The distribution of securities may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions, including block transactions and transactions on the New York Stock Exchange or any other organized market where the securities may be traded. The securities may be sold at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, or at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices relating to the prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. The consideration may be cash or another form negotiated by the parties. Agents, underwriters or broker- dealers may be paid compensation for offering and selling the securities. That compensation may be in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions to be received from us or the selling shareholders or from the purchasers of the securities. The selling shareholders and dealers and agents participating in the distribution of the securities may be deemed to be underwriters, and compensation received by them on resale of the securities may be deemed to be underwriting discounts. If the selling shareholders or such dealers or agents were deemed to be underwriters, they may be subject to statutory liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the Securities Act.
Agents may from time to time solicit offers to purchase the securities. If required, we will name in the applicable prospectus supplement any agent involved in the offer or sale of the securities and set forth any compensation payable to the agent. Unless otherwise indicated in the prospectus supplement, any agent will be acting on a best efforts basis for the period of its appointment. Any agent selling the securities covered by this prospectus may be deemed to be an underwriter, as that term is defined in the Securities Act, of the securities.
If underwriters are used in a sale, securities will be acquired by the underwriters for their own account and may be resold from time to time in one or more transactions, including negotiated transactions, at a fixed public offering price or at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or under delayed delivery contracts or other contractual commitments. Securities may be offered to the public either through underwriting syndicates represented by one or more managing underwriters or directly by one or more firms acting as underwriters. If an underwriter or underwriters are used in the sale of securities, an underwriting agreement will be executed with the underwriter or underwriters at the time an agreement for the sale is reached. The applicable prospectus supplement will set forth the managing underwriter or underwriters, as well as any other underwriter or underwriters, with respect to a particular underwritten offering of securities, and will set forth the terms of the transactions, including compensation of the underwriters and dealers and the public offering price, if applicable. The prospectus and prospectus supplement will be used by the underwriters to resell the securities.
If a dealer is used in the sale of the securities, we, the selling shareholders or an underwriter will sell the securities to the dealer, as principal. The dealer may then resell the securities to the public at varying prices to be determined by the dealer at the time of resale. To the extent required, we will set forth in the prospectus supplement the name of the dealer and the terms of the transactions.
We and the selling shareholders may directly solicit offers to purchase the securities and we or the selling shareholders may make sales of securities directly to institutional investors or others. These persons may be deemed to be underwriters within the meaning of the Securities Act with respect to any resale of the
Back to Contents
securities. To the extent required, the prospectus supplement will describe the terms of any such sales, including the terms of any bidding or auction process, if used.
Agents, underwriters and dealers may be entitled under agreements which may be entered into with us or the selling shareholders to indemnification by us or the selling shareholders against specified liabilities, including liabilities incurred under the Securities Act, or to contribution by us and/or the selling shareholders to payments they may be required to make in respect of such liabilities. If required, the prospectus supplement will describe the terms and conditions of the indemnification or contribution. Some of the agents, underwriters or dealers, or their affiliates may be customers of, engage in transactions with or perform services for us or our subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business.
Under the securities laws of some states, the securities offered by this prospectus may be sold in those states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers.
Any person participating in the distribution of common shares registered under the registration statement that includes this prospectus will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act, and the applicable SEC rules and regulations, including, among others, Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of our common shares by that person. Furthermore, Regulation M may restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of our common shares to engage in market-making activities with respect to our common shares. These restrictions may affect the marketability of our common shares and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to our common shares.
Certain persons participating in an offering may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing transactions, short-covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the offered securities. For a description of these activities, see the information under the heading “Underwriting” in the applicable prospectus supplement.
In connection with the sales of the common shares, the selling shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers. These broker-dealers may in turn engage in short sales of the common shares in the course of hedging their positions. The selling shareholders may also sell short the common shares and deliver common shares to close out short positions, or loan or pledge the common shares to broker-dealers that, in turn, may sell the securities.
To our knowledge, there are currently no plans, arrangements or understandings between any selling shareholder and any underwriter, broker-dealer or agent regarding the sale of the common shares by any selling shareholder. The selling shareholders may decide not to sell all or a portion of the common shares offered by them pursuant to this prospectus or may decide not to sell common shares under this prospectus. However, the selling shareholders do not intend to offer for resale either the convertible preferred shares or any convertible common shares and have entered into an agreement with us not to do so. In addition, the selling shareholders may transfer, devise or give the common shares by other means not described in this prospectus. Any common shares that qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act, or Regulation S under the Securities Act, may be sold under Rule 144 or Regulation S rather than pursuant to this prospectus.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters with respect to Bermuda law will be passed upon for us by Conyers Dill & Pearman, Hamilton, Bermuda. Certain legal matters with respect to United States and New York law will be passed upon for us by Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP will rely on the opinion of Conyers Dill & Pearman with respect to Bermuda law.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of PXRE Group Ltd. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
58
Back to Contents
December 31, 2004 have been incorporated by reference herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The audit reports refer to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46R “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” during 2004.
CERTAIN ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
Each fiduciary of a pension, profit-sharing or other employee benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), which we refer to as a “plan,” should consider the fiduciary standards of ERISA in the context of the plan’s particular circumstances before authorizing an investment in these securities. Accordingly, among other factors, the fiduciary should consider whether the investment would satisfy the prudence and diversification requirements of ERISA and would be consistent with the documents and instruments governing the plan.
ERISA Section 406 and Code Section 4975 generally prohibit transactions between plans, individual retirement accounts and other arrangements including individual retirement accounts and Keogh plans that are subject to ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code (also “plans”), and “parties in interest” within the meaning of ERISA or “disqualified persons” within the meaning of the Code. Prohibited transactions within the meaning of ERISA or the Code could arise, for example, if these securities are acquired by or with the assets of a plan with respect to which we or one of our subsidiaries or affiliates is a service provider, unless the securities are acquired pursuant to an exemption from the “prohibited transaction” rules. A violation of these “prohibited transaction” rules may result in an excise tax or other liabilities under ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code for those persons, unless exemptive relief is available under an applicable statutory or administrative exemption.
The U.S. Department of Labor has issued five prohibited transaction class exemptions (“PTCEs”) that may provide exemptive relief for direct or indirect prohibited transactions resulting from the purchase or holding of these securities. Those class exemptions are PTCE 96-23 (for certain transactions determined by in-house asset managers), PTCE 95-60 (for certain transactions involving insurance company general accounts), PTCE 91-38 (for certain transactions involving bank collective investment funds), PTCE 90-1 (for certain transactions involving insurance company separate accounts) and PTCE 84-14 (for certain transactions determined by independent qualified asset managers).
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, these securities may not be purchased or held by any plan, any entity whose underlying assets include “plan assets” by reason of any plan’s investment in the entity (a “Plan Asset Entity”) or any person investing “plan assets” of any plan, unless such purchase and holding will not constitute a non-exempt prohibited transaction. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, any purchaser, including any fiduciary purchasing on behalf of a plan, or holder of these securities will be deemed to have represented, in its corporate and fiduciary capacity, by its purchase and holding thereof that it either (a) is not a plan or a Plan Asset Entity and is not purchasing such securities on behalf of or with “plan assets” of any plan or (b) or such purchase and holding will not constitute a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code.
Under ERISA, assets of a plan may include assets held in the general account of an insurance company which has issued an insurance policy to such plan or assets of an entity in which the plan has invested. Accordingly, insurance company general accounts that include assets of a plan must ensure that one of the foregoing exemptions is available. Due to the complexity of these rules and the penalties that may be imposed upon persons involved in non-exempt prohibited transactions, it is particularly important that fiduciaries or other persons considering purchasing these securities on behalf of or with “plan assets” of any plan consult with their counsel regarding the availability of exemptive relief under PTCE 96-23, 95-60, 91-38, 90-1 or 84-14.
Purchasers of these securities have exclusive responsibility for ensuring that their purchase and holding of the securities do not violate the prohibited transaction rules of ERISA or the Code.
59
Back to Contents
BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY
The Bermuda Monetary Authority has classified us as a non-resident of Bermuda for exchange control purposes. Accordingly, the Bermuda Monetary Authority does not restrict our ability to convert currency, other than Bermuda dollars, held for our account to any other currency, to transfer funds in and out of Bermuda or to pay dividends or other forms of payment to non-Bermuda residents who are shareholders or holders of our other securities, other than in Bermuda dollars.
We have obtained the permission of the Bermuda Monetary Authority for the issuance and free transferability of our share capital that we may offer as described in this document to and between non-residents of Bermuda for exchange control purposes. This permission is subject to the condition that our common shares be listed on an appointed stock exchange, which includes the New York Stock Exchange. No further permission from the Bermuda Monetary Authority will be required to issue our shares or to transfer our shares between persons regarded as non-resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes. Approvals or permissions received from the Bermuda Monetary Authority do not constitute a guaranty by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as to our performance or our creditworthiness. Accordingly, in giving those approvals or permissions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority will not be liable for our performance or default or for the correctness of any opinions or statements expressed in this document.
Supervision, Investigation and Intervention |
The Bermuda Monetary Authority may appoint an inspector with extensive powers to investigate the affairs of an insurer if the Bermuda Monetary Authority believes that such an investigation is in the best interests of the insurer’s policyholders or persons who may become policyholders. In order to verify or supplement information otherwise provided to the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the Bermuda Monetary Authority may direct an insurer to produce documents or information relating to matters connected with its business. In addition, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has the power to require the production of documents from any person who appears to be in possession of such documents as the Authority may reasonably require for the performance of its functions under the Insurance Act. The Bermuda Monetary Authority has the power in respect of a person registered under the Insurance Act, to appoint a professional person to prepare a report on any aspect of any matter about which the Bermuda Monetary Authority has required or could require information. If it appears to the Bermuda Monetary Authority to be desirable in the interests of the clients of a person registered under the Insurance Act, the Bermuda Monetary Authority may also exercise these powers in relation to any company that is or has at any relevant time been (a) a parent company, subsidiary company or related company of that registered person, (b) a subsidiary company of a parent company of that registered person, (c) a parent company of a subsidiary company of that registered person or (d) a company in the case of which a shareholder controller of that registered person, either alone or with any associate or associates, holds 50 per cent or more of the shares or is entitled to exercise, or control the exercise of more than 50 per cent of the voting power at a general meeting.
If it appears to the Bermuda Monetary Authority that there is a risk of an insurer becoming insolvent, or that the insurer is in breach of the Insurance Act or any conditions imposed upon its registration, the Bermuda Monetary Authority may, among other things, direct the insurer (i) not to take on any new insurance business, (ii) not to vary any insurance contract if the effect would be to increase its liabilities, (iii) not to make certain investments, (iv) to liquidate certain investments, (v) to maintain in, or transfer to the custody of a specified bank, certain assets, (vi) not to declare or pay any dividends or other distributions or to restrict the making of such payments and/or (vii) to limit its premium income. The Bermuda Monetary Authority intends to meet with each Class 4 insurance company on a voluntary basis, every two years.
Disclosure of Information |
In addition to powers under the Insurance Act to investigate the affairs of an insurer, the Bermuda Monetary Authority may require certain information from an insurer (or certain other persons) to be produced to them. The Bermuda Monetary Authority has the power to assist other regulatory authorities, including foreign insurance regulatory authorities, with their investigations involving insurance and reinsurance companies in Bermuda but subject to restrictions. For example, the Bermuda Monetary Authority must be
60
Back to Contents
satisfied that the assistance being requested is in connection with the discharge of regulatory responsibilities of the foreign regulatory authority. Further, the Bermuda Monetary Authority must consider whether cooperation is in the public interest. The grounds for disclosure are limited and the Insurance Act provides sanctions for breach of the statutory duty of confidentiality.
Under the Companies Act, the Minister of Finance has been given powers to assist a foreign regulatory authority that has requested assistance in connection with inquiries being carried out by it in the performance of its regulatory functions. The Minister’s powers include requiring a person to furnish information, to produce documents, to attend and to give assistance and answer questions in connection with inquiries. The Minister must be satisfied that the assistance requested by the foreign regulatory authority is for the purpose of its regulatory functions and that the request is in relation to information in Bermuda that a person possesses or controls. The Minister must consider, amongst other things, whether it is in the public interest to give the information.
UNENFORCEABILITY OF CERTAIN UNITED STATES JUDGMENTS
PXRE Group Ltd. is organized under the laws of Bermuda. In addition, some of our directors and officers, as well as the experts named in this prospectus reside outside of the United States. A substantial portion of our and their assets are or may be located outside the United States. As a result it may not be possible for the holders of our common or preferred shares or holders of other securities to effect service of process within the United States upon us and them or to enforce against us and them in U.S. courts judgments based on the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States. However, investors may serve us with process in the United States with respect to actions against us arising out of or in connection with violations of securities laws of the United States, relating to offers and sales of the securities covered by this prospectus, by serving CT Corporation, our United States agent irrevocably appointed for that purpose.
In addition, there is significant doubt as to whether the courts of Bermuda would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or our directors or officers based on the liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state or hear actions brought in Bermuda against us or those persons based on those laws. We have been advised by our Bermuda legal counsel, Conyers Dill & Pearman, that the United States and Bermuda do not currently have as treaty providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. As a result, whether a U.S. judgment would be enforceable in Bermuda against us or our directors and officers depends on whether the U.S. court that entered the judgment is recognized by the Bermuda Court as having jurisdiction over us or our directors or officers, as determined by reference to the Bermuda conflict of law rules. A judgment debt from a U.S. court that is final and for a sum certain based on U.S. federal securities laws may not be enforceable in Bermuda. A Bermuda court may, however, impose civil liability on us or our directors and officers if the facts alleged in a complaint constitute or give rise to a cause of action under Bermuda law.
U.S. statutory law and related regulations are not enforceable by original action in Bermuda and investors could not rely upon U.S. federal securities laws to assert a cause of action in the Bermuda courts. There are, however, remedies available under Bermuda common law, equity and under Bermuda statutes that would be available to investors in the Bermuda courts against the registrant, affiliates of the registrant, underwriters, or any named expert. These remedies will not be identical to the remedies available under U.S. statutory law and may not be as extensive.
61
Back to Contents
DIFFERENCE IN CORPORATE LAWS
The Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, which applies to us, differs in material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of significant provisions of the Companies Act, including modifications adopted pursuant to the bye-laws, applicable to us which differ in some respects from provisions of Delaware corporate law. Because the following statements are summaries, they do not purport to deal with all aspects of Bermuda law that may be relevant to us and our shareholders.
Bermuda law provides that each director may appoint an alternate director, who shall have the power to attend and vote at any meeting of the board of directors or committee at which that director is not personally present and to sign written consents in place of that director. Delaware law does not provide for alternate directors.
Committees of the Board of Directors |
Our bye-laws provide, as permitted by Bermuda law, that the board of directors may delegate any of its powers to committees that the board appoints, and those committees may consist partly or entirely of non-directors. Delaware law allows the board of directors of a corporation to delegate many of its powers to committees, but those committees may consist only of directors.
Fiduciary Duties of Directors and Officers |
In addition to common law fiduciary duty to us, the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda imposes the following fiduciary duties on each director and officer:
Duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company. In conflict of interest situations, a director or officer must place the best interests of the company above the director’s own personal interests. A director or officer may not use his or her position as a director or officer to make a personal profit from opportunities that rightfully belong to the company.
Duty to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. A director or officer must act reasonably in accordance with the level of skill expected from a person of his or her knowledge and experience. A director must attend diligently to the company’s affairs, but may, in doing so, act on an intermittent, rather than a continuous, basis. A director or officer may delegate management functions to suitably qualified persons, although the director or officer will not avoid duty by delegation to others.
These two duties are similar to the duty of loyalty and the duty of care that directors and officers have under Delaware law. Delaware courts generally presume that directors have fulfilled their duty of care so long as their conduct does not involve fraud, illegality, conflict of interest, lack of a rational business purpose or gross negligence. A Bermuda court is likely to interfere with decisions of directors only if the directors acted in bad faith or exceeded the powers granted to them under a company’s bye-laws, or it the court finds that no reasonable board of directors could have come to the decision that was reached.
Under Bermuda law, directors and officers owe fiduciary duties to the company as a whole and not to shareholders individually. If a company suffers any losses due to acts or omissions of its directors or officers that constitute a breach of their duties to the company, then the company may be able to recover its losses from those directors or officers. Examples of this type of situation would be misappropriation of the company’s assets or transactions undertaken on behalf of the company for an unlawful purpose. Under Delaware law, directors and officers owe fiduciary duties to both the corporation and its shareholders.
Interested Director Transactions |
Bermuda law and our bye-laws provide that any transaction entered into by us in which a director has an interest is not voidable by us nor can the director be liable to us for any profit realized pursuant to the
62
Back to Contents
transaction provided the nature of the interest is disclosed at the first opportunity at a meeting of directors or in writing to the directors. Under Delaware law, this type of transaction would not be voidable if:
| • | the material facts as to the director’s relationship or interest and as to the transaction are disclosed or are known to the board of directors, and the board, in good faith, authorizes the transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested directors; |
| | |
| • | the material facts as to the director’s relationship or interest and as to the transaction are specifically approved, in good faith, by vote of the shareholders; or |
| | |
| • | the transaction is fair as to the corporation as of the time it is authorized, approved or ratified by the board of directors or the shareholders. |
Under Delaware law, the interested director could be held liable for a transaction in which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
A Bermuda company may not enter into business combinations with its large shareholders or affiliates, without obtaining prior approval from its board of directors and, in certain instances, its shareholders. Examples of business combinations include mergers, asset sales and other transactions in which a large shareholder or affiliate receives or could receive a financial benefit that is greater than that received or to be received by other shareholders. A Delaware company may not enter into a business combination with an interested shareholder for a period of three years from the time the person became an interested shareholder unless it obtained either:
| • | prior approval from its board of directors of the business combination or transaction, which resulted in the person becoming an interested shareholder; or |
| | |
| • | simultaneous or subsequent approval by its board of directors and a supermajority of its shareholders. |
Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the prior approval of its board of directors and/or a supermajority of its shareholders would not be required if, upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested shareholder, the interested shareholder owned at least 85% of the outstanding voting shares at the time the transaction commenced or if the company expressly opted out of this statute in its articles of incorporation. Under Delaware law, an interested shareholder is someone who, together with its affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting shares.
Mergers and Similar Arrangements |
We may acquire the business of another Bermuda exempted company or a company incorporated outside Bermuda of which the business is within the business purposes as set forth in our memorandum of association. We may, with the approval of a majority of votes cast at a general meeting of our shareholders at which a quorum is present, amalgamate with another Bermuda company or with a body incorporated outside of Bermuda. In the case of an amalgamation, a shareholder may apply to a Bermuda court for a proper valuation of the shareholder’s shares if the shareholder is not satisfied that fair value has been paid for the shares. The court ordinarily would not disapprove the transaction on that ground absent evidence of fraud or bad faith. Under Delaware law, with some exceptions, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of a corporation must be approved by the board of directors and a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the transaction (rather than, as in Bermuda, a majority of votes cast). Delaware law also provides that a parent corporation, by resolution of its board of directors and without any shareholder vote, may merge with any subsidiary of which it owns at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of share capital. Upon this type of merger and unless the parent corporation owns 100% of the subsidiary’s shares, dissenting shareholders of the subsidiary would have appraisal rights for the shares of the subsidiary.
Bermuda law provides that where an offer is made for shares of a company and within four months of the offer the holders of not less than 90% of the shares which are the subject of the offer accept the offer, the
63
Back to Contents
company may, by notice, require the nontendering shareholders to transfer their shares on the terms of the offer. Dissenting shareholders may apply to the court within one month of the notice objecting to the transfer. The burden is on the dissenting shareholders to show that the court should exercise its direction to enjoin the required transfer, which the court will be unlikely to do unless there is evidence of fraud or bad faith or collusion between the offeror and the holders of the shares who have accepted the offer as a means of unfairly forcing out minority shareholders. There are no directly comparable provisions under Delaware law, although as set forth above under “Mergers and Similar Arrangements,” a parent corporation holding 90% of a subsidiary’s shares could cause a merger of that subsidiary, which would give any minority shareholders dissenter rights.
The rights of shareholders under Bermuda law are not as extensive as the rights of shareholders under legislation or judicial precedent in many United States jurisdictions. Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under the laws of Bermuda. However, the Bermuda courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law precedent, which would permit a shareholder to commence an action in the name of the company to remedy a wrong done to a company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company, is illegal or would result in the violation of the company’s memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by the court to acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders or where any act requires the approval of a greater percentage of our shareholders than actually approved it. The winning party in this type of an action generally would be able to recover a portion of attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the action. Our bye- laws provide that shareholders waive all claims or rights of action that they might have, individually or in the right of the company, against any director or officer for any act or failure to act in the performance of the director’s or officer’s duties, except with respect to any fraud or dishonesty of the director or officer. Class actions and derivative actions generally are available to shareholders under Delaware law for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and actions not taken in accordance with applicable law. In these types of actions, the court has discretion to permit the winning party to recover its attorneys’ fees.
Limitation of Liability of Directors and Officers |
Our bye-laws provide that we and our shareholders waive all claims or rights of action that we or they might have, individually or in the right of the company, against any director or officer for any act or failure to act in the performance of that director’s or officer’s duties. However, this waiver does not apply to claims involving fraud or dishonesty. This waiver may have the effect of barring claims arising under U.S. federal securities laws. Under Delaware law, a corporation may include in its certificate of incorporation provisions limiting the personal liability of its directors to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for many types of breach of fiduciary duty. However, these provisions may not limit liability for any breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, the authorization of unlawful dividends, share repurchases or share redemptions, or any transaction from which a director derived an improper personal benefit. Moreover, these provisions would not be likely to bar claims arising under U.S. federal securities laws. Our bye-laws do not provide for these specific types of limitation of liability of our directors and officers.
Indemnification of Directors |
In accordance with Bermuda law, we may indemnify our directors or officers in their capacity as directors or officers against all civil liabilities for any loss arising out of, or liability attaching to them by virtue of, any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which a director or officer may be guilty in relation to the company other than in respect of the director’s or officer’s fraud or dishonesty. Under Delaware law, a corporation may indemnify a director or officer of the corporation against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with an action, suit or proceeding by reason of his or her position if:
64
Back to Contents
| • | the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation; and |
| | |
| • | with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. |
|
Enforcement of Judgments and Other Matters |
We have been advised by Conyers Dill & Pearman, our Bermuda counsel, that there is doubt as to whether:
| • | an investor would be able to enforce, in the courts of Bermuda, judgments of United States courts against us or our directors or officers, as well as the experts name in this prospectus, based on the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws; or |
| | |
| • | an investor would be able to bring an original action in the courts of Bermuda to enforce liabilities against us or our directors and officers, as well as the experts name in this prospectus, based solely on United States federal securities laws. |
We also have been advised by Conyers Dill & Pearman that there is no treaty in effect between the United States and Bermuda providing for enforcement of judgments based on securities laws, and there are grounds upon which Bermuda courts may decide not to enforce judgments of Unites States courts. Certain remedies available under the laws of United States jurisdictions, including some remedies available under the United federal securities laws, may not be allowed in Bermuda courts as contrary to Bermuda public policy. See also “Unenforceability of Certain United States Judgments.”
Inspection of Corporate Records |
Members of the general public have the right to inspect our public documents at the office of the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda, which will include our memorandum of association, including its objects and powers, and any alteration to our memorandum of association and documents relating to any increase or reduction of authorized share capital. Our shareholders have the additional right to inspect our bye-laws, minutes of general meetings and audited financial statements (and, if applicable, summarized financial statements), which must be presented to the general meeting of shareholders. The register of our shareholders is also open to inspection by shareholder without charge, and to members of the public for a fee. We are required to maintain our share register in Bermuda but may establish a branch register outside Bermuda. We are required to keep at our registered office a register of our directors and officers, which is open for inspection by members of the public without charge. Bermuda law does not, however, provide a general right for shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other corporate records. Delaware law permits any shareholder to inspect or obtain copies of a corporation’s shareholder list, share ledger and its other books and records for any purpose reasonably related to the person’s interest as a shareholder.
65
Back to Contents
7,690,000 Shares

PXRE Group Ltd.
Common Shares
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
Credit Suisse First Boston