Exhibit 99.1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74c80/74c802a5d94dffc6721e542cddb1856ece105be7" alt=""
| Magna Entertainment Corp. |
| 337 Magna Drive |
| Aurora, Ontario, |
| Canada L4G 7K1 |
| Tel (905) 726-2462 |
| Fax (905) 726-2585 |
| |
| |
PRESS RELEASE
MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
ANNOUNCES RESULTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
November 1, 2007, Aurora, Ontario, Canada......Magna Entertainment Corp. (“MEC”) (NASDAQ: MECA; TSX: MEC.A) today reported its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2007.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | (unaudited) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenues(i) | | $ | 114,532 | | $ | 112,028 | | $ | 601,769 | | $ | 569,270 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”)(i) | | $ | (26,053 | ) | $ | (21,043 | ) | $ | 1,622 | | $ | 5,252 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (49,811 | ) | $ | (47,709 | ) | $ | (70,779 | ) | $ | (72,692 | ) |
Discontinued operations(ii) | | — | | (3,033 | ) | — | | (2,176 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (49,811 | ) | $ | (50,742 | ) | $ | (70,779 | ) | $ | (74,868 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted loss per share | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) |
Discontinued operations(ii) | | — | | (0.03 | ) | — | | (0.02 | ) |
Total diluted loss per share | | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.70 | ) |
(i) | Revenues and EBITDA for all periods presented are from continuing operations only. |
| |
(ii) | Discontinued operations for 2006 include the Fontana Golf Club, the sale of which was completed on November 1, 2006, the Magna Golf Club, the sale of which was completed on August 25, 2006, and the operations of a restaurant and related real estate in the United States, the sale of which was completed on May 26, 2006. |
| |
| All amounts are reported in U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share figures. |
| | |
Frank Stronach, MEC’s Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer, commented: “While we are very disappointed with our results this quarter, we are making progress on the debt elimination plan that we announced in mid-September. We have listed four of our properties for sale with real estate brokers and engaged a U.S. investment bank to assist in soliciting potential purchasers and managing the sales process for certain of our assets and to help us evaluate partnership, joint venture and strategic investment opportunities. We remain firmly committed to implementing the debt elimination plan on a timely basis.”
Blake Tohana, MEC’s Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, remarked: “Although we are moving forward with our Corporate cost reduction initiatives and have seen some improvement at our PariMax operations, including XpressBet® and HRTV™, our financial results continue to be weak. We recognize that we must significantly improve Gulfstream Park’s poor slots performance and we recently hired Steve Calabro, a gaming executive with more than 25 years industry experience, as MEC’s Vice-President of Gaming Operations. Steve has already identified multiple improvement opportunities for Gulfstream Park’s slots operation, including implementing a more effective and targeted marketing approach, changing out game types and denominations and creating a dedicated video poker area. We are also continuing to implement various profit improvement initiatives for Gulfstream Park's upcoming 2008 race meet."
1
Our racetracks operate for prescribed periods each year. As a result, our racing revenues and operating results for any quarter will not be indicative of our racing revenues and operating results for the year.
Revenues were $114.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $2.5 million or 2.2% compared to $112.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increased revenues were primarily due to:
• Florida revenues above the prior year period by $10.9 million primarily due to the Gulfstream Park casino facility, which generated $9.0 million of gaming revenues in the third quarter of 2007;
• PariMax revenues above the prior year period by $4.5 million as a result of a full period of results of AmTote in 2007, as we completed the acquisition of the remaining 70% equity interest in AmTote in July 2006;
• Southern U.S. operations above the prior year period by $2.1 million primarily due to five additional live race days at Lone Star Park in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006 as race days cancelled due to weather in June 2007 were made up during the third quarter of 2007;
• Real estate and other operations above the prior year period by $2.0 million due to increased sales of housing units at our European residential development;
• California revenues below the prior year period by $13.1 million due to a change in the racing calendar at Golden Gate Fields, which resulted in 29 fewer live race days compared to the prior year period; and
• Northern U.S. operations below the prior year period by $2.3 million primarily due to a planned reduction of 19 live race days at The Meadows as the grandstand was demolished to accomodate a new grandstand/casino reconstruction project by Millennium-Oaktree, as well as fewer live race days, lower handle and decreased attendance at Thistledown.
Revenues were $601.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $32.5 million or 5.7% compared to $569.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increased revenues were primarily due to some of the same factors noted above for the three months ended September 30, 2007, including a $30.8 million increase in Florida revenues and a $25.9 million increase in PariMax revenues, partially offset by a $14.5 million decrease in California revenues and a $5.4 million decrease in revenues at our Northern U.S. operations. A 15.2% increase in North American wagering handle at XpressBet® also contributed to the increase in PariMax revenues.
EBITDA loss of $26.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased $5.0 million or 23.8% from a loss of $21.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2006 and was impacted by the following:
• PariMax operations above the prior year period by $3.2 million as a result of improved performance at XpressBet®, reduced losses at HRTVTM with the formation of the joint venture with Churchill Downs Incorporated in April 2007, and a full period of results of AmTote;
• Predevelopment, pre-opening and other costs decreased from the prior year period by $3.9 million primarily due to lower spending on alternative gaming initiatives and costs incurred in the prior year period relating to certain financing initiatives;
• Florida operations below the prior year period by $4.2 million as increased gaming revenues at Gulfstream Park were more than offset by higher marketing and operating costs for the new casino facility;
• California operations below the prior year period by $4.0 million due to a change in the racing calendar at Golden Gate Fields, which resulted in 29 fewer live race days compared to the prior year period, and decreased stabling and vanning reimbursements at Santa Anita Park and Golden Gate Fields as the backsides were closed during the third quarter of 2007 for the synthetic track installation at both of these racetracks;
• Corporate and other below the prior year period by $2.3 million due to employee termination payments of $3.8 million paid to the former owners of The Maryland Jockey Club, partially offset by cost reduction initiatives; and
• Non-cash write-down of long-lived assets of $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2007 relating to our Porter, New York real estate property, which has been classified as an asset held for sale.
EBITDA of $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 decreased $3.6 million or 69.1% from $5.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was negatively impacted for the same factors noted above which affected EBITDA for the third quarter of 2007, except that for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our European operations EBITDA was above the prior year period by $2.7 million primarily due to cost reduction efforts at Magna Racino™ and our Corporate and other EBITDA was above the prior year period by $0.8 million as higher employee severance and termination costs incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were more than offset by other cost reductions.
2
Net loss from continuing operations of $49.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased $2.1 million or 4.4% from a net loss from continuing operations of $47.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in net loss from continuing operations is due to EBITDA decreases as noted above, partially offset by lower net interest expense attributable to the repayment of a previous bridge loan facility with our parent in November 2006, reduced borrowings under our $40.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility and repayment of other debt over the past year from the proceeds of various asset sales, partially offset by increased borrowings on our Gulfstream Park project financing arrangements with our parent company. Net loss from continuing operations of $70.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 decreased $1.9 million or 2.6% from a net loss from continuing operations of $72.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 for the same reasons as previously noted for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, cash used for operations was $33.8 million, which increased $9.5 million from cash used for operations of $24.3 million in the third quarter of 2006, primarily due to the increase in net loss from continuing operations and decreases in items not involving current cash flows and changes in non-cash working capital balances in 2007 relative to the prior year period. Cash used for investing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $18.6 million, which included $2.7 million of proceeds on the sale of real estate and fixed assets, partially offset by real estate property and fixed asset additions of $20.6 million and other asset additions of $0.7 million. Cash provided from financing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $31.3 million includes proceeds from bank indebtedness of $25.2 million and net borrowings of $8.1 million from our parent company, partially offset by net repayments of $2.0 million of long-term debt.
We will hold a conference call to discuss our third quarter results on Friday November 2, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. EST. The number to use for this call is 1-800-926-4402. Please call 10 minutes prior to the start of the conference call. The dial-in number for overseas callers is 212-231-2900. We will also web cast the conference call at www.magnaentertainment.com. If you have any teleconferencing questions, please call Karen Richardson at 905-726-7465.
MEC, North America’s largest owner and operator of horse racetracks, based on revenue, acquires, develops, owns and operates horse racetracks and related pari-mutuel wagering operations, including off-track betting facilities. MEC also develops, owns and operates casinos in conjunction with its racetracks where permitted by law. MEC owns and operates AmTote International, Inc., a provider of totalisator services to the pari-mutuel industry, XpressBet®, a national Internet and telephone account wagering system, as well as MagnaBet™ internationally. Pursuant to joint ventures, MEC has a fifty percent interest in HorseRacing TVä, a 24-hour horse racing television network and TrackNet Media Group, LLC, a content management company formed for distribution of the full breadth of MEC’s horse racing content.
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, including Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and forward-looking information as defined in the Securities Act (Ontario) (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the Securities Act (Ontario) and include, among others, statements regarding: the potential impact of the September 2007 adopted debt elimination plan on our debt reduction efforts, as to which there can be no assurance of success; expectations as to our ability to complete asset sales at the appropriate prices and in a timely manner; the impact of the new bridge loan facility; expectations as to our ability to administer the new bridge loan facility; strategies and plans; expectations as to financing and liquidity requirements and arrangements; expectations as to operational improvements; expectations as to cost savings, revenue growth and earnings; the time by which certain redevelopment projects, transactions or other objectives will be achieved; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration; proposed new racetracks or other developments, products and services; expectations as to the timing and receipt of government approvals and regulatory changes in gaming and other racing laws and regulations; expectations that claims, lawsuits, environmental costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, labor negotiations or agreements, or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operating results, prospects or liquidity; projections, predictions, expectations, estimates, beliefs or forecasts as to our financial and operating results and future economic performance; and other matters that are not historical facts.
Forward-looking statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or the times at or by which such performance or results will be achieved. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time and/or management’s good faith assumptions and analyses made in light of our perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include, but may not be limited to, material adverse changes: in general economic conditions, the popularity of racing and other gaming activities as recreational activities, the regulatory environment affecting the horse racing and gaming industries; our ability to obtain or maintain government and other regulatory approvals necessary or desirable to proceed with proposed real estate developments; increased regulation affecting certain of our non-racetrack operations, such as broadcasting ventures; and our ability to develop, execute or finance our strategies and plans within expected timelines or budgets. In drawing conclusions set out in our forward-looking statements above, we have assumed, among other things, that there will not be any material adverse changes: in general economic conditions, the popularity of horse racing and other gaming activities, the regulatory environment, and our ability to develop, execute or finance our strategies and plans as anticipated.
3
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements were made. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking statements. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.
For more information contact:
Blake Tohana
Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer
Magna Entertainment Corp.
337 Magna Drive
Aurora, ON L4G 7K1
Tel: 905-726-7493
4
MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
[Unaudited]
[U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share figures]
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | (restated-note 8) | | | | (restated-note 8) | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | |
Racing and gaming | | | | | | | | | |
Pari-mutuel wagering | | $ | 58,272 | | $ | 70,761 | | $ | 401,565 | | $ | 425,801 | |
Gaming | | 22,525 | | 13,565 | | 73,723 | | 43,054 | |
Non-wagering | | 31,040 | | 26,985 | | 120,895 | | 96,673 | |
| | 111,837 | | 111,311 | | 596,183 | | 565,528 | |
Real estate and other | | 2,695 | | 717 | | 5,586 | | 3,742 | |
| | 114,532 | | 112,028 | | 601,769 | | 569,270 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Costs and expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Racing and gaming | | | | | | | | | |
Pari-mutuel purses, awards and other | | 32,938 | | 43,045 | | 243,259 | | 265,674 | |
Gaming taxes, purses and other | | 12,756 | | 6,532 | | 42,741 | | 20,898 | |
Operating costs | | 71,065 | | 60,883 | | 249,649 | | 215,385 | |
General and administrative | | 19,559 | | 18,020 | | 55,578 | | 52,249 | |
| | 136,318 | | 128,480 | | 591,227 | | 554,206 | |
Real estate and other | | | | | | | | | |
Operating costs (recovery) | | 1,185 | | (177 | ) | 2,915 | | 2,136 | |
General and administrative | | 152 | | 9 | | 561 | | 33 | |
| | 1,337 | | (168 | ) | 3,476 | | 2,169 | |
Predevelopment, pre-opening and other costs | | 451 | | 4,324 | | 1,869 | | 7,418 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 11,848 | | 11,252 | | 33,061 | | 31,251 | |
Interest expense, net | | 12,680 | | 16,277 | | 37,348 | | 45,141 | |
Write-down of long-lived assets | | 1,444 | | — | | 1,444 | | — | |
Equity loss | | 1,035 | | 435 | | 2,131 | | 225 | |
| | 165,113 | | 160,600 | | 670,556 | | 640,410 | |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | (50,581 | ) | (48,572 | ) | (68,787 | ) | (71,140 | ) |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | (770 | ) | (863 | ) | 1,992 | | 1,552 | |
Loss from continuing operations | | (49,811 | ) | (47,709 | ) | (70,779 | ) | (72,692 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | — | | (3,033 | ) | — | | (2,176 | ) |
Net loss | | (49,811 | ) | (50,742 | ) | (70,779 | ) | (74,868 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | 2,112 | | (706 | ) | 4,122 | | 6,572 | |
Change in fair value of interest rate swap | | (327 | ) | (133 | ) | (423 | ) | (33 | ) |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (48,026 | ) | $ | (51,581 | ) | $ | (67,080 | ) | $ | (68,329 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss per share for Class A Subordinate Voting Stock and Class B Stock: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and Diluted | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | — | | (0.03 | ) | — | | (0.02 | ) |
Loss per share | | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.70 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock and Class B Stock outstanding during the period [in thousands]: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and Diluted | | 107,726 | | 107,498 | | 107,669 | | 107,445 | |
See accompanying notes
1
MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
[Unaudited]
[U.S. dollars in thousands]
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | (restated-note 8) | | | | (restated-note 8) | |
Cash provided from (used for): | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities of continuing operations | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss from continuing operations | | $ | (49,811 | ) | $ | (47,709 | ) | $ | (70,779 | ) | $ | (72,692 | ) |
Items not involving current cash flows | | 13,030 | | 17,704 | | 34,198 | | 47,867 | |
| | (36,781 | ) | (30,005 | ) | (36,581 | ) | (24,825 | ) |
Changes in non-cash working capital balances | | 3,021 | | 5,741 | | (11,614 | ) | (15,431 | ) |
| | (33,760 | ) | (24,264 | ) | (48,195 | ) | (40,256 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Investing activities of continuing operations | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | | — | | (9,347 | ) | — | | (9,347 | ) |
Real estate property and fixed asset additions | | (20,610 | ) | (12,725 | ) | (59,698 | ) | (68,600 | ) |
Other asset disposals (additions) | | (692 | ) | 1,149 | | (3,178 | ) | 302 | |
Proceeds on disposal of real estate properties and fixed assets | | 2,602 | | 653 | | 5,243 | | 3,478 | |
Proceeds on real estate sold to parent | | 100 | | — | | 88,009 | | — | |
Proceeds on real estate sold to a related party | | — | | — | | — | | 5,578 | |
| | (18,600 | ) | (20,270 | ) | 30,376 | | (68,589 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Financing activities of continuing operations | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from bank indebtedness | | 25,199 | | 18,129 | | 40,940 | | 18,129 | |
Proceeds from indebtedness and long-term debt with parent | | 10,189 | | 6,272 | | 26,518 | | 66,849 | |
Proceeds from long-term debt | | 205 | | 6,927 | | 4,345 | | 12,134 | |
Repayment of bank indebtedness | | — | | — | | (21,515 | ) | (5,500 | ) |
Repayment of long-term debt with parent | | (2,072 | ) | (1,600 | ) | (6,125 | ) | (3,400 | ) |
Repayment of long-term debt | | (2,207 | ) | (2,501 | ) | (51,349 | ) | (12,498 | ) |
| | 31,314 | | 27,227 | | (7,186 | ) | 75,714 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | 210 | | (210 | ) | 131 | | (506 | ) |
Net cash flows used for continuing operations | | (20,836 | ) | (17,517 | ) | (24,874 | ) | (33,637 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided from (used for) discontinued operations | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities of discontinued operations | | — | | (6,677 | ) | — | | (1,299 | ) |
Investing activities of discontinued operations | | — | | 46,056 | | — | | 47,435 | |
Financing activities of discontinued operations | | — | | (26,699 | ) | — | | (32,427 | ) |
Net cash flows provided from discontinued operations | | — | | 12,680 | | — | | 13,709 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the period | | (20,836 | ) | (4,837 | ) | (24,874 | ) | (19,928 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 54,253 | | 35,791 | | 58,291 | | 50,882 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 33,417 | | $ | 30,954 | | $ | 33,417 | | $ | 30,954 | |
See accompanying notes
2
MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
[REFER TO NOTE 1 – GOING CONCERN]
[Unaudited]
[U.S. dollars and share amounts in thousands]
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | (restated – note 7) | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 33,417 | | $ | 58,291 | |
Restricted cash | | 28,603 | | 34,194 | |
Accounts receivable | | 31,656 | | 35,949 | |
Due from parent | | 5,313 | | 6,648 | |
Income taxes receivable | | 327 | | 580 | |
Inventories | | 8,866 | | 6,384 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | 9,837 | | 8,884 | |
Assets held for sale | | 29,150 | | — | |
| | 147,169 | | 150,930 | |
Real estate properties, net | | 807,889 | | 815,766 | |
Fixed assets, net | | 85,717 | | 93,141 | |
Racing licenses | | 109,868 | | 109,868 | |
Other assets, net | | 6,880 | | 4,664 | |
Future tax assets | | 45,220 | | 42,388 | |
Assets held for sale | | — | | 30,128 | |
| | $ | 1,202,743 | | $ | 1,246,885 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Bank indebtedness | | $ | 25,940 | | $ | 6,515 | |
Accounts payable | | 55,839 | | 76,105 | |
Accrued salaries and wages | | 8,366 | | 8,792 | |
Customer deposits | | 2,468 | | 2,531 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | 52,247 | | 56,228 | |
Long-term debt due within one year | | 52,531 | | 85,754 | |
Due to parent | | 110,086 | | 3,108 | |
Deferred revenue | | 3,491 | | 6,098 | |
Liabilities related to assets held for sale | | 1,047 | | — | |
| | 312,015 | | 245,131 | |
Long-term debt | | 81,883 | | 93,859 | |
Long-term debt due to parent | | 93,426 | | 177,250 | |
Convertible subordinated notes | | 222,254 | | 221,437 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | 17,180 | | 17,484 | |
Future tax liabilities | | 91,010 | | 90,059 | |
Liabilities related to assets held for sale | | — | | 1,047 | |
| | 817,768 | | 846,267 | |
| | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Class A Subordinate Voting Stock (Issued: 2007 – 49,260; 2006 – 49,055) | | 319,833 | | 319,087 | |
Class B Stock | | | | | |
(Convertible into Class A Subordinate Voting Stock) (Issued: 2007 and 2006 - 58,466) | | 394,094 | | 394,094 | |
Contributed surplus | | 91,803 | | 41,718 | |
Other paid-in-capital | | 2,016 | | 1,410 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (467,077 | ) | (396,298 | ) |
Accumulated comprehensive income | | 44,306 | | 40,607 | |
| | 384,975 | | 400,618 | |
| | $ | 1,202,743 | | $ | 1,246,885 | |
See accompanying notes
3
MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
[Unaudited]
[all amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted and all tabular amounts in thousands, except per share figures]
1. Going Concern
These interim consolidated financial statements of Magna Entertainment Corp. (the “Company”) have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred net losses of $87.4 million, $105.3 million and $95.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, has incurred a net loss of $70.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and has an accumulated deficit of $467.1 million and a working capital deficiency of $164.8 million at September 30, 2007. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt and is dependent on the Company generating cash flows that are adequate to sustain the operations of the business, renew or extend current financing arrangements and meet its obligations with respect to secured and unsecured creditors, none of which is assured. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company completed asset sale transactions for proceeds totaling approximately $89.1 million. On September 12, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a debt elimination plan designed to eliminate net debt by December 31, 2008 by generating aggregate proceeds of approximately $600.0 - $700.0 million from the sale of assets, entering into strategic transactions involving certain of the Company’s racing, gaming and technology operations, and a possible future equity issuance. In addition, to address immediate liquidity concerns and provide sufficient time to implement the debt elimination plan, the Company has arranged $100.0 million of funding, comprised of (i) a $20.0 million private placement of the Company’s Class A Subordinate Voting Stock to Fair Enterprise Limited (“Fair Enterprise”), a company that forms part of an estate planning vehicle for the family of Mr. Frank Stronach, the Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company (refer to note 17[b]); and (ii) an $80.0 million short-term bridge loan from a subsidiary of MI Developments Inc. (“MID”), the Company’s controlling shareholder (refer to note 14[a][i]). The success of the debt elimination plan is not determinable at this time. These interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments which would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and, therefore, be required to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which consist of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Seasonality
The Company’s racing business is seasonal in nature. The Company’s racing revenues and operating results for any quarter will not be indicative of the racing revenues and operating results for the year. The Company’s racing operations have historically operated at a loss in the second half of the year, with the third quarter generating the largest operating loss. This seasonality has resulted in large quarterly fluctuations in revenues and operating results.
Comparative Amounts
Certain of the comparative amounts have been reclassified to reflect assets held for sale and discontinued operations.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently reviewing SFAS 157, but has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
4
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 allows companies to voluntarily choose, at specified election dates, to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities, as well as certain non-financial instruments that are similar to financial instruments, at fair value (the “fair value option”). The election is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, SFAS 159 specifies that all subsequent changes in fair value for that instrument be reported in earnings. The provisions of SFAS 159 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently reviewing SFAS 159, but has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3. Accounting Change
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires an entity to recognize the tax benefit of uncertain tax positions only when it is more likely than not, based on the position’s technical merits, that the position would be sustained upon examination by the respective taxing authorities. The tax benefit is measured as the largest benefit that is more than fifty-percent likely of being realized upon final settlement with the respective taxing authorities. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on a retroactive basis, which did not result in any charge to accumulated deficit as a cumulative effect of an accounting change or adjustment to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Accordingly, the adoption of FIN 48 did not have an effect on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.
As of January 1, 2007, the Company had $2.0 million of unrecognized income tax benefits and $0.3 million of related accrued interest and penalties (net of any tax effect), all of which could ultimately reduce the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company is currently under audit in Austria. Although it is not possible to accurately predict the timing of the conclusion of the audit, the Company does not anticipate that the Austrian audit relating to the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of 2007. Given the stage of completion of the audit, the Company does not currently estimate significant changes to unrecognized income tax benefits over the next year. In addition, the Company does not anticipate any other significant changes to unrecognized income tax benefits over the next year.
It is the Company’s continuing policy to account for interest and penalties associated with income tax obligations as a component of income tax expense. The Company did not recognize any interest and penalties as provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 as the maximum interest and penalty period have elapsed.
As of January 1, 2007, the following tax years remained subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions:
Major Jurisdictions | | Open Years |
| | |
Austria | | 2002 through 2006 |
Canada | | 2003 through 2006 |
United States | | 2003 through 2006 |
The Company is subject to income taxes in many state and local taxing jurisdictions in Canada and the United States, many of which are still open to tax examinations. Management does not believe these represent a significant financial exposure to the Company.
4. Income Taxes
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company estimates its annual effective tax rate at the end of each of the first three quarters of the year, based on current facts and circumstances. The Company has estimated a nominal annual effective tax rate for the entire year and accordingly has applied this effective tax rate to the loss from continuing operations before income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, resulting in an income tax recovery of $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and an income tax expense of $2.0 million and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 primarily represents income tax expense recognized from certain of the Company’s U.S. operations that are not included in the Company’s U.S. consolidated income tax return.
5
5. Acquisition
On August 22, 2003, MEC Maryland Investments Inc. (“MEC Maryland”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired a 30% equity interest in AmTote International, Inc. (“AmTote”) for a total cash purchase price, including transaction costs, of $4.3 million. On July 26, 2006, MEC Maryland acquired the remaining 70% equity interest of AmTote for a total cash purchase price of $9.3 million, including transaction costs of $0.1 million, net of cash acquired of $5.5 million. AmTote is a provider of totalisator services to the North American pari-mutuel industry with service contracts with over 70 North American racetracks and other wagering entities. The results of AmTote have been consolidated from July 26, 2006 and are included in the racing and gaming – PariMax operations segment. Prior to July 26, 2006, the results of AmTote were accounted for on an equity basis.
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired as follows:
Non-cash working capital | | $ | 1,203 | |
Fixed assets | | 12,691 | |
Other assets | | 127 | |
Long-term debt | | (1,470 | ) |
Other long-term liabilities | | (980 | ) |
Future tax liabilities | | (2,224 | ) |
Net assets acquired and total purchase price, net of cash acquired | | $ | 9,347 | |
6. Sale of The Meadows
On November 14, 2006, the Company completed the sale of all of the outstanding shares of Washington Trotting Association, Inc., Mountain Laurel Racing, Inc. and MEC Pennsylvania Racing, Inc. (collectively “The Meadows”), each a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, through which the Company owned and operated The Meadows, a standardbred racetrack in Pennsylvania, to PA Meadows, LLC, a company jointly owned by William Paulos and William Wortman, controlling shareholders of Millennium Gaming, Inc., and a fund managed by Oaktree Capital Management, LLC (“Oaktree” and together, with PA Meadows, LLC, “Millennium-Oaktree”). On closing, the Company received cash consideration of $171.8 million, net of transaction costs of $3.2 million, and a holdback agreement, under which $25.0 million is payable to the Company over a five-year period, subject to offset for certain indemnification obligations. Under the terms of the holdback agreement, the Company agreed to release the security requirement for the holdback amount, defer subordinate payments under the holdback, defer receipt of holdback payments until the opening of the permanent casino at The Meadows and defer receipt of holdback payments to the extent of available cash flows as defined in the holdback agreement, in exchange for Millennium-Oaktree providing an additional $25.0 million of equity support for PA Meadows, LLC. The Company also entered into a racing services agreement whereby the Company pays $50 thousand per annum and continues to operate, for its own account, the racing operations at The Meadows for at least five years. The transaction proceeds of $171.8 million were allocated to the assets of The Meadows as follows: (i) $7.2 million was allocated to the long-lived assets representing the fair value of the underlying real estate and fixed assets based on appraised values; and (ii) $164.6 million was allocated to the intangible assets representing the fair value of the racing/gaming licenses based on applying the residual method to determine the fair value of the intangible assets. On the closing date of the transaction, the net book value of the long-lived assets was $18.4 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment loss of $11.2 million relating to the long-lived assets, and the net book value of the intangible assets was $32.6 million, resulting in a gain of $132.0 million on the sale of the intangible assets. This gain was reduced by $5.6 million, representing the net present value of the operating losses expected over the term of the racing services agreement. Accordingly, the net gain recognized by the Company on the disposition of the intangible assets was $126.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Given that the racing services agreement was effectively a lease of property, plant and equipment and since the amount owing under the holdback note is to be paid to the extent of available cash flows as defined in the holdback agreement, the Company was deemed to have continuing involvement with the long-lived assets for accounting purposes. As a result, the sale of The Meadows’ real estate and fixed assets was precluded from sales recognition and not accounted for as a sale-leaseback, but rather using the financing method of accounting under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, $12.8 million of the proceeds were deferred, representing the fair value of long-lived assets of $7.2 million and the net present value of the operating losses expected over the term of the racing services agreement of $5.6 million, and recorded as “other long-term liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet at the date of completion of the transaction. The deferred proceeds are being recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss over the five-year term of the racing services agreement and/or at the point when the sale-leaseback subsequently qualifies for sales recognition. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized $0.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of the deferred proceeds in earnings, which is recorded as an offset to racing and gaming “general and administrative” expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. With respect to the $25.0 million holdback agreement, the Company will recognize this consideration upon the settlement of the indemnification obligations and as payments are received.
6
7. Assets Held for Sale
[a] On August 9, 2007, the Company announced its intention to sell real estate properties located in Dixon, California; Ocala, Florida and Porter, New York and has begun activities to sell these properties, including formally listing each of the properties for sale with a real estate broker. Accordingly, at September 30, 2007, these real estate properties are classified as “assets held for sale” on the consolidated balance sheets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”). In accordance with the terms of the Company’s bridge loan agreement with a subsidiary of MID, the Company is required to use the net proceeds from the sale of these real estate properties to pay down principal amounts outstanding under the bridge loan and the amount of such net proceeds will permanently reduce the committed amount of the bridge loan.
[b] The Company’s assets held for sale and related liabilities at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are shown below. All assets held for sale and related liabilities are classified as current at September 30, 2007 as the assets and related liabilities described in section [a] above are expected to be sold within one year from the balance sheet date.
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Real estate properties, net | | | | | |
Dixon, California | | $ | 19,139 | | $ | 18,711 | |
Ocala, Florida | | 8,399 | | 8,427 | |
Porter, New York [i] | | 1,612 | | 2,990 | |
| | $ | 29,150 | | $ | 30,128 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | |
Future tax liabilities | | $ | 1,047 | | $ | 1,047 | |
[i] In connection with the plan to sell the Porter, New York real estate, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment loss of $1.4 million at September 30, 2007, which represents the excess of the carrying value of the asset over the estimated fair value. The impairment loss is included in the real estate and other operations segment.
