OVERVIEW, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | OVERVIEW, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization Array BioPharma Inc. (also referred to as "Array,","we", "us", "our" or "the Company"), incorporated in Delaware on February 6, 1998, is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of targeted small molecule cancer therapies. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim reporting and, as permitted under those rules, do not include all of the disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. The Company's management performed an evaluation of its activities through the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 , included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2016, from which the Company derived its balance sheet data as of June 30, 2016 . The Company operates in one reportable segment and, accordingly, no segment disclosures have been presented herein. All of the Company's equipment, leasehold improvements and other fixed assets are physically located within the U.S., and the vast majority of its agreements with its partners are denominated in U.S. dollars. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on the Company's historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are the basis for the Company's judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities, which in turn may impact its reported revenue and expenses. The Company's actual results could differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company believes its financial statements are most significantly impacted by the following accounting estimates and judgments: (i) identifying deliverables under collaboration and license agreements involving multiple elements and determining whether such deliverables are separable from other aspects of the contractual relationship; (ii) estimating the selling price of deliverables for the purpose of allocating arrangement consideration for revenue recognition; (iii) estimating the periods over which the allocated consideration for deliverables is recognized; (iv) estimating accrued outsourcing costs for clinical trials and preclinical testing; and (v) estimating fair value of the notes payable. Liquidity With the exception of the 2015 fiscal year, the Company has incurred operating losses and an accumulated deficit as a result of ongoing research and development spending since inception. As of March 31, 2017 , the Company had an accumulated deficit of $889.1 million and it had net losses of $35.3 million and $87.2 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 , respectively. The Company had a net loss of $92.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. The Company had net income of $9.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, primarily as a result of an $80.0 million net gain related to the return of rights to binimetinib and our acquisition of rights to encorafenib, as well as $16.3 million of realized gains from the sale of marketable securities. The Company had a net loss of $85.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The Company has historically funded its operations from upfront fees, proceeds from research and development reimbursement arrangements, and license and milestone payments received under its drug collaborations and license agreements, the sale of equity securities, and debt provided by convertible debt and other credit facilities. The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable as of March 31, 2017 will enable it to continue to fund operations in the normal course of business for at least the next 12 months. Until the Company can generate sufficient levels of cash from operations, which it does not expect to achieve in the next two years, and because sufficient funds may not be available to it when needed from existing collaborations, the Company expects that it will be required to continue to fund its operations in part through the sale of debt or equity securities, and through licensing select programs or partial economic rights that include upfront, royalty and/or milestone payments. On October 3, 2016, Array closed an underwritten public offering of 21.2 million shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $6.25 per share. The total net proceeds from the offering were $124.2 million , after underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. The Company also sells shares of its common stock to the public from time to time in an at-the-market offering under a Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald. As of March 31, 2017, the Company has received net proceeds totaling $142.6 million since September 2013 under the Sales Agreement, and the Company may sell up to $52.4 million in additional shares of common stock under the Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald. The Company's ability to successfully raise sufficient funds through the sale of debt or equity securities or from debt financing from lenders when needed is subject to many risks and uncertainties and, even if it were successful, future equity issuances would result in dilution to its existing stockholders. The Company also may not successfully consummate new collaboration and license agreements that provide for upfront fees or milestone payments, or the Company may not earn milestone payments under such agreements when anticipated, or at all. The Company's ability to realize milestone or royalty payments under existing agreements and to enter into new arrangements that generate additional revenue through upfront fees and milestone or royalty payments is subject to a number of risks, many of which are beyond the Company's control. The Company's assessment of its future need for funding and its ability to continue to fund its operations is a forward-looking statement that is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong and that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. If the Company is unable to generate enough revenue from its existing or new collaboration and license agreements when needed or to secure additional sources of funding and receive related full and timely collections of amounts due, it may be necessary to significantly reduce the current rate of spending through reductions in staff and delaying, scaling back, or stopping certain research and development programs, including more costly late phase clinical trials on its wholly-owned programs. Insufficient liquidity may also require the Company to relinquish greater rights to product candidates at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms to the Company and its stockholders than the Company would otherwise choose in order to obtain upfront license fees needed to fund operations. These events could prevent the Company from successfully executing its operating plan and, in the future, could raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Further, as discussed in Note 4 – Debt - Silicon Valley Bank Term Loan , the Company is required to maintain during the term of the loan agreement a balance of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank plus eligible accounts of at least two times the entire outstanding debt balance with Silicon Valley Bank, which is currently $15.0 million . Concentration of Business Risks The following counterparties contributed greater than 10% of the Company's total revenue during at least one of the periods set forth below. The revenue from these counterparties as a percentage of total revenue was as follows: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended March 31, March 31, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Novartis Pharmaceuticals 79.7 % 87.9 % 74.1 % 80.9 % Loxo Oncology 6.1 % 6.2 % 11.4 % 9.9 % 85.8 % 94.1 % 85.5 % 90.8 % The loss of one or more of the Company's significant partners or collaborators could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results or financial condition. Although the Company is impacted by economic conditions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors, management does not believe significant credit risk exists as of March 31, 2017 . Geographic Information The following table details revenue by geographic area based on the country in which the Company's counterparties are located (in thousands): Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended March 31, March 31, 2017 2016 2017 2016 North America $ 3,200 $ 4,432 $ 16,826 $ 17,158 Europe 29,223 38,615 97,564 77,516 Asia Pacific 857 — 2,684 — Total revenue $ 33,280 $ 43,047 $ 117,074 $ 94,674 Accounts Receivable Novartis Pharmaceutical Ltd. and Novartis Pharma AG (collectively, "Novartis") accounted for 80.2% and 85% of the Company's total accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016 , respectively. Pierre Fabre Medicament SAS ("Pierre Fabre") accounted for 13.0% and 5.4% of the Company's total accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016 , respectively. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Company's other significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to its audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 , included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Equity Investments Prior to September 30, 2016, the shares of preferred stock of VentiRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("VentiRx") that the Company received under a February 2007 collaboration and licensing agreement with VentiRx had a recorded cost of $1.5 million . The Company did not have a controlling interest nor did it exert significant influence over VentiRx. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, a triggering event occurred related to the underlying viability of the investment, which caused the Company to record a $1.5 million impairment loss related to this investment at that time. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, Celgene Corporation acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of VentiRx, and the Company received $0.5 million as its share of proceeds from this acquisition and recorded a corresponding realized gain of $0.5 million . Fair Value Measurements The Company follows accounting guidance on fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as for certain assets and liabilities that are initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses the following three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs to value our financial instruments: Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.Estimated fair values of financial instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, where the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires us to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability. The use of different assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair values. Accordingly, the fair value estimates disclosed or initial amounts recorded may not be indicative of the amount that we or holders of the instruments could realize in a current market exchange. Certain of the Company's financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, but are recorded at amounts that approximate their fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature, such as cash, accounts receivable and payable, and other financial instruments in current assets or current liabilities. Notes Payable Fair Value Option As described further in Note 4 - Debt - Notes Payable , in September 2016, the Company issued Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes to Redmile Capital Offshore Fund II, Ltd. and Redmile Biopharma Investments I, L.P. in the aggregate original principal amount of $10.0 million . The Company has elected the fair value option to account for these notes due to the complexity and number of embedded features. Accordingly, the Company records these notes at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. As a result of applying the fair value option, direct costs and fees related to the notes were recognized in earnings (as "change in fair value of notes payable") as incurred and were not deferred. Stock-Based Compensation Previously, FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, ASC 718 , required forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differed from those estimates. FASB subsequently issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09") , which allows an entity to elect as an accounting policy either to continue to estimate the total number of awards for which the requisite service period will not be rendered or to account for forfeitures when they occur. In the third quarter of 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 and elected to modify its accounting policy to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company applied this change in accounting policy on a modified retrospective basis, with July 1, 2016 as the effective date of adoption. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings which resulted in an increase to accumulated deficit of $0.4 million with an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital (zero net total equity impact) as of the date of adoption. These adjustments were principally related to additional stock compensation expense that would have been recognized under ASC 718 on unvested outstanding options and restricted stock units that were unadjusted for estimated forfeitures. The Company classifies the excess tax benefits from employee stock plans as a reduction from financing cash flows for all periods presented. In addition, under ASU 2016-09, previously unrecognized deferred tax assets were recognized on a modified retrospective basis as of July 1, 2016. As a result, the Company recorded approximately $5.5 million of additional deferred tax assets, which are fully offset by a valuation allowance. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , which requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The FASB subsequently issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customer (Topic 606) Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, to address issues arising from implementation of the new revenue recognition standard. ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-10 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning July 1, 2018, and may be adopted earlier, but not before July 1, 2017. The revenue standards are required to be adopted by taking either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2014-09 and 2016-10 will have on the Company’s financial statements and determining the transition method, including the period of adoption, that it will apply. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern , which defines management's responsibility to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and requires related footnote disclosures if there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for Array for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2017, and for annual and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt ASU No. 2014-15 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and does not anticipate that it will have a material impact on its financial statements and related disclosures. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . ASU No. 2016-01 requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-01 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. The Company does not anticipate that ASU No. 2016-02 will have a material impact on its financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . The amendment is to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU No. 2016-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim reporting periods within those reporting periods. The Company early adopted ASU No. 2016-09 during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 using the modified retrospective transition method, as described above under Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Stock-Based Compensation . In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments . The amendments in this ASU replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. ASU 2016-13 requires that companies record expected credit losses relating to financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis and available-for-sale debt securities through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 limits the amount of credit losses to be recognized for available-for-sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and also requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses when estimated credit losses declines. The new standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption will be available for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the impact that ASU 2016-13 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) . This amendment will provide guidance on the presentation and classification of specific cash flow items to improve consistency within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-15 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash . The new guidance requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. If restricted cash is presented separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet, companies will be required to reconcile the amounts presented on the statement of cash flows to the amounts on the balance sheet. Companies will also need to disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2016-18 will have a material impact on its financial statements upon adoption. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business . The amendments in this ASU clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2017-01 will have a material impact on its financial statements upon adoption. |