UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
| | |
o | | Registration statement pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | |
| | or |
| | |
þ | | Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
| | |
| | or |
| | |
o | | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-14700
![(COMPANY NAME)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984804.gif)
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd.
(Translation of Registrant’s Name Into English)
Taiwan, Republic of China
(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
No. 123, Sec. 3, Da Fong Road, Tantzu, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | |
Title of Each Class
| | Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered
|
| | |
None | | |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Shares, par value NT$10 per share
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
As of December 31, 2004, 2,105,073,060 Common Shares were outstanding
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17o Item 18þ
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yeso Noo
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
FORM 20-F ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- i -
Forward Looking Statements in This Annual Report May Not Be Accurate
Our disclosure and analysis in this annual report contain or incorporate by reference some forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements contain information regarding, among other things, our financial condition, future expansion plans and business strategy. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Although we believe that these expectations and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, including, among other things:
| • | the intensely competitive semiconductor and personal computer industries and markets; |
|
| • | risks associated with international business activities; |
|
| • | our dependence on key personnel; |
|
| • | natural disasters, such as earthquakes and droughts, which are beyond our control; |
|
| • | general economic and political conditions, including those related to the semiconductor and personal computer industries; |
|
| • | possible disruptions in commercial activities caused by human-induced disasters, including terrorist activity and armed conflict, and outbreaks of contagious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, which reduce end-user purchases relative to expectations and orders; |
|
| • | fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
| • | additional disclosures we make in our previous and future Form 20-F annual reports and Form 6-K periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC; and |
|
| • | those other risks identified in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report. |
The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “shall” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify a number of these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this annual report might not occur and our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
1
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data shown below should be read in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” and the financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 have been derived from our audited financial statements not included in this annual report. The financial statements have been prepared and presented according to generally accepted accounting principles in the Republic of China, or ROC GAAP, which differ in many important respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or US GAAP. For a discussion of the material differences, see note 28 to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. Some of our statement of income and balance sheet data items have been reconciled to US GAAP as shown below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2000 | | | 2001 | | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$(6) | |
| | (in millions, except earnings (loss) or dividends per share and per ADS data) | | | | | |
Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ROC GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating revenues | | | 18,846 | | | | 16,530 | | | | 22,299 | | | | 27,411 | | | | 35,252 | | | | 1,110.6 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | (14,907 | ) | | | (15,109 | ) | | | (20,210 | ) | | | (23,298 | ) | | | (28,871 | ) | | | (909.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 3,939 | | | | 1,421 | | | | 2,089 | | | | 4,113 | | | | 6,381 | | | | 201.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | | (999 | ) | | | (1,428 | ) | | | (1,542 | ) | | | (1,592 | ) | | | (2,048 | ) | | | (64.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 2,940 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 547 | | | | 2,521 | | | | 4,333 | | | | 136.5 | |
Equity investment income (loss)(1) | | | 192 | | | | (1,199 | ) | | | 61 | | | | (533 | ) | | | 308 | | | | 9.7 | |
Other non-operating income(1) | | | 662 | | | | 608 | | | | 469 | | | | 882 | | | | 732 | | | | 23.1 | |
Other non-operating expenses | | | (599 | ) | | | (884 | ) | | | (797 | ) | | | (667 | ) | | | (1,548 | ) | | | (48.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income tax(1) | | | 3,195 | | | | (1,482 | ) | | | 280 | | | | 2,203 | | | | 3,825 | | | | 120.5 | |
Income tax benefit | | | 26 | | | | 283 | | | | 145 | | | | 636 | | | | 457 | | | | 14.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss)(1)(2) | | | 3,221 | | | | (1,183 | ) | | | 425 | | | | 2,839 | | | | 4,282 | | | | 134.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 1.83 | | | | (0.58 | ) | | | 0.21 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 2.09 | | | | 0.07 | |
Diluted | | | 1.83 | | | | (0.58 | ) | | | 0.21 | | | | 1.27 | | | | 1.63 | | | | 0.05 | |
Shares used in per share calculation (average, as adjusted)(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 1,763 | | | | 2,032 | | | | 2,008 | | | | 2,020 | | | | 2,052 | | | | 2,052 | |
Diluted | | | 1,763 | | | | 2,032 | | | | 2,008 | | | | 2,267 | | | | 2,411 | | | | 2,411 | |
Earnings (loss) per ADS(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 9.12 | | | | (2.91 | ) | | | 1.05 | | | | 6.35 | | | | 10.44 | | | | 0.33 | |
Diluted | | | 9.12 | | | | (2.91 | ) | | | 1.05 | | | | 6.27 | | | | 8.15 | | | | 0.29 | |
Dividends per share(4) | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.45 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.35 | | | | 0.04 | |
ADSs used in per ADS calculation (average, as adjusted)(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2000 | | | 2001 | | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$(6) | |
| | (in millions, except earnings (loss) or dividends per share and per ADS data) | | | | | |
Basic | | | 353 | | | | 406 | | | | 402 | | | | 404 | | | | 410 | | | | 410 | |
Diluted | | | 353 | | | | 406 | | | | 402 | | | | 453 | | | | 482 | | | | 482 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 1,982 | | | | (1,790 | ) | | | (223 | ) | | | 3,248 | | | | 3,667 | | | | 115.5 | |
Earnings (loss) per share(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 1.15 | | | | (0.89 | ) | | | (0.11 | ) | | | 1.61 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 0.06 | |
Diluted | | | 1.15 | | | | (0.89 | ) | | | (0.11 | ) | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.52 | | | | 0.05 | |
Shares used in per share calculation (average, as adjusted)(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 1,729 | | | | 2,015 | | | | 2,008 | | | | 2,020 | | | | 2,060 | | | | 2,060 | |
Diluted | | | 1,729 | | | | 2,015 | | | | 2,008 | | | | 2,267 | | | | 2,419 | | | | 2,419 | |
Earnings (loss) per ADS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 5.73 | | | | (4.44 | ) | | | (0.55 | ) | | | 8.04 | | | | 8.90 | | | | 0.24 | |
Diluted | | | 5.73 | | | | (4.44 | ) | | | (0.55 | ) | | | 7.15 | | | | 7.58 | | | | 0.24 | |
ADSs used in per ADS calculation (average, as adjusted)(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 346 | | | | 403 | | | | 402 | | | | 404 | | | | 412 | | | | 412 | |
Diluted | | | 346 | | | | 403 | | | | 402 | | | | 453 | | | | 484 | | | | 484 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2000 | | | 2001 | | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$(6) | |
| | (in millions) | |
Other Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ROC GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | 6,535 | | | | 5,474 | | | | 6,445 | | | | 4,885 | | | | 9,785 | | | | 308.3 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,257 | | | | 4,323 | | | | 4,902 | | | | 5,185 | | | | 6,153 | | | | 193.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2000 | | | 2001 | | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$(6) | |
| | (in millions) | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ROC GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 6,566 | | | | 6,310 | | | | 5,970 | | | | 12,203 | | | | 10,922 | | | | 344.1 | |
Working capital | | | 8,361 | | | | 6,176 | | | | 6,856 | | | | 4,766 | | | | 13,492 | | | | 425.1 | |
Total assets | | | 41,740 | | | | 42,566 | | | | 46,236 | | | | 54,658 | | | | 58,962 | | | | 1,857.6 | |
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | | | 1,272 | | | | 2,667 | | | | 2,968 | | | | 10,342 | | | | 4,013 | | | | 126.4 | |
Long-term debt | | | 9,291 | | | | 10,640 | | | | 14,143 | | | | 8,813 | | | | 16,639 | | | | 524.2 | |
Total liabilities | | | 13,884 | | | | 16,519 | | | | 20,057 | | | | 24,960 | | | | 25,469 | | | | 802.4 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 27,856 | | | | 26,047 | | | | 26,179 | | | | 29,698 | | | | 33,493 | | | | 1,055.2 | |
US GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 47,179 | | | | 47,852 | | | | 50,333 | | | | 61,756 | | | | 65,118 | | | | 2,051.6 | |
Total liabilities | | | 14,474 | | | | 16,517 | | | | 20,071 | | | | 25,322 | | | | 25,927 | | | | 816.9 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 32,705 | | | | 31,335 | | | | 30,262 | | | | 36,434 | | | | 39,191 | | | | 1,234.7 | |
(1) | | The ROC Securities and Futures Bureau has allowed us to delay our recognition of investment income in certain investee companies accounted for under equity method. In particular, we derive a significant amount of our investment income in ChipMOS Technologies Inc., or ChipMOS, which we owned 28.7% equity interest as of March 31, 2005. In 2002, because ChipMOS did not provide its financial statements to us in time to enable us to recognize its financial results for such period, we were permitted to delay the recognition of the investment loss of ChipMOS until 2003. As a result, we did not recognize investment loss of ChipMOS for 2002 in our financial results under ROC GAAP until the first |
3
| | quarter of 2003. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, we recognized an investment loss of NT$366 million for ChipMOS in 2002. If this investment loss had been included in our results for 2002, our non-operating income, income before income tax and net income for 2002 would have been reduced by the same amount and our basic and diluted earnings per share in 2002 would have been reduced by NT$0.2. In 2003 and 2004, we also experienced a delay in recognition of investment income. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recognized an investment income of NT$247 million from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2003. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized an investment income of NT$667 million (US$21.0 million) from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2004. We also experienced a delay in recognition of investment income in Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. and Taiwan High-tech Corporation in 2002, 2003 and 2004 and Universal Communication Technology Inc. in 2002, and recognized their financial results in the subsequent year. Our investment income (loss) from Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taiwan High-tech Corporation and Universal Communication Technology Inc. for the aforementioned years was not material. |
|
| | Under US GAAP, there is no provision that allows us to delay recognition of financial results of ChipMOS or any other investee accounted for under the equity method. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, our investment income (loss) under US GAAP from ChipMOS were (NT$342 million), NT$250 million and NT$664 million (US$20.9 million), respectively. As a result, our financial results under US GAAP would not provide meaningful year-to-year comparison to our financial results under ROC GAAP. |
|
(2) | | Net income in 2000 and 2001 was net of minority interest loss of NT$3,000 and NT$16 million, respectively. The company does not have minority interest in 2002, 2003 and 2004, and is therefore not presented separately in this table. |
|
(3) | | Retroactively adjusted for all subsequent stock dividends and employee share bonuses. |
|
(4) | | Adjusted to reflect 123,980,637 shares, 235,421,212 shares and 189,447,578 shares distributed as stock dividends in 2000, 2001 and 2004, respectively, with respect to the earnings of 1999, 2000 and 2003. No stock dividend was declared in 2002 and 2003. |
|
(5) | | Retroactively adjusted for all subsequent stock dividends only. |
|
(6) | | Amounts translated for convenience at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York noon buying exchange rate of NT$31.74 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2004. |
Currency Translations and Exchange Rates
In portions of this annual report, we have translated New Taiwan dollars, or NT dollars, amounts into US dollars for the convenience of the readers. The rate we used for the translations was NT$31.74 = US$1.00, which was the noon buying rate announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on December 31, 2004. The translation does not mean that NT dollars could actually be converted into US dollars at that rate. The following table shows the noon buying rates for NT dollars expressed in NT dollar per US$1.00.
| | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, | | Average(1) | | High | | Low | | At Period-End |
2000 | | 31.37 | | 33.25 | | 30.35 | | 33.17 |
2001 | | 33.91 | | 35.13 | | 32.23 | | 35.00 |
2002 | | 34.53 | | 35.16 | | 32.85 | | 34.70 |
2003 | | 34.41 | | 34.98 | | 33.72 | | 33.99 |
2004 | | 33.27 | | 34.16 | | 31.74 | | 31.74 |
November | | 32.78 | | 33.48 | | 32.17 | | 32.20 |
December | | 32.17 | | 32.49 | | 31.74 | | 31.74 |
2005 | | | | | | | | |
January | | 31.85 | | 32.22 | | 31.65 | | 31.71 |
February | | 31.50 | | 31.79 | | 31.06 | | 31.06 |
March | | 31.11 | | 31.73 | | 30.65 | | 31.46 |
April | | 31.47 | | 31.70 | | 31.23 | | 31.23 |
May | | 31.27 | | 34.47 | | 30.98 | | 31.13 |
Source: Federal Reserve Statistical Release, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. |
(1) | Annual averages are calculated using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period. Monthly averages are calculated using the average of the daily rates during the relevant period. |
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
4
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
D. Risk Factors
Our business and operations are subject to various risks, many of which are beyond our control. If any of the risks described below actually occurs, our services, financial condition or results of operations could be seriously harmed.
Risks Relating to Our Financial Condition and Business
Our operating results fluctuate significantly, which may affect the value of your investments
Our historical net operating revenues and results of operations have varied, at times significantly, from quarter to quarter. Our future net operating revenues, gross profit and operating income may vary significantly due to a combination of factors. These factors include:
| • | our ability to develop and implement new technologies. If we are unable to successfully implement new technologies in a timely manner, our operating results could suffer because we would allow our competitors to seize the opportunities in developing new markets. |
|
| • | changes in our product mix or our customers’ preferences. When we discontinue or add a product or when our customers’ demand change, our operating results usually fluctuate. |
|
| • | changes in capacity utilization. When capacity utilization is low, such as in times of market downturns, we may need to adjust our product mix to respond to changes in demand and to adjust our prices sufficiently enough to maintain the level of our capacity utilization. |
Moreover, the growing demand for substrate packaging which uses higher-cost raw materials has caused the costs of production for semiconductor packaging to rise significantly. If our revenues do not grow and we are unable to reduce our expenses, our profitability will suffer.
The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry makes us particularly vulnerable to economic downturns and changes in the semiconductor industry
Because our services is, and will continue to be, dependent on the requirements of semiconductor companies for independent testing and assembly services, any downturn in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry may reduce demand for our services and adversely affect our results of operations. All of our customers operate in this industry and variations in order levels from our customers and in service fee rates may result in volatility in our net operating revenues and earnings. The markets for semiconductors are also characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and periods of heightened competition. If demand for semiconductor capacity does not keep pace with the growth of supply, or further declines, our services would be subject to more intense competition and our results of operations may suffer because of the resulting downward pricing pressure and capacity underutilization. From the last quarter of 2000 to early 2003, we also experienced intense competition in the semiconductor industry worldwide and oversupply of packaging and testing capacities in the local market. This increased competition caused average selling prices of many of our semiconductor packages and testing services to decrease significantly. Downward pressure on average selling prices led to pressure on our gross margins which negatively affected our operating results. Future downturns in the semiconductor industry may be severe. In the event of any future downturn, our average selling prices may decline without a corresponding decrease in our high fixed costs. This could lead to a decline in our gross margin, which would seriously harm our services.
The general recovery in the semiconductor industry since 2003 could be temporary and could be adversely affected by general economic uncertainties created by the possibility of future terrorist attacks, retaliatory actions, hostilities and outbreaks of contagious diseases. Since we cannot predict results for 2005 and subsequent periods with
5
confidence at this time, we cannot assure you that our results would continue to improve; any unfavorable factors such as those described above could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
We are highly dependent on the personal computer industry and any downturn in the personal computer industry would harm our operating results
A significant percentage of our net operating revenues is derived from customers who use our manufacturing services to make semiconductors for personal computers. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, more than half of our net operating revenues were attributable to customers whose products are primarily used in personal computers or personal computer peripherals. Our results of operations were negatively affected in 2001 due to reduced demand for personal computer products as a result of the global economic downturn between late 2000 and 2002. However, our net operating revenues improved in 2002 and 2003 compared to 2001 due partially to increased demand for personal computers as market conditions in 2002 and 2003 have generally improved compared to 2001. Our net operating revenues increased in 2004 compared to 2003 due in part to general improvement in the personal computer industry. Any future decrease in the demand for personal computers may decrease the demand for our services and would likely to seriously harm our operating results. In addition, the declining average selling price of personal computers has placed significant pressure on the price of the components that are used in these personal computers. We believe the average selling price of personal computers will continue to decrease, and the resulting pricing pressure on the semiconductor components we package and test may reduce our net operating revenues and reduce our gross profit margin significantly.
We do not have any significant backlog because our customers do not place purchase orders far in advance, which makes us vulnerable to sudden changes in customer demand
Our customers generally do not place purchase orders far in advance, and our contracts with major domestic customers do not generally require minimum purchase of our products or services. In addition, our customers’ purchase orders have varied significantly from period to period because demand for their products is often volatile. As a result, we do not typically operate with any significant backlog. The lack of a significant backlog makes it difficult for us to forecast our net operating revenues in future periods and causes our operating results to fluctuate from period to period. Moreover, our expense levels are based in part on our expectations of future revenue and we may be unable to adjust costs in a timely manner to compensate for revenue shortfalls. For example, in 1999 and early 2000, we incurred significant costs in expectation of strong demand in the semiconductor market, but this demand did not fully materialize because of the market downturn between late 2000 and early 2003. We expect that in the future our net operating revenues in any quarter will continue to be substantially dependent upon purchase orders received in that quarter. We cannot assure you that any of our customers will continue to place orders with us in the future at the same levels as in prior periods. We also cannot assure you that our customers’ orders will be consistent with our expectations when we made or will make the necessary investments in raw materials, labor and equipment.
A decline in the operating results of ChipMOS would reduce our participation in the memory chip package market and harm our financial performance
As of March 31, 2005, we owned 28.7% equity interest in ChipMOS, a provider of semiconductor packaging and testing services. If ChipMOS requires guarantees of its indebtedness to obtain financing, we and Mosel Vitelic Inc., or Mosel Vitelic, the other major investor in ChipMOS, are required under the joint venture agreement establishing ChipMOS to provide these guarantees in the ratios of 30% and 70%, respectively. Because ChipMOS did not provide its financial statements to us in time to enable us to recognize its financial results for 2002, the Securities and Futures Bureau of the ROC, or ROC SFB, allows us to delay the recognition of the income (loss) of ChipMOS in our financial results until a subsequent year. Thus, we recorded no investment income or loss of ChipMOS in our financial results under ROC GAAP for 2002. The audited financial results of ChipMOS in 2002 were available to us in the first quarter of 2003, and we recorded an investment loss amounting to NT$366 million. This investment loss was included in our financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2003. If this investment loss had been included in our results for 2002, our net income for 2002 would have been decreased by the same amount. In 2003 and 2004, we also experienced similar delays in recognition of investment income. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recognized an investment income of NT$247 million from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2003. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized an investment income of NT$667 million (US$21.0 million) from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2004. Under US GAAP, however, there is no provision that allows us to delay recognition of
6
ChipMOS’s income or loss. In 2003, our investment loss from ChipMOS was NT$250 million under US GAAP. In 2004, our investment income from ChipMOS was NT$664 million (US$20.9 million) under US GAAP. We cannot assure you that ChipMOS will maintain its positive operating results in the future. A decline in the operating results of ChipMOS would reduce our participation in the memory chip package and testing market and adversely affect our non-operating income (loss) and net income (loss).
Potential conflicts of interest with ChipMOS may cause us to lose opportunities to expand and improve our operations
As of March 31, 2005, we owned 28.7% equity interest in ChipMOS. Since ChipMOS is a provider of semiconductor packaging and testing services, our substantial interest in ChipMOS may lead to potential conflicts of interest in the expansion and development of the semiconductor packaging and testing markets. These conflicts may result in lost corporate opportunities or actions that may prevent us from taking advantage of opportunities to expand and improve our operations.
If we are unable to maintain a steady return to our former capacity utilization rates, our profitability would be adversely affected
For 2001, our capacity utilization rates were negatively affected by a general global economic downturn and decreased market demand in the semiconductor industry in general. As a result, our profitability suffered severely in 2001. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, our capacity utilization rates increased significantly due to improved demand for our products and services as market conditions in 2002, 2003 and 2004 have generally improved compared to 2001. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve or sustain a high utilization rate in the future. Nor can we assure you that declines in the semiconductor industry or other factors will not harm our capacity utilization or our profitability in the future.
Given the high fixed costs of our services, high capacity utilization allows us to maintain higher gross margins because it allows us to allocate fixed costs over a greater number of units we package and test. Increases or decreases in capacity utilization rates can have a significant effect on our services. Accordingly, our ability to enhance our gross margins will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to increase our capacity utilization rates.
In addition, in order to continue to increase or sustain our capacity utilization we must:
| • | ensure that our packaging and testing technologies meet our customers’ needs; |
|
| • | install advanced equipment in anticipation of new business; and |
|
| • | prevent disruption of operations due to fire, accidents, mechanical and technical failures, expansion, introduction of new packages or relocation of equipment. |
If demand for our services does not meet our expectations, our capacity utilization would decrease and our gross margins would suffer.
We depend on a small number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenues and a loss of any one of these customers would result in the loss of a significant portion of our revenues
We are dependent on a small group of customers for a substantial portion of our services. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, 66.3%, 66.8% and 64.8% of our net operating revenues, respectively, were derived from sales to our top ten customers. In 2004, our top two customers accounted for 11% and 11%, respectively, of our net operating revenues. We expect that we will continue to depend on a relatively limited number of customers for a significant portion of our net operating revenues because of the concentration of demand in the semiconductor industry for our products and services. Our ability to maintain close and satisfactory relationships with our customers is important to the ongoing success and profitability of our services. Few of our customers are presently obligated to purchase packaging or testing services or to provide us with binding forecasts of product purchases for any period. If any of our significant customers
7
reduces, delays or cancels its orders, our services would be seriously harmed because each of these customers accounts for a significant portion of our net operating revenues.
If capital resources required for our future expansion plans are not available, we may be unable to successfully implement our services strategy
We have engaged in equipment and facilities expansion in recent years to upgrade our technology and equipment. Our business growth in the future will continue to require substantial capital expenditures to fund such equipment and facilities expansions. The growing demand for substrate products has and will continue to require significant capital expenditures on substrate packaging technology and equipment. In making these planned capital expenditures, we may need to obtain additional capital. In addition, we may be unable to accurately estimate the timing and amount of our capital requirements, which depend on a number of factors including demand for our services and availability of equipment and whether or when the market will recover. In addition, we cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms to us, or at all, when we require additional financing. If we are unable to obtain the necessary capital resources or financing, we will not be able to achieve our future business growth.
If we cannot compete successfully in our industry, our current and potential customers would likely decide not to use our services, which would seriously harm our services
The independent semiconductor packaging and testing industry is very competitive. We face substantial competition from established packaging and testing companies, including Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. (Taiwan), ASE Test Limited (Taiwan and Malaysia), Amkor Technology Inc. (USA), ASAT, Ltd. (Hong Kong), STATS ChipPAC Ltd. (Singapore), Hana Microelectronics Public Co. Ltd. (Thailand), Orient Semiconductor Electronics, Limited (Taiwan), Astra International (Indonesia), Carsem Bhd. (Malaysia) and Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd. (Japan). We may face additional competition from new competitors in our industry in emerging countries, such as the People’s Republic of China, or the PRC, where demand is expected to grow for our products and services. To a lesser extent, we also compete with the internal packaging and testing capabilities of our customers who have in-house packaging and testing capabilities. Some of our competitors have greater resources in substrate technology. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we have, including established relationships with many large semiconductor companies which are our current or potential customers. These relationships and lengthy qualification periods required by most of our potential customers may prevent us from securing new customers.
If the outsourcing trend for packaging and testing services does not continue, we could lose a significant number of our current customers and we may be unable to implement our services strategy plan in the future
We depend on outsourcing of packaging and testing services by fabless semiconductor companies and integrated device manufacturers. In recent years, semiconductor companies have increasingly subcontracted parts of the semiconductor production process, including packaging and testing, to independent companies to reduce costs and shorten production cycles. However, we cannot assure you that the outsourcing trend will continue. If integrated device manufacturers become dissatisfied with the services of independent semiconductor packaging and testing companies, they may return to utilizing in-house packaging and testing capabilities. A reversal of, or slowdown in, the outsourcing trend would seriously harm our services and make it difficult for us to implement our growth plan in the future.
If demand for the services of Taiwan’s wafer foundries decreases, a significant source of our sales would decrease, which would seriously harm our services
We depend on Taiwan’s independent wafer foundries to source our sales orders. In recent years, more than half of our net operating revenues were derived from packaging and testing semiconductor wafers manufactured at Taiwan’s wafer foundries. If the demand for foundry services offered by Taiwan’s wafer foundries decreases for any reason, including shifts in demand for these services to wafer foundries in other countries, an important source of our sales would be lost and our profitability would suffer.
8
If we are unable to obtain raw materials from our suppliers, our production schedules would be delayed and we may lose customers
We must obtain sufficient quantities of raw materials at acceptable prices in a timely manner. We source most of our raw materials, including critical materials like lead-frames and substrates, from a limited group of suppliers. We purchase all of our materials on a purchase order basis and have no long-term contracts with any of our suppliers. From time to time, suppliers have extended lead times or limited the supply of required materials to us because of supply capacity constraints during market upturns for the semiconductor industry. Consequently, we have experienced from time to time difficulty in obtaining acceptable quantities of raw materials on a timely basis. In addition, from time to time, we may reject materials that do not meet our specifications, resulting in declines in output or yield. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain in the future sufficient quantities of raw materials and other supplies of an acceptable quality. Our inability to obtain raw materials in a timely and cost effective manner would cause us to delay our production and delivery schedules, which may result in the loss of our customers and revenues.
If we are unable to obtain equipment from our suppliers, we may be forced to delay any future expansion plans
We need to purchase new packaging and testing equipment if we decide to expand our operations in anticipation of a market recovery. From time to time, increased demand for new equipment may cause lead times to extend beyond those normally required by equipment vendors. For example, in the past, increased demand for equipment caused some equipment suppliers to only partially satisfy our equipment orders in the normal lead time frame during market upturns for the semiconductor industry. The unavailability of equipment or failures to deliver equipment could delay implementation of our future expansion plans and impair our ability to meet customer orders. If we are unable to implement our future expansion plans or meet customer orders, we could lose potential and existing customers. Generally, we do not enter into binding equipment purchase agreements and we acquire our equipment on a purchase order basis, which exposes us to substantial risks. For example, sudden changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the US dollar and Japanese yen, could result in increased prices for equipment purchased by us, which could seriously harm our results of operations.
If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our expansion plans could be jeopardized
We have in the past and again recently experienced growth in the scope and complexity of our operations and in the number of our employees. This growth has strained our managerial, financial, manufacturing and other resources. In order to manage our future growth, we must continue to implement additional operating and financial controls and hire and train additional personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in the future, and our failure to do so could jeopardize our future expansion plans.
We are exploring the possibility of expanding our operations or making additional investments in the PRC, which may expose us to additional political, regulatory, economic and foreign investment risks
Some of our customers and foreign competitors have expanded their operations to the PRC. In order to remain competitive and to position ourselves to gain market share, we are exploring potential opportunities for expansion to or investments in the PRC. In December 2001 and June 2004, we obtained foreign investment approval from the Investment Commission of the ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs to invest up to US$50 million in aggregate in Suzhou, PRC. We established a subsidiary named Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited, and, as of March 31, 2005, we have invested a total of US$30 million in this subsidiary. We are in the stage of ramping up our facilities in Suzhou for the manufacturing of DRAM modules, flash memory cards, transistors and other electronic components. With this investment in the PRC, our financial condition, results of operations and future prospects are subject, to a significant degree, to the political and economic situation, regulatory control and general legal developments in the PRC and other foreign investment risks. In addition, these expansions or investments could be adversely affected if relations between the PRC and the ROC deteriorate.
We depend on key management and the loss of any key management personnel may disrupt our services
Our success depends upon the continued service of key senior management. Members of our senior management have served us for an average of over 10 years and have made substantial contributions to our growth. We do not have
9
employment contracts with many of our senior management and none of our senior management is bound by any non- competition agreement. If we lose the services of key senior management it would be very difficult to find and integrate replacement personnel, which would seriously harm our services expansion.
We depend on our technical personnel and the inability to attract and retain them would jeopardize our operations and future expansion plans
Our business depends on technology and, accordingly, our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees, particularly engineering and technical personnel. Without sufficient numbers of skilled employees, our operations would suffer, resulting in deteriorating ability to solve operating and other issues in a timely and effective manner. Competition for qualified engineering and technical employees in Taiwan is intense and replacement of qualified employees is difficult. If we are unable to attract, retain and motivate our technical personnel, our operations would be jeopardized and our operating efficiency would deteriorate.
Our failure to comply with environmental regulations or to defend against environmental claims could expose us to serious liabilities
The semiconductor packaging and testing processes require the use of chemicals and gases which are regulated by the government. For example, liquid waste is produced when silicon wafers are diced into chips using diamond saws and cooled with running water. Liquid waste is also produced when lead-frames are plated onto wafer chips and cleansed with water. Moreover, excess material on leads and moldings are removed from packaged semiconductors in the trim and form process. Environmental claims or the failure to comply with any environmental regulations could result in damages or fines against us or suspension of production. We may be required by new regulations to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses. If we fail to control the use of hazardous substances, we could incur future liabilities, including clean up costs.
We and many Taiwan customers and suppliers are vulnerable to natural disasters and other events outside our control, the occurrence of which may seriously harm our services
Our operations and those of our customers and suppliers are particularly vulnerable to fires, earthquakes, typhoons, droughts, floods, power losses, and similar events. The occurrence of any of these events could interrupt services. For instance, our operations were interrupted for approximately ten days in September 1999 because of an earthquake. Our property and business interruption insurance did not cover all damages incurred during the interruption. Most recently, in November 2004, Taiwan experienced significant earthquakes registering up to 6.7 on the Richter scale. We did not experience any significant damage as a result of these earthquakes. We cannot guarantee that future earthquakes will not cause material damage to our facilities or property, including work in progress, or cause significant business interruptions. Although we maintain property and business interruption insurance for such risks, there is no guarantee that future damages or business loss from earthquakes will be covered by such insurance, that we will be able to collect from our insurance carriers, should we choose to claim under our insurance policies, or that such coverage will be sufficient.
In addition, the production facilities of many of our suppliers and customers providers of complementary semiconductor manufacturing services, including foundries, are located in Taiwan. If our customers are affected, it could result in a decline in the demand for our testing and assembly services. If our suppliers and providers of complementary semiconductor manufacturing services are affected, our production schedule could be interrupted or delayed. As a result, a major earthquake, natural disaster or other disruptive event in Taiwan could severely disrupt the normal operation of business and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Disruptions in the international trading environment may seriously decrease our international sales
A substantial portion of our net operating revenues is derived from sales to customers located outside of Taiwan. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, sales to our overseas customers accounted for 54.6%, 56.8% and 59.9%, respectively, of our net operating revenues. We expect sales to customers outside of Taiwan to continue to represent a significant portion of our net operating revenues. As a result, our services will continue to be vulnerable to disruptions in the international
10
trading environment, including adverse changes in foreign government regulations, political unrest and international economic downturns.
These disruptions in the international trading environment affect the demand for our products and change the terms upon which we sell our products overseas, which could seriously decrease our international sales.
The differences between Taiwan and U.S. accounting standards resulted in different amounts of our net income under those standards, which makes evaluating our financial performance difficult
Our financial statements are prepared under ROC GAAP, which differ in many respects from US GAAP. For example, ROC GAAP does not require the recognition of the fair market value of shares distributed as bonuses to employees when calculating net income. Largely as a result of the differences in accounting for employee bonuses and equity investments, our net income (loss) in 2002, 2003 and 2004 under US GAAP was NT$(223) million, NT$3,248 million and NT$3,667 million (US$115.5 million), respectively, as compared to net income under ROC GAAP of NT$425 million, NT$2,839 million and NT$4,282 million (US$134.9 million), respectively.
In addition, the ROC SFB allowed us to delay recognition of investment income (loss) from certain of our investee companies in our financial results under the ROC GAAP until June 30 of the following year until the end of fiscal year 2004. After the adoption of amended ROC Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, “Accounting for Long-term Equity Investment” which became effective on January 1, 2005, we cease to delay recognizing investment income (loss) from certain investee companies accounted for under the equity method. Therefore, our financial results in 2004 may not contain investment income (loss) of certain investee companies in such year. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results-Delay in Recognition of Investment Income in Certain Investee Companies Accounted for under Equity Method.” Under US GAAP, however, there is no provision that allows us to delay recognition of our investment income from our investee companies. As a result, you may not be able to perform a meaningful year-to-year comparison of our financial results. In addition, year-to-year comparison of our financial results under ROC GAAP may significantly differ from year-to-year comparison under US GAAP.
Investor confidence in us may be adversely impacted if we or our independent registered public accountants are unable to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring U.S. public companies to include a report of management on the company’s internal control over financial reporting in its Annual Report on Form 10-K or Form 20-F, as the case may be, that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the company’s independent registered public accountants must attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. These requirements will first apply to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2006.
In the course of their audit, our independent auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers have identified certain weaknesses in our current internal accounting processes. While we have taken actions to address these weaknesses, additional measures may be necessary and these measures, along with other measures expected to be taken to improve our internal controls, may not be sufficient to address the issues identified by us or to ensure that our internal controls are effective. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures”. Moreover, even if our management does conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, if our independent accountants are not satisfied with our internal controls, the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if the independent accountants interpret the requirements, rules or regulations differently from us, they may decline to attest to our management’s assessment or may issue a report with adverse opinion. Any of these possible outcomes could result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could negatively impact the market price of our ADSs.
Risks Relating to Our Technologies
If we cannot respond to rapid technology changes in the semiconductor packaging and testing industry, our
11
profitability will suffer
The semiconductor packaging and testing industry is characterized by rapid increases in the diversity and complexity of semiconductor packaging and testing products. As a result, we expect that we will need to continue to develop and offer more advanced packaging and testing processes in order to respond to our customers’ requirements as industry conditions change. Developing and maintaining advanced packaging and testing processes requires significant research and development and capital expenditures.
In addition, advances in technology typically lead to rapid and significant price erosion and decreased margins for older products and services and may cause our current products and services to become less competitive. Our failure to develop or obtain advanced packaging or testing designs will materially and adversely affect our product mix and would seriously harm our profitability.
If we are unable to successfully package and test our products within the acceptable range of precision, we will not be able to achieve satisfactory production yields and our results of operations will suffer
The semiconductor packaging and testing processes are complex and involve a number of precise steps. Defective packaging and testing can result from a number of factors, including:
| • | the level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment; |
|
| • | human error; |
|
| • | equipment malfunction; |
|
| • | defective plating services; |
|
| • | use of defective raw materials; and |
|
| • | inadequate sample testing. |
From time to time, we expect to experience lower than anticipated production yields as a result of the above factors, particularly in connection with the expansion of our capacity or change in our processing methods. In addition, our yield on new products will be lower than average as we develop the necessary expertise and experience to produce those products. If we fail to maintain high quality production standards, our reputation may suffer and our customers may cancel their orders or return our products.
We rely on technology provided by third parties
We have licensed from Motorola, Inc., or Motorola, the technology for ball grid array for which we make royalty payments based on the number of pads or balls used in our packages. We also implement new package design by enter into technology alliances and by licensing package technologies from certain technology companies. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, our royalty expenses were NT$426 million, NT$161 million and NT$143 million (US$4.5 million), respectively, which accounted for 1.9%, 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, of our net operating revenues. There can be no assurance that third parties will continue to license advanced technologies to us on terms satisfactory or acceptable to us, or at all. In the event that we are unable to license advanced technologies from third parties, we may be required to develop such technologies internally. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop such technologies internally.
Disputes over intellectual property rights could be costly and could deprive us of technologies to stay competitive
We may suffer legal liabilities and damages if we infringe on the proprietary rights of others or incur costs resulting from legal claims and adverse proceedings against us. Despite this, we have no means of knowing what patent applications have been filed in the United States or elsewhere until they are granted. The semiconductor packaging and testing industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property
12
rights. If any third party were to make valid intellectual property infringement claims against us or our customers, we could be required to:
| • | discontinue using disputed process technologies which would prevent us from offering some of our packaging and testing products; |
|
| • | pay substantial monetary damages; |
|
| • | seek to develop non-infringing technologies, which may not be feasible; or |
|
| • | seek to acquire licenses to the infringed technology, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. |
We could also be required to expend substantial resources to defend any claim alleging our infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights. If we fail to obtain necessary licenses or if litigation relating to patent infringement or other intellectual property matters occurs, it could seriously harm our company.
In addition, we have acquired patents and trademarks to protect some of our proprietary technologies and products. We cannot assure you, however, that these measures will provide meaningful protection of our intellectual property. For example, our competitors may be able to develop similar or superior products, or we may not have sufficient financial and legal resources to protect and enforce our rights.
Political and Economic Risks
We face substantial political risks associated with doing business in Taiwan, particularly due to the tense relationship between the ROC and the PRC.
Our principal executive offices and substantially all of our assets are located in Taiwan. Accordingly, our services, financial condition and results of operations and the market price of our common shares and the ADSs may be affected by changes in Republic of China governmental policies, taxation, inflation or interest rates and by social instability and diplomatic and social developments in or affecting Taiwan which are outside of our control. Taiwan has a unique international political status. Since 1949, Taiwan and the Chinese mainland have been separately governed. The PRC claims that it is the sole government in China and that Taiwan is part of China. Although significant economic and cultural relations have been established during recent years between the ROC and the PRC, relations have often been strained. The PRC government has refused to renounce the use of military force to gain control over Taiwan. Furthermore, the PRC government passed an Anti-Secession Law in March 2005, which authorizes non-peaceful means and other necessary measures should Taiwan move to gain independence from the PRC. Past developments in relations between the ROC and the PRC have on occasion depressed the market prices of the securities of companies in the ROC. Relations between the Republic of China and the PRC and other factors affecting military, political or economic conditions in Taiwan could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, as well as the market price and the liquidity of our securities.
The trading price of our American Depositary Shares may be adversely affected by the general activities of the Taiwan Stock Exchange and U.S. stock exchanges, the trading price of our shares, increases in interest rates and the economic performance of Taiwan markets
Our shares are listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The trading price of our ADSs may be affected by the trading price of our shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The Taiwan Stock Exchange is a smaller market and, more volatile than the securities markets in the United States and a number of European countries. The Taiwan Stock Exchange has experienced substantial fluctuations in the prices and volumes of sales of listed securities, and there are currently limits on the range of daily price movements on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In the past fifteen years, the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index peaked at 12,495.34 in February 1990 and subsequently fell to a low of 2,560.47 in October 1990. On March 13, 2000, the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index experienced a 617-point drop, which represented the single largest decrease in the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index in its history. During 2004, the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index peaked at 7,135 on March 5, 2004, and reached a low of 5,255 on August 5, 2004. From
13
January 2, 2004 to May 31, 2005, daily closing values of our shares ranged from NT$21.20 per share to NT$42.40 per share. The Taiwan Stock Exchange is particularly volatile during times of political instability including when relations between Taiwan and the PRC are strained. Moreover, the Taiwan Stock Exchange has experienced problems including market manipulation, insider trading and settlement defaults. The recurrence of these or similar problems could decrease the market price and liquidity of our shares and ADSs.
The market price of the ADSs may also be affected by general trading activities on the U.S. stock exchanges, which have experienced significant price volatility with respect to shares of technology companies. Increases in interest rates and other general economic conditions may also have an effect on the market price of our ADSs. Daily closing values of our ADSs ranged from US$1.88 to US$6.00 between June 7, 2000, the date our ADSs were listed on NASDAQ, and May 31, 2005. Over the same period, the NASDAQ Composite Index ranged from 1,114.11 to 2,178.34.
On May 31, 2005, the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index closed at 6,011.56, and the daily closing value of our shares was NT$29.90 per share.
Currency fluctuations could increase our costs relative to our revenues, which could adversely affect our profitability.
More than half of our net operating revenues are denominated in currencies other than NT dollars, primarily US dollars and Japanese Yen. On the other hand, more than half of our costs of direct labor, raw materials and overhead are incurred in NT dollars. We are affected by fluctuations in exchange rates among the US dollar, the Japanese Yen, the NT dollar and other currencies. Any significant fluctuation in exchange rates may be harmful to our financial condition. In addition, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar and the NT dollar will affect the US dollar value of the ADSs and the US dollar value of any cash dividends we pay, which could have a corresponding effect on the market price of the ADSs.
Any future outbreak of contagious diseases may materially and adversely affect our services and operations, as well as our financial condition and results of operations.
Any future outbreak of contagious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome or avian influenza, may disrupt our ability to adequately staff our services, and may generally disrupt our operations. If any of our employees is suspected of having contracted any contagious disease, we may under certain circumstances be required to quarantine such employees and the affected areas of our premises. As a result, we may have to temporarily suspend part of or all of our operations. Furthermore, any future outbreak may restrict the level of economic activity in affected regions, including Taiwan, which may also adversely affect our services and prospects. As a result, we cannot assure you that any future outbreak of contagious diseases would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Assessment regarding our value-added tax obligation may adversely affect our profitability
We have historically treated certain of our revenues as “service revenues” for the purpose of determining our value-added tax, or VAT, obligations. Service revenues have an applicable VAT rate of 0%. The relevant tax authority has determined that a certain amount of such revenues should be taxable and is currently in the process of assessing the aggregate amount of our VAT obligations. Although we believe that our VAT provisions of NT$468 million recorded as of December 31, 2004 are sufficient to cover the liability associated with the tax assessment, we can provide no assurance that the amount of the final assessment will not adversely affect our profitability.
14
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Shares or ADSs
Restrictions on the ability to deposit shares into our ADS program may adversely affect the liquidity and price of the ADSs
The ability to deposit shares into our ADS program is restricted by ROC law. Under current ROC law, no person or entity, including you and us, may deposit shares into our ADS program without specific approval of the ROC SFB except for the deposit of the shares into our ADS program and for the issuance of additional ADSs in connection with:
| • | distribution of share dividends or free distribution of our shares; |
|
| • | exercise of the preemptive rights of ADS holders applicable to the shares evidenced by ADSs in the event of capital increases for cash; or |
|
| • | if permitted under the deposit agreement and the custody agreement, purchases of our shares in the domestic market in Taiwan by the investor directly or through the depositary or the surrender of shares under the possession of investors and then delivery of such shares to the custodian for deposit into our ADS program, subject to the following conditions: (a) the depositary may accept deposit of those shares and issue the corresponding number of ADSs with regard to such deposit only if the total number of ADSs outstanding after the deposit does not exceed the number of ADSs previously approved by ROC SFB, plus any ADSs issued pursuant to the events described in the above two bullet points; and (b) this deposit may only be made to the extent previously issued ADSs have been cancelled. |
As a result of the limited ability to deposit shares into our ADS program, the prevailing market price of our ADSs on the NASDAQ National Market, or NASDAQ, may differ from the prevailing market price of the equivalent number of our shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Holders of our ADSs will not have the same voting rights as the holders of our shares, which may affect the value of your investment
Due to the amendment to the ROC Company Act and the amendment made to our articles of incorporation accordingly, except for treasury shares, each common share is generally entitled to one vote and no voting discount will be applied. However, except as described in this annual report and in the deposit agreement, holders of our ADSs will not be able to exercise voting rights attaching to the shares evidenced by our ADSs on an individual basis. Holders of our ADSs will appoint the depositary or its nominee as their representative to exercise the voting rights attaching to the shares represented by the ADSs. The voting rights attaching to the shares evidenced by our ADSs must be exercised as to all matters brought to a vote of shareholders collectively in the same manner.
If holders of at least 51% of the ADSs outstanding at the relevant record date instruct the depositary to vote in the same manner regarding a resolution, including election of directors and/or supervisors, the depositary will appoint our Chairman, or his designee, to represent the ADS holders at the shareholders’ meetings and to vote the shares represented by the ADSs outstanding in the manner so instructed. If by the relevant record date the depositary has not received instructions from holders of ADSs holding at least 51% of the ADSs to vote in the same manner for any resolution, then the holders will be deemed to have instructed the depositary to authorize and appoint our Chairman, or his designee, to vote all the shares represented by ADSs at his sole discretion, which may not be in your interest.
The rights of holders of our ADSs to participate in our rights offerings may be limited, which may cause dilution to their holdings
We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not offer those rights to ADS holders unless both the rights and the underlying securities to be distributed to ADS holders are either registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective.
15
Accordingly, holders of our ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution in their holdings.
Our public shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. corporation
Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and by laws governing ROC corporations. The rights of our shareholders to bring shareholders’ suits against us or our board of directors under ROC law are much more limited than those of the shareholders of U.S. corporations. Therefore, our public shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our management, members of our board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as shareholders of a U.S. corporation. Please refer to “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association” included elsewhere in this annual report for a detailed discussion of the rights of our shareholders to bring legal actions against us or our directors under ROC law.
Holders of our ADSs will be required to appoint several local agents in Taiwan if they withdraw shares from our ADS program and become our shareholders, which may make ownership burdensome
Non-ROC persons wishing to withdraw shares represented by their ADSs from our ADS program and hold our shares represented by those ADSs are required to appoint a local agent or representative with qualifications set forth by the ROC SFB to open a securities trading account with a local brokerage firm, pay ROC taxes, remit funds and exercise shareholders’ rights. In addition, the withdrawing holders are also required to appoint a custodian bank with qualifications set forth by the Ministry of Finance to hold the securities in safekeeping, make confirmations, settle trades and report all relevant information. Without making this appointment and opening of the accounts, the withdrawing holders would not be able to subsequently sell our shares withdrawn from a depositary receipt facility on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Under ROC law and regulations, citizens of the PRC are not permitted to hold our shares or withdraw shares represented by ADSs from our ADS program.
You may not be able to enforce a judgment of a foreign court in the ROC
We are a company limited by shares incorporated under the ROC Company Act. Most of our assets and most of our directors, supervisors and executive officers and experts named in the registration statement are located in Taiwan. As a result, it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments obtained outside Taiwan upon us or such persons in Taiwan. Any judgment obtained against us in any court outside the ROC arising out of or relating to the ADSs will not be enforced by ROC courts if any of the following situations shall apply to such final judgment:
| • | the court rendering the judgment does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter according to ROC law; |
|
| • | the judgment or the court procedures resulting in the judgment is contrary to the public order or good morals of the ROC; |
|
| • | the judgment was rendered by default, except where the summons or order necessary for the commencement of the action was duly served on us within the jurisdiction of the court rendering the judgment within a reasonable period of time and in accordance with the laws and regulations of such jurisdiction, or with judicial assistance of the ROC; or |
|
| • | judgments of ROC courts are not recognized and enforceable in the jurisdiction of the court rendering the judgment on a reciprocal basis. |
Item 4. Information on the Company
A. History and Development of the Company
Our legal and commercial name is Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. We were incorporated under the ROC Company Act as a company limited by shares on May 17, 1984 and our shares were listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in 1993. On June 7, 2000, we issued 30,000,000 ADSs, each representing five shares. Our ADSs have been
16
listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “SPIL” since June 2, 2000. Our principal executive offices are located at No. 123, Sec. 3, Da Fong Road, Tantzu, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China, and our telephone number is 886-4-2534-1525. Our Internet website address iswww.spil.com.tw.
We are one of the world’s leading independent providers of semiconductor packaging and testing services. We offer a full range of both standard and customized packaging and testing solutions, including advanced lead-frame packages and substrate packages such as the flip-chip ball grid array, as well as testing for logic, mixed signal and embedded memory devices. We also offer our customers turnkey solutions from packaging and testing to direct shipment of semiconductor devices to end users designated by our customers.
Our headquarters and packaging facilities are located in Taichung, Taiwan, where we had 2,999 wire bonders as of December 31, 2004. In addition, we had 249 testers in Hsinchu and Taichung, Taiwan as of the same date. Taiwan is home to the world’s largest independent wafer foundries and as such is home to one of the world’s leading suppliers of outsourcing semiconductor manufacturing. Our close proximity to and relationships with Taiwan’s leading wafer foundries allow us to benefit significantly from the trend towards outsourcing in the semiconductor industry and to quickly respond to our customers’ needs. Our location in Taiwan also enables our customers to secure seamless services within Taiwan for all of their manufacturing needs, thereby minimizing the time required to deliver finished semiconductor devices to the market.
We provide packaging and testing services to more than 100 customers worldwide. For 2004, our top customers included the following leading semiconductor suppliers: ATI Technologies, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Intel Corporation, LSI Logic Corporation, Marvell Semiconductor Inc., MediaTek, NVIDIA, SanDisk Corporation, VIA Technologies Inc. and Xilinx, Inc. We currently target customers in the personal computer, communications, consumer ICs and non-commodity memory semiconductor markets. We strive to provide the highest level of customer service to meet and anticipate our customers’ current and future requirements. We have established technical and sales teams near major customer facilities, including the Hsinchu Science Park, to work with our customers on developing and implementing new packaging and testing technologies as semiconductors become smaller and more sophisticated.
Our objective is to be the leading worldwide, full service independent provider of semiconductor packaging and testing services. Key elements of our strategy include:
| • | providing a full range of packaging and testing services including turnkey capabilities to simplify our customers’ supply chain management; |
|
| • | offering leading packaging and testing technology to attract and retain customers; |
|
| • | focusing on customer service and working with our customers on developing and fulfilling their current and future semiconductor packaging and testing needs; |
|
| • | leveraging our existing foundry relationships and Taiwan location to enable our customers to easily integrate all of their outsourced semiconductor manufacturing needs; |
|
| • | diversifying and expanding our customer base geographically, by customer type and by end-market application to capitalize on growing markets including communications and increased outsourcing from vertically integrated semiconductor device manufacturers and systems original equipment manufacturers; and |
|
| • | expanding in the PRC to remain competitive and position ourselves to achieve greater market share as some of our customers and foreign competitors have expanded their operations in the PRC. |
For information relating to our capital expenditure, see “¾ B. Business Overview¾ Capital Expenditures and Divestitures”.
17
B. Business Overview
Our Business
We offer semiconductor packaging and testing services to the semiconductor industry for applications in communications, computing, consumer, automotive and industrial end markets. We offer full back-end turnkey services from wafer probe to final test and drop shipment. The services we offer are customized to the needs of our individual customers. In 2004, 88.3% of our net operating revenues were from packaging services and 11.7% of our net operating revenues were from testing and other services.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the amount of our packaging and testing revenues by product type and the product’s revenues as a percentage of our total net operating revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | % | | | NT$ | | | % | | | NT$ | | | % | |
| | (audited) (consolidated) | |
| | (in millions, except for percentages) | |
Ball grid array packages | | | 8,576 | | | | 38.5 | | | | 11,698 | | | | 42.7 | | | | 16,416 | | | | 46.6 | |
Quad flat packages | | | 7,659 | | | | 34.3 | | | | 8,635 | | | | 31.5 | | | | 9,435 | | | | 26.7 | |
Small outline packages | | | 2,744 | | | | 12.3 | | | | 3,160 | | | | 11.5 | | | | 3,800 | | | | 10.8 | |
Other packages | | | 677 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 956 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 1,467 | | | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total packaging revenues | | | 19,656 | | | | 88.1 | | | | 24,449 | | | | 89.2 | | | | 31,118 | | | | 88.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Testing and other revenues | | | 2,643 | | | | 11.9 | | | | 2,962 | | | | 10.8 | | | | 4,134 | | | | 11.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net operating revenues | | | 22,299 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 27,411 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 35,252 | | | | 100.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Because our services is, and will continue to be, dependent on the requirements of semiconductor companies for independent testing and assembly services, any downturn in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry may reduce demand for our services and adversely affect our results of operations. Our operations, however, are not subject to any clear seasonal effects.
Our Packaging Services
We offer a broad range of package formats designed to provide our customers with a full array of packaging solutions. The packaging solutions we currently offer to our customers include lead-frame packages and substrate packages, which include ball grid array and module packages (incorporating multiple semiconductor chips) and flip-chip ball gird array packages. Our flip-chip ball grid array packages, which we began to offer in the first quarter of 2001, are based on the proprietary Flex-On-Cap wafer bumping and redistribution technologies we license from Flip Chip Technologies L.L.C., or Flip Chip. Semiconductor packaging serves to protect semiconductor chips, to facilitate their integration into electronic systems and to enable the dissipation of heat produced by the final product. The packaging process begins when patterned silicon wafers received from our customers are diced using diamond saws into separate die. Each die is attached to a lead-frame or substrate either directly in a substrate package or first to a die-attached pad in a lead-frame package, by silver paste made with epoxy resin. Leads on the lead-frame or substrate are then connected by extremely fine gold wires to the input/output terminals on the chip, using machines called wire bonders. Each chip is then encapsulated, generally in a plastic casing molded from a molding compound, with only the leads protruding from the finished casing. To complete the packaging process, excess molding compound is eliminated from the packaged semiconductor chip and the leads are trimmed and formed into various shapes.
