The Company converted to a public company at the end of 1999, and at the end of 2000 bought a $200 million thrift for stock. Since that time the Company has been buying back the Company’s stock to manage capital levels and enhance earnings per share. During the first nine months of 2006, the Company used $4.3 million for this purpose, thereby reducing earning assets from where they otherwise would have been and correspondingly reduced net interest income.
On September 16, 2005 the Bank purchased certain assets totaling $106 million and assumed certain liabilities totaling $96.6 million representing the operations of Fidelity Federal Savings Bank (“Fidelity”) located in Marion, Indiana for $20 million in cash. The assets purchased included residential real estate mortgage loans of $55.0 million, consumer loans of $14.0 million, commercial real estate loans of $9.2 million and commercial business loans of $3.6 million. The liabilities assumed included total deposits of $75.9 million (including $23.5 million core savings and transaction accounts) and Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $20.5 million.
On August 18, 2006 the Bank purchased assets totaling $7.6 million and assumed liabilities totaling $12.3 million representing the Winchester, Wabash and Warsaw offices owned by First Financial Bank, NA, which were operated as branches of Community First Bank and Trust (“First Financial”). The assets purchased included residential real estate mortgage loans of $5.4 million and consumer loans of $1.2 million. The liabilities assumed included total deposits of $12.3 million.
Results of operations also depend upon the level of the Company’s non-interest income, including fee income and service charges, and the level of its non-interest expense, including general and administrative expenses. In addition to the Fidelity and First Financial acquisitions, the Company expanded through the addition of a new branch office that opened in June 2005 located in Syracuse, Indiana in Kosciusko County and the recent purchase of land in Madison County in preparation for possible expansion towards the greater Indianapolis area. In addition, it is anticipated that construction will begin on a new branch in Elkhart County later in the year. The Company also continues to work toward the development of an Investment Management and Private Banking Division in order to better service clients with more specialized financial needs. The intent of all these expansion transactions is to increase income over the long term. However, on a short term basis, expenses relating to the new branches and a new division will have the effect of increasing non-interest expense with no immediate offsetting income.
Assets totaled $990.7 million at September 30, 2006, an increase from December 31, 2005 of $18.9 million, or 1.9%. Gross loans, excluding loans held for sale, increased $16.3 million or 2.0%. Consumer loans increased $12.9 million, or 6.0%, and commercial business loans increased $5.8 million, or 9.0%, while residential and commercial real estate loans held in the portfolio decreased $2.4 million, furthering our strategy to reduce the percentage of longer term, fixed rate real estate mortgage loans to total loans. Mortgage loans held for sale increased $597,000 and mortgage loans sold during the first nine months of 2006 totaled $18.7 million. Investment securities available for sale increased $818,000 or 2.1% in order to maintain liquidity targets set by the Board of Directors.
Premises and equipment increased $1.1 million or 7.7% due to the purchase of assets from First Financial in August and the purchase of land for the purpose of building a branch office in Madison County in the yet to be determined future. These purchases were partially offset by normal depreciation.
Allowance for loan losses decreased $49,000 to $8.1 million when comparing December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006. Net charge offs for the first nine months of 2006 were $1.5 million or .24% of average loans on an annualized basis compared to $1.6 million, or .30% of average loans for the comparable period in 2005. A large portion of the net charge offs in the third quarter of 2006 was related to 1-4 family residential and consumer loans. As of September 30, 2006 the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans receivable and non-performing loans was .95% and 158.67%, respectively.
Total deposits were $727.3 million at September 30, 2006 an increase of $42.7 million, or 6.2%, from December 31, 2005. Increases in core demand and savings accounts of $42.5 million, brokered deposits of $10.1 million and public deposits of $4.0 million were offset by reductions in daily money market accounts of $13.9 million. A new market rate checking account was introduced during the second quarter. The account pays an interest rate (indexed to the fed funds rate) that is tiered based on the balance of the checking account. The higher the balance the higher the interest rate paid. As of September 30, 2006 the balance in this account was $33.2 million. Total borrowings decreased $24.9 million to $162.9 million at September 30, 2006 from $187.8 million at December 31, 2005 primarily due to the increase in the new checking account. The increase of this checking account and decrease in borrowings increases the overall franchise value of the Company.
Stockholders’ equity decreased $904,000, or 1.0%, from $88.8 million at December 31, 2005, to $87.9 million at September 30, 2006. The decrease was due primarily to the repurchase of 204,000 shares of common stock for $4.3 million and dividend payments of $1.9 million. This decrease was partially offset by net income of $4.1 million, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares earned of $496,000, and RRP shares earned of $113,000. Also, the market value of securities available for sale compared to their book value increased $19,000 from a loss of $375,000 at December 31, 2005 to a loss of $356,000 at September 30, 2006.
Comparison of the Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
Net income for the third quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $1.1 million, or $.27 for basic and diluted earnings per share. This compared to net income for the comparable period in 2005 of $1.6 million, or $.36 for basic and $.35 for diluted earnings per share. Annualized return on assets was .47% and return on tangible equity was 6.23% for the third quarter of 2006 compared to .70% and 7.29% respectively, for the same period last year.
13
Net interest income before the provision for loan losses decreased $354,000 from $6.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The primary reason for the decline was a 48 basis point decrease in the net interest margin reflecting the Bank’s liability sensitive nature, partially offset by an increase of $88.7 million, or 11.0% increase in average interest earning assets (mainly due to the Fidelity Federal purchase in September of 2005).
The provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2006 was $525,000, compared to $444,000 for last year’s comparable period. The increase was due primarily to higher balances and changing composition of the loan portfolio. Non-performing loans to total loans at September 30, 2006 were .60% compared to .85% at September 30, 2005. Non-performing assets to total assets were .76% at September 30, 2006 compared to .90% at September 30, 2005. The decrease in the non-performing loans and assets was due in part to a non-performing loan in the amount of approximately $1.9 million being paid in full.
Non-interest income increased $102,000 to $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2005. The increase resulted primarily from increases in service fees on transaction accounts of $134,000, or 13.2%, increased gain on loan sales of $28,000, or 30.1% and other operating income increased $52,000, or 132.4%, mostly related to a prior year state tax refund. The increases were offset by a reduction in commission income on annuity and mutual fund sales of $71,000 as short term interest rates have risen making these products less competitive. On a linked quarter basis non-interest income increased $71,000, or 4.2%.
Non-interest expense increased $415,000 or 7.2% to $6.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $5.8 million for the same period in 2005. The increase was due primarily to increased salaries and benefits, which were up $156,000 due to annual salary adjustments, increased health insurance costs and increased staffing for three new branches opened: one in May of 2005, another with the purchase of Fidelity Federal in September of 2005 and the other with the First Financial acquisition in August 2006. Marketing expenses were up $69,000 primarily due to a new branding campaign designed to more clearly communicate our strategic position. Other expenses increased $111,000 due to increased professional fees primarily related to regulatory compliance requirements and legal costs related to REO, increased REO expenses (other than legal costs) resulting from more repossessed properties, and other general and administrative expense increases related to the opening of the previously mentioned new branches. On a linked quarter basis non-interest expense was flat at $6.2 million.
Income tax expense decreased $304,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to less taxable income. The effective tax rate decreased from 26.3% to 15.8% due to an increased percentage of low income housing tax credits to taxable income when comparing the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2005.
14
Comparison of the Operating Results for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $4.1 million or $.96 for basic and $.94 for diluted earnings per share. This compared to net income for the comparable period in 2005 of $4.9 million or $1.12 for basic and $1.09 for diluted earnings per share. The primary reason for the decrease was a shrinking net interest margin brought on by increased short term interest rates. Annualized return on average assets was .56% and return on average tangible equity was 7.25% for the first nine months of 2006 compared to .76% and 7.51% respectively, for the same period last year.
Net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $65,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The primary reason for the slight increase was due to a $102.3 million, or 13.0% increase in average interest earning assets (mainly due to the Fidelity Federal purchase in September of 2005), which was mostly offset by a 38 basis point decrease in the net interest margin reflecting the Bank’s liability sensitive nature, as short term interest rates continued to rise.
The provision for loan losses for the first nine months of 2006 was $1.4 million, compared to $1.3 million for last year’s comparable period. The increase was primarily due to higher loan balances at the end of the period compared to a year ago. The increase was also attributable to the changing composition of the loan portfolio into higher risk products. Non-performing loans to total loans at September 30, 2006 were .60% compared to .85% at September 30, 2005. Non-performing assets to total assets were .76% at September 30, 2006 compared to .90% at September 30, 2005. As previously noted, the decrease in the non-performing loans and assets was due in part to a non-performing loan in the amount of approximately $1.9 million being paid in full.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 non-interest income increased $189,000 to $5.1 million compared to the same period in 2005. The increase resulted primarily from increases in service fees on transaction accounts of $378,000, or 13.1% and other income increases of $114,000 (primarily increased gains on sale of REO and a prior year state tax refund) were offset by a reduction in commission income on annuity and mutual fund sales of $274,000 as short term interest rates have risen making these products less competitive.
