Table of Contents
SCHEDULE 14A
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x No fee required.
o | $125 per Exchange Act Rules O-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2) or |
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule O-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) Total fee paid: |
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule O-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) Filing Party: |
(4) Date Filed: |
Table of Contents
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To our Stockholders:
The 2005 annual meeting of stockholders of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at the Hyatt Regency, 1111 Airport Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA 15231, (724) 899-1234, June 1, 2005, beginning at 1:30 p.m. local time. At the meeting, the holders of the Company’s issued and outstanding Class B common stock and common stock will act on the following matters:
(1) Election of two Class C Directors, each for terms that expire in 2008; and | |
(2) Any other matters that properly come before the meeting. |
All holders of record of shares of Dick’s Sporting Goods’ Class B common stock and common stock (NYSE: DKS) at the close of business on April 11, 2005 are entitled to vote at the meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting may be examined by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, at 300 Industry Drive, RIDC Park West, Pittsburgh, PA 15275 beginning on May 20, 2005.
By order of the Board of Directors, | |
William R. Newlin | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative | |
Officer and Corporate Secretary |
April 22, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
4 | |||||
5 | |||||
7 | |||||
7 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 | |||||
9 | |||||
9 | |||||
10 | |||||
10 | |||||
11 | |||||
11 | |||||
11 | |||||
12 | |||||
12 | |||||
12 | |||||
14 | |||||
14 | |||||
14 | |||||
15 | |||||
16 | |||||
16 | |||||
16 | |||||
17 | |||||
18 | |||||
18 | |||||
19 | |||||
19 | |||||
19 | |||||
21 | |||||
23 |
i
Table of Contents
300 Industry Drive, RIDC Park West
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement contains information related to the annual meeting of stockholders of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to be held at the Hyatt Regency, 1111 Airport Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA 15231, (724) 899-1234, June 1, 2005, beginning at 1:30 p.m. local time, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. This proxy statement is being mailed to stockholders on or about April 22, 2005.
ABOUT THE MEETING
What is the purpose of the annual meeting?
At our annual meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters outlined in the notice of meeting on the cover page of this proxy statement, including the election of two Class C Directors and to act on any other matter to properly come before the meeting. In addition, management will report on the performance of the Company and respond to questions from stockholders.
Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 11, 2005, the record date for the meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to participate in the annual meeting. If you were a stockholder of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the shares that you held on that date at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
What are the voting rights of the holders of Dick’s Sporting Goods common stock and Class B common stock?
Holders of our common stock and Class B common stock have identical rights, except that holders of the common stock are entitled to one (1) vote for each share held of record and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to 10 votes for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of Directors. Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all matters presented to the stockholders for their vote or approval, except as may be required by Delaware law.
Who can attend the meeting?
Subject to space availability, all common stockholders and Class B stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting. Since seating is limited, admission to the meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration will begin at 1:00 p.m. If you attend, please note that you may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.
1
Table of Contents
Please also note that if you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date and check in at the registration desk at the meeting.
What constitutes a quorum?
The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of record of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting constitutes a quorum, permitting the meeting to conduct its business. As of the record date, April 11, 2005, 35,328,222 shares of common stock representing the same number of votes and 13,959,529 shares of Class B common stock representing 139,595,290 votes were issued and outstanding. Thus, the presence of the holders of common stock or Class B common stock or the combination thereof representing at least 87,461,757 votes will be required to establish a quorum.
Proxies received but marked as abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of votes considered to be present at the meeting.
How do I vote?
If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy card and return it to the Company, it will be voted as you direct. If you are a registered stockholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. “Street name” stockholders who wish to vote at the meeting will need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds their shares.
Can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?
Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised by filing with the Corporate Secretary of the Company either a notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. The powers of the proxy holders will be suspended if you attend the meeting in person and so request, although attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
What are the Board’s recommendations?
Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. The Board’s recommendation is set forth together with the description of each item in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a voteforelection of the nominated slate of Class C Directors (see Item 1).
With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.
What vote is required to approve each item?
Election of Directors. The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting is required for the election of Directors. A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD” with respect to the election of one or more Directors will not be voted with respect to the Director or Directors indicated, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum.
Other Items. For each other item, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item will be required for approval. A properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN” with respect to any such matter will not be voted, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a negative vote.
If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to some of the matters to be acted upon. Thus, if you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, your shares may not be voted on those matters and will
2
Table of Contents
We are a controlled Company under the New York Stock Exchange rules.
Because as of March 1, 2005, Edward W. Stack, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, controlled approximately 68% of the combined voting power of our common stock and Class B common stock, we are a “controlled company” under the New York Stock Exchanges Corporate Governance Standards, and we have chosen to take advantage of all of the exemptions available to “controlled companies” under Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Standards.
3
Table of Contents
STOCK OWNERSHIP
Who are the largest owners of the Company’s stock?
Based on a review of filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and information known to us about our Class B common stock, the following are the non-management beneficial holders of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (i) common stock (or Class B common stock that is convertible into more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock) or (ii) Class B common stock as of December 31, 2004 (the date on which holders of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock report their ownership):
Percentage | ||||||||||||
Percentage | of | |||||||||||
of | Class B | |||||||||||
Name and Address of | Amount and Nature of | Common | Common | |||||||||
Title of Class | Beneficial Owner | Beneficial Ownership(7) | Stock(8) | Stock(8) | ||||||||
Common Stock | Lee S. Ainslie III and Maverick Capital Management, LLC(1) 300 Crescent Court, 18th Floor Dallas, TX 75201 | 3,111,500 shares of common stock sole power to vote and direct disposition | 9.0 | % | — | |||||||
Common Stock | Stephen F. Mandel, Jr. and Lone Pine Associates LLC(2) Two Greenwich Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 | 2,803,410 shares of common stock shared power to vote and direct disposition(2) | 8.1 | % | — | |||||||
Common Stock | Friess Associates LLC(3) 115 E. Snow King Jackson, WY 83001 | 2,014,000 shares of common stock sole power to vote and direct disposition | 5.8 | % | — | |||||||
Common Stock | Morgan Stanley 1585 Broadway, New York, NY 10036 | 1,680,300 shares of common stock shared power to vote and direct disposition(4) | 5.12 | % | — | |||||||
Common Stock | Chris W. Shumway and Shumway Capital Partners LLC(5) c/o Chris W. Shumway 600 Steamboat Rd. Greenwich, CT 06830 | 1,759,370 shares of common stock shared power to vote and direct disposition(5) | 5.1 | % | — | |||||||
Class B Common Stock | Michael Hefferon, Trustee, for The Frederick & Nancy Heichemer Intangible Asset Management Trust c/o Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. 300 Industry Drive, RIDC Park West Pittsburgh, PA 15275 | 800,000 shares of Class B common stock shared voting and dispositive power(6) | (9) | 5.70 | % | |||||||
Class B Common Stock | Kim Myers c/o Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. 300 Industry Drive, RIDC Park West Pittsburgh, PA 15275 | 1,059,810 shares of Class B common stock sole power to vote and direct disposition | (9) | 7.55 | % |
(1) | Share ownership amounts are based on figures set forth in the Schedule 13G filed by Maverick Capital Management, LLC, Maverick Capital, Ltd. and Mr. Ainslie on February 14, 2005. Maverick Capital Management, LLC is the general partner of Maverick Capital, Ltd., an investment advisor, and Lee S. |
4
Table of Contents
Ainslie III is a manager of Maverick Capital Management, LLC who has been granted sole investment discretion on behalf of that entity. | |
(2) | Includes 68,783 shares of common stock owned by Lone Spruce, L.P., 150,949 shares of common stock owned by Lone Balsam, L.P., 126,107 shares of common stock owned by Lone Sequoia, L.P., and 2,457,571 shares of common stock owned by Lone Pine Capital LLC which serves as investment manager to Lone Cypress, Ltd. and Lone Kauri, Ltd. Lone Pine Associates LLC is the general partner of Lone Balsam, L.P., Lone Sequoia, L.P., and Lone Spruce, L.P., and has the power to direct the affairs of each, including decisions respecting the disposition of the proceeds from the sale of shares. Stephen F. Mandel, Jr. is the Managing Member of Lone Pine Associates LLC and in that capacity directs its operations. Mr. Mandel is the Managing Member of Lone Pine Capital LLC. Share ownership amounts are based on figures set forth in the Schedule 13G-A filed by Mr. Mandel, Jr., Lone Spruce, L.P., Lone Balsam, L.P., Lone Sequoia, L.P., Lone Pine Associates LLC and Lone Pine Capital LLC on February 11, 2005. |
(3) | Share ownership amounts are based on figures set forth in the Schedule 13G filed by Friess Associates LLC on February 14, 2005. |
(4) | Share ownership amounts are based on figures set forth in the Schedule 13G filed by Morgan Stanley in its capacity as the parent company of, and indirect beneficial owner of securities held by, one of its business units. |
(5) | Share ownership amounts are based on figures set forth in the Schedule 13G filed by Shumway Capital Partners LLC and Mr. Shumway on January 4, 2005. |
(6) | Includes 800,000 shares of Class B common stock beneficially owned by Michael Hefferon, Trustee, for the Frederick & Nancy Heichemer Intangible Asset Management Trust. |
(7) | A person has beneficial ownership of shares if he has the power to vote or dispose of the shares. This power can be exclusive or shared, direct or indirect. In addition, a person is considered by SEC rules to beneficially own shares underlying options or convertible securities that are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2004. The shares listed in this table above include shares issuable upon the exercise of options or other rights that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2004. |
(8) | As of December 31, 2004, there were 34,649,358 shares of our common stock outstanding and 14,039,529 shares of Class B common stock outstanding. To calculate a stockholder’s percentage of beneficial ownership of common stock, we must include in the numerator and denominator those shares of common stock underlying options or convertible securities (such as our Class B common stock) that the stockholder is considered to beneficially own. Shares of common stock underlying options or convertible securities held by other stockholders, however, are disregarded in this calculation. Therefore, the denominator used in calculating beneficial ownership among our stockholders may differ. |
(9) | Less than 5%. |
How much stock do the Company’s Directors and executive officers own?
The following table shows the amount of Dick’s Sporting Goods Class B common stock and common stock beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated) by our Directors, the executive officers named in the Summary Executive Compensation Table below and the Directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all information is as of March 1, 2005.
A person has beneficial ownership of shares if he has the power to vote or dispose of the shares. This power can be exclusive or shared, direct or indirect. In addition, a person is considered by the Commission rules to beneficially own shares underlying options and convertible securities that are presently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. The shares listed in this table below include shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options or other rights that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005.
5
Table of Contents
Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Percent(12) | |||||||||||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Common Stock | Class B | Common Stock | Class B | Voting Power | |||||||||||||||
Executive Officers and Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||
Edward W. Stack | 393,500 | (1) | 11,962,690 | (2) | 26.37% (includes Class B common shares owned by Mr. Stack)(12) | 85.21 | % | 68.47 | % | |||||||||||
William J. Colombo | 668,235 | (3) | — | 1.91% | — | * | ||||||||||||||
William R. Newlin | 337,527 | (4) | — | * | — | * | ||||||||||||||
Michael F. Hines | 473,737 | (5) | — | 1.36% | — | * | ||||||||||||||
Gary M. Sterling | 466,277 | (6) | — | 1.33% | — | * | ||||||||||||||
Emanuel Chirico | 7,500 | (7) | — | * | — | * | ||||||||||||||
David I. Fuente | 236,324 | (8) | — | * | — | * | ||||||||||||||
Walter Rossi | 216,600 | (9) | — | * | — | * | ||||||||||||||
Lawrence J. Schorr | 88,076 | (10) | — | * | — | * | ||||||||||||||
All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (9 persons) | 2,887,776 | (11) | 11,962,690 | 31.70% | 85.21 | % | 68.47 | % |
* | Percentage of shares of common stock beneficially owned does not exceed one percent (1%). | |
(1) | Includes 388,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. Also includes 5,000 shares held by Mr. Stack’s minor children. Mr. Stack disclaims beneficial ownership of those securities, and the inclusion of such shares shall not be an admission that the reporting person is the beneficial owner for the purposes of Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On January 15, 2004, Mr. Stack entered into a three-year variable prepaid forward contract. At maturity on or just after January 16, 2007, Mr. Stack will deliver a maximum of 300,000 shares of common stock (the “Pre-paid Shares”) of the Company to the counter party in the transaction, based upon the closing sale price of the common stock on January 16, 2007. At Mr. Stack’s option, he may deliver cash in an amount equivalent to the value of the required number of shares at maturity. As part of this transaction, Mr. Stack is required to pledge with the counter party shares of common stock and/or Class B common stock equal to the number of Pre-paid Shares. | |
(2) | Includes 600,000 shares held by Richard T. Stack, over which Edward W. Stack maintains sole voting power. | |
(3) | Includes 560,134 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. Also includes 1,200 shares held by Mr. Colombo’s children. Mr. Colombo disclaims beneficial ownership of those securities, and the inclusion of such shares shall not be an admission that the reporting person is the beneficial owner for the purposes of Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
(4) | Includes 311,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. Includes 18,000 shares held by Mr. Newlin’s spouse. Mr. Newlin disclaims beneficial ownership of those securities, and the inclusion of such shares shall not be an admission that the reporting person is the beneficial owner for the purposes of Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
(5) | Includes 465,940 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. | |
(6) | Includes 270,780 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. Also includes 1,000 shares held by Mr. Sterling’s daughter. Mr. Sterling disclaims beneficial ownership of those securities, and the inclusion of such shares shall not be an admission |
6
Table of Contents
that the reporting person is the beneficial owner for the purposes of Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
(7) | Includes 7,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. | |
(8) | Includes 210,400 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. | |
(9) | Includes 187,300 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. |
(10) | Includes 22,750 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options that were exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2005. |
(11) | A total of 2,424,804 shares of common stock are issuable upon the exercise of options for all 10 officers and directors as a group within 60 days of March 1, 2005. |
(12) | As of March 1, 2005, there were 34,885,526 shares of common stock outstanding and 14,039,529 shares of Class B common stock outstanding. To calculate an individual Director or executive officer’s percentage of beneficial ownership of common stock, we must include in the numerator and denominator those shares of common stock underlying options or convertible securities (such as our Class B common stock) that the Director or executive officer is considered to beneficially own. Shares of common stock underlying options or convertible securities held by other directors, executive officers and stockholders, however, are disregarded in this calculation. Therefore, the denominator used in calculating beneficial ownership among our Directors and executive officers may differ. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Based upon a review of filings with the Commission and written representations that no other reports were required we believe that all of our Directors and executive officers complied during 2004 with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with the exception of Michael Hines, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who had a report untimely filed, due to an administrative error on the part of the Company’s outside counsel. This report was untimely by one business day.
ITEM 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board is divided into three (3) classes, each containing as nearly as possible an equal number of Directors. The current term of office of our Class C Directors expires at the 2005 annual meeting while the Class A Directors expires at the 2006 annual meeting and the Class B Directors expires at the 2007 annual meeting. Upon recommendation by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors proposes that the following nominees, Edward W. Stack (a Class C Director) and Lawrence J. Schorr (a Class C Director), be elected for new terms of three (3) years and until their successors are duly elected and qualified as Class C Directors. Each of the nominees has consented to serve if elected. If any of them becomes unavailable to serve as a Director, the Board may designate a substitute nominee. In that case, the persons named as proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board.
Directors Standing for Election.
The Directors standing for election at the annual meeting are:
Edward W. Stack, 50,has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 1984 when the founder and Edward Stack’s father, Richard “Dick” Stack, retired from our then two store chain. Mr. Edward Stack has served us full time since 1977 in a variety of positions, including President, Store Manager and Merchandise Manager. Mr. Stack’s current term of office as a Class C Director expires at the 2005 annual meeting.
Lawrence J. Schorr, 50, has served on the Board since 1985. Mr. Schorr currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Boltaron Performance Products, LLC (formerly, Empire Plastics, Inc.) (a privately owned plastics manufacturing company) and as co-managing partner of the law firm of Levene, Gouldin and Thompson LLP.
7
Table of Contents
The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “For” the persons nominated by the Board as Class C Directors.
