February 11, 2008
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY
FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and other financial information contained in this annual report have been prepared by, and are the responsibility of, the management of The Westaim Corporation. Financial information contained throughout this annual report is consistent with the financial statements. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, using management’s best estimates and judgements when appropriate. The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibility for financial reporting and internal control. In meeting our responsibility for the reliability and timeliness of financial information, the Corporation maintains and relies upon a comprehensive system of internal controls including organizational, procedural and disclosure controls. The Audit Committee, which is comprised of three Directors, none of whom is an officer of the Company, meets with management as well as the external auditors to satisfy itself that management is properly discharging its financial reporting responsibilities and to review the consolidated financial statements and the report of the auditors. It reports its findings to the Board of Directors who approve the consolidated financial statements.
As at December 31, 2007, I, as The Westaim Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have determined that the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent auditors, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The auditors have full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.
SIGNED
G.A. (Drew) Fitch
President and Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Report of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
To the Shareholders of
The Westaim Corporation
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of The Westaim Corporation as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss, deficit and cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Westaim Corporation as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
(signed) DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
February 11, 2008
Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada — United States of America Reporting Difference
The standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) require the addition of an explanatory paragraph when there are changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Company’s financial statements, such as the change described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, and changes in accounting principles that have been implemented in the financial statements, such as the changes described in Note 2(r) to the consolidated financial statements. Although we conducted our audit in accordance with both Canadian generally accepted accounting standards and the standards of the Public company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), our report to the Board of Directors and Shareholders, dated February 11, 2008, is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the auditors’ report when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.
(signed) DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
February 11, 2008
THE WESTAIM CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | December 31 | | | December 31 | |
(thousands of Canadian dollars) | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 30,993 | | | $ | 45,035 | |
Short-term investments | | | — | | | | 17,451 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 14,931 | | | | 8,189 | |
Inventories (note 6) | | | 4,373 | | | | 8,506 | |
Other | | | 674 | | | | 589 | |
Current assets held for sale (note 3) | | | 590 | | | | 486 | |
|
| | | 51,561 | | | | 80,256 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investments (note 7) | | | 5,968 | | | | — | |
Capital assets (note 8) | | | 12,581 | | | | 19,201 | |
Capital assets held for sale (note 3) | | | 10,086 | | | | 44,757 | |
Intangible assets (note 9) | | | 799 | | | | 951 | |
Intangible assets held for sale (note 3) | | | 2,392 | | | | 3,174 | |
|
| | $ | 83,387 | | | $ | 148,339 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 20) | | $ | 7,018 | | | $ | 6,165 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities held for sale (note 3) | | | 1,443 | | | | 1,812 | |
Current portion of long-term debt (note 4, 11) | | | — | | | | 8,000 | |
|
| | | 8,461 | | | | 15,977 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred gain (note 4) | | | 218 | | | | — | |
Provision for site restoration (note 12) | | | 6,580 | | | | 6,580 | |
|
| | | 15,259 | | | | 22,557 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Non-controlling interest (note 5) | | | 11,757 | | | | 12,805 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Guarantees (note 14) | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (note 15) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock (note 13) | | | 426,262 | | | | 426,122 | |
Contributed surplus (note 13) | | | 7,769 | | | | 5,379 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 2r) | | | (1,779 | ) | | | (676 | ) |
Deficit | | | (375,881 | ) | | | (317,848 | ) |
|
| | | 56,371 | | | | 112,977 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 83,387 | | | $ | 148,339 | |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Approved on behalf of the Board:
| | | | | | |
SIGNED | | | | SIGNED | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Ian W. Delaney Director | | | | Frank W. King Director | | |
1
THE WESTAIM CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and Deficit
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | December 31 | | | December 31 | | | December 31 | |
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data) | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 31,830 | | | $ | 27,591 | | | $ | 28,560 | |
Costs | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | | | 14,617 | | | | 17,324 | | | | 10,799 | |
Research and development | | | 6,356 | | | | 12,112 | | | | 9,742 | |
General and administrative | | | 9,348 | | | | 6,762 | | | | 4,109 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,093 | | | | 2,614 | | | | 2,266 | |
Corporate costs (note 20) | | | 10,856 | | | | 6,123 | | | | 8,217 | |
|
Operating loss | | | (11,440 | ) | | | (17,344 | ) | | | (6,573 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign exchange (loss) gain | | | (3,804 | ) | | | (720 | ) | | | 771 | |
Interest | | | 1,822 | | | | 3,242 | | | | 2,078 | |
Change in fair value of third party asset-backed commercial paper (note 7) | | | (4,048 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Loss on sale of third party asset-backed commercial paper (note 7) | | | (1,067 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Write-down of capital assets and intangible assets (note 8) | | | (1,203 | ) | | | (1,210 | ) | | | — | |
Gain on sale of investment (note 4) | | | 2,648 | | | | — | | | | 1,120 | |
Gain on sale of capital assets (note 8) | | | 8,722 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Dilution gain (note 4) | | | 4,525 | | | | — | | | | — | |
(Loss) gain on issuance of shares of subsidiary (note 5) | | | (134 | ) | | | (99 | ) | | | 30,055 | |
Non-controlling interest (note 5) | | | 1,293 | | | | 3,222 | | | | — | |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (2,686 | ) | | | (12,909 | ) | | | 27,451 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax (expense) recovery (note 10) | | | (144 | ) | | | 48 | | | | (130 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | | | (2,830 | ) | | | (12,861 | ) | | | 27,321 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations net of income taxes (note 3) | | | (55,203 | ) | | | (37,696 | ) | | | (18,051 | ) |
|
Net (loss) income | | $ | (58,033 | ) | | $ | (50,557 | ) | | $ | 9,270 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income per common share (note 17) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations — basic and diluted | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | 0.29 | |
Net (loss) income — basic and diluted | | | (0.62 | ) | | | (0.54 | ) | | | 0.10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 94,069,547 | | | | 93,523,041 | | | | 92,852,120 | |
Diluted | | | 94,069,547 | | | | 93,523,041 | | | | 93,120,936 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (58,033 | ) | | $ | (50,557 | ) | | $ | 9,270 | |
Unrealized loss on translation of net foreign operations (note 2c) | | | (1,103 | ) | | | (173 | ) | | | (503 | ) |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (59,136 | ) | | $ | (50,730 | ) | | $ | 8,767 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Deficit | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deficit at beginning of year | | $ | (317,848 | ) | | $ | (267,291 | ) | | $ | (276,561 | ) |
Net (loss) income | | | (58,033 | ) | | | (50,557 | ) | | | 9,270 | |
|
Deficit at end of year | | $ | (375,881 | ) | | $ | (317,848 | ) | | $ | (267,291 | ) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
THE WESTAIM CORPORATION
Consolidated Cash Flow Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | December 31 | | | December 31 | | | December 31 | |
(thousands of Canadian dollars) | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (12,861 | ) | | $ | 27,321 | |
Items not affecting cash | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,093 | | | | 2,614 | | | | 2,266 | |
Change in fair value of third party asset-backed commercial paper | | | 4,048 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Loss on sale of third party asset-backed commercial paper | | | 1,067 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Dilution gain | | | (4,525 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Foreign exchange on short-term investments | | | — | | | | (52 | ) | | | — | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 2,469 | | | | 1,412 | | | | 847 | |
Write-down of capital assets and intangible assets | | | 1,203 | | | | 1,210 | | | | — | |
Gain on sale of capital assets | | | (8,722 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on sale of investment | | | (2,648 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,120 | ) |
Loss (gain) on issuance of shares of subsidiary | | | 134 | | | | 99 | | | | (30,055 | ) |
Non-controlling interest | | | (1,293 | ) | | | (3,222 | ) | | | — | |
Accounts receivable | | | (7,190 | ) | | | (320 | ) | | | (2,582 | ) |
Inventories | | | 4,128 | | | | (838 | ) | | | (4,350 | ) |
Other | | | (98 | ) | | | (30 | ) | | | (32 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 1,131 | | | | (6,563 | ) | | | 5,234 | |
Site restoration expenditures net of recoveries | | | — | | | | — | | | | 52 | |
|
Cash used in continuing operations | | | (11,033 | ) | | | (18,551 | ) | | | (2,419 | ) |
Cash used in discontinued operations | | | (19,739 | ) | | | (25,703 | ) | | | (30,263 | ) |
|
Cash used in operating activities | | | (30,772 | ) | | | (44,254 | ) | | | (32,682 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (2,376 | ) | | | (6,541 | ) | | | (6,577 | ) |
Capital expenditures — discontinued operations | | | — | | | | (1,339 | ) | | | (25,318 | ) |
Intangible assets | | | (72 | ) | | | (245 | ) | | | (177 | ) |
Intangible assets — discontinued operations | | | (480 | ) | | | (404 | ) | | | (800 | ) |
Maturity of short-term investments | | | 46,904 | | | | 30,594 | | | | 98,335 | |
Purchase of short-term investments | | | (29,453 | ) | | | (44,039 | ) | | | (90,289 | ) |
Purchase of short-term investments reclassified to investments (note 7) | | | (14,400 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Reclassification of cash equivalents to investments (note 7) | | | (2,650 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds on sale of capital assets (note 8) | | | 14,437 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds on sale of investments (note 4) | | | 1,582 | | | | — | | | | 1,620 | |
Proceeds on sale of discontinued operations (note 3) | | | 24 | | | | 312 | | | | 22,614 | |
Proceeds on sale of third party asset-backed commercial paper (note 7) | | | 5,968 | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
Cash provided from (used in) investing activities | | | 19,484 | | | | (21,662 | ) | | | (592 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common shares of subsidiary, net of share issuance costs (note 5) | | | 14 | | | | 325 | | | | 45,502 | |
Issuance of common shares (note 13) | | | 27 | | | | 4,484 | | | | 171 | |
Issuance of convertible debentures of subsidiary (note 11) | | | — | | | | 2,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
