Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. It also includes non-controlling interest, which is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable to a parent. The non-controlling interest of the Company and its subsidiaries are not considered to be permanent equity. Non-controlling interest’s share of subsidiary earnings is reflected as net income attributable to non-controlling interest in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Liquidity The Company has incurred significant historical losses and negative cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit of $302.3 million at March 31, 2016. Until the Company can generate significant cash from operations, its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon obtaining additional financing. Management intends to raise additional funds through equity and/or debt offerings until the Company has positive operating cash flows. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating or raising funds, if necessary, to sustain its operations for twelve months or beyond. Should the Company be unable to generate funds or obtain future financing, the Company may have to curtail operations by delaying development programs or relinquishing employees, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. Non-Controlling Interest On July 31, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of b-pack and its subsidiaries resulting in Determine SAS continuing as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Determine SAS is headquartered in Paris, France, and has the following subsidiaries: b-pack Software, in charge of the sales and marketing, b-pack Services, incorporated in Aix-en-Provence, France and b-pack, Inc. incorporated in Atlanta, Georgia that primarily operates as a sales office in the US. b-pack, Inc. became a subsidiary of Determine, Inc. and was then merged into Determine, Inc. b-pack Software became a subsidiary of Determine SAS and was then merged into Determine SAS. As of March 31, 2016 neither b-pack, Inc. nor b-pack Software existed. The consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of b-pack Services in which the Company owns 82%, maintaining a controlling interest. Total assets $ 517,000 Total liabilities $ (822,000 ) Loss before income taxes $ (72,000 ) Change in Presentation of Financial Statements During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, the Company changed the presentation of its consolidated financial statements to separate the impairment of capitalized software development costs and acquisition related costs from operating expenses. Previously, these costs were included in research and development expenses of $0.3 million and general and administrative expenses of $1.7 million, respectively, to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification of the prior period amounts did not change the previously reported operating loss or net loss. Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent of the amount recorded on the balance sheet. The Company’s cash balances periodically exceed the FDIC insured amounts. Accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and historically, such losses have not been significant. Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds and commercial paper. Fair values of cash equivalents approximated original cost due to the short period of time to maturity. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The Company’s investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer of debt securities. Restricted Cash The Company’s restricted cash consist of certificates of deposits for our credit card for our office in the UK. Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When the Company believes a collectability issue exists with respect to a specific receivable, the Company records an allowance to reduce that receivable to the amount that it believes to be collectible. In making the evaluations, the Company will consider the collection history with the customer, the customer’s credit rating, communications with the customer as to reasons for the delay in payment, disputes or claims filed by the customer, warranty claims, non-responsiveness of customers to collection calls, and feedback from the responsible sales contact. In addition, the Company will also consider general economic conditions, the age of the receivable and the quality of the collection efforts. Property and Equipment, Net Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives for computer software and equipment is three years, furniture and fixtures is five years, and leasehold improvements is the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life. Business Combinations The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 - Business Combinations. estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows from customer relationships and acquired patents and developed technology; and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. Intangible Assets and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names, and acquired technology. Intangible assets are recorded at fair value at the date of the acquisition and, for those assets having finite useful lives, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from two to five years. The Company periodically reviews its intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company then compares the carrying amounts of the assets with the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such asset. Should an impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset’s fair value determined using discounted estimates of future cash flows. There was a $1.4 million and $0.3 million impairment charge recorded during the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase consideration over the net tangible and an identifiable intangible asset acquired in a business combination and is allocated to reporting units expected to benefit from the business combination. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The Company has elected to first assess certain qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its single reporting operating unit is less than the carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test will be performed. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step will be performed; otherwise, no further step is required. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. Any excess of the goodwill carrying amount over the applied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded during years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Customer Concentrations A limited number of customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues. The following table presents customers that accounted for more than 10% of revenue: 2016 2015 (in thousands, except percentages) Revenues from Customer A $ - $ 2,102 Percentage of total revenues - 10 % As of March 31, 2016, no customers accounted for at least 10% of net accounts receivable or revenue. As of March 31, 2015, Customer A accounted for 15% of net accounts receivable. Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenues by providing its software-as-a-service solutions through subscription license arrangements and related professional services, and related software maintenance. The Company presents revenue net of sales taxes and any similar assessments. Revenue recognition criteria The Company recognizes revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) fees are fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. If the Company determines that any one of the four criteria is not met, the Company will defer recognition of revenue until all the criteria are met. Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements. The Company enters into arrangements with multiple-deliverables that generally include subscription, support, and professional services. If a deliverable has standalone value, and delivery is probable and within the Company’s control, the Company accounts for the deliverable as a separate unit of accounting. Subscriptions to use our software solutions have standalone value as such services are often sold separately, primarily through renewals. Professional services have standalone value as the services have value to the customer on a standalone basis and are available from other vendors. Upon separating the multiple-deliverables into separate units of accounting, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the identified separate units based on a relative selling price hierarchy. The Company determines the relative selling price for a deliverable based on its vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”), if available, or its best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if VSOE is not available. The Company has determined that third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) is not a practical alternative due to differences in its service offerings compared to other parties and the availability of relevant third-party pricing information. The amount of revenue allocated to delivered items is limited by contingent revenue, if any. For professional services and subscription services, the Company has not established VSOE due to lack of pricing consistency, and other factors. Accordingly, the Company uses its BESP to determine the relative selling price. The Company determined BESP by considering its price list, as well as overall pricing objectives and market conditions. Significant pricing practices taken into consideration include the Company’s discounting practices, contract prices per user, the size and volume of the Company’s transactions, the customer demographic, and its market strategy. Recurring revenues. Recurring revenues consist of subscription license sales, maintenance revenues from previously sold perpetual licenses, and hosting revenues. Recurring revenues are recognized ratably over the stated contractual period. Non-recurring revenues. Non-recurring revenues are comprised of revenues from professional services for system implementations, enhancements, and training. For professional services arrangements billed on a time-and-materials basis, services are recognized as revenue as the services are rendered. For fixed-fee professional service arrangements, the Company recognizes revenue under the proportional performance method of accounting and estimates the proportional performance utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. If the Company does not have a sufficient basis to measure progress toward completion, revenue is recognized upon completion. The Company recognizes a loss for a fixed-fee professional service if the total estimated project costs exceed project revenues. Advertising Expense The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended March 31, 2016 were approximately $588,000. Advertising expense for the years ended March 31, 2015 were approximately $614,000. Foreign Currency For the Company’s UK subsidiary, the functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate over the period. Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. For French subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate over the period. Resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Los s The accumulated other comprehensive loss balance consists of translation gains and losses related to our international subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro. Capitalized Software Development Costs The Company capitalizes costs for internal use software incurred during the application development stage that are included in research and development expenses. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software will be amortized once the product is ready for its intended use, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, w hich is three years. Management incurred impairment costs of $0.3 million in fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. During fiscal 2016, the Company continued to evaluate the capitalized software development costs across all products lines with the recent acquisition of b-pack. Given this conclusion, the Company impaired the investment previously made in what was to be a separate platform to hold all products, resulting in an impairment charge of $1.4 million in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for only those awards ultimately expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option’s expected term and stock price volatility. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, its stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Geographic Information: International revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of the customers. For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, sales to international locations were derived primarily from France, Bermuda, China, Denmark, Brazil, Canada, India, Italy, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Norway and the United Kingdom. Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2016 2015 (in thousands, except percentages) International revenue 21 % 13 % Domestic revenue 79 % 87 % Total revenue 100 % 100 % For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held long-lived assets outside of the United States with a net book value of approximately $13,000 and $47,000, respectively. These assets were located in Odessa, Ukraine. Treasury Stock There were no stock repurchases for the years ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015. The Company had approximately 96,000 shares of treasury stock as of March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities In February 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“ In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments In June 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-10, Technical Corrections and Improvements In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles−Goodwill and Other−Internal-use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, December 15, 2015 and interim. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this update on our consolidated financial statements. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Subtopic 810) Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) In August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). |