UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32518
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 23-3011702 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
209 Perry Parkway, Suite 7
Gaithersburg, MD 20877
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(240) 499-2680
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filero | Accelerated Filero | |
Non-accelerated Filero | Smaller Reporting Companyx |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Nox
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
As of July 31, 2011, the Company had 52,146,014 shares of common stock, par value $.0001, issued and outstanding.
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 1 | |||
Item 1. Financial Statements | 1 | |||
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 23 | |||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 23 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | 24 | |||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 24 | |||
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 24 | |||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 24 | |||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 24 | |||
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved] | 24 | |||
Item 5. Other Information | 24 | |||
Item 6. Exhibits (see Exhibit Index at end of report) | 24 | |||
Signatures | 25 | |||
Exhibit Index | 26 |
i
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 301,723 | $ | 638,868 | ||||
Short-term investments, restricted | 52,840 | 52,817 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 1,224,423 | 1,207,027 | ||||||
Inventory | 401,912 | 627,984 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 591,306 | 610,409 | ||||||
Deferred costs, current portion | 136,436 | 357,412 | ||||||
Total current assets | 2,708,640 | 3,494,517 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 1,114,067 | 1,324,996 | ||||||
Deferred costs | 385,437 | 191,153 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net | 3,049,458 | 3,182,875 | ||||||
Goodwill | 706,823 | 706,823 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,964,425 | $ | 8,900,364 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 3,231,686 | $ | 3,558,161 | ||||
Note payable, current portion | — | 1,520,947 | ||||||
Dividends payable on preferred stock | 98,077 | 92,853 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 3,329,763 | 5,171,961 | ||||||
Note payable | 2,100,000 | 1,981,208 | ||||||
Derivative and other liabilities | 24,000 | 1,826,447 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 5,453,763 | 8,979,616 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | ||||||||
Series A Convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares; 2011 and 2010 issued and outstanding – 97,663 shares, liquidation preference of $97,663 | 10 | 10 | ||||||
Series B Convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares; 2011 and 2010 issued and outstanding – 65,784 shares, liquidation preference of $65,784 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
Series D Convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value, authorized 2,000,000 shares; 2011 and 2010 issued and outstanding – 3,315 shares, liquidation preference of $3,315,000 | — | — | ||||||
Common stock; $.0001 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; 2011 issued and outstanding – 51,954,810 shares; 2010 issued and outstanding – 44,103,743 shares | 5,195 | 4,410 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 52,378,674 | 47,587,964 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (49,873,224 | ) | (47,671,643 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | 2,510,662 | (79,252 | ) | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 7,964,425 | $ | 8,900,364 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 1,394,294 | $ | 1,147,219 | $ | 2,759,907 | $ | 1,210,479 | ||||||||
Royalties | — | — | — | 115,474 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,394,294 | 1,147,219 | 2,759,907 | 1,325,953 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 639,227 | 685,278 | 1,284,611 | 700,215 | ||||||||||||
Cost of royalties | — | — | — | (189,380 | ) | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 639,227 | 685,278 | 1,284,611 | 510,835 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 755,067 | 461,941 | 1,475,296 | 815,118 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries and wages | 733,410 | 664,750 | 1,459,473 | 1,286,951 | ||||||||||||
Consulting expenses | 298,751 | 119,404 | 635,233 | 195,501 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees | 213,230 | 401,718 | 450,151 | 587,125 | ||||||||||||
Research, development, trials and studies | 42,107 | 156,407 | 102,053 | 220,898 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 705,547 | 679,494 | 1,549,091 | 1,145,181 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,993,045 | 2,021,773 | 4,196,001 | 3,435,656 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (1,237,978 | ) | (1,559,832 | ) | (2,720,705 | ) | (2,620,538 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest, net | (121,712 | ) | (274,645 | ) | (372,093 | ) | (275,146 | ) | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | — | (419,739 | ) | 378,125 | (421,795 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on debt restructuring | 576,677 | — | 576,677 | — | ||||||||||||
Other | (3,348 | ) | (3,143 | ) | (53,585 | ) | (7,846 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income (expenses) | 451,617 | (697,527 | ) | 529,124 | (704,787 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (786,361 | ) | (2,257,359 | ) | (2,191,581 | ) | (3,325,325 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision | 5,000 | — | 10,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (791,361 | ) | (2,257,359 | ) | (2,201,581 | ) | (3,325,325 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred dividends: | ||||||||||||||||
Series A preferred stock | 2,242 | 2,073 | 4,441 | 4,106 | ||||||||||||
Series B preferred stock | 1,526 | 1,410 | 3,022 | 2,793 | ||||||||||||
Series D preferred stock | 82,875 | 83,250 | 165,750 | 83,250 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature on Series D preferred stock | — | 1,948,155 | — | 1,948,155 | ||||||||||||
Net loss to common stockholders | $ | (878,004 | ) | $ | (4,292,247 | ) | $ | (2,374,794 | ) | $ | (5,363,629 | ) | ||||
Loss per common share – Basic and diluted | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – Basic and diluted | 50,588,129 | 37,502,673 | 48,336,096 | 37,388,783 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (2,201,581 | ) | $ | (3,325,325 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | �� | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 318,911 | 142,677 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 138,955 | 180,771 | ||||||
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | (378,125 | ) | 421,795 | |||||
Discharge of deferred costs | 133,657 | 81,908 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision | 10,000 | — | ||||||
Gain on disposal of assets | (19,580 | ) | (8,255 | ) | ||||
Gain on debt restructuring | (576,677 | ) | — | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | (695,020 | ) | (877,133 | ) | ||||
Inventory | 226,072 | 146,649 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 19,080 | 63,138 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 369,419 | 789,577 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (2,654,889 | ) | (2,384,198 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,561 | ) | (76,413 | ) | ||||
Payment for acquisition of Angel business | — | (2,000,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of equipment | 46,576 | 29,895 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 45,015 | (2,046,518 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Proceeds from debt | 2,100,000 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock | 2,814,235 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net | — | 3,227,125 | ||||||
Repayment of note payable | (2,641,506 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from option and warrant exercises | — | 165,703 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 2,272,729 | 3,392,828 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash | (337,145 | ) | (1,037,888 | ) | ||||
Cash, beginning of period | 638,868 | 2,107,499 | ||||||
Cash, end of period | $ | 301,723 | $ | 1,069,611 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Business and Presentation
Description of Business
Cytomedix, Inc. (“Cytomedix,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) develops, sells, and licenses regenerative biological therapies intended to aid the human body in regenerating/healing itself, to primarily address the areas of wound care, infection control, and orthopedic surgery. The Company currently markets the AutoloGelTM System (“AutoloGelTM”), as well as the Angel® Whole Blood Separation System (“Angel®”) and activAT® Autologous Thrombin Processing Kit (“activAT®”), both of which were acquired from Sorin in April 2010 (the “Angel Business”).
AutoloGelTM is a device for the production of platelet rich plasma (“PRP”) gel derived from the patient’s own blood. The AutoloGelTM System is cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for use on a variety of exuding wounds. The Company is currently pursuing a multi-faceted strategy to penetrate the chronic wound market with its AutoloGelTM System.
Angel® and activAT® are used primarily in operating rooms. Angel® is used for separation of whole blood into red cells, platelet poor plasma and platelet rich plasma. ActivAT® is designed to produce autologous thrombin serum from platelet poor plasma and is sold exclusively in Europe and Canada, where it provides a safe alternative to bovine-derived products.
The Company is also pursuing opportunities for the application of AutoloGelTM and Angel® into other markets such as hair transplantation, pain management, and sports medicine, as well as actively seeking complementary products for regenerative medicine markets.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited financial statements included herein are presented on a condensed consolidated basis and have been prepared by Cytomedix pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly state such information. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures, including a description of significant accounting policies normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
The year-end balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent quarter or the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
Basic and diluted net losses per common share are presented in accordance with established standards for all periods presented. We compute basic and diluted net losses per common share using the weighted-average number of shares of Common stock outstanding during the period. During periods of net losses, shares associated with outstanding stock options, stock warrants, and convertible preferred stock are not included because the inclusion would be anti-dilutive (i.e., reduce the net loss per share). The total numbers of such shares excluded from diluted net loss per common share were 27,214,526 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 22,912,247 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
4
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2 — Liquidity Risks and Management’s Plans
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Since inception we have incurred, and continue to incur significant losses from operations. The Company used approximately $2.7 million cash in operations in the first six months of 2011. The Angel® and ActivAT® product lines, acquired in April 2010, historically generated approximately $5 million in revenue per year. While the Company is currently generating revenue consistent with those historical levels, there is no assurance that it will be successful in maintaining or growing these revenues.
The Company needs to sustain and grow Angel® and ActivAT® product sales and increase sales of AutoloGelTM to meet its business objectives. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this regard.
The promissory note payable to Sorin with a remaining face amount of $3.4 million as of April 28, 2011, was fully satisfied with a payment of $2.1 million in April 2011, as more fully described in the Notes Payable Note to the consolidated financial statements. This development removes a significant short term financing obligation. The $2.1 million was funded through a new promissory note raised from an existing shareholder, which note carries a 12% annual cash interest only obligation, payable quarterly beginning on September 30, 2011. The principal under this note is due April 28, 2015.
The Company also raised $325,000 in April 2011 through a private offering of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.33 per share to four “accredited” investors. The shares were sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. These funds will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
In July 2011, the Company raised an aggregate $1.2 million through two separate offerings of convertible debt, as more fully described in the Subsequent Events Note to the consolidated financial statements. The Company placed a three year convertible note with a single accredited investor totaling $1.3 million with an initial funding of $600,000 available at closing, another $200,000 available within 60 days of the closing date provided certain conditions are met, and the remaining $500,000 anticipated to be available in monthly installments beginning in February 2012. The Company also placed an aggregate of $600,000 in 12% short-term convertible notes with several accredited investors and long term shareholders of the Company. Quarterly cash interest payments under these notes will commence on September 30, 2011, with the notes maturing on March 31, 2012. The shares were sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. These funds will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
While this additional funding will sustain the Company in the immediate term as it seeks to make progress on its primary business objectives, it will also require additional capital to finance the further development of its business operations. The Company may access such capital through the purchase agreements entered into in October 2010 with Lincoln Park Capital (“LPC”). These agreements allow the Company to sell up to 150,000 shares of common stock every other business day to LPC within certain pre-defined parameters (including a minimum share per price of $0.30), up to an aggregate amount of $11.5 million over a 25-month period. Given the parameters within which the Company may draw down from LPC, there is no assurance that the amounts available under the Purchase Agreements will be sufficient to fund our operational cash flow needs and service the Notes Payable. The Company raised approximately $2.5 million in the first six months of 2011 under these agreements.
We believe that cash on hand, the amounts available under the purchase agreements with LPC (provided that the purchase price per share remains above $0.30) and significant planned sales growth of the Angel® and ActivAT® products, along with the successful execution of our sales strategy for AutoloGelTM, would be sufficient to fund our operations, service the interest on the new promissory notes, and fund planned capital expenditures through 2011. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to meet our sales targets or
5
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2 — Liquidity Risks and Management’s Plans – (continued)
that we will be able to raise sufficient capital through the LPC purchase agreements to fund our operations, meet our debt service commitments, or invest in planned capital expenditures.
If significant amounts are not available to the Company under the LPC Purchase Agreements, additional funding will be required for the Company to pursue all elements of its strategic plan. Specific programs that may require additional funding include, without limitation, accelerated investment in the sales, marketing, distribution, and customer service areas, further expansion into the European market, significant new product development or modifications, conduct of any trials the Company may deem necessary in order to obtain Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) coverage, and pursuit of certain other attractive opportunities for the Company. We would likely raise such additional capital through the issuance of our equity securities, which may result in significant additional dilution to our investors. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital is dependent on, among other things, the state of the financial markets at the time of any proposed offering. Given the current state of the financial markets, the ability to raise capital may be significantly diminished. We are also exploring potential strategic partnerships, which could provide a capital infusion to the Company. However, it may be necessary to partner one or more of our technologies at an earlier stage of development than currently anticipated, which could cause the Company to share a greater portion of the potential future economic value of those programs with its partners. The Company is also exploring the possibility of obtaining grant funding for some of its ongoing projects, but it is too early to determine whether these efforts are likely to be successful. Because of certain restrictive covenants relating to its preferred stock, we may not be able to obtain traditional debt financing. There is no assurance that additional funding, through any of the aforementioned means, will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate capital cannot be obtained on a timely basis and on satisfactory terms, the Company’s operations could be materially negatively impacted. As a result, there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In the event the Company is unable to successfully sustain and increase product sales as described above and obtain additional capital, it is unlikely that the Company will have sufficient cash flows and liquidity to finance its business operations as currently contemplated. Accordingly, if the Company determines it will not be able to obtain the necessary financing to address its working capital needs for a reasonable period into the future, it may pursue alternative paths forward for the Company. These paths could include, but not be limited to, sale of the Company or its assets, merger, organized wind-down, going private/dark, fundamental shift in its strategic plan (e.g. abandon commercialization strategy and focus exclusively on licensing), bankruptcy, etc.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
Note 3 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) — When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.”ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
6
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements
The Company had certain derivative liabilities related to stock purchase warrants that were valued using Level 3 inputs. The change in fair value of the derivative liabilities is classified in other income (expense) in the Company’s statement of operations. The fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities related to these stock purchase warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model — a Level 3 input.
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of Level 3 liabilities for six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Description | Balance at beginning of year | Exercise of Outstanding Warrants | Modification of Warrant Agreements | Change in Fair Value | Balance at June 30 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 1,812,447 | $ | — | $ | (1,434,322 | ) | $ | (378,125 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
2010 | $ | 623,853 | $ | (232,564 | ) | $ | 66,991 | $ | 421,795 | $ | 880,075 |
The terms of these stock purchase warrants were modified in January 2011, resulting in a reclassification of the fair value of these warrants to Additional Paid-In Capital (“APIC”). In addition, transaction costs of approximately $158,000 were allocated to these stock purchase warrants and recorded as deferred charges at the time of issuance. The deferred charges were being amortized on a straight-line basis over the contractual term of the warrants and recorded in other expense on the statement of operations. Unamortized deferred costs remaining at the time of the aforementioned warrant modification were also reclassed to APIC.
The remaining portion of unamortized deferred costs at June 30, 2011 relates to deferred debt issuance costs associated with the note payable, as discussed in Note 10.
In June 2011, the Company purchased a Certificate of Deposit (“CD”) from its commercial bank in the amount of $53,000. This CD bears interest at an annual rate of 0.50% and matures on February 24, 2012. The $53,000 carrying value of the CD approximates its fair value. This CD collateralizes the Letter of Credit described in Commitment and Contingencies (see Note 14).
