Washington, D.C. 20549
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (In thousands of dollars, except per share amounts) |
Forward-looking Statements |
This report on Form 10-Q contains certain matters which are not historical facts, but which are forward-looking statements. Words such as "may," "should," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company intends for these forward-looking statements to qualify for safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include certain information relating to the Company’s business strategy; statements including, but not limited to:
| · | expected profitability and results of operations; |
| · | goals, priorities and plans for, and cost of, growth and expansion; |
| · | availability of water supply; |
| · | water usage by customers; and |
| · | ability to pay dividends on common stock and the rate of those dividends. |
The forward-looking statements in this report reflect what the Company currently anticipates will happen. What actually happens could differ materially from what it currently anticipates will happen. The Company does not intend to make any public announcement when forward-looking statements in this report are no longer accurate, whether as a result of new information, what actually happens in the future or for any other reason. Important matters that may affect what will actually happen include, but are not limited to:
| · | changes in weather, including drought conditions; |
| · | levels of rate relief granted; |
| · | the level of commercial and industrial business activity within the Company's service territory; |
| · | construction of new housing within the Company's service territory and increases in population; |
| · | changes in government policies or regulations; |
| · | the ability to obtain permits for expansion projects; |
| · | material changes in demand from customers, including the impact of conservation efforts which may impact the demand of customers for water; and |
| · | changes in economic and business conditions, including interest rates, which are less favorable than expected; and |
| · | other matters set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2007. |
General Information
The business of the Company is to impound, purify to meet or exceed safe drinking water standards and distribute water. The Company operates entirely within its franchised territory, which covers 39 municipalities within York County, Pennsylvania and seven municipalities within Adams County, Pennsylvania. The Company is regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, or PPUC, in the areas of billing, payment procedures, dispute processing, terminations, service territory, and rate setting. The Company must obtain PPUC approval before changing any of the aforementioned procedures. Water service is supplied through the Company's own distribution system. The Company obtains its water supply from both the South Branch and East Branch of the Codorus Creek, which together have an average daily flow of 89.0 million gallons per day. This combined watershed area is approximately 117 square miles. The Company has two reservoirs, Lake Williams and Lake Redman, which together hold up to approximately 2.2 billion gallons of water. The Company has a 15-mile pipeline from the Susquehanna River to Lake Redman which provides access to an additional supply of 12.0 million gallons of untreated water per day. As of March 31, 2008, the Company's average daily availability was 35.0 million gallons, and daily consumption was approximately 16.7 million gallons. The Company's service territory had an estimated population of 171,000 as of December 31, 2007. Industry within the Company's service territory is diversified, manufacturing such items as fixtures and furniture, electrical machinery, food products, paper, ordnance units, textile products, air conditioning systems, barbells and motorcycles.
The Company's business is somewhat dependent on weather conditions, particularly the amount of rainfall; however, minimum customer charges are in place, and the Company expects to cover its fixed costs of operations under all likely weather conditions.
The Company’s business does not require large amounts of working capital and is not dependent on any single customer or a very few customers for a material portion of its business. Increases in revenues are generally dependent on obtaining rate increases from regulatory authorities in a timely manner and in an adequate amount, and increasing volumes of water sold through increased consumption and increases in the number of customers served.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared
With Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Net income for the first quarter of 2008 was $1,206, a decrease of $120, or 9.0%, from net income of $1,326 for the same period of 2007. The primary contributing factors to the decrease in net income were increased operating expenses partially offset by higher water operating revenues.
Water operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 increased $121, or 1.6%, from $7,385 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to $7,506 for the corresponding 2008 period. The primary reason for the increase in revenues was customer growth. The average number of customers served in the first quarter of 2008 increased as compared to the same period in 2007 by 905 customers, from 58,101 to 59,006 customers due to growth in the Company’s service territory. Despite this increase in customers, the total per capita volume of water sold in the first quarter of 2008 decreased compared to the corresponding 2007 period by approximately two percent.
