Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Principles The accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-K and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of these estimates could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to the Company’s industry, and general economic conditions. It is possible that these external conditions could have an effect on the Company’s estimates that could cause actual results to differ materially from its estimates. The Company re-evaluates all of its accounting estimates at least quarterly based on these conditions and records adjustments when necessary. Significant estimates relied upon in preparing these consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, accounts receivable reserves, inventory and related reserves, valuations and purchase price allocations related to business combinations, expected future cash flows used to evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, estimated fair values of long-lived assets used to record impairment charges related to intangible assets and goodwill, amortization periods, accrued expenses, share-based compensation, and recoverability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and any related valuation allowance. Financial Statement Reclassification The Company has recast certain prior period current liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets, consisting of accounts payable and accrued liabilities and expenses, to conform to the current period presentation. The Company also recast for the year ended December 31, 2018, $27,557 of operating expenses to cost of goods sold. This recast of operating expenses to cost of goods sold were made to more accurately reflect the absorption calculations used in the current periods. These items had no impact in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations or net cash from or used in operating, financing, or investing in its consolidated cash flow statements. Remaining Performance Obligations As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s backlog of orders that it believed to be firm was $97,310, all which the Company expects to fill during 2020. As of December 31, 2018, its backlog was $51,495, only $9,433 of which was filled during 2019, because three customers, whose orders totaled $42,062, deferred delivery; these orders remain open and those customers have not withdrawn their deposits. Cash The Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity at the date of purchase of 3 months or less to be cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable Included in “Accounts receivable” on the consolidated balance sheets are amounts primarily related to customers. The Company estimates losses on receivables based on known troubled accounts and historical experience of losses incurred. Receivables are considered impaired and written off when it is probable that all contractual payments due will not be collected in accordance with the terms of the related agreement. Based on experience and the judgment of management, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 as of December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018. Inventories Inventories, which consist of products held for resale, are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in first-out method, and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to complete and dispose of the product. If the Company identifies excess, obsolete or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to their realizable value in the period in which the impairment is first identified. Shipping and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and product shipments are recorded in cost of sales in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets. For furniture and fixtures the useful life is 7 years. Machinery, equipment, and computers are depreciated over the useful life of 3 to7 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over 2 years and were fully depreciated as of December 31, 2019. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized and repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company records intangible assets at fair value, estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. The Company amortizes intangible assets that have finite lives using either the straight-line method or based upon estimated future cash flows to approximate the pattern in which the economic benefit of the assets will be utilized. Amortization is recorded over estimated useful lives ranging from 14 to 20 years. The Company reviews intangible assets subject to amortization at least quarterly to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in the remaining useful life. Conditions that would indicate impairment and trigger a more frequent than quarterly impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate that could affect the value of an asset, or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. If the carrying value of an intangible asset exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, the Company will write down the carrying value to its fair value in the period identified. The Company generally calculates fair value as the present value of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the asset using a risk-adjusted discount rate. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the Company will amortize its remaining carrying value prospectively over its revised remaining useful life. The Company has conducted annual impairment test of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year, commencing in the year ended December 31, 2018, in which year it first acquired intangible assets. The Company operates as a single operating segment with one reporting unit and consequently evaluates goodwill for impairment based upon an evaluation of the fair value of the Company as a whole. The estimation of fair value requires significant judgment. Loss resulting from an impairment test will be reflected in operating income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The annual impairment testing process is subjective and requires judgment at many points. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges for these assets not previously recorded. In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment Intangible assets, domain names, trademarks and non-compete agreements that are deemed to have a definite life are amortized over their estimate useful lives and intangible assets with an indefinite life are assessed for impairment at least annually. Beginning in 2018, the Company has evaluated quarterly the estimated remaining useful life of its intangible assets and whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. Convertible Instruments The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities. GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free-standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. These criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not remeasured at fair value under otherwise applicable GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. The Company accounts for convertible instruments when it has been determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments as follows: the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt. The Company accounts for the conversion of convertible debt when a conversion option has been bifurcated using the general extinguishment standards. Debt- and equity-linked derivatives are removed at their carrying amounts and the shares issued are measured at their then-current fair value, with any difference recorded as a gain or loss on extinguishment of the two separate accounting liabilities. Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 20l4-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net); Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing; Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients; Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and were adopted using the modified retrospective method. Adoption of the new revenue standards did not change the Company’s revenue recognition, as the majority of its revenues continue to be recognized when the customer takes control of its product. As the Company did not identify any accounting changes that impacted the amount of reported revenues with respect to its product revenues, no adjustment to retained earnings was required upon adoption of the new revenue standards. Under the new revenue standards, the Company recognizes revenues when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services, or when they are shipped to a customer, in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to receive in exchange for them. The Company recognizes revenues following the five-step model prescribed under ASU No. 2014-09: (a) identify contract(s) with a customer; (b) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (c) determine the transaction price; (d) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (e) recognize revenues when (or as) the Company satisfies its performance obligation. Revenues from product sales are recognized when a customer obtains control of the Company’s product, which occurs at a point in time, typically upon shipment or delivery to the customer. The Company expenses incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred if the expected amortization period of the asset that it would have recognized is one year or less or the amount is immaterial. Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, were as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Revenues % Revenues % Medtainers ® $ 1,391,296 65 $ 1,374,403 62 Humidity pack inserts 357,218 17 397,875 18 Lighters 140,662 6 134,470 6 Printing 83,442 4 82,617 4 Plastic lighter holders 74,547 3 85,367 4 Shipping charges 65,542 3 86,429 4 Jars 23,370 1 21,498 1 Others 12,389 1 47,671 1 Total Revenues $ 2,148,466 100 $ 2,230,330 100 Share-Based Payments In June 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, Equity—Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Fair Value Measurements The Company has adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, is carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts of the Company’s short- and long-term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances of warrants and/or embedded conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair-value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC Topic 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable Level 3 – Inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions) As of December 31, 2018, and during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had no derivative liability. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company accounted for a derivative liability in connection with the conversion feature of convertible debt, classified as a Level 3 liability, as the only financial liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Advertising Advertising and marketing expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Income Taxes The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. ASC Topic 740.10.30 clarifies accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company has no material uncertain tax positions. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash accounts in financial institutions, which at times, may exceed the federal deposit insurance coverage of $250,000. The Company has not experienced losses on these accounts and that it is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts. The Company has not experienced losses on accounts receivable and the Company believe that it is not exposed to significant risks with respect to them. Recent accounting pronouncements In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), The Company does not believe there are any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards that would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |