a market based discount rate on a pre-tax basis.
98
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
The following cash-generating unit includes in its carrying value goodwill that comprises the goodwill reported by Abbey. The cash-generating unit does not carry on its balance sheet any intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, other than goodwill.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Goodwill | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Significant | | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | | | | | Key | | | Discount | | | Growth | |
Business Division | | Cash Generating Unit | | | £m | | | £m | | | Basis of valuation | | assumptions | | | rate | | | rate | |
|
Retail Banking | | Cater Allen Private Bank | | | 90 | | | | 90 | | | Value in use: cash flow | | 3 year plan | | | 8.95% | | | | 2.25% | |
|
b) Other intangibles
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Trademarks | | | Distribution channels | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2006 | | | 24 | | | | 235 | | | | 259 | |
Disposals | | | (24) | | | | (235) | | | | (259) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Accumulated amortisation / impairment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2006 | | | 5 | | | | 219 | | | | 224 | |
Impairment losses | | | 18 | | | | 15 | | | | 33 | |
Charge for the year | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 2 | |
Disposals | | | (24) | | | | (235) | | | | (259) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Net book value | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
In 2006, the Group sold its entire life insurance business to which the trademarks and distribution channels above related.
23. Property, plant and equipment (excluding operating lease assets)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Owner-occupied | | | Office fixtures | | | Computer | | | | |
| | properties | | | and equipment | | | software | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2007 | | | 55 | | | | 432 | | | | 261 | | | | 748 | |
Additions | | | 23 | | | | 66 | | | | 103 | | | | 192 | |
Disposals | | | (4) | | | | (19) | | | | (5) | | | | (28) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 74 | | | | 479 | | | | 359 | | | | 912 | |
|
Accumulated depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2007 | | | 14 | | | | 245 | | | | 74 | | | | 333 | |
Depreciation charge for the year | | | 6 | | | | 56 | | | | 14 | | | | 76 | |
Disposals | | | (2) | | | | (18) | | | | (5) | | | | (25) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 18 | | | | 283 | | | | 83 | | | | 384 | |
|
Net book value | | | 56 | | | | 196 | | | | 276 | | | | 528 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Owner-occupied | | | Office fixtures | | | Computer | | | | |
| | properties | | | and equipment | | | software | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2006 | | | 46 | | | | 1,043 | | | | 347 | | | | 1,436 | |
Additions | | | 15 | | | | 71 | | | | 103 | | | | 189 | |
Disposals | | | (6) | | | | (682) | | | | (189) | | | | (877) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 55 | | | | 432 | | | | 261 | | | | 748 | |
|
Accumulated depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2006 | | | 12 | | | | 850 | | | | 260 | | | | 1,122 | |
Depreciation charge for the year | | | 5 | | | | 77 | | | | 3 | | | | 85 | |
Disposals | | | (3) | | | | (682) | | | | (189) | | | | (874) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 14 | | | | 245 | | | | 74 | | | | 333 | |
|
Net book value | | | 41 | | | | 187 | | | | 187 | | | | 415 | |
|
99
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Owner-occupied | | | Office fixtures | | | Computer | | | | |
| | properties | | | and equipment | | | software | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2007 | | | 47 | | | | 406 | | | | 186 | | | | 639 | |
Additions | | | 23 | | | | 60 | | | | 98 | | | | 181 | |
Disposals | | | (2) | | | | (13) | | | | (5) | | | | (20) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 68 | | | | 453 | | | | 279 | | | | 800 | |
|
Accumulated depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2007 | | | 10 | | | | 230 | | | | 5 | | | | 245 | |
Depreciation charge | | | 6 | | | | 53 | | | | 13 | | | | 72 | |
Disposals | | | (1) | | | | (12) | | | | (5) | | | | (18) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 15 | | | | 271 | | | | 13 | | | | 299 | |
|
Net book value | | | 53 | | | | 182 | | | | 266 | | | | 501 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Owner-occupied | | | Office fixtures | | | Computer | | | | |
| | properties | | | and equipment | | | software | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2006 | | | 38 | | | | 1,017 | | | | 199 | | | | 1,254 | |
Additions | | | 15 | | | | 66 | | | | 98 | | | | 179 | |
Disposals | | | (6) | | | | (677) | | | | (110) | | | | (793) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 47 | | | | 406 | | | | 187 | | | | 640 | |
|
Accumulated depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January 2006 | | | 9 | | | | 834 | | | | 113 | | | | 956 | |
Depreciation charge | | | 4 | | | | 73 | | | | 2 | | | | 79 | |
Disposals | | | (3) | | | | (677) | | | | (110) | | | | (790) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 10 | | | | 230 | | | | 5 | | | | 245 | |
|
Net book value | | | 37 | | | | 176 | | | | 182 | | | | 395 | |
|
At 31 December 2007 capital expenditure contracted, but not provided for was £nil (2006: £7m, 2005: £17m) in respect of property, plant and equipment. Of the carrying value as at 31 December 2007, £163m (2006: £179m) related to assets under construction.
24. Operating lease assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cost | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January | | | 3,275 | | | | 3,252 | |
Additions | | | 215 | | | | 41 | |
Disposals | | | (16) | | | | (18) | |
|
At 31 December | | | 3,474 | | | | 3,275 | |
|
Depreciation and impairment | | | | | | | | |
At 1 January | | | 1,193 | | | | 1,080 | |
Charge for the year | | | 129 | | | | 130 | |
Impairment charge | | | 4 | | | | – | |
Disposals | | | (16) | | | | (17) | |
|
At 31 December | | | 1,310 | | | | 1,193 | |
|
Net book value | | | 2,164 | | | | 2,082 | |
|
The operating lease assets of the Group consist of trains and related assets. Of the carrying value as at 31 December 2007, £162m (2006: £1m) related to assets under construction. The Company has no operating lease assets.
Future minimum lease receipts under non-cancellable operating leases are due over the following periods:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
In no more than 1 year | | | 296 | | | | 228 | |
In more than 1 year but no more than 5 years | | | 991 | | | | 636 | |
In more than 5 years | | | 678 | | | | 338 | |
|
| | | 1,965 | | | | 1,202 | |
|
Contingent rents recognised as income | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Capital expenditure which has been contracted, but not provided for in the financial statements | | | 258 | | | | 93 | |
|
100
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
25. Deferred tax
Deferred income taxes are calculated on temporary differences under the liability method using the tax rates expected to apply when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. The effective rate for 2007 is 28.1% (2006: 30%, 2005: 30%).
The movement on the deferred tax account is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January | | | 240 | | | | (90) | | | | 747 | | | | 702 | |
Income statement charge – continuing operations | | | (88) | | | | 46 | | | | (103) | | | | 109 | |
Income statement charge – discontinued operations | | | – | | | | (56) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Credited/ (charged) to equity | | | 9 | | | | (66) | | | | 10 | | | | (54) | |
Disposal of subsidiary undertaking | | | (40) | | | | 406 | | | | (40) | | | | (10) | |
|
At 31 December | | | 121 | | | | 240 | | | | 614 | | | | 747 | |
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following items:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accelerated tax depreciation | | | (463) | | | | (483) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Other temporary differences | | | (81) | | | | (81) | | | | (6) | | | | – | |
|
| | | (544) | | | | (564) | | | | (6) | | | | – | |
|
Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pensions and other post retirement benefits | | | 275 | | | | 310 | | | | 275 | | | | 310 | |
Accelerated book depreciation | | | 45 | | | | 64 | | | | 41 | | | | 58 | |
IAS 32 & IAS 39 transitional adjustments | | | 135 | | | | 158 | | | | 91 | | | | 110 | |
Other temporary differences | | | 64 | | | | 78 | | | | 67 | | | | 75 | |
Tax losses carried forward | | | 146 | | | | 194 | | | | 146 | | | | 194 | |
|
| | | 665 | | | | 804 | | | | 620 | | | | 747 | |
|
The aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items charged or credited to equity is:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Group | | | | | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Pensions and other post retirement benefits | | | 300 | | | | 309 | | | | 398 | | | | 301 | | | | 309 | | | | 363 | |
|
The deferred tax assets scheduled above have been recognised in both the Company and the Group on the evidence that sufficient future taxable profits are forecast within the foreseeable future to allow for the utilisation of the assets as they reverse. Under current UK tax legislation, the tax losses in respect of which deferred tax assets have been recognised do not expire.
The benefit of the tax losses carried forward in Abbey National plc may only be realised by utilisation against the future taxable profits of the Company.
The deferred tax charge in the income statement comprises the following temporary differences:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Accelerated tax depreciation | | | 1 | | | | 36 | | | | (83) | |
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits | | | (4) | | | | (27) | | | | 7 | |
IAS 32 & IAS 39 transition adjustments | | | (23) | | | | (16) | | | | (28) | |
Tax losses carried forward | | | (48) | | | | 105 | | | | 89 | |
Other temporary differences | | | (14) | | | | (52) | | | | 27 | |
|
| | | (88) | | | | 46 | | | | 12 | |
|
At the balance sheet date the aggregate amount of the temporary differences associated with undistributed earnings of subsidiaries for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised is £84m (2006: £58m). No liability has been recognised in respect of these differences because the Group is in a position to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that such differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
101
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
26. Other assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Trade and other receivables | | | 746 | | | | 2,341 | | | | 541 | | | | 597 | |
Prepayments | | | 48 | | | | 46 | | | | 45 | | | | 41 | |
Accrued income | | | 12 | | | | 14 | | | | – | | | | – | |
General insurance assets | | | 100 | | | | 106 | | | | 100 | | | | 106 | |
|
| | | 906 | | | | 2,507 | | | | 686 | | | | 744 | |
|
27. Deposits by banks
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Items in the course of transmission | | | 786 | | | | 363 | | | | 769 | | | | 354 | |
Sale and repurchase agreements | | | – | | | | 251 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Amounts due to subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 59,005 | | | | 60,767 | |
Other deposits | | | 7,137 | | | | 6,042 | | | | 24 | | | | 2 | |
|
| | | 7,923 | | | | 6,656 | | | | 59,798 | | | | 61,123 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Repayable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On demand | | | 416 | | | | 102 | | | | 2,060 | | | | 3,487 | |
In not more than 3 months | | | 7,256 | | | | 6,554 | | | | 13,838 | | | | 22,937 | |
In more than 3 months but not more than 1 year | | | 251 | | | | – | | | | 7,845 | | | | 2,377 | |
In more than 1 year but not more than 5 years | | | – | | | | – | | | | 31,045 | | | | 27,905 | |
In more than 5 years | | | – | | | | – | | | | 5,010 | | | | 4,417 | |
|
| | | 7,923 | | | | 6,656 | | | | 59,798 | | | | 61,123 | |
|
28. Deposits by customers
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Retail deposits | | | 67,208 | | | | 63,994 | | | | 59,187 | | | | 56,695 | |
Amounts due to subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 34,623 | | | | 21,968 | |
Wholesale deposits by customers | | | 2,442 | | | | 2,525 | | | | 1,877 | | | | 1,441 | |
|
| | | 69,650 | | | | 66,519 | | | | 95,687 | | | | 80,104 | |
|
Repayable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In no more than 3 months | | | 64,204 | | | | 62,578 | | | | 59,588 | | | | 59,709 | |
In more than 3 months but no more than 1 year | | | 3,579 | | | | 2,279 | | | | 3,322 | | | | 1,617 | |
In more than 1 year but not more than 5 years | | | 1,728 | | | | 1,267 | | | | 5,687 | | | | 4,060 | |
In more than 5 years | | | 139 | | | | 395 | | | | 27,090 | | | | 14,718 | |
|
| | | 69,650 | | | | 66,519 | | | | 95,687 | | | | 80,104 | |
|
Contracts involving the receipt of cash on which customers received an index linked return are accounted for in substance as equity index linked deposits. Retail deposits and wholesale deposits by customers are interest-bearing.
102
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
29. Trading liabilities
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 19,632 | | | | 30,099 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 20,498 | | | | 11,139 | |
Short positions in securities | | | 2,252 | | | | 4,600 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 12,534 | | | | 11,766 | |
|
| | | 54,916 | | | | 57,604 | |
|
Equity index-linked deposits Contracts involving the receipt of cash on which customers receive an index-linked return are accounted for as equity index-linked deposits, and classified as deposits by customers within trading liabilities. Equity index-linked deposits are managed within the equity derivatives trading book as an integral part of the equity derivatives portfolio. The total fair value of equity index-linked deposits was £2,455m at 31 December 2007 (2006: £2,546m). There are two principal product types.
Capital at Risk:These products are designed to replicate the investment performance of an equity index, subject to a floor. In the event the index falls under a certain predetermined level, customers forfeit a predetermined percentage of principal up to a predetermined amount.
Capital Guaranteed:These products give the customers a limited participation in the upside growth of an equity index. In the event the index falls in price, a cash principal element is guaranteed.
Equity index-linked deposits are remeasured at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair values recognised in the income statement. The equity index-linked deposits contain embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives, in combination with the principal cash deposit element, are designed to replicate the investment performance profile tailored to the return agreed in the contracts with customers. The embedded derivatives are not separated from the host instrument and are not separately accounted for as a derivative instrument, as the entire contract embodies both the embedded derivative and the host instrument and is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. As such, there is no requirement to bifurcate the embedded derivative in the equity index-linked deposits.
The Company has no trading liabilities.
30. Financial liabilities designated at fair value
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Debt securities in issue | | | 7,538 | | | | 8,151 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Financial liabilities are designated at fair value through profit or loss where this results in more relevant information because it significantly reduces a measurement inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets and liabilities or recognising the gains or losses on them on a different basis. The “fair value option” has been used where debt securities in issue would otherwise be measured at amortised cost, and the associated derivatives used to economically hedge the risk are held at fair value. No material amount of the movements in the fair value of the above debt securities in issue reflects any element of the Group’s own credit risk. The amount that would be required to be contractually paid at maturity of the debt securities in issue above is £257m (2006: £113m) higher than the carrying value.
31. Debt securities in issue
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Bonds and medium term notes | | | 29,613 | | | | 23,149 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Other debt securities in issue | | | 6,099 | | | | 5,849 | | | | – | | | | 4 | |
|
| | | 35,712 | | | | 28,998 | | | | – | | | | 4 | |
|
103
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
A breakdown, by issue currency, of the above is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Group | | | | | | | Company | |
| | Interest Rate | | | Maturity | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Euro | | | 2.00% - 3.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | – | | | | 674 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2011 - 2019 | | | | 1,406 | | | | 1,356 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | – | | | | 503 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2030 - 2040 | | | | – | | | | 598 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 4.00% - 4.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | 1,476 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | 1,063 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 5.00% - 7.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | – | | | | 1,568 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | 3,887 | | | | 2,371 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2030 - 2040 | | | | 2,679 | | | | 990 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
US Dollar | | | 2.00% - 3.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | 1,496 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 4.00% - 6.87% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | 5,351 | | | | 5,910 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2011 - 2019 | | | | 1,102 | | | | 2,662 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | 4,509 | | | | 1,000 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2030 - 2040 | | | | 3,831 | | | | 2,559 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 7.00% - 8.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | – | | | | 1,458 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2011 to 2040 | | | | 35 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Pounds Sterling | | | 2.00% - 4.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | – | | | | 6 | | | | – | | | | 4 | |
| | | 5.00% - 5.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | 378 | | | | 1,494 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2011 - 2019 | | | | – | | | | 1,470 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | – | | | | 405 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2030 - 2040 | | | | – | | | | 3,374 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 6.00% - 6.87% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | 776 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2011 - 2019 | | | | 1,439 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | 1,469 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2030 - 2040 | | | | 4,408 | | | | 143 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 7.00% - 8.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | – | | | | 343 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | | | | | 2011 - 2040 | | | | 113 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Other currencies | | | 0.00% - 5.99% | | | Up to 2010 | | | | – | | | | 114 | | | | – | | | | – | |
| | | 6.00% - 6.87% | | | | 2020 - 2029 | | | | 294 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | 35,712 | | | | 28,998 | | | | – | | | | 4 | |
|
In 2007 no new issuances were made under the Euro 12bn covered bond programme established in 2005 (2006: one issue of £1bn).
32. Other borrowed funds
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
£300m Step Up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments | | | 308 | | | | 309 | | | | 308 | | | | 309 | |
$500m Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Instruments | | | – | | | | 247 | | | | – | | | | 247 | |
£175m Fixed/Floating Rate Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities | | | 182 | | | | 182 | | | | 182 | | | | 182 | |
$1,000m Non-Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities | | | 585 | | | | 573 | | | | – | | | | – | |
£325m Sterling Preference Shares | | | 344 | | | | 344 | | | | 344 | | | | 344 | |
|
| | | 1,419 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 834 | | | | 1,082 | |
|
104
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statements continued
£300m Step-up Callable Perpetual Reserve Capital Instruments
The Reserve Capital Instruments were issued in 2001 by Abbey National plc. Reserve Capital Instruments are redeemable by Abbey on 14 February 2026 or on each coupon payment date thereafter, subject to the prior approval of the Financial Services Authority and provided that the auditors have reported to the trustee within the previous six months that the solvency condition is met.