Semiconductor packages have evolved from lead-frame packages to substrate packages in response to the increasing demands of today’s high-performance electronics products. The differentiating characteristics of these packages include:
| • | the size of the package; |
18
| • | the number of electrical connections the package can support; and |
|
| • | the thermal and electrical requirements of the package. |
As modern applications for semiconductor devices require smaller chips, the size of packages has also decreased. In leading-edge packages, the size of the package is reduced to just slightly larger than the size of the individual chip itself through a process known as chip scale packaging.
As semiconductor devices increase in complexity, the number of required electrical connections also increases. Our lead-frame products have electrical connections from the semiconductor device to the electronic product through leads on the perimeter of the package. Our substrate products have balls on the bottom of the package that create the electrical connections with the electronic system and can support larger numbers of electrical connections.
New methods of packaging have also enhanced the thermal and electrical characteristics of semiconductor packages to meet the high-bandwidth, high-speed and high-power demands of modern semiconductor devices. Substrate packages with cavity design considerably enhance heat-dissipation without necessitating a change in the substrate or chip layout. Flip-chip packages enable direct interconnection from the chip to the substrate. Electrical connection is first deposited on one side of a chip; then, the chip is flipped onto the substrate. Flip-chip technology eliminates the need for wire bonding and provides superior electrical performances. Chip scale packages have been designed for devices which require reduced height, board space and weight by reducing the size of the package to be only slightly larger than the size of the die and are ideally suited for the latest generation of wireless and consumer electronics. Multi-chip module packages allow for the combination of multiple chips into a single packages, enabling increased application functionality while minimizing overall size.
We price our packaging products on a per unit basis, taking into account the complexity of the product, the prevailing market conditions, the order size, the strength and history of our relationship with the customer and our capacity utilization at the time.
Lead-Frame Packages
Lead-frame packages are the most widely used package category and are characterized by a semiconductor chip encapsulated in a plastic molding compound with metal leads on the perimeter. This package category has evolved from a design where the leads are plugged into holes on the circuit board to a design where the leads are soldered to the surface of the circuit board. Lead-frame packages are divided into two general types of packages: quad flat packages and small outline packages.
To satisfy the demand for miniaturization of portable electronic products, we are developing increasingly smaller versions of lead-frame packages to keep pace with continually shrinking semiconductor device sizes. Our advanced lead-frame packages are similar in design to our older lead-frame packages. However, our advanced lead-frame packages generally are thinner and smaller, have more leads and have advanced thermal and electrical characteristics. As a result of continued product development, we offer lead-frame products with a wide range of lead counts and body sizes to satisfy variations in the size of customers’ semiconductor devices.
The following diagram presents the basic component parts of a standard lead-frame package:
![(STANDARD LEAD-FRAME PACKAGE DIAGRAM)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984805.gif)
The following tables present our standard quad flat packages and small outline packages, including the number of leads in each package, a description of each package and the end uses of each package.
Quad Flat Packages
| | | | | | |
Package | | Lead-count | �� | Major Applications | | End Uses |
Quad Flat Package | | 100-256 | | Package with leads on four sides designed for advanced | | Desktop personal computers, consumer and industrial |
19
| | | | | | |
Package | | Lead-count | | Major Applications | | End Uses |
| | | | processors, consumer and industrial controllers, digital signal processors and application specific integrated circuits | | products, commercial and office equipment, automotive systems |
| | | | | | |
Low-Profile Quad Flat Package | | 32-256 | | Low-profile and lightweight package designed for application specific integrated circuits, digital signal processors, microprocessors/cont rollers, graphic processors, gate arrays, static random access memory and personal computer chipsets | | Wireless communication products, laptop computers, digital cameras, cordless/radiofrequency devices |
| | | | | | |
Thin Quad Flat Package | | 44-176 | | Designed for lightweight, portable electronics requiring broad performance characteristics | | Laptop computers, personal computers, disk drives, office equipment, audio and video products, wireless communication products |
| | | | | | |
Very Thin Quad Flat Package | | 80-100 | | Designed for lightweight, portable electronics requiring low profile packages | | Laptop computers, personal computers, disk drives, office equipment, audio, video products, wireless communication products |
| | | | | | |
Quad Flat No-lead Package | | 5-88 | | Small and light package with improved thermal and electrical performance makes it suitable for wireless transmitters RF front end, hard disk devices and micro-controllers | | Wireless communication products, disk drives, portable products, consumer products |
| | | | | | |
Thin Quad Flat No-lead Package | | 48-56 | | This device offers similar features to those of Quad Flat No-lead Package, but can process smaller and lighter packages | | Wireless communication products, disk drives, portable products, consumer products |
Small Outline Packages
| | | | | | |
Package | | Lead-count | | Major Applications | | End Uses |
Plastic Dual In-line Package | | 28-42 | | General purpose plastic package used in consumer electronic products | | Games, telephones, televisions, audioequipment, computer peripherals |
| | | | | | |
Small Outline Package | | 24-44 | | Small lead-frame package designed for applications requiring reduced height | | Pagers, cordless telephones, fax machines, copiers, printers, computer peripherals, audio and video products, automotive systems |
20
| | | | | | | | |
Package | | Lead-count | | Major Applications | | End Uses |
Shrink Small Outline Package | | | 28-70 | | | Small lead-frame package designed for applications requiring reduced height | | Pagers, cordless telephones, fax machines, copiers, printers, computer peripherals, audio and video products, automotive systems |
| | | | | | | | |
Small Outline J-Bend Package | | | 24-44 | | | Package designed for memory and low pin-count applications | | Consumer (audio/video/entertainment), communications (pagers/cordless phones), radiofrequency devices, cable TV, office appliances (fax/copiers/printer s/personal computer peripherals) |
| | | | | | | | |
Thin Small Outline Package I | | | 28-56 | | | Package designed for high-volume production of low-lead count memory devices including flash memory, static random access memory and dynamic random access memory | | Laptop computers, personal computers, still and video cameras and standard connections for peripherals to computers |
| | | | | | | | |
Very Thin Small Outline Package I | | | 48 | | | Package designed for a variety of applications where small sized memory devices are required, such as static random access memory, flash memory and electrically erasable programmable read-only-memory | | Memory module, mobile phones, PDAs, laptop computers, and digital still cameras |
| | | | | | | | |
Dual DIC TSOP I | | | 48-56 | | | Package designed for a variety of applications where small sized memory devices are required, such as static random access memory, flash memory and electrically erasable programmable read-only-memory | | Memory module, mobile phones, PDAs, laptop computers and digital still cameras |
| | | | | | | | |
Thin Small Outline Package II | | | 32-86 | | | Smaller version of Thin Small Outline Package I designed for logic and analog devices and memory devices including flash memory, static random access memory, erasable and electrically erasable programmable read only memory, and dynamic random access memory | | Disk drives, recordable optical disks, audio and video products, consumer electronics, communication products |
21
Substrate Packages
This category generally employs the ball grid array design which utilizes a plastic or tape laminate substrate rather than a lead-frame and places the electrical connections on the bottom of the package rather than around the perimeter.
The ball grid array format was developed to address the need for higher lead counts required by advanced semiconductor devices. Benefits of ball grid array packaging over leaded packaging include:
| • | smaller size; |
|
| • | greater pin count; |
|
| • | greater reliability; |
|
| • | better electrical signal integrity; and |
|
| • | easier attachment to a printed circuit board. |
As the number of leads surrounding the package increased, the proximity of the leads to one another became closer in an attempt to maintain the size of the package. The close proximity of one lead to another resulted in electrical shorting problems, and required the development of increasingly sophisticated and expensive techniques for producing circuit boards to accommodate the high number of leads.
The ball grid array format solved this problem by effectively creating leads on the bottom of the package in the form of solder balls. These balls can be evenly distributed across the entire bottom surface of the package, allowing greater distance between the individual leads. For the highest lead count devices, the ball grid array configuration can be manufactured less expensively and requires less delicate handling at installation.
The following diagram presents the basic component parts of a standard ball grid array packages:
![(IMAGE)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984806.gif)
To address the electronics market demand for higher frequency, higher input/output, and better thermal performance, we have made efforts to develop high value-added advanced packaging technologies, such as flip-chip and wafer bumping technologies. In addition to the development of the 8-inch wafer bumping technology, in order to meet the trend of wafer size moving to 12-inch from 8-inch, we have successfully established the first 12-inch wafer bumping technology in the world. Flip-chip ball grid array is a high-end, high-growth product typically used in advanced semiconductor products such as microprocessor units, micro peripherals, field programmable gate arrays and application specific ICs. The flip-chip technology enables direct interconnection from the chip to the substrate, eliminates the need for wire bonding and provides superior electrical performance. We licensed the flip-chip assembly technology from Flip-Chip to enhance our assembly process capability in flip-chip products. We have also developed thin and small package, or CSPs, on flexible or rigid substrates as well as lead-frames, which are suitable for the portable consumer market. Furthermore, we have developed module packages, with multiple chips integrated into one package, in order to meet the growing demand for “system-in-package,” or SIP, for applications in personal computers, communications devices and consumer products.
The following diagram presents the cross section of a flip-chip ball grid array package:
![(IMAGE)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984807.gif)
The following table presents our substrate packages, including the number of leads and the description of and uses for each package format:
22
| | | | | | | | |
Package | | Lead-count | | Major Applications | | End Uses |
Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array | | | 36-1,936 | | | Much higher electrical performance than traditional ball grid array for modern, more demanding applications | | Workstations, networking, graphics, application specific integrated circuits, personal digital assistants, processors |
| | | | | | | | |
Chip Scale Package | | | 14-448 | | | Low cost solution for low input/output count suitable for semiconductors that require a smaller package size than plastic ball grid array | | Memory, analog, flash memory, application specific integrated circuits, radio frequency devices, personal digital assistants, communications, mobile phones, laptop computers, sub-notebooks, wireless systems |
| | | | | | | | |
Stacked-Die Chip Scale Package | | | 21-400 | | | Low cost solution for low input/output count suitable for semiconductors that require a smaller package size than plastic ball grid array. This device offers double memory capacity with increased device functionality while allowing manufacturers to maintain size reduction roadmaps | | Memory, analog, flash memory, application specific integrated circuits, radio frequency devices, personal digital assistants, communications, mobile phones, laptop computers, sub-notebooks, wireless systems |
| | | | | | | | |
Ball Grid Array | | | 119-1,156 | | | Ball grid array package designed for applications which require high performance | | Laptop computers, disk drives, video cameras, global positioning systems, wireless communication products, standard connections for peripherals to computers |
| | | | | | | | |
Thermal Enhanced Ball Grid Array | | | 241-1,152 | | | Optimum low cost solution for high speed, high power applications with multiple routing layers for high performance applications | | Application specific integrated circuits, microprocessors, gate arrays, personal digital assistants, communications, mobile phones, laptops, sub-notebooks, boards |
| | | | | | | | |
Low Profile Ball Grid Array | | | 176-352 | | | Low-profile and light-weight package designed for applications which require high performance | | Laptop computers, wireless communication products, computer peripherals |
23
| | | | | | | | |
Package | | Lead-count | | Major Applications | | End Uses |
Land Grid Array | | | 23-68 | | | Land grid array package designed for applications which require high performance | | Laptop computers, disk drives, video cameras, global positioning systems, wireless communication products, standard connections for peripherals to computers |
| | | | | | | | |
Organic Leadless Chip Carrier | | | 28-48 | | | Package designed for CMOS image sensor chip, which offers small and light-weight for image applications | | Mobile phones, PDAs, laptop computers, digital still cameras, personal computer cameras, toys, automobile, security and surveillance |
| | | | | | | | |
Ceramic Leadless Chip Carrier | | | 48 | | | Offers similar feature as organic leadless chip carrier, but only using ceramic substrate material | | Mobile phones, PDAs, laptop computers, digital still cameras, personal computer cameras, toys, automobile, security and surveillance |
| | | | | | | | |
Organic Leadless Grid Array | | | 28-48 | | | Offers small and light-weight for image sensor applications and is made of organic substrate designed for better thermal performance | | Mobile phones, PDAs, laptop computers, digital still cameras, personal computer cameras, toys, automobile, security and surveillance |
| | | | | | | | |
CMOS Image Sensor Module | | | | | | Offers manufacturing flexibility for customized solutions for image sensor applications that require short time-to-market | | Mobile phones, PDAs, laptop computers, digital still cameras, personal computer cameras, toys, automobile, security and surveillance |
Testing and Other Services
Semiconductor testing measures and ensures the performance, functionality and reliability of a packaged semiconductor device. Testing semiconductor devices requires significant technical expertise and knowledge of the specific applications and functions of the device under testing. In addition to maintaining different types of advanced testing equipment which enable us to test a variety of semiconductor device functions, we work closely with our customers to develop and convert programs to test particular semiconductor products on multiple equipment platforms effectively. The cost of any specific test is dependent on the test time (usually measured in seconds) required to run a test which varies depending on the complexity of the semiconductor device and the customer’s specification with the percentage of fault coverage.
We also conduct wafer probing and final testing of digital logic and mixed signal products. In addition, many of our customers request drop shipment of their tested integrated circuits directly to designated final destinations.
Wafer Probing.Wafer probing is the step immediately before packaging of integrated circuits and involves sorting the processed wafer for defects to ensure that it meets customer acceptance criteria. Integrated circuits on an accepted wafer are then individually inspected visually and with scanners before packaging and final testing.
24
Logic and Mixed Signal Final Testing.We conduct final testing of a wide variety of logic and mixed signal integrated circuits, including complex, high-performance, as well as lower-performance integrated circuits. High-performance products include personal computer-related components such as CPU chipsets and graphic processors, while major lower performance products include integrated circuits used in consumer electronics products.
Other Testing Services.In addition to wafer probing and final testing services, we also provide “system-level testing” for testing products on mother board with automatic load and unload features, “dynamic burn-in” service to screen out device infant mortality, “laser repair” to modify device connection structure for specific product applications, “lead/ball scanner” to screen out abnormal products, including bent lead or ball defective devices from being shipped to end customers, “marking” to specify the unique customer logo and batch identification on product as for traceability and “tape and reel” to packing devices into one complete reel for surface mount operation.
We offer drop shipment services by providing for shipment of integrated circuits directly to final destinations designated by our customers. Since drop shipment eliminates the additional step of inspection by the customer before shipment to the customer, quality of service is a key consideration. We believe that our ability to successfully execute our full range of services, including drop shipment services, is an important factor in maintaining existing customers as well as attracting new customers.
Customers
We currently have more than 100 customers worldwide, and our customers include many of the largest semiconductor companies in the world. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, 48.3%, 48.7% and 45.0% of our net operating revenues were derived from sales to our top five customers, respectively, and 66.3%, 66.8% and 64.8% of our net operating revenues were derived from sales to our top ten customers, respectively. In 2004, our top two customers provided approximately 11% and 11%, respectively, of our net operating revenues. Our representative customers as of December 31, 2004 include: ATI Technologies, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Intel Corporation, LSI Logic Corporation, Marvell Semiconductor Inc., MediaTek, NVIDIA Corp., SanDisk Corporation, VIA Technologies Inc. and Xilinx, Inc.
Industry-leading companies require early access to advanced packages because they manufacture products which have first-to-market technologies. Our close relationships with industry leading customers help us to further develop their technology and position us to benefit from the high unit volumes of these major semiconductor customers.
Set forth below is a geographic breakdown of our net operating revenues for the periods presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | % | | | NT$ | | | % | | | NT$ | | | % | |
| | (audited) (consolidated) | |
| | (in millions, except for percentages) | |
Taiwan | | | 10,123 | | | | 45.4 | | | | 11,875 | | | | 43.3 | | | | 14,127 | | | | 40.1 | |
U.S. and Canada | | | 11,525 | | | | 51.7 | | | | 14,775 | | | | 53.9 | | | | 20,001 | | | | 56.7 | |
Others(1) | | | 650 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 761 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 1,124 | | | | 3.2 | |
(1) | | Includes primarily Japan, Germany, Singapore and Hong Kong. |
Sales from outside of Taiwan accounted for 54.6%, 56.7% and 59.9% of our net operating revenues in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. We primarily target those U.S. and Canadian semiconductor companies that contract their wafer foundry services to major independent ROC foundries. Our U.S. and Canadian customers, including ATI Technologies, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp., are world-leading suppliers of graphic chipsets. Our U.S. customers mainly require quad flat packages and substrate packages. We also focus on marketing our packaging and testing services in Japan and expect sales to Japan to increase in the near future.
25
We believe we have benefited from our location in Taiwan where outsourced semiconductor manufacturing infrastructure is well established. Our long-term relationships with two of the world’s largest independent wafer foundries are important to the continued growth of our services. The majority of the semiconductor devices we package and test have been manufactured in Taiwan’s leading wafer foundries. As these wafer foundries grow, we expect that their demand for our services will continue to grow. Moreover, we believe that we can leverage these relationships to jointly market seamless outsourced semiconductor manufacturing services from design to drop shipment and remain at the forefront in semiconductor technology. We also believe that our close proximity and close relationships to wafer foundries enables our customers to more efficiently manage their supply chains and find comprehensive solutions to their semiconductor needs.
Due to the ever-changing technology and functionality of semiconductor chip design, customers requiring semiconductor packaging and testing services generally do not place purchase orders far in advance. However, we engage customers in advance of the placement of purchase orders based on each customer’s expected packaging and testing requirements. In addition, our customers generally agree to purchase from us any unused materials that we purchase to meet their forecasted demand. Although we have long-term sales relationships with a number of customers, our customers generally may cancel or reschedule orders without significant penalty. In the past, very few customers have cancelled firm orders for our packaging and testing services. This is due in part to the fact that firm orders usually immediately precede shipment of wafers to be packaged by us. Our customers do, however, routinely change their forecasts for future purchases from us, and we adjust our production plans accordingly. We do not maintain reserves for customer cancellations and variations in customer orders. Accordingly, our backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of future sales.
In addition, packaging and testing service customers generally require that our facilities undergo a stringent “qualification” process during which the customer evaluates our operations and production processes. The qualification process can take many weeks. Due to this lengthy qualification process, we believe semiconductor manufacturers are generally reluctant to switch semiconductor packaging and testing companies once these companies have been qualified. For test qualification, after we have been qualified by a customer and before the customer delivers semiconductors to us for testing in volume, a process known as “correlation” is undertaken. During the correlation process, the customer provides us with test criteria, information regarding process flow and sample semiconductors to be tested and either provides us with the test program or requests that we develop a new or conversion program. In some cases, the customer also provides us with a data log of results of any testing of the semiconductor that the customer may have conducted previously. The correlation process typically takes up to two weeks but can take longer depending on the requirements of the customer.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing strategy is focused on providing high-quality advanced semiconductor device packaging and testing services, consistent on-time delivery and competitive pricing. We believe that this strategy is best implemented by servicing a select number of customers whom we consider to have a high level of anticipated growth. We work on a cooperative basis with these customers so that we can best meet their needs.
We engage in semi-annual and quarterly reviews of all of our customers; we regularly collect data from different segments of the semiconductor industry and, when possible, we work closely with our customers to design and develop packaging and testing solutions for their new products. These “co-development” or “sponsorship” projects can be critical when customers seek large-scale, early market entry with a significant new product.
Our sales and marketing efforts are primarily carried out by our sales team in Taichung and Hsinchu near many of Taiwan’s leading domestic semiconductor companies. In addition, our subsidiary Siliconware U.S.A., with sales offices in San Jose and Irvine, California, Boston, Massachusetts and Lewisville, Texas, is responsible for our sales in the United States.
We have signed annual or two-year contracts with our major domestic customers. These contracts normally provide that the quantities of products furnished by us are updated by the customer every month, generally through three-month non-binding rolling forecasts. We have such formal contracts with some of our overseas customers.
26
Quality Control
We employ quality control procedures at every critical manufacturing stage, with the aim of identifying and solving problems at the earliest possible stage of the production process. Our quality control procedures include statistical process control, which involves sampling tests to control and monitor the production process. Such tests include optical scanning and reliability tests, which include temperature and humidity tests, pressure and stress tests and test for resistance to solvents. If a problem is detected, failure analysis will be used to determine the cause. Visual inspection and optical scanning are performed on all assembled semiconductor devices to test for lead coplanarity and integrity. Final products are tested on a sample basis for open shorts in wire connections. To ensure that our quality control procedures are effectively applied, production line employees are provided with periodic training.
Our comprehensive quality control and environmental protection programs have received numerous accredited International Standards Organization certifications, including ISO 9002 in 1992, ISO 9001 in 1994, QS 9000 in 1998 and ISO 14001 in May 1999. We undergo periodic audits to maintain our ISO certifications. Although some semiconductor companies view the ISO certification as a basis for initiating contact with a potential subcontractor, they generally perform separate production and quality audits of the subcontractors themselves. We also received TS16949 certification for our quality control in August 2003 and OHSAS 18001 certification for safety and health management system in December 2004.
As a result of our ongoing focus on quality, we achieved average quarterly packaging yields of 99.9% for leader frame base, 99.9% for substrate base, 99.9% for flip-chip and 99.6% for wafer bumping products in 2004. Packaging yield, which is the industry standard for measuring production yield, is equal to the number of integrated circuit packages that are shipped for packaging divided by the number of individual integrated circuits that are attached to lead-frames or substrates.
As part of our overall focus on quality service, we also closely monitor our product delivery performance against scheduled delivery times.
Research and Development
We focus our research and development efforts on developing new package designs and improving the efficiency and capabilities of our production process technologies. Production process enhancements include:
| • | reduction of the size and thickness of semiconductor device packages; |
|
| • | increasing input/output density of semiconductor device packages; |
|
| • | enhancement of the electrical, thermal and reliability performance of semiconductor device packages; |
|
| • | reduction of spacing between leads; |
|
| • | reduction of the height of gold wire used in the wire bonding process; |
|
| • | increasing packaging yields; |
|
| • | shortening cycle times; and |
|
| • | investigating the use of new or replacement raw materials. |
We believe that technology development is one of the key success factors in the semiconductor packaging and testing industry. We work with our customers, equipment manufacturers and materials suppliers to develop advanced processing capabilities and materials for use in our production process. For example, we are currently conducting a research project with Kinsus Interconnect Technology Corp., a substrate developer in Taiwan, to develop the advanced flip-chip substrate technology. In addition, we and Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd., a raw material supplier in Japan, are jointly developing low-cost and high-performance underfill materials. Moreover, we work with customers
27
including Xilinx, Inc. early in the process of wafer design to ensure that their packaging needs are met and that our packaging products provide our customers with the flexibility they require when designing their products.
Our research and development personnel are divided among our design department, characterization department and product development department. In addition, our quality assurance and manufacturing personnel also participate in research and development activities. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, we spent NT$507 million, NT$559 million and NT$753 million (US$23.7 million), respectively, on research and development.
We maintain laboratory facilities to analyze the characteristics of semiconductor device packages by computer simulation and verify their performance by measurement devices. The use of computer-aided engineering tools substantially reduces the time required to validate the proper function of packages, as compared to physical testing methods.
Supplies
Raw Materials
Our packaging operations require adequate supplies of materials and equipment on a timely basis. The principal raw materials used in packaging are lead-frames, substrate, gold wire and molding compound. We purchase materials based on customer forecasts and our customers are generally responsible for any unused materials in excess of the quantity that they indicated they would need.
Our major suppliers of raw materials, including Sumitomo Metal Mining Asia Pacific Pte Ltd., Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd., Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation, Sumitomo Bakelite (Taiwan) Co., Ltd. and Nippon Micrometal Corp., are leading companies in the types of materials they supply. We work closely with them, provide them with rolling forecasts, weekly requirement schedules and update them on the status of our new products. Due to the growth of substrate packaging products that are sold, our raw material costs have also increased. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, our raw material costs were 48.7%, 52.9% and 54.7%, respectively, of cost of goods sold. We expect that raw materials will continue to constitute a significant portion of our cost of goods sold as demand for substrate packaging products continues to increase.
We do not maintain large inventories of raw materials; we usually only maintain enough for one month’s production based upon regular estimates of orders from customers. Our principal suppliers usually dedicate portions of their inventories as reserves to meet our production requirements. Nevertheless, on occasion when customer orders have exceeded the supply of raw materials, we have typically been able to obtain extensions from our customers to allow sufficient supply to become available. Such arrangements help us remain cost competitive in today’s market. In the past, prices of our principal raw materials have not been volatile.
Equipment
In addition to raw materials, the availability of packaging and testing equipment is critical to our services. We generally seek to maintain equipment from different suppliers with broad functionality and flexibility for different packaging types to enhance capacity utilization. We purchase packaging equipment from major international manufacturers, including Apic Yamada Corporation, Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc., ASM Technology Singapore PTE LTD. and TOWA Corporation. As of December 31, 2004, we operated 2,999 wire bonders. We also had 249 testers in Taichung and Hsinchu, Taiwan. We must order equipment in advance of customer demand to expand our capacity, based on our expectation of future demand for our packaging and testing services.
Testing equipment is one of the critical components of the wafer probing and device testing process. We generally seek to maintain testers from different vendors with similar functionality and the ability to test a variety of different semiconductors. In general, certain semiconductors can only be tested on a limited number of specially configured testers. Our major suppliers of testing equipment are Agilent Technologies, Inc., Advantest Taiwan Inc. and Teradyne Inc.
28
Competition
We face substantial competition from established packaging and testing service providers, including companies with greater manufacturing, financial and other resources. These companies include Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. (Taiwan), ASE Test Limited (Taiwan and Malaysia), Amkor Technology Inc. (USA), ASAT, Ltd. (Hong Kong), STATS ChipPAC Ltd. (Singapore), Hana Microelectronics Public Co. Ltd. (Thailand), Orient Semiconductor Electronics, Limited (Taiwan), Astra International (Indonesia), Carsem Bhd. (Malaysia) and Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd. (Japan). These companies have also established relationships with many large semiconductor companies that are our current or potential customers. To a lesser extent, we also compete with the internal semiconductor packaging and testing capabilities of many of our customers.
The principal elements of competition in the independent semiconductor packaging and testing market include:
| • | the breadth of package and test offerings; |
|
| • | technical competence; |
|
| • | manufacturing yields; |
|
| • | manufacturing cycle times; |
|
| • | customer service; and |
|
| • | price. |
Integrated Device Makers, or IDMs, that use our services continually evaluate our performance against their own in-house testing and assembly capabilities. These IDMs may have access to more advanced technologies and greater financial and other resources than we do. We believe, however, that we can offer greater efficiency and lower costs while maintaining an equivalent or higher level of quality for three reasons:
| • | we offer a broader and more complex range of services as compared to the IDMs, which tend to focus their resources on improving their front-end operations; |
|
| • | we generally have lower unit costs because of our higher utilization rates; and |
|
| • | we offer a wider range of services in terms of complexity and technology. |
Strategic Investments
We, together with Siliconware Investment Company Ltd., our subsidiary, make equity joint ventures and strategic investments in companies located in Taiwan and the United States engaged in the semiconductor packaging and testing businesses. We believe that our participation in these companies allows us to enhance and complement our product offerings, secure access to raw materials and keep us up to date with technological changes in the semiconductor industry. We are able to maintain close relationships with these companies and influence strategic management decisions through representation on the boards of many of these companies. These participations include:
| • | ChipMOS.As of March 31, 2005, we held a 28.7% equity interest in ChipMOS. We acquired this equity interest in 1997 as part of a joint-venture arrangement with Mosel Vitelic Inc. to create a company concentrating on the packaging and testing of memory chips. Mr. Jerome Tsai, one of our supervisors, is a director of ChipMOS. |
29
| • | Sigurd Microelectronics Corp.As of March 31, 2005, we held, directly and indirectly, a 26.5% equity interest in Sigurd Microelectronics Corp. Sigurd provides lower-end packaging and testing services. Mr. Byron Chiang, one of our officers, is a director of Sigurd. |
|
| • | Double Win Enterprise Co. Ltd.As of March 31, 2005, we held a 24.1% equity interest in Double Win Enterprise Co. Ltd., which is engaged in the business of printed circuit boards and surface mount technology. Mr. Jerome Tsai, one of our supervisors, and Mr. Byron Chiang and Mr. Chao-Hong Huang, two of our officers, are directors of Double Win Enterprise Co. Ltd. |
|
| • | Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation.As of March 31, 2005, we held, directly and indirectly, a 17.9% equity interest in Phoenix Precision, a supplier of semiconductor raw materials, including substrates. Mr. Bough Lin, our Chairman, and Ms. Teresa Wang, one of our supervisors, are directors of Phoenix Precision. |
|
| • | King Yuan Electronics Co., Ltd.As of March 31, 2005, we held a 9.1% equity interest in King Yuan, which is engaged in the business of IC testing. Mr. Bough Lin, our Chairman, is a director of King Yuan. |
|
| • | ThaiLin Technology Corporation.As of March 31, 2005, we held a 2.9% equity interest in ThaiLin, which is engaged in the business of memory testing. |
In May 2004, we sold all of our interest in Taiwan Hi-tech Corporation, a company engaged in the business of solder plating, for NT$100 million (US$3.1 million).
On March 1, 2005, Universal Communication Technology Inc., or Universal Communication, merged with Sigurd Microelectronics Corp. and Universal Communication was subsequently liquidated.
Intellectual Property
As of December 31, 2004, we held 254 Taiwan patents and 156 U.S. patents related to various semiconductor packaging technologies, including patents for improvements of thermal and electrical performance used in the semiconductor packaging process. As of December 31, 2004, we also had a total of 103 pending patent applications in the United States, 112 in Taiwan and 77 in the PRC. In addition, we had registered “SPIL” as a trademark and as a servicemark in Taiwan.
We have licensed from Motorola the technology for ball grid array for which we make royalty payments based upon the number of pads or balls used in our packages. This license will expire in December 2010. We have also implemented package designs by entering into other technology alliances and by licensing leading-edge package technologies, including:
| • | Flip Chip’s flip-chip ball grid package design technology, whereby silicon die is directly attached to the substrate using solder bumping rather than wire bonding. A flip-chip ball grid package can support semiconductor devices with more than 1,000 leads. This license will expire in November 2009. |
|
| • | Flip Chip’s flip-chip wafer bumping technology and technology of redistributing bond pads on IC using a redistribution layer enables us to facilitate wafer bumping in the manufacturing of flip-chip ICs. This license will expire in January 2011. |
|
| • | FujiTsu Limited’s electroplating bumping technology which enables us to produce a bumped wafer with cost-effective, fine-pitch and high-reliability features instead of screen printing bump to meet current market requirements. This license will expire in December 2007. |
|
| • | LSI Logic Corporation’s packaging technology pertaining to flip-chips, which offer us a cost-effective solution for high performance ASIC and system-on-chip, or SoC, designs. We acquired this license in August 2001. This license will terminate at the expiration of the patent. |
30
| • | Industrial Technology Research Institute’s thermally enhanced-PBGA technology, which enables us to produce small sized, high speed and high density devices to provide PBGA the capability of spreading heat more effectively. This license will terminate at the expiration of the patent. |
|
| • | Tessera, Inc.’s TCC technology which enables us to produce micro ball grid array products. This license will terminate at the expiration of the patent. |
In 2002, 2003 and 2004, ongoing royalty payments to the companies from which we license intellectual property were NT$426 million, NT$161 million and NT$143 million (US$4.5 million), respectively, which accounted for 1.9%, 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, of our net operating revenues. With the increasing pace of technological change in the semiconductor industry, however, we expect that royalty payments will increase in the future.
We expect to continue to file patent applications where appropriate to protect our proprietary technologies. We may need to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or to defend ourselves against claimed infringement of the rights of others through litigation, which could result in substantial cost and diversion of our resources.
Although we are not currently and have not been a party to any material litigation, the semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. If a third party were to bring a valid legal claim against us, we could be required to:
| • | discontinue the use of disputed process technologies; |
|
| • | pay substantial damages; |
|
| • | develop non-infringing technologies; or |
|
| • | acquire licenses to the technologies that we had allegedly infringed. |
Environmental Matters
The principal pollutants produced during semiconductor packaging are waste water and gases from solder plating, and waste water from the wafer dicing and grinding processes. During these processes, waste water is produced when water is used to cool and rinse wafers while they are being diced and ground, or to rinse semiconductor chips when lead-frames are being plated. Solid waste materials produced during the process include metal lead-frame and substrate scrap and excess molding resin.
As for the newly developed bumping process, wastewater is produced when water is used to rinse the wafers in the processes of etching and solder deposition. Gases are come from the emissions of solvents that are used to clean the wafers while they are in the bumping process.
To mitigate environmental claims, we maintain pollution control facilities at all of our facilities. We have installed various types of pollution control equipment for the treatment of gaseous waste and waste water in our facilities. As part of our pollution control programs, we also subcontract certain waste disposal and resource recycling of our facilities to third parties that have the requisite environmental protection agency permits. Furthermore, we also actively monitor any changes in the international requirements for environmental protection in the electronic and semiconductor industries. We believe that we are in compliance with the existing environmental laws and regulations in Taiwan in all respects.
Insurance
Our insurance policies on buildings, equipment and inventories cover damages due to natural disasters, excluding earthquakes. We maintain insurance policies on both our old and new production facilities in Taichung and Hsinchu, Taiwan and on inland transit of inventories. Our property insurance covers replacement costs for our assets. Our insurance also includes protection from losses caused by business interruption for seven to fourteen consecutive
31
working days and, as of December 31, 2004, had a maximum coverage of NT$63,125 million (US$1,988.8 million) and other specified limits and exclusions.
We also maintain insurance on the silicon wafers delivered to us. These insurance policies cover the risk of loss of the silicon wafers while they are in our possession or consigned by our customers and/or during inland transportation.
Employees
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees — D. Employees” for certain information relating to our employees.
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
Our capital expenditures amounted to NT$6,445 million, NT$4,885 million and NT$9,785 million (US$308.3 million) in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Our initial budget for capital expenditures for 2005 is approximately US$175.0 million. We may adjust the amount of our capital expenditures upward or downward based on the progress of our capital projects, market conditions and our anticipation of future business outlook. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
We have made, and expect to continue to make, capital expenditures in connection with the expansion of our production capacity. The table below sets forth our principal capital expenditures, paid or committed, for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (in millions) | |
Equipment purchases | | | 6,380 | | | | 4,627 | | | | 8,777 | | | | 276.5 | |
Land and building construction and purchases | | | 65 | | | | 258 | | | | 1,008 | | | | 31.8 | |
Litigation
We are not involved in any material litigation or other proceedings which outcome we believe could have a material adverse effect on our services.
C. Organizational Structure
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2005 regarding certain companies in which we consolidated and the principal business of each such entity.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Total Paid-in | | Direct/Indirect |
| | | | | | Capital(1)of | | Equity |
Company | | Main Activities | | Location | | Such Entity | | Interest |
| | | | | | (in millions) | | | | |
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | Investment activities | | British Virgin Islands | | US$57.8 | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Investment activities | | Taipei, Taiwan | | NT$1,770 | | | 100.0 | % |
|
Siliconware U.S.A. Inc. | | Sales, solicitation, marketing and order collection ordering in | | San Jose, CA, USA | | US$1.3 | | | 100.0 | % |
32
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Total Paid-in | | Direct/Indirect |
| | | | | | Capital(1) of | | Equity |
Company | | Main Activities | | Location | | Such Entity | | Interest |
| | | | | | (in millions) | | | | |
SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited | | North America Investment activities | | Cayman Islands | | US$30.1 | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited | | Design and manufacturing of DRAM modules, flash memory cards, transistor and other electronic components | | Suzhou, Jiangsu, China | | US$30.0 | | | 100.0 | % |
(1) | | Aggregate par value of all issued shares. |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity investees that are accounted for under equity method and cost method as of March 31, 2005.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Total Paid-in | | Direct/Indirect |
| | | | | | Capital(1) of | | Equity |
Company | | Main Activities | | Location | | Such Entity | | Interest |
| | | | | | (in millions) | | | | |
Artest Corporation | | Testing and development of integrated circuits | | Sunnyvale, CA, USA | | US$15.6 | | | 30.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | Testing and assembly of integrated circuits | | Hsinchu, Taiwan | | NT$8,872 | | | 28.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sigurd Microelectronics Corp. | | Testing and assembly of integrated circuits | | Hsinchu, Taiwan | | NT$1,573 | | | 26.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. | | PCB, SMT process and hand insert | | Taoyuan, Taiwan | | NT$280 | | | 24.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Phoenix Precision Technology Corp. | | Researching, developing, manufacturing and selling ball grid array substrate | | Hsinchu, Taiwan | | NT$5,409 | | | 17.9 | % |
|
King Yuan Electronics Co., Ltd. | | IC testing | | Hsinchu, Taiwan | | NT$7,692 | | | 9.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
ThaiLin Technology Corporation | | IC memory testing | | Hsinchu, Taiwan | | NT$2,333 | | | 2.9 | % |
(1) | | Aggregate par value of all issued shares. |
33
D. Property, Plants and Equipment
We provide packaging services through our three facilities in Taichung, Taiwan. In addition, we provide testing services through our facilities in Hsinchu and Taichung, Taiwan. We own all of our packaging and testing facilities.
The following table shows the location, size and wire bonding or testing capacity of each of our facilities and the property on which each facility is located as of December 31, 2004.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Wire Bonding or |
Facility | | Location of Facility | | Size of Facility | | Size of Land(1) | | Testing Capacity |
Facility I | | Taichung, Taiwan | | 6,755 square meters | | 7,881 square meters | | 348 wire bonders |
Facility II | | Taichung, Taiwan | | 81,146 square meters | | 26,246 square meters | | 1,788 wire bonders |
Facility III | | Taichung, Taiwan | | 134,620 square meters | | 39,455 square meters | | 86 testers, 863 wire bonders |
Facility IV | | Hsinchu, Taiwan | | 32,645 square meters | | 14,215 square meters | | 163 testers |
(1) | | We own all of our properties except otherwise noted. |
Our principal executive offices are located at Facility II in Taichung, Taiwan. Our research and development activities are also located at this facility. In 2003, we have started the construction of a new plant in Facility III, which was completed in the second half of 2004. The size of Facility III is approximately 134,620 square meters. This facility is now used for testing and 12-inch wafer bumping and other assembly purposes.
We also have plans to expand our operations to the PRC in anticipation of future market demand sourced from our existing and new customers based in China. Many of our customers and competitors have announced plans to begin operation in the PRC. We believe that, as a leading packaging and testing company, we are in a competitive position to gain a significant market share in this developing market. In December 2001 and June 2004, we obtained foreign investment approval from the Investment Commission of the ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs to invest up to US$50 million in aggregate in Suzhou, PRC. As of March 31, 2005, we had invested a total of US$30 million in this subsidiary. We are in the stage of ramping up our facilities in Suzhou for the manufacturing of DRAM modules, flash memory cards, transistors and other electronic components.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Unless stated otherwise, the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in this section apply to our financial information as prepared according to ROC GAAP. You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with the financial statements and the notes to these statements included in this annual report. Our financial statements are prepared according to ROC GAAP, which differ from US GAAP. For a discussion of the material differences, see note 28 to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
A. Operating Results
Overview
We are one of the world’s leading independent providers of semiconductor packaging services. We also provide semiconductor testing services to our customers. We offer a complete portfolio of packaging and testing solutions, including advanced lead-frame and substrate packages such as flip-chip ball grid packages, and testing services for logic, mixed signal and embedded memory devices. We also offer our customers complete turnkey solutions, including packaging, testing and direct shipment of semiconductor devices to end users designated by our customers.
The semiconductor industry experienced moderate recovery in 2002, 2003 and 2004. As a result, we recorded operating income of NT$547 million, NT$2,521 million and NT$4,333 million (US$136.5 million) in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Increases in our operating income were also attributable to increases in our offering more advanced packaging services and testing of high-performance semiconductor products.
34
Intense competition in the semiconductor industry worldwide resulted in decreases in the average selling prices of our products. We expect that average selling prices for most of our semiconductor packages to continue to decline in the future. A decline in average selling prices of our semiconductor packages, coupled with high depreciation cost resulting from our purchase of additional equipment during the previous periods, if not offset by reductions in the other cost of producing those packages, would decrease our gross margins.
To counter the effects of decreasing average selling prices, we will continue to attempt to:
| • | negotiate better pricing terms with our suppliers, including quantity discounts; |
|
| • | find alternative, less expensive sources of raw materials; |
|
| • | maximize production efficiency of our employees; and |
|
| • | engage in utility conservation programs. |
We do not maintain reserves for cancellations or variations in customer orders.
Consolidation
Under ROC GAAP, we are required on an annual basis to consolidate the financial results of any subsidiary whose total assets or net sales exceed 10% of our unconsolidated total assets or net sales, as the case may be. In addition, the ROC SFB requires us to consolidate the financial statements of each subsidiary whose total assets or net sales exceed 3% of our unconsolidated total assets or net sales, as the case may be, if the total assets or net sales of all unconsolidated subsidiaries exceed 30% of our unconsolidated total assets or net sales, as the case may be. For each of 2002, 2003 and 2004, we consolidated five subsidiaries: Siliconware Investment Company Ltd., SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited, Siliconware U.S.A. Inc., SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited and Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited, each in which we own a 100% equity interest.
Upon adoption of the amended ROC GAAP Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 1 “Consolidated Financial Statements” and SFAS No. 7, which became effective on January 1, 2005, we are required to prepare consolidated financial statements on a semiannual basis. Such consolidated financial statements should include all entities over which we hold more than 50% of voting shares or has common control as defined under SFAS No. 7.
Delay in Recognition of Investment Income in Certain Investee Companies Accounted for Under Equity Method
ChipMOS
As of March 31, 2005, we owned a 28.7% equity interest in ChipMOS, a semiconductor packaging and testing and LCD driver integrated circuit manufacturing company, located in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
We entered into a joint venture agreement with Mosel Vitelic in July 1997 to establish ChipMOS. We contributed NT$1,400 million in the form of cash and NT$100 million in the form of packaging technology know-how in exchange for a 30% equity interest in ChipMOS. Mosel Vitelic received a 48% interest in ChipMOS, and the remaining ownership interests in ChipMOS were allocated to several institutions and individuals selected by Mosel Vitelic. We are entitled to appoint two out of the seven-member board of directors of ChipMOS. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, we must maintain a minimum 18% equity interest in ChipMOS for five years from the date of any initial public listing of ChipMOS. If ChipMOS requires guarantees of its indebtedness to obtain financing, we and Mosel Vitelic are required under the joint venture agreement to provide these guarantees in the ratios of 30% and 70%, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, we had not provided any guarantees with respect to ChipMOS’s indebtedness.
The ROC SFB has allowed us to delay our recognition of investment income in certain investee companies accounted for under the equity method. In 2002, because ChipMOS did not provide its financial statements to us in
35
time to enable us to recognize its financial results for such period, we were permitted by the ROC SFB to delay the recognition of the investment loss of ChipMOS in our financial results until 2003. As a result, we did not recognize investment loss of ChipMOS for 2002 in our financial results under ROC GAAP until the first quarter of 2003. For the first three months ended March 31, 2003, we recognized an investment loss amounting to NT$366 million. If this investment loss had been included in our results for 2002, our non-operating income, income before income tax and net income for 2002 would have been reduced by the same amount and our basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share in 2002 would have been reduced by NT$0.2. In 2003 and 2004, we also experienced delays in recognition of investment income. For the first three months ended March 31, 2004, we recognized an investment income of NT$247 million from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2003. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized an investment income of NT$667 million (US$21.0 million) from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2004.
Under US GAAP, however, there is no provision that allows us to delay recognition of ChipMOS’s financial results. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, our investment income (loss) from ChipMOS were (NT$342 million), NT$250 million and NT$664 million (US$20.9 million) under US GAAP. As a result, our financial results under US GAAP would not provide meaningful year-to-year comparison to our financial results under ROC GAAP.
Universal Communication
Our investment income (loss) from Universal Communication Technology Inc., or Universal Communication, was accounted for under the cost method in 2001. In 2002, as a result of increasing our stake in Universal Communication from 16.2% to 42.8%, we changed our method of recognizing investment income (loss) from the cost method to the equity method. At the same time, we delayed the recognition of the income (loss) of Universal Communication until 2003 because we were not able to obtain the statements of Universal Communication for the same period of time and hence our financial results for 2002 do not reflect the performance of Universal Communication in 2002. In 2003, following the appointment of three directors to the board of Universal Communication, we are no longer eligible for a delay in recognition of investment income (loss) of this investee. For 2003, we recognized investment loss of Universal Communication of NT$47 million, which was based on the financial statements of the investee for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and in accordance with the preference of the preferred stock of Universal Communication. On March 1, 2005, Universal Communication merged with Sigurd Microelectronics Corp. and Universal Communication was subsequently liquidated.
Double Win and Taiwan High-tech
Recognition of our investment income (loss) in Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. and Taiwan Hi-tech Corporation has consistently been recorded in the subsequent year on a delayed basis. Accordingly, the combined investment income (loss) of NT$(15) million, NT$3 million and NT$5 million (US$0.2 million) from investments in these two companies for 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, were based on the audited financial statements of the investee companies for 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
CAESAR
CAESAR was dissolved on December 26, 2001. At the time of its dissolution, we owned a 34.65% equity interest in CAESAR, the financial results of which were accounted for under the equity method. We incurred investment loss of NT$716 million for 2001 for CAESAR. Under ROC GAAP, we were required to recognize a one-time write-off of our investment loss on the day of dissolution subject to further write off or reversal, depending on the residual value of CAESAR upon the completion of the liquidation procedure, which was completed in 2003.
Under US GAAP, we are required to review the carrying value of an asset for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset might not be recoverable. When such an event occurs, we estimate the future discounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and our eventual disposition. If the discounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. Accordingly, US GAAP has also required that an impairment review be performed for our investment in CAESAR in 2001 and an impairment loss could also be recognized for the amount not recoverable.
36
Change in Product Mix
Since January 1998, our lead-frame products including quad flat packages have made a substantial contribution to our net operating revenues. However, substrate packages have been accounting for an increasing proportion of our net operating revenues. We expect this trend to continue in the future and, we also expect substrate packages to become our highest-revenue product.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the amount of our packaging and testing revenues by product type (which are more fully described in Item 4. “Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Business”) and each product’s revenues as a percentage of our total net operating revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | % | | | NT$ | | | % | | | NT$ | | | % | |
| | (audited) (consolidated) | |
| | (in millions, except for percentages) | |
Ball grid array packages | | | 8,576 | | | | 38.5 | | | | 11,698 | | | | 42.7 | | | | 16,416 | | | | 46.6 | |
Quad flat packages | | | 7,659 | | | | 34.3 | | | | 8,635 | | | | 31.5 | | | | 9,435 | | | | 26.7 | |
Small outline packages | | | 2,744 | | | | 12.3 | | | | 3,160 | | | | 11.5 | | | | 3,800 | | | | 10.8 | |
Other packages | | | 677 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 956 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 1,467 | | | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total packaging revenues | | | 19,656 | | | | 88.1 | | | | 24,449 | | | | 89.2 | | | | 31,118 | | | | 88.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Testing and other revenues | | | 2,643 | | | | 11.9 | | | | 2,962 | | | | 10.8 | | | | 4,134 | | | | 11.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net operating revenues | | | 22,299 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 27,411 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 35,252 | | | | 100.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expansion and Utilization Rate
In 2000, we expanded our packaging capacity significantly, increasing the number of wire bonders to 1,829, and added testing capacity to our operations through our acquisition of Siliconware Corp., through which acquisition we acquired 140 testers. However, in 2001, our capacity utilization rate declined significantly due to a downturn in the semiconductor industry and, as a result, we expanded less aggressively than we did in 2000. Our wire bonders and testers increased from 2,056 and 167, respectively, as of December 31, 2001, to 2,481 and 198, respectively, as of December 31, 2002. Our wire bonders further increased to 2,869, as of December 31, 2003, whereas our number of testers remains nearly the same to 196 as of December 31, 2003. As of December 31, 2004, our number of wire bonders and testers increased to 2,999 and 249, respectively, as we continue to expand our capacity in order to meet increasing demand from our clients.
Our operating results are characterized by relatively high fixed costs. For example, a wire bonder typically costs between US$70,000 and US$75,000. As a result, capacity utilization rates can significantly affect margins as the unit cost of packaging and testing services generally decreases as fixed charges, including depreciation expenses on our equipment, are allocated over a larger number of units. Our utilization rates have varied from period to period as we have expanded our production capacity. We have been successful in minimizing the industry-wide fluctuation in capacity utilization rates by deploying flexible packaging equipment for use in the production of different packages and by utilizing our test equipment also for probing purposes. Our ability to maintain or enhance our margins will continue to depend in part on our ability to effectively manage capacity utilization rates. The capacity utilization of our facilities decreased significantly in the first eight months of 2001 but has since increased through 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Applications of Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report, which have been prepared in accordance with ROC GAAP. ROC GAAP vary in certain significant respects from US GAAP. These differences and their effects on our financial statements are described in note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The preparation of our audited consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments
37
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory, marketable securities, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, employee bonuses, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill impairment. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates using different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our audited consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We principally provide assembly and testing services of integrated circuits, which may be assembly only, test only or turnkey solutions. Revenues are recognized when services have been provided based on transaction terms and when collectibility is reasonably assured. We also record sales allowances for estimated pricing discounts and sales returns. These estimates are based on historical experiences and the management’s judgment. Actual returns and discounts may differ from the estimates.
Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
The allowances for doubtful accounts are provided based on evaluations of collectibility, aging analyses of the accounts and the management’s judgment. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivable including the current credit worthiness and the past collection history of each customer. If the financial conditions of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be recorded.
Inventory Reserves
In general, raw materials are purchased based on the customers’ forecasted demand. If our customers change their forecasted requirements and we are unable to cancel our excess raw material orders, we would experience a build up in our raw material inventory. We could either seek to recover the cost of the materials from our customers or utilize the inventory in production. However, we may not be successful in recovering the cost from our customers or in using such excess inventory in production, which we would consider as part of our reserve estimate. Our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory is based on forecasted demand we receive from our customers. When a determination is made that the inventory would not be utilized in production, it is written off and disposed of. Actual demand may differ from our forecast and may result in additional reserve.
We also recognize losses from declines in the market value of inventories. The market value of raw materials and supplies are determined on the basis of replacement cost. The market value of finished goods and work in progress are determined on the basis of net realizable value. If the market value of inventories further drops, additional loss may be recorded.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review equity investments and other long-lived assets for the purpose of determining the amount of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. The estimate of fair value is generally based on quoted market prices or on the best available information, including prices for similar assets and the results of using other valuation techniques.
38
We evaluate our equity investments for impairment due to declines in the market value that are considered other than temporary. Such evaluations include an assessment of general economic and company-specific considerations, such as customer forecasts and regularly updated projections of operating results. In the event of a determination that a decline in market value is non-temporary, loss is recognized in the current year’s income. The evaluation of whether a decline in market value is other than temporary requires considerable management judgment. For an investee who resolves to liquidate or dissolve, a one-time write-off would be recorded to the extent that the estimated proceeds would be obtained and the amount of investment balance would not be recovered.
Artest Corporation, an investee accounted for under the equity method, incurred significant losses since the dates of our investments and there is no indication of recovery in the near future. During 2003, we concluded that the impairment loss was other than temporary. Accordingly, in 2003, we recorded an impairment charge of NT$157 million on this long-term equity investment to write off the carrying value of the investment to its fair value. The amount of the write off is determined as follows: (1) whether there is a quoted market value to determine its fair value; and (2) based on our evaluation, whether the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of the investee approximated its fair value. If the fair value of the investee was lower than its carrying value, additional impairment may be recorded. We further recorded an impairment charge of NT$8 million during 2004 on our long-term equity investment in Artest Corporation to write down the carrying value of the investment to fair value. As of December 31, 2004, the carrying amount of our investment in Artest Corporation was NT$0.
In 2003, we also recognized an impairment charge of NT$132 million for packaging and testing assets to be disposed of to reduce the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value less cost of sale. The fair value of the assets to be disposed of was determined by the estimated net realizable value of the assets. We determined the estimated net realizable value of these assets to be disposed to be zero based on the condition and anticipated future cash flows. The impairment charge was mainly related to our decision to dispose certain