[c] On September 12, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a debt elimination plan designed to eliminate net debt by generating aggregate proceeds of approximately $600.0 - $700.0 million from the sale of certain assets, entering into strategic transactions involving the Company’s racing, gaming and technology operations, and a possible future equity issuance (refer to note 1). In addition to the sale of real estate described in section [a] above, the debt elimination plan also contemplates the sale of real estate properties located in Aventura and Hallandale, Florida, both adjacent to Gulfstream Park; Anne Arundel County, Maryland, adjacent to Laurel Park; and Ebreichsdorf, Austria, adjacent to the Magna Racino™. The Company also intends to explore selling its membership interests in the mixed-use developments at Gulfstream Park in Florida and Santa Anita Park in California that the Company is pursuing under joint venture arrangements with Forest City Enterprises, Inc. (“Forest City”) and Caruso Affiliated, respectively. The Company also intends to sell Great Lakes Downs in Michigan and has announced that the 2007 race meet will be the last that MI Racing, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, will run at Great Lakes Downs; Thistledown in Ohio; and its interest in Portland Meadows in Oregon. The Company also intends to explore other strategic transactions involving other racing, gaming and technology operations, including: partnerships or joint ventures in respect of the existing gaming facility at Gulfstream Park; partnerships or joint ventures in respect of potential alternative gaming operations at certain of the Company’s other racetracks that currently do not have gaming operations; the possible sale of Remington Park, a horse racetrack and gaming facility in Oklahoma City; and transactions involving the Company’s technology operations, which may include one or more of the assets that comprise the Company’s PariMax business. At September 30, 2007, all of the criteria required to classify an asset held for sale or operation as discontinued operations pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 144 were not met and accordingly these assets and operations continue to be classified as held and used. Once the criteria to classify an asset as held for sale or operation as discontinued operations pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 144 are met, the Company will reclassify these assets to “assets held for sale” and “discontinued operations” as and when appropriate.
8. Discontinued Operations
[a] On November 1, 2006, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company completed the sale of the Fontana Golf Club located in Oberwaltersdorf, Austria to a subsidiary of Magna International Inc. (“Magna”), a related party, for a sale value of Euros 30.0 million (U.S. $38.3 million), which included cash consideration of Euros 13.2 million (U.S. $16.9 million), net of transaction costs, and approximately Euros 16.8 million (U.S. $21.4 million) of debt assumed by Magna. The gain at the date of disposition of approximately $20.9 million, net of tax, was recorded as a contribution of equity in contributed surplus on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
7
[b] On August 25, 2006, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company completed the sale of the Magna Golf Club located in Aurora, Ontario, Canada to Magna, for cash consideration of Cdn. $51.8 million (U.S. $46.4 million), net of transaction costs. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $1.2 million at the date of disposition equal to the excess of the Company’s carrying value of the assets disposed over their fair values at the date of disposition. Of the sale proceeds, Cdn. $32.6 million (U.S. $29.3 million) was used to pay all amounts owing under certain loan agreements with Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG related to the Magna Golf Club.
[c] On May 26, 2006, the Company completed the sale of a restaurant and related real estate in the United States and received cash consideration of $2.0 million, net of transaction costs, and recognized a gain at the date of disposition of approximately $1.5 million.
[d] The Company’s results of operations related to discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
Results of Operations | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 4,381 | | $ | 13,909 | |
Costs and expenses | | 3,759 | | 10,584 | |
| | 622 | | 3,325 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 606 | | 2,047 | |
Interest expense, net | | 593 | | 1,934 | |
Impairment loss recorded on disposition | | 1,202 | | 1,202 | |
Loss before gain on disposition | | (1,779 | ) | (1,858 | ) |
Gain on disposition | | — | | 1,495 | |
Loss before income taxes | | (1,779 | ) | (363 | ) |
Income tax expense | | 1,254 | | 1,813 | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,033 | ) | $ | (2,176 | ) |
The Company did not have any assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations at September 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
9. Bank Indebtedness and Long-term Debt
[a] The Company has a $40.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with a Canadian financial institution, which was scheduled to mature on October 1, 2007, but on September 13, 2007 was amended and extended to January 31, 2008. The credit facility is available by way of U.S. dollar loans and letters of credit. Loans under the facility are secured by a first charge on the assets of Golden Gate Fields and a second charge on the assets of Santa Anita Park, and are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company. At September 30, 2007, the Company had borrowings of $15.0 million (December 31, 2006 – nil) under the credit facility and had issued letters of credit totaling $24.7 million (December 31, 2006 - $24.7 million), such that $0.3 million was unused and available. The loans under the facility bear interest at the U.S. Base rate plus 5% or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 6%. The weighted average interest rate on the loans outstanding under the credit facility at September 30, 2007 was 9.26% (December 31, 2006 – nil).
At September 30, 2007, the Company was not in compliance with one of the financial covenants contained in the credit agreement. A waiver for the financial covenant breach at September 30, 2007 was obtained from the lender.
[b] A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns and operates Santa Anita Park has a $10.0 million revolving loan arrangement under its existing credit facility with a U.S. financial institution, which was scheduled to mature on October 8, 2007, but on October 2, 2007 was amended and extended to October 31, 2012 (refer to note 17[d]). The revolving loan agreement is guaranteed by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, the Los Angeles Turf Club, Incorporated (“LATC”) and is secured by a first deed of trust on Santa Anita Park and the surrounding real property, an assignment of the lease between LATC, the racetrack operator, and The Santa Anita Companies, Inc. (“SAC”) and a pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock of LATC and SAC. At September 30, 2007, the Company had borrowings of $8.6 million (December 31, 2006 - $6.5 million) under the revolving loan agreement. Borrowings under the revolving loan agreement bear interest at the U.S. Prime rate. The weighted average interest rate on the borrowings outstanding under the revolving loan agreement at September 30, 2007 was 7.75% (December 31, 2006 – 8.25%).
8
[c] On May 11, 2007, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, AmTote, completed a refinancing of its existing credit facilities with a new lender. The refinancing includes: (i) a $3.0 million revolving credit facility to finance working capital requirements, available by way of U.S. dollar loans and letters of credit, bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.5%, with a maturity date of May 11, 2008; (ii) a $4.2 million term loan for the repayment of AmTote’s debt outstanding under its existing term loan facilities, bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%, with a maturity date of May 11, 2011; and (iii) a $10.0 million term loan to finance up to 80% of eligible capital costs related to tote service contracts, bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%, with a maturity date of May 11, 2012. Loans under the credit facilities are secured by a first charge on the assets and a pledge of stock of AmTote.
At September 30, 2007, the Company had (i) borrowed $2.4 million under the $3.0 million revolving credit facility, which is included in “bank indebtedness” on the consolidated balance sheets; (ii) borrowed $3.5 million under the $4.2 million term loan, which is included in “long-term debt” on the consolidated balance sheets; and (iii) no borrowings under the $10.0 million term loan. The weighted average interest rates on the borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility and term loan at September 30, 2007 were 8.22% and 8.47%, respectively.
At September 30, 2007, the Company was not in compliance with certain of the financial covenants contained in the credit agreement. A waiver for the financial covenants breach at September 30, 2007 was obtained from the lender.
[d] On July 24, 2007, one of the Company’s European subsidiaries amended and extended its Euros 3.9 million bank term loan by increasing the amount available under the bank term loan to Euros 4.0 million (U.S. $5.7 million), bearing interest at the Euro Overnight Index Average rate plus 3.0% per annum, and extending the term to July 31, 2008. At September 30, 2007, this bank term loan is fully drawn.
10. Capital Stock
[a] Changes in Class A Subordinate Voting Stock and Class B Stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are shown in the following table (number of shares and stated value have been rounded to the nearest thousand):
| | Class A | | | | | | | | | |
| | Subordinate Voting Stock | | Class B Stock | | Total | |
| | Number of | | Stated | | Number of | | Stated | | Number of | | Stated | |
| | Shares | | Value | | Shares | | Value | | Shares | | Value | |
Issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 | | 49,055 | | $ | 319,087 | | 58,466 | | $ | 394,094 | | 107,521 | | $ | 713,181 | |
Issued under the Long-term Incentive Plan | | 204 | | 741 | | — | | — | | 204 | | 741 | |
Issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007 | | 49,259 | | 319,828 | | 58,466 | | 394,094 | | 107,725 | | 713,922 | |
Issued under the Long-term Incentive Plan | | 1 | | 5 | | — | | — | | 1 | | 5 | |
Issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 | | 49,260 | | $ | 319,833 | | 58,466 | | $ | 394,094 | | 107,726 | | $ | 713,927 | |
[b] The following table (number of shares have been rounded to the nearest thousand) presents the maximum number of shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock and Class B Stock that would be outstanding if all of the outstanding options and convertible subordinated notes issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 were exercised or converted:
| | Number of Shares | |
Class A Subordinate Voting Stock outstanding | | 49,260 | |
Class B Stock outstanding | | 58,466 | |
Options to purchase Class A Subordinate Voting Stock | | 5,090 | |
8.55% Convertible Subordinated Notes, convertible at $7.05 per share | | 21,276 | |
7.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes, convertible at $8.50 per share | | 8,824 | |
| | 142,916 | |
9
11. Long-term Incentive Plan
The Company’s Long-term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) (adopted in 2000 and amended in 2007) allows for the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, bonus stock and performance shares to directors, officers, employees, consultants, independent contractors and agents. A maximum of 9.2 million shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock remain available to be issued under the Plan, of which 7.8 million are available for issuance pursuant to stock options and tandem stock appreciation rights and 1.4 million are available for issuance pursuant to any other type of award under the Plan.