The Reserve Capital Instruments bear interest at a rate of 7.037% per annum, payable annually in arrears, from 14 February 2001 to 14 February 2026. Thereafter, the reserve capital instruments will bear interest at a rate, reset every five years, of 3.75% per annum above the gross redemption yield on the UK five year benchmark gilt rate.
$500m Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Securities
The Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Securities were issued on 8 August 2002 by Abbey National plc. The Securities had an interest rate of 7.375% per annum, payable in US dollars quarterly in arrears. The Securities had no maturity date. However, Abbey National plc had the option to redeem the securities in whole, but not in part, on 15 September 2007 or on each coupon payment date thereafter. Abbey National plc redeemed the securities in whole on 17 September 2007. As at 31 December 2007 Abbey National plc therefore had no Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Securities outstanding.
£175m Fixed/Floating Rate Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities
The Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities were issued on 9 August 2002 by Abbey National plc. The Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities are redeemable by Abbey National plc in whole but not in part on 9 February 2018 or on each coupon payment date thereafter, subject to the prior approval of the Financial Services Authority.
The Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities bear interest at a rate of 6.984% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears. From (and including) 9 February 2018, the Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities will bear interest, at a rate reset semi-annually of 1.86% per annum above the six-month sterling LIBOR rate, payable semi-annually in arrears.
The Reserve Capital Instruments, Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Instruments and Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities are not redeemable at the option of the holders and the holders do not have any rights against other Abbey Group companies. Upon the occurrence of certain tax or regulatory events, the Reserve Capital Instruments may be exchanged, their terms varied, or redeemed.
Interest payments may be deferred, but Abbey National plc may not declare or pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase any junior securities until Abbey National plc next make a scheduled payment on the Reserve Capital Instruments, Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Instruments and Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities.
The Reserve Capital Instruments, Tier One Perpetual Subordinated Debt Instruments and Tier One Preferred Income Capital Securities are unsecured securities of Abbey National plc and are subordinated to the claims of unsubordinated creditors and subordinated creditors holding Abbey National plc loan capital. Upon the winding up of Abbey National plc, the holder of each Reserve Capital Instruments, Securities and Tier One Preferred Income Capital will rankpari passuwith the holders of the most senior class or classes of preference shares (if any) of Abbey National plc then in issue and in priority to all other Abbey shareholders.
$1,000m Non-Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities
Abbey National Capital Trust I, Abbey National Capital Trust II, Abbey National Capital LP I and Abbey National Capital LP II are each 100% owned finance subsidiaries of Abbey National plc. Abbey National Capital Trust I and Abbey National Capital Trust II have registered trust preferred securities, and Abbey National Capital LP I and Abbey National Capital LP II have registered partnership preferred securities, for issuance in the US. Abbey National Capital Trust I and Abbey National Capital Trust II each serve solely as passive vehicles holding the partnership preferred securities issued by Abbey National Capital LP I and Abbey National Capital LP II, respectively, and each has passed all the rights relating to such partnership preferred securities to the holders of the issued trust preferred securities. All of the trust preferred securities and the partnership preferred securities have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by Abbey National plc. Abbey National Capital Trust I has issued to the public US $1,000,000,000 of 8.963% Non-Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Abbey National plc to obtain funds, by dividend or loan, from any subsidiary. After 30 June 2030, the distribution rate on the preferred securities will be at the rate of 2.825% per annum above the three-month US dollar LIBOR rate for the relevant distribution period.
The trust preferred securities are not redeemable at the option of the holders and the holders do not have any rights against other Abbey Group companies. The partnership preferred securities may be redeemed by the partnership, in whole or in part, on 30 June 2030 and on each distribution payment date thereafter. Redemption by the partnership of the partnership preferred securities may also occur in the event of a tax or regulatory change. Generally, holders of the preferred securities will have no voting rights.
�� On a return of capital or on a distribution of assets on a winding up of the partnership, holders of the partnership preferred securities will be entitled to receive, for each partnership preferred security, a liquidation preference of US $1,000, together with any due and accrued distributions and any additional amounts, out of the assets of the partnership available for distribution.
The trust preferred securities, the partnership preferred securities and the subordinated guarantees taken together will not entitle the holders to receive more than they would have been entitled to receive had they been the holders of directly issued non-cumulative, non-voting preference shares of Abbey National plc.
105
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
£325m Sterling Preference Shares
| | | | | | | | |
Size of shareholding | | Shareholders | | | Preference shares of £1 each | |
|
1–100 | | | 1 | | | | 100 | |
101–1,000 | | | 40 | | | | 29,458 | |
1,001+ | | | 1,698 | | | | 324,970,442 | |
|
| | | 1,739 | | | | 325,000,000 | |
|
Holders of the sterling preference shares are entitled to receive a biannual non-cumulative preferential dividend payable in sterling out of the distributable profits of the Company. The rate per annum will ensure that the sum of the dividend payable on such date and the associated tax credit (as defined in the terms of the sterling preference shares) represents an annual rate of 8 5/8% per annum of the nominal amount of shares issued in 1997, and an annual rate of 10 3/8% for shares issued in 1995 and 1996. On a return of capital or on a distribution of assets on a winding up, the sterling preference shares shall rankpari passuwith any other shares that are expressed to rankpari passutherewith as regards participation in assets, and otherwise in priority to any other share capital of the Company.
On such a return of capital or winding up, each sterling preference share shall, out of the surplus assets of the Company available for distribution amongst the members after payment of the Company’s liabilities, carry the right to receive an amount equal to the amount paid up or credited as paid together with any premium paid on issue and the full amount of any dividend otherwise due for payment. Other than as set out above, no sterling preference share confers any right to participate on a return of capital or a distribution of assets of the Company.
Holders of the sterling preference shares are not entitled to receive notice of or attend, speak and vote at general meetings of the Company unless the business of the meeting includes the consideration of a resolution to wind up the Company or any resolution varying, altering or abrogating any of the rights, privileges, limitations or restrictions attached to the sterling preference shares or if the dividend on the sterling preference shares has not been paid in full for the three consecutive dividend periods immediately prior to the relevant general meeting. In any such case, the sterling preference shareholders are entitled to receive notice of and attend the general meeting at which such resolution is proposed and will be entitled to speak and vote on such a resolution but not on any other resolution.
33. Subordinated Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Dated subordinated liabilities: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
5.00% Subordinated bond 2009 (€511.3m) | | | 393 | | | | 362 | | | | 393 | | | | 362 | |
4.625% Subordinated notes 2011 (€500m) | | | 378 | | | | 349 | | | | 378 | | | | 349 | |
10.125% Subordinated guaranteed bond 2023 | | | 212 | | | | 230 | | | | – | | | | – | |
11.50% Subordinated guaranteed bond 2017 | | | 220 | | | | 217 | | | | – | | | | – | |
11.59% Subordinated loan stock 2017 | | | – | | | | – | | | | 203 | | | | 213 | |
10.18% Subordinated loan stock 2023 | | | – | | | | – | | | | 198 | | | | 204 | |
7.57% Subordinated notes 2029 (US $1,000m) | | | 588 | | | | 578 | | | | 588 | | | | 578 | |
6.50% Subordinated notes 2030 | | | 164 | | | | 167 | | | | 164 | | | | 167 | |
8.9% Subordinated notes 2030 (US $1,000m) | | | – | | | | – | | | | 586 | | | | 573 | |
5.25% Subordinated notes 2015 | | | 206 | | | | 203 | | | | 206 | | | | 203 | |
Subordinated floating rate EURIBOR notes 2015 | | | 370 | | | | 338 | | | | 370 | | | | 338 | |
Callable capped subordinated floating rate notes 2012 (US$50m) | | | – | | | | 26 | | | | – | | | | 26 | |
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 2012 (US $50m) | | | – | | | | 26 | | | | – | | | | 26 | |
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 2012 (€500m) | | | – | | | | 335 | | | | – | | | | 335 | |
Subordinated floating rate EURIBOR notes 2016 | | | – | | | | – | | | | 65 | | | | – | |
|
| | | 2,531 | | | | 2,831 | | | | 3,151 | | | | 3,374 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Undated subordinated liabilities: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
10.0625% Exchangeable subordinated capital securities | | | 204 | | | | 204 | | | | 204 | | | | 204 | |
6.70% Perpetual subordinated reset capital securities (US $500m) | | | 252 | | | | 258 | | | | 252 | | | | 258 | |
5.56% Subordinated guaranteed notes (YEN 15,000m) | | | 84 | | | | 81 | | | | 84 | | | | 81 | |
5.50% Subordinated guaranteed notes (YEN 5,000m) | | | 28 | | | | 27 | | | | 28 | | | | 27 | |
Fixed/Floating rate subordinated notes (YEN 5,000m) | | | 26 | | | | 26 | | | | 26 | | | | 26 | |
7.50% 10 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes | | | 342 | | | | 342 | | | | 342 | | | | 342 | |
7.50% 15 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes | | | 465 | | | | 466 | | | | 465 | | | | 466 | |
7.38% 20 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes | | | 198 | | | | 199 | | | | 198 | | | | 199 | |
7.13% 30 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes | | | 293 | | | | 298 | | | | 293 | | | | 298 | |
7.13% Fixed to floating rate perpetual subordinated notes | | | 309 | | | | 288 | | | | 309 | | | | 288 | |
|
| | | 2,201 | | | | 2,189 | | | | 2,201 | | | | 2,189 | |
|
Total subordinated liabilities | | | 4,732 | | | | 5,020 | | | | 5,352 | | | | 5,563 | |
|
106
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
The subordinated floating rate notes pay a rate of interest related to the LIBOR of the currency of denomination.
The 10.0625% Exchangeable subordinated capital securities are exchangeable into fully paid 10.375% non-cumulative non-redeemable sterling preference shares of £1 each, at the option of Abbey. Exchange may take place on any interest payment date providing that between 30 and 60 days notice has been given to the holders. The holders will receive one new sterling preference share for each £1 principal amount of capital securities held. Note 32 details the rights attaching to these shares, as they are the same.
The 6.70% Perpetual subordinated reset capital securities are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 15 June 2008 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The 5.56% Subordinated guaranteed notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 31 January 2015 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The 5.50% Subordinated guaranteed notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 27 June 2015 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The Fixed/Floating rate subordinated notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 27 December 2016 and each interest payment date anniversary thereafter.
The 7.50% 10 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 28 September 2010 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The 7.50% 15 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 28 September 2015 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The 7.38% 20 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 28 September 2020 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The 7.13% 30 Year step-up perpetual subordinated notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 30 September 2030 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
The 7.13% Fixed to Floating rate perpetual subordinated notes are redeemable at par, at the option of Abbey, on 28 September 2010 and each fifth anniversary thereafter.
In common with other debt securities issued by Group companies, the subordinated liabilities are redeemable in whole at the option of Abbey, on any interest payment date, in the event of certain tax changes affecting the treatment of payments of interest on the subordinated liabilities in the UK, at their principal amount together with any accrued interest.
In 2007, the dated callable capped subordinated floating rate notes 2012 (US$50m), the dated callable subordinated floating rate notes 2012 (US$50m) and the dated callable subordinated floating rate notes 2012 (Euro 500m) were redeemed in full.
Subordinated liabilities including convertible debt securities in issue are repayable:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
In more than 1 year but no more than 5 years | | | 771 | | | | 711 | | | | 771 | | | | 711 | |
In more than 5 years | | | 1,760 | | | | 2,120 | | | | 2,380 | | | | 2,663 | |
Undated | | | 2,201 | | | | 2,189 | | | | 2,201 | | | | 2,189 | |
|
| | | 4,732 | | | | 5,020 | | | | 5,352 | | | | 5,563 | |
|
34. Other liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Trade and other payables | | | 2,271 | | | | 1,521 | | | | 1,452 | | | | 1,016 | |
Deferred income | | | 66 | | | | 95 | | | | – | | | | 11 | |
|
| | | 2,337 | | | | 1,616 | | | | 1,452 | | | | 1,027 | |
|
35. Provisions
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2007 | | | 153 | | | | 27 | | | | 180 | |
Additional provisions | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Provisions released | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (1) | |
Used during the year | | | (58) | | | | (7) | | | | (65) | |
Reclassifications | | | – | | | | 16 | | | | 16 | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 95 | | | | 36 | | | | 131 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
To be settled: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Within 12 months | | | 55 | | | | 26 | | | | 81 | |
In more than 12 months | | | 40 | | | | 10 | | | | 50 | |
|
| | | 95 | | | | 36 | | | | 131 | |
|
107
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2007 | | | 151 | | | | 6 | | | | 157 | |
Used during the year | | | (56) | | | | (1) | | | | (57) | |
|
At 31 December 2007 | | | 95 | | | | 5 | | | | 100 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
To be settled: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Within 12 months | | | 55 | | | | 1 | | | | 56 | |
In more than 12 months | | | 40 | | | | 4 | | | | 44 | |
|
| | | 95 | | | | 5 | | | | 100 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2006 | | | 192 | | | | 61 | | | | 253 | |
Additional provisions | | | 61 | | | | 3 | | | | 64 | |
Provisions released | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | (1) | |
Used during the year | | | (100) | | | | (47) | | | | (147) | |
Reclassifications | | | – | | | | 11 | | | | 11 | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 153 | | | | 27 | | | | 180 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
To be settled: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Within 12 months | | | 131 | | | | 16 | | | | 147 | |
In more than 12 months | | | 22 | | | | 11 | | | | 33 | |
|
| | | 153 | | | | 27 | | | | 180 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January 2006 | | | 190 | | | | 12 | | | | 202 | |
Additional provisions | | | 61 | | | | – | | | | 61 | |
Used during the year | | | (100) | | | | (6) | | | | (106) | |
|
At 31 December 2006 | | | 151 | | | | 6 | | | | 157 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Misselling | | | Other | | | Total | |
To be settled: | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Within 12 months | | | 131 | | | | 2 | | | | 133 | |
In more than 12 months | | | 20 | | | | 4 | | | | 24 | |
|
| | | 151 | | | | 6 | | | | 157 | |
|
The charge disclosed in the income statement in respect of provisions for other liabilities and charges of nil (2006: £63m), comprises the additional provisions of £1m (2006: £64m), less the provisions released of £1m (2006: £1m) in the table above.
The misselling provision comprises various claims with respect to product misselling. In calculating the misselling provision, management’s best estimate of the provision was calculated based on conclusions regarding the number of claims that will be received, of those, the number that will be upheld, and the estimated average settlement per case. Further information on misselling provisions can be found in “Critical Accounting Policies” within the Accounting Policies on page 81.
Other provisions comprise amounts in respect of litigation and related expenses, restructuring expenses and other post retirement benefits.
36. Retirement benefit obligations
Defined Contribution Pension schemes
The Group operates a number of defined contribution pension schemes, of which the Stakeholder scheme introduced in 2001 is the principal scheme. The scheme assets are held separately from those of the Company by an independently administered scheme.
An expense of £7m (2006: £4m, 2005: £4m) was recognised for defined contribution plans in the year, and is included in staff costs classified within administration expenses in the Income Statement. None of this amount was recognised in respect of key management personnel for the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005.
108
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
Defined Benefit Pension schemes
The Group operates a number of defined benefit pension schemes; the Abbey National Amalgamated Pension Fund, Abbey National Group Pension Scheme, Abbey National Associated Bodies Pension Fund, National & Provincial Building Society Pension Fund, the Scottish Mutual Assurance Staff Pension Scheme and the Scottish Provident Institution Staff Pension Fund are the principal pension schemes within the Group, covering 45% (2006: 47%, 2005: 60%) of the Group’s employees, and are all funded defined benefits schemes. All are closed schemes, and under the projected unit method, the current service cost when expressed as a percentage of pensionable salaries, will gradually increase over time.
On 31 August 2006, the Company became the legally sponsoring employer of the Scottish Mutual Assurance Staff Pension Scheme and the Scottish Provident Institution Staff Pension Fund. Employees of these schemes who transferred to Resolution plc upon the sale of the life insurance businesses became deferred members of these schemes.
Formal actuarial valuations of the assets and liabilities of the schemes are carried out on a triennial basis by an independent professionally qualified actuary and valued for accounting purposes at each balance sheet date. The latest formal actuarial valuation was made as at 31 March 2005 for the Amalgamated Fund, Associated Bodies Fund, Group Pension Scheme and the National & Provincial Building Society Pension Fund, and as at 31 December 2003 for the Scottish Mutual Assurance Staff Pension Scheme and the Scottish Provident Institution Staff Pension Fund. Valuations for the two latter schemes as at 31 December 2006 are in progress.
