Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Change in Presentation of Financial Statements During the first quarter ended June 30, 2014 in prior year, the Company changed the presentation of its financial statements to include third party consulting costs related to our Selectica Configuration Solutions in its cost of revenue. Previously, these costs were included in revenue and marketing expenses. Reclassifications of $0.1 million from research and development expense to recurring cost of revenue were made in fiscal 2015, to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification of the prior period amounts does not change the previously reported operating loss or net loss. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and accounts receivable. The Company places its short-term investments in high-credit quality financial institutions. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent of the amount recorded on the balance sheet. The Company’s cash balances periodically exceed the FDIC insured amounts. Accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and historically, such losses have not been significant. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds, certificates of deposits, and commercial paper. Fair values of cash equivalents approximated original cost due to the short period of time to maturity. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The Company’s investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer of debt securities. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Restricted Cash The Company’s restricted cash consist of certificates of deposits for our credit card for our office in the UK. |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When the Company believes a collectability issue exists with respect to a specific receivable, the Company records an allowance to reduce that receivable to the amount that it believes to be collectible. In making the evaluations, the Company will consider the collection history with the customer, the customer’s credit rating, communications with the customer as to reasons for the delay in payment, disputes or claims filed by the customer, warranty claims, non-responsiveness of customers to collection calls, and feedback from the responsible sales contact. In addition, the Company will also consider general economic conditions, the age of the receivable and the quality of the collection efforts. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and Equipment, Net Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives for computer software and equipment is three years, furniture and fixtures is five years, and leasehold improvements is the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life. |
Business Combinations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Business Combinations The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 - Business Combinations. |
Intangible Assets And Impairment Of Long Lived Assets, [Policy Policy Text Block] | Intangible Assets and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names, and acquired technology. Intangible assets are recorded at fair values at the date of the acquisition and, for those assets having finite useful lives, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from two to five years. The Company periodically reviews its intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company then compares the carrying amounts of the assets with the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such asset. Should an impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset’s fair value determined using discounted estimates of future cash flows. There was no impairment charge recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase consideration over the net tangible and an identifiable intangible asset acquired in a business combination and is allocated to reporting units expected to benefit from the business combination. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The Company has elected to first assess certain qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its single reporting operating unit is less than the carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test will be performed. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step will be performed; otherwise, no further step is required. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. Any excess of the goodwill carrying amount over the applied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015. |
Customer Concentration Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Customer Concentrations A limited number of customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues. The following table presents customers that accounted for more than 10% of revenue and AR during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014: Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Revenues from Customer A * 14 % Revenues from Customer B * 12 % Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Accounts Receivable from Customer C * 23 % Accounts Receivable from Customer D * 10 % Accounts Receivable from Customer E 10 % * |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenues by providing its software as a service solutions through subscription license arrangements and related professional services, as well as through perpetual and term licenses and related software maintenance and professional services. The Company presents revenue net of sales taxes and any similar assessments. Revenue recognition criteria Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements. 9 Upon separating the multiple-deliverables into separate units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the identified separate units based on a relative selling price hierarchy. The Company determines the relative selling price for a deliverable based on its vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”), if available, or its best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if VSOE is not available. The Company has determined that third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) is not a practical alternative due to differences in its service offerings compared to other parties and the availability of relevant third-party pricing information. The amount of revenue allocated to delivered items is limited by contingent revenue, if any. For professional services and subscription services, the Company has not established VSOE due to lack of pricing consistency, and other factors. Accordingly, the Company uses its BESP to determine the relative selling price. The Company determined BESP by considering its price list, as well as overall pricing objectives and market conditions. Significant pricing practices taken into consideration include the Company’s discounting practices, contract prices per user, the size and volume of the Company’s transactions, the customer demographic, and its market strategy. Recurring revenues. Non-recurring revenues. In certain arrangements with non-standard acceptance criteria, the Company defers the revenue until the acceptance criteria are satisfied. Reimbursements, including those related to travel and out-of-pocket expenses are included in non-recurring revenues, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses is included in non-recurring cost of revenues. |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Advertising Expense The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $175,000 and $95,000 respectively. |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign Currency The Company’s UK subsidiary’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate over the period. The net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. |
Research, Development, and Computer Software, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Capitalized Software Development Costs Software development costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are included in research and development expenses. The Company defines achievement of technological feasibility as the completion of a working model. Software development costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility through the period of general market availability of the products are capitalized, if material, after consideration of various factors, including net realizable value. Capitalized software costs are amortized once the product is available for general release, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the asset. Capitalized software developments costs are evaluated for recoverability based on estimated future gross revenues reduced by the associated costs. If gross revenues were to be significantly less than estimated, the net realizable value of the capitalized software would be considered impaired, which could result in the write-off of all or a portion of the unamortized balance of such capitalized software. There is no impairment charges recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for only those awards ultimately expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option’s expected term and stock price volatility. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, its stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. |
Geographic Information, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Geographic Information: International revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of the customers. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, sales to international locations were derived primarily from Canada, India, New Zealand, Switzerland, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Norway and the United Kingdom. Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 International Revenues 27 % 3 % Domestic Revenues 73 % 97 % Total Revenues 100 % 100 % For the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company held long-lived assets outside of the United States with a net book value of approximately $16,000 and $47,000, respectively. These assets were located in Odessa, Ukraine. |
Stockholders' Equity, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Treasury Stock There were no stock repurchases during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. The Company had 96,000 shares of treasury stock as of June 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Subtopic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”) which amended the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This standard establishes a principle for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also provides guidance on the recognition of costs related to obtaining and fulfilling customer contracts. In April 2015, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of the effective date for the new revenue reporting standard for entities reporting under U.S. GAAP. In accordance with the deferral, ASU 2014-09 will be effective for fiscal 2019, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently in the process of assessing the adoption methodology, which allows the amendment to be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented, or with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. The Company is also evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and has not determined whether the effect will be material to either its revenue results or its deferred commission balances. In August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40).” The new guidance addresses management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect to early adopt this guidance and does not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |