Mad Catz Interactive (MCZAF) 10-Q 2016 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2015

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                    to                    

Commission File No. 001-14944

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Canada	Not Applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
10680 Treena Street, Suite 500 San Diego, California	92131
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(858) 790-5008

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes¨    No  x

There were 73,469,571 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2016.

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations—Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)—Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Nine Months Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	6
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	21
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION		22
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	22
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	23
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	23
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	23
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	23
Item 5.	Other Information	23
Item 6.	Exhibits	23
SIGNATURES		24

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	3,986		$	5,142
Restricted cash		5,780			—
Accounts receivable, net		26,944			7,823
Other receivables		1,384			560
Inventories		27,738			15,479
Deferred tax assets		169			2,245
Income taxes receivable		341			967
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,707			1,293
Total current assets		69,049			33,509
Deferred tax assets		7,585			7,605
Other assets		606			418
Property and equipment, net		3,682			3,376
Intangible assets, net		2,377			2,584
Total assets	$	83,299		$	47,492
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Bank loans	$	27,502		$	7,920
Accounts payable		28,351			16,404
Accrued liabilities		12,778			4,196
Notes payable		637			1,015
Income taxes payable		536			141
Total current liabilities		69,804			29,676
Notes payable, less current portion		158			36
Warrant liabilities		904			1,187
Deferred tax liabilities		43			43
Deferred rent		691			762
Total liabilities		71,600			31,704
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, unlimited shares authorized; 73,469,571 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively		63,485			63,128
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,212	)		(5,123	)
Accumulated deficit		(46,574	)		(42,217	)
Total shareholders’ equity		11,699			15,788
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	83,299		$	47,492

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net sales	$	65,038		$	30,451		$	116,930		$	69,665
Cost of sales		53,633			22,273			93,641			49,693
Gross profit		11,405			8,178			23,289			19,972
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		4,865			2,673			12,038			8,562
General and administrative		2,600			2,337			8,132			8,210
Research and development		1,007			852			2,869			2,220
Amortization of intangible assets		112			109			332			328
Total operating expenses		8,584			5,971			23,371			19,320
Operating income (loss)		2,821			2,207			(82	)		652
Other expense:
Interest expense, net		(657	)		(238	)		(1,278	)		(563	)
Foreign currency exchange loss, net		(657	)		(83	)		(750	)		(500	)
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities		1,200			1			283			56
Other income		18			13			40			92
Total other expense		(96	)		(307	)		(1,705	)		(915	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		2,725			1,900			(1,787	)		(263	)
Income tax expense		(1,506	)		(542	)		(2,570	)		(546	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,219		$	1,358		$	(4,357	)	$	(809	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.02		$	0.02		$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted	$	0.02		$	0.02		$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)
Shares used in per share computations:
Basic		73,469,571			64,488,798			73,469,571			64,240,446
Diluted		73,902,905			64,644,470			73,469,571			64,240,446

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net income (loss)	$	1,219		$	1,358		$	(4,357	)	$	(809	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(295	)		(1,170	)		(89	)		(1,965	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	924		$	188		$	(4,446	)	$	(2,774	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(4,357	)	$	(809	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,711			1,549
Accrued and unpaid interest expense on note payable		—			10
Amortization of deferred financing fees		262			57
Loss on disposal of assets		4			8
Stock-based compensation		357			376
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities		(283	)		(56	)
Provision for deferred income taxes		2,096			114
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(19,150	)		(7,314	)
Other receivables		(825	)		511
Inventories		(12,277	)		(1,460	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,168	)		(49	)
Other assets		114			36
Accounts payable		12,031			2,585
Accrued liabilities		8,698			(292	)
Deferred rent		(71	)		553
Income taxes receivable/payable		1,019			(50	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(11,839	)		(4,231	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of intangible assets		(125	)		—
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,600	)		(1,604	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,725	)		(1,604	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings on bank loans		103,629			53,839
Repayments on bank loans		(84,047	)		(44,824	)
Payment of financing fees		(818	)		(50	)
Changes in restricted cash		(5,780	)		—
Borrowings on notes payable		95			—
Repayments on notes payable		(501	)		(791	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			236
Payment of expenses related to issuance of common stock		(164	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		12,414			8,410
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash		(6	)		(181	)
Net increase in cash		(1,156	)		2,394
Cash, beginning of period		5,142			1,496
Cash, end of period	$	3,986		$	3,890
Supplemental cash flow information:
Income taxes paid	$	314		$	578
Interest paid	$	1,190		$	350

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

Nature of Operations

Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (“Mad Catz”) designs, manufactures (primarily through third parties in Asia), markets and distributes innovative interactive entertainment products marketed under its Mad Catz^® (gaming), Tritton^® (audio), and Saitek^® (simulation) brands. Mad Catz products, which primarily include headsets, mice, keyboards, controllers, specialty controllers, and other accessories, cater to passionate gamers across multiple platforms including in-home gaming consoles, handheld gaming consoles, PC and Mac^® computers, smart phones, tablets and other mobile devices. Mad Catz distributes its products through its online store as well as through many leading retailers around the globe. Operationally headquartered in San Diego, California, Mad Catz also maintains offices in Europe and Asia.

Basis of Accounting

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial information has been prepared by management, without audit, in accordance with the instructions toForm 10-Q and Article 10 ofRegulation S-X. The consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2015 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date; however, it does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

The Company maintained a Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”) to borrow up to $25 million under a revolving line of credit subject to the availability of eligible collateral (accounts receivable and inventories), which changed throughout the year. Borrowings under the Credit Facility were secured by a first priority security interest in the inventories, equipment, and accounts receivable of certain of our subsidiaries and by a pledge of all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries.

On June 30, 2015, Mad Catz, Inc. (“MCI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with NewStar Business Credit LLC (“NSBC”) to provide for a $20.0 million revolving line of credit (which increases to $35.0 million from September 1, 2015 through February 29, 2016) subject to the availability of eligible accounts receivable and inventories, which changes throughout the year. The Loan Agreement expires on June 30, 2018. The Company is required to meet a monthly financial covenant based on a trailing twelve months’ Adjusted EBITDA, as defined. Additionally, on June 30, 2015, Mad Catz Europe Ltd. (“MCE”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Master Facilities Agreement (the “Facilities Agreement”) with Faunus Group International, Inc. (“FGI”) to provide for a $10.0 million secured demand credit facility subject to the availability of eligible accounts receivable and inventories, which changes throughout the year. The Facilities Agreement has a three-year term, although FGI may terminate the facility at any time upon at least three months’ notice. On July 6, 2015, the closing date of the Loan Agreement and Facilities Agreement, the Company used the proceeds to pay in full the obligations outstanding under the credit facility with Wells Fargo, and the agreement with Wells Fargo was terminated.

The Company depends upon the availability of capital under the Loan Agreement and Facilities Agreement to finance operations. The Company operates in a rapidly evolving and often unpredictable business environment that may change the timing or amount of expected future sales and expenses. If the Company is unable to comply with the Adjusted EBITDA covenants contained in the Loan Agreement, as amended from time to time, NSBC could declare the outstanding borrowings under the facility immediately due and payable. If the Company needs to obtain additional funds as a result of the termination of the Loan Agreement or the acceleration of amounts due thereunder, there can be no assurance that alternative financing can be obtained on substantially similar or acceptable terms, or at all. The Company’s failure to promptly obtain alternate financing could limit our ability to implement our business plan and have an immediate, severe and adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In the event that no alternative financing is available, the Company would be forced to drastically curtail operations, or dispose of assets, or cease operations altogether.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the interim period presented reflect all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations as of and for such periods indicated. These unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes hereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements refer to the Company’s fiscal years ending March 31 as its “fiscal” years. The Company generates a substantial percentage of net sales in the last three months of every calendar year, its fiscal third quarter. Results for the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be reported for any other interim period or for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016. All currency amounts are presented in U.S. dollars.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mad Catz and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and other similar words refer to Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context suggests otherwise.

7

Use of Estimates

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Applying these principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to asset impairments, reserves for accounts receivable and inventories, contingencies and litigation, valuation and recognition of share-based payments, warrant liabilities and income taxes. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which removes the requirement to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. Instead, the update requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU 2015-17 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with prospective or retrospective application allowed to all periods presented. Early application is permitted. The Company has elected not to early adopt this guidance and the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which requires entities to measure most inventory “at the lower of cost and net realizable value,” thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The ASU will not apply to inventories that are measured by using either the last-in, first-out method or the retail inventory method. For public business entities, the ASU is effective prospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. Upon transition, entities must disclose the nature of and reason for the accounting change. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2015, the FASB issuedASU 2015-03, Interest — Imputation of Interest(Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issuedASU 2015-15, Interest — Imputation of Interest(Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.ASU 2015-15 amendsSubtopic 835-30 to include that the Securities and Exchange Commission would not object to the deferral and presentation of debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequent amortization of debt issuance costs over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, whether or not there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issuedASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a one year period subsequent to the date of the financial statements. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance is effective for all entities for the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. As the requirements of this literature are disclosure only, adoption of this guidance is not expected to impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issuedASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB agreed to defer by one year the effective date ofASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption as of the original effective date permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoptingASU 2014-09.

(2) Fair Value Measurements

The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and income taxes receivable/payable approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of the bank loans approximates their fair value as the interest rate and other terms are that which is currently available to the Company. The carrying value of the note payable approximates fair value as it represents the present value using an effective interest rate of 5.25%, which approximates the interest rate on the Company’s domestic bank loan.

For a description of the fair value hierarchy, see Note 2 to the Company’s 2015 consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

8

The following tables provide a summary of the recognized assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

				Basis of Fair Value Measurements
	Balance as of December 31, 2015			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Liabilities:
Warrant liabilities (Note 5)	$	(904	)	$	—	$	—	$	(904	)
				Basis of Fair Value Measurements
	Balance as of March 31, 2015			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Liabilities:
Warrant liabilities (Note 5)	$	(1,187	)	$	—	$	—	$	(1,187	)

The following table provides a roll forward of the Company’s level three fair value measurements during the nine months ended December 31, 2015, which consist of the Company’s warrant liabilities (in thousands):

Warrant liabilities:
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	(1,187	)
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities		283
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(904	)

(3) Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31, 2015		March 31, 2015
Raw materials	$	1,830	$	735
Finished goods		25,908		14,744
	$	27,738	$	15,479

(4) Restricted cash

Cash accounts that are restricted as to withdrawal or usage are presented as restricted cash. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $5.8 million of restricted cash held by a bank in deposit accounts. This amount represents payments from customers into restricted bank accounts on December 31, 2015 that were subsequently automatically swept to repay borrowings under our bank loans.

(5) Securities Purchase Agreements

2015 Securities Purchase Agreement

On March 24, 2015, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “2015 Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company sold (a) an aggregate of 8,980,773 shares of its common stock (the “2015 Shares”) and (b) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,490,387 shares of common stock of the Company (“2015 Warrants” and, together with the 2015 Shares, the “2015 Securities”). The 2015 Securities were issued at a price equal to $0.41 for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $3,682,000. The 2015 Warrants became exercisable on September 24, 2015 at a per share exercise price equal to $0.61 and expire on September 24, 2020. The 2015 Warrants are subject to limitation on exercise if the Holder or its affiliates would beneficially own more than 9.99%/4.99% of the total number of the Company’s shares of common stock following such exercise. The 2015 Warrants also provide that in the event of a Company Controlled Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the 2015 Warrants), the Company may, at the election of the 2015 Warrant holder, be required to redeem all or a portion of the 2015

