See Accompanying Notes to these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
TARA GOLD RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1.
Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation an d Organization
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Tara Gold Resources Corp. (the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Significant accounting policies disclosed therein have not changed except as noted below.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote information are unaudited. In the opinion of management, they include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the condensed consolidated results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Results of operations reported for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.
The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral resource properties in United States of America and Mexico. The Company owns 100% of the common stock of Corporacion Amermin, S.A. de C.V. In May 2006, the Company established Tara Minerals Corp, which owns 99.9% of American Metal Mining (“AMM”). Tara Minerals organized Adit Resources (“Adit”) in June 2009 and owns 90% Adit’s common stock as of September 30, 2010. Adit in turns owns 99.9% of American Copper Mining, S.A. de C.V. (“ACM”), which was established in December 2006; ACM operates in Mexico and was purchased in June 2009. Corporacion Amermin and AMM are Mexican corporations. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company owned 75% and 80%, respectively, of the outstanding shares of Tara Minerals.
As used in these Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the terms the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” and similar terms refer to Tara Gold Resources, Corp. and, unless the context indicates otherwise its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company’s subsidiaries include Corporacion Amermin, S.A. de C.V., which operates in México (“Amermin”) and Tara Minerals Corp.
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the Company include the operation of its subsidiaries and all references to Adit i nclude the operations of its subsidiary.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its subsidiaries and variable interest entities (“VIE”) over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and we are considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of the VIE consolidates the entity if control is achieved through means other than voting rights such as certain capital structures and contractual relationships. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing industry practice. At September 30, 2010 the Company has no joint ventures or VIEs.
The reporting currency of the Company, Tara Minerals and Adit is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of Amermin, AMM and ACM is the Mexican Peso. As a result, the financial statements of the subsidiaries have been re-measured from Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars using (i) current exchange rates for monetary asset and liability accounts, (ii) historical exchange rates for nonmonetary asset and liability accounts, (iii) historical exchange rates for revenues and expenses associated with nonmonetary assets and liabilities and (iv) the weighted average exchange rate of the reporting period for all other revenues and expenses. In addition, foreign currency transaction gains and losses resulting from U.S. dollar denominated transactions are eliminated. The resulting re-measurement gain or loss is recorded as other comprehensive income (loss).
9
The financial statements of the Mexican subsidiaries should not be construed as representations that Mexican pesos have been, could have been or may in the future be converted into U.S. dollars at such rates or any other rates. Current and historical exchange rates are not indicative of what future exchange rates will be and should not be construed as such.
Relevant exchange rates used in the preparation of the financial statements of the subsidiaries are as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (denoted in Mexican pesos per one U .S. dollar):
| |
| 2010 |
Current exchange rate at September 30, | Ps. 12.4801 |
Weighted average exchange rate for the nine months ended September 30, | Ps. 12.7178 |
| |
| 2009 |
Current exchange rate at September 30, | Ps. 13.5513 |
Weighted average exchange rate for the nine months ended September 30, | Ps. 13.6581 |
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Each period the Company analyzes its receivables for collectability. When a receivable is determined to not be collectible the receivable is allowed for until there is assurance of its collection or that a write off is necessary. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company has allowed $442,999 and $374,116, respectively, relating to other receivables, since it was determined that the Mexican government m ay not allow the complete refund of value added taxes (“VAT”) previously paid by the Company
Mexican Income Tax Rates: Recoverable Value Added Taxes (IVA) and Income Tax (ISR)
Effective January 1, 2010 the Mexican government increased Impuesto al Valor Agregado taxes (IVA) from 15% to 16% and Impuesto Sobre la Renta (ISR) from 28% to 30%. These financial statements reflect these increases.
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications reported in prior records, which hav e no effect on net loss, have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. Specifically, certain items in the Operating Activities section of the Statement of Cash Flows have been reclassified between categories in the inception to date column for clearer presentation.
Fair Value Accounting
As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
| | |
| Level 1 | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or l iabilities; |
| | |
| Level 2 | Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; |
| | |
| Level 3 | Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). |
10
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
The Company considers all highly-liquid investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company has no cash equivalents at September 30, 20 10 and December 31, 2009.
