NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Note 1 - Company And Basis Of Presentation And Accounting Policies Policies | |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and include operations and balances of Caspian Services, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Caspian Services Group Limited (“CSGL”), Caspian Services Group LLP (“Caspian LLP”), Caspian Services Group B.V. (“Caspian B.V.”), Caspian Services LLC (“Caspian LLC”), Caspian Geophysics, Ltd (“CGEO”), TatArka LLP (“TatArka”), Caspian Real Estate, Ltd (“CRE”) and Kyran Holdings Limited (“Kyran”); and include majority owned subsidiaries: Balykshi LLP (“Balykshi”) and Mangistau Oblast Boat Yard LLP (“MOBY”), collectively “Caspian” or the “Company.” TatArka owns a 40% non-controlling interest in Veritas-Caspian LLP (“Veritas-Caspian”). Ownership of up to 50% noncontrolling interests are accounted for by the equity method. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Business Condition | Business Condition – The Company funded a portion of the construction of its marine base through a combination of debt and equity financing pursuant to which the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (“EBRD”) provided $18,600 of debt financing. EBRD also made an equity investment in the marine base in the amount of $10,000 in exchange for a 22% equity interest in Balykshi. |
|
In connection with EBRD’s 22% equity interest in Balykshi, the Company entered into a Put Option Agreement granting EBRD the right to require the Company to repurchase the 22% equity interest based on Balykshi’s fair market value. The put option is exercisable between June 2013 and June 2017. This agreement also contains an acceleration feature that, should a triggering event occur, grants EBRD the right to require the Company to repurchase the $10,000 equity investment at a 20% annual rate of return at any time following the triggering event. |
|
In accordance with US GAAP the put option is an unconditional obligation and is measured at its fair value based on an estimate of the amount of cash that would be required to settle the liability. |
|
Under the terms of the EBRD Loan Agreement, as amended, Balykshi is required to repay the loan principal and accrued interest in eight equal semi-annual installments commencing November 20, 2011 and then occurring each May 20 and November 20 thereafter until fully repaid. As of the date of this report, none of the required semi-annual repayment installments have been made. The failure to pay the principal or interest on the EBRD loan when due may constitute an event of default under the EBRD Loan Agreement. The EBRD financing agreements have acceleration right features that, in the event of default, allow EBRD to declare the loans and accrued interest immediately due and payable. As a result, the Company has included the EBRD loan and all accrued interest as current liabilities at September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. Additionally, an event of default may trigger the acceleration clause in the Put Option Agreement with EBRD which would allow EBRD to put its $10,000 investment in Balykshi back to the Company. If EBRD were to accelerate its put right, the Company could be obligated to repay the initial investment plus a 20% annual rate of return. The balance of the accelerated put option liability was $21,649 and $19,649 as of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively. This balance includes the 20% rate of return on the $10,000 investment and is classified as a current liability. EBRD also previously notified the Company that it believes the Company and Balykshi are in violation of certain other covenants of the EBRD financing agreements. As of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K, to the Company’s knowledge, EBRD has not sought to accelerate repayment of the loan or the put option. |
|
The Company continues to engage in discussions with EBRD regarding a possible restructuring of its financial obligations to EBRD. |
|
To help the Company meet its additional funding obligations to construct the marine base, in 2008 the Company entered into two facility agreements pursuant to which the Company received debt funding of $30,000. In June and July 2011 Mr. Bakhytbek Baiseitov (the “Investor”) acquired the two facility agreements. In connection with restructuring the facility agreements, each of which matured in 2011, in September 2011 the Company issued Investor two secured promissory notes, a Secured Non-Negotiable Promissory Note in the principal amount of $10,800 (“Non-Negotiable Note”) and a Secured Convertible Consolidated Promissory Note in the principal amount of $24,446 (“Consolidated Note”). |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Non-Negotiable Note, Investor may, at any time, demand and receive payment of the Note by the issuance of common stock of the Company. The price per share for principal and interest is $0.12. The Investor has the right, at any time, to demand the issuance of shares in satisfaction of the Non-Negotiable Note. In September 2014 the Company and Investor agreed to extend the maturity date of the Non-Negotiable Note from September 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015. If the issuance of common stock has not been demanded by Investor or made at the election of the Company by the June 30, 2015 maturity date, the Company must repay the principal and interest in cash. |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Consolidated Note, interest accrues at 12% per annum and shall be paid semi-annually in arrears on each six month anniversary of the Issuance Date (September 30, 2011). The Consolidated Note provides for a default rate of interest of 13% per annum upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, which shall be payable in cash upon demand. In September 2014 the Company and Investor agreed to extend the maturity date of the Consolidated Note from September 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015. The unpaid principal amount of the Consolidated Note, and any accrued but unpaid interest thereon, is due and payable on June 30, 2015. |
