Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and those of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, inventory valuations, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair value of financial instruments |
|
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate their fair values. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentrations of Credit Risk |
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and accounts receivable. The Company places its short-term investments in high-credit quality financial institutions. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent of the amount recorded on the balance sheet. The Company’s cash balances periodically exceed the FDIC insured amounts. Accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and historically, such losses have not been significant. |
Customer Concentrations |
|
|
A limited number of customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues. The following table presents customers that accounted for more than 10% of revenue during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014: |
|
|
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine | |
Months Ended |
| | 31-Dec | | | 31-Dec | | | December 31, | | | 31-Dec | |
, | , | , |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Revenues from Customer A | | | N/A | | | | 14% | | | | 11% | | | | 15% | |
|
At December 31, 2014, Customer A accounted for 17% of net accounts receivable. At March 3 |
1, 2014, one customer accounted for 29% of net accounts receivable. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds, certificates of deposits, and commercial paper. Fair values of cash equivalents approximated original cost due to the short period of time to maturity. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The Company’s investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer of debt securities. |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When the Company believes a collectability issue exists with respect to a specific receivable, the Company records an allowance to reduce that receivable to the amount that it believes to be collectible. In making the evaluations, the Company will consider the collection history with the customer, the customer’s credit rating, communications with the customer as to reasons for the delay in payment, disputes or claims filed by the customer, warranty claims, non-responsiveness of customers to collection calls, and feedback from the responsible sales contact. In addition, the Company will also consider general economic conditions, the age of the receivable and the quality of the collection efforts. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives for computer software and equipment is three years, furniture and fixtures is five years, and leasehold improvements is the shorter of the applicable lease term or estimated useful life. |
Business Combinations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Business Combinations |
|
The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 - |
Business Combinations. |
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase consideration of an acquisition is allocated to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. |
The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. When determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows from customer relationships and acquired patents and developed technology; and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. |
Intangible Assets And Impairment Of Long Lived Assets Policy Policy Text Block | Intangible Assets and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
|
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names, and acquired technology. Intangible assets are recorded at fair values at the date of the acquisition and, for those assets having finite useful lives, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from two to five years. The Company periodically reviews its intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. There was no impairment charge recorded during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Goodwill |
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase consideration over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination and |
is allocated to reporting units expected to benefit from the business combination. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The Company has elected to first assess certain qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its single reporting operating unit is less than the carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test will be performed. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step will be performed; otherwise, no further step is required. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. Any excess of the goodwill carrying amount over the applied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company generates revenues by providing its software as a service solutions through subscription license arrangements and related professional services, as well as through perpetual and term licenses and related software maintenance and professional services. The Company presents revenue net of sales taxes and any similar assessments. |
|
Revenue recognition criteria |
. The Company recognizes revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) fees are fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is probable. If the Company determines that any one of the four criteria is not met, the Company will defer recognition of revenue until all the criteria are met. |
|
Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements. |
The Company enters into arrangements with multiple-deliverables that generally include subscription, support and professional services. If a deliverable has standalone value, and delivery is probable and within the Company’s control, the Company accounts for the deliverable as a separate unit of accounting. Subscriptions to use our software solutions have standalone value as such services are often sold separately, primarily through renewals. Professional services have standalone value as such services are often sold separately, and are available from other vendors. |
|
Upon separating the multiple-deliverables into separate units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the identified separate units based on a relative selling price hierarchy. The Company determines the relative selling price for a deliverable based on its vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”), if available, or its best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if VSOE is not available. The Company has determined that third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) is not a practical alternative due to differences in its service offerings compared to other parties and the availability of relevant third-party pricing information. The amount of revenue allocated to delivered items is limited by contingent revenue, if any. |
|
For professional services, the Company has established VSOE as a consistent number of standalone sales of this deliverable have been priced within a reasonably narrow range. The Company has not established VSOE for its subscription services due to lack of pricing consistency, and other factors. Accordingly, the Company uses its BESP to determine the relative selling price. |
|
|
The Company determined BESP by considering its price list, as well as overall pricing objectives and market conditions. Significant pricing practices taken into consideration include the Company’s discounting practices, contract prices per user, the size and volume of the Company’s transactions, the customer demographic, and its market strategy. |
|
Recurring revenues. |
Recurring revenues consist of subscription license sales, maintenance revenues from previously sold perpetual licenses, and hosting revenues. Recurring revenues are recognized ratably over the stated contractual period. |
|
Non-recurring revenues. |
Non-recurring revenues are comprised of revenues from professional services for system implementations, enhancements, and training, and perpetual license sales prior to fiscal 2015. For professional services arrangements billed on a time-and-materials basis, services are recognized as revenue as the services are rendered. For fixed-fee professional service arrangements, the Company recognizes revenue under the proportional performance method of accounting and estimates the proportional performance utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. If the Company does not have a sufficient basis to measure progress toward completion, revenue is recognized upon completion. The Company recognizes a loss for a fixed-fee professional service if the total estimated project costs exceed project revenues. Perpetual license sales are recognized upon delivery of the product, assuming all the other conditions for revenue recognition have been met. |
|
In certain arrangements with non-standard acceptance criteria, the Company defers the revenue until the acceptance criteria are satisfied. Reimbursements, including those related to travel and out-of-pocket expenses are included in non-recurring revenues, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses is included in non-recurring cost of revenues. |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign Currency |
|
The Company’s UK subsidiary’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate over the period. The net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. |
Research, Development, and Computer Software, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Capitalized Software Development Costs |
|
Software development costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are included in research and development expenses. The Company defines achievement of technological feasibility as the completion of a working model. Software development costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility through the period of general market availability of the products are capitalized, if material, after consideration of various factors, including net realizable value. |
|
Capitalized software are amortized once the product is available for general release, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the asset. Capitalized software developments costs are evaluated for recoverability based on estimated future gross revenues reduced by the associated costs. If gross revenues were to be significantly less than estimated, the net realizable value of the capitalized software would be considered impaired, which could result in the write-off of all or a portion of the unamortized balance of such capitalized software. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an accounting standard which completes the joint effort by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this update is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company intends to adopt this update in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The standard allows for full retrospective adoption applied to all periods presented or retrospective adoption with the cumulative effect of initially applying this update recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this authoritative guidance on its consolidated financial statements. |