The total amount charged to the income statement, including amounts classified in discontinued operations and redundancy costs, is determined as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Current service cost | | | 67 | | | | 92 | | | | 102 | | | | 57 | | | | 76 | | | | 85 | |
Past service cost | | | 14 | | | | 16 | | | | 21 | | | | 14 | | | | 15 | | | | 18 | |
Gain on settlements or curtailments | | | (10) | | | | (69) | | | | – | | | | (10) | | | | (69) | | | | – | |
Expected return on pension scheme assets | | | (194) | | | | (180) | | | | (163) | | | | (192) | | | | (168) | | | | (136) | |
Interest cost | | | 220 | | | | 211 | | | | 200 | | | | 220 | | | | 197 | | | | 175 | |
|
| | | 97 | | | | 70 | | | | 160 | | | | 89 | | | | 51 | | | | 142 | |
|
The net liability recognised in the balance sheet is determined as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Present value of defined benefit obligation | | | (4,581) | | | | (4,264) | | | | (4,559) | | | | (4,241) | |
Fair value of plan assets | | | 3,602 | | | | 3,230 | | | | 3,577 | | | | 3,208 | |
|
Unfunded benefit obligation | | | (979) | | | | (1,034) | | | | (982) | | | | (1,033) | |
|
Movements in the defined benefit obligations during the year were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Balance at 1 January | | | (4,264) | | | | (4,354) | | | | (4,241) | | | | (3,822) | |
Schemes transferred to Company | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (472) | |
Current service cost | | | (67) | | | | (92) | | | | (65) | | | | (76) | |
Interest cost | | | (220) | | | | (211) | | | | (220) | | | | (197) | |
Employee contributions | | | (8) | | | | (9) | | | | (8) | | | | (9) | |
Past service cost | | | (14) | | | | (16) | | | | (14) | | | | (15) | |
Actuarial (loss)/gain | | | (138) | | | | 228 | | | | (140) | | | | 166 | |
Actual benefit payments | | | 120 | | | | 121 | | | | 119 | | | | 115 | |
Settlement/curtailment | | | 10 | | | | 69 | | | | 10 | | | | 69 | |
|
Balance at 31 December | | | (4,581) | | | | (4,264) | | | | (4,559) | | | | (4,241) | |
|
Movements in the present value of fair value of scheme assets during the year were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Balance at 1 January | | | 3,230 | | | | 2,974 | | | | 3,208 | | | | 2,582 | |
Schemes transferred to Company | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 374 | |
Expected return on scheme assets | | | 194 | | | | 180 | | | | 192 | | | | 168 | |
Actuarial gain/(loss) on scheme assets | | | 33 | | | | (9) | | | | 32 | | | | – | |
Company contributions paid (regular) | | | 243 | | | | 181 | | | | 242 | | | | 174 | |
Company contributions paid (special) | | | 14 | | | | 16 | | | | 14 | | | | 16 | |
Employee contributions | | | 8 | | | | 9 | | | | 8 | | | | 9 | |
Actual benefit payments | | | (120) | | | | (121) | | | | (119) | | | | (115) | |
|
Balance at 31 December | | | 3,602 | | | | 3,230 | | | | 3,577 | | | | 3,208 | |
|
109
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
The rate used to discount the retirement benefit obligation is determined based on the annual yield as at 31 December of the Sterling 15+ year AA Corporate Bond iBoxx Index, representing the market yield of high quality corporate bonds on that date.
The amounts recognised in the statement of recognised income and expense for each of the four years indicated were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Experience gain on scheme liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 13 | |
Actuarial (gain)/loss on scheme liabilities | | | 146 | | | | (228) | | | | 436 | | | | 164 | |
Actuarial (gain)/loss on scheme assets | | | (33) | | | | 9 | | | | (282) | | | | (107) | |
|
| | | 113 | | | | (219) | | | | 154 | | | | 70 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Experience gain on scheme liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | 7 | | | | 10 | |
Actuarial (gain)/loss on scheme liabilities | | | 148 | | | | (180) | | | | 387 | | | | 133 | |
Actuarial (gain)/loss on scheme assets | | | (32) | | | | – | | | | (242) | | | | (94) | |
|
| | | 116 | | | | (180) | | | | 152 | | | | 49 | |
|
The actual return on scheme assets was £227m (2006: £171m, 2005: £445m). Cumulative net actuarial losses of £118m (2006: £5m, 2005: £224m) have been recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Recognised Income and Expenses.
Abbey’s pension schemes did not directly hold any equity securities of Abbey or any of its related parties at 31 December 2007 (2006: nil, 2005: nil). In addition, Abbey does not hold insurance policies over the schemes, and has not entered into any significant transactions with the schemes.
The principal actuarial assumptions used for the Group and the Company were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Nominal per | | | Nominal per | | | Nominal per | |
| | annum | | | annum | | | annum | |
| | % | | | % | | | % | |
|
To determine benefit obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Discount rate for scheme liabilities | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.2 | | | | 4.85 | |
– General salary increase | | | 4.0 | | | | 4.0 | | | | 4.3 | |
– General price inflation | | | 3.5 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.8 | |
– Expected rate of pension increase | | | 3.5 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.8 | |
– Expected rate of return on plan assets | | | 6.1 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 6.5 | |
|
To determine net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Discount rate | | | 5.2 | | | | 4.85 | | | | 5.4 | |
– Expected rate of pension increase | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 2.8 | |
– Expected rate of return on plan assets | | | 6.1 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 6.5 | |
|
The mortality assumption used in preparation of the valuation was the Continuous Mortality Investigation table PXA 92MCC 2007. The Group determined its expense measurements above based upon long-term assumptions taking into account target asset allocations of equities and bonds set at the beginning of the year, offset by actual returns during the year. Year-end obligation measurements are determined by reference to market conditions at the balance sheet date. Assumptions are set in consultation with third party advisors and in-house expertise.
The trustees of the schemes are required under the Pensions Act 2004 to prepare a statement of investment principles. The principal duty of the trustees is to act in the best interest of the members of the schemes and they have developed the following investment objectives for their defined benefit sections:
> | | To maintain a portfolio of suitable assets of appropriate quality, suitability and liquidity which will generate income and capital growth to meet, together with new contributions from members and the employers, the cost of current and future benefits which the Fund provides, as set out in the Trust Deed and Rules. |
|
> | | To limit the risk of the assets failing to meet the liabilities, over the long-term and on a shorter-term basis as required by prevailing legislation. |
|
> | | To minimise the long-term costs of the Fund by maximising the return on the assets whilst having regard to the objectives shown above. |
The statement of investment principles has set the target allocation of plan assets at 48% Equities, 30% Bonds and 22% Gilts for 2007 and 2006, which was changed from 2005 when a 50% Equity, 30% Bonds and 20% Gilts policy was in place.
The expected rates of return by asset class used to calculate the expected return for 2007 are Equities 7.7% (2006: 7.8%, 2005: 8.0%), Bonds 5.1% (2006: 4.8%, 2005: 5.3%) and Gilts 4.3% (2006: 4.0%, 2005: 4.6%). The overall long-term rate of return on the assets employed has been determined after considering projected movements in asset indices.
110
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
The categories of assets in the scheme as a percentage of total assets in the scheme for Group and Company are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | % | | | % | |
|
UK equities | | | 24 | | | | 25 | |
Overseas equities | | | 20 | | | | 21 | |
Corporate bonds | | | 30 | | | | 27 | |
Government Fixed Interest | | | 12 | | | | 13 | |
Government Index Linked | | | 10 | | | | 11 | |
Others | | | 4 | | | | 3 | |
|
| | | 100 | | | | 100 | |
|
The Group expects to contribute £128m to its defined benefit pension schemes in 2008. The benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years, and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter are:
| | | | |
Year ending 31 December: | | £m | |
|
2008 | | | 128 | |
2009 | | | 137 | |
2010 | | | 148 | |
2011 | | | 159 | |
2012 | | | 171 | |
Five years ended 2017 | | | 1,075 | |
|
Participation of Group companies in the principal pension schemes is governed by the Pensions Acts 1995 and 2004. Under the 1995 Pensions Act, a company ceasing to participate in a pension scheme is required under Section 75 to pay a deficit reduction contribution certified by the scheme actuary, of any deficit relating to its employees, assessed on the basis of the cost of securing accrued benefits with an insurance company. Payments agreed with the trustees following the sale of the life insurance businesses in 2006 were made by the end of 2007.
37. Contingent liabilities and commitments
Abbey gives guarantees on behalf of customers. These guarantees have been made in the normal course of business. A financial guarantee represents an undertaking that the Group will meet a customer’s obligation to third parties if the customer fails to do so. The Group expects most of the guarantees it provides to expire unused. Financial guarantee contracts are measured at the higher of amortised fair value and any provision for a transfer of economic benefits when it is more likely than not that an outflow will occur and it can be reliably measured. The estimated maximum exposure in respect of guarantees granted is:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Guarantees given to subsidiaries | | | – | | | | – | | | | 101,785 | | | | 104,395 | |
Guarantees given to third parties | | | 3,589 | | | | 372 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Formal standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments with original term to maturity of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– One year or less | | | 1,928 | | | | 1,797 | | | | 1,925 | | | | 1,792 | |
– More than one year | | | 5,392 | | | | 4,445 | | | | 3,150 | | | | 2,522 | |
|
| | | 10,909 | | | | 6,614 | | | | 106,860 | | | | 108,709 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Other contingent liabilities | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
|
Unauthorised overdraft fees
Abbey, in line with other UK banks and building societies, levies charges on current account customers, for example when a customer goes overdrawn (if they did not have an arranged overdraft facility) when a customer exceeds their agreed overdraft limit, or when the bank refuses to pay an item if the customer does not have sufficient funds in their account. UK banks and building societies believe these fees customers pay are fair and clear.
Media publicity during the year about current account charges generated an industry wide increase in customer requests for refunds of current account service fees (in particular, unauthorised overdraft fees). On 27 July 2007 it was announced that the Company, along with seven other major UK current account providers, had reached agreement with the Office of Fair Trading to start legal proceedings in the High Court of England and Wales for a declaration (or declarations) to resolve legal uncertainties concerning the level, fairness and lawfulness of unauthorised overdraft charges including declarations on legal issues arising from the banks’ terms and conditions relating to overdraft charges and the applicability of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations to those terms and conditions (the “test case”).
111
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
It was also announced that the Company and those other providers will seek a stay of all current and potential future Court proceedings which are brought against them in the UK concerning these charges and have obtained the consent of the Financial Services Ombudsman not to proceed with consideration of the merits of any complaints concerning these charges that are referred to him prior to the resolution of the test case.
A definitive outcome of the test case is unlikely to be known for at least 12 months. Given the very early stage of these proceedings and the uncertainty as to the timing and quantum of the outcome, it is not practicable at this time to estimate any potential financial effect.
Overseas tax claim
Abbey National Treasury Services plc has received a demand from an overseas tax authority relating to the repayment of certain tax credits and related charges. Following modifications to the demand, its nominal amount stands at £61m at the balance sheet exchange rate (2006: £56m). At 31 December 2007, additional interest in relation to the demand could amount to £24m at the balance sheet exchange rate (2006: £21m). Abbey National Treasury Services plc received legal advice that it had strong grounds to challenge the validity of the demand. In September 2006, Abbey National Treasury Services plc won its case at the first stage of the litigation process. In January 2007, the tax authority appealed this decision. However, in December 2006, a ruling was published of a similar case unconnected to Abbey but which might affect Abbey National Treasury Services plc’s position. In this instance, the courts ruled against the taxpayer.
Other
As part of the sale of subsidiaries, and as is normal in such circumstances, the Group has given warranties and indemnities to the purchasers. There are also some insignificant litigation and tax matters.
Obligations under stock borrowing and lending agreements
Obligations under stock borrowing and lending agreements represent contractual commitments to return stock borrowed. These obligations totalling £33,774m at 31 December 2007 (2006: £32,293m) are offset by a contractual right to receive stock under other contractual agreements.
Other off-balance sheet commitments
The Group has commitments to lend at fixed interest rates which expose it to interest rate risk.
Operating lease commitments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
Rental commitments under operating leases expiring: | | | | | | | | |
– No later than 1 year | | | 101 | | | | 94 | |
– Later than 1 year but no later than 5 years | | | 396 | | | | 367 | |
– Later than 5 years | | | 641 | | | | 591 | |
|
| | | 1,138 | | | | 1,052 | |
|
At 31 December 2007 the Group held various leases on land and buildings, many for extended periods, and other leases for equipment, which require the following aggregate minimum lease payments:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
Year ended 31 December: | | £m | | | £m | |
|
2008 | | | 101 | | | | 94 | |
2009 | | | 98 | | | | 91 | |
2010 | | | 99 | | | | 92 | |
2011 | | | 101 | | | | 93 | |
2012 | | | 98 | | | | 91 | |
Total thereafter | | | 641 | | | | 591 | |
|
| | |
(1) | | Under the terms of these leases Abbey has the opportunity to extend its occupation of properties by a minimum of three years subject to 12 months notice and lease renewal being available from external landlords during the term of the lease. At expiry Abbey has the option to reacquire the freehold of certain properties. |
Group rental expense comprises:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
In respect of minimum rentals | | | 96 | | | | 105 | | | | 109 | |
Less: sub-lease rentals | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
| | | 96 | | | | 105 | | | | 109 | |
|
Appropriate provisions are maintained to cover the above matters.
112
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
38. Share capital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Ordinary shares of 10 | | | Preference shares of £1 | | | Preference shares of | | | Preference shares of | | | | |
| | pence each | | | each | | | US$0.01 each | | | €0.01 each | | | Total | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Share capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Authorised share capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 31 December 2007 and 2006 | | | 175 | | | | 1,000 | | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | | | 1,187 | |
|
Issued and fully paid share capital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 31 December 2007 and 2006 | | | 148 | | | | 325 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 473 | |
|
Share premium account | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 31 December 2007 and 2006 | | | 1,857 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,857 | |
|
39. Retained earnings and minority interest
Movements in retained earnings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January | | | 1,111 | | | | 1,105 | | | | 694 | | | | 903 | |
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 351 | | | | (128) | |
Post tax actuarial movement on defined benefit pension schemes | | | (98) | | | | 153 | | | | (100) | | | | 126 | |
Gains on available for sale securities | | | 13 | | | | 1 | | | | 12 | | | | – | |
Gains on available for sale securities transferred to profit or loss on sale | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | (1) | | | | – | |
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | | | (1) | | | | (9) | | | | – | | | | – | |
Equity dividends proposed | | | (370) | | | | (207) | | | | (370) | | | | (207) | |
|
At 31 December | | | 1,339 | | | | 1,111 | | | | 586 | | | | 694 | |
|
Movements in minority interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | |
|
At 1 January | | | – | | | | – | |
Additions | | | 98 | | | | – | |
|
At 31 December | | | 98 | | | | – | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | Pence per | | | Pence per | | | Pence per | | | Pence per | | | Pence per | | | Pence per | |
| | Share | | | Share | | | Share | | | Share | | | Share | | | Share | |
|
Ordinary shares (equity): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006 interim | | | 13.46 | | | | 13.93 | | | | – | | | | 13.46 | | | | 13.93 | | | | – | |
2007 interim | | | 11.44 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 11.44 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
| | | 24.90 | | | | 13.93 | | | | – | | | | 24.90 | | | | 13.93 | | | | – | |
|
40. Consolidated cash flow statement
a) Reconciliation of profit/(loss) before tax to net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Group profit/(loss) for the year | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | | | | 351 | | | | (128) | | | | 691 | |
Non cash items included in net profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease/(increase) in prepayments and accrued income | | | (105) | | | | (91) | | | | (306) | | | | (353) | | | | (91) | | | | (203) | |
Increase/(decrease) in accruals and deferred income | | | 531 | | | | 176 | | | | (220) | | | | 411 | | | | (64) | | | | 109 | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | 205 | | | | 217 | | | | 199 | | | | 72 | | | | 79 | | | | 66 | |
Loss/(profit) on sale of subsidiary and associated undertakings | | | – | | | | 223 | | | | (62) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Change in value of in-force Life Assurance Business | | | – | | | | 96 | | | | 56 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | 63 | | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | 159 | | | | – | |
Provision for impairment | | | 388 | | | | 413 | | | | 218 | | | | 346 | | | | 375 | | | | (296) | |
Other non-cash items | | | 288 | | | | 28 | | | | 385 | | | | (30) | | | | (207) | | | | 216 | |
|
| | | 1,992 | | | | 1,193 | | | | 693 | | | | 797 | | | | 123 | | | | 583 | |
|
113
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | Restated(1) 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net increase in trading assets | | | (695) | | | | (938) | | | | (7,330) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net (increase)/decrease in derivative assets | | | (1,615) | | | | 2,512 | | | | (1,717) | | | | (43) | | | | 581 | | | | (970) | |
Net (increase)/decrease in financial assets designated at fair value | | | (3,107) | | | | (933) | | | | (2,859) | | | | (7,434) | | | | 724 | | | | (79) | |
Net (increase)/decrease in loans and advances to banks and customers | | | (8,908) | | | | (9,914) | | | | (2,352) | | | | (1,641) | | | | (20,801) | | | | (8,232) | |
Net decrease/(increase) in other assets | | | 1,914 | | | | (360) | | | | 2,650 | | | | 357 | | | | (166) | | | | 943 | |
Net (increase/decrease in deferred acquisition costs | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | 67 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net increase/(decrease) in deposits by banks and deposits by customers | | | 3,024 | | | | 329 | | | | (5,973) | | | | 24,339 | | | | 10,796 | | | | 2,894 | |
Net (decrease)/increase in derivative liabilities | | | (287) | | | | (1,046) | | | | (289) | | | | 370 | | | | 58 | | | | 623 | |
Net (decrease)/increase in trading liabilities | | | (3,251) | | | | (6,668) | | | | 14,218 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net (decrease)/increase in financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | (619) | | | | 679 | | | | 21 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net decrease in insurance contract liabilities | | | – | | | | (1,832) | | | | (231) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net (decrease)/increase in investment contract liabilities | | | – | | | | (53) | | | | 93 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net increase/(decrease) in debt issued | | | 368 | | | | 5,879 | | | | (185) | | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | 1 | |
Net (decrease)/increase in other liabilities | | | (20) | | | | (675) | | | | (4,009) | | | | (315) | | | | (134) | | | | (1,580) | |
Effects of exchange rate differences | | | 396 | | | | (1,196) | | | | 80 | | | | – | | | | (108) | | | | 122 | |
|
Net cash flow (used in)/from operating activities before tax | | | (10,808) | | | | (13,026) | | | | (7,123) | | | | 16,427 | | | | (8,927) | | | | (5,695) | |
Income tax (paid)/received | | | (5) | | | | (60) | | | | (132) | | | | 48 | | | | 56 | | | | (8) | |
|
Net cash flow (used in)/from operating activities | | | (10,813) | | | | (13,086) | | | | (7,255) | | | | 16,475 | | | | (8,871) | | | | (5,703) | |
|
b) Analysis of the balances of cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | | | Company | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | Restated(1) 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cash and balances with central banks | | | 1,038 | | | | 888 | | | | 991 | | | | 1,032 | | | | 888 | | | | 370 | |
Debt securities | | | 5,819 | | | | 8,026 | | | | 16,117 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net trading other cash equivalents | | | (11,832) | | | | (6,629) | | | | (5,175) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net non trading other cash equivalents | | | (5,830) | | | | (6,132) | | | | (3,692) | | | | (6,336) | | | | (22,105) | | | | (15,454) | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | | (10,805) | | | | (3,847) | | | | 8,241 | | | | (5,304) | | | | (21,217) | | | | (15,084) | |
|
(1) | | A description of the restatement can be found in the Accounting Policies on page 77. |
c) Sale of subsidiaries, associated undertakings and businesses
| | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Net assets disposed of: | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Derivative financial instruments | | | 1,007 | | | | – | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 24,130 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 1,329 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 19 | | | | 1,092 | |
Value of in force business | | | 1,625 | | | | – | |
Current tax accounts | | | 4 | | | | – | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 1 | | | | – | |
Other assets | | | 1,903 | | | | 20 | |
Deposits by banks | | | (609) | | | | – | |
Deposits by customers | | | (3) | | | | – | |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | (544) | | | | – | |
Debt securities in issue | | | (67) | | | | – | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | (334) | | | | – | |
Insurance and reinsurance liabilities | | | (19,647) | | | | – | |
Other liabilities | | | (1,151) | | | | (329) | |
Investment contract liabilities | | | (3,253) | | | | – | |
Current tax liabilities | | | (34) | | | | – | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | (406) | | | | – | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | (2) | | | | – | |
|
| | | 3,968 | | | | 783 | |
Profit/ (loss) on disposal | | | (223) | | | | 62 | |
|
| | | 3,745 | | | | 845 | |
|
Satisfied by: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 3,745 | | | | 845 | |
Less: Cash and cash equivalents in subsidiary sold | | | (3,501) | | | | – | |
|
Net cash inflow of sale | | | 244 | | | | 845 | |
|
114
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
In addition, as described in Note 20, on 17 December 2007, Abbey National plc sold 49% of its shareholding in Santander Private Banking UK Limited to a direct subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. for a total cash consideration of £203m. Further, in 2007, recoveries of £5m were received in respect of subsidiaries sold in 2003.