The Company does not have any non financial assets or liabilities that it measures at fair value.
Note 5 — Receivables
Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Trade receivables | $ | 641,363 | $ | 578,936 | ||||
Due from Sorin Group USA, net | — | 637,132 | ||||||
Other receivables | 613,361 | 26,476 | ||||||
1,254,724 | 1,242,544 | |||||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | (30,301 | ) | (35,517 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,224,423 | $ | 1,207,027 |
Pursuant to our April 2011 settlement agreement with Sorin (see Note 10), the amounts due between the parties as a result of the transition services agreement were netted and are reflected in the Accounts payable and accrued liabilities line of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011. Other receivables consist primarily of the cost of raw materials needed to manufacture the Angel® products that are sourced by the Company and immediately resold, at cost, to the manufacturer.
7
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 6 — Inventory
The carrying amounts of inventories are as follows:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials | $ | 12,319 | $ | 63,940 | ||||
Finished goods | 389,593 | 564,044 | ||||||
$ | 401,912 | $ | 627,984 |
Note 7 — Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Medical equipment | $ | 1,257,182 | $ | 1,291,107 | ||||
Office equipment | 73,927 | 73,927 | ||||||
Manufacturing equipment | 256,672 | 255,685 | ||||||
1,587,781 | 1,620,719 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (473,714 | ) | (295,723 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,114,067 | $ | 1,324,996 |
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded depreciation expense of approximately $185,500 with $149,700 reported as cost of sales and $35,800 to general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded depreciation expense of approximately $68,600, with $46,400 reported as cost of sales and $22,200 to general and administrative expenses.
Note 8 — Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill
As a result of its acquisition of the Angel® Business in April 2010, Cytomedix recorded goodwill of approximately $707,000. There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Prior to the acquisition of the Angel® Business, the Company had no goodwill. The Company conducts an impairment test of goodwill on an annual basis as of October 1 of each year. The Company will also conduct tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the Company below its carrying value. No such triggering events were identified during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Identifiable Intangible Assets
Cytomedix’s identifiable intangible assets consist of trademarks, technology (including patents), and customer relationships. These assets were a result of the Angel® Business acquisition. The carrying value of those intangible assets, and the associated amortization, as of June 30, 2011 were as follows:
Trademarks | $ | 320,000 | ||
Technology | 2,355,000 | |||
Customer relationships | 708,000 | |||
Total | $ | 3,383,000 | ||
Less accumulated amortization | (333,542 | ) | ||
$ | 3,049,458 |
8
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8 — Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets – (continued)
Cytomedix reevaluates the recoverability of its identifiable, finite lived intangible assets when changes in circumstances indicate the asset’s value may be impaired. If such indicators are identified the Company then would evaluate the assets to determine the amount of such impairment, if any. No such indicators have been identified since the acquisition. Amortization expense of approximately $78,500 was recorded to cost of sales and approximately $54,900 was recorded to general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Amortization expense for the remainder of 2011 is expected to be approximately $133,400. Annual amortization expense based on our existing intangible assets and their estimated useful lives is expected to be approximately:
2012 | $ | 267,000 | ||
2013 | $ | 267,000 | ||
2014 | $ | 267,000 | ||
2015 | $ | 267,000 | ||
Thereafter | $ | 1,849,000 |
Note 9 — Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Trade payables | $ | 1,554,808 | $ | 1,096,799 | ||||
Due to Sorin Group, net | 1,183,482 | 1,859,060 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 189,951 | 152,253 | ||||||
Accrued professional fees | 129,379 | 100,000 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 44,800 | 157,598 | ||||||
Other payables | 129,266 | 192,451 | ||||||
$ | 3,231,686 | $ | 3,558,161 |
Pursuant to our April 2011 settlement agreement with Sorin (see Note 10), the amounts due between the parties as a result of the transition services agreement were netted and are reflected in the Accounts payable and accrued liabilities line of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011.
Note 10 — Note Payable
In April 2010, Cytomedix entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Sorin pursuant to which the Company purchased all title and interest in Sorin’s operation of the Angel® systems and activATTM (the “Business Assets”). In conjunction with the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company executed a $5 million Promissory Note. The Promissory Note accrued interest at 2.7% per annum and was secured by a first priority security interest on the Business Assets acquired. The payments on the Promissory Note were payable as follows: (i) installments of $800,000 each on the 6- and 12-month anniversaries of the Promissory Note, (ii) installments of $1,200,000 each on the 18- and 24-month anniversaries of the Promissory Note, and (iii) an installment of $1,000,000 on the 30-month anniversary of the Note. A portion of the foregoing payment obligations of the Company was guaranteed by certain guarantors as described below. Interest paid in the first six months of 2011 was approximately $315,000.
In conjunction with the Asset Purchase Agreement, certain existing shareholders of the Company (the “Guarantors”) executed guaranty agreements pursuant to which such Guarantors agreed to guaranty 50% of the first $4 million payable to Sorin under the Promissory Note (the “Guaranty Agreements”). In connection with the foregoing guaranties, the Company agreed to provide the following consideration to the Guarantors: (i) cash fee calculated as a percentage of the amount guaranteed (the “Cash Fee”) and (ii) 5 year warrants to purchase an aggregate 1,333,334 shares of Common stock of the Company at an exercise price of
9
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 — Note Payable – (continued)
$0.5368 per share. These warrants were valued at approximately $655,000, were capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs and were being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the two year guarantee period. The Company determined that the straight line method of amortization did not yield a materially different amortization schedule from the effective interest method.
On April 28, 2011, we entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) pursuant to which: (a) the Company agreed to satisfy in full the remaining $3,400,000 due under the Sorin Note, and (b) the parties agreed to settle disputes that had arisen between them related to certain ancillary agreements entered into at the time of acquisition.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Sorin an amount equal to $2,100,000 in complete satisfaction of the $3,400,000 due under the Sorin Note. Upon receipt of this payment, Sorin agreed to waive its right to and release the Company from its obligation to pay the remaining $1,300,000 million due under the Sorin Note, and to release its security interest in the Business Assets and its rights under a subordination agreement that was issued in favor of Sorin at the time of acquisition. The $2,100,000 payment was made on April 29, 2011.
The Company agreed to repay approximately $1.2 million in net amounts due Sorin pursuant to distribution agreements entered into at the time of the acquisition in eight equal monthly installments commencing June 15, 2011.
In order to fund the $2.1 million payment to Sorin described above, on April 28, 2011, the Company borrowed $2.1 million pursuant to a secured promissory note that matures April 28, 2015. The note accrues interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and requires interest-only payments each quarter commencing September 30, 2011, with the then outstanding principal due on the maturity date, or April 28, 2015. The note may be accelerated by the lender if Cytomedix defaults in the performance of the terms of the promissory note, if the representations and warranties made by us in the note are materially incorrect, or if we undergo a bankruptcy event. The note is secured by business assets acquired from Sorin.
In accordance with the debt restructuring, the Company wrote-off the remaining unamortized deferred costs of the warrants relating to the Sorin Note guarantees and recognized a gain on the debt restructuring. These amounts, net of legal fees, is reflected as an approximate $577,000 gain in the Other income (expense) section of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The carrying value of the new note is reflected in the non-current liabilities section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In connection with the issuance of the new secured promissory note, the Company issued the lender a warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share vesting as follows: (a) 666,667 shares upon issuance of the note, (b) 83,333 shares if the note has not been prepaid by the first anniversary of its issuance, (c) 116,667 shares if the note has not been prepaid by the second anniversary of its issuance, and (d) 133,333 shares if the note has not been prepaid by the third anniversary of its issuance.
Of the $2,100,000 due under the note, our payment obligations with respect to $1,400,000 under note were guaranteed by certain insiders, affiliates, and shareholders of the Company, including Mr. David Jorden, one of the Company’s directors. In connection with this guarantee, the Company issued the guarantors warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 1,500,000 shares, on a pro rata basis based on the amount of the guarantee, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share vesting as follows: (a) 833,333 shares upon issuance of the note, (b) 166,667 shares if the note has not been prepaid by the first anniversary of its issuance, (c) 233,333 shares if the note has not been prepaid by the second anniversary of its issuance, and (d) 266,667 shares if the note has not been prepaid by the third anniversary of its issuance.
10
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 — Note Payable – (continued)
The warrants issued to the lender and the guarantors were valued at approximately $546,000, were capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs, and are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the four-year guarantee period. The Company determined that the straight-line method of amortization did not yield a materially different amortization schedule from the effective interest method.
Note 11 — Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which requires companies to account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, current income tax expense or benefit is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credits and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Tax rate changes are reflected in income during the period such changes are enacted.
At June 30, 2011, we have accumulated U.S. federal and state net operating tax losses that are available to offset future taxable income and reduce future federal and state income taxes during the carryforward period. The utilization of available losses depends on the generation of future taxable income to absorb the losses. We may not be able to use available losses within the carryforward period. In addition, based on generally accepted accounting principles, we have determined for financial accounting and reporting purposes that it is unlikely that we will be able to apply or use the available losses to reduce future federal or state income taxes during the carryforward period. This assessment is updated annually or more frequently based on changes in circumstances.
A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. The assessment for a valuation allowance requires judgment on the part of management with respect to the benefits that may be realized. The Company has concluded, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that the U.S. federal, state, and local deferred tax assets at June 30, 2011, will not be realized. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the income tax provision relates exclusively to a deferred tax liability associated with the amortization of goodwill. No further provision was recorded as a full valuation allowance has been provided against U.S. federal, state, and local deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance will be reversed at such time that realization is believed to be more likely than not. The Company has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The only periods subject to examination for the Company’s federal return are the 2003 through 2010 tax years. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions would be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material change to its financial position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.
The Company’s policy for recording interest and penalties associated with audits is to record such items as a component of income before taxes. There were no such items during the periods covered in this report.
11
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 12 — Capital Stock Activity
The Company issued 7,851,067 shares of Common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The following table lists the sources of and the proceeds from those issuances:
Source | # of Shares | Total Proceeds | ||||||
Common stock issued in lieu of cash for dividend payable on Series D Convertible Preferred shares | 350,104 | $ | — | |||||
Sale of shares pursuant to private offering completed in Second Quarter 2011 | 984,850 | $ | 325,000 | |||||
Sale of shares pursuant to October 2010 equity purchase agreements | 6,363,804 | $ | 2,489,235 | |||||
Common stock issued in lieu of cash for fees incurred pursuant to October 2010 equity purchase agreements | 152,309 | $ | — | |||||
Totals | 7,851,067 | $ | 2,814,235 |
The following table summarizes the stock options granted by the Company during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. These options were granted to employees, board members, and a service provider under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||
Options Granted | Exercise Price | Options Granted | Exercise Price | |||||||||
40,000 | $0.37 | 550,000 | $0.37 – $0.49 |
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 41,833 options were forfeited by contract due to the termination of the underlying service arrangement.
No dividends were declared or paid on the Company’s Common stock in any of the periods discussed in this report.
The Company had the following outstanding warrants and options:
# Outstanding | ||||||||
Equity Instrument | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
D Warrants(1) | — | 304,033 | ||||||
Fitch/Coleman Warrants(2) | 975,000 | 975,000 | ||||||
August 2008 Warrants(3) | 1,000,007 | 1,000,007 | ||||||
August 2009 Warrants(4) | 1,638,888 | 1,638,888 | ||||||
April 2010 Warrants(5) | 4,128,631 | 4,128,631 | ||||||
Guarantor 2010 Warrants(6) | 1,333,334 | 1,333,334 | ||||||
October 2010 Warrants(7) | 1,863,839 | 1,863,839 | ||||||
Guarantor 2011 Warrants(8) | 2,500,000 | — | ||||||
Other warrants(9) | 394,632 | 424,632 | ||||||
Options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan(10) | 5,831,221 | 5,323,054 |
(1) | These warrants were issued in May 2006 and voluntarily exercisable at $3.50 per share, provided that the exercise did not result in the holder owning in excess of 9.9% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common stock. They expired without exercise on May 1, 2011. |
(2) | These warrants were issued in connection with the August 2, 2007 Term Sheet Agreement and Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company’s outside patent counsel, Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery and The Coleman Law Firm, and have a 7.5 year term. The strike prices on the warrants are: 325,000 at $1.25 (Group A); 325,000 at $1.50 (Group B); and 325,000 at $1.75 (Group C). The Company may call |
12
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 12 — Capital Stock Activity – (continued)
up to 100% of these warrants, provided that the closing stock price is at or above the following call prices for ten consecutive trading days: Group A — $4/share; Group B — $5/share; Group C — $6/share. If the Company exercises its right to call, it shall provide at least 45 days notice for one-half of the warrants subject to the call and at least 90 days notice for the remainder of the warrants subject to the call. |
(3) | These warrants were issued in connection with the August 2008 registered direct offering of Common stock and warrants, are voluntarily exercisable at $1.00 per share, provided that the exercise does not result in the holder owning in excess of 9.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common stock, and expire on August 29, 2012. |
(4) | These warrants were issued in connection with the August 2009 financing, are voluntarily exercisable at $0.58 per share and expire in February 2014. These amounts reflect adjustments for an additional 195,339 warrants due to anti-dilutive provisions. These warrants were previously accounted for as a derivative liability through January 28, 2011. At that time, they were modified to remove non-standard anti-dilution clauses and the associated derivative liability and related deferred financing costs were reclassified to APIC. |
(5) | These warrants were issued in connection with the April 2010 Series D preferred stock offering, are voluntarily exercisable at $0.54 per share and expire on April 9, 2015. |
(6) | These warrants were issued pursuant to the Guaranty Agreements executed in connection with the Promissory Note payable to Sorin. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.54 per share and expire on April 9, 2015. |
(7) | These warrants were issued in connection with the October 2010 registered direct offering of common stock. They have an exercise price of $0.60 and expire on April 7, 2016. These warrants were previously accounted for as a derivative liability through January 28, 2011. At that time, they were modified to remove non-standard anti-dilution clauses and the associated derivative liability and related deferred financing costs were reclassified to APIC. |
(8) | These warrants were issued pursuant to the Guaranty Agreements executed in connection with the Promissory Note payable to JP’s Nevada Trust. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.50 per share and expire on April 28, 2016. |
(9) | These warrants were issued to placement agents, consultants, and other professional service providers in exchange for services provided. They have terms ranging from 4 to 10 years with various expiration dates through February 24, 2014 and exercise prices ranging from $1.10 to $6.00. They are voluntarily exercisable once vested. There is no call provision associated with these warrants. |
(10) | These options were issued under the Company’s shareholder approved Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
On March 28, 2011, the Board of Directors retired the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred stock; there was no such stock outstanding at the time of retirement.
On April 29, 2011, the Company sold 984,850 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.33 per share to four investors. The shares were sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance on Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder. Each purchaser represented that it was an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D.
