Mastermind (MMND) 10-K 30 Apr 15 2014 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	COCONNECT, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	1088638
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	31-Dec-14
Amendment Flag	FALSE
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filer	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	No
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-19
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float			$6,000,000
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		3,239,428
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014

Balance_Sheets

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Current assets:
Cash	$6,390
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	24,128
Total current assets	30,518
Total assets	30,518	0
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	46,517	50,129
Other payables	1,660	1,660
Due to stockholders		13,385
Total current liabilities	48,177	65,174
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' deficiency:
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized - 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - no shares and 100,000 shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively		100
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized - 4,999,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - 3,179,428 shares and 2,750,000 shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively	3,179	2,750
Additional paid-in capital	11,973,076	11,823,622
Accumulated deficit	-11,993,914	-11,891,646
Total stockholders' deficiency	-17,659	-65,174
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency	$30,518	$0

Balance_Sheets_Parenthetical

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Series B Preferred Stock, par value		$0.00
Series B Preferred Stock, shares authorized		1,000,000
Series B Preferred Stock, shares issued		100,000
Series B Preferred Stock, shares outstanding		100,000
Common Stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common Stock, shares authorized	4,999,000,000	4,999,000,000
Common Stock, shares issued	3,179,428	2,750,000
Common Stock, shares outstanding	3,179,428	2,750,000

Statements_of_Operations

Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenues
Operating costs and expenses:
General and administrative	82,163	18
Costs related to terminated acquisition	53,957
Gain from reversal of accounts payable	-34,040
Total operating expenses	102,080	18
Loss from operations	-102,080	-18
Interest expense	-213
Interest income	25
Net loss	($102,268)	($18)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	($0.03)	$0
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted	3,013,539	2,750,000

Statement_of_Stockholders_Defi

Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Balance	($65,174)	($65,156)
Shares cancelled
Debt contributed to capital by prior shareholders	24,052
Common stock sold in private placement	140,303
Costs related to private placement	-14,572
Net loss	-102,268	-18
Balance	-17,659	-65,174
Preferred Stock [Member]
Balance	100	100
Balance, shares	100,000	100,000
Shares cancelled	-100
Shares cancelled, shares	-100,000
Debt contributed to capital by prior shareholders
Common stock sold in private placement
Common stock sold in private placement, shares
Costs related to private placement
Net loss
Balance		100
Balance, shares		100,000
Common Stock [Member]
Balance	2,750	2,750
Balance, shares	2,750,000	2,750,000
Shares cancelled
Debt contributed to capital by prior shareholders
Common stock sold in private placement	429
Common stock sold in private placement, shares	429,428
Costs related to private placement
Net loss
Balance	3,179	2,750
Balance, shares	3,179,428	2,750,000
Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]
Balance	11,823,622	11,823,622
Shares cancelled	100
Debt contributed to capital by prior shareholders	24,052
Common stock sold in private placement	139,874
Costs related to private placement	-14,572
Net loss
Balance	11,973,076	11,823,622
Accumulated Deficit [Member]
Balance	-11,891,646	-11,891,628
Shares cancelled
Debt contributed to capital by prior shareholders
Common stock sold in private placement
Costs related to private placement
Net loss	-102,268	-18
Balance	($11,993,914)	($11,891,646)

Statements_of_Cash_Flows

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	($102,268)	($18)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Gain from reversal of accounts payable	-34,040
(Increase) decrease in -
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	-24,128
Increase (decrease) in -
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	30,428	-52
Net cash used in operating activities	-130,008	-70
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from private placement	140,303
Payment of costs of private placement	-14,572
Advances from prior stockholders	10,667
Net cash provided by financing activities	136,398
Cash:
Net increase (decrease)	6,390	-70
Balance at beginning of period		70
Balance at end of period	6,390
Cash paid for -
Interest	213
Income taxes
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Cancellation of preferred stock	100
Cancellation of debt to prior stockholders	$24,052

Business_Operations

Business Operations	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Business Operations	1. Business Operations
	Business
	CoConnect, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”), currently has no operations, and has been engaged in efforts to identify an operating company to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction. As the Company’s planned principal operations have not yet commenced, the Company activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.
	Any business combination or transaction will likely result in a significant issuance of shares and substantial dilution to the Company’s present stockholders. As it is expected that the closing of such a transaction will result in a change in control of the Company, such transaction is expected to be accounted for as a reverse merger, with the operating company being considered the legal acquiree and accounting acquirer, and the Company being considered the legal acquirer and the accounting acquiree. As a result, at and subsequent to closing of any such transaction, the financial statements of the operating company would become the financial statements of the Company for all periods presented.
	Change-in-Control Transaction
	On May 1, 2014, PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar company (“PacificWave”), acquired 2,307,767 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock for $210,000 (approximately $0.09 per share), plus legal fees of $20,000, from the Company’s stockholders at that time pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”). The 2,307,767 shares represented approximately 83.9% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock. At closing, PacificWave also transferred a number of the purchased shares to certain person and entities providing services in connection with the change-in-control transaction. At the conclusion of this transaction, PacificWave and its Managing Director and sole owner, Henrik Rouf, were the owners of an aggregate of 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which constituted 4.4% of the outstanding shares of common stock at that time. The Company was not a party to these transactions.
	Additional terms of the SPA provided for the surrender and cancellation of the 100,000 outstanding shares of the Company’s Series B preferred stock also held by the same stockholders, which represented all of the Company’s then outstanding shares of preferred stock. The SPA also stipulated that each of the selling stockholders waive any outstanding liabilities, claims, damages or obligations, contingent or otherwise, owed by the Company to the selling stockholders. Accordingly, amounts owed by the Company to such stockholders totaling $24,052 were recorded as a contribution to additional paid-in capital on May 1, 2014.
	Effective May 1, 2014, the Company’s sole officer and director at that time, York Chandler (who had been previously appointed on December 31, 2013), resigned, and Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointed as the Company’s sole director and as its President, Secretary and Treasurer.
	In conjunction with the aforementioned transaction with PacificWave, Mr. Yankowitz purchased 461,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $42,000 (approximately $0.09 per share) from PacificWave on May 1, 2014, reflecting approximately 16.8% of the outstanding shares of common stock at that time. The purchase price was evidenced by a promissory note due May 1, 2019 with interest at 3% per annum and secured by the purchased shares. The Company was not a party to this transaction. PacificWave and Mr. Yankowitz did not have any relationship with the Company prior to the aforementioned change-in-control transaction.
	Henrik Rouf is Managing Director of PacificWave and also serves as Assistant Secretary of the Company While PacificWave does not have a formal contract with the Company, it has in the past provided and is expected to continue to provide consulting and investment banking services to the Company, in particular with respect to raising capital for the Company and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates.
	Going Concern
	The Company’s financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows, and has financed its recent working capital requirements primarily through the issuance of debt and equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had a working capital deficiency of $17,659 and an accumulated deficit of $11,993,914. As a result, management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately acquire or develop a commercially viable business. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Summary_of_Significant_Account

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
	Cash Concentrations
	The Company’s cash balances may periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a loss in such accounts to date. The Company maintains its accounts with financial institutions with high credit ratings.
	Concentration of Risk
	Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.
	Income Taxes
	The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.
	The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.
	The Company is subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. As the Company’s net operating losses have yet to be utilized, all previous tax years remain open to examination by Federal authorities and other jurisdictions in which the Company currently operates or has operated in the past.
	The Company accounts for uncertainties in income tax law under a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns as prescribed by GAAP. The tax effects of a position are recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority as of the reporting date. If the tax position is not considered “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, then no benefits of the position are recognized. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had not recorded any liability for uncertain tax positions. In subsequent periods, any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense.
	The Company is currently delinquent with respect to its U.S. federal income tax filings for the past several years.
	Stock-Based Compensation
	The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to officers, directors and consultants for services rendered. Stock options and warrants vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.
	The Company accounts for stock-based payments to officers and directors by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the cost recognized as compensation expense in the Company’s financial statements on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards.
	The Company accounts for stock-based payments to consultants by determining the value of the stock compensation based upon the measurement date at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.
	Options and warrants granted to outside consultants are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting.
	The fair value of stock options and warrants granted are estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
	Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Components of comprehensive income or loss, including net income or loss, are reported in the financial statements in the period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive income or loss is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) are reported net of any related tax effect to arrive at comprehensive income (loss). The Company did not have any items of comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
	Earnings Per Share
	The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., warrants and options) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.
	Loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss per common share is the same for all periods presented because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive.
	At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no outstanding stock options, warrants, debt or securities that entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The authoritative guidance with respect to fair value established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels, and requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of three categories, as presented below. Disclosure as to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, is also required.
	Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.
	Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.
	Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data for the asset or liability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are measured using present value pricing models.
	The Company determines the level in the fair value hierarchy within which each fair value measurement falls in its entirety, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs an analysis of the assets and liabilities at each reporting period end.
	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10 (ASU 2014-10), Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. ASU 2014-10 eliminated the requirement to present inception-to-date information about income statement line items, cash flows, and equity transactions, and clarifies how entities should disclose the risks and uncertainties related to their activities. ASU 2014-10 also eliminated an exception provided to development stage entities in Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The presentation and disclosure requirements in Topic 915 will no longer be required for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and the revised consolidation standards will take effect in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-10). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance as to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 (ASU 2015-01), Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20). ASU 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification: (1) Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormality and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinary and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. (2) Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the guidance prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02), Consolidation (Topic 810). ASU 2015-02 changes the guidance with respect to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation mode. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas: (1) Limited partnerships and similar legal entities. (2) Evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest. (3) The effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination. (4) The effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination. (5) Certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the new guidance. ASU-2015-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These disclosures include the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Terminated_Merger_Transaction

Terminated Merger Transaction	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Terminated Merger Transaction
Terminated Merger Transaction	3. Terminated Merger Transaction
	On October 31, 2014, the Company entered into a Stock and Membership Interest Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Company and the members (equity owners) of House of Knipschildt, LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company (“HOK”). The Agreement provided for the acquisition of all of the outstanding membership interests of HOK by the Company in exchange for 4,200,000 newly issued unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock. HOK is a privately owned manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer of hand-made and other high-end chocolate products, and is based in Norwalk, Connecticut. HOK has one retail store.
	The Agreement provided for various conditions to closing, including the completion of a due diligence review by both the Company and HOK, completion of an audit of HOK’s financial statements and the absence of any material adverse change in the business, assets or condition (financial or otherwise) of either the Company or HOK. The Company also had the right to terminate the Agreement if satisfaction of any closing condition by December 15, 2014, or such later date as the parties may have agreed upon, became impossible (other than through the failure of the Company to comply with its obligations under the Agreement).  As a condition to the closing of the Agreement, the Company was required to complete a private placement of newly issued unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock for net proceeds of at least $900,000.
	The 4,200,000 shares of common stock that were to be issued to the equity owners of HOK at closing would have constituted approximately 50.1% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, after issuance of the new shares in the private placement.
	On March 18, 2015, the Company elected to terminate the Agreement for, among others, the following reasons: (i) numerous negative matters that came to light during the Company’s due diligence review of HOK; (ii) ongoing delays and deficiencies in producing financial statements for 2013 and 2014 in a form capable of being audited; and (iii) material adverse changes in HOK’s business, assets and financial condition. The Company does not believe that the termination of the Agreement will result in any material termination penalty or other liability to the Company.
	The Company incurred costs related to the terminated acquisition of $53,957 during the year ended December 31, 2014 and $4,711 during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Gain_from_Reversal_of_Accounts

Gain from Reversal of Accounts Payable	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Payables and Accruals [Abstract]
Gain from Reversal of Accounts Payable	4. Gain from Reversal of Accounts Payable
	At December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a gain of $34,040 resulting from the reversal of accounts payable that had been on the Company’s books since December 31, 2007 and as to which there had been no activity during the period subsequent to that date.

Stockholders_Equity

Stockholders' Equity	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Equity [Abstract]
Stockholders' Equity	5. Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock
	On May 21, 2014, the Company sold 429,428 shares of common stock to PacificWave at $0.32672 per share for gross cash proceeds of $140,303. PacificWave resold the shares to five accredited investors who were non-U.S. residents in an exempt transaction. Costs associated with the sale of the shares amounting to $14,572 were charged to additional paid-in capital.
	The share sale transaction was completed in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Rules 504, 505, 506 and 903 thereunder. The shares will not be registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws, and unless so registered, may not be reoffered or resold in the United States absent such registration or an applicable exemption therefrom, or in a transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act and other applicable securities laws.
	Common Stock Warrants
	On December 19, 2011, the Company issued 65,000 warrants to Brad M. Bingham, a director of the Company, and 15,000 warrants to Dave Hunt, the managing member of RVCA Partners, LLC, a principal stockholder of the Company at that time, for services rendered. The warrants entitled the holders to purchase shares of common stock at $0.50 per share and were exercisable for a period of two years. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date was $0.61 per share. The warrants were determined to have a fair value of $0.6018 per share based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following input variables: (1) discount rate - 0.24%; (2) expected warrant life – 2 years; (3) expected volatility - 345%; and (4) expected dividends - zero.
	A summary of common stock warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is presented below.
							Weighted
							Average
					Weighted		Remaining
		Number			Average		Contractual
		Of			Exercise		Life
		Shares			Price		(in Years)
	Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2012		80,000		$	0.5
	Issued		—			—
	Exercised		—			—
	Expired		(80,000	)		0.5
	Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2013		—			—
	Issued		—			—
	Exercised		—			—
	Expired		—			—
	Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2014		—		$	—		—
	Prior Financing
	In connection with certain capital raising efforts in 2011, the Company received funds from prospective investors aggregating $209,977. During 2012, the Company returned $208,317 of such funds to the investors, with the remaining $1,660 of such funds reflected in the Company’s balance sheet as other payables at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Income_Taxes

Income Taxes	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	6. Income Taxes
	Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized below.
		December 31,
		2014			2013
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	4,182,000		$	4,146,000
	Valuation allowance		(4,182,000	)		(4,146,000	)
	Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—
	In assessing the potential realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company attaining future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, management was unable to determine that it was more likely than not that the Company’s deferred tax assets will be realized, and has therefore recorded an appropriate valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at such dates.
	No federal tax provision has been provided for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 due to the losses incurred during such periods. The Company’s effective tax rate is different from the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to net losses that receive no tax benefit as a result of a valuation allowance recorded for such losses.
	Reconciled below is the difference between the income tax rate computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
		Years Ended December 31,
		2014			2013
	U. S. federal statutory tax rate		(35.0	)%		(35.0	)%
	Change in valuation allowance		35	%		35	%
	Effective tax rate		0	%		0	%
	As of December 31, 2014, the Company had federal tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $11,949,000. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2025 through 2034.
	While the Company has not performed a formal analysis of the availability of its net operating loss carryforwards under Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, management expects that the Company’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards will be limited in future periods.

Related_Party_Transactions

Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Related Party Transactions	7. Related Party Transactions
	Through April 30, 2014, certain prior stockholders advanced funds to the Company in order to fund its working capital requirements. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, such advances totaled $10,667 and $0, respectively. As of May 1, 2014 and December 31, 2013, such advances totaled $24,052 and $13,385, respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the SPA, amounts owed by the Company to such stockholders totaling $24,052 were recorded as a contribution to additional paid-in capital on May 1, 2014.
	In connection with the sale of shares of the Company’s common stock on May 21, 2014, the Company paid a company associated with one of the ultimate non-U.S. stockholders cash fees of $13,572 for services rendered with respect to such financing, which were charged to additional paid-in capital.
	During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company’s former sole officer and director through April 30, 2014 was paid cash compensation of $2,000.
	Effective May 1, 2014, Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointed as the Company’s sole director and as its President, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Yankowitz devotes approximately one-third of his time on an annual basis to matters involving the Company. On October 20, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized the payment of $1,000 per month to Mr. Yankowitz for such services, effective for the period from May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (subsequently amended to October 31, 2014). During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a charge to operations of $6,000 pursuant to this compensation arrangement.
	Effective January 1, 2015, Bamboo Holdings, LLC, of which Mr. Yankowitz is the sole member and manager, entered into a month-to-month sublease for office space from the Company at the rate of $1,050 per month, which the Company believes approximates fair market value for such space.

