OVERVIEW, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | OVERVIEW, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization Array BioPharma Inc. (also referred to as "Array," or "the Company"), incorporated in Delaware on February 6, 1998, is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of targeted small molecule drugs to treat patients afflicted with cancer. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim reporting and, as permitted under those rules, do not include all of the disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. The Company's management performed an evaluation of its activities through the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and concluded that there are no subsequent events. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 , included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, from which the Company derived its balance sheet data as of June 30, 2015 . The Company operates in one reportable segment and, accordingly, no segment disclosures have been presented herein. All of the Company's equipment, leasehold improvements and other fixed assets are physically located within the U.S., and the vast majority of its agreements with its partners are denominated in U.S. dollars. Recent Developments On March 31, 2016, the Company announced a strategic collaboration with Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation ("AKP") to develop and commercialize select Tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) inhibitors, including Array-invented ARRY-954, for pain, inflammation and other non-cancer indications. The Company received a $12.0 million up-front payment in April 2016 and may receive up to $64.0 million in additional development and commercialization milestone payments, including up to double-digit royalties on future sales. The Company will retain full commercialization rights for all compounds in all indications in territories outside of Asia and within Asia retains full rights to cancer indications for all compounds excluding those being developed by Asahi Kasei Pharma. On April 1, 2016, the Company announced its decision to discontinue the MILO study, a Phase 3 trial of binimetinib for the treatment of patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. The decision to stop the study was made after a planned interim analysis showed that the Hazard Ratio for Progression Free Survival (PFS) crossed the predefined futility boundary. Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts in the Company's unaudited condensed financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The $39.4 million balance attributable to outstanding warrants, which was presented historically as a separate item in stockholders' equity (deficit) on the Company's balance sheet, has been combined with additional paid-in capital for all periods presented in these unaudited condensed financial statements. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on the Company's historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are the basis for the Company's judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities, which in turn may impact its reported revenue and expenses. The Company's actual results could differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company believes its financial statements are most significantly impacted by the following accounting estimates and judgments: (i) identifying deliverables under collaboration and license agreements involving multiple elements and determining whether such deliverables are separable from other aspects of the contractual relationship; (ii) estimating the selling price of deliverables for the purpose of allocating arrangement consideration for revenue recognition; (iii) estimating the periods over which the allocated consideration for deliverables is recognized; (iv) estimating accrued outsourcing costs for clinical trials and preclinical testing; and (v) estimating the collectible portion of recorded accounts receivable. Liquidity With the exception of the prior fiscal year, the Company has incurred operating losses and an accumulated deficit as a result of ongoing research and development spending since inception. As of March 31, 2016 , the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $776.4 million and it had net losses of approximately $(22.7) million and $(67.8) million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 , respectively. The Company had net income of approximately $58.3 million and $22.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015 , respectively. In the third quarter of fiscal 2015, in connection with the closing of the asset transfer agreements with Novartis Pharma AG and Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd. (collectively "Novartis") relating to binimetinib and encorafenib, as discussed below under Note 3 - Collaboration and Other Agreements (the "Novartis Agreements"), the Company received an $85.0 million up-front cash payment and $5.0 million for the reimbursement of certain transaction costs, extinguished net co-development liabilities of $21.6 million and recorded deferred revenue of $6.6 million . Also during the third quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company entered into a third party agreement to complete the Novartis transactions for a net consideration payment of $25.0 million . On November 10, 2015, the Company entered into a Development and Commercialization Agreement with Pierre Fabre Medicament SAS, (“Pierre Fabre” or "PFM"), which the Company and Pierre Fabre amended and restated as of December 3, 2015 to make certain minor changes required by the European Commission on Competition (as amended and restated, the "PF Agreement"). Under the PF Agreement, the Company granted Pierre Fabre rights to commercialize binimetinib and encorafenib in all countries except for the United States, Canada, Japan, Korea and Israel, where Array retains its ownership rights. The PF Agreement satisfies the Company’s commitment to secure a development and commercialization partner for the European market for both encorafenib and binimetinib acceptable to European Commission regulatory agencies made in connection with the Novartis Agreements. In December 2015, the Company closed the PF Agreement following approval of the agreement by the European Commission on Competition. In connection with the closing, the Company recorded a $30.0 million receivable from PFM and $30.0 million in deferred revenue related to a non-refundable, upfront license payment, which the Company received in January 2016. The Company is also entitled to receive up to $415.0 million in milestone payments from PFM if certain regulatory and sales goals are achieved, and royalties on combined annual net sales. Array and Pierre Fabre have agreed to split future development costs on a 60 : 40 basis (Array:Pierre Fabre) with initial funding committed for new clinical trials in colorectal cancer and melanoma. All ongoing binimetinib and encorafenib clinical trials remain substantially funded through completion by Novartis. Unless terminated early (for breach, bankruptcy of one of the parties, or safety reasons), the PF Agreement continues as long as PFM continues to develop and commercialize the products, and PFM can terminate the PF Agreement on a region by region basis with 6 months’ notice except for the European Economic Area market. The PF Agreement also provides for customary indemnifications. The Company has historically funded its operations from up-front fees, proceeds from research and development reimbursement arrangements, and license and milestone payments received under its drug collaborations and license agreements, the sale of equity securities, and debt provided by convertible debt and other credit facilities. The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable as of March 31, 2016 will enable it to continue to fund operations in the normal course of business for at least the next 12 months. Until the Company can generate sufficient levels of cash from operations, which it does not expect to achieve in the next two years, and because sufficient funds may not be available to it when needed from existing collaborations, the Company expects that it will be required to continue to fund its operations in part through the sale of debt or equity securities, and through licensing select programs or partial economic rights that include up-front, royalty and/or milestone payments. The Company's ability to successfully raise sufficient funds through the sale of debt or equity securities or from debt financing from lenders when needed is subject to many risks and uncertainties and, even if it were successful, future equity issuances would result in dilution to its existing stockholders. The Company also may not successfully consummate new collaboration and license agreements that provide for up-front fees or milestone payments, or the Company may not earn milestone payments under such agreements when anticipated, or at all. The Company's ability to realize milestone or royalty payments under existing agreements and to enter into new arrangements that generate additional revenue through up-front fees and milestone or royalty payments is subject to a number of risks, many of which are beyond the Company's control. The Company's assessment of its future need for funding and its ability to continue to fund its operations is a forward-looking statement that is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong and that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. If the Company is unable to generate enough revenue from its existing or new collaboration and license agreements when needed or to secure additional sources of funding and receive related full and timely collections of amounts due, it may be necessary to significantly reduce the current rate of spending through reductions in staff and delaying, scaling back, or stopping certain research and development programs, including more costly late phase clinical trials on its wholly-owned programs. Insufficient liquidity may also require the Company to relinquish greater rights to product candidates at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms to the Company and its stockholders than the Company would otherwise choose in order to obtain up-front license fees needed to fund operations. These events could prevent the Company from successfully executing its operating plan and, in the future, could raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Further, as discussed in Note 4 – Long-term Debt, if at any time the Company's balance of total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at Comerica Bank and approved outside accounts falls below $22.0 million , the Company must maintain a balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at Comerica at least equivalent to the entire outstanding debt balance with Comerica, which is currently $14.6 million . The Company must also maintain a monthly liquidity ratio for the revolving line of credit with Comerica. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Company's other significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to its audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 , included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Revenue Recognition - Reimbursement Revenue The Company records as reimbursement revenue amounts received for reimbursement of costs it incurs from its license partners where Array acts as a principal, controls the research and development activities, bears credit risk and may perform part of the services required in the transactions, consistent with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605-45-15. Novartis currently provides financial support to Array in the form of reimbursement for all associated out-of-pocket costs and for one-half or more of Array’s fully-burdened full-time equivalent ("FTE") costs based on an agreed-upon FTE rate for all clinical trials involving binimetinib and encorafenib, as further discussed in Note 3 - Collaboration and Other Agreements. The gross amount of these pass-through reimbursed costs are reported as reimbursement revenue in the accompanying condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with ASC 605-45-15. The actual expenses for which the Company is reimbursed are reflected as research and development for proprietary programs. Revenue Recognition - PFM Upfront License Payment As discussed above, on November 10, 2015, the Company entered into the PF Agreement with Pierre Fabre pursuant to which the Company granted Pierre Fabre rights to commercialize binimetinib and encorafenib in all countries except for the United States, Canada, Japan, Korea and Israel, where Array will retain its ownership rights. The PF Agreement satisfies the Company’s commitment to secure a development and commercialization partner for the European market for both encorafenib and binimetinib acceptable to European Commission regulatory agencies made in connection with the Novartis Agreements. The terms of the PF Agreement include substantial ongoing collaboration and cost-sharing activities between the companies, and require Array to perform future development and commercialization activities. The Company determined that the PF Agreement does not have stand-alone value apart from these ongoing collaboration and cost-sharing activities. Accordingly, non-refundable upfront amounts received under the PF agreement are recorded as deferred revenue and are being recognized on a straight-line basis over 10 years , the period during which management expects that substantial development activities will be performed. Revenue recognized under this agreement was $750 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 ; at March 31, 2016 deferred revenue associated with this agreement was approximately $29.1 million . Revenue Recognition – AKP Upfront License Payment As discussed above, on March 31, 2016, the Company entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement with AKP. In accordance with the revenue recognition criteria under ASC Topic 605, the Company determined that the AKP agreement is a multi-deliverable arrangement with three deliverables: (1) the license rights, (2) services related to obtaining enhanced intellectual property rights through the issuance of a particular patent and (3) clinical development services. As of March 31, 2016, the earnings process related to any of these deliverables was not complete. The initial non-refundable $12.0 million license fee will be allocated to each of the three deliverables based upon their relative selling prices using best estimates and will be recognized as revenue when earned under the applicable revenue recognition guidance. The analysis of the best estimate of the selling price of the deliverables was based on the income approach, and took into account the Company’s negotiations with AKP and management’s estimates and assumptions of how a market participant would use the license, estimated market opportunity and market share, what contract research organizations would charge for clinical development services, the costs of clinical trial materials and other factors. Also considered were entity specific assumptions regarding the results of clinical trials and the likelihood of FDA approval of the licensed pre-clinical candidate. As of March 31, 2016, the Company recorded deferred revenue associated with the AKP agreement of $12.0 million . Concentration of Business Risks The following counterparties contributed greater than 10% of the Company's total revenue during at least one of the periods set forth below. The revenue from these counterparties as a percentage of total revenue was as follows: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended March 31, March 31, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Novartis 87.9 % 24.8 % 80.9 % 4.1 % Loxo 6.2 31.9 9.9 16.2 Biogen Idec — 17.5 3.0 8.8 Celgene 1.8 10.9 2.3 8.6 Oncothyreon 0.1 4.1 0.1 55.2 96.0 % 89.2 % 96.2 % 92.9 % The loss of one or more of the Company's significant partners or collaborators could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results or financial condition. Although the Company is impacted by economic conditions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors, management does not believe significant credit risk exists as of March 31, 2016 . Geographic Information The following table details revenue by geographic area based on the country in which the Company's counterparties are located (in thousands): Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended March 31, March 31, 2016 2015 2016 2015 North America $ 4,432 $ 4,937 $ 17,158 $ 37,810 Europe 38,615 1,664 77,516 1,710 Asia Pacific — — — 69 Total revenue $ 43,047 $ 6,601 $ 94,674 $ 39,589 Accounts Receivable Novartis and Asahi Kasei accounted for 80% , and 19% , respectively, of the Company's total accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2016 . Novartis accounted for approximately 95% of the Company's total accounts receivable balance as of June 30, 2015 . Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements , which clarifies the treatment of debt issuance costs from line-of-credit arrangements after the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs . In particular, ASU No. 2015-15 clarifies that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of such arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-15 during the first quarter of fiscal 2016, and its adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , an updated standard on revenue recognition. ASU No. 2014-09 provides enhancements to the quality and consistency of how revenue is reported by companies while also improving comparability in the financial statements of companies reporting using International Financial Reporting Standards or U.S. GAAP. The main purpose of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard also will result in enhanced disclosures about revenue, provide guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively and improve guidance for multiple-element arrangements. In July 2015, the FASB voted to approve a one-year deferral of the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09, which will be effective for Array in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and may be applied on a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the impact of implementation and transition approach of this standard on its financial statements. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern , which defines management's responsibility to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and requires related footnote disclosures if there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for Array for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-15 and its related disclosures. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes . ASU No. 2015-17 requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU No. 2015-17 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2015-17 will have on its balance sheet and financial statement disclosures. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . ASU No. 2016-01 requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-01 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. When adopted, the Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations . The purpose of ASU No. 2016-08 is to clarify the implementation of guidance on principal versus agent considerations. For public entities, the amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU No. 2016-08 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . Under ASU No. 2016-09, companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU No. 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. ASU No. 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU No. 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will now be allowed to withhold shares with a fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory tax rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU No. 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it was not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 will have on its financial statements. |