During 2005, the Company introduced an incentive compensation program for certain officers and key employees, which awarded performance shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock under the Plan. The number of shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock underlying the performance share awards were based either on a percentage of a guaranteed bonus or a percentage of total 2005 compensation divided by the market value of the Class A Subordinate Voting Stock on the date the program was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. These performance shares vested over a six or eight-month period to December 31, 2005 and were distributed, subject to certain conditions, in two equal installments. The first distribution occurred in March 2006 and the second distribution occurred in March 2007. At December 31, 2005, there were no non-vested performance share awards and there were 199,471 vested performance share awards with a weighted average grant-date market value of either U.S. $6.26 or Cdn. $7.61 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2006, 131,751 of these vested performance shares were issued with a stated value of $0.8 million and 4,812 performance share awards were forfeited (of which 115,408 vested performance shares were issued with a stated value of $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006). Accordingly, at December 31, 2006, there were 62,908 performance share awards vested with a weighted average grant-date market value of either U.S. $6.26 or Cdn. $7.61 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, all of these performance shares were issued with a stated value of $0.2 million. At September 30, 2007, there are no performance shares remaining to be issued under the 2005 incentive compensation arrangement. The Company recognized no compensation expense related to the 2005 incentive compensation arrangement for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
In 2006, the Company continued the incentive compensation program as described in the immediately preceding paragraph. The program was similar in all respects, except that the 2006 performance shares vested over a 12-month period to December 31, 2006 and were distributed, subject to certain conditions, prior to March 31, 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2006, 162,556 performance share awards were granted under the Plan with a weighted average grant-date market value of either U.S. $6.80 or Cdn. $7.63 per share, 1,616 performance shares were issued with a nominal stated value and 42,622 performance share awards were forfeited (of which 162,556 performance share awards were granted, 1,616 performance shares were issued and 12,490 performance share awards were forfeited during the nine months ended September 30, 2006). Accordingly, at December 31, 2006, there were 118,318 performance share awards vested with a weighted average grant-date market value of either U.S. $6.80 or Cdn. $7.63 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 111,841 performance shares were issued with a stated value of $0.4 million and 6,477 performance share awards were forfeited. At September 30, 2007, there are no performance shares remaining to be issued under the 2006 incentive compensation arrangement. The Company recognized no compensation expense related to the 2006 incentive compensation arrangement for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and recognized approximately $0.2 million and $0.8 million of compensation expense related to the 2006 incentive compensation arrangement for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
At September 30, 2007, there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to these performance share award arrangements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 30,941 shares with a stated value of $0.1 million (during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 – 25,896 shares with a stated value of $0.2 million) were issued to the Company’s directors in payment of services rendered.
The Company grants stock options to certain directors, officers, key employees and consultants to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A Subordinate Voting Stock. All of such stock options give the grantee the right to purchase Class A Subordinate Voting Stock of the Company at a price no less than the fair market value of such stock at the date of grant. Generally, stock options under the Plan vest over a period of two to six years from the date of grant at rates of 1/7th to 1/3rd per year and expire on or before the tenth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to earlier cancellation upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the stock option agreements entered into by the Company with each recipient of options.
10
Information with respect to shares subject to option at September 30, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (number of shares subject to option in the following tables are expressed in whole numbers and have not been rounded to the nearest thousand):
| | | | | | Weighted Average | |
| | Shares Subject to Option | | Exercise Price | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Balance outstanding at January 1 | | 4,905,000 | | 4,827,500 | | $ | 6.08 | | $ | 6.14 | |
Forfeited or expired[i] | | (166,000 | ) | — | | 6.74 | | — | |
Balance outstanding at March 31 | | 4,739,000 | | 4,827,500 | | 6.06 | | 6.14 | |
Forfeited or expired[i] | | (25,000 | ) | (64,000 | ) | 5.71 | | 6.80 | |
Balance outstanding at June 30 | | 4,714,000 | | 4,763,500 | | 6.07 | | 6.13 | |
Granted | | 390,000 | | — | | 3.20 | | — | |
Forfeited or expired[i] | | (14,000 | ) | — | | 5.20 | | — | |
Balance outstanding at September 30 | | 5,090,000 | | 4,763,500 | | $ | 5.85 | | $ | 6.13 | |
[i] Options forfeited or expired were primarily as a result of employment contracts being terminated and voluntary employee resignations.
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Number | | 5,090,000 | | 4,763,500 | | 4,435,668 | | 4,279,700 | |
Weighted average exercise price | | $ | 5.85 | | $ | 6.13 | | $ | 6.02 | | $ | 6.08 | |
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) | | 4.0 | | 4.3 | | 3.2 | | 3.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At September 30, 2007, the 5,090,000 stock options outstanding had exercise prices ranging from $2.78 to $7.24 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the 390,000 stock options granted had a weighted-average fair value of $1.36 per option (for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 – no options were granted). The fair value of stock option grants is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Risk free interest rates | | 4.15 | % | N/A | | 4.15 | % | N/A | |
Dividend yields | | — | | N/A | | — | | N/A | |
Volatility factor of expected market price of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock | | 0.559 | | N/A | | 0.559 | | N/A | |
Weighted average expected life (years) | | 5.00 | | N/A | | 5.00 | | N/A | |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options.
The compensation expense recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 related to stock options is approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively (for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 – $0.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively). At September 30, 2007, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options is $0.6 million, which is expected to be recognized in expense over a period of 4.0 years.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized total compensation expense of $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively (for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 - $0.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively), relating to performance share awards, director compensation and stock options under the Plan.
11
12. Other Paid-in-Capital
Other paid-in-capital consists of accumulated stock option compensation expense less the fair value of stock options at the date of grant that have been exercised and reclassified to share capital. Changes in other paid-in-capital for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 are shown in the following table:
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Balance at January 1 | | $ | 1,410 | | $ | — | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 73 | | 772 | |
Balance at March 31 | | 1,483 | | 772 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 70 | | 289 | |
Balance at June 30 | | 1,553 | | 1,061 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 463 | | 135 | |
Balance at September 30 | | $ | 2,016 | | $ | 1,196 | |
13. Loss Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted loss per share computations (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | Basic and | | Basic and | | Basic and | | Basic and | |
| | Diluted | | Diluted | | Diluted | | Diluted | |
Loss from continuing operations | | $ | (49,811 | ) | $ | (47,709 | ) | $ | (70,779 | ) | $ | (72,692 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | — | | (3,033 | ) | — | | (2,176 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (49,811 | ) | $ | (50,742 | ) | $ | (70,779 | ) | $ | (74,868 | ) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Subordinate Voting Stock | | 49,260 | | 49,032 | | 49,203 | | 48,979 | |
Class B Stock | | 58,466 | | 58,466 | | 58,466 | | 58,466 | |
| | 107,726 | | 107,498 | | 107,669 | | 107,445 | |
Loss per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | — | | (0.03 | ) | — | | (0.02 | ) |
Loss per share | | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.70 | ) |
As a result of the net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, options to purchase 5,090,000 shares and notes convertible into 30,100,124 shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share since the effect is anti-dilutive.
As a result of the net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, options to purchase 4,763,500 shares, notes convertible into 30,100,124 shares and 231,056 performance share awards have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share since the effect is anti-dilutive.
14. Transactions with Related Parties
[a] The Company’s indebtedness, long-term debt and accrued interest payable due to parent consists of the following:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Bridge Loan Facility [i] | | $ | 8,740 | | $ | — | |
Gulfstream Park Project Financing | | | | | |
Tranche 1 [ii] | | 130,611 | | 131,350 | |
Tranche 2 [iii] | | 24,132 | | 18,617 | |
Tranche 3 [iv] | | 12,822 | | — | |
Remington Park Project Financing [v] | | 27,207 | | 30,391 | |
| | 203,512 | | 180,358 | |
Less: due within one year | | (110,086 | ) | (3,108 | ) |
| | $ | 93,426 | | $ | 177,250 | |
12
[i] Bridge Loan Facility
On September 12, 2007, the Company entered into a bridge loan agreement with a subsidiary of MID, pursuant to which up to $80.0 million of financing will be made available to the Company, subject to certain conditions. The bridge loan matures on May 31, 2008, is non-revolving and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 10.0% per annum, subject to a 1.0% increase in the event the Company has not, by December 31, 2007, completed asset sales (or executed asset sale agreements acceptable to MID) or completed equity financings (other than the Fair Enterprise private placement) with aggregate net proceeds of $50.0 million. If, by February 29, 2008, the Company has not entered into agreements acceptable to MID for asset sales that would yield aggregate net proceeds sufficient to repay the entire outstanding loan amount, the interest rate increases by an additional 1.0%. An arrangement fee of $2.4 million was paid to MID on closing and there is a commitment fee equal to 1.0% per annum (payable in arrears) on the undrawn portion of the $80.0 million maximum loan commitment. In addition, on February 29, 2008, there is an additional arrangement fee equal to 1% of the maximum principal amount then available under this facility. The bridge loan is required to be repaid by way of the payment of the net proceeds of any asset sale, any equity offering (other than the Fair Enterprise private placement) or any debt offering, subject to specified amounts required to be paid to eliminate other prior-ranking indebtedness. The bridge loan is secured by essentially all of the assets of the Company and by guarantees provided by certain subsidiaries of the Company. The guarantees are secured by charges over the lands owned by Golden Gate Fields, Santa Anita Park and Thistledown, and charges over the lands in Dixon, California and Ocala, Florida, as well as by pledges of the shares of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. The bridge loan is also cross-defaulted to all other obligations to MID and to other significant indebtedness of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the terms of the bridge loan, advances after January 15, 2008 are subject to MID being satisfied that the Company’s $40.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility will be further extended to at least April 30, 2008 or that satisfactory refinancing of that facility has been arranged. In addition, the first advance that would result in the then outstanding loan amount under the bridge loan exceeding $40.0 million is subject to MID being satisfied that the Company is in compliance with, can reasonably be expected to be able to implement, and is using all commercially reasonable efforts to implement the debt elimination plan.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company received loan advances of $11.5 million and incurred interest expense of $0.1 million, such that at September 30, 2007, $11.6 million was outstanding under the bridge loan facility, including $0.1 million of accrued interest payable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company amortized $0.2 million of loan origination costs such that at September 30, 2007, $2.8 million of net loan origination costs have been recorded as a reduction of the outstanding loan balance. The loan balance is being accreted to its face value over the term to maturity. The weighted average interest rate on the borrowings outstanding under the bridge loan at September 30, 2007 is 15.6%.
[ii] Gulfstream Park Project Financing – Tranche 1
In December 2004, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a $115.0 million project financing arrangement with a subsidiary of MID, for the reconstruction of facilities at Gulfstream Park. This project financing arrangement was amended on July 22, 2005 in connection with the Remington Park loan as described in note 14[a][v] below. The project financing was made by way of progress draw advances to fund reconstruction. The loan has a ten-year term from the completion date of the reconstruction project, which was February 1, 2006. Prior to the completion date, amounts outstanding under the loan bore interest at a floating rate equal to 2.55% per annum above MID’s notional cost of borrowing under its floating rate credit facility, compounded monthly. After the completion date, amounts outstanding under the loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 10.5% per annum, compounded semi-annually. Prior to January 1, 2007, interest was capitalized to the principal balance of the loan. Commencing January 1, 2007, the Company is required to make monthly blended payments of principal and interest based on a 25-year amortization period commencing on the completion date. The loan contains cross-guarantee, cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions. The loan is guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries that own and operate Remington Park and the Palm Meadows Training Center and is collateralized principally by security over the lands forming part of the operations at Gulfstream Park, Remington Park and Palm Meadows and over all other assets of Gulfstream Park, Remington Park and Palm Meadows, excluding licenses and permits. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company incurred interest expense of $3.4 million and $10.3 million, repaid accrued interest of $3.4 million and $9.1 million, and repaid outstanding principal of $0.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $133.8 million was outstanding under this project financing arrangement, including $1.1 million of accrued interest payable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company amortized loan origination costs of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $3.2 million of net loan origination costs have been recorded as a reduction of the outstanding loan balance. The loan balance is being accreted to its face value over the term to maturity.
13
On September 12, 2007, certain amendments were made to the Gulfstream Park and Remington Park project financings. In return for MID agreeing to waive any applicable make-whole payments for repayments made under either of the project financings prior to May 31, 2008, the required amendments provide, among other things, that under the Gulfstream Park project financing arrangement: (i) Gulfstream Park’s obligations are now guaranteed by the Company; and (ii) $100.0 million of indebtedness under the Gulfstream Park project financings must be repaid by May 31, 2008.
[iii] Gulfstream Park Project Financing – Tranche 2
On July 26, 2006, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries that own and operate Gulfstream Park entered into an amending agreement relating to the existing Gulfstream Park project financing arrangement with a subsidiary of MID by adding an additional tranche of $25.8 million, plus lender costs and capitalized interest, to fund the design and construction of phase one of the slots facility to be located in the existing Gulfstream Park clubhouse building, as well as related capital expenditures and start-up costs, including the acquisition and installation of approximately 500 slot machines. The second tranche of the Gulfstream Park financing has a five-year term and bears interest at a fixed rate of 10.5% per annum, compounded semi-annually. Prior to January 1, 2007, interest on this tranche was capitalized to the principal balance of the loan. Beginning January 1, 2007, this tranche requires blended payments of principal and interest based on a 25-year amortization period commencing on that date. Advances related to phase one of the slots facility were made available by way of progress draw advances and there is no prepayment penalty associated with this tranche. The Gulfstream Park project financing facility was further amended to introduce a mandatory annual cash flow sweep of not less than 75% of Gulfstream Park’s total excess cash flow, after permitted capital expenditures and debt service, to be used to repay the additional principal amount being made available under the new tranche. A lender fee of $0.3 million (1% of the amount of this tranche) was added to the principal amount of the loan as consideration for the amendments. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company received loan advances of $0.7 million and $5.5 million, incurred interest expense of $0.6 million and $1.8 million, repaid accrued interest of $0.6 million and $1.5 million, and repaid outstanding principal of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $24.8 million was outstanding under this project financing arrangement, including $0.2 million of accrued interest payable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company amortized loan origination costs of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $0.7 million of net loan origination costs have been recorded as a reduction of the outstanding loan balance. The loan balance is being accreted to its face value over the term to maturity.
[iv] Gulfstream Park Project Financing – Tranche 3
On December 22, 2006, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries that own and operate Gulfstream Park entered into an additional amending agreement relating to the existing Gulfstream Park project financing arrangement with a subsidiary of MID by adding an additional tranche of $21.5 million, plus lender costs and capitalized interest, to fund the design and construction of phase two of the slots facility, as well as related capital expenditures and start-up costs, including the acquisition and installation of approximately 700 slot machines. This third tranche of the Gulfstream Park financing has a five-year term and bears interest at a rate of 10.5% per annum, compounded semi-annually. Prior to May 1, 2007, interest on this tranche was capitalized to the principal balance of the loan. Beginning May 1, 2007, this tranche requires blended payments of principal and interest based on a 25-year amortization period commencing on that date. Advances related to phase two of the slots facility are made available by way of progress draw advances and there is no prepayment penalty associated with this tranche. A lender fee of $0.2 million (1% of the amount of this tranche) was added to the principal amount of the loan as consideration for the amendments on January 19, 2007, when the first funding advance was made available to the Company. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company received loan advances of $1.1 million and $13.1 million, accrued interest of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, of which $0.1 million has been capitalized to the principal balance of the loan, repaid accrued interest of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, and repaid outstanding principal of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $13.3 million was outstanding under this project financing arrangement, including $0.1 million of accrued interest payable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company amortized loan origination costs of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $0.4 million of net loan origination costs have been recorded as a reduction of the outstanding loan balance. The loan balance is being accreted to its face value over the term to maturity.
14
[v] Remington Park Project Financing
In July 2005, the Company’s subsidiary that owns and operates Remington Park entered into a $34.2 million project financing arrangement with a subsidiary of MID for the build-out of the casino facility at Remington Park. Advances under the loan were made by way of progress draw advances to fund the capital expenditures relating to the development, design and construction of the casino facility, including the purchase and installation of electronic gaming machines. The loan has a ten-year term from the completion date of the reconstruction project, which was November 28, 2005. Prior to the completion date, amounts outstanding under the loan bore interest at a floating rate equal to 2.55% per annum above MID’s notional cost of LIBOR borrowing under its floating rate credit facility, compounded monthly. After the completion date, amounts outstanding under the loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 10.5% per annum, compounded semi-annually. Prior to January 1, 2007, interest was capitalized to the principal balance of the loan. Commencing January 1, 2007, the Company is required to make monthly blended payments of principal and interest based on a 25-year amortization period commencing on the completion date. Certain cash from the operations of Remington Park must be used to pay deferred interest on the loan plus a portion of the principal under the loan equal to the deferred interest on the Gulfstream Park construction loan. The loan is secured by all assets of Remington Park, excluding licenses and permits. The loan is also secured by a charge over the Gulfstream Park lands and a charge over the Palm Meadows Training Center and contains cross-guarantee, cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company incurred interest expense of $0.7 million and $2.3 million, repaid accrued interest of $0.8 million and $2.1 million, and repaid outstanding principal of $1.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively, such that at September 30, 2007, $28.4 million was outstanding under this project financing arrangement, including $0.2 million of accrued interest payable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company amortized a nominal amount and $0.1 million, respectively, of loan origination costs, such that at September 30, 2007, $1.2 million of net loan origination costs have been recorded as a reduction of the outstanding loan balance. The loan balance is being accreted to its face value over the term to maturity.
[b] At September 30, 2007, $5.3 million (December 31, 2006 - $6.5 million) of the funds the Company placed into escrow with MID remain in escrow.
[c] On September 24, 2007, the Company exercised its option to acquire the remaining voting and equity interests in The Maryland Jockey Club, pursuant to an agreement with certain companies controlled by Joseph De Francis, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, and Karin De Francis. Under the terms of the option agreement, the Company paid $18.3 million plus interest on October 5, 2007. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, this obligation was reflected as “long-term debt due within one year” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and was secured by letters of credit under the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility.
[d] On June 7, 2007, the Company sold 205 acres of land and buildings, located in Bonsall, California, and on which the San Luis Rey Downs Training Center is situated, to MID for cash consideration of approximately $24.0 million. The Company also has entered into a lease agreement whereby a subsidiary of the Company will lease the property from MID for a three-year period on a triple-net lease basis, which provides for a nominal annual rent in addition to operating costs that arise from the use of the property. The lease is terminable at any time by either party on four-months notice. The gain on sale of the property of approximately $17.7 million, net of tax, has been reported as a contribution of equity in contributed surplus.
[e] On March 28, 2007, the Company sold a 157 acre parcel of excess land adjacent to the Palm Meadows Training Center, located in Palm Beach County, Florida and certain development rights to MID for cash consideration of $35.0 million. The gain on sale of the excess land and development rights of approximately $16.7 million, net of tax, has been reported as a contribution of equity in contributed surplus.
On February 7, 2007, MID acquired all of the Company’s interests and rights in a 34 acre parcel of residential development land in Aurora, Ontario, Canada for cash consideration of Cdn. $12.0 million (U.S. $10.1 million), which was equal to the carrying value of the land.
On February 7, 2007, MID also acquired a 64 acre parcel of excess land at Laurel Park in Howard County, Maryland for cash consideration of $20.0 million. The gain on sale of the excess land of approximately $15.7 million, net of tax, has been reported as a contribution of equity in contributed surplus.
The Company has been granted profit participation rights in respect of each of these three properties under which it is entitled to receive 15% of the net proceeds from any sale or development after MID achieves a 15% internal rate of return.
[f] The Company has entered into a consulting agreement with MID, dated September 12, 2007, under which MID will provide consulting services to the Company’s management and Board of Directors in connection with the debt elimination plan. The Company is required to reimburse MID for its expenses, but there are no fees payable to MID in connection with the consulting agreement. The consulting agreement may be terminated by either party under certain circumstances.
15
[g] On March 31, 2006, the Company sold a non-core real estate property located in the United States to Magna for total proceeds of $5.6 million, net of transaction costs. The gain on sale of the property of approximately $2.9 million, net of tax, has been reported as a contribution of equity in contributed surplus. In accordance with the terms of the senior secured revolving credit facility, the Company used the net proceeds from this transaction to repay principal amounts outstanding under this credit facility.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
[a] The Company generates a substantial amount of its revenues from wagering activities and, therefore, it is subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of a racetrack. These include, among others, the risks normally associated with changes in the general economic climate, trends in the gaming industry, including competition from other gaming institutions and state lottery commissions, and changes in tax and gaming laws.
[b] In the ordinary course of business activities, the Company may be contingently liable for litigation and claims with, among others, customers, suppliers and former employees. Management believes that adequate provisions have been recorded in the accounts where required. Although it is not possible to accurately estimate the extent of potential costs and losses, if any, management believes, but can provide no assurance, that the ultimate resolution of such contingencies would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company.
[c] On May 18, 2007, ODS Technologies, L.P., doing business as TVG Network, filed a summons against the Company, HRTV, LLC and XpressBet, Inc. seeking an order that the defendants be enjoined from infringing certain patents relating to interactive wagering systems and for an award for damages to compensate for the infringement. An Answer to Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims have been filed on behalf of the defendants. At the present time, the final outcome related to this action cannot be accurately determined by management.
[d] At September 30, 2007, the Company has letters of credit issued with various financial institutions of $1.0 million to guarantee various construction projects related to activity of the Company. These letters of credit are secured by cash deposits of the Company. The Company also has letters of credit issued under its senior secured revolving credit facility of $24.7 million (refer to note 9[a]).
[e] The Company has provided indemnities related to surety bonds and letters of credit issued in the process of obtaining licenses and permits at certain racetracks and to guarantee various construction projects related to activity of its subsidiaries. At September 30, 2007, these indemnities amounted to $6.1 million with expiration dates through 2008.
[f] Contractual commitments outstanding at September 30, 2007, which related to construction and development projects, amounted to approximately $2.2 million.
[g] At September 30, 2007, one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, SAC, had entered into three interest rate swap contracts, one on March 1, 2007, one on April 27, 2007 and one on July 26, 2007, all with effective dates of October 1, 2007, which fix the rate of interest at 6.98%, 7.06% and 7.24% per annum, respectively, to October 8, 2009 on a notional amount of $10.0 million per contract of the outstanding balance under the SAC term loan facility.
[h] On March 4, 2007, the Company entered into a series of customer-focused agreements with Churchill Downs Incorporated (“CDI”) in order to enhance wagering integrity and security, to own and operate HorseRacing TV™ (“HRTV™”), to buy and sell horse racing content, and to promote the availability of horse racing signals to customers worldwide. These agreements involved the formation of a joint venture, TrackNet Media Group, LLC (“TrackNet Media”), a reciprocal content swap agreement and the purchase by CDI from the Company of a 50% interest in HRTV™. TrackNet Media is the vehicle through which the Company and CDI horse racing content is made available to third parties, including racetracks, off-track betting facilities, casinos and advance deposit wagering companies. TrackNet Media will also purchase horse racing content from third parties to be made available through the Company’s and CDI’s respective outlets. Under the reciprocal content swap agreement, the Company and CDI will exchange their respective horse racing signals. To facilitate the sale of 50% of HRTV™ to CDI, on March 4, 2007, HRTV, LLC was created with an effective date of April 27, 2007. Both the Company and CDI are required to make quarterly capital contributions, on an equal basis, until October 2009 to fund the operations of HRTV, LLC; however, the Company may under certain circumstances be responsible for additional capital commitments. The Company’s share of the required capital contributions to HRTV, LLC is expected to be approximately $7.0 million of which $0.8 million has been contributed to September 30, 2007.
16
[i] On November 15, 2006, the Company opened the slots facility at Gulfstream Park, which now offers 1,221 slot machines, of which 516 slot machines were available on November 15, 2006 and an additional 705 slot machines were available on March 20, 2007. The Company opened the slots facilities despite an August 2006 decision rendered by the Florida First District Court of Appeals that reversed a lower court decision granting summary judgment in favor of “Floridians for a Level Playing Field” (“FLPF”), a group in which Gulfstream Park is a member. The Court ruled that a trial is necessary to determine whether the constitutional amendment adopting the slots initiative, approved by Floridians in the November 2004 election, was invalid because the petitions bringing the initiative forward did not contain the minimum number of valid signatures. FLPF filed an application for a rehearing, rehearing en banc before the full panel of the Florida First District Court of Appeals and Certification by the Florida Supreme Court. On November 30, 2006, in a split decision, the en banc court affirmed the August 2006 panel decision and certified the matter to the Florida Supreme Court, which stayed the appellate court ruling pending its jurisdictional review of the matter. On September 27, 2007, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the matter was not procedurally proper for consideration by the court. Its order effectively remanded the matter to the trial court for a trial on the merits. A trial on the merits will likely take over a year to fully develop and could take as many as three years to achieve a full factual record and trial court ruling for an appellate court to review. The Company believes that the August 2006 decision rendered by the Florida First District Court of Appeals is incorrect and that any allegations of fraud in the securing of the petitions will ultimately be disproven at the trial level, and accordingly, we have proceeded to open the slots facility. At September 30, 2007, the carrying value of the fixed assets related to the slots facility is approximately $32.0 million. If the August 2006 decision rendered by the Florida First District Court of Appeals is correct, the Company may incur a write-down of these fixed assets.
[j] In May 2005, a Limited Liability Company Agreement was entered into with Forest City concerning the planned development of “The Village at Gulfstream Park™”. That agreement contemplates the development of a mixed-use project consisting of residential units, parking, restaurants, hotels, entertainment, retail outlets and other commercial use projects on a portion of the Gulfstream Park property. Forest City is required to contribute up to a maximum of $15.0 million as an initial capital contribution. The Company is obligated to contribute 50% of any equity amounts in excess of $15.0 million as and when needed, however, to September 30, 2007, the Company has not made any such contributions. At September 30, 2007, approximately $28.0 million of costs have been incurred by The Village at Gulfstream Park, LLC, which have been funded by a construction loan and equity contributions from Forest City. The Company has reflected its share of equity amounts in excess of $15.0 million, of approximately $2.8 million, as an obligation which is included in “other accrued liabilities” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Limited Liability Company Agreement also contemplated additional agreements, including a ground lease, a reciprocal easement agreement, a development agreement, a leasing agreement and a management agreement which were executed upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Upon the opening of The Village at Gulfstream Park™, construction of which commenced in late June 2007, annual cash receipts (adjusted for certain disbursements and reserves) will first be distributed to the Forest City partner, subject to certain limitations, until such time as the initial contribution accounts of the partners are equal. Thereafter, the cash receipts are generally expected to be distributed to the partners equally, provided they maintain their equal interest in the partnership. The annual cash payments made to the Forest City partner to equalize the partners’ initial contribution accounts will not exceed the amount of the annual ground rent.
[k] On September 28, 2006, certain of the Company’s affiliates entered into definitive operating agreements with certain Caruso Affiliated affiliates regarding the proposed development of The Shops at Santa Anita on approximately 51 acres of undeveloped lands surrounding Santa Anita Park. This development project, first contemplated in an April 2004 Letter of Intent which also addressed the possibility of developing undeveloped lands surrounding Golden Gate Fields, contemplates a mixed-use development with approximately 800,000 square feet of retail, entertainment and restaurants as well as 4,000 parking spaces. Westfield Corporation (“Westfield”), a developer of a neighboring parcel of land, has challenged the manner in which the entitlement process for the development of the land surrounding Santa Anita Park has been proceeding. On May 16, 2007, Westfield commenced civil litigation in the Los Angeles Superior Court in an attempt to overturn the Arcadia City Council’s approval and granting of entitlements related to the construction of The Shops at Santa Anita. In addition, on May 21, 2007, Arcadia First! filed a petition against the City of Arcadia to overturn the entitlements and named the Company and certain of its subsidiaries as real parties in interest. If either Westfield or Arcadia First! is ultimately successful in its challenge, development efforts could potentially be delayed or suspended. The first hearings on the merits of the petitioners’ claims are scheduled to be heard before the trial judge during the third week of April 2008. To September 30, 2007, the Company has expended approximately $9.7 million on these initiatives, of which $3.4 million was paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. These amounts have been recorded as “real estate properties, net” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Under the terms of the Letter of Intent, the Company may be responsible to fund additional costs, however, to September 30, 2007, the Company has not made any such payments.
[l] The Meadows participates in a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan for which the pension plan’s total vested liabilities exceed its assets. An updated actuarial valuation is in the process of being obtained, however, based on allocation information currently provided by the plan, the portion of the estimated unfunded liability for vested benefits attributable to The Meadows is approximately $3.7 million. Effective November 1, 2007, the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority (“NJSEA”) withdrew from the plan and The Meadows now remains the only participant in the plan. In light of the NJSEA’s withdrawal from the plan, the Company is considering its options with respect to The Meadows’ participation in the plan and has yet to determine whether The Meadows will also withdraw from the plan. As part of the indemnification obligations under the holdback agreement with Millennium-Oaktree, a withdrawal liability that may be triggered if The Meadows decides to withdraw from the plan will be settled under the holdback agreement (refer to note 6).
17
16. Segment Information
Operating Segments
The Company’s reportable segments reflect how the Company is organized and managed by senior management. The Company has two principal operating segments: racing and gaming operations and real estate and other operations. The racing and gaming segment has been further segmented to reflect geographical and other operations as follows: (1) California operations include Santa Anita Park, Golden Gate Fields and San Luis Rey Downs; (2) Florida operations include Gulfstream Park’s racing and gaming operations and the Palm Meadows Training Center; (3) Maryland operations include Laurel Park, Pimlico Race Course, Bowie Training Center and the Maryland off-track betting network; (4) Southern U.S. operations include Lone Star Park, Remington Park’s racing and gaming operations and its off-track betting network; (5) Northern U.S. operations include The Meadows and its off-track betting network, Thistledown, Great Lakes Downs, Portland Meadows and the Oregon off-track betting network and the North American production and sales operations for StreuFex™; (6) European operations include Magna Racino™ and the European production and sales operations for StreuFex™; (7) PariMax operations include XpressBet®, HRTV™ to April 27, 2007, MagnaBet™, RaceONTV™, AmTote and the Company’s equity investments in Racing World Limited, TrackNet Media and HRTV, LLC from April 28, 2007; and (8) Corporate and other operations include costs related to the Company’s corporate head office, cash and other corporate office assets and investments in racing related real estate held for development. Eliminations reflect the elimination of revenues between business units. The real estate and other operations segment includes the Company’s residential housing development. Comparative amounts reflected in segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 have been reclassified to reflect MagnaBet™ and RaceONTV™ in PariMax operations rather than in European operations.
The Company uses revenues and earnings (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) as key performance measures of results of operations for purposes of evaluating operating and financial performance internally. Management believes that the use of these measures enables management and investors to evaluate and compare, from period to period, operating and financial performance of companies within the horse racing industry in a meaningful and consistent manner as EBITDA eliminates the effects of financing and capital structures, which vary between companies. Because the Company uses EBITDA as a key measure of financial performance, the Company is required by U.S. GAAP to provide the information in this note concerning EBITDA. However, these measures should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) as a measure of the Company’s operating results or cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity.
The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” section of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The following summary presents key information about reported segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | |
California operations | | $ | 8,010 | | $ | 21,116 | | $ | 167,756 | | $ | 182,223 | |
Florida operations | | 11,129 | | 254 | | 109,685 | | 78,921 | |
Maryland operations | | 18,961 | | 19,136 | | 88,530 | | 90,871 | |
Southern U.S. operations | | 34,167 | | 32,048 | | 107,379 | | 107,698 | |
Northern U.S. operations | | 20,441 | | 22,763 | | 64,108 | | 69,532 | |
European operations | | 1,995 | | 2,711 | | 6,180 | | 6,967 | |
PariMax operations | | 18,307 | | 13,801 | | 62,807 | | 36,893 | |
| | 113,010 | | 111,829 | | 606,445 | | 573,105 | |
Corporate and other | | 151 | | 34 | | 257 | | 118 | |
Eliminations | | (1,324 | ) | (552 | ) | (10,519 | ) | (7,695 | ) |
Total racing and gaming operations | | 111,837 | | 111,311 | | 596,183 | | 565,528 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total real estate and other operations | | 2,695 | | 717 | | 5,586 | | 3,742 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 114,532 | | $ | 112,028 | | $ | 601,769 | | $ | 569,270 | |
18
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Earnings (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) | | | | | | | | | |
California operations | | $ | (6,436 | ) | $ | (2,403 | ) | $ | 13,627 | | $ | 20,285 | |
Florida operations | | (8,500 | ) | (4,317 | ) | (3,217 | ) | 6,109 | |
Maryland operations | | (1,767 | ) | (1,792 | ) | 8,024 | | 8,147 | |
Southern U.S. operations | | 1,956 | | 2,281 | | 8,997 | | 11,798 | |
Northern U.S. operations | | (529 | ) | (569 | ) | (2,151 | ) | (855 | ) |
European operations | | (2,754 | ) | (2,467 | ) | (5,620 | ) | (8,291 | ) |
PariMax operations | | 473 | | (2,689 | ) | 3,224 | | (5,214 | ) |
| | (17,557 | ) | (11,956 | ) | 22,884 | | 31,979 | |
Corporate and other | | (7,959 | ) | (5,648 | ) | (20,059 | ) | (20,882 | ) |
Predevelopment, pre-opening and other costs | | (451 | ) | (4,324 | ) | (1,869 | ) | (7,418 | ) |
Total racing and gaming operations | | (25,967 | ) | (21,928 | ) | 956 | | 3,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Real estate and other operations | | 1,358 | | 885 | | 2,110 | | 1,573 | |
Write-down of long-lived assets | | (1,444 | ) | — | | (1,444 | ) | — | |
Total real estate and other operations | | (86 | ) | 885 | | 666 | | 1,573 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total EBITDA | | $ | (26,053 | ) | $ | (21,043 | ) | $ | 1,622 | | $ | 5,252 | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Loss
| | Three months ended September 30, 2007 | |
| | Racing and Gaming | | Real Estate and | | | |
| | Operations | | Other Operations | | Total | |
| | | | | | | |
EBITDA (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (25,967 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | $ | (26,053 | ) |
Interest expense, net | | 12,612 | | 68 | | 12,680 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 11,840 | | 8 | | 11,848 | |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | (50,419 | ) | $ | (162 | ) | (50,581 | ) |
Income tax benefit | | | | | | (770 | ) |
Net loss | | | | | | $ | (49,811 | ) |
| | Three months ended September 30, 2006 | |
| | Racing and Gaming | | Real Estate and | | | |
| | Operations | | Other Operations | | Total | |
| | | | | | | |
EBITDA (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (21,928 | ) | $ | 885 | | $ | (21,043 | ) |
Interest expense (income), net | | 16,462 | | (185 | ) | 16,277 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 11,246 | | 6 | | 11,252 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | (49,636 | ) | $ | 1,064 | | (48,572 | ) |
Income tax benefit | | | | | | (863 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations | | | | | | (47,709 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | | | | (3,033 | ) |
Net loss | | | | | | $ | (50,742 | ) |
| | Nine months ended September 30, 2007 | |
| | Racing and Gaming | | Real Estate and | | | |
| | Operations | | Other Operations | | Total | |
| | | | | | | |
EBITDA from continuing operations | | $ | 956 | | $ | 666 | | $ | 1,622 | |
Interest expense, net | | 37,203 | | 145 | | 37,348 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 33,037 | | 24 | | 33,061 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | (69,284 | ) | $ | 497 | | (68,787 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | | | | 1,992 | |
Net loss | | | | | | $ | (70,779 | ) |
19
| | Nine months ended September 30, 2006 | |
| | Racing and Gaming | | Real Estate and | | | |
| | Operations | | Other Operations | | Total | |
| | | | | | | |
EBITDA from continuing operations | | $ | 3,679 | | $ | 1,573 | | $ | 5,252 | |
Interest expense (income), net | | 45,660 | | (519 | ) | 45,141 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 31,221 | | 30 | | 31,251 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | (73,202 | ) | $ | 2,062 | | (71,140 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | | | | 1,552 | |
Loss from continuing operations | | | | | | (72,692 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | | | | (2,176 | ) |
Net loss | | | | | | $ | (74,868 | ) |
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | (restated-note 7) | |
| | | | | |
Total Assets | | | | | |
California operations | | $ | 286,481 | | $ | 309,443 | |
Florida operations | | 354,577 | | 361,550 | |
Maryland operations | | 165,801 | | 171,135 | |
Southern U.S. operations | | 144,873 | | 141,213 | |
Northern U.S. operations | | 51,324 | | 46,913 | |
European operations | | 56,223 | | 55,624 | |
PariMax operations | | 44,018 | | 41,625 | |
| | 1,103,297 | | 1,127,503 | |
Corporate and other | | 58,938 | | 55,370 | |
Total racing and gaming operations | | 1,162,235 | | 1,182,873 | |
Total real estate and other operations | | 11,358 | | 33,884 | |
Assets held for sale | | 29,150 | | 30,128 | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,202,743 | | $ | 1,246,885 | |
17. Subsequent Events
[a] On October 31, 2007, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 for the purpose of registering additional securities of the same class as those registered under a currently effective registration statement on Form S-8, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on March 14, 2000. The original registration statement registered an aggregate of 8,000,000 shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock under the Company’s Plan. On April 16, 2007, the Company filed with the Commission a definitive Proxy Statement, which included a proposal for stockholder approval to increase the overall number of shares available for awards under the Plan by 2,000,000 shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock, which proposal was approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 9, 2007.
[b] On October 29, 2007, the Company completed a $20.0 million private placement of the Company’s Class A Subordinate Voting Stock to Fair Enterprise. Pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreement entered into on September 13, 2007, Fair Enterprise was issued 8.9 million shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock at a price of $2.25 per share. The price per share was set at the greater of (i) 90% of the volume weighted average price per share of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock on NASDAQ for the five trading days commencing on September 13, 2007; and (ii) U.S. $1.91, being 100% of the volume weighted average price per share of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock on NASDAQ for the five trading days immediately preceding September 13, 2007 (the date of announcement of the private placement). Prior to this transaction, Fair Enterprise owned approximately 7.5% of the issued and outstanding Class A Subordinate Voting Stock. As a result of the completion of the private placement, the percentage of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock beneficially owned by Fair Enterprise has increased to approximately 21.6% of the issued and outstanding Class A Subordinate Voting Stock, representing approximately 10.8% of the equity of the Company. The shares of Class A Subordinate Voting Stock issued pursuant to the subscription agreement were issued and sold in a private transaction exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
[c] On September 24, 2007, the Company exercised its option to acquire the remaining voting and equity interests in The Maryland Jockey Club, pursuant to an agreement with certain companies controlled by Joseph De Francis, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, and Karin De Francis. Under the terms of the option agreement, the Company paid $18.3 million plus interest on October 5, 2007. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, this obligation was reflected as “long-term debt due within one year” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and is secured by letters of credit under the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility.
[d] On October 2, 2007, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns and operates Santa Anita Park amended and extended its term and revolving loan arrangements with a U.S. financial institution. The principal amendments to the term and revolving loan agreements included reducing the amount available under the revolving loan facility from $10.0 million to $7.5 million, requiring the aggregate outstanding principal under the revolving loan facility to be fully repaid for a period of 60 consecutive days during each year, increasing the amount available under the term loan facility from $60.0 million to $67.5 million, reducing the monthly principal repayments under the term loan facility to $375 thousand, extending the maturity date for both facilities to October 31, 2012 and modifying certain financial covenants.
20