Settlement of Certain Litigation Relating to the Merger
On March 8, 2019, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation and to allow each ofII-VI Incorporated’s(“II-VI”) shareholders and Finisar Corporation’s (“Finisar”) stockholders to vote on the proposals required in connection with the proposed merger (the “Merger”) between Finisar and Mutation Merger Sub Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary ofII-VI, Finisar andII-VI entered into a memorandum of understanding (the “Finisar Stockholder MOU”) with the plaintiffs and other named defendants regarding the settlement of the following eight lawsuits filed by alleged Finisar stockholders challenging the Merger (collectively, the “Finisar Stockholder Actions”): (1)Hein v. Finisar Corporation, et al., 19CV340510, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara; (2) Tenvold v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,1:19-cv-00050, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; (3) Klein v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,5:19-cv-00155, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; (4) Wheby v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,1:19-cv-00064, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; (5) Sharma v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,5:19-cv-00220, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; (6) Davis v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,3:19-cv-00271, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; (7) Bushansky v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,5:19-cv-00446, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; and (8) Pappey v. Finisar Corporation, et al.,1:19-cv-00167, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
In addition, on March 11, 2019, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation and to allow each ofII-VI’s shareholders and Finisar’s stockholders to vote on the proposals required in connection with the proposed Merger,II-VI entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the plaintiff and other named defendants regarding the settlement of a putative class action complaint, filed by Thomas Stabile in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and captionedStabile v.II-VI Incorporated, et al.,2:19-cv-00062 (the“II-VI Shareholder Action”).
On or around March 12, 2019,II-VI and Finisar sent a letter to their respective shareholders and stockholders, which describes the Finisar Stockholder Actions andII-VI Shareholder Action, and terms of the Finisar Stockholder MOU and Settlement Agreement, in greater detail, and which contains certain supplemental disclosures to the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus, dated February 7, 2019, contained inII-VI’s registration statement on FormS-4 (FileNo. 333-229052). A copy of this letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference.
Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |