SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
Commission File Number 000-30141
LIVEPERSON, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| DELAWARE | 13-3861628 |
| (State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. employer identification number) |
| 462 SEVENTH AVENUE, 21st FLOOR | 10018 |
| NEW YORK, NEW YORK | (Zip Code) |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |
(212) 609-4200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes |_| No |X|
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $34,931,446 (computed by reference to the last reported sale price on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on that date). The registrant does not have any non-voting common stock outstanding.
On March 15, 2004, 37,265,159 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed not later than April 29, 2004, are incorporated by reference into Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Form 10-K.
LIVEPERSON, INC.
2003 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT ABOUT LIVEPERSON, INC. (“LIVEPERSON”) THAT ARE NOT HISTORICAL FACTS ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED ON OUR CURRENT EXPECTATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS ABOUT LIVEPERSON AND OUR INDUSTRY. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL FUTURE EVENTS OR RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM SUCH STATEMENTS. ANY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE MADE PURSUANT TO THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. IT IS ROUTINE FOR OUR INTERNAL PROJECTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS TO CHANGE AS THE YEAR OR EACH QUARTER IN THE YEAR PROGRESS, AND THEREFORE IT SHOULD BE CLEARLYUNDERSTOOD THAT THE INTERNAL PROJECTIONS AND BELIEFS UPON WHICH WE BASE OUR EXPECTATIONS MAY CHANGE PRIOR TO THE END OF EACH QUARTER OR THE YEAR. ALTHOUGH THESE EXPECTATIONS MAY CHANGE, WE ARE UNDER NOOBLIGATION TO INFORM YOU IF THEY DO. OUR COMPANY POLICY IS GENERALLY TO PROVIDE OUR EXPECTATIONS ONLY ONCE PER QUARTER, AND NOT TO UPDATE THAT INFORMATION UNTIL THE NEXT QUARTER. ACTUAL EVENTS OR RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE CONTAINED IN THE PROJECTIONS OR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH DIFFERENCES INCLUDE THOSE DISCUSSED BELOW AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT, PARTICULARLY IN THE SECTION CAPTIONED “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OFFINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS.”
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
LivePerson, Inc., an online communication application service provider (ASP), delivers real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions for companies that conduct business online. Over 3,000 businesses currently employ LivePerson’s suite of products and services. We believe our products and services help our clients increase revenue and productivity, efficiently respond to customer inquiries and build customer relationships.
LivePerson’s products and services enable sales and customer service teams to interact with their customers online in a cost-effective and secure real-time environment. Through the use of the LivePerson application, companies can engage online customers at critical points in the buying process. We believe the ability to communicate with the right customer at the right time helps to increase revenue by increasing online sales conversion rates, improve the efficiency of sales and customer service operators and decrease overall customer support costs. The continued advancement of these combined capabilities has enabled LivePerson to develop into an online communication service provider. Traditionally, companies deployed and maintained software on their own internally managed networks. Through application service providers, companies can now outsource much of this technology. We offer our solutions via ASP delivery, which allows our clients to eliminate the large hardware and software investment typically associated with enterprise software applications. Because our application is hosted on servers that are managed by us, our clients benefit from limited software requirements, no hardware installations and minimum effort for upgrades. Clients may also easily add additional services upon request.
1
With LivePerson’s real-time chat applications, a company’s customer service and sales agents are able to respond to customer inquiries quickly and efficiently. By using features such as preformatted responses, repeat visitor alerts, proactive engagement tools and chat transcripts, companies can offer online shoppers a more enhanced and satisfactory customer experience. Based on feedback from our clients, we believe that businesses that use LivePerson’s products and services begin to see an immediate return on their investment as customers who complete a chat with a sales or customer service representative often purchase more items and make purchases more frequently than those who do not. Companies also realize lower customer support costs as operators can handle up to four incoming customer inquiries at one time. Combining the interactive nature of the Internet with the dependability of traditional customer service, LivePerson’s applications help companies build strong, long-lasting consumer relationships, convert browsers into buyers and turn one-time visitors into loyal customers.
The LivePerson suite of products and services includes Service Edition, LivePerson’s integrated call center application that enables chat, email and self-service interaction; Sales Edition, a proactive online sales application; and LivePerson Pro for small businesses.
LivePerson currently has more than 3,000 clients, including key players in the software, financial services, retail, telecom and cable television sectors. The 2003 client list includes Ameritrade, Bell Canada, Bell South, Computer Associates, EarthLink, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, Neiman Marcus, Qwest and VeriSign.
LivePerson was incorporated in the State of Delaware in November 1995 and the initial LivePerson service was introduced in November 1998.
Industry Background
According to a 2003 Jupiter Research study, online retail spending will reach $105 billion by 2007, and will account for five percent of all U.S. retail spending. More significantly, by 2007 the Internet will influence 34% of all U.S. retail spending according to the same Jupiter Research study. To effectively compete in this environment, online businesses increasingly strive to provide high quality customer service and interactive sales capabilities to attract and retain customers. Companies must focus on their customers to prevent the loss of revenue and market share to their competitors.
Another Jupiter Research study in 2003 showed that 58% of consumers surveyed said they would call when an email goes unanswered, potentially doubling processing costs, while 36% said they would send another email. LivePerson’s integrated chat and email capability enables companies to resolve issues in real time thereby increasing customer satisfaction and reducing transaction costs.
The LivePerson Solution
LivePerson’s services enable site monitoring and proactive interaction capabilities that create an online experience very much like a traditional offline sales or service environment, by enabling clients to welcome Web site visitors, share marketing or promotional information with them, and engage them in an online, text-based conversation, all within the feature set of the LivePerson solution. The combined solution provides a complete online communication platform.
To implement our text-based chat, email and frequently asked question (FAQ) services, our clients simply place a LivePerson-branded or custom-created icon on one or more pages of their Web sites and give their operators access to our service via the Internet. When an Internet user browsing a client’s Web site desires live text-based assistance, the user simply clicks on the icon. This causes a dialogue window to appear on the user’s screen. The Internet user and our client’s operator then engage in a real-time online conversation in this dialogue window. The operator may incorporate graphics and links to Web
2
pages into the dialogue window. Our service enables this live conversation by linking the Internet user and our clients’ operators through our proprietary technology, which resides on our servers. Our clients may also have their customer service operators proactively engage in chat conversations with their customers, or provide customized marketing or promotional information directly to those customers. To enable the proactive capability, our clients place monitoring tags on key Web site pages to gather information about site traffic and visitor flow through the site.
Our integrated email solutions enable our clients’ customer service operators to respond to both chat and email inquiries via an integrated queue of activity, with a single view of all incoming traffic. We create and store conversation transcripts, email text and related data, and we also enable our clients to generate optional Internet user exit surveys, which our clients can use to collect additional information about Internet users. Stored data includes the Internet user’s name, browser type, Internet Protocol (IP) address, responses to exit surveys, the operator’s identity and time stamps for each transmission. In addition, we provide our clients with tools to analyze the stored information. These tools include summary reports of the number of chats or emails in certain periods, the duration of chats, filters to sort data from exit surveys, statistical summaries of those data and statistical summaries of operator performance. These administrative functions are designed to help our clients replicate traditional call center and sales support tools in an online environment.
LivePerson’s products and services enable clients to:
3
Because LivePerson is an ASP and provides clients with a service rather than an in-house technology solution, clients realize the following additional benefits:
The LivePerson Services
The LivePerson suite of products and services includes Service Edition, LivePerson’s integrated call center application that enables chat, email and self-service interaction; Sales Edition, a proactive online sales application; and LivePerson Pro for small businesses.
LivePerson Service Edition
LivePerson Service Edition is our integrated chat, email and knowledgebase product for contact centers. Our clients use this solution to provide instant support to their customers and prospects during critical stages of online processes. With LivePerson Service Edition, clients place a LivePerson-branded or custom-created “live help” icon on their Web site that allows a customer browsing a client’s Web site to simply click on the icon and launch a LivePerson dialogue window for text-based chat, or enables site visitors to transmit an email inquiry or search a knowledgebase. These services enhance online sales and service efforts by offering Internet users a self-help option, which is especially useful for those customers with routine inquiries. Our knowledgebase uses a natural language processing engine to answer customer questions. Customers can also submit inquiries through the message management system or download a product document, brochure or application with the searchable document library, all from one common interface.
Set-up and training for Service Edition requires from a few hours to a few days depending on the size and scope of the implementation. LivePerson customer service personnel carefully train our clients’ staffs and implement technology to fully enable Service Edition clients to support inquiries within days of initial implementation.
4
LivePerson Sales Edition
LivePerson Sales Edition is based on an advanced rule-based engine technology, enabling our clients to offer personalized interaction and proactive, real-time sales support. Sales Edition clients typically see online sales conversion rates increase for those end users who engage in a real-time conversation. Setup and training for Sales Edition typically occurs over a 90-day Proof of Concept period. A dedicated LivePerson account manager carefully trains our clients’ staffs and implements technology at our clients’ locations to fully enable Sales Edition clients to support inquiries within days of initial implementation.
LivePerson Pro
LivePerson Pro, LivePerson’s basic sales and customer service interaction tool for small- and medium-sized businesses, allows small customer service and sales operations to receive the benefits of live chat at an affordable price. LivePerson Pro contains similar features to LivePerson Service Edition, but excludes certain features, such as automatic call distribution and operations reports, designed for support teams that handle thousands of incoming chats each day.
Launching LivePerson Pro requires:
Set-up and training can generally be accomplished within the same day. LivePerson also maintains a 24-hour per day/seven-day per week help desk to assist Pro clients with any technical concerns or issues.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to enhance our current position as a provider of real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions for companies that conduct business online. The continued development of these capabilities will enable us to strengthen our position as an online communication service provider. The key elements of our strategy include:
Strengthening our Position in Target Markets and Growing our Recurring Revenue Base.We intend to extend our market position by significantly increasing our installed client base. We plan to continue to focus primarily on internal corporate call centers in the financial services, computer software and hardware, retail and telecom industries, as well as small businesses, as our key target markets. We intend to capitalize on our growing base of existing clients by selling them additional services and other services as online shoppers are increasingly exposed to the benefits and functionality of live text-based interaction. Increasing our client base will enable us to continue to strengthen our recurring revenue stream. We also believe that greater exposure of Internet users to our services will create additional demand for real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions.
Increasing the Value of our Service to our Clients. We strive to continuously add new features and functionality to our live interaction platform. Because we manage the server infrastructure, we can make new features available immediately to our clients without client or end-user installation of software or hardware. We currently offer a suite of reporting and administrative tools as part of our overall suite of services. We will continue to develop more comprehensive tools for appropriate sectors of our client base, while adding further interactive capabilities. We will also continue to develop additional services
5
that will provide value to our clients. For example, we intend to provide more robust advisory services to our clients that enable improved reporting capabilities, data storage and bridges to existing client systems. Our clients may use these capabilities to increase productivity, manage call center staffing, develop one-to-one marketing tactics and pinpoint sales opportunities. We have recently added an integrated email response capability and a more robust knowledgebase functionality to our product offerings. Through these and other initiatives, we intend to increase the value of our services to clients and their reliance on its benefits, which we believe will result in additional revenue from both new and existing clients over time.
Continuing to Build Strong Brand Recognition.Our brand name is generally prominently displayed on the pop-up dialogue window that appears when an Internet user commences a text-based chat. In addition, our clients see our brand name when they log into our server infrastructure, which typically occurs on a daily basis, with many logged into our servers on a continuous basis. We believe that high visibility placement of our brand name will create greater brand awareness and increase demand for the LivePerson services. In addition, we intend to leverage increasing awareness of our brand and our reputation as a provider of real-time sales, marketing and customer service technology to become a well-recognized solution for companies that conduct business online.
Maintaining our Technological Leadership Position.We focus on the development of tightly integrated software design and network architecture that is both reliable and scalable. We continue to devote significant resources to technological innovation. Specifically, we plan to continue to expand the features and functionality of our existing services, develop broader applications for our services and create new products and services that will benefit our expanding client base. We evaluate emerging technologies and industry standards and continually update our technology in response to changes in the real-time customer service industry. We believe that these efforts will allow us to effectively anticipate changing client and end-user requirements in our rapidly evolving industry.
Evaluating Strategic Alliances and Acquisitions where Appropriate.We continue to seek opportunities to form strategic alliances with or to acquire other companies that can accelerate our growth or broaden our product offerings. In October 2000, we acquired HumanClick Ltd., an Israeli-based provider of real-time, on-line customer service applications to small- and mid-sized businesses. In July 2002, we acquired the customer contracts and associated rights of NewChannel, Inc., a Silicon Valley based provider of proactive online sales services. In December 2003, we acquired certain identifiable assets of San Diego-based Island Data Corporation, a provider of knowledgebase services to large corporate clients.
We have no commitments with respect to any strategic alliances or acquisitions and we are not currently engaged in any material negotiations with respect to these opportunities.
Expanding our International Presence.We have translated the user interface for the LivePerson services into eighteen languages, including Dutch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish. We are expanding our international presence to better penetrate these markets through reseller relationships in the United Kingdom, China, South Korea, Denmark and the Netherlands and are evaluating strategies to implement further international expansion.
Clients
Our client base includes dedicated Internet companies, Fortune 1000 companies and other companies with established commercial Web sites. Our service benefits companies of all sizes doing business on the Internet. We continue to focus primarily on internal corporate call centers in the financial services, computer software and hardware, retail and telecom industries, as well as small businesses, as our key target markets.
6
The following is a representative list of our clients among those generating at least $24,000 in revenue during 2003:
| American Airlines Credit Union | Federated Department Stores | Neiman Marcus |
| American Power Conversion | Ford Motor Company | Pacific Sunwear |
| Ameritrade | HP | Qwest |
| Bell Canada | IndyMac Bank | TechnoBrands |
| Bell South | Intranets.com | VeriSign |
| Computer Associates | Kinko’s | Wall Street Access |
| EarthLink | Maersk Sealand | World Sports Exchange |
| eHealthInsurance | Microsoft |
Sales, Client Support and Marketing
Sales.LivePerson sells its products primarily via telephone, the LivePerson chat services or direct automated download from the Internet. Due to the relatively low start-up costs of the LivePerson services, experience has shown that purchase approval frequently comes from customer service, sales or marketing managers, and requires little or no involvement on the part of a client’s information technology staff. LivePerson sells its services mainly through a direct sales organization that targets companies – primarily internal corporate call centers in the financial services, computer software and hardware, retail and telecom industries, as well as small businesses – seeking to improve customer relations and increase sales and lead generation online. Additionally, potential clients contact LivePerson as a result of trade show exhibits, press releases, news articles, online and offline advertising campaigns or visits to our Web site. Sales agents demonstrate the LivePerson services online and, for larger accounts, provide in-person service demonstrations.
LivePerson has also begun to enter into contractual arrangements that complement our direct sales force. These arrangements primarily include sales partner organizations and individuals in key markets who receive compensation through a commission-based plan. Revenue from these partnerships is not material.
Client Support.The LivePerson professional services group provides support to major clients throughout the launch of the LivePerson application and continues to manage that relationship over time. Each client has access to help desk services, while larger clients also have access to an account manager for ongoing support and process improvement.
Marketing.The LivePerson marketing strategy focuses on building brand awareness of LivePerson as a provider of real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions for companies conducting business online. Marketing is targeted primarily on internal corporate call centers in the financial services, computer software and hardware, retail and telecom industries, as well as small businesses. Marketing efforts consist primarily of direct communication efforts to potential and existing users through interactive email, direct mail, focused tradeshows and real-time chat, as well as channel support through newsletters and trade publications.
The LivePerson marketing strategy also includes public relations efforts through which LivePerson participates in interviews with media, industry and financial analysts that often result in published articles and research. Other initiatives include speaking engagements and byline articles featuring our executives. LivePerson also develops potential sales relationships through the use of case studies featuring the successes of our existing client relationships.
7
Competition
The market for sales and customer service technology is intensely competitive. Relatively few substantial barriers to entry in this market exist, other than the ability to design and build scalable software and, with respect to outsourced solution providers, the ability to design, build and manage scalable network architecture.
LivePerson competes directly with companies focused on technology that facilitates real-time sales, email management, searchable knowledgebase applications and customer service interaction. These markets remain fairly saturated with small companies that compete on price and features. LivePerson also faces significant competition from two customer service enterprise software providers, KANA and RightNow Technologies, which offer hosted solutions. The current competition within the proactive sales market is minimal. The most significant barriers to entry in this market are knowledge of:
LivePerson also faces competition from larger enterprise software companies such as Oracle and Siebel Systems. In addition, established technology companies may also leverage their existing relationships and capabilities to offer real-time sales, marketing and customer service applications.
Finally, LivePerson competes with clients and potential clients that choose to provide a real-time sales, marketing and customer service solution in-house as well as, to a lesser extent, traditional offline customer service solutions, such as telephone call centers.
LivePerson believes that competition will increase as our current competitors increase the sophistication of their offerings and as new participants enter the market. When compared to LivePerson, some of our larger current and potential competitors have:
Some competitors may enter into strategic or commercial relationships with larger, more established and better-financed companies, enabling them to:
8
Technology
Three key technological features distinguish the LivePerson services:
As an application service provider, we focus on the development of tightly integrated software design and network architecture. We have dedicated significant resources to designing our software and network architecture based on the fundamental principles of security, reliability and scalability.
Software Design.Our software design is based on client server architecture. As an application service provider, our customers install only the LivePerson software client (Windows or Java-based) on their operators’ workstations. Visitors to our clients’ Web sites require only a standard Web browser and do not need to download software from LivePerson in order to interact with our clients’ operators.
Our software design is also based on open standards. These standard protocols facilitate integration with our clients’ legacy and third-party systems, and include:
Network Architecture. The software underlying our services is integrated with scalable and reliable network architecture. Our network is scalable; we do not need to add new hardware or network capacity for each new LivePerson client. This network architecture is hosted in a third-party server center with redundant network connections, servers and other infrastructure, ensuring high availability and up-time. We also maintain a backup server infrastructure at a remote location for effective disaster recovery. For increased security, we use advanced firewall architecture. We also enable our clients to encrypt their sensitive data using industry standard encryption algorithms.
Government Regulation
We are subject to federal, state and local regulation, and laws of jurisdictions outside of the United States, including laws and regulations applicable to computer software and access to or commerce over the Internet. Due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet and various other online services, it
9
is likely that a number of new laws and regulations will be adopted with respect to the Internet or other online services covering issues such as user privacy, freedom of expression, pricing, content and quality of products and services, taxation, advertising, intellectual property rights and information security. The nature of such legislation and the manner in which it may be interpreted and enforced cannot be fully determined and, therefore, such legislation could subject us and/or our clients or Internet users to potential liability, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As a result of collecting data from live online Internet user dialogues, our clients may be able to analyze the commercial habits of Internet users. Privacy concerns may cause Internet users to avoid online sites that collect such behavioral information and even the perception of security and privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may indirectly inhibit market acceptance of our services. In addition, we or our clients may be harmed by any laws or regulations that restrict the ability to collect or use this data. The European Union and many countries within the E.U. have adopted privacy directives or laws that strictly regulate the collection and use of personally identifiable information of Internet users. The United States has adopted legislation which governs the collection and use of certain personal information. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has also taken action against Web site operators who do not comply with their stated privacy policies. Furthermore, other foreign jurisdictions have adopted legislation governing the collection and use of personal information. These and other governmental efforts may limit our clients’ ability to collect and use information about their Internet users through our services. As a result, such laws and efforts could create uncertainty in the marketplace that could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery costs, or could in some other manner have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition to privacy legislation, any new legislation or regulation regarding the Internet, or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet, could harm us. Additionally, as we operate outside the U.S., the international regulatory environment relating to the Internet could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark and other common law in the United States and other jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property, to the extent that protection is sought or secured at all. However, we believe that factors such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel, new service developments, frequent enhancements and reliable maintenance are more essential to establishing and maintaining a competitive advantage. Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology. We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and strategic partners, and through these and other written agreements, we attempt to control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a service with the same functionality as our services. Policing unauthorized use of our services and intellectual property rights is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology or intellectual property rights, particularly in foreign countries where we do business, where our services are sold or used, where the laws may not protect proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States or where enforcement of laws protecting proprietary rights is not common or effective.
10
Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the software industry. In the ordinary course of our business, our services may be increasingly subject to third-party infringement claims as the number of competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of services in different industry segments overlaps. Some of our competitors in the market for real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions may have filed or may intend to file patent applications covering aspects of their technology. Any claims alleging infringement of third-party intellectual property rights could require us to spend significant amounts in litigation (even if the claim is invalid), distract management from other tasks of operating our business, pay substantial damage awards, prevent us from selling our products, delay delivery of the LivePerson services, develop non-infringing software, technology, business processes, systems or other intellectual property (none of which might be successful), or limit our ability to use the intellectual property that is the subject of any of these claims, unless we enter into license agreements with the third parties (which may be unavailable on commercially reasonable terms, or not available at all). Therefore, such claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Employees
As of March 15, 2004, we had 58 full-time employees. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe our relations with our employees are good.
Web Site Access to Reports
We make available, free of charge, on our Web site (www.liveperson.com) our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practical, after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We currently lease approximately 7,000 square feet at our headquarters location in New York City, through October 2004.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, HumanClick Ltd., maintains offices in Raanana, Israel of approximately 4,000 square feet, under leases expiring in September 2005.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On or about December 2, 2002, MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, containing claims for unpaid invoices related to a contract with MCI for voice and data services. The complaint sought to recover approximately $761,000 plus interest. The District Court dismissed the action on our motion on May 29, 2003 because the contract contained a binding arbitration provision. The matter is presently pending for arbitration with JAMS in New York City in which we have denied liability.
Although we believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend vigorously the matter described above, and believe that we have provided adequate reserves in connection with the claim, we cannot assure you that our defense will be successful and, if it is not, that our ultimate liability in connection with this claim will not exceed our reserves or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
11
On November 16, 2001, Corio, Inc. filed a demand for arbitration against us with the American Arbitration Association in San Francisco County, California. The demand was related to a hosted software service contract terminated during 2001. In December 2003, the matter was settled and we paid Corio approximately $1.4 million.
ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003.
12
PART II
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATEDSTOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock was quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “LPSN” from our initial public offering on April 7, 2000 until May 28, 2002, and has been quoted on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the same symbol since that time. The following table sets forth, for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years, the range of high and low bid information (in dollars per share) of our common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market or the Nasdaq SmallCap Market:
| High | Low | ||||
| Year ended December 31, 2002: | |||||
| First Quarter | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.29 | |
| Second Quarter | $ | 0.98 | $ | 0.33 | |
| Third Quarter | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.33 | |
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 0.94 | $ | 0.51 | |
| Year ended December 31, 2003: | |||||
| First Quarter | $ | 1.26 | $ | 0.65 | |
| Second Quarter | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.75 | |
| Third Quarter | $ | 4.17 | $ | 1.64 | |
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 7.48 | $ | 3.75 | |
HOLDERS
As of March 15, 2004, there were approximately 189 holders of record of our common stock.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception. We intend to retain earnings, if any, to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
We issued an aggregate of 98,302 shares of Common Stock on September 19, 2003 upon the exercise of a warrant by FG-LP, in consideration of the termination of the right to purchase an additional 77,479 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the warrant’s net exercise provision. The shares were issued to the partners of FG-LP. The issuance was made under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because the issuance did not involve any public offering.
We issued an aggregate of 118,152 shares of Common Stock on October 8, 2003 upon the exercise of a warrant by Allen & Company Incorporated, in consideration of the termination of the right to purchase an additional 77,161 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the warrant’s net exercise provision. The shares were issued to Allen & Company Incorporated and certain of its affiliates and customers. The issuance was made under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because the issuance did not involve any public offering.
13
We issued 4,733 shares of Common Stock on October 10, 2003 upon the exercise of a warrant by Alan Braverman, in consideration of the termination of the right to purchase an additional 3,079 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the warrant’s net exercise provision. The issuance was made under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because the issuance did not involve any public offering.
We issued 55,723 shares of Common Stock on October 29, 2003 upon the exercise of a warrant by Sterling Payot Capital, LP, in consideration of the termination of the right to purchase an additional 22,401 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the warrant’s net exercise provision. The issuance was made under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because the issuance did not involve any public offering.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table provides certain information regarding the common stock authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, as of December 31, 2003.
| Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (3) | ||||||||
| Plan Category | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||
| Equity compensation plans | ||||||||||
| approved by stockholders (1) | 5,723,000 | $ | 1.46 | 5,356,769 | ||||||
| Equity compensation plans not | ||||||||||
| approved by stockholders (2) | 150,000 | $ | 0.69 | — | ||||||
| Total | 5,873,000 | $ | 1.44 | 5,356,769 | ||||||
| (1) | Our equity compensation plans which were approved by our stockholders are the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
| (2) | On December 11, 2002, we issued a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at $0.69 per share to Genesis Select Corp. in exchange for investor relations services. Because approval was not required at the time, our stockholders did not approve the issuance of the warrant. |
| (3) | Excludes securities reflected in column (a). The number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan automatically increases on the first trading day in each calendar year by an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar year, but in no event shall such annual increase exceed 1,500,000 shares. The number of shares of common stock available for issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan automatically increases on the first trading day in each calendar year by an amount equal to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar year, but in no event shall such annual increase exceed 150,000 shares. Effective October 2001, we suspended our Employee Stock Purchase Plan until further notice. Also see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements. |
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
We did not repurchase any of our securities during any month within the quarter ended December 31, 2003.
14
ITEM 6.SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated financial data with respect to our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which are included herein. The selected financial data with respect to our balance sheets as of December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 have been derived from our audited financial statements which are not included herein. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the information contained in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except share and per share data) | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue: | |||||||||||||||
| Service revenue | $ | 12,023 | $ | 8,234 | $ | 7,806 | $ | 6,279 | $ | 576 | |||||
| Programming revenue | — | — | — | — | 39 | ||||||||||
| Total revenue | 12,023 | 8,234 | 7,806 | 6,279 | 615 | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue, exclusive of $0, $0, $(193), $1,109 | |||||||||||||||
| and $198 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, | |||||||||||||||
| 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, reported below as | |||||||||||||||
| non-cash compensation expense | 2,028 | 1,604 | 6,740 | 7,888 | 856 | ||||||||||
| Product development, exclusive of $0, $0, $(181), | |||||||||||||||
| $1,476 and $566 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, | |||||||||||||||
| 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, reported below as | |||||||||||||||
| non-cash compensation expense | 1,641 | 1,283 | 3,509 | 8,209 | 1,637 | ||||||||||
| Sales and marketing, exclusive of $0, $0, $376, | |||||||||||||||
| $4,822 and $577 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, | |||||||||||||||
| 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, reported below as | |||||||||||||||
| non-cash compensation expense | 3,555 | 2,177 | 5,089 | 14,529 | 3,987 | ||||||||||
| General and administrative, exclusive of $343, $365, | |||||||||||||||
| $675,$5,838 and $1,338 for the years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, | |||||||||||||||
| reported below as non-cash compensation expense | 3,267 | 2,811 | 5,694 | 6,994 | 1,706 | ||||||||||
| Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles | 1,014 | 357 | 2,975 | 619 | — | ||||||||||
| Non-cash compensation expense, net | 343 | 365 | 677 | 13,245 | 2,679 | ||||||||||
| Non-cash compensation credit related to restructuring, net | — | — | (1,720 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
| Restructuring and impairment charges | 1,024 | 1,186 | 12,740 | — | — | ||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 12,872 | 9,783 | 35,704 | 51,484 | 10,865 | ||||||||||
| Loss from operations | (849 | ) | (1,549 | ) | (27,898 | ) | (45,205 | ) | (10,250 | ) | |||||
| Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | (8 | ) | — | 109 | 65 | — | |||||||||
| Interest income | 41 | 126 | 538 | 1,839 | 474 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense | — | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | (33 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
| Total other income, net | 33 | 116 | 637 | 1,871 | 473 | ||||||||||
| Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change | (816 | ) | (1,433 | ) | (27,261 | ) | (43,334 | ) | (9,777 | ) | |||||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | — | (5,338 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net loss | (816 | ) | (6,771 | ) | (27,261 | ) | (43,334 | ) | (9,777 | ) | |||||
| Non-cash preferred stock dividend | — | — | — | (18,000 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (6,771 | ) | $ | (27,261 | ) | $ | (61,334 | ) | $ | (9,777 | ) |
| Basic and diluted net loss per common share: | |||||||||||||||
| Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) | $ | (2.50 | ) | $ | (1.38 | ) |
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | — | (0.16 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) | $ | (2.50 | ) | $ | (1.38 | ) |
| Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding | 34,854,802 | 34,028,702 | 33,987,895 | 24,535,078 | 7,092,000 | ||||||||||
15
| December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,898 | $ | 8,004 | $ | 10,136 | $ | 20,449 | $ | 14,944 | |||||
| Working capital | 8,486 | 6,137 | 7,878 | 20,280 | 13,380 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | 13,537 | 10,837 | 17,627 | 47,000 | 19,570 | ||||||||||
| Redeemable convertible preferred stock | — | — | — | — | 18,990 | ||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | 9,336 | 7,888 | 14,271 | 42,775 | (2,046 | ) | |||||||||
16
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Statements in the following discussion about LivePerson that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about LivePerson and our industry. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual future events or results to differ materially from such statements. Any such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. It is routine for our internal projections and expectations to change as the year or each quarter in the year progress, and therefore it should be clearly understood that the internal projections and beliefs upon which we base our expectations may change prior to the end of each quarter or the year. Although these expectations may change, we are under no obligation to inform you if they do. Our company policy is generally to provide our expectations only once per quarter, and not to update that information until the next quarter. Actual events or results may differ materially from those contained in the projections or forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in the section captioned “—Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results.”
Subsequent Events
In January 2004, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the resale of up to 500,000 shares of our common stock by Island Data Corporation. Our registration of the resale of the shares was required by our agreement to purchase certain identifiable assets from Island Data. See “—Overview.” We currently estimate our obligation to issue shares of our common stock to Island Data as a portion of the purchase price to be approximately 375,000 shares in total, some of which were issued in February 2004 and March 2004 as described below. The exact number of shares will be determined according to an earn-out formula contained in the agreement. Any shares registered for resale on the registration statement, but not actually issued to Island Data pursuant to the earn-out formula, will be deregistered. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock covered by the Island Data registration statement.
In January 2004, we filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock that we may issue from time to time. We have no immediate plans to offer or sell any shares under this shelf registration. We presently intend to use the net proceeds from any sale of the registered shares for general corporate purposes, working capital and potential strategic acquisitions. We would announce the terms of any issuance in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the time we offer or sell the shares.
In February 2004, we issued 76,074 shares of our common stock to Island Data as the first stock portion of the purchase price, determined according to an earn-out formula contained in our agreement with Island Data. The value of the shares issued was approximately $364,000, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on the date of issuance.
In March 2004, we issued an additional 294,820 shares of our common stock to Island Data as the second stock portion of the purchase price, determined according to an earn-out formula contained in our agreement with Island Data. The value of the shares issued was approximately $1.4 million, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on the date of issuance.
17
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believes are reasonable based upon the information available. We base these estimates on our historical experience, future expectations and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for our judgments that may not be readily apparent from other sources. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates and assumptions relate to estimates of collectibility of accounts receivable, the realization of goodwill, the expected term of a client relationship, accruals and other factors. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and any differences could be material.
The significant accounting policies which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating the reported consolidated financial results include the following:
Revenue Recognition
The LivePerson services facilitate real-time sales, marketing and customer service for companies that conduct business online. We charge a monthly fee, which varies by service. Certain of our larger clients, who require more sophisticated implementation and training, may also pay an initial non-refundable setup fee.
The initial set-up fee is intended to recover certain costs (principally customer service, training and other administrative costs) prior to the deployment of our services. Such fees are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over a period of 24 months, representing the estimated term of the client relationships. Although we believe this estimate is reasonable, this estimate may change in the future. In instances where we do charge a set-up fee, we typically do not charge an additional set-up fee if an existing client adds more services. Unamortized deferred fees, if any, are recognized upon termination of the agreement with the customer. We recognized $0, $12,000 and $286,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, of set-up fees due to client attrition.
We also sell certain of the LivePerson services directly via Internet download. These services are marketed as LivePerson Pro for small- and medium-sized businesses, and are paid for almost exclusively by credit card. Credit card payments accelerate cash flow and reduce our collection risk, subject to the merchant bank’s right to hold back cash pending settlement of the transactions. Sales executed via Internet download may occur with or without the assistance of an online sales representative, rather than through face-to-face or telephone contact that is typically required for traditional direct sales. Sales of the LivePerson services via Internet download typically have no set-up fee, because we do not provide the customer with training and administrative costs are minimal.
We record revenue for traditional direct sales and Internet download sales based upon a monthly fee charged for the LivePerson services, provided that no significant Company obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. We recognize monthly service revenue fees as services are provided. Our service agreements typically have no termination date and are terminable by either party upon 30 to 90 days’ notice without penalty.
18
Accounts Receivable
Our customers are primarily concentrated in the United States. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition (except for customers who purchase the LivePerson services via Internet download) and have established an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information that we believe to be reasonable, although they may change in the future. If there is a deterioration of a customer’s credit worthiness or actual write-offs are higher than our historical experience, our estimates of recoverability for these receivables could be adversely affected. Our concentration of credit risk is limited due to the large number of customers. No single customer accounted for or exceeded 10% of our total revenue in 2003, 2002 or 2001. Two customers accounted for approximately 22% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2003. One customer accounted for approximately 16% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2002.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Prior to January 1, 2002, we accounted for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.” SFAS No. 121 requires that long-lived assets, including fixed assets and goodwill, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
We adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,” on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 144 requires long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization to be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of an asset to estimated undisclosed future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sales would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have any impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Restructuring Activities
Restructuring activities, prior to January 1, 2003, were accounted for in accordance with the guidance provided in the consensus opinion of the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”), in connection with EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring).” EITF Issue No. 94-3 generally requires, with respect to the recognition of severance expenses, management approval of the restructuring plan, the determination of the employees to be terminated and communication of benefit arrangement to employees.
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 146,“Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which supersedes EITF Issue No. 94-3. SFAS No. 146 requires that costs associated with an exit or disposal plan be recognized when incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The adoption of SFAS No. 146, effective January 1, 2003, did not have any impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
19
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 established standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. SFAS No. 150 was effective for our instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise will be effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. For these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, SFAS No. 150 will be effective for us on January 1, 2005. The effective date has been deferred indefinitely for certain other types of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. We do not have any financial instruments that are within the scope of SFAS No. 150.
In December 2003, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulleting (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition,” which supersedes SAB No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB No. 104 primarily rescinds the accounting guidance contained in SAB No. 101 related to multiple-element revenue arrangements, which was superseded as a result of the issuance of EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Additionally, SAB No. 104 rescinds the SEC’s “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” issued with SAB No. 101, which had been codified in SEC Topic 13, “Revenue Recognition.” SAB No. 104 was effective upon issuance. The issuance of SAB No. 104 did not have any impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Overview
LivePerson, an online communication application service provider (ASP), delivers real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions for companies that conduct business online. We offer our proprietary real-time interaction technology as outsourced services. We currently generate revenue from the sale of our LivePerson services, which enable our clients to communicate directly with Internet users via text-based chat, integrated email functionality or a searchable knowledgebase. Our integrated communication software enables a consolidated view of incoming inquiries, via chat, email and self-service channels.
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in November 1995 and the initial LivePerson service was introduced in November 1998.
On May 28, 2002, our common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, following approval by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. of our May 14, 2002 application to transfer the listing of our common stock from the Nasdaq National Market to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.
In July 2002, we acquired all of the existing customer contracts of NewChannel, Inc. and associated rights. The purchase price was based, in part, on projected revenue from each of the former NewChannel clients at the time of their successful conversion to the LivePerson software platform. Our acquisition cost was approximately $1.4 million, including the initial purchase price payment of $600,000 to NewChannel. The total acquisition cost has been allocated to customer contracts and was amortized ratably over a period of 18 months, representing the then expected term of the client relationships. As of December 31, 2003, the total purchase has been completely amortized. The net amount of $1.0 million is included in “Assets – Other intangibles, net” on our December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet.
On May 21, 2003, we were notified by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. that we had regained compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid requirement for the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.
20
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of LivePerson held on May 22, 2003, our stockholders approved separate proposals to amend our Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect, alternatively, one of three different reverse splits of the outstanding shares of our common stock, at a ratio of one-for-three, one-for-five and one-for-seven. Pursuant to authority granted by these proposals, our Board of Directors will have the discretion, at any time on or prior to May 31, 2004, to decide which reverse split proposal to implement, or not to effect a reverse split at all. As set forth in the proxy statement delivered to stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting, the principal purpose of each reverse split proposal is to increase the market price of our common stock above the minimum bid requirement of $1.00 per share required by Nasdaq. We do not currently intend to effect a reverse split because the bid price for shares of our common stock satisfies the minimum requirement for quotation on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market; however, there can be no assurance that we will not need to or choose to effect a reverse stock split in the future.
In December 2003, we acquired certain identifiable assets of Island Data Corporation. The purchase price is based on projected revenue from the acquired customer contracts at the time of their assignment to us. As of December 31, 2003, we paid approximately $75,000 in cash and accrued an additional $286,000. We currently estimate our obligation to issue shares of our common stock in connection with the acquisition to be approximately 375,000 shares in total, some of which were issued in February 2004 and March 2004 as described above under the heading “Subsequent Events.” The exact number of shares will be determined according to an earn-out formula contained in the agreement. We do not expect the total acquisition costs to exceed approximately $2.4 million. Of the total purchase price, we have allocated approximately $65,000 to non-compete agreements which will be amortized over a period of 24 months, representing the terms of the agreements. The remainder of the purchase price will be allocated to customer contracts and will be amortized over a period of 36 months, representing our current estimate of the expected term of the client relationships. The net acquisition costs of $361,000 are included in “Assets – Other intangibles, net” on our December 31, 2003 balance sheet. This amount does not include the value of any shares issued or to be issued pursuant to the earn-out formula.
Revenue
Our clients pay us a monthly fee, which varies by service. Certain of our larger clients, who require more sophisticated implementation and training, may also pay an initial non-refundable set-up fee. Our set-up fee is intended to recover certain costs incurred by us (principally customer service, training and other administrative costs) prior to deployment of our services. Such fees are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized over a period of 24 months, representing the estimated term of the client relationships. As a result of recognizing set-up fees in this manner, combined with the fact that a small proportion of our clients are charged a set-up fee, revenue attributable to our monthly service fee for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 accounted for 98%, 97% and 90, respectively, of total LivePerson services revenue. In addition, because we typically do not charge a set-up fee for sales generated via Internet download, we expect the set-up fee to continue to represent a small percentage of total revenue. In instances where we do charge a set-up fee, we typically do not charge an additional setup fee if an existing client adds more services. Our service agreements typically have no termination date and are terminable by either party upon 30 to 90 days’ notice without penalty. We recognize monthly service revenue fees and professional service fees as services are provided. Professional service fees consist of additional training and business consulting and analysis provided to customers, both at the initial launch and over the term of the contract. Given the time required to schedule training for our clients’ operators and our clients’ resource constraints, we have historically experienced a lag between signing a client contract and generating revenue from that client. This lag has generally ranged from one day to 30 days. There is no lag for sales generated via Internet download, because our services are
21
immediately available and fully functional upon download. To date, revenue from professional services has not been material.
We also sell certain of the LivePerson services directly via Internet download. These services are marketed as LivePerson Pro for small- and medium-sized businesses, and are paid for almost exclusively by credit card. Credit card payments accelerate cash flow and reduce our collection risk, subject to the merchant bank’s right to hold back cash pending settlement of the transactions. Sales executed via Internet download may occur with or without the assistance of an online sales representative, rather than through face-to-face or telephone contact which is typically required for traditional direct sales. Sales of the LivePerson services via Internet download typically have no set-up fee, because we do not provide the customer with training, and administrative costs are minimal. We recognize monthly service revenue fees from Internet downloads as services are provided.
We also have entered into contractual arrangements that complement our direct sales force and online sales efforts. These are primarily with Web hosting and call center service companies, pursuant to which LivePerson is paid a commission based on revenue generated by these service companies from our referrals. To date, revenue from such commissions has not been material.
Operating Expenses
Our cost of revenue has principally been associated with the LivePerson services and has consisted of:
Our product development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for product development personnel, allocated occupancy costs and related overhead, outsourced labor and expenses for testing new versions of our software. Product development expenses are charged to operations as incurred.
Our sales and marketing expenses consist of compensation and related expenses for sales personnel and marketing personnel, allocated occupancy costs and related overhead, advertising, sales commissions, marketing programs, public relations, promotional materials, travel expenses and trade show exhibit expenses.
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for executive, accounting and human resources personnel, allocated occupancy costs and related overhead, professional fees, provision for doubtful accounts and other general corporate expenses.
We did not increase our allowance for doubtful accounts in the three months ended December 31, 2001 or the year ended December 31, 2002. This is attributable to the fact that our accounts receivable collections improved beginning in the fourth quarter of 2001, due primarily to the significantly larger percentage of our total outstanding accounts receivable being comprised of businesses with more
22
established and proven operating histories, and to a lesser extent, to the fact that an increased number of our clients now pay us by credit card, which transfers the collection risk to the credit card provider.
In the year ended December 31, 2003, we increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by $15,000 to approximately $85,000, principally due to an increase in accounts receivable as a result of increased sales. During 2003, we wrote off approximately $21,000 of previously reserved accounts, leaving a net allowance of $64,000 at December 31, 2003. We base our allowance for doubtful accounts on specifically identified known doubtful accounts plus a general reserve for potential future doubtful accounts. We adjust our allowance for doubtful accounts when accounts previously reserved have been collected.
Non-cash Compensation Expense
The net non-cash compensation amounts for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 consist of:
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||
| May 1999 option granted to a client (discussed below) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 237 | |||
| December 2002 warrant granted for investor relations | |||||||||
| services (discussed below) | 298 | — | — | ||||||
| Amortization of employee stock compensation | — | 365 | 833 | ||||||
| Acceleration of deferred compensation charges related to | |||||||||
| certain employee terminations | 45 | — | 616 | ||||||
| Reversal of previously amortized deferred compensation | |||||||||
| charges due to forfeitures of employee stock options | — | — | (1,009 | ) | |||||
| Total | $ | 343 | $ | 365 | $ | 677 | |||
During May 1999, we issued an option to purchase 94,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.60 per share to ShopNow.com Inc. (now known as Network Commerce Inc.), a client, in connection with an agreement to provide the LivePerson services to Network Commerce for two years. We were to receive subscription revenue from Network Commerce over the two-year period based on the number of LivePerson chat operator access accounts the client was using. As discussed below, the option was amended in February 2000. The original terms of the option provided that it would vest on or before May 2001, if revenue generated by Network Commerce met certain targets. We granted the option as an incentive for entering into a two-year service agreement with us, at a point in time when the LivePerson services were new and their viability was unknown. The option had no minimum revenue guarantee, and was exercisable for a period of three years from the date of grant. We accounted for this option in accordance with EITF Abstract No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” Pursuant to EITF No. 96-18, we valued the option at each balance sheet date using a Black-Scholes pricing model as of each balance sheet date. The unamortized value ascribed to this option was adjusted at each balance sheet date to bring the total ascribed value of the option up to the then current unamortized fair value. This cost was then ratably amortized over the two-year service agreement, as we believed that the achievement of the revenue targets was probable.
In February 2000, we amended the option agreement. Under the amendment, the option became fully vested and immediately exercisable, and Network Commerce exercised the option in May 2000. Network Commerce agreed, however, that it could not sell the underlying common stock until the earlier of five years or, if certain revenue criteria were met, May 19, 2001. The value ascribed to the option at the time the option agreement was amended, using a Black-Scholes pricing model, was $1,014,000, which was being amortized ratably over the remaining service period of approximately fifteen months because the vesting of the option did not affect our obligation under the service agreement. We amortized $723,000
23
of the deferred costs during the year ended December 31, 2000, of which $59,000 was offset against the $59,000 of revenue recognized from Network Commerce. The remaining $664,000 of sales and marketing expense was included in non-cash compensation expense in our 2000 statement of operations.
As of March 31, 2001, we determined that it was unlikely that Network Commerce would meet the remaining revenue requirements under the agreement. Accordingly, we amortized the remaining deferred cost of $291,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2001, of which $54,000 was offset against the $54,000 of revenue recognized from Network Commerce. The remaining $237,000 of sales and marketing expense was included in non-cash compensation expense in our statement of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.
In December 2002, we issued a warrant to purchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock at $0.69 per share to Genesis Select Corp. in exchange for investor relations services. The warrant vested such that 12,500 shares became exercisable on each monthly anniversary of the warrant issuance date for the first 12 months of the warrant’s five-year term. Some or all of the purchase price may be paid by canceling a vested portion of the warrant. As of December 31, 2003, the warrant was fully vested and remained outstanding. We recorded non-cash compensation expense of $298,000 related to this warrant during 2003.
The net non-cash compensation amounts for the year ended December 31, 2001 exclude the net non-cash compensation credit of $1.7 million related to our restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2001 (see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements).
Excluding the net non-cash compensation credit of approximately $1.7 million related to our restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2001, the net non-cash compensation charge of $677,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001, includes $237,000 related to the May 1999 option granted to Network Commerce (discussed above), $833,000 of amortization expense and $616,000 of charges related to acceleration of vesting of options in connection with the termination of the employment of certain employees, and approximately $1.0 million of credits due to forfeiture in connection with the termination of the employment of certain employees.
Restructuring
In the first quarter of 2001, following a review of our business in connection with our acquisition of the private Israeli company HumanClick Ltd. in October 2000, we commenced restructuring initiatives to streamline our operations, including the consolidation of our two San Francisco Bay area offices. The restructuring resulted in a reduction of our workforce by approximately 90 people as of the end of the first quarter of 2001. In the first quarter of 2001, we recorded a charge of approximately $3.4 million for severance and other expenses related to the restructuring. In the third quarter of 2001, in a continued effort to streamline our operations, we initiated additional restructuring initiatives and recorded a charge of approximately $9.3 million. These initiatives resulted in the elimination of redundant staff positions, and the decision to relocate our principal executive offices, which included the termination of an office space lease (and the entering into of a new three-year lease that commenced in November 2001). The restructuring resulted in a reduction of our workforce by approximately 20 people, the write-off of impaired computer equipment and software and the write-off of certain furniture, equipment and building improvements. For the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded net charges of approximately $12.7 million for our various restructuring initiatives.
In connection with our third quarter 2001 restructuring initiatives, we consolidated all of our clients onto a single software application platform and network. The new platform provided our customers with a more dependable product and reduced our cost of providing these services. Our network is hosted by a third-party provider of secure server hosting services located in the United States. While the cost of
24
providing our services as a result of these initiatives has decreased, we are dependent on our third-party server hosting provider for redundant network connections, server maintenance and general security. We have not experienced any material product instability or operational consequences since the implementation of these initiatives. We have also consolidated our product development, help desk and online sales personnel in our Israel office. As a result, the political, economic or military conditions affecting Israel could have a material adverse effect on our operations in Israel or our business.
In the fourth quarter of 2002, in accordance with EITF 94-3, we incurred an additional restructuring charge related to our 2001 restructuring initiatives. This $1.2 million charge primarily related to the unfavorable settlement of a previously disclosed legal proceeding in excess of the provision initially provided for in connection with our original restructuring plan. The legal proceeding was the result of the termination of an operating lease for computer equipment that supported our application platform prior to the consolidation of all clients onto a single application platform in the third quarter of 2001.
In the second quarter of 2003, we recorded an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1.0 million related to our 2001 restructuring initiatives. This charge reflected the amount of the judgment in a previously disclosed arbitration proceeding in excess of the $350,000 provision initially provided for by us in connection with our original restructuring plan in 2001. The arbitration proceeding was related to a hosted software service contract terminated during 2001 (see Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings”).
Results of Operations
Due to our acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002, our acquisition of HumanClick in October 2000, our significant restructuring initiatives during 2001 and our limited operating history, we believe that comparisons of our 2003, 2002 and 2001 operating results with each other, or with those of prior periods, are not meaningful and that our historical operating results should not be relied upon as indicative of future performance.
Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
Revenue.Total revenue increased to $12.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, from $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase is attributable to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002 and to a combination of revenue from new clients, increased revenue from existing clients and a greater proportion of new clients purchasing the higher-priced Sales Edition as a result of increased market acceptance of our services. Revenue in 2003 and 2002 included the recognition of $0 and $12,000, respectively, of set-up fees due to client attrition. Unamortized deferred fees, if any, are recognized upon termination of the agreement with the client. We cannot assure you that we will achieve similar revenue growth, if any, in future periods.
Cost of Revenue.Cost of revenue consists of compensation costs relating to employees who provide customer service to our clients, compensation costs relating to our network support staff, the cost of supporting our infrastructure, including expenses related to leasing space and connectivity for our services, third-party monitoring services, as well as depreciation of certain hardware and software, and allocated occupancy costs and related overhead. Cost of revenue increased to $2.0 million in 2003, from $1.6 million in 2002. This increase is primarily related to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002, as well as increased usage from existing clients and the addition of new clients.
Product Development. Our product development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for product development personnel. Product development costs increased to $1.6
25
million in 2003, from $1.3 million in 2002. This increase is attributable to an increase in the number of LivePerson product development personnel, as well as an increase in outsourced labor costs related to the continuing development of our product line as we broaden the range of services we offer to include a fully integrated, multi-channel software platform.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses consist of compensation and related expenses for sales and marketing personnel, as well as advertising and public relations expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased to $3.6 million in 2003, from $2.2 million in 2002. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in sales and marketing personnel as a result of both the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002 and the expansion of our sales force, and, to a lesser extent, to an increase in on-line advertising and marketing expenses related to our increasing efforts to enhance our brand recognition and to increased sales lead activity.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for executive, accounting, human resources and administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses increased to $3.3 million in 2003, from $2.8 million in 2002. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in compensation and related expenses and to an increase in investor relations expenses as the result of the hiring of an outside firm and, to a lesser extent, to increases in recruitment costs and depreciation, partially offset by a decrease in the cost of our directors and officers insurance.
Amortization of Other Intangibles. Amortization expense was $1.0 million and $357,000 in the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and relates to acquisition costs recorded as a result of our acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002.
Non-Cash Compensation Expense, Net. Non-cash compensation expense consists primarily of amortization of deferred stock-based compensation. Deferred stock-based compensation represents the difference between the exercise price and the deemed fair value of certain stock options and warrants granted to employees, consultants and directors. Deferred compensation has been amortized over the vesting period of the individual options and warrants. In 2003, we recorded non-cash compensation expense of $343,000, a decrease from $365,000 in 2002.
Restructuring Charge. Restructuring charge was $1.0 million and $1.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2003, and 2002, respectively. In the second quarter of 2003, we recorded an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1.0 million related to our 2001 restructuring initiatives. This charge reflected the amount of the judgment in a previously disclosed arbitration proceeding in excess of the $350,000 provision initially provided for in connection with our original restructuring plan in 2001. The arbitration proceeding was related to a hosted software service contract terminated during 2001. In the fourth quarter of 2002, we incurred an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1.2 million related to our 2001 restructuring initiatives. This charge primarily related to the unfavorable settlement of a previously disclosed legal proceeding in excess of the provision initially provided for in connection with our original restructuring plan in 2001. The legal proceeding was the result of the termination of an operating lease for computer equipment that supported our application platform prior to the consolidation of all clients onto a single application platform in the third quarter or 2001.
Other Income. Interest income was $41,000 and $126,000 in 2003 and 2002, respectively, and consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents generated by the receipt of proceeds from our initial public offering in 2000 and preferred stock issuances in 2000 and 1999. Interest expense was $0 and $10,000 in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Other expense was $8,000 and $0 in 2003 and 2002, respectively, and was related to the write-off, in the first quarter of 2003, of our accumulated other comprehensive loss in connection with the closing of our operations in the United Kingdom.
26
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change. On January 1, 2002, we were required to adopt the full provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and certain indefinite-lived intangibles no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually. This testing requires the identification of reporting units and comparison of the reporting units’ carrying value to their fair value and, when appropriate, requires the reduction of the carrying value of impaired assets to their fair value.
The transitional impairment analysis required upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 was completed during the first quarter of 2002, and we determined that there was an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill. As part of this analysis, we determined that we continued to operate in one operating segment and that we did not have any separate reporting units under SFAS No. 142; accordingly, the impairment analysis was performed on an enterprise-wide basis. This process included obtaining an independent appraisal of our fair value as a whole and of our individual assets. Fair value was determined from the same cash flow forecasts used in December 2001 for the evaluation of our carrying value under SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” which was the accounting rule for impairment of goodwill that preceded SFAS No. 142 and was effective through December 31, 2001. The valuation methodology required by SFAS No. 142 is different than that required by SFAS No. 121. An impairment is more likely to result under SFAS No. 142 because it requires, among other items, the discounting of forecasted cash flows as compared to the undiscounted cash flow valuation method under SFAS No. 121.
The allocation of fair values to identifiable tangible and intangible assets as of January 1, 2002, resulted in an implied valuation of the goodwill of $0. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined in the same manner as determining the amount of goodwill that would have been required to be recognized in a business combination. That is, under SFAS No. 142, an entity is required to allocate the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire it. Comparing this implied value to the carrying value resulted in an impairment of $5.3 million, with no income tax effect. This impairment was recorded as a cumulative effect of accounting change on our statement of operations as of January 1, 2002.
Net Loss. Our net loss decreased to $816,000 in 2003, from $6.8 million in 2002. The net loss for 2003 includes the additional restructuring charge of approximately $1.0 million recorded in the second quarter of 2003 described above under “Restructuring Charge.” The net loss for 2002 includes the cumulative effect of an accounting change of $5.3 million related to the impairment of goodwill described above and a restructuring charge of approximately $1.2 million.
Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
Revenue.Total revenue increased to $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, from $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was due primarily to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002 and, to a lesser extent, to the introduction of a new range of services and increased market acceptance of our services. Revenue in 2002 and 2001 included the recognition of $12,000 and $286,000, respectively, of set-up fees due to client attrition. Unamortized deferred fees, if any, are recognized upon termination of the agreement with the client.
Cost of Revenue.Cost of revenue consists of compensation costs relating to employees who provide customer service to our clients, compensation costs relating to our network support staff, the cost of supporting our infrastructure, including expenses related to leasing space and connectivity for our services, third-party monitoring services, as well as depreciation of certain hardware and software, and allocated occupancy costs and related overhead. Cost of revenue decreased to $1.6 million in 2002, from
27
$6.7 million in 2001. This decrease was primarily attributable to reduced spending requirements associated with supporting our infrastructure as a result of our 2001 restructuring initiatives, including the consolidation of our clients onto a single customer application platform and the cancellation of operating leases for certain computer equipment in the third quarter of 2001. The decrease is also attributable, to a lesser extent, to reduced allocated occupancy costs and related overhead.
Product Development.Our product development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for product development personnel. Product development costs decreased to $1.3 million in 2002, from $3.5 million in 2001. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in outsourced labor costs and to our 2001 restructuring initiatives, which resulted in fewer employees, streamlined operations and reduced spending requirements in 2002, including relocating software development activities to our Israel office in the third quarter of 2001.
Sales and Marketing.Our sales and marketing expenses consist of compensation and related expenses for sales and marketing personnel, as well as advertising and public relations expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $2.2 million in 2002, from $5.1 million in 2001. This decrease was primarily attributable to reduced print advertising expense and to our 2001 restructuring initiatives, which resulted in fewer employees, streamlined operations and reduced spending requirements.
General and Administrative.Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for executive, accounting, human resources and administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses decreased to $2.8 million in 2002, from $5.7 million in 2001. This decrease was primarily attributable to our 2001 restructuring initiatives, which resulted in fewer employees, streamlined operations and reduced spending requirements, including the termination of our office lease agreement for our former principal executive offices in the third quarter of 2001.
Amortization of Goodwill and Other Intangibles.Amortization expense was $357,000 in the year ended December 31, 2002 and relates to acquisition costs recorded as a result of our acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002. Amortization expense was $3.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2001 and relates to goodwill recorded as a result of our acquisition of HumanClick in October 2000. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we did not record any amortization expense related to the goodwill recorded as a result of our acquisition of HumanClick. The decrease in amortization expense in the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the comparable period in 2001 is attributable to an accounting change related to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, described under the caption “Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change” below.
Non-Cash Compensation Expense, Net.Non-cash compensation expense consists primarily of amortization of deferred stock-based compensation. Deferred stock-based compensation represents the difference between the exercise price and the deemed fair value of certain stock options granted to employees. Deferred compensation has been amortized over the vesting period of the individual options. In 2002, we recorded non-cash compensation expense of $365,000, a decrease from $677,000 in 2001. This decrease is due primarily to the forfeiture of employee stock options, and associated deferred stock based compensation, associated with employees who were terminated. The net non-cash compensation amounts for the year ended December 31, 2001 exclude the net non-cash compensation credit of $1.7 million related to our restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2001.
Other Income.Interest income was $126,000 and $538,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively, and consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents generated by the receipt of proceeds from our initial public offering in 2000 and preferred stock issuances in 2000 and 1999. Interest expense was $10,000 and $10,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Other income was $0 and $109,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively, and consists primarily of amortization of deferred gain on the sale-leaseback of certain computer equipment which was terminated as a result of our third quarter 2001 restructuring initiatives.
28
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change.On January 1, 2002, we were required to adopt the full provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 requires that purchased goodwill and certain indefinite-lived intangibles no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually. This testing requires the comparison of carrying values to fair value and, when appropriate, requires the reduction of the carrying value of impaired assets to their fair value.
The transitional impairment analysis required upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 was completed during the first quarter of 2002, and we determined that there was an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill. As part of this analysis, we determined that LivePerson continued to operate in one operating segment and that we do not have any separate reporting units under SFAS No. 142; accordingly, the impairment analysis was performed on an enterprise-wide basis. This process included obtaining an independent appraisal of our fair value as a whole and of our individual assets. Fair value was determined from the same cash flow forecasts used in December 2001 for the evaluation of our carrying value under SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” which was the accounting rule for impairment of goodwill that preceded SFAS No. 142 and was effective through December 31, 2001. The valuation methodology required by SFAS No. 142 is different than that required by SFAS No. 121. An impairment is more likely to result under SFAS No. 142 because it requires, among other items, the discounting of forecasted cash flows as compared to the undiscounted cash flow valuation method under SFAS No. 121, among other items.
The allocation of fair values to identifiable tangible and intangible assets as of January 1, 2002, resulted in an implied valuation of the goodwill of $0. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined in the same manner as determining the amount of goodwill that would have been required to be recognized in a business combination. That is, under SFAS No. 142, an entity is required to allocate the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire it. Comparing this implied value to the carrying value resulted in an impairment of $5.3 million, with no income tax effect. This impairment is recorded as a cumulative effect of accounting change on our statement of operations as of January 1, 2002.
Net Loss.Our net loss decreased to $6.8 million in 2002, from $27.3 million in 2001. The net loss for 2002 includes the cumulative effect of an accounting change of $5.3 million related to the impairment of goodwill described above and a restructuring charge of approximately $1.2 million. As noted above, we did not record any amortization of goodwill in 2002 related to our acquisition of HumanClick. In comparison, we recorded approximately $3.0 million of goodwill amortization in 2001.
29
Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our financial information for the eight most recent quarters ended December 31, 2003. In our opinion, this unaudited information has been prepared on a basis consistent with our annual consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited information for the periods presented. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, included elsewhere in this annual report. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results that we may achieve for any subsequent periods.
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec. 31, | Sept. 30, | June 30, | Mar. 31, | Dec. 31, | Sept. 30, | June 30, | Mar. 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | 2002 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 3,526 | $ | 3,142 | $ | 2,826 | $ | 2,529 | $ | 2,374 | $ | 2,161 | $ | 1,873 | $ | 1,826 | ||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 520 | 501 | 514 | 493 | 467 | 480 | 318 | 338 | ||||||||||||||||
| Product development | 471 | 419 | 419 | 331 | 403 | 303 | 281 | 296 | ||||||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 1,062 | 910 | 856 | 727 | 519 | 600 | 493 | 564 | ||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 803 | 916 | 744 | 807 | 731 | 660 | 750 | 671 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of other intangibles | 254 | 253 | 253 | 253 | 232 | 125 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash compensation expense, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| net | 151 | 143 | 42 | 6 | 100 | 47 | 116 | 102 | ||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| impairment charges | — | — | 1,024 | — | 1,186 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 3,261 | 3,142 | 3,852 | 2,617 | 3,638 | 2,215 | 1,958 | 1,971 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | 265 | — | (1,026 | ) | (88 | ) | (1,264 | ) | (54 | ) | (85 | ) | (145 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other expense | — | — | (8 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 13 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 28 | 26 | 34 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | — | — | — | — | (10 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total other income, net | 13 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 18 | 26 | 34 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before cumulative effect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of accounting change | 278 | 9 | (1,020 | ) | (83 | ) | (1,246 | ) | (28 | ) | (51 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (5,338 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 278 | $ | 9 | $ | (1,020 | ) | $ | (83 | ) | $ | (1,246 | ) | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (5,446 | ) | ||
| Basic net income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before cumulative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| effect of accounting change | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||
| Cumulative effect of accounting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| change | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (0.00 | ) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (0.16 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before cumulative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effect of accounting change | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||
| Cumulative effect of accounting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| change | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (0.00 | ) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (0.16 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||
| Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| used in basic net income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| per share calculation | 36,133,570 | 34,887,114 | 34,229,236 | 34,155,869 | 34,058,569 | 34,046,504 | 34,029,588 | 34,003,610 | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| used in diluted net income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| per share calculation | 37,915,195 | 36,882,683 | 34,229,236 | 34,155,869 | 34,058,569 | 34,046,504 | 34,029,588 | 34,003,610 | ||||||||||||||||
Our revenue from the LivePerson services increased in each of the last eight quarters, from $1.8 million to $3.5 million. The increase is due primarily to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002 and, to a lesser extent, to the addition of new clients and increased revenue from existing clients as the result of the introduction of a new range of services and increased market acceptance of our services. The increase in the last quarter is also attributed to an increase in fees from professional services. We cannot assure you that we will experience similar or any future revenue growth.
Our cost of revenue has generally increased in each of the last eight quarters from $338,000 to $520,000. The increase is primarily related to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002, as well as the addition of new clients and increased usage from existing clients.
Our product development costs have generally increased in each of the last eight quarters from $296,000 to $471,000. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in the number of LivePerson product development personnel, as well as an increase in outsourced labor costs related to the continuing development of our product line as we broaden the range of services we offer to include a fully integrated, multi-channel software platform.
Our sales and marketing costs have generally increased in each of the last eight quarters from $564,000 to $1.1 million. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in sales and marketing
30
personnel as a result of both the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002 and the expansion of our sales force, and, to a lesser extent, to an increase in on-line advertising and marketing expenses related to our increasing efforts to enhance our brand recognition.
Our general and administrative costs have generally increased in each of the last eight quarters from $671,000 to $804,000. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in compensation and related expenses and to an increase in investor relations expenses as the result of the hiring of an outside firm and, to a lesser extent, to increases in recruitment costs and depreciation, partially offset by a decrease in the cost of our directors and officers insurance.
Amortization of other intangibles in 2003 and 2002 relates to acquisition costs recorded as a result of our acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in July 2002.
Non-cash compensation expense has generally remained flat over the last eight quarters, ranging from $102,000 to $151,000. Non-cash compensation expense in 2003 was primarily related to amortization of a warrant issued to our investor relations firm for services.
Liquidity And Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed our operations principally through cash generated by private placements of convertible preferred stock and the initial public offering of our common stock. In 2000 and 1999, we raised a total of $69.5 million in aggregate net proceeds. As of December 31, 2003, we had $10.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $2.9 million from December 31, 2002. This increase is attributable to the $1.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options by employees, and to net cash provided by operating activities. We regularly invest excess funds in short-term money market funds.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2003 and consisted of net operating losses offset by non-cash expenses related to the amortization of other intangibles, non-cash compensation and depreciation and to a lesser extent, to increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable. Net cash used in operating activities was $738,000 in the year ended December 31, 2002 and consisted primarily of net operating losses and decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses partially offset by the cumulative effect of an accounting change related to the impairment of goodwill and to a lesser extent, an increase in deferred revenue.
Net cash used in investing activities was $142,000 in the year ended December 31, 2003 and was due to the acquisition of the certain Island Data assets, and the purchase of fixed assets. Net cash used in investing activities was $1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 and was due primarily to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights, and to a lesser extent to the purchase of fixed assets.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2003 and was attributable to proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options by employees. Net cash provided by financing activities was $24,000 in the year ended December 31, 2002 and was attributable to proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options by employees.
We have incurred significant costs to develop our technology and services, to hire employees in our customer service, sales, marketing and administration departments, and for the amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as non-cash compensation costs. Although annual revenue growth increased in 2003 compared to 2002, our annual revenue growth in 2002 was lower than in 2001, and our
31
annual revenue growth in 2001 was lower than in 2000. As a result, we have incurred significant net losses from inception through June 30, 2003, significant negative cash flows from operations in the periods from inception through December 31, 2002, and as of December 31, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $106.0 million. These losses have been funded primarily through the issuance of common stock in our initial public offering and, prior to the initial public offering, the issuance of convertible preferred stock.
We anticipate that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, we cannot assure you that we will not require additional funds prior to such time, and we would then seek to sell additional equity or debt securities through public financings, or seek alternative sources of financing. We cannot assure you that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, when needed, if at all. If we are unable to obtain any necessary additional financing, we may be required to further reduce the scope of our planned sales and marketing and product development efforts, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, we may require additional funds in order to fund more rapid expansion, to develop new or enhanced services or products or to invest in complementary businesses, technologies, services or products.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We do not have any special purposes entities, and other than operating leases, which are described below, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
We lease facilities and certain equipment under agreements accounted for as operating leases. These leases generally require us to pay all executory costs such as maintenance and insurance. Rental expense for operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was approximately $430,000 and $378,000, respectively.
As of December 31, 2003, our principal commitments were approximately $583,000 under various operating leases, of which $385,000 is due in 2004. We do not currently expect that our principal commitments for the year ended December 31, 2004 will exceed $500,000 in the aggregate. Our capital expenditures are not currently expected to exceed $300,000 in 2004. Our contractual obligations at December 31, 2003 are summarized as follows:
| Payments due by period | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 1 | More than | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations | Total | year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | $ | 583 | $ | 385 | $ | 198 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 583 | $ | 385 | $ | 198 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a history of losses, we had an accumulated deficit of $106.0 million as of December 31, 2003 and we may incur losses in the future.
Although we achieved profitability in each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2003, we may, in the future, incur losses and experience negative cash flow, either or both of which may be significant. We recorded a net loss of $9.8 million for the year ended December 31,
32
1999, $61.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $27.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $816,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. We had total revenue of less than $615,000 in the year ended December 31, 1999, approximately $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, and approximately $7.8 million, $8.2 million and $12.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2000 included a non-cash dividend of $18.0 million. As of December 31, 2003, our accumulated deficit was approximately $106.0 million. We cannot assure you that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. Failure to maintain profitability may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results are subject to significant fluctuations, which may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, including the following factors which are in part within our control, and in part outside of our control:
Our revenue and results may also fluctuate significantly in the future due to the following factors that are entirely outside of our control:
Period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful because of these factors. You should not rely upon these comparisons as indicators of our future performance.
Due to the foregoing factors, it is possible that our results of operations in one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. If this occurs, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
We may be unable to respond to the rapid technological change and changing client preferences in the online sales, marketing and customer service industry and this may harm our business.
If we are unable, for technological, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner to changing market conditions in the online sales, marketing and customer service industry or our clients’ or Internet users’ requirements, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be
33
materially and adversely affected. Business on the Internet is characterized by rapid technological change. In addition, the market for online sales, marketing and customer service solutions is relatively new. Sudden changes in client and Internet user requirements and preferences, frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies, such as broadband communications, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices could render the LivePerson services and our proprietary technology and systems obsolete. The rapid evolution of these products and services will require that we continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our services. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to:
If any of our new services, including upgrades to our current services, do not meet our clients’ or Internet users’ expectations, our business may be harmed. Updating our technology may require significant additional capital expenditures and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If new services require us to grow rapidly, this could place a significant strain on our managerial, operational, technical and financial resources. In order to manage our growth, we could be required to implement new or upgraded operating and financial systems, procedures and controls. Our failure to expand our operations in an efficient manner could cause our expenses to grow, our revenue to decline or grow more slowly than expected and could otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we are not competitive in the market for real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions, our business could be harmed.
The market for real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions is intensely competitive. Relatively few substantial barriers to entry exist in this market, other than the ability to design and build scalable software and, with respect to outsourced solution providers, the ability to design, build and manage scalable network architecture. Established or new entities may enter this market in the near future, including those that provide real-time interaction online, with or without the user’s request.