|
The Investor has the right at any time following a five day written notice to convert all or any portion of the principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the Consolidated Note into common stock at $0.10 per share. Any conversion that would result in a change in control of the Company without the prior consent of EBRD could result in a breach of the EBRD financing agreements. |
|
As of the date of this report, none of the semi-annual interest payments have been made when due. The Company has, however, made partial interest payments to Investor totaling $2,300 in reduction of interest due as of September 30, 2014, and an additional $300 was paid in December 2014. |
|
The failure to pay interest on the Consolidated Note when due is an event of default under the Consolidated Note. In the event of a default that remains uncured, Investor may, at any time, demand immediate repayment of the Consolidated Note. As a result, the Company has included the Consolidated Note and all accrued but unpaid interest as current liabilities at September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. As of the date of this report, to the Company’s knowledge, Investor has not demanded immediate repayment of the Consolidated Note. |
|
Acquisition | Acquisition of Kyran – On August 7, 2014 the Company and Topaz Engineering Limited (“Topaz”), the owner of Kyran, closed a Share Purchase Agreement dated November 20, 2013 (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company acquired Topaz’s 100% equity interest in Kyran for $0.1. The principal asset of Kyran is a 50% equity interest in MOBY. Since this transaction increased the Company’s interest in MOBY to 65.6% the Company began consolidating MOBY’s operations from the date of acquisition. This acquisition resulted in goodwill of $2,324 which was immediately impaired. Additionally, the Company recognized a $722 loss as a result of the remeasurement of the fair value of the Company's 15.6% equity interest in MOBY held before the acquisition. Please, refer to Note 11 for details. This transaction was undertaken in connection with the Company’s ongoing efforts to restructure its debt obligations to EBRD and Investor. |
|
The fair values of MOBY assets and liabilities acquired as of the acquisition date, are as follows: |
|
| 7-Aug-14 |
Cash consideration | $ | 0.10 |
Fair value of equity interest in MOBY before the business combination | | (722) |
| $ | (722) |
| | |
Fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | | |
Cash | $ | 47 |
Trade accounts receivable | | 346 |
Other receivables | | 20 |
Prepaid taxes | | 97 |
Advances paid | | 12 |
Vessels, equipment and property, net | | 1,405 |
Accounts payable | | (403) |
Accounts payable to related parties | | (56) |
Accrued expenses | | (315) |
Taxes payable | | (249) |
Long-term debt - current portion | | (5,549) |
Total indentifiable net assets | $ | (4,645) |
Fair value of noncontrolling interest | | 1,599 |
Goodwill | | 2,324 |
| $ | (722) |
|
Acquired receivables are amounts due from customers as of August 7, 2014. The gross amount due for these receivables was $458 of which $112 is expected to be uncollectible. The collectible receivables are expected to be collected during the fiscal 2015. |
|
The fair value of the noncontrolling interest at the acquisition date was ($1,599). This amount was calculated as 34.4% of MOBY’s identifiable net assets on August 7, 2014. Please, refer to Note 11 for the discussion of the valuation method and assumptions used to value MOBY’s noncontrolling interest. |
|
The Company recognized a loss of $722 as a result of remeasuring to fair value its 15.6% equity interest in MOBY held before the acquisition. The loss is reported as loss on remeasurement of equity interests in MOBY in the Company’s statement of operations. |
|
The revenue and earnings of MOBY since the acquisition date that are included in the consolidated income statement are as follows: |
|
| For the period August 8 - September 30, 2014 |
Revenues | $ | 6 |
Net loss | $ | 3,133 |
|
MOBY was established as a joint venture between Balykshi and two non-related companies – Kyran and JSC KazMorTransFlot (“KMTF”). MOBY was formed to operate a boat repair and drydocking services yard located at the Company’s marine base. Balykshi holds a 20% equity interest in MOBY. |
|
In August 2008 MOBY entered into a Loan Agreement (the “MOBY Loan Agreement”) with EBRD. Pursuant to the MOBY Loan Agreement, MOBY borrowed $10,300 from EBRD. In connection with the loan, EBRD required the Company, Topaz and KMTF to, among other things, execute a Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity (“Guarantee”), guaranteeing the repayment of the MOBY loan. The guarantee obligation of each party was limited to each party’s respective ownership interest in MOBY. |
|
