Hanmi Financial 10Q 2005 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2005


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From To

Commission File Number:000-30421

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		95-4788120

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A
Los Angeles, California		90010

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(213) 382-2200

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ

As of November 7, 2005, there were 48,633,544 outstanding shares of the issuer’s Common Stock.

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page
		PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited)		1
		Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)		2
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		3
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		4

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			9

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			31

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures			32

		PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings			33

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			33

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities			33

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			33

Item 5.	Other Information			33

Item 6.	Exhibits			34

Signatures				35
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in Thousands)


	September 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
ASSETS
Cash and Due from Banks	$	112,233		$	55,164
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell		62,000			72,000

Cash and Cash Equivalents		174,233			127,164
Federal Reserve Bank Stock		12,153			12,099
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		12,098			9,862
Securities Held to Maturity, at Amortized Cost (Fair Value: September 30, 2005 — $1,059; December 31, 2004 — $1,093)		1,055			1,090
Securities Available for Sale, at Fair Value		397,219			417,883
Loans Receivable, Net of Allowance for Loan Losses of $24,523 and $22,702 at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Respectively		2,458,573			2,230,992
Loans Held for Sale, at the Lower of Cost or Fair Value		375			3,850
Customers’ Liability on Acceptances		9,360			4,579
Premises and Equipment, Net		20,426			19,691
Accrued Interest Receivable		12,157			10,029
Deferred Income Taxes		8,159			5,009
Servicing Asset		3,716			3,846
Goodwill		209,058			209,643
Core Deposit Intangible		9,336			11,476
Bank-Owned Life Insurance — Cash Surrender Value		22,498			21,868
Other Assets		17,972			15,107

TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,368,388		$	3,104,188


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Noninterest-Bearing	$	764,380		$	729,583
Interest-Bearing:
Money Market Checking		506,843			613,662
Savings		127,349			153,862
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More		1,089,917			756,580
Other Time Deposits		258,281			275,120

Total Deposits		2,746,770			2,528,807
Accrued Interest Payable		9,010			7,100
Acceptances Outstanding		9,360			4,579
Other Borrowed Funds		86,931			69,293
Junior Subordinated Debentures		82,406			82,406
Other Liabilities		17,905			12,093

Total Liabilities		2,952,382			2,704,278

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value; Authorized 200,000,000 Shares; Issued and Outstanding, 49,769,245 Shares and 49,330,704 Shares at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Respectively		50			49
Additional Paid-In Capital		339,492			334,932
Unearned Compensation		(1,240	)		—
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale and Interest Rate Swaps, Net of Income Taxes of ($1,562) and $744 at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Respectively		(2,094	)		1,035
Retained Earnings		99,839			63,894

		436,047			399,910
Less Treasury Stock, at Cost; 1,163,000 Shares and 0 Shares at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Respectively		(20,041	)		—

Total Shareholders’ Equity		416,006			399,910

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	3,368,388		$	3,104,188

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest and Fees on Loans	$	47,175		$	34,389		$	127,900		$	79,553
Interest on Investments		4,277			4,674			13,659			12,894
Interest on Federal Funds Sold		221			28			679			100

Total Interest Income		51,673			39,091			142,238			92,547

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest on Deposits		14,515			7,334			35,811			17,525
Interest on Borrowings		2,316			1,942			5,829			4,405

Total Interest Expense		16,831			9,276			41,640			21,930

NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES		34,842			29,815			100,598			70,617
Provision for Credit Losses		3,157			—			3,743			1,750

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES		31,685			29,815			96,855			68,867

NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts		4,059			4,197			11,657			10,388
Trade Finance Fees		1,162			1,253			3,143			3,088
Other Service Charges and Fees		959			383			2,478			1,204
Remittance Fees		527			456			1,545			1,149
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income		215			216			630			513
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives		176			(4	)		965			19
Other Income		648			364			1,823			1,105
Gain on Sales of Loans Held for Sale		1,712			352			2,076			1,654
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale		21			115			117			124

Total Non-Interest Income		9,479			7,332			24,434			19,244

NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and Employee Benefits		9,155			9,505			26,867			23,079
Occupancy and Equipment		2,179			2,299			6,581			5,816
Data Processing		1,253			1,442			3,663			3,326
Advertising and Promotion		726			630			1,983			2,053
Amortization of Core Deposit Intangible		694			686			2,140			1,185
Supplies and Communications		559			981			1,867			1,959
Professional Fees		393			600			1,432			1,483
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded Option		173			—			748			—
Merger-Related Expenses		—			325			(509	)		2,053
Other Operating Expenses		1,859			2,521			5,836			6,161

Total Non-Interest Expenses		16,991			18,989			50,608			47,115

INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		24,173			18,158			70,681			40,996
Provision for Income Taxes		9,204			7,089			27,342			15,996

NET INCOME	$	14,969		$	11,069		$	43,339		$	25,000


EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic	$	0.30		$	0.23		$	0.88		$	0.63
Diluted	$	0.30		$	0.22		$	0.86		$	0.62
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic		49,144,508			48,971,194			49,386,112			39,877,288
Diluted		49,914,432			49,803,814			50,157,206			40,560,294
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE	$	0.05		$	0.05		$	0.15		$	0.15

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Net Income	$	14,969		$	11,069		$	43,339		$	25,000

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Arising During the Period		(1,822	)		5,866			(2,141	)		1,319
Less Reclassification Adjustment for Realized Gain on Securities Available for Sale Included in Net Income		—			(70	)		(114	)		(76	)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Cash Flow Hedge		(546	)		794			(874	)		71

Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax		(2,368	)		6,590			(3,129	)		1,314

Total Comprehensive Income	$	12,601		$	17,659		$	40,210		$	26,314

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in Thousands)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	43,339		$	25,000
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization of Premises and Equipment		1,985			1,725
Amortization of Premiums and Discounts on Investments		245			3,026
Amortization of Core Deposit Intangible		2,140			1,185
Amortization of Unearned Compensation		575			—
Provision for Credit Losses		3,743			1,750
Federal Reserve Bank Stock and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Dividends		(224	)		(296	)
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale		(117	)		(124	)
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives		(217	)		(19	)
Gain on Sales of Loans Held for Sale		(2,076	)		(1,654	)
Loss on Sales of Premises and Equipment		13			9
Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options		546			—
Deferred Tax (Benefit) Provision		(6,279	)		2,311
Origination of Loans Held for Sale		(34,563	)		(58,266	)
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held for Sale		40,114			26,725
Change In:
(Increase) Decrease in Accrued Interest Receivable		(2,128	)		470
Increase in Cash Surrender Value of Bank-Owned Life Insurance		(630	)		(513	)
(Increase) Decrease in Other Assets		(6,931	)		3,366
Increase (Decrease) in Accrued Interest Payable		1,910			(1,270	)
Increase (Decrease) in Other Liabilities		10,586			(13,975	)

Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities		52,031			(10,550	)


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from Matured or Called Securities Available for Sale		72,449			93,111
Proceeds from Matured or Called Securities Held to Maturity		—			196
Proceeds from Sale of Securities Available for Sale		11,360			52,634
Net Increase in Loans Receivable		(231,100	)		(105,716	)
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank Stock and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		(2,066	)		(414	)
Purchases of Securities Available for Sale		(63,238	)		(15,660	)
Purchases of Bank-Owned Life Insurance		—			(10,000	)
Purchases of Premises and Equipment, Net		(2,733	)		(815	)
Acquisition of Pacific Union Bank, Net of Cash Acquired		—			(64,000	)

Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Used In Investing Activities		(215,328	)		(50,664	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in Deposits		217,963			22,185
Issuance of Junior Subordinated Debentures		—			82,406
Stock Issued Through Private Placement		—			71,710
Cash Paid to Acquire Treasury Stock		(20,041	)		—
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options		2,192			2,223
Cash Dividends Paid		(7,386	)		(5,286	)
Decrease (Increase) in Other Borrowed Funds		17,638			(96,655	)

Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Provided By Financing Activities		210,366			76,583


NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		47,069			15,369
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period		127,164			62,595


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	174,233		$	77,964


Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest Paid	$	43,550		$	20,059
Income Taxes Paid	$	26,150		$	22,401

Reconciliation of Acquisition of Pacific Union Bank, Net of Cash Acquired:
Fair Value of Assets Acquired				$	1,383,881
Cash and Cash Equivalents Acquired					(104,427	)
Non-Cash Financing of Purchase Price and Liabilities Assumed:
Issuance of Common Stock					(156,751	)
Liabilities Assumed					(1,058,703	)

Acquisition of Pacific Union Bank, Net of Cash Acquired				$	64,000

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(UNAUDITED)

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE 1 — HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Hanmi Financial Corporation (“Hanmi Financial,” “we” or “our”) is a Delaware corporation that is the holding company for Hanmi Bank (the “Bank”) and is subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.

Hanmi Bank, our primary subsidiary, is a commercial bank licensed by the California Department of Financial Institutions. The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, up to the applicable limits thereof. The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System.

Our primary operations are related to traditional banking activities, including the acceptance of deposits and the lending and investing of money through operation of the Bank. Hanmi Bank is a community bank conducting general business banking with its primary market encompassing the multi-ethnic populations of Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, San Francisco and Santa Clara counties. Hanmi Bank’s offices are located in business areas where many of the businesses are run by immigrants and other minority groups. Hanmi Bank’s client base reflects the multi-ethnic composition of these communities.

On April 30, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Pacific Union Bank (“PUB”), a $1.2 billion (assets) commercial bank headquartered in Los Angeles that also served primarily the Korean-American community. As of September 30, 2005, the Bank maintained a branch network of 22 full-service locations, serving individuals and small- to medium-sized businesses in California, and three loan production offices in Chicago, Illinois; the San Jose, California metropolitan area; and the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area.

NOTE 2 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements of Hanmi Financial Corporation and subsidiary reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods ended September 30, 2005, but are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be reported for the entire year. In the opinion of management, the aforementioned consolidated financial statements are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The interim information should be read in conjunction with our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Descriptions of our significant accounting policies are included in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain reclassifications were made to the prior period’s presentation to conform to the current period’s presentation.

On January 20, 2005, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split, to be effected in the form of a 100 percent common stock dividend. The new shares were distributed on February 15, 2005 to shareholders of record on the close of business on January 31, 2005. All share and per share amounts for the prior periods have been restated to reflect the stock dividend.

On August 25, 2005, we repurchased 1,163,000 shares of our common stock from Korea Exchange Bank for an aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million as part of our ongoing capital management program. Repurchased shares are held in treasury pending use for general corporate purposes, including issuances under our employee stock option plan.

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(UNAUDITED)

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004(Continued)

NOTE 3 — EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Our employee stock-based compensation arrangements are measured under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock awards is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock at the date of grant over the exercise price an employee must pay to acquire the stock. No compensation expense has been recognized for the stock option plan, as stock options were granted at fair value at the date of grant. Had compensation expense for the stock option plan been determined based on the fair values estimated using the Black-Scholes model at the grant dates for previous awards, our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Net Income – As Reported	$	14,969		$	11,069		$	43,339		$	25,000

Add – Stock-Based Employee Compensation Expense Included in Reported Net Income, Net of Related Tax Effects (Restricted Stock Grant)		56			—			353			—

Deduct – Total Stock-Based Employee Compensation Expense Determined Under Fair Value-Based Method for All Awards Subject to SFAS No. 123, Net of Related Tax Effects		(507	)		(196	)		(1,384	)		(406	)


Net Income – Pro Forma	$	14,518		$	10,873		$	42,308		$	24,594


Earnings Per Share – As Reported:
Basic	$	0.30		$	0.23		$	0.88		$	0.63
Diluted	$	0.30		$	0.22		$	0.86		$	0.62

Earnings Per Share – Pro Forma:
Basic	$	0.30		$	0.22		$	0.86		$	0.62
Diluted	$	0.29		$	0.22		$	0.84		$	0.61

In February 2005, 100,000 shares of restricted stock were granted to Dr. Sung Won Sohn, our Chief Executive Officer. 20,000 of these shares vested immediately, and an additional 20,000 shares will vest each year over the next four years on each anniversary date of the grant. The market value of the shares awarded totaled $1.8 million. The 20,000 shares that vested immediately were recorded as compensation expense and the remaining 80,000 shares were recorded as unearned compensation, a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Unearned compensation is being amortized against income over the four-year vesting period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, compensation expense of $91,000 and $575,000, respectively, was recognized in the consolidated statements of income.

NOTE 4 — EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated on both a basic and a diluted basis. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings, excluding common shares in treasury.

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(UNAUDITED)

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004(Continued)

NOTE 4 — EARNINGS PER SHARE(Continued)

The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to derive basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated.


			Weighted-
			Average		Per
	Income		Shares		Share
	(Numerator)		(Denominator)		Amount
	(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended:
September 30, 2005:
Basic EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	14,969		49,144,508	$	0.30
Effect of Dilutive Securities – Options and Warrants		—		769,924		—

Diluted EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	14,969		49,914,432	$	0.30

September 30, 2004:
Basic EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	11,069		48,971,194	$	0.23
Effect of Dilutive Securities – Options and Warrants		—		832,620		(0.01	)

Diluted EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	11,069		49,803,814	$	0.22


Nine Months Ended:
September 30, 2005:
Basic EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	43,339		49,386,112	$	0.88
Effect of Dilutive Securities – Options and Warrants		—		771,094		(0.02	)

Diluted EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	43,339		50,157,206	$	0.86

September 30, 2004:
Basic EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	25,000		39,877,288	$	0.63
Effect of Dilutive Securities – Options and Warrants		—		683,006		(0.01	)

Diluted EPS – Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	25,000		40,560,294	$	0.62

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, there were 45,554 and 60,554 options outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because their exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2004, there were no anti-dilutive options. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, there were 372,500 options outstanding that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS.

NOTE 5 — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

During 2004, to hedge the interest rate risk, the Bank entered into one interest rate swap agreement, wherein the Bank received a fixed rate of 7.29 percent at quarterly intervals, and paid Prime-based floating rates, at quarterly intervals, on a total notional amount of $10.0 million. This swap agreement matures in 2009 and was designated as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes. During 2003, to hedge the interest rate risk, the Bank entered into four interest rate swap agreements, wherein the Bank received fixed rates of 5.77 percent, 6.37 percent, 6.51 percent and 6.76 percent, at quarterly intervals, and paid Prime-based floating rates, at quarterly intervals, on a total notional amount of $60.0 million. All four of the swap agreements mature in 2008. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. As of September 30, 2005, the total notional amount of interest rate swaps was $70.0 million.

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(UNAUDITED)

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004(Continued)

NOTE 5 — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS(Continued)

As of September 30, 2005, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was in an unfavorable position of $1.8 million. A total of ($1.1 million), net of tax, was included in Other Comprehensive Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. No income or expense related to hedge ineffectiveness was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

In 2004, the Bank offered a certificate of deposit (“CD”) product that paid interest tied to the movement in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. The economic characteristics and risks of the embedded option were not clearly and closely related to the CD. Therefore, the embedded option was separated from the CD and accounted for separately in liabilities. As of September 30, 2005, the fair value of the embedded option was $1,284,000, and the change in the liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $112,000. The change was recognized in earnings.

To economically hedge the interest risk described above, the Bank entered into an agreement to purchase an equity swap. As of September 30, 2005, the fair value of the equity swap was $84,000, and the change recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was ($115,000).

In 2005, the Bank offered a CD product that pays interest based on the increase in the weighted-average value of five Asian currencies (Korean Won, Singapore Dollar, Taiwan Dollar, Thai Baht and Chinese Yuan) against the U.S. Dollar plus 0.25% annual interest. The economic characteristics and risks of the embedded option were not clearly and closely related to the CD. Therefore, the embedded option was separated from the CD and accounted for separately in liabilities. As of September 30, 2005, the fair value of the embedded option was $18,000, and the change in the liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $402,000. The change was recognized in earnings.

To economically hedge the interest risk described above, the Bank entered into an agreement to purchase a currency swap. As of September 30, 2005, the fair value of the currency swap was ($224,000), and the change recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was ($182,000).

NOTE 6 — OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As part of the Bank’s services to small- and medium-sized business customers, the Bank issues formal loan commitments and letters of credit. These commitments can be either secured or unsecured. They may be in the form of revolving lines of credit for seasonal working capital needs or may take the form of commercial letters of credit or standby letters of credit. Commercial letters of credit facilitate import trade. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

The following table shows the distribution of the Hanmi Bank’s undisbursed loan commitments and letters of credit as of the dates indicated.


	September 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004
	(In Thousands)
Commitments to Extend Credit	$	525,638	$	367,708
Standby Letters of Credit		41,860		47,901
Commercial Letters of Credit		58,763		49,699
Unused Credit Card Lines		14,914		14,324


Total Undisbursed Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit	$	641,175	$	479,632

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(UNAUDITED)

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004(Continued)

NOTE 7 — CURRENT ACCOUNTING MATTERS

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R,“Share-Based Payment”(“SFAS No. 123R”), a revision of SFAS No. 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”SFAS No. 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of the company or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the company’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method that is currently used and requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value-based method and recognized as expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. SFAS No. 123R was to be effective as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2005; however, on April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule that deferred the required adoption date to the beginning of the first quarter of 2006. We have provided pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123 in “Note 3 — Employee Stock-Based Compensation.”

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,“Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.”SFAS No. 154 replaces Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 20,“Accounting Changes,”and FASB Statement No. 3,“Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements (an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28).”SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed by SFAS No. 154. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2005. We will adopt this pronouncement beginning in fiscal year 2006. SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In March of 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached consensus on the guidance provided in EITF Issue No. 03-1,“The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments.”Among other investments, this guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within the scope of Statement No. 115,“Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”Paragraph 10 of EITF 03-1 specifies that an impairment would be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. A company’s liquidity and capital requirements should be considered when assessing its intent and ability to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time that would allow the fair value of the investment to recover up to or beyond its cost. A pattern of selling investments prior to the forecasted fair value recovery may call into question a company’s intent. In addition, the severity and duration of the impairment should also be considered when determining whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. This guidance was effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004 with the exception of paragraphs 10 — 20 of EITF 03-1, which was to be deliberated further.

Subsequently, the FASB decided not to provide additional guidance on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment, but directed the staff to issue proposed FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-1a,“Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1,”as final. The final FSP (retitled FSP FAS 115-1,“The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”) will replace the guidance set forth in paragraphs 10-18 of Issue 03-1. FSP FAS 115-1 will clarify that an investor should recognize an impairment loss no later than when the impairment is deemed other than temporary, even if a decision to sell has not been made. The Board decided that FSP FAS 115-1 would be effective for other-than-temporary impairment analysis conducted in periods beginning after September 15, 2005. FSP FAS 115-1 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the major factors that influenced our results of operations and financial condition for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. This analysis should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in this Report.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We have established various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Certain accounting policies require us to make significant estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions that could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and our results of operations for the reporting periods. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

We believe establishing the allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items, such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, are critical accounting policies that require significant estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the preparation of our financial statements. See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition — Financial Condition — Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items” for a description of the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the application of SFAS No. 141,“Business Combinations,”to the purchase of Pacific Union Bank (“PUB”) required significant estimates and assumptions. We engaged outside experts including appraisers to assist in estimating the fair values of certain assets acquired, particularly the loan portfolio, core deposit intangible asset and fixed assets. The fair values of financial assets, including the investments portfolio, deposits and borrowings, were estimated by the Bank, using market data regarding securities market prices and interest rates. We also evaluated long-lived assets for impairment and recorded any necessary adjustments. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3,“Recognition of Liabilities in Connection With a Purchase Business Combination,”we recognized liabilities assumed for costs to involuntarily terminate employees of PUB and costs to exit activities of PUB under an exit plan approved by Hanmi Bank’s board of directors.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables sets forth certain selected financial data for the periods indicated.


	As of and for the
	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands,
	Except Per Share Data)
Average Balances:
Average Gross Loans, Net of Deferred Loan fees	$	2,456,033		$	2,269,477
Average Interest-Earning Assets		2,913,198			2,739,222
Average Total Assets		3,299,551			3,119,083
Average Deposits		2,650,581			2,438,223
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities		2,075,091			1,964,657
Average Shareholders’ Equity		427,535			379,028
Average Tangible Equity⁽¹⁾		208,729			157,169

Selected Performance Ratios:
Return on Average Total Assets^{(2) (3)}		1.80	%		1.41	%
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity^{(2) (4)}		13.89	%		11.62	%
Return on Average Tangible Equity^{(2) (5)}		28.45	%		28.02	%
Net Interest Margin⁽⁶⁾		4.75	%		4.38	%
Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Total Assets		12.96	%		12.15	%
Efficiency Ratio⁽⁷⁾		38.34	%		51.12	%
Dividend Payout Ratio⁽⁸⁾		16.67	%		21.74	%

Selected Capital Ratios:⁽⁹⁾
Tier 1 Capital to Average Total Assets:
Hanmi Financial		11.55	%		11.43	%
Hanmi Bank		11.49	%		11.51	%
Tier 1 Capital to Total Risk-Weighted Assets:
Hanmi Financial		10.55	%		10.42	%
Hanmi Bank		10.48	%		10.49	%
Total Capital to Total Risk-Weighted Assets:
Hanmi Financial		9.07	%		8.48	%
Hanmi Bank		9.01	%		8.49	%
Book Value Per Share^{(10) (11)}	$	8.56		$	8.15

Selected Asset Quality Ratios:
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Average Total Gross Loans⁽¹²⁾		0.10	%		0.25	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Gross Loans at End of Period		0.99	%		0.98	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Performing Loans		310.73	%		368.31	%
Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets⁽¹³⁾		0.23	%		0.22	%


⁽¹⁾		Average tangible equity is calculated by subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit intangible assets from average shareholders’ equity.

⁽²⁾		Calculation based upon annualized net income.

⁽³⁾		Net income divided by average total assets.

⁽⁴⁾		Net income divided by average shareholders’ equity.

⁽⁵⁾		Net income divided by average tangible equity.

⁽⁶⁾		Net interest income before provision for credit losses as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

⁽⁷⁾		Ratio of total non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income before provision for credit losses and total non-interest income including securities gains and losses.

⁽⁸⁾		Dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.

⁽⁹⁾		The required ratios for a “well-capitalized” institution, as defined by regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, are 5 percent leverage capital, 6 percent Tier 1 risk-based capital and 10 percent total risk-based capital.

⁽¹⁰⁾		2004 book value per share has been restated for a 100 percent stock dividend declared in January 2005.

⁽¹¹⁾		Shareholders’ equity divided by common shares outstanding.

⁽¹²⁾		Calculation based upon annualized net loan charge-offs.

⁽¹³⁾		Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans (non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more and restructured loans where the terms of repayment have been renegotiated and resulted in a reduction or deferral of interest or principal) and other real estate owned.


	As of and for the
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Average Balances:
Average Gross Loans, Net of Deferred Loan Fees	$	2,344,123		$	1,821,496
Average Interest-Earning Assets		2,815,192			2,272,567
Average Total Assets		3,191,373			2,524,788
Average Deposits		2,571,380			2,017,851
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities		1,988,038			1,599,515
Average Shareholders’ Equity		416,737			259,345
Average Tangible Equity⁽¹⁾		197,060			109,294

Selected Performance Ratios:
Return on Average Total Assets^{(2) (3)}		1.82	%		1.33	%
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity^{(2) (4)}		13.90	%		12.92	%
Return on Average Tangible Equity^{(2) (5)}		29.40	%		30.67	%
Net Interest Margin⁽⁶⁾		4.78	%		4.15	%
Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Total Assets		13.06	%		10.27	%
Efficiency Ratio⁽⁷⁾		40.88	%		52.43	%
Dividend Payout Ratio⁽⁸⁾		17.05	%		23.81	%


⁽¹⁾		Average tangible equity is calculated by subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit intangible assets from average shareholders’ equity.

⁽²⁾		Calculation based upon annualized net income.

⁽³⁾		Net income divided by average total assets.

⁽⁴⁾		Net income divided by average shareholders’ equity.

⁽⁵⁾		Net income divided by average tangible equity.

⁽⁶⁾		Net interest income before provision for credit losses as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

⁽⁷⁾		Ratio of total non-interest expenses (excluding the reversal of merger-related expenses totaling $509,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005) to the sum of net interest income before provision for credit losses and total non-interest income including securities gains and losses.

⁽⁸⁾		Dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements under “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statement. For additional information concerning these factors, see our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005 under the headings “Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations,” “Interest Rate Risk Management” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” These forward-looking statements should not be relied on as representing our view as of any subsequent date and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

On April 30, 2004, we completed the merger with Pacific Union Bank (“PUB”). As a result, operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 include only five months of results following the merger with PUB. Operating results reflect the resulting increase in average total assets from $2.52 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $3.19 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

For the three months ended September 30, 2005, net income was $15.0 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, compared to $11.1 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The 35.2 percent increase in net income for 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily due to an increase of 37 basis points in the net interest margin and an increase in gain on sales of loans held for sale. Net interest income before provision for credit losses increased $5.0 million, or 16.9 percent, due to ongoing growth in the loan portfolio. Non-interest income increased by $2.1 million, or 29.3 percent, due to a $1.4 million increase in gain on sales of loans held for sale and a $0.6 million increase in other service charges and fees. Non-interest expenses decreased by $2.0 million, or 10.5 percent, due to expense reductions after the acquisition of PUB. The annualized return on average total assets was 1.80 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to an annualized return on average total assets of 1.41 percent for the same period of 2004, an increase of 39 basis points. The annualized return on average shareholders’ equity was 13.89 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2005, and the annualized return on average tangible equity was 28.45 percent, compared to 11.62 percent and 28.02 percent, respectively, for the same period in 2004.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, net income was $43.3 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, compared to $25.0 million, or $0.62 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The 73.4 percent increase in net income for 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily due to an increase of 63 basis points in the net interest margin, the acquisition of PUB and asset growth subsequent to the acquisition of PUB. Net interest income before provision for credit losses increased $30.0 million, or 42.5 percent, due to ongoing growth in the loan portfolio as well as the newly acquired interest-earning assets from PUB. Non-interest income increased by $5.2 million, or 27.0 percent, mainly due to increases in service charges on deposit accounts and other service charges and fees. Non-interest expenses increased by $3.5 million, or 7.4 percent, due to the additional salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, data processing and core deposit intangible amortization expenses incurred following the merger, offset by decreased merger-related expenses. The annualized return on average total assets was 1.82 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to an annualized return on average total assets of 1.33 percent for the same period of 2004, an increase of 49 basis points. The annualized return on average shareholders’ equity was 13.90 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, and the annualized return on average tangible equity was 29.40 percent, compared to 12.92 percent and 30.67 percent, respectively, for the same period in 2004.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Return on average tangible equity is supplemental financial information determined by a method other than in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). This non-GAAP measure is used by management in the analysis of Hanmi Financial’s performance. Average tangible equity is calculated by subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit intangible assets from average shareholders’ equity. Banking and financial institution regulators also exclude goodwill and intangibles from shareholders’ equity when assessing the capital adequacy of a financial institution. Management believes the presentation of this financial measure excluding the impact of these items provides useful supplemental information that is essential to a proper understanding of the financial results of Hanmi Financial, as it provides a method to assess management’s success in utilizing tangible capital. This disclosure should not be viewed as a substitution for results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

The following table reconciles this non-GAAP performance measure to the GAAP performance measure for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Average Shareholders’ Equity	$	427,535		$	379,028		$	416,737		$	259,345
Less Average Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible Asset		(218,806	)		(221,859	)		(219,677	)		(150,051	)

Average Tangible Equity	$	208,729		$	157,169		$	197,060		$	109,294


Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity		13.89	%		11.62	%		13.90	%		12.92	%
Effect of Average Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible Asset		14.56	%		16.40	%		15.50	%		17.75	%

Return on Average Tangible Equity		28.45	%		28.02	%		29.40	%		30.67	%

Net Interest Income Before Provision for Credit Losses

Our earnings depend largely upon the difference between the interest income received from the loan portfolio and other interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The difference is “net interest income.” Net interest income, when expressed as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets, is referred to as the net interest margin. Net interest income is affected by the change in the level and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as volume changes. Net interest income is also affected by changes in the yields earned on assets and rates paid on liabilities, referred to as rate changes. Interest rates charged on loans are affected principally by the demand for such loans, the supply of money available for lending purposes and competitive factors. Those factors are, in turn, affected by general economic conditions and other factors beyond our control, such as Federal economic policies, the general supply of money in the economy, income tax policies, governmental budgetary matters and the actions of the Federal Reserve Bank.

For the three months ended September 30, 2005, net interest income before provision for credit losses was $34.8 million. This represented an increase of $5.0 million, or 16.9 percent, over net interest income before provision for credit losses of $29.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The interest rate spread decreased to 3.82 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from 3.84 percent for the same period in 2004. The change was mainly due to an increase in rates paid on deposits as the result of competitive pricing pressure, which offset an increase in rates received on loans and investments as our prime rate and The Wall Street Journal prime rate both increased by a total of 50 basis points during the third quarter of 2005. Approximately 82.7 percent of our loan portfolio is tied to The Wall Street Journal prime rate or our prime rate. We also emphasized spread income and disposed of certain low yielding assets in the first and second quarters of 2004 and reinvested the proceeds from the amortization of our investment portfolio into loan production. Average loans outstanding increased from 82.9 percent of average interest-earning assets in the third quarter of 2004 to 84.3 percent of average interest-earning assets in the third quarter of 2005. The net interest margin also increased by 37 basis points to 4.75 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from 4.38 percent for the same period in 2004, due to an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets with higher interest rates.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, net interest income before provision for credit losses was $100.6 million. This represented an increase of $30.0 million, or 42.5 percent, over net interest income before provision for credit losses of $70.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The interest rate spread increased to 3.96 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from 3.61 percent for the same period in 2004. The change was mainly due to an increase in rates received on loans and investments as we increased our prime rate by a total of 150 basis points during the first nine months of 2005. We also emphasized spread income and disposed of certain low yielding assets in the first and second quarters of 2004 and reinvested the proceeds from the amortization of our investment portfolio into loan production. Average loans outstanding increased from 80.2 percent of average interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to 83.3 percent of average interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The net interest margin also increased by 63 basis points to 4.78 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from 4.15 percent for the same period in 2004, due to an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets with higher interest rates.

Total interest income increased $12.6 million, or 32.2 percent, to $51.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from $39.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The increase was the result of an increase of 130 basis points in the yield on average interest-earning assets and an increase in average interest-earning assets of $174.0 million, or 6.4 percent, to $2.91 billion, compared to $2.74 billion a year ago.

Total interest income increased $49.7 million, or 53.7 percent, to $142.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from $92.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase was the result of an increase of 132 basis points in the yield on average interest-earning assets and an increase in average interest-earning assets of $542.6 million, or 23.9 percent, to $2.82 billion, compared to $2.27 billion a year ago.

Total interest expense increased $7.6 million, or 81.4 percent, to $16.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, from $9.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The increase reflects an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities and higher interest rates paid to depositors. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $110.4 million, or 5.6 percent, to $2.08 billion, compared to $1.96 billion a year ago. The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 3.22 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2005, compared to 1.90 percent for the same period in 2004. In addition, the Bank experienced disintermediation as depositors shifted balances from money market accounts into higher yielding certificates of deposit in response to upward movements in market interest rates. Certificates of deposit over $100,000 made up 55.0 percent of interest-bearing deposits at September 30, 2005, compared to 41.7 percent at September 30, 2004.

Total interest expense increased $19.7 million, or 89.9 percent, to $41.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from $21.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase reflects an increase in interest-bearing liabilities and higher interest rates paid to depositors. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $388.5 million, or 24.3 percent, to $1.99 billion, compared to $1.60 billion a year ago. The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 2.80 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to 1.83 percent for the same period in 2004. Disintermediation did not have a significant effect on the change in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2004, as the majority of the shift in the mix of the deposits portfolio occurred in the three months ended September 30, 2005.

The following tables present the average balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity; the amount of interest income or interest expense; the average yield or rate for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the periods indicated. All average balances are daily average balances.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2005								September 30, 2004
				Interest		Average						Interest		Average
	Average			Income/		Yield/			Average			Income/		Yield/
	Balance			Expense		Rate			Balance			Expense		Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Interest-Earning Assets:
Gross Loans, Net of Deferred Loan Fees⁽¹⁾	$	2,456,033		$	47,175		7.62	%	$	2,269,477		$	34,389		6.09	%
Municipal Securities⁽²⁾		75,023			784		6.43	%		71,090			783		6.78	%
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies		99,322			945		3.81	%		96,317			932		3.87	%
Other Debt Securities		233,747			2,368		4.05	%		276,628			2,726		3.94	%
Equity Securities		24,172			177		2.93	%		17,347			232		5.35	%
Federal Funds Sold		24,801			221		3.56	%		8,263			28		1.36	%
Interest-Earning Deposits		100			3		3.45	%		100			1		4.00	%

Total Interest-Earning Assets		2,913,198			51,673		7.04	%		2,739,222			39,091		5.74	%


Noninterest-Earning Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents		99,130								97,317
Allowance for Loan Losses		(21,923	)							(25,074	)
Other Assets		309,146								307,618

Total Noninterest-Earning Assets		386,353								379,861


Total Assets	$	3,299,551							$	3,119,083


Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Money Market Checking	$	498,167			3,125		2.49	%	$	578,278			2,471		1.72	%
Savings		134,923			521		1.53	%		148,943			497		1.34	%
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More		1,019,296			9,188		3.58	%		704,313			2,998		1.71	%
Other Time Deposits		237,857			1,681		2.80	%		259,573			1,368		2.12	%
Other Borrowed Funds		184,848			2,316		4.97	%		273,550			1,942		2.86	%

Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities		2,075,091			16,831		3.22	%		1,964,657			9,276		1.90	%

Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
Demand Deposits		760,338								747,116
Other Liabilities		36,587								28,282

Total Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities		796,925								775,398

Total Liabilities		2,872,016								2,740,055
Shareholders’ Equity		427,535								379,028


Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	3,299,551							$	3,119,083


Net Interest Income				$	34,842							$	29,815


Net Interest Spread⁽³⁾							3.82	%							3.84	%


Net Interest Margin⁽⁴⁾							4.75	%							4.38	%


⁽¹⁾		Loans are net of deferred fees and related direct costs, but excluding the allowance for loan losses. Non-accrual loans are included in the average loan balance. Loan fees have been included in the calculation of interest income. Loan fees were $1.3 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Yields on tax-exempt income have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a rate of 35 percent.

⁽³⁾		Represents the average rate earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾		Represents annualized net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2005								September 30, 2004
				Interest		Average						Interest		Average
	Average			Income/		Yield/			Average			Income/		Yield/
	Balance			Expense		Rate			Balance			Expense		Rate
						(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets

Interest-Earning Assets:
Gross Loans, Net of Deferred Loan Fees⁽¹⁾	$	2,344,123		$	127,900		7.29	%	$	1,821,496		$	79,553		5.83	%
Municipal Securities⁽²⁾		74,101			2,340		6.50	%		69,085			2,229		6.62	%
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies		97,838			2,812		3.83	%		89,918			2,481		3.68	%
Other Debt Securities		243,528			7,723		4.23	%		265,556			7,614		3.82	%
Equity Securities		23,259			780		4.47	%		14,369			566		5.25	%
Federal Funds Sold		32,091			679		2.82	%		11,770			100		1.13	%
Interest-Earning Deposits		252			4		2.12	%		373			4		1.43	%

Total Interest-Earning Assets		2,815,192			142,238		6.76	%		2,272,567			92,547		5.44	%


Noninterest-Earning Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents		91,237								84,717
Allowance for Loan Losses		(22,305	)							(21,227	)
Other Assets		307,249								188,731

Total Noninterest-Earning Assets		376,181								252,221


Total Assets	$	3,191,373							$	2,524,788


Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Money Market Checking	$	542,858			9,218		2.27	%	$	423,816			5,201		1.64	%
Savings		142,988			1,625		1.52	%		124,551			1,219		1.31	%
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More		898,059			20,797		3.10	%		572,768			7,300		1.70	%
Other Time Deposits		232,838			4,171		2.40	%		253,152			3,806		2.01	%
Other Borrowed Funds		171,295			5,829		4.55	%		225,228			4,404		2.61	%

Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities		1,988,038			41,640		2.80	%		1,599,515			21,930		1.83	%


Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
Demand Deposits		754,637								643,564
Other Liabilities		31,961								22,364

Total Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities		786,598								665,928


Total Liabilities		2,744,636								2,265,443

Shareholders’ Equity		416,737								259,345


Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	3,191,373							$	2,524,788


Net Interest Income				$	100,598							$	70,617


Net Interest Spread⁽³⁾							3.96	%							3.61	%


Net Interest Margin⁽⁴⁾							4.78	%							4.15	%


⁽¹⁾		Loans are net of deferred fees and related direct costs, but excluding the allowance for loan losses. Non-accrual loans are included in the average loan balance. Loan fees have been included in the calculation of interest income. Loan fees were $4.3 million and $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.


⁽²⁾		Yields on tax-exempt income have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a rate of 35 percent.


⁽³⁾		Represents the average rate earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.


⁽⁴⁾		Represents annualized net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

The following tables show changes in interest income and interest expense and the amounts attributable to variations in interest rates and volumes for the periods indicated. The variances attributable to simultaneous volume and rate changes have been allocated to the change due to volume and the change due to rate categories in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount attributable solely to the change in volume and to the change in rate.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2005 vs. 2004
	Increases (Decreases)
	Due to Change in
	Volume			Rate			Total
	(In Thousands)
Interest Income:
Gross Loans, Net of Deferred Loan Fees	$	2,927		$	9,859		$	12,786
Municipal Securities		38			(37	)		1
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies		29			(16	)		13
Other Debt Securities		(439	)		81			(358	)
Equity Securities		72			(127	)		(55	)
Federal Funds Sold		109			84			193
Interest-Earning Deposits		1			1			2

Total Interest Income		2,737			9,845			12,582


Interest Expense:
Money Market Checking		(392	)		1,046			654
Savings		(53	)		77			24
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More		1,778			4,412			6,190
Other Time Deposits		(127	)		440			313
Other Borrowed Funds		(790	)		1,164			374

Total Interest Expense		416			7,139			7,555


Change in Net Interest Income	$	2,321		$	2,706		$	5,027


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2005 vs. 2004
	Increases (Decreases)
	Due to Change in
	Volume			Rate			Total
	(In Thousands)
Interest Income:
Gross Loans, Net of Deferred Loan Fees	$	25,894		$	22,453		$	48,347
Municipal Securities		162			(51	)		111
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies		223			108			331
Other Debt Securities		(660	)		769			109
Equity Securities		306			(92	)		214
Federal Funds Sold		309			270			579
Interest-Earning Deposits		(1	)		1			—

Total Interest Income		26,233			23,458			49,691


Interest Expense:
Money Market Checking		1,699			2,318			4,017
Savings		194			212			406
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More		5,534			7,963			13,497
Other Time Deposits		(321	)		686			365
Other Borrowed Funds		(1,244	)		2,669			1,425

Total Interest Expense		5,862			13,848			19,710


Change in Net Interest Income	$	20,371		$	9,610		$	29,981

Provision for Credit Losses

Provisions to the allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items, such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, are made at least quarterly, in anticipation of probable loan losses. The provision is based on the allowance need, which is calculated using a formula designed to provide adequate allowances for anticipated losses. See “Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items” section below for further discussion on methodologies used to determine the allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items.

For the three months ended September 30, 2005, the provision for credit losses was $3.2 million, compared to $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The increase in provision for credit losses is attributable to specific provisions associated with an increase of $1.9 million in non-accrual loans in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the prior quarter and an increase in the general provision requirements caused by the migration of risk ratings, particularly with respect to non-accrual loans. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, net charge-offs were $595,000, compared to $1.0 million net charge-offs in the second quarter of 2005 and $1.5 million net charge-offs in the third quarter of 2004. The level of non-performing loans increased from $6.0 million at December 31, 2004 to $7.9 million at September 30, 2005, an increase of $1.9 million, or 31.2 percent.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the provision for credit losses was $3.7 million, compared to $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 113.9 percent. The increase in provision for credit losses is attributable to specific provisions associated with an increase of $1.8 million in certain non-accrual loans in the third quarter of 2005 and an increase in the general provision requirements caused by the migration of risk ratings, particularly with respect to non-accrual loans. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, net charge-offs were $1.7 million, compared to $3.1 million net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.

Non-Interest Income

The following tables set forth the various components of non-interest income for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2005		2004			Amount			Percentage
			(Dollars in Thousands)
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	$	4,059	$	4,197		$	(138	)		(3.3	%)
Trade Finance Fees		1,162		1,253			(91	)		(7.3	%)
Other Service Charges and Fees		959		383			576			150.4	%
Remittance Fees		527		456			71			15.6	%
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income		215		216			(1	)		(0.5	%)
Increase in Fair Value of Derivatives		176		(4	)		180			N/M
Other Income		648		364			284			78.0	%
Gain on Sales of Loans Held for Sale		1,712		352			1,360			386.4	%
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale		21		115			(94	)		(81.7	%)

Total Non-Interest Income	$	9,479	$	7,332		$	2,147			29.3	%


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2005		2004			Amount			Percentage
			(Dollars in Thousands)
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	$	11,657	$	10,388		$	1,269			12.2	%
Trade Finance Fees		3,143		3,088			55			1.8	%
Other Service Charges and Fees		2,478		1,204			1,274			105.8	%
Remittance Fees		1,545		1,149			396			34.5	%
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income		630		513			117			22.8	%
Increase in Fair Value of Derivatives		965		19			946			N/M
Other Income		1,823		1,105			718			65.0	%
Gain on Sales of Loans Held for Sale		2,076		1,654			422			25.5	%
Gain on Sales of Securities Available for Sale		117		124			(7	)		(5.6	%)

Total Non-Interest Income	$	24,434	$	19,244		$	5,190			27.0	%

Non-interest income is earned from three major sources: service charges on deposit accounts, fees generated from international trade finance and gain on sales of loans held for sale. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, non-interest income was $9.5 million and $24.4 million, respectively, an increase of $2.1 million, or 29.3 percent, and $5.2 million, or 27.0 percent, respectively, from $7.3 million and $19.2 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. The overall increase in non-interest income is due to the higher deposit volume and number of accounts resulting from the PUB merger, which closed on April 30, 2004, and an increase in gain on sales of loans held for sale.

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased by $138,000, or 3.3 percent, and increased by $1.3 million, or 12.2 percent, respectively, from $4.2 million and $10.4 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $4.1 million and $11.7 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. Average deposits increased by $212.4 million, or 8.7 percent, and $553.5 million, or 27.4 percent, respectively, from $2.44 billion and $2.02 billion, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $2.65 billion and $2.57 billion, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. Service charges are reviewed on an ongoing basis to maximize service charge income while still maintaining a competitive position.

Other service charges and fees increased by $576,000, or 150.4 percent, and $1.3 million, or 105.8 percent, respectively, from $383.000 and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $959,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increases were primarily due to an increase in income from documentation fees and prepayment penalties.

The change in the fair value of derivatives increased by $180,000 and $946,000, respectively, from ($4,000) and $19,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $176,000 and $965,000, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. This change was caused by an increase in the value of swaps used to economically hedge certificate of deposit interest that is tied to movements in the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index and a basket of Asian currencies. The increase is attributable to changes in five-year fixed interest rates, which the Bank pays in exchange for fluctuations in the value of the S&P 500 Index.

Gain on sales of loans held for sale increased by $1.4 million, or 386.4 percent, and $422,000, or 25.5 percent, respectively, from $352,000 and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $1.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in gain on sales of loans held for sale resulted from an increase in SBA loans sold. The guaranteed portion of certain SBA loans is sold in the secondary markets with servicing rights retained.

Other income increased by $284,000, or 78.0 percent, and $718,000, or 65.0 percent, respectively, from $364,000 and $1,105,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $648,000 and $1.8 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in other income was due to increases in amortization of net deferred income on SBA loans sold, credit card fee income and sales commissions from mutual funds and insurance products.

Non-Interest Expenses

The following tables set forth the breakdown of non-interest expenses for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2005			2004		Amount			Percentage
				(Dollars in Thousands)
Salaries and Employee Benefits	$	9,155		$	9,505	$	(350	)		(3.7	%)
Occupancy and Equipment		2,179			2,299		(120	)		(5.2	%)
Data Processing		1,253			1,442		(189	)		(13.1	%)
Advertising and Promotion		726			630		96			15.2	%
Amortization of Core Deposit Intangible		694			686		8			1.2	%
Supplies and Communications		559			981		(422	)		(43.0	%)
Professional Fees		393			600		(207	)		(34.5	%)
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded Option		173			—		173			—
Merger-Related Expenses		—			325		(325	)		(100.0	%)
Other Operating Expenses		1,859			2,521		(662	)		(26.3	%)

Total Non-Interest Expenses	$	16,991		$	18,989	$	(1,998	)		(10.5	%)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2005			2004		Amount			Percentage
				(Dollars in Thousands)
Salaries and Employee Benefits	$	26,867		$	23,079	$	3,788			16.4	%
Occupancy and Equipment		6,581			5,816		765			13.2	%
Data Processing		3,663			3,326		337			10.1	%
Advertising and Promotion		1,983			2,053		(70	)		(3.4	%)
Amortization of Core Deposit Intangible		2,140			1,185		955			80.6	%
Supplies and Communications		1,867			1,959		(92	)		(4.7	%)
Professional Fees		1,432			1,483		(51	)		(3.4	%)
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded Option		748			—		748			—
Merger-Related Expenses		(509	)		2,053		(2,562	)		(124.8	%)
Other Operating Expenses		5,836			6,161		(325	)		(5.3	%)

Total Non-Interest Expenses	$	50,608		$	47,115	$	3,493			7.4	%

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, non-interest expenses were $17.0 million and $50.6 million, respectively, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 10.5 percent, and an increase of $3.5 million, or 7.4 percent, respectively, from $19.0 million and $47.1 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. On a year-to-date basis, these fluctuations were primarily due to the increased cost structure associated with the merger with PUB. On a quarterly basis, these fluctuations reflect the operating efficiencies achieved as a result of the merger.

Salaries and employee benefits expenses decreased by $350,000, or 3.7 percent, and increased by $3.8 million, or 16.4 percent, respectively, from $9.5 million and $23.1 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $9.2 million and $26.9 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, the average number of employees decreased by 37, or 6.5 percent, to 533, compared to 570 for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was due to the increase in the number of employees following the acquisition of PUB and an increase in bonus accruals of $1.8 million.

Occupancy and equipment expenses decreased by $120,000, or 5.2 percent, and increased by $765,000, or 13.2 percent, respectively, from $2.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $2.2 million and $6.6 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. This increase was due to the acquisition of twelve former PUB branches as of April 30, 2004 and the subsequent closure of four branches in October 2004 and one additional branch closure in January 2005.

Data processing expense decreased by $189,000, or 13.1 percent, and increased by $337,000, or 10.1 percent, respectively, from $1.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $1.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2005 was due to costs incurred through August 2004 to operate duplicate data processing systems following the merger with PUB and the cost to convert to a common system. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the additional expense was incurred mainly due to an increase in loan and deposits volume related to the acquisition.

Supplies and communications expense decreased by $422,000, or 43.0 percent, and $92,000, or 4.7 percent, respectively, from $981,000 and $2.0 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $559,000 and $1.9 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2005 was due to one-time costs incurred immediately following the merger with PUB.