Other Directors Not Standing for Election at this Meeting. Other than the current nominees, the four (4) remaining members of the Board of Directors who served during fiscal 2004 will continue to serve as members of our Board. Our other Directors who will serve after the 2005 annual meeting are:
Emanuel Chirico, 47,has served on the Board since December 2003. Since 1999, Mr. Chirico has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (apparel and footwear listed on the NYSE) and effective on June 14, 2005 Mr. Chirico will become Phillips-Van Heusen’s President and Chief Operating Officer and a nominee as a candidate for its Board of Directors. From 1993 until 1999, Mr. Chirico was Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation’s controller. Prior to that, he was a partner at Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Chirico’s current term of office as a Class B Director expires at the 2007 annual meeting.
Walter Rossi, 62, has served on the Board since 1993. In 2004, Mr. Rossi became a director of Guitar Center, Inc. (a retailer of musical instruments listed on Nasdaq). Mr. Rossi formerly served as Chief Executive Officer of Naartjie Custom Kids, Inc. (a children’s apparel retailer), Chief Executive Officer of Home Express (a retailer of home furnishings), Chairman of the Retail Group at Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (apparel and footwear company listed on the NYSE) and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mervyn’s (a department store chain). Mr. Rossi’s current term of office as a Class B Director expires at the 2007 annual meeting.
William J. Colombo, 49,became our President and a board member in 2002 in addition to being Chief Operating Officer. From late in 1998 to 2000, Mr. Colombo served as President of dsports.com LLC, our internet commerce subsidiary. Mr. Colombo served as Chief Operating Officer and an Executive Vice President from 1995 to 1998. Mr. Colombo joined us in 1988. From 1977 to 1988, he held various field and district positions with J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (a retailing company listed on the NYSE). He is also on the board of directors of Gibraltar Industries (a leading processor, manufacturer and provider of high value-added, high margin steel products and services listed on Nasdaq). Mr. Colombo’s term as a Class A Director expires at the 2006 annual meeting.
David I. Fuente, 59,has served on the Board since 1993. Mr. Fuente is currently a member of the board of Office Depot, Inc. (an office supply retailer listed on the NYSE) and was Chairman of Office Depot from 1987 to 2001 and its Chief Executive Officer from 1987 to 2000. He currently serves as a director for Ryder System, Inc. (a truck leasing and logistics company listed on the NYSE). Mr. Fuente’s term as a Class A Director expires at the 2006 annual meeting.
How are Directors compensated?
Beginning in fiscal 2001, non-employee Directors were compensated by means of an annual retainer of $20,000 plus $7,500 per meeting both paid in cash. Beginning in fiscal 2003, in addition to the annual retainer and per meeting fees (Board and committee per meeting fee is reduced if attended by teleconference), each committee chair receives $15,000 per committee chairmanship per year, except that the audit committee chair receives an annual retainer of $25,000. Each committee member also receives a per committee meeting fee of $1,500. There are generally six (6) Board meetings per year. Prior to fiscal 2001, non-employee Directors received no cash compensation. Instead, there was an initial stock option grant of 46,200 shares and annual stock option grants of 23,100 shares. Currently, each Director receives an initial option grant exercisable for 20,000 shares upon his first election to the board with an additional annual option grant exercisable for 10,000 shares for each year of service thereafter. In accordance with our practice, each of Messrs. Fuente, Chirico, Rossi and Schorr received option grants exercisable for 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $35.95 as part of their annual stock option grant made in fiscal 2005. In each case these
8
Table of Contents
How often did the Board meet during fiscal 2004?
The Board of Directors met eight (8) times during fiscal 2004. Each Director attended all Board of Director meetings either in person or via teleconference except one director was absent from one meeting. The Audit Committee met eleven (11) times during fiscal 2004. Each Audit Committee member attended all Audit Committee Meetings except one director was absent for one meeting. During fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee met four (4) times. Each Compensation Committee member attended all of the Compensation Committee Meetings. The Governance and Nominating Committee met three (3) times during fiscal 2004. Each Governance and Nominating Committee member attended all of the Governance and Nominating Committee Meetings.
What committees has the Board established?
The Board of Directors has standing Compensation and Audit Committees that were established prior to our initial public offering, and in March 2003 we constituted a standing Governance and Nominating Committee. The following sets forth Committee memberships as of the date of this proxy statement.
Governance and | ||||||||||||
Compensation | Audit | Nominating | ||||||||||
Director | Committee | Committee | Committee | |||||||||
Edward W. Stack | ||||||||||||
William J. Colombo | ||||||||||||
David I. Fuente | X | (c) | X | |||||||||
Emanuel Chirico | X | (c)† | ||||||||||
Walter Rossi | X | |||||||||||
Lawrence J. Schorr | X | X | X | (c) |
(c) | Denotes chair. | |
† | Mr. Chirico became Chairman of the Audit Committee in March 2005. |
Messrs. Chirico (Chairperson), Schorr and Rossi were members of the Audit Committee during fiscal 2004, which has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We adopted an Audit Committee charter that was effective upon completion of our initial public offering, which we amended and restated after the adoption of the final New York Stock Exchange rules relating to corporate governance in December 2003 and amended further in December 2004 to reflect additions changes in the New York Stock Exchange rules relating to corporate governance under which the Audit Committee reviews with management our internal financial controls, accounting procedures and reports. The Audit Committee also reviews the engagement of our independent auditors, makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the selection of independent auditors and reviews the scope, fees and results of any audit. Emanuel Chirico is qualified as the audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the SEC regulations and the Board has determined that he has accounting and financial management expertise within the meaning of the standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board has determined that Mr. Chirico is independent as the term is defined in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A and the Board has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of the SEC regulations relating to audit committee independence, the listing standards of New York Stock Exchange and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Audit Committee Charter is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website (www.dickssportinggoods.com).
Messrs. Fuente (Chairperson) and Schorr comprise the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee monitors our stock option and stock purchase plans and establishes the terms and conditions of all stock option grants. Our Compensation Committee Charter, which was amended in December 2004 to reflect changes in the New York Stock Exchange Rules relating to corporate governance, is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website (www.dickssportinggoods.com).
9
Table of Contents
Messrs. Fuente and Schorr (Chairperson) currently comprise the Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Stack served on the Governance and Nominating Committee in 2004 but resigned from the Committee in March of 2005. This committee provides oversight and guidance to the Board of Directors to ensure that the membership, structure, policies and processes of the Board and its committees facilitate the effective exercise of the Board’s role in our governance. The committee reviews and evaluates the policies and practices with respect to the size, composition and functioning of the board, evaluates the qualifications of and recommends to the full Board candidates for election as Directors, and reviews and recommends to the full Board the compensation and benefits for non-employee Directors. The Governance and Nominating Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that Messrs. Stack and Schorr stand for election as Class C Directors. Our Governance and Nominating Committee charter is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website (www.dickssportinggoods.com). Because the Company is a “controlled company” under the New York Stock Exchanges Corporate Governance Standards, it is not required to have an independent nominating committee. However, both Messrs. Fuente and Schorr would qualify as independent under the standards applicable to non-controlled companies under the New York Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance Standards.
How does the Board select nominees for the Board?
The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members and management. This committee will consider Director candidates from stockholders for election at the 2006 annual meeting if such nominees are submitted in accordance with the procedures set forth in “Additional Information — Advanced Notice Procedures.”
The Governance and Nominating Committee, at the direction of the Committee Chair, makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of a prospective candidate. This initial determination is based on whatever information is provided to the Committee with the recommendation of the prospective candidate, as well as the Committee’s own knowledge of the prospective candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others. The preliminary determination is based primarily on the need for additional Board members to fill vacancies or expand the size of the Board and the likelihood that the prospective nominee can satisfy the evaluation factors described below. If the Committee determines, in consultation with the other Board members as appropriate, that additional consideration is warranted, it may request that additional information about the prospective nominee’s background and experience be gathered and a report be prepared for the Committee. The Committee then would evaluate the prospective nominee against the standards and qualifications set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including, independence, integrity, experience, sound judgment in areas relevant to the Company’s businesses and willingness to commit sufficient time to the Board, all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that point in time. The Committee will also measure candidates against the criteria it sets, including skills and attributes that reflect the values of the Company. The Governance and Nominating Committee will also be responsible for reviewing with the Board, on an annual basis, the criteria it believes appropriate for Board membership.
