UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Commission file number 000-27307
| | |
North Carolina | | | 56-1980549 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | | |
| 2634 Durham Chapel Hill Blvd., Durham, NC 27707-2800 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
| | | | | | | |
| | (919) 687-7800 | | |
| | | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the previous 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
As of April 29, 2010, there were 2,031,337 shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, no par value.
Table of Contents
PART I......................................................................................................................................................................................................1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................................................1 Item 1- Financial Statements .................................................................................................................................................................1 Item 2--Management’s Discussion and Analysis..............................................................................................................................17 Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk ........................................................................................28 PART II ....................................................................................................................................................................................................28 OTHER INFORMATION.......................................................................................................................................................................28 Item 1 — Legal Proceedings..................................................................................................................................................................28 Item 1A – Risk Factors ...........................................................................................................................................................................28 Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.........................................................................................28 Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities...........................................................................................................................................28 Item 4 — Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.......................................................................................................28 Item 5 — Other Information ...................................................................................................................................................................28 Item 6 — Exhibits .....................................................................................................................................................................................28 |
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1- Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | | | | |
| AS OF | |
(Unaudited) | | | | |
| March 31, | | December 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | |
ASSETS | | | | |
| | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 39,924 | | $ | 30,313 | |
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value | | 17,304 | | | 17,699 | |
Other invested assets | | 1,061 | | | 1,061 | |
Loans, net of unearned income and deferred fees | | 208,478 | | | 210,111 | |
Allowances for loan losses | | (3,749 | | | (3,564 | ) |
Loans, net | | 204,729 | | | 206,547 | |
Interest receivable | | 879 | | | 935 | |
Bank premises and equipment, net | | 4,776 | | | 4,852 | |
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance | | 5,546 | | | 5,499 | |
Other real estate owned | | 2,159 | | | 2,176 | |
Deferred tax assets and taxes receivable, net | | 4,362 | | | 4,402 | |
Other assets | | 961 | | | 897 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 281,701 | | $ | 274,381 | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 194,196 | | $ | 186,791 | |
Noninterest-bearing deposits | | 43,847 | | | 38,016 | |
Total deposits | | 238,043 | | | 224,807 | |
| | | | | | |
Other borrowings | | 1,761 | | | 7,766 | |
Other liabilities | | 5,325 | | | 5,253 | |
Total liabilities | | 245,129 | | | 237,826 | |
| | | | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | |
Common stock, no par value 10,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009; 2,031,337 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 | | 8,732 | | | 8,732 | |
Series A Preferred stock- $1,000 liquidation value per share, 11,735 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 | | 11,720 | | | 11,719 | |
Retained earnings | | 17,169 | | | 17,128 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (1,049 | | | (1,024 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | 36,572 | | | 36,555 | |
| | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 281,701 | | $ | 274,381 | |
| | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements | | | | | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | | | | | | |
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | |
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Interest income: | | | | | | |
Loans, including fees | | $ | 3,139 | | | $ | 3,280 | |
Investment securities, including dividends | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | | 113 | | | | 220 | |
Tax-exempt | | | 81 | | | | 126 | |
Other | | | 14 | | | | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total interest income | | | 3,347 | | | | 3,634 | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 536 | | | | 863 | |
Borrowings | | | 2 | | | | 34 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 538 | | | | 897 | |
Net interest income | | | 2,809 | | | | 2,737 | |
Less provision for loan losses | | | 191 | | | | 59 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 2,618 | | | | 2,678 | |
Noninterest income: | | | | | | | | |
Service charges | | | 439 | | | | 423 | |
Rental income | | | 61 | | | | 69 | |
Cash surrender value of life insurance | | | 48 | | | | 48 | |
Realized gain on disposition of securities | | | 16 | | | | 62 | |
Realized gain on sale of real estate owned | | | 14 | | | | 1 | |
Realized loss on disposal of assets | | | (3 | ) | | | - | |
Other income | | | (1 | ) | | | 1 | |
Total noninterest income | | | 574 | | | | 604 | |
Noninterest expense: | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 1,238 | | | | 1,502 | |
Occupancy and equipment | | | 395 | | | | 488 | |
Directors fees | | | 87 | | | | 84 | |
Marketing | | | 38 | | | | 41 | |
Professional fees | | | 254 | | | | 244 | |
Information technology | | | 225 | | | | 156 | |
FDIC deposit insurance | | | 239 | | | | 53 | |
Other | | | 435 | | | | 310 | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 2,911 | | | | 2,878 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 281 | | | | 404 | |
Income tax expense | | | 59 | | | | 98 | |
Net income | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | 146 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income available to common stockholders | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock: | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | 0.15 | |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | | 2,031,337 | | | | 2,031,337 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Dividends per share of common stock | | $ | 0.0175 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | |
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 and 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | |
| Number | | | | | | | | Other | | | |
| of | | Common | | Preferred | | Retained | | Comprehensive | | | |
(Dollars in thousands) | Shares | | Stock | | Stock | | Earnings | | Loss | | Total | |
Balances as of December 31, 2008 | | 2,031,337 | | $ | 8,732 | | $ | - | | $ | 16,972 | | $ | (1,385 | ) | $ | 24,319 | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | 306 | | | | | | 306 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 98 | | | 98 | |
Total comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 404 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balances as of March 31, 2009 | | 2,031,337 | | $ | 8,732 | | $ | - | | $ | 17,278 | | $ | (1,287 | ) | $ | 24,723 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balances as of December 31, 2009 | | 2,031,337 | | $ | 8,732 | | $ | 11,719 | | $ | 17,128 | | $ | (1,024 | ) | $ | 36,555 | |
Accretion of preferred stock issuance costs | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | 1 | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | 222 | | | | | | 222 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (25 | ) | | (25 | ) |
Total comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 197 | |
Dividends declared on preferred stock | | | | | | | | | | | (146 | ) | | | | | (146 | ) |
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.0175 per share) | | | | | | | | | | | (35 | ) | | | | | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balances as of March 31, 2010 | | 2,031,337 | | $ | 8,732 | | $ | 11,720 | | $ | 17,169 | | $ | (1,049 | ) | $ | 36,572 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements | | | | | | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 and 2009 | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 306 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash | | | | | | | | |
provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 191 | | | | 59 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 102 | | | | 164 | |
Loss from disposals of bank premises and equipment | | | 3 | | | | - | |
Amortization of premiums/discounts on investments, net | | | 5 | | | | 6 | |
Loan purchase accounting amortization and accretion, net | | | 43 | | | | 43 | |
Deferred loan origination fees and costs, net | | | 61 | | | | 24 | |
Gains on disposition of available for sale securities | | | (16 | ) | | | (62 | ) |
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance | | | (48 | ) | | | (48 | ) |
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned | | | (14 | ) | | | - | |
Changes in: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | | | 65 | | | | 449 | |
Other liabilities | | | 90 | | | | (323 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 704 | | | | 618 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Activity in available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | | - | | | | 4,165 | |
Maturities, prepayments and calls | | | 443 | | | | 2,914 | |
Principal collections | | | 922 | | | | 1,348 | |
Purchases | | | (1,000 | ) | | | (2,086 | ) |
Net decrease (increase) in loans | | | 1,440 | | | | (3,081 | ) |
Purchases of bank premises and equipment | | | (29 | ) | | | (73 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned | | | 96 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | | 1,872 | | | | 3,187 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in deposits | | | 13,236 | | | | 6,557 | |
Net decrease from other borrowings | | | (6,005 | ) | | | (18,634 | ) |
Cash dividends | | | (196 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 7,035 | | | | (12,077 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 9,611 | | | | (8,272 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the period | | | 30,313 | | | | 13,776 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the period | | $ | 39,924 | | | $ | 5,504 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | |
Cash paid during period for: | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 478 | | | $ | 820 | |
Income taxes | | | 5 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements. | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts and transactions of M&F Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Mechanics and Farmers Bank (the “Bank”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes are unaudited except for the balance sheet and footnote information as of December 31, 2009, which were derived from the Company’s audited consolidated Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Consolidated Financial Statements included herein do not include all the information and notes required by GAAP and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The unaudited operating results for the periods presented may not be indicative of annual results.
Reclassification—Certain amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2009 have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. These reclassifications have had no impact on reported amounts of net income, shareholder’s equity or total assets.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Update amends the Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The amendments in this update improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Comparability and consistency in accounting for transferred financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) entitled “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 820”) which amends ASC 820-10. This ASU requires new disclosures: (i) of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 with reasons for the transfers; and (ii) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, including purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis. In addition, the reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities, and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value of both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The ASU includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets (ASC 715-20). These amendments change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and provide a cross reference to ASC 820-10 on how to determine appropriate class to present fair value disclosures. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years. This ASU requires additional disclosures which will not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations or assets.
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) computations are based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the reporting periods. Diluted EPS computations are based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each reporting period plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. The Company had no options outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 25,200 options outstanding as of March 31, 2009 all of which were anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The options and the option plan expired on December 31, 2009. Basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock were $0.04 and $0.15 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Loans are made primarily to customers in the Company’s market areas within North Carolina which include Raleigh, Durham, Charlotte, Winston-Salem, and Greensboro. The Company’s loans, classified by type are as follows:
(Unaudited) | | March 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | % of Total | | | Amount | | | % of Total | |
Commercial | | $ | 8,415 | | | | 4.04 | % | | $ | 8,605 | | | | 4.10 | % |
Real estate construction | | | 18,191 | | | | 8.73 | | | | 16,987 | | | | 8.08 | |
Consumer | | | 5,660 | | | | 2.71 | | | | 5,891 | | | | 2.80 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 134,540 | | | | 64.54 | | | | 135,249 | | | | 64.37 | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 41,016 | | | | 19.67 | | | | 42,706 | | | | 20.33 | |
Other | | | 656 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 673 | | | | 0.32 | |
| | $ | 208,478 | | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 210,111 | | | | 100.00 | % |
Nonperforming assets were as follows:
| | | |
(Unaudited) | | March 31 | | | December 31 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Loans contractually past due 90 days or more and/or on nonaccrual status | | | | | | |
Commercial | | $ | 1,350 | | | $ | 1,263 | |
Real estate construction | | | 717 | | | | 681 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 5,183 | | | | 4,703 | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 2,468 | | | | 2,352 | |
Total nonaccrual loans | | | 9,718 | | | | 8,999 | |
Foreclosed properties | | | 2,159 | | | | 2,176 | |
Total nonperforming assets | | $ | 11,877 | | | $ | 11,175 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonperforming assets to: | | | | | | | | |
Loans outstanding at end of quarter | | | 5.70 | % | | | 5.32 | % |
Total assets at end of quarter | | | 4.22 | | | | 4.07 | |
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming assets | | | 31.57 | | | | 31.89 | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
4. | Allowances for Loan Losses |
Allowances for loan losses consisted of the following:
(Unaudited) | | March 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | Allowance | | | % of Total | | | Amount | | | Allowance | | | % of Total | |
Commercial | | $ | 8,415 | | | $ | 577 | | | | 0.28 | % | | $ | 8,605 | | | $ | 515 | | | | 0.25 | |
Real estate construction | | | 18,191 | | | | 232 | | | | 0.11 | | | | 16,987 | | | | 176 | | | | 0.08 | |
Consumer | | | 5,660 | | | | 97 | | | | 0.05 | | | | 5,891 | | | | 122 | | | | 0.06 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 134,540 | | | | 2,196 | | | | 1.05 | | | | 135,249 | | | | 2,238 | | | | 1.07 | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 41,016 | | | | 576 | | | | 0.28 | | | | 42,706 | | | | 485 | | | | 0.23 | |
Other | | | 656 | | | | 71 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 673 | | | | 28 | | | | 0.01 | |
| | $ | 208,478 | | | $ | 3,749 | | | | 1.80 | % | | $ | 210,111 | | | $ | 3,564 | | | | 1.70 | |
The activity in the allowance for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
| | As of and for the | |
(Unaudited) | | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Average amount of loans outstanding, net of unearned income/expense | | $ | 207,943 | | | $ | 208,672 | |
Amount of loans outstanding at quarter end, net of unearned income | | | 208,478 | | | | 210,111 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 3,564 | | | $ | 2,962 | |
Loans charged-off: | | | | | | | | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 4 | | | | 1 | |
Total charge-offs | | | 4 | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | - | | | | 18 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
Total recoveries | | | 3 | | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loans charged off | | | 1 | | | | (20 | ) |
Bounce protection charge-offs (net) | | | 5 | | | | 9 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 191 | | | | 59 | |
Balance at end of year (1) | | $ | 3,749 | | | $ | 3,032 | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
The loans classified as impaired and substandard with the respective allowance are shown in the table below:
| | Impaired and TDR Loans | | | Impaired and TDR Loans | |
| | As of March 31, 2010 | | | As of December 31, 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | Amount | | | Allowance | | | Coverage | | | Amount | | | Allowance | | | Coverage | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | $ | 110 | | | $ | 75 | | | | 68.18 | % | | $ | 1,607 | | | $ | 35 | | | | 2.18 | % |
Commercial real estate | | | 1,835 | | | | 65 | | | | 3.54 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 1,329 | | | | 48 | | | | 3.61 | | | | 1,605 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | $ | 3,274 | | | $ | 188 | | | | 5.74 | % | | $ | 3,212 | | | $ | 35 | | | | 1.09 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TDRs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | $ | 1,239 | | | $ | - | | | | - | % | | $ | 1,263 | | | $ | - | | | | - | % |
Real estate construction | | | 666 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | 4,837 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,488 | | | | 203 | | | | 3.70 | |
Consumer real estate mortgage | | | 138 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 227 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | $ | 6,880 | | | $ | - | | | | - | % | | $ | 6,978 | | | $ | 203 | | | | 2.91 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Board has declared dividends of $0.0175 per share to be paid in April 2010 to shareholders of record as of April 2, 2010.
The Company sponsors a non-contributory qualified defined benefit retirement (pension) plan (the “Cash Balance Plan”) for substantially all full-time employees. The Company also sponsors a non-qualified, unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (the “SERP Plan”) that provides benefits to certain current and former executives. The Company has not made any contributions during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Company provides post-retirement benefits to certain former executive officers. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the amount of this liability was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and is reflected in Other Liabilities.
The components of the net periodic benefit cost reflected in salaries and employee benefits expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | Cash Balance Plan | | | SERP | | | Total | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 34 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 34 | | | $ | 29 | |
Interest cost | | | 63 | | | | 63 | | | | 28 | | | | 28 | | | | 91 | | | | 91 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (53 | ) | | | (50 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (53 | ) | | | (50 | ) |
Amortization of prior service costs | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Amortization of net loss | | | 38 | | | | 45 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 38 | | | | 45 | |
Net periodic cost | | $ | 82 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 29 | | | $ | 111 | | | $ | 116 | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
Comprehensive income includes net income and all other changes to the Company’s equity, with the exception of transactions with stockholders. The Company’s other comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income are comprised of unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt securities and pension adjustments.
| | For the Three Months Ended | |
(Unaudited) | | March 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Items of other comprehensive income, before tax: | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale, net of taxes | | | (27 | ) | | | 222 | |
Reclassification adjustments for gains | | | | | | | | |
included in income before income tax expense | | | (16 | ) | | | (62 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax expense | | | (43 | ) | | | 160 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Less: Changes in deferred income taxes related to change in unrealized | | | | | | | | |
(loss) gains on securities available for sale | | | (18 | ) | | | 62 | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes | | | (25 | ) | | | 98 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | | $ | 197 | | | $ | 404 | |
The Company follows the “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” topic of the ASC which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. This category generally includes securities that are traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, and U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Level 2 securities include U. S. Government agency obligations, state and municipal bonds and mortgage-backed securities.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Level 3 category generally includes other real estate owned and impaired loans when there is no observable market price or if it is impaired.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other financial institutions, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges, which is a Level 1 input, or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities, which is a Level 2 input.
The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired, and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company classifies the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Other real estate owned is reported at fair value less anticipated costs to sell. Fair value is based on third party or internally developed appraisals which, considering the assumptions in the valuation, are considered Level 3 inputs.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy level, are summarized below:
(Unaudited) | | | | | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant Other | | | Significant | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | Active Markets for | | | Observable | | | Unobservable | |
| | | | | | Identical Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | |
Description | | | March 31, 2010 | | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
Recurring: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Available for sale securities | | $ | 17,304 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 17,304 | | | $ | - | |
| Other invested assets | | | 1,061 | | | | - | | | | 1,061 | | | | - | |
Non-recurring: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other real estate owned | | | 2,159 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,159 | |
| Impaired and TDR loans, net of allowance | | | 9,966 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9,966 | |
| Total | | $ | 30,490 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 18,365 | | | $ | 12,125 | |
The “Financial Instruments” topic of the ASC requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments. These estimated fair values as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of alternative market assumptions and estimation methodologies could have a material effect on these estimates of fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.
Other Invested Assets: As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) system, the Company is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the FHLB. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in FHLB stock was $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and was classified as other invested assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Because of membership requirements to hold stock in this institution and restrictions on the Company’s ability to sell such stock, this investment does not have a readily determinable market value and is accounted for using the cost method.
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
Loans (other than impaired loans): Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, residential mortgage, and other consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into groups by fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories.
The fair value of performing loans is typically calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through their estimated maturity, using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in each group of loans. The estimate of maturity is based on contractual maturities for loans within each group, or on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic conditions.
For all loans, assumptions regarding the characteristics and segregation of loans, maturities, credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are judgmentally determined using specific borrower and other available information.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable: The fair value of interest receivable and payable is estimated to approximate the carrying amounts due to the relatively short term of these instruments.
Deposits: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as demand deposits, checking accounts, savings and money market accounts, is equal to the carrying amount. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, where the discount rate is estimated using the market rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Borrowings: The fair value of borrowings is based on the discounted value of estimated cash flows. The discounted rate is estimated using market rates currently offered for similar advances or borrowings.
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments: Since the majority of the Company’s off-balance sheet instruments consist of non-fee-producing, variable rate commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair value.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amounts and associated estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities of the Company are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | | March 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
(Unaudited) | | Carrying Amount | | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Carrying Amount | | | Estimated Fair Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 39,924 | | | $ | 39,924 | | | $ | 30,313 | | | $ | 30,313 | |
Marketable securities | | | 17,304 | | | | 17,304 | | | | 17,699 | | | | 17,699 | |
Other invested assets | | | 1,061 | | | | 1,061 | | | | 1,061 | | | | 1,061 | |
Loans, net of allowances for loan losses | | | 204,729 | | | | 205,663 | | | | 206,547 | | | | 212,158 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 879 | | | | 879 | | | | 935 | | | | 935 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 238,043 | | | $ | 233,305 | | | $ | 224,807 | | | $ | 228,506 | |
Other borrowings | | | 1,761 | | | | 1,785 | | | | 7,766 | | | | 6,951 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 249 | | | | 249 | | | | 188 | | | | 188 | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
Investment securities represent the second largest component of earning assets. The Company’s securities portfolio consists primarily of the following debt securities:
· | U.S. government agencies |
· | Government sponsored mortgage-backed securities |
o | Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae |
· | Highly-rated collateralized debt securities |
All of the securities are classified as available for sale. The available for sale classification allows flexibility in the management of interest rate risk, liquidity, and loan portfolio growth. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses (net of tax) excluded from operations and reported in other comprehensive income. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium and accretion of purchase discount. The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts is determined by using the level yield method. Securities are not acquired for purposes of engaging in trading activities. Realized gains and losses from sales of securities are determined using the specific identification method.
The Company regularly reviews declines in the fair value of securities below their costs for purposes of determining whether such declines are other-than-temporary in nature. In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers adverse changes in expected cash flows, the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the investments prior to maturity or recovery of cost. If the Company determines that a decline in the fair value of a security below cost is other-than-temporary, the carrying amount of the security is reduced by any portion of the decline deemed to be credit related, with the corresponding decline charged to earnings. The carrying amount of the security is also reduced by any additional impairment deemed to be non-credit related, with the corresponding decline charged to other comprehensive income. Securities available for sale are carried at their fair value, and the mark-to-market adjustment was a $0.5 million unrealized gain as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. After considering applicable tax expense, the cumulative mark-to-market adjustment increased stockholders’ equity by $0.3 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Future fluctuations in stockholders’ equity will occur due to changes in the fair values of available for sale securities.
On March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the recorded value of investments totaled $17.3 million and $17.7 million, respectively. Factors affecting the decrease of the investment securities portfolio include loan growth, the interest rates available for reinvesting maturing securities, and changes in the interest rate yield curve. Other invested assets include FHLB stock with a carrying value of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Company has reviewed the investment portfolio and does not believe any of the declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. The Company anticipates that substantially all of the book value of the investments will be recovered over the life of any securities whose market value is below amortized cost.
The following table reflects the carrying value of the Company’s investment securities at the dates indicated.
| | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | March 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | |
US government agencies | | $ | 999 | | | $ | - | |
Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 8,363 | | | | 9,244 | |
Non-Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 282 | | | | 307 | |
Municipal securities | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina | | | 4,044 | | | | 4,517 | |
Out of state | | | 3,616 | | | | 3,631 | |
| | $ | 17,304 | | | $ | 17,699 | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
The following table reflects the debt securities by contractual maturities as of March 31, 2010. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
(Unaudited) | | As of March 31, 2010 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Fair Value | | | Amortized Cost | |
US government agencies | | | | | | |
Due within one year | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Due after one year through five years | | | 999 | | | | 1,000 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | - | | | | - | |
Due after ten years | | | - | | | | - | |
Total US government agencies | | $ | 999 | | | $ | 1,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | | | | | | |
Due within one year | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Due after one year through five years | | | 11 | | | | 11 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 600 | | | | 567 | |
Due after ten years | | | 7,752 | | | | 7,436 | |
Total government sponsored MBS | | $ | 8,363 | | | $ | 8,014 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | | | | | | |
Due after ten years | | $ | 282 | | | $ | 277 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Municipal bonds | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina | | | | | | | | |
Due within one year | | $ | 342 | | | $ | 340 | |
Due after one year through five years | | | 503 | | | | 468 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 1,457 | | | | 1,419 | |
Due after ten years | | | 1,742 | | | | 1,730 | |
Total North Carolina municipal bonds | | $ | 4,044 | | | $ | 3,957 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Out of state | | | | | | | | |
Due after one year through five years | | $ | 856 | | | $ | 820 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 259 | | | | 265 | |
Due after ten years | | | 2,501 | | | | 2,480 | |
Total out of state municipal bonds | | $ | 3,616 | | | $ | 3,565 | |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair values of investment securities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
(Unaudited) | | Amortized Cost | | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Value | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US government agencies | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | - | | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 999 | |
Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 8,014 | | | | 349 | | | | - | | | | 8,363 | |
Non-Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 277 | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | 282 | |
Municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina | | | 3,957 | | | | 87 | | | | - | | | | 4,044 | |
Out of state | | | 3,565 | | | | 57 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 3,616 | |
Total at March 31, 2010 | | $ | 16,813 | | | $ | 498 | | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | 17,304 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US government agencies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | 8,887 | | | $ | 357 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 9,244 | |
Non-Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 310 | | | | - | | | | (3 | ) | | | 307 | |
Municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina | | | 4,402 | | | | 115 | | | | - | | | | 4,517 | |
Out of state | | | 3,566 | | | | 71 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 3,631 | |
Total at December 31, 2009 | | $ | 17,165 | | | $ | 543 | | | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 17,699 | |
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of securities with gross unrealized losses by length of time that the individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position is as follows:
(Unaudited) | | Less Than 12 Months | | | 12 Months or Greater | | | Total | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Fair Value | | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Value | | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Value | | | Unrealized Losses | |
March 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US government agencies | | $ | 999 | | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 999 | | | $ | (1 | ) |
Municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Out of state | | | 244 | | | | (6 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 244 | | | | (6 | ) |
Total at March 31, 2010 | | $ | 1,243 | | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,243 | | | $ | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Government sponsored MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 307 | | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 307 | | | $ | (3 | ) |
Municipal securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Out of state | | | 244 | | | | (6 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 244 | | | | (6 | ) |
Total at December 31, 2009 | | $ | 244 | | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 307 | | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 551 | | | $ | (9 | ) |
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
10. | Commitments and Contingent Liabilities |
Commitments to Extend Credit
In the normal course of business, the Company has various commitments to extend credit, which are not reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding loan commitments (including available lines of credit) of approximately $22.4 million and $24.7 million, respectively. Commitments under standby letters of credit and financial guarantees amounted to approximately $0.2 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. These lines of credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees represent agreements whereby the Company commits to lend funds to customers up to a predetermined maximum amount during a certain period.
The Company approves lines of credit to consumer customers through home equity and consumer overdraft protection loans, all of which are included in the above commitments to extend credit. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, in addition to actual advances made on such loans, the Company’s consumer customers have available additional lines of credit on home equity and consumer overdraft protection loans. Available amounts on home equity lines as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were approximately $2.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively. In addition, the available amounts on consumer overdraft protection loans were $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these transactions.
Fed Funds Line
As of March 31, 2010, the Company has available for use Federal Funds Lines (“Fed Funds Lines”) aggregating $12.0 million from three correspondent banks. The Fed Funds Lines are renewed annually. Interest rates are stated as variable on a daily basis. The balance outstanding under the Fed Funds Lines as of March 31, 2010 was $1.0 million, which was repaid on April 1, 2010. The Company utilizes its Fed Funds Lines periodically. $2.0 million was the maximum borrowed during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company has additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $11.7 million.
Letters of Credit
In October 2009, the Company secured a $2.0 million letter of credit with FHLB to use as collateral for public deposits. The letter of credit is secured by the Company’s collateral with FHLB and is renewable annually.
The March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 borrowings, and accompanying maturities and interest rates were:
(Unaudited) | | March 31, 2010 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | Maturity Date | | | Rate | |
Fixed Rate Note | | $ | 761 | | | | 2020 | | | | 0.50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2009 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | Maturity Date | | | Rate | |
Daily Rate Credit (1) | | $ | 2,000 | | | | 2010 | | | | 0.36 | % |
Fixed Rate Note | | | 5,000 | | | | 2013 | | | | 0.32 | |
Fixed Rate Note | | | 766 | | | | 2020 | | | | 0.50 | |
| | $ | 7,766 | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Variable rate as of December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In January 2010, the Company took advantage of an opportunity to repay the $5 million fixed rate note referenced in the above table, with no prepayment penalty, and the Company repaid the Daily Rate Credit balance in full. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 the Company had $1.0 million in Fed Funds Lines and a $0.8 million FHLB fixed rate note outstanding. The Fed Funds Line was repaid on April 1, 2010.
M&F BANCORP, INC.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the financial statements and has determined there are no further adjustments or disclosures required.
