FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | 3 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS [Abstract] | ' |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | ' |
|
2. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The FASB established a three-level hierarchy for disclosure based on the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair value. Level 1 inputs consist of valuations based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs consist of valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an inactive market, or other observable inputs. Level 3 inputs consist of valuations based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. |
|
|
|
The following table presents financial instruments, other than long-term debt, that we measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013. See Note 7 for a detailed discussion of our long-term debt. We have chosen to not measure any of our other financial instruments at fair value as we believe their carrying value approximates their fair value. We have classified the following assets in accordance with the fair value hierarchy set forth in the applicable standards. In instances where the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset fall into more than one level of the hierarchy, we have classified them based on the lowest level input that is significant to the determination of the fair value. |
|
31-Dec-13 | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Fair Value |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 246,463 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 246,463 | |
Auction rate securities (ARS) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 6,087 | | | | 6,087 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 1,636 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,636 | |
Total | | $ | 248,099 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,087 | | | $ | 254,186 | |
|
30-Sep-13 | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Fair Value |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 226,029 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 226,029 | |
Auction rate securities (ARS) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 7,966 | | | | 7,966 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 1,375 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,375 | |
Total | | $ | 227,404 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 7,966 | | | $ | 235,370 | |
|
Our cash and cash equivalents consist of various bank accounts used to support our operations and investments in institutional money-market funds which are traded in active markets. The ARS and other long-term investments are included in other long-term assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of our long-term ARS is determined through two discounted cash flow analyses, one using a discount rate based on a market index comprised of tax exempt variable rate demand obligations and one using a discount rate based on the LIBOR swap curve, adding a risk factor to reflect current liquidity issues in the ARS market. Our other long-term investments represent the fair value of investments under the Cabot Microelectronics Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP), which is a nonqualified supplemental savings plan. The fair value of the investments is determined through quoted market prices within actively traded markets. Although the investments are allocated to individual participants and investment decisions are made solely by those participants, the SERP is a nonqualified plan. Consequently, the Company owns the assets and the related offsetting liability for disbursement until such time a participant makes a qualifying withdrawal. The long-term asset was adjusted to $1,636 in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to reflect its fair value as of December 31, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
We applied accounting standards regarding the classification and valuation of financial instruments to the valuation of our investment in ARS at December 31, 2013. Our ARS investments at December 31, 2013 consisted of two tax exempt municipal debt securities with a total par value of $6,087. The ARS market began to experience illiquidity in early 2008, and this illiquidity continues. Despite this lack of liquidity, there have been no defaults in payment of the underlying securities and interest income on these holdings continues to be received on scheduled interest payment dates. Our ARS, when purchased, were issued by A-rated municipalities. Although the credit ratings of both municipalities have been downgraded since our original investment, one of the ARS is credit enhanced with bond insurance, and the other, as discussed below in this footnote, has become an obligation of the bond insurer. Both ARS currently carry a credit rating of AA- by Standard and Poors. |
|
Since an active market for ARS does not currently exist, we classify these investments as held-to-maturity and we determine the fair value of these investments using a Level 3 discounted cash flow analysis and also consider other factors such as the reduced liquidity in the ARS market and nature of the insurance backing. Key inputs to our discounted cash flow model include projected cash flows from interest and principal payments and the weighted probabilities of improved liquidity or debt refinancing by the issuer. We also incorporate certain Level 2 market indices into the discounted cash flow analysis, including published rates such as the LIBOR rate, the LIBOR swap curve and a municipal swap index published by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. The following table presents a reconciliation of the activity in fiscal 2014 for fair value measurements using level 3 inputs: |
|
Balance as of October 1, 2013 | | $ | 7,966 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales of ARS | | | (2,113 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reversal of temporary impairment | | | 234 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | | $ | 6,087 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on our fair value assessment, we determined that one ARS continued to be impaired as of September 30, 2013. In November 2011, the muncipality that issued our impaird ARS filed for bankruptcy protection. As a result of the approval of the municipality's reorganization plan, and our voting elections, we received 65.0 % of the par value outstanding, or $2,113, during the quarter ended December 31, 2013, and we reversed the $234 temporary impairment that we previously recorded. We believe that this ARS is no longer impaired as of December 31, 2013 based on: (1) the successful monetization of 65% of the par value of the security in accordance with a bankruptcy plan during the quarter ended December 31, 2013; (2) the fact that the bond insurer is now responsible for servicing all future interest and principal payments; (3) the fact that all interest payments have been received; and (4) our intention not to sell the security nor be required to sell the security until the value is collected in full, which may be at maturity. As of December 31, 2013, this security has a fair value equal to its par value of $1,137. We determined that the fair value of the other ARS was not impaired as of December 31, 2013. See Note 5 for more information on these investments. |