Stock Issued in Exchange for Services
The valuation of common stock issued in exchange for services is valued at an estimated fair market value as determined by the most readily determinable value of either the stock or services exchanged. Values of the stock are based upon other sales and issuances of the Company’s common stock within the same general time period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which at times may exceed federally insured limits of $250,000. The Company has not experienced any losses related to this concentration of risk. Deposits did not exceed insured limits during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011.
Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 360,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques
including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.
Financial Instruments
For accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt, the carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximates their fair value. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Stock-based Compensation
ASC 718 “Stock Compensation” requires public companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity instruments, based on the grant-date fair value of those instruments, with limited exceptions. ASC 718 “Stock Compensation” also affects the pattern in
which compensation cost is recognized, the accounting for employee share purchase plans, and the accounting for income tax effects of share-based payment transactions. For small business filers, ASC 718 “Stock Compensation” is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted the guidance in ASC 718 “Stock Compensation” on October 1, 2007.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company translates foreign currency transactions and balances to its reporting currency, United States Dollars, in accordance with ASC 830 “Foreign Currency Matters”. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the year. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate prevailing when the assets were acquired or the liabilities assumed. Revenue and expenses are translated at the rate approximating the rate of exchange on the transaction date. All exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of net income (loss) for the year.
Income Taxes
The Company applies ASC 740, which requires the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. The asset and liability method requires that the current or deferred tax consequences of all events recognized in the financial statements are measured by applying the provisions of enacted tax laws to determine the amount of taxes payable or refundable currently or in future years. Deferred tax assets are reviewed for recoverability and the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce
its deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be recovered.
The Company adopted ASC 740, at the beginning of fiscal year 2008. This interpretation requires recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach, requiring the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. The adoption of ASC 740 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements and their adoption has not had or is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or statements
NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN
The Company's financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent
on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.
NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN (CONTINUED)
In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating
expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.
The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY PAYABLES
The Company from time to time has borrowed funds from or has received services from several individuals and corporations related to the Company for operating purposes. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company owed $528,851 and $520,851 respectively. These amounts bear no interest, are not collateralized, and are due on demand. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, a related party paid expenses in the amount of $8,000 on behalf of the Company.
NOTE 5 – COMMON STOCK
The Company has two classes of stock authorized as of March 31, 2012. The Company has 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized with no shares outstanding as of Marchr 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company also has 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized with 100,788,607 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued new shares as follows:
On November 23, 2011 25,000,000 common shares were issued under a debt settlement agreement with a related Party.
On December 1, 2011, 10,000,000 common shares were issued under the terms of an Oil & Gas Farm-In, Operating and Consulting Agreement with a consultant.
On December 1, 2011, 10,000,000 common shares were issued to the same consultant under a debt settlement agreement as payment in full for previous debt incurred under a Consulting Agreement.
On December 1, 2011, 10,000,000 common shares were issued to the President of the Company as payment for services rendered in the performance of his duties.
No further shares have been issued in the three months ended March 31, 2012.
NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In accordance with ASC 855-10 Company management reviewed all material events through the date of this report and there are no subsequent events to report.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and the other financial information included elsewhere in this report. Certain statements contained in this report, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects” and words of similar import, constitute “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including our ability to create, sustain, manage or forecast our growth; our ability to attract and retain key personnel; changes in our business strategy or development plans; competition; business disruptions; adverse publicity; and international, national and local general economic and market conditions.
Overview
The Company does not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The Company is currently in the exploration stage.
On July 8, 2009, the Company had signed an option agreement with Morgan Creek Energy Corp. to acquire up to a 50% Working Interest (40.75% Net Revenue Interest) in Morgan Creeks’ approximately 13,000 acre entire Frio Draw Prospect located in Curry County, New Mexico. Under the terms of the agreement, FormCap is required to drill and complete two mutually defined targets on the acreage to earn its interest.
Following the initial two wells, Morgan Creeks’ management and land team will work with FormCap to establish additional targets on the Frio draw based on technical data and drill results. The two companies will jointly fund additional targets and have committed to a minimum five holes drill program in order to effectively test the Frio Draw.
On September 25, 2009, the Company has received a letter from Morgan Creek Energy Corp. terminating the Option Agreement between FormCap Corp. and Morgan Creek Energy Corp. on the Frio Draw Prospect in New Mexico.