Item 2--Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Overview
Management’s Discussion and Analysis is provided to assist readers in understanding and evaluating the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The following discussion is intended to provide a general overview of the Company’s performance for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared with the same period in 2009. Readers seeking a more in-depth discussion are invited to read the more detailed discussions below, as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included under Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All information presented is consolidated data unless otherwise specified.
Financial Highlights for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2010
Net income from operations decreased by $0.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to $0.2 million from $0.3 million from the same period in 2009. Compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2009, net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 improved 2.63% or $0.1 million, and the net interest margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 decreased 28 basis points (“bp”). The provision for loan losses increased in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 over the quarter ended March 31, 2009 largely due to an additional allowance for impaired loans. Non-interest income decreased 4.97%, mainly due to the gains on sales and calls of securities in 2009 versus no sales and only one call in 2010. Non-interest expense increased 1.15%, and income tax expense decreased 39.80% in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Selected Financial Data:
(Unaudited) | | As of and for the Three Months ended March 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 39,924 | | | $ | 5,504 | |
Securities | | | 17,304 | | | | 27,245 | |
Gross loans | | | 208,478 | | | | 211,436 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (3,749 | ) | | | (3,032 | ) |
Total Assets | | | 281,701 | | | | 259,625 | |
Deposits | | | 238,043 | | | | 223,124 | |
Borrowings | | | 1,761 | | | | 6,412 | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 36,572 | | | | 24,723 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | |
Summary of Operations | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | $ | 3,347 | | | $ | 3,634 | |
Interest expense | | | 538 | | | | 897 | |
Net interest income | | | 2,809 | | | | 2,737 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 191 | | | | 59 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 2,618 | | | | 2,678 | |
Other operating income | | | 574 | | | | 604 | |
Other operating expense | | | 2,911 | | | | 2,878 | |
Pre-tax net income | | | 281 | | | | 404 | |
Income tax expense | | | 59 | | | | 98 | |
Net income | | $ | 222 | | | $ | 306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred dividends | | $ | 146 | | | $ | - | |
Per Share Data (1) | | | | | | | | |
Net income-basic and diluted | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | 0.15 | |
Common stock dividends | | $ | 35 | | | $ | - | |
Book value per share of common stock (2) | | $ | 12.23 | | | $ | 12.17 | |
Average common shares outstanding | | | 2,031,337 | | | | 2,031,337 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Selected Ratios (1) | | | | | | | | |
Return on average assets | | | 0.11 | % | | | 0.46 | % |
Return on average stockholders' equity | | | 0.83 | | | | 4.94 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Average stockholders' equity to average total assets | | | 12.99 | % | | | 9.38 | % |
Net interest margin (3) | | | 4.64 | | | | 4.60 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) available to common stockholders | | | | | | | | |
(2) stockholders equity reduced for liquidation value of preferred stock | | | | | |
(3) on a tax equivalent basis | | | | | | | | |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements represent expectations and beliefs of M&F Bancorp, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) including but not limited to the Company’s operations, performance, financial condition, growth or strategies. These forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “should”, “estimates”, “believes” and variations of these words and other similar statements. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current projections depending on a variety of important factors, including without limitation:
• | | the Bank’s failure to satisfy the requirements of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Commissioner of Banking of North Carolina and the Regional Director of the FDIC’s Atlanta Regional Office (the “MOU”); |
• | | the effect of the requirements in the MOU and any further regulatory actions; |
• | | regulatory limitations or prohibitions with respect to the operations or activities of the Company and/or the Bank; |
• | | revenues are lower than expected; |
• | | credit quality deterioration which could cause an increase in the provision for credit losses; |
• | | competitive pressure among depository institutions increases significantly; |
• | | changes in consumer spending, borrowings and savings habits; |
• | | our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities or to achieve expected synergies and operating efficiencies within expected time-frames or at all; |
• | | technological changes and security and operations risks associated with the use of technology; |
• | | the cost of additional capital is more than expected; |
• | | a change in the interest rate environment reduces interest margins; |
• | | asset/liability repricing risks, ineffective hedging and liquidity risks; |
• | | general economic conditions, particularly those affecting real estate values, either nationally or in the market area in which we do or anticipate doing business, are less favorable than expected; |
• | | the effects of the FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments; |
• | | the effects of and changes in monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; |
• | | volatility in the credit or equity markets and its effect on the general economy; |
• | | demand for the products or services of the Company and the Bank, as well as their ability to attract and retain qualified people; |
• | | the costs and effects of legal, accounting and regulatory developments and compliance; and |
• | | regulatory approvals for acquisitions cannot be obtained on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule. |
The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. See also “Risk Factors” which begins on page 11 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to the allowance for loan losses, investment and intangible asset values, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and the Company may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.
Management believes that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating the Company’s reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Loans — Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balance, net of the allowance for loan losses, and deferred loan origination fees and costs. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the related loan or commitment as an adjustment to yield, or taken directly into income when the related loan is sold or commitment expires.
Allowance for Loan Losses – The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of a specific component for identified problem loans, and a formula component which addresses historical loan loss experience together with other relevant risk factors affecting the portfolio.
The specific component incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as required by the “Receivables” topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired loans. A loan is recognized as impaired when it is probable that principal and/or interest are not collectible in accordance with the loan’s contractual terms. A loan is not deemed to be impaired if the Company expects to collect all amounts due including interest accrued at the contractual rate during the period of delay. Measurement of impairment can be based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. If the fair value of the impaired loan is less than the related recorded amount, a specific valuation component is established within the allowance for loan losses or a write-down is charged against the allowance for loan losses if the impairment is considered to be permanent. Measurement of impairment does not apply to large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans, unless specifically identified as impaired and the estimated value of the underlying collateral does not support the full balance, that are collectively evaluated for impairment such as the Company’s portfolios of home equity loans, real estate mortgages, installment and other loans. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments at the time of their examinations.
The formula component is calculated by first applying historical loss experience factors to outstanding loans by type. This component is then adjusted to reflect additional risk factors not addressed by historical loss experience. These factors include the evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of the Company and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio. Senior management reviews these conditions quarterly. Management’s evaluation of the loss related to each of these conditions is quantified and reflected in the formula component. The evaluations of the inherent loss with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty due to the subjective nature of such evaluations and because they are not identified with specific problem credits.
Actual losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. The Company’s methodology permits adjustments to the allowance in the event that, in management’s judgment, significant factors which affect the collectability of the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date have changed.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is the best estimate of inherent losses which have been incurred as of March 31, 2010. There is no assurance that the Company will not be required to make future adjustments to the allowance in response to changing economic conditions, particularly in the Company’s service area, since the majority of the Company’s loans are collateralized by real estate.
Loan Restructurings — Loan restructurings are renegotiated loans for which concessions have been granted to the borrower that the Company would not have otherwise granted. Restructured loans are returned to accrual status when said loans have demonstrated performance, generally evidenced by six months of payment performance in accordance with the restructured terms, or by the presence of other significant factors.
Investments – The Company records an investment impairment charge when it believes an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions and associated market values of investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Valuation Allowances – The Company assesses the need to record a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company considers anticipated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for the valuation. In the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.
Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) — Real estate properties acquired through loan foreclosure are recorded at estimated fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at time of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Credit losses arising at the time of foreclosure are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent valuations are periodically performed by management and the carrying value is adjusted by a charge to expense to reflect any subsequent declines in the estimated fair value. Routine holding costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Income Taxes — Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the change is enacted.
Executive Overview
The Company generated the majority of its interest and non-interest income in the first three months of 2010 and 2009 from traditional lending and deposit banking services. The Company continued to execute management’s strategy of targeting commercial business, diversifying the customer base, and pursuing strategic relationships for deposits.
Impact of Recent Developments on the Banking Industry
The banking industry, including the Company, is operating in a challenging and volatile economic environment. The effects of the downturn in the housing market have adversely impacted credit markets, consumer confidence and the broader economy. Although the Bank remains profitable, it has not been immune from the impact of the current recession or the increased focus of banking regulators upon capital and liquidity levels. A material change in volatile funding, brokered deposits, or the balance sheet composition would require receipt of non-objections from the federal and state regulators. At its annual Strategic Planning session in September 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank directed management to limit material changes to the balance sheet, and to focus on asset quality, liquidity, and managing the Bank through the challenging economic environment. Subsequently, the Board established higher liquidity targets which Management achieved by December 31, 2009. All of the Bank’s Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® (“CDARS”) brokered deposits are reciprocal, relationship-based deposits.
On April 27, 2010, the Bank and the directors of the Bank signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), which will become effective upon the execution thereof by the Commissioner of Banking of North Carolina and the Regional Director of the FDIC’s Atlanta Regional Office, the supervisory authorities. The MOU requires the Bank to:
· | Reduce the balance of adversely classified assets, and develop specific plans and proposals for the reduction and improvement of assets which are adversely classified, and not extend further credit to borrowers whose loans are adversely classified without prior consent of the supervisory authorities; |
· | Remain well-capitalized; |
· | Maintain adequate liquidity; |
· | Not pay dividends to the holding company without prior consent of the supervisory authorities; and |
· | Obtain the non-objection of the supervisory authorities before engaging in any transactions that would change the composition of the Bank’s balance sheet by more than 10%. |
Management believes that the Bank has already successfully addressed many of the areas in the MOU, which is characterized by the supervisory authorities as an informal action that is neither published nor made publicly available by the supervisory authorities and is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action rather than a formal supervisory action. Management is committed to continuing to actively address the items to achieve full compliance and resolution.
Issuance of Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury (the “Treasury”)under the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”)
In June 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Treasury pursuant to which, among other things, the Company sold to the Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $11.7 million, 11,735 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, constituting 5.00% of the Company’s risk-weighted assets. As a condition of the CPP, the Company is prohibited from paying any dividends on its common stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the Series A Preferred Stock for all past dividend periods (including the latest completed dividend period). Except with the Treasury’s prior approval, the Company is generally prohibited from repurchasing its common stock until the earlier of June 2012 or until the Treasury no longer owns any of the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Restriction Period”). In addition, except with the Treasury’s prior approval, during the Restriction Period, the Company is restricted from increasing its quarterly cash dividend on its common stock above the last quarterly dividend ($0.05) declared prior to November 17, 2008.
Financial Condition
Total assets increased 2.67%, or $7.3 million, to $281.7 million as of March 31, 2010 from $274.4 million as of December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents increased $9.6 million or 31.7%, to $39.9 million as of March 31, 2010, compared to $30.3 million as of December 31, 2009. Investment securities decreased $0.4 million from $17.7 million as of December 31, 2009 to $17.3 million as of March 31, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company paid down debt by $6.0 million, decreased loans by $1.6 million, and deposits increased by $13.2 million. All other assets comprised of interest receivable, bank premises and equipment, bank-owned life insurance, other real estate owned, income taxes, and other miscellaneous assets, decreased a net of $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The entire investment portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and is comprised of investment-grade securities. Securities with a book value of $1.0 million were purchased and $0.4 million were called during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Principal payments of $0.9 million were received during the three month period.
Deposits increased 5.89%, or $13.2 million, to $238.0 million as of March 31, 2010 from $224.8 million as of December 31, 2009. The $13.2 million increase was mainly due to an increase in CDARS deposits.
Total stockholders’ equity was essentially unchanged at $36.6 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The net income before dividends of $0.2 million was mostly offset by preferred and common stock dividends and a small other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company recorded dividends totaling $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, which included a 5.00% preferred stock dividend for the period from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010, and a dividend to common stockholders, of $0.0175 per share.
Results of Operations, Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased $0.1 million to $0.2 million from $0.3 million for the same period in 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the same period in 2009, interest income decreased 7.90%, or $0.3 million, and interest expense decreased 40.02%, or $0.4 million, resulting in an overall improvement in net interest income of 2.63%, or $0.1 million.
Interest income on loans decreased $0.1 million, in part due to the $0.7 million decrease in average loans outstanding to $207.9 million from $208.7 million, partially offset by a 25 bp decrease in yield to 6.04% from 6.29% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Interest income on securities decreased $0.2 million, when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2010 with the same period in 2009, primarily due to the average balances of the portfolio decreasing by $15.4 million.
Total interest expense decreased 40.02%, or $0.4 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, reflecting a 78 bp decrease from 1.88% to 1.10% in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits. The decrease in interest expense on borrowed funds of 94.12% during the three months ended March 31, 2010 from the same period in 2009 was primarily due to $9.0 million lower average balances for the three months ending March 31, 2010 of $0.8 million compared to $9.8 million for the same period in 2009. In addition, the average borrowing rate decreased from 1.38% in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to 1.01% in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The Company has made a concerted effort to decrease the use of borrowed funds while closely managing its liquidity in order to maximize its net interest margin in 2010 and 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company increased its expense for loan loss provision $0.1 million from the three months ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to reserves for impaired loans. The provision for loan losses is the result of management’s assessment of the Company’s delinquency ratios, non-performing assets, charge-off history, and composition of loans in the portfolio. Management performs a thorough review of the loan portfolio quarterly, and an outside loan review firm reviews a substantial portion of the loan portfolio semi-annually.
Non-interest income decreased 4.80% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, mainly due to the realized gains on sales and calls of securities in 2009 with a much smaller gain realized on the calls of securities in 2010.
