Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Description of Business | Description of Business |
TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. develops and delivers highly reliable and secure wireless communication technology. The Company enables 9-1-1 infrastructure, cybersecurity, deployable wireless terminals, space components, and applications for mobile location-based services and messaging. Principal customers are wireless network operators, defense and public safety government agencies, and Fortune 150 enterprises requiring high reliability and security. While we manage and have historically reported two business segments, Commercial and Government, digital wireless voice and data communication technology is converging, so engineers from either segment are collaborating to address solution needs for customers of the other segment. |
Commercial Segment: We are one of two leading companies that enable 9-1-1 call routing via cellular, VoIP, and next generation technology. Other TCS hosted and managed services include cellular carrier infrastructure for text messaging and location-based platforms and applications. Commercial segment customers include wireless network operators, VoIP, wireless device manufacturers, automotive industry suppliers, and state and local governments. |
Government Segment: For our core segment customers, U.S. Department of Defense agencies, we provide cybersecurity services, support, and training and “C4ISR” (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance) resources, wireless ground terminals and related support, management and resale of satellite bandwidth, and information technology outsource services. TCS engineers, furnishes, and supports ground terminals used for secure satellite-based and other line-of-sight and beyond-line-of-sight communications, as well as related components incorporating government-approved cryptologic devices and other hardened components for aerospace and defense. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Significant estimates and assumptions in these consolidated financial statements include estimates used in revenue recognition, fair value of business combinations, fair value associated with goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived asset impairment tests, estimated values of software development costs, income taxes and deferred tax valuation allowances, the fair value of marketable securities and stock based compensation, and legal and contingent liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
In reporting the values of long-lived assets, the Company reported no impairment charges in 2014. In 2013, TCS’s Platforms and Applications reporting unit’s goodwill and long-lived assets with a carrying value of $65,406 were written down to estimated fair value of $33,429, resulting in an impairment charge of $31,977 to goodwill and long-lived assets. We valued the existing technology using a discounted cash flow method to determine whether a write-down was necessary, and after concluding that a write-down was necessary, used a relief from royalty method to value the licensable technology. We then used a discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of our Platforms and Applications reporting unit. |
|
A summary of the 2013 impairment charge is set forth below: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Carrying | | |
Value | Fair Value | Total |
January 1, | December 31, | Impairment |
2013 | 2013 | Charge |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill – Platforms and Applications | $ | 36,121 | | | $ | 27,912 | | | $ | 8,209 | |
Property and equipment, including capitalized software for internal use | | 18,082 | | | | 5,517 | | | | 12,565 | |
Software development costs | | 9,270 | | | | — | | | | 9,270 | |
Acquired intangible assets | | 599 | | | | — | | | | 599 | |
Other assets | | 1,334 | | | | — | | | | 1,334 | |
| $ | 65,406 | | | $ | 33,429 | | | $ | 31,977 | |
In 2012, TCS’s Navigation reporting unit’s goodwill and long-lived assets with a carrying value of $164,500 were written down to estimated fair value of $38,797, resulting in an impairment charge of $125,703 to Goodwill, Acquired intangibles, and Long-lived (fixed) assets. We used a discounted cash flow model to determine the fair value of goodwill and an income approach to determine the fair values of acquired intangibles, capitalized software, and long-lived assets. |
Foreign Currency Transaction | Foreign Currency Translation. Financial statements for the Company’s small foreign subsidiaries with functional currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated using the exchange rates at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities, and a weighted average rate is used to remeasure revenues and expenses. The resulting adjustments are reported in other comprehensive income. Income and expense items are translated at average monthly rates of exchange. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in other income (expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash equivalents are reported at fair value, which approximates cost. |
Marketable Securities | Marketable Securities. Our marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. Our primary objectives when investing are to preserve principal, maintain liquidity, and obtain higher yield. Our intent is not specifically to invest and hold securities with longer term maturities. We have the ability and intent, if necessary, to liquidate any of these investments in order to meet our operating needs within the next twelve months. The securities are carried at fair market value based on quoted market price with net unrealized gains and losses in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. If we determine that a decline in fair value of the marketable securities is other than temporary, a realized loss would be recognized in earnings. Gains or losses on securities sold are based on the specific identification method and are recognized in earnings. We recorded immaterial net gains on the sale and maturity of marketable securities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 in Other income (expense), net. |
Interest Rate Hedging Activity | Interest Rate Hedging Activity. To reduce the risk of variability of cash flows associated with changes in interest rates on a portion of our floating rate debt, we entered into an interest rate swap (“hedge” or “swap”) agreement with our principal bank during the third quarter of 2014. The interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and its effect is recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. We formally documented the relationship between the interest rate swap and the hedged bank debt, as well as the risk management objective and the strategy for using the hedging instrument. We assess whether the relationship is highly effective at offsetting changes in the fair value both at inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent that the hedge is effective at offsetting the change in the fair value of the hedged item and realized gains and losses are recognized in interest expense. |
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Receivable | Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Receivable. Substantially all of our accounts receivable are trade receivables generated in the ordinary course of our business. We use estimates to determine the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts necessary to reduce accounts receivable to their expected net realizable value. We estimate the amount of the required allowance by reviewing the status of significant past-due receivables and by establishing provisions for estimated losses by analyzing current and historical bad debt trends. Changes to our allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded as a component of general and administrative expenses in our accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our credit and collection policies and the financial strength of our customers are critical to us in maintaining a relatively small amount of write-offs of receivables. We generally do not require collateral from or enter netting agreements with our customers. Receivables that are ultimately deemed uncollectible are charged-off as a reduction of receivables and the allowance for doubtful accounts. |
Inventory | Inventory. We maintain inventory of component parts and finished product for our deployable communication systems and aerospace components. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on the weighted average method. The cost basis for finished units includes manufacturing cost. We record any amounts required to reduce the carrying value of inventory to net realizable value as a change to cost of revenue. |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment. Property and equipment represents costs associated with our investment in information technology and telecommunications equipment, software, furniture and fixtures, leasehold improvements, as well as capitalized software developed for internal use, including hosted applications. Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally five years for furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements and three to seven years for other types of assets including computers, software, and telephone equipment. |
The carrying value of property and equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be fully recoverable. If an impairment indicator is present, we evaluate recoverability by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows that we expect to generate from these assets. If the assets are impaired, we recognize an impairment charge equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets using the appropriate valuation technique of market, income or cost approach. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying values or fair values, less estimated costs of disposal. |
In 2013 and 2012, after adjusting projections for decreased expected revenue from services supported by capitalized software for internal use included in property and equipment, we evaluated the recoverability of our Platforms and Applications and Navigation reporting units’ fixed assets, respectively, by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows that we expect to generate from these assets. As a result of our reviews, we recorded impairment charges of $12,565 in 2013 and $12,987 in 2012. |
|
Goodwill | Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is evaluated for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, or sooner should there be an indicator of impairment. We may assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not an event or circumstance might indicate the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Such indicators include a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization, a decline in the Company’s expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition, and/or slower expected growth, among others. After completing our assessment of such qualitative factors, and if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value we perform a two-step process. The first step requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In the second step, a fair value for implied goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any, would represent the amount of goodwill impairment. |
|
At December 31, 2014, goodwill was $104,241. Our assessment of goodwill in the current reporting period indicated that the fair value of our reporting units exceeded their carrying value, see Note 9 for additional details. |
For goodwill impairment testing, we have four reporting units. In 2013, we reorganized the Commercial Segment in order to better conform and integrate the product lines and create efficiencies, so that one management team is now responsible for all Commercial Platforms & Applications other than the 9-1-1 Safety and Security part of the Commercial Segment. Previously, our Commercial Segment was comprised of Navigation and Other Commercial reporting units. Our two Government Segment reporting units, the Government Solutions Group unit and the Cyber Intelligence unit, remain the same. |
In 2013, we recorded an $8,209 impairment charge for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over the estimated fair value of our Platform and Applications reporting unit. In 2012, we recorded an $86,332 impairment charge for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over the estimated fair value of our Navigation reporting unit. |
Software Development Costs | Software Development Costs. Acquired technology, representing the estimated value of the proprietary technology acquired, has been recorded as capitalized software development costs. We also capitalize software development costs after we establish technological feasibility, and amortize those costs over the estimated useful lives of the software beginning on the date when the software is available for general release. |
Costs are capitalized when technological feasibility has been established. For new products, technological feasibility is established when an operative version of the computer software product is completed in the same software language as the product to be ultimately marketed, performs all the major functions planned for the product, and has successfully completed initial customer testing. Technological feasibility for enhancements to an existing product is established when a detail program design is completed. Costs that are capitalized include direct labor and other direct costs. These costs are amortized on a product-by-product basis using the straight-line method over the product’s estimated useful life, between three and five years. Amortization is also computed using the ratio that current revenue for the product bears to the total of current and anticipated future revenue for that product (the revenue curve method). If this revenue curve method results in amortization greater than the amount computed using the straight-line method, amortization is recorded at that greater amount. Our policies to determine when to capitalize software development costs and how much to amortize in a given period require us to make subjective estimates and judgments. If our software products do not achieve the level of market acceptance that we expect and our future revenue estimates for these products change, the amount of amortization that we record may increase compared to prior periods. The amortization of capitalized software development costs is recorded as a cost of revenue. Amortization of capitalized software developments costs included in direct costs of services and systems were respectively $88 and $1,194 in 2014, $2,527 and $4,939 in 2013, and $2,692 and $4,971 in 2012. The decrease in capitalized software development costs included in services is directly related to the 2013 and 2012 write-down of capitalized software development costs associated with the Platforms and Applications and Navigation reporting unit, respectively. |
Acquired technology is amortized over the product’s estimated useful life based on the valuation procedures performed at the time of the acquisition. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method or the revenue curve method, whichever is greater. |
We also capitalize costs related to software developed or obtained for internal use when management commits to funding the project and the project completes the preliminary project stage. Capitalization of such costs ceases when the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalized software developed for internal use is reported as part of property and equipment on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
During 2013, we recognized a software development cost impairment charge of $9,270 after determining that costs related to our Platforms and Applications reporting unit were not recoverable based on decreased expected revenue from services using the software. During 2012, we recognized a software development cost impairment charge of $12,420 after determining that the costs related our Navigation reporting unit were not recoverable based on decreased projected revenue. |
Acquired Intangible Assets | Acquired Intangible Assets. Our acquired intangible assets have useful lives of four to ten years, including assets acquired in 2009 and 2012. We are amortizing these assets using the straight-line method. We have not incurred costs to renew or extend the term of acquired intangible assets. |
We evaluate acquired intangible assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of such assets might not be recoverable. Our review of factors present and the resulting appropriate carrying value of our acquired intangible assets are subject to judgments and estimates by management. Future events such as a significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets, and significant negative industry or economic trends could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that our acquired intangible assets might be impaired. In 2013, after adjusting projections for uncertainty at a significant customer, we recorded an impairment charge of $599 to acquired intangible assets related to our Platforms and Applications reporting unit. In 2012, after adjusting projections for the impact of a customer contract renegotiation, we recorded an impairment charge of $13,964 to acquired intangible assets related to our Navigation reporting unit. |
Deferred Compensation Plan | Deferred Compensation Plan. We have a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement to fund certain supplemental executive retirement and deferred income plans. Under the terms of the arrangement, the participants may elect to defer the receipt of a portion of their compensation and each participant directs the manner in which their investments are deemed invested. The funds are held by us in a rabbi trust which include fixed income funds, equity securities, and money market accounts, or other investments for which there is an active quoted market, and are classified as trading securities. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, funds of $1,282 and $1,003, respectively, were included in Other assets and the deferred compensation liabilities of $873 in 2014 and $637 in 2013 were included in Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) the fee is probable of collection. |
Revenue is reported as described below: |
Services Revenue. Revenue from hosted and subscriber services consists of monthly recurring service fees and is recognized in the month earned. Maintenance fees are generally collected in advance and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Services revenue for consulting, training and the design, development, deployment, field support and maintenance of communication systems is generated under time and materials contracts, cost plus fee contracts, or fixed price contracts. Revenue is recognized under time and materials contracts and cost plus fee contracts as billable costs are incurred. Fixed-price service contracts are accounted for using the proportional performance method. These contracts generally allow for monthly billing or billing upon achieving certain specified milestones. |
Systems Revenue. We design, develop, and deploy custom communications products, components, and systems. Custom systems typically contain multiple elements, which may include hardware, installation, integration, and product licenses, which are either incidental or provide essential functionality. |
We allocate the fees in a multi-element arrangement to each element based on the relative fair value of each element, using vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value of each of the elements, if available. VSOE is generally determined based on the price charged when an element is sold separately. In the absence of VSOE of fair value, the fee is allocated among each element based on third-party evidence (“TPE”) of fair value, which is determined based on competitor pricing for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we are unable to establish fair value using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated selling price (“ESP”) to allocate value to each element. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold separately. We determine ESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices we charge for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape, and pricing practices. |
Fees from the development and implementation of custom systems are generally performed under time and materials and fixed fee contracts. Revenue is recognized under time and materials contracts and cost plus fee contracts as billable costs are incurred. Fixed-price product delivery contracts are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion or proportional performance method, measured either by total costs incurred as a percentage of total estimated costs at the completion of the contract, or direct labor costs incurred compared to estimated total direct labor costs for projects for which third-party hardware represents a significant portion of the total estimated costs. These contracts generally allow for monthly billing or billing upon achieving certain specified milestones. Any estimated losses under long-term contracts are recognized in their entirety at the date that it becomes probable of occurring. Revenue from hardware sales to monthly subscriber customers is recognized as systems revenue. We have contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recognized at the time products or services are delivered, or when the product is shipped and the risk of the loss is transferred to the buyer, net of discounts. |
Software licenses are generally perpetual licenses for a specified number of users that allow for the purchase of annual maintenance at a specified rate. All fees are recognized as revenue when the four criteria described above are met. For multiple element arrangements that contain only software and software-related elements, we allocate the fees to each element based on the VSOE of fair value of each element. Some systems containing software licenses include a 90-day warranty for defects. We have not incurred significant warranty costs on any software product to date, and no costs are currently accrued upon recording the related revenue. |
Revenue generated from our intellectual property consists of patent infringement liabilities, upfront and non-refundable license fees, royalty fees, and sales of our patents. Revenue from upfront and non-refundable payments is recognized when the arrangement is executed. When patent licensing arrangements include royalties for future sales of products using our licensed patented technology, revenue is recognized when earned during the applicable period. Due to the nature of some of the agreements it may be difficult to establish VSOE of separate elements of an agreement, in these circumstances the appropriate recognition of revenue may require the use of judgment based on the particular facts and circumstances. In all cases, revenue from the licensing of our intellectual property is recognized when all of four of the revenue recognition criteria are met, and included in Commercial systems revenue. |
When a customer is billed or we receive payment and we have not met all of the criteria for revenue recognition, the billed or paid amount is recorded as deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheet. As the revenue recognition criteria are met, the deferred amounts are recognized as revenue. We defer direct project costs incurred in certain situations as dictated by authoritative accounting literature. We classify deferred revenue and deferred project costs on the consolidated balance sheet as either current or long-term depending on the expected product delivery dates or service coverage periods. Long-term deferred revenue is included in other liabilities and long-term deferred project costs are included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Under our contracts with the U.S. Government for both systems and services, contract costs, including the allocated indirect expenses, are subject to audit and adjustment by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. We record revenue under these contracts at estimated net realizable amounts. |
Advertising Costs | Advertising Costs. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense totaled $174, $104, and $69, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. |
Capitalized Interest | Capitalized Interest. Total interest incurred, including amortization of deferred financing fees, was $9,296, $11,780, and $8,278 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Approximately $27, $115, and $138 of total interest incurred was capitalized as a component of software development costs during the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 respectively. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation. We have two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 18. Both the incentive stock option plan and the employee stock purchase plan are considered equity plans. The fair values of stock option grants are estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the options, which is generally three to five years. The employee stock purchase plan gives all employees an opportunity to purchase shares of our Class A common stock at a discount of 15% of the fair market value. |
Research and Development Expense | Research and Development Expense. We incur research and development costs which are primarily comprised of compensation expenses for engineers engaged in the development and enhancement of software and integrated system products. Research and development cost is expensed as incurred or accounted for as set forth in “Software Development Costs” above. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. Our deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards as well as deductible temporary differences. Prior to 2008 and since December 31, 2013, we have provided a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets based on the evaluation that our ability to realize such assets did not meet the criteria of “more likely than not”. We continuously evaluate additional facts representing positive and negative evidence in determining our ability to realize the deferred tax assets. |
We record the estimated value of uncertain tax positions by reducing the value of certain tax attributes. We would classify any interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the provision for income taxes. There were no interest or penalties recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2014 and the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014. We do not currently anticipate that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase within the next 12 months. We file income tax returns in U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2014, open tax years in the federal and some state jurisdictions date back to 1998, due to the taxing authorities’ ability to adjust operating loss carryforwards. |
|
The accounting standards require that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This process requires management to make assessments regarding the timing and probability of the ultimate tax impact and to record valuation allowances on deferred tax assets if determined it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized. Management also establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions based upon management’s judgment regarding potential future challenges to those positions. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, significant changes in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, our inability to generate sufficient future taxable income or unpredicted results from the final determination of each year’s liability by taxing authorities. These changes could have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position. |
Other Comprehensive Income | Other Comprehensive Income. Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that under GAAP are included as a component of shareholders’ equity but are excluded from net income. Other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gains or losses on interest rate hedge and unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value Measurements. We apply valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flows), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost) and uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels: |
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. |
Level 3: Observable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions. |
Our major categories of financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements, including cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities that are held as available-for-sale, are measured on a recurring basis. Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Additional disclosures regarding our fair value measurements are included in Note 15. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new guidance for presentation of financial statements for simplifying income statement presentation by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items. Under the new guidance, items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring should be presented within income from continuing operations or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 including interim periods within those annual periods. The amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued new guidance for presentation of financial statements for going-concern, which addresses when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new guidance applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance for revenue recognition. The new guidance provides a five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety. The core principle of the new standard is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The guidance provides alternative methods of initial adoption; retrospectively applied to each prior reporting period or a modified retrospective approach, in which the cumulative effect of initially applying this new guidance is recognized at the date of initial application with additional disclosures. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the alternative transition methods and the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB amended guidance related to reporting discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity. The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results or a business activity should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendment also expands the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and adds new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The guidance is for periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported. The amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
On January 1, 2014, the FASB adopted amended guidance related to income taxes and the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. Under certain circumstances, unrecognized tax benefits should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The amendment did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. |
|