MANAGEMENT'S REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
Management’s Responsibility to Shareholders
The Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are the responsibility of the management of Pengrowth Energy Corporation. They have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board which have been adopted in Canada. Financial information that is presented in the Management Discussion and Analysis is consistent with the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary because a precise determination of certain assets and liabilities is dependant on future events. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management is responsible for the reliability and integrity of the Consolidated Financial Statements, the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and other financial information contained in this report. In order to ensure that management fulfills its responsibilities for financial reporting, we have established an organizational structure that provides appropriate delegation of authority, division of responsibilities, and selection and training of properly qualified personnel. Management is also responsible for the development of internal controls over the financial reporting process.
The Board of Directors ("the Board") is assisted in exercising its responsibilities through the Audit and Risk Committee ("the Committee") of the Board, which is composed of four independent directors. The Committee meets regularly with management and the independent auditors to satisfy itself that management’s responsibilities are properly discharged, to review the Consolidated Financial Statements and to recommend approval of the Consolidated Financial Statements to the Board.
KPMG LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the shareholders, have audited Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and provided an independent professional opinion. The auditors have full and unrestricted access to the Committee to discuss the audit and their related findings as to the integrity of the financial reporting process.
|
| |
| |
Derek W. Evans | Christopher G. Webster |
President and Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
February 28, 2017
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 1 |
KPMG LLP
205 5th Avenue SW
Suite 3100
Calgary AB
T2P 4B9
Telephone (403) 691-8000
Fax (403) 691-8008
www.kpmg.ca
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Directors of Pengrowth Energy Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Pengrowth Energy Corporation, which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the consolidated statements of income (loss), cash flow and shareholders’ equity for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 2 |
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pengrowth Energy Corporation as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Other Matter
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 28, 2017 expressed an unmodified (unqualified) opinion on the effectiveness of Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Chartered Professional Accountants
February 28, 2017
Calgary, Canada
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 3 |
KPMG LLP
205 5th Avenue SW
Suite 3100
Calgary AB
T2P 4B9
Telephone (403) 691-8000
Fax (403) 691-8008
www.kpmg.ca
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Pengrowth Energy Corporation
We have audited Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s (the "Corporation") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 4 |
In our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Corporation as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), cash flow and shareholders’ equity for the years then ended, and our report dated February 28, 2017 expressed an unmodified (unqualified) opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Chartered Professional Accountants
February 28, 2017
Calgary, Canada
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 5 |
PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Stated in millions of Canadian dollars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | As at |
| As at |
|
| Note |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
ASSETS | | | |
Current Assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 286.7 |
| $ | — |
|
Accounts receivable | 17 |
| 110.8 |
| 139.5 |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 17 |
| 2.9 |
| 288.8 |
|
Assets held for sale | 5 |
| 117.5 |
| — |
|
| | 517.9 |
| 428.3 |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 17 |
| 1.0 |
| 166.7 |
|
Other assets | 4 |
| 118.7 |
| 89.1 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | 5 |
| 2,849.0 |
| 3,346.8 |
|
Exploration and evaluation assets | 6 |
| 496.3 |
| 494.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 11 |
| 118.4 |
| 25.0 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 4,101.3 |
| $ | 4,550.7 |
|
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | |
Bank indebtedness | 9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3.7 |
|
Accounts payable | | 173.8 |
| 217.8 |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 17 |
| 55.3 |
| 3.4 |
|
Convertible debentures | 8 |
| 126.6 |
| — |
|
Current portion of long term debt | 9 |
| 537.0 |
| — |
|
Current portion of provisions and other liabilities | 10 |
| 22.1 |
| 21.8 |
|
| | 914.8 |
| 246.7 |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 17 |
| 5.3 |
| — |
|
Convertible debentures | 8 |
| — |
| 137.0 |
|
Long term debt | 9 |
| 1,023.7 |
| 1,715.8 |
|
Provisions and other liabilities | 10 |
| 672.5 |
| 686.2 |
|
| | 2,616.3 |
| 2,785.7 |
|
Shareholders' Equity | | | |
Shareholders' capital | 12 |
| 4,815.1 |
| 4,797.0 |
|
Contributed surplus | | 22.9 |
| 27.3 |
|
Deficit | | (3,353.0 | ) | (3,059.3 | ) |
| | 1,485.0 |
| 1,765.0 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | 19, 20 |
| | |
Subsequent events | 16, 22 |
| | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | $ | 4,101.3 |
| $ | 4,550.7 |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors of Pengrowth Energy Corporation
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 6 |
PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(Stated in millions of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31 |
| Note |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
REVENUES | | | |
Oil and gas sales | | $ | 566.2 |
| $ | 830.8 |
|
Royalties, net of incentives | | (40.0 | ) | (89.5 | ) |
| | 526.2 |
| 741.3 |
|
Realized gain (loss) on commodity risk management | 17 |
| 385.7 |
| 327.0 |
|
Change in fair value of commodity risk management contracts | 17 |
| (424.5 | ) | (50.6 | ) |
| | 487.4 |
| 1,017.7 |
|
EXPENSES | | | |
Operating | | 275.4 |
| 372.1 |
|
Transportation | | 33.7 |
| 45.5 |
|
General and administrative | | 83.6 |
| 99.7 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 5 |
| 349.9 |
| 455.3 |
|
Impairment | 5, 7 |
| — |
| 1,000.5 |
|
| | 742.6 |
| 1,973.1 |
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | (255.2 | ) | (955.4 | ) |
| | | |
Other (income) expense items | | | |
(Gain) loss on disposition of properties | 5 |
| 27.1 |
| 98.1 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss | 18 |
| 33.4 |
| 235.2 |
|
Realized foreign exchange (gain) loss | 18 |
| (46.5 | ) | (91.5 | ) |
Interest and financing charges | | 105.5 |
| 103.9 |
|
Accretion | 10 |
| 15.1 |
| 17.1 |
|
Other (income) expense | | (2.7 | ) | (2.4 | ) |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES | | (387.1 | ) | (1,315.8 | ) |
Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | 11 |
| (93.4 | ) | (222.7 | ) |
NET INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | (293.7 | ) | $ | (1,093.1 | ) |
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE | 15 |
| | |
Basic | | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (2.02 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (2.02 | ) |
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 7 |
PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(Stated in millions of Canadian dollars) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31 |
| Note |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR): | | | |
OPERATING | | | |
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | (293.7 | ) | $ | (1,093.1 | ) |
Non-cash items | | | |
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion | 5, 10 |
| 365.0 |
| 472.4 |
|
Impairment | 5, 7 |
| — |
| 1,000.5 |
|
Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | 11 |
| (93.4 | ) | (222.7 | ) |
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss | 18 |
| 33.4 |
| 235.2 |
|
Change in fair value of commodity risk management contracts | 17 |
| 424.5 |
| 50.6 |
|
Share based compensation | 13 |
| 13.2 |
| 12.7 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of properties | 5 |
| 27.1 |
| 98.1 |
|
Other items | | 0.6 |
| (0.3 | ) |
Foreign exchange derivative settlements | 17 |
| (47.0 | ) | (94.1 | ) |
Funds flow from operations | | 429.7 |
| 459.3 |
|
Interest and financing charges | | 105.5 |
| 103.9 |
|
Expenditures on remediation | 10 |
| (20.0 | ) | (19.0 | ) |
Change in non-cash operating working capital | 14 |
| (21.5 | ) | (75.7 | ) |
Cash flow from operating activities | | 493.7 |
| 468.5 |
|
FINANCING | | | |
Dividends paid | | — |
| (122.3 | ) |
Bank indebtedness (repayment) | 9 |
| (3.7 | ) | (7.0 | ) |
Long term debt (repayment) | 9 |
| (104.0 | ) | (274.4 | ) |
Convertible debentures repurchase | 8 |
| (10.2 | ) | — |
|
Foreign exchange derivative settlements | 17 |
| 47.0 |
| 94.1 |
|
Interest and financing charges paid | | (108.6 | ) | (114.8 | ) |
Proceeds from DRIP | | — |
| 18.7 |
|
Cash flow from financing activities | | (179.5 | ) | (405.7 | ) |
INVESTING | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (64.4 | ) | (183.8 | ) |
Property acquisitions | 5 |
| (1.3 | ) | (0.9 | ) |
Proceeds on property dispositions | 5 |
| 60.2 |
| 210.5 |
|
Contributions to remediation trust funds and other items | | (29.6 | ) | (24.1 | ) |
Change in non-cash investing working capital | 14 |
| 7.6 |
| (64.5 | ) |
Cash flow from investing activities | | (27.5 | ) | (62.8 | ) |
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | 286.7 |
| — |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR | | — |
| — |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | | $ | 286.7 |
| $ | — |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 8 |
PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Stated in millions of Canadian dollars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31 |
| Note |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS' CAPITAL | 12 |
| | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 4,797.0 |
| $ | 4,759.7 |
|
Share based compensation | | 18.1 |
| 18.6 |
|
Issued under DRIP | | — |
| 18.7 |
|
Balance, end of year | | 4,815.1 |
| 4,797.0 |
|
| | | |
CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | 27.3 |
| 32.3 |
|
Share based compensation | 13 |
| 13.7 |
| 13.6 |
|
Exercise of share based compensation awards | | (18.1 | ) | (18.6 | ) |
Balance, end of year | | 22.9 |
| 27.3 |
|
| | | |
DEFICIT | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | (3,059.3 | ) | (1,865.2 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | (293.7 | ) | (1,093.1 | ) |
Dividends declared | | — |
| (101.0 | ) |
Balance, end of year | | (3,353.0 | ) | (3,059.3 | ) |
| | | |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | $ | 1,485.0 |
| $ | 1,765.0 |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 9 |
PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
(Tabular amounts are stated in millions of Canadian dollars except per share amounts and as otherwise stated)
|
| |
1. | BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION |
Pengrowth Energy Corporation ("Pengrowth" or the "Corporation") is a Canadian resource company that is engaged in the production, development, exploration and acquisition of oil and natural gas assets. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Corporation, and its subsidiary, collectively referred to as Pengrowth. All inter-entity transactions have been eliminated.
|
| |
2. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).
Pengrowth’s operations are viewed as a single operating segment by the chief operating decision maker (CEO) of the Corporation for the purpose of resource allocation and assessing performance.
The Consolidated Financial Statements were authorized for release by the Board of Directors on February 28, 2017.
Property, Plant and Equipment (“PP&E”) and Exploration and Evaluation (“E&E”) Assets
Pengrowth capitalizes all costs of developing and acquiring oil and gas properties. These costs include lease acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, costs of drilling and completion of wells, plant and production equipment costs and related overhead charges. Pengrowth capitalizes a portion of general and administrative costs and share based compensation expense associated with exploration and development activities. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Property, Plant and Equipment
PP&E is stated at cost less accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization, and accumulated impairment losses. The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, costs attributable to bringing the asset into operation, the initial estimate of asset retirement obligation and, for qualifying assets, borrowing costs. When significant parts of an item of PP&E, including oil and natural gas interests, have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items.
Exploration and Evaluation Assets
Costs of exploring for and evaluating certain oil and natural gas properties are capitalized within E&E assets. These E&E assets include lease acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, costs of drilling and completion of wells, plant and production equipment costs and related overhead charges. E&E assets do not include costs of general prospecting, or evaluation costs incurred prior to having obtained the legal rights to explore an area, which are expensed as incurred. Interest is not capitalized on E&E assets.
E&E assets are not depleted or depreciated and are carried forward until technical feasibility and commercial viability is considered to be determined. The technical feasibility and commercial viability is generally considered to be determined when proved plus probable reserves are determined to exist and the commercial production of oil and gas has commenced. A review of each exploration license or field is carried out, at least annually, to ascertain whether the project is technically feasible and commercially viable. Upon determination of technical feasibility and commercial viability, E&E assets attributable to those reserves are first tested for impairment and then reclassified from E&E assets to PP&E.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 10 |
Subsequent Costs
Costs incurred subsequent to the determination of technical feasibility and commercial viability and the costs of replacing parts of PP&E are recognized as oil and natural gas interests only when they increase the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which they relate. Such capitalized oil and natural gas interests generally represent costs incurred in developing proved and/or probable reserves and bringing in or enhancing production from such reserves, and are accumulated on a field or geotechnical area basis.
The carrying amount of any replaced or sold component is de-recognized. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of PP&E are expensed as incurred.
Pengrowth capitalizes a portion of general and administrative costs directly associated with exploration and development activities. Pengrowth capitalizes interest incurred in construction of qualifying assets, if applicable. Qualifying assets are defined by Pengrowth as capital projects that require capital expenditures over a period greater than one year, in order to produce oil or gas from a specific property. Interest capitalization to a qualifying asset ceases once the asset is substantially available for its intended use.
Assets Held for Sale
Non-current assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is met when the sale is highly probable and the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition. For the sale to be highly probable, Management must be committed to sell the asset and an active program to locate a buyer and complete the sale must have been initiated. The asset must be actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value and the sale should be expected to be completed within one year from the date of classification. Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs of disposal, with impairments recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) in the period measured.
Dispositions
Gains or losses are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) on dispositions of PP&E and certain E&E assets, including asset swaps, farm-out transactions, gross overriding royalty and property dispositions. The gain or loss is measured as the difference between the fair value of the proceeds received and the carrying value of the assets disposed, including capitalized future asset retirement obligations and any associated goodwill.
Depletion and Depreciation
The net carrying value of developed or producing fields or groups of fields is depleted using the unit of production method by reference to the ratio of production in the period to the related proved plus probable reserves, taking into account estimated future development costs necessary to bring those reserves into production. Future development costs are estimated taking into account the level of development required to produce the reserves. These estimates are reviewed by independent reserve engineers at least annually. Pengrowth’s total proved plus probable reserves are estimated by an independent reserve evaluator and represent the "best estimate" of quantities of oil, natural gas and related substances to be commercially recoverable from known accumulations, from a given date forward, based on geological and engineering data. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater than or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves. Properties with no remaining production and reserves are fully depleted in the year that production ceases. Assets under construction are not depleted or depreciated until available for their intended use.
For other assets, depreciation is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) using either a straight line or declining balance basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of PP&E. The estimated useful lives for other assets for the current and comparative periods are as follows:
|
| | |
- | Office equipment | 60 months |
- | Leasehold improvements and finance leases | Lease term/Useful life |
- | Computers | 36 months |
- | Deferred hydrocarbon injectants | 24 months |
- | Motor vehicles | 60 months |
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 11 |
Farmouts
Under IFRS, farmouts are considered a disposition of a partial interest in a property. The proceeds on the disposition are generally considered to be the capital spent, or estimated to be spent, by the farmee in order to earn the interest. When the agreed upon work commitment has been completed, the farmee has earned their interest. It is at this stage that Pengrowth records a gain or loss on disposition, as the difference between the estimated capital and the carrying value of the disposed interest, in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Leased Assets
Assets held by Pengrowth under leases which transfer to the Corporation substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. On initial recognition, the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset. Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance expense and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
Assets held under other leases are classified as operating leases and are not recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives received are recognized as an integral part of the total lease expense, over the term of the lease.
At inception of certain arrangements, the Corporation determines whether such arrangement is or contains a lease. This will be the case if the following two criteria are met:
| |
• | The fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets; and |
| |
• | The arrangement contains the right to use the asset(s). |
Goodwill and Business Combinations
Goodwill
Goodwill may arise on business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired assets or company. When the excess is negative, it is recognized immediately in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Impairment
Non-Financial Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment
For the purpose of impairment testing, PP&E is grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets - cash generating unit (the “CGU”).
CGUs that have associated goodwill are tested for impairment at least annually, however, CGUs with or without associated goodwill are first tested when there is an indication of impairment, such as sustained decreases in commodity prices or significant downward revisions in reserves volumes. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent the carrying value of the CGU exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
The recoverable amount of a CGU is the higher of its value in use and the fair value less costs to sell. In determining the recoverable amount, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the cost of capital, which take into account the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. The recoverable amount is generally computed by reference to the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from production of proved and probable reserves. Undeveloped land, contingent resources and infrastructure may also be considered in the recoverable amount.
Impairment losses recognized in respect of specific CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the unit on a pro-rata basis. Impairment losses recognized in respect of goodwill allocated to a group of CGUs is allocated to the goodwill on a pro-rata basis.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 12 |
Impairment losses in respect of PP&E recognized in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. In such circumstances, the recoverable amount is determined and to the extent the loss is reduced, it is reversed. An impairment loss is reversed only to the lesser of the revised recoverable amount or the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depletion and depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
Exploration and Evaluation Assets
E&E assets are tested for impairment when there is an indication that a particular E&E project may be impaired. Examples of indicators of impairment include a significant price decline over an extended period, the decision to delay or no longer pursue the E&E project, an expiry of the rights to explore in an area, or failure to receive regulatory approval. In addition, E&E assets are assessed for impairment upon their reclassification to producing assets (oil and natural gas interests in PP&E). In assessing the impairment of E&E assets, the carrying value of the E&E assets would be compared to their estimated recoverable amount and, in certain circumstances, could be tested in conjunction with PP&E impairment testing of related CGUs. The impairment of E&E assets would be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Goodwill
For goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not yet available for use, an impairment test is completed each year at December 31. In assessing the impairment of goodwill, the carrying value of goodwill is compared to the excess of the recoverable amount over the carrying amount of the PP&E and E&E assets, as applicable, within the groups of CGUs where the acquired properties are grouped. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the excess of the recoverable amount above the carrying amount of the CGUs. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill cannot be reversed.
Financial Assets
A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence, including failure to pay on time, indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset.
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset, measured at amortized cost, is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. Significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics.
Any impairment losses of financial assets are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized. For financial assets measured at amortized cost, the reversal is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Provisions and Other Liabilities
A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, the Corporation has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the appropriate discount rate. Provisions are not permitted for future operating losses.
Asset Retirement Obligations (“ARO”)
Pengrowth initially recognizes the net present value of an ARO in the period in which it is incurred when a reasonable estimate of the net present value can be made. The net present value of the estimated ARO is recorded as a liability, with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset. The capitalized asset is depleted on the unit of production method based on proved plus probable reserves. The liability is increased each reporting period due to the passage of time and the amount of such accretion is expensed to income in the period. Actual costs incurred upon the settlement of the ARO are charged against the ARO. Management reviews the ARO estimate and changes, if any, are applied prospectively. Revisions made to the ARO estimate are recorded as an increase or decrease to the ARO liability with a corresponding change made to the carrying amount of the related asset. The carrying amount of both the liability and the capitalized asset, net of accumulated depreciation, are derecognized if the asset is subsequently disposed.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 13 |
Pengrowth has placed cash in segregated, independently managed, remediation trust fund accounts to fund certain ARO for the Judy Creek and Sable Offshore Energy Project ("SOEP") properties. These funds are reflected in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Finance Leases
Finance lease transactions are also categorized in Provisions and other liabilities.
Contract & Other Liabilities
Firm pipeline commitments from an acquisition would be reflected as a contract liability, with the amount reduced each period as the contract settles.
Pengrowth also categorizes cash-settled long term incentive plan ("LTIP") grants and cash deferred bonus, within this grouping.
Deferred Income Taxes
Income tax (recovery) expense is composed of current and deferred tax. Income tax (recovery) expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognized using the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, income tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to differences between the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and their respective tax bases, using substantively enacted income tax rates. The effect of a change in income tax rates on deferred income tax liabilities and assets is recognized in income in the period the change occurs. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity.
Pengrowth’s policy for income tax uncertainties is that tax benefits will be recognized only when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained on examination.
Share Based Compensation Plans
Pengrowth has share-settled and cash-settled share based compensation plans, which are described in Note 13.
i) Share-settled LTIP
Compensation expense is based on the estimated fair value of the share-settled award at the date of grant. Compensation expenses associated with the share-settled plans are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) over the vesting period of the plan with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus. Pengrowth estimates the forfeiture rate for each type of share based award at the date of grant. Any consideration received upon the exercise of the awards together with the amount of non-cash compensation expense recognized in contributed surplus is recorded as an increase in shareholders’ capital at the time of exercise.
ii) Cash-settled LTIP
Commencing in 2016, certain employees receive cash-settled RSUs in place of previously received share-settled long term incentives. Each cash-settled RSU entitles the holder to a cash payment equivalent to the value of a number of common shares (including the reinvestment of deemed dividends, if applicable) which vest evenly over a period of three years or less. Furthermore, the independent members of the Board of Directors also receive cash-settled long term incentives called Phantom Deferred Share Units ("Phantom DSUs"). Each Phantom DSU entitles the holder to a cash payment equivalent to the value of a number of common shares (including the reinvestment of deemed dividends, if applicable) to be paid upon the individual ceasing to be a Director for any reason.
Compensation expense associated with the cash-settled LTIP is determined based on the fair value of the share units at the grant date and is subsequently adjusted to reflect the fair value of the share units at each period end, including notional dividends, as applicable. This valuation incorporates the period end share price and the number of cash-settled LTIP units outstanding at each period end. Compensation expense is recognized in the Statements of Income
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 14 |
(Loss) with a corresponding increase or decrease in liabilities. Classification of the associated short term and long term liabilities is dependent on the expected payout dates.
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments are utilized by Pengrowth to manage its exposure to commodity and power price fluctuations, as well as foreign currency exposures. Pengrowth’s policy is not to utilize financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Financial instruments are classified into one of five categories: (i) fair value through profit or loss, (ii) held to maturity investments, (iii) loans and receivables, (iv) available for sale financial assets or (v) other liabilities.
Accounts receivable are classified as loans and receivables which are measured at amortized cost.
Investments held in the remediation trust funds and other investments have been designated as fair value through profit or loss and are measured at fair value. Any change in the fair value is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Bank indebtedness, accounts payable, any dividends payable, convertible debentures and long term debt have been classified as other liabilities which are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.
Pengrowth has accounted for its physical delivery sales contracts, which were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of receipt or delivery of non-financial items in accordance with its expected purchase, sale or usage requirements as executory contracts. As such, these contracts are not considered to be derivative financial instruments and have not been recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Settlements on these physical delivery sales contracts are recognized in revenue in the period of settlement.
All derivatives must be classified as fair value through profit or loss and measured at fair value with changes in fair value over a reporting period recognized in net income (loss).
The receipts or payments arising from derivative commodity contracts are presented as realized gain (loss) on commodity risk management while the unrealized gains and losses are presented as changes in fair value of commodity risk management contracts.
The receipts or payments arising from derivative power contracts are included in operating expenses. The unrealized gains and losses on derivative power contracts are included in other (income) expense.
The receipts or payments arising from derivative foreign exchange contracts are presented as realized foreign exchange (gain) loss while the unrealized gains and losses are presented as unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss.
Transaction costs incurred in connection with the issuance of term debt instruments with a maturity of greater than one year are deducted against the carrying value of the debt and amortized to net income (loss) using the effective interest rate method over the expected life of the debt.
Pengrowth capitalizes transaction costs incurred in connection with the renewal of the revolving credit facility with a maturity date greater than one year and amortizes the cost to net income (loss) on a straight line basis over the term of the facility.
Fair Value Measurement
All financial assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements are further categorized using a three-level hierarchy that reflects the significance of the lowest level of inputs used in determining fair value:
| |
• | Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. |
| |
• | Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1. Prices in Level 2 are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 valuations are based on inputs, |
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 15 |
including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value and volatility factors, which can be substantially observed or corroborated in the marketplace.
| |
• | Level 3 – Valuations in this level are those with inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data. |
Foreign Currency
The functional and reporting currency of the Corporation is Canadian dollars. Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to Canadian dollars at the exchange rates on the date of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the Consolidated Balance Sheet date. Foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Jointly Controlled Operations
A significant proportion of Pengrowth’s petroleum and natural gas development and production activities are conducted through jointly controlled operations that are not conducted through separate vehicles and accordingly, the accounts reflect only Pengrowth’s interest in such activities.
Related Parties
Related parties are persons or entities that have control or significant influence over Pengrowth, as well as key management personnel. Note 21 provides information on compensation expense related to key management personnel. Pengrowth has no significant transactions with any other related parties.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of oil and natural gas is recognized when the product is delivered and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue from processing and other miscellaneous sources is recognized upon completion of the relevant service.
Equity Investment
Pengrowth utilizes the equity method of accounting for investments subject to significant influence, if applicable. Under this method, investments are initially recorded at cost and adjusted thereafter to include Pengrowth’s pro rata share of post-acquisition earnings. Any dividends received or receivable from the investee would reduce the carrying value of the investment.
Estimates
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimated.
In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements is described below:
Estimating oil and gas reserves and contingent resources
Pengrowth engages a qualified, independent oil and gas reserves evaluator to perform an estimation of the Corporation’s oil and gas reserves at least annually and contingent resources on an ad hoc basis. Reserves form the basis for the calculation of depletion charges, while oil and gas reserves and contingent resources are used in the assessment of impairment of goodwill and oil and gas assets. Reserves and contingent resources are estimated using the reserve definitions and guidelines prescribed by National Instrument 51-101 (“NI 51-101”) and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGEH”).
Proved plus probable reserves are defined as the "best estimate" of quantities of oil, natural gas and related substances estimated to be commercially recoverable from known accumulations, from a given date forward, based on drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data, the use of established technology and specified economic conditions. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater than or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves. The estimates are made using all available geological and reservoir data as well as historical production data. Estimates are reviewed and revised as appropriate. Revisions occur as a result of changes
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 16 |
in prices, costs, fiscal regimes and reservoir performance or a change in Pengrowth's plans with respect to future development or operating practices.
Contingent resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters or a lack of markets. Contingent resources do not constitute, and should not be confused with, reserves.
Determination of CGUs
The recoverability of development and production asset carrying values are assessed at the CGU level. Determination of what constitutes a CGU is subject to management’s judgment. The asset composition of a CGU can directly impact the recoverability of the assets included therein. In assessing the recoverability of oil and gas properties, each CGU's carrying value is compared to its recoverable amount, defined as the fair value less costs to sell.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Pengrowth estimates obligations under environmental regulations in respect of decommissioning and site restoration. These obligations are determined based on the expected present value of expenses required in the process of plugging and abandoning wells, dismantling of wellheads, production and transportation facilities and restoration of producing areas in accordance with relevant legislation, discounted from the date when expenses are expected to be incurred. Most of the abandonment of Pengrowth's wells is estimated to take place far in the future. Therefore, changes in estimated timing of future expenses, estimated logistics of performing abandonment work, the inflation assumption, and the discount rate used to present value future expenses could have a significant effect on the carrying amount of the decommissioning provision.
Impairment testing
CGUs that have associated goodwill are tested for impairment at least annually and CGUs without associated goodwill are tested when there is an indication of impairment. The test is based on estimates of proved plus probable reserves, production rates, oil and natural gas prices, future costs, discount rate and other relevant assumptions. Undeveloped land, contingent resources and infrastructure may also be considered. The impairment assessment of goodwill is based on the estimated recoverable amount of the related CGUs. By their nature, these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and may impact the Consolidated Financial Statements of future periods.
Fair value of risk management contracts
Pengrowth records risk management contracts at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The fair values are determined using observable market data and external counterparty information.
Valuation of trade and other receivables, and prepayments to suppliers
Management estimates the likelihood of the collection of trade and other receivables and recovery of prepayments based on an analysis of individual accounts. Factors taken into consideration include the aging of receivables in comparison with the credit terms allowed to customers and the financial position and collection history with the customer. Should actual collections be less than estimates, Pengrowth would be required to record an additional expense.
Net Income (Loss) per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the year. Diluted net income (loss) per share amounts includes the dilutive effect of share units under the share-settled long term incentive plans using the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method assumes that any proceeds obtained on the exercise of any dilutive share units would be used to repurchase common shares at the average trading price during the period.
The dilutive effect of convertible debentures is calculated using net income (loss) for the period, adjusted for the after tax interest on the convertible debentures assuming they were converted at the start of the period; and adding to the diluted number of shares the weighted average shares issuable if the convertible debentures were converted at the start of the period.
Cash and Term Deposits
Cash and term deposits include demand deposits and term deposits with original maturities of less than 90 days.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 17 |
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ADOPTED
There were no new or amended accounting standards adopted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.
|
| |
3. | ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED |
In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15"). The new standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Earlier application is permitted. The standard contains a single model that applies to contracts with customers and two approaches to recognising revenue: at a point in time or over time. The model features a contract-based five-step analysis of transactions to determine whether, how much and when revenue is recognized. New estimates and judgmental thresholds have been introduced, which may affect the amount and/or timing of revenue recognized. The new standard applies to contracts with customers. It does not apply to insurance contracts, financial instruments or lease contracts, which fall in the scope of other IFRSs.
Pengrowth intends to adopt IFRS 15 in its Consolidated Financial Statements for the annual period beginning on January 1, 2018. Pengrowth is currently evaluating and documenting the impact, if any, that the adoption of this standard will have on its financial statements.
In July 2014, the IASB issued the complete IFRS 9 ("IFRS 9 (2014)"). The mandatory effective date of IFRS 9 is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and must be applied retrospectively with some exemptions. Early adoption is permitted. The restatement of prior periods is not required and is only permitted if information is available without the use of hindsight. IFRS 9 (2014) introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. Under IFRS 9 (2014), financial assets are classified and measured based on the business model in which they are held and the characteristics of their contractual cash flows. The standard introduces additional changes relating to financial liabilities. It also amends the impairment model by introducing a new ‘expected credit loss’ model for calculating impairment. Pengrowth does not anticipate any material changes in the carrying value of its financial instruments nor from the credit loss impairment model upon adoption of IFRS 9.
IFRS 9 (2014) also includes a new general hedge accounting standard which aligns hedge accounting more closely with risk management. This new standard does not fundamentally change the types of hedging relationships or the requirement to measure and recognize ineffectiveness; however it will provide more hedging strategies that are used for risk management to qualify for hedge accounting and introduce more judgment to assess the effectiveness of a hedging relationship. Special transitional requirements have been set for the application of the new general hedging model. Pengrowth does not currently apply hedge accounting and does not intend to apply hedge accounting to its existing risk management contracts.
In January 2016, the IASB issued the complete IFRS 16 Leases ("IFRS 16") which replaces IAS 17, Leases. The effective date of IFRS 16 is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. Under IFRS 16, a single recognition and measurement model will apply for lessees which will require recognition of assets and liabilities for most leases. Pengrowth is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its financial statements.
|
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Remediation trust funds | $ | 106.5 |
| $ | 79.6 |
|
Prepaid tax assessment | 12.2 |
| 9.5 |
|
| $ | 118.7 |
| $ | 89.1 |
|
REMEDIATION TRUST FUNDS
Pengrowth has a contractual obligation to make contributions to an independently managed remediation trust fund that is used to cover certain ARO on its Judy Creek properties in the Swan Hills area. Pengrowth makes monthly contributions to the fund of $0.10/boe of production from the Judy Creek properties and an annual lump sum contribution of $0.25 million. The investment in the Judy Creek remediation trust fund is classified as fair value through profit or loss. Interest income is recognized when earned and included in other (income) expense. As at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the Judy Creek remediation trust fund was $7.2 million (December 31, 2015 - $6.8 million).
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 18 |
Pengrowth has a contractual obligation to make contributions to an independently managed remediation trust fund that is used to fund the ARO of the SOEP properties and facilities. In 2016, Pengrowth made a monthly contribution to the fund at a rate of $6.64/MMBtu of its share of natural gas production and $13.29/bbl of its share of natural gas liquids production from SOEP. Starting in January 2017, the rates decreased to $4.07/MMBtu of Pengrowth's share of natural gas production and $7.71/bbl of Pengrowth's share of natural gas liquids production. The investment in the SOEP fund is classified as fair value through profit or loss. Investment income is recognized when earned and is recorded in other (income) expense. As at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the SOEP remediation trust fund was $99.3 million (December 31, 2015 - $72.8 million).
The following table reconciles Pengrowth’s investment in remediation trust funds for the periods noted below: |
| | | |
| Remediation Trust Funds |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 60.4 |
|
Contributions | 19.0 |
|
Remediation expenditures | (1.7 | ) |
Investment income | 2.4 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) | (0.5 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 79.6 |
|
Contributions | 26.9 |
|
Remediation expenditures | (0.9 | ) |
Investment income | 3.2 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) | (2.3 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 106.5 |
|
PREPAID TAX ASSESSMENT
Pengrowth has certain income tax filings from predecessor entities that are in dispute with tax authorities and has paid $9.5 million and $2.7 million to the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") and the Alberta Tax and Revenue Administration, respectively, to formally begin the process of challenging the particular taxation year. Pengrowth believes that its filings to-date are correct and that it will be successful in defending its positions. Therefore, no provision for any potential income tax liability was recorded and the $12.2 million prepayment has been recorded as a long term receivable.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 19 |
|
| |
5. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT ("PP&E") |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost or deemed cost | Oil and natural gas assets |
| Other equipment |
| Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 7,497.8 |
| $ | 84.9 |
| $ | 7,582.7 |
|
Additions to PP&E | 192.8 |
| 4.0 |
| 196.8 |
|
Property acquisitions | 0.9 |
| — |
| 0.9 |
|
Change in asset retirement obligations | 36.9 |
| — |
| 36.9 |
|
Divestitures | (754.9 | ) | — |
| (754.9 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 6,973.5 |
| $ | 88.9 |
| $ | 7,062.4 |
|
Additions to PP&E | 89.9 |
| 1.9 |
| 91.8 |
|
Property acquisitions | 1.3 |
| — |
| 1.3 |
|
Change in asset retirement obligations | (34.4 | ) | — |
| (34.4 | ) |
Divestitures | (191.5 | ) | — |
| (191.5 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 6,838.8 |
| $ | 90.8 |
| $ | 6,929.6 |
|
| | | |
Accumulated depletion, amortization and impairment losses | Oil and natural gas assets |
| Other equipment |
| Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 2,725.6 |
| $ | 70.3 |
| $ | 2,795.9 |
|
Depletion and amortization for the period | 449.5 |
| 5.8 |
| 455.3 |
|
Impairment | 810.0 |
| — |
| 810.0 |
|
Divestitures | (345.6 | ) | — |
| (345.6 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 3,639.5 |
| $ | 76.1 |
| $ | 3,715.6 |
|
Depletion and amortization for the period | 345.6 |
| 4.3 |
| 349.9 |
|
Divestitures | (102.4 | ) | — |
| (102.4 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,882.7 |
| $ | 80.4 |
| $ | 3,963.1 |
|
| | | |
Net book value | Oil and natural gas assets |
| Other equipment |
| Total |
|
As at December 31, 2016 | | | |
Assets held for sale | $ | 117.5 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 117.5 |
|
Long term | 2,838.6 |
| 10.4 |
| 2,849.0 |
|
| $ | 2,956.1 |
| $ | 10.4 |
| $ | 2,966.5 |
|
As at December 31, 2015 | | | |
Assets held for sale | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Long term | 3,334.0 |
| 12.8 |
| 3,346.8 |
|
| $ | 3,334.0 |
| $ | 12.8 |
| $ | 3,346.8 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2016, $3.2 million (December 31, 2015 – $8.5 million) of directly attributable general and administrative costs were capitalized to PP&E.
At December 31, 2016, $5.8 million (December 31, 2015 - $5.7 million) of net book value relating to the Lindbergh project was excluded from the calculation of depletion as those amounts were considered a project in the construction phase.
Pengrowth capitalizes interest for qualifying assets in the construction phase based on costs incurred on the project and the average cost of borrowing. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $3.0 million (December 31, 2015 – $12.4 million) of interest was capitalized on the Lindbergh Project to PP&E using Pengrowth's weighted average cost of debt of 5.7 percent (December 31, 2015 – 5.4 percent).