9

Warrants for cash in an amount equal to the Black-Scholes option pricing model value. As a result of this cash settlement provision, the 2015 Warrants are classified as liabilities and carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in net income (loss) until such time as the 2015 Warrants are exercised or expire. The fair value of the 2015 Warrants decreased from $1,172,000 as of March 31, 2015 to $904,000 as of December 31, 2015, which resulted in a $268,000 gain from the change in fair value of warrant liabilities for the nine months ended December 31, 2015. The 2015 Warrants are not traded in an active securities market, and as such, the Company estimates the fair value of the of the warrant liability using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:

	December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
Expected term		4.75 years			5.5 years
Common stock market price	$	0.40		$	0.37
Risk-free interest rate		1.70	%		1.46	%
Expected volatility		73.53	%		100	%

Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility was computed using daily pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected term of the 2015 Warrants. The Company believes this method produces an estimate that is representative of the Company’s expectations of future volatility over the expected term of the 2015 Warrants. The Company currently has no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of the 2015 Warrants is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the 2015 Warrants. The risk-free interest rate is the interest rate for treasury constant maturity instruments published by the Federal Reserve Board that is closest to the expected term of the 2015 Warrants.

Fluctuations in the fair value of the 2015 Warrants are impacted by unobservable inputs, most significantly the Company’s common stock market price. Significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

2011 Securities Purchase Agreement

In April 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “2011 Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company sold (a) an aggregate of 6,352,293 shares of its common stock (the “2011 Shares”) and (b) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,540,918 shares of common stock of the Company (“2011 Warrants” and, together with the 2011 Shares, the “2011 Securities”). The 2011 Securities were issued at a price equal to $1.92 for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $12,196,000. The 2011 Warrants became exercisable on October 21, 2011 at a per share exercise price equal to $2.56 and expire on October 21, 2016. The 2011 Warrants contain provisions that adjust the exercise price in the event the Company pays stock dividends, effects stock splits or issues additional shares of common stock at a price per share less than the exercise price of the 2011 Warrants. As a result of this exercise price reset feature, the 2011 Warrants are classified as liabilities and carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in net income (loss) until such time as the 2011 Warrants are exercised or expire.

As a result of the March 2015 offering, described above, and pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Warrants, the exercise price of the 2011 Warrants was adjusted to $2.30 per share.

The fair value of the 2011 Warrants decreased from $15,000 as of March 31, 2015 to $0 as of December 31, 2015, which resulted in a $15,000 gain from the change in fair value of warrant liabilities for the nine months ended December 31, 2015.

The 2011 Warrants are not traded in an active securities market, and as such, the Company estimated the fair value of the 2011 Warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:

	December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
Expected term		0.75 years			1.5 years
Common stock market price	$	0.40		$	0.37
Risk-free interest rate		0.57	%		0.41	%
Expected volatility		64.23	%		73.53	%

Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility is computed using daily pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected term of the 2011 Warrants. The Company believes this method produces an estimate that is representative of the Company’s expectations of future volatility over the expected term of these 2011 Warrants. The Company

10

currently has no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of these 2011 Warrants is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the 2011 Warrants. The risk-free interest rate is the interest rate for treasury constant maturity instruments published by the Federal Reserve Board that is closest to the expected term of the 2011 Warrants.

Fluctuations in the fair value of the 2011 Warrants are impacted by unobservable inputs, most significantly the assumption with regards to future equity issuances and their impact to the down-round protection feature. Significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

(6) At the Market Offering Agreement

On November 4, 2015, the Company established an “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program through which the Company may sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $25.0 million of our common stock. As of December 31, 2015, no shares of the Company’s common stock have been sold.

(7) Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the impact of potentially dilutive securities unless inclusion of such securities would be anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of diluted weighted average common and potential common shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015		2014		2015			2014
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	1,219	$	1,358	$	(4,357	)	$	(809	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares used to compute basic loss per share		73,469,571		64,488,798		73,469,571			64,240,446
Effect of dilutive share-based awards		433,334		155,672		—			—
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share		73,902,905		64,644,470		73,469,571			64,240,446
Basic income (loss) per share	$	0.02	$	0.02	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted income (loss) per share	$	0.02	$	0.02	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)

Outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 7,687,983 and 7,994,415 shares of the Company’s common stock for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, respectively, and 7,749,132 and 7,310,704 shares of the Company’s common stock for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculations because of their anti-dilutive effect during these periods. Outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 7,031,305 shares of the Company’s common stock for each of the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2,540,918 shares of the Company’s common stock for each of the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 were excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculations because of their anti-dilutive effect during these periods.

(8) Geographic and Product Line Data and Concentrations

The Company’s net sales are attributed to the following geographic regions (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Americas	$	47,002	$	9,573	$	79,003	$	22,281
EMEA		16,702		17,825		32,000		37,104
APAC		1,334		3,053		5,927		10,280
	$	65,038	$	30,451	$	116,930	$	69,665

11

Revenue is attributed to geographic regions based on the location of the customer. During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, one customer accounted for approximately 29% and 25% of the Company’s gross sales, respectively and one other customer accounted for approximately 14% and 15% of the Company’s gross sales, respectively. During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014, one customer accounted for approximately 15% and 13% of the Company’s gross sales, respectively, another customer accounted for approximately 11% and 10% of the Company’s gross sales, respectively, and one other customer accounted for approximately 10% and 9% of the Company’s gross sales, respectively. At December 31, 2015, one customer represented 35% of accounts receivable and another customer represented 16% of accounts receivable. At March 31, 2015, two customers represented 14%, each, of accounts receivable and another customer represented 11% of accounts receivable. During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, no other customers accounted for greater than 10% of gross sales. At December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, no other customers accounted for greater than 10% of accounts receivable.

The Company’s sales by platform as a percentage of gross sales were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Next gen consoles (a)		79	%		21	%		71	%		19	%
PC and Mac		14	%		43	%		19	%		44	%
Universal		5	%		25	%		6	%		23	%
Smart devices		2	%		5	%		3	%		8	%
Legacy consoles (b)		—	%		6	%		1	%		6	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

(a) Includes products developed for Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and Wii U.