Non-interest expense increased 1.15% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. During the three month period ending March 31, 2010 the following attributed to the increase:
| · | The Company maintained fewer employees resulting in a $0.3 million decrease in salary and benefits expense |
| · | In the first half of 2009, the Company had two additional branches, one of which was leased, the expenses for which were included in occupancy and equipment |
| · | The costs of occupancy and equipment decreased $0.1 million |
| · | Information technology expenses increased $0.1 million, due to higher processing fees |
| · | FDIC insurance expense increased $0.2 million |
| · | Other miscellaneous expenses increased $0.1 million, with forms, franchise tax, and sponsorships attributing to this increase, partially offset by a decrease in the reserve for contingent off balance sheet liabilities. |
Average Balances, Interest Earned or Paid, and Interest Yields/Rates | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 | |
(Unaudited) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Average Balance | | | Amount Earned/Paid | | | Average Rate | | | Average Balance | | | Amount Earned/Paid | | | Average Rate | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable (1): | | $ | 207,943 | | | $ | 3,139 | | | | 6.04 | % | | $ | 208,672 | | | $ | 3,280 | | | | 6.29 | % |
Taxable securities | | | 8,856 | | | | 113 | | | | 5.10 | | | | 19,925 | | | | 220 | | | | 4.42 | |
Nontaxable securities(2) | | | 7,824 | | | | 81 | | | | 6.74 | | | | 12,173 | | | | 126 | | | | 6.74 | |
Federal funds sold and other interest on short-term investments | | | 39,600 | | | | 14 | | | | 0.14 | | | | 3,198 | | | | 8 | | | | 1.00 | |
Total interest earning assets | | | 264,223 | | | | 3,347 | | | | 5.14 | % | | | 243,968 | | | | 3,634 | | | | 6.05 | % |
Cash and due from banks | | | 2,135 | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,055 | | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 20,037 | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,143 | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (3,614 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (2,973 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 282,781 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 264,193 | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings deposits | | $ | 45,570 | | | $ | 36 | | | | 0.32 | % | | $ | 30,403 | | | $ | 25 | | | | 0.33 | % |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 27,913 | | | | 24 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 48,687 | | | | 132 | | | | 1.08 | |
Time deposits | | | 120,843 | | | | 476 | | | | 1.58 | | | | 104,283 | | | | 704 | | | | 2.70 | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 194,326 | | | | 536 | | | | 1.10 | | | | 183,373 | | | | 861 | | | | 1.88 | |
Borrowed funds | | | 793 | | | | 2 | | | | 1.01 | | | | 9,837 | | | | 34 | | | | 1.38 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 195,119 | | | | 538 | | | | 1.10 | % | | | 193,210 | | | | 895 | | | | 1.85 | % |
Non-interest-bearing deposits | | | 45,680 | | | | | | | | | | | | 41,238 | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 5,249 | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,960 | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 246,048 | | | | | | | | | | | | 239,408 | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders' equity | | | 36,733 | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,785 | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | $ | 282,781 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 264,193 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | | $ | 2,809 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,739 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-taxable securities | | | | | | | 81 | | | | | | | | | | | | 126 | | | | | |
Tax equivalent amount at 38.55% tax rate | | | | | | | 31 | | | | | | | | | | | | 49 | | | | | |
Tax equivalent adjustment (3) | | | | | | | 43 | | | | | | | | | | | | 67 | | | | | |
Tax equivalent net interest income | | | | | | $ | 2,852 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,806 | | | | | |
Net interest spread (4) | | | | | | | | | | | 4.04 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 4.20 | % |
Net interest margin (5) | | | | | | | 4.32 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 4.60 | % | | | | |
(1) Loans receivable include nonaccrual loans for which accrual of interest income has not been recorded. | |
(2) The tax equivalent rate is computed using a blended federal and state tax rate of 38.55% | |
(3) The tax equivalent adjustment is computed using a blended tax rate of 38.55%. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(4) Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. | |
(5) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. | |
Loan Portfolio and Adequacy of the Allowances for Loan Losses
Allowance for Loan Losses – The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses which management believes to be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of a specific component for identified problem loans, and a formula component which addresses historical loan loss experience together with other relevant risk factors affecting the portfolio.
The specific component incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as required by the “Receivables” topic of the ASC. These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired loans. A loan is recognized as impaired when it is probable that principal and/or interest are not collectible in accordance with the loan’s contractual terms. A loan is not deemed to be impaired if there is a short delay in receipt of payment or if, during a longer period of delay, the Company expects to collect all amounts due including interest accrued at the contractual rate during the period of delay. Measurement of impairment can be based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. If the fair value of the impaired loan is less than the related recorded amount, a specific valuation component is established within the allowance for loan losses or a write-down is charged against the allowance for loan losses if the impairment is considered to be permanent. Measurement of impairment does not apply to large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans, unless specifically identified as impaired and the estimated value of the underlying collateral does not support the full balance, that are collectively evaluated for impairment such as the Company’s portfolios of home equity loans, real estate mortgages, and installment loans.
The formula component uses the actual net loss/recovery history, by loan type, the Company has incurred from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 on average loans outstanding over the same period. This component is then adjusted to reflect additional risk factors not addressed by historical loss experience. These factors include the evaluation of existing economic and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of the Company and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio. Senior management reviews these conditions quarterly. Management’s evaluation of the loss related to each of these conditions is quantified and reflected in the formula component. The evaluations of the inherent loss with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty due to the subjective nature of such evaluations and because they are not identified with specific problem credits. Management increased some qualitative factors in the analysis for loan and losses to reflect the continued challenges in the current economic environment.
Of the non-homogenous classified loans that are not identified as impaired, 47.89% of the classified loans, constituting 38.03% of the outstanding classified balances, have a loan-to-value of less than 50.00% of the loan balance outstanding. Of the non-homogenous classified loans that are not identified as impaired, 47.18% of the loans are considered current (paid within 30 days of due date), constituting 48.56% of the classified loan balances outstanding. Management believes that the low loan-to-values combined with the payment status of these unimpaired classified loans, reduces the risk of loss inherent in these classified loans. For any non-homogenous classified loans that were not paid current (defined as less than 30 days past due) at March 31, 2010, and which had a loan to value of more than 50.00%, an additional qualitative factor was included in the allowance calculation.
Actual losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. The Company’s methodology permits adjustments to the allowance in the event that, in management’s judgment, significant factors which affect the collectability of the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date have changed.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is the best estimate of probable losses which have been incurred as of March 31, 2010. There is no assurance that the Company will not be required to make future adjustments to the allowance in response to changing economic conditions, particularly in the Company’s service area, since the majority of the Company’s loans are collateralized by real estate. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments at the time of their examinations.
The allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2010, was $3.7 million or 1.80% of total loans outstanding, compared with 1.43% of total loans outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and 1.70% as of December 31, 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, loans totaling $10.2 million were classified as impaired, of which $6.9 million were classified as Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”). Of the Company’s nonperforming assets, 88.63% are secured by real estate collateral, which management believes mitigates the Company’s exposure to losses as compared to those loans that are unsecured or collateralized with other types of assets. All impaired loans are evaluated individually for inherent losses for which an allowance will be recorded. If collateral and other factors support full repayment, or if a direct write-down of the loan balance has been recorded, the allowance is adjusted accordingly.
Consumer real estate mortgage loans comprised 19.67% of the total loans outstanding at March 31, 2010. The Company’s history of realized losses in consumer real estate mortgages as compared to the average consumer real estate mortgages outstanding from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 is 38 bp. As of March 31, 2010, 40.75% of the total loans outstanding were to faith-based and non-profit organizations, in which the Company has specialized lending experience. The Company’s history of realized losses during April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 is a net recovery when compared to the average loans outstanding in this unique market.
For additional information regarding the allowances for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Nonperforming Assets
The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets is one indicator of the exposure to credit risk. Nonperforming assets of the Company consist of non-accrual loans 90 days or more past due and foreclosed assets, which have been acquired as a result of foreclosure or deed-in-lieu-of foreclosure. All foreclosed assets are recorded at the estimated realizable value.
Non-accrual loans increased from $4.9 million as of March 31, 2009 to $9.7 million as of March 31, 2010, primarily due to TDR loans to three borrowers with combined loan balances of $5.9 million. One of these borrowers, with a total loan balance of $3.6 million at March 31, 2010 is making scheduled payments in accordance with a repayment agreement.
Management continues to monitor all non-accrual loan relationships to identify any improvements or deterioration in borrowers’ cash flow and to maintain the value of any underlying collateral. In addition, significant loans in non-accrual status or in excess of 90 days delinquent for a period of one year or more are required to have a new appraisal performed to reevaluate the underlying collateral.
Management considers the allowance for loan losses of $3.7 million as of March 31, 2010 to be sufficient to cover the probable loan losses inherent in its loan portfolio.
For additional information regarding nonperforming assets as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity, Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risks
The objectives of the Company’s liquidity management policy include providing adequate funds to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers at all times, providing funds to meet the basic needs for on-going operations of the Company, and to meet regulatory requirements. The liquidity ratio is the sum of cash, overnight funds, and un-pledged, marketable U.S. Government and agency securities divided by the sum of deposits and short-term borrowings (less the full amount of pledged deposits). Management believes that core deposit activity, available borrowing capacity from the FHLB of Atlanta, and Fed Funds accommodations will be adequate to meet the short-term and long-term liquidity needs of the Company. The Company had $0.7 million outstanding from the FHLB as of March 31, 2010. The maximum outstanding balance from FHLB at any time during the first quarter, 2010 , was $7.8 million, during the first quarter 2010. The Company participates in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® (“CDARS”) program, which enables depositors to receive FDIC insurance coverage for deposits otherwise exceeding the maximum insurable amount. Through the CDARS program, deposits in excess of the maximum insurable amount are placed with multiple participating financial institutions. All of the Bank’s CDARS® brokered deposits are reciprocal, relationship-based deposits.
Capital Resources
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by supervisory authorities. Failure to satisfy minimum capital requirements may result in certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As discussed under the section heading, "Executive Overview - Impact of Recent Developments on the Banking Industry" on page [22] of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, at its annual Strategic Planning session in September 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank directed management to limit material changes to the balance sheet, and to focus on asset quality, liquidity, and managing the Bank through the challenging economic environment. Subsequently, the Board established higher liquidity targets which Management achieved by December 31, 2009. Additionally, pursuant to the MOU, discussed under the section heading, “Subsidiary Bank Corrective Resolutions” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Bank is required to obtain the non-objection of the supervisory authorities before engaging in any transactions that would materially change the composition of the Bank’s balance sheet. Also, the MOU requires the Bank to maintain a tier 1 leverage capital ratios of not less than 8.00%, and a total risk based capital ratio of not less than 10.00%.
As of March 31, 2010, the regulatory capital levels of the Company and Bank are as indicated below:
| | March 31, 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | For Capital | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Adequacy | | | To Be Well | |
(Unaudited) | | Actual | | | Purposes | | | Capitalized | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | $ | 36,857 | | | | 15.80 | % | | $ | 18,662 | | | | 8.00 | % | | $ | 23,328 | | | | 10.00 | % |
The Bank | | | 33,468 | | | | 14.41 | | | | 18,574 | | | | 8.00 | | | | 23,218 | | | | 10.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 (to risk weighted assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | $ | 33,933 | | | | 14.55 | % | | $ | 9,331 | | | | 4.00 | % | | $ | 13,997 | | | | 6.00 | % |
The Bank | | | 30,558 | | | | 13.16 | | | | 9,287 | | | | 4.00 | | | | 13,931 | | | | 6.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 (to Average total assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | $ | 33,933 | | | | 12.16 | % | | $ | 11,164 | | | | 4.00 | % | | $ | 13,955 | | | | 5.00 | % |
The Bank | | | 30,558 | | | | 11.09 | | | | 11,020 | | | | 4.00 | | | | 13,775 | | | | 5.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | For Capital | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Adequacy | | | To Be Well | |
| | Actual | | | Purposes | | | Capitalized | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | $ | 36,871 | | | | 15.58 | % | | $ | 18,934 | | | | 8.00 | % | | $ | 23,667 | | | | 10.00 | % |
The Bank | | | 33,257 | | | | 14.11 | | | | 18,854 | | | | 8.00 | | | | 23,568 | | | | 10.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 (to risk weighted assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | $ | 33,908 | | | | 14.33 | % | | $ | 9,467 | | | | 4.00 | % | | $ | 14,200 | | | | 6.00 | % |
The Bank | | | 30,306 | | | | 12.86 | | | | 9,427 | | | | 4.00 | | | | 14,141 | | | | 6.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 (to Average total assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | $ | 33,908 | | | | 13.00 | % | | $ | 10,435 | | | | 4.00 | % | | $ | 13,044 | | | | 5.00 | % |
The Bank | | | 30,306 | | | | 11.30 | | | | 10,727 | | | | 4.00 | | | | 13,409 | | | | 5.00 | |
Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not applicable.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company becomes involved in legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Except as disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the section heading “Subsidiary Bank Corrective Resolutions”, subject to the uncertainties inherent in any litigation, management believes there currently are no pending or threatened proceedings that are reasonably likely to result in a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations
Item 1A – Risk Factors
To smaller reporting companies
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Not applicable
Item 5 — Other Information
On April 27, the Bank and the directors of the Bank entered into an MOU with the supervisory authorities. See the discussion in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the section heading “Subsidiary Bank Corrective Resolutions”, which discussion is incorporated herein by reference
Item 6 — Exhibits
Exhibit 31(i) | | Certification of Kim D. Saunders. |
Exhibit 31(ii) | | Certification of Lyn Hittle. |
Exhibit 32 | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | M&F Bancorp, Inc. |
Date: | | | April 30, 2010 | | By: | | /s/ Kim D. Saunders |
| | | | | | | Kim D. Saunders |
| | | | | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | | | |
Date: | | | April 30, 2010 | | By: | | /s/ Lyn Hittle |
| | | | | | | Lyn Hittle |
| | | | | | | Chief Financial Officer |
29