Net cash outflow on deconsolidation of former subsidiary | | | (2,306 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from long-term debt — discontinued operations (note 3) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,154 | |
Repayment of long-term debt — discontinued operations (note 3) | | | — | | | | (10,434 | ) | | | — | |
|
Cash (used in) provided from financing activities | | | (2,265 | ) | | | (3,625 | ) | | | 58,827 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | (489 | ) | | | 26 | | | | — | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | (14,042 | ) | | | (69,515 | ) | | | 25,553 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 45,035 | | | | 114,550 | | | | 88,997 | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | $ | 30,993 | | | $ | 45,035 | | | $ | 114,550 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-cash capital asset additions included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 452 | | | $ | 508 | | | $ | 1,304 | |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
| | | The Westaim Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated on May 7, 1996 by articles of incorporation under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta). |
|
| | | These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, iFire Technology Ltd. (“iFire”) and Nucryst Pharmaceuticals Corp. (“Nucryst”). |
|
| | | These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”). In addition, note 22 describes and reconciles the significant measurement differences between Canadian GAAP and United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) affecting these consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | All amounts are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars except share and per share data unless otherwise noted. |
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES |
| a) | | Principles of consolidation |
|
| | | The financial statements of entities which are controlled by the Company through voting equity interests, referred to as subsidiaries, are consolidated. Entities which are not controlled but over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in other entities are accounted for using the cost method. Variable interest entities (“VIEs”) are entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a “controlling financial interest” or there is not sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. VIEs are consolidated by the Company when it is determined that it will, as the primary beneficiary, absorb the majority of the VIEs’ expected losses and/or expected residual returns. The Company currently does not have any VIEs. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation. |
|
| b) | | Use of estimates |
|
| | | Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the year. Significant estimates include the provision for site restoration, inventory valuation, fair value of stock-based compensation, fair value of financial instruments, valuation allowance against future income taxes, useful lives of capital assets and intangible assets, uncertain tax positions and the fair value of assets held for sale. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. |
|
| c) | | Translation of foreign currencies |
|
| | | Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at rates of exchange at the time of such transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange. The resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated statement of operations. |
|
| | | Foreign operations are considered financially and operationally self-sustaining and are translated into Canadian dollars using the current rate method of translation. Under this method, assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end exchange rates. Unrealized gains and losses arising from translating net investments in foreign operations into Canadian dollars are included in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. |
4
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued) |
| d) | | Revenue recognition |
|
| | | Specific revenue recognition policies for each of the Company’s operating segments are as follows: |
|
| | | Nucryst— Revenue from direct sales to third parties is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. The Company’s revenues earned under license agreements consist primarily of product revenue, royalties and payments upon the achievement of specific milestones. For products manufactured under license, revenue is recorded at the date of shipment. Royalty revenue is earned based on a percentage of sales revenue earned by the licensee on its sales to third parties. Revenue relating to the achievement of milestones under licensing agreements is recognized when the milestone event has occurred. Manufacturing cost rebates paid annually are recorded as a reduction to revenue evenly throughout the year. Nucryst also derives revenue from research activities and this revenue is recognized as services are performed (note 19). |
|
| | | iFire— The Company recognizes revenue from licensing fees over the term that services are being rendered. Royalties are recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the specific agreement. As at December 31, 2007 and 2006, iFire was not party to any licensing fee or royalty agreements. |
|
| e) | | Cash and cash equivalents |
|
| | | Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit and highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities at the date of acquisition of 90 days or less and are recorded at fair value as they are classified as held-for-trading financial assets (note 2r). Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2007 is comprised of cash of $12,537 and cash equivalents of $18,456 (2006 — $9,180 and $35,855). |
|
| f) | | Short-term investments |
|
| | | Short-term investments consist of money-market instruments with maturities of less than one year and are classified as held-for-trading financial assets (note 2r). As at December 31, 2007, the Company did not hold any short-term investments (2006 — $17,451). |
|
| g) | | Long-term investments |
|
| | | Long-term investments are reported at fair value and are classified as held-for-trading or available for sale financial assets (note 2r). |
|
| h) | | Inventory valuation |
|
| | | Finished product, raw materials, materials in process, and spare parts and operating materials are valued at the lower of average cost and net realizable value. |
|
| i) | | Research and development costs |
|
| | | Research costs are expensed as incurred and significant project development costs are capitalized in accordance with Canadian GAAP once the Company has determined that commercialization criteria concerning the product or process have been met. Amortization of these costs over their estimated useful life commences with the successful commercial production or use of the product or process. On |
5
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued) |
| | | an ongoing basis, management reviews the unamortized balance to ensure that the deferred development costs continue to satisfy the criteria for deferral and amortization. |
|
| | | As at December 31, 2007 and 2006, no development costs have been capitalized. |
|
| j) | | Capital assets |
|
| | | Land, buildings, machinery and equipment, and computer hardware and software are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using a straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the particular assets which are 20 years for buildings, and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment, and computer hardware and software. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the assets. |
|
| | | The Company evaluates the carrying value of capital assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, and recognizes an impairment charge when it is probable that estimated future non-discounted cash flows of the underlying assets will be less than the carrying value of the assets. Measurement of an impairment loss related to capital assets that management intends to hold and use is based on the fair value of the assets, whereas assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. |
|
| k) | | Site restoration costs and asset retirement obligations |
|
| | | The total estimated costs of site restoration relating to tangible, long-lived assets have been accrued. Site restoration costs have been estimated, taking into consideration the anticipated method and extent of the remediation consistent with regulatory requirements, industry practices, current technology and the possible uses of the site. The estimated amount of future restoration costs is reviewed regularly based on available information. Where the forecasted net restoration costs exceed existing provisions, an additional expense is recognized in the period. |
|
| | | Potential recoveries of costs resulting from indemnifications provided by previous owners of the Company’s industrial sites have not been recognized in these consolidated financial statements as the amount of recovery cannot be reasonably determined. Any future recoveries will be recorded when received. |
|
| l) | | Income taxes |
|
| | | Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method of income tax allocation. Under the liability method, income tax assets and liabilities are recorded to recognize future income tax inflows and outflows arising from the settlement or recovery of assets and liabilities at their carrying values. |
|
| | | Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce future tax assets to the amount that, in the opinion of management, is more likely than not to be realized. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the substantively enacted tax laws and rates that are anticipated to apply in the period of realization. |
6
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued) |
| m) | | Stock-based compensation plans |
|
| | | The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have stock-based compensation plans, which are described in note 13. Compensation expense for awards that call for settlement in cash or other assets is measured on an ongoing basis as the amount by which the quoted market price exceeds the exercise price at each measurement date. Any obligations related to increases in the value of Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”), Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) and Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) are accrued when a change in value occurs with an offset to the consolidated statement of operations. |
|
| | | Any consideration paid by option holders for the purchase of stock is credited to capital stock. If plan entitlements are repurchased from the holder, the consideration paid is charged to deficit. |
|
| n) | | Earnings per share |
|
| | | Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated on the basis of the average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares had been issued using the “treasury stock” method. |
|
| o) | | Employee future benefits |
|
| | | All employee future benefits are accounted for on an accrual basis. The Company maintains defined contribution pension plans for its employees. These plans were funded in an amount of $706 during the year ended December 31, 2007 (2006 — $876; 2005 —$745). |
|
| p) | | Discontinued operations |
|
| | | Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are classified as held for sale in the period in which a formal plan of disposal has been approved, the assets are available for immediate sale and are actively being marketed, and it is expected that the sale will occur within one year. Long-lived assets to be abandoned are classified as held and used until they are disposed of. |
|
| | | Long-lived assets classified as held for sale are carried at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value net of estimated disposition costs. Losses are recognized immediately where carrying value exceeds fair value and gains are recognized at the time of sale. |
|
| | | The results of discontinued operations are reported separately, including gains or losses related to the disposal of related long-lived assets held for sale or disposal. Future costs associated with an exit or disposal activity are recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred. |
|
| q) | | Intangible assets |
|
| | | The Company’s definite life intangible assets consist of the prosecution and application costs of patents and trademarks and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives to a maximum of 10 years. The cost of maintaining patents and trademarks are expensed as incurred. The Company evaluates the carrying value of definite life intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Any impairment in the carrying value, which is based on the fair value of the intangible assets, is charged to expense in the period that impairment has been determined. |