Prior to closing the Purchase Agreement; (i) Topaz, through Kyran, voluntarily repaid 50% of the outstanding principal and accrued but unpaid interest of the MOBY loan; (ii) MOBY entered into a loan agreement with Kyran in the amount of the Topaz repayment, approximately $5,700; and (iii) Topaz obtained waivers from EBRD of the obligations of Topaz and Kyran under the MOBY Loan Agreement, the Guarantee and applicable security agreements. The Company and KMTF were not released from their obligations under the Guarantee. While the dollar amount of the Company’s obligation pursuant to the Guarantee did not increase as a result of the release of Topaz, the percentage of the MOBY loan that is guaranteed by the Company (and KMTF) under the Guarantee effectively doubled to reflect the 50% repayment by and release of Topaz as a guarantor. |
|
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue indemnity to Topaz and its related parties against any and all past, present and future claims or court actions in relation to Seller’s good faith and legally taken actions during its participation in Kyran. |
|
As of September 30, 2014 the outstanding balance of the MOBY loan was $5,998 including accrued and unpaid interest. The interest rate under the MOBY loan is generally the interbank rate plus a margin of 3.6%. The MOBY Loan Agreement provides that during any period when the loan is in default the rate of interest shall be the interbank rate plus a margin of 3.6% plus 2% per annum. The MOBY Loan Agreement provides for 14 equal semi-annual installment payments of principal and interest on June 15 and December 15, commencing on or after the third anniversary of the MOBY Loan Agreement. |
|
As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 MOBY had made no semi-annual installment payments and was in violation of certain financial covenants under the MOBY Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the MOBY Loan Agreement, if an event of default occurs and is continuing, EBRD may, at its option, by notice to MOBY, declare all or any portion of the principal and accrued interest of the loan due and payable on demand, or immediately due and payable without further notice and without presentment, demand or protest. |
|
To the Company’s knowledge, to date EBRD has taken no action to establish the defaults or to increase or accelerate the debt obligations of MOBY or guarantee obligations of the Company. Should EBRD determine to take action, the Company would not have sufficient funds to repay its portion of the MOBY loan or the guarantee and would be forced to seek sources of funding to satisfy these obligations. |
|
Should EBRD or Investor determine to accelerate the Company’s repayment obligations to them, the Company currently has insufficient funds to repay its obligations to EBRD or Investor, individually or collectively, and would be forced to seek other sources of funds to satisfy these obligations. Given the Company’s current and near-term anticipated operating results, the difficult credit and equity markets and the Company’s current financial condition, the Company believes it would be very difficult to obtain new funding to satisfy these obligations. If the Company were unable to obtain funding to meet these obligations EBRD or Investor could seek any legal remedy available to them to obtain repayment, including forcing the Company into bankruptcy, or in the case of the EBRD loan, which is collateralized by the assets, including the marine base, and bank accounts of Balykshi, CRE and MOBY, foreclosure by EBRD on such assets and bank accounts. As of September 30, 2014 the book value of collateralized assets was $32,226. The Company has also agreed to collateralize Investor’s Notes with non-marine base related assets. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, its ability to (i) successfully restructure its financial obligations to EBRD and Investor on terms that will allow the Company to service the restructured obligations, (ii) generate sufficient revenue from operations to satisfy its financial obligations, and/or (iii) identify a financing source that will provide the Company the ability to satisfy its financial obligations. Uncertainty as to the outcome of these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to continue its efforts to restructure its financial obligations to EBRD and Investor. |
Accelerated Put Option Liability | Accelerated Put Option Liability – In connection with EBRD’s $10,000 equity investment to purchase a 22% equity interest in Balykshi, the Company entered into a Put Option Agreement granting EBRD the right to require the Company to repurchase the 22% equity interest. The put option is exercisable between June 2013 and June 2017. The put price is determined based on the fair market value of Balykshi as mutually agreed by the parties. If the parties are unable to agree upon a fair market valuation, the parties agree to hire a third party expert to determine the put price on the basis of the fair market value of Balykshi, as set forth in the Put Option Agreement. In the event there is a change in control of the Company, EBRD has the right to require the repurchase of its equity interest at fair market value. The Put Option Agreement also contains an acceleration feature. Should Balykshi: (i) default on $1,000 or more of debt; (ii) fail to meet the obligations of any of the agreements between Balykshi, the Company and EBRD; (iii) be found to have made false representations to EBRD; or (iv) be declared insolvent, EBRD has the right to accelerate the put option. If the put option is accelerated, EBRD can require the Company to repurchase the $10,000 equity investment plus a 20% per annum rate of return, taking into account any dividend or other distribution received by EBRD, at any time following one of the events mentioned above. Due to the fact that certain events of default under the EBRD Loan Agreement may have occurred and that such could trigger EBRD’s accelerated put right, we have reflected an accelerated put option liability of $21,649, although, as of the date of this annual report, EBRD has not sought to accelerate the put option. |