(b) Includes products developed for Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii.

The Company’s sales by product category as a percentage of gross sales were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Specialty controllers		72	%		22	%		67	%		23	%
Audio		16	%		47	%		18	%		43	%
Mice and keyboards		6	%		23	%		8	%		23	%
Accessories		4	%		4	%		3	%		4	%
Games and other		1	%		—	%		2	%		1	%
Controllers		1	%		4	%		2	%		6	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

The Company’s sales by brand as a percentage of gross sales were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Mad Catz		78	%		34	%		72	%		34	%
Tritton		15	%		44	%		17	%		39	%
Saitek		6	%		17	%		9	%		18	%
All others		1	%		5	%		2	%		9	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

12

(9) Subsequent Events

On February 5, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan in order to lower operating costs, increase efficiencies and better align the Company’s workforce with the needs of the business. The plan consists of a reduction in the number of Company positions across the organization equal to approximately 37% of its total workforce. As a result of the reductions, the Company expects to record cash restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, comprised primarily of severance and benefits afforded to terminated employees and executive officers, of approximately $3.0 million. The Company anticipates that the actions associated with the reductions will be substantially completed by the end of the fiscal fourth quarter of 2016.

13

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer, collectively, to Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries, and all references in this section to “Mad Catz” refer to Mad Catz Interactive, Inc.

This section contains forward-looking statements and forward looking information (collectively “forward-looking statements”) as defined in applicable securities legislation involving risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including those set out under “Forward-looking Statements” herein and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 and in Part II Other Information — Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q and in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

OVERVIEW

Our Business

We design, manufacture (primarily through third parties in Asia), market and distribute innovative interactive entertainment products marketed under our Mad Catz^® (gaming), Tritton^® (audio), and Saitek^® (simulation) brands. Our products, which primarily include headsets, mice, keyboards, controllers, specialty controllers, and other accessories, cater to passionate gamers across multiple platforms including in-home gaming consoles, handheld gaming consoles, PC and Mac^® computers, smart phones, tablets and other mobile devices. We distribute our products through our online store as well as through many leading retailers around the globe. Operationally headquartered in San Diego, California, we also maintain offices in Europe and Asia.

Seasonality and Fluctuation of Sales

We generate a substantial percentage of our net sales in the last three months of every calendar year, our fiscal third quarter. Our quarterly results of operations can be expected to fluctuate significantly in the future, as a result of many factors, including: seasonal influences on our sales; unpredictable consumer preferences and spending trends; the introduction of new videogame platforms or titles; the need to increase inventories in advance of our primary selling season; and timing of introductions of new products.

Foreign Currency

During each of the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2015, approximately 33% and 37% of total net sales were transacted outside of the United States, respectively. The majority of our international business is presently conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses arising from normal business operations are credited to or charged against earnings in the period incurred. As a result, fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we conduct our business relative to the U.S. dollar will cause foreign currency exchange gains and losses, which we have experienced in the past and continue to experience. Due to the volatility of foreign currency exchange rates, among other factors, we cannot predict the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations upon future operating results. There can be no assurances that we will not experience foreign currency exchange losses in the future. To date, we have not hedged against foreign currency exposure and we cannot predict the effect foreign currency fluctuations will have on us in the future.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our critical accounting policies and estimates remain consistent with those reported in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Sales

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, net sales increased 114% and 68%, respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014. We experienced a significant increase in net sales in the Americas, partially offset by decreases in EMEA and APAC. The increase in net sales during the three and nine month periods was driven primarily by sales of products designed for the new consoles, particularly products related to the Rock Band 4 video game which began shipping in September predominantly in North America. These increases in net sales were partially offset by a decrease in sales of our other products, primarily audio, designed for legacy consoles and universal platforms due to the launch of the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One consoles in November 2013. Sales of products designed for legacy consoles and universal platforms, combined, represented 5% and

14

7% of our gross sales during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, respectively, down from 31% and 29% during the same periods in the prior year. We expect to launch a new line of audio products designed for the next gen consoles in calendar 2016 which we believe will drive growth in audio sales. Declines in sales of our products designed for the PC and Mac are due primarily to an increase in aggressive pricing competition in mice and keyboards, particularly in EMEA, and an aging product line. We have started launching a refresh of our gaming mice, which we believe will drive growth in this category. Additionally, sales of our Saitek flight simulation products have been impacted by supply constraints this year. We also experienced a decrease in sales of products developed for smart devices driven primarily by controllers sold to a customer in APAC under a private label program in the prior year, partially offset by an increase in sales of Mad Catz branded controllers.

From a geographical perspective, our net sales for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2015		% of total			2014		% of total			$ Change			% Change
Americas	$	47,002		72	%	$	9,573		31	%	$	37,429			391	%
EMEA		16,702		26	%		17,825		59	%		(1,123	)		(6	)%
APAC		1,334		2	%		3,053		10	%		(1,719	)		(56	)%
	$	65,038		100	%	$	30,451		100	%	$	34,587			114	%
	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015		% of total			2014		% of total			$ Change			% Change
Americas	$	79,003		68	%	$	22,281		32	%	$	56,722			255	%
EMEA		32,000		27	%		37,104		53	%	$	(5,104	)		(14	)%
APAC		5,927		5	%		10,280		15	%	$	(4,353	)		(42	)%
	$	116,930		100	%	$	69,665		100	%	$	47,265			68	%

Our sales by platform as a percentage of gross sales were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Next gen consoles (a)		79	%		21	%		71	%		19	%
PC and Mac		14	%		43	%		19	%		44	%
Universal		5	%		25	%		6	%		23	%
Smart devices		2	%		5	%		3	%		8	%
Legacy consoles (b)		—	%		6	%		1	%		6	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

(a) Includes products developed for Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and Wii U.

(b) Includes products developed for Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii.

15

Our sales by product category as a percentage of gross sales were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Specialty controllers		72	%		22	%		67	%		23	%
Audio		16	%		47	%		18	%		43	%
Mice and keyboards		6	%		23	%		8	%		23	%
Accessories		4	%		4	%		3	%		4	%
Games and other		1	%		—	%		2	%		1	%
Controllers		1	%		4	%		2	%		6	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

Our sales by brand as a percentage of gross sales were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Mad Catz		78	%		34	%		72	%		34	%
Tritton		15	%		44	%		17	%		39	%
Saitek		6	%		17	%		9	%		18	%
Other		1	%		5	%		2	%		9	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

Gross Profit

Gross profit is defined as net sales less cost of sales. Cost of sales consists of product costs, cost of licenses and royalties, write-downs of inventory, cost of freight-in and freight-out and distribution center costs, including depreciation and other overhead costs.

The following table presents net sales, cost of sales and gross profit for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2015		% of Net Sales			2014		% of Net Sales			$ Change		% Change
Net sales	$	65,038		100	%	$	30,451		100	%	$	34,587		114	%
Cost of sales		53,633		82	%		22,273		73	%		31,360		141	%
Gross profit	$	11,405		18	%	$	8,178		27	%	$	3,227		39	%
	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015		% of Net Sales			2014		% of Net Sales			$ Change		% Change
Net sales	$	116,930		100	%	$	69,665		100	%	$	47,265		68	%
Cost of sales		93,641		80	%		49,693		71	%		43,948		88	%
Gross profit	$	23,289		20	%	$	19,972		29	%	$	3,317		17	%

Gross profit for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 increased 39% and 17%, respectively, due to the increase in net sales, while gross profit margin decreased to 18% and 20% in the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 compared to 27% and 29% in the three and nine month periods in prior year. The decrease in gross margin over the prior year periods was due primarily to a large percentage of sales in the current year represented by lower margin products, particularly products related to the Rock Band 4 video game, as well as an increase in royalties and licenses and temporary price concessions as a percentage of net sales.

16

The increase in royalties and licenses is also due to a large percentage of sales in the current year represented by sales of products related to the Rock Band 4 video game as well as other products designed for the new consoles. The increase in temporary price concessions was due to promotional pricing programs with retailers to drive sell-through of products related to the Rock Bank 4 video game. These decreases in gross margin were offset partially by lower product returns and lower distribution costs as a percentage of net sales. We expect gross profit for the full year fiscal 2016 to increase compared to fiscal 2015, although we expect gross margin to be lower than fiscal 2015 due to lower margin sales of products related to the Rock Band 4 video game.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2015		% of Net Sales			2014		% of Net Sales			$ Change		% Change
Sales and marketing	$	4,865		8	%	$	2,673		9	%	$	2,192		82	%
General and administrative		2,600		4	%		2,337		8	%		263		11	%
Research and development		1,007		1	%		852		3	%		155		18	%
Amortization of intangible assets		112		—	%		109		—	%		3		3	%
									��
	$	8,584		13	%	$	5,971		20	%	$	2,613		44	%

	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015		% of Net Sales			2014		% of Net Sales			$ Change			% Change
Sales and marketing	$	12,038		10	%	$	8,562		12	%	$	3,476			41	%
General and administrative		8,132		7	%		8,210		12	%		(78	)		(1	)%
Research and development		2,869		3	%		2,220		3	%		649			29	%
Amortization of intangible assets		332		—	%		328		1	%		4			1	%
	$	23,371		20	%	$	19,320		28	%	$	4,051			21	%

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of payroll, commissions, participation at trade shows and travel costs for our worldwide sales and marketing staff, advertising expense and costs of operating our websites. The increase in sales and marketing expense in both the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to increased marketing efforts, particularly cooperative advertising programs with retailers and other marketing expenses, related to the Rock Band 4 video game. We expect sales and marketing expenses for the full year fiscal 2016, on an absolute dollar basis, to increase compared to fiscal 2015 levels.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits for our executive and administrative personnel, facilities costs and professional services, such as legal and accounting. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2015 was due to a reversal of incentive compensation expense recorded in the prior year. In fiscal 2015, incentive compensation expense was accrued in the first and second fiscal quarters and reversed in the third quarter, when it became apparent bonuses would not be earned. In the current fiscal year, no incentive compensation expense has been recorded. General and administrative expenses in the nine months ended December 31, 2015 is consistent with prior year. We expect general and administrative expenses for the full year fiscal 2016, on an absolute dollar basis, to remain approximately the same as that of fiscal 2015.

Research and Development Expenses.Research and development expenses include the costs of developing and enhancing new and existing products. The increase in research and development expenses in both the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same prior year periods, was primarily related to an increase in new product development expenses compared to the prior year. Additionally, during the nine months ended December 31, 2014, we received a reimbursement for engineering work performed on behalf of a third party of approximately $0.5 million. We expect research and development expenses for the full year fiscal 2016, on an absolute dollar basis, to increase compared to fiscal 2015 levels.

Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles consist of the amortization of the acquired intangible assets from prior acquisitions. We expect amortization of intangibles for the full year fiscal 2016, on an absolute dollar basis, to remain approximately the same as that of fiscal 2015.