During the year ended December 31, 2016, Pengrowth's dispositions were primarily related to the sale and leaseback of the co-generation facilities at Lindbergh and other minor dispositions for aggregate net proceeds of $60.2 million, resulting in pre-tax losses on dispositions of properties of $27.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2015,
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 20 |
Pengrowth successfully closed several non-core property dispositions for aggregate net proceeds of $210.5 million, resulting in pre-tax losses on disposition of properties of $98.1 million.
ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
On January 6, 2017, Pengrowth completed the sale of a 4.0 percent gross overriding royalty ("GORR") interest on its Lindbergh thermal property and certain seismic assets for $250 million cash consideration.
The $117.5 million carrying value associated with the GORR and seismic sale is presented as assets held for sale and classified as a current asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. It is expected that a gain on disposition of approximately $130 million before tax, net of transaction costs, will be recorded in the first quarter of 2017.
IMPAIRMENT TESTING
Pengrowth is in the process of marketing various assets as an alternative to reduce debt. Management identified impairment triggers in this regard and performed impairment tests; however, no impairment expense was required to be recorded as at the date of the financial statements. The December 31, 2016 impairment tests were carried out based only on proved plus probable reserve values using pre-tax discount rates of 10 - 12 percent, January 1, 2017 independent reserves evaluator's forecast pricing, and an inflation rate of 2 percent.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2015, impairment tests were carried out on all CGUs in light of significant and rapid declines in benchmark prices at that time. This resulted in an $810.0 million total PP&E impairment recorded in 2015. See Note 5 to the December 31, 2015 audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
|
| |
6. | EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS ("E&E") |
|
| | | |
Cost or deemed cost | |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 490.1 |
|
Additions | 4.7 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 494.8 |
|
Additions | 1.5 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 496.3 |
|
E&E assets consist of Pengrowth’s exploration and development projects which are pending the determination of proved plus probable reserves and production. Upon achievement of commercial viability and technical feasibility, E&E assets are transferred to PP&E, after being tested for impairment.
2016 and 2015 additions represent Pengrowth’s share of costs incurred on E&E assets during the period.
IMPAIRMENT TESTING
For the year ended December 31, 2015, Pengrowth evaluated Groundbirch for an impairment in conjunction with the Montney CGU, which has both PP&E and E&E. This was in accordance with Pengrowth's policy and IFRS which states that the impairment of ongoing E&E projects should be assessed on the cash flow from the applicable CGUs in the operating segment. It was determined that the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount and, as such, no impairment was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2015. See Note 5 to the December 31, 2015 audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
|
| | | |
Cost or deemed cost | |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 202.2 |
|
Divestitures | (11.7 | ) |
Impairment | (190.5 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016 | $ | — |
|
In 2015, Pengrowth had goodwill allocated to groups of CGUs resulting from several prior years' acquisitions. As Pengrowth disposed of certain properties, associated goodwill was included in the carrying amount of the properties when determining the gain or loss on disposal. This amount was measured on the basis of the relative value of the
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 21 |
properties disposed of and the portion of the CGUs retained, resulting in $11.7 million of goodwill being removed as at December 31, 2015.
IMPAIRMENT TESTING
During 2015, all CGUs were negatively impacted by a downturn in the forward benchmark prices resulting in goodwill impairment testing at September 30, 2015 and at December 31, 2015. At September 30, 2015, Pengrowth impaired goodwill by $73.0 million. In conjunction with PP&E impairment testing at year end 2015, it was determined that the entire balance of goodwill was impaired at December 31, 2015. Pengrowth therefore recognized an additional $117.5 million impairment eliminating the remaining goodwill balance at December 31, 2015, which may not be reversed. See Note 5 and Note 7 to the December 31, 2015 audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
The subordinated convertible debentures are unsecured, and pay interest in arrears on a semi-annual basis. Each $1,000 debenture is convertible at the option of the holder at any time into fully paid common shares at a pre-determined conversion price per common share.
The convertible debentures are presented as current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the debt premium accreted over time to the principal amount owing on maturity. No value was ascribed to equity (through the conversion feature), as a result of Pengrowth’s ability to borrow at a lower rate than the convertible debenture interest rate.
In February 2016, Pengrowth commenced a Normal Course Issuer Bid ("NCIB") for a portion of its Series B 6.25 percent coupon convertible unsecured subordinated debentures, in accordance with TSX requirements. The NCIB expired on February 28, 2017. Throughout 2016, Pengrowth repurchased $10.2 million of principal amount of convertible debentures. Pengrowth paid $9.2 million, including $0.1 million of accrued interest, to repurchase the debentures resulting in a gain of $1.0 million which was credited against interest expense. Purchases under the NCIB were made by Pengrowth through the facilities of the TSX. The price that Pengrowth paid for the convertible debentures was the market price at the time of acquisition and any gain or loss resulting from the transaction was recorded as part of interest expense.
The following table summarizes the activity associated with the convertible debentures:
|
| | | |
Series | Series B - 6.25 percent |
|
Maturity date | March 31, 2017 |
|
Conversion price (per Pengrowth share) | $ | 11.51 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 137.2 |
|
Premium accretion | (0.2 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 137.0 |
|
Repurchase of convertible debentures | (10.2 | ) |
Premium accretion | (0.2 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 126.6 |
|
Face value, December 31, 2016 | $ | 126.6 |
|
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 22 |
|
| |
9. | LONG TERM DEBT AND BANK INDEBTEDNESS |
LONG TERM DEBT |
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured notes: | | |
400 million at 6.35 percent due July 26, 2017 | $ | 537.0 |
| $ | 553.2 |
|
265 million at 6.98 percent due August 21, 2018 | 355.6 |
| 366.4 |
|
35 million at 3.49 percent due October 18, 2019 | 46.9 |
| 48.3 |
|
115.5 million at 5.98 percent due May 11, 2020 | 154.8 |
| 159.6 |
|
105 million at 4.07 percent due October 18, 2022 | 140.6 |
| 144.9 |
|
195 million at 4.17 percent due October 18, 2024 | 261.1 |
| 269.0 |
|
| $ | 1,496.0 |
| $ | 1,541.4 |
|
U.K. pound sterling denominated unsecured notes: | | |
15 million at 3.45 percent due October 18, 2019 | $ | 24.8 |
| $ | 30.5 |
|
Canadian dollar senior unsecured notes: | | |
15 million at 6.61 percent due August 21, 2018 | $ | 15.0 |
| $ | 15.0 |
|
25 million at 4.74 percent due October 18, 2022 | 24.9 |
| 24.9 |
|
| $ | 39.9 |
| $ | 39.9 |
|
Canadian dollar term credit facility borrowings | $ | — |
| $ | 104.0 |
|
Total long term debt | $ | 1,560.7 |
| $ | 1,715.8 |
|
| | |
Current portion of long term debt | $ | 537.0 |
| $ | — |
|
Non-current portion of long term debt | 1,023.7 |
| 1,715.8 |
|
| $ | 1,560.7 |
| $ | 1,715.8 |
|
Pengrowth has in place a $1.0 billion revolving, committed term credit facility supported by a syndicate of eleven international and domestic banks. The facility can be extended at Pengrowth’s discretion any time prior to maturity, subject to syndicate approval. In the event that the lenders do not agree to a renewal, the outstanding balance is due upon maturity. The facility was renewed in March 2015 and matures on March 31, 2019. Pengrowth can access the unutilized portion of the term credit facility, provided it remains in compliance with all financial covenants.
The facility carries floating interest rates that are expected to range between 1.6 percent and 3.25 percent over bankers’ acceptance rates, depending on Pengrowth’s ratio of senior debt to earnings before interest, taxes and non-cash items. At December 31, 2016, the facility had no drawings (December 31, 2015 – $104.0 million) and letters of credit in the amount of $44.9 million (December 31, 2015 – $21.6 million) were outstanding.
As of December 31, 2016, an unrealized cumulative foreign exchange loss of $353.3 million (December 31, 2015 - $399.4 million) has been recognized on the remaining U.S. dollar senior unsecured notes since the date of issuance. As of December 31, 2016, an unrealized cumulative foreign exchange loss of $1.1 million (December 31, 2015 - $6.9 million) has been recognized on the U.K. pound sterling denominated senior unsecured notes since the date of issuance. See Note 17 for additional information about foreign exchange risk management and the impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The five year schedule of long term debt repayment based on current maturity dates and assuming the revolving credit facility is not renewed is as follows: 2017 - $537.0 million, 2018 - $370.6 million, 2019 - $71.7 million, 2020 - $154.8 million, 2021 - $nil.
On February 21, 2017, Pengrowth announced plans to early repay U.S.$300.0 million of the U.S.$400.0 million 6.35 percent senior unsecured notes on March 30, 2017.
BANK INDEBTEDNESS
Pengrowth also maintains a $50 million demand operating facility with one Canadian bank. At December 31, 2016, the facility had no drawings (December 31, 2015 – $2.5 million) and was reduced by $6.4 million of outstanding letters
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 23 |
of credit (December 31, 2015 – $1.4 million). When utilized together with any overdraft amounts, this facility appears on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a current liability in bank indebtedness, as applicable.
FINANCIAL COVENANTS
Pengrowth’s senior unsecured notes and credit facilities are subject to a number of covenants, all of which were met at all times during the preceding twelve months, and at December 31, 2016. The covenants are substantially similar between the credit facilities and the senior unsecured notes. See Note 16 for more information on the covenants.
|
| |
10. | PROVISIONS AND OTHER LIABILITIES |
Provisions and other liabilities are composed of Asset Retirement Obligations ("ARO"), finance leases and contract & other liabilities. The following table provides a continuity of the balances for the following periods: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asset retirement obligations |
| Finance leases |
| Contract & Other liabilities |
| Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 780.8 |
| $ | 5.1 |
| $ | 2.1 |
| $ | 788.0 |
|
Incurred during the period | 16.8 |
| — |
| 1.0 |
| 17.8 |
|
Property dispositions | (112.4 | ) | — |
| — |
| (112.4 | ) |
Expenditures on remediation/provisions settled | (19.0 | ) | (0.8 | ) | — |
| (19.8 | ) |
Other revisions | 20.1 |
| — |
| (1.2 | ) | 18.9 |
|
Accretion (amortization) | 17.1 |
| — |
| (1.6 | ) | 15.5 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 703.4 |
| $ | 4.3 |
| $ | 0.3 |
| $ | 708.0 |
|
Incurred during the period | — |
| 35.0 |
| 2.9 |
| 37.9 |
|
Property dispositions | (11.8 | ) | — |
| — |
| (11.8 | ) |
Expenditures on remediation/provisions settled | (20.0 | ) | (1.4 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (21.5 | ) |
Other revisions | (34.4 | ) | — |
| 1.3 |
| (33.1 | ) |
Accretion (amortization) | 15.1 |
| — |
| — |
| 15.1 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 652.3 |
| $ | 37.9 |
| $ | 4.4 |
| $ | 694.6 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at December 31, 2016 | Asset retirement obligations |
| Finance leases |
| Contract & Other liabilities |
| Total |
|
Current | $ | 20.0 |
| $ | 1.5 |
| $ | 0.6 |
| $ | 22.1 |
|
Long term | 632.3 |
| 36.4 |
| 3.8 |
| 672.5 |
|
| $ | 652.3 |
| $ | 37.9 |
| $ | 4.4 |
| $ | 694.6 |
|
|
As at December 31, 2015 | | | | |
Current | $ | 20.9 |
| $ | 0.9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 21.8 |
|
Long term | 682.5 |
| 3.4 |
| 0.3 |
| 686.2 |
|
| $ | 703.4 |
| $ | 4.3 |
| $ | 0.3 |
| $ | 708.0 |
|
The following assumptions were used to estimate the ARO liability:
|
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Total escalated future costs | $ | 2,120.4 |
| $ | 1,701.7 |
|
Discount rate, per annum | 2.3 | % | 2.3 | % |
Inflation rate, per annum | 1.5 | % | 1.5 | % |
Total escalated future costs increased in 2016 due to the economic field lives being extended, driven by the improvement in economics relative to 2015.The majority of the ARO costs are expected to be incurred between 2040 and 2085.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 24 |
FINANCE LEASES
In April 2016, Pengrowth entered into a sale and leaseback of its co-generation facilities at Lindbergh. The arrangement was determined to be a lease and has been classified as a finance lease. Pengrowth received $35.0 million in proceeds for the disposition of the co-generation facilities and recorded a finance lease obligation and a corresponding asset in property, plant and equipment. As at December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of this finance lease obligation together with other minor finance leases, included in provisions and other liabilities, was $37.9 million.
CONTRACT & OTHER LIABILITIES
Commencing in 2016, provisions were recorded for cash-settled long term incentives, which are received by certain employees in place of previously received share-settled long term incentives. Provisions for the Board of Directors cash-settled deferred share unit grants were also incurred.
A reconciliation of the deferred income tax recovery calculated based on the loss before taxes at the statutory tax rate to the actual provision for deferred income taxes is as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes | $ | (387.1 | ) | $ | (1,315.8 | ) |
Combined federal and provincial tax rate (1) | 27.09 | % | 26.13 | % |
Expected income tax expense (recovery) (1) | $ | (104.9 | ) | $ | (343.8 | ) |
Goodwill | — |
| 52.8 |
|
Change in unrecognized deferred tax asset | 9.8 |
| 40.7 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss (2) | (1.8 | ) | 20.3 |
|
Effect of change in corporate tax rate | — |
| 4.0 |
|
Other including share based compensation | 3.5 |
| 3.3 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | $ | (93.4 | ) | $ | (222.7 | ) |
(1) Expected income tax rate increased due to an increase in the corporate income tax rate in Alberta (from 10 percent to 12 percent).
(2) Reflects the 50 percent non-taxable portion of foreign exchange gains and losses and related risk management contracts.
The net deferred income tax asset (liability) is composed of:
|
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities associated with: | | |
PP&E and E&E assets | $ | (411.0 | ) | $ | (405.3 | ) |
Risk management contracts | 14.6 |
| (99.8 | ) |
Less deferred tax assets associated with: | | |
Non-capital losses | 325.9 |
| 328.7 |
|
Provisions | 176.6 |
| 190.2 |
|
Long term debt | 12.1 |
| 10.8 |
|
Convertible debentures | 0.2 |
| 0.2 |
|
Share issue costs | — |
| 0.2 |
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | 118.4 |
| $ | 25.0 |
|
In calculating the deferred income tax asset in 2016, Pengrowth included $1,234.6 million (2015 - $1,227.5 million) of non-capital losses available for carry forward to reduce taxable income in future years. These losses expire between 2027 and 2036.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 25 |
Deferred tax assets have not been recognized with respect to the following items:
|
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Deductible temporary differences | $ | 188.9 |
| $ | 176.0 |
|
Tax losses | 40.2 |
| 16.7 |
|
| $ | 229.1 |
| $ | 192.7 |
|
A continuity of the net deferred income tax asset (liability) for 2016 and 2015 is detailed in the following tables:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Movement in temporary differences during the year | Balance Jan 1, 2016 |
| Recognized in profit or loss |
| Balance Dec 31, 2016 |
|
PP&E and E&E assets | $ | (405.3 | ) | $ | (5.7 | ) | $ | (411.0 | ) |
Non-capital losses | 328.7 |
| (2.8 | ) | 325.9 |
|
Provisions | 190.2 |
| (13.6 | ) | 176.6 |
|
Risk management contracts | (99.8 | ) | 114.4 |
| 14.6 |
|
Long term debt | 10.8 |
| 1.3 |
| 12.1 |
|
Convertible debentures | 0.2 |
| — |
| 0.2 |
|
Share issue costs | 0.2 |
| (0.2 | ) | — |
|
| $ | 25.0 |
| $ | 93.4 |
| $ | 118.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Movement in temporary differences during the year | Balance Jan 1, 2015 |
| Recognized in profit or loss |
| Balance Dec 31, 2015 |
|
PP&E and E&E assets | (590.3 | ) | 185.0 |
| (405.3 | ) |
Non-capital losses | 287.7 |
| 41.0 |
| 328.7 |
|
Provisions | 197.4 |
| (7.2 | ) | 190.2 |
|
Risk management contracts | (105.5 | ) | 5.7 |
| (99.8 | ) |
Long term debt | 12.5 |
| (1.7 | ) | 10.8 |
|
Convertible debentures | 0.1 |
| 0.1 |
| 0.2 |
|
Share issue costs | 0.4 |
| (0.2 | ) | 0.2 |
|
| $ | (197.7 | ) | $ | 222.7 |
| $ | 25.0 |
|
Deferred income tax is a non-cash item relating to the temporary differences between the accounting and tax basis of Pengrowth's assets and liabilities and has no immediate impact on Pengrowth's cash flows.
Pengrowth is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares and up to 10 million preferred shares. No preferred shares have been issued.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2016 | 2015 |
(Common shares in 000's) | Number of common shares |
| Amount |
| Number of common shares |
| Amount |
|
Balance, beginning of year | 543,033 |
| $ | 4,797.0 |
| 533,438 |
| $ | 4,759.7 |
|
Share based compensation (non-cash exercised) | 4,676 |
| 18.1 |
| 3,188 |
| 18.6 |
|
Issued for cash under Dividend Reinvestment Plan ("DRIP") | — |
| — |
| 6,407 |
| 18.7 |
|
Balance, end of year | 547,709 |
| $ | 4,815.1 |
| 543,033 |
| $ | 4,797.0 |
|
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 26 |
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
Until it was suspended on September 1, 2015, Pengrowth’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”) entitled shareholders to reinvest cash dividends in additional shares of Pengrowth. Under the DRIP, the shares were issued from treasury at a 5 percent discount to the weighted average price as determined by the plan.
|
| |
13. | LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS ("LTIP") |
Pengrowth’s Long Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP"), as described below, is used to grant awards of share based compensation.
(i) SHARE-SETTLED LTIP
Pengrowth’s share-settled LTIP has the following components:
(a) Performance Share Units ("PSUs")
PSUs entitle the holder to a number of common shares to be issued in the third year after grant. Prior to 2016, PSUs were awarded to employees, officers and consultants. Commencing in 2016, PSUs are only awarded to individuals in senior leadership roles whose responsibilities are thought to have a more direct impact on the share price. PSUs are subject to a performance factor ranging from 0 percent to 200 percent of the number of PSUs granted plus the amount of reinvested notional dividends, if applicable.
(b) Restricted Share Units ("RSUs")
RSUs entitle the holder to a number of common shares plus reinvested notional dividends, if applicable, to be issued at vesting in three even tranches in the three years following grant. Prior to 2016, RSUs were awarded to employees, officers and consultants. Commencing in 2016, RSUs are only awarded to individuals in mid-level leadership roles. The RSUs generally vest on the first, second and third anniversary date from the date of grant.
(c) Deferred Share Units ("DSUs")
As of 2014, there were no new grants of the share-settled DSUs as independent members of the Board of Directors receive cash-settled Phantom DSUs instead. Prior to 2014, DSUs were issued to the independent members of the Board of Directors only. Each DSU entitled the holder to one common share plus reinvested notional dividends, if applicable, since the grant date of the DSU. The DSUs vest upon grant but can only be converted to common shares upon the holder ceasing to be a Director of Pengrowth. The number of common shares ultimately issued will be equal to the number of DSUs initially granted to the holder plus the amount of reinvested notional dividends, if applicable, accruing during the term of the DSUs.
The following table provides a continuity of the share-settled LTIP:
|
| | | | | | |
(number of share units - 000's) | PSUs |
| RSUs |
| DSUs |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2014 | 5,945 |
| 5,168 |
| 308 |
|
Granted | 2,783 |
| 3,548 |
| — |
|
Forfeited | (1,952 | ) | (1,587 | ) | — |
|
Exercised | (871 | ) | (2,285 | ) | (31 | ) |
Performance adjustment | (1,812 | ) | — |
| — |
|
Deemed dividends | 547 |
| 497 |
| 25 |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2015 | 4,640 |
| 5,341 |
| 302 |
|
Granted | 3,049 |
| 6,553 |
| — |
|
Forfeited | (460 | ) | (737 | ) | — |
|
Exercised | (1,695 | ) | (2,721 | ) | (104 | ) |
Performance adjustment | 704 |
| — |
| — |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2016 | 6,238 |
| 8,436 |
| 198 |
|
Pengrowth may determine, at its sole discretion, that any shares issuable pursuant to new grants could be paid in cash equal to the fair market value of the shares otherwise issuable.
A rolling and reloading plan with a maximum of 3.2 percent of the issued and outstanding common shares may be reserved for issuance under all share-settled compensation plans in the aggregate, as approved by shareholders. As at December 31, 2016, the number of shares issuable under the share-settled compensation plans, in aggregate, represents 2.7 percent of the issued and outstanding common shares, which is within the limit.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 27 |
Compensation expense related to PSU, RSU, and DSU share-settled plans is based on the fair value of the share units at the date of grant. The fair value of the PSUs is determined at the date of grant using the closing share price and is adjusted for the estimated performance multiplier. The amount of compensation expense is reduced by an estimated forfeiture rate at the date of grant. For PSU and RSU grants in 2014, 2015 and 2016, the estimated forfeiture rates range from 10 to 40 percent depending on the vesting period. There was no forfeiture rate applied for DSUs as they vested immediately upon grant. For PSUs, the number of shares awarded at the end of the vesting period is subject to certain performance conditions. Fluctuations in compensation expense may occur due to changes in estimating the outcome of the performance conditions. Compensation expense is recognized in net income (loss) over the vesting period with a corresponding increase or decrease to contributed surplus. Upon the issuance of common shares at the end of the vesting period, shareholders’ capital is increased and contributed surplus is decreased by the amount of compensation expense incurred during the vesting period. The shares are issued from treasury upon vesting.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, Pengrowth recorded $13.7 million of compensation expense related to the share-settled LTIP units (December 31, 2015 - $13.6 million). The weighted average grant date fair value was $1.02 per share unit for the 2016 grants (December 31, 2015 - $4.05 per share unit for the 2015 grants). As at December 31, 2016, the amount of compensation expense to be recognized over the remaining vesting period was $9.8 million or $0.78 per share unit (December 31, 2015 - $14.5 million or $2.04 per share unit) subject to the determination of the performance multiplier, if applicable. The unrecognized compensation cost will be expensed to net income (loss) over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.3 years.
PREVIOUS LTIP
Prior to January 1, 2011, Pengrowth had a Deferred Entitlement Share Unit ("DESU") Plan that was used while Pengrowth was a trust and is being phased out. As at December 31, 2016, all of the grants were fully vested and the total outstanding balance was composed of grants made prior to January 1, 2011 to the independent members of the Board of Directors. DESUs are not exercisable by the independent Directors and do not expire until they cease to be Directors for any reason. As at December 31, 2016, 163,867 common shares (December 31, 2015 - 321,308 common shares) were reserved for issuance under the DESU plan. The DESUs are entitled to deemed dividends, if applicable.
(ii) CASH-SETTLED LTIP
(a) Cash-Settled Restricted Share Units ("Cash-Settled RSUs")
Commencing in 2016, certain employees receive cash-settled RSUs in place of previously received share-settled long term incentives. Each cash-settled RSU entitles the holder to a cash payment equivalent to the value of a number of common shares (including the reinvestment of deemed dividends, if applicable) which vest in three even tranches in the three years following grant. Compensation expense associated with the cash-settled RSUs is determined based on the fair value of the share units at the grant date and is subsequently adjusted to reflect the fair value of the share units at each period end. This valuation incorporates the period end share price and the number of cash-settled RSUs outstanding at each period end. During the year ended December 31, 2016, compensation expense of $3.6 million (December 31, 2015 - $nil) was recognized in the Statements of Income (Loss) with a corresponding increase or decrease in liabilities. Classification of the associated short term and long term liabilities is dependent on the expected payout dates. As at December 31, 2016, $1.5 million (December 31, 2015 - $nil) was included in non-current provisions and $2.1 million (December 31, 2015 - $nil) was included in accounts payable representing the current portion of the liability.