15
Non-interest expense increased $1.7 million, or 9.9% to $18.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $17.0 million for the same period in 2005. The increase was due primarily to increased salaries and benefits which were up $746,000 due to annual salary adjustments, increased health insurance costs and increased staffing for three new branches opened; one in May of 2005, another with the purchase of Fidelity Federal in September of 2005, and the other a result of the First Financial branch acquisition. Marketing expenses were up $179,000 primarily due to a new branding campaign designed to more clearly communicate our strategic position. Other expenses increased $485,000 due to increased professional fees primarily related to regulatory compliance requirements and legal costs related to REO, increased REO expenses (other than legal costs) due to more repossessed properties, and other general and administrative expense increases primarily related to the opening of the new branches.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, income tax expense decreased $736,000 compared to the same period in 2005. The decrease was due primarily to decreased taxable income. The effective tax rate decreased from 27.1% to 20.9% due to an increased percentage of low income housing tax credits to taxable income when comparing the first nine months of 2006 to the first nine months of 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The standard measure of liquidity for savings associations is the ratio of cash and eligible investments to a certain percentage of the net-withdrawable savings accounts and borrowings due within one year. As of September 30, 2006, Mutual Federal had liquid assets of $59.4 million and a liquidity ratio of 6.74%. It is anticipated that this level of liquidity will be adequate for the remainder of 2006.
ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Presented below as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 is an analysis of Mutual Federal’s interest rate risk as measured by changes in Mutual Federal’s net portfolio value (“NPV”) assuming an instantaneous and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve, in 100 basis point increments.
September 30, 2006
Net Portfolio Value
| | | | % | | | | | | | NPV as % of PV of Assets | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Changes In Rates | | | $ Amount | | | $ Change | | | % Change | | | NPV Ratio | | | Change | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
+300 bp | | | 49,648 | | | -48,047 | | | -49 | % | | 5.54 | % | | -456 bp | |
+200 bp | | | 66,290 | | | -31,405 | | | -32 | % | | 7.21 | % | | -289 bp | |
+100 bp | | | 82,361 | | | -15,334 | | | -16 | % | | 8.73 | % | | -137 bp | |
0 bp | | | 97,695 | | | | | | | | | 10.10 | % | | | |
-100 bp | | | 109,798 | | | 12,103 | | | 12 | % | | 11.10 | % | | 100 bp | |
-200 bp | | | 114,736 | | | 17,041 | | | 17 | % | | 11.42 | % | | 131 bp | |
-300 bp | | | 117,814 | | | 20,119 | | | 21 | % | | 11.54 | % | | 144 bp | |
September 30, 2005
Net Portfolio Value
| | | | | | | | | | | NPV as of PV of Assets | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Changes In Rates | | | $ Amount | | | $ Change | | | % Change | | | NPV Ratio | | | Change | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
+300 bp | | | 64,885 | | | -44,913 | | | -38 | % | | 7.25 | % | | -359 bp | |
+200 bp | | | 79,741 | | | -30,057 | | | -24 | % | | 8.68 | % | | -216 bp | |
+100 bp | | | 93,336 | | | -16,462 | | | -11 | % | | 9.91 | % | | -94 bp | |
0 bp | | | 104,669 | | | | | | | | | 10.84 | % | | | |
-100 bp | | | 108,563 | | | -1,235 | | | 4 | % | | 11.05 | % | | 20 bp | |
-200 bp | | | 106,957 | | | -2,841 | | | 2 | % | | 10.72 | % | | -12 bp | |
-300 bp | | | 107,133 | | | -2,665 | | | 2 | % | | 10.59 | % | | -26 bp | |
The analysis at September 30, 2006, indicates that there have been no material changes in market interest rates for Mutual Federal’s interest rate sensitivity instruments which would cause a material change in the market risk exposures that effect the quantitative and qualitative risk disclosures as presented in item 7A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005.
16
ITEM - 4 Controls and Procedures.
An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a -15(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) was carried out, as of September 30, 2006, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company’s senior management. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a – 15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
17
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION |
| |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
| |
| There are no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
| |
| On December 22, 2004 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase an additional 10% of the Company’s outstanding stock, or approximately 470,000 shares. Information on the shares purchased during the third quarter of 2006 is as follows: |
| | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | | Average Price Per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plan | | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 169,460 | (1) |
July 1, 2006 - July 31, 2006 | | | 835 | | $ | 20.45 | | | 835 | | | 168,625 | |
August 1, 2006 - August 31, 2006 | | | 61,000 | | | 21.08 | | | 61,000 | | | 107,625 | |
September 1, 2006 - September 30, 2006 | | | — | | | 0 | | | — | | | 107,625 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| | | 61,835 | | $ | 21.07 | | | 61,835 | | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
(1) | Amount represents the number of shares available to be repurchased under the plan as of June 30, 2006 |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders. |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 5. | Other Information. |
| |
| None. |
| |
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
| (a) | Exhibits |
| | |
| | Exhibit 31.1 – Rule 13a – 14(a) Certification – Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | Exhibit 31.2 – Rule 13a – 14(a) Certification – Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
| | Exhibit 32 – Section 1350 - Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| MutualFirstFinancial, Inc. |
| |
| |
Date: November 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ David W. Heeter |
| |
|
| | David W. Heeter |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | |
Date: November 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Timothy J. McArdle |
| |
|
| | Timothy J. McArdle |
| | Senior Vice President and Treasurer |
| | |
19