All investments with stated maturities of greater than three months are classified as marketable securities. The Company had $650,000 and $450,000 in marketable securities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These marketable securities had a cost basis of $646,875 and $450,000 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In accordance with the Comprehensive Income topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has accounted for unrealized gain (loss) as a component of other comprehensive income. An unrealized gain of $3,125 and $33,762 was recorded in other comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively.
Concentrations
The Company maintains cash balances at highly-rated financial institutions in the United States. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. The Company had zero bank accounts and three bank accounts in excess of $250,000, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses in these accounts.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance to amend the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair valu e measurements. The guidance requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices in active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers. The guidance became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance does not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events to alleviate potential conflicts between FASB guidance and SEC requirements. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and t he Company adopted these new requirements for the period ended March 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Issued
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance to amend the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). The guidance will become effective for the Company with the reporting period beginning July 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial sta tements.
11
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not have, or are not believed by management will have, a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
Note 2.
Property, plant, equipment, mine development and land
| | |
| September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 |
| (Unaudited) | (Audited) |
| | |
Land | $ 19,590 | $ 19,590 |
| | |
Mining concessions (a): | | |
La Currita | 1,253,439 | 1,253,439 |
Las Minitas | 2,336,059 | 2,292,428 |
Pilar | 728,313 | 728,313 |
Don Roman | 521,739 | 521,739 |
Las Nuvias | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Picacho | 1,250,000 | 4,564,331 |
Centenario | 1,919,282 | 1,905,472 |
Las Brisas | 3,134 | 3,134 |
Mezquite and Mariana | 168,298 | 166,599 |
Auriferos | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Pirita | 246,455 | 245,270 |
Picacho Fractions | 206,719 | 206,719 |
Mining concessions | 8,833,438 | 12,087,444 |
| | |
Property, plant and equipment (b) | 3,883,343 | 1,144,834 |
| 12,736,371 | 13,251,868 |
Less – accumulated depreciation | (280,496) | (111,280) |
| $ 12,455, 875 | $ 13,140,588 |
a.
Mining Concessions
Mining concessions as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:
i)
In March 2006, the Company acquired the rights to 23 concessions, known as “Las Minitas”. The effective purchase price of the properties is $2,663,913.
As of September 30, 2010, the resulting debt payment schedule, including applicable value added tax, is as follow:
| |
2010 | $ 22,500 |
2012 | 1,938,657 |
| $ 1,961,157 |
In accordance with the Interest Expense topic of FASB ASC, the future payments of the total payment amount of $2,150,000 have been discounted using the incremental borrowing rate of 3.56%. As of September 30, 2010, the present value of future payments on the Las Minitas contract is as follows:
| | | | | |
| Debt | | IVA | | Total |
Future payments | $ 1,750,000 | | $ 302,500 | | $ 2,052,500 |
Imputed interest | (91,343) | | - | | (91,343) |
Present value of debt | 1,658,657 | | 302,500 | | 1,961,157 |
Less: current portion | - | | (22,500) | | (22,500) |
| $ 1,658,657 | | $ 280,000 | | $ 1,938,657 |
12
In addition to the $2,150,000 above, the Company capitalized $173,913 in payments made toward the original agreement. Pursuant to the agreement signed in April 2007 this payment could not be applicable to the purchase price. Accordingly, the effective purchase price of the properties is $2,663,913.
No payments were made after February 2008 and as of January 13, 2011, the Company is actively working with the note holder to renegotiate the agreement.
ii)
In January 2007, the Company acquired the rights to the six concessions, known as “Picacho”. Due to economic circumstances relating to the current recession, the Company failed to make a payment due in November 2008 and the concession was returned to the third party note holder on June 16, 2009.
In July 2009 Tara Minerals agreed to acquire the Picacho claims from a third party, which then included the Dos Amigos and Unification Rey de Oro concessions, for $4,800,000, plus value-added tax of $720,000. Tara Minerals paid $575,000 of the purchase price in June 2009. The $575,000 paid in June 2009 was borrowed from the Company by Tara Minerals.
In July 2009 Tara Minerals transferred the Picacho prospect to Adit. In connection with the transfer of the prospect, Adit issued Tara Minerals a promissory note in the principal amount of $650,000 to compensate Tara Minerals for its down payment toward the purchase price of the property and to reimburse Tara Minerals for other amounts advanced on behalf of Adit. The note is unsecured, bears interest at 3.25% per year, and is due and payable on June 30, 2011. In December 2009 Adit paid an installment of $278,500 (which included applicable value added taxes) toward the purchase.
In March 2010, Adit, on behalf of ACM, and the note holder agreed to reduce the purchase of the Picacho concession to $1,250,000. Under the revised agreement, Adit paid the vendor $500,000 in cash (plus applicable taxes) as final consideration for the mining concession. These changes resulted in the following: 1) decrease debt by $3,324,48 5; and 2) decrease recoverable value-added taxes by $508,814. At September 30, 2010 the amended purchase price had been paid in full.
In March 2010, Adit purchased technical data pertaining to the Picacho Prospect from the prospect’s former owner in consideration for the issuance to the former owner of 437,500 shares of Tara Minerals’ common stock and 320,000 shares of Adit’s common stock. The technical data includes engineering reports, maps, assessment reports, exploration samples certificates, surveys, environmental studies and other miscellaneous information pertaining to the Picacho Prospect. As of September 30, 2010 the Picacho Prospect did not have any proven reserves. As such, the information purchased was considered research and development pertaining to a developing mine and in accordance with the ASC Research and Development (R&D) Topic - R&D is expense d when incurred. The parties agreed that the value of the stock for the technical data was $2.25 per share for Adit stock and $4.00 per share for the Tara Minerals’ common stock. Tara Minerals has accounted for the shares at their fair market value as follows: 320,000 shares of Adit’s common stock were valued at $0.75 per share, and 437,500 shares of Tara Minerals’ common stock were valued at $2.25 per share. All fair market values were determined based on contemporaneous stock issuances for cash or if the stock was quoted on an exchange, it’s closing stock price. All stock was issued April 2010.
iii)
In November 2008, Tara Minerals acquired eight mining concessions, known as “Centenario”. The acquisition price of the p roperty, as amended, was $1,675,044, plus $266,001 of value added tax.
The resulting debt payments schedule, including applicable value added tax, is as follow:
| |
2010 | $ 251,874 |
2011 | 551,673 |
2012 | 698,474 |
| $ 1,502,021 |
13
In accordance with the Interest Expense topic of FASB ASC, the future payments of the total payment amount of $1,675,044 have been discounted using the incremental borrowing rate of 2.97%. As of September 30, 2010, the present value of future payments on the Centenario contract is as follows:
| | | | | |
| Debt | | IVA | | Total |
Future payments | $ 1,364,429 | | $ 218,309 | | $ 1,582,738 |
Imputed interest | (80,717) | | - | | (80,717) |
Present value of debt | 1,283,712 | | 218,309 | | 1,502,021 |
Less: current portion | (446,088) | | (80,000) | | (526,088) |
| $ 837,624 | | $ 138,309 | | $ 975,933 |
iv)
In March 2008, Pershimco Resources transferred the Mariana and Mezquite properties to Tara Gold, as well as the remaining debt payments of $190,000, which includes value added taxes of $25,907 owed to a third party.
The remaining debt payment schedule, including applicable value added tax, is as follow:
| |
2010 | $ 29,676 |
2011 | 117,171 |
| $ 146,847 |
In accordance with the Interest Expense topic of FASB, the future payments of the total payment amount of $190,000 have been discounted using the incremental borrowing rate of 2.97%. As of September 30, 2010, the present value of future payments on the Mariana and Mezquite contract is as follows:
| | | | | |
| Debt | | IVA | | Total |
Future payments | $ 129,310 | | $ 20,690 | | $ 150,000 |
Imputed interest | (3,153) | | - | | (3,153) |
Present value of debt | 126,157 | | 20,690 | | 146,847 |
Less: current portion | (54,447) | | (9,044) | | (63,491) |
| $ 71,710 | | $ 11,646 | | $ 83,356 |
As of January 13, 2011 the Company was in negotiations to amend to its agreements with all vendors relating to Mariana and Mesquite Prospect.
v)
In June 2009, Tara Minerals acquired the rights to three mining concessions, known as “Pirita”. The acquisition price of the property was $250,000 plus value added taxes of $30,000; $50,000 was paid cash and $200,000 plus value added taxes of $30,000 were financed.