13
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13 — Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures — Non-Cash Transactions
Non-cash transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2011 include:
Accrued dividends on preferred stock | $ | 173,213 | ||
Preferred dividends paid by issuance of stock | (167,954 | ) | ||
Abatement of derivative liabilities for modified warrant agreements | 1,434,322 | |||
Discharge of previously deferred financing costs for modified warrant agreements | (136,543 | ) |
Additionally, pursuant to our April 2011 settlement agreement with Sorin (see Note 10), the amounts due between the parties as a result of the transition services agreement were netted. We reclassed approximately $678,000 from the Accounts receivable, net line to the Accounts payable and accrued expenses line of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011.
Note 14 — Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is prohibited from granting a security interest in certain of the Company’s patents and/or future royalty streams under the terms of the Series A and B Convertible Preferred stock.
Under the Company’s plan of reorganization upon emergence from bankruptcy in July 2002, the Series A Preferred stock and the dividends accrued thereon that existed prior to emergence from bankruptcy are to be exchanged into one share of new Common stock for every five shares of Series A Preferred stock held as of the date of emergence from bankruptcy. This exchange is contingent on the Company’s attaining aggregate gross revenues for four consecutive quarters of at least $10,000,000 and would result in the issuance of 325,000 shares of Common stock. Through June 30, 2011, the Company had not reached such aggregate revenue levels.
In conjunction with its FDA clearance, the Company agreed to conduct a post-market surveillance study to further analyze the safety profile of bovine thrombin as used in the AutoloGelTM System. This study is estimated to cost between $500,000 and $700,000 over a period of several years, which began in the third quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2011, approximately $361,000 had been incurred.
In July 2009, in satisfaction of a new Maryland law pertaining to Wholesale Distributor Permits, the Company established a Letter of Credit, in the amount of $50,000, naming the Maryland Board of Pharmacy as the beneficiary. This Letter of Credit serves as security for the performance by the Company of its obligations under applicable Maryland law regarding this permit and is collateralized by the CD described in Fair Value Measurements (see Note 4).
In 2011, we are committed to $324,000 in capital expenditures representing Angel® machines sufficient to address forecasted customer demand.
The Company’s offices and warehouse facilities are located in Gaithersburg, Maryland, and comprise approximately 4,100 square feet under a 40-month operating lease expiring December 2013. Monthly rent, including our share of certain annual operating costs and taxes, is approximately $5,800 per month, with the first four months free.
Note 15 — Subsequent Events
July 2011 Debt Offerings
On July 15, 2011, Cytomedix entered into a Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”) with an unaffiliated third party, JMJ Financial Group Inc. (“JMJ”), relating to a private placement of up to $1.3 million in principal amount of a three-year convertible promissory note (the “JMJ Note”) providing for advances in the following amounts: (i) $600,000 paid to the Company at the closing of the investment on July 18, 2011, (ii) $200,000 to be paid to the Company within 60 days of the closing of this investment provided that (a) there is no event of default at the time of such payment and (b) the trading volume of the Company’s common stock for the previous 22 trading days is at least $500,000, and (iii) on a best efforts basis and at JMJ’s election to pay the
14
CYTOMEDIX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15 — Subsequent Events – (continued)
remaining amount commencing 210 days following the closing of the investment, in monthly installments of $150,000, but in no case later than the maturity date of the note, which payment amount and schedule may be changed, subject to JMJ’s discretion upon written notice to the Company. JMJ has the option to provide additional funding of up to $1.5 million on substantially the same terms. In the event JMJ elects to execute an additional note in the amount of $500,000 and to enforce the conversion “ceiling” (discussed below), the Company may elect to cancel within three days of JMJ’s execution in exchange for a one-time penalty in the amount of 20% of the unfunded amount, which can be added either to the balance of the note or paid in cash, at the Company’s discretion. Finally, in the event JMJ elects to execute additional notes in an additional amount of up to $1 million, the Company may elect to cancel such notes at no fee or penalty. The JMJ Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on 80% of the average of the three lowest closing prices in the 20 trading days prior to the date of conversion. The JMJ Note bears a one-time 4% interest charge, which can be paid in shares of common stock at the conversion rate. The conversion is subject to a “ceiling” of $0.80 per share which is applicable to the initial $800,000 of the funding, and a “floor” of $0.25 per share. The JMJ Note may not be prepaid by the Company unless approved by JMJ. JMJ’s funding obligations are secured and collateralized over the remainder of the three-year period. The JMJ Note also includes customary default provisions related to payment of principal and interest and bankruptcy or creditor assignment. In addition, it will constitute an event of default under the JMJ Note if the Company is not eligible to transfer shares by DWAC/FAST or becomes delinquent in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The foregoing description of the Letter Agreement and JMJ Note does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreements and documents.
On July 15, 2011, the Company also entered into Subscription Agreements with four of its existing shareholders in connection with the sale of the Company’s 12% convertible promissory notes maturing on March 31, 2012 (the “Notes”) for a total investment in the amount of $600,000 (the “Note Offering”). The Notes bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum that is payable quarterly commencing on September 30, 2011. The Note holders may, at their option, at any time prior to the maturity date of the Note, convert the unpaid principal amount and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock, which number is determined by dividing the Note conversion amount by the conversion price equal to 90% of the volume-weighted average price for the 10 trading days prior to the conversion date, subject to a conversion “ceiling” of $0.50 per share. The Notes may be prepaid at any time after January 12, 2012, without premium or penalty. The Subscription Agreement and the Notes contain other terms and provisions that are customary for instruments of this nature. The foregoing description of the Subscription Agreement and the Notes does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreements and documents.
The securities in JMJ Offering and the Note Offering were sold exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance on Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder. Each purchaser represented that it was an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D.
15
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements regarding Cytomedix, Inc. (“Cytomedix,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include those that express plans, anticipation, intent, contingency, goals, targets or future development and/or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and they are subject to risks and uncertainties known and unknown that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Although forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. When used in this document and other documents, releases and reports released by us, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “the facts suggest” and words of similar import, are intended to identify any forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current view of future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties as noted below. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Actual events, transactions and results may materially differ from the anticipated events, transactions or results described in such statements. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will materialize. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward looking statements. Other unknown, unidentified or unpredictable factors could materially and adversely impact our future results. You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements contained in this report, as well as the audited financial statements, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Risk Factors” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The Company undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may occur as part of its ongoing periodic reports filed with the SEC. Given these uncertainties, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements.
Description of the Business
Overview
Cytomedix develops, sells, and licenses regenerative biological therapies intended to aid the human body in regenerating/healing itself, to primarily address the areas of wound care, infection control, and orthopedic surgery. The Company currently markets the AutoloGelTM System (“AutoloGelTM”), as well as the Angel® Whole Blood Separation System (“Angel®”) and activAT® Autologous Thrombin Processing Kit (“activAT®”), both of which were acquired from Sorin in April 2010.
AutoloGelTM is a device for the production of autologous platelet rich plasma (“PRP”) gel. The AutoloGelTM System is cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for use on a variety of exuding wounds. The Company is currently pursuing a multi-faceted strategy to penetrate the chronic wound market with its AutoloGelTM System.
Angel® and activAT® are used primarily in surgical settings. Angel® is used for separation of whole blood into red cells, platelet poor plasma and platelet rich plasma. ActivAT® is designed to produce autologous thrombin serum from platelet poor plasma and is sold exclusively in Europe and Canada, where it provides a safe alternative to bovine-derived products.
The Company is also pursuing opportunities for the application of AutoloGelTM and Angel® into other markets such as hair transplantation, pain management, and sports medicine, as well as actively seeking complementary products for regenerative medicine markets.
16
Angel® and ActivAT® Product Lines
The Angel® Whole Blood Separation System is designed for single patient use at the point of care, and provides a simple yet flexible means for producing quality platelet rich plasma (“PRP”) and platelet poor plasma (“PPP”) clinical blood components. The system is easy to set up and maintain. It is capable of processing up to 180 ml of whole blood. In surgical procedures, the PRP can be mixed with bone graft material prior to application. Growth factors released by platelets present in the PRP have been shown to control infection and aid in the healing process.
We have grown worldwide Angel® and activAT® sales each quarter since acquiring these product lines from Sorin in April 2010 and expect this trend to continue as we progress through 2011. We expect that future sales growth of these products will be driven through a combination of strengthened distributor relationships, collaborative agreements, expanded indications, and direct sales. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we added a number of independent agents in the U.S. They are now fully trained and we believe they will drive domestic sales growth in 2011. In April, we also added a Director of National Accounts to focus on large chains, managed care organizations, and commercial reimbursement matters. In Europe, we have established a small network of distributors serving the UK, Netherlands, Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Belgium, and have also contracted with a distributor in Kuwait. We expect these distributors to drive increased sales in Europe in the coming quarters. In the long term, we expect new technology applications for Angel® and expansion into other surgical and orthopedic applications will provide future growth opportunities.
We continue to make progress on our efforts to obtain FDA clearance for additional indications for Angel®, specifically bone marrow aspirate processing and also for the re-transfusion of packed red blood cells separated during processing. We are aware that Angel has been used effectively in both these indications, giving us the confidence to proceed. Bone marrow is a rich source of stem cells used in regenerative procedures. Stem cells have the ability to grow and differentiate into specific tissues making them a critical component for tissue regeneration in addition to growth factors and other signal molecules. The protocol for collecting the data necessary for a 510(k) submission has been developed and has been shared with the FDA. Preliminary evaluations have been successfully completed and formal data collection is nearly complete. In addition, total blood management has become an important aspect with surgical procedures. The ability to re-infuse blood components separated during processing of platelet rich plasma may improve patient outcomes by preventing the unnecessary loss of blood and plasma. The data supporting a 510(k) submission for re-infusion has been collected and is currently under review. We expect to file the 510(k) for the bone marrow aspirate in August 2011.
ActivAT® is designed to produce autologous thrombin serum from platelet poor plasma and is sold exclusively in Europe and Canada, where it provides a safe alternative to bovine-derived products. It is generally sold in conjunction with Angel®. It currently represents a very small fraction of our total revenues.
Integration of the Angel® and ActivAT® product lines is nearly complete. Sales, customer service, warehousing, distribution, quality/regulatory, and manufacturing are under Cytomedix control. During the transition period, we successfully worked to ensure no net attrition of sales and no major supply chain interruptions. Looking forward, our focus will be on growing sales in both the U.S. and Europe, and seeking efficiencies in the supply chain. Worldwide Angel® and ActivAT® sales in the second quarter of 2011 were up approximately 22% compared with similar revenues in the second quarter of 2010.
AutoloGelTM System
We continue to execute our clinical/scientific based sales approach. This approach is yielding increased clinical awareness and acceptance of our AutoloGelTM System. Sales of AutoloGelTM were up approximately 15% in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. We continue to focus our sales efforts on Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals, Veterans Administration Facilities, and certain state Medicaid Agencies. We have also seen recent interest in AutoloGelTM in the acute care setting. The broader market, comprised of outpatient wound care centers, doctor’s offices, and others, is a longer range target of ours which we plan to address after obtainment of broad commercial reimbursement by Medicare and commercial third party payors.
17
Regarding Medicare coverage, on March 16, 2011 we had a pre-submission meeting with the coverage and analysis group at Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). CMS reviewed clinical data collected over the past three years and the scientific literature we subjected to a thorough systematic review. CMS representatives requested that we provide more information regarding the net health benefit for Medicare beneficiaries following PRP treatment such as the patient’s ability to regain lost functionality and mobility. On May 10, 2011, we met again with Medicare to present our responses to its comments from the March 16, 2011 meeting. We submitted our formal request for reconsideration of coverage to Medicare on May 27, 2011. We have been in regular communication with CMS as they review our submission.
We believe this request is supported by a number of factors, including, among others:
• | the inclusion of 285 wounds from our wound registry versus the 40 wounds from our randomized controlled trial included in the previous submission |
• | a robust systematic review of all of the pertinent published journal articles which has yielded a significant amount of new data |
• | support and participation of key opinion leaders who have collaborated with us on the manuscript we are taking to CMS and who have or will join us at meetings with CMS |
• | legislative and advocacy support that did not exist at the time of our previous request |
Although there are a number of factors that may support our request, there is no assurance that reconsideration will be granted.
We intend to utilize these factors to approach commercial payors in the coming months.
We continue to build a body of clinical data in support of the use of our advanced plasma derived regenerative therapy in a number of indications for use in a variety of clinical settings. Following is a brief summary of presentations and articles recently published or expected to be published in the immediate future:
• | Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma Gel in a Physiologically Relevant Platelet Concentration on Wounds in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury, authored by Dr. Laurie Rappl, our clinical development liaison, April 2011 Edition of theInternational Wound Journal. |
• | The clinical relevance of treating chronic wounds with an enhanced near-physiological concentration of platelet rich plasma (PRP) gel.de Leon J, Driver VR, Fylling CP, Carter MJ, Anderson C, Wilson J, et al. (2011)Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 24(8), 357 – 368. This article documents the outcomes from our dataset of 285 wounds. 96.5% of these wounds had a positive response to AutoloGelTM treatment within 2.2 weeks with 2.8 treatments. This demonstrates a fast trajectory towards healing in chronic wounds treated with AutoloGelTM. |
• | We have submitted 3 additional articles for review for potential publication: |
º | Run-in data from a subset of the 285 wound registry. Analysis of the run-in period allowed us to evaluate the effectiveness of the AutoloGelTM System as compared to earlier treatment used during the period of non-healing. The healing benefits of AutoloGelTM were highly statistically significant. |
º | A systematic review of the PRP literature. |
º | A literature review and survey results documenting the positive impact of AutoloGelTM on the Quality of Life of the patients that have been treated. |
• | We had several posters displayed and an oral presentation at the Symposium on Advanced Wound Care meeting held in the middle of April 2011. This is the largest annual gathering of wound care clinicians in the United States. |
We continue to make progress on our enhanced separation device that we have been developing in conjunction with biomedical engineers in Israel. The new separation device provides the added convenience and effectiveness that treating clinicians are looking for at the point of care. Importantly, the new device allows for the whole blood collection and the separation of the platelet rich plasma to be accomplished with a
18
single specially designed closed syringe system that maintains an aseptic environment. This streamlines the process, improves safety and ease-of-use and may be more conducive for certain developing orthopedic indications. The sterilization studies are complete. We expect to file a 510(k) upon the completion of platelet characterization and validation studies.
In October 2010, we showcased the AutoloGelTM System at the 18th annual scientific meeting of the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery, receiving positive feedback at our exhibit booth. In July 2011 we officially launched AutoloGelTM in the surgical hair restoration market. We completed an evaluation with one of the world renown thought leaders in this area, and his practice is now a customer. We expect to leverage this early experience to further penetrate this market in the coming quarters.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three- and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Certain numbers in this section have been rounded for ease of analysis.
Sales and gross profits from AutoloGelTM, while growing, continue to be modest. In April 2010, we acquired the Angel® and ActivAT® businesses from Sorin Group USA, Inc. We have grown revenues of these products in each successive quarter since the acquisition and believe there is opportunity for significant future growth.
However, even with the acquisition of Angel®, our revenues will be insufficient to cover our operating expenses in the near term. Operating expenses primarily consist of employee compensation, professional fees, consulting expenses, and other general business expenses such as insurance, travel related expenses, research and development, and sales and marketing related items. Operating expenses have risen to support the transition and ongoing support of the Angel® business, as well as to fund the increased investment in the commercialization efforts around AutoloGelTM, the evaluation of additional products/technologies, and an enhanced investor relations effort. Moving forward, the Company will endeavor to streamline operating expenses without jeopardizing sales growth as it works toward achieving break-even operational cash flow.
Revenues
Revenues rose $247,000 (22%) to $1,394,000 and $1,434,000 (108%) to $2,760,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, to the same periods last year.
For the three-month period, the increase was primarily due to higher Angel® sales ($233,000). AutoloGelTM sales were also up 15% to $110,000.
For the six-month period, the increase was primarily due to higher Angel® sales ($1,511,000) as a result of the acquisition of the Angel® product line from Sorin Group USA, Inc. on April 9, 2010. AutoloGelTM sales were also up 24% to $197,000. The increases in product line sales were offset by a decrease in royalty revenues ($115,000) due to the expiration of the underlying agreement in late November 2009.
Gross Profit
Gross profit rose $293,000 (63%) to $755,000 and $660,000 (81%) to $1,475,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to the same periods last year.
For the three-month period, the increase was primarily attributable to the increase in product sales along with higher product costs recognized in 2010. The higher product costs recognized in 2010 were primarily a result of logistics costs provided by Sorin during the transition period and the sale of inventory adjusted to fair value in accordance with purchase accounting rules.
For the six-month period, the increase was primarily attributable to higher product sales along with higher product costs recognized in 2010, as described above, offset by a credit in 2010 reflecting final adjustments relating to the close-out of license agreements described above.
For the same periods, gross margin for product sales rose to 54% from 40% and to 53% from 42%, respectively. The increase was due to various costs recognized in 2010 related to the purchase of the Angel® product line partly offset by additional costs necessary to support production since the Company took over the manufacturing of the Angel® product line in 2011.
19
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses fell $29,000 (1%) to $1,993,000 and rose $760,000 (22%) to $4,196,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, to the same periods last year. A discussion of the various components of operating expenses follows below.
Salaries and Wages
Salaries and wages rose $69,000 (10%) to $733,000 and $173,000 (13%) to $1,459,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to the same period last year. The increase was due to higher salaries due to additional employees and higher commissions associated with increased product sales. This increase was partly offset by lower stock based compensation primarily due to a decrease in unvested employee options.
Consulting Expenses
Consulting expenses rose $179,000 (150%) to $299,000 and $440,000 (225%) to $635,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to new spending associated with regulatory compliance and CMS reimbursement efforts and the addition of dedicated consultants in the areas of marketing and European operations.
Professional Fees
Professional fees fell $188,000 (47%) to $213,000 and $137,000 (23%) to $450,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, to the same periods last year. The decrease was primarily due to legal and accounting costs recognized in 2010 associated with the Company’s April 2010 acquisition of the Angel® and ActivAT® product lines.
Research, Development, Trials and Studies
Trials and studies expenses fell $114,000 (73%) to $42,000 and $119,000 (54%) to $102,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, to the same periods last year. The decrease for both periods was primarily due to lower spending around development of the enhanced AutoloGelTM device.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses rose $26,000 (4%) to $706,000 and $404,000 (35%) to $1,549,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, to the same periods last year.
For the three-month period, the increase was primarily due to higher employee benefits ($30,000) due to additional personel, commissions paid to independent sales agents ($20,000) as the Company expanded its sales efforts, marketing services ($29,000), and setup fees ($30,000) and European services ($25,000) as a result of the establishment of the Angel® and ActivAT® manufacturing and European distribution lines. These increases were offset by decreases to investor services ($20,000), office rent ($18,000), travel ($34,000), and bad debt expense ($13,000).
For the six-month period, the increase was primarily due to higher setup fees ($99,000) as a result of the establishment of the Angel® and ActivAT® manufacturing lines, commissions paid to independent sales agents ($82,000) as the Company expanded its sales efforts, marketing services ($66,000), employee benefits ($51,000) due to additional personnel, European services ($36,000) related to the establishment of the Angel® and ActivAT® European distribution lines, and amortization of intangibles ($27,000).
Other Income and Expense
Other income, net rose $1,149,000 to $452,000 and $1,234,000 to $529,000 comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, to the same periods last year. The increase in both periods was primarily due to a gain from the Company’s restructuring of the Sorin note payable in April 2011 and a decrease in the expense related to a decrease in fair value of the derivative liabilities mainly due to the change in the Company’s stock price.
20
Management Compensation Deferrals
On May 23, 2011, our Board approved compensation deferrals for our executive management as well as the members of the Board. Namely, the Board approved (i) executive management compensation deferrals of 10% of annual compensation for Patrick Vanek, Andrew Maslan and Carelyn Fylling (named executive officers in the Annual Report for the 2010 fiscal year), and Pete Clausen, and 30% — for Martin Rosendale, our CEO, and (ii) 100% deferral of the Board and committee member compensation for the 2nd half of 2011 until December 31, 2011. Our Board also approved one-time grants of 10,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.37 per share (closing price on the date of the grant) for each Patrick Vanek, Carelyn Fylling, Andrew Maslan and Pete Clausen, vesting at December 31, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
There is substantial doubt that the Company will continue as a going concern. Since inception we have incurred, and continue to incur significant losses from operations. The Company used approximately $2.7 million cash in operations in the first six months of 2011. The Angel® and ActivAT® product lines, acquired in April 2010, historically generated approximately $5 million in revenue per year. While the Company is currently generating revenue consistent with those historical levels, there is no assurance that it will be successful in maintaining or growing these revenues.
The Company needs to sustain and grow Angel® and ActivAT® product sales and increase sales of AutoloGelTM to meet its business objectives. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this regard.
The promissory note payable to Sorin with a remaining face amount of $3.4 million as of April 28, 2011, was fully satisfied with a payment of $2.1 million in April 2011, as more fully described in the Notes Payable Note to the consolidated financial statements. This development removes a significant short term financing obligation. The $2.1 million was funded through a new promissory note raised from an existing shareholder, which note carries a 12% annual cash interest only obligation, payable quarterly beginning on September 30, 2011. The principal under this note is due April 28, 2015.
The Company also raised $325,000 in April 2011 through a private offering of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.33 per share to four “accredited” investors. These funds will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
In July 2011, the Company raised an aggregate $1.2 million through two separate offerings of convertible debt, as more fully described in the Subsequent Events Note to the consolidated financial statements. The Company placed a three year convertible note with a single accredited investor totaling $1.3 million with an initial funding of $600,000 available at closing, another $200,000 available within 60 days of the closing date provided certain conditions are met, and the remaining $500,000 anticipated to be available in monthly installments beginning in February 2012. The Company also placed an aggregate of $600,000 in 12% short-term convertible notes with several accredited investors and long term shareholders of the Company. Quarterly cash interest payments under these notes will commence on September 30, 2011, with the notes maturing on March 31, 2012. The shares were sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. These funds will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
While this additional funding will sustain the Company in the immediate term as it seeks to make progress on its primary business objectives, it will also require additional capital to finance the further development of its business operations as it works toward achieving operational cash flow break-even in the next 12 months. The Company may access such capital through the purchase agreements entered into in October 2010 with Lincoln Park Capital (“LPC”). These agreements allow the Company to sell up to 150,000 shares of common stock every other business day to LPC within certain pre-defined parameters (including a minimum share per price of $0.30), up to an aggregate amount of $11.5 million over a 25-month period. Given the parameters within which the Company may draw down from LPC, there is no assurance that the amounts available under the Purchase Agreements will be sufficient to fund our operational cash flow needs and service the Notes Payable. The Company raised approximately $2.5 million in the first six months of 2011 under these agreements.