d) Discontinued operations
The life insurance businesses that were sold in 2006, which constitute the Sold Life Businesses segment, qualify as discontinued operations. The net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing activities of discontinued operations were nil (2006: £554m, 2005: £130m), nil (2006: nil, 2005: £1,330m), and nil (2006: nil, 2005: £(52)m), respectively.
41. Collateral pledged and received
Abbey and its subsidiaries pledge assets as collateral in the following areas of the business.
The Company enters into securitisation transactions whereby portfolios of residential mortgages loans are purchased by or assigned to special purpose securitisation companies, and have been funded through the issue of mortgage backed securities. Holders of the securities are only entitled to obtain payments of principal and interest to the extent that the resources of the securitisation companies are sufficient to support such payments and the holders of the securities have agreed in writing not to seek recourse in any other form. At 31 December 2007 £29,494m (2006: £15,153m) of residential mortgage loans were so assigned.
In 2005, the Company also established a covered bond programme, whereby securities are issued to investors and are secured by a pool of ring-fenced residential mortgages. At 31 December 2007 £3,170m (2006: £2,950m) of residential mortgage loans had been so secured.
Collateral is also provided by Abbey National Treasury Services plc in the normal course of its derivative business to counter parties. As at 31 December 2007 £683m (2006: £578m) of such collateral in the form of cash had been pledged.
As part of structured transactions entered into by subsidiaries of the Company, assets are provided as collateral. As at 31 December 2007 £2,035m (2006: £2,323m) of assets had been pledged in relation to these transactions.
Subsidiaries of the Company enter into sale and repurchase agreements and similar transactions, which are accounted for as secured borrowings. Upon entering into such transactions, the subsidiaries pledge collateral equal to 100%-105% of the borrowed amount. The carrying amount of assets that were so pledged at 31 December 2007 was £37,455m (2006: £26,431m).
Subsidiaries of the Company also enter into purchase and resale agreements and similar transactions, which are accounted for as collateralised loans. Upon entering into such transactions, the companies receive collateral equal to 100%-105% of the loan amount. The level of collateral held is monitored daily and if required, further calls are made to ensure the market values of collateral remains equal to the loan balance. The companies are permitted to sell or repledge the collateral held. At 31 December 2007, the fair value of such collateral was £48,015m (2006: £44,898m) of which £48,015m (2006: £44,898m) was sold or repledged. The companies have an obligation to return the collateral that it has sold or pledged with a fair value of £48,015m (2006: £44,898m).
42. Share-based compensation
Abbey granted share options to executive officers and employees under the Executive Share Option scheme, Sharesave scheme and the Employee Share Option scheme prior to being acquired by Banco Santander, S.A. on 12 November 2004. Options granted under the Executive Share Option scheme are generally exercisable between the third and tenth anniversaries of the grant date, provided that certain performance criteria are met. Under the Sharesave scheme, eligible employees can elect to exercise their options either three, five or seven years after the grant date. All of the share options prior to the 12 November 2004 relate to shares in Abbey National plc. After 12 November 2004, all share options relate to shares in Banco Santander, S.A. On 12 November 2004 all holders of options in ordinary shares of Abbey National plc were given the option to exercise their options, to cancel their options in return for a cash payment or to transfer their options to options in shares of Banco Santander, S.A. The options over Banco Santander, S.A. shares are accounted for as cash settled share-based transactions. On acquisition of Abbey by Banco Santander, S.A. there was no fair value adjustment of options modified to rights over Banco Santander, S.A. shares. From 12 November 2004 Abbey has purchased Banco Santander, S.A. shares on the open market in order to settle its share based compensation obligations.
The total carrying amount at the end of the period for liabilities arising from share-based payment transactions was £68m (2006: £54m, 2005: £55m). Cash received from the exercise of share options and the actual tax benefits realised from tax deductions were £6m (2006: £18m) and £2m (2006: £6m), respectively.
The fair value of each option for 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been estimated at the date of acquisition or grant using a partial differential equation model with the following assumptions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
|
Risk free interest rate | | | 5.0%-5.8% | | | | 4.5%-5.0% | | | | 4.5%-4.6% | |
Dividend growth, based solely upon average growth since 1989 | | | 10% | | | | 10% | | | | 10% | |
Volatility of underlying shares based upon historical volatility over five years | | | 19.80%-26.90% | | | | 17.70%-19.85% | | | | 16.96%-17.58% | |
Expected lives of options granted under: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
– Employee Sharesave 3, 5 & 7 year schemes | | 3, 5 & 7 years | | | 3, 5 & 7 years | | | 3, 5 & 7 years | |
– Executive Share Option scheme | | 10 years | | | 10 years | | | 10 years | |
– Medium term incentive plan | | 3 years | | | 3 years | | | 3 years | |
– Long term incentive plan | | 3 years | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
115
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
With the exception of those that include terms related to market conditions, vesting conditions included in the terms of the grant are not taken into account in estimating fair value. Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of shares or share options included in the measurement of the cost of the employee service so that ultimately, the amount recognised in the income statement reflects the number of vested shares or share options. Where vesting conditions are related to market conditions, the charges for the services received are recognised regardless of whether or not the market related vesting conditions are met, provided that, the non-market vesting conditions are met. Share price volatility has been based upon the range of implied volatility for the Banco Santander, S.A. shares at the strikes and tenors in which the majority of the sensitivities lie.
The following table summarises the movement in the number of share options between those outstanding at the beginning and end of the year, together with the changes in weighted average exercise price over the same period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Executive Share Option scheme | | | Employee Sharesave scheme | | | Employee Share Option scheme | |
| | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | average | | | | | | | average | | | | | | | average | |
| | Number of | | | exercise | | | Number of | | | exercise | | | Number of | | | exercise | |
| | options | | | price | | | options | | | price | | | options | | | price | |
| | ’000s | | | £ | | | ’000s | | | £ | | | ’000s | | | £ | |
|
2007 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding at the start of the year | | | 178 | | | | 4.11 | | | | 7,638 | | | | 3.32 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options exercised during the year | | | (34) | | | | 3.96 | | | | (1,501) | | | | 3.81 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options forfeited during the year | | | – | | | | – | | | | (419) | | | | 3.25 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options expired during the year | | | – | | | | – | | | | (34) | | | | 5.92 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options outstanding at the end of the year | | | 144 | | | | 4.15 | | | | 5,684 | | | | 3.18 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options exercisable at the end of the year | | | 144 | | | | 4.15 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding at the start of the year | | | 270 | | | | 4.08 | | | | 13,799 | | | | 3.38 | | | | 54 | | | | 5.90 | |
Options exercised during the year | | | (92) | | | | 4.01 | | | | (5,095) | | | | 3.36 | | | | (33) | | | | 5.90 | |
Options forfeited during the year | | | – | | | | – | | | | (897) | | | | 3.42 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options expired during the year | | | – | | | | – | | | | (169) | | | | 6.05 | | | | (21) | | | | 5.90 | |
Options outstanding at the end of the year | | | 178 | | | | 4.11 | | | | 7,638 | | | | 3.32 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options exercisable at the end of the year | | | 178 | | | | 4.11 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding at the start of the year | | | 359 | | | | 4.16 | | | | 17,260 | | | | 3.56 | | | | 57 | | | | 5.90 | |
Options exercised during the year | | | (89) | | | | 4.43 | | | | (1,677) | | | | 4.45 | | | | (3) | | | | 5.90 | |
Options forfeited during the year | | | – | | | | – | | | | (1,775) | | | | 4.07 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options expired during the year | | | – | | | | – | | | | (9) | | | | 7.69 | | | | – | | | | – | |
Options outstanding at the end of the year | | | 270 | | | | 4.08 | | | | 13,799 | | | | 3.38 | | | | 54 | | | | 5.90 | |
Options exercisable at the end of the year | | | 270 | | | | 4.08 | | | | 3 | | | | 7.17 | | | | 54 | | | | 5.90 | |
|
The intrinsic value of the options exercised and the fair value of the shares vested during the year were £3m (2006: £25m, 2005: £4m) and £3m (2006: £37m, 2005: £12m), respectively.
Executive Share Option scheme
The following table summarises information about the options outstanding at 31 December 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options outstanding | | | Options exercisable | |
| | | | | | Weighted average | | | Weighted average | | | | | | | Weighted average | |
| | Number | | | remaining contractual life | | | exercise price | | | Number | | | exercise price | |
Range of exercise prices | | ’000s | | | years | | | £ | | | ’000s | | | £ | |
|
Between £3 and £4 | | | 70 | | | | 5 | | | | 3.73 | | | | 70 | | | | 3.73 | |
Between £4 and £5 | | | 74 | | | | 6 | | | | 4.54 | | | | 74 | | | | 4.74 | |
|
The following table summarises information about the options outstanding at 31 December 2006.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options outstanding | | | | | | | Options exercisable | |
| | | | | | Weighted average | | | Weighted average | | | | | | | Weighted average | |
| | Number | | | remaining contractual life | | | exercise price | | | Number | | | exercise price | |
Range of exercise prices | | ’000s | | | years | | | £ | | | ’000s | | | £ | |
|
Between £3 and £4 | | | 94 | | | | 6 | | | | 3.73 | | | | 94 | | | | 3.73 | |
Between £4 and £5 | | | 84 | | | | 7 | | | | 4.54 | | | | 84 | | | | 4.54 | |
|
Employee Sharesave scheme
Under the Employee Sharesave scheme, the weighted-average exercise prices of options are less than the market prices of the shares on the relevant grant dates.
116
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
Employee Share Option scheme
All outstanding options under the Employee Share Option scheme expired on 8 August 2006. Accordingly, none were outstanding at 31 December 2007 and 2006. Movements in the share options for 2006 are contained in the summary table above.
Medium Term Incentive Plan
See Note 44 for details of conditional share grants awarded to certain Executive Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and other nominated individuals under the Medium Term Incentive Plan.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of awards | | | Weighted average fair | |
| | granted | | | value | |
2007 | | 000s | | | £ | |
| | |
Conditional awards outstanding at the beginning of the year | | | 2,537 | | | | 9.39 | |
Conditional awards granted during the year | | | – | | | | – | |
Conditional awards forfeited during the year | | | (317) | | | | 9.39 | |
|
Conditional awards outstanding at the end of the year | | | (2,220) | | | | 10.88 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of awards | | | Weighted average fair | |
| | granted | | | value | |
2006 | | 000s | | | £ | |
| | |
Conditional awards outstanding at the beginning of the year | | | 2,519 | | | | 7.34 | |
Conditional awards granted during the year | | | 306 | | | | 8.83 | |
Conditional awards forfeited during the year | | | (288) | | | | 7.34 | |
|
Conditional awards outstanding at the end of the year | | | 2,537 | | | | 9.39 | |
|
Long Term Incentive Plan
See Note 44 for details of conditional share grants awarded to certain Executive Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and other nominated individuals under the Long Term Incentive Plan.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of awards | | | Weighted average fair | |
| | granted | | | value | |
2007 | | 000s | | | £ | |
|
Conditional awards outstanding at the beginning of the year | | | – | | | | – | |
Conditional awards granted during the year | | | 3,092 | | | | 4.23 | |
Conditional awards forfeited during the year | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Conditional awards outstanding at the end of the year | | | 3,092 | | | | 4.60 | |
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of conditional awards granted during the year was £3.85 (2006: £8.83).
As at 31 December 2007, the compensation cost not yet recognised is £11m, and the weighted average period over which the compensation expense is expected to be recognised is two years. No awards vested during the year (2006: nil).
43. Directors’ emoluments and interests
Ex gratia pensions paid to former Directors of Abbey National plc in 2007, which have been provided for previously, amounted to £21,524 (2006: £26,998, 2005: £39,164). In 1992, the Board decided not to award any new such ex gratia pensions.
There were no loans, quasi loans and credit transactions entered into or agreed by the Company or its subsidiaries with persons who are or were Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and each of their connected persons during the year except as described below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Aggregate amount | |
| | Number of | | | outstanding | |
Other Key Management Personnel - Loans* | | persons | | | £000 | |
|
2007 | | | 1 | | | | 806 | |
|
2006 | | | 2 | | | | 1,281 | |
|
| | |
* | | Other Key Management Personnel are defined as the Executive Committee of Abbey and the Board and Executive Committee of Abbey’s parent company, Banco Santander, S.A. who served during the year. |
Secured and unsecured loans are made to Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and their connected persons, in the ordinary course of business, with terms prevailing for comparable transactions and on the same terms and conditions as applicable to other employees within Abbey. Such loans do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present any unfavourable features.
117
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
44. Related party disclosures
Transactions with Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and each of their connected persons
Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and their connected persons have undertaken the following transactions with Abbey in the course of normal banking and life assurance business.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Amounts in respect of | |
| | Number of directors and | | | directors, Other Key Management
| |
| | Other Key Management | | | Personnel(1)and their connected persons | |
2007 | | Personnel(1) | | | £000 | |
|
Secured loans, unsecured loans and overdrafts | | | | | | | | |
Loans outstanding at 1 January | | | 2 | | | | 1,281 | |
Net movements in the year | | | (1) | | | | (475) | |
|
Loans outstanding at 31 December | | | 1 | | | | 806 | |
|
Deposit, bank and instant access accounts and investments | | | | | | | | |
Deposits, bank instant access accounts and investments at 1 January | | | 14 | | | | 2,588 | |
Net movements in the year | | | (2) | | | | 2,977 | |
|
Deposit, bank and instant access accounts and investments at 31 December | | | 12 | | | | 5,565 | |
|
Life assurance policies | | | | | | | | |
Life assurance policies at 1 January | | | 6 | | | | 1,515 | |
Net movements in the year | | | (4) | | | | 85 | |
|
Life assurance policies at 31 December | | | 2 | | | | 1,600 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Amounts in respect of | |
| | Number of directors and | | | directors, Other Key Management
| |
| | Other Key Management | | | Personnel(1)and their connected persons | |
2006 | | Personnel(1) | | | £000 | |
|
Secured loans, unsecured loans and overdrafts | | | | | | | | |
Loans outstanding at 1 January | | | 1 | | | | 215 | |
Net movements in the year | | | 1 | | | | 1,066 | |
|
Loans outstanding at 31 December | | | 2 | | | | 1,281 | |
|
Deposit, bank and instant access accounts and investments | | | | | | | | |
Deposits, bank instant access accounts and investments at 1 January | | | 12 | | | | 4,904 | |
Net movements in the year | | | 2 | | | | (2,316) | |
|
Deposit, bank and instant access accounts and investments at 31 December | | | 14 | | | | 2,588 | |
|
Life assurance policies | | | | | | | | |
Life assurance policies at 1 January | | | 6 | | | | 1,202 | |
Net movements in the year | | | – | | | | 313 | |
|
Life assurance policies at 31 December | | | 6 | | | | 1,515 | |
|
| | |
(1) | | Other Key Management Personnel are defined as the Executive Committee of Abbey and the Board and Executive Committee of Abbey’s parent company, Banco Santander, S.A., who served during the year. |
In 2007, one Director undertook sharedealing transactions through Abbey’s execution only stockbroker subsidiary (2006: no directors) with an aggregate net value of £262,667. Any transactions were on normal business terms and standard commission rates were payable.
Secured and unsecured loans are made to Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and their connected persons, in the ordinary course of business, with terms prevailing for comparable transactions and on the same terms and conditions as applicable to other employees within Abbey. Such loans do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present any unfavourable features. Amounts deposited by Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and their connected persons earn interest at the same rates as those offered to the market or on the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees within Abbey.
Life assurance policies and investments are entered into by Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and their connected persons on normal market terms and conditions, or on the same terms and conditions as applicable to other employees within Abbey.
Remuneration of Key Management Personnel
The remuneration of the Directors, and Other Key Management Personnel of Abbey, is set out in aggregate for each of the categories specified in IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures. Further information about the aggregate remuneration of the Directors is provided in the “Directors’ Remuneration” table in the Directors’ Report on page 54.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Key management compensation | | £ | | | £ | | | £ | |
|
Short-term employee benefits | | | 11,602,405 | | | | 15,076,922 | | | | 14,700,960 | |
Post employment benefits | | | 77,814 | | | | 89,753 | | | | 4,138,247 | |
Other long term benefits | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Termination benefits | | | – | | | | 548,692 | | | | 771,661 | |
Share-based payments | | | 1,101,786 | | | | 904,217 | | | | 984,105 | |
|
| | | 12,782,005 | | | | 16,619,584 | | | | 20,594,973 | |
|
118
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
Medium Term Incentive Plan
In 2007 and 2006, no Executive Directors or Other Key Management Personnel were granted conditional awards of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. under the Abbey National plc Medium-Term Incentive Plan. In 2005, two Executive Directors and five Other Key Management Personnel were granted conditional awards of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. under the Abbey National plc Medium-Term Incentive Plan for a total aggregate value of £2,952,316. The value attributable to the current year of conditional awards granted in 2005, excluding those awards that have lapsed, is included in share-based payments above. Under the Medium-Term Incentive Plan granted on 20 October 2005, certain Executive Directors, Other Key Management Personnel and other nominated individuals were granted a conditional award of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. The amount of shares participants will receive at the end of the three-year period depends on the performance of Abbey in this period. The performance conditions were set by the Remuneration Committee (dissolved on 29 May 2007) and were linked to Abbey’s three-year plan. Performance will be measured in two ways, half of the award depends on Abbey achieving an attributable profit target for the 2007 financial year, and the remainder depends on the achievement of a revenue target for the 2007 financial year.
Long Term Incentive Plan
In 2007, three Executive Directors and seven other Key Management Personnel were granted conditional awards of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. under the Santander Long-Term Incentive Plan for a total fair value of £2,884,471, (based on the closing share price on 31 December 2007 of Euro 14.79). The value attributable to the current year of these conditional awards is included in share-based payments above. Under the Santander Long-Term Incentive Plan granted on 31 December 2007, certain Executive Directors, Key Management Personnel (as defined above) and other nominated individuals were granted a conditional award of shares in Banco Santander, S.A. The amount of shares participants will receive throughout a three-year period depends on the performance of Banco Santander, S.A. during this period. All awards under the Santander Long-Term Incentive Plan will depend on Santander’s Total Shareholder Return and Earnings Per Share performance against a competitor benchmark group. Provided performance conditions are met, 40% of the conditional award of shares will vest in July 2009 with the remaining 60% vesting in July 2010.
Parent undertaking and controlling party
The Company’s immediate and ultimate parent and controlling party is Banco Santander, S.A.. The smallest and largest group into which the Group’s results are included is the group accounts of Banco Santander, S.A. copies of which may be obtained from Santander Shareholder Department, Santander, Santander House, 100 Ludgate Hill, London EC4M 7NJ.
Transactions with related parties
During the year, the Group entered into the following transactions with related parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest, fees and | | | Interest, fees and | | | Amounts owed by | | | Amounts owed | |
| | other income received | | | other expenses paid | | | related parties | | | to related parties | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Parent company | | | (293) | | | | (23) | | | | (16) | | | | 327 | | | | 80 | | | | 40 | | | | 2,238 | | | | 1,562 | | | | (7,388) | | | | (5,941) | |
Fellow subsidiaries | | | (171) | | | | (28) | | | | – | | | | 24 | | | | 84 | | | | 108 | | | | 3,031 | | | | 2,732 | | | | (351) | | | | (408) | |
Associates | | | (19) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 5 | | | | 2 | | | | – | | | | 3 | | | | 340 | | | | (8) | | | | – | |
|
| | | (483) | | | | (51) | | | | (16) | | | | 356 | | | | 166 | | | | 148 | | | | 5,272 | | | | 4,634 | | | | (7,747) | | | | (6,349) | |
|
During the year, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Interest, fees and | | | | | | | Interest, fees and | | | Amounts owed by | | | Amounts owed | |
| | other income received | | | other expenses paid | | | related parties | | | to related parties | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Parent company | | | (91) | | | | (21) | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 7 | | | | – | | | | 1,018 | | | | 1,500 | | | | (373) | | | | – | |
Subsidiaries | | | (2,072) | | | | (1,611) | | | | (1,541) | | | | 4,532 | | | | 3,592 | | | | 3,442 | | | | 39,464 | | | | 41,219 | | | | (95,553) | | | | (84,278) | |
Fellow subsidiaries | | | (106) | | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | 17 | | | | 61 | | | | – | | | | 13 | | | | 7 | | | | (228) | | | | (373) | |
Associates | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
| | | (2,269) | | | | (1,635) | | | | (1,541) | | | | 4,549 | | | | 3,660 | | | | 3,442 | | | | 40,495 | | | | 42,727 | | | | (96,154) | | | | (84,651) | |
|
In addition, transactions with the pension schemes operated by the Group are described in Note 36.
On 17 December 2007, Abbey National plc sold 100% of its shareholdings in James Hay, Cater Allen and Abbey Sharedealing to Santander Private Banking UK Limited, at the time of the transaction a 100% owned direct subsidiary of Abbey National plc, for a total cash consideration of £414m. The companies sold were Cater Allen Limited, Abbey Stockbrokers Limited, Abbey Stockbrokers (Nominees) Limited, James Hay Holdings Limited, James Hay Wrap Managers Limited, James Hay Insurance Company Limited, James Hay Administration Company Limited, James Hay Pension Trustees Limited and Sarum Trustees Limited. Subsequently, on 17 December 2007, Abbey National plc sold 49% of its shareholding in Santander Private Banking UK Limited to Santander PB UK (Holdings) Limited, a direct subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. for a total cash consideration of £203m.
119
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
On 31 December 2006, Abbey National plc sold its asset management businesses to Santander Asset Management UK Holdings Limited, an indirect subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A., for a total cash consideration of £134m. The asset management companies sold were Abbey National Asset Managers Limited (now called Santander Asset Management UK Limited), Abbey National PEP & ISA Managers Limited, Abbey National Unit Trust Managers Limited (now called Santander Unit Trust Managers UK Limited) and Inscape Investments Limited (now called Santander Portfolio Management UK Limited).
The above transactions were made in the ordinary course of business and substantially on the same terms as for comparable transactions with third party counterparties.
45. Events after the balance sheet date
Since the year-end, the decision has been taken to close the US securities financing business in the Global Banking & Markets segment to focus the business in the UK. The closure is not expected to have a material effect on the results of the Group. The total assets of the business at 31 December 2007 were £14.1bn.
46. Financial Instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are measured on an ongoing basis either at fair value or at amortised cost. The accounting policies note describes how the classes of financial instruments are measured, and how income and expenses, including fair value gains and losses, are recognised. Each class of financial asset and liability on the balance sheet has a single measurement basis, which is described in the accounting policies note.
The following tables analyse the fair value of financial instruments not measured at fair value in the balance sheet:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
2007 | | Carrying | | | | | | | Surplus/ | |
| | value | | | Fair value | | | (deficit) | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 1,038 | | | | 1,038 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 3,441 | | | | 3,441 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 112,147 | | | | 112,824 | | | | 677 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 7,923 | | | | 7,923 | | | | – | |
Deposits by customers | | | 69,650 | | | | 69,754 | | | | (104) | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 35,712 | | | | 35,399 | | | | 313 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 1,419 | | | | 1,620 | | | | (201) | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 4,732 | | | | 4,698 | | | | 34 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
2007 | | Carrying | | | | | | | Surplus/ | |
| | value | | | Fair value | | | (deficit) | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 1,032 | | | | 1,032 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 40,685 | | | | 40,685 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 110,976 | | | | 111,653 | | | | 677 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 59,798 | | | | 60,019 | | | | (221) | |
Deposits by customers | | | 95,686 | | | | 95,791 | | | | (105) | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 834 | | | | 1,022 | | | | (188) | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 5,352 | | | | 5,361 | | | | (9) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
2006 | | Carrying | | | | | | | Surplus/ | |
| | value | | | Fair value | | | (deficit) | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 888 | | | | 888 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 2,242 | | | | 2,242 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 103,146 | | | | 103,309 | | | | 163 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 6,656 | | | | 6,656 | | | | – | |
Deposits by customers | | | 66,519 | | | | 66,571 | | | | (52) | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 28,998 | | | | 29,142 | | | | (144) | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 1,655 | | | | 2,069 | | | | (414) | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 5,020 | | | | 5,200 | | | | (180) | |
|
120
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Company | |
2006 | | Carrying | | | | | | | Surplus/ | |
| | value | | | Fair value | | | (deficit) | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 888 | | | | 888 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 41,711 | | | | 41,711 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 103,249 | | | | 103,412 | | | | 163 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 61,123 | | | | 60,955 | | | | 168 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 80,104 | | | | 80,156 | | | | (52) | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | – | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 1,082 | | | | 1,392 | | | | (310) | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 5,563 | | | | 5,877 | | | | (314) | |
|
The surplus/(deficit) in the table above represents the surplus/(deficit) of fair value compared to the carrying amount of those financial instruments for which fair values have been estimated.
Fair value measurement
The fair value of financial instruments is the estimated amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. If a quoted market price is available for an instrument, the fair value is calculated based on the market price. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined using pricing models which use a mathematical methodology based on accepted financial theories, depending on the product type and its components. Pricing models take into account the contract terms of the securities as well as market-based valuation parameters, such as interest rates, volatility, exchange rates and the credit rating of the counterparty. Valuation adjustments are an integral component of the fair value estimation process and are taken on individual positions where either the absolute size of the trade or other specific features of the trade or the particular market (such as counterparty credit risk, concentration or market liquidity) require more than the simple application of pricing models. Further information on fair value measurement can be found in “Critical Accounting Policies” within the Accounting Policies on page 79.
Fair value management
The fair value exposures, as tabled above, are managed by using a combination of hedging derivatives and offsetting on balance sheet positions. The approach to specific categories of financial instruments is described below.
Assets:
Cash and balances at central banks/ Loans and advances to banks
The carrying amount is deemed a reasonable approximation of the fair value, because they are short term in nature.
Loans and advances to customers
Loans and advances to personal customers are made both at variable and at fixed rates. As there is no active secondary market in the UK for such loans and advances, there is no reliable market value available for such a significant portfolio.
a) Variable rate
The Directors believe that the carrying value of the variable rate loans may be assumed to be their fair value.
b) Fixed rate
Certain of the loans secured on residential properties are at a fixed rate for a limited period, typically two to five years from their commencement. At the end of this period these loans revert to the relevant variable rate. The excess of fair value over carrying value of each of these loans has been estimated by reference to the market rates available at the balance sheet date for similar loans of maturity equal to the remaining fixed period.
Liabilities:
Deposits by banks
The carrying amount is deemed a reasonable approximation of the fair value, because they are short term in nature.
Deposits by customers
The majority of deposit liabilities are payable on demand and therefore can be deemed short term in nature with the fair value equal to the carrying value. However, given the long-term and continuing nature of the relationships with Abbey’s customers, the Directors believe there is significant value to Abbey in this source of funds. Certain of the deposit liabilities are at a fixed rate until maturity. The deficit of fair value over carrying value of these liabilities has been estimated by reference to the market rates available at the balance sheet date for similar deposit liabilities of similar maturities.
121
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
Debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities
Where reliable prices are available, the fair value of debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities has been calculated using quoted market prices. Other market values have been determined using in-house pricing models.
Intra Group balances
Included in the asset and liability categories on the Company balance sheet are outstanding intra group balances. The fair value of these balances has been estimated using in-house pricing models.
Net gains and losses on financial instruments
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition | | | (14) | | | | (73) | | | | (77) | |
Financial assets and liabilities held for trading | | | 85 | | | | 430 | | | | 514 | |
Loans and receivables | | | 6,974 | | | | 5,599 | | | | 5,360 | |
Available for sale | | | 18 | | | | 1 | | | | – | |
Financial liabilities held at amortised cost | | | (5,292) | | | | (4,388) | | | | (4,294) | |
|
| | | 1,771 | | | | 1,569 | | | | 1,503 | |
|
47. Capital Management and Resources
Capital management and capital allocation
Abbey adopts a centralised capital management approach, based on an assessment of both regulatory requirements and the economic capital impacts of our businesses. The various regulatory minimum capital criteria are augmented by internally assigned buffers. These ratios, buffers and restrictions, together with the relevant costs of differing capital instruments and a consideration of the various other capital management techniques are used to shape the most cost-effective structure to fulfil Abbey’s capital needs. Abbey manages its equity requirements in discussion with Santander and has its own active debt management programme. To support its debt issuance program, Abbey is rated on a standalone basis. Abbey also manages the capital resources it requires by actively managing and monitoring the risk it takes in terms of volume of business, size of exposures to risk categories and the use of risk mitigation techniques. Abbey’s capital allocation control process has two main determinants: the capital volumes approved to business units within the planning process, and the need to have access to a capital buffer which is sufficient to cover the capital impact of major contingent events or “capital shocks”. Capital allocation decisions will be influenced by comparison of returns earned on regulatory equity, conducted as part of planning review under which capital levels for operating divisions are approved or when additional capital requests are received. Abbey’s regulatory capital comprises Tier 1 capital, which consists of shareholders’ equity and innovative and non-innovative debt-capital Tier 1 securities less goodwill; and Tier 2 capital, which consists of subordinated debt and incurred but not observed impairment allowances.
Capital adequacy
Capital adequacy and capital resources are monitored by Abbey on the basis of the capital adequacy framework and techniques that were first developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the ‘Basel Committee’) in 1988 and subsequently implemented in the UK and Spain. Abbey is directly regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority and indirectly by the Banco de España as Santander’s home regulator. The Basel Committee issued a revised capital adequacy framework for assessing the capital required to cover all of a financial institution’s business risks in June 2004, which were incorporated into European Community Law via the Capital Requirements Directive (‘CRD’) of October 2005. These changes were introduced on a gradual basis from 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2008. This revised capital adequacy framework includes a more risk-sensitive methodology for the allocation of regulatory capital for credit risk and a largely unchanged assessment of market risk. CRD introduced a capital adequacy requirement for operational risk and other risk types material to the bank. The international minimum risk asset ratio of 8% will be unchanged. Management expects a beneficial change to the capital adequacy position for the business of Abbey to arise from its adoption of the revised capital adequacy framework.