(b) Cash-Settled Phantom Deferred Share Units ("Phantom DSUs")
Independent members of the Board of Directors receive cash-settled Phantom DSUs. Each Phantom DSU entitles the holder to a cash payment equivalent to the value of a number of common shares (including deemed dividends, if applicable) to be paid upon the individual ceasing to be a Director for any reason, subject to the right to defer payment until up to December 31 of the year following their departure from the Board. Compensation expense associated with the Phantom DSUs is determined based on the fair value of the Phantom DSUs at the grant date and is subsequently adjusted to reflect the fair value of the associated common shares at each period end. This valuation incorporates the period end share price and the number of Phantom DSUs outstanding at each period end including notional dividends, if applicable. Compensation expense is recognized in net income (loss) with a corresponding increase or decrease in liabilities. Classification of the associated short term and long term liabilities is dependent on the expected payout dates.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 28 |
As at December 31, 2016, Phantom DSUs, awarded to Directors, had a corresponding liability of $2.6 million (December 31, 2015 - $0.3 million) of which $0.6 million was included in current provisions due to the retirement of certain Directors in the second quarter of 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Pengrowth recorded a $2.3 million compensation expense (December 31, 2015 - $0.2 million recovery) related to Phantom DSUs.
The following table provides a continuity of the cash-settled LTIP:
|
| | | | |
(number of share units - 000's) | Cash-settled RSUs |
| Phantom DSUs |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2014 | — |
| 134 |
|
Granted | — |
| 239 |
|
Deemed dividends | — |
| 24 |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2015 | — |
| 397 |
|
Granted | 4,559 |
| 1,024 |
|
Forfeited | (330 | ) | — |
|
Exercised | — |
| (75 | ) |
Outstanding, December 31, 2016 | 4,229 |
| 1,346 |
|
(iii) TOTAL SHARE BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
Total share based compensation expenses are included in both general and administrative and operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and are composed of the following:
|
| | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Non-cash share based compensation | $ | 13.7 |
| $ | 13.6 |
|
Amounts capitalized in the year | (0.5 | ) | (0.9 | ) |
Non-cash share based compensation expense | $ | 13.2 |
| $ | 12.7 |
|
Cash-settled RSUs | $ | 3.6 |
| $ | — |
|
Cash-settled Phantom DSUs (recovery) expense | $ | 2.3 |
| $ | (0.2 | ) |
Total share based compensation expense | $ | 19.1 |
| $ | 12.5 |
|
|
| |
14. | OTHER CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES |
CHANGE IN NON-CASH OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL AND OTHER ASSETS |
| | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
Cash provided by (used for): | 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Accounts receivable | $ | 28.7 |
| $ | 8.3 |
|
Accounts payable | (47.5 | ) | (74.5 | ) |
Prepaid tax assessment | (2.7 | ) | (9.5 | ) |
| $ | (21.5 | ) | $ | (75.7 | ) |
CHANGE IN NON-CASH INVESTING WORKING CAPITAL
|
| | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
Cash provided by (used for): | 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Accounts payable, including capital accruals | $ | 7.6 |
| $ | (64.5 | ) |
DIVIDENDS PAID
There were no dividend payments in 2016.
In 2015, Pengrowth paid dividends of $0.04 per share per month in January and February, $0.02 per share in each of the months March to September inclusive, and $0.01 per share in December for an aggregate annual cash dividend of $0.23 per share.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 29 |
The following table reconciles the weighted average number of shares used in the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculations: |
| | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
(000's) | 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Weighted average number of shares - basic and diluted | 546,566 |
| 539,951 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 7.8 million shares (December 31, 2015 - 5.4 million) that are issuable on exercise of the share based compensation plans were excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation as their effect is anti-dilutive.
Further, for the year ended December 31, 2016, 11.0 million shares (December 31, 2015 - 11.9 million) that are issuable on potential conversion of the convertible debentures were excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation as their effect is anti-dilutive.
Pengrowth defines its capital as shareholders’ equity, long term debt, convertible debentures, bank indebtedness and working capital.
Pengrowth must comply with certain financial debt covenants. Compliance with these financial covenants is closely monitored by management as part of Pengrowth’s overall capital management objectives. The covenants are based on specific definitions prescribed in the debt agreements and are slightly different between the term credit facility and the senior unsecured notes. Throughout the period, Pengrowth was in compliance with all financial covenants.
The key financial covenants as at December 31, 2016 are summarized below:
|
| | |
Covenant | Limit | Actual at Dec. 31, 2016 (1) |
Senior debt before working capital must not exceed 3.5 times EBITDA for the last four fiscal quarters | < 3.5 times | 3.1 times |
Total debt before working capital must not exceed 4.0 times EBITDA for the last four fiscal quarters | < 4.0 times | 3.1 times |
Senior debt before working capital must be less than 55 percent of total book capitalization | < 55% | 54.5% (2) |
EBITDA must not be less than four times interest expense for the last four fiscal quarters | > 4 times | 5.5 times |
| |
(1) | The actual covenants presented in the table reflect those closest to the limits. Calculations for each financial covenant are based on specific definitions within the agreements and contain adjustments, pursuant to the agreements, some of which cannot be readily replicated by referring to Pengrowth’s Consolidated Financial Statements. For the purposes of covenant calculations only, convertible debentures, letters of credit and finance leases are incorporated in senior and total debt before working capital for covenant purposes. |
| |
(2) | A waiver was obtained for this covenant from the holders of its senior unsecured notes for the reporting period of December 31, 2016. This covenant was permanently removed from the Credit Facility effective December 31, 2016. |
Management monitors Pengrowth's capital structure using non-GAAP financial metrics, primarily senior debt before working capital to the trailing twelve months Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization, Accretion, and other non-cash items ("Adjusted EBITDA"), total debt before working capital to Adjusted EBITDA, senior debt before working capital as a percentage of total book capitalization and interest coverage ratio. Pengrowth seeks to manage these ratios with the objective of being able to finance its growth strategy while maintaining sufficient flexibility under the debt covenants. However, there may be instances where it would be acceptable for total debt before working capital to trailing Adjusted EBITDA to temporarily fall outside of the normal targets set by management such as financing growth opportunities. This would be a strategic decision recommended by management and approved by the Board of Directors with steps taken in the subsequent period to restore Pengrowth’s capital structure based on its capital management objectives.
Due to the rapid deterioration of commodity prices commencing in late 2014, Pengrowth took several steps to manage its capital, primarily relating to reducing debt. Capital spending was reduced, non-core assets were marketed and divested, foreign exchange and commodity risk management swaps were monetized, the dividend was initially reduced and then suspended, the term credit facility was renewed for four years, and the covenants were largely aligned between the senior unsecured notes and term credit facility.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 30 |
Pengrowth had $286.7 million of cash on hand at December 31, 2016, and approximately $537 million after closing of the 4.0 percent Lindbergh GORR and seismic sale in early January 2017. This cash balance will be utilized to retire convertible debentures in the amount of $126.6 million maturing on March 31, 2017, and on March 30, 2017, early repay U.S.$300.0 million of the U.S.$400.0 million senior unsecured notes due July 2017. Following these payments, Pengrowth's pro forma debt will be reduced to approximately $1.1 billion assuming February 21, 2017 exchange rates.
After the above debt repayments by March 31, 2017, Pengrowth anticipates it will remain in compliance with its covenants through the end of 2018. In order to comply with certain financial covenants in its senior unsecured notes and term credit facilities through 2017 and 2018, Pengrowth has run a scenario, that accesses the capital markets before the end of 2017, and includes an improvement in realizations for oil and natural gas. Pengrowth is also continuing with its efforts to sell various assets and to use the proceeds to reduce debt as an alternative way to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. The Company remains confident in its ability to complete additional transactions to further advance its debt reduction objectives.
Pengrowth is proactively in discussions with the lenders of its term credit facility and with the holders of its senior unsecured notes to obtain covenant amendments and provide the Company with additional financial flexibility as it works to improve its debt position. For the reporting period ended December 31, 2016, Pengrowth received a waiver from the holders of its senior unsecured notes for the senior debt before working capital as a percent of total book capitalization ratio. On February 9, 2017 the senior debt before working capital to total book capitalization covenant in the term credit facility was permanently removed effective December 31, 2016.
Pengrowth's senior debt is expected to be reduced to approximately $1.1 billion by March 31, 2017 with the repayment of the convertible debentures and U.S.$300.0 million of senior unsecured notes using cash on hand. However, if the Company is unable to obtain permanent waivers or relaxation of its debt covenants and is not able to remain in compliance with them, the senior unsecured notes and credit facilities may become due on demand and the undrawn portion of the credit facilities would no longer be available to the Company. There are currently no drawings on the credit facilities.
The following is a summary of Pengrowth’s capital structure, excluding shareholders’ equity:
|
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Long term debt (1) | $ | 1,560.7 |
| $ | 1,719.5 |
|
Convertible debentures | 126.6 |
| 137.0 |
|
Working capital (surplus) deficiency (2) | (266.7 | ) | (185.3 | ) |
| $ | 1,420.6 |
| $ | 1,671.2 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes current portion of senior unsecured notes and bank indebtedness, as applicable. |
| |
(2) | Working capital (surplus) deficiency is calculated as current liabilities less current assets per the Consolidated Balance Sheets, excluding bank indebtedness and the current portions of long term debt and convertible debentures, as applicable. |
|
| |
17. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT |
Pengrowth’s financial instruments are composed of accounts receivable, accounts payable, risk management assets and liabilities, remediation trust funds, any dividends payable to shareholders, finance lease obligation, bank indebtedness, convertible debentures and long term debt, as applicable.
Details of Pengrowth’s significant accounting policies for recognition and measurement of financial instruments are disclosed in Note 2 to the December 31, 2016 audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Pengrowth has exposure to certain market risks related to volatility in commodity and power prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Derivative instruments are used to manage exposure to these risks. Pengrowth’s policy is not to utilize financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
The Board of Directors and management have overall responsibility for the establishment of risk management strategies and objectives. Pengrowth’s risk management policies are established to identify the risks faced by Pengrowth, to set appropriate risk limits, and to monitor adherence to risk limits. Risk management policies are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and Pengrowth’s activities.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 31 |
MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk that the fair value, or future cash flows of financial assets and liabilities, will fluctuate due to movements in market prices. Market risk is composed of commodity and power price risk, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk, as applicable.
Commodity Price Risk
Pengrowth is exposed to commodity price risk as prices for oil and gas products fluctuate in response to many factors including local and global supply and demand, weather patterns, pipeline transportation, political stability and economic factors. Commodity price fluctuations are an inherent part of the oil and gas business. Pengrowth mitigates some of the exposure to commodity price risk to protect the return on acquisitions and provide a level of stability to operating cash flow. Pengrowth may utilize financial and physical delivery contracts to fix the commodity price associated with a portion of its future production. The use of forward and futures contracts are governed by formal policies and is subject to limits established by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors and management may re-evaluate these limits as needed in response to specific events such as market activity, additional leverage, acquisitions or other transactions where Pengrowth’s capital structure may be subject to more risk from commodity prices.
Commodity Price Contracts
As at December 31, 2016, Pengrowth had the following financial contracts outstanding: |
| | | | | | | |
Financial Crude Oil Contracts: | | |
Swaps | | | | |
Reference point | Term | Volume (bbl/d) |
| Cdn$/bbl unless otherwise noted |
| |
WTI | 2017 | 14,500 |
|
| $65.59 |
| |
WTI - U.S.$ | 2017 | 500 |
|
| $49.00 |
| U.S.$ |
Financial Natural Gas Contracts: | | |
Swaps | | | | |
Reference point | Term | Volume (MMBtu/d) |
| Price per MMBtu (Cdn) |
| |
AECO | 2017 | 4,739 |
|
| $3.46 |
| |
During the year ended December 31, 2016, Pengrowth early settled a portion of its 2017 and all of its 2018 crude oil swap contracts for proceeds of $35.8 million and its 2018 and 2019 natural gas swap contracts for proceeds of $41.4 million.