7
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued) |
| | | Indefinite life intangible assets are recorded at fair value. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying value of these assets for impairment. As at December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had no indefinite life intangible assets. |
|
| r) | | Recently adopted and pending accounting pronouncements |
| i) | | In 2005, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) issued three new standards: Comprehensive Income; Financial Instruments — Recognition and Measurement; and Hedges. These Sections became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007 and require the following: |
| a) | | In Section 1530 “Comprehensive Income”, certain gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are temporarily recorded outside the consolidated statement of operations in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. |
|
| | | Comprehensive loss is comprised of the Company’s net loss and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) may include any unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, foreign currency translation gains and losses on the net investment in self-sustaining foreign operations and changes in the fair market value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, all net of income taxes. On implementation of Section 1530, amounts previously recorded as cumulative translation adjustment are now included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. At December 31, 2007, the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss of $1,779 (December 31, 2006 — $676) is comprised solely of foreign currency translation losses on the Company’s net investment in its self-sustaining foreign operations. |
|
| b) | | In Section 3855 “Financial Instruments — Recognition and Measurement” and Section 3865 “Hedges”, all financial instruments including derivatives are to be included on a company’s balance sheet and measured either at their fair value or, in limited circumstances, when fair value may not be considered most relevant, at cost or amortized cost. These Sections specify when gains and losses, as a result of changes in fair value, are to be recognized in the statement of operations. Section 3855 requires that all financial assets and liabilities be accounted for using one of five available accounting models, being held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, held-for-trading, loans and receivables and other liabilities. All financial instruments classified as available-for-sale, held-for-trading, and derivative financial instruments meeting certain recognition criteria, are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of financial instruments designated as held-for-trading and recognized derivative financial instruments are charged or credited to the statement of operations for the current period, while changes in the fair value of financial instruments designated as available-for-sale are charged or credited to other comprehensive income and charged or credited to the statement of operations when the instrument is sold. All other financial assets and liabilities are accounted for at amortized cost depending upon the nature of the instrument. Financial assets and liabilities designated as held-to-maturity are initially recognized at their fair values, with any resulting premium or discount from the fair value being amortized to income or expense using the effective interest method. After their initial fair value measurement, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Section 3855 requires the Company to make certain elections, upon initial adoption of the new rules, regarding the accounting model to be used to classify and measure each financial instrument. Section 3855 also requires that transaction costs incurred by the Company in connection with the acquisition of various financial assets or liabilities be recorded as a reduction of the carrying |
8
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued) |
| | | value of the related financial instrument and amortized using the effective interest method or expensed as incurred. Transaction costs related to the acquisition of financial instruments held-for-trading are expensed as incurred. Transaction costs with respect to instruments not classified as held-for-trading are recognized as an adjustment to the cost of the underlying instruments, when they are recognized, and amortized using the effective interest method. |
|
| | | The following is a summary of the accounting model the Company has elected to apply to each of its significant categories of financial instruments on implementation at January 1, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2007: |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | held-for-trading |
Short-term investments | | held-for-trading |
Long-term investments | | available for sale |
Long-term investments — asset-backed commercial paper | | held-for-trading |
Accounts receivable | | loans and receivables |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | other liabilities |
Long-term debt | | other liabilities |
|
| | | The implementation of these Sections did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | Derivative instruments are recorded at fair value unless exempted from derivative treatment as normal purchases and sales. All changes in their fair value are recorded in income unless cash flow hedge accounting is used, in which case, changes in fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The Company has elected to apply this accounting treatment for embedded derivatives on transactions entered into after January 1, 2003, and the change in accounting policy did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | For cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the carrying value approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. |
| ii) | | In January 2005, the CICA issued a new Section to the CICA Handbook, Section 3251 “Equity” which became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. This Section establishes standards for the presentation of equity during a reporting period. The implementation of this Section did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
| iii) | | Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted CICA Handbook Section 1506 “Accounting Changes” which establishes criteria for changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of changes in accounting policies and estimates, and correction of errors. Under the new standard, accounting changes should be applied retroactively unless otherwise permitted or where impracticable to determine. As well, voluntary changes in accounting policies are made only when required by a primary source of Canadian GAAP or the change results in more relevant and reliable information. The Company has determined that the application of this Section did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
9
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
2 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued) |
| | | Future accounting pronouncements |
|
| | | Effective January 1, 2008, the Company will be required to adopt two new CICA standards, Section 3862 “Financial Instruments — Disclosures” and Section 3863 “Financial Instruments — Presentation” which will replace Section 3861 “Financial Instruments — Disclosure and Presentation”. The new Disclosure standard increases the emphasis on the risks associated with both recognized and unrecognized financial instruments and how these risks are managed. The new Presentation standard carries forward the former presentation requirements. The Company does not expect that the implementation of these new standards will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | Effective January 1, 2008, the Company will be required to adopt CICA Section 3031 “Inventories”. This Section relates to the accounting for inventories and revises and enhances the requirements for assigning costs to inventories. The Company does not expect that the implementation of this Section will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | In November 2006, the CICA issued new Handbook Section 1535 “Capital Disclosures”, effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after October 1, 2007. This Section establishes standards for disclosing information about an entity’s capital and how it is managed in order that a user of the financial statements may evaluate the entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital. This new Standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | In 2006, Canada’s Accounting Standards Board ratified a strategic plan that will result in Canadian GAAP, as used by public entities, being converged with International Financial Reporting Standards over a transitional period currently expected to be about five years. The precise timing of convergence will depend on an Accounting Standards Board progress review to be undertaken by early 2008. The impact of this transition on the Company’s consolidated financial statements has not yet been determined; however, management continues to monitor these regulatory developments. |
|
| | | In February 2008, the CICA issued new Handbook Section 3064 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, replacing Handbook Section 3062 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and Handbook Section 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. The new section will be applicable to financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008. Accordingly, the Company will adopt the new standards for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. This section establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and of intangible assets by profit-oriented enterprises. Standards concerning goodwill are unchanged from the standards included in the previous Handbook Section 3062. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this new section on its consolidated financial statements. |
3 | | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
| a) | | On November 13, 2007, the Company announced that it was seeking a buyer for the business and assets of iFire. Accordingly, the results from the operations of this business have been accounted for on a discontinued basis and the related assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale. In accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3475 (“Section 3475”), no depreciation or amortization has been recorded from the date of this announcement on iFire’s long-lived assets consisting of capital assets and intangible assets. Also, in accordance with Section 3475, the Company has estimated the |
10
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
3 | | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued) |
| | | fair value of these assets at December 31, 2007 less costs to sell, assuming that iFire will be sold as a going concern. This valuation resulted in a write-down of iFire’s capital assets of $22,100 in the fourth quarter of 2007. |
|
| b) | | In December 2005, the Company completed the sale of land and building previously included in long-term capital assets held for sale. Net proceeds from the sale amounted to $7,423 and the gain on sale of $1,923 was included in income from discontinued operations in 2005. |
|
| c) | | In January 2005, the Company completed a series of transactions whereby two non-core wholly owned subsidiary companies participated in a Plan of Arrangement with two widely held publicly traded companies. This resulted in the reorganization of the participating companies into a single company and the dilution of the Company’s investments to approximately 6.0%. The Company’s pro rata interest in the book value of the recapitalized companies amounted to $2,189. Subsequently, the company created under the Plan of Arrangement was listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The subsidiaries were previously carried at nominal value and this transaction resulted in the Company recording a dilution gain of $2,189 in 2005. In February 2005, the Company sold its investment in the publicly traded company discussed above for net proceeds of $11,519 and recorded a gain on sale of $9,330. No income tax provision was recorded in relation to the dilution gain or the gain on sale of investment as these gains were more than offset by the reduction of unrecognized tax loss carry-forwards. As a result of the divestiture, the Company’s non-capital losses, capital losses and research and development tax credits were reduced by approximately $49,500, $7,700 and $600 respectively. |
|
| d) | | In January 2004, the Company sold substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to the Ambeon business segment, including its wholly owned subsidiary Neomet Limited, for proceeds of $33,359 (net of transaction costs of $911), of which, $2,800 was held in escrow in respect of general representations and warranties relating to the sale transaction. The entire escrow amount was received during 2005 and was included as proceeds on sale of discontinued operations in the consolidated cash flow statement. |
|
| e) | | In 2005, the Company sold the remaining assets and operations related to Ambeon for net proceeds of $872. The gain on sale of this business amounting to $739 and the results from operations of this business were reported in discontinued operations in 2005. |
11
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
3 | | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued) |
| | | Results of discontinued operations: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
Revenue | | Dec. 31, 2007 | | | Dec. 31, 2006 | | | Dec. 31, 2005 | |
|
Ambeon | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 162 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
Income (expense) | | Dec. 31, 2007 | | | Dec. 31, 2006 | | | Dec. 31, 2005 | |
|
Dilution gain | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,189 | |
Gain on sale of non-core subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,330 | |
Gain on sale of capital assets held for sale | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,923 | |
Gain on sale of Ambeon | | | — | | | | — | | | | 739 | |
Income related to discontinued operations — Ambeon | | | — | | | | — | | | | 597 | |
Loss related to discontinued operations — iFire | | | (33,103 | ) | | | (37,696 | ) | | | (32,829 | ) |
Write-down of discontinued operations to fair value — iFire | | | (22,100 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of income taxes | | $ | (55,203 | ) | | $ | (37,696 | ) | | $ | (18,051 | ) |
|
| | | The loss from discontinued operations is after deduction of depreciation and amortization of $13,588 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2006 — $11,748; 2005 — $5,072). Current income tax expense included in loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $22 (2006 — $12; 2005 — $49). |
|
| | | Loss per common share from discontinued operations was $0.59 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2006 — $0.40; 2005 — $0.19). |
|
| | | Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets relating to the iFire discontinued operations are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | 2007 | | 2006 |
|
Current assets held for sale | | $ | 590 | | | $ | 486 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities held for sale | | | (1,443 | ) | | | (1,812 | ) |
Capital assets held for sale | | | 10,086 | | | | 44,757 | |
Intangible assets held for sale | | | 2,392 | | | | 3,174 | |
|
| | | In 2004, iFire entered into a Japanese Yen 1,080,000,000 loan agreement with Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. (“DNP”) whereby DNP partially financed certain new equipment used to upgrade iFire’s Toronto facility. The loan was drawn down in 2004 and 2005 and carried an interest rate of 1.64% per annum. The loan of Japanese Yen 1,051,460,644 (CAD $10,434) was repaid in full on June 30, 2006. |
12
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
3 | | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued) |
| | | In 2001, iFire entered into a research and development contribution agreement with the Government of Canada through Technology Partnerships Canada (“TPC”). Under this agreement, TPC agreed to contribute 28.371% of eligible research and development costs and related capital expenditures incurred by iFire to a maximum of $30,000, all of which was received prior to December 31, 2003. Under the terms of the agreement, iFire will pay a royalty to TPC equal to 1.065% of eventual commercial sales of the technology under development. In addition, TPC received warrants to purchase common shares of iFire exercisable for an additional consideration of $6,283. The warrants expire on December 31, 2011 and, as at December 31, 2007, represented approximately 0.5% of the current outstanding common shares of iFire. |
4 | | DILUTION GAIN AND GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENTS |
| | | In the first quarter of 2007, a subsidiary issued 11,954,000 common shares for proceeds of $5,977 to private investors which reduced the Company’s voting interest in the subsidiary to 22.1%. As a result of this dilution in ownership, the net assets of the subsidiary were no longer consolidated and in the first quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a dilution gain of $4,525 resulting from a reduction in cash of $2,306, a reduction in long-term debt of $8,000 and an increase in net working capital of $115. The Company also recorded a deferred gain of $1,284 in the first quarter of 2007 representing a deficiency in the investment. This investment is classified as an available-for-sale security. In the third quarter of 2007, the convertible debentures of the subsidiary were converted to common shares which further reduced the Company’s economic interest in the subsidiary to 14.6%. |
|
| | | As a result of the dilution event in the first quarter of 2007, the Company’s consolidated non-capital losses, unclaimed scientific research and development expenditures, and research and development tax credits, were reduced by approximately $16,000, $76,000 and $18,000 respectively. |
|
| | | In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company sold 87% of its investment in this former subsidiary for proceeds of $1,582. As a result, the Company realized a gain on the sale of this investment of $2,648 including the pro-rata recognition of the deferred gain in an amount of $1,066. The Company continues to carry a deferred gain of $218 as at December 31, 2007. |
5 | | GAIN ON ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF SUBSIDIARY AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST |
| | | On December 29, 2005, the Company’s formerly wholly owned subsidiary, Nucryst, completed an initial public offering in which 4,500,000 common shares were issued at a price of US $10.00 per share. Net proceeds after commissions and expenses amounted to US $39,095 (CDN $45,502). US $6,850 of the proceeds were used to reduce the term loan owing by Nucryst to the Company and the remaining balance of the term loan of US $39,642 was converted to common shares of Nucryst on January 27, 2006. As a result of these transactions, the Company’s ownership in Nucryst was reduced from 100% to 68.4% as at December 31, 2005 and increased to 75.3% after the conversion of the remaining term loan on January 27, 2006. The conversion of the term loan to common shares, completed in January 2006, was in accordance with the terms of the Nucryst initial public offering and was accounted for as being effective on December 31, 2005 in accordance with Canadian GAAP. The reduction in the Company’s equity interest in Nucryst was accounted for as a disposition of shares and resulted in a dilution gain for accounting purposes of $30,055 in 2005 and a non-controlling interest of $15,447 as at December 31, 2005. |
|
| | | Non-controlling interest on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $1,293 (2006 — $3,222; 2005 — $nil). The Company recorded a loss on the issuance of Nucryst shares, in relation to Nucryst’s stock-based compensation plans, of $134 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2006 — $99; 2005 — $nil). The Company’s ownership in Nucryst was 74.5% as at December 31, 2007 (2006 — 74.8%; 2005 — 68.4%). |
13
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | December 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
|
Raw materials | | $ | 2,759 | | | $ | 4,531 | |
Materials in process | | | 1,378 | | | | 756 | |
Finished product | | | 236 | | | | 3,217 | |
Spare parts and operating materials | | | — | | | | 2 | |
|
| | $ | 4,373 | | | $ | 8,506 | |
|
7 | | INVESTMENT IN CANADIAN THIRD PARTY ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER |
| | | In the third quarter of 2007, global financial markets experienced an unprecedented credit and liquidity crisis. Dominion Bond Rating Service (“DBRS”) placed Canadian third party asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”) “Under Review with Developing Implications” following an announcement on August 16, 2007 that a consortium representing banks, asset providers and major investors had agreed in principle to a long-term proposal and interim agreement regarding ABCP (the “Montreal Proposal”). Under this proposal, the affected ABCP would be converted into term floating rate notes maturing no earlier than the scheduled termination dates of the underlying assets. The Montreal Proposal called for investors to continue to roll their ABCP during the standstill period. The Company is not a signatory to this agreement. |
|
| | | On September 6, 2007, a Pan Canadian Committee (the “Committee”) was formed to oversee the proposed restructuring process of the ABCP. On December 23, 2007, the Committee approved an agreement in principle to restructure the ABCP issued by 20 trusts covered by the Montreal Proposal, which includes the investments held by the Company. The Committee expects a AAA rating for most of the restructured notes which, together with the full transparency of the underlying assets supporting these notes, will facilitate trading. All of the ABCP will be exchanged for longer dated notes that will match the maturity of the underlying reference assets in the proposed structure. The restructuring will also pool certain series of ABCP which are supported in whole or in part by underlying synthetic assets. Under this arrangement, there will be three distinct restructuring solutions for (1) Traditional-ABCP which is supported solely by traditional securitized assets, (2) Synthetic-ABCP which is supported by synthetic assets, or a combination of synthetic and traditional securitized assets, and (3) Ineligible-ABCP supported primarily by U.S. sub-prime mortgage assets. The approval of the restructuring is subject to a vote by all investors, and the Committee expects that the restructuring will close by March 31, 2008. The information provided below on the nature of the assets supporting these investments is based on data provided by the Committee and by DBRS. The Company has not been able to access information to verify these allocations or the information relating to the assets securing its investments. |
|
| | | At December 31, 2007, the Company held $8,525 of ABCP of which 7% were Traditional, 91% were Synthetic, and 2% were Ineligible. ABCP held by the Company was rated by DBRS as R-1 (high) at the date of investment and met the criteria of the Company’s investment policy. An R-1 (high) rating by DBRS is the highest rating for commercial paper. |
|
| | | At September 30, 2007, the Company held ABCP with a book value of $14,069 which reflected a face value of $17,050 and a reduction in fair value of $2,981 recorded in the third quarter of 2007. In November 2007, in order to diversify its risk in the uncertain global credit market, the Company sold 50% of its holdings in ABCP with a face value of $8,525 and a book value of $7,035 for immediate proceeds of $5,968. The Company retains a right to receive additional proceeds in the event that the buyer re-sells the related ABCP within six months. In such event, the Company will receive 50% of any proceeds received by the buyer in excess of $7,200. This sale resulted in a loss on the sale of the ABCP of $1,067. |
14
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
7 | | INVESTMENT IN CANADIAN THIRD PARTY ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER (continued) |
| | | The Company has classified its ABCP as long-term investments as there is no assurance that these assets will be restructured to mature within a 365-day period. The ABCP in which the Company has invested has not traded in an active market since mid-August 2007 and there are currently no market quotations available. The Company has estimated the fair value of its investments in ABCP considering the best available public information regarding market conditions and other factors that a market participant would consider for such investments. In accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3855, when the market for a financial instrument is not active, the fair value should be estimated using an appropriate valuation technique. The Company has used a probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach to value its ABCP investments at December 31, 2007 which considered expected interest rates, fixed/floating interest rate swaps, credit spreads, estimated restructuring fees, estimated renegotiated maturity dates and estimated principal reductions. The assumptions used in this model include: average risk free interest rate of 4.8%; weighted average discount rate of 6.4%; maturity of long-term notes of 10 years; and credit losses of 5% to 80%, depending on the nature of the underlying assets. Due to the lack of public information relating to the details of the assets supporting these investments and lack of details surrounding the restructuring proposed by the Committee, the Company was required to use management estimates when calculating this fair value. As a result of this valuation, the Company has recorded an additional valuation adjustment of $1,067 in the fourth quarter of 2007 and the estimated fair value was $5,968 at December 31, 2007. Based on management’s assumptions, the fair value of the Company’s holdings of ABCP could range from $5,600 to $6,400. Realized losses and valuation adjustments relating to ABCP totaled $5,115 in 2007. Continuing uncertainties regarding the value of the assets which underlie the ABCP, the amount and timing of cash flows and the outcome of the restructuring process could give rise to a further change in the fair value of the Company’s investment in the ABCP which would impact the Company’s results from operations. The Company has sufficient other cash resources and credit facilities (note 11) to satisfy its financial obligations as they come due over the next twelve months. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | Accumulated | | Net |
December 31, 2007 | | Cost | | Depreciation | | Book Value |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | $ | 2,909 | | | $ | 1,508 | | | $ | 1,401 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 9,422 | | | | 3,481 | | | | 5,941 | |
Construction in progress | | | 5,064 | | | | — | | | | 5,064 | |
Computer hardware and software | | | 1,344 | | | | 1,169 | | | | 175 | |
|
| | $ | 18,739 | | | $ | 6,158 | | | $ | 12,581 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | Accumulated | | Net |
December 31, 2006 | | Cost | | Depreciation | | Book Value |
|
Land | | $ | 220 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 220 | |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | | 16,407 | | | | 9,646 | | | | 6,761 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 11,993 | | | | 4,305 | | | | 7,688 | |
Construction in progress | | | 4,301 | | | | — | | | | 4,301 | |
Computer hardware and software | | | 1,479 | | | | 1,248 | | | | 231 | |
|
| | $ | 34,400 | | | $ | 15,199 | | | $ | 19,201 | |
|
| | | Capital assets excludes capital assets held for sale (note 3). |
15
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
8 | | CAPITAL ASSETS (continued) |
| | | Depreciation on capital assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $1,869 (2006 — $2,371; 2005 — $2,041). |
|
| | | In the third quarter of 2007, certain capital assets previously used by Nucryst for the production of wound care dressings and NPI 32101 powder were replaced by newer, more efficient and economical equipment. As a result, Nucryst recorded a write-down of the obsolete equipment of $1,203. In 2006, construction in progress relating to the design of a future Nucryst pharmaceutical ingredient production facility, in the amount of $1,210, was written off. |
|
| | | Nucryst continues to upgrade its wound care production facility in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. As a result, at December 31, 2007, capital assets include construction in progress in the amount of $5,064 (2006 — $4,301) that is not currently subject to depreciation. |
|
| | | In 2007, the Company sold its real estate holdings in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta for net proceeds of $14,362 and recorded a gain on the sale of these capital assets of $8,647. |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | December 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
|
Patents and trademarks | | $ | 2,611 | | | $ | 2,540 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | 1,812 | | | | 1,589 | |
|
| | $ | 799 | | | $ | 951 | |
|
| | | Intangible assets excludes intangible assets held for sale (note 3). |
|
| | | Amortization of intangible assets was $224 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2006 — $243; 2005 — $225). |
| | | The following is a reconciliation of income taxes, calculated at the statutory income tax rate, to the income tax provision included in the consolidated statement of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
| | Dec. 31, 2007 | | Dec. 31, 2006 | | Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | (2,686 | ) | | $ | (12,909 | ) | | $ | 27,451 | |
Statutory income tax rate | | | 32.12 | % | | | 32.12 | % | | | 33.62 | % |
|
Expected income tax (recovery) expense | | | (863 | ) | | | (4,146 | ) | | | 9,229 | |
Losses and temporary differences | | | | | | | | | | | | |
— valuation allowance | | | 2,456 | | | | 4,098 | | | | 953 | |
Tax effect of items not subject to tax | | | | | | | | | | | | |
— dilution gain (note 4) | | | (1,453 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
— gain on issuance of shares of subsidiary (note 5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (10,107 | ) |
Large corporations and capital taxes | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 55 | |
|
Income tax expense (recovery) | | $ | 144 | | | $ | (48 | ) | | $ | 130 | |
|
16
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
10 | | INCOME TAXES (continued) |
| | | Income taxes are recognized for future income tax consequences attributed to estimated differences between the financial statement carrying values of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases. |
|
| | | The net future income tax asset is comprised of: |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | December 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
|
Future income tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Tax benefit of loss carry-forwards and tax credits | | $ | 104,430 | | | $ | 144,561 | |
Provisions and reserves | | | 3,912 | | | | 2,796 | |
Capital, intangible and other assets | | | 1,198 | | | | 2,337 | |
Less valuation allowance | | | (109,216 | ) | | | (134,182 | ) |
|
| | | 324 | | | | 15,512 | |
|
Future income tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Capital, intangible and other assets | | | (324 | ) | | | (15,330 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | | (182 | ) |
|
| | | (324 | ) | | | (15,512 | ) |
|
Future income tax assets, net | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
| | | The future income tax asset valuation allowance is in respect of tax loss carry-forwards and tax credits primarily relating to subsidiaries involved in technology development. |
|
| | | The Company has consolidated non-capital losses for income tax purposes of approximately $185,422 (2006 — $155,968; 2005 — $118,735) and unclaimed scientific research and experimental development expenditures of approximately $41,493 (2006 — $139,287; 2005 — $118,606) which can be used to offset taxable income, if any, in future periods. The Company also has consolidated capital losses of approximately $43,382 (2006 — $20,384; 2005 — $20,224) as well as research and development tax credits of approximately $34,963 (2006 — $52,114; 2005 — $47,380). The non-capital losses and research and development tax credits will expire at various times up to the end of 2027. The tax losses carry-forward and tax credits described above include those related to iFire which is reported as a discontinued operation (note 3). Cash taxes relating to continuing operations paid during the year amounted to $17 (2006 — $121; 2005 — $270). |
|
| | | Nucryst’s share of the above consolidated tax losses and credits comprises approximately $34,629 in non-capital losses, approximately $8,510 in unclaimed scientific research and development expenditures, approximately $2,107 in capital losses and approximately $4,525 in research and development tax credits. In 2005, the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) commenced an examination of Nucryst’s Canadian income tax returns for 2001 and 2002. In December 2007, the CRA proposed certain transfer pricing adjustments for those years. These proposed adjustments, if processed, will not result in any cash tax liability for the Company. Although the CRA has not commenced any transfer pricing review for taxation years beyond 2002, the proposed adjustments, based on the CRA’s primary position, are expected to be extended to later taxation years. Nucryst is currently evaluating the CRA’s proposal and awaiting reports from the CRA which should provide greater details of the basis of their proposed adjustments. Following receipt of these reports, Nucryst will be better able to make an informed assessment of the CRA’s position. Any reassessments to be issued by the CRA, on an aggregate basis, could result in a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, although at this time, the potential impact cannot be reasonably estimated by Nucryst. |
17
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
As at December 31, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company had $8,000 of convertible debentures outstanding which had been issued to private investors (note 4). These debentures, which were converted to common shares in July 2007, bore interest at 5% per annum, had no recourse to the Company and were convertible into a maximum of 16,000,000 non-voting common shares of the subsidiary. These convertible debentures were financial instruments which had both debt and equity components. The value assignable to the conversion option at the date of issue was determined to be immaterial. As a result of the dilution of the Company’s interest in this subsidiary to 22.1% in the first quarter of 2007, these debentures were no longer included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements (note 4). Interest expense on these debentures reported by the Company for 2007 amounted to $94 (2006 — $361).
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company completed a credit agreement with a major Canadian financial institution. Under the terms of the revolving credit line, the Company may borrow up to $6,300 for 364 days. Borrowings will be secured by ABCP of equivalent value held by the Company. Interest rates on the credit line increase during the term from banker acceptance rate to banker acceptance rate plus 2%.
12 | | PROVISION FOR SITE RESTORATION |
The provision for site restoration amounted to $6,580 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, with no changes reported in 2007 or 2006.
The provision relates primarily to site restoration associated with soil and groundwater reclamation and remediation, based on periodic independent estimates of these costs.
Potential recoveries of costs resulting from indemnifications provided by previous owners of the Company’s industrial sites have not been recognized in the consolidated financial statements as the amount of recovery cannot be determined. Any future recoveries will be recorded when received.
The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares, Preferred A shares and Preferred B shares. Changes in the Company’s common shares outstanding during 2007, 2006, and 2005 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
Common Shares | | Number | | Stated Capital | | Number | | Stated Capital | | Number | | Stated Capital |
|
Balance at beginning of year | | | 93,978,758 | | | $ | 426,122 | | | | 92,900,649 | | | $ | 421,466 | | | | 92,828,054 | | | $ | 421,233 | |
Employee share purchase plan | | | 54,531 | | | | 39 | | | | 50,909 | | | | 244 | | | | 72,595 | | | | 233 | |
RSUs exercised | | | 102,246 | | | | 101 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Stock options exercised | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,027,200 | | | | 4,412 | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
Balance at end of year | | | 94,135,535 | | | $ | 426,262 | | | | 93,978,758 | | | $ | 426,122 | | | | 92,900,649 | | | $ | 421,466 | |
|
18
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
13 | | CAPITAL STOCK (continued) |
During 2007, 54,531 (2006 — 50,909; 2005 — 72,595) common shares were issued with respect to the Company’s employee share purchase plan at a weighted average price of $0.49 (2006 — $3.55; 2005 — $2.36). The value of these rights to acquire common shares of $13 (2006 — $64; 2005 — $62) was reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital.
In 2007, 102,246 shares were issued as settlement for 102,246 fully vested RSUs.
No options were exercised in 2007 or 2005. In 2006, 1,027,200 options were exercised at a weighted average price of $4.19 and $108 was reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital. As a result of the exercise of Nucryst stock options, contributed surplus was reduced by $nil in 2007 (2006 — $31; 2005 — $nil).
| b) | | Stock-based compensation plans |
Employee and Director stock option plan— The Company maintains an Employee and Director Stock Option Plan under which the Company may grant options for 10,955,445 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Options awarded are exercisable for a period of 10 years and vest as to one third of the grant on each of the first, second and third anniversaries after the date of the grant. The Company maintains a Directors and Officers Share Purchase Program under the provisions of the Stock Option Plan. Under the Share Purchase Program, Directors and designated officers may be granted one option for each common share purchased to a cumulative 50,000 options. Options, equal to the net purchases of common shares by the optionee during the calendar year, vest at the end of the calendar year in which the purchases were made. Any options issued under this program which do not vest at the end of the year are cancelled.
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan as at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | Average | | | | | | | Average | | | | | | | Average | |
| | | | | | Exercise | | | | | | | Exercise | | | | | | | Exercise | |
Stock Options | | Number | | | Price | | | Number | | | Price | | | Number | | | Price | |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year | | | 4,431,900 | | | $ | 7.08 | | | | 5,049,600 | | | $ | 6.68 | | | | 4,659,600 | | | $ | 6.94 | |
Granted | | | 762,200 | | | $ | 0.85 | | | | 409,500 | | | $ | 4.73 | | | | 390,000 | | | $ | 3.66 | |
Exercised | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | (1,027,200 | ) | | $ | 4.19 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Cancelled | | | (428,667 | ) | | $ | 5.84 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Expired | | | (316,835 | ) | | $ | 6.85 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
|
Outstanding at end of year | | | 4,448,598 | | | $ | 6.15 | | | | 4,431,900 | | | $ | 7.08 | | | | 5,049,600 | | | $ | 6.68 | |
|
19
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
13 | | CAPITAL STOCK (continued) |
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as at December 31, 2007:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
| | | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | | | | | Weighted |
| | Number | | Average Remaining | | Average | | Number | | Average |
Range of Exercise | | Outstanding | | Contractual Life | | Exercise | | Exercisable | | Exercise |
Prices | | Dec.31, 2007 | | (in years) | | Price | | Dec.31, 2007 | | Price |
|
$0.22—$0.93 | | | 297,200 | | | | 9.9 | | | $ | 0.25 | | | | 57,200 | | | $ | 0.22 | |
$0.94—$1.40 | | | 390,000 | | | | 6.2 | | | $ | 1.23 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
$1.41—$2.10 | | | 499,533 | | | | 4.0 | | | $ | 1.77 | | | | 432,311 | | | $ | 1.78 | |
$2.11—$3.20 | | | 130,800 | | | | 6.1 | | | $ | 2.84 | | | | 130,800 | | | $ | 2.84 | |
$3.21—$4.80 | | | 701,000 | | | | 4.5 | | | $ | 3.72 | | | | 571,000 | | | $ | 3.74 | |
$4.81—$7.20 | | | 1,351,668 | | | | 2.2 | | | $ | 6.52 | | | | 1,168,335 | | | $ | 6.58 | |
$7.21—$10.81 | | | 170,000 | | | | 1.1 | | | $ | 7.53 | | | | 170,000 | | | $ | 7.53 | |
$10.82—$16.20 | | | 908,397 | | | | 2.1 | | | $ | 14.13 | | | | 908,397 | | | $ | 14.13 | |
|
Total | | | 4,448,598 | | | | 3.7 | | | $ | 6.15 | | | | 3,438,043 | | | $ | 7.30 | |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007, corporate costs, research and development costs, and general and administrative expenses include additional compensation expense relating to stock options totaling $2,310 (2006 — $1,376; 2005 — $847) with an offsetting increase to contributed surplus. Discontinued operations include compensation expense relating to stock options totaling $31 (2006 — $238; 2005 — $58) with an offsetting increase to contributed surplus. Also included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 is compensation expense of $80 (2006 — $36; 2005 — $nil) related to the direct award of restricted common shares by Nucryst with a corresponding increase in non-controlling interest in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
The fair value of each option grant by the Company is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming no dividends are paid on common shares, a risk-free interest rate of 3.93% (2006 — 3.89%; 2005 — 4.33%), an average life of 7.0 years and a volatility of 63.57% (2006 — 58.08%; 2005 — 57.72%). The amounts computed according to the Black-Scholes pricing model may not be indicative of the actual values realized upon the exercise of these options by the holders.
Deferred share unit plan— The Company maintains DSUs for the non-executive Directors of the Company. DSUs are issued at the market value of the Company’s shares at the date of grant, vest upon death or retirement of the non-executive Director and are payable in cash. Directors may elect to receive additional DSUs in lieu of fees, which are issued at 90% of the market value of the Company’s shares at the date of grant. Compensation recovery relating to DSUs during the year amounted to $523 (2006 — $868; 2005 — expense $888) and as at December 31, 2007, a liability of $261 (2006 — $974) has been accrued with respect to issued DSUs. In 2007, 196,118 DSUs were exercised and settled with a cash payment of $190.
Restricted share unit plan— The Company maintains a Restricted Share Unit Plan for the Executive Officers of the Company. These units vest over three years and are payable when fully vested in a combination of common shares and cash at the weighted average trading price at the date of exercise. The liability with respect to these units is accrued over the vesting period. Compensation recovery with respect to RSUs during the year amounted to $68 (2006 — $117; 2005 — expense $524) and the corresponding accrued liability as at December 31, 2007 was $65 (2006 — $546).
20
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
13 | | CAPITAL STOCK (continued) |
In 2007, 449,659 RSUs with a value of $413 were settled with the issuance of 102,246 common shares and cash payments of $312.
Stock appreciation rights— Employees of the Company, other than non-executive officers, are granted Stock Appreciation Rights. SARs are issued at the market value of the Company’s shares at the date of grant, vest over three years and are payable when vested in cash at the amount by which the market value of the Company’s shares exceed the share price at the date of grant. Net changes in the value of SARs is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period. Compensation recovery with respect to SARs during the year amounted to $nil (2006 — $159; 2005 — expense $142). As at December 31, 2007 and 2006, there was no accrued liability relating to SARs. Payments to holders of SARs in 2007 amounted to $nil (2006 — $19; 2005 — $14).
For the year ended December 31, 2007, corporate costs include a recovery of compensation expense totaling $591 (2006 — $1,144; 2005 — expense $1,554) relating to DSUs, RSUs and SARs.
Employee share purchase plan— Under the Employee Share Purchase Plan, employees were entitled to subscribe for common shares of the Company, to a maximum value of five percent of their annual compensation. Payment for these shares was made over a 24-month period at a price per share equal to the lesser of the market value at the offering date and the market value at the end of the purchase period.
This plan was discontinued after the issuance of shares in September 2007 with respect to the 2005 and 2006 plans. At December 31, 2007, there were no outstanding purchase arrangements with employees and the aggregate value was $nil (2006 — $409; 2005 — $474). During the year ended December 31, 2007, a total of 54,531 shares were issued under this plan at an average price of $0.49 (2006 — 50,909 shares at $3.55; 2005 — 72,595 shares at $2.36).
Subsidiary stock-based compensation plans —The Company’s subsidiaries, Nucryst and iFire, maintain equity incentive plans for certain directors and employees, under which stock options have been granted representing 7.7% and 3.9% of the outstanding shares of the respective subsidiaries. These plans are accounted for using the fair value method with the related compensation expense is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. Subsidiary stock options generally vest evenly over a three-year period and expire after 10 years from the date of grant. The exercise prices of stock options granted are not less than the fair value of the subsidiary’s stock at the time of the grant. In 2007, 4,540 Nucryst options were exercised at a weighted average price of $3.08 (2006 — 105,303 options at a weighted average price of $3.09). No shares were issued by these subsidiaries in 2005 with respect to these plans.
SARs have been granted to employees of the Company’s subsidiaries, Nucryst and iFire. SARs vest over time and may be settled with cash, shares of the subsidiary and, in the case of iFire SARs, shares of the Company at the Company’s option. The exercise prices of SARs granted are not less than the fair value of the subsidiary’s stock at the time of the grant. The total potential liability upon exercise of these SARs is capped at $586.
Net changes in the value of SARs, measured as the amount by which quoted market prices or fair value exceeds the exercise price at the measurement date, is recognized as compensation expense over the SAR’s vesting period. There was no accrued liability as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 as the estimated market value of the subsidiaries’ SARs was less than their exercise price.
21
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
13 | | CAPITAL STOCK (continued) |
For the year ended December 31, 2007, research and development and general and administrative expenses included compensation expense relating to subsidiary SARs of $nil (2006 — recovery $19; 2005 — expense $35). There were no Nucryst SARs outstanding at December 31, 2007 or 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, 10,376 Nucryst SARs were exercised and settled through the issuance of 7,610 common shares of Nucryst (2005 — nil).
Nucryst Directors and certain Executives have been granted RSUs. These units are issued at the market value of a Nucryst share at the date of grant, vest over two to three years and are payable in common shares of Nucryst. Net changes in the value of these RSUs are recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period with an offset to contributed surplus. General and administrative expenses included compensation expense relating to Nucryst RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $79 (2006 — $nil; 2005 — $nil).
The Company has agreements to indemnify its Officers and Directors for certain events or occurrences while the Officer or Director is or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments is unlimited. However, the Company maintains Director and Officer liability insurance coverage that limits its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
In addition, the Company has provided indemnifications to third parties with respect to future site restoration costs to be incurred on properties previously owned by the Company. These estimated costs have been included in the provision for site restoration (note 12).
15 | | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Commitments
The Company is committed to capital expenditures of $41 (2006 — $937; 2005 — $2,508) and to future annual payments under operating leases for facility and office space and equipment as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 |
|
$1,741 | | $ | 1,540 | | | $ | 1,294 | | | $ | 1,306 | | | $ | 849 | |
|
In addition, the Company has contractual obligations to make manufacturing cost rebate payments of U.S. $4,500 in each of 2008 and 2009 (note 19).
Contingencies
The Company and its subsidiaries are party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of their businesses. Management does not expect the outcome of any of these proceedings to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or operating results.
22
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying value of the Company’s interest in financial instruments approximates their fair value. The estimated fair value approximates the amount for which the financial instruments could currently be exchanged in an arm’s length transaction between willing parties who are under no compulsion to act. Certain financial instruments lack an available trading market and, therefore, fair value amounts should not be interpreted as being necessarily realizable in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk reflects the sensitivity of the Company’s financial results and condition to movements in interest rates. For 2007, a 1% decrease in interest rates on investments, excluding ABCP (note 7), would have reduced earnings before income taxes by approximately $160. Conversely, a 1% increase in interest rates would have increased earnings before income taxes by a similar amount.
Foreign currency risk
The Company is exposed to currency risks as a result of holding U.S. dollar denominated monetary assets and as a result of export to foreign jurisdictions of goods produced in Canada. These risks are partially covered by purchases of goods and services in the foreign currency.
Credit risk
The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments, and accounts receivable. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are placed with major financial institutions or invested in the commercial paper of large organizations. The Company currently faces credit risk relating to the exposure from holding ABCP (note 7). The Company has a concentration of credit risk through its reliance on one customer for Nucryst’s wound care products. This risk is limited due to the long-term contractual relationship with this customer.
17 | | EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
In calculating earnings per share under the treasury stock method, the numerator remains unchanged from the basic earnings per share calculation as the assumed exercise of the Company’s stock options does not result in an adjustment to income. The reconciliation of the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
| | Dec. 31, 2007 | | Dec. 31, 2006 | | Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic earnings per share | | | 94,069,547 | | | | 93,523,041 | | | | 92,852,120 | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
— Options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 267,078 | |
— Employee share purchase plan | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,738 | |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted earnings per share | | | 94,069,547 | | | | 93,523,041 | | | | 93,120,936 | |
|
23
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
17 | | EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (continued) |
The impact of all dilutive securities on earnings per common share was anti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Options to purchase 4,448,598 common shares were outstanding at December 31, 2007 (2006 — 4,431,900; 2005 — 5,049,600). Of these options outstanding in 2007, 4,151,398 (2006 — 3,006,900; 2005 — 3,979,100) were excluded in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because the exercise price of the options was greater than the weighted average market value of the common shares in the year.
The Company had two operating segments, Nucryst and iFire, which have been determined based on the nature of the products produced. In November 2007, the Company announced its intention to sell iFire and, as a result, the iFire segment has been reported as a discontinued operation (note 3).
The Nucryst segment researches, develops and commercializes wound care products and pharmaceutical products based on noble metal nanocrystalline technology.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in note 2. Included in other non-cash assets of $6,403 at December 31, 2007 (2006 — $6,169; 2005 — $6,914) are assets that cannot be allocated to a particular segment. Non-cash assets excludes short-term investments and assets held for sale.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Depreciation | | | | | | Non-cash |
Year ended | | | | | | Operating | | and | | Capital | | Assets |
December 31, 2007 | | Revenue | | Loss | | Amortization | | Expenditures | | Dec.31, 2007 |
|
Nucryst | | $ | 31,830 | | | $ | (635 | ) | | $ | 1,760 | | | $ | 2,083 | | | $ | 32,923 | |
Other | | | — | | | | (10,805 | ) | | | 333 | | | | 293 | | | | 6,403 | |
|
| | $ | 31,830 | | | $ | (11,440 | ) | | $ | 2,093 | | | $ | 2,376 | | | $ | 39,326 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Depreciation | | | | | | Non-cash |
Year ended | | | | | | Operating | | and | | Capital | | Assets |
December 31, 2006 | | Revenue | | Loss | | Amortization | | Expenditures | | Dec.31, 2006 |
|
Nucryst | | $ | 27,591 | | | $ | (11,216 | ) | | $ | 1,876 | | | $ | 5,609 | | | $ | 31,267 | |
Other | | | — | | | | (6,128 | ) | | | 738 | | | | 932 | | | | 6,169 | |
|
| | $ | 27,591 | | | $ | (17,344 | ) | | $ | 2,614 | | | $ | 6,541 | | | $ | 37,436 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Operating | | Depreciation | | | | | | Non-cash |
Year ended | | | | | | Income | | and | | Capital | | Assets |
December 31, 2005 | | Revenue | | (Loss) | | Amortization | | Expenditures | | Dec.31, 2005 |
|
Nucryst | | $ | 28,560 | | | $ | 1,590 | | | $ | 1,549 | | | $ | 4,584 | | | $ | 27,315 | |
Other | | | — | | | | (8,163 | ) | | | 717 | | | | 1,993 | | | | 6,914 | |
|
| | $ | 28,560 | | | $ | (6,573 | ) | | $ | 2,266 | | | $ | 6,577 | | | $ | 34,229 | |
|
All of Nucryst’s revenues are earned through a long-term exclusive licensing agreement with an international wound care company, Smith & Nephew plc (“Smith & Nephew”), which expires in 2026. Nucryst exports manufactured products to this company for their resale in international markets.
24
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
19 | | AGREEMENTS WITH SMITH & NEPHEW |
On September 30, 2007, Nucryst and Smith & Nephew signed amended agreements for the sale to Smith & Nephew of Acticoat™ wound care dressings manufactured by Nucryst. The new agreements amended the criteria for the achievement of sales milestones that resulted in a U.S. $5,000 sales milestone being earned by Nucryst in the third quarter of 2007. The cost to manufacture Acticoat™ products was previously fully reimbursed to Nucryst. The cost recovery structure has been amended so that the parties will annually come to an agreement on the direct costs and fixed overhead costs for manufacturing these products. A U.S. $4,500 manufacturing cost rebate, relating to 2007, became due and payable to Smith & Nephew on September 30, 2007 under the terms of the amended agreements. Nucryst has also committed to similar payments of U.S. $4,500 in each of the years 2008 and 2009. The manufacturing cost rebate is recorded as a reduction to wound care product revenue. After 2009, additional amounts may become due under the terms of the agreements.
Milestone revenue for 2007 was $10,143 (2006 — $nil; 2005 — $5,882). Wound care product revenue for 2007 was reduced by $4,565 (2006 — $nil; 2005 — $nil) relating to the 2007 manufacturing cost rebate.
20 | | OPERATIONAL RESTRUCTURING |
In 2007, the Company announced an operational restructuring in which staffing levels at iFire and at the Company’s corporate offices were reduced.
The total operational restructuring costs, including severances and transition costs, are estimated to amount to $8,994 of which $8,798 has been expensed in 2007. Of these amounts, $3,904 is included in discontinued operations while $4,894 is included in corporate costs in the consolidated statement of operations. In addition, approximately $196 in costs have not yet been expensed as they relate to future estimated severance amounts and to completion bonus arrangements which will be charged to operations evenly over the employees’ expected remaining employment period. These amounts do not include additional severance costs that may be incurred as a result of the decision to sell iFire discussed in note 3. Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2007 are accrued severances and transition costs of $2,430 relating to the operational restructuring. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities held for sale include accrued severance costs of $284.
In January 2008, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company issued to a non-related Canadian company common shares for proceeds of $1,000 representing 40% of the issued share capital of the subsidiary and $3,500 of convertible debentures. The debentures mature on January 31, 2009 and bear interest at 1.0% per annum commencing February 1, 2008. Interest is waived for the portion of the year in which the debentures are converted. The debentures have no recourse to the Company and are convertible into common non-voting shares of the subsidiary representing 58.3% of the issued share capital on a fully diluted basis. As a result of these transactions, the Company’s interest in this subsidiary was reduced to 60% in January 2008 and the Company will report a dilution gain of $1,000 in the first quarter of 2008. If the debentures are converted, the Company’s economic interest in the subsidiary will be reduced to approximately 25% and the Company’s consolidated non-capital losses, unclaimed scientific research and development expenditures and research and development tax credits will be reduced by approximately $85,000, $17,000 and $19,000 respectively.
25
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
22 | | RECONCILIATION TO ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES |
| | | These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP which conform in all material respects with those used in U.S. GAAP, except as set forth below: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | December 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
|
| | Canadian | | U.S. | | Canadian | | U.S. |
| | GAAP | | GAAP | | GAAP | | GAAP |
| | |
Intangible assets held for sale (a) | | $ | 2,392 | | | $ | 2,392 | | | $ | 3,174 | | | $ | 2,174 | |
Non-controlling interest (b) | | | 11,757 | | | | 11,730 | | | | 12,805 | | | | 12,775 | |
Capital stock (b) | | | 426,262 | | | | 425,958 | | | | 426,122 | | | | 425,831 | |
Contributed Surplus (b) | | | 7,769 | | | | 4,568 | | | | 5,379 | | | | 2,468 | |
Deficit (a)(b)(c) | | | (375,881 | ) | | | (382,858 | ) | | | (317,848 | ) | | | (326,125 | ) |
Additional paid-in-capital (c) | | | — | | | | 10,509 | | | | — | | | | 10,509 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
Shareholders’ Equity | | December 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
|
Canadian GAAP | | $ | 56,371 | | | $ | 112,977 | |
Adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation (b) | | | 27 | | | | 30 | |
Research and development (a) | | | — | | | | (1,000 | ) |
|
U.S. GAAP | | $ | 56,398 | | | $ | 112,007 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
Consolidated Statements of Operations | | Dec. 31, 2007 | | Dec. 31, 2006 | | Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations Canadian GAAP | | $ | (2,830 | ) | | $ | (12,861 | ) | | $ | 27,321 | |
Stock-based compensation (b) | | | 303 | | | | (280 | ) | | | 905 | |
Non-controlling interest (b) | | | (2 | ) | | | 30 | | | | — | |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (b) | | | — | | | | (202 | ) | | | — | |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations U.S. GAAP | | | (2,529 | ) | | | (13,313 | ) | | | 28,226 | |
|
Loss from discontinued operations Canadian GAAP | | | (55,203 | ) | | | (37,696 | ) | | | (18,051 | ) |
Research and development (a) | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,000 | |
|
Loss from discontinued operations — U.S. GAAP | | | (54,203 | ) | | | (36,696 | ) | | | (17,051 | ) |
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GAAP | | | (56,732 | ) | | | (50,009 | ) | | | 11,175 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (1,103 | ) | | | (173 | ) | | | (503 | ) |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income U.S. GAAP | | $ | (57,835 | ) | | $ | (50,182 | ) | | $ | 10,672 | |
|
26
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
22 | | RECONCILIATION TO ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
(Loss) Income Per Common Share | | Dec. 31, 2007 | | Dec. 31, 2006 | | Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
Canadian GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before and after the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | 0.29 | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | $ | (0.59 | ) | | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (0.54 | ) | | $ | 0.10 | |
U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before and after the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | 0.30 | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | $ | (0.58 | ) | | $ | (0.39 | ) | | $ | (0.18 | ) |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (0.60 | ) | | $ | (0.53 | ) | | $ | 0.12 | |
|
| a) | | Research and Development |
|
| | | Under U.S. GAAP, the cost of purchased research and development should be charged to income, in the period incurred, when no alternative uses exist for the purchased research and development. As the patents and intellectual property purchased are restricted to use in inorganic electroluminescent displays, the costs have been fully expensed under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| | | Under Canadian GAAP, such costs are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives. |
|
| b) | | Stock-based Compensation |
|
| | | For U.S. GAAP, on January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires that all share-based payments to directors and employees, including grants of stock options, be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. |
|
| | | The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2006. |
|
| | | SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”), as allowed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense had been recognized in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. |
27
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
22 | | RECONCILIATION TO ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (continued) |
| | | SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to fiscal year 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for forfeitures at the date they occur. |
|
| | | SFAS 123(R) requires that liability classified awards such as SARs be revalued to estimated fair value at each reporting date using an option pricing model. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company valued SARs at the amount by which the market value exceeded the exercise price at each measurement date. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company records the value of SARs as the amount by which quoted market prices or fair value exceeds the exercise price at measurement date. |
|
| | | Under SFAS 123(R), the fair value of options with accelerated vesting provisions issued prior to 2007 is expensed using a graded vesting methodology. Under Canadian GAAP, the fair value of these options is expensed on a straight-line vesting basis. |
|
| | | The Company continues to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for valuation of share-based payment awards which was previously used for the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS 123. |
|
| | | The impact of the implementation of SFAS 123(R) on the reconciliation between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP in 2007 on the consolidated statement of operations was a decrease in stock-based compensation expense under U.S. GAAP of $303 (2006 — increase $280; 2005 — decrease $905) relating to activity in the current year and $nil (2006 — expense $202) relating to the cumulative effects of the change in accounting principle. The impact on non-controlling interest for 2007 resulting from the implementation of SFAS 123(R) amounted to an increase of $2 (2006 — decrease $30) in loss from continuing operations under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| | | Stock-based compensation — pro forma disclosure |
|
| | | For U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) which requires that liability classified awards such as SARs be measured at fair value at each balance sheet date until the awards are settled. Previously, net changes in the value of SARs, measured as the amount by which the market value of the common shares of the Company exceeds the exercise price at the measurement date, were recognized as compensation expense over the SARs vesting period with a corresponding increase to accounts payable and accrued liabilities. |
|
| | | If compensation costs for the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ stock option plans had been determined using SFAS 123(R) prior to January 1, 2006, the Company’s net income (loss) per share for 2005 would have been adjusted to the pro-forma amounts indicated below: |
28
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
22 | | RECONCILIATION TO ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (continued) |
| | | | |
|
| | Year ended |
| | Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders — U.S. GAAP | | $ | 11,175 | |
Total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair-value based method for awards net of tax effects | | | (905 | ) |
|
Pro forma net income applicable to common shareholders — U.S. GAAP | | $ | 10,270 | |
Income per common share — U.S. GAAP | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 0.30 | |
Net income | | | 0.12 | |
Pro forma | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 0.29 | |
Net income | | | 0.11 | |
|
| c) | | Gain on issuance of shares by subsidiary |
|
| | | In accordance with Canadian GAAP, the Company is required to account for gains and losses on the issuance of shares by a subsidiary as a component of income. Under U.S. GAAP, the effect of such dilution gains may be recorded as income except in circumstances where subsequent capital transactions are contemplated that raise concerns about the likelihood of realizing the gain. In addition, realization of the gain is not assured where the subsidiary is a newly formed, non-operating entity; a research and development start-up; or a development-stage company. It is the Company’s policy to record dilution gains as a component of income for U.S. GAAP purposes. However, for a transaction in 2001 involving iFire, which at that time was an early stage research and development company, the dilution gain of $10,509 was required to be recorded in equity as an increase in paid-in capital rather than as income. Subsequent dilution gains have met the criteria for income statement recognition under both Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP. |
| | | Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements |
|
| | | SFAS 157 |
|
| | | In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS 157 will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | SFAS 159 |
|
| | | In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 allows entities the option to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value as of specified dates. Such election, which may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis, is typically irrevocable once elected. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and early application is allowed under certain circumstances. The Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS 159 will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial position. |
29
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
22 | | RECONCILIATION TO ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (continued) |
| | | SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 |
|
| | | The FASB recently completed the second phase of its business combinations project, to date the most significant convergence effort with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), and issued the following two accounting standards: |
| i) | | Statement No. 141(R), Business Combination; and |
|
| ii) | | Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51. |
| | | These statements dramatically change the way companies account for business combinations and noncontrolling interests (minority interests in current U.S. GAAP). Compared with their predecessors, Statements 141(R) and 160 will require: |
| • | | More assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be measured at fair value as of the acquisition date; |
|
| • | | Liabilities related to contingent consideration to be remeasured at fair value in each subsequent reporting period; |
|
| • | | An acquirer in preacquisition periods to expense all acquisition related costs; and |
|
| • | | Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries initially to be measured at fair value and classified as a separate component of equity. |
| | | Statements 141(R) and 160 should both be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. However, Statement 160 requires entities to apply the presentation and disclosure requirements retrospectively (e.g., by reclassifying noncontrolling interests to appear in equity) to comparative financial statements if presented. Both standards prohibit early adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact these new standards will have on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | | FIN 48 |
|
| | | On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 that prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax position in the financial statements if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. In accordance with the provisions of FIN 48, any cumulative effect resulting from the change in accounting principle is to be recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of deficit. The adoption of FIN 48 did not result in a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
|
| | | EITF 07-3 |
|
| | | In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 07-3, “Accounting for Non-refundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities” (“EITF 07-3”). EITF 07-3 requires that non refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities be deferred and capitalized and recognized as an expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed. EITF 07-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and will be adopted in the first quarter of 2008. The Company has determined that the adoption of EITF 07-3 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
30
The Westaim Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(thousands of Canadian dollars except per share data)
22 | | RECONCILIATION TO ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (continued) |
| | | EITF 07-1 |
|
| | | In September 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-1 “Collaborative Arrangements” (“EITF 07-1”). EITF 07-1 addresses the accounting for arrangements in which two companies work together to achieve a commercial objective, without forming a separate legal entity. The nature and purpose of a company’s collaborative arrangements are required to be disclosed, along with the accounting policies applied and the classification and amounts for significant financial activities related to the arrangements. EITF 07-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact EITF 07-1 will have on its results of operations and financial position. |
31