Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended:May 31, 2011
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: to
Commission File Number: 0-30746
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 75-2592165 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1320 | 75234 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(972) 234-2610
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.o Yesþ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).o Yeso No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-Accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o Yesþ No
As of July 14, 2011, there were 4,027,442 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
outstanding.
outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
May 31, 2011 | November 30, | |||||||
(Unaudited) | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 443 | $ | 665 | ||||
Oil and gas revenue receivable | 286 | 8,271 | ||||||
Inventory | — | 8,300 | ||||||
Total current assets | 729 | 17,236 | ||||||
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method), net | — | 37,567 | ||||||
Other | 6,211 | 6,211 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 6,940 | $ | 61,014 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 27,599 | $ | 33,609 | ||||
Advances from affiliate | 53,337 | — | ||||||
Deferred revenue | — | 8,300 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 80,936 | 41,909 | ||||||
Long-term Liabilities | ||||||||
Asset retirement obligations | — | 21,347 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10) | — | — | ||||||
Stockholders’ Deficit | ||||||||
Preferred stock- $.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000; no shares outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock- $.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; 4,027,442 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2011, 4,027,442 shares issued and outstanding at November 30, 2010 | 40,274 | 40,274 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 11,363,172 | 11,363,172 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (11,477,442 | ) | (11,405,688 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ deficit | (73,996 | ) | (2,242 | ) | ||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit | $ | 6,940 | $ | 61,014 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
F-1
Table of Contents
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
May 31, 2011 | May 31, 2010 | May 31, 2011 | May 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas sales | $ | 931 | $ | 13,741 | $ | 2,421 | $ | 36,109 | ||||||||
Total revenues | 931 | 13,741 | 2,421 | 36,109 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Lease operating and taxes | 3,808 | 11,427 | 4,180 | 19,577 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 19,352 | 14,669 | 56,126 | 81,077 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | — | 2,537 | — | 5,529 | ||||||||||||
Loss on forfeiture of oil and gas properties | — | — | 16,089 | — | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of office equipment | (2,220 | ) | — | (2,220 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 20,940 | 28,633 | 74,175 | 106,183 | ||||||||||||
Operating Loss | (20,009 | ) | (14,892 | ) | (71,754 | ) | (70,074 | ) | ||||||||
Other Income: | ||||||||||||||||
Partial loss recovery (Note 10) | — | 87,122 | — | 94,064 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes | (20,009 | ) | 72,230 | (71,754 | ) | 23,990 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | (20,009 | ) | $ | 72,230 | $ | (71,754 | ) | $ | 23,990 | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic and Diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic and Diluted | 4,027,442 | 4,027,442 | 4,027,442 | 4,027,442 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
F-2
Table of Contents
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
May 31, 2011 | May 31, 2010 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (71,754 | ) | $ | 23,990 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: | ||||||||
Loss on forfeiture of oil and gas properties | 16,089 | — | ||||||
Gain on sale of office equipment | (2,220 | ) | — | |||||
Allocated general and administrative expenses | 14,076 | |||||||
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion | — | 5,529 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities other than advances from affiliate: | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in operating assets: | ||||||||
Oil and gas revenue receivable | 1,760 | 105,298 | ||||||
Inventory | 8,300 | (156 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: | ||||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses | 346 | (30,023 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue | (8,300 | ) | 156 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | (41,703 | ) | 104,794 | |||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Advances from affiliate | 41,481 | 108,360 | ||||||
Payments to affiliate | — | (216,188 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | 41,481 | (107,828 | ) | |||||
Net Decrease In Cash | (222 | ) | (3,034 | ) | ||||
Cash at beginning of period | 665 | 5,327 | ||||||
Cash at end of period | $ | 443 | $ | 2,293 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The condensed financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been made. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or of results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended November 30, 2010 (including the notes thereto) set forth in Form 10-K.
2. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES:
TBX Resources, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Texas in March 1995. In the past we have primarily focused our business efforts on acquiring oil and gas production properties and leases. We did this because we believed that the major oil companies were leaving the US domestic oil and gas market due to domestic oil and gas exploration properties being significantly depleted. However this trend has changed and major oil companies are again acquiring domestic properties primarily in fields where natural gas is prevalent. This has increased the competition and prices for oil properties and management believes, due to our current financial condition, that we will not be able to compete for and purchase oil and gas properties as effectively as we have in the past. In response to this trend management has recently initiated changes to the Company’s business plan. Currently, our primary focus is to secure additional capital through business alliances with third parties or other debt/equity financing arrangements to acquire companies and assets which will allow the company to operate in the oil field services industry with an emphasis on acquiring companies involved in salt water and drilling fluid disposal. Secondarily we will continue to seek out and acquire producing oil and gas leases and wells. At this time we have no specific acquisition targets identified but we are actively engaged generally in such a search.
3. GOING CONCERN:
The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has negative stockholders’ equity and minimal working capital. In addition, the Company sold its primary source of revenue (East Texas properties) effective April 1, 2008 and forfeited its interest in the Johnson #1 and Johnson #2 Joint Ventures effective September 7, 2010 (see Note 8). These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Revenue Recognition
For direct oil and gas operations, the revenue is recorded when production is sold. The Company accrues revenue for oil and gas production sold but not paid. See Receivables below.
Concentration of Credit Risk
During the six months ended May 31, 2011 the Company received advances from Gulftex totaling $41,481. During the six months ended May 31, 2010 the Company had a net reduction in advances from Gulftex totaling $108,360. The balance due Gulftex as of May 31, 2011 is $53,337.
Oil and Gas Revenue Receivable
F-4
Table of Contents
Receivables consist of accrued oil and gas receivables due from either purchasers of oil and gas or operators in oil and natural gas wells for which the Company owns an interest. Oil and natural gas sales are generally unsecured and such amounts are generally due within 30 days after the month of sale.
Inventory
Inventory consists of crude oil held in storage tanks. Inventory is stated at market based on anticipated selling prices.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at the Company’s cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over five to seven years. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred, while major improvements are capitalized.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas exploration and development expenditures. Under this method, costs of successful exploratory wells and all development wells are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves are expensed.
Significant costs associated with the acquisition of oil and gas properties are capitalized. Upon sale or abandonment of units of property or the disposition of miscellaneous equipment, the cost is removed from the asset account, the related reserves relieved of the accumulated depreciation or depletion and the gain or abandonment loss is credited to or charged against operations. Both proved and unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the time of impairment. Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs and estimated salvage values are depreciated and depleted by the unit-of-production method. Support equipment and other property and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
Long-lived Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used, including proved oil and gas properties accounted for under the successful efforts method of accounting, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the Company recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
The Company provides for depreciation, depletion and amortization of its investment in producing oil and gas properties on the unit-of-production method, based upon independent reserve engineers’ estimates of recoverable oil and gas reserves from the property.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations by recording the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) in the period in which it is incurred when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Asset retirement obligations are capitalized as part of the carrying value of the long-lived asset. The Company writes down capitalized ARO assets if they are impaired.
The following table describes changes to the asset retirement liability for the six months ended May 31, 2011.
F-5
Table of Contents
ARO at November 30, 2010 | $ | 21,347 | ||
Accretion expense | — | |||
Liabilities settled (see Note 8) | (21,347 | ) | ||
Changes in estimates | — | |||
ARO at May 31, 2011 | $ | — | ||
Equity Instruments Issued for Goods and Services
The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. That cost is recognized in the financial statements over the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Income tax expense is the tax payable for the year plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share are calculated by adjusting outstanding shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options. The computation of diluted EPS does not assume conversion, exercise, or contingent issuance of shares that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share. Antidilution results from an increase in earnings per share or reduction in loss per share from the inclusion of potentially dilutive shares in EPS calculations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include: estimates of proved reserves as key components of the Company’s depletion rate for oil properties; accruals of operating costs; estimates of production revenues; and calculating asset retirement obligations. Because there are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities that have been evaluated at least annually. The standard defines fair value as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Impairment analyses will be made of all assets using fair value measurements.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by generally accepted accounting principles and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
F-6
Table of Contents
Level 1 | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. | |
Level 2 | Inputs to the valuation methodology include: |
• | quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; | ||
• | quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; | ||
• | inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset of liability; | ||
• | inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. | ||
If the asset or liability has specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 impute must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
Level 3 | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
Cash, receivable and payable amounts, accrued expenses and other current liabilities are carried at book value amounts which approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
During the six months ended May 31, 2011 and the year ended November 30, 2010, there were several new accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the Company. Management does not believe the adoption of any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results. The Company will monitor these emerging issues to assess any potential future impact on its consolidated financial statements.
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
The Company conducts substantial transactions with Gulftex. These related party transactions have a significant impact on the financial condition and operations of the Company. If these transactions were conducted with third parties, the financial condition and operations of the Company could be materially different from reported results.
a. | During the six months ended May 31, 2011 the Company received advances from Gulftex totaling $41,481. During the six months ended May 31, 2010 the Company had a net reduction in advances from Gulftex totaling $108,360. The balance due Gulftex as of May 31, 2011 is $53,337. | ||
b. | The Company is charging Gulftex rent for a portion of the Company’s office space and Gulftex is charging the Company administrative expenses as it relates to TBX operations. The Company billed $15,211 for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and $36,756 for the six months ended May 31, 2010. Gulftex began to bill the Company for administrative services in the current quarter which totaled $7,500 ($2,500 per month). |
7. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company executed an amended Employment Agreement effective August 4, 2005 with our president Mr. Tim Burroughs for three years. Among other items, the agreement provides that Mr. Burroughs has the contractual right to require TBX to issue, upon his request, up to 250,000 common share options subject to certain conditions. The conditions are that the options will not be issued unless Mr. Burroughs makes a demand for their issuance and the number of shares so demanded have vested (the agreement provides that 50,000 potential options vest at the beginning of each employment year for the five year term of the agreement and are cumulative.) The amendment also changed how the options are to be priced. The options are to be priced at a maximum exercise price of one-half the bid price for TBX common stock as of August 4, 2005 or $0.70 per share (one-half $1.40 the closing bid price on August 4, 2005.) In the event the closing bid price of TBX’s common stock is below $0.70 on the date of a call by Mr. Burroughs, the exercise price would be reduced to the lower actual bid price. Mr. Burroughs’ Employment Agreement was further amended in April 2007. In exchange for TBX dropping the three year service requirement, Mr. Burroughs agreed to forgo his eligibility to call for stock options for fiscal years 2005 and 2006. The Employment Agreement was again amended on December 1, 2010 wherein options were continued for an additional five
F-7
Table of Contents
years at an option price no greater than 50% of the closing price on December 1, 2010 or $0.015 per share (one-half of the $0.03 closing bid price on December 1, 2010). Mr. Burroughs did not call any of his potential stock options as of May 31, 2011. In accordance with the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement, no compensation expense is recognized as of May 31, 2011 related to Mr. Burroughs’ potential common stock options.
The Company executed an amended Employment Agreement effective April 1, 2006 with our Vice President of Investor Relations, Dick O’Donnell, having a term of one year, which automatically renews unless otherwise terminated as provided in said agreement. Under the terms of the agreement the Company agreed to issue Mr. O’Donnell options to acquire 25,000 shares of common stock per quarter beginning April 1, 2006 for a period of up to three years at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The option exercise period is one year from its date. Mr. O’Donnell’s options to acquire common stock expired on January 1, 2009.
8. FORFEITURE OF OIL AND GAS INTERESTS:
The Company was recently notified it had forfeited its interest in the Johnson #1 -H and Johnson #2-H Joint Ventures effective September 7, 2010 for not paying a Special Assessment of $43,008 for estimated workover expenses. If the Company had known of the Special Assessment cash call it would have declined to participate because there was no assurance that the rework would be successful in increasing production to recoup the Special Assessment amount and extend the life of the wells. In addition, the Company no longer is obligated to pay the plug and abandonment costs for these wells.
As a result of the forfeiture the Company wrote-off the book value of the wells, asset retirement obligations, receivables and payables which resulted in a loss of $16,089 in the first quarter of 2011.
9. SALE OF OFFICE FURNITURE AND FIXTURES:
The Company sold its furniture and fixtures to a third-party in the current quarter for $2,220 and wrote-off the fully depreciated value of the related assets.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
The Company’s operating lease agreement for rent of its office space in Dallas, Texas was extended for thirty-nine months through May 31, 2014. Rent expense for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and May 31, 2010 is $29,469 and $34,837, respectively.
Trio Consulting & Management and Merrit Operating are the bonded operators for the Company’s former Denton and Wise County, Texas wells and is responsible for compliance with the laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. While it is not possible to quantify with certainty the potential impact of actions regarding environmental matters, particularly any future remediation and other compliance efforts, in the opinion of management, compliance with the present environmental protection laws will not have a material adverse affect on the financial condition, competitive position or capital expenditures of TBX Resources. However, the Company’s cost to comply with increasingly stringent environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on the Company’s future earnings.
11. LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT:
On May 28, 2009 the Company, along with Grasslands I, L.P., intervened as third party plaintiffs in a lawsuit originally captioned as Clay Bain, et. al. v. Earthwise Energy, Inc. (EEI) which was filed in April 2009 in the 14th Judicial District, Dallas County Texas, Cause No. 095253. Our petition requested that we be given certain injunctive relief and be awarded unspecified damages for certain alleged causes of action including, but not limited to, fraud, conversion and violation of fiduciary duty against defendant Earthwise Energy, Inc. but also as against two individuals, Jeffery C. Reynolds and Steven C. Howard who were added to the lawsuit as third party defendants. Mr. Reynolds is a former member of our Board of Directors who resigned in July 2008. The lawsuit was settled on February 11, 2010 wherein it is acknowledged that the Company is the rightful owner of certain interests in the Wise and Denton County, Texas. Gulftex Operating received $97,909 (net of expenses) on behalf of the Company for the Johnson Nos. 1 and 2 gas wells in Wise County, Texas covering the period March 1, 2008 through October 31, 2009. The $97,909 received by Gulftex Operating was used to pay down a portion of its loans to the Company. The Company’s also received $13,973 (net of expenses) for its overrides in nine gas wells in Denton County,
F-8
Table of Contents
Texas covering the period March 1, 2008 through October 31, 2009. It is intended that these payments fully resolve all claims by the Company against the defendants.
12. INCOME TAXES:
The Company computes income taxes using the asset and liability approach. The Company currently has no issue that creates timing differences that would mandate deferred tax expense. Due to the uncertainty as to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, an evaluation allowance has been made to the extent of any tax benefit that net operating losses may generate. No provision for income taxes has been recorded for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and May 31, 2010 due to the Company’s net operating losses.
13. COURT ORDERED RESTITUTION TO COMPANY BY FORMER EMPLOYEE:
On May 26, 2000 a former employee was sentenced to three years probation for forging Company checks. As part of the sentencing the former employee is required to make restitution to the Company in the amount of $152,915. Because of the uncertainty of collecting the amount owed, the Company has not recorded a receivable but instead is recording income as payments are made by the U.S. District Court of Dallas, Texas. The Company has not received any payments in the current fiscal year. The Company received $94,064 during the six months ended May 31, 2010. The balance outstanding as of May 31, 2011 is approximately $51,000.
F-9
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Statements in this report which are not purely historical facts, including statements regarding the Company’s anticipations, beliefs, expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. All forward -looking statements in this report are based upon information available to us on the date of the report. Any forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from events or results described in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
GENERAL: We currently have royalty interests in Denton and Wise Counties, Texas.
PROPERTIES
The following is a breakdown of our properties by field as of May 31, 2011:
Gross | Net | |||||||
Producing | Producing | |||||||
Name of Field or Well | Well Count | Well Count | ||||||
Newark East, Override Interest | 9 | 0.04 |
PRODUCTIVE WELLS AND ACREAGE:
The following is a breakdown of our productive wells and acreage as of May 31, 2011:
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net | Net | Gross | Total Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross | Productive | Total Gross | Productive | Developed | Developed | |||||||||||||||||||
Geographic Area | Oil Wells | Oil Wells | Gas Wells | Gas Wells | Acres | Acres | ||||||||||||||||||
Wise County | — | — | 2 | 0.0360 | 224 | 8.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Denton County | — | — | 7 | 0.0360 | 566 | 20.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes: |
1. | Total Gross Wells are those wells in which the Company holds an overriding interest in as of May 31, 2011. | |
2. | Net Productive Wells was calculated by multiplying the overriding interest held by the Company in each of the 9 Gross Wells and adding the resulting products. | |
3. | Total Gross Developed Acres is equal to the total surface acres of the properties in which the Company holds an overriding interest. | |
4. | Net Developed Acres is equal to the Total Gross Developed Acres multiplied by the percentage of the total overriding interest held by the Company in the respective properties. | |
5. | All acreage in which we hold an overriding interest as of May 31, 2011 have or had existing wells located thereon; thus all acreage may be accurately classified as developed. |
OIL AND GAS PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
We currently own a 0.4% overriding interest in the Grasslands L. P. We did not acquire any additional partnership interests in the current quarter.
3
Table of Contents
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the audited financial statements included on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide useful and reliable financial information about our operating results and financial condition.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
OVERVIEW
Going Concern and Liquidity Problems
Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion with respect to our consolidated financial statements at November 30, 2010. The paragraph states that our recurring losses from operations and resulting continued dependence on access to external financing raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. Furthermore, the factors leading to and the existence of the explanatory paragraph may adversely affect our relationship with customers and suppliers and have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain financing.
Our company has experienced operating losses over the past several years. We do not have sufficient working capital to sustain our operations. We have been unable to generate sufficient revenues to sustain our operations. If no additional funds are received, we will be forced to rely on existing oil and gas revenue and upon additional funds which may or may not be loaned by an affiliate to preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. No formal commitments or arrangements currently exist with the affiliate to advance or loan funds to the Company. In the event we are unable to acquire sufficient funds, the Company’s ongoing operations will be negatively impacted and we may not be able to continue as a going concern and we may have to curtail or terminate our operations and liquidate our business.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the second quarter ended May 31, 2011 we reported a net loss of $20,009 as compared to net income of $72,230 for the same quarter last year. For the six months ended May 31, 2011, we reported a net loss of $71,754 as compared to net income of $23,990 for the same period last year. The components of these results are explained below.
Revenue-Oil and gas revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was $931, a decrease of 93.2%, as compared to $13,741 for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Oil and gas revenue for the six months ended May 31, 2011 was $2,421, a decreased of 93.2%, as compared to $36,109 for the six months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease in revenue for the quarter and year-to-date is primarily attributable to the forfeiture of the Johnson #1-H and Johnson a#2-H Joint Ventures.
Expenses-The components of our expenses for the three and six months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
4
Table of Contents
% | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase | Six Months Ended | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2011 | May 31, 2010 | (Decrease) | May 31, 2011 | May 31, 2010 | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating and taxes | $ | 3,808 | $ | 11,427 | - 66.68 | % | $ | 4,180 | $ | 19,577 | -78.65 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 19,352 | 14,669 | 31.92 | % | 56,126 | 81,077 | -30.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Depr, depl, amort., & accretion | — | 2,537 | -100.00 | % | — | 5,529 | - 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on forfeiture of properties | — | — | 0.00 | % | 16,089 | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of furnishings | (2,220 | ) | — | 0.00 | % | (2,220 | ) | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 20,940 | $ | 28,633 | -26.87 | % | $ | 74,175 | $ | 106,183 | -30.14 | % | |||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses decreased $7,619 for the quarter ended May 31, 2011 and decreased $15,397 for the six months ended May 31, 2011 over the same periods last year. The decrease in for the quarter and year-to-date is primarily attributable to the forfeiture of the Johnson #1-H and Johnson a#2-H Joint Ventures.
General and administrative expenses increased $4,683 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 as compared to the same period last year. The increase in general and administrative expenses is attributable to rent of $4,509 and expenses in all other categories totaling $2,301, offset by lower G&A cost allocations of $11,493. For the six months ended May 31, 2011, general and administrative expenses decreased $24,951 as compared to the same period last year. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is attributable to salaries and wages of $44,815 and expenses in all other categories totaling $1,710, offset by lower G&A cost allocations of $21,574.
Depreciation and depletion expense totaled $0 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and $2,282 for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Depreciation and depletion expense totaled $0 for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and $5,019 for the six months ended May 31, 2010. Accretion expense totaled $0 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and $255 for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Accretion expense totaled $0 for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and $510 for the six months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease in depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion expense is attributable to the write-off of the Johnson #1-H and Johnson and #2-H Joint Ventures.
The Company forfeited its interest in Johnson #1-H and Johnson and #2-H Joint Ventures and wrote -off the book value of the wells, asset retirement obligations, receivables and payables which resulted in a loss of $16,089.
The Company sold its furniture and fixtures in the current quarter for $2,220 and wrote-off the fully depreciated value of the related assets.
Other income for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 consists of a partial recovery of losses sustained when a former employee forged Company checks for personal use. On May 26, 2000 the former employee was sentenced to three years’ probation. As part of the sentencing the former employee is required to make restitution to the Company.
We have not recorded any income taxes for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 because of our accumulated losses. Also, since there is continued uncertainty as to the realization of a tax asset, we have not recorded any tax benefit.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company had a cash balance of $443 as of May 31, 2011. Our current ratio at May 31, 2011 was .009:1 As of May 31, 2011 our stockholders’ deficit was $73,996. Our cash used for operations totaled $41,703 for the six months ended May 31, 2011 while cash provided by operations totaled $104,794 for the same period last year. This represents a decrease of $146,497 in cash provided by operating activities. There were no investment activities for the six months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010. Advances from Gulftex totaled $41,481 during the six months ended May 31, 2011 while advances decreased $108,360 during the six months ended May 31, 2010.
5
Table of Contents
PLAN OF OPERATION FOR THE FUTURE
TBX Resources, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Texas in March 1995. In the past we have primarily focused our business efforts on acquiring oil and gas production properties and leases. We did this because we believed that the major oil companies were leaving the US domestic oil and gas market due to domestic oil and gas exploration properties being significantly depleted. However this trend has changed and major oil companies are again acquiring domestic properties primarily in fields where natural gas is prevalent. This has increased the competition and prices for oil properties and management believes, due to our current financial condition, that we will not be able to compete for and purchase oil and gas properties as effectively as we have in the past. In response to this trend management has recently initiated changes to the Company’s business plan. Currently, our primary focus is to secure additional capital through business alliances with third parties or other debt/equity financing arrangements to acquire companies and assets which will allow the company to operate in the oil field services industry with an emphasis on acquiring companies involved in salt water and drilling fluid disposal. Secondarily we will continue to seek out and acquire producing oil and gas leases and wells. At this time we have no specific acquisition targets identified but we are actively engaged generally in such a search.
We have explored and will continue to explore all avenues possible to raise the funds required. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to execute our plans or that if successful in securing the funds our actual financial results will improve.
Our ability to acquire additional properties or equipment is strictly contingent upon our ability to locate adequate financing or equity to pay for these additional properties or equipment. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the opportunity to buy properties or equipment that are suitable for our investment or that we may be able to obtain financing or equity to pay for the costs of these additional properties or equipment at terms that are acceptable to us.. Additionally, if economic conditions justify the same, we may hire additional employees although we do not currently have any definite plans to make additional hires. However, in the event, we are successful in making any acquisitions, it is likely that existing employees currently employed with the acquisition(s).
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of Tim Burroughs our Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the quarter covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that, as of May 31, 2011 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported. Management is currently looking for a professional accounting person to become part of its management team in an effort to provide not only complete but timely reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its rules and forms.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.The Company’s management, including the CEO/CFO, does not expect that it’s Disclosure Controls or its Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must
6
Table of Contents
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
(a) EXHIBITS:
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) | REPORTS ON FORM 8-K: None |
7