UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to _________
Commission File Number:000-28915
Sonoran Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington, United States
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
13-4093341
(I.R.S. Employer ID Number)
14180 Dallas Parkway, Ste 400, Dallas, TX 75254
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
214-389-3480
(Issuer's telephone number)
3100 W. Ray Road, Ste 130, Chandler, AZ 85226
(Old address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
480-963-8800
(Old telephone number)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES NO X
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES NO X
The number of shares outstanding of the Company's no par common stock as of October 31, 2006 was 84,524,163.
Traditional Small Business Disclosure Format:
YES NO X
CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
SONORAN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the Periods Ended October 31, 2006 and 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
�� &n bsp; PAGE
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) | F-1 |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) | F-2 |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) | F-3 |
| |
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | F-4 |
| |
| |
SONORAN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
| | |
| October 31, 2006 | April 30, 2006 |
Assets | | |
Current assets: | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 78,642 | $ 4,832,327 |
Accounts receivable | 551,621 | 433,233 |
Prepaid and other current assets | 80,767 | 161,376 |
Total current assets | 711,030 | 5,426,936 |
| | |
Oil and gas properties - full cost method: | | |
Proved, less accumulated depletion of $510,143 and $260,503, respectively | 10,552,357 | 3,494,614 |
Unproved, less impairment charge of $71,078 for both years | 18,062,321 | 19,053,245 |
Property, less accumulated depreciation of $96,744 and $73,787, respectively, (Note 1) | 75,237 | 98,194 |
Total capital assets | 28,689,915 | 22,646,053 |
| | |
Other assets (Note 2): | | |
Certificate of deposit | 300,000 | 350,000 |
Prepaid rent, net of current portion | 57,599 | 70,400 |
Loan fees | 50,000 | - |
Prepaid legal settlement | 565,329 | 247,533 |
Deferred finance charge | 204,751 | 307,126 |
Goodwill | 394,585 | 394,585 |
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $21,000 and $0, respectively | 189,000 | 210,000 |
Total other assets | 1,761,264 | 1,579,644 |
| | |
| $ 31,162,209 | $ 29,652,633 |
| | |
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity/(Deficit) | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | | |
Accounts payable | $ 7,192,065 | $ 3,396,601 |
Accounts payable - ad valorem tax | 278,874 | 219,973 |
Indebtedness to related parties (Note 3) | 56,342 | 75,339 |
Accrued expenses | 380,190 | 464,776 |
Convertible debentures, net of discount of $112,278 and $202,100, respectively (Note 4) | 1,638,894 | 1,549,072 |
Loans payable (Note 5) | 114,273 | 119,214 |
Total current liabilities | 9,660,638 | 5,824,975 |
| | |
Long-term liabilities: | | |
Deferred rent | 29,376 | 30,730 |
Convertible debentures, net of discount of $38,156 (Note 4) | 231,644 | - |
Deferred gains on oil and gas property sales | 484,046 | 484,046 |
Deferred commission payable | 250,000 | 250,000 |
Asset retirement obligation (Note 6) | 829,511 | 795,589 |
| 1,824,577 | 1,560,365 |
| | |
| | |
Contingencies | - | - |
| | |
Shareholders' equity/(deficit) (Note 8): | | |
Series "A" convertible preferred stock, no par value, 25,000,000 | | |
shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding | - | - |
Common stock, no par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, | | |
84,524,163 and 83,345,663 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005, respectively | 60,448,270 | 59,692,602 |
Treasury shares at cost – 136,500 and 0 respectively | (30,724) | - |
Paid-in capital | 1,870,845 | 1,767,720 |
Deferred compensation | (291,836) | - |
Accumulated deficit | (42,319,561) | (39,193,029) |
Total shareholders' equity | 19,676,994 | 22,267,293 |
| | |
| $31,162,209 | $ 29,652,633 |
| | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
SONORAN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
For the Three and Six months Ended October 31, 2006 and 2005
Six months Ended October 31, Three months Ended October 31,
| | | | | |
| 2006 | 2005 | | 2006 | 2005 |
Revenue: | | | | | |
Oil and gas sales | $ 1 ,135,543 | $ 724,727 | | $ 690,389 | $ 407,190 |
Other | 272,032 | 209,742 | | 185,219 | 100,847 |
Total revenue | 1,407,575 | 933,869 | | 875,578 | 508,037 |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Oil and gas production costs | 886,038 | 450,561 | | 437,870 | 204,885 |
Workover expense | 36,456 | 63,256 | | 25,868 | 63,256 |
Ad valorem and other taxes | 135,915 | 89,358 | | 85,111 | 47,066 |
Accretion expense | 33,921 | 42,390 | | 16,961 | 21,195 |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 293,598 | 107,267 | | 217,040 | 57,416 |
Stock based compensation: | | | | | |
Officers | 125,538 | 2,956,654 | | 94,153 | 2,956,654 |
Stock options | 61,538 | - | | 46,153 | - |
Employees | 13,125 | 367,293 | | 13,125 | 367,293 |
Consulting | - | 375,000 | | - | 210,000 |
Directors | 33,501 | 481,993 | | - | 481,993 |
General and administrative | 2,686,117 | 2,105,886 | | 1,366,354 | 1,172,161 |
Total expenses | 4,305,747 | 7,039,658 | | 2,302,635 | 5,581,919 |
| | | | | |
Other income/(expense): | | | | | |
Interest income | 22,144 | 2,717 | | 329 | 2,526 |
Interest expense | (250,504) | (315,594) | | (126,352) | ( 233,063) |
Total net expense | (228,360) | (312,877) | | (126,023) | (230,537) |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | (3,126,352) | (6,418,666) | | (1,553,080) | (5,304,419) |
| | | | | |
Income tax provision | - | - | | - | - |
| | | | | |
Net loss | $(3,126,352) | $(6,418,666) | | $(1,553,080) | $ (5,304,419) |
| | | | | |
Net loss per common share: Basic and diluted |
$ (0.04) |
$ (0.15) | |
$ (0.02) |
$ (0.11) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic and diluted |
83,985,969 |
41,952,413 | |
83,733,886 |
50,220,544 |
| | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
SONORAN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | |
| For the Six Months Ended October 31, |
| 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ 1,145,460 | | $ (1,037,581) |
| | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Acquisition of property | - | | (37,753) |
Payments for certificate of deposit | - | | (50,000) |
Payment for oil and gas equipment | (6,249,869) | | - |
Net cash used in investing activities | (6,249,869) | | (87,753) |
| | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Proceeds from exercised options and warrants | - | | 50 |
Repayment of advance from related party advances | - | | (100,000) |
Purchase of treasury stock | 30,724 | | - |
Redemption of certificate of deposit | 50,000 | | - |
Proceeds from issue of convertible debt | 270,000 | | - |
Proceeds from the sale of common stock | - | | 5,506,011 |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 350,724 | | 5,406,061 |
| | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (4,753,685) | | 4,280,727 |
| | | |
| | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 4,832,327 | | 62,313 |
| | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ 78,642 | | $ 4,343,040 |
| | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | |
| | | |
Cash paid for income taxes | $ - | | $ - |
Cash paid for interest | $ - | | $ 12,768 |
| | | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | |
Common stock issued for payment of debt and current liabilities | $ - | | $ 2,608,694 |
| | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
SONORAN ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31, 2006
General Information
The accompanying un-audited condensed consolidated financial statements of Sonoran Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the three and six months ended October 31, 2006 and October 31, 2005 have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim period have been included. Operating results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended April 30, 2006 included in the Company's report in Form 10-KSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Note 1: Property
The Company’s property is made up of the following:
| |
Computers | $ 58,620 |
Furniture and fixtures | 85,801 |
Leasehold improvements | 27,560 |
| 171,981 |
Accumulated depreciation | 96,744 |
Property total | $ 75,237 |
Note 2: Other Assets
Certificate of Deposit
The Company was required to post $300,000 in Bonds with governments for the operations in the U.S. The funds are held by financial institutions in investment certificates, which bear interest at a variable rate, and are included in certificates of deposit.
Deferred Finance Charges
The Company incurred commitment fees and finder fees for the Cornell Capital convertible debentures totaling $689,000. The term of the debenture is three years and the Company has chosen to amortize the commitment and finder fees over the life of the debenture resulting in a charge to interest expense of $51,187 for the three and six months ended October 31, 2006 and 2005.
Goodwill, Intangible Assets
The Company acquired Scottsdale Oil Field Services Ltd. during the year ended April 30, 2006 for 1 million restricted common stock shares valued at $0.65 per share for $650,000. Based on a third party valuation of the acquisition the Company has recorded goodwill of $394,585 and intangible assets, being proprietary computer programs, for an amount of $210,000. The Company charged $10,500 to expense for the amortization of the Intangible Asset for each of the quarters ended October 31 and July 31, 2006.
Note 3: Indebtedness to Related Parties
The balance of $56,342 shown on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet relates to funds owed to a past CEO of the Company.
Note 4: Convertible Debentures
On October 18, 2004, the Company entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement with Cornell Capital Partners, L.P. wherein we may, at our discretion, periodically sell to Cornell Capital Partners shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of up to $15,000,000. For each share of common stock purchased under the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, Cornell Capital Partners will pay 100% of the lowest volume weighted average price of the common stock as quoted on Bloomberg LP during the five consecutive trading days immediately following the notice date.
On August 17, 2005 the Company signed an agreement with Cornell Capital Partners, LP that replaces the existing agreement. Under the new agreement the lender chose to convert the $425,000 commitment fee note into 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock. The balance of $1,680,000 plus accrued interest, plus a delay fee of approximately $272,000 resulted in a total debt of $2,021,172 bearing interest at 5% annually, repayable at $150,000 per month plus interest over 13 months starting November 1, 2005 with a final payment of $71,461 in the 14th month. Subsequently, the lender has converted $270,000 of the loan to shares at $0.54.
The lender has the right to convert all or a portion of the outstanding amount to common stock at a price of $0.54 per share subject to the actual shares received cannot exceed 4.99% of the then outstanding shares. The Company recorded a debt discount for the beneficial conversion feature in the note agreement of $336,833 resulting in an allocation to interest expense of $44,911 for each of the quarters ended October 31 and July 31, 2006 and 2005.
On August 29, 2006 the Company issued a convertible note for $100,000 and during October the Company issued additional notes totaling $170,000 as indicated in the table below. The convertible notes have a two year term and bear interest at 10%, the Company has charged $2,700 to interest expense this quarter. The lender has the right to convert all or a portion of the outstanding amount to common stock at a price not less than $0.25 per share for the $5,000 note and $.23 per share for each of the remaining notes. The agreements also provide for 1 warrant grant for each dollar of debt converted shares to be exercised at $.55 per share. The Company has recognized a debt discount amount pertaining to the notes of $41,587 and charged $3,231 to expense being the allocation for the quarter ended October 31, 2006.
Convertible debentures and loans payable at October 31, 2006 and April 30, 2006 were comprised of the following:
| | | |
| October 31, | | April 30, |
| 2006 | | 2006 |
| | | |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 5% repayable Dec. 1, 2006 | $ 1,751,172 | | $ 1,751,172 |
Debt discount on beneficial conversion factors | (112,278) | | (202,100) |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 10% repayable Aug. 29,2008 | 100,000 | | - |
Debt discount on 10% conv. note | (32,518) | | - |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 10% repayable Oct. 11, 2008 | 100,000 | | - |
Debt discount on 10% conv. Note | (3,716) | | - |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 10% repayable Oct. 6, 2008 | 30,000 | | - |
Debt discount on 10% conv. Note | (1,223) | | - |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 10% repayable Oct. 18, 2008 | 10,000 | | - |
Debt discount on 10% conv. Note | (302) | | - |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 10% repayable Oct. 25, 2008 | 25,000 | | - |
Debt discount on 10% conv. Note | (446) | | - |
Convertible debentures bearing interest at 10% repayable Oct. 19, 2008 | 5,000 | | - |
Debt discount on 10% conv. note | (151) | | - |
Total convertible debentures | 1,870,538 | | 1,549,072 |
| | | |
Loan payable to Camden Holdings, on demand and non-interest bearing | 48,476 | | 48,476 |
| | | |
Credit line bearing interest of 14.99%, repayable at a minimum of 2 ½ % of the outstanding balance | 10,967 | | 13,467 |
| | | |
Loan payable bearing interest of 10.81%, repayable in monthly installments of $609 for 36 months | 11,630 | | 14,071 |
| | | |
Loan payable for cancelled stock purchase | 43,200 | | 43,200 |
Total other | 114,273 | | 119,214 |
| | | |
Totals | $ 1,984,811 | | $ 1,668,286 |
| | | |
Principal payments due in years ended April 30:
2007 �� $ 1,737,718
2008 12,780
2009 234,313
Total $ 1,984,811
Note 5: Loans Payable
The balance of $114,273 consists of loans covering furniture and equipment purchases plus two advances that may be paid in stock.
F-5
Note 6: Asset Retirement Obligation
In June 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Subsequently, the asset retirement cost is allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. The provisions of SFAS No. 143 were effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002.
The following table is a reconciliation of the Company's liability for asset retirement obligations:
| | |
Balance April 30, 2006 | $ | 795,589 |
Addition to Liability | | - |
Liability Settled | | - |
Accretion Expense | | 33,922 |
Balance October 31, 2006 | $ | 829,511 |
Note 7: Stock Based Compensation
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), effective May 1, 2006. SFAS 123R requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation in net income. SFAS 123R supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensations (“SFAS 123”) and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”). The Company has adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under the modified prospective method, stock options awards that are granted, modified or settled after April 30, 2006 will be valued at fair value in accordance with provisions of SFAS 123R and recognized on a straight line basis over the service period of the entire award.. As all prior option awards were fully vested prior to May1, 2006 there was no effect due to the implementation of SFAS 123R in the six months ended October 31, 2006.
Common Stock Options
A summary of the status of the Company's stock option awards and the changes during the periods presented are:
| | | | | | |
| | Options Issued to Non-Employees | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Fair Value | Exercisable | Weighted Average Exercise Price - Exercisable |
| Options Issued to Employees |
Outstanding, April 30, 2005 | 10,100,000 | 4,175,000 | $ 0.53 | $ 0.29 | 14,275,000 | $ 0.53 |
| | | | | | |
Options granted | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Options exercised | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Options cancelled | (150,000) | - | - | - | (150,000) | - |
Outstanding, April 30, 2006 | 9,950,000 | 4,175,000 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 14,125,000 | 0.53 |
| | | | | | |
Options granted | 1,000,000 | - | 0.33 | 0.20 | 1,000,000 | .- |
Options exercised | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Options cancelled | (1,750,000) | - | - | - | (1,750,000) | - |
Outstanding, October 31, 2006 | 9,200,000 | 4,175,000 | $ 0.52 | $ 0.28 | 13,375,000 | $ 0.53 |
| | | | | | |
The weighted average remaining contractual term and aggregate intrinsic value for options outstanding at October 31, 2006 was .3 years and $0.00.
As part of a private placement done during the year ended April 30, 2006, investors were granted warrants to purchase additional shares. The exercise price on 4,863,438 warrants was set at $0.95 per share and 156,250 warrants set at $1.50 per share were outstanding at October 31, 2006.
Effective July 1, 2006 the Company granted 1,200,000 shares of common stock to Frank T. Smith, Jr. in conjunction with his Employment Agreement of the same date. These grant shares vest monthly in twelve equal 100,000 share installments beginning on August 1, 2006. In addition, Mr. Smith was granted options to purchase 1,000,000 common shares were awarded to Frank T. Smith, Jr. at $0.33 per share (closing price July 14, 2006). Beginning on August 1, 2006, the options will vest monthly in eleven equal 83,333 share increments plus 83,337 shares in the twelfth month.
The Company has valued the stock grant at the market price on July 1 for a total cost of $408,000 to be charged against expense over the next 12 months. The Company allocated $125,538 to stock paid compensation – officers for the six months ended October 31, 2006 leaving a balance of $282,462 to be allocated over future periods. The Company has valued the stock option grant using the Black-Sholes option-pricing model for a total cost of $200,000 to be charged against expense over the next 12 months. The Company allocated $61,539 to stock paid compensation – options for the period ended October 31, 2006 leaving a balance of $138,461 to be allocated over future periods.
The company has granted 50,000 shares of common stock for a total cost on the grant date of $22,500 to an employee that will vest over a 12 month period. The Company allocated $13,125 to stock paid compensation – employees for the six months ended October 31, 2006 leaving a balance of $9,375 to be allocated over future periods.
The fair value for the options granted during the three months ended July 31, 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.10%
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.00%
Volatility factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118.75%
Weighted average expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 years
The Black-Scholes options valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock options. However, the Company has presented the pro forma net loss and pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share using the assumptions noted above.
Note 8: Common Stock
During the quarter ended July 31, 2006 the Company issued:
- 50,001 restricted common shares at $0.67 per share, being market price on the day of the grant, for payment of Director fees amounting to $33,500.
- 532,666 shares of common stock at $0.42 per share, being market price at the date of agreement, for payment of prepaid legal settlement expense amounting to $223,667.
During the quarter ended October 31, 2006 the Company issued:
- 300,000 restricted common shares at $0.34 per share, being market price on the day of the grant, for payment of a stock grant to an officer amounting to $102,000.
- 29,167 restricted common shares at $0.45 per share, being market price on the day of the grant, for payment of a stock grant to an employee amounting to $13,125.
- 133,333 shares of common stock at $0.31 per share and 133,333 of common stock at $0.20 per share, being market price at the date of issue, for payment of prepaid legal settlement expense amounting to $68,000.
Note 9 -Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R which requires public entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on fair value at the date of grant. The cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. We have adopted this pronouncement effective May 1, 2006.
Note 10: Segmented Information
The Company is presently operating in two segments:
| | | | | |
Oil and Gas: | Six months ended October 31 | Three months ended October 31 |
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 |
Revenue | 1,135,543 | 724,727 | 690,389 | 407,190 |
Income | (3,155,547) | (6,407,043) | (1,576,012) | (5,289,117) |
Assets | 31,162,209 | 10,105,671 | 31,162,209 | 10,105,671 |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Consulting Services: | Six months ended October 31 | Three months ended October 31 |
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 |
Revenue | 272,032 | 209,742 | 185,219 | 100,847 |
Income | 29,195 | (11,623) | 22,932 | (15,302) |
Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | | |
Oil field services work consists of engineers performing services based outside the Corporate offices therefore no Company assets being allocated to this function.
Note 11: Subsequent Events
On December 4, 2006, Sonoran Energy, Inc. (the "Company") entered into a Common Stock Subscription Agreement (the "Subscription Agreement") with Cubus APS ("Cubus"). Pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement, the Company has agreed to issue 30,000,000 shares of its common stock and 50,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share. In exchange for the warrants and shares described above, Cubus has agreed to tender $3,000,000 in cash to the Company. Additionally, the Company has agreed to appoint a representative of Cubus to the Company's Board of Directors. The funds were received by the Company on December 6, 2006.
On September 11, 2006 the Company received a commitment from a financial institution for a $12 million senior secured credit facility that was expected to close on or before October 2, 2006. However, the loan documentation process has taken longer than anticipated and the agreement was executed on December 4, 2006.
The Company closed on a Credit Agreement (the "Agreement") with NGPC Asset Holdings, LP ("NGPC"), the Administrative Agent for certain institutional investors. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, NGPC has agreed to give the Company access to a $12 million reserve-based debt facility backed by NGP Capital Resources Company. The Company has immediate access to $8 million of the debt facility and can borrow an additional $4 million as production increases on the Company's oil and gas assets. The Company has agreed to use the proceeds from the debt facility (1) to finance trade payables, (2) to repay indebtedness of the Company to Cornell Capital Partners, L.P. existing as of the date of the Agreement, (3) to finance certain acquisitions, (4) to conduct other activities on the Company's properties as described in the Agreement, (5) to enter into Hedge Agreements as may be required from time to time by NGPC, and (6) for working capital purposes in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. The debt facility is secured by first liens on substantially all of the Company's properties. Additionally, the Company has agreed to pay interest on amounts borrowed and grant NGPC an overriding royalty of 3% on all of the Company's production. The Company has also agreed to issue 2,870,000 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at a price of $0.20 per share. The Company has agreed to re-pay any funds borrowed within 18 months of the Closing Date. Funds gave been advanced to pay off the Cornell Convertible loan and reduce trade payables as of December 7, 2006.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "believes", "anticipates", "plans", "expects" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Sonoran Energy, Inc. (the "Company", "Sonoran", and sometimes "we", "us", "our" and derivatives of such words) undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstan ces after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. These forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's disclosures included in their Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006.
General
US Operations:
East Texas Fields:
JRC/Lisa Layne
The Owen Taylor 2 well in the Lisa Layne Field which has marginal production went down in early August with a parted pump rod, and is under evaluation to be converted to a water disposal well to reduce the burden on the existing wells. In addition the JW Wells 2 in the Lisa Layne went down in early August and did not return to production until early September as a result of a parted pump rod. This was a rafter only a short period with a repeat of the previous rod problem. Other outages to production to both the J W Wells #2 and #4 were the result of leaks within the water disposal lines and electrical outages generally as the result of storm activity in the area.
The Marilyn Bradford well has been SI as being uneconomic under the current well design and the well is being reviewed as to possible conversion to an electrical submersible pump. In addition the J W Wells #3 has remained off line during this period waiting for transformers. The J W Wells 2 horizontal well was down with recurring electrical submersible pump problems which have been addressed by the pump vendor.
Maintaining wells on production continues to be an issue particularly with regards to the frequent electrical outages. This is being reviewed particularly with regards to grounding issues with the submersible pumps and installation of lightning arrestors to reduce the outages caused by electrical storms.
Ann McKnight Unit:
AMU 201 went down in August with a hole in the tubing and has remained off line while engineering is undertaken to determine if a submersible pump would be a better solution to avoid the tubing wear being caused by the current rod pump. In addition the AMU 801 was shut in during August as the well did not produce economically and was causing problems associated with hydrogen sulphide production in addition to affecting the AMU 101 as a result of the volumes of water being extracted from the reservoir. Further engineering on the gas handling facilities and the recompletion of the AMU 1601 were put on hold pending further review.
Louisiana:
Operations were suspended on the Crosby 25 and the snubbing unit removed in early August when the obstruction identified from earlier operations could not be retrieved. Plans to bring this well onto production continue to be developed with a start date scheduled for early 2007
The debris in the Strickland 17 was removed by surging the well and the well placed into production in early August. The well has performed better than expected and continues to flow without problems.
Various options to bring the Crosby 36A onto production are still being evaluated and the well is scheduled to be entered after the work on the Crosby 25 scheduled for 2007.
It is anticipated that operations will commence on the other wells before the end of the year to further clean out any debris and improve well performance.
West Texas:
Review of the engineering study indicated a number of areas of interest that are currently being evaluated for development.
Middle East, North Africa and Caspian:
The Company finalized the terms of a Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) with the Natural Resource Authority (NRA) of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The PSA was signed by the Government on November 23, 2005. The terms of the PSA calls for the exploration and development of the Azraq Block in Jordan including the existing producing Hamza Oil field. The PSA is being discussed by the Jordanian Parliament for formal approval and ratification leading to the signature by His Majesty King Abdullah II, King of Jordan.
The company has decided to close the office in Jordan to reduce costs at this time but is actively in discussions with potential joint venture partners for this project.
Analysis of Operations
Results of operations for the six months ended October 31, 2006 compared to the six months ended October 31, 2005:
REVENUES
The Company generated total revenues of $1,407,575 for the six months ended October 31, 2006 as compared to $875,578 revenue generated for the six months ended October 31, 2005 as a result of improved operations on the Louisiana wells.
OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION COSTS
Oil and gas production costs were $886,038 for the six months ending October 31, 2006 as compared to the $437,870 for the six months ending October 31, 2005. The increase reflects the increased operations as well as higher maintenance costs. Management continues to review the operating costs to determine areas in which to improve performance and to lower costs.
DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depletion, depreciation and amortization charge was $293,598 for the six months ended October 31, 2006 compared to $107,267 for the six months ended October 31, 2005. The increase in cost reflects the addition to the full cost pool of additional Louisiana wells in the last quarter which were considered part of the unproven assets last year.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock based compensation has decreased substantially from previous periods due to reduced expenses being paid by stock and a reduction in staff based compensation.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses, which include the cost of consulting revenue of $234,111, salaries and benefits of $782,813, legal and audit of $710,878, outside consultants for recruitment, shareholder relations, engineering and valuations of $518,017 and other expense including travel of $440,298, increased by $580,231 for the six months ended October 31, 2006, when compared with the same period for 2005. The increase is due primarily to increased legal fees associated with the Anderson case, see Item 1 below, and an increase in employee compensation due to increased staff resulting from the Scottsdale Oil Field Services acquisition and other hires.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Workover expense and ad valorem taxes reflect full year and increased operations at East Texas and Louisiana operations.
Accretion expense reflects the current quarter allocation of estimated plugging and abandonment costs estimated for the three properties.
Results of operations for the six months ended October 31, 2005 compared to the six months ended October 31, 2004:
REVENUES
The Company generated total revenues of $933,869 during the six months ended October 31, 2005 as compared to $53,431 revenue generated for the six months ended October 31, 2004.
The significant increase in the Company’s revenue is a direct result of the acquisition of the East Texas properties and the increased production of that oil field resulting in revenue of $656,762. In addition, the Company generated $ 202,895 in consulting revenue through its acquisition of Scottsdale Oil. The revenue that was generated during the six months ended October 31, 2004 was mainly from the minor oil production from the Louisiana properties only.
OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION COSTS
Oil and gas production costs were $450,461 for the six months ending October 31, 2005 as compared to the $200,355 for the six months ending October 31, 2004. The increase reflects two full quarters cost of the East Texas operation which the Company did not own in the first half of 2004. Increased oil prices and improved operations resulted in a gross margin of 38% for them six months of 2005 compared to a loss for the same period last year. Management continues to review the operating costs to determine areas in which to improve performance and to lower costs
DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depletion, depreciation and amortization charge was $107,267 for the six months ended October 31, 2005 compared to $566 for the six months ended October 31, 2004. The current six months reflects the depreciation on equipment plus depletion expense of $91,203 on the East Texas fields. Last year the Company did not record any depletion expense on its unproved properties and had not yet acquired the East Texas property.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company chose to recognize the efforts and commitment of the officers and staff during the previous year and for the future with an incentive share allocation that resulted in the issuance of 4.2 million shares at $0.70 per share, 270 K at $0.54 and 273 K at $0.78 being the market values on the date of issue. The Director’s also agreed to take their fees in common stock with the issuance of 500K shares at $0.70 per share, 100 K at $0.54 and 1000 K at $0.78 being the market values on the date of issue. The company was able to settle a legal matter with two consultants by the issuance of 300,000 shares at $0.70 for a total of $210 K.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million dollars for the six months ended October 31, 2005, when compared with the same period for 2004. The Company now employs several experienced oil and gas personal and has offices in Arizona, London and Jordan for part of the first six months. The increase is also attributable to the increased travel expense due to the Company's efforts to penetrate the global market place.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
Under generally accepted accounting principles management is required to make use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts on the financial statements and in disclosures in the notes to the financial statements at the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Oil & Gas Producing Activities
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for its oil and gas activities. Accordingly, all costs associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties are capitalized within the appropriate cost center. Any internal costs that are capitalized are limited to those costs that can be directly identified with acquisition, exploration, and development activities undertaken by the Company for its own account, and do not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead, or similar activities.
Revenue Recognition
The Company utilizes the accrual method of accounting for crude oil revenues whereby revenues are recognized as the Company's entitlement share of the oil that is produced and delivered to a purchaser based upon its working interest in the properties. The Company records a receivable (payable) to the extent that it receives less (more) than its proportionate share of the gas revenues.
Impairments on Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No. 144 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. If such assets are impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has successfully managed to source sufficient immediate funding through a market priced equity during the last several months. These funds will be targeted at developing the Company’s current assets to enable it generate positive cash flow and be the basis for additional future oil field acquisitions. The Company believes that the cash resources will be sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for the next twelve months. Management is pleased that most of the funds raised came from either our Strategic Partners or strategic investors from out international core areas, thus supporting our active support network for future expansion.
The Company is not a party to off-balance sheet arrangements and does not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. In addition, the Company has no financial guarantees, or lease agreements or other arrangements that could trigger a requirement for an early payment or that could change the value of the Company's assets. Management continues to examine various alternatives for increasing capital resources including, among other things, participation with industry and/or private partners and specific rework of existing properties to enhance production and expansion of its sales of crude oil and natural gas.
Foreign Currency Exposure
Sonoran is not exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar at this time but, as Sonoran expands its operations, it may begin to collect revenues from customers in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Sonoran does not currently engage in any hedging activities.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures.
The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on an evaluation conducted within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures have functioned effectively so as to provide those officers the information necessary whether:
(i) this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, and
(ii) the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB.
There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors since the date of the Chief Executive Officer's and Chief Financial Officer's evaluation that could significantly affect these internal controls, including any corrective actions with regards to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal proceedings
Longbow, LLC v. Sonoran Energy, Inc. - Superior Court of California, County of Kern, Metropolitan Division Case No. S-1500-CV-25398-SPC
On or about March 8, 2004, a complaint was filed by Longbow, LLC against the Company alleging that Sonoran breached the agreement to purchase Longbow's interest in the Emjayco Glide #33 Property, the Keystone-Deer Creek Property and the Deer Creek-Merzonian Property. The action essentially alleges that, according the agreements entered into between Longbow and Sonoran, Longbow had the right of first refusal on the properties in the event that Sonoran offered those properties for sale. In addition, Longbow claims that they are entitled to a percentage of the profits if the property is sold to a third party. Subsequent to the execution of those agreements, Sonoran entered into an agreement to sell those properties to a third party, Harvest Worldwide, LLC. Sonoran filed a cross-complaint against Harvest and Longbow seeking the rescission of the Harvest purchase agreements. This case was consolidated withHarvest Worldwide, LLC v. Longbow, LLC(Case no. S-1500-CV-253284-SPC). The trial was held in September, 2006 and an out of court settlement was reached to allow Longbow to purchase the properties in question subject to Sonoran arranging for the removal of liens held by Ironwood and assuming partial responsibility for the retirement of certain obligations.. This is expected to be completed by the end of the Company’s third quarter.