On October 20, 2009, the company acquired 5,313 acres of oil and gas leases (“leases”), all with primary terms of five years initiated in June 2009. The leases, known as the Weber City Prospect, are located in Curry County, New Mexico, which lies on the eastern most side of New Mexico bordering the State of Texas. The Company had acquired a 100% working interest (80% Net Revenue Interest) from Atlas Larunas LLC for $250,000.
On February 15, 2011, the Company assigned all its rights in the leases to Rich Investments Ltd. (“Rich”) and Leare Developments Ltd. (“Leare”), under the terms of a loans settlement agreement whereby Rich and Leare accepted the assignment of the leases in full and final satisfaction of the outstanding indebtedness of the Company to each of Rich and Leare.
On March 16, 2011, the Company signed a Farm-Out Agreement for oil and gas exploration in the Peco Area of Alberta. The Farm-Out Agreement between FormCap Corp. and a private Alberta Corporation is comprised of a Seismic Option, a Farm-Out and a Participation clause. The Agreement stipulated a commencement date for the shooting of a 3D seismic program on the Farm-Out Lands not later than June 1, 2011 and a Commencement Date of November 1, 2011 for spudding and continuous drilling of a Test Well. Due to conditions in the oil and gas industry these dates were amended to October 1, 2011 for commencement of seismic program and February 1, 2012 for the spudding of a Test Well. The Agreement provides FormCap 60 days following completion of the seismic program to elect to drill the Test Well. Upon completion of the Test Well FormCap shall have earned a 40% working interest in the well subject to a 10% Gross Overiding Royalty payable to the Farmor. The Farmor may elect to convert the Gross Overiding Royalty to a 50% interest in FormCap’s working interest ( ie: a 20% working interest).
Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
The operating results and cash flows are presented for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the period of inception to March 31, 2012.
Revenues. There was no revenue for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Operating Expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we had total operating expenses of $36,271 as compared to $76,875 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This was accounted for mainly by a reduction in consultng expense of $41,600.
Interest Expense. The three months ended March 31, 2012 had interest expense of $Nil, compared to $13,800 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This was because there was no debenture payble in 2012.
Net Loss. The net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 was $36,271 as compared to income of $220,791 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. This was because there was no gain on settement of debt as compared to a gain of $311,466 recorded in 2011.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company does not hold any derivatives or investments that are subject to market risk. The carrying values of any financial instruments, approximate fair value as of those dates because of relatively short-term maturity of these instruments which eliminates any potential market risk associated with such instruments.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
As supervised by our board of directors and our principal executive and principal financial officers, management has established a system of disclosure controls and procedures and has evaluated the effectiveness of that system. The system and its evaluation are reported on in the below Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our principal executive and financial officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the 1934 Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of September 30, 2011, are not effective, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012. We carried out this assessment using the criteria of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm, pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits us to provide only management's report in this annual report. Management concluded in this assessment that as of March 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the first quarter of our 2012 fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On May 21, 2009, the Company received a Writ of Summons from Robert D. Holmes Law Corporation and Terrence E. King Law Corporation, the “Plaintiffs” and William McKay, Jupiter Capital Ltd., Jupiter Capital Ventures, Inc., Barron Energy Corporation, Media Games Ltd., Brandgamz Marketing Inc., FormCap Corp. and Snap-Email, Inc., the “Defendants”. The claim against FormCap Corp. in the amount of $53,839.64 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum thereon from and after October 1, 2007. On June 9, 2009, the Company’s related parties who took over the debt of the company as per the agreement dated November 7, 2006, have made a settlement with the “Plaintiffs” and have agreed to file a discontinuance of claims made against FormCap. On March 23, 2010, the company received document regarding notice of discontinuance of proceeding in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
On February 15, 2011, the Company assigned all its rights in the leases to Rich Investments Ltd. (“Rich”) and Leare Developments Ltd. (“Leare”), under the terms of a loans settlement agreement whereby Rich and Leare accepted the assignment of the leases in full and final satisfaction of the outstanding indebtedness of the Company to each of Rich and Leare.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE IN NATURE AND INVOLVES AN EXTREMELY HIGH DEGREE OF RISK.
There may be conflicts of interest between our management and our non-management stockholders.
Conflicts of interest create the risk that management may have an incentive to act adversely to the interests of other investors. A conflict of interest may arise between our management’s own pecuniary interest and may at some point compromise its fiduciary duty to our stockholders. In addition, our officers and directors are currently involved with other blank check companies and conflicts in the pursuit of business combinations with such other blank check companies with which they and other members of our management are, and may in the future be affiliated with, may arise. If we and the other blank check companies that our officers and directors are affiliated with desire to take advantage of the same opportunity, then those officers and directors that are affiliated with both companies would abstain from voting upon the opportunity. In the event of identical officers and directors, the officers and directors will arbitrarily determine the company that will be entitled to proceed with the proposed transaction.
As the Company has no recent operating history or revenue and there is a risk that we will be unable to continue as a going concern and consummate a business combination. We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
least until the consummation of a business combination. This may result in our incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a profitable business opportunity. We cannot assure you that we can identify a suitable business opportunity and consummate a business combination.
THERE IS COMPETITION FOR THOSE PRIVATE COMPANIES SUITABLE FOR A MERGER TRANSACTION OF THE TYPE CONTEMPLATED BY MANAGEMENT.
The Company is in a highly competitive market for a small number of business opportunities which could reduce the likelihood of consummating a successful business combination. We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including small public companies and venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be desirable target candidates for us. Nearly all these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. These competitive factors may reduce the likelihood of our identifying and consummating a successful business combination.
FUTURE SUCCESS IS HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON THE ABILITY OF MANAGEMENT TO LOCATE AND ATTRACT A SUITABLE ACQUISITION.
The nature of our operations is highly speculative and there is a consequent risk of loss of your investment. The success of our plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the identified business opportunity. While management intends to seek business combination(s) with entities having established operating histories, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in locating candidates meeting that criterion. In the event we complete a business combination, the success of our operations may be dependent upon management of the successor firm or venture partner firm and numerous other factors beyond our control.
OUR BUSINESS WILL HAVE NO REVENUES UNLESS AND UNTIL WE MERGE WITH OR ACQUIRE AN OPERATING BUSINESS.
We are a development stage company and have had no revenues from operations. We may not realized any revenues unless and until we successfully merge with or acquire an operating business.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On February 11, 2010, 500,000 shares were issued to Norman J Mackenzie for consulting services valued at $170,000.
On July 20, 2010, 250,000 shares at $0.05 per share were issued to Leare Developments Ltd. as collateral for its Convertible Note Payable.
On July 20, 2010, 100,000 shares at $0.05 per share were issued to Leare Developments Ltd. as fee for extension of the repayment of its Convertible Note Payable.
On October 27, 2010, 500,000 shares at $0.04 per share were issued to Jim Romano as finders fee as per agreements dated July 21, and October 5, 2010.
On November 23, 2011 25,000,000 common shares were issued under a debt settlement agreement with a related Party.
On December 1, 2011, 10,000,000 common shares were issued under the terms of a Oil & Gas Farm-In, Operating and Consulting Agreement with a consultant.
On December 1, 2011, 10,000,000 common shares were issued to the same consultant as payment in full of debt arising under a Consulting Agreement.
On Decemebr 1, 2011, 10,000,000 common shares were issued to the President of the Company as payment for services rendered in the performance of his duties.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the first quarter of 2011.
.
Item 5. Other Information.
None
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
31.2 Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
32.2 Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: May 21, 2012
FORMCAP CORP.
By:/S/ Graham Douglas
Graham Douglas
Chief Executive Officer & Director
Page 6 of 25
Exhibit 31.01
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Graham Douglas, Director and Chief Executive Officer of FormCap Corp. certify that :
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FormCap Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have :
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purpose in accordance with general accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Page 7 of 25
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarized and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Dated : May 21, 2012 Signature:/s/ Graham Douglas |
---------------------------
Director and Chief Executive Officer
Page 8 of 25
Exhibit 31.02
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|
|
I, Graham Douglas, Chief Financial Officer of FormCap Corp. certify that : |
|
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FormCap Corp. ; |
|
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have :
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purpose in accordance with general accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Page 9 of 25
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions ):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarized and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Dated : May 21, 2012 Signature: /s/ Graham Douglas |
-------------------------- |
Graham Douglas |
Chief Financial Officer |
Page 10 of 25
EXHIBIT 32 .01
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of FormCap Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Graham Douglas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Graham Douglas
-------------------------
Graham Douglas
Chief Executive Officer
May 21, 2012
Page 11 of 25
EXHIBIT 32 .02
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of FormCap Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Graham Douglas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Graham Douglas
---------------------------
Graham Douglas
Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2012
Page 12 of 25