The Committee will also consider such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for Audit Committee expertise and the evaluations of other prospective nominees. Depending on the needs of the Company at the time, the prospective nominees and such other factors as the Committee deems in its business judgment to be relevant, the Committee will take such other steps as are necessary to evaluate the prospective nominee, including, if warranted, one or more of the members of the Committee interviewing the prospective nominee. After completing this evaluation and other steps of the process the Committee would make a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Committee.
Does the Company have a Code of Ethics?
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all our officers, directors and employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer. The Code is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website (www.dickssportinggoods.com). We intend to
10
Table of Contents
How do stockholders communicate with the Board?
Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Board, the presiding non-management director or with the non-management directors as a group may do so by writing to the Board or Presiding Director (as the case may be), c/o Chief Administrative Officer and the Corporate Secretary, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., 300 Industry Drive, RIDC Park West, Pittsburgh, PA 15275 or e-mail at investors@dcsg.com to the attention of the Chief Administrative Officer and the Corporate Secretary. Effective March 25, 2004, the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board approved a process for handling letters received by the Company and addressed to non-management members of the Board. Under that process, our Governance and Nominating Committee has instructed our Chief Administrative Officer to (i) review any such correspondence, (ii) regularly forward to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and (iii) regularly forward to the presiding non-management director copies of all correspondence that is addressed to the presiding director or the non-management directors as a group or that, in the opinion of the Chief Administrative Officer, is intended for the presiding director or the non-management directors or that otherwise requires their attention. Directors may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by the Company that is addressed to members of the Board and request copies of any such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of the Company’s internal audit department and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters.
On March 2, 2005, the Board named David I. Fuente to act as the presiding non-management director for a one-year term (until the 2006 annual meeting proxy statement is filed or until his successor is duly appointed and qualified).
How does the Board determine which directors are considered independent?
On December 4, 2003, the Board adopted its Corporate Governance Guidelines which were amended on December 1, 2004 to reflect certain changes made by the New York Stock Exchange to its listing standards. The Guidelines adopted by the Board meet the new listing standards adopted during the year by the New York Stock Exchange for “controlled companies.” The portion of the Guidelines addressing director independence as amended to date is attached to this proxy statement as Annex I, and the full text of the Guidelines can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website (www.dickssportinggoods.com). A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary.
Pursuant to the Guidelines, the Board undertook its annual review of director independence on March 2, 2005 and March 24, 2005. During this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of any organization that has a relationship with the Company). As provided in the Guidelines, the purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.
As a result of this review, the Governance and Nominating Committee affirmatively determined that Messrs. Chirico, Fuente, Rossi and Schorr are independent directors in accordance with the standards set forth in the Guidelines.
Policy on Annual Meeting Attendance.
The Board’s official policy with respect to Board attendance at the annual meeting of stockholders is that the Board strongly encourages its members to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders; the Company also expects that most of its Directors will attend its 2005 annual meeting. All of the current members of the Board were in attendance at last year’s annual meeting.
11
Table of Contents
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Fuente and Schorr. Neither Mr. Fuente nor Mr. Schorr has ever been an officer or employee of ours or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers serve or have served as a member of the Board of Directors, Compensation Committee or other Board committee performing equivalent functions of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of our Directors or on our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee customarily has met and discussed matters relating to the compensation of our employees and key officers.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Some of our stockholders who own more than 5% of a class of our common stock have registration rights to register shares of our common stock under the Securities Act of 1933. They may request that we register their shares of common stock with the Commission, and, if all conditions under our registration rights agreement are met, we must register their shares. We would be required to bear specified expenses related to those registrations.
We owe entities established by the estate of Richard “Dick” Stack, our founder and father of Edward W. Stack, a balance of $190,000 as of February 1, 2005. The obligation represents the remaining balance on a $1,251,000 (the largest aggregate amount of indebtedness outstanding under the promissory note) in principal amount loan granted to us in 1986, payable at an annual interest rate of 12% in monthly installments of approximately $14,000 through May 1, 2006. The loan, which is subordinated to all of our senior indebtedness, may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty. The loan may be accelerated upon an event of default, including default on any payment on the loan for a period of 15 days after notice, default in the observance of any other covenant, condition or agreement for a period of 30 days, the acceleration of our other indebtedness or our inability to pay our debts as they become due. At the time the loan was granted to us, we believed the terms were consistent with the terms that we would have received from an unaffiliated third party in an arms-length transaction.
We also lease two locations from entities established by Dick Stack’s estate, one of which continues to operate as one of our stores and the second of which has been subleased to a third party. Our total monthly lease payments for the two locations is $20,000. We paid $240,000 under these leases in fiscal year 2004. The amount we are paying per square foot under these leases is comparable to the amounts we agreed to pay to unaffiliated third parties for other new leases that were entered into around the same time period.
We entered into an agreement with Edward W. Stack and Richard T. Stack, dated November 12, 1992, which gives Edward W. Stack an irrevocable proxy to vote all of our shares owned (including shares acquired in the future) by Richard T. Stack.
Kim Myers, the sister of our Chairman and CEO and a holder of more than 5% of our Class B common stock, is married to Tim Myers, our Director of Reverse Logistics, an employee in our Conklin, New York facility. During fiscal 2004, Mr. Myers was paid an aggregate salary and bonus of $163,300 for his services during the year.
Report of the Audit Committee
The following Report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.
The charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors specifies that the purpose of the Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its responsibility to:
• | oversee the integrity of the audit process, financial reporting and internal accounting controls of the Company; |
12
Table of Contents
• | oversee the work of the Company’s financial management, the internal auditors employed by the Company and any registered public accounting firm employed by the Company for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work; | |
• | oversee management’s development of, and adherence to, a sound system of internal accounting and financial controls and that internal auditors and outside auditors objectively assess the Company’s financial reporting, accounting practices and internal controls; and | |
• | provide an open avenue of communication between outside auditors, internal auditors and the Board. |
(In connection with the New York Stock Exchange’s adopting its revised Corporate Governance Standards, we amended and restated the Company’s Audit Committee Charter on December 1, 2004. The full text of the Committee’s charter is attached to this proxy statement as Annex II and is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website (www.dickssportinggoods.com).)
In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee, among other things:
• | provides oversight on matters relating to its appointment of and oversight of the outside auditors; | |
• | reviews matters concerning the appointment and oversight of the internal auditors; | |
• | provides oversight and review of accounting principles and practices and internal controls; | |
• | provides oversight and monitoring of the Company’s financial statements and audits; | |
• | oversees matters relating to communications with the outside auditors and management; | |
• | prepares an annual report to be included in the Company’s proxy statement relating to the annual report; and | |
• | provides oversight to the extent it deems necessary on certain other matters related to certain related party transactions. |
The Committee met eleven (11) times during fiscal 2004. The Committee schedules its meetings with a view to ensuring that it devotes appropriate attention to all of its tasks. The Committee’s meetings include, whenever appropriate, executive sessions with the Company’s independent auditors without the presence of the Company’s management.
As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Committee reviews and discusses with both management and the Company’s independent auditors all annual financial statements and quarterly operating results prior to their issuance. During fiscal 2004, management advised the Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Committee. These reviews included discussion with the outside auditors of matters required to be discussed pursuant toStatement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), including the adoption of, or changes to, the Company’s significant internal auditing and accounting principles and procedures as suggested by the outside auditors, internal audit and management and any management letters provided by the outside auditors and the response to those letters. The Committee also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP matters relating to its independence, including a review of audit and non-audit fees and the disclosures made to the Committee pursuant toIndependence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees)and the Audit Committee has received a written disclosure letter as required by that standard. The Audit Committee has also received, reviewed and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the report required by section 10A(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
13
Table of Contents
Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, the undersigned Committee members recommended to the Board of Directors that the Board approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005, for filing with the Commission.
Members of the Audit Committee | |
Emanuel Chirico (Chairperson) | |
Lawrence J. Schorr | |
Walter Rossi |
Audit and Non-Audit Fees and Independent Public Accountants
The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP (we sometimes refer to Deloitte & Touche LLP as D&T) for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for fiscal 2003 and 2004, and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T for fiscal 2003 and 2004.
Fiscal 2004 | Fiscal 2003 | |||||||
Audit fees(a) | $ | 727,724 | $ | 303,450 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(b) | 53,042 | 15,300 | ||||||
Tax Fees(c) | 171,538 | 248,000 | ||||||
All other fees | — | — | ||||||
Total all fees | $ | 952,304 | $ | 566,750 | ||||
(a) | Includes $320,934 of fees incurred in connection with review of Company compliance under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. | |
(b) | Principally audits of employee benefit plans. | |
(c) | Tax-related services related primarily to tax compliance (including U.S. federal and state returns), tax consulting and tax planning. |
During fiscal 2004, both on an annual basis and as it relates to specific engagements, the Audit Committee pre-approved the terms (including compensation) of all auditing services (including the provision of any comfort letters in connection with securities underwritings) and the terms of any permissible non-audit services and the compensation for such services.
D&T has served as our independent accountants since the audit for the 11-month period ended January 30, 1999. D&T has been selected by the Audit Committee to act as our independent public accountant for fiscal 2005. Representatives of D&T will be present at the meeting to respond to questions and to make statements as they desire.
Executive Compensation
Report of the Compensation Committee
The following Report of the Compensation Committee and the performance graph included elsewhere in this proxy statement do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report or the performance graphs by reference therein.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has furnished the following report on executive compensation for fiscal 2004.
14
Table of Contents
What is the Company’s philosophy of executive officer compensation? |
The Company’s compensation program for executives consists of three key elements:
• | a base salary; | |
• | a performance-based annual bonus, which is payable in cash; and | |
• | periodic grants of stock-based compensation, such as stock options. Under this approach, compensation for these officers involves a high proportion of pay that is “at risk,” in the form of the annual bonus, which is based, in significant part, on our performance. In addition, stock-based compensation such as stock options relate a significant portion of long-term remuneration directly to stock price appreciation realized by all of the Company’s stockholders. |
We believe that this three-part approach best serves the interests of our Company and its stockholders. It enables the Company to meet its requirements for management and creative talent while ensuring that executive officers are compensated in a way that advances both the short- and long-term interests of stockholders.
Base Salary. Base salaries for our executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, including any annual or other adjustments, are based upon recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer, taking into account such factors as salary norms in comparable businesses, a subjective assessment of the nature of the position and the contribution and experience of the officer. During fiscal 2004, recommendations relating to executive officers subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code were reviewed by the Compensation Committee.
Annual Bonus. Awards of annual bonuses to executive officers who are subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code were made by the Compensation Committee, and all other bonuses paid to non-executive officers were made in accordance with a formula established by the Compensation Committee and Chief Executive Officer.
Under the Company’s annual bonus program, executive officers and certain other employees are eligible to receive cash bonuses based upon the Company’s attainment of specific performance goals, primarily total Company pre-tax earnings, as recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation Committee. Target incentive bonus opportunities are established at the beginning of the fiscal year as measured by earnings before taxes at the total Company level. A specified percentage of a bonus program participant’s annual salary is used to determine any amount to be paid. A threshold level of performance is established below which no bonus award is paid, levels of performance at which specified percentages of the target bonus will be paid, and a maximum level of performance above which no additional bonus would be paid.
The fiscal 2004 bonus programs specified that the maximum bonus payable to the Chief Executive Officer is limited to four (4) times annual salary and the maximum bonus payable to the President and Chief Operating Officer, the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer is limited to 1.5 times annual salary and .75 times the annual salary for the Senior Vice President Merchandising.
Stock Options. During fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee operated under guidelines for stock option grants, which are generally applicable to all eligible employees. Under these guidelines, stock option grants are generally made on an annual basis in amounts that take into account such factors as market data on total compensation packages, the value of stock option grants at targeted external companies, total stockholder return, share usage and stockholder dilution. In appropriate cases, however, special grants may be authorized outside of the annual-grant framework.
Generally, all decisions to grant stock options are in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and, except for grants to the Chief Executive Officer, based upon recommendation from the Chief Executive Officer. Historically most options have vested over a minimum four (4) years. Virtually all options are granted with exercise prices equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock.
15
Table of Contents
How is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer compensated? |
Mr. Stack, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is eligible to participate in the same executive compensation program available to other Company executives and his total annual compensation, including compensation derived from the annual bonus program, was set by the Compensation Committee based on the same factors as other executives, namely, the continued increase in the Company’s earnings and the Company’s comparative performance versus other companies in the sporting goods retail category. Payments earned by Mr. Stack are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Stack as a greater than 5% stockholder is ineligible to participate in the Company’s employee stock purchase plan.
How is the Company addressing Internal Revenue Code limits on deductibility of compensation? |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the corporation’s chief executive officer and four (4) other most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of any fiscal year. However, the statute exempts qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements are met.
The Committee believes that it is generally in the Company’s best interest to attempt to structure performance-based compensation, including stock option grants and annual bonuses, to executive officers who may be subject to Section 162(m) in a manner that satisfies the statute’s requirements. However, the Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet Section 162(m) standards when necessary to enable the Company to meet its overall objectives, even if the Company may not deduct all of the compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee expressly reserves the authority to approve non-deductible compensation in appropriate circumstances. Further, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, no assurance can be given, notwithstanding the Company’s efforts, that compensation intended by the Company to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m) does in fact do so.
Members of the Compensation Committee | |
David I. Fuente (Chairperson) | |
Lawrence J. Schorr |
Severance and Other Arrangements
All of our executive officers have executed agreements with us providing them with severance payments upon termination of employment with us under certain circumstances. Upon the termination of employment of an officer under such circumstances we are obligated to pay to that officer an amount equal to the greater of (i) four (4) weeks of pay at the officer’s base salary or (ii) one week of pay for every year of employment with us. The severance payment is payable bi-weekly over the 12-month period following the officer’s termination. No severance payment is payable to the officer if the officer voluntarily terminates employment with us, retires or is terminated due to “cause” (as defined in the agreement), death, or permanent disability. The Company in its discretion may offer other arrangements to employees who end employment with the Company.
We entered into an offer letter with William R. Newlin, our Chief Administrative Officer and Executive Vice President who joined the Company on October 22, 2003. Under the offer letter, if Mr. Newlin’s employment terminates involuntarily within the first two years of employment, he receives severance of one year of base pay and the prorated portion of the bonus for that year. Any applicable severance amount doubles if there is an event where Edward W. Stack (whether by reason of stock ownership or position) is no longer in a position to make controlling judgments concerning Mr. Newlin’s responsibilities with the Company and Mr. Newlin chooses to leave the Company. As part of his offer letter, Mr. Newlin received a non-qualified stock option grant exercisable for 600,000 shares of our common stock, which vests 50%, 25% and 25% on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant and is exercisable for not less than six years from the dates of vesting. All of the option vests upon the occurrence of an event where Edward W. Stack (whether by reason of stock ownership or position)
16
Table of Contents
Summary Executive Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by our chief executive officer and our other executive officers (our “named executive officers”) for services rendered in all capacities to us in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Long-Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Compensation | Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Annual | Underlying | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus(1) | Compensation | Options/SARs (#) | Compensation(6) | |||||||||||||||||||
Edward W. Stack | 2004 | $ | 650,000 | $ | 2,600,000 | $ | 19,025 | (2)(4) | — | $ | 40,041 | (7) | |||||||||||||
Chairman and Chief | 2003 | 600,000 | 1,728,000 | 43,668 | (2)(4) | 1,920,000 | 41,941 | (8) | |||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer | 2002 | 600,000 | 1,800,000 | 106,637 | (3) | 1,848,000 | 37,774 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||
William J. Colombo | 2004 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 4,592 | (2)(4) | — | $ | 10,359 | (7) | |||||||||||||
President and Chief | 2003 | 450,000 | 648,000 | 3,428 | (2)(4) | 46,000 | 12,990 | (8) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating Officer | 2002 | 450,000 | 675,000 | 471 | (4)(5) | 462,000 | 8,904 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||
William R. Newlin | 2004 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 3,941 | (2)(4) | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and | 2003 | 126,346 | 181,938 | — | 646,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Administrative Officer(10) | 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Michael F. Hines | 2004 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 675,000 | $ | 2,049 | (2)(4) | — | $ | 2,596 | ||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and | 2003 | 450,000 | 648,000 | 831 | (2)(4) | 46,000 | 8,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2002 | 450,000 | 675,000 | — | (4) | 462,000 | 3,294 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gary M. Sterling | 2004 | $ | 375,000 | $ | 281,250 | $ | 1,713 | (2)(4) | — | $ | 6,500 | ||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, | 2003 | 334,750 | 240,615 | 1,116 | (2)(4) | 320,000 | 8,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Merchandising | 2002 | 323,558 | 242,668 | — | (4) | 10,000 | 3,294 |
(1) | Bonus awards shown in this column for fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004 were earned under our bonus program during and based on our performance in fiscal year 2002, 2003 and 2004 but were not paid until fiscal year 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. | |
(2) | Amount shown is the tax payment incurred as a result of (i) insurance and country club dues for Mr. Stack in fiscal year 2004, (ii) professional fees, personal air travel, insurance and country club dues for Mr. Stack in fiscal year 2003, (iii) professional fees and insurance for Mr. Colombo, (iv) country club dues for Mr. Newlin and (v) professional fees for Mr. Hines and Mr. Sterling. The amounts do not include the value of perquisites because they do not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of any such officer’s total annual salary and bonus. | |
(3) | Includes the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of providing perquisites and personal benefits to Mr. Stack in 2002, as well as tax payments of $45,741 made by the Company on behalf of Mr. Stack. The only perquisite which represents at least 25% of the total amount of all perquisites attributable to Mr. Stack for 2002 is the payment of the $45,000 fee due to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in connection with the Hart-Scott-Rodino filing made by Mr. Stack as a result of the share exchange occurring prior to the Company’s initial public offering. The 2002 tax payment for Mr. Stack is related to taxes incurred as a result of the payment of this regulatory filing fee, personal air travel, country club reimbursements and life insurance premiums (the amount for insurance premiums paid by the Company is disclosed for fiscal 2002 under All Other Compensation). The amounts incurred by the Company as a result of personal air travel, use of a company car and country club reimbursements are also included as Other Annual Compensation. | |
(4) | The amounts do not include the value of perquisites and other personal benefits because they do not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of any such officer’s total annual salary and bonus. | |
(5) | Amount shown is the tax payment incurred as a result of life insurance premiums. | |
(6) | All Other Compensation includes matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan and/or life insurance premiums. |
17
Table of Contents
(7) | Includes $9,000 and $4,590 of insurance premiums paid in fiscal 2004 by us on life insurance policies for the benefit of Messrs. Stack and Colombo, respectively. The beneficiaries under the policies, upon the executive’s death, are the executive’s respective spouses. For Mr. Stack, the amount also includes a $24,541 insurance premium paid in fiscal 2004 by us on an additional life insurance policy for which the Company is, upon the executive’s death, the beneficiary or where prior to death, Mr. Stack may receive the cash surrender value of the policy. The aggregate remaining premiums on this second policy are $98,164. Includes $6,500 and $5,769 of matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan for Messrs. Stack and Colombo, respectively. | |
(8) | Includes $9,000 and $4,590 of term life insurance premiums paid in fiscal 2003 by us on life insurance policies for the benefit of Messrs. Stack and Colombo, respectively. The beneficiaries under the policies, upon the executive’s death, are the executive’s respective spouses. For Mr. Stack, the amount also includes a $24,541 insurance premium paid in fiscal 2003 by us on an additional life insurance policy for which the Company is, upon the executive’s death, the beneficiary or where prior to death, Mr. Stack may receive the cash surrender value of the policy. The aggregate remaining premiums on this second policy are $122,705. Includes $8,400 and $8,400 of matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan for Messrs. Stack and Colombo, respectively. | |
(9) | Includes $9,939 and $5,610 of insurance premiums paid in fiscal 2002 by us on life insurance policies for the benefit of Messrs. Stack and Colombo, respectively. The beneficiaries under the policies, upon the executive’s death, are the executive’s respective spouses. For Mr. Stack, the amount also includes a $24,541 insurance premium paid in fiscal 2002 by us on an additional life insurance policy for which the Company is, upon the executive’s death, the beneficiary or where prior to death, Mr. Stack may receive the cash surrender value of the policy. The aggregate remaining premiums on this second policy are $147,246. Includes $3,294 and $3,294 of matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan for Messrs. Stack and Colombo, respectively. |
(10) | Mr. Newlin’s employment with us began on October 22, 2003 and his compensation for fiscal 2003 represents amounts paid from his start date. |
Option Grants in Fiscal 2004
During fiscal 2004 no stock options were granted to the named executive officers.
Option Exercises and Values for Fiscal 2004
The following table sets forth information with respect to the number and value of outstanding options held by executive officers named in the Executive Compensation Summary Table at the end of fiscal 2004.
Number of Securities | Value of Unexercised | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying Unexercised | In-the-Money | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Options/SARs at Fiscal | Options/SARs at Fiscal | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Year End (#) | Year End ($)(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | upon Exercise | Realized | Exercisable | Unexercisable | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ||||||||||||||||||
Edward W. Stack | — | — | 388,500 | 3,750,000 | $ | 11,915,370 | $ | 72,409,740 | ||||||||||||||||
William J. Colombo | 100,000 | $ | 3,083,670 | 560,134 | 496,500 | 17,904,288 | 13,188,225 | |||||||||||||||||
William R. Newlin | — | — | 311,500 | 334,500 | 4,755,475 | 4,954,425 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael F. Hines | 240,000 | 6,128,766 | 465,940 | 496,500 | 14,523,401 | 13,188,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gary M. Sterling | 55,000 | 1,296,950 | 270,780 | 320,000 | 8,437,557 | 2,841,900 |
(1) | Based upon the market price of $33.90, which was the closing price per share price of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the last trading day of fiscal 2004 (January 28, 2005), less the option exercise price per share. All amounts are pre-tax. |
18
Table of Contents
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURNS
The following graph compares the performance of the Company’s common stock with the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the “S&P 500 Composite Index”) and the S&P Specialty Retail Index for the periods indicated below. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on October 15, 2002 in the Company’s common stock, the S&P 500 Composite Index and the S&P Specialty Retail Index and that all dividends were reinvested.
CHART 1: S&P 500 and S&P Specialty Retail Index
The stock performance graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
Cumulative Total Return
10/15/02 | 1/31/03 | 1/30/04 | 1/29/05 | |||||||||||||
Dick’s Sporting Goods | $ | 100.00 | $ | 158.34 | $ | 414.58 | $ | 565.00 | ||||||||
S&P 500 Composite Index | 100.00 | 100.50 | 128.35 | 132.92 | ||||||||||||
S&P Specialty Retail Index | 100.00 | 86.30 | 131.64 | 146.26 |
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than the items referred to above. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by stockholders, proxies in the enclosed form returned to the Company will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holder.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
“Householding” of Proxy Materials. The Commission has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two (2) or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. The Company and some brokers household proxy
19
Table of Contents
Advance Notice Procedures. Under our bylaws, no business may be presented by any stockholder before an annual meeting unless it is properly presented before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or by a stockholder entitled to vote who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary (containing certain information specified in the bylaws about the stockholder and the proposed action) at least 150 days prior to the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting — that is, with respect to the 2006 annual meeting, by January 2, 2006. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the SEC’s requirements that a stockholder must meet in order to have a stockholder proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement.
Stockholder Proposals for the 2006 Annual Meeting. Stockholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders in 2006 may do so by following the procedures prescribed in SEC Rule l4a-8. To be eligible for inclusion, stockholder proposals must be received by the Company’s Corporate Secretary no later than January 2, 2006. Proposals should be sent to Corporate Secretary, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., 300 Industry Drive, RIDC Park West, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275.
Proxy Solicitation and Costs. The proxies being solicited hereby are being solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. The cost of soliciting proxies in the enclosed form will be borne by the Company. We have not retained an outside firm to aid in the solicitation. Officers and regular employees of the Company may, but without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by further mailing or personal conversations, or by telephone, telex, facsimile or electronic means. We will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock.
20
Table of Contents
ANNEX I
(EXCERPT FROM CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES)
Board Composition and Independence
Independent Directors. A majority of the Board members should qualify as independent directors (the “Independent Directors”) under the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and any other applicable regulatory authority.
The Board shall review annually the relationships that each director has with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). Following such annual review, only those directors who the Board affirmatively determines have no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) will be considered Independent Directors, subject to any additional qualifications under the listing standards of the NYSE or the roles of any other applicable regulatory authority.
A director will be deemed to have no material relationship with the Company and to be an Independent Director as long as: (i) the director is not or was not employed by the Company within the past three years and none of the director’s immediate family members is or was within the past three years an executive officer of the Company; (ii) neither the director nor any of his or her immediate family members receives or has during any 12 month period within the past three years received, more than $100,000 in direct compensation from the Company, other than (a) director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service)), or (b) compensation received by an immediate family member for services rendered as an employee of the Company (other than an executive officer); (iii) (a) neither the director nor an immediate family member of a director is a current partner of the Company’s internal or external auditor (the “Audit Firm”); (b) the director is not a current employee of the Audit Firm; (c) the director does not have a member of his/her immediate family who is a current employee of the Audit Firm and who participates in the Audit Firm’s audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice; or (d) neither the director nor any member of his or her immediate family who is a former partner or former employee of the Audit Firm within the past three years personally worked on the Company’s audit ; (iv) neither the director nor any of his or her immediate family members is or was within the past three years employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; (v) the director is not a current employee; nor is a member of his immediate family a current executive officer of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of (a) one million dollars ($1,000,000), or (b) two percent (2%) of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues; (vi) the director is not an executive officer, a partner or owner of more than ten percent of the equity interest of a company (a) to which the Company was indebted at the end of any fiscal quarter during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in an amount in excess of five percent (5%) of Company’s total consolidated assets at the end of such fiscal quarter or (b) which was indebted to the Company, other than in the ordinary course of business or on terms available to the public, at the end of any fiscal quarter during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in an amount in excess of $100,000 at the end of such fiscal quarter; (vii) the director is not an executive officer or partner of any investment banking firm that has performed services for the Company during the most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in the amount of fees paid to the investment banking firm exceeds five percent (5%) of the investment banking firm’s gross revenues for that firm’s most recently completed fiscal year; (viii) the director is not a member or of counsel to a law firm that the Company has retained during the most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in which the amount of fees paid to the law firm exceeds five percent (5%) of the law firm’s gross revenues for that firm’s most recently completed fiscal year; (ix) the director is not affiliated with a tax exempt entity that receives more than five percent (5%) of its total annual contributions from the Company (based on the tax exempt entity’s most recently completed fiscal year); and (x) neither the director nor any of his or her immediate family members (a) was indebted to the Company, other than in the ordinary course of business or on arms-length terms, at the end of any fiscal quarter during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year or current fiscal year in an amount in excess of
21
Table of Contents
The basis for any determination that a relationship is not material which does not meet the standards set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph will be explained in the Company’s annual proxy statement. However, no director shall be determined to be an Independent Director who has one of relationships described in clauses (i) through (v) of the preceding paragraph.
Management Directors. The Chief Executive Officer should serve on the Company’s Board. While the Board is willing to consider other members of management, in addition to the Chief Executive Officer, as directors, Board membership is not necessary or a prerequisite to any higher management position in the Company.
22
Table of Contents
ANNEX II
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
PURPOSES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Audit Committee has been created to implement and to support the oversight function of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to promote quality financial reporting, accounting policies, internal controls and independent and objective outside auditors.
The Audit Committee has responsibility to:
• | oversee the integrity of the audit process, financial reporting and internal accounting controls of the Company; | |
• | oversee the work of the Company’s financial management (“Management”), the internal auditors, if any, employed by the Company (the “Internal Auditors”) and any registered public accounting firm employed by the Company for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work (the “Outside Auditors”); | |
• | oversee Management’s development of, and adherence to, a sound system of internal accounting and financial controls and that the Internal Auditors and the Outside Auditors objectively assess the Company’s financial reporting, accounting practices and internal controls; and | |
• | provide an open avenue of communication between the Outside Auditors, the Internal Auditors and the Board. |
The Audit Committee will adopt policies and procedures for carrying out its responsibilities. Such policies and procedures should be flexible so the Audit Committee may react to changing conditions and ensure that the Company’s internal controls and accounting and financial reporting practices meet all legal requirements and are of the highest quality. The Audit Committee shall have the authority as it determines necessary to retain at the Company’s expense independent legal, accounting or other advisors to the Audit Committee. The Company will provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee for (i) the payment of compensation to any registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or preparing other audit, review or attest services for the Company, (ii) compensation to any advisor employed by the Audit Committee and (iii) ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.
While the Audit Committee has the specific responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is recognized that members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company and, as such, do not bear any of the responsibilities of management and the Outside Auditors. While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it has no duty or obligation to plan or conduct any audit or to determine or certify that the Company’s financial statements and disclosures are complete, accurate, fairly presented, and/ or presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable rules and regulations. The foregoing are the responsibilities of management and the Outside Auditors. The Outside Auditors are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and for reviewing the Company’s unaudited interim financial statements. The Audit Committee does not guarantee any report of the Outside Auditors.
Each member of the Audit Committee shall be entitled to rely on (a) the integrity of those persons and organizations within and outside the Company that provide financial and other information to the Audit Committee and (b) the accuracy and completeness of such information provided to the Audit Committee by such persons or organizations, absent actual knowledge to the contrary (which shall be promptly reported to the Board).
23
Table of Contents
MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE
1. The Audit Committee shall consist of no fewer than three members, as determined annually by the Board on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The members of the Audit Committee shall meet the independence and expertise requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, any other exchange on which the Company’s securities are traded, Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). Audit Committee members shall not serve simultaneously on the audit committees of more than two other public companies without the approval of the full Board.
2. The members of the Audit Committee shall be appointed annually by the Board on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee. Audit Committee members may be replaced by the Board at any time. The Board shall designate the Chairman or Chairwoman (“Chairperson”) of the Audit Committee.
3. The Board and its committees will exercise its business judgment to determine a director’s eligibility to serve on the Audit Committee.
MEETINGS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
4. The Audit Committee will meet or hold telephonic meetings as often as it deems appropriate to discharge its responsibilities, but shall meet at least four times each year. The Audit Committee may ask members of Management, the Outside Auditors, the Internal Auditors or others to attend any of its meetings and to provide any information it may deem appropriate.
5. To the extent it deems necessary, the Audit Committee will meet either as part of Audit Committee meetings or otherwise with Management, the Outside Auditors and the Internal Auditors, either with all or one or more of such group being present at any meeting, to discuss matters for which the Audit Committee has responsibility and shall at least twice each fiscal year meet separately with Management, the Outside Auditors and the Internal Auditors either as part of Audit Committee meetings or otherwise.
SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Appointment and Oversight of the Outside Auditors. |
6. The Outside Auditors are ultimately accountable to the Board and the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall be directly responsible for the appointment, retention, termination, compensation and terms of engagement, evaluation and oversight of the work of the Outside Auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the Outside Auditor regarding financing reporting). The Outside Auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee.
7. The Audit Committee will preapprove the terms (including compensation) of all auditing services (including the providing of any comfort letters in connection with securities underwritings), the terms of any non-audit services which the Outside Auditors or an affiliate of the Outside Auditors are permitted to render under Section 10A(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the compensation for such services. The Audit Committee may delegate the preapproval to one of its members, provided that if such delegation is made, the full Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting shall be presented with any preapproval decision made by that member.
8. The Audit Committee shall also, at least annually, obtain and review the Outside Auditor’s report on the firm’s internal quality-control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the Outside Auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the Outside Auditors, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and (to assess the Outside Auditor’s independence) all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company.
9. The Audit Committee shall be responsible for requiring that the Outside Auditors submit to it on a periodic basis a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the Outside Auditors and the Company, including the disclosures regarding the Outside Auditors independence required by the Independence
24
Table of Contents
10. The Audit Committee shall be responsible for actively engaging in a dialogue with the Outside Auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the Outside Auditors and for taking appropriate action in response to the Outside Auditors’ report to satisfy itself of the Outside Auditors’ independence.
11. The Audit Committee shall set clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the Outside Auditors.
Appointment and Oversight of Internal Auditors. |
12. The Audit Committee will review and concur in the appointment, replacement, reassignment or dismissal of the Company’s head of Internal Auditors and the compensation package for such person.
13. The Audit Committee will, as it deems necessary, evaluate the Internal Auditors and their impact on the accounting practices, internal controls and financial reporting of the Company.
14. The Audit Committee will assist board oversight of the performance of the Company’s internal audit function.
Oversight and Review of Accounting Principles and Practices and Internal Controls. |
15. The Audit Committee will, as it deems necessary, exercise oversight of, and review and discuss with Management, the Outside Auditors and the Internal Auditors:
A. significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, the clarity of the financial disclosures made, changes in the Company’s accounting principles or practices, the application of particular accounting principles and disclosure practices by Management to new transactions or events and the development, selection and disclosure of critical accounting estimates and analysis of alternative assumptions or estimates and the effect of such estimates on the Company’s financial statements; | |
B. potential major changes in generally accepted accounting principles and the effect of those changes on the Company’s financial statements; | |
C. changes in accounting principles, financial reporting policies and internal controls proposed to be implemented by the Company; | |
D. significant litigation, contingencies and claims against the Company and material accounting issues that require disclosure in the Company’s financial statements; | |
E. information regarding any “second” opinions sought by Management from an independent auditor with respect to the accounting treatment of a particular event or transaction; | |
F. management’s compliance with the Company’s processes, procedures and internal controls; | |
G. the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal accounting and financial controls and the recommendations of Management, the Outside Auditors and Internal Auditors for the improvement of accounting practices and internal controls; and | |
H. disagreements between Management and the Outside Auditors or the Internal Auditors regarding the application of any accounting principles or any other matter and the Audit Committee shall resolve any such disagreements. |
Oversight and Monitoring of the Company’s Financial Statements and Audits. |
16. The Audit Committee will review and discuss the annual audited financial statements (prior to the filing of its Form 10-K) and quarterly financial statements (prior to the filing of its Form 10-Q) with management, the
25
Table of Contents
17. The Audit Committee will, as it deems necessary:
A. review and discuss with management, and to the extent the Audit Committee deems necessary or appropriate, the Internal Auditors and the Outside Auditor, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the reports the Company files with the Commission comply with the Commission’s rules and forms. | |
B. review and discuss quarterly reports from the Outside Auditor on: |
(i) all critical accounting policies and practices to be used; | |
(ii) all alternative treatments under GAAP for policies and practices related to material items that have been discussed with management, including ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the Outside Auditor; | |
(iii) the internal controls adhered to by the Company, management, and the Company’s financial, accounting and internal auditing personnel, and the impact of each on the quality and reliability of the Company’s financial reporting; | |
(iv) other material written communications between the Outside Auditor and management, such as any management letter or schedule of unadjusted differences. |
C. discuss in advance with management the Company’s practice with respect to the types of information to be disclosed and the types of presentations to be made in earnings press releases, including the use, if any, of “pro forma” or “adjusted” non-GAAP information, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies. | |
D. discuss with management and the Outside Auditor the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives as well as off-balance sheet structures and aggregate contractual obligations on the Company’s financial statements. | |
E. discuss with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. | |
F. discuss with the Outside Auditor the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards (“SAS”) No. 61 relating to the conduct of the audit. In particular, discuss: |
(i) the adoption of, or changes to, the Company’s significant internal auditing and accounting principles and practices as suggested by the Outside Auditor, Internal Auditors or management; and | |
(ii) the management letter provided by the Outside Auditor and the Company’s response to that letter. |
G. receive and review disclosures, including any qualifications attached to the disclosure, made to the Audit Committee by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during their certification process for the Company’s Form 10-K and Form 10-Q about (a) any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls or material weakness therein, (b) any fraud involving management or other associates who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls and (c) any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. | |
H. discuss with the Outside Auditors any problems difficulties or disputes with Management encountered during the course of the audit and management’s response. |
26
Table of Contents
I. in accordance with section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, generally discuss earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies. |
Communications with the Outside Auditors. |
18. The Outside Auditors shall report directly to the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee will, as it deems necessary, communicate with the Outside Auditors to:
A. obtain information concerning accounting principles adopted by the Company, internal controls of the Company, Management, the Company’s financial, accounting and internal auditing personnel and the impact of each on the quality and reliability of the Company’s financial reporting; | |
B. obtain the information required to be disclosed to the Company by generally accepted auditing standards in connection with the conduct of an audit, including topics covered by SAS 54, 60 and 82; | |
C. obtain the report required to be delivered to the Audit Committee by the Outside Auditors on critical accounting policies and practices, on alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that the Outside Auditors discussed with Management and on other material written communications between the Outside Auditors and Management. | |
D. require the Outside Auditors to review the financial information included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q in accordance with Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) prior to the Company filing such reports with the Commission and to provide to the Company for inclusion in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q any reports of the Outside Auditors required by Rule 10-01(d). |
Communications with the Internal Auditors.
19. The Audit Committee will, as it deems necessary, communicate with the Internal Auditors to obtain information concerning accounting principles adopted by the Company, internal controls of the Company, Management, the Company’s financial and accounting personnel and the impact of each on the quality and reliability of the Company’s financial statements.
Communications with Management.
20. The Audit Committee will, as it deems necessary, communicate with Management to obtain information concerning accounting principles adopted by the Company, internal controls of the Company, the Outside Auditors, the Company’s financial, accounting and internal auditing personnel and the impact of each on the quality and reliability of the Company’s financial statements.
Audit Committee Reports.
21. The Audit Committee will prepare annually a report for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement relating to its annual shareholders meeting. In that report, the Audit Committee will state whether it has: (i) reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with Management; (ii) discussed with the Outside Auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as that statement may be modified or supplemented from time to time; (iii) received from the Outside Auditors the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standard Board Standard No. 1, as that standard may be modified or supplemented from time to time, and has discussed with the Outside Auditors, the Outside Auditors’ independence; (iv) received, reviewed and discussed with the Outside Auditors the report required by section 10A(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (v) based on the review and discussions referred to in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above, recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the Commission.
27
Table of Contents
22. To the extent such information is not included in the annual report of the Audit Committee to be included in the Company’s proxy statement relating to its annual shareholders meeting, the Audit Committee will also report at least annually to the Board on significant results of its activities and compliance with this Charter.
23. The Audit Committee will report regularly to the Board and review with the Board any issues that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the performance and independence of the Company’s independent auditors, or the performance of the internal audit function.
Additional Responsibilities.
24. The Audit Committee will:
A. as it deems necessary, conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the Audit Committee’s scope of responsibilities. The Audit Committee shall be empowered to retain independent counsel and other professionals to assist in the conduct of any investigation; | |
B. as it deems necessary, review and approve or disapprove the Company entering into any transaction with one or more Affiliates involving in excess of $60,000; | |
C. create a procedure for the confidential, anonymous submission by Company employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; | |
D. create a procedure for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; | |
E. conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Audit Committee. |
The Charter.
The Board and the Audit Committee shall review and update this Charter annually and otherwise as circumstances dictate.
28
Table of Contents
PROXY | ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF |
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company
The undersigned stockholder hereby appoints Edward W. Stack, William J. Colombo, William R. Newlin and Michael F. Hines, and each of them individually as proxies for the undersigned, each with full power of substitution for and in the name of the undersigned, to act for the undersigned and to vote, as designated on the reverse, all of the shares of common stock of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (the “Company”), and hereby appoints Edward W. Stack as proxy for the undersigned, with full power of substitution for and in the name of the undersigned, to act for the undersigned and to vote, as designated on the reverse, all of the shares of Class B common stock of the Company, which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, or adjournment or postponement thereof, to be held June 1, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., local time, at the Hyatt Regency, 1111 Airport Boulevard, Pittsburgh, PA 15231 to consider and act upon the following matters:
xPlease mark your votes as in this example.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” proposal number 1.
FOR | WITHHOLD | |||||
1. Item 1– Election of Directors – Election of two (2) Class C Members of the Board of Directors: Nominees: Edward W. Stack; Lawrence J. Schorr | o | o | ||||
Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write the nominee’s name in the space below. |
Please date, sign and mail your proxy card as soon as possible
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise specified in the boxes and space provided, the proxies shall vote in the election of directors for the nominees listed above, and shall have discretionary power to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The Board of Directors has established the close of business on April 11, 2005, as the record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
To change the name of your account, please check the box at the right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted by this method. | o |
Signature | |
(Signature if held jointly) |
Dated _______________________________________, 2005 |
IMPORTANT: Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon and mail it promptly even though you may plan to attend the meeting. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by a duly authorized person. |