Commodity Price Sensitivity on Financial Risk Management Contracts as at December 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | |
Oil swaps | Cdn$1/bbl increase in future oil prices |
| Cdn$1/bbl decrease in future oil prices |
|
Increase (decrease) to fair value of oil risk management contracts |
| ($5.5 | ) |
| $5.5 |
|
Natural gas swaps | Cdn$0.25/MMBtu increase in future natural gas prices |
| Cdn$0.25/MMBtu decrease in future natural gas prices |
|
Increase (decrease) to fair value of natural gas risk management contracts |
| ($0.4 | ) |
| $0.4 |
|
As at close December 31, 2016, the AECO gas spot price was $3.45/MMBtu (December 31, 2015 – $2.51/MMBtu). The WTI prompt monthly price was Cdn$72.13/bbl (December 31, 2015 – Cdn$51.26/bbl).
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 32 |
Physical Delivery Contracts
As at December 31, 2016, the following physical delivery contracts were held for the purpose of delivery of non-financial items in accordance with Pengrowth's expected sales requirements. Physical delivery contracts are not considered financial instruments and therefore, no asset or liability has been recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| | | | |
Crude Oil: | | | |
Reference point | Volume (bbl/d) |
| Term | Price per bbl (U.S.$) |
Western Canada Select | 12,000 |
| 2017 | WTI less $15.40 |
Western Canada Select | 5,000 |
| 2017 | WTI less $15.60 - $18.35 (1) |
Western Canada Select | 12,000 |
| 2018 | WTI less $16.95 |
Western Canada Select | 5,000 |
| 2018 | WTI less $16.50 - $19.25 (1) |
Western Canada Select | 2,500 |
| 2019 | WTI less $17.95 |
Western Canada Select | 5,000 |
| 2019 | WTI less $17.70 - $20.45 (1) |
| |
(1) | Includes apportionment protection fee to guarantee flow assurance in the event mainlines are overcapacity. |
Power Price Contracts
As at December 31, 2016, Pengrowth did not have any material outstanding power price contracts.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Pengrowth is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations as crude oil and natural gas prices received are referenced to U.S. dollar denominated prices. Pengrowth has mitigated some of this exchange risk by entering into fixed Canadian dollar crude oil and natural gas price swaps as outlined in the commodity price risk section above.
Pengrowth is exposed to foreign currency fluctuation on the U.S. dollar and U.K. pound sterling denominated senior unsecured notes for both interest and principal payments. Pengrowth has mitigated some of this risk by entering into a series of futures and swap contracts in order to fix the foreign exchange rate on a portion of the U.S. dollar and the U.K. pound sterling denominated senior unsecured notes.
Foreign Exchange Contracts Associated with the U.S. Dollar and U.K. Pound Sterling Denominated Term Debt
U.K. Pound Sterling Denominated Term Debt
Pengrowth entered into a foreign exchange risk management contract when it issued the U.K. pound sterling term debt. This contract fixes the Canadian dollar to the U.K. pound sterling exchange rate on the interest and principal of the U.K. pound sterling denominated debt as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
Principal amount (U.K. pound sterling millions) |
| Swapped amount (U.K. pound sterling millions) |
| % of principal swapped |
| Fixed rate (Cdn$1 = U.K. pound sterling) |
|
15.0 |
| 15.0 |
| 100 | % | 0.63 |
|
U.S. Dollar Denominated Term Debt
A series of swap contracts were transacted in order to fix the foreign exchange rate on a portion of Pengrowth’s U.S. dollar denominated term debt. Each swap requires Pengrowth to buy U.S. dollars at a predetermined rate and time based upon the maturity dates of the U.S. denominated term debt.
|
| | | | | | | |
Principal amount (U.S.$ millions) |
| Swapped amount (U.S.$ millions) |
| % of principal swapped |
| Average fixed rate (Cdn$1 = U.S.$) |
|
1,115.5 |
| 920.0 |
| 82 | % | 0.75 |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2016, Pengrowth monetized all of the outstanding U.S.$920.0 million of swap contracts that fixed the foreign exchange rate on Pengrowth’s U.S. dollar denominated term debt. This resulted in a Cdn$47.0 million realized foreign exchange gain in the fourth quarter of 2016. Pengrowth subsequently entered into new swap contracts and at December 31, 2016 held the amount of U.S.$920.0 million of swap contracts at a weighted average rate of U.S.$0.75 per Cdn$1.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 33 |
Foreign Exchange Contracts Associated with the Fixed Price WCS Differential
Pengrowth entered into several foreign exchange risk management contracts related to the U.S. dollar WCS differential physical delivery contracts as follows:
|
| | | | |
Notional quantity (bbl/d) |
| Term | Average fixed rate (Cdn$1 = U.S.$) |
|
15,000 |
| 2017 | 0.76 |
|
Foreign Exchange Rate Sensitivity
Foreign Exchange on Foreign Denominated Term Debt
The following summarizes the sensitivity on a pre-tax basis, of a change in the foreign exchange rate related to the translation of the foreign denominated term debt and the offsetting change in the fair value of the foreign exchange risk management contracts relating to that debt, holding all other variables constant:
|
| | | | | | |
| Cdn$0.01 Exchange rate change |
Foreign exchange sensitivity as at December 31, 2016 | Cdn - U.S. |
| Cdn - U.K. |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain or loss on foreign denominated debt | $ | 11.2 |
| $ | 0.2 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange risk management gain or loss | 9.2 |
| 0.2 |
|
Net pre-tax impact on Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) | $ | 2.0 |
| $ | — |
|
Foreign Exchange on Fixed Price WCS Differential
A Cdn$0.01 exchange rate change in the U.S. dollar would result in a pre-tax change in the unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange risk management contracts outstanding as at December 31, 2016 of approximately $0.8 million.
Interest Rate Risk
Pengrowth is exposed to interest rate risk on any outstanding balances on the Canadian dollar revolving credit facility.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Bank Interest Cost
As at December 31, 2016, Pengrowth had approximately $1.6 billion of current and non-current long term debt and $0.1 billion of convertible debentures outstanding (December 31, 2015 - $1.7 billion and $0.1 billion) of which $nil was based on floating interest rates (December 31, 2015 - $104.0 million). Therefore, Pengrowth had no interest rate risk as at December 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015 - $1.0 million).
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 34 |
Summary of Gains and Losses on Risk Management Contracts
Pengrowth’s risk management contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their estimated fair value and split between current and non-current assets and liabilities on a contract by contract basis, netted by counterparty. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
The following tables provide details of the fair value of risk management contracts that appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the unrealized and realized gains and losses on risk management recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at and for the year ended December 31, 2016 | Commodity contracts (1) |
| Power contracts (2) |
| Foreign exchange contracts (3) |
| Total |
|
Current portion of risk management assets | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 2.9 |
| $ | 2.9 |
|
Non-current portion of risk management assets | — |
| — |
| 1.0 |
| 1.0 |
|
Current portion of risk management liabilities | (54.0 | ) | — |
| (1.3 | ) | (55.3 | ) |
Non-current portion of risk management liabilities | — |
| — |
| (5.3 | ) | (5.3 | ) |
Risk management assets (liabilities), end of year | $ | (54.0 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (2.7 | ) | $ | (56.7 | ) |
Less: Risk management assets (liabilities) at beginning of year | 370.5 |
| (1.7 | ) | 83.3 |
| 452.1 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on risk management contracts for the year | $ | (424.5 | ) | $ | 1.7 |
| $ | (86.0 | ) | $ | (508.8 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on risk management contracts for the year | 385.7 |
| (4.5 | ) | 47.0 |
| 428.2 |
|
Total unrealized and realized gain (loss) on risk management contracts for the year | $ | (38.8 | ) | $ | (2.8 | ) | $ | (39.0 | ) | $ | (80.6 | ) |
| | | | |
As at and for the year ended December 31, 2015 | Commodity contracts (1) |
| Power contracts (2) |
| Foreign exchange contracts (3) |
| Total |
|
Current portion of risk management assets | $ | 288.8 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 288.8 |
|
Non-current portion of risk management assets | 83.4 |
| — |
| 83.3 |
| 166.7 |
|
Current portion of risk management liabilities | (1.7 | ) | (1.7 | ) | — |
| (3.4 | ) |
Risk management assets (liabilities), end of year | $ | 370.5 |
| $ | (1.7 | ) | $ | 83.3 |
| $ | 452.1 |
|
Less: Risk management assets (liabilities) at beginning of year | 421.1 |
| (2.9 | ) | 50.8 |
| 469.0 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on risk management contracts for the year | $ | (50.6 | ) | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | 32.5 |
| $ | (16.9 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on risk management contracts for the year | 327.0 |
| (5.7 | ) | 94.1 |
| 415.4 |
|
Total unrealized and realized gain (loss) on risk management contracts for the year | $ | 276.4 |
| $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | 126.6 |
| $ | 398.5 |
|
| |
(1) | Unrealized and realized gains and losses are presented as separate line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). |
| |
(2) | Unrealized gains and losses are included in other (income) expense. Realized gains and losses are included in operating expense. |
| |
(3) | Unrealized and realized gains and losses are included as part of separate line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). |
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 35 |
FAIR VALUE
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid tax assessment, accounts payable and bank indebtedness approximate their carrying amount due to the short-term nature of those instruments. The fair value of the Canadian dollar term credit facility, as applicable, is equal to its carrying amount as the facility bears interest at floating rates and credit spreads within the facility are indicative of market rates. The fair values of the remediation trust funds are equal to their carrying amount as these assets are carried at their estimated fair value. The following tables provide fair value measurement information for financial assets and liabilities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair value measurements using: |
As at December 31, 2016 | Carrying amount |
| Fair value |
| Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
| Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) |
| Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
|
Financial Assets | | | | | |
Remediation trust funds | $ | 106.5 |
| $ | 106.5 |
| $ | 106.5 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 3.9 |
| 3.9 |
| — |
| 3.9 |
| — |
|
| | | | | |
Financial Liabilities | | | | | |
Convertible debentures | 126.6 |
| 126.7 |
| 126.7 |
| — |
| — |
|
U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured notes | 1,496.0 |
| 1,527.7 |
| — |
| 1,527.7 |
| — |
|
Cdn dollar senior unsecured notes | 39.9 |
| 41.3 |
| — |
| 41.3 |
| — |
|
U.K. pound sterling denominated unsecured notes | 24.8 |
| 25.5 |
| — |
| 25.5 |
| — |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 60.6 |
| 60.6 |
| — |
| 60.6 |
| — |
|
| | | | | |
| | | Fair value measurements using: |
As at December 31, 2015 | Carrying amount |
| Fair value |
| Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
| Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) |
| Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
|
Financial Assets | | | | | |
Remediation trust funds | $ | 79.6 |
| $ | 79.6 |
| $ | 79.6 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 455.5 |
| 455.5 |
| — |
| 455.5 |
| — |
|
| | | | | |
Financial Liabilities | | | | | |
Convertible debentures | 137.0 |
| 98.5 |
| 98.5 |
| — |
| — |
|
U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured notes | 1,541.4 |
| 1,606.9 |
| — |
| 1,606.9 |
| — |
|
Cdn dollar senior unsecured notes | 39.9 |
| 42.2 |
| — |
| 42.2 |
| — |
|
U.K. pound sterling denominated unsecured notes | 30.5 |
| 30.6 |
| — |
| 30.6 |
| — |
|
Fair value of risk management contracts | 3.4 |
| 3.4 |
| — |
| 3.4 |
| — |
|
Level 1 Fair Value Measurements
Financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value based on quoted prices in active markets.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
Risk management contracts - the fair value of the risk management contracts is based on commodity, power and foreign exchange curves that are readily available or, in their absence, third-party market indications and forecasts priced on the last trading day of the applicable period.
Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as current or long-term assets or liabilities, based on their values on a contract by contract basis, netted by counterparty. The derivative contracts fair values are all considered level 2 under the fair value hierarchy.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 36 |
The fair value of the senior unsecured notes is determined based on the risk free interest rate on government debt instruments of similar maturities, adjusted for estimated credit risk, industry risk and market risk premiums.
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to Pengrowth if a counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. A significant portion of Pengrowth’s accounts receivable are with customers in the oil and gas industry and are subject to normal industry credit risks. Uncertainty in the credit markets, should it exist, may restrict the ability of Pengrowth’s normal business counterparties to meet their obligations to Pengrowth. Additional credit risk could exist where little or none previously existed. Pengrowth manages its credit risk by performing a credit review on each marketing counterparty and following a credit practice that limits transactions according to the counterparty’s credit rating as assessed by Pengrowth. In addition, Pengrowth may require letters of credit or parental guarantees from certain counterparties to mitigate some of the credit risk associated with the amounts owing by the counterparty. The use of financial swap agreements involves a degree of credit risk that Pengrowth manages through its credit policies which are designed to limit eligible counterparties to those with investment grade credit ratings or better. The carrying value of accounts receivable and risk management assets represents Pengrowth’s maximum credit exposure.
Pengrowth sells a significant portion of its oil and gas to a limited number of counterparties. In 2016, Pengrowth has 2 counterparties that individually account for more than 10 percent of annual revenue. All of the counterparties are large trading companies and subject to regular internal credit reviews.
Pengrowth considers amounts over 90 days as past due. As at December 31, 2016, the amount of accounts receivable that were past due was not significant. Pengrowth has not recorded a significant allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016 or 2015 and has no significant bad debt provision at December 31, 2016. Pengrowth’s objectives, processes and policies for managing credit risk have not changed from the previous year.
The components of accounts receivable are as follows: |
| | | | | | |
| As at |
| December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Trade | $ | 94.5 |
| $ | 124.2 |
|
Prepaid and other | 16.3 |
| 15.3 |
|
| $ | 110.8 |
| $ | 139.5 |
|
LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk that Pengrowth will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. Pengrowth’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as much as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under normal and stressed conditions. Management closely monitors cash flow requirements to ensure that it has sufficient cash on demand or borrowing capacity to meet operational and financial obligations over the next three years. Pengrowth maintains a notional committed $1.0 billion term credit facility and a $50 million demand operating line of credit. Use of the remaining credit capacity is still subject to complying with all financial covenants as discussed in Note 16. Pengrowth’s unsecured senior notes and term credit facilities are unsecured and equally ranked.
Pengrowth’s non-current financial liabilities are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at December 31, 2016 | Carrying amount |
| Contractual cash flows |
| Year 1 |
| Year 2 |
| Years 3-5 |
| More than 5 years |
|
Convertible debentures (1) | $ | 126.6 |
| 130.5 |
| $ | 130.5 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Cdn dollar senior unsecured notes (2) | 39.9 |
| 48.5 |
| 2.2 |
| 16.8 |
| 3.6 |
| 25.9 |
|
U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured notes (2) (3) | 1,496.0 |
| 1,726.8 |
| 623.7 |
| 399.2 |
| 266.0 |
| 437.9 |
|
U.K. pound sterling denominated unsecured notes (2) | 24.8 |
| 27.3 |
| 0.9 |
| 0.9 |
| 25.5 |
| — |
|
Finance leases | 36.4 |
| 90.0 |
| 5.0 |
| 5.0 |
| 14.2 |
| 65.8 |
|
Foreign exchange risk management contracts | 5.3 |
| 4.8 |
| — |
| 1.7 |
| 2.4 |
| 0.7 |
|
Other liabilities | 3.8 |
| 7.7 |
| — |
| 2.9 |
| 2.8 |
| 2.0 |
|
Remediation trust fund payments | — |
| 12.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 0.3 |
| 0.9 |
| 11.0 |
|
| |
(2) | Contractual cash flows include future interest payments and senior unsecured notes calculated at December 31, 2016 period end exchange rate. |
| |
(3) | Includes the $400 million U.S. senior unsecured note due in July 2017. |
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 37 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at December 31, 2015 | Carrying amount |
| Contractual cash flows |
| Year 1 |
| Year 2 |
| Years 3-5 |
| More than 5 years |
|
Convertible debentures | $ | 137.0 |
| $ | 147.5 |
| $ | 8.6 |
| $ | 138.9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Cdn dollar revolving credit facility (1) | 104.0 |
| 115.0 |
| 3.4 |
| 3.4 |
| 108.2 |
| — |
|
Cdn dollar senior unsecured notes (1) | 39.9 |
| 50.7 |
| 2.2 |
| 2.2 |
| 19.2 |
| 27.1 |
|
U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured notes (1) | 1,541.4 |
| 1,854.1 |
| 89.4 |
| 627.5 |
| 668.6 |
| 468.6 |
|
U.K. pound sterling denominated unsecured notes (1) | 30.5 |
| 34.6 |
| 1.1 |
| 1.1 |
| 32.4 |
| — |
|
Other liabilities | 3.7 |
| 10.3 |
| — |
| 1.5 |
| 1.9 |
| 6.9 |
|
Remediation trust fund payments | — |
| 12.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 0.3 |
| 0.9 |
| 11.0 |
|
| |
(1) | Contractual cash flows include future interest payments and senior unsecured notes calculated at December 31, 2015 period end exchange rate. |
RISK MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS – GROSS AMOUNTS
Risk management contracts assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets when the Corporation has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle them on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
The following table sets out gross amounts relating to risk management contracts assets and liabilities that have been presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
| | | | | | |
| As at |
Gross amounts | December 31, 2016 |
| December 31, 2015 |
|
Risk management contracts | | |
Current asset | $ | 3.0 |
| $ | 292.8 |
|
Non-current asset | 1.0 |
| 168.7 |
|
Current liability | (55.4 | ) | (7.4 | ) |
Non-current liability | (5.3 | ) | (2.0 | ) |
| $ | (56.7 | ) | $ | 452.1 |
|
|
| |
18. | FOREIGN EXCHANGE (GAIN) LOSS |
|
| | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Currency exchange rate (Cdn$1 = U.S.$) at year end | $ | 0.74 |
| $ | 0.72 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss on U.S. dollar denominated debt (1) | $ | (46.8 | ) | $ | 253.8 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss on U.K. pound sterling denominated debt (1) | (5.8 | ) | 13.9 |
|
Total unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss from translation of foreign denominated debt | $ | (52.6 | ) | $ | 267.7 |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on U.S. foreign exchange risk management contracts (2) | $ | 80.6 |
| $ | (19.2 | ) |
Unrealized (gain) loss on U.K. foreign exchange risk management contracts | 5.4 |
| (13.3 | ) |
Total unrealized (gain) loss on foreign exchange risk management contracts | $ | 86.0 |
| $ | (32.5 | ) |
Net unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss | $ | 33.4 |
| $ | 235.2 |
|
Net realized foreign exchange (gain) loss (3) | $ | (46.5 | ) | $ | (91.5 | ) |
| |
(1) | Includes both principal and interest. |
| |
(2) | Includes both foreign exchange risk management contracts associated with the U.S. senior unsecured notes and with the fixed price WCS differential. |
| |
(3) | 2016 and 2015 amounts include $47.0 million and $94.1 million gains, respectively, from settlement of foreign exchange swap contracts. |
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 38 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
| Thereafter |
| Total |
|
Convertible debentures (1) | $ | 126.6 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 126.6 |
|
Interest payments on convertible debentures | 3.9 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3.9 |
|
Long term debt (2) | 537.0 |
| 370.6 |
| 71.7 |
| 154.8 |
| — |
| 426.6 |
| 1,560.7 |
|
Interest payments on long term debt (3) | 89.6 |
| 46.1 |
| 29.1 |
| 21.2 |
| 17.8 |
| 36.1 |
| 239.9 |
|
Operating leases (4) | 14.5 |
| 9.1 |
| 9.1 |
| 9.4 |
| 9.4 |
| 29.2 |
| 80.7 |
|
Pipeline transportation | 32.1 |
| 33.0 |
| 30.8 |
| 31.9 |
| 31.6 |
| 109.0 |
| 268.4 |
|
Other | 14.5 |
| 2.1 |
| 0.4 |
| 0.4 |
| 0.4 |
| 15.6 |
| 33.4 |
|
| $ | 818.2 |
| $ | 460.9 |
| $ | 141.1 |
| $ | 217.7 |
| $ | 59.2 |
| $ | 616.5 |
| $ | 2,313.6 |
|
| |
(1) | Assumes no conversion of convertible debentures prior to maturity. |
| |
(2) | The debt repayment includes foreign denominated fixed rate debt translated using the year end exchange rate and excludes related foreign exchange risk management contracts. |
| |
(3) | Interest payments are calculated at fixed rate debt interest rates and December 31, 2016 period end exchange rate. |
| |
(4) | Includes office rent, vehicle leases and other. |
Pengrowth has been named as a defendant in various litigation matters. The nature of these claims is usually related to settlement of normal operational issues and labour issues. The outcome of such claims against Pengrowth is not determinable at this time; however, their ultimate resolution is not expected to have a materially adverse effect on Pengrowth as a whole.
|
| |
21. | SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
Pengrowth’s Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) are prepared primarily by the nature of expense, with the exception of employee compensation costs which are included in both operating and general and administrative expense line items.
The following table details the amount of total employee compensation costs (including share based compensation expense) included in the operating and general and administrative expense line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
|
| | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
|
Operating | $ | 44.1 |
| $ | 48.3 |
|
General and administrative | 50.2 |
| 61.7 |
|
Total employee compensation costs | $ | 94.3 |
| $ | 110.0 |
|
KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Pengrowth has determined that the key management personnel of the Corporation are its officers and directors. In addition to the officers’ salaries and directors’ fees, the Corporation also provides other compensation to both groups including long term equity based incentives.
The following table provides information on compensation expense related to officers and directors. During 2016, Pengrowth had up to 10 non-executive directors and finished the year with 8. There were 8 officers at the beginning of 2016 and 7 at the end of 2016 (December 31, 2015 - 9 non-executive directors and 8 officers).
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 39 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2016 | Wages & benefits paid |
| Bonus and other compensation paid |
| Share based compensation expense |
| Severance paid |
| Total |
|
Directors | $ | 0.6 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 2.3 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 2.9 |
|
Officers | 2.8 |
| 0.7 |
| 5.3 |
| 0.6 |
| 9.4 |
|
| $ | 3.4 |
| $ | 0.7 |
| $ | 7.6 |
| $ | 0.6 |
| $ | 12.3 |
|
| | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2015 | Wages & benefits paid |
| Bonus and other compensation paid |
| Share based compensation expense |
| Severance paid |
| Total |
|
Directors | $ | 0.8 |
| $ | — |
| $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | 0.6 |
|
Officers | 4.2 |
| 3.5 |
| 4.6 |
| 2.9 |
| 15.2 |
|
| $ | 5.0 |
| $ | 3.5 |
| $ | 4.4 |
| $ | 2.9 |
| $ | 15.8 |
|
On January 6, 2017, Pengrowth completed the sale of a 4.0 percent GORR interest on its Lindbergh thermal property and certain seismic assets for $250 million cash consideration. The $117.5 million carrying value associated with the GORR and seismic sale is presented as assets held for sale and classified as a current asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. It is expected that a gain on disposition of approximately $130 million before tax, net of transaction costs, will be recorded in the first quarter of 2017.
On February 21, 2017, Pengrowth announced plans to use its cash on hand to repay the $126.6 million convertible debenture on March 31, 2017 and early repay U.S.$300.0 million of the U.S.$400.0 million 6.35 percent senior unsecured notes on March 30, 2017. Following these payments, Pengrowth's pro forma debt will be reduced to approximately $1.1 billion assuming February 21, 2017 exchange rates.
|
| |
PENGROWTH 2016 Financial Results | 40 |