Nature of Operations | Nature of Operations – The Company’s business consists of three major business segments: |
|
Vessel Operations – Vessel operations consist of chartering a fleet of shallow draft offshore support vessels to customers performing oil and gas exploration activities in the Caspian Sea. |
|
Geophysical Services – Geophysical services consist of providing seismic data acquisition services to oil and gas companies operating onshore in Kazakhstan. |
|
Marine Base Services – Marine Base Services consists of operating a marine base with boat repair and drydocking services yard located at the Port of Bautino on the North Caspian Sea. |
Discontinued Operations | Discontinued Operations – In August 2013 the Company discontinued operations in Kazmorgeophisica CJSC (“KMG”). Upon determining to discontinue KMG, all prior periods presented have been restated to separately account for the discontinued operations. All assets of KMG that were considered to be useful in ongoing operations were transferred to TatArka including its 40% non-controlling participation interest in Veritas-Caspian. |
Equity method investments | Equity method investments – During 2005 the Company and an unrelated company formed a joint venture (Veritas-Caspian) to gather and market seismic data from unlicensed blocks of the Kazakhstan sector of the Caspian Sea. The Kazakhstan Government owns the data gathered; however, Veritas-Caspian has the exclusive right to market and sell the data to prospective bidders on tendered Kazakhstan oil blocks. |
|
Initially, the Company obtained its interest in Veritas-Caspian through KMG participation for a capital contribution of $0.4 and accounted for the investment under the equity method of accounting. Later, after the Company discontinued KMG operations this investment was transferred to TatArka. |
|
At September 30, 2014 the Company’s investment in Veritas-Caspian was zero due to Veritas-Caspian’s accumulated losses recognized. If Veritas-Caspian has income in the future, the Company will resume applying the equity method after its share of that income equals the share of net losses not recognized during the period the equity method was suspended. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements – |
|
In April 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment. Reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity. The Company does not believe that adoption of the standard will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position upon adoption. |
|
In May 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The objective of this update is to provide a robust framework for addressing revenue recognition issues and, upon its effective date, replaces almost all existing revenue recognition guidance. This update is effective in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and the interim periods within that year. The Company is evaluating the impact of this update on the Company’s financial statements. |
|
In June 2014 FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Accounting for Share Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period." ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendments can be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented and to all new or modified awards thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect to the Company's operating results or financial condition. |
|
In August 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). The guidance in ASU 2014-15 sets forth management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern as well as required disclosures. ASU 2014-15 indicates that, when preparing financial statements for interim and annual financial statements, management should evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This evaluation should include consideration of conditions and events that are either known or are reasonably knowable at the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, as well as whether it is probable that management's plans to address the substantial doubt will be implemented and, if so, whether it is probable that the plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition. |
|
The Company has considered all recent accounting pronouncements issued or proposed by the FASB and other standards-setting bodies since the last audit of its financial statements. The Company does not believe that these pronouncements will have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for other receivables, accounts receivables from related parties, accounts payable to related parties and accrued expenses approximate fair values because of the immediate nature or short-term maturities of these financial instruments. The carrying amount of long-term debts approximates fair value due to the stated interest rates approximating prevailing market rates. |
Cash | Cash – The Company considers all highly-liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. |
|
Cash balances in Balykshi and CRE, have been designated under our loan agreement with EBRD and may not be used for any purpose other than construction and operations of the marine base. At September 30, 2014 and 2013 the total cash balance of Balykshi and CRE was $11 and $101, respectively. |
|
Cash deposit in Kazakhstan bank accounts was $1,857 as of September 30, 2014 and these accounts are not insured by the government. |
Receivables | Receivables – In the normal course of business the Company extends credit to its customers on a short-term basis. The principal customers for the Company’s marine vessels are major oil and natural gas exploration, development and production companies and their contractors. Credit risks associated with these customers are considered minimal. Dealings with smaller, local companies pose the greatest risks. For new geophysical services customers the Company typically requires an advance payment and the Company retains the seismic data generated from these services until payment is made in full. The Company routinely reviews accounts receivable balances and makes provisions for doubtful accounts as necessary. Accounts are reviewed on a case-by-case basis and losses are recognized in the period the Company determines it is likely that receivables will not be fully collected. The Company may also provide a general provision for accounts receivable based on existing economic conditions. |
|
Inventories | Inventories – Inventory consists of fuel, spare parts and supplies related to geophysical and marine base operations. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined by an average cost method, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. Property held for sale represents items and materials, which are expected to be sold within the next fiscal year. As of September 30, 2014 and 2013 an allowance of $1,074 and $1,273, respectively, was recognized. |
Vessels, Equipment and Property | Vessels, Equipment and Property – Vessels, equipment and property are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. At the time property is disposed of or traded in, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is charged to operations. Major renewals and betterments that extend the life of the property and equipment are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred except for marine vessel drydocking expenditures, which are capitalized and amortized. |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method and resulted in depreciation expense for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 of $4,100 and $4,826, respectively. |
|
Dry-docking Costs | Drydocking Costs – Caspian’s vessels must be periodically drydocked and undergo certain inspections to maintain their operating classification, as mandated by certain maritime regulations. Costs incurred to drydock the vessels for certification are capitalized and amortized over the period until the next drydocking, which is generally 24 months. Drydocking costs comprise painting the vessels’ hulls and sides, recoating cargo and fuel tanks, and performing other engine and equipment maintenance activities to bring the vessels into compliance with classification standards. |
|
Amortization of drydocking costs is calculated by using the straight-line method and resulted in amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 of $397 and $189, respectively. Accumulated amortization of the drydocking costs was $481 and $102 as of September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets for Disposal | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets for Disposal – Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount that the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. At September 30, 2013 the Company impaired the vessels held for disposal. At September 30, 2014 the Company reviewed its long-lived assets and determined the MOBY assets were impaired. See Note 11 for details. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition – Vessel revenues are usually derived from time charter contracts on a rate-per-day of service basis; therefore, vessel revenues are recognized on a daily basis throughout the contract period. These time charter contracts are generally on a term basis. The base rate of hire for a contract is generally a fixed rate; however, these contracts often include clauses to recover mobilization and demobilization costs and specific additional costs which are billed on a monthly basis. |
|
Geophysical service revenue is recognized when services are rendered, accepted by the customer and collectability is reasonably assured. Direct costs are charged to each contract as incurred along with allocated indirect costs for the specific period of service. Losses on contracts are recognized during the period in which the loss first becomes probable and reasonably estimated. Due to the nature of some of the geophysical services provided, certain customers have prepaid their contract services. These prepayments have been deferred and are recognized as revenue as the services are provided. At September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 the Company had $0 and $10, respectively, of deferred revenue related to these prepaid services. |
|
Marine base service revenue is recognized when services are rendered, accepted by the customer and collectability is reasonably assured. |
Foreign Currency Transactions | Foreign Currency Transactions – Caspian Services, Inc., the parent company of the subsidiaries, makes its principal investing and financing transactions in United States Dollars (USD), which is also its functional currency. Transactions and balances denominated in other currencies have been translated into USD using historical exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses from holding foreign currencies and having liabilities payable in foreign currencies are included in the results of operations. |
|
USD is also the functional currency of CSGL, CGEO and CRE. |
|
The Kazakh Tenge (KZT) is the functional currency of Caspian LLP, TatArka, Balykshi, Kyran and MOBY; the Euro is the functional currency of Caspian B.V. and the Russian Ruble is the functional currency of Caspian LLC. Their respective balance sheets have been translated into USD at the exchange rates prevailing at each balance sheet date. Their respective statements of comprehensive income (loss) have been translated into USD using the average exchange rates prevailing during the periods of each statement. The corresponding translation adjustments are part of accumulated other comprehensive income and are shown as part of shareholders’ equity. |
|
The translation of KZT denominated assets and liabilities into USD for the purpose of these consolidated financial statements does not necessarily mean the Company could realize or settle, in USD, the reported values of these assets and liabilities in USD. Likewise it does not mean the Company could return or distribute the reported USD value of its Kazakh subsidiaries’ capital to its shareholders. |
|
In February 2014 the Kazakh government devalued the KZT by 20%. As a result of the devaluation, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded foreign exchange transaction losses of $6,645 mostly as a result of the remeasurement of the Balykshi EBRD loan which is denominated in U.S. Dollars. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes – Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences in assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and attributable to operating loss carry forwards. Differences generally result from the calculation of income under US GAAP and the calculation of taxable income calculated under Kazakhstan income tax regulations. |
|
The current regime of penalties and interest related to reported and discovered violations of Kazakhstan’s laws, decrees and related regulations can be severe. Penalties include confiscation of the amounts in question for currency law violations, as well as fines of generally 100% of the unpaid taxes. Interest is assessable at rates of generally 0.06% per day. As a result, penalties and interest can result in amounts that are multiples of any unreported taxes. At September 30, 2014 and 2013 no interest or penalties have been accrued as a result of any tax positions taken. In the event interest or penalties are assessed, the Company will include these amounts related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. |
|
A deferred tax liability is not recognized for the following types of temporary differences unless it becomes apparent that those temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future: |
|
(a) An excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of an investment in a foreign subsidiary or a foreign corporate joint venture, that is essentially permanent in duration. |
|
(b) Undistributed earnings of a domestic subsidiary or a domestic corporate joint venture that is essentially permanent in duration. |
|
Comprehensive Loss | Comprehensive Loss – Total comprehensive loss consists of net loss and changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Accumulated other comprehensive loss is presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) and consists of foreign currency translation adjustments. |
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share | Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share – Basic loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to Caspian Services by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to Caspian Services by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding giving effect to potentially dilutive issuable common shares. |
|
At September 30, 2014 the Company had 800,000 options outstanding and 419,328,333 potential shares related to convertible debt that were not included in the computation of diluted loss per common share because they would be anti-dilutive. |
|
At September 30, 2013 the Company had 800,000 options outstanding, 147,939 non-vested restricted shares outstanding and 386,396,667 potential shares related to convertible debt that were not included in the computation of diluted loss per common share because they would be anti-dilutive. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation – The Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. Fair value of the award is calculated based on closing stock price at the grant date. Restricted stock compensation expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period). |
Concentration of Revenue | Concentration of Revenue – During fiscal 2014 vessel revenue from four customers that together represented approximately 81% of total vessel revenue as follows, Customer A – 29%; Customer B – 23%; Customer C – 18%; and Customer D – 11%. |
|
During fiscal 2014 geophysical service revenue from six customers together represented approximately 79% of total geophysical service revenue as follows, Customer A – 18%; Customer B – 16%; Customer C – 12%; Customer D – 11%; Customer E – 11% and Customer F – 11%. |
|
During fiscal 2014 marine base revenue from two customers represented 78% of total marine base revenue as follows, Customer A – 49% and Customer B – 29%. |