17

Other Expense

Other expense consists primarily of interest expense on our outstanding debt, foreign currency exchange gains or losses, change in fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreements entered into by the Company in 2011 and 2015, and other items that may be specific to a reporting period. The foreign currency exchange gains or losses are associated with fluctuations in the value of the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries, which include the Pound Sterling, the Euro, the Canadian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, the Japanese yen, and the Chinese Yuan Renminbi (“CNY”), against the U.S. Dollar. Other expense decreased to $0.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2015, from other expense of $0.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014, due primarily to a an increase in interest expense of $0.4 million and an increase in the foreign currency exchange loss of $0.6 million, partially offset by an increase in the change in fair value of warrant liabilities of $1.2 million. The increase in interest expense is due primarily to an increase in the outstanding balances under our credit facilities during the three month period. The increase in the foreign currency exchange loss is due primarily to the fluctuations in the value of the Pound Sterling. Other expense increased to $1.7 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 from other expense of $0.9 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2014. The change is primarily due to an increase in interest expense of $0.7 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 due primarily to the increase in the outstanding balances under our credit facilities as well as an acceleration in the amortization of fees associated with the replacement of our Wells Fargo credit facility during the nine month period.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense of $1.5 million and $0.5 million reflect effective tax rates of 55% and 29% for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Income tax expense of $2.6 million and $0.5 million reflect effective tax rates of (144)% and (208)% for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Our effective tax rate is a blended rate for the different jurisdictions in which we operate. Our effective tax rate fluctuates depending on the taxable income in each jurisdiction and the statutory income tax rates in those jurisdictions, in which we do business, including our Hong Kong operating company and our Canadian parent company for which we continue to provide a full valuation allowance against the net operating losses. We will continue to evaluate our ability to realize our deferred tax assets on an ongoing basis to identify whether any significant changes in circumstances or assumptions have occurred that could materially affect the ability to realize our deferred tax assets and expect to release the valuation allowance when we have sufficient positive evidence, including but not limited to cumulative earnings in successive recent periods, to overcome such negative evidence. Changes in future earnings projections, among other factors, may cause us to adjust our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which would impact our income tax expense in the period we determine these factors to have changed.

Mad Catz does not record deferred income taxes on the approximate $32.3 million of undistributed earnings of its non-Canadian subsidiaries based upon the Company’s intention to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings. Mad Catz may be subject to income and withholding taxes if earnings of the non-Canadian subsidiaries were distributed. Considering the tax loss carry forwards in Canada and the related valuation allowance, the deferred tax liability on the Company’s undistributed earnings would be no more than $2.0 million at December 31, 2015.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The table below provides a summary of cash (used in) provided by operating, investing and financing activities during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			Change
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(11,839	)	$	(4,231	)	$	(7,608	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,725	)		(1,604	)		(121	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		12,414			8,410			4,004
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash		(6	)		(181	)		175
Net increase in cash	$	(1,156	)	$	2,394		$	(3,550	)

18

Our cash balance was $4.0 million and $5.1 million at December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively. Additionally, our restricted cash balance was $5.8 million and $0 at December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively. Our primary sources of liquidity include borrowings under our credit facilities (as discussed below under Financing Activities), cash on hand and cash flows generated from operations. We may also supplement our cash flows from operations with proceeds from our at-the-market equity offering program (“ATM program”), although we have not done so to date. Due to the seasonality of our business (as discussed below under Operating Activities) cash provided by (used in) operating activities will fluctuate throughout our fiscal year.

Equity Offerings

On November 4, 2015, the Company established an ATM program which allows us to sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $25.0 million of our common stock. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, we issued no shares of common stock under the program.

Operating Activities

Our cash flows from operating activities have typically included the collection of customer receivables generated by the sale of our products, offset by payments to vendors for materials and manufacture of our products. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 primarily reflects the net loss for the period before non-cash items (i.e. depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, the change in fair value of warrant liabilities and provision for deferred income taxes), a $19.1 million increase in accounts receivable resulting from the increase in net sales and a $12.3 million increase in inventory due to sales of products related to the Rock Band 4 video game being less than originally forecasted during the holiday selling season. The decreases in operating cash flow were offset partially by a $20.7 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to inventory purchases, accrued royalties and timing of payments. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 primarily reflects the net loss for the period before non-cash items (i.e. depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, and provision for deferred income taxes), a $7.3 million increase in accounts receivable resulting from the increase in net sales and an increase in inventory of $1.5 million due to sales during the holiday selling season being less than originally forecasted. The decreases in operating cash flow were offset partially by a $2.6 million increase in accounts payable related to inventory purchases and timing of payments. We are focused on effectively managing our overall liquidity position by continuously monitoring inventory levels and expenses, and managing our accounts receivable collection efforts.

Due to the seasonality of our business, we typically experience a large build-up in inventories beginning during our second fiscal quarter ending September 30, with corresponding increases in accounts payable and outstanding borrowings under our bank loans. These increases are in anticipation of the holiday selling season, which occurs during our third fiscal quarter ending December 31. A large percentage of our annual revenue is generated during our third fiscal quarter and, typically, our inventories decrease and accounts receivable increase as a result of the annual holiday selling. However, due to sales of products related to the Rock Band 4 video game being less than originally forecasted during the holiday selling season, inventory levels increased during the third fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2015. During our fourth fiscal quarter ending March 31, the sales cycle completes with decreases in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and outstanding borrowings under our bank loans and net increase in cash. We forecast the expected demand for the holiday selling season months in advance to ensure adequate quantities of inventory. Our sales personnel forecast holiday sales based on information received from our major customers as to expected product purchases for the holiday season, and we also utilize mathematical modeling techniques to forecast demand based on recent point-of-sale activity. If demand does not meet expectations, the result will be excess inventories, and/or reduced sales and the overall effect could result in a reduction to cash flows from operating activities following payment of accounts payable.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities, which consisted of capital expenditures to support our operations and were made up primarily of production molds, and to a lesser extent, computers and machinery and equipment, was $1.7 million and $1.6 million during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 of $12.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively, was primarily the result of net borrowings under our credit facilities, offset partially by payments of financing fees related to our new credit facilities (as discussed below) and repayments on a note payable. The changes in restricted cash of $5.8 million represents payments from customers into a restricted bank account on December 31, 2015 that were automatically swept the following day to repay borrowings under our bank loans.

We maintained a Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”) to borrow up to $25 million under a revolving line of credit subject to the availability of eligible collateral (accounts receivable and inventories), which changed throughout the year. Borrowings under the Credit Facility were secured by a first priority security interest in the inventories, equipment, and accounts receivable of certain of our subsidiaries and by a pledge of all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries.

19

On June 30, 2015, Mad Catz, Inc. (“MCI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with NewStar Business Credit LLC (“NSBC”) to provide for a $20.0 million revolving line of credit (which increases to $35.0 million from September 1, 2015 through February 29, 2016) subject to the availability of eligible accounts receivable and inventories, which changes throughout the year. The Loan Agreement expires on June 30, 2018. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, NSBC will advance MCI up to 85% of the value of eligible accounts receivables, depending on dilution rates. Also, MCI may borrow against eligible inventory, subject to an inventory sublimit amount and certain other conditions. The inventory sublimit amount will be the lesser of 85% of net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, 60% of the lower of cost or market value of eligible inventory, or 2.3333 times (which increased to 5.55 times between August 31, 2015 and November 6, 2015) eligible accounts receivable under the Loan Agreement. Borrowings under the Loan Agreement accrue interest on the daily outstanding balance at 4.5% plus 30-day LIBOR rate per annum, with a LIBOR floor of 1.0%. MCI is also required to pay a commitment fee equal to 1.0% of the facility upon entry into the Loan Agreement, an unused line fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the unused portion of the facility and a collateral monitoring fee of $1,500 per month. We are required to meet a monthly financial covenant based on a trailing twelve months’ Adjusted EBITDA, as defined. As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with the covenants, as amended on February 5, 2016. For periods subsequent to December 31, 2015, we believe we will be able to meet the covenants in January and February 2016, and that the covenants in subsequent periods will be reset based on fiscal 2017 forecast that will be submitted to NSBC in March 2016. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to meet the covenants subsequent to December 31, 2015 or that we would be able to obtain waivers from NSBC to the extent we are not in compliance with the covenants. Additionally, on June 30, 2015, Mad Catz Europe Ltd. (“MCE”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Master Facilities Agreement (the “Facilities Agreement”) with Faunus Group International, Inc. (“FGI”) to provide for a $10.0 million secured demand credit facility subject to the availability of eligible accounts receivable and inventories, which changes throughout the year. The Facilities Agreement has a three-year term, although FGI may terminate the facility at any time upon at least three months’ notice. Pursuant to the Facilities Agreement, FGI will advance MCE up to 85% of the value of eligible accounts receivable, depending on dilution rates. Also, MCE may borrow against eligible inventory, subject to an inventory sublimit amount and certain other conditions. On July 6, 2015, the closing of the Loan Agreement and Facilities Agreement, we used the proceeds to pay in full the obligations outstanding under the credit facility with Wells Fargo, and the agreement with Wells Fargo was terminated.

We believe that, partially due to the cost savings expected from the restructuring plan discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our available cash balances, anticipated cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to satisfy our operating needs for at least the next twelve months, and in the longer term, including any payments due on the note payable. We depend upon the availability of capital under our Loan Agreement and Facilities Agreement to finance our operations. We operate in a rapidly evolving and often unpredictable business environment that may change the timing or amount of expected future sales and expenses. If we are unable to comply with the Adjusted EBITDA covenants contained in the Loan Agreement, as amended from time to time, NSBC could declare the outstanding borrowings under the facility immediately due and payable. If we need to obtain additional funds as a result of the termination of the Loan Agreement or the acceleration of amounts due thereunder, there can be no assurance that alternative financing can be obtained on substantially similar or acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to promptly obtain alternate financing could limit our ability to implement our business plan and have an immediate, severe and adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In the event that no alternative financing is available, we would be forced to drastically curtail operations, or dispose of assets, or cease operations altogether.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

As of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial parties, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

ADJUSTED EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP (“Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”) financial measure, represents net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and change in the fair value of warrant liabilities. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flows for the period, nor is it being presented as an alternative to operating or net income (loss) as an indicator of operating performance and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. As defined, Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. Our management believes, however, that in addition to the performance measures found in our financial statements, Adjusted EBITDA is a useful financial performance measurement for assessing our Company’s operating performance. Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a measurement of operating performance in comparing our performance on a consistent basis over prior periods, as it removes from operating results the

20

impact of our capital structure, including the interest expense resulting from our outstanding debt, and our asset base, including depreciation and amortization of our capital and intangible assets. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure for our lender. We calculate Adjusted EBITDA as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net income (loss)	$	1,219		$	1,358		$	(4,357	)	$	(809	)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization		673			440			1,711			1,536
Stock-based compensation		95			136			357			376
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities		(1,200	)		(1	)		(283	)		(56	)
Interest expense, net		657			238			1,278			563
Income tax expense		1,506			542			2,570			546
Adjusted EBITDA	$	2,950		$	2,713		$	1,276		$	2,156

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q are not historical fact and constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and constitute “forward-looking information” as defined in applicable Canadian securities legislation (collectively “forward-looking statements”). These forward-looking statements may address, among other things, our strategy for growth, business development, market and competitive position, financial results, expected revenue, expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of our existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending needs. These statements relate to our expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments, intentions and strategies regarding the future, and may be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate,” and “potential,” among others. Specifically this document contains forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, the continuance of significant seasonal fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations, inventories, receivables, payables and cash; the sufficiency of funds available to meet operational needs, including payments under our note payable; the ability to meet the financial covenants under our existing credit facilities; the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; the possible use of financial hedging techniques; our expectations regarding sales, gross margins and operating expenses; and the potential release of the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

The forward-looking statements contained herein reflect management’s current beliefs and expectations and are based on information currently available to management, as well as its analysis made in light of its experience, perception of trends, current conditions, expected developments and other factors and assumptions believed to be reasonable and relevant in the circumstances. These assumptions include, but are not limited to: continuing demand by consumers for videogames and accessories, continued financial viability of our largest customers, continued access to capital to finance our working capital requirements, ability to timely execute the restructuring plan in a manner that will positively impact our financial condition and results of operations and not disrupt our business operations, and the continuance of open trade with China, where the preponderance of our products are manufactured.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and are subject to important factors and events that could cause our actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materially from the historical information contained in thisForm 10-Q, and from those that may be expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that actual results could differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons detailed in Part I — Item 1A. — Risk Factors of our most recent Annual Report onForm 10-K, and in Part II Other Information — Item 1A. We believe that many of the risks detailed in our other SEC filings are part of doing business in the industry in which we operate, and will likely be present in all periods reported. The fact that certain risks are endemic to the industry does not lessen their significance. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update them or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements, except as may be required by applicable law.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including

21

our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. As required by Securities and Exchange CommissionRules 13a-15(b) we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (who is also the Chief Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined underRule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our process for evaluating controls and procedures is continuous and encompasses constant improvement of the design and effectiveness of established controls and procedures and the remediation of any deficiencies which may be identified during the process.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On October 3, 2013, Mad Catz filed a complaint for patent infringement styledMad Catz Interactive, Inc. v. Razer USA, Ltd., CaseNo. 13-cv-02371-GPC-JLB, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against Razer USA, Ltd. (“Razer”). The complaint alleges that Mad Catz held, at that time, an exclusive license, within the United States, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import, gift or otherwise dispose of the any product falling within the scope of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,157,370 (the “370 Patent”), including all right, power and interest to enforce the ‘370 Patent against any and all third parties, as well as exclusive standing to bring suit against any third party infringing the ‘370 Patent. The complaint further alleges that Razer has infringed and continued to infringe the ‘370 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing in the United States certain products covered by one of more claims of the ‘370 Patent, including Razer’s “Ouroboros” computer mouse. On January 10, 2014, Razer filed a counterclaim against Mad Catz for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,605,063 (the “063 Patent”). Razer further contends that the ‘370 Patent is invalid and unenforceable, and denies infringement. Mad Catz also contends that the ‘063 Patent is invalid and unenforceable, and denies infringement. No trial date has been set in the matter. On December 8, 2015, the Court granted Razer’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘370 Patent. Razer has also moved for summary judgment of infringement of the ‘063 Patent. The hearing on that motion is set for February 19, 2016. The parties are currently conducting discovery. We believe that our allegations made against Razer are meritorious and intend to vigorously prosecute all claims we have asserted, including appeal of the order granting summary judgment and the Court’s claim construction order. We also believe that the allegations made by Razer lack merit and intend to vigorously defend all claims asserted. We have not recorded any accrual for a contingent liability associated with this legal proceeding based on our belief that a liability is not probable and any range of potential future charge cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

On March 11, 2014, the Better Mouse Company, LLC (“BMC”) filed a complaint against Mad Catz and MCI for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The action was styledBetter Mouse Company, LLC v. Steelseries Aps et al, Lead Civil ActionNo. 2:14-CV-198. By its complaint, the plaintiff alleged that Mad Catz and MCI infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,532,200. Mad Catz and MCI answered the complaint on July 17, 2014 and denied all substantive allegations of infringement and damage. The parties began mediation in August 2015, and, after extensive negotiations, in September 2015 the parties entered into a confidential Settlement and License Agreement, wherein the parties stipulated to a complete dismissal of the action with prejudice. On September 28, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation and entered its judgment dismissing the action with prejudice. On December 31, 2015, Mad Catz paid the final amounts owed and due Better Mouse Company under the settlement agreement and the matter is now closed.

On November 21, 2014, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) filed a complaint against MCI (and numerous third parties, including Nvidia Corporation) for patent infringement in the United States International Trade Commission (the “Commission”). The complaint is styledIn the Matter of Certain Graphics Processing Chips, Systems on a Chip, and Products Containing the Same, InvestigationNo. 377-TA-941 and alleges that the defendants have infringed and continue to infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,147,385, 6,173,349, 7,056,776, and 7,804,734 by offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States certain graphics processing units, systems on a chip, and products containing the same that, allegedly, are covered by one of more claims of the above-cited patents. Specifically, as to MCI, Samsung alleges that the Mad Catz-branded M.O.J.O. micro-console for Android product, which utilizes the Nvidia Tegra 4 T40S systems on a chip, directly infringes one of more claims of at least one of the patents at issue. On December 22, 2015, the Commission issued a confidential, non-final, initial

22

determination that the alleged products, including the Company’s M.O.J.O. infringes the asserted patents. On January 4, 2016, MCI, along with Nvidia, filed a petition for review, seeking review and reversal by the Commission of its initial determination. Under the current schedule, the Commission will determine whether to review the initial determination by February 22, 2016. The target date for the Commission’s final decision in the investigation is April 22, 2016. MCI believes that the allegations lack merit and intends to vigorously defend all claims asserted. It is impossible at this time to assess whether the outcome of this proceeding will have a material adverse effect on Mad Catz. We have not recorded any accrual for a contingent liability associated with this legal proceeding based on our belief that a liability, while possible, is not probable and any range of potential future charge cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The Company has entered into an indemnity agreement with NVIDIA, whereby NVIDIA has agreed to defend and indemnify the Company in this matter.

In addition to the foregoing matters, we may at times be involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We will also, from time to time, when appropriate in management’s estimation, record reserves in our financial statements for pending litigation. Litigation is expensive and is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in any such matters could adversely impact our operating results or financial condition. Additionally, any litigation to which we may become subject could also require significant involvement of our senior management and may divert management’s attention from our business and operations. Although claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of any current pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I — Item 1A. — Risk Factors our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, except for the additional risk factor set forth below.

Successful execution of our restructuring plan is critical to our future performance.

The success of the restructuring initiatives is dependent on accomplishing the plan in a timely and effective manner that will positively impact our financial condition and results of operations and not disrupt our business operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company.
32.2	Certification of Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.
February 9, 2016	/s/ Karen McGinnis
	Karen McGinnis President and Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2016	/s/ David McKeon
	David McKeon Chief Financial Officer

24