LOAN PORTFOLIO | NOTE 4 – LOAN PORTFOLIO Loans consisted of the following: June 30, December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2016 2015 Residential $ 70,577 $ 75,081 Commercial Real Estate 86,998 101,291 Commercial 36,760 27,881 Consumer 4,737 5,114 Total gross loans $ 199,072 $ 209,367 At June 30, 2016, $4.3 million of loans receivable were transferred to loans held for sale. The loans were recorded at fair value on June 30, 2016, which was equal to the sales contract value. Differences between the carrying values and contract values were charged off through the allowance for loan losses. Prior to the transfer to loans held for sale, all of the loans were classified as nonaccrual and $3.3 million of the loans were classified as TDRs with an initial carrying value of $5.5 million. These loans have been presented separately and consisted of the following: Initial Balance Carrying Charged-off June 30, (Dollars in thousands) Value Amount 2016 Residential $ 1,830 $ (744 ) $ 1,086 Commercial Real Estate 4,749 (1,930 ) 2,819 Commercial 615 (250 ) 365 Consumer 17 (7 ) 10 Total loans held for sale $ 7,211 $ (2,931 ) $ 4,280 Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses An allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to adequately provide for known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. In evaluating the adequacy of the Company’s loan loss reserves, management identifies loans believed to be impaired. Impaired loans are those not likely to be repaid as to principal and interest in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, or liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Reserves are maintained for each loan in which the principal balance of the loan exceeds the net present value of cash flows. In addition to the specific allowance for individually reviewed loans, a general allowance for potential loan losses is established based on management’s review of the composition of the loan portfolio with the purpose of identifying any concentrations of risk, and an analysis of historical loan charge-offs and recoveries. The final component of the allowance for loan losses incorporates management’s evaluation of current economic conditions and other risk factors which may impact the inherent losses in the loan portfolio. These evaluations are highly subjective and require that a great degree of judgmental assumptions be made by management. This component of the allowance for loan losses includes additional estimated reserves for internal factors such as changes in lending staff, loan policy and underwriting guidelines, and loan seasoning and quality, and external factors such as national and local economic trends and conditions. Based on management observation, judgment, and experience, environmental factors used in the allowance for loan loss model were reassessed during the second quarter of 2016 for all loan classes. Management also determined that a look back period of twelve quarters would be more appropriate in light of recent changes to the economy. The allowance was previously based on a six quarter look back period. The impact of the change to the model resulted in a $2.1 million increase to the loan loss reserves as of the time of the change. The following table details the activity within our allowance for loan losses as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, by portfolio segment: June 30, 2016 ( Dollars in thousands Commercial Commercial Real Estate Consumer Residential Total Allowance for loan losses: Beginning balance $ 952 $ 2,543 $ 80 $ 1,026 $ 4,601 Charge-offs (1,068 ) (4,591 ) (32 ) (777 ) (6,468 ) Recoveries 1,253 50 12 60 1,375 Provision (402 ) 4,359 66 961 4,984 Ending balance $ 735 $ 2,361 $ 126 $ 1,270 $ 4,492 Ending balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 46 $ 389 $ 7 $ 403 $ 845 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 689 $ 1,972 $ 119 $ 867 $ 3,647 Loans receivable: Ending balance, total $ 36,760 $ 86,998 $ 4,737 $ 70,577 $ 199,072 Ending balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 1,651 $ 14,038 $ 95 $ 7,709 $ 23,493 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 35,109 $ 72,960 $ 4,642 $ 62,868 $ 175,579 June 30, 2015 ( Dollars in thousands Commercial Commercial Real Estate Consumer Residential Total Allowance for loan losses: Beginning balance $ 597 $ 3,591 $ 185 $ 1,414 $ 5,787 Charge-offs (451 ) (253 ) (47 ) (357 ) (1,108 ) Recoveries 157 688 12 63 920 Provision 670 (902 ) 70 162 — Ending balance $ 973 $ 3,124 $ 220 $ 1,282 $ 5,599 Ending balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 148 $ 786 $ 9 $ 585 $ 1,528 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 825 $ 2,338 $ 211 $ 697 $ 4,071 Loans receivable: Ending balance, total $ 34,603 $ 108,817 $ 5,877 $ 82,001 $ 231,298 Ending balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 2,929 $ 24,164 $ 112 $ 10,905 $ 38,110 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 31,674 $ 84,653 $ 5,765 $ 71,096 $ 193,188 December 31, 2015 ( Dollars in thousands Commercial Commercial Real Estate Consumer Residential Total Allowance for loan losses: Beginning balance $ 597 $ 3,591 $ 185 $ 1,414 $ 5,787 Charge-offs (539 ) (1,212 ) (81 ) (501 ) (2,333 ) Recoveries 200 727 37 183 1,147 Provision 694 (563 ) (61 ) (70 ) — Ending balance $ 952 $ 2,543 $ 80 $ 1,026 $ 4,601 Ending balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 137 $ 396 $ 10 $ 560 $ 1,103 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 815 $ 2,147 $ 70 $ 466 $ 3,498 Loans receivable: Ending balance, total $ 27,881 $ 101,291 $ 5,114 $ 75,081 $ 209,367 Ending balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 2,727 $ 21,582 $ 134 $ 9,418 $ 33,861 Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 25,154 $ 79,709 $ 4,980 $ 65,663 $ 175,506 Loan Performance and Asset Quality Generally, a loan will be placed on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest, or when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of the loan is doubtful. When a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, interest accruals are discontinued and income earned but not collected is reversed. Cash receipts on nonaccrual loans are not recorded as interest income, but are used to reduce principal. The following chart summarizes delinquencies and nonaccruals, by portfolio class, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. June 30, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90+ Days Total Total Loans Non- Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Current Receivable accrual Commercial $ 104 $ 1 $ — $ 105 $ 36,655 $ 36,760 $ 118 Commercial real estate: Construction 22 — — 22 19,721 19,743 — Other 202 — — 202 67,053 67,255 59 Real Estate: Residential 320 143 37 500 70,077 70,577 148 Consumer: Other 16 15 — 31 4,158 4,189 7 Revolving credit — — — — 548 548 — Total $ 664 $ 159 $ 37 $ 860 $ 198,212 $ 199,072 $ 332 December 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90+ Days Total Total Loans Non- Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Current Receivable accrual Commercial $ 321 $ 110 $ 1 $ 432 $ 27,449 $ 27,881 $ 139 Commercial real estate: Construction 25 — 3,186 3,211 27,321 30,532 3,384 Other 973 — 3,046 4,019 66,740 70,759 3,895 Real Estate: Residential 2,887 142 948 3,977 71,104 75,081 1,314 Consumer: Other 108 18 10 136 4,395 4,531 10 Revolving credit 4 — — 4 579 583 — Total $ 4,318 $ 270 $ 7,191 $ 11,779 $ 197,588 $ 209,367 $ 8,742 There were no loans outstanding 90 days or more and still accruing interest at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. Loans held for sale are summarized as follows, by portfolio class, as of June 30, 2016. June 30, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90+ Days Total Total Loans Non- Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Current Receivable accrual Commercial $ — $ 35 $ 255 $ 290 $ 75 $ 365 $ 365 Commercial real estate: Construction — — 18 18 235 253 253 Other — 59 2,296 2,355 211 2,566 2,566 Real Estate: Residential 41 248 295 584 502 1,086 1,086 Consumer: Other — 7 — 7 3 10 10 Revolving credit — — — — — — — Total $ 41 $ 349 $ 2,864 $ 3,254 $ 1,026 $ 4,280 $ 4,280 The following table summarizes management’s internal credit risk grades, by portfolio class, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. June 30, 2016 ( Dollars in thousands Commercial Commercial Real Estate Consumer Residential Total Grade 1 - Minimal $ 2,177 $ — $ 392 $ 84 $ 2,653 Grade 2 – Modest 450 140 44 433 1,067 Grade 3 – Average 3,645 8,404 148 4,936 17,133 Grade 4 – Satisfactory 17,357 45,297 3,542 46,860 113,056 Grade 5 – Watch 11,435 18,733 325 10,378 40,871 Grade 6 – Special Mention 1,137 1,840 203 1,447 4,627 Grade 7 – Substandard 559 12,584 83 6,439 19,665 Grade 8 – Doubtful — — — — — Grade 9 – Loss — — — — — Total loans receivable $ 36,760 $ 86,998 $ 4,737 $ 70,577 $ 199,072 December 31, 2015 ( Dollars in thousands Commercial Commercial Real Estate Consumer Residential Total Grade 1 - Minimal $ 975 $ — $ 434 $ — $ 1,409 Grade 2 – Modest 561 1,024 37 277 1,899 Grade 3 – Average 4,934 5,620 218 4,716 15,488 Grade 4 – Satisfactory 14,693 58,549 4,031 53,187 130,460 Grade 5 – Watch 2,445 9,654 152 2,988 15,239 Grade 6 – Special Mention 992 6,321 98 3,544 10,955 Grade 7 – Substandard 3,281 20,123 144 10,369 33,917 Grade 8 – Doubtful — — — — — Grade 9 – Loss — — — — — Total loans receivable $ 27,881 $ 101,291 $ 5,114 $ 75,081 $ 209,367 Loans held for sale by management’s internal credit risk grades, by portfolio class, as of June 30, 2016 were as follows: June 30, 2016 ( Dollars in thousands Commercial Commercial Real Estate Consumer Residential Total Grade 1 - Minimal $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Grade 2 – Modest — — — — — Grade 3 – Average — — — — — Grade 4 – Satisfactory — — — — — Grade 5 – Watch 12 — — — 12 Grade 6 – Special Mention — — — — — Grade 7 – Substandard 353 2,819 10 1,086 4,268 Grade 8 – Doubtful — — — — — Grade 9 – Loss — — — — — Total loans receivable $ 365 $ 2,819 $ 10 $ 1,086 $ 4,280 Loans graded one through four are considered “pass” credits. As of June 30, 2016, $133.9 million, or 67.3% of the loan portfolio, had a credit grade of “minimal,” “modest,” “average” or “satisfactory.” For loans to qualify for these grades, they must be performing relatively close to expectations, with no significant departures from the intended source and timing of repayment. Loans with a credit grade of “watch” and “special mention” are not considered classified; however, they are categorized as a watch list credit and are considered potential problem loans. This classification is utilized when there is an initial concern about the financial health of a borrower. These loans are designated as such in order to be monitored more closely than other credits in the portfolio. Loans on the watch list are not considered problem loans until they are determined by management to be classified as substandard. As of June 30, 2016, loans with a credit grade of “watch” and “special mention” totaled $45.5 million. Watch list loans are considered potential problem loans and are monitored as they may develop into problem loans in the future. Loans graded “substandard” or greater are considered classified credits. At June 30, 2016, classified loans totaled $19.7 million, with $19.0 million being collateralized by real estate. This includes $12.9 million in troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), of which $12.9 million were performing as expected under the new terms and $4 thousand were considered to be nonperforming. Classified credits are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis. Loans showing improvement may be upgraded to “watch”. The Bank identifies impaired loans through its normal internal loan review process. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by calculating either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Any resultant shortfall is charged to provision for loan losses and is classified as a specific reserve. When an impaired loan is ultimately charged-off, the charge-off is taken against the specific reserve. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Impaired consumer and residential loans are identified for impairment disclosures, however, it is policy to individually evaluate for impairment all loans with a credit grade of “substandard” or greater that have an outstanding balance of $50 thousand or greater, and all loans with a credit grade of “special mention” that have outstanding principal balance of $100 thousand or greater. Impaired loans are valued on a nonrecurring basis at the lower of cost or market value of the underlying collateral or based on the net present value of cash flows. For loans valued based on collateral, market values were obtained using independent appraisals, updated every 18 to 24 months, in accordance with our reappraisal policy, or other market data such as recent offers to the borrower. At June 30, 2016, the recorded investment in impaired loans was $23.5 million, compared to $33.9 million at December 31, 2015. The following chart details our impaired loans, which includes TDRs totaling $21.8 million and $29.1 million, by category, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively: June 30, 2016 ( Dollars in thousands Six months ended Three months ended Unpaid Average Interest Average Interest Recorded Principal Related Recorded Income Recorded Income Investment Balance Allowance Investment Recognized Investment R ecognized With no related allowance recorded: Commercial $ 635 $ 818 $ — $ 860 $ 22 $ 791 $ 10 Commercial real estate 10,195 13,241 — 10,345 249 10,222 117 Residential 3,821 3,979 — 3,846 108 3,831 57 Consumer 45 45 — 48 2 46 — Total: $ 14,696 $ 18,083 $ — $ 15,099 $ 381 $ 14,890 $ 184 With an allowance recorded: Commercial 1,016 1,016 46 1,058 20 1,033 11 Commercial real estate 3,843 3,843 389 3,888 94 3,856 53 Residential 3,888 3,888 403 3,913 85 3,897 41 Consumer 50 50 7 52 1 51 1 Total: $ 8,797 $ 8,797 $ 845 $ 8,911 $ 200 $ 8,837 $ 106 Total: Commercial 1,651 1,834 46 1,918 42 1,824 21 Commercial real estate 14,038 17,084 389 14,233 343 14,078 170 Residential 7,709 7,867 403 7,759 193 7,728 98 Consumer 95 95 7 100 3 97 1 Total: $ 23,493 $ 28,880 $ 845 $ 24,010 $ 581 $ 23,727 $ 290 December 31, 2015 ( Dollars in thousands Unpaid Average Interest Recorded Principal Related Recorded Income Investment Balance Allowance Investment Recognized With no related allowance recorded: Commercial $ 1,070 $ 1,339 $ — $ 1,319 $ 72 Commercial real estate 17,180 22,037 — 18,989 722 Residential 4,016 4,338 — 4,936 137 Consumer 68 68 — 84 7 Total: $ 22,334 $ 27,782 $ — $ 25,328 $ 938 With an allowance recorded: Commercial 1,657 1,657 137 1,729 79 Commercial real estate 4,402 4,402 396 4,461 207 Residential 5,402 5,443 560 5,445 215 Consumer 66 66 10 66 3 Total: $ 11,527 $ 11,568 $ 1,103 $ 11,701 $ 504 Total: Commercial 2,727 2,996 137 3,048 151 Commercial real estate 21,582 26,439 396 23,450 929 Residential 9,418 9,781 560 10,381 352 Consumer 134 134 10 150 10 Total: $ 33,861 $ 39,350 $ 1,103 $ 37,029 $ 1,442 TDRs are loans which have been restructured from their original contractual terms and include concessions that would not otherwise have been granted outside of the financial difficulty of the borrower. We only restructure loans for borrowers in financial difficulty that have designed a viable business plan to fully pay off all obligations, including outstanding debt, interest and fees, either by generating additional income from the business or through liquidation of assets. Generally, these loans are restructured to provide the borrower additional time to execute upon their plans. With respect to restructured loans, we grant concessions by (1) reduction of the stated interest rate for the remaining original life of the debt, or (2) extension of the maturity date at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. We do not generally grant concessions through forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. Restructured loans where a concession has been granted through extension of the maturity date generally include extension of payments in an interest only period, extension of payments with capitalized interest and extension of payments through a forbearance agreement. These extended payment terms are also combined with a reduction of the stated interest rate in certain cases. Success in restructuring loans has been mixed but it has proven to be a useful tool in certain situations to protect collateral values and allow certain borrowers additional time to execute upon defined business plans. In situations where a TDR is unsuccessful and the borrower is unable to follow through with terms of the restructured agreement, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status and continues to be written down to the underlying collateral value. Our policy with respect to accrual of interest on loans restructured in a TDR follows relevant supervisory guidance. That is, if a borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous loan terms and shows capacity to perform under the restructured loan terms, continued accrual of interest at the restructured interest rate is likely. If a borrower was materially delinquent on payments prior to the restructuring but shows capacity to meet the restructured loan terms, the loan will likely continue as nonaccrual going forward. Lastly, if the borrower does not perform under the restructured terms, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. We will continue to closely monitor these loans and will cease accruing interest on them if management believes that the borrowers may not continue performing based on the restructured note terms. If, after previously being classified as a TDR, a loan is restructured a second time, then that loan is automatically placed on nonaccrual status. Our policy with respect to nonperforming loans requires the borrower to make a minimum of six consecutive payments in accordance with the loan terms before that loan can be placed back on accrual status. Further, the borrower must show capacity to continue performing into the future prior to restoration of accrual status. We believe that all of our modified loans meet the definition of a TDR. The following is a summary of information pertaining to our TDRs: June 30, December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2016 2015 Nonperforming TDRs $ 4 $ 5,449 Performing TDRs: Commercial 1,651 2,565 Commercial real estate 13,392 13,883 Residential 6,637 7,059 Consumer 95 106 Total performing TDRs 21,775 23,613 Total TDRs $ 21,779 $ 29,062 Nonperforming TDRs of $3.3 million were included in loans held for sale at June 30, 2016 and are not included in the table above. The following tables summarize how loans that were considered TDRs were modified during the periods indicated: For the Six Months ended June 30, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) TDRs identified in the last twelve TDRs identified during the period months that subsequently defaulted (1) Pre- Post- Pre- Post- modification modification modification modification Number outstanding outstanding Number outstanding outstanding of recorded recorded of recorded recorded contracts investment investment contracts investment investment Commercial