This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule14D-9 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, this “Schedule14D-9”) filed by Array BioPharma Inc. (“Array”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 28, 2019, relating to the tender offer by Arlington Acquisition Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Pfizer”), to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), other than Excluded Shares and Converted Shares (each as defined in the Merger Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2019, among Array, Pfizer and Purchaser) of Array for a purchase price of $48.00 per Share in cash, net to the seller without interest thereon and subject to any withholding of taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, filed by Pfizer and Purchaser with the SEC on June 28, 2019 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and in the related Letter of Transmittal, filed by Pfizer and Purchaser with the SEC on June 28, 2019 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal,” which, together with the Offer to Purchase, constitute the “Offer”).
Except to the extent specifically provided in this Amendment, the information set forth in this Schedule 14D-9 remains unchanged. Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in thisSchedule 14D-9. This Amendment is being filed to reflect certain updates as reflected below.
ITEM 8. | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
Item 8 of this Schedule14D-9 is hereby amended and supplemented by deleting the paragraph under the heading “—Legal Proceedings” on page 43 of this Schedule14D-9 and replacing it with the following paragraph:
On July 1, 2019, a purported stockholder of Array filed a putative class action lawsuit against Array, its directors, Pfizer and Purchaser in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captionedMichael Kent v. Array BioPharma Inc., et al., Case No.1:19-cv-01248 (the “Kent Complaint”). Additionally, on July 2, 2019 another purported stockholder of Array filed a lawsuit against Array, its directors, Pfizer and Purchaser in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captionedElaine Wang v. Array BioPharma Inc., et al., Case No.1:19-cv-06168. The complaints allege that all defendants, including Pfizer and Purchaser, violated Sections 14(d) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule14d-9 promulgated thereunder because the Schedule14D-9 is materially deficient, and that Array’s directors (acting in their capacity as control persons of Array) and, solely in the Kent Complaint, Pfizer (which the Kent Complaint alleges should also be deemed to be a control person of Array for purposes of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act), violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by filing a materially deficient Schedule14D-9. Each of the complaints seeks, among other things, (i) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Transactions, (ii) rescissory damages or rescission in the event the Transactions are consummated and (iii) plaintiffs’ attorneys’ and experts’ fees. The defendants believe the claims asserted in the complaints are without merit.