Operating expenses for the first quarter of 2008 increased $321, or 7.7%, from $4,193 for the first quarter of 2007 to $4,514 for the corresponding 2008 period. Higher depreciation expense of approximately $125 due to increased plant investment, higher salaries of approximately $100 due to wage increases and additional employees, increased health insurance costs of approximately $64, higher realty taxes of approximately $36 and meter repair expenses of approximately $34 were the principal reasons for the increase. Higher legal, director and banking fees and increased power expenses aggregating approximately $61 also added to the increase. The increase in expenses was partially offset by reduced software support expenses of approximately $88.
Interest expense on long-term debt for the first quarter of 2008 increased $176, or 18.6%, from $944 for the first quarter of 2007 to $1,120 for the corresponding 2008 period. The primary reasons for the increase were increased borrowings under the Company’s committed line of credit to fund operations and construction and higher variable interest rates.
Interest expense on short-term debt for the first quarter of 2008 was $28 higher than the same period in 2007 due to an increase in short-term borrowings partially offset by a reduction in rates. The average short-term debt outstanding was $4,253 for the first quarter of 2008 and $1,093 for the first quarter of 2007. The interest rate on short-term debt was 3.44% on March 31, 2008 compared to 6.02% on March 31, 2007.
Allowance for funds used during construction increased $145, from $27 in the first quarter of 2007 to $172 in the 2008 period, due to an increase in construction expenditures that were eligible for interest. Eligible 2008 construction expenditures include investment in a large water treatment expansion project.
Other expenses, net for the first quarter of 2008 decreased by $43 as compared to the same period of 2007. The decrease was primarily due to higher interest income in 2008 of approximately $61 on water district notes receivable. 2007 interest income on water district notes receivable included a negative adjustment (expense) due to the recalculation of a note. The increased income was partially offset by increased supplemental retirement expenses of approximately $21.
Federal and state income taxes for the first quarter of 2008 decreased by $96, or 12.9%, compared to the same period of 2007 primarily due to a decrease in taxable income. The Company’s effective tax rate was 35.0% in the first quarter of 2008 and 36.0% in the first quarter of 2007.
Rate Developments
From time to time the Company files applications for rate increases with the PPUC and is granted rate relief as a result of such requests. The most recent rate request was filed by the Company on April 27, 2006, and sought an increase of $4.5 million, which would have represented a 16.0% increase in rates. Effective September 15, 2006, the PPUC authorized an increase in rates designed to produce approximately $2.6 million in additional annual revenues, which represented an increase of 9.2% in the Company’s rates at such time. The Company is currently completing a new application for a 2008 rate increase. The Company expects to file the new application with the PPUC in May 2008.
Acquisitions
On January 5, 2007, the Company closed the acquisition of the water system of Abbottstown Borough which served approximately 400 customers in Adams County, Pennsylvania. The purchase price of approximately $900 was less than the depreciated original cost of these assets. The Company has recorded a negative acquisition adjustment of approximately $131 and is amortizing this credit over the remaining life of the acquired assets. The purchase was funded through internally generated funds and short-term borrowings. The Company began serving the customers of Abbottstown Borough in January, 2007.
On May 16, 2007, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire the water system of West Manheim Township in York County, Pennsylvania. This acquisition is expected to result in the addition of 2,100 customers and will cost approximately $2,075. The agreement was approved by both the PPUC and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The Company began construction on a main from its current distribution system to interconnect with West Manheim’s distribution system in April 2008. The interconnection and closing on this acquisition are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The Company has entered into an agreement to purchase the water facilities of the Asbury Pointe Water Company in York County, Pennsylvania. This acquisition is expected to result in the addition of 250 customers and will cost approximately $242. A request for approval of this purchase will be filed with the PPUC in May 2008. Following approval, the Company will acquire and continue to use Asbury Pointe’s distribution system through an interconnection with its current distribution system.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2008, current liabilities exceeded current assets by $5,029. At December 31, 2007, current liabilities exceeded current assets by $14,548. The change was primarily due to a decrease in current maturities of long-term debt, due to the redemption of our $12,000 variable rate PEDFA Series B Bonds described below and an increase in short-term borrowings. The Company maintains two lines of credit aggregating $28,000. Loans granted under these lines of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.70% to 0.75%. Both lines of credit are unsecured. One line, amounting to $11,000 is payable upon demand, whereas the other is a committed line with a revolving 2-year maturity. The Company had $12,964 outstanding borrowings under its lines of credit as of March 31, 2008 and $11,210 outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2007. The borrowings were incurred primarily for acquisitions and construction expenditures. $7,964 of the outstanding borrowings were under the committed line of credit and classified as long term, and $5,000 of the borrowings were under the short-term line. The weighted average interest rate on line of credit borrowings at March 31, 2008 was 3.67%. The Company is not required to maintain compensating balances on its lines of credit.
During the first three months of 2008, the Company was able to fund operating activities and construction expenditures using internally-generated funds, borrowings against the Company’s lines of credit, proceeds from the issuance of common stock under its dividend reinvestment plan (stock issued in lieu of cash dividends), or DRIP, and employee stock purchase plan, or ESPP, customer advances and the distribution surcharge allowed by the PPUC. The distribution surcharge allows the Company to add a charge to customers’ bills for qualified replacement costs of certain infrastructure without submitting a rate filing. The Company incurred $3,400 of construction expenditures for routine items as well as a new emergency diesel generator for the main pumping station, main replacements and a water treatment expansion project. The Company anticipates construction expenditures for the remainder of 2008 of approximately $23,240. In addition to routine transmission and distribution projects, a portion of the anticipated 2008 expenditures will be for additional standpipes, booster stations, upgrades to water treatment facilities, distribution center renovations, the West Manheim acquisition and main extension and various replacements of aging infrastructure. Internally-generated funds, borrowings against the Company’s lines of credit, proceeds from the issuance of common stock under its DRIP and ESPP, customer advances, the distribution surcharge and potential long-term debt and common stock issues will be used to satisfy the need for additional cash.
On May 7, 2008, the Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (PEDFA) issued $12,000 aggregate principal amount of PEDFA Exempt Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series A of 2008 (York Water Company Project) (the “Series A Bonds”) for our benefit pursuant to the terms of a trust indenture, dated as of May 1, 2008, between the PEDFA and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, as trustee. The PEDFA then loaned the proceeds of the offering of the Series A Bonds to us pursuant to a loan agreement, dated as of May 1, 2008, between us and the PEDFA. The loan agreement provides for a $12,000 loan with a maturity date of October 1, 2029. Amounts outstanding under the loan agreement are our direct general obligations. The proceeds of the loan were used to redeem the PEDFA Exempt Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series B of 2004.
Borrowings under the loan agreement bear interest at a variable rate as determined by PNC Capital Markets, as Remarketing Agent, on a periodic basis elected by us. We have currently elected that the interest rate be determined on a weekly basis. The Remarketing Agent determines the interest rate based on then current market conditions in order to determine the lowest interest rate which would cause the Series A Bonds to have a market value equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest thereon. As of May 7, 2008, the interest rate under the loan agreement was 2.61%.
In order to keep variable interest rates down and to enhance the marketability of the Series A Bonds, the Company entered into a Reimbursement, Credit and Security Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association (“the bank”) dated as of May 1, 2008. This agreement provides for a three-year direct pay letter of credit issued by the bank to the trustee for the Series A Bonds. The bank is responsible for providing the trustee with funds for the timely payment of the principal of and interest on the Series A Bonds and for the purchase price of the Series A Bonds that have been tendered or deemed tendered for purchase and have not been remarketed. The Company’s responsibility is to reimburse the bank the same day as regular interest payments are made, and within fourteen months for the purchase price of tendered bonds that have not be remarketed. The reimbursement period for the principal is immediate at maturity, upon default by the Company, or if the Bank does not renew the Letter of Credit. The Letter of Credit is a three-year agreement with a one-year extension evaluated annually.
In connection with the issuance of the PEDFA Series B Bonds of 2004, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction with a counterparty in the notional principal amount of $12,000. The interest rate swap agreement provides that the Company pay the counterparty a fixed interest rate of 3.16% on the notional amount. In exchange, the counterparty pays to the Company a floating interest rate (based on 59% of the U.S. Dollar one-month LIBOR rate) on the notional amount. The purpose of the interest rate swap is to manage the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The Company has elected to retain the swap agreement for the PEDFA Series A Bonds of 2008. The swap agreement expires on October 1, 2029.
As a result of this refinancing, the Company’s short-term obligation as of March 31, 2008, on the $12,000 Series B Bonds of 2004 is for interest only, and the principal amount represents a long-term obligation.
The Company is affected by inflation, most notably by the continually increasing costs incurred to maintain and expand its service capacity. The cumulative effect of inflation results in significantly higher facility replacement costs which must be recovered from future cash flows. The ability of the Company to recover this increased investment in facilities is dependent upon future rate increases, which are subject to approval by the PPUC. The Company can provide no assurances that its rate increases will be approved by the PPUC; and, if approved, the Company cannot guarantee that these rate increases will be granted in a timely or sufficient manner to cover the investments and expenses for which the rate increase was sought.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. Our accounting policies require us to make subjective judgments because of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical accounting estimates include: regulatory assets and liabilities, revenue recognition and accounting for our pension plans. There has been no significant change in our accounting estimates or the method of estimation during the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
The Company does not use off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations that may have a material current or future effect on financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources, or significant components of revenues or expenses. The Company does not engage in trading or risk management activities with the exception of the interest rate swap agreement mentioned above; does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes; has no lease obligations and does not have material transactions involving related parties.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See note 12 to the Financial Statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The Company does not use off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations that may have a material current or future effect on financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources, or significant components of revenues or expenses. The Company does not use securitization of receivables or unconsolidated entities. The Company does not engage in trading or risk management activities with the exception of an interest rate swap agreement, described below, does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes, has no lease obligations, and does not have material transactions involving related parties.
The Company's operations are exposed to market risks primarily as a result of changes in interest rates. This exposure to these market risks relates to the Company's debt obligations under its lines of credit. The Company maintains unsecured lines of credit aggregating $28,000 with two banks, under which there were borrowings of $12,964 outstanding as of March 31, 2008. Loans granted under these lines bear interest based on LIBOR plus 0.70 to 0.75 percent. One line, amounting to $11,000 is payable upon demand, whereas the other is a committed line with a revolving 2-year maturity. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under these lines at March 31, 2008 was 3.67%. A 25-basis point increase in LIBOR would cause additional interest expense of approximately $32 on an annual basis. Other than lines of credit, the Company has long-term fixed rate debt obligations and a variable-rate long-term debt obligation, the PEDFA Series B issue of 2004.
In May 2008, the PEDFA issued $12.0 million aggregate principal amount of PEDFA Exempt Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series A of 2008 (York Water Company Project) (the “Series A Bonds”). The PEDFA then loaned the proceeds to the Company pursuant to a variable interest rate loan agreement with a maturity date of October 1, 2029. The interest rate on the loan as of May 7, 2008 was 2.61%. In connection with the loan agreement, the Company continued its interest rate swap agreement which results in the Company’s floating rate obligation becoming substantially a fixed rate obligation. The purpose of the interest rate swap is to manage the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the interest rate. Moderate interest rate changes are not expected to have a material impact on cash flows relating to the interest rate swap.
The proceeds of the May 2008 Series A Bond issue were used to refund the PEDFA Exempt Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series B of 2004 (the “Series B Bonds”). The Series B Bonds had been tendered by the bondholders due to a bond insurer downgrade. After the Series B Bonds were tendered, they were held by the remarketing agent at a higher interest rate. Since the Series B Bonds were tendered, the Company’s interest cost, including swap payments, for the variable rate debt was averaging 5.00%, whereas in 2007, the interest cost averaged 3.77%. The Series A Bond issue will bring the interest rate on the variable rate bonds back down to more historic levels.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
(b) | Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following Part 1 exhibits are attached to this report: |
31.1 | |
31.2 | |
32.1 | |
32.2 | |