real estate 3 $ 308 $ 144 — $ — $ — Residential 6 634 534 2 111 111 Commercial 4 179 155 2 193 77 Consumer — — — — — — Total 13 $ 1,121 $ 833 4 $ 304 $ 188 During the six months ended June 30, 2016, 13 loans were modified that were considered to be TDRs. Term concessions only were granted for seven loans; term and interest concessions were granted for one loan; term and payment deferrals were granted for one loan; term, payment deferrals and interest concessions were granted for one loan; principal was forgiven on two loans; and other concessions were extended for one loan. (1) For the Three Months ended June 30, 2016 (Dollars in thousands) TDRs identified in the last twelve TDRs identified during the period months that subsequently defaulted (1) Pre- Post Pre- Post- modification modification modification modification Number outstanding outstanding Number outstanding outstanding of recorded recorded of recorded recorded contracts investment investment contracts investment investment Commercial real estate 3 $ 308 $ 144 — $ — $ — Residential 4 502 456 — — — Commercial 2 44 44 1 87 51 Consumer — — — — — — Total 9 $ 854 $ 644 1 $ 87 $ 51 During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, nine loans were modified that were considered to be TDRs. Term concessions only were granted for four loans; term and interest concessions were granted for one loan; term, payment deferrals and interest concessions were granted for one loan; principal was forgiven on two loans; and other concessions were extended for one loan. (1) For the Six Months ended June 30, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) TDRs identified in the last twelve TDRs identified during the period months that subsequently defaulted (1) Pre- Post- Pre- Post- modification modification modification modification Number outstanding outstanding Number outstanding outstanding of recorded recorded of recorded recorded contracts investment investment contracts investment investment Commercial real estate 2 $ 252 $ 252 1 $ 148 $ 148 Residential 5 636 596 3 496 496 Commercial 1 62 62 1 27 27 Consumer 1 10 10 — — — Total 9 $ 960 $ 920 5 $ 671 $ 671 During the six months ended June 30, 2015, nine loans were modified that were considered to be TDRs. Term concessions only were granted for two loans; payment deferrals only were granted for one loan; term and payment deferrals were granted for four loans; and term, payment deferrals and interest concessions were granted for two loans. (1) For the Three Months ended June 30, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) TDRs identified in the last twelve TDRs identified during the period months that subsequently defaulted (1) Pre- Post Pre- Post- modification modification modification modification Number outstanding outstanding Number outstanding outstanding of recorded recorded of recorded recorded contracts investment investment contracts investment investment Commercial real estate 1 $ 83 $ 83 1 $ 148 $ 148 Residential 3 549 509 2 200 200 Commercial — — — — — — Consumer 1 10 10 — — — Total 5 $ 642 $ 602 3 $ 348 $ 348 During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, five loans were modified that were considered to be TDRs. Term concessions only were granted for one loan; payment deferrals only were granted for one loan; term and payment deferrals were granted for one loan; and term, payment deferrals and interest concessions were granted for two loans. (1) Portions of the allowance for loan losses may be allocated for specific loans or portfolio segments. However, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off. While management utilizes the best judgment and information available to it, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance for loan losses depends on a variety of factors beyond our control, including the performance of our loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates, and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications. If delinquencies and defaults increase, we may be required to increase our provision for loan losses, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that charge-offs of loans in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses as estimated at any point in time or that provisions for loan losses will not be significant to a particular accounting period. The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The fair value of standby letters of credit is insignificant. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counter-party. Collateral held for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. The following table summarizes the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: June 30, December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2016 2015 Commitments to extend credit $ 28,411 $ 21,318 Standby letters of credit 183 257 |