The resulting debt payment schedule, including applicable value added tax, is as follow:
| | |
2010 | $ | 84,477 |
2011 | | 85,978 |
| $ | 170,455 |
In accordance with the Interest Expense topic of FASB ASC, the future payments of the total payment amount of $200,000 have been discounted using the incremental borrowing r ate of 2.76%. As of September 30, 2010, the present value of future payments on the Pirita contract is as follows:
| | | | | |
| Debt | | IVA | | Total |
Future payments | $ 150,000 | | $ 24,000 | | $ 174,000 |
Imputed interest | (3,545) | | - | | (3,545) |
Present value of debt | 146,455 | | 24,000 | | 170,455 |
Less: cu rrent portion | (146,455) | | (24,000) | | (170,455) |
| $ - | | $ - | | $ - |
b) Other Fixed Assets
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Tara Minerals and it subsidiaries purchased equipment and other fixed assets in the normal course of business. During the 6 months ended June 30, 2010, Tara Minerals finished th e construction of the plant at the Don Roman mine.
Note 3.
Notes Payable
The following table represents the outstanding balance of loans for the Company as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
| | |
| September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 |
| (Unaudited) | (Audited) |
| | |
Mining concessions | $ 3,350,524 | $ 7,274,400 |
Non-related parties loans, net of debt discount of $97,292 and $0 at September 30, 2010 and December 30, 2009, respectively | 382,708 | - |
Auto loans | 126,320 | - |
Equipment | 72,848 | - |
| 3,932,400 | 7,274,400 |
Less – current portion | (1,269,586) | (1,106,052) |
Total long term notes payable | $ 2,662,814 | $ 6,168,348 |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 various non-related parties loaned Tara Minerals a total of $480,000. The notes bear interest at 10% per year, and are due and payable six months after the promissory note date. In December 2010, Tara Minerals elected to extend the notes to June 15, 2011. The interest will increase to 12% from and after December 15, 2010. As further consideration for extending credit to Tara Minerals, each note holder received a warrant that entitles them to purchase 380,000 shares of Tara Minerals’ restricted common stock at a price of $1.20 per share. The warrant may be exercised at any time on or prior to June 15, 2013. As of September 30, 2010 the debt discount associated with the notes is $97,292 (see Note 7).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, AMM financed the purchase of three Ford F-150's, one Ford F-250, one Ford-350 and one Courier Pick-Ups to be used in operations for $128,750. The loan is for 48 months. As of September 30, 2010 the outstanding balance of the loan was $126,320.
In July 2010, AMM financed the purchase of mining equipment for $98,500 plus IVA of $15,760 to be used in operations. AMM gave a down payment of $20,000 plus IVA of $3,200. The terms of the note are as follows: five monthly payments of $15,700 plus IVA. As of September 30, 2010 the outstanding balance of the note is $72,848 including IVA.
Note 4.
Balances and transactions with related parties
Balances with related parties are as follows:
| | |
| September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 |
Due (to) from related parties | $ (194,314) | $ 354,247 |
In accordance to the receivables from related parties Tara Minerals allowed for $632,000, as of September 30, 2010, of receivables that were outstanding for more than a year and deemed uncollectable. The remaining change in due to related parties is primarily due to officers of the Company having reimbursable expenses to the Company that were not remitted to the officers. All transactions with related parties have occurred in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount.
As of September 30, 2010 the Company had loaned Tara Minerals $1,826,900. There are no terms to this intercompany payable and it is due on demand. This is an intercompany transaction that eliminates during the consolidation of these financial statements.
15
In March 2010, Adit acquired technical data pertaining to the Picacho Prospect, mentioned in Note 2 (ii) above. Adit paid for the Tara Minerals shares used in the acquisition by means of a note in the principal amount of $1,750,000. The note bears interest at 6% per year and is due and payable on March 31, 2012. Tara Minerals may convert the outstanding principal, plus accrued interest, into shares of Adit’s common stock. Tara Minerals will receive one share of Adit’s common stock for each $1.00 of principal and interest converted. This is an intercompany transaction that eliminates during the consolidation of these financial statements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 an officer of Tara Minerals loaned the Company $50,000. The note bears interest at 10% per year, and is due and payable six months after the promissory note date. In December 2010, the Company elected to extend this note to June 25, 2011. The interest will increase to 12% on December 15, 2010. As further consideration for extending credit to Tara Minerals, the officer received a warrant that entitles him to purchase 50,000 shares of Tara Minerals’ restricted common stock at a price of $1.20 per share. The warrant may be exercised at any time on or prior to June 15, 2013. As of September 30, 2010 the debt discount associated with the note is $10,098 (see Note 7).