We compete directly with companies focused on technology that facilitates real-time sales, email management, searchable knowledgebase applications and customer service interaction. These markets remain fairly saturated with small companies that compete on price and features. We also face significant competition from two customer service enterprise software providers, KANA and RightNow Technologies, which offer hosted solutions. Furthermore, many of our competitors offer a broader range of customer relationship management products and services than we currently offer. We may be disadvantaged and our business may be harmed if companies doing business online choose real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions from such providers.
We also face potential competition from larger enterprise software companies such as Oracle and Siebel Systems. In addition, established technology companies, including Aspect Communications, Avaya, Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, IBM and Microsoft, may also leverage their existing relationships and capabilities to offer real-time sales, marketing and customer service applications.
34
Finally, we face competition from clients and potential clients that choose to provide a real-time sales, marketing and customer service solution in-house as well as, to a lesser extent, traditional offline customer service solutions, such as telephone call centers.
We believe that competition will increase as our current competitors increase the sophistication of their offerings and as new participants enter the market. Many of our larger current and potential competitors have:
Some competitors may enter into strategic or commercial relationships with larger, more established and better-financed companies. These competitors may be able to:
Any delay in the general market acceptance of the real-time sales, marketing and customer service solution business model would likely harm our competitive position. Delays would allow our competitors additional time to improve their service or product offerings, and would also provide time for new competitors to develop real-time sales, marketing and customer service applications and solicit prospective clients within our target markets. Increased competition could result in pricing pressures, reduced operating margins and loss of market share.
The success of our business is dependent on the retention of existing clients and their purchase of additional LivePerson services.
Our LivePerson services agreements typically have no termination date and are terminable upon 30 to 90 days’ notice without penalty. If a significant number of our clients, or any one client to whom we provide a significant amount of services, were to terminate these services agreements, or reduce the amount of services purchased or fail to purchase additional services, our results of operations may be negatively and materially affected. Dissatisfaction with the nature or quality of our services, including our software application platform introduced in the third quarter of 2001, could also lead clients to terminate our service. We depend on monthly fees from the LivePerson services for substantially all our revenue. If our retention rate declines, our revenue could decline unless we are able to obtain additional clients or alternate revenue sources. Further, because of the historically small amount of services sold in initial orders, we depend on sales to new clients and sales of additional services to our existing clients. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain as clients those customers of the Express Response hosted knowledgebase and FAQ service we acquired from Island Data Corporation in December 2003.
We are dependent on technology systems that are beyond our control.
The success of the LivePerson services depends in part on our clients’ online services as well as the Internet connections of visitors to their Web sites, both of which are outside of our control. As a result, it
35
may be difficult to identify the source of problems if they occur. In the past, we have experienced problems related to connectivity which have resulted in slower than normal response times to Internet user chat requests and messages and interruptions in service. The LivePerson services rely both on the Internet and on our connectivity vendors for data transmission. Therefore, even when connectivity problems are not caused by the LivePerson services, our clients or Internet users may attribute the problem to us. This could diminish our brand and harm our business, divert the attention of our technical personnel from our product development efforts or cause significant client relations problems.
In addition, we rely on a third-party Web hosting service provider for Internet connectivity and network infrastructure hosting, security and maintenance. The provider has, in the past, experienced problems that have resulted in slower than normal response times and interruptions in service. If we are unable to continue utilizing the services of our existing Web hosting provider or if our Web hosting services experience interruptions or delays, it is possible that our business could be harmed.
Our service also depends on many third parties for hardware and software, which products could contain defects. Problems arising from our use of such hardware or software could require us to incur significant costs or divert the attention of our technical personnel from our product development efforts. To the extent any such problems require us to replace such hardware or software, we may not be able to do so on acceptable terms, if at all.
Technological defects could disrupt our services, which could harm our business and reputation.
We face risks related to the technological capabilities of the LivePerson services. We expect the number of interactions between our clients’ operators and Internet users over our system to increase significantly as we expand our client base. Our network hardware and software may not be able to accommodate this additional volume. Additionally, we must continually upgrade our software to improve the features and functionality of the LivePerson services in order to be competitive in our market. If future versions of our software contain undetected errors, our business could be harmed. As a result of major software upgrades at LivePerson, our client sites have, from time to time, experienced slower than normal response times and interruptions in service. If we experience system failures or degraded response times, our reputation and brand could be harmed. We may also experience technical problems in the process of installing and initiating the LivePerson services on new Web hosting services. These problems, if unremedied, could harm our business.
The LivePerson services also depend on complex software which may contain defects, particularly when we introduce new versions onto our servers. We may not discover software defects that affect our new or current services or enhancements until after they are deployed. It is possible that, despite testing by us, defects may occur in the software. These defects could result in:
36
Our clients may experience adverse business conditions that could adversely affect our business.
Some of our clients may experience difficulty in supporting their current operations and implementing their business plans. These clients may reduce their spending on our services, or may not be able to discharge their payment and other obligations to us. These circumstances are influenced by general economic and industry-specific conditions, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as a result of these conditions, our clients, in particular our Internet-related clients that may experience (or that anticipate experiencing) difficulty raising capital, may elect to scale back the resources they devote to customer service technology, including services such as ours. If the current environment for our clients, including, in particular, our Internet-related clients, does not improve, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the non-payment or late payment of amounts due to us from a significant number of clients would negatively impact our financial condition. We increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by $15,000 to approximately $85,000 in the year ended December 31, 2003, principally due to an increase in accounts receivable as a result of increased sales. During 2003, we wrote off approximately $21,000 of previously reserved accounts, leaving a net allowance of $64,000 at December 31, 2003. We did not increase our allowance for doubtful accounts in the year ended December 31, 2002. This is attributable to the fact that our accounts receivable collections improved in 2002, due primarily to the significantly larger percentage of our total outstanding accounts receivable now comprised of businesses with more established and proven operating histories, and to a lesser extent, to the fact that an increased number of our clients now pay us by credit card.
Our business is significantly dependent on our ability to retain our current key personnel, to attract new personnel, and to manage staff attrition.
Our future success depends to a significant extent on the continued services of our senior management team, including Robert P. LoCascio, our founder and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management team, in particular Mr. LoCascio, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We cannot assure you that we would be able to successfully integrate newly-hired senior managers who would work together successfully with our existing management team.
We may be unable to attract, integrate or retain other highly qualified employees in the future. If our retention efforts are ineffective, employee turnover could increase and our ability to provide services to our clients would be materially and adversely affected.
Any staff attrition we experience, whether initiated by the departing employees or by us, could place a significant strain on our managerial, operational, financial and other resources. To the extent that we do not initiate or seek any staff attrition that occurs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and hire adequate replacement staff promptly, if at all, and even that if such staff is replaced, we will be successful in integrating these employees. In addition, we may not be able to outsource certain functions. We expect to evaluate our needs and the performance of our staff on a periodic basis, and may choose to make adjustments in the future. If the size of our staff is significantly reduced, either by our choice or otherwise, it may become more difficult for us to manage existing, or establish new, relationships with clients and other counter-parties, or to expand and improve our service offerings. It may also become more difficult for us to implement changes to our business plan or to respond promptly to opportunities in the marketplace. Further, it may become more difficult for us to devote personnel resources necessary to maintain or improve existing systems, including our financial and managerial controls, billing systems, reporting systems and procedures. Thus, any significant amount of staff attrition could cause our business and financial results to suffer.
37
We cannot predict our future capital needs to execute our business strategy and we may not be able to secure additional financing.
We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations, if any, will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. To the extent that we require additional funds to support our operations or the expansion of our business, or to pay for acquisitions, we may need to sell additional equity, issue debt or convertible securities or obtain credit facilities through financial institutions. In the past, we have obtained financing principally through the sale of preferred stock, common stock and warrants. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt or preferred equity securities, these securities could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock, and could have terms that impose restrictions on our operations. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of additional equity or convertible securities, our stockholders could suffer dilution. We cannot assure you that additional funding, if required, will be available to us in amounts or on terms acceptable to us. If sufficient funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to fund any potential expansion, take advantage of acquisition opportunities, develop or enhance our services or products, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited. Those limitations would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we do not successfully integrate potential future acquisitions, our business could be harmed.
In the future, we may acquire or invest in complementary companies, products or technologies. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks to us, including:
These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and adversely affect our results of operations. Furthermore, we may incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisitions. The issuance of equity securities could be dilutive to our existing stockholders.
We could face additional regulatory requirements, tax liabilities and other risks as we expand internationally.
In October 2000, we acquired HumanClick, an Israeli-based provider of real-time online customer service applications. In addition, we are testing an outsourced sales and marketing service provider to sell the LivePerson services in Western Europe. There are risks related to doing business in international markets, such as changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, more stringent rules relating to the privacy of Internet users and adverse tax consequences. In addition, there are likely to be different consumer preferences and requirements in specific international markets. Furthermore, we may face difficulties in staffing and managing any foreign operations. One or more of these factors could harm any future international operations.
38
Our reputation depends, in part, on factors which are entirely outside of our control.
Our services typically appear as a LivePerson-branded or a custom-created icon on our clients’ Web sites. The customer service operators who respond to the inquiries of our clients’ Internet users are employees or agents of our clients; they are not our employees. As a result, we have no way of controlling the actions of these operators. In addition, an Internet user may not know that the operator is an employee or agent of our client, rather than a LivePerson employee. If an Internet user were to have a negative experience in a LivePerson-powered or HumanClick-powered real-time dialogue, it is possible that this experience could be attributed to us, which could diminish our brand and harm our business. Finally, we believe the success of our services depend on the prominent placement of the icon on the client’s Web site, over which we also have no control.
Our business and prospects would suffer if we are unable to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights.
Our success and ability to compete depend, in part, upon the protection of our intellectual property rights relating to the technology underlying the LivePerson services. It is possible that:
Further, to the extent that the invention described in any U.S. patent was made public prior to the filing of the patent application, we may not be able to obtain patent protection in certain foreign countries. We also rely upon copyright, trade secret, trademark and other common law in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property, to the extent that protection is sought or secured at all. Any steps we might take may not be adequate to protect against infringement and misappropriation of our intellectual property by third parties. Similarly, third parties may be able to independently develop similar or superior technology, processes or other intellectual property. Policing unauthorized use of our services and intellectual property rights is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology or intellectual property rights, particularly in foreign countries where we do business, where our services are sold or used, where the laws may not protect proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States or where enforcement of laws protecting proprietary rights is not common or effective. The unauthorized reproduction or other misappropriation of our intellectual property rights could enable third parties to benefit from our technology without paying us for it. If this occurs, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, disputes concerning the ownership or rights to use intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming to litigate, may distract management from operating our business and may result in our loss of significant rights.
39
Our products and services may infringe upon intellectual property rights of third parties and any infringement could require us to incur substantial costs and may distract our management.
We are subject to the risk of claims alleging infringement of third-party proprietary rights. Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the software industry. In the ordinary course of our business, our services may be increasingly subject to third-party infringement claims as the number of competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of services in different industry segments overlaps. Some of our competitors in the market for real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions may have filed or may intend to file patent applications covering aspects of their technology. Any claims alleging infringement of third-party intellectual property rights could require us to spend significant amounts in litigation (even if the claim is invalid), distract management from other tasks of operating our business, pay substantial damage awards, prevent us from selling our products, delay delivery of the LivePerson services, develop non-infringing software, technology, business processes, systems or other intellectual property (none of which might be successful), or limit our ability to use the intellectual property that is the subject of any of these claims, unless we enter into license agreements with the third parties (which may be unavailable on commercially reasonable terms, or not available at all). Therefore, such claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may be liable if third parties misappropriate personal information belonging to our clients’ Internet users.
We maintain dialogue transcripts of the text-based chats and email interactions between our clients and Internet users and store on our servers information supplied voluntarily by these Internet users in surveys. We provide this information to our clients to allow them to perform Internet user analyses and monitor the effectiveness of our services. Some of the information we collect may include personal information, such as contact and demographic information. If third parties were able to penetrate our network security or otherwise misappropriate personal information relating to our clients’ Internet users or the text of customer service inquiries, we could be subject to liability. We could be subject to negligence claims or claims for misuse of personal information. These claims could result in litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may incur significant costs to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches.
The need to physically secure and securely transmit confidential information online has been a significant barrier to electronic commerce and online communications. Any well-publicized compromise of security could deter people from using online services such as the ones we offer, or from using them to conduct transactions, which involve transmitting confidential information. Because our success depends on the general acceptance of our services and electronic commerce, we may incur significant costs to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches.
Political, economic and military conditions in Israel could negatively impact our Israeli operations.
Our product development staff, help desk and online sales personnel are located in Israel. As of December 31, 2003, we had 33 full-time employees in Israel and as of December 31, 2002, we had 19 full-time employees in Israel. Although substantially all of our sales to date have been made to customers outside Israel, we are directly influenced by the political, economic and military conditions affecting Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors. A state of hostility, varying in degree and intensity, has caused security and economic problems in Israel. Further, since September 2000, there has been a significant deterioration in the relationship between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and serious violence has
40
ensued, the peace process between the parties has stagnated, and Israel’s relationship with several Arab countries has been adversely affected. Moreover, hostilities during 2002 and 2003 have escalated significantly, with increased attacks in Israel and an armed conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. Efforts to resolve the conflict have failed to result in an agreeable solution. Continued hostilities between the Palestinian community and Israel and any failure to settle the conflict could adversely affect our operations in Israel and our business. Further deterioration of the situation into a full-scale armed conflict might require more widespread military reserve service by some of our Israeli employees and might result in a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations in Israel and our business. In addition, several Arab countries still restrict business with Israeli companies. Our operations in Israel could be adversely affected by restrictive laws or policies directed towards Israel and Israeli businesses.
Risks Related to Our Industry
We are dependent on the continued use of the Internet as a medium for commerce.
We cannot be sure that a sufficiently broad base of consumers will continue to use the Internet as a medium for commerce. Convincing our clients to offer real-time sales, marketing and customer service technology may be difficult.
The continuation of the Internet as a viable commercial marketplace is subject to a number of factors, including:
We depend on the continued viability of the infrastructure of the Internet.
To the extent that the Internet continues to experience growth in the number of users and frequency of use by consumers resulting in increased bandwidth demands, we cannot assure you that the infrastructure for the Internet will be able to support the demands placed upon it. The Internet has experienced outages and delays as a result of damage to portions of its infrastructure. Outages or delays could adversely affect online sites, email and the level of traffic on the Internet. We also depend on Internet service providers that provide our clients and Internet users with access to the LivePerson services. In the past, users have experienced difficulties due to system failures unrelated to our service. In addition, the Internet could lose its viability due to delays in the adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity. Insufficient availability of telecommunications services to support the Internet also could result in slower response times and negatively impact use of the Internet generally, and our clients’ sites (including the LivePerson pop-up dialogue windows) in particular. If the use of the Internet fails to grow or grows more slowly than expected, if the infrastructure for the Internet does not effectively support growth that may occur or if the Internet does not become a viable commercial marketplace, we may not maintain profitability and our business, results of operations and financial condition will suffer.
41
We may become subject to burdensome government regulation and legal uncertainties.
We are subject to federal, state and local regulation, and laws of jurisdictions outside of the United States, including laws and regulations applicable to computer software and access to or commerce over the Internet. Due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet and various other online services, it is likely that a number of new laws and regulations will be adopted with respect to the Internet or other online services covering issues such as user privacy, freedom of expression, pricing, content and quality of products and services, taxation, advertising, intellectual property rights and information security. The nature of such legislation and the manner in which it may be interpreted and enforced cannot be fully determined and, therefore, such legislation could subject us and/or our clients or Internet users to potential liability, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As a result of collecting data from live online Internet user dialogues, our clients may be able to analyze the commercial habits of Internet users. Privacy concerns may cause Internet users to avoid online sites that collect such behavioral information and even the perception of security and privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may indirectly inhibit market acceptance of our services. In addition, we or our clients may be harmed by any laws or regulations that restrict the ability to collect or use this data. The European Union and many countries within the E.U. have adopted privacy directives or laws that strictly regulate the collection and use of personally identifiable information of Internet users. The United States has adopted legislation which governs the collection and use of certain personal information. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has also taken action against Web site operators who do not comply with their stated privacy policies. Furthermore, other foreign jurisdictions have adopted legislation governing the collection and use of personal information. These and other governmental efforts may limit our clients’ ability to collect and use information about their Internet users through our services. As a result, such laws and efforts could create uncertainty in the marketplace that could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery costs, or could in some other manner have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
For example, the LivePerson services allow our clients to capture and save information about Internet users, possibly without their knowledge. Additionally, our service uses a tool, commonly referred to as a “cookie,” to uniquely identify each of our clients’ Internet users. To the extent that additional legislation regarding Internet user privacy is enacted, such as legislation governing the collection and use of information regarding Internet users through the use of cookies, the effectiveness of the LivePerson services could be impaired by restricting us from collecting information which may be valuable to our clients. The foregoing could have a material adverse effect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition to privacy legislation, any new legislation or regulation regarding the Internet, or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet, could harm us. Additionally, as we operate outside the U.S., the international regulatory environment relating to the Internet could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Security concerns could hinder commerce on the Internet.
User concerns about the security of confidential information online has been a significant barrier to commerce on the Internet and online communications. Any well-publicized compromise of security could deter people from using the Internet or other online services or from using them to conduct transactions that involve the transmission of confidential information. If Internet commerce is inhibited as a result of such security concerns, our business would be harmed.
42
Other Risks
Our executive officers, directors and stockholders who each own greater than 5% of the outstanding common stock will be able to influence matters requiring a stockholder vote.
Our executive officers, directors and stockholders who each own greater than 5% of the outstanding common stock and their affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 51.5% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders, if acting together, will be able to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership could also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control.
The future sale of shares of our common stock may negatively affect our stock price.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants in the public market, or if our stockholders are perceived by the market as intending to sell substantial amounts of our common stock, the market price of our common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. The number of shares of common stock subject to the registration statements we filed in January 2004, registering the resale of up to 500,000 shares of common stock by Island Data Corporation and registering our issuance and sale from time to time of up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock, is much greater than the average weekly trading volume for our shares. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that market sales of these or other shares of our common stock will have on the market price of our common stock.
Our stock price has been highly volatile and may experience extreme price and volume fluctuations in the future, which could reduce the value of your investment and subject us to litigation.
Fluctuations in market price and volume are particularly common among securities of Internet and other technology companies. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly in the past and may continue to be highly volatile, with extreme price and volume fluctuations, in response to the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:
43
In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation, which could result in substantial costs and distract management from other important aspects of operating our business.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may make it difficult for a third party to acquire us.
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, such as our staggered Board of Directors, the manner in which director vacancies may be filled and provisions regarding the calling of stockholder meetings, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, provisions of our amended and restated bylaws, such as advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals, and applicable provisions of Delaware law, such as the application of business combination limitations, could impose similar difficulties. Further, provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation relating to directors, stockholder meetings, limitation of director liability, indemnification and amendment of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws may not be amended without the affirmative vote of not less than 66.67% of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (considered for this purpose as a single class) cast at a meeting of our stockholders called for that purpose. Our amended and restated bylaws may not be amended without the affirmative vote of at least 66.67% of our Board of Directors or without the affirmative vote of not less than 66.67% of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (considered for this purpose as a single class) cast at a meeting of our stockholders called for that purpose.
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKETRISK |
Currency Rate Fluctuations
Through December 31, 2003, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows have not been materially affected by changes in the relative values of non-U.S. currencies to the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of our wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary, HumanClick Ltd., is the U.S. dollar. We do not use derivative financial instruments to limit our foreign currency risk exposure.
Collection Risk
Our accounts receivable are subject, in the normal course of business, to collection risks. We regularly assess these risks and have established policies and business practices to protect against the adverse effects of collection risks. We increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by $15,000 to approximately $85,000 in the year ended December 31, 2003, principally due to an increase in accounts receivable as a result of increased sales. During 2003, we wrote off approximately $21,000 of previously reserved accounts, leaving a net allowance of $64,000 at December 31, 2003. We did not increase our allowance for doubtful accounts in the year ended December 31, 2002. This is attributable to the fact that our accounts receivable collections improved in 2002, due primarily to the significantly larger percentage of our total outstanding accounts receivable now comprised of businesses with more established and proven operating histories, and to a lesser extent, to the fact that an increased number of our clients now pay us by credit card.
44
Interest Rate Risk
Our investments consist of cash and cash equivalents. Therefore, changes in the market’s interest rates do not affect in any material respect the value of the investments as recorded by us.
45
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Auditors
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The unaudited supplementary data regarding quarterly results of operations are incorporated by reference to the information set forth in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in the section captioned, “Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations.”
46
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
LivePerson, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LivePerson, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LivePerson, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 7, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” effective January 1, 2002.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
January 29, 2004
47
LIVEPERSON, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| December 31, | ||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | |||||
| Current assets: | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,898 | $ | 8,004 | ||
| Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts | ||||||
| of $64 and $70, in 2003 and 2002, respectively | 1,239 | 607 | ||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 318 | 299 | ||||
| Total current assets | 12,455 | 8,910 | ||||
| Property and equipment, net | 341 | 595 | ||||
| Other intangibles, net | 361 | 1,014 | ||||
| Security deposits | 129 | 124 | ||||
| Other assets | 251 | 194 | ||||
| Total assets | $ | 13,537 | $ | 10,837 | ||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 116 | $ | 136 | ||
| Accrued expenses | 2,577 | 1,837 | ||||
| Deferred revenue | 1,276 | 800 | ||||
| Total current liabilities | 3,969 | 2,773 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 232 | 176 | ||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||
| Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||
| Preferred stock, $.001 par value per share; 5,000,000 | ||||||
| shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding at | ||||||
| December 31, 2003 and 2002 | — | — | ||||
| Common stock, $.001 par value per share; 100,000,000 | ||||||
| shares authorized, 36,816,415 shares issued and | ||||||
| outstanding at December 31, 2003; 34,060,881 shares | ||||||
| shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002 | 36 | 34 | ||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 115,315 | 113,061 | ||||
| Accumulated deficit | (106,015 | ) | (105,199 | ) | ||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | (8 | ) | |||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 9,336 | 7,888 | ||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 13,537 | $ | 10,837 | ||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
LIVEPERSON, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
| Revenue | $ | 12,023 | $ | 8,234 | $ | 7,806 | |||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue, exclusive of $0, $0 and $(193) | |||||||||
| for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, | |||||||||
| respectively, reported below as non-cash compensation | |||||||||
| expense | 2,028 | 1,604 | 6,740 | ||||||
| Product development, exclusive of $0, $0 and | |||||||||
| $(181) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and | |||||||||
| 2001, respectively, reported below as non-cash | |||||||||
| compensation expense | 1,641 | 1,283 | 3,509 | ||||||
| Sales and marketing, exclusive of $0, $0 and $376 | |||||||||
| for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, | |||||||||
| respectively, reported below as non-cash compensation | |||||||||
| expense | 3,555 | 2,177 | 5,089 | ||||||
| General and administrative, exclusive of $343, $365 | |||||||||
| and $675 for the years ended December 31, 2003, | |||||||||
| 2002 and 2001, respectively, reported below as | |||||||||
| non-cash compensation expense | 3,267 | 2,811 | 5,694 | ||||||
| Amortization of goodwill | — | — | 2,975 | ||||||
| Amortization of intangibles | 1,014 | 357 | — | ||||||
| Non-cash compensation expense, net | 343 | 365 | 677 | ||||||
| Non-cash compensation credit related to restructuring, | |||||||||
| net | — | — | (1,720 | ) | |||||
| Restructuring and impairment charges | 1,024 | 1,186 | 12,740 | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | 12,872 | 9,783 | 35,704 | ||||||
| Loss from operations | (849 | ) | (1,549 | ) | (27,898 | ) | |||
| Other income (expense): | |||||||||
| Other (expense) income | (8 | ) | — | 109 | |||||
| Interest income | 41 | 126 | 538 | ||||||
| Interest expense | — | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
| Total other income, net | 33 | 116 | 637 | ||||||
| Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change | (816 | ) | (1,433 | ) | (27,261 | ) | |||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | — | (5,338 | ) | — | |||||
| Net loss | (816 | ) | (6,771 | ) | (27,261 | ) | |||
| Basic and diluted net loss per common share: | |||||||||
| Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) |
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | — | (0.16 | ) | — | |||||
| Net loss | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) |
| Weighted average shares outstanding used in basic and | |||||||||
| diluted net loss per common share calculation | 34,854,802 | 34,028,702 | 33,987,895 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
49
LIVEPERSON, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Deferred Compensation | Accumulated Deficit | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Total | ||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2000 | 33,914,613 | $34 | $119,780 | $(5,872 | ) | $ (71,167 | ) | $ — | $42,775 | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and warrants | 54,768 | — | 37 | — | — | — | 37 | ||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in connection with Employee Stock Purchase Plan | 4,000 | — | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||
| Issuance of common stock as settlement | 10,000 | — | 5 | — | — | — | 5 | ||||||||
| Deferred stock based compensation, net of forfeitures | — | — | (7,369 | ) | 7,369 | — | — | — | |||||||
| Acceleration of employee stock options | — | — | 616 | — | — | — | 616 | ||||||||
| Amortization of deferred compensation, net of forfeitures | — | — | — | (176 | ) | — | — | (176 | ) | ||||||
| Net reversal of deferred compensation due to restructuring | — | — | — | (1,720 | ) | — | — | (1,720 | ) | ||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (27,261 | ) | — | (27,261 | ) | ||||||
| Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (27,268 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2001 | 33,983,381 | 34 | 113,071 | (399 | ) | (98,428 | ) | (7 | ) | 14,271 | |||||
| Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | 77,500 | — | 24 | — | — | — | 24 | ||||||||
| Deferred stock based compensation, net of forfeitures | — | — | (34 | ) | 34 | — | — | — | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred compensation, net of forfeitures | — | — | — | 365 | — | — | 365 | ||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (6,771 | ) | — | (6,771 | ) | ||||||
| Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | (1) | (1 | ) | |||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (6,772 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2002 | 34,060,881 | 34 | 113,061 | — | (105,199 | ) | (8 | ) | 7,888 | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and warrants | 2,755,534 | 2 | 1,911 | — | — | — | 1,913 | ||||||||
| Deferred stock based compensation | — | — | 298 | (298 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||
| Acceleration of employee stock options | — | — | 45 | — | — | — | 45 | ||||||||
| Amortization of deferred compensation | — | — | — | 298 | — | — | 298 | ||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (816 | ) | — | (816 | ) | ||||||
| Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 8 | ||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (808 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2003 | 36,816,415 | $36 | $115,315 | $ — | $(106,015 | ) | $ — | $ 9,336 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
50
LIVEPERSON, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (6,771 | ) | $ | (27,261 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in | |||||||||
| operating activities: | |||||||||
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | — | 5,338 | — | ||||||
| Non-cash compensation expense, net | 343 | 365 | 677 | ||||||
| Non-cash compensation credit related to restructuring, | |||||||||
| net | — | — | (1,720 | ) | |||||
| Non-cash portions of restructuring and impairment | |||||||||
| charges | — | — | 9,459 | ||||||
| Depreciation | 321 | 366 | 2,348 | ||||||
| Amortization of goodwill | — | — | 2,975 | ||||||
| Amortization of intangibles | 1,014 | 357 | — | ||||||
| Amortization of gain on sale-leaseback | — | — | (175 | ) | |||||
| Provision for doubtful accounts, net | 15 | — | 860 | ||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: | |||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (648 | ) | 13 | (231 | ) | ||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (19 | ) | 90 | 281 | |||||
| Security deposits | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | (54 | ) | |||
| Other assets | — | — | (107 | ) | |||||
| Accounts payable | (21 | ) | (456 | ) | (534 | ) | |||
| Accrued expenses | 454 | (278 | ) | 669 | |||||
| Deferred revenue | 476 | 240 | (255 | ) | |||||
| Deferred rent | — | — | 66 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | — | — | 89 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 1,114 | (738 | ) | (12,913 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized | |||||||||
| software | (67 | ) | (59 | ) | (516 | ) | |||
| Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | — | 13 | 106 | ||||||
| Proceeds from sale of investment securities | |||||||||
| available-for-sale | — | — | 1,000 | ||||||
| Purchase of restricted cash related to leases | — | — | (2,225 | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from release of restricted cash | — | — | 4,225 | ||||||
| Acquisition of Island Data customer contracts | (75 | ) | — | — | |||||
| Acquisition of NewChannel customer contracts | — | (1,371 | ) | — | |||||
| Cash paid in HumanClick acquisition | — | — | (22 | ) | |||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (142 | ) | (1,417 | ) | 2,568 | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with | |||||||||
| the exercise of options | 1,914 | 24 | 37 | ||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with | |||||||||
| Employee Stock Option Plan | — | — | 2 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,914 | 24 | 39 | ||||||
| Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash | |||||||||
| and cash equivalents | 8 | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 2,894 | (2,132 | ) | (10,313 | ) | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 8,004 | 10,136 | 20,449 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | $ | 10,898 | $ | 8,004 | $ | 10,136 | |||
| ========= | ======== | ======== | |||||||
| Supplemental disclosures: | |||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for: | |||||||||
| Interest | $ | — | $ | 10 | $ | 10 | |||
| Income taxes | — | — | — | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing | |||||||||
| activities: | |||||||||
| Common stock issued for non-cash consideration | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5 | |||
During the year ended December 31, 2003, 276,910 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the cashless exercise of warrants.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
51
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(1) Summary of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Summary of Operations
LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company” or “LivePerson”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1995. The Company commenced operations in 1996. The Company is an online communication application service provider that delivers real-time sales, marketing and customer service solutions for companies that conduct business online.
The Company’s primary revenue source is from the sale of the LivePerson services, which is conducted within one operating segment. The Company’s product development staff, help desk and online sales support are located in Israel.
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements reflect the operations of LivePerson and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(c) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions relate to estimates of collectibility of accounts receivable, the realization of goodwill and other intangible assets, the expected term of a client relationship, accruals and other factors. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents.
(e) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to five years for equipment and software. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Total depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $321, $366 and $2,348, respectively, and was recorded in Cost of revenue and General and administrative expense for each year.
(f) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,” on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 144 requires long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization to be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
52
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of an asset to estimated undisclosed future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sales would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not affect the Company’s financial statements.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS No. 143 requires a company to record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the assets. A company also would record a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the obligation would be adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation. The Company was required to adopt SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
(g) Revenue Recognition
The LivePerson services facilitate real-time sales, marketing and customer service for companies that conduct business online. The Company charges a monthly fee, which varies by service. Certain of the Company’s larger clients, who require more sophisticated implementation and training, may also pay an initial non-refundable set-up fee.
The initial set-up fee is intended to recover certain costs (principally customer service, training and other administrative costs) prior to the deployment of the LivePerson services. Such fees are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over a period of 24 months, representing the estimated term of the client relationships. Although the Company believes this estimate is reasonable, this estimate may change in the future. In instances where the Company does charge a set-up fee, the Company typically does not charge an additional set-up fee if an existing client adds more services. Unamortized deferred fees, if any, are recognized upon termination of the agreement with the customer. The Company recognized $0, $12 and $286 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, of set-up fees due to client attrition.
The Company also sells certain of the LivePerson services directly via Internet download. These services are marketed as LivePerson Pro for small- and medium-sized businesses, and are paid for almost exclusively by credit card. Credit card payments accelerate cash flow and reduce the Company’s collection risk, subject to the merchant bank’s right to hold back cash pending settlement of the transactions. Sales executed via Internet download may occur with or without the assistance of an online sales representative, rather than through face-to-face or telephone contact that is typically required for traditional direct sales. Sales of the LivePerson services via Internet download typically have no set-up fee, because the Company does not provide the customer with training and administrative costs are minimal.
53
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company records revenue for its traditional direct sales and Internet download sales based upon a monthly fee charged for the LivePerson services, provided that no significant Company obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. The Company recognizes monthly service revenue fees as services are provided. The Company’s service agreements typically have no termination date and are terminable by either party upon 30 to 90 days’ notice without penalty.
(h) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in results of operations in the period that the tax change occurs. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
(i) Advertising Costs
The Company expenses the cost of advertising and promoting its services as incurred. Such costs totaled approximately $208, $71 and $392 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(j) Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company’s business is characterized by rapid technological change, new product development and evolving industry standards. Inherent in the Company’s business are various risks and uncertainties, including its limited operating history, unproven business model and the limited history of commerce on the Internet. The Company’s success may depend, in part, upon the emergence of the Internet as a commerce medium, prospective product development efforts and the acceptance of the Company’s solutions by the marketplace.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable which approximate fair value at December 31, 2003 because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company invests its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions that it believes are of high quality, and performs periodic evaluations of these instruments and the relative credit standings of the institutions with which it invests. At certain times, the Company’s cash balances with any one financial institution may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. The Company believes it mitigates its risk by depositing its cash balances with high credit, quality financial institutions.
The Company’s customers are primarily concentrated in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition (except for customers who purchase the LivePerson services via Internet download) and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information.
Concentration of credit risk is limited due to the Company’s large number of customers. No single customer accounted for or exceeded 10% of revenue in 2003, 2002 or 2001. Two customers accounted
54
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
for approximately 22% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2003. One customer accounted for approximately 16% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2002.
(k) Stock-based Compensation
The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation: An Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25” (issued in March 2000), to account for its fixed plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (an amendment to SFAS No. 123), established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by existing accounting standards, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The Company amortizes deferred compensation on a graded vesting methodology in accordance with FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 28, “Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Award Plans.”
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option grants to employees. Accordingly, except as mentioned below, no compensation expense has been recognized relating to these stock option grants in the consolidated financial statements. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option grants been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net loss for each year would have been increased to the pro forma amounts presented below. The Company did not have any employee stock options outstanding prior to January 1, 1998.
| Year Ended | |||||||||
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
| Net loss as reported | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (6,771 | ) | $ | (27,261 | ) |
| Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in net | |||||||||
| loss as reported | 45 | 365 | 440 | ||||||
| Deduct: Pro forma stock-based compensation cost | (403 | ) | (499 | ) | (873 | ) | |||
| Pro forma net loss | $ | (1,174 | ) | $ | (6,905 | ) | $ | (27,694 | ) |
| Basic and diluted net loss per common share: | |||||||||
| As reported | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) |
| Pro forma | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) |
The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2003, 2002 and 2001, was $1.85, $0.47 and $0.44, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2003, 2002 and 2001: dividend yield of zero percent for all years; risk-free interest rates of
55
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued) December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
4.1%, 4.6% and 5.0%, respectively; and expected life of five years for all years. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company used a volatility factor of 91%, 135.4% and 125.0%, respectively.
(l) Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share (“EPS”),” and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 98. Under SFAS No. 128, basic EPS excludes dilution for common stock equivalents and is computed by dividing net income or loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. All options, warrants or other potentially dilutive instruments issued for nominal consideration are required to be included in the calculation of basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders. The Company has included 17,339 shares of common stock in the calculation of basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders from October 2000 which relate to certain options that were originally issued by HumanClick Ltd. for nominal consideration and subsequently assumed by the Company in connection with its acquisition of HumanClick in October 2000. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock and resulted in the issuance of common stock. Diluted net loss per share presented is equal to basic net loss per share since all common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive for each of the periods presented.
Diluted net loss per common share for the years ending December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 does not include the effects of options to purchase 5,723,000, 7,828,334 and 6,467,242 shares of common stock, respectively and warrants to purchase 150,000, 607,030 and 457,030 shares of common stock, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion is anti-dilutive during each period.
(m) Segment Reporting
The Company accounts for its segment information in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS No. 131 establishes annual and interim reporting standards for operating segments of a company. SFAS No. 131 requires disclosures of selected segment-related financial information about products, major customers, and geographic areas. The Company is organized in a single operating segment for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance. The chief operating decision-maker evaluates performance, makes operating decisions, and allocates resources based on financial data consistent with the presentation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company’s revenue has been earned primarily from customers in the United States.
(n) Comprehensive Loss
SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” requires the Company to report in its consolidated financial statements, in addition to its net income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), which includes all changes in equity during a period from non-owner sources including, as applicable, foreign currency items, minimum pension liability adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities. There were no material differences between the Company’s comprehensive loss and its net loss for all periods presented.
56
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued) December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(o) Computer Software
In April 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” SOP 98-1 provides guidance for determining whether computer software is internal-use software and on accounting for the proceeds of computer software originally developed or obtained for internal use and then subsequently sold to the public. It also provides guidance on capitalization of the costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use. The Company adopted SOP 98-1 in 1999 and capitalized $682 as of December 31, 2003 and $669 as of December 31, 2002.
(p) Intangible Assets
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” on January 1, 2002. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with measurable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
Intangible assets are stated net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $357 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Other intangible assets relate to the acquisition of the Island Data customer contracts in 2003 and to the acquisition of the NewChannel customer contracts and associated rights in 2002 and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit of 36 months and 18 months, respectively (see Note 2).
(q) Deferred Rent
The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. The difference between the rent expense recognized for financial reporting purposes and the actual payments made in accordance with the lease agreement is recognized as deferred rent liability. Rent expense charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 exceeded actual rental payments by $0, $0, and $66, respectively (see Note 10).
(r) Product Development Costs
The Company accounts for product development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” under which certain software development costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility are capitalized and amortized over the estimated lives of the related products. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a working model. To date, completion of a working model of the Company’s products and general release have substantially coincided. As a result, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs and such costs have not been significant. Through December 31, 2003, all development costs have been charged to product development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
57
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(s) Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities in foreign functional currencies are translated at the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Revenue, costs and expenses denominated in foreign functional currencies are translated at the weighted average exchange rate for the period. The Company’s translation adjustment was $0 and $1 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
(t) Restructuring Activities
Restructuring activities, prior to January 1, 2003, were accounted for in accordance with the guidance provided in the consensus opinion of the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”), in connection with EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring).” EITF Issue No. 94-3 generally requires, with respect to the recognition of severance expenses, management approval of the restructuring plan, the determination of the employees to be terminated and communication of benefit arrangement to employees.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which supersedes EITF Issue No. 94-3. SFAS No. 146 requires that costs associated with an exit or disposal plan be recognized when incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The adoption of SFAS No. 146, effective January 1, 2003, did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
(u) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 established standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. For the Company, SFAS No. 150 was effective for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise will be effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. For these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, SFAS No. 150 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2005. The effective date has been deferred indefinitely for certain other types of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. The Company does not have any financial instruments that are within the scope of SFAS No. 150.
In December 2003, the staff of the SEC issued SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition,” which supersedes SAB No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB No. 104 primarily rescinds the accounting guidance contained in SAB No. 101 related to multiple-element revenue arrangements, which was superseded as a result of the issuance of EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Additionally, SAB No. 104 rescinds the SEC’s “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” issued with SAB No. 101, which had been codified in SEC Topic 13, “Revenue Recognition.” SAB No. 104 was effective upon issuance. The issuance of SAB No. 104 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
58
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(2) Asset Acquisitions
NewChannel
In July 2002, the Company acquired all of the existing customer contracts of NewChannel, Inc. (“NewChannel”) and associated rights. The purchase price was based, in part, on projected revenue from each of the former NewChannel clients at the time of their successful conversion to the LivePerson software platform. The Company incurred total acquisition costs of approximately $1,371. The total acquisition cost has been allocated to customer contracts and the net amount is included in “Assets – Other intangibles, net” on the Company’s December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet. Amortization expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $1,014. The total acquisition cost was amortized ratably over a period of 18 months, representing the then expected term of the client relationships.
Island Data
In December 2003, the Company acquired certain identifiable assets of Island Data Corporation (“Island Data”). The purchase price is based on projected revenue from the acquired customer contracts at the time of their assignment to the Company. As of December 31, 2003, the Company paid approximately $75 in cash and accrued an additional $286. The Company currently estimates its obligation to issue shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition to be approximately 375,000 shares in total, some of which were issued in February 2004 and March 2004 as described in Note 13. The exact number of shares will be determined according to an earn-out formula contained in the agreement. The Company does not expect the total acquisition costs to exceed approximately $2.4 million. Of the total purchase price, the Company has allocated approximately $65 to non-compete agreements which will be amortized over a period of 24 months, representing the terms of the agreements. The remainder of the purchase price will be allocated to customer contracts and will be amortized over a period of 36 months, representing the expected term of the client relationships. The net acquisition costs of $361 are included in “Assets – Other intangibles, net” on the Company’s December 31, 2003 balance sheet. This amount does not include the value of any shares issued or to be issued pursuant to the earn-out formula.
59
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(3) Balance Sheet Components
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is summarized as follows:
| December 31, | |||||
| 2003 | 2002 | ||||
| Computer equipment and software | $ | 1,460 | $ | 1,401 | |
| Furniture, equipment and building improvements | 36 | 77 | |||
| 1,496 | 1,478 | ||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | 1,155 | 883 | |||
| Total | $ | 341 | $ | 595 | |
| Accrued Expenses | |||||
| Accrued expenses consist of the following: | |||||
| December 31, | |||||
| 2003 | 2002 | ||||
| Professional services and consulting fees | $ | 382 | $ | 408 | |
| Sales commissions | 31 | 15 | |||
| Island Data customer contracts acquisition costs | 286 | — | |||
| NewChannel customer contracts acquisition costs | — | 84 | |||
| Payroll and related costs | 1,820 | 585 | |||
| Restructuring charges (see Note 6) | — | 615 | |||
| Other | 58 | 130 | |||
| Total | $ | 2,577 | $ | 1,837 | |
(4) Capitalization
On December 11, 2002, the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock at $0.69 per share to Genesis Select Corp. in exchange for investor relations services. The warrant vested such that 12,500 shares became exercisable on each monthly anniversary of the warrant issuance date for the first 12 months of the warrant’s five-year term. Some or all of the purchase price may be paid by canceling a vested portion of the warrant. As of December 31, 2003, the warrant was fully vested and remained outstanding. The Company accounted for this warrant in accordance with EITF Abstract No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” Pursuant to EITF No. 96-18, the Company values the warrant at each balance sheet date using a Black-Scholes pricing model as of each balance sheet date. Had the warrant been accounted for with the method established by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro forma net loss would not have been materially different. The Company recorded non-cash compensation expense of $298 related to this warrant during 2003. At December 31, 2003, this warrant remained outstanding.
60
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued an aggregate of 276,910 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants, in consideration of the termination of the right to purchase an additional 180,910 shares of common stock in the aggregate, pursuant to the warrants’ net exercise provisions.
(5) Stock Options
During 1998, the Company established the Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (the “1998 Plan”). Under the 1998 Plan, the Board of Directors could issue incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options to purchase up to 5,850,000 shares of common stock.
The Company established a successor to the 1998 Plan, the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”). Under the 2000 Plan, the options which had been outstanding under the 1998 Plan were incorporated into the 2000 Plan and the Company increased the number of shares available for issuance under the plan by approximately 4,150,000, thereby reserving for issuance 10,000,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate. Options to acquire common stock granted thereunder have ten-year terms. Pursuant to the provisions of the 2000 Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance thereunder automatically increases on the first trading day in each calendar year by an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar year, but in no event shall such annual increase exceed 1,500,000 shares. As of December 31, 2003, approximately 10,210,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2000 Plan (taking into account all option exercises through December 31, 2003). On the first trading day in January 2004, approximately 1,104,000 additional shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2000 Plan pursuant to its automatic increase provisions.
In March 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan with 450,000 shares of common stock initially reserved for issuance. Pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 0 and 4,000 shares were issued in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Pursuant to the provisions of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance thereunder automatically increases on the first trading day in each calendar year by an amount equal to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar year, but in no event shall such annual increase exceed 150,000 shares. As of December 31, 2003, 870,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (taking into account all share purchases through December 31, 2003). On the first trading day in January 2004, 150,000 additional shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan pursuant to its automatic increase provisions. Effective October 2001, the Company suspended the Employee Stock Purchase Plan until further notice.
61
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and weighted average exercise prices is as follows:
| Weighted | |||||
| Average | |||||
| Options | Exercise Price | ||||
| Options outstanding at January 1, 2001 | 7,669,553 | $ | 2.76 | ||
| Options granted | 3,967,500 | $ | 0.51 | ||
| Options exercised | (54,768 | ) | $ | 0.68 | |
| Options cancelled | (5,115,043 | ) | $ | 2.68 | |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2001 | 6,467,242 | $ | 1.46 | ||
| Options granted | 2,265,000 | $ | 0.70 | ||
| Options exercised | (77,500 | ) | $ | 0.31 | |
| Options cancelled | (826,408 | ) | $ | 1.68 | |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2002 | 7,828,334 | $ | 1.23 | ||
| Options granted | 590,000 | $ | 1.85 | ||
| Options exercised | (2,478,624 | ) | $ | 0.77 | |
| Options cancelled | (216,710 | ) | $ | 2.05 | |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2003 | 5,723,000 | $ | 1.46 | ||
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2001 | 2,896,000 | $ | 2.18 | ||
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2002 | 3,635,542 | $ | 1.82 | ||
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2003 | 2,672,447 | $ | 2.21 | ||
The net non-cash compensation amounts for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 consist of:
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
| May 1999 option granted to a client (discussed below) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 237 | |||
| December 2002 warrant granted for investor relations | |||||||||
| services (discussed in Note 4) | 298 | — | — | ||||||
| Amortization of employee stock compensation | — | 365 | 833 | ||||||
| Acceleration of deferred compensation charges related to | |||||||||
| certain employee terminations | 45 | — | 616 | ||||||
| Reversal of previously amortized deferred compensation | |||||||||
| charges due to forfeitures of employee stock options | — | — | (1,009 | ) | |||||
| Total | $ | 343 | $ | 365 | $ | 677 | |||
During May 1999, the Company issued an option to purchase 94,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.60 per share to a client in connection with an agreement by the Company to provide services to the client for a two-year period. The Company was receiving subscription revenue from the client over the two-year period based on the number of LivePerson chat operator access accounts the client was using. There was no minimum guarantee. This option originally provided that it would vest on or before May 2001 if the client met certain defined revenue targets and was exercisable for a period of three years from the date of grant. The Company accounted for this option in accordance with EITF Abstract No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for
62
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” Pursuant to EITF No. 96-18, the Company valued the option at each balance sheet date using a Black-Scholes pricing model as of each balance sheet date. The unamortized value ascribed to this option was adjusted at each balance sheet date to bring the total ascribed value of the option up to the then current unamortized fair value. This cost was then ratably amortized over the two-year service agreement, as the Company believed that the achievement of the revenue targets was probable.
In February 2000, the Company amended the option agreement with the client whereby the option became fully vested and immediately exercisable. The client exercised the option in May 2000. However, the client was precluded from selling the underlying common stock until the earlier of five years or, if certain revenue targets were met, May 19, 2001. The value ascribed to the option at the time the option agreement was amended, using a Black-Scholes pricing model, was $1,014, which was amortized ratably over the remaining service period of approximately fifteen months because the vesting of the option did not affect the Company’s obligation under the service agreement. The Company amortized $723 of the deferred costs during the year ended December 31, 2000, of which $59 was offset against the $59 of revenue recognized from the client. The remaining $664 of sales and marketing expense was included in non-cash compensation expense in the Company’s 2000 statement of operations.
As of March 31, 2001, the Company determined that it was unlikely that the client would meet the remaining revenue requirements under the agreement. Accordingly, the Company has amortized the remaining deferred cost of $291 during the three months ended March 31, 2001, of which $54 was offset against the $54 of revenue recognized from the client. The remaining $237 of sales and marketing expense was included in non-cash compensation expense in the Company’s statement of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.
The aggregate amount of unamortized deferred compensation reversed against additional paid-in capital was approximately $34 for the year ended December 31, 2002, and represents the forfeiture of options associated with employees who voluntarily left the Company during 2002. The aggregate amount of unamortized deferred compensation reversed against additional paid-in capital for the year ended December 31, 2001 was approximately $2,938. This amount represents the forfeiture of options associated with the Company’s employees whose employment was terminated as part of the Company’s restructuring initiatives.
The net non-cash compensation amounts for the year ended December 31, 2001 exclude the net non-cash compensation credit of $1,720 related to the Company’s restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2001 (see Note 6).
Excluding the net non-cash compensation credit of $1,720 related to the Company’s restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2001, the net non-cash compensation charge of $677 for the year ended December 31, 2001, includes $237 related to the May 1999 option granted to Network Commerce (discussed above), $833 of amortization expense and $616 of charges related to acceleration of vesting of options in connection with the termination of the employment of certain employees, and $1,009 of credits due to forfeiture in connection with the termination of the employment of certain employees.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2003:
63
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Remaining | Average | Number | Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercise Price | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Exercise Price | Outstanding | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 0.00 | – $ | 1.00 | 4,008,311 | 7.88 | $ | 0.58 | 1,248,851 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||||||
| $ | 1.01 | – $ | 2.00 | 700,189 | 5.00 | 1.88 | 660,002 | 1.93 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 2.01 | – $ | 5.00 | 637,375 | 7.08 | 3.29 | 415,875 | 3.58 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 5.01 | – $ | 11.00 | 377,125 | 6.36 | 6.96 | 347,719 | 7.05 | ||||||||||||
| 5,723,000 | $ | 1.46 | 2,672,447 | $ | 2.21 | |||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2002:
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Remaining | Average | Number | Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercise Price | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Exercise Price | Outstanding | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 0.00 | – | $ | 1.00 | 5,854,850 | 8.42 | $ | 0.55 | 1,992,143 | $ | 0.56 | |||||||||
| $ | 1.01 | – | $ | 2.00 | 1,166,109 | 6.95 | 1.82 | 957,040 | 1.81 | |||||||||||
| $ | 2.01 | – | $ | 5.00 | 417,375 | 6.74 | 3.58 | 321,375 | 3.58 | |||||||||||
| $ | 5.01 | – | $ | 11.00 | 390,000 | 6.53 | 7.18 | 364,984 | 7.18 | |||||||||||
| 7,828,334 | $ | 1.23 | 3,635,542 | $ | 1.82 | |||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2001:
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Remaining | Average | Number | Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercise Price | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Exercise Price | Outstanding | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 0.00 | – | $ | 1.00 | 4,046,989 | 8.31 | $ | 0.45 | 1,255,746 | $ | 0.68 | |||||||||
| $ | 1.01 | – | $ | 2.00 | 1,453,434 | 6.38 | 1.85 | 956,139 | 1.85 | |||||||||||
| $ | 2.01 | – | $ | 5.00 | 532,444 | 6.41 | 3.46 | 308,682 | 3.35 | |||||||||||
| $ | 5.01 | – | $ | 11.00 | 434,375 | 7.68 | 7.22 | 375,433 | 7.09 | |||||||||||
| 6,467,242 | $ | 1.46 | 2,896,000 | $ | 2.18 | |||||||||||||||
(6) Restructuring and Impairment Charges
In the first quarter of 2001, following a review of the Company’s business in connection with its acquisition of HumanClick, the Company commenced restructuring initiatives to streamline its operations, including the consolidation of its two San Francisco Bay area offices. The restructuring resulted in a reduction of the Company’s workforce by approximately 90 people as of the end of the first quarter of 2001. In the first quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a charge of $3,391 for severance and other expenses related to the restructuring.
In the third quarter of 2001, in a continued effort to streamline its operations, the Company initiated additional restructuring initiatives. These initiatives resulted in the elimination of redundant staff positions, the consolidation of all clients onto a single application platform and the decision to relocate its principal executive offices, which included the termination of an office space lease. These initiatives
64
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
resulted in a reduction of the Company’s workforce by approximately 20 people, the write-off of impaired computer equipment and software and the write-off of certain furniture, equipment and building improvements. In the third quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a charge of $9,232 for severance and other expenses related to the additional restructuring.
As a result of the various restructuring initiatives, for the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $12,740, in the aggregate. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company also recognized a net non-cash compensation credit in the amount of approximately $1,720 associated with LivePerson employees who were terminated as part of the Company’s restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2001. The net non-cash compensation credit of $1,720 for the year ended December 31, 2001 represents the reversal of $3,228 of previously recognized amortization of deferred compensation related to options of employees which did not vest due to their termination of employment in connection with the Company’s restructuring initiatives, offset by the acceleration of vesting of certain other employee options of $1,508 also in connection with the restructuring initiatives. Approximately $446 of the $1,508 represents additional compensation related to the intrinsic value of options at the date of modification recorded during the first quarter of 2001.
The balance of the accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2003 is as follows:
| Net (utilization) | ||||||||||
| Provision for | reversals during | |||||||||
| Balance as of | the year ended | the year ended | Balance as of | |||||||
| January 1, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||
| Contract terminations (a) | $ | 615 | $ | 1,024 | $ | (1,639 | ) | $— | ||
| Total | $ | 615 | $ | 1,024 | $ | (1,639 | ) | $— | ||
(a) In the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1,024 related to its 2001 restructuring initiatives. This charge reflected the amount of the judgment in a previously disclosed arbitration proceeding in excess of the $350 provision initially provided for in connection with the Company’s original restructuring plan in 2001 (see Note 11).
The allocation of the restructuring and impairment charges as of December 31, 2002 is as follows:
| Provision | Net (utilization) | |||||||||||||||||
| (reversals) | reversals during | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of | for the year ended | the year ended | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||
| January 1, 2002 | December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
| Severance | $ | 55 | $ | (55 | ) | $ | — | $ — | ||||||||||
| Contract terminations (b) | 985 | 1,241 | (1,611 | ) | 615 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,040 | $ | 1,186 | $ | (1,611 | ) | $615 | ||||||||||
(b) In the fourth quarter of 2002, in accordance with EITF 94-3, the Company incurred an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1,241 related to its 2001 restructuring initiatives. This charge primarily related to the unfavorable settlement of a previously disclosed legal proceeding in excess of the provision initially provided for in connection with the Company’s original restructuring plan. The legal proceeding was the result of the termination of an operating lease for computer equipment that supported the Company’s application platform prior to the consolidation of all clients onto a single application platform in the third quarter of 2001.
65
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(7) Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
On January 1, 2002, the Company was required to adopt the full provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and certain indefinite-lived intangibles no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually. This testing requires the identification of reporting units and comparison of the reporting units’ carrying value to their fair value and, when appropriate, requires the reduction of the carrying value of impaired assets to their fair value.
The transitional impairment analysis required upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 was completed during the first quarter of 2002, and the Company determined that there was an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill. As part of this analysis, management determined that the Company continued to operate in one operating segment and that it did not have any separate reporting units under SFAS No. 142; accordingly, the impairment analysis was performed on an enterprise-wide basis. This process included obtaining an independent appraisal of the fair value of the Company as a whole and of its individual assets. Fair value was determined from the same cash flow forecasts used in December 2001 for the evaluation of Company’s carrying value under SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” which was the accounting rule for impairment of goodwill that preceded SFAS No. 142 and was effective through December 31, 2001. The valuation methodology required by SFAS No. 142 is different than that required by SFAS No. 121. An impairment is more likely to result under SFAS No. 142 because it requires, among other items, the discounting of forecasted cash flows as compared to the undiscounted cash flow valuation method under SFAS No. 121.
The allocation of fair values to identifiable tangible and intangible assets as of January 1, 2002, resulted in an implied valuation of the goodwill of $0. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined in the same manner as determining the amount of goodwill that would have been required to be recognized in a business combination. That is, under SFAS No. 142, an entity is required to allocate the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire it. Comparing this implied value to the carrying value resulted in an impairment of $5,338, with no income tax effect. This impairment was recorded as a cumulative effect of accounting change on the Company’s statement of operations as of January 1, 2002.
66
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
As required by SFAS No. 142, the following table shows the Company’s 2001 results, which are presented on a basis comparable to the 2003 and 2002 results, adjusted to exclude amortization expense related to goodwill:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
| Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change — | |||||||||
| as reported | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (1,433 | ) | $ | (27,261 | ) |
| Add back: Goodwill amortization | — | — | 2,975 | ||||||
| Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change — | |||||||||
| as adjusted | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (1,433 | ) | $ | (24,286 | ) |
| Net loss – as reported | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (6,771 | ) | $ | (27,261 | ) |
| Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax | — | — | 2,975 | ||||||
| Net loss – as adjusted (a) | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (6,771 | ) | $ | (24,286 | ) |
| Basic and diluted net loss per share: | |||||||||
| Net loss–as reported | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.80 | ) |
| Add back: Goodwill amortization | — | — | 0.09 | ||||||
| Net loss – as adjusted (a) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) |
| (a) | Includes cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, which increased the net loss by $5,338 and the basic and diluted net loss per share by $0.16 during the year ended December 31, 2002. |
(8) Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
| Additions | |||||||||||
| Balance at | Charged to | Balance at | |||||||||
| Beginning of | Costs and | Deductions/ | End of | ||||||||
| Period | Expenses | Write-offs | Period | ||||||||
| For the year ended December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 70 | $ | 15 | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 64 | ||
| For the year ended December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 160 | $ | — | $ | (90 | ) | $ | 70 | ||
| For the year ended December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 577 | $ | 875 | $ | (1,292 | ) | $ | 160 | ||
(9) Income Taxes
There is no provision for federal, state or local income taxes for any periods presented, because the Company has incurred losses since inception. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets because management is uncertain, after considering all of the available objective evidence, whether or not these assets will be realized.
Management will continue to assess the valuation allowance. To the extent it is determined that a valuation allowance is no longer required with respect to certain deferred tax assets, the tax benefit, if any, of such deferred tax assets will be recognized in the future.
At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had approximately $68,457 and $61,600, respectively, of federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards available to offset future taxable income. These carryforwards expire in various years through 2023. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Company’s use of its NOL carryforwards may be limited if the Company has
67
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
experienced an ownership change, as defined in Section 382. Management is currently in the process of determining whether a Section 382 change has occurred and to what extent the use of its NOL carryforwards may be limited. Preliminary results indicate that the Company has experienced an ownership change and may have a material limitation on the use of its NOL carryforwards. Management expects to complete its Section 382 analysis during the first half of 2004.
The effects of temporary differences and tax loss carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of federal deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are presented below:
| 2003 | 2002 | |||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||
| Net operating loss carry forwards | $ | 28,752 | $ | 25,882 | ||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 84 | 821 | ||||
| Deferred revenue | 324 | 336 | ||||
| Non-cash compensation | 722 | 703 | ||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles amortization | 3,395 | 3,199 | ||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | 27 | — | ||||
| Other | 3 | 11 | ||||
| Gross deferred tax assets | 33,307 | 30,952 | ||||
| Less: valuation allowance | (33,306 | ) | (30,456 | ) | ||
| Net deferred tax assets | 1 | 496 | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||
| Plant and equipment, principally due to differences in | ||||||
| depreciation | (1 | ) | (115 | ) | ||
| Accounts receivable | — | (255 | ) | |||
| Prepaid expenses | — | (126 | ) | |||
| Gross deferred tax liabilities | (1 | ) | (496 | ) | ||
| Net deferred taxes | $ | — | $ | — | ||
| ======== | ======== | |||||
(10) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases facilities and certain equipment under agreements accounted for as operating leases. These leases generally require the Company to pay all executory costs such as maintenance and insurance. Rental expense for operating leases for the years ending December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were approximately $430, $378 and $2,749, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases (with an initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) are as follows:
| Year ending December 31, | Operating Leases | |||
| 2004 | $ | 385 | ||
| 2005 | 133 | |||
| 2006 | 64 | |||
| Thereafter | 1 | |||
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 583 | ||
68
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(11) Legal Proceedings
On or about December 2, 2002, MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, containing claims for unpaid invoices related to a contract with MCI for voice and data services. The complaint sought to recover approximately $761 plus interest. The District Court dismissed the action on the Company’s motion on May 29, 2003 because the contract contained a binding arbitration provision. The matter is presently pending for arbitration with JAMS in New York City in which the Company has denied liability.
Although the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend vigorously the matter described above, and believes that the Company has provided adequate reserves in connection with the claim, the Company cannot assure you that the Company’s defense will be successful and, if it is not, that the Company’s ultimate liability in connection with this claim will not exceed the Company’s reserves or have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
On November 16, 2001, Corio, Inc. filed a demand for arbitration against the Company with the American Arbitration Association in San Francisco County, California. The demand was related to a hosted software service contract terminated during 2001. In December 2003, the matter was settled and the Company paid Corio approximately $1,369.
(12) Subsequent Events
In January 2004, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of up to 500,000 shares of its common stock by Island Data Corporation. The Company’s registration of the resale of the shares was required by its agreement to purchase certain identifiable assets from Island Data. (See Note 2.) The Company currently estimates its obligation to issue shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition to be approximately 375,000 shares in total, some of which were issued in February 2004 and March 2004 as described in Note 13. The exact number of shares will be determined according to an earn-out formula contained in the agreement. Any shares registered for resale on the registration statement, but not actually issued to Island Data pursuant to the earn-out formula, will be deregistered. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock covered by the Island Data registration statement.
In January 2004, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC relating to 4,000,000 shares of its common stock that it may issue from time to time. The Company has no immediate plans to offer or sell any shares under this shelf registration. The Company presently intends to use the net proceeds from any sale of the registered shares for general corporate purposes, working capital and potential strategic acquisitions. The Company would announce the terms of any issuance in a filing with the SEC at the time it offers or sells the shares.
69
LIVEPERSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(13) Subsequent Events – Unaudited
In February 2004, the Company issued 76,074 shares of its common stock to Island Data as the first stock portion of the purchase price, determined according to an earn-out formula contained in the Company’s agreement with Island Data. The value of the shares issued was approximately $364, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on the date of issuance.
In March 2004, the Company issued an additional 294,820 shares of its common stock to Island Data as the second stock portion of the purchase price, determined according to an earn-out formula contained in the Company’s agreement with Island Data. The value of the shares issued was approximately $1,430, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on the date of issuance.
70
| ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ONACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of LivePerson’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2003. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by LivePerson in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to LivePerson’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in LivePerson’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 identified in connection with the evaluation thereof by our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed not later than April 29, 2004.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed not later than April 29, 2004.
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS ANDMANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this Item 12 with respect to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed not later than April 29, 2004.
The information required by this Item 12 with respect to the securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference from the section captioned “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
71
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed not later than April 29, 2004.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed not later than April 29, 2004.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ONFORM 8-K
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: | ||
| 1. | Financial Statements. | ||
| Incorporated by reference to the index of consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |||
| 2. | Financial Statement Schedules. | ||
| None. | |||
| 3. | Exhibits. | ||
| Number | Description | |
| 2.1 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2000, among LivePerson,HumanClick Ltd. and the shareholders of HumanClick Ltd. named in Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to LivePerson’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 12, 2000 and filed October 19, 2000) | |
| 3.1 | Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to LivePerson’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and filed March 30, 2001 (the “2000 Form 10-K”)) | |
| 3.2 | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2000 Form 10-K) | |
| 4.1 | Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to LivePerson’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (Registration No. 333-96689) (“Registration No. 333-96689”)) | |
| 4.2 | Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2000, by and among LivePerson, the several persons and entities named on the signature pages thereto as Investors, and Robert LoCascio (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to Registration No. 333-96689) |
72
| Number | Description | |
| 4.3 | See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for further provisions defining the rights of holders of common | |
| stock of LivePerson | ||
| 10.1 | Employment Agreement between LivePerson and Robert P. LoCascio, dated as of | |
| January 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to | ||
| Registration No. 333-96689)* | ||
| 10.2 | Employment Agreement between LivePerson and Timothy E. Bixby, dated as of June 23, | |
| 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registration No. 333-96689)* | ||
| 10.2.1 | Modification to Employment Agreement between LivePerson, Inc. and Timothy E. | |
| Bixby, dated as of April 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered | ||
| exhibit to LivePerson’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, | ||
| 2003 and filed August 13, 2003)* | ||
| 10.3 | 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit | |
| to the 2000 Form 10-K)* | ||
| 10.4 | Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered | |
| exhibit to the 2000 Form 10-K)* | ||
| 10.5 | Agreement of Lease between Vornado 330 West 34th Street L.L.C. as Landlord and | |
| LivePerson as Tenant, dated as of March 8, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit | ||
| 10.8 to Registration No. 333-96689) | ||
| 10.5.1 | Surrender Agreement between Vornado 330 West 34th Street L.L.C. and LivePerson, | |
| dated as of September 20, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered | ||
| exhibit to LivePerson’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September | ||
| 30, 2001 and filed November 14, 2001) | ||
| 10.6 | Master Lease and Financing Agreement (with exhibits and schedules) by and between | |
| Compaq Financial Services Corporation and LivePerson, dated as of August 28, 2000 | ||
| (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2000 Form 10-K) | ||
| 10.7.1 | Employment Agreement between HumanClick Ltd. and Eitan Ron, dated as of October | |
| 12, 2000 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to LivePerson’s | ||
| Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and filed | ||
| April 1, 2002 (the “2001 Form 10-K”))* | ||
| 10.7.2 | Letter Agreement between LivePerson, Inc. and Eitan Ron, dated October 12, 2000 | |
| (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2001 Form 10-K)* | ||
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2001 | |
| Form 10-K) | ||
| 23.1 | Consent of KPMG LLP | |
| 31.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as | |
| adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 31.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as | |
| adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted | |
| pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| 32.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted | |
| pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
| * | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
73
(b) Current Reports on Form 8-K filed or furnished during the quarter ended December 31, 2003:
Items 7 and 12 – dated October 28, 2003 and furnished October 29, 2003, announcing theissuance of a press release with regard to the Company’s results of operations and financial condition for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.Information in any of our Current Reports on Form 8-K furnished under Item 12, “Results of Operations and Financial Condition,” shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be incorporated by reference into a filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
74
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 29, 2004.
| LIVEPERSON, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ ROBERT P. LOCASCIO | |
| Robert P. LoCascio Chief Executive Officer | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 29, 2004.
| Signature | Title(s) | |
| /s/ ROBERT P. LOCASCIO | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the | |
| Board of Directors (principal executive | ||
| Robert P. LoCascio | officer) | |
| /s/ TIMOTHY E. BIXBY | President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary | |
| and Director (principal financial and | ||
| Timothy E. Bixby | accounting officer) | |
| /s/ STEVEN BERNS | Director | |
| Steven Berns | ||
| /s/ RICHARD L. FIELDS | Director | |
| Richard L. Fields | ||
| /s/ EMMANUEL GILL | Director | |
| Emmanuel Gill | ||
| /s/ KEVIN C. LAVAN | Director | |
| Kevin C. Lavan |
| EXHIBIT INDEX | ||
| Number | Description | |
| 2.1 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2000, among LivePerson, | |
| HumanClick Ltd. and the shareholders of HumanClick Ltd. named in Schedule I thereto | ||
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to LivePerson’s Current Report on Form 8-K, | ||
| dated October 12, 2000 and filed October 19, 2000) | ||
| 3.1 | Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to | |
| the identically-numbered exhibit to LivePerson’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the | ||
| fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and filed March 30, 2001 (the “2000 Form 10-K”)) | ||
| 3.2 | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to the | |
| identically-numbered exhibit to the 2000 Form 10-K) | ||
| 4.1 | Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to the identically- | |
| numbered exhibit to LivePerson’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended | ||
| (Registration No. 333-96689) (“Registration No. 333-96689”)) | ||
| 4.2 | Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, | |
| 2000, by and among LivePerson, the several persons and entities named on the signature | ||
| pages thereto as Investors, and Robert LoCascio (incorporated by reference to the | ||
| identically-numbered exhibit to Registration No. 333-96689) | ||
| 4.3 | See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for further provisions defining the rights of holders of common | |
| stock of LivePerson | ||
| 10.1 | Employment Agreement between LivePerson and Robert P. LoCascio, dated as of | |
| January 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to | ||
| Registration No. 333-96689)* | ||
| 10.2 | Employment Agreement between LivePerson and Timothy E. Bixby, dated as of June 23, | |
| 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registration No. 333-96689)* | ||
| 10.2.1 | Modification to Employment Agreement between LivePerson, Inc. and Timothy E. | |
| Bixby, dated as of April 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered | ||
| exhibit to LivePerson’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, | ||
| 2003 and filed August 13, 2003)* | ||
| 10.3 | 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit | |
| to the 2000 Form 10-K)* | ||
| 10.4 | Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered | |
| exhibit to the 2000 Form 10-K)* | ||
| 10.5 | Agreement of Lease between Vornado 330 West 34th Street L.L.C. as Landlord and | |
| LivePerson as Tenant, dated as of March 8, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit | ||
| 10.8 to Registration No. 333-96689) | ||
| 10.5.1 | Surrender Agreement between Vornado 330 West 34th Street L.L.C. and LivePerson, |
| dated as of September 20, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered | |
| exhibit to LivePerson’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September | |
| 30, 2001 and filed November 14, 2001) | |
| 10.6 | Master Lease and Financing Agreement (with exhibits and schedules) by and between |
| Compaq Financial Services Corporation and LivePerson, dated as of August 28, 2000 | |
| (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2000 Form 10-K) | |
| 10.7.1 | Employment Agreement between HumanClick Ltd. and Eitan Ron, dated as of October |
| 12, 2000 (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to LivePerson’s | |
| Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and filed | |
| April 1, 2002 (the “2001 Form 10-K”))* | |
| 10.7.2 | Letter Agreement between LivePerson, Inc. and Eitan Ron, dated October 12, 2000 |
| (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2001 Form 10-K)* | |
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to the identically-numbered exhibit to the 2001 |
| Form 10-K) | |
| 23.1 | Consent of KPMG LLP |
| 31.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as |
| adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 31.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as |
| adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted |
| pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted |
| pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