Commitments_and_Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	8. Commitments and Contingencies
	On August 10, 2014, the Company executed a month-to-month lease for office space beginning September 1, 2014 at a cost of $5,200 per month. Effective December 1, 2014, the lease was amended to reduce the space occupied and to reduce the monthly rental to $4,200.

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Events	9. Subsequent Events
	Termination of Acquisition Agreement
	On March 18, 2015, the Company elected to terminate its Agreement to acquire all of the outstanding membership interests of HOK, as described at Note 3.
	Sale of Shares of Common Stock
	On February 3, 2015, the Company sold 20,000 shares of common stock to PacificWave for an aggregate sales price of $20,000 ($1.00 per share). On March 25, 2015, the Company sold 40,000 shares of its common stock for $40,000 ($1.00 per share), consisting of 20,000 shares to Richway Finance Ltd., a Hong Kong company and an approximate 4.5% stockholder of the Company, and 20,000 shares to Allan Kronborg, an approximate 14.8% stockholder of the Company. The share sale transactions were completed in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Rules 504, 505, 506 and 903 thereunder. The shares will not be registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws, and unless so registered, may not be reoffered or resold in the United States absent such registration or an applicable exemption therefrom, or in a transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act and other applicable securities laws.
	Short-Term Loan
	On March 16, 2015, PacificWave loaned the Company $5,000 for working capital purposes pursuant to a short-term unsecured promissory note due March 31, 2015 with interest at 5%. The promissory note was repaid on March 23, 2015.

Summary_of_Significant_Account1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
Cash Concentrations	Cash Concentrations
	The Company’s cash balances may periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a loss in such accounts to date. The Company maintains its accounts with financial institutions with high credit ratings.
Concentration of Risk	Concentration of Risk
	Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.
Income Taxes	Income Taxes
	The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.
	The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.
	The Company is subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. As the Company’s net operating losses have yet to be utilized, all previous tax years remain open to examination by Federal authorities and other jurisdictions in which the Company currently operates or has operated in the past.
	The Company accounts for uncertainties in income tax law under a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns as prescribed by GAAP. The tax effects of a position are recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority as of the reporting date. If the tax position is not considered “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, then no benefits of the position are recognized. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had not recorded any liability for uncertain tax positions. In subsequent periods, any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense.
	The Company is currently delinquent with respect to its U.S. federal income tax filings for the past several years.
Stock-Based Compensation	Stock-Based Compensation
	The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to officers, directors and consultants for services rendered. Stock options and warrants vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.
	The Company accounts for stock-based payments to officers and directors by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the cost recognized as compensation expense in the Company’s financial statements on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards.
	The Company accounts for stock-based payments to consultants by determining the value of the stock compensation based upon the measurement date at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.
	Options and warrants granted to outside consultants are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting.
	The fair value of stock options and warrants granted are estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Comprehensive Income (Loss)
	Components of comprehensive income or loss, including net income or loss, are reported in the financial statements in the period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive income or loss is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) are reported net of any related tax effect to arrive at comprehensive income (loss). The Company did not have any items of comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Earnings Per Share	Earnings Per Share
	The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., warrants and options) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.
	Loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss per common share is the same for all periods presented because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive.
	At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no outstanding stock options, warrants, debt or securities that entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The authoritative guidance with respect to fair value established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels, and requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of three categories, as presented below. Disclosure as to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, is also required.
	Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.
	Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.
	Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data for the asset or liability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are measured using present value pricing models.
	The Company determines the level in the fair value hierarchy within which each fair value measurement falls in its entirety, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs an analysis of the assets and liabilities at each reporting period end.
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10 (ASU 2014-10), Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. ASU 2014-10 eliminated the requirement to present inception-to-date information about income statement line items, cash flows, and equity transactions, and clarifies how entities should disclose the risks and uncertainties related to their activities. ASU 2014-10 also eliminated an exception provided to development stage entities in Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The presentation and disclosure requirements in Topic 915 will no longer be required for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and the revised consolidation standards will take effect in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-10). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance as to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 (ASU 2015-01), Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20). ASU 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification: (1) Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormality and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinary and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. (2) Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the guidance prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02), Consolidation (Topic 810). ASU 2015-02 changes the guidance with respect to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation mode. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas: (1) Limited partnerships and similar legal entities. (2) Evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest. (3) The effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination. (4) The effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination. (5) Certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the new guidance. ASU-2015-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These disclosures include the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.
	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Stockholders_Equity_Tables

Stockholders' Equity (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Equity [Abstract]
Summary of Common Stock Warrant Activity	A summary of common stock warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is presented below.
							Weighted
							Average
					Weighted		Remaining
		Number			Average		Contractual
		Of			Exercise		Life
		Shares			Price		(in Years)
	Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2012		80,000		$	0.5
	Issued		—			—
	Exercised		—			—
	Expired		(80,000	)		0.5
	Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2013		—			—
	Issued		—			—
	Exercised		—			—
	Expired		—			—
	Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2014		—		$	—		—

Income_Taxes_Tables

Income Taxes (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Summary of Deferred Tax Assets Components	Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized below.
		December 31,
		2014			2013
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	4,182,000		$	4,146,000
	Valuation allowance		(4,182,000	)		(4,146,000	)
	Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—
Schedule of Reconciliation of Income Tax	Reconciled below is the difference between the income tax rate computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
		Years Ended December 31,
		2014			2013
	U. S. federal statutory tax rate		(35.0	)%		(35.0	)%
	Change in valuation allowance		35	%		35	%
	Effective tax rate		0	%		0	%

Business_Operations_Details_Na

Business Operations (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
	1-May-14	1-May-14	21-May-14	Dec. 31, 2014	31-May-14	Dec. 31, 2013
Amount owed to shareholders	$24,052	24,052			$24,052	$13,385
Working capital deficiency				17,659
Accumulated deficit				11,993,914		11,891,646
Henrik Rouf [Member]
Percentage of ownership through acquiring shares	4.40%	4.40%
Number of aggregate share owned	120,000	120,000
Mr. Yankowitz [Member]
Percentage of ownership through acquiring shares	16.80%	16.80%
Sale of common stock, shares	461,000
Aggregate sale price	42,000
Per share price	$0.09	0.09
Promissory note due date	1-May-19
Debt interest rate per annum	3.00%
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
Cancellation of outstanding shares of the Company		100,000
PacificWave Partners Limited [Member]
Shares of outstanding common stock acquired		2,307,767
Shares of outstanding common stock acquired, value		210,000
Per share value	$0.09	0.09
Legal fees		20,000
Percentage of ownership through acquiring shares	83.90%	83.90%
Sale of common stock, shares			429,428
Aggregate sale price			$140,303
Per share price			$0.33

Terminated_Merger_Transaction_

Terminated Merger Transaction (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		0 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2014
Minimum proceeds from issuance of shares to private placement	$140,303
Costs related to terminated acquisition	53,957
March 31, 2015 [Member]
Costs related to terminated acquisition	4,711
HOK [Member]
Minimum proceeds from issuance of shares to private placement			$900,000
Number of shares issued for equity owners			4,200,000
Percentage of expected outstanding shares of common stock			50.10%
Agreement [Member] | HOK [Member]
Acquisition of membership interests through exchange of common stock			4,200,000

Gain_from_Reversal_of_Accounts1

Gain from Reversal of Accounts Payable (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Gain From Reversal Of Accounts Payable Details Narrative
Gain from reversal of accounts payable	$34,040

Stockholders_Equity_Details_Na

Stockholders' Equity (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended			0 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 19, 2011	Dec. 19, 2011	21-May-14	Dec. 31, 2013
						AccreditedInvestors
Costs associated with sale of shares charged to additional paid-in capital	($14,572)
Funds received from prospective investors			209,977
Funds raised returned to investors		208,317
Other payables	1,660						1,660
Warrants [Member]
Warrants purchase price per share				$0.50	0.5
Warrants exercisable term				2 years
Warrants grant date per share value				$0.61
common stock grant date per share				$0.60	0.6018
Fair value of discount rate				0.24%
Fair value of expected warrant life				2 years
Fair value expected volatility				345.00%
Fair value of dividends				0.00%
Warrants [Member] | Brad M Bingham [Member]
Warrants issued during period to related party					65,000
Warrants [Member] | Dave Hunt [Member]
Warrants issued during period to related party					15,000
PacificWave Partners Limited [Member]
Sale of common stock, shares						429,428
Sale of common stock, price per share						$0.33
Gross cash proceeds						140,303
Number of accredited investors						5
Costs associated with sale of shares charged to additional paid-in capital						$14,572

Stockholders_Equity_Summary_of

Stockholders' Equity - Summary of Common Stock Warrant Activity (Details) (Warrants [Member], USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Warrants [Member]
Number Of Shares, Warrants outstanding, Beginning balance		80,000
Number Of Shares, Issued
Number Of Shares, Exercised
Number Of Shares, Expired		-80,000
Number Of Shares, Warrants outstanding, Ending balance
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding, Beginning		$0.50
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Issued
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Expired		$0.50
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding, Ending

Income_Taxes_Details_Narrative

Income Taxes (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Federal statutory rate	35.00%	35.00%
Operating loss carryforwards	$11,949,000
Operating loss carryforwards expiration years	2025 through 2034

Income_Taxes_Summary_of_Deferr

Income Taxes - Summary of Deferred Tax Assets Components (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Net operating loss carryforwards	$4,182,000	$4,146,000
Valuation Allowance	-4,182,000	-4,146,000
Net deferred tax assets	$0	$0

Income_Taxes_Schedule_of_Recon

Income Taxes - Schedule of Reconciliation of Income Tax (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
U. S. federal statutory tax rate	-35.00%	-35.00%
Change in valuation allowance	35.00%	35.00%
Effective tax rate	0.00%	0.00%

Related_Party_Transactions_Det

Related Party Transactions (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended			12 Months Ended		0 Months Ended
	Dec. 01, 2014	Sep. 01, 2014	21-May-14	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Oct. 20, 2014	31-May-14	1-May-14
Advances from shareholders during period				$10,667
Due to shareholders					13,385		24,052	24,052
Cash fees payment associated with one of the ultimate non-U.S. shareholders			13,572
Cash compensation				2,000
Related party operation charges				6,000
Operating lease rent amount	4,200	5,200
Mr. Yankowitz [Member]
Authorized payment of officer compensation						1,000
Officer service period						May 1, 2014 through October 31, 2014
Mr. Yankowitz [Member] | January 1, 2015 [Member]
Operating lease rent amount				$1,050

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Dec. 01, 2014	Sep. 01, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Operating lease rent amount	$4,200	$5,200

Subsequent_Events_Details_Narr

Subsequent Events (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Mar. 16, 2015	Mar. 25, 2015	21-May-14	Feb. 03, 2015	1-May-14
Subsequent Events [Member] | Short-Term Loan [Member]
Short term loan for working capital	$5,000
Short term unsecured promissory note due date	3/31/15
Short term loan interest rate	5.00%
Promissory note repaid date	23-Mar-15
Subsequent Events [Member] | Allen Kronborg [Member]
Number of common stock sold		20,000
Percentage of ownership through acquiring shares		14.80%
PacificWave Partners Limited [Member]
Number of common stock sold			429,428
Aggregate sale price			140,303
Per share price			$0.33
Percentage of ownership through acquiring shares					83.90%
PacificWave Partners Limited [Member] | Subsequent Events [Member]
Number of common stock sold		40,000		20,000
Aggregate sale price		40,000		$20,000
Per share price		1		$1
Richway Finance Ltd [Member] | Subsequent Events [Member]
Number of common stock sold		20,000
Percentage of ownership through acquiring shares		4.50%