Group capital
Group capital is calculated in accordance with the Financial Services Authority’s interpretation of the techniques specified by the Basel Committee. Abbey’s capital ratio exceeded both the Basel Committee minimum risk asset ratio of 8% and the Financial Services Authority’s set minimum capital ratio for Abbey both during the year and at 31 December 2007.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Balance sheet | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Total Tier 1 capital | | | 4,971 | | | | 5,040 | |
Total Tier 2 capital | | | 4,260 | | | | 4,668 | |
Less: supervisory deductions | | | (1,434) | | | | (1,806) | |
|
Total regulatory capital | | | 7,797 | | | | 7,902 | |
|
Tier 1 capital includes audited profits for the years ended 31 December 2007 and 31 December 2006 respectively.
122
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
2007 compared to 2006
Tier 1 capital decreased by £69m to £4,971m, largely driven by the call and non-replacement of non-innovative Tier 1 capital partly offset by the inclusion of 2007 audited profits. The decrease in Tier 2 capital of £408m was principally due to the calling and non-replacement of three subordinated debt issues during the year. Supervisory deductions represent lending which is capital in nature together with capital invested in non-banking businesses. The movement in the year principally represents a decrease in such lending.
48. Consolidating financial information
Abbey National Treasury Services plc is a wholly owned subsidiary of Abbey National plc and is able to offer and sell certain securities in the US from time to time pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC (the ‘Registration Statement’). Abbey National plc has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Abbey National Treasury Services plc that have been, or will be incurred before 31 July 2012: this guarantee includes all securities issued by Abbey National Treasury Services plc pursuant to the Registration Statement.
Abbey National Treasury Services plc utilizes an exception provided in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, and therefore does not file its financial statements with the SEC, In accordance with the requirements to qualify for the exception, presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for (i) Abbey National plc, on a stand-alone basis as guarantor (‘The Company’); (ii) Abbey National Treasury Services plc, on a stand-alone basis; (iii) other subsidiaries of the Company on a combined basis (’Other’); (iv) consolidation adjustments (‘Adjustments’); and (v) total consolidated amounts (‘Consolidated’).
Under IAS 27, the Company and Abbey National Treasury Services account for investments in their subsidiaries at cost subject to impairment. Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X requires a company to account for its investments in subsidiaries using the equity method, which would increase/(decrease) the results for the year of the Company and Abbey National Treasury Services in the information below by £334m and £219m, respectively (2006: £196m and £177m, 2005: £(271)m and £175m). The net assets of the Company and Abbey National Treasury Services in the information below would also be increased by £753m and £359m, respectively (2006: £417m and £140m).
Income statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Abbey National Treasury | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
For the year ended 31 December 2007 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 1,101 | | | | 241 | | | | 162 | | | | (5) | | | | 1,499 | |
Fee, commission, trading, and other income | | | 900 | | | | 22 | | | | 623 | | | | (262) | | | | 1,283 | |
|
Total operating income | | | 2,001 | | | | 263 | | | | 785 | | | | (267) | | | | 2,782 | |
Administration expenses | | | (1,163) | | | | (129) | | | | (92) | | | | 15 | | | | (1,369) | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | (72) | | | | (2) | | | | (131) | | | | – | | | | (205) | |
Impairment and provisions | | | (346) | | | | 4 | | | | 24 | | | | (26) | | | | (344) | |
|
Profit/(loss) on continuing ops before tax | | | 420 | | | | 136 | | | | 586 | | | | (278) | | | | 864 | |
Tax on profit/(loss) on continuing ops | | | (69) | | | | (29) | | | | (89) | | | | 8 | | | | (179) | |
|
Profit/ (loss) for the year from continuing ops | | | 351 | | | | 107 | | | | 497 | | | | (270) | | | | 685 | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year from discontinued ops | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | 351 | | | | 107 | | | | 497 | | | | (270) | | | | 685 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Abbey National Treasury | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
For the year ended 31 December 2006 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 983 | | | | 109 | | | | 136 | | | | – | | | | 1,228 | |
Fee, commission, trading, and other income | | | 574 | | | | 122 | | | | 805 | | | | (259) | | | | 1,242 | |
|
Total operating income | | | 1,557 | | | | 231 | | | | 941 | | | | (259) | | | | 2,470 | |
Administration expenses | | | (1,181) | | | | (109) | | | | (130) | | | | – | | | | (1,420) | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | (79) | | | | (3) | | | | (133) | | | | – | | | | (215) | |
Impairment and provisions | | | (534) | | | | – | | | | 165 | | | | (38) | | | | (407) | |
|
Profit/(loss) on continuing ops before tax | | | (237) | | | | 119 | | | | 843 | | | | (297) | | | | 428 | |
Tax on profit/(loss) on continuing ops | | | 109 | | | | (55) | | | | (169) | | | | – | | | | (115) | |
|
Profit/ (loss) for the year from continuing ops | | | (128) | | | | 64 | | | | 674 | | | | (297) | | | | 313 | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year from discontinued ops | | | – | | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | – | | | | (245) | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | (128) | | | | 64 | | | | 429 | | | | (297) | | | | 68 | |
|
123
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Abbey National Treasury | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
For the year ended 31 December 2005 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 748 | | | | 156 | | | | 263 | | | | 5 | | | | 1,172 | |
Fee, commission, trading, and other income | | | 1,162 | | | | 240 | | | | 419 | | | | (638) | | | | 1,183 | |
|
Total operating income | | | 1,910 | | | | 396 | | | | 682 | | | | (633) | | | | 2,355 | |
Administration expenses | | | (1,441) | | | | (128) | | | | (26) | | | | 18 | | | | (1,577) | |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | (66) | | | | (3) | | | | (126) | | | | – | | | | (195) | |
Impairment and provisions | | | 296 | | | | – | | | | (233) | | | | (284) | | | | (221) | |
|
Profit/(loss) on continuing ops before tax | | | 699 | | | | 265 | | | | 297 | | | | (899) | | | | 362 | |
Tax on profit/(loss) on continuing ops | | | (8) | | | | (89) | | | | (1) | | | | (10) | | | | (108) | |
|
Profit/ (loss) for the year from continuing ops | | | 691 | | | | 176 | | | | 296 | | | | (909) | | | | 254 | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year from discontinued ops | | | – | | | | – | | | | 166 | | | | – | | | | 166 | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | 691 | | | | 176 | | | | 462 | | | | (909) | | | | 420 | |
|
Balance sheets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Abbey National | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Treasury Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
At 31 December 2007 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 1,032 | | | | 7 | | | | (1) | | | | – | | | | 1,038 | |
Trading assets | | | – | | | | 32,760 | | | | 34,622 | | | | (10,955) | | | | 56,427 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 689 | | | | 10,358 | | | | 1,618 | | | | (2,714) | | | | 9,951 | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 7,500 | | | | 11,446 | | | | 283 | | | | (7,446) | | | | 11,783 | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 40,685 | | | | 57,021 | | | | 60,124 | | | | (154,389) | | | | 3,441 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 110,976 | | | | 6,181 | | | | 35,143 | | | | (40,153) | | | | 112,147 | |
Available for sale securities | | | 28 | | | | 45 | | | | 1,929 | | | | (1,962) | | | | 40 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | – | | | | 220 | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | 217 | |
Investment in associated undertakings | | | 33 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (4) | | | | 29 | |
Investment in subsidiary undertakings | | | 5,053 | | | | 2,336 | | | | 2,925 | | | | (10,314) | | | | – | |
Intangible assets | | | – | | | | – | | | | 90 | | | | – | | | | 90 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 501 | | | | 13 | | | | 14 | | | | – | | | | 528 | |
Operating lease assets | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,164 | | | | – | | | | 2,164 | |
Current tax assets | | | 190 | | | | – | | | | 7 | | | | – | | | | 197 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 620 | | | | 18 | | | | 27 | | | | – | | | | 665 | |
Other assets | | | 686 | | | | 57 | | | | 165 | | | | (2) | | | | 906 | |
|
Total assets | | | 167,993 | | | | 120,462 | | | | 139,110 | | | | (227,942) | | | | 199,623 | |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 59,798 | | | | 49,847 | | | | 17,990 | | | | (119,712) | | | | 7,923 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 95,687 | | | | 9,714 | | | | 43,768 | | | | (79,519) | | | | 69,650 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 1,051 | | | | 10,457 | | | | 1,137 | | | | (2,714) | | | | 9,931 | |
Trading liabilities | | | – | | | | 33,926 | | | | 27,219 | | | | (6,229) | | | | 54,916 | |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | – | | | | 7,530 | | | | 8 | | | | – | | | | 7,538 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | – | | | | 5,840 | | | | 37,502 | | | | (7,630) | | | | 35,712 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 834 | | | | – | | | | 737 | | | | (152) | | | | 1,419 | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 5,352 | | | | – | | | | 1,091 | | | | (1,711) | | | | 4,732 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | 3 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | – | |
Other liabilities | | | 1,452 | | | | 254 | | | | 632 | | | | (1) | | | | 2,337 | |
Other provisions | | | 100 | | | | – | | | | 31 | | | | – | | | | 131 | |
Current tax liabilities | | | 137 | | | | 176 | | | | 56 | | | | – | | | | 369 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 6 | | | | – | | | | 532 | | | | 6 | | | | 544 | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | 982 | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | – | | | | 979 | |
|
Total liabilities | | | 165,402 | | | | 117,744 | | | | 130,700 | | | | (217,665) | | | | 196,181 | |
|
Total shareholders equity | | | 2,591 | | | | 2,718 | | | | 8,410 | | | | (10,277) | | | | 3,342 | |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | | 167,993 | | | | 120,462 | | | | 139,110 | | | | (227,942) | | | | 199,623 | |
|
124
Financial Statements
Notes to the Financial Statementscontinued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Abbey National Treasury | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
At 31 December 2006 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 888 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 888 | |
Trading assets | | | – | | | | 39,611 | | | | 22,703 | | | | – | | | | 62,314 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 646 | | | | 9,000 | | | | 427 | | | | (1,737) | | | | 8,336 | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 66 | | | | 8,137 | | | | 510 | | | | – | | | | 8,713 | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 41,711 | | | | 57,784 | | | | 39,348 | | | | (136,601) | | | | 2,242 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 103,249 | | | | 4,860 | | | | 19,946 | | | | (24,909) | | | | 103,146 | |
Available for sale securities | | | 12 | | | | 46 | | | | 1,883 | | | | (1,918) | | | | 23 | |
Investment in associated undertakings | | | 25 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | (3) | | | | 22 | |
Investment in subsidiary undertakings | | | 4,926 | | | | 2,341 | | | | 2,518 | | | | (9,785) | | | | – | |
Intangible assets | | | – | | | | – | | | | 90 | | | | – | | | | 90 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 395 | | | | 8 | | | | 12 | | | | – | | | | 415 | |
Operating lease assets | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2,082 | | | | – | | | | 2,082 | |
Current tax assets | | | 192 | | | | – | | | | 31 | | | | – | | | | 223 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 747 | | | | 22 | | | | 35 | | | | – | | | | 804 | |
Other assets | | | 744 | | | | 1,470 | | | | 293 | | | | – | | | | 2,507 | |
|
Total assets | | | 153,601 | | | | 123,279 | | | | 89,878 | | | | (174,953) | | | | 191,805 | |
|
Deposits by banks | | | 61,123 | | | | 49,012 | | | | 8,007 | | | | (111,486) | | | | 6,656 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 80,104 | | | | 8,261 | | | | 28,340 | | | | (50,186) | | | | 66,519 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 681 | | | | 10,236 | | | | 1,038 | | | | (1,737) | | | | 10,218 | |
Trading liabilities | | | – | | | | 38,287 | | | | 19,317 | | | | – | | | | 57,604 | |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | – | | | | 8,134 | | | | 17 | | | | – | | | | 8,151 | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 4 | | | | 6,232 | | | | 22,762 | | | | – | | | | 28,998 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 1,082 | | | | – | | | | 847 | | | | (274) | | | | 1,655 | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 5,563 | | | | – | | | | 1,102 | | | | (1,645) | | | | 5,020 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | 6 | | | | 168 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 174 | |
Other liabilities | | | 1,027 | | | | 177 | | | | 412 | | | | – | | | | 1,616 | |
Other provisions | | | 157 | | | | – | | | | 23 | | | | – | | | | 180 | |
Current tax liabilities | | | 122 | | | | 160 | | | | 18 | | | | – | | | | 300 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | 564 | | | | – | | | | 564 | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | 1,033 | | | | – | | | | 1 | | | | – | | | | 1,034 | |
|
Total liabilities | | | 150,902 | | | | 120,667 | | | | 82,448 | | | | (165,328) | | | | 188,689 | |
|
Total shareholders equity | | | 2,699 | | | | 2,612 | | | | 7,430 | | | | (9,625) | | | | 3,116 | |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | | 153,601 | | | | 123,279 | | | | 89,878 | | | | (174,953) | | | | 191,805 | |
|
Cash flow statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Abbey National | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Treasury Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
For the year ended 31 December 2007 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net cash flow from / (used in) operating activities | | | 16,475 | | | | (8,667) | | | | (18,621) | | | | – | | | | (10,813) | |
Net cash flow from / (used in) investing activities | | | 14 | | | | (9) | | | | (201) | | | | – | | | | (196) | |
Net cash flow from / (used in) financing activities | | | (576) | | | | – | | | | 5,352 | | | | – | | | | 4,776 | |
|
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 15,913 | | | | (8,676) | | | | (13,470) | | | | – | | | | (6,233) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | | | (21,217) | | | | 1,078 | | | | 16,292 | | | | – | | | | (3,847) | |
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | – | | | | (333) | | | | (392) | | | | – | | | | (725) | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | | | (5,304) | | | | (7,931) | | | | 2,430 | | | | – | | | | (10,805) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Abbey National Treasury | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
For the year ended 31 December 2006 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net cash flow from / (used in) operating activities | | | (8,871) | | | | (9,024) | | | | 4,809 | | | | – | | | | (13,086) | |
Net cash flow from / (used in) investing activities | | | 3,977 | | | | 294 | | | | (4,259) | | | | – | | | | 12 | |
Net cash flow from / (used in) financing activities | | | (1,239) | | | | (247) | | | | 3,244 | | | | – | | | | 1,758 | |
|
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (6,133) | | | | (8,977) | | | | 3,794 | | | | – | | | | (11,316) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | | | (15,084) | | | | 9,553 | | | | 13,772 | | | | – | | | | 8,241 | |
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | – | | | | 502 | | | | (1,274) | | | | – | | | | (772) | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | | | (21,217) | | | | 1,078 | | | | 16,292 | | | | – | | | | (3,847) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Abbey National Treasury | | | | | | | | | | |
| | The Company | | | Services | | | Other | | | Adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
For the year ended 31 December 2005 | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net cash flow from / (used in) operating activities | | | (5,703) | | | | (16,657) | | | | 15,105 | | | | – | | | | (7,255) | |
Net cash flow from investing activities | | | 41 | | | | 243 | | | | 1,750 | | | | – | | | | 2,034 | |
Net cash flow from / (used in) financing activities | | | 96 | | | | (38) | | | | 1,368 | | | | – | | | | 1,426 | |
|
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (5,566) | | | | (16,452) | | | | 18,223 | | | | – | | | | (3,795) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | | | (9,518) | | | | 26,392 | | | | (5,615) | | | | – | | | | 11,259 | |
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | (387) | | | | 1,164 | | | | – | | | | 777 | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | | | (15,084) | | | | 9,553 | | | | 13,772 | | | | – | | | | 8,241 | |
|
125
Selected Financial Data
Selected Financial Data
The financial information set forth below for the twelve month periods ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005 and as at 31 December 2007 and 2006 has been derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group prepared in accordance with IFRS included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The information should be read in connection with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto. Financial information set forth below for the twelve-month period ended 31 December 2004, and as at 31 December 2005 and 2004, has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group for 2005 and 2004 not included in this Annual Report. The financial information in this selected consolidated financial and statistical data does not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of the Companies Act 1985. The auditors’ report in the Consolidated Financial Statements for each of the four years ended 31 December 2007 was unqualified and did not include a statement under sections 237(2) and 237(3) of the Companies Act 1985. The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group for the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, chartered accountants and registered auditors.
