UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2010
o TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transitional period from ______ to ______
Commission File No. 0-32923
CLICKER INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 33-0198542 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
18952 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 210, Irvine, CA 92612
(Address of principal executive office) (zip code)
(949) 486-3990
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
As of January 17, 2011, there were 61,747,355 shares of registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.
1
CLICKER INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Report on Form 10-Q
For the quarter ended November 30, 2010
Page | |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
Item 1. Financial Statements | 3 |
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets at November 30, 2010 and August 31, 2010 | 3 |
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Month Periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 | 4 |
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Month Periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 | 5 |
Notes to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 – 15 |
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16 – 24 |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 24 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 25 |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 26 |
Item 1A. Fisk Factors | 26 |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 26 |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities | 27 |
Item 4. RESERVED | 27 |
Item 5. Other Information | 27 |
Item 6. Exhibits | 27 |
Signatures | 28 |
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
CLICKERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Formerly, Financial Media Group)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS | ||||||||
As of | As of | |||||||
NOVEMBER 30, 2010 | AUGUST 31, 2010 | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents | $ | 983 | $ | 44,700 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 11,707 | 3,579 | ||||||
Marketable securities | 118,691 | 135,400 | ||||||
Other Loan & Current Assets | 67,587 | 95,822 | ||||||
Total current assets | 198,968 | 279,501 | ||||||
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT, net | 2,266 | 7,298 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 201,234 | $ | 286,798 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,306,988 | $ | 1,301,510 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 859,577 | 773,410 | ||||||
Derivative liability | 486,595 | 364,327 | ||||||
Due to related parties | 420,171 | 401,921 | ||||||
Note payable | 70,000 | 170,000 | ||||||
Convertible note payble, net | 312,613 | 308,285 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 3,455,944 | 3,319,453 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT: | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, | ||||||||
61,582,355 and 59,697,688 shares issued and outstanding at | ||||||||
November 30, 2010 and August 31, 2010, respectively | 61,582 | 59,698 | ||||||
Paid in capital | 21,440,098 | 20,200,737 | ||||||
Prepaid consulting | - | (7,292 | ) | |||||
Shares to be Issued | 15,400 | - | ||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities | 20,376 | 37,194 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (24,792,167 | ) | (23,322,990 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' deficit | (3,254,710 | ) | (3,032,653 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit | $ | 201,234 | $ | 286,800 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
CLICKERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Formerly, Financial Media Group)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 24,205 | $ | 198,920 | |||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||
Selling, general & administrative | 1,049,678 | 442,145 | |||||||
Depreciation | 5,032 | 8,120 | |||||||
Impairments | - | 52,684 | |||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,054,710 | 502,949 | |||||||
Loss from operations | (1,030,505 | ) | (304,029 | ) | |||||
Non-Operating Income (Expense): | |||||||||
Interest expense | (176,105 | ) | (100,612 | ) | |||||
Interest income | - | 267 | |||||||
Change in derivative liability | (240,270 | ) | (93,556 | ) | |||||
Loss on debt redemption | (17,497 | ) | - | ||||||
Total non-operating income (expense) | (433,872 | ) | (193,901 | ) | |||||
Loss before income taxes | (1,464,377 | ) | (497,930 | ) | |||||
Provision for income tax | 4,800 | 4,800 | |||||||
Net loss | (1,469,177 | ) | (502,730 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive gain (loss): | |||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities | (16,818 | ) | 633,133 | ||||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (1,485,995 | ) | $ | 130,403 | ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (1.67 | ) | |||
Basis weighted average shares of common stock outstanding | 60,308,963 | 300,264 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
CLICKERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Formerly, Financial Media Group)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,469,177 | ) | $ | (502,730 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | ||||||||
used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Bad debts | - | 27,227 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,032 | 8,120 | ||||||
Revenues in form of marketable securities | - | (50,000 | ) | |||||
Impairment of marketable securities | - | 52,684 | ||||||
Change in derivative liability | 240,270 | 93,556 | ||||||
Loss on debt redemption | 17,497 | - | ||||||
Issuance of options and warrants for services | 712,538 | 39,728 | ||||||
Amortization of shares issued for services | 25,643 | 1,458 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in current assets: | ||||||||
Receivables | (8,128 | ) | - | |||||
Loan and other current assets | 28,236 | (90 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | 5,478 | 70,651 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 273,392 | 164,978 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (169,218 | ) | (94,417 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Cash proceeds from convertible note | 30,000 | 120,000 | ||||||
Cash received from sale of common stock | 95,500 | - | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 125,500 | 120,000 | ||||||
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS | (43,717 | ) | 25,583 | |||||
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE | 44,700 | 32,380 | ||||||
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE | $ | 983 | $ | 57,963 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure for cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents paid for interest | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents paid for taxes | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow investing and financing activity: | ||||||||
Conversion of convertible note | $ | 231,726 | $ | 18,357 | ||||
Issuance of shares for accrued salaries | $ | 18,351 | $ | 35,000 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
CLICKER INC.
(Formerly Financial Media Group, Inc.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Clicker Inc. (the “Company,” "We," or "Clicker"), a corporation incorporated in the State of Nevada, is a web publisher brand builder focused on developing stand alone brands that incorporate social networking and reward properties that leverage content, commerce and advertising for the next generation global internet users.
Clicker, Inc., formerly, Financial Media Group, Inc. (“FMG”) acquired on May 12, 2009, all of the outstanding capital stock of Clicker, Inc. in exchange for the issuance of 219,900 shares of common stock to the Clicker Shareholders. Such shares are restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the 1933 Securities Act. Based upon same, Clicker became our wholly-owned subsidiary. As if the date of the merger, Financial Media Group, Inc. changed its name to Clicker, Inc.
The exchange of shares with Clicker was accounted for as a reverse acquisition under the purchase method of accounting since the stockholders of Clicker obtained control of the consolidated entity. Accordingly, the merger of the two companies was recorded as a recapitalization of Clicker, with Clicker, Inc. being treated as the continuing entity. The historical financial statements presented are those of Clicker. The continuing company has retained December 31 as its fiscal year end.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries WallStreet Direct, Inc., Digital Wall Street, Inc., Financial Filings, Corp., My WallStreet, Inc. and Wealth Expo Inc. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include collectability of accounts receivable, accounts payable, sales returns and recoverability of long-term assets. Actual results could differ from our estimates..
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents.
6
Accounts Receivable
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves. Reserves are recorded primarily on a specific identification basis. Allowance for doubtful debts amounted to $572,099 and $572,099 as of November 30, 2010 and August 31, 2010, respectively.
Marketable Securities
The Company’s investments in securities are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. Securities classified as available-for-sale may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs, and for other purposes.
Unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized and unrealized gains and losses for securities classified as available-for-sale are included in the statement of operations and comprehensive gain, respectively.
The Company reviews, on a quarterly basis or more frequently if warranted by circumstances, the carrying value of the marketable securities it receives from its customers for providing services. The Company records impairment expense each quarter when the market value of the securities received show a consistent decline over 90 to 180 days, and the carrying amount of the marketable securities exceeds its fair value by 50% or more, and is deemed not recoverable. As such, the Company records on a quarterly basis in its financial statements the impairment loss for the difference between the carrying amount of the marketable securities and their fair value.
To safeguard the Company with impairments of marketable securities, the Company has revised its contractual terms on its agreements with its clients which provides that, in the event during the term of the agreement, the share bid price declines by more than ten per cent (10%) of the share bid price on the date of execution of the agreement, the Client would agree to issue additional shares of their common stock to the Company in order to make up the deficiency caused by the reduction in the value of their stock.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based on whether or not the inputs are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are observable. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company's financial instruments primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities, and accounts payable.
As of the balance sheet dates, the estimated fair values of the financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values as presented on the balance sheet. This is primarily attributed to the short maturities of these instruments.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets from three to five years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
7
Derivatives
Derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recorded on the basis of services provide to our clients, and is recognized when a formal arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue.
Our primary source of revenue was generated from building and developing stand alone brands that incorporate social networking, and providing internet based media and advertising services. The services included web designs, integrated social media network, text and display advertising, press releases, e-mail marketing, and promotion across our network of web sites. Revenues from Internet based media and advertising services were recognized and recorded when the performance of such services completed.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash, accounts receivable and marketable securities. The Company places its cash with financial institutions deemed by management to be of high credit quality. The amount on deposit in any one institution that exceeds federally insured limits is subject to credit risk. All of the Company’s investment in marketable securities are considered “available-for-sale” and are carried at their fair value, with unrealized gains and losses (net of income taxes) that are temporary in nature recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying balance sheets. The fair values of the Company’s investments in marketable securities are determined based on market quotations. Exposure to losses on receivables i s principally dependent on each customer's financial condition. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses, as required.
Reporting Segments
The Company reports segment information using the “management approach” model. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure, or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company. The Company allocates its resources and assesses the performance of its sales activities based upon its products and services.
Stock-Based Compensation
The costs of all employee stock options, as well as other equity-based compensation arrangements, are reflected in the consolidated financial statements based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the grant date. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award—the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). Stock compensation for stock granted to non-employees is determined as the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity, except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The unrealized loss and gain as of November 30, 2010 and 2009 was $16,818 and $633,133, respectively.
8
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820- 10 that clarifies existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value me asurements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-13 (ASU 2010-13), "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." This Update provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarity that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The provisions of ASU 2010-13 are not expected to have a mater ial effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued an accounting update to provide guidance to enhance disclosures related to the credit quality of a company's financing receivables portfolio and the associated allowance for credit losses. Pursuant to this accounting update, a company is required to provide a greater level of disaggregated information about its allowance for credit loss with the objective of facilitating users' evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in the company's portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses, and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. The revised disclosures as of the end of the reporting period are effective for the Company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, and the revised discourse s related to activities during the reporting period are effective for the Company beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting update on its financial disclosures.
NOTE 3 MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company receives cash and/or securities of client companies as payment in full for services rendered. The numbers of shares the Company receives for services is based on contract amount, and the number of shares is determined based on the bid price at the time of signing the agreement. The securities received from clients are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are carried at fair value based on the quoted market prices. The securities comprised of shares of common stock of third party customers and securities purchased. Securities classified as available-for-sale may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs, and for other purposes. The Company does not currently have any held-to-maturity or trading securities.
9
Marketable securities classified as available for sale consisted of the following as of November 30, 2010:
Name | No | Cost | Market value | Accumulated unrealized Gain | Accumulated unrealized Loss | Traded on | |||||||||||||||
VOIP PAL.com, Inc. VPLM | 2,500,000 | $ | 15,000 | 25,000 | 10,000 | - | PK | ||||||||||||||
Sunrise Consulting Group SNRS | 515,000,000 | 51,500 | 51,500 | - | - | PK | |||||||||||||||
Others-Less than $10,000 cost | 98,211,723 | 31,580 | 42,191 | 17,128 | 6,517 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 98,080 | $ | 118,691 | $ | 27,128 | $ | 6,517 | |||||||||||||
Marketable securities classified as available for sale consisted of the following as of August 31, 2010
Equity Securities Name and Symbol | Number of shares held at August 31, 2010 | Cost | Market Value at August 31, 2010 | Accumulated Unrealized Gain | Accumulated Unrealized Loss | Traded on Pink Sheets (PK) or Bulletin Board (BB) | |||||||||||||||
Sunrise Consulting Group SNRS | 515,000,000 | $ | 51,500 | $ | 51,500 | $ | - | $ | - | PK | |||||||||||
VOIP PAL.com, Inc. VPLM | 2,500,000 | 15,000 | 50,000 | 35,000 | - | PK | |||||||||||||||
Others - Less than $10,000 cost | 98,211,723 | 31,580 | 33,900 | 5,544 | 3,224 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 98,080 | $ | 135,400 | $ | 40,544 | $ | 3,224 | ||||||||||||||
As of November 30, 2010, the Company evaluated its marketable securities holdings by valuing the securities according to the quoted price of the securities on the stock exchange.
It is the Company’s policy to assess its marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that losses may be other-than-temporary. The Company recognized impairment losses on marketable securities of zero and $52,684 for the year ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company did not sell any marketable securities during three months ended November 30, 2010, therefore, no realized gain or loss were recognized as of November 30, 2010 and the same for three months period in November 30, 2009.
NOTE 4 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of the following:
November 30, 2010 | August, 31, 2010 | |||||||
Office and computer equipment | $ | 191,653 | $ | 191,653 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation: | (189,387 | ) | (184,355 | ) | ||||
$ | 2,266 | $ | 7,298 |
Depreciation expense for the three months periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 was $5,032 and $8,120 respectively. Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.
10
NOTE 5 LOAN AND OTHER ASSETS
As of November 30, 2010 and August 31, 2010, other assets consisted of the following:
November 30, 2010 | August 31, 2010 | |||||||
Loan Receivable | $ | 61,135 | $ 91,670 | |||||
Rent deposit | 4,152 | 4,152 | ||||||
Total | 67,587 | 95,822 | ||||||
Loan to others are due on demand, interest free, and unsecured.
NOTE 6 ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
November 30, 2010 | August 31, 2010 | |||||||
Accrued legal & Consulting fees | $ | 179,875 | $ | 126,700 | ||||
Accrued interest | 25,252 | 18,232 | ||||||
Accrued salaries and payroll taxes | 464,981 | 447,508 | ||||||
Others | 189,470 | 180,970 | ||||||
$ | 859,577 | $ | 773,410 |
NOTE 7 DUE TO RELATED PARTIES
Due to officers and an entity owned by an officer, consist of the following:
November 30, 2010 | August 31, 2010 | |||||||
Accrued officer’s compensation | $ | 171,798 | $ | 153,548 | ||||
Accrued interest on a loan paid off | 248,373 | 248,373 | ||||||
$ | 420,171 | $ | 401,921 |
The Company recorded an expense of $81,250 and $92,188 for the three months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 for compensation and benefits provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The due balances were interest free, due on demand, and unsecured as of November 30, 2010 and August 31, 2010, respectively.
NOTE 8 NOTE PAYABLE
On March 5, 2010, the Company executed a promissory note of $170,000 to a third party, unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on September 5, 2010. During the three months ended November 30, 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to the note holder to settle for $100,000. The shares were valued at fair valued at $107,500, and the loss on debt settlement of $7,500 was recorded in the accompanying financial statements.
NOTE 9 CONVERTIBLE NOTES
In 2009 and 2010 (the “Dates of Issuance”), the Company issued multiple secured convertible notes to related and unrelated parties (the “Holders”), in the total amount of $1,462,034 (the “Secured Convertible Notes” or the “Notes”). The Secured Convertible Notes have various maturity dates ranging from 9 to 12 months and have annual interest rates ranging from of 0% to 10% per annum. The Holders have the right from and after the Date of Issuance, and until any time until the Secured Convertible Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the Secured Convertible Notes, and accrued interest, into fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock with an ownership limit of 4.99%. The Secured Convertible Notes have a variable conversion price and full res et feature. The percentage of market conversion rates range from 20% to 50% of the average closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion, which in the terms of the note agreements range from 3 days to 10 days. The Holders were not issued warrants with the Secured Convertible Notes. In the event of default for the Notes, the amount of principal and interest not paid when due bear interest at the rate of 18% per annum and the notes become immediately due and payable. Should that occur, the Company is liable to pay 105% of the then outstanding principal and interest.
11
The Company has recorded the embedded conversion feature in the Secured Convertible Notes as derivative liabilities due to the full reset provisions.
During the year ended August 31, 2010, the note due to the former Chief Financial Officer was amended into convertible note with accrued interest rate at 10%. The Company accrued interest on the outstanding balance on February 22, 2010 at 10% annually. The note is derivative instrument because the agreement does not contain an explicit limit on the number of shares to be delivered in a share settlement. However, because of the terms detailed in in note agreements which the value of the shares issued is capped to the amount of principal and interest, the derivative liability is zero.
The Company valued the derivative liability for secured convertible notes based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. These models are based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features in the note that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the conversion feature with the reset provisions and the call/redemption options.
The notes issued in 2009 and 2010 were valued with the following assumptions:
· | The stock projections are based on the estimate volatilities for each period; |
· | The projected volatility curve for each valuation period was based on the historical volatility of the Company as follows: |
1 year | 2 year | 3 year | 4 year | 5 year | ||||||||||||||||
8/31/2010 | 655 | % | 759 | % | 782 | % | 796 | % | 799 | % | ||||||||||
11/30/2010 | 629 | % | 711 | % | 781 | % | 801 | % | 804 | % |
· | An event of default would occur 1% of the time, increasing 1.00% per quarter and would occur 90% of the time at maturity; |
· | Conversion (at 20%, 40% or 50% of market price) to stock would be limited by the average trading volume and the holder would convert throughout the period; |
· | The Company would have funds available to redeem the notes 0% of the time, increasing 0 % per quarter and |
· | The Holders would convert up to the maximum ownership limit on a monthly basis. |
NOTE 10 EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
Common Stock
On January 26, 2010, we proposed a consolidation of all our outstanding common shares as record date of February 18, 2010, also known as a reverse stock split by 300:1. This reverse stock split reduced the total number of issued and outstanding common shares from 155,729,507 to 521,000. As a result of the reduction in the number of common shares, the market price per common share increased. However, there is no assurance that the post-reverse stock split price will be equal to or greater than the consolidation ratio multiplied by the pre-reverse stock split price on a going forward basis.
12
We affected the 300 for 1 reverse stock split of our common stock on April 1, 2010, as a result of which every 300 issued and outstanding shares of common stock has been combined into one share. Any fractional share as result of the reverse stock split received a whole share in lieu of any fractional share to which they might otherwise have been entitled.
From September to November 2010, the Company issued 1,518,377 shares of common stock at conversion prices from $0.09 to $0.43 per share for redemption of $231,726 note payable and convertible notes payable.
For the same period the Company also issued 155,000 shares of common stock to consultants valued at $18,351 in exchange for their services.
During the three months ended November 30, 2010, the Company received total of $95,500 from consultants upon exercise of their stock options. The Company issued 211,290 shares against $80,100 received and recorded the remaining of $15,400 as shares to be issued in the accompany financial statements .
Outstanding Warrants:
The company has no warrants outstanding at November 30, 2010.
Outstanding Stock Options:
2007 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (“2007 Non-Qualified Plan”):
On January 5, 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Non-Qualified Plan and reserved 10,000 shares of common stock for grant to employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors. The 2007 Non-Qualified Plan terminates ten (10) years from the date of adoption or sooner, at the discretion of the board of directors. As of November 30, 2010, there are no stock options granted under the 2007 Non-Qualified Plan.
2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (“2008 Non-Qualified Plan”):
On July 2, 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Non-Qualified Plan and the Board of Directors approved the reservation of 6,667 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock for issuance under the plan. As of August 31, 2010, no options have been granted under the 2008 Non-Qualified Plan.
2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“2007 Equity Plan”):
On February 6, 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Equity Plan, which was approved by the shareholders on April 11, 2007. The Company has reserved 23,333 shares of common stock for grant under this plan, The 2007 Equity Plan terminates ten (10) years from the date of adoption or sooner, at the discretion of the board of directors.
2010 Incentive Stock Plan
On June 18, 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Incentive Stock Plan which was approved by the shareholders and reserved 4,000,000 common shares of the Company’s authorized common stock to grant to employees, directors, officers and consultants for services. The stock granted under the 2010 Incentive Stock Plan shall be the Common Shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of November 30, 2010, under the 2010 Incentive Stock Plan, the Company issued 211,290 common shares to consultants for options exercised.
13
The number and weighted average exercise prices of stock Options granted by the Company at November 30, 2010 are as follows:
Options Outstanding | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||
Outstanding - August 31, 2010 | 16,083 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 6,684 | ||||||
Granted | 1,530,000 | - | - | ||||||||
Exercised | - | - | - | ||||||||
Expired/forfeited | - | - | - | ||||||||
Outstanding – November 30, 2010 | 1,546,083 | $ | 0.39 | 1,886 |
Following is a summary of the status of stock Options outstanding at November 30, 2010:
Range of Exercise Prices | Total Options Outstanding | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | Total Weighted Average Life | Options Exercisable | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 0.015 - $0.45 | 1,546,083 | 6.03 | $ | 4.82 | 1,546,036 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||||||||||
1,546,083 | 6.03 | $ | 4.82 | 1,546,036 | $ | 0.39 |
NOTE 11 BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
Weighted average number of shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share is the same since the effect of dilutive securities is anti-dilutive. The following number of potential shares of common stock has been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively as effect is anti-dilutive.
NOTE 12 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Lease
The Company leases its corporate office facilities in California from a third party under an operating lease on monthly basis. Rent expense under the operating lease for the three months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 was $11,663 and $90,888, respectively. The Company has no future lease obligations.
Contingencies
From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims, lawsuits, and disputes with third parties, actions involving allegations of discrimination or breach of contract actions incidental to the normal operations of the business. Company is not currently involved in any litigation which it believes could have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
14
NOTE 14 GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of the Company's assets and the satisfaction of its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $24,792,167 as of November 30, 2010 and has incurred net loss of $1,469,177 for the three months ended November 30, 2010. In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital, obtain financing and to succeed in its future o perations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management has taken the following steps to revise its operating and financial requirements, which it believes are sufficient to provide the Company with the ability to continue as a going concern. Management devoted considerable effort during the period ended November 30, 2010 towards (i) obtaining additional equity financing, (ii) evaluation of its marketing methods and (iii) further streamlining and reducing costs.
15
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect Management's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue,” or similar words. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of us and members of its management team as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risk and uncertainties , and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.
Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Important factors currently known to Management could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the future operating results over time. We believe that our assumptions are based upon reasonable data derived from and known about our business and operations. No assurances are made that actual results of operations or the results of our future activities will not differ materially from its assumptions. Factors that could cause differences include, but are not limited to, expected market demand for our services, fluctuations in pricing for materials, and competition.
Overview and Recent Transactions
We are web publishers and internet brand builders focused on developing stand alone brands and properties that incorporate social networking and reward properties that leverage content, commerce and advertising for the next generation global internet user. Clicker intends to build these properties and position them for sale to companies who desire to take the brands and proof of concept to next level of development.
The developments of these internet websites have four main stages of development:
Stage One: | The idea and concept stage of a potentially good idea. At this stage a budget and timeline for the property is developed. The size of the market and our plan for integration or exit is established. Additionally the business model is introduced at this level. |
Stage Two: | The development of the property is laid out. Site layout and design is established. Logic and user flow and finally site architecture and design are established. |
Stage Three: | The site is launched and the operational model is implemented in beta form. We begin to scale some web traffic and begin to test the model. The site is officially launched in the beta stage and can be in a few different versions |
Stage Four: | Full operation stage and the property should now have gone though a couple stages of beta with the model pretty much established. The property is established for operation as a subsidiary while positioning for sale or executive control. |
16
Web Properties
Forwant.com
ForWant.com is a free classified advertisements site with millions of ads posted by users. The website allows users to post advertisements for and search a variety of specialized categories including, housing, merchandises, services, personal ads and employment listings in specialized communities in the United States and Canada, as well as other countries such as United Kingdom, India and Ireland. The website also has paid premium content and sections, and the property has millions of listings throughout its network. The property is now incorporated under ForWant Inc and ready to begin operations as a standalone entity. Competitors for the property are Craigslist, kijiji (an eBay company), Hotjobs (yahoo), and Monster.
Cashclicker.com and C2we.com
Cashclicker.com is an e-reward site that will reward registered users on everyday consumption of content, commerce and search. C2we.com is the social network site that is affiliated with Cashclicker.com. Both sites are currently in design and expected to be launched in middle of 2011. Both sites have been delayed due to delay in funding. Management may sell the property at this stage of development. The model for this property is to provide a rewards program that incorporates Social Networking whereby users are paid to review offers, websites and fill out surveys. The platform for that is through a website with an added search component. Plans call for the revenue model for this property to be largely advertising driven model incorporating CPA (cost per action), CPM (cost per thousand), CPC (cost per click) type ad solutions. Plans als o call for a premium membership whereby members can have added benefits.
Sippinit.com
Sippinit.com is an online pop, entertainment and gossip property that will incorporate social networking with entertainment gossip. The property is currently in design and expected to be launched in middle of 2011. The site has been delayed due to delay in funding. Management may sell the property at this stage of development. Plans call for the property to be entertainment and gossip site that pulls entertainment feeds while users will be able to comment and gossip on the events. The platform will also call for users to be able to create a social networking pulse about a story or an event. The property will be advertising driven gathering to the entertainment ad market that will largely be in the event arenas. Users can promote its events through social network and anticipated to be paid on a cost per post type model. Addition ally, plans call for conversational marketing to be also implemented.
17
ItsMyLocal.com
ItsMyLocal.com is a reward property incorporates local search and rewards with local peer to peer social networking and rewards. The site is in the concept stage and expected to launch middle of 2011 providing we can secure additional capital.. The strategic plan for the brand is to provide a social network and rewards to local search whereby users of local participating patrons can receive coupons from their local vendors. Plans call for these patrons to become members and rate the established while offering coupons or special offers to their friends within the network. Competitors included Local.com and yelp.com.
Sportsgulp.net
Sportsgulp.net is a social networking website and gossip channel for sports enthusiasts. The property is in development and expected to launch in third quarter 2011. Plans call for the property to pull conventional sports feeds while allowing users a more interactive social networking component whereby the sports community could be more interactive with each other by incorporating social networking tools.
Wallst.net and Mywallst.net
Wallst.net & Mywallst.net- A financial social community provides an open forum for likeminded investors to share and collaborate and mentor. The site offers message boards, quotes as well as in depth video interviews which have aired on both internet and/or television. Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Wallstreet Direct Inc, these properties have been the cornerstone and main focus for the company. And while the property is in itself been very successful having been the staple of revenue for the company over the years, the industry as a whole has suffered greatly and the company focus will be more development of the other brands.
Financial Filings Corp.
Financial Filings Corp. was launched in March 2006 and provides news distribution and electronic document conversion services to public companies. for filing to the EDGAR website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Web Development
Based on our experience with developing our web properties, we have created a web development and programming business. We provide the following services to companies who are building web properties who have been “early stage” in their development. As a result, we may take all or a portion of payment in the form of stock or security interest when management feels that will be able to recoup or gain on our capital outlay. Typically we provide services and to include the following: help develop properties for client with high load usage and scalability in mind. We Develop hardware backbone which is typically run on Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2), which allows clients to dynamically scale CPU, storage and bandwidth usage for rapid growth while also being cost-effective in allowing the client company to use only what they need. The main application code base is programmed in PHP. Data is stored in a MySQL database. Various other technologies such as CSS, XML, HTML, JavaScript, Flash, etc. are used to enrich the frontend user experience.
18
Results of Operations
Our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 include our wholly-owned subsidiaries WallStreet, Financial Filings, Corp., My WallStreet, Inc., and The Wealth Expo Inc.
Revenues
Revenues for the three month period ended November 30, 2010 were $24,205 compared to $198,920 for the same period in 2009. Revenues decrease by $174,715 (88%) due to significant decrease in advertisements on our website resulting from the current economic conditions and recent downturn in financial markets, which caused our clients to spend significantly less money on internet advertising. To date, we have been unable to attract new clients for our new line of business as web development and brand builder.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (S,G&A) for the three months ended November 30, 2010 were $1,049,678 compared to $442,145 for the same period in 2009. SG&A expenses increase by $607,533 (137%) during the three months ended November 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 primarily due to an increase of $688,500 in stock option expenses resulted in higher net loss.
Impairment of marketable securities for the three months ended November 30, 2010 was Zero compared to $52,684 for the same period ended in 2009. We had significant reduction in impairment compared to last year due to lack of securities available for sale and a reduction in receipt of securities as payment. Impairment expense was recorded because the market value of the securities we received as compensation for services declined in excess of 50% of their market value. This reduction in our judgment appeared to be other than temporary reduction in the fair value of the marketable securities. Therefore, we took a conservative approach of recording the impairment expense. Furthermore, to safeguard us with impairments of marketable securities, we have revised our contractual terms o n agreements with our clients which provides that, in the event during the term of the agreement, the share bid price of client securities decline by more than 10% of the share bid price on the date of execution of the agreement, the client agrees to issue additional shares of their common stock to us in order to make up the deficiency caused by the reduction in the value of their stock. Implementation of this policy further helped us reduce our impairment expense during the three months ended November 30, 2010.
Depreciation expense for the three months ended November 30, 2010 was $5,032 compared to $8,120 for the same period in 2009. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets from three to five years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Interest expense for the three months ended November 30, 2010 was $176,105 compared to $100,612 for the same period in 2009. The increase in interest expense for the three months ended November 30, 2010 resulted as we amortized the beneficial conversion feature interest on convertible notes issued during the quarter ended November 30, 2010.
Unrealized loss at November 30, 2010 was $16,818 compared to unrealized gain of $633,133 for the same period in 2009. Unrealized gain resulted from the decrease in market value of the marketable securities held at November 30, 2010. The value of our marketable securities available for sale decreased at November 30, 2010 compared to at November 30, 2009, resulting in the unrealized loss, which was increased as most of our securities were liquidated during the year ended August 31, 2010.
We recorded an expense of $240,270 in change of derivative liability for the three months ended November 30, 2010 as compared to $93,556 for the same periods in 2009. The increased derivative liability resulted from our issuance of convertible notes for the quarter ended November 30, 2010.
19
Net Loss
We reported net losses of $1,469,177 and $502,730 for the three months ended November 30, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively. We recorded an increase in net loss for the three months ended November 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due to the factors described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents were $983 at November 30, 2010 compared to $44,700 at August 31, 2010. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we recorded a net loss of $1,469,177 for the three months ended November 30, 2010 compared to a loss of $502,730 for the same period in 2009. Our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $3,256,976 at November 30, 2010 and net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended November 30, 2010 was $169,218. These factors and our ability to meet our debt obligations from current operations, and the need to raise additional capital to accomplish our objectives raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We expect significant capital expenditures during the next 12 months, contingent upon raising capital. These anticipated expenditures are for software development, assets additions, administrative overheads and working capital requirements. We do not have sufficient funds to conduct our operations for more than a month and we will need an additional $2,000,000 to fund our anticipated operations for the next 12 months, depending on revenues from operations. We have no contracts or commitments for additional funds and there can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
We presently do not have any available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. Due to our historical operating losses, our operations have not been a source of liquidity. We will need to obtain additional capital in order to expand operations and become profitable. In order to obtain capital, we may need to sell additional shares of our common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding.
To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities may result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our operations. Regardless of whether our cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet our operational needs, we may seek to compensate providers of services by issuance of stock in lieu of cash, which may also result in dilution to existing shareholders. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpe cted cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing.
Whereas we have been successful in the past in raising capital, no assurance can be given that these sources of financing will continue to be available to us and/or that demand for our equity/debt instruments will be sufficient to meet our capital needs, or that financing will be available on terms favorable to us. If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, we may not be able to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or may be required to reduce the scope of our planned service development and marketing efforts, any of which could have a negative impact on our business and operating results. In addition, insufficient funding may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, which could require us to:
- | curtail operations significantly; |
- | sell significant assets; |
- | seek arrangements with strategic partners or other parties that may require the company to relinquish significant rights to products, technologies or markets; or |
- | explore other strategic alternatives including a merger or sale of our company. |
20
November 2009 Financing
On November 18, 2009, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with SBCH Charitable Foundation, an accredited investor (“SBCH”), providing for the sale by us to SBCH of a 10% convertible debenture in the principal amount of $120,000 (the “SBCH Debenture”).
The SBCH Debenture matures on the first anniversary of the date of issuance and bears interest at the annual rate of 10%. SBCH may convert, at any time, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the SBCH Debenture into shares of our common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) forty percent (40%) of the average of the closing bid price of our common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP or (ii) $0.00192.
December 2009 Debt Conversion
On December 16, 2009, we entered into an exchange agreement with Thalia Woods Management (“Thalia”), pursuant to which Thalia exchanged a $158,534.44 promissory note for a $158,534.44 convertible debenture (the “Thalia Debenture”). The Thalia Debenture does not accrue interest and matures on December 16, 2010. Thalia has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of our common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.
February 2010 Debt Conversion
On February 1, 2010, we entered into an exchange agreement with Greystone Capital Partners, Inc. (“Greystone”), pursuant to which Greystone exchanged a $491,400 promissory note for a $491,400 convertible debenture (the “Greystone Debenture”). The Greystone Debenture does not accrue interest and matures on February 1, 2011. Greystone has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of our common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.
April 2010 Debt Conversion
On April 23, 2010, we entered into an exchange agreement with Cortell Communications, Inc. (“Cortell”), which was amended on April 27, 2010, pursuant to which Cortell exchanged an outstanding promissory note in the face amount of $70,000, which had accrued interest of $2,100, for a $72,100 convertible debenture (the “Cortell Debenture”). The Cortell Debenture does not accrue interest and matures on April 23, 2011. Cortell has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of our common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) forty percent (40%) of the average of the closing bid price of our common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP or (ii) forty percent (40%) of th e closing price of our common stock on April 23, 2010.
July 2010 IIG Financing
On July 26, 2010, we entered into a securities purchase agreement, as amended on January 5, 2011, with IIG Management LLC, an accredited investor (“IIG”), providing for the sale by us to IIG of a 10% convertible debenture in the principal amount of $205,000 (the “IIG Debenture”).
The IIG Debenture matures on the first anniversary of the date of issuance and bears interest at the annual rate of 10%. IIG may convert, at any time, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the IIG Debenture into shares of our common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) thirty-five percent (35%) of the lowest closing price of the Common Stock during the 10 trading days immediately preceding the Conversion Date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP or such other quotation service as mutually agreed to by the parties or (ii) $0.3465.
21
December 2010 Financing
On December 10, 2010, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Assurance Funding Solutions, LLC, an accredited investor (“Assurance”), providing for the sale by us to Assurance of a 10% convertible debenture in the principal amount of $55,000 (the “Assurance Debenture”).
The Assurance Debenture matures on the first anniversary of the date of issuance and bears interest at the annual rate of 10%. Assurance may convert, at any time, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Assurance Debenture into shares of our common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) thirty five percent (35%) of the average of the closing bid price of our common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP or (ii) $0.0336.
January 2011 Financing
On January 5, 2011, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with IIG providing for the sale by us to IIG of a 10% convertible debenture in the principal amount of $55,000 (the “Second IIG Debenture”).
The Second IIG Debenture matures on the first anniversary of the date of issuance and bears interest at the annual rate of 10%. IIG may convert, at any time, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Second IIG Debenture into shares of our common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) thirty-five percent (35%) of the lowest closing price of our common stock during the 10 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP or such other quotation service as mutually agreed to by the parties or (ii) $0.0175.
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended November 30, 2010 was $169,218, which resulted primarily from a net loss of $1,469,177, which was offset by issuance of options for services of $712,538, an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $273,392 and changes in derivative liability of convertible notes of $240,270.
22
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 was zero.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $125,500 for November 30, 2010, of which $95,500 was from the sale of common stock and $30,000 from the sale of a convertible note.
As a result of the above activities, we experienced a net decrease in cash of $43,717 for the three months ended November 30, 2010 compared to increase of $25,583 for the same period 2009. Our ability to continue as a going concern is still dependent on our success in obtaining additional financing from investors or through the sale of convertible debentures.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Marketable Securities and Impairments
The Company’s investments in securities are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. Securities classified as available-for-sale may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs, and for other purposes.
Unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized and unrealized gains and losses for securities classified as available-for-sale are included in the statement of operations and comprehensive gain, respectively.
The Company reviews, on a quarterly basis or more frequently if warranted by circumstances, the carrying value of the marketable securities it receives from its customers for providing services. The Company records impairment expense each quarter when the market value of the securities received show a consistent decline over 90 to 180 days, and the carrying amount of the marketable securities exceeds its fair value by 50% or more, and is deemed not recoverable. As such, the Company records on a quarterly basis in its financial statements the impairment loss for the difference between the carrying amount of the marketable securities and their fair value.
To safeguard the Company with impairments of marketable securities, the Company has revised its contractual terms on its agreements with its clients which provides that, in the event during the term of the agreement, the share bid price declines by more than ten per cent (10%) of the share bid price on the date of execution of the agreement, the Client would agree to issue additional shares of their common stock to the Company in order to make up the deficiency caused by the reduction in the value of their stock.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recorded on the basis of services provide to our clients, and is recognized when a formal arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue.
Our primary source of revenue was generated from building and developing stand alone brands that incorporate social networking, and providing internet based media and advertising services. The services included web designs, integrated social media network, text and display advertising, press releases, e-mail marketing, and promotion across our network of web sites. Revenues from Internet based media and advertising services were recognized and recorded when the performance of such services completed.
23
Stock-Based Compensation
The costs of all employee stock options, as well as other equity-based compensation arrangements, are reflected in the consolidated financial statements based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the grant date. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award—the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). Stock compensation for stock granted to non-employees is determined as the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarifies existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal year s beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-13 (ASU 2010-13), "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." This Update provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarity that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The provisions of ASU 2010-13 are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statemen ts.
In July 2010, the FASB issued an accounting update to provide guidance to enhance disclosures related to the credit quality of a company's financing receivables portfolio and the associated allowance for credit losses. Pursuant to this accounting update, a company is required to provide a greater level of disaggregated information about its allowance for credit loss with the objective of facilitating users' evaluation of the nature of credit risk inherent in the company's portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses, and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. The revised disclosures as of the end of the reporting period are effective for the Company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, and the revised discourse s related to activities during the reporting period are effective for the Company beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting update on its financial disclosures.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”
24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of November 30, 2010. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Based on our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Except as disclosed below, there are no legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is subject, and to the best of our knowledge, no such actions against us is contemplated or threatened.
PR Newswire Association, Inc. vs. Financial Filings Corporation, Digital Wall Street, Inc. and WallStreet Direct, Inc., Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County, Civil Division #5, Docket No. L-878-09. On February 12, 2009, PR Newswire filed litigation against us and our subsidiaries to pay $74,194.60 for services provided by PR Newswire. A judgment was entered against us in the amount of $74,194.60 and said amount remains unpaid and we are in negotiations to settle the judgment.
Adon Networks, Inc. vs. Wall Street Direct, Inc., Superior Court of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa County Civil Action #CV2009-00035. On February 4, 2009, Adon Networks filed a action to collect $41,966 in amounts due for services provided to Wall Street Direct. A judgment was entered against us in the amount of $41,966 and said amount remains unpaid and we are in negotiations to settle the judgment.
Renaissance Hotel Management Company, LLC vs. Financial Media Group, Inc., Cook County Court, Illinois, First Municipal District, Case No. 08M110495. On January 22, 2008, litigation claiming $20,250 from us was commenced under the above-entitled action. On September 10, 2008, a judgment was entered against us in the amount of $14,371.87 and said amount remains unpaid and we are in negotiations to settle the judgment.
CBS Outdoors, Inc. vs. Financial Media Group, Inc., New York City Civil Court Index No. CV-003947-08/NY. On March 27, 2008, a Stipulation of Settlement was entered between CBS Outdoors and us for a sum of $16,800. A default judgment in the amount of $17,794.85 was entered against us on October 16, 2008 and the company believes it can reach a settlement agreement.
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. DBA Dow Jones Marketwatch as successor in interest to Marketwatch, Inc. vs. Financial Media Group, Inc. Et. Al., Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2208 00112726. On September 30, 2008, Dow Jones filed a complaint for a breach of contract against us for failing to pay $42,000 in licensing fees for using Marketwatch’s financial information and analytical tools relating to securities pursuant to the terms as required by the License and Service Agreement. On March 4, 2009, a judgment for $48,162.40 was awarded in favor of Dow Jones, and said amount remains unpaid. We plan to contest the judgment if a settlement is not reached as services were supplied to a subsidiary. On November 15, 2010, the Company agreed to settle judg ment and paying $2,000 per month until the amount is paid in full
Elite Financial Communications Group, LLC vs. Financial Media Group, Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-20090012358.On May 22, 2009, Elite Financial Communications Group, LLC filed a complaint for a breach of contract against us for failing to pay for Investor Relations Services. On October 1, 2009, a judgment for $61,293 was awarded in favor of Elite Financial Communications, and the amount remains unpaid. The balance has been included in current liability on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to challenge the judgment with countersuit if necessary.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”
On September 3, 2010, we issued 25,000 shares of our common stock at fair market value of $11,250 as payment owed to consultant.
26
On September 15, 2010, we issued 79,757 shares of our common stock upon conversion of $16,430 of an outstanding convertible debenture held by SBCH Charitable Foundation. The securities were issued in private placement transaction pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act.
On September 20, 2010, we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock at fair market value of $107,500 to redeem portion of the note payable held by consultant.
On November 16, 2010, we issued 130,000 shares of our common stock at fair market value of $7,101 as payment owed to consultant.
On November 18, 2010, we issued 1,188,620 shares of our common stock upon conversion of $115,296 of an outstanding convertible debenture held by SBCH Charitable Foundation. The securities were issued in private placement transaction pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act.
During the three months ended November 30, 2010, we issued 211,290 shares of our common stock to consultants upon exercise of their stock options and we received $95,500 in cash.
None.
None.
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
27
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CLICKER INC. | |||
Date: January 19, 2011 | By: | /s/ ALBERT AIMERS | |
Albert Aimers Chief Executive Officer |
28