21
We believe that cash on hand, the amounts available under the purchase agreements with LPC (provided that the purchase price per share remains above $0.30) and significant planned sales growth of the Angel® and ActivAT® products, along with the successful execution of our sales strategy for AutoloGelTM, would be sufficient to fund our operations, service the interest on the new promissory notes, and fund planned capital expenditures through 2011. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to meet our sales targets or that we will be able to raise sufficient capital through the LPC purchase agreements to fund our operations, meet our debt service commitments, or invest in planned capital expenditures.
If significant amounts are not available to the Company under the LPC Purchase Agreements, additional funding will be required for the Company to pursue all elements of its strategic plan. Specific programs that may require additional funding include, without limitation, accelerated investment in the sales, marketing, distribution, and customer service areas, further expansion into the European market, significant new product development or modifications, conduct of any trials the Company may deem necessary in order to obtain CMS coverage, and pursuit of certain other attractive opportunities for the Company. We would likely raise such additional capital through the issuance of our equity securities, which may result in significant additional dilution to our investors. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital is dependent on, among other things, the state of the financial markets at the time of any proposed offering. Given the current state of the financial markets, the ability to raise capital may be significantly diminished. We are also exploring potential strategic partnerships, which could provide a capital infusion to the Company. However, it may be necessary to partner one or more of our technologies at an earlier stage of development, which could cause the Company to share a greater portion of the potential future economic value of those programs with its partners. The Company is also exploring the possibility of obtaining grant funding for some of its ongoing projects, but it is too early to determine whether these efforts are likely to be successful. Because of certain restrictive covenants relating to its preferred stock, we may not be able to obtain traditional debt financing. There is no assurance that additional funding, through any of the aforementioned means, will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate capital cannot be obtained on a timely basis and on satisfactory terms, the Company’s operations could be materially negatively impacted.
The Company is currently conducting a post-market surveillance study per its understanding reached with the FDA. The Company estimates that this study, designed to treat 300 patients, which began in the third quarter of 2008, will cost between $500,000 and $700,000 in total. Of that amount, approximately $360,000 has been incurred through June 30, 2011. We have treated approximately 115 patients in this study so far, and no adverse events have been reported to date. We will likely seek a release from gathering further data based on the positive results received to date. However, there is no assurance that the FDA will grant such release.
In the second half of 2011, we are committed to $324,000 in capital expenditures representing Angel® machines sufficient to address forecasted customer demand.
Contractual Obligations
The Company’s offices and warehouse facilities are located in Gaithersburg, Maryland, and comprise approximately 4,100 square feet under a 40-month operating lease expiring December 2013. Monthly rent, including our share of certain annual operating costs and taxes, is approximately $5,800 per month, with the first four months free.
The Company has also committed to purchase approximately $324,000 of new Angel® machines in order to support demand for the Angel® products.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) — When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a smaller reporting issuer (as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K), the Company is not required to report quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk specified in Item 305 of Regulation S-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of June 30, 2011 (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the material information required to be filed with our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the required time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter of 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
At present, the Company is not engaged in or the subject of any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed on our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company issued no unregistered shares of Common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2011, except as set forth below.
In April 2011, the Company issued 207,189 shares of its common stock as a quarterly dividend payment on its 10% Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. The description of the terms of the April 2010 Series D Convertible Preferred Stock offering and other requisite information is set forth under Item 3.02 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 12, 2010 and is incorporated by reference herein.
In April 2010, in connection with its debt restructuring transaction, the Company sold 984,850 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.33 per share to four investors, raising gross proceeds of $325,000. The shares were sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance on Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 of Regulation D hereunder. Each purchaser represented that it was an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D. The description of the terms of the April 2011 debt restructuring and other related information is set forth in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 3, 2011 and is incorporated by reference herein.
The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
N/A
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are furnished as part of this report.
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CYTOMEDIX, INC. | ||
Date: August 15, 2011 | By: /s/ Martin P. Rosendale | |
Date: August 15, 2011 | By: /s/ Andrew S. Maslan |
25
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number | Exhibit Table | |
2.1 | First Amended Plan of Reorganization with All Technical Amendments (Previously filed on June 28, 2002, as exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-28443, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
2.2 | Amended and Restated Official Exhibits to the First Amended Plan of Reorganization of Cytomedix, Inc. with All Technical Amendments (Previously filed on May 10, 2004, as exhibit to Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, File No. 000-28443, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
2.3 | Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Sorin Group USA, Inc., Cytomedix Acquisition Company and Cytomedix, Inc, dated as of April 9, 2010 (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
3(i) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cytomedix, Inc. (Previously filed on November 7, 2002, as exhibit to Form 10-QSB for quarter ended June 30, 2001, File No. 000-28443, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
3(i)(1) | Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cytomedix, Inc. (Previously filed on November 15, 2004, as exhibit to Form 10-QSB for quarter ended September 30, 2004, File No. 000-28443, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
3(i)(2) | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation (Previously filed on July 1, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
3(ii) | Restated Bylaws of Cytomedix, Inc. (Previously filed on November 7, 2002, as exhibit to Form 10-QSB for quarter ended June 30, 2001, File No. 000-28443, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
4.1 | Form of Warrant (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
4.2 | Certificate of Designation, Relative Rights and Preferences of the 10% Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
4.3 | Form of Warrant (Previously filed on October 8, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
4.4 | Form of Warrant (Previously filed on May 16, 2011 as exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.1 | Form of Transition Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2010 (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.2 | Form of Asset Transfer and Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2010 (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.3 | Form of Subscription Agreement (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.4 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.5 | Form of Promissory Note (Previously filed on April 12, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File no. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.6 | Flex Space Office Lease by and between Cytomedix, Inc. and Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, dated as of May 19, 2010 (Previously filed on August 16, 2010, as exhibit to Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2010, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). |
26
Number | Exhibit Table | |
10.7 | Form of the Purchase Agreement (Previously filed on October 8, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.8 | Form of the Registration Rights Agreement (Previously filed on October 8, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.9 | Form of the Securities Purchase Agreement (Previously filed on October 8, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.10 | Form of the Lincoln Purchase Agreement (Previously filed on October 8, 2010 as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.11 | Form of Settlement Agreement dated as of April 28, 2011 (Previously filed on May 16, 2011 as exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.12 | Form of Subscription Agreement (Previously filed on May 16, 2011 as exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.13 | Form of Promissory Note dated as of April 28, 2011 (Previously filed on May 16, 2011 as exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-32518, and incorporated by reference herein). | |
10.14 | JMJ Promissory Note dated July 15, 2011 | |
10.15 | JMJ Letter Agreement and Additional Default Provisions dated July 14, 2011 | |
10.16 | JMJ Collateralized Note dated July 15, 2011 | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350. | |
32.2 | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
27