Balance sheets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007(1) | | | 2007 | | | 2006(2) | | | 2005(3) | | | 2004 | |
| | $m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and balances at central banks | | | 2,060 | | | | 1,038 | | | | 888 | | | | 991 | | | | 454 | |
Trading assets | | | 111,968 | | | | 56,427 | | | | 62,314 | | | | 58,231 | | | | – | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 19,746 | | | | 9,951 | | | | 8,336 | | | | 11,855 | | | | 2,377 | |
Financial assets designated at fair value | | | 23,381 | | | | 11,783 | | | | 8,713 | | | | 30,597 | | | | – | |
Loans and advances to banks | | | 6,828 | | | | 3,441 | | | | 2,242 | | | | 444 | | | | 11,751 | |
Loans and advances to customers | | | 222,532 | | | | 112,147 | | | | 103,146 | | | | 95,467 | | | | 109,416 | |
Debt securities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 37,010 | |
Equity securities and other variable yield securities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 10,792 | |
Available for sale securities | | | 79 | | | | 40 | | | | 23 | | | | 13 | | | | – | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | 431 | | | | 217 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Investment in associated undertakings | | | 58 | | | | 29 | | | | 22 | | | | 24 | | | | 25 | |
Intangible assets | | | 179 | | | | 90 | | | | 90 | | | | 171 | | | | 175 | |
Value of in-force business | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,721 | | | | 1,844 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 1,048 | | | | 528 | | | | 415 | | | | 314 | | | | 262 | |
Operating lease assets | | | 4,294 | | | | 2,164 | | | | 2,082 | | | | 2,172 | | | | 2,275 | |
Investment property | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 1,228 | |
Current tax assets | | | 391 | | | | 197 | | | | 223 | | | | 235 | | | | 242 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 1,320 | | | | 665 | | | | 804 | | | | 796 | | | | 501 | |
Other assets | | | 1,797 | | | | 906 | | | | 2,507 | | | | 4,003 | | | | 6,381 | |
|
Total assets | | | 396,112 | | | | 199,623 | | | | 191,805 | | | | 207,034 | | | | 184,733 | |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits by banks | | | 15,722 | | | | 7,923 | | | | 6,656 | | | | 5,617 | | | | 18,412 | |
Deposits by customers | | | 138,206 | | | | 69,650 | | | | 66,519 | | | | 65,889 | | | | 78,660 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 19,706 | | | | 9,931 | | | | 10,218 | | | | 11,264 | | | | 3,665 | |
Trading liabilities | | | 108,970 | | | | 54,916 | | | | 57,604 | | | | 52,664 | | | | – | |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | | | 14,958 | | | | 7,538 | | | | 8,151 | | | | 7,948 | | | | – | |
Debt securities in issue | | | 70,863 | | | | 35,712 | | | | 28,998 | | | | 21,276 | | | | 37,067 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 2,816 | | | | 1,419 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 2,244 | | | | 722 | |
Subordinated liabilities | | | 9,390 | | | | 4,732 | | | | 5,020 | | | | 6,205 | | | | 5,484 | |
Insurance and reinsurance liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 21,501 | | | | 24,923 | |
Macro hedge of interest rate risk | | | – | | | | – | | | | 174 | | | | 13 | | | | – | |
Other liabilities | | | 4,637 | | | | 2,337 | | | | 1,616 | | | | 3,190 | | | | 8,844 | |
Investment contract liabilities | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 3,306 | | | | – | |
Provisions | | | 260 | | | | 131 | | | | 180 | | | | 253 | | | | 302 | |
Current tax liabilities | | | 732 | | | | 369 | | | | 300 | | | | 288 | | | | 161 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 1,079 | | | | 544 | | | | 564 | | | | 886 | | | | 1,064 | |
Retirement benefit obligations | | | 1,943 | | | | 979 | | | | 1,034 | | | | 1,380 | | | | 1,197 | |
Minority interests – non-equity | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 512 | |
|
Total liabilities | | | 389,282 | | | | 196,181 | | | | 188,689 | | | | 203,924 | | | | 181,013 | |
|
Share capital | | | 294 | | | | 148 | | | | 148 | | | | 148 | | | | 473 | |
Share premium account | | | 3,685 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 2,164 | |
Retained earnings | | | 2,657 | | | | 1,339 | | | | 1,111 | | | | 1,105 | | | | 1,083 | |
|
| | | 6,636 | | | | 3,344 | | | | 3,116 | | | | 3,110 | | | | 3,720 | |
Minority interest | | | 194 | | | | 98 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
|
Total shareholders equity | | | 6,830 | | | | 3,442 | | | | 3,116 | | | | 3,110 | | | | 3,720 | |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | | 396,112 | | | | 199,623 | | | | 191,805 | | | | 207,034 | | | | 184,733 | |
|
| | |
1. | | Amounts stated in dollars have been translated from sterling at the rate of £1.00 — $1.9843, the noon buying rate on 31 December 2007. |
2. | | In the third quarter of 2006 Abbey sold its life insurance business. A description of the transaction, and an analysis of the results of the life insurance business are disclosed in Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
3. | | Abbey, in line with all listed entities in the European Union, was required to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) in preparing its financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005. Up to 31 December 2004, the Group prepared its financial statements in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“UK GAAP”). Key standards IAS 32 “Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation”, IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” and IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts” have been applied prospectively from 1 January 2005. All other standards are required to be applied retrospectively. |
126
Selected Financial Data
Selected Financial Datacontinued
Income Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007(1) | | | 2007 | | | 2006(2) | | | 2005(3) | | | 2004 | |
| | $m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
Net interest income | | | 2,974 | | | | 1,499 | | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,172 | | | | 1,406 | |
|
Net fee and commission income | | | 1,379 | | | | 695 | | | | 699 | | | | 644 | | | | 526 | |
Dividend income | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Net trading income | | | 516 | | | | 260 | | | | 408 | | | | 471 | | | | 267 | |
Other operating income | | | 649 | | | | 327 | | | | 134 | | | | 67 | | | | 330 | |
|
Total operating income | | | 5,520 | | | | 2,782 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,355 | | | | 2,530 | |
|
Administration expenses | | | (2,717 | ) | | | (1,369 | ) | | | (1,420 | ) | | | (1,577 | ) | | | (2,013 | ) |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | (407 | ) | | | (205 | ) | | | (215 | ) | | | (195 | ) | | | (355 | ) |
|
Total operating expenses, excluding provisions and charges | | | (3,124 | ) | | | (1,574 | ) | | | (1,635 | ) | | | (1,772 | ) | | | (2,368 | ) |
|
Impairment losses on loans and advances | | | (682 | ) | | | (344 | ) | | | (344 | ) | | | (218 | ) | | | (25 | ) |
Amounts written off fixed asset investments | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 80 | |
Provisions for other liabilities and charges | | | – | | | | – | | | | (63 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | (201 | ) |
|
Total operating provisions and charges | | | (682 | ) | | | (344 | ) | | | (407 | ) | | | (221 | ) | | | (146 | ) |
|
Profit on continuing operations before tax | | | 1,714 | | | | 864 | | | | 428 | | | | 362 | | | | 16 | |
Tax on profit on continuing operations | | | (355) | | | | (179 | ) | | | (115) | | | | (108) | | | | 12 | |
|
Profit on continuing operations after tax | | | 1,359 | | | | 685 | | | | 313 | | | | 254 | | | | 28 | |
Profit/(loss) on discontinued operations after tax | | | – | | | | – | | | | (245) | | | | 166 | | | | (82) | |
|
Profit/(loss) for the year | | | 1,359 | | | | 685 | | | | 68 | | | | 420 | | | | (54 | ) | |
|
Selected statistical information
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006(2) | | | 2005(3) | | | 2004 | |
| | % | | | % | | | % | | | % | |
|
Profitability ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return on average total assets (4) | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 0.21 | | | | (0.03) | |
Return on average ordinary shareholders’ funds(5) | | | 22.08 | | | | 2.20 | | | | 19.56 | | | | (1.17) | |
Return on average risk weighted assets(6) | | | 1.04 | | | | 0.11 | | | | 0.75 | | | | (0.09) | |
Net interest margin(7) | | | 1.34 | | | | 1.19 | | | | 1.19 | | | | 1.36 | |
Abbey trading cost income ratio(8) | | | 49.7 | | | | 55.0 | | | | 59.6 | | | | 74.0 | |
PFS trading cost income ratio(9) | | | 49.7 | | | | 55.0 | | | | 61.3 | | | | 73.0 | |
Capital ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average ordinary shareholders’ funds as a percentage of average total assets | | | 1.52 | | | | 1.54 | | | | 1.07 | | | | 2.23 | |
Risk asset ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 11.4 | | | | 12.6 | | | | 12.5 | | | | 12.0 | |
Tier 1 | | | 7.3 | | | | 8.0 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 10.4 | |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:(10) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Excluding interest on retail deposits | | | 132.74 | | | | 122.57 | | | | 121.45 | | | | 100.77 | |
Including interest on retail deposits | | | 115.58 | | | | 109.70 | | | | 108.52 | | | | 100.38 | |
|
| | |
1. | | Amounts stated in dollars have been translated from sterling at the rate of £1.00 — $1.9843, the noon buying rate on 31 December 2007. |
2. | | In the third quarter of 2006 Abbey sold its life insurance business. See Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
3. | | Abbey, in line with all listed entities in the European Union, was required to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) in preparing its financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005. Up to 31 December 2004, the Group prepared its financial statements in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“UK GAAP”). Key standards IAS 32 “Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation”, IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” and IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts” have been applied prospectively from 1 January 2005. All other standards are required to be applied retrospectively. |
4. | | Profit after tax divided by average total assets. |
5. | | Profit after tax divided by average equity shareholders’ funds. |
6. | | Profit after tax divided by average risk weighted assets. |
7. | | Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
8. | | The Abbey trading cost income ratio is defined as trading expenses from continuing operations divided by trading income from continuing operations. Abbey’s Board reviews discrete financial information for each of its segments that includes measures of operating results and assets, which are measured on a “trading” basis. The trading basis differs from the statutory basis as a result of the application of various adjustments. For further information see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
9. | | The PFS trading cost income ratio is defined as trading expenses divided by trading income of the Personal Financial Services businesses. The Personal Financial Services businesses represent the continuing operations of the Group, except for the businesses, assets and portfolios that were inconsistent with Abbey’s future strategy to focus on Personal Financial Services and were sold during 2004 and 2005. The excluded businesses were known as the Portfolio Business Unit (‘PBU’). As the PBU businesses are inconsistent with Abbey’s future strategy, management believes that presentation of this financial measure provides useful information to investors regarding the Group’s financial condition and results of operations. For further information on the PBU, see “Business Review — Portfolio Business Unit” on page 19. As there were no longer any businesses, assets or portfolios remaining in the PBU by the end of 2005, there is no difference between the PFS cost income ratio and the Abbey cost income ratio from 2006 onwards. A reconciliation between the Abbey trading cost income ratio and the PFS trading cost income ratio is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | £m | | | £m | | | £m | | | £m | |
|
PFS trading costs | | | 1,299 | | | | 1,349 | | | | 1,431 | | | | 1,627 | |
PBU trading costs | | | – | | | | – | | | | 2 | | | | 56 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Abbey trading costs | | | 1,299 | | | | 1,349 | | | | 1,433 | | | | 1,683 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
PFS trading income | | | 2,615 | | | | 2,452 | | | | 2,334 | | | | 2,229 | |
PBU trading income | | | – | | | | – | | | | 70 | | | | 46 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Abbey trading income | | | 2,615 | | | | 2,452 | | | | 2,404 | | | | 2,275 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Abbey trading cost incomeratio | | | 49.7 | | | | 55.0 | | | | 59.6 | | | | 74.0 | |
PFS trading cost income ratio | | | 49.7 | | | | 55.0 | | | | 61.3 | | | | 73.0 | |
|
| | |
10. | | For the purpose of calculating the ratios of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of profit on continuing operations before tax plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest payable, which includes the amortisation of discounts and premiums on debt securities in issue and interest payable on finance lease obligations. |
127
Selected Financial Data
Selected Financial Datacontinued
Exchange rates
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rate for pounds sterling based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, expressed in US dollars per £1.00. No representation is made that amounts in pounds sterling have been, could have been or could be converted into US dollars at the noon buying rate or at any other rate. The noon buying rate for US dollars on 3 March 2008 was $1.99.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High | | | Low | | | Average(1) | | | Period end | |
Calendar period | | $Rate | | | $Rate | | | $Rate | | | $Rate | |
|
Years ended 31 December: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2007 | | | 2.11 | | | | 1.92 | | | | 2.00 | | | | 1.98 | |
2006 | | | 1.98 | | | | 1.73 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.96 | |
2005 | | | 1.93 | | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.81 | | | | 1.72 | |
2004 | | | 1.95 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.78 | |
2003 | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 1.78 | |
Months ended: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 2008(2) | | 1.99 | | | 1.99 | | | 1.99 | | | 1.99 | |
February 2008 | | 1.99 | | | 1.94 | | | 1.96 | | | 1.99 | |
January 2008 | | | 1.99 | | | | 1.95 | | | | 1.97 | | | | 1.99 | |
December 2007 | | | 2.07 | | | | 1.98 | | | | 2.02 | | | | 1.98 | |
November 2007 | | | 2.11 | | | | 2.05 | | | | 2.07 | | | | 2.06 | |
October 2007 | | | 2.08 | | | | 2.03 | | | | 2.04 | | | | 2.08 | |
September 2007 | | | 2.04 | | | | 1.99 | | | | 2.02 | | | | 2.04 | |
|
| | |
1. | | The average of the noon buying rates on the last business day of each month during the relevant period. |
2. | | With respect to March 2008, for the period from 1 March to 3 March. |
128
Shareholder Information
Share Information
Sterling-denominated preference shares
At 31 December 2007, Abbey National plc had outstanding 325,000,000 sterling denominated preference shares, nominal value of £1.00 each. The sterling denominated preference shares were issued on 23 October 1995, 13 February 1996 and 9 June 1997. Currently, the only trading market for these sterling denominated preference shares is the London Stock Exchange.
Major shareholders
As at 31 December 2007, Abbey National plc was a wholly owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A.. The acquisition was effected by means of a scheme of arrangement under Section 425 Companies Act 1985 on 12 November 2004. The ordinary shares in Abbey National plc were cancelled and holders of Abbey National plc shares who were on the register at 4.30pm on 12 November 2004 received one Banco Santander, S.A. share for each Abbey National plc share.
Exchange controls
There are no UK laws, decrees or regulations that restrict Abbey’s export or import of capital, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use by Abbey, or that affect the remittance of dividends or other shareholder payments to non-UK holders of Abbey National plc shares, except as outlined in the section on “Taxation” on page 131.
129
Shareholder Information
Risk Factors
An investment in Abbey involves a number of risks, the material ones of which are set forth below.
Risks concerning enforcement of judgements made in the United States
Abbey is a public limited company incorporated in England and Wales. All of Abbey’s Directors live outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible to serve process on such persons in the United States or to enforce judgements obtained in US courts against them or Abbey based on the civil liability provisions of the US federal securities laws or other laws of the United States or any state thereof. The Directors’ Report on pages 53 to 58 has been prepared and presented in accordance with and in reliance upon English company law and the liabilities of the Directors in connection with that Report shall be subject to the limitations and restrictions provided by such law. Under the UK Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the liability of Directors in respect of statements in and omissions from the Directors’ Report on pages 53 to 58, under this safe harbour, the Directors would be liable to the company (but not to any third party) if the Directors’ Report contains errors as a result of recklessness or knowing misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, but would not otherwise be liable.
Risks concerning borrower credit quality and general economic conditions are inherent in Abbey’s business
Risks arising from changes in credit quality and the recoverability of loans and amounts due from borrowers and counterparties are inherent in a wide range of Abbey’s businesses. Adverse changes in the credit quality of Abbey’s borrowers and counterparties or a general deterioration in UK or global economic conditions, or arising from systemic risks in the financial systems, could reduce the recoverability and value of Abbey’s assets and require an increase in Abbey’s level of provisions for bad and doubtful debts. Deterioration in the UK economy could reduce the profit margins for Abbey’s banking and financial services businesses. See “Risk management” for a discussion of these items.
Market risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates, bond and equity prices and other market factors are inherent in Abbey’s business
The most significant market risks Abbey faces are interest rates and bond and equity price risks. Changes in the general level of interest rates, as well as changes in the shape of yield curves and basis spreads may adversely affect the interest rate margin realised between lending rates and borrowing costs in Abbey’s banking operation. Although Abbey has implemented risk management processes to mitigate and control these and other market risks the performance of financial markets may cause changes in the value of Abbey’s investment and trading portfolios. In addition, Abbey sponsors a number of defined benefit staff pension schemes, and its obligations to those schemes may increase depending on the performance of financial markets. See “Risk Management” for a discussion of these risks.
Risks associated with liquidity and funding are inherent in Abbey’s business
Liquidity risks are inherent in any Retail Bank. Whilst Abbey has implemented liquidity management processes to mitigate and control these risks, unforeseen systemic market factors in particular make it difficult to eliminate these risks completely. Adverse and continued constraints in the supply of liquidity may adversely affect the cost of funding the business and extreme liquidity constraints may limit growth possibilities. Additionally, these events may have an adverse effect on the market value and liquidity of bonds issued by Abbey in the secondary markets. An example of liquidity constraints was that during the second half of 2007, the prime residential mortgage securitization and covered bond markets experienced significant disruption. These markets, which are important sources of funding for Abbey, were effectively closed to new external issuances of securities. The persistence of adverse market conditions could have a material adverse effect on Abbey's liquidity and funding. See “Risk Management — Liquidity Risk”.
Operational risks are inherent in Abbey’s business
Abbey’s businesses depend on the ability to process a large number of transactions efficiently and accurately. Losses can result from inadequate or failed internal control processes, people and systems, or from external events that interrupt normal business operations. See “Risk Management - Operational risk”.