On July 28, 2010 Adit borrowed $100,000 from an officer of Adit. The note bears interest at 3.25% per year due and payable on December 31, 2010, the note was extended to December 31, 2011.
Note 5.
Stockholders’ Equity
The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 150,000,000 shares of common shares with par value of $0.001.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company did not issue shares of common stock.
Net loss per common share
Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of FASB ASC. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic loss per share. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted averaged number of shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised, such as options, warrants and convertible debt.
At September 30, 2010, the Company had a net loss resulting in no dilution of any common stock equivalents.
Note 6.
Non-controlling Interest
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 Tara Minerals issued the following to third parties resulting in an increase in non-controlling interest of the Company:
·
100,000 shares for officer bonuses valued at $157,000;
·
1,540,000 shares issued for investor relations and other services valued at $3,099,050;
·
1,592,389 shares issued for cash and with warrants attached valued at $980,043 (inclusive of 131,053 shares for $262,106 in association with the March 2010 Private Placement); and,
·
437,500 shares valued at $984,375 for exploration expenses, Technical Data relating to Picacho.
Tara Minerals stock payable at September 30, 2010 was $671,500 for 622,200 shares.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 Adit issued the following to third parties resulting in an increase in non-controlling interest of the Company:
·
347,309 shares for cash $260,482; and
·
320,000 shares valued at $240,000 for exploration expenses, Technical D ata relating to Picacho.
Adit’s stock payable at September 30, 2010 increased by:
·
Engaged services for $26,145 which increased subscribed stock for 20,805 shares.
16
| | |
| Non-controlling interest at September 30, 2010 | Non-controlling interest at December 31, 2009 |
Tara Minerals: | | |
January 2007 private placement | $ 2,540,500 | $ 2,540,500 |
Equipment | 600,000 | 600,000 |
Shares issued with warrants and exercised warrants | 2,093,437 | 1,375,500 |
Shares issued for services and bonuses | 3,722,526 | 353,976 |
March 2009 private placement | 458,000 | 458,000 |
March 2010 private placement | 262,106 | - |
Shares acquired by the Company from a third party | (1,073,875) | (1,073,875) |
Cumulative statement of operations pickup through December 31, 2009 | (1,189,195) | (1,189,195) |
Statement of operations pickup 2010 | (3,904,887) | - |
Exploration expenses paid | 984,375 | - |
Warrants and options to third parties (see footnote 7) | 7,612,235 | - |
Share subscriptions | 671,500 | - |
Adit: | | |
July 2009 private placement | 1,499,500 | 1,239,018 |
Finder’s fees | 11,879 | 11,879 |
Share subscriptions | 383,338 | 357,272 |
Statement of operations pickup 2010 | (304,043) | - |
Exploration expenses paid with stock | 240,000 | - |
ACM: | | |
Non-controlling interest | 4 | - |
Total non-controlling interest | $ 14,607,400 | $ 4,673,075 |
Note 7.
Options and Warrants
On February 1, 2007, Tara Minerals adopted the following stock option plans:
·
Incentive Stock Option Plan (for up to 1,000,000 shares)
·
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (for up to 3,000,000 shares, as amended)
·
Stock Bonus Plan (for up to 750,000 shares)
In July 2008, Tara Minerals filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register the shares issuable upon the exercise of Incentive Stock and Nonqualified Stock Option as well as any shares that may be issued pursuant to the Stock Bonus Plan.
In February 2007, Tara Minerals granted 1,000,000 options under its Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for 1,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.05 to two of Tara Minerals’ officers for compensation which orig inally expired February 1, 2010. In January 2010, the expiration date of these options was extended to February 2012. In the first quarter of 2010, the Company recognized an additional $889,031 in stock compensation associated with the extension of the expiration date.
In January 2010, Tara Minerals granted 750,000 options under it Incentive Stock Option Plan for 750,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.57 to two of Tara Minerals’ officers for compensation. These options vest at various times until January 2017 and begin expiring at various times beginning January 2015. The vested amount of these options was valued at $182,735.
In January 2010, Tara Minerals granted 1,250,000 options under it Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for 1, 250,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.05 to three of Tara Minerals’ officers for compensation. These options vested immediately and expire January 2015. These options were valued at $2,334,201.
17
In 2010, Tara Minerals granted 1,000,000 options for 1,000,000 shares of common stock for investor relations services with an exercise price of $2.15 a share, vesting throughout 2010 with a total value of $2,684,028. During the second quarter of 2010, the number of options granted was reduced to 500,000 with no increment al compensation cost.
Warrants issued in relation to investment relation agreements vest at various rates starting in the second quarter of 2010. At September 30, 2010 all warrants were vested.
Warrants issued in relation to debt may be exercised at any time on or prior to June 15, 2013.
The fair value of each option/warrant award discussed above is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on volatilities from Tara Minerals’ traded common stock. The expected term of options granted is estimated at half of the contractual term as noted in the ind ividual option/warrant agreements and represents the period of time that management anticipates option/warrants granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for the periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury bond rate in effect at the time of grant for bonds with maturity dates at the estimated term of the options.
| |
| 2010 |
Expected volatility | 208.37% - 92.53% |
Weighted-average volatility | 208.67% |
Expected dividends | 0 |
Expected term (in years) | 0.75 – 3 |
Risk-free rate | 0.25% - 1.57% |
A summary of option activity under the Option Plans as of September 30, 2010, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:
| | | | |
Options | Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | 1,000,000 | $ 0.05 | | |
Granted | 3,650,000 | 0.97 | &nbs p; | |
Exercised | (20,000) | 1.00 | | |
Forfeited or expired | (1,000,000) | 0.05 | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 | 3,630,000 | $ 0.52 | 4.0 | $ 3,657,000 |
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 | 2,805,000 | $ 1.01 | 4.0 | $ 3,522,000 |
| | |
Nonvested Options | Options | Weighted -Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 | - | $ - |
Granted | 3,650,000 | 1.50 |
Vested | (2,825,000) | 1.52 |
Forfeited | - | - |
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 | 825,000 | $ 1.50 |
18
A summary of warrant activity as of September 30, 2010, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:
| | | | |
Warrants | Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | 3,222,500 | $ 0.65 | * | |
Granted | 2,908,253 | 1.61 | | |
Exercised | (1,532,336) | 1.09 | | |
Forfeited or expired | (500,164) | 2.15 | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 | 4,098,253 | $ 1.38 | 1.0 | $1,468,748 |
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 | 4,098,253 | $ 1.26 | 1.0 | $1,468,748 |
| | |
Nonvested Warrants | Warrants | Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 | - | $ - |
Granted | 2,908,253 | 1.87 |
Vested | (2,408,253) | 1.54 |
Forfeited | (500,000) | 2.15 |
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 | - | $ - |
Note 8.
Fair Value
The Company's financial assets and liabilities, measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy, are shown below. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
| | | | | |
| | Fair Value at September 30, 2010 |
| | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Assets: | | | | | |
Marketable Securities | | $ 650,000 | $ - | $ - | $ 650,000 |
Total | | $ 650,000 | $ - | $ - | $ 650,000 |
| | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | |
Tot al due from related parties | | $ 194,314 | $ 194,314 | $ - | $ - |
Notes payable, related parties | | 139,902 | 139,902 | - | - |
Notes payable, | | 3,932,400 | 3,932,400 | - | - |
Total | | $ 4,266,616 | $ 4,266,616 | $ - | $ - |
19
| | | | | |
| | Fair Value at December 31, 2009 |
| | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Assets: | | | | | |
Marketable Securities | | $ 450,000 | $ - | $ - | $ 450,000 |
Total due from related parties | | 354,247 | 354,247 | - | - |
Total | | $ 804,247 | $ 354,247 | $ - | $ 450,000 |
| | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | |
Notes payable | | $ 7,274,400 | $ 7,274,400 | $ - | $ - |
Total | | $ 7,274,400 | $ 7,274,400 | $ - | $ - |
Note 9.
Subsequent Events
a.
Subsequent to September 30, 2010, Tara Minerals had the following stock transactions:
o
issued 2,304,279 shares of common stock for $1,131,500 in cash and
o
issued 149,361 shares of common stock for services rendered, valued at $176,099.
20