Company who are not employees of the Company voted to approve the transaction. The Board has produced the fairness determination on behalf of the Company. Based on the Board’s considerations and recommendation, the Company reasonably believes that the Offer and the Merger are fair to the unaffiliated stockholders.”
The following paragraph is inserted as a new last paragraph under “ITEM 4. THE SOLICITATION OR RECOMMENDATION—(c) Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee; Recommendation of the Board of Directors; Fairness of the Merger—Recommendation of the Board of Directors” as follows:
“Other than the acquisition proposal from Fund C, as described in more detail under the heading “(b) Background of the Offer and the Merger” above, the Company has not received any firm offers of which the Company or any of its affiliates are aware made by any unaffiliated person, other than the Purchaser Group, during the past two years for (i) the merger or consolidation of the Company with or into another company, or vice versa, (ii) the sale or other transfer of all or any substantial part of the assets of the Company; or (iii) a purchase of the Company’s securities that would enable the holder to exercise control of the Company.”
ITEM 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
“ITEM 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION—(e) Legal Proceedings” of theSchedule 14D-9 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(e) Legal Proceedings.
On December 11, 2018, a putative class action captionedFranchi v. Intersections Inc. et al., C.A.No. 1:18-cv-01957-UNA was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the Company, members of the Board, Parent and Merger Sub. The complaint alleges that theSchedule 14D-9 omits material information with respect to the proposed transaction, which renders theSchedule 14D-9 false and misleading, and that defendants violated Sections 14(e), 14(d), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act in connection with theSchedule 14D-9. Among other things, the complaint seeks to enjoin defendants from proceeding with the proposed transaction, or in the event defendants consummate the proposed transaction, rescind it and set it aside or award the plaintiff rescissory damages, and award costs, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees. The Company believes that the plaintiff’s allegations are without merit and expects that the defendants will defend against them vigorously.”
The paragraph under “ITEM 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION—(i) Schedule13E-3” is supplemented by adding the following at the end of such paragraph:
“The Company has filed as an exhibit to its Schedule13E-3 North Point’s presentation to the Special Committee dated October 29, 2018. Notwithstanding any statements in such presentation to the contrary, North Point has consented to the use of its presentation by the Company solely for purposes of satisfying public disclosure obligations required bySchedule 13E-3.”
“ITEM 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION—(m) Certain Company Information” is supplemented by adding the following at the end of such paragraph:
Estimated Annual Cost Savings. Following the completion of the Offer and the Merger, the Company estimates that the annually recurring cost savings as a result of no longer being a publicly traded company subject to the reporting requirements of the federal securities laws will be approximately $1.8 million per year.
Summary Financial Information. The following table sets forth summary historical consolidated financial data for the Company as of and for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The selected financial data and the per Share data set forth below are extracted from, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and other financial
3