Abbey’s businesses are subject to substantial legislation, regulatory and governmental oversight
Abbey is subject to financial services laws, regulations, administrative actions and policies in each location in which Abbey operates and, indirectly, in Spain, as a result of being part of Santander. Changes in supervision and regulation, in particular in the UK, which are beyond our control, could materially affect Abbey’s business, the products and services offered and the value of assets as well as our operations. Although Abbey works closely with its regulators and continually monitors the situation, future changes in regulation, fiscal or other policies can be unpredictable and are beyond the control of Abbey. No assurance can be given generally that laws or regulations will be adopted, enforced or interpreted in a manner which will not have an adverse effect on Abbey’s business. The resolution of a number of issues, including regulatory investigations and reviews and court cases, affecting the UK financial services industry, including Abbey, could have a negative impact on Abbey’s results on operations or on its relations with some of its customers and potential customers.
Risks associated with strategic decisions regarding organic growth, the competitive environment and potential acquisitions and disposals
Abbey devotes substantial management and planning resources developing strategic plans for organic growth and identifying possible acquisitions and disposals and the restructuring of Abbey’s businesses. If the outcome of these plans do not match expectations, Abbey’s earnings may not develop as forecast. In addition, the market for UK financial services and the other markets within which Abbey operates are highly competitive; Abbey’s ability to generate an appropriate return depends significantly upon management’s response to the competitive environment. See “Business Overview — Competition” for additional information.
130
Shareholder Information
Taxation for US Investors
The following is a summary, under current law, of the principal UK and US federal income tax considerations relating to the beneficial ownership by a US taxpayer of the 7.25% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities or the 7.375% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities. The following summary is provided for general guidance and does not address investors that are subject to special rules or that do not hold the perpetual securities as capital assets. US residents should consult their local tax advisers, particularly in connection with potential liability to pay US taxes on disposal, lifetime gift or bequest of their perpetual securities.
United States tax status of perpetual securities
For US federal income tax purposes, the perpetual securities will be treated as equity of the issuer, and payments of interest on the securities will be treated as dividends.
United Kingdom taxation on dividends
Under UK law, income tax is not withheld from dividends paid by UK companies. Shareholders, whether resident in the UK or not, receive the full amount of the dividend actually declared.
United States taxation on dividends
If you are a shareholder resident in the US, cash dividends up to the amount of our earnings and profits for US federal income tax purposes will be dividend income, which must be included in income on the date that you receive them. In accordance with their treatment as dividends for US federal income tax purposes, interest payments on the perpetual securities generally will be includible in your income on the date of receipt without regard to your method of tax accounting.
Dividends received by an individual during taxable years before 2011 will be taxed at a maximum rate of 15%, provided that the individual has held the shares unhedged for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date, that Abbey National plc is a qualified foreign corporation and certain other conditions are satisfied. Abbey National plc is a qualified foreign corporation for this purpose. Dividends received by an individual for taxable years after 2010 will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates. The dividend is not eligible for the dividends received deduction allowable to corporations. The dividend is foreign source income for US foreign tax credit purposes.
Any portion of the dividend that exceeds our US earnings and profits is subject to different rules. This portion is a tax-free return of capital to the extent of your basis in Abbey’s perpetual securities, and thereafter is treated as a gain on a disposition of the shares or perpetual securities.
United Kingdom taxation on capital gains
Under UK law, when you sell shares you may be liable to pay either capital gains tax or corporation tax on chargeable gains. However if you are either:
> | | an individual who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in the UK; or |
|
> | | a company which is not resident in the UK; |
you will not be liable to UK tax on any capital gains made on disposal of your shares. The exception is if the shares are held in connection with a trade or business that is conducted in the UK through a branch or agency (for capital gains tax purposes) or a permanent establishment (for corporation tax purposes).
United States taxation of dispositions
Dispositions of perpetual securities by you generally will give rise to capital gain or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss, subject to taxation at reduced rates for non-corporate taxpayers, if the perpetual securities were held for more than one year.
In accordance with the treatment of the perpetual securities as equity for US federal income tax purposes, you generally will not be required to account separately for accrued interest realised upon a disposition of the securities, and instead will treat amounts received in respect of accrued interest as part of the amount realised for purposes of determining gain or loss realised upon the disposition.
United Kingdom inheritance tax
Under the current estate and gift tax convention between the US and the UK, shares held by an individual shareholder who is:
> | | domiciled for the purposes of the convention in the US; and |
|
> | | is not for the purposes of the convention a national of the UK; |
will not be subject to UK inheritance tax on:
> | | the individual’s death; or |
|
> | | on a gift of the shares during the individual’s lifetime. |
The exception is if the shares are part of the business property of a permanent establishment of the individual in the UK or, in the case of a shareholder who performs independent personal services, pertain to a fixed base situated in the UK.
131
Shareholder Information
Contact Information
Abbey National plc registered office, principal office and investor relations department
Abbey National House
2 Triton Square
Regent’s Place
London
NW1 3AN
Registered Number 2294747
Registered in England and Wales
Santander shareholder department
Santander
Santander House
100 Ludgate Hill
London
EC4M 7NJ
Phone numbers
Abbey Switchboard
0870-607-6000
Santander Shareholder Services
0870-532-9430
+44 (0) 121-415-7188 (overseas)
Documents on display
Abbey is subject to the information requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with these requirements, Abbey files its Annual Report and other related documents with the SEC. These documents may be inspected by US investors at the SEC’s public reference rooms, which are located at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549-0102. Information on the operation of the public reference rooms can be obtained by calling the SEC on 1-202-551-8090 or by looking at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Corporate Governance
A disclosure of the difference between the corporate governance rules applicable to Abbey and the NYSE corporate governance rules is available on our website at www.abbey.com>About Abbey> About>Our Policies>Corporate Governance>NYSE Corporate Governance.
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Pursuant to the requirements of Item 10(B) of Form 20-F, the following is a summary of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Abbey National plc.
Abbey is a public company registered in England and Wales, registered number 2294747. Abbey’s objects and purposes are set out in the Memorandum and Articles of Association. These include the power to carry on financial business and financial operations as well as a wide range of other specified powers and an overarching power to carry on any business or activity which the Board of Directors believes will enhance the value or profitability of the business of Abbey.
Subject to certain exceptions, as permitted by English law, no Director may vote, or be counted in the quorum for a Board meeting in relation to any resolution concerning his own appointment or the terms of his appointment, or in respect of any contract in which he has a material interest.
The Board may exercise all the powers of Abbey to borrow money and to mortgage or charge all or any part of Abbey or to issue debentures and other securities whether outright or as collateral security.
A Director has to leave office at the Annual General Meeting following his or her 70th birthday, although that Director may be reappointed at that Annual General Meeting.
No share ownership is required for a Director to qualify.
Preference shares
Preference shares entitle the holder to receive a preferential dividend payment at a fixed or variable rate, such dividend to be payable on a date determined by the Board prior to the allotment of the shares. The Board will also determine whether these dividend rights are cumulative or non-cumulative. If dividends are unclaimed for twelve years, the right to the dividend ceases.
The holders of any series of preference shares will only be entitled to receive notice of and to attend any general meeting of Abbey if the preference dividend on the preference shares of such series has not, at the date of the notice of the Annual General Meeting, been paid in full in respect of such dividend periods as the Board may (prior to allotment) determine, in which case the holders of the preference shares will be entitled to speak and/or vote upon any resolution proposed; or, if a resolution is proposed at the Annual General Meeting, for, or in relation to, the winding-up of Abbey; or varying, altering or abrogating any of the rights, privileges, limitations or restrictions attached to the preference shares of such series, in which case the holders of the preference shares of such series will be entitled to speak and/or vote only upon such resolution; or in such other circumstances, and upon and subject to such terms, as the Board may determine prior to allotment.
132
Shareholder Information
Contact Information continued
If Abbey commences liquidation, the liquidator may, with the sanction of a special resolution and any other sanction required by the Companies Act:
> | | divide among the members in kind the whole or any part of the assets of Abbey (whether they shall consist of property of the same kind or not) and, for that purpose, set such values as he deems fair upon any property to be divided and determine how the division shall be carried out as between the members or different classes of members; or |
|
> | | vest the whole or any part of the assets in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of the contributories as the liquidator, with the like sanction, shall think fit but no member shall be compelled to accept any shares or other assets upon which there is any liability. |
Unless the Board determines, prior to allotment, that the series of preference shares shall be non-redeemable, each series shall be redeemable at the option of Abbey on any date falling not earlier than five years and one day after the date of allotment. On redemption Abbey shall pay the amount due. The formula for calculation of any relevant redemption premium is set out in the Memorandum and Articles of Association.
There are no sinking fund provisions. Where the preference shares are partly paid, the Board may make further calls upon the holders. There are no provisions discriminating against any existing or prospective shareholder as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares.
Ordinary Shares
Dividends are payable to the holders of ordinary shares. These ordinary shares are transferable. If dividends are unclaimed for twelve years, the right to the dividend ceases.
Subject to any special terms as to voting upon which any ordinary shares may be issued or may for the time being be held or any suspension or any abrogation of voting rights as set out in the Memorandum and Articles of Association, on a show of hands every member who is present in person at a Annual General Meeting of Abbey shall have one vote, and on a poll every member who is present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for every share of which he is the holder.
Subject to the prior rights of holders of preference shares, Abbey pays dividends on its ordinary shares only out of its distributable profits and not out of share capital. Dividends are determined by the Board.
If Abbey commences liquidation, the liquidator may, with the sanction of a special resolution and any other sanction required by the Companies Act:
> | | divide among the members the whole or any part of the assets of Abbey (whether they shall consist of property of the same kind or not) and, for that purpose, set such values as he deems fair upon any property to be divided and determine how the division shall be carried out as between the members or different classes of members; or |
|
> | | vest the whole or any part of the assets in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of the contributories as the liquidator, with the like sanction, shall think fit but no member shall be compelled to accept any shares or other assets upon which there is any liability. |
Abbey’s Memorandum and Articles of Association authorise it to issue redeemable shares, but Abbey’s ordinary shares are not redeemable. There are no sinking fund provisions. The Board may from time to time make calls upon the members in respect of any monies unpaid on their shares. There are no provisions discriminating against any existing or prospective shareholder as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of ordinary shares.
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, all or any of the rights attached to any class of shares (whether or not Abbey is being wound up) may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of not less than three-fourths in nominal value of the issued shares of that class or with the sanction of an extraordinary resolution passed at a separate Annual General Meeting of the holders of those ordinary shares. Additional quorum and voting requirements apply to such meeting.
Abbey’s Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that an Annual General Meeting must be held in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act. Twenty-one days written notice is required to be given.
All other meetings are Extraordinary General Meetings and may be called by the Board or by shareholders holding at least one-tenth of the paid up share capital carrying voting rights at Annual General Meetings. The notice period depends on the resolutions to be put to the meeting and will be either 14 or 21 days.
There are no restrictions on the rights to own securities for either resident or non-resident shareholders, other than those to which they may be subject as a result of the laws and regulations in their home jurisdiction.
There are no provisions that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Abbey that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring.
There are no provisions governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.
There are no conditions governing changes in capital in the Memorandum and Articles of Association which are more stringent than those implied by law.
133
Glossary and Definitions
Glossary and Definitions
| | |
Terms used | | US equivalent or brief description of meaning |
|
Accounts | | Financial statements |
Allotted | | Issued |
Attributable profit | | Net income |
Balance sheet | | Statement of financial position |
Bills | | Notes |
Called up share capital | | Ordinary shares or common stock and preferred stock, issued and fully paid |
Capital allowances | | Tax depreciation allowances |
Combined Code | | UK-derived principles of good corporate governance and code of best practice |
Creditors | | Payables |
Current account | | Checking account |
Dealing | | Trading |
Debtors | | Receivables |
Deferred tax | | Deferred income tax |
Depreciation | | Write-down of tangible fixed assets over their estimated useful lives |
Fees and commissions payable | | Fees and commissions expense |
Fees and commissions receivable | | Fees and commissions income |
Finance lease | | Capital lease |
Freehold | | Ownership with absolute rights in perpetuity |
Interest payable | | Interest expense |
Interest receivable | | Interest income |
Loans and advances | | Lendings |
Loan capital | | Long-term debt |
Long-term assurance fund | | Long-term insurance fund |
Members | | Shareholders |
Memorandum and Articles of Association | | Bylaws |
Net asset value | | Book value |
Nominal value | | Par value |
One-off | | Non-recurring |
Ordinary shares | | Common stock |
Overdraft | | A line of credit established through a customer’s current account and contractually repayable on demand |
Preference shares | | Preferred stock |
Premises | | Real estate |
Profit | | Income |
Provisions | | Allowances |
Share capital | | Ordinary shares, or common stock, and preferred stock |
Shareholders’ funds | | Stockholders’ equity |
Share premium account | | Additional paid-in capital |
Shares in issue | | Shares outstanding |
Tangible fixed assets | | Property, plant and equipment |
Undistributable reserves | | Restricted surplus |
Write-offs | | Charge-offs |
|
134
Cross-reference to Form 20-F
Cross-reference to Form 20-F
| | | | | | | |
Part I |
|
1 | | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers | | | | | * |
|
2 | | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | | | | | * |
|
3 | | Key Information | | Selected Financial Data | | | 126 |
| | | | Capitalisation and Indebtedness Reasons for the Offer and use of Proceeds Risk Factors | | | * * 130 |
|
4 | | Information on the Company | | History and Development of the Company | | | 5 |
| | | | Business Overview | | | 5 |
| | | | Organisational Structure | | | 5 |
| | | | Property, Plant and Equipment | | | 26 |
|
4A | | Unresolved Staff Comments | | | | | N/a |
|
5 | | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | | Operating Results | | | 9 |
| | | | Liquidity and Capital Resources | | | 28, 29, 30 |
| | | | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc Trend Information | | | N/a 2 |
| | | | Off- Balance Sheet Arrangements | | | 29 |
| | | | Contractual Obligations | | | 30 |
|
6 | | Directors, Senior Management and Employees | | Directors and senior management | | | 50,51,52 |
| | | | Compensation | | | 54 |
| | | | Board Practices | | | 53,54 |
| | | | Employees | | | 56 |
| | | | Share Ownership | | | 56 |
|
7 | | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | | Major Shareholders | | | 129 |
| | | | Related Party Transactions
Interests of Experts and Counsel | | | 55, 118, 119, 120 * |
|
8 | | Financial Information | | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial | | | 63 |
| | | | Information Significant Changes | | | 8 |
|
9 | | The Offer and Listing | | Offer Listing and Details | | | * |
| | | | Plan of Distribution Markets Selling shareholders Dilution Expenses of the Issue | | | * N/a * * * |
|
10 | | Additional Information | | Share Capital | | | * |
| | | | Memorandum and Articles of Association | | | 132 |
| | | | Material Contracts | | | 21 |
| | | | Exchange Controls Taxation | | | N/a 131 |
| | | | Dividends and Paying Agents Statements by Experts Documents on Display | | | * * 132 |
| | | | Subsidiary Information | | | N/a |
|
11 | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | | | | | 36 |
|
12 | | Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities | | Debt Securities | | | * |
Part II | | | | Warrants and Rights Other Securities American Depositary Shares
| | | * * * |
|
13 | | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | | | | | N/a |
|
14 | | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | | | N/a |
|
15 | | Controls and Procedures | | Disclosure Controls and Procedures | | | 57 |
| | | | Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control | | | 57, 58 |
| | | | over Financial Reporting Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting | | | N/a
58 |
|
15T | | Controls and Procedures | | | | | N/a |
|
16A | | Audit Committee Financial Expert | | | | | 54 |
|
16B | | Code of Ethics | | | | | 57 |
|
16C | | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | | | | | 88 |
|
16D | | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees | | | | | N/a |
|
16E | | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers | | | | | N/a |
|
Part III | | | | | | | |
|
17 | | Financial Statements | | | | | N/a |
|
18 | | Financial Statements | | | | | 63 |
|
19 | | Exhibits | | | | Filed with SEC |
|
| | |
* Not required for an Annual Report. |
135
SIGNATURE
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing onForm 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
ABBEY NATIONAL plc
| | |
| By: | /s/ António Horta-Osório |
António Horta-Osório
Chief Executive
Dated: 4 March 2008
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibits * | | |
|
| 1 | .1 | | Memorandum and Articles of Association of Abbey National plc*** |
| 4 | .1 | | Sale and Purchase Agreement between Abbey National plc, Resolution Life Limited and Resolution plc dated 7 June 2006*** |
| 7 | .1 | | Statement of ratio of earning to fixed charges** |
| 8 | .1 | | List of Subsidiaries of Abbey National plc |
| 12 | .1 | | CEO Certificate pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 12 | .2 | | CFO Certificate pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 13 | .1 | | Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 15 | .1 | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP** |
| | |
* | | Documents concerning Abbey National plc referred to within the Annual Report onForm 20-F 2007 may be inspected at Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regent’s Place, London NW1 3AN, the principal executive offices and registered address of Abbey National plc. |
|
** | | Incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement onForm F-3(No. 333-13146). |
|
*** | | As previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to Abbey National plc’sForm 20-F dated 26 June 2006. |