Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. It also includes non-controlling interest, which is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable to a parent. The non-controlling interest of the Company and its subsidiaries are not considered to be permanent equity. Non-controlling interest’s share of subsidiary earnings is reflected as net income attributable to non-controlling interest in the condensed consolidated statements of loss. |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Non-Controlling Interest On July 31, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of b-pack and its subsidiaries. Determine, SAS is headquartered in Paris, France, and has the following subsidiaries: b-pack Software, in charge of the sales and marketing, b-pack Services, incorporated in Aix-en-Provence, France and b-pack, Inc. incorporated in Atlanta, Georgia that primarily operates as a sales office in the US. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of b-pack Services in which the Company owns 82%, maintaining a controlling interest. Total Assets $ 381,000 Total Liabilities $ (502,000 ) Income before Income Taxes $ 216,000 |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Change in Presentation of Financial Statements During the first quarter ended June 30, 2014 in prior year, the Company changed the presentation of its financial statements to include third party consulting costs related to our Selectica Configuration Solutions in cost of revenue. Previously, these costs were included in sales and marketing expenses. Reclassifications of $0.4 million from sales and marketing to cost of revenue were made in fiscal 2015, to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification of the prior period amounts does not significantly change the previously reported operating loss or net loss. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent of the amount recorded on the balance sheet. The Company’s cash balances periodically exceed the FDIC insured amounts. Accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and historically, such losses have not been significant. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds, certificates of deposits, and commercial paper. Fair values of cash equivalents approximated original cost due to the short period of time to maturity. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The Company’s investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer of debt securities. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Restricted Cash The Company’s restricted cash consist of certificates of deposits for our credit card for our office in the UK. |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When the Company believes a collectability issue exists with respect to a specific receivable, the Company records an allowance to reduce that receivable to the amount that it believes to be collectible. In making the evaluations, the Company will consider the collection history with the customer, the customer’s credit rating, communications with the customer as to reasons for the delay in payment, disputes or claims filed by the customer, warranty claims, non-responsiveness of customers to collection calls, and feedback from the responsible sales contact. In addition, the Company will also consider general economic conditions, the age of the receivable and the quality of the collection efforts. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and Equipment, Net Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives for computer software and equipment is three years, furniture and fixtures is five years, and leasehold improvements is the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life. |
Business Combinations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Business Combinations The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 - Business Combinations. |
Intangible Assets And Impairment Of Long Lived Assets, [Policy Policy Text Block] | Intangible Assets and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names, and acquired technology. Intangible assets are recorded at fair value at the date of the acquisition and, for those assets having finite useful lives, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from two to five years. The Company periodically reviews its intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company then compares the carrying amounts of the assets with the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such asset. Should an impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset’s fair value determined using discounted estimates of future cash flows. There was no impairment charge recorded during the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase consideration over the net tangible and an identifiable intangible asset acquired in a business combination and is allocated to reporting units expected to benefit from the business combination. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The Company has elected to first assess certain qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its single reporting operating unit is less than the carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test will be performed. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step will be performed; otherwise, no further step is required. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. Any excess of the goodwill carrying amount over the applied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded during the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. |
Customer Concentration Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Customer Concentrations A limited number of customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues. The following table presents customers that accounted for more than 10% of revenue: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Revenues from Customer A * 10 % * 12 % |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenues by providing its software as a service solutions through subscription license arrangements and related professional services, as well as through perpetual and term licenses and related software maintenance and professional services. The Company presents revenue net of sales taxes and any similar assessments. Revenue recognition criteria The Company recognizes revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) fees are fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is probable. If the Company determines that any one of the four criteria is not met, the Company will defer recognition of revenue until all the criteria are met. Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements. Upon separating the multiple-deliverables into separate units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the identified separate units based on a relative selling price hierarchy. The Company determines the relative selling price for a deliverable based on its vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”), if available, or its best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if VSOE is not available. The Company has determined that third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) is not a practical alternative due to differences in its service offerings compared to other parties and the availability of relevant third-party pricing information. The amount of revenue allocated to delivered items is limited by contingent revenue, if any. For professional services and subscription services, the Company has not established VSOE due to lack of pricing consistency, and other factors. Accordingly, the Company uses its BESP to determine the relative selling price. The Company determined BESP by considering its price list, as well as overall pricing objectives and market conditions. Significant pricing practices taken into consideration include the Company’s discounting practices, contract prices per user, the size and volume of the Company’s transactions, the customer demographic, and its market strategy. Recurring revenues. Recurring revenues consist of subscription license sales, maintenance revenues from previously sold perpetual licenses, and hosting revenues. Recurring revenues are recognized ratably over the stated contractual period. Non-recurring revenues. Non-recurring revenues are comprised of revenues from professional services for system implementations, enhancements, training, and perpetual license sales prior to fiscal 2015. For professional services arrangements billed on a time-and-materials basis, services are recognized as revenue as the services are rendered. For fixed-fee professional service arrangements, the Company recognizes revenue under the proportional performance method of accounting and estimates the proportional performance utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. If the Company does not have a sufficient basis to measure progress toward completion, revenue is recognized upon completion. The Company recognizes a loss for a fixed-fee professional service if the total estimated project costs exceed project revenues. Perpetual license sales are recognized upon delivery of the product, assuming all the other conditions for revenue recognition have been met. |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Advertising Expense The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Advertising expense for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2014 were approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign Currency For the Company’s UK subsidiary, the functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate over the period. Resulting currency translation adjustments and net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. For French subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate over the period. Resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Los s The accumulated other comprehensive loss balance consists of translation gains and losses related to our international subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro. |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Capitalized Software Development Costs The Company capitalizes costs for internal use incurred during the application development stage that are included in research and development expenses. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software will be amortized once the product is available for general release, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which has been determined to be three years based on Management’s discussion and industry average. Capitalized software developments costs are evaluated for recoverability based on estimated future gross revenues reduced by the associated costs. If gross revenues were to be significantly less than estimated, the net realizable value of the capitalized software intended for sale would be impaired, which could result in the write-off of all or a portion of the unamortized balance of such capitalized software. Management has performed the net realizable value analysis and that no impairment of capitalized costs is deemed necessary as of September 30, 2015. Capitalized software will be amortized once the product is available for general release, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which has been determined to be three years based on Management’s discussion and industry average. Capitalized software developments costs are evaluated for recoverability based on estimated future gross revenues reduced by the associated costs. If gross revenues were to be significantly less than estimated, the net realizable value of the capitalized software intended for sale would be impaired, which could result in the write-off of all or a portion of the unamortized balance of such capitalized software. Management has performed the net realizable value analysis and that no impairment of capitalized costs is deemed necessary as of September 30, 2015. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for only those awards ultimately expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option’s expected term and stock price volatility. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, its stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. |
Geographic Information, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Geographic Information: International revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of the customers. For the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, sales to international locations were derived primarily from France, Canada, India, New Zealand, Switzerland, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Norway and the United Kingdom. Three Months Ended Six Months Ended September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 International Revenues 18 % 22 % 14 % 14 % Domestic Revenues 82 % 78 % 86 % 86 % Total Revenues 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % For the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company held long-lived assets outside of the United States with a net book value of approximately $21,000 and $50,000, respectively. These assets were located in Odessa, Ukraine. |
Stockholders' Equity, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Treasury Stock There were no stock repurchases during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. The Company had 96,000 shares of treasury stock as of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments In June 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-10, Technical Corrections and Improvements In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.” ASU 2015-15 supplements the requirements of ASU 2015-03 by allowing an entity to defer and present debt issuance costs related to a line of credit arrangement as an asset and subsequently amortize the deferred costs ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement. The Company has not determined in which period it will adopt the new guidance. Retrospective adoption is required. Long-term debt issuance costs will be reclassified from other assets to long-term debt upon adoption. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Subtopic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”) which amended the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This standard establishes a principle for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also provides guidance on the recognition of costs related to obtaining and fulfilling customer contracts. In April 2015, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of the effective date for the new revenue reporting standard for entities reporting under U.S. GAAP. In accordance with the deferral, ASU 2014-09 will be effective for fiscal 2019, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently in the process of assessing the adoption methodology, which allows the amendment to be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented, or with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. The Company is also evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and has not determined whether the effect will be material to either its revenue results or its deferred commission balances. In August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40).” The new guidance addresses management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect to early adopt this guidance and does not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements. |