Sonoran Energy, Inc v. Mark Roy Anderson et al
Mark Anderson was sued, individually and in the form of his corporate alter egos, by Sonoran (Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC327099), seeking rescission of all shares issued to these entities, with additional compensation due for various timing failures and legal exposures resulting from Anderson's various shortcomings. Anderson cross-complained against Sonoran, alleging certain commissions earned for projects Sonoran has undertaken that occurred during the pendency of his (Camden Holdings) consulting agreement . On June 5, 2006 the Company entered in a tentative settlement of their court case wherein Mr. Anderson has agreed to transfer control of the shares in controversy to settle debts that were to be originally assumed by Anderson, and retire obligations associated with project developments underway at the time of the original dealings. The final settlement was dependant upon the resolution of the c ase in Bakersfield (above) and includes the assumption of certain obligations as well as the cancellation of a commission payable of $250,000 and a loan payable of $48,000. The ultimate disposition of the properties will dictate the accounting treatment of the $484,000 gain on disposal presently showing in other liabilities. Sonoran has agreed to pay down a note on the three properties, subject to the case decision and has prepaid part of the note with stock and included the payment in prepaids on the balance sheet and a pledge of certain securities to secure payments. Sonoran hopes to have this matter completely settled by the end of its fiscal year.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter the Company issued restricted common stock as follows:
The Company issued 300,000 restricted common shares at $0.34 per share, being market price on the day of the grant, for payment of a stock grant to an officer amounting to $102,000. These shares were issued under the Rule 4(2) exemption.
The Company issued 29,167 restricted common shares at $0.45 per share, being market price on the day of the grant, for payment of a stock grant to an employee amounting to $13,125. These shares were issued under the Rule 4(2) exemption.
The Company also issued 133,333 shares of common stock at $0.31 per share and 133,333 of common stock at $0.20 per share, being market price at the date of issue, for payment of prepaid legal settlement expense amounting to $67,001. These shares were issued to non-U.S. residents under the auspices of Regulation S.
Item 5. Other Information
On September 11, 2006 the Company received a commitment from a financial institution for a 12 million senior secured credit facility that is expected to close on or before October 2, 2006. It was initially thought that this arrangement would close on or before October 2, 2006. However, the loan documentation process took longer than anticipated and the agreement was completed on December 4, 2006
In conjunction with the loan commitment, the Company has arranged to privately place common stock that will provide an additional $3,000,000 of capital. This transaction is conditioned upon and will fund contemporaneously with this above referenced credit facility.
A Form 8-K was been filed on December 7, 2006 detailing the financing and the equity placement and funds have been received and applied to repaying existing debt and trade payables.
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 - Rule 13a-14a/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer
31.2 - Rule 13a-14a/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer
32.1 - Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
32.2 - Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act , the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: December 7, 2006
SONORAN ENERGY, INC.
/s/ Peter Rosenthal
Peter Rosenthal,
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Frank T. Smith Jr.
Frank T. Smith Jr.
Exec VP/CFO
Exhibit 31.1
| |
Pursuant to the requirements of Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides the following certification.
I, Peter Rosenthal, President of Sonoran Energy, Inc. ("Company"), certify that: |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sonoran Energy, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The other certifying directors and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The other certifying directors and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and |
|
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
| |
| |
Date: December 7, 2006 | /s/ Peter Rosenthal |
| Peter Rosenthal, President |
| |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides the following certification.
I, Frank T. Smith Jr., Exec VP/CFO of Sonoran Energy, Inc. ("Company"), certify that: |
| |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sonoran Energy, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The other certifying director and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The other certifying director and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and |
| |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
| |
| |
Date: December 7,2006 | /s/ Frank T. Smith Jr. |
| Frank T. Smith Jr., Exec VP/CFO |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonoran Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Rosenthal, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Peter Rosenthal
Peter Rosenthal
President
December 7, 2006
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonoran Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank T. Smith Jr., Interim CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Frank T. Smith Jr.
Frank T. Smith Jr.
Exec VP/CFO
December 7, 2006