Core deposit premium amortization increased by $8,000, or 1.2 percent, and $955,000, or 80.6 percent, respectively, from $686,000 and $1,185,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $694,000 and $2.1 million, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase is attributable to the core deposits acquired in the merger with PUB.

The decrease in fair value of embedded option associated with the Bank’s CD products that are linked to the S&P 500 and a basket of Asian currencies was $173,000 and $748,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. There was no associated expense in 2004.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, merger-related expenses were a credit of $509,000, compared to $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a decrease of 124.8 percent. The $509,000 credit in merger-related expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was due to the reversal of restructuring reserves that were no longer needed.

Provision for Income Taxes

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, we recognized provisions for income taxes of $9.2 million and $27.3 million, respectively, on net income before tax of $24.2 million and $70.7 million, respectively, representing an effective tax rate of 38.1 percent and 38.7 percent, respectively. The tax rate for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 was 39.0 percent. In the third quarter of 2005, we recognized certain affordable housing investment and Enterprise Zone tax credits, which reduced our effective tax rate by 0.7 percent.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Summary of Changes in Balance Sheets — September 30, 2005 Compared to December 31, 2004

As of September 30, 2005, total assets were $3.37 billion, an increase of $264.2 million, or 8.5 percent, from the December 31, 2004 balance of $3.10 billion. The increase in assets was mainly funded by deposits, which increased by $218.0 million, or 8.6 percent, to $2.75 billion at September 30, 2005 from $2.53 billion at December 31, 2004, and additional borrowings, which increased by $17.6 million, or 25.5 percent, to $86.9 million at September 30, 2005 from $69.3 million at December 31, 2004. Loans increased by $224.1 million, or 10.0 percent, to $2.46 billion at September 30, 2005 from $2.23 billion at December 31, 2004. Investment securities decreased $20.7 million, or 4.9 percent, to $398.3 million at September 30, 2005 from $419.0 million at December 31, 2004.

Investment Securities

Securities are classified as held to maturity or available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115,“Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”Those securities that we have the ability and intent to hold to maturity are classified as “securities held to maturity.” All other securities are classified as “available for sale.” There were no trading securities at September 30, 2005. Securities classified as held to maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and securities available for sale are stated at fair value. The securities currently held consist primarily of U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and municipal bonds.

As of September 30, 2005, securities held to maturity totaled $1.1 million and securities available for sale totaled $397.2 million, compared to $1.1 million and $417.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004.


	September 30, 2005							December 31, 2004
					Unrealized							Unrealized
	Amortized		Fair		Gain			Amortized		Fair		Gain
	Cost		Value		(Loss)			Cost		Value		(Loss)
	(In Thousands)
Held to Maturity:
Municipal Bonds	$	692	$	692	$	—		$	691	$	691	$	—
Mortgage-Backed Securities		363		367		4			399		402		3

Total Held to Maturity	$	1,055	$	1,059	$	4		$	1,090	$	1,093	$	3


Available for Sale:
Mortgage-Backed Securities	$	130,863	$	129,588	$	(1,275	)	$	148,706	$	149,174	$	468
U.S. Government Agency Securities		104,560		103,283		(1,277	)		89,345		89,677		332
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations		78,632		77,284		(1,348	)		93,172		92,539		(633	)
Municipal Bonds		71,665		73,793		2,128			71,771		73,616		1,845
Corporate Bonds		8,271		8,235		(36	)		8,380		8,444		64
Other Securities		4,999		5,036		37			4,437		4,433		(4	)

Total Available for Sale	$	398,990	$	397,219	$	(1,771	)	$	415,811	$	417,883	$	2,072

All individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer at September 30, 2005 had investment grade ratings upon purchase. The issuers of these securities have not, to our knowledge, established any cause for default on these securities, and the various rating agencies have reaffirmed these securities’ long-term investment grade status at September 30, 2005. These securities have fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market interest rates have fluctuated. However, the Company has the ability, and management intends, to hold these securities until their fair values recover to cost. Therefore, in management’s opinion, all securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the past 12 months or longer as of September 30, 2005 are not other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, no impairment charges as of September 30, 2005 are warranted.

The following table summarizes the maturity and/or repricing schedule for investment securities and their weighted-average yield as of September 30, 2005:


				After One			After Five
	Within			But Within			But Within			After
	One Year			Five Years			Ten Years			Ten Years
	Amount		Yield	Amount		Yield	Amount		Yield	Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Mortgage-Backed Securities⁽¹⁾	$	54,464	3.82%	$	38,437	4.26%	$	32,103	4.31%	$	4,947	5.04%
Obligations of Other U.S. Government Agencies		14,853	2.74%		88,430	3.92%		—	—		—	—
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations⁽¹⁾		16,079	2.93%		56,569	3.69%		4,636	3.86%		—	—
Obligations of State and Local Political Subdivisions⁽²⁾		386	7.53%		1,423	4.94%		7,151	6.01%		65,525	6.20%
Corporate Bonds		—	—		8,235	4.29%		—	—		—	—
Other Securities		5,036	6.54%		—	—		—	—		—	—

	$	90,818	3.65%	$	193,094	3.94%	$	43,890	4.54%	$	70,472	6.12%


⁽¹⁾		Collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities have contractual maturities through 2034. The above table is based on the expected prepayment schedule.

⁽²⁾		The yield on obligations of state and local political subdivisions has been computed on a tax-equivalent basis, using an effective marginal rate of 32 percent.

Loan Portfolio

All loans are carried at face amount, less principal repayments collected, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on all loans is accrued daily on a simple interest basis. Once a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinued and previously accrued interest is reversed. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal and interest on a loan is past due 90 days or more, unless a loan is both well secured and in the process of collection.

The following table shows the loan composition by type, including loans held for sale, as of the dates indicated.


	September 30,			December 31,			Increase (Decrease)
	2005			2004			Amount			Percentage
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
Commercial Property	$	742,449		$	783,539		$	(41,090	)		(5.2	%)
Construction		137,994			92,521			45,473			49.1	%
Residential Property⁽¹⁾		86,582			80,786			5,796			7.2	%

Total Real Estate Loans		967,025			956,846			10,179			1.1	%


Commercial and Industrial Loans:
Commercial Term Loans		932,954			754,108			178,846			23.7	%
Commercial Lines of Credit		223,463			201,940			21,523			10.7	%
SBA Loans⁽²⁾		163,142			166,285			(3,143	)		(1.9	%)
International Loans		109,149			95,936			13,213			13.8	%

Total Commercial and Industrial Loans		1,428,708			1,218,269			210,439			17.3	%


Consumer Loans		91,799			87,526			4,273			4.9	%


Total Loans — Gross		2,487,532			2,262,641			224,891			9.9	%

Deferred Loan Fees		(4,061	)		(5,097	)		1,036			(20.3	%)
Allowance for Loan Losses		(24,523	)		(22,702	)		(1,821	)		8.0	%


Net Loans Receivable	$	2,458,948		$	2,234,842		$	224,106			10.0	%


⁽¹⁾		Amount includes mortgage loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market, of $375,000 and $0 at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Amount includes SBA loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market, of $0 and $3.9 million at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, loans, net of deferred loan fees and allowance for loan losses, totaled $2.46 billion and $2.23 billion, respectively. Real estate loans, comprising commercial property, residential property and construction loans, increased $10.2 million, or 1.1 percent, to $967.0 million at September 30, 2005 from $956.8 million at December 31, 2004. The slight increase in the real estate loan portfolio reflects management’s emphasis on controlling exposure to concentrations in commercial real estate loans.

Total commercial and industrial loans, composed of commercial term loans and lines of credit, trade financing and SBA loans, were $1.43 billion at September 30, 2005, which represented an increase of $210.4 million, or 17.3 percent, from $1.22 billion at December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to growth in commercial term loans and commercial lines of credit.

Consumer loans increased $4.3 million, or 4.9 percent, to $91.8 million at September 30, 2005 from $87.5 million at December 31, 2004.

As of September 30, 2005, there were $260.3 million of loans outstanding, or 10.46 percent of total gross loans outstanding, to borrowers who were involved in the accommodation industry. There was no other concentration of loans to any one type of industry exceeding 10 percent of total gross loans.

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets consist of loans on non-accrual status, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, loans restructured where the terms of repayment have been renegotiated resulting in a reduction or deferral of interest or principal, and other real estate owned (“OREO”). Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days past due unless management believes the loan is adequately collateralized and in the process of collection. Loans may be restructured by management when a borrower has experienced some change in financial status, causing an inability to meet the original repayment terms, and where we believe the borrower eventually will overcome those circumstances and repay the loan in full. OREO consists of properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means that management intends to offer for sale.

Management’s classification of a loan as non-accrual is an indication that there is reasonable doubt as to the full collectibility of principal or interest on the loan; at this point, we stop recognizing income from the interest on the loan and reverse any uncollected interest that had been accrued but unpaid. These loans may or may not be collateralized, but collection efforts are continuously pursued.

The table below shows the composition of non-performing assets as of the dates indicated.


	September 30,		December 31,		Increase/(Decrease)
	2005		2004		Amount		Percentage
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-Accrual Loans	$	7,622	$	5,806	$	1,816		31.3	%
Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing		270		208		62		29.8	%

Total Non-Performing Loans		7,892		6,014		1,878		31.2	%
Other Real Estate Owned		—		—		—		—

Total Non-Performing Assets	$	7,892	$	6,014	$	1,878		31.2	%

At September 30, 2005, accruing loans 90 days past due or more were $270,000, an increase of $62,000 from $208,000 at December 31, 2004. Non-accrual loans were $7.6 million at September 30, 2005, an increase of $1.8 million compared to $5.8 million at December 31, 2004. The increase was due primarily to three loans, totaling $2.2 million, being placed on non-accrual status in the third quarter. We believe that these three loans became non-performing due to the particular circumstances surrounding these loans and do not reflect a widespread decline in credit quality.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items

The allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items, such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, are maintained at levels that management believes are adequate to absorb probable loan losses inherent in various financial instruments. The adequacy of both allowances is determined through periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and other pertinent factors, which are inherently subjective as the process calls for various significant estimates and assumptions. Among other factors, the estimates involve the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows and fair value of collateral on impaired loans, estimated losses on loans based on historical loss experience, various qualitative factors, and uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the various credit portfolios, which may be subject to substantial change.

On a quarterly basis, we utilize a migration analysis model and individual loan review analysis tools as starting points for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items. Our loss migration analysis tracks twelve quarters of loan losses to determine historical loss experience in every classification category (i.e., “pass,” “special mention,” “substandard” and “doubtful”) for each loan type, except for certain consumer loans (automobile, mortgage and credit cards) that are analyzed as homogeneous loan pools. The individual loan review analysis is the other part of the allowance allocation process, applying specific monitoring policies and procedures in analyzing the existing loan portfolios. Further assignments are made based on general and specific economic conditions, as well as performance trends within specific portfolio segments and individual concentrations of credit.

As of September 30, 2005, the allowance for loan losses was $24.5 million, an increase of $1.8 million, or 8.0 percent, compared to $22.7 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in the allowance for loan losses is attributable to specific provisions associated with an increase of $1.8 million in certain non-accrual loans in the third quarter of 2005 and an increase in the general provision requirements caused by the migration of risk ratings, particularly with respect to non-accrual loans. As of September 30, 2005, the allowance for off-balance sheet items was $2.0 million, an increase of $224,000, or 12.4 percent, compared to $1.8 million at December 31, 2004.

The loan loss estimation is based on historical losses, and specific allocations of the allowance are performed on a quarterly basis. Adjustments to allowance allocations for specific segments of the loan portfolio may be made as a result thereof, based on the accuracy of forecasted loss amounts and other loan-related or policy-related issues.

We determine the appropriate overall allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items based on the foregoing analysis, taking into account management’s judgment. This methodology is reviewed on a periodic basis and modified as appropriate. Based on this analysis, including the aforementioned factors, we believe that the allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items are adequate as of September 30, 2005.


	As of and for the
	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	22,049		$	23,608


Charge-Offs		(861	)		(1,608	)
Recoveries on Loans Previously Charged Off		266			150

Net Loan Charge-Offs		(595	)		(1,458	)


Provision Charged to Operating Expenses		3,069			—



Balance at End of Period	$	24,523		$	22,150


Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	1,936		$	1,800
Provision Charged to Operating Expenses		88			—

Balance at End of Period	$	2,024		$	1,800


Ratios:
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Average Total Gross Loans⁽¹⁾		0.10	%		0.25	%
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Total Gross Loans at End of Period⁽¹⁾		0.09	%		0.25	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Average Total Gross Loans		1.00	%		0.97	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Gross Loans at End of Period		0.99	%		0.97	%
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Allowance for Loan Losses⁽¹⁾		9.63	%		26.19	%
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Provision Charged to Operating Expenses		18.85	%		—
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Performing Loans		310.73	%		327.23	%

Balances:
Average Total Gross Loans Outstanding During Period	$	2,460,221		$	2,274,574
Total Gross Loans Outstanding at End of Period	$	2,487,532		$	2,279,062
Non-Performing Loans at End of Period	$	7,892		$	6,769


⁽¹⁾		Net loan charge-offs annualized to calculate the ratios.


	As of and for the
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	22,702		$	13,349

Allowance for Loan Losses – PUB Acquisition		—			10,566

Charge-Offs		(3,842	)		(4,445	)
Recoveries on Loans Previously Charged Off		2,144			1,345

Net Loan Charge-Offs		(1,698	)		(3,100	)


Provision Charged to Operating Expenses		3,519			1,335


Balance at End of Period	$	24,523		$	22,150


Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	1,800		$	1,385
Provision Charged to Operating Expenses		224			415


Balance at End of Period	$	2,024		$	1,800


Ratios:
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Average Total Gross Loans⁽¹⁾		0.10	%		0.23	%
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Total Gross Loans at End of Period⁽¹⁾		0.09	%		0.18	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Average Total Gross Loans		1.04	%		1.21	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Gross Loans at End of Period		0.99	%		0.97	%
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Allowance for Loan Losses⁽¹⁾		9.26	%		18.76	%
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Provision Charged to Operating Expenses		45.36	%		177.14	%
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Performing Loans		310.73	%		327.23	%

Balances:
Average Total Gross Loans Outstanding During Period	$	2,348,706		$	1,825,055
Total Gross Loans Outstanding at End of Period	$	2,487,532		$	2,279,062
Non-Performing Loans at End of Period	$	7,892		$	6,769


⁽¹⁾		Net loan charge-offs annualized to calculate the ratios.

We concentrate the majority of our interest-earning assets in loans. In all forms of lending, there are inherent risks. We concentrate the preponderance of our loan portfolio in either commercial loans or real estate loans. A small part of the portfolio is represented by installment loans, primarily for the purchase of automobiles.

While we believe that our underwriting criteria are prudent, outside factors can adversely impact credit quality. A portion of the portfolio is represented by loans guaranteed by the SBA, which further reduces the potential for loss. We also utilize credit review in an effort to maintain loan quality. Loans are reviewed throughout the year with special attention given to new loans and those loans that are classified as “special mention” and worse. In addition to our internal grading system, loans criticized by this credit review are downgraded with appropriate allowances added if required.

Although management believes the allowance is adequate to absorb losses as they arise, no assurance can be given that we will not sustain losses in any given period, which could be substantial in relation to the size of the allowance.

Deposits

The following table shows the composition of deposits by type as of the dates indicated.


	September 30,		December 31,		Increase (Decrease)
	2005		2004		Amount			Percentage
			(Dollars in Thousands)
Deposits:
Noninterest-Bearing	$	764,380	$	729,583	$	34,797			4.8	%
Interest-Bearing:
Money Market Checking		506,843		613,662		(106,819	)		(17.4	%)
Savings		127,349		153,862		(26,513	)		(17.2	%)
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More		1,089,917		756,580		333,337			44.1	%
Other Time Deposits		258,281		275,120		(16,839	)		(6.1	%)

Total Deposits	$	2,746,770	$	2,528,807	$	217,963			8.6	%

Demand deposits increased $34.8 million, or 4.8 percent, to $764.4 million at September 30, 2005 from $729.6 million at December 31, 2004. This increase was due to continued efforts to increase the net interest margin by changing the deposit composition mix between interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing accounts. Money market checking, savings and other time deposits decreased $106.8 million, or 17.4 percent, $26.5 million, or 17.2 percent, and $16.8 million, or 6.1 percent, respectively, to $506.8 million, $127.3 million and $258.3 million, respectively, at September 30, 2005 from $613.7 million, $153.9 million and $275.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004. These accounts decreased because customers shifted their balances into higher yielding certificates of deposit. Time deposits of $100,000 or more increased $333.3 million, or 44.1 percent, to $1.09 billion at September 30, 2005 from $756.6 million at December 31, 2004. This shift reflected the higher market interest rates in effect during the third quarter of 2005. In order to retain customers, the Bank adjusted its rates offered to its most valued customers to levels comparable to those offered by its competitors.

Borrowings

At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, total borrowings were $169.3 million and $151.7 million, respectively. Borrowings consisted of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”), overnight federal funds and junior subordinated debentures associated with trust preferred securities.

At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, advances from the FHLB were $68.6 million and $66.4 million, respectively. Junior subordinated debentures totaled $82.4 million at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Among the total borrowings, as of September 30, 2005, short-term borrowings with a remaining maturity of less than one year were $48.3 million, and the weighted-average interest rate thereon was 3.84 percent.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity of the Bank is defined as the ability to supply cash as quickly as needed without causing a severe deterioration in its profitability. The Bank’s major liquidity on the asset side stems from available cash positions, Federal funds sold and short-term investments categorized as trading and/or available for sale securities, which can be disposed of without significant capital losses in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity sources on the liability side come from borrowing capacities, which include Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements and FHLB advances. Thus, maintenance of high quality loans and securities that can be used for collateral in repurchase agreements or other secured borrowings is another important feature of liquidity management.

Liquidity risk may occur when the Bank has few short-duration securities available for sale and/or is not capable of raising funds as quickly as necessary at acceptable rates in the capital or money markets. Also, a heavy and sudden increase in cash demands for loans and/or deposits can tighten the liquidity position. Several ratios are reviewed on a daily, monthly and quarterly basis to manage the liquidity position and to preempt any liquidity crisis. Nine specific statistics, which include the loans-to-assets ratio, off-balance sheet items and dependence on non-core deposits, foreign deposits, lines of credit and liquid assets, are reviewed regularly for liquidity management purposes.

The maintenance of a proper level of liquid assets is critical for both the liquidity and the profitability of the Bank. Since the primary objective of the investment portfolio is to ensure proper liquidity of the Bank, management maintains appropriate levels of liquid assets to avoid exposure to higher than necessary liquidity risk.

At September 30, 2005, short-term investments totaled 3.3 percent of total assets, compared to 4.8 percent at December 31, 2004. Core deposits, expressed as a percentage of total assets, decreased slightly to 36.3 percent at September 30, 2005 from 41.1 percent at December 31, 2004, while short-term non-core funding as a percentage of total assets increased to 40.9 percent at September 30, 2005 from 33.2 percent at December 31, 2004. The ratio of short-term investments to short-term non-core funding decreased slightly to 19.1 percent at September 30, 2005 from 22.6 percent at December 31, 2004. Off-balance sheet items, primarily unused credit lines, as a percentage of total assets increased to 17.8 percent at September 30, 2005 from 15.0 percent at December 31, 2004.

The Bank saw a decline in the demand for loans at the beginning of the first quarter of 2005, but the demand for loans increased toward the end of the first quarter and continued through the third quarter of 2005. Net loans as a percentage of total assets increased to 73.0 percent at September 30, 2005 from 72.0 percent at December 31, 2004.

In order to ensure adequate levels of capital, we conduct an ongoing assessment of projected sources and uses of capital in conjunction with projected increases in assets and levels of risk. Management considers, among other things, cash generated from operations, and access to capital from financial markets or the issuance of additional securities, including common stock or notes, to meet our capital needs. Total shareholders’ equity was $416.0 million at September 30, 2005, which represented an increase of $16.1 million, or 4.0 percent, over total shareholders’ equity of $399.9 million at December 31, 2004.

The regulatory agencies require a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8.0 percent and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4.0 percent. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to total assets, referred to as the leverage ratio, of 4.0 percent. For a bank rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banks, the minimum leverage ratio is 3.0 percent. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines that apply across the industry, the regulators have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above the minimum guidelines and ratios.

At September 30, 2005, Hanmi Financial’s Tier 1 capital (shareholders’ equity plus junior subordinated debentures less intangible assets) was $279.2 million. This represented an increase of $22.0 million, or 8.6 percent, over Tier 1 capital of $257.2 million at December 31, 2004. The capital ratios of Hanmi Financial and Hanmi Bank were as follows as of September 30, 2005:


						Minimum					Minimum to Be
						Regulatory					Categorized as
	Actual					Requirement					“Well Capitalized”
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
						(Dollars in Thousands)
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	305,737		11.55	%	$	211,729		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	303,504		11.49	%	$	211,310		8.00	%	$	264,137		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	279,173		10.55	%	$	105,864		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	276,940		10.48	%	$	105,655		4.00	%	$	158,482		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Total Assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	279,173		9.07	%	$	123,155		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	276,940		9.01	%	$	122,953		4.00	%	$	153,691		5.00	%

Dividends

On September 22, 2005, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per common share for the third quarter of 2005. The dividend was paid on October 17, 2005. Future dividend payments are subject to the future earnings and legal requirements and the discretion of the Board of Directors.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

For a discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements, see “Note 5 — Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Item 1. Business – Small Business Administration Guaranteed Loans” and “Item 1. Business – Off-Balance Sheet Commitments” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

There were no material changes to the contractual obligations described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

GENERAL

Interest rate risk indicates our exposure to market interest rate fluctuations. The movement of interest rates directly and inversely affects the economic value of fixed-income assets, which is the present value of future cash flow discounted by the current interest rate. Under the same conditions, the higher the current interest rate, the higher the denominator of discounting. Interest rate risk management is intended to decrease or increase the level of our exposure to fluctuations in market interest rate. The level of interest rate risk can be managed through the changing of gap positions and the volume of fixed-income assets and so forth. For successful management of interest rate risk, we use various methods to measure existing and future interest rate risk exposures. In addition to regular reports used in business operations, repricing gap analysis, stress testing and simulation modeling are the main measurement techniques used to quantify interest rate risk exposure.

The following table shows the status of the gap position as of September 30, 2005:


				After			After One
				Three			Year But
	Within			Months			Within			After			Non-
	Three			But Within			Five			Five			Interest-
	Months			One Year			Years			Years			Sensitive			Total
							(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets:
Cash (Noninterest-Earning)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	112,233		$	112,233
Federal Funds Sold		62,000			—			—			—			—			62,000
FRB and FHLB Stock		—			—			—			24,251			—			24,251
Securities:
Fixed Rate		10,907			28,881			193,094			114,361			—			347,243
Floating Rate		7,580			—			35,076			8,375			—			51,031
Loans:
Fixed Rate		26,800			41,100			229,812			121,383			—			419,095
Floating Rate		2,033,023			11,420			16,894			—			—			2,061,337
Non-Accrual		—			—			—			—			7,622			7,622
Deferred Loan Fees and Allowance for Loan Losses		—			—			—			—			(29,106	)		(29,106	)
Derivatives		(70,000	)		—			70,000			—			—			—
Other Assets		—			22,498			—			6,327			283,857			312,682

Total Assets	$	2,070,310		$	103,899		$	544,876		$	274,697		$	374,606		$	3,368,388

Liabilities
Deposits:
Demand Deposits	$	76,088		$	198,840		$	420,623		$	68,829		$	—		$	764,380
Money Market Checking		67,568			167,662			214,989			56,624			—			506,843
Savings		14,867			43,312			60,721			8,449			—			127,349
Time Deposits:
Fixed Rate		474,741			696,725			18,461			178			—			1,190,105
Floating Rate		158,093			—			—			—			—			158,093
Other Borrowed Funds		38,302			10,000			33,449			5,180			—			86,931
Junior Subordinated Debentures		82,406			—			—			—			—			82,406
Fair Value Swaps		24,019			(24,019	)		—			—			—			—
Other Liabilities		—			—			—			—			36,275			36,275
Shareholders’ Equity		—			—			—			—			416,006			416,006

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	936,084		$	1,092,520		$	748,243		$	139,260		$	452,281		$	3,368,388

Repricing Gap	$	1,134,226		$	(988,621	)	$	(203,367	)	$	135,437		$	(77,675	)
Cumulative Repricing Gap	$	1,134,226		$	145,605		$	(57,762	)	$	77,675		$	—
Cumulative Repricing Gap as a Percentage of Total Assets		33.67	%		4.32	%		(1.71	%)		2.31	%		—
Cumulative Repricing Gap as a Percentage of Interest-Earning Assets		38.25	%		4.91	%		(1.95	%)		2.62	%		—

The repricing gap analysis measures the static timing of repricing risk of assets and liabilities, i.e., a point-in-time analysis measuring the difference between assets maturing or repricing in a period and liabilities maturing or repricing within the same time period. Assets are assigned to maturity and repricing categories based on their expected repayment or repricing dates, and liabilities are assigned based on their repricing or maturity dates. Core deposits that have no maturity dates (demand deposits, savings and money market checking) are assigned to categories based on expected decay rates.

On September 30, 2005, the cumulative repricing gap as a percentage of interest-earning assets in the less-than-three month period was 38.25 percent. This was a decrease from the previous quarter’s figure of 41.95 percent. The decrease was primarily caused by increase in time deposits and a decrease in loans, which were partially offset by a decrease in other borrowed funds. The cumulative repricing gap as a percentage of interest-earning assets in the three to twelve-month period moved significantly lower, reaching 4.91 percent as compared to 14.31 percent in the previous quarter. In terms of fixed and floating gap positions, which are used internally to control repricing risk, the accumulated fixed gap position between assets and liabilities as a percentage of interest-earning assets was (13.27) percent. The floating gap position in the less-than-one year period was 12.88 percent.

The following table summarizes the status of the gap position as of the dates indicated:


	Less than Three Months						Three to Twelve Months
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			June 30,
	2005			2005			2005			2005
				(Dollars in Thousands)
Cumulative Repricing Gap	$	1,134,226		$	1,202,927		$	145,605		$	410,296
Percentage of Total Assets		33.67	%		36.99	%		4.32	%		12.62	%
Percentage of Interest-Earning Assets		38.25	%		41.95	%		4.91	%		14.31	%

The spread between interest income on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities is the principal component of net interest income, and interest rate changes substantially affect our financial performance. We emphasize capital protection through stable earnings rather than maximizing yield. In order to achieve stable earnings, we prudently manage our assets and liabilities and closely monitor the percentage changes in net interest income and equity value in relation to limits established within our guidelines.

From time to time, the Bank has offered CD products that have offered costumers CD rates that are tied to market indexes, including the S&P 500 Index and foreign currencies. In order to hedge the market risk associated with the embedded options inherent in them, the Bank has entered into equity and currency swap contracts that are accounted for at market value. Management believes these swaps effectively hedge the economic risk associated with these CD products, but the swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer directly supervised and participated in evaluating the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2005 and concluded that these controls and procedures were effective. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, Hanmi Financial or Hanmi Bank is a party to claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. After taking into consideration information furnished by counsel as to the current status of these claims or proceedings to which Hanmi Financial or Hanmi Bank is a party, management is of the opinion that the ultimate aggregate liability represented thereby, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Hanmi Financial or Hanmi Bank.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(d)

(a)

(c)

Maximum Number or

Total

(b)

Total Number of

(Approximate Dollar

Number

Average

Shares (or Units)

Value) of Shares (or

of Shares

Price Paid

Purchased as Part of

Units) that May Yet Be

(or Units)

Per Share

Publicly Announced

Purchased Under the

Period

Purchased

(or Unit)

Plans or Programs

July 1, 2005 to July 31, 2005

—

August 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005

1,163,000

⁽¹⁾

17.20

—

September 1, 2005 to September 30, 2005

—

Total

1,163,000

17.20

—


⁽¹⁾		Shares were purchased from Korea Exchange Bank (“KEB”). Following this transaction, KEB continued to own approximately 1.18 million shares of Hanmi’s common stock. KEB acquired its position in Hanmi Financial Corporation at the time of Hanmi’s April 2004 acquisition of Pacific Union Bank, in which KEB was a shareholder. KEB’s Hanmi shares are the subject of a shelf registration statement that was declared effective in September 2004.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number		Document

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date: November 9, 2005	By:	/s/ Sung Won Sohn, Ph.D.
		Sung Won Sohn, Ph.D.
		President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 9, 2005	By:	/s/ Michael J. Winiarski
		Michael J. Winiarski
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. sophomore Avg

Hanmi Financial (HAFC) 10-Q2005 Q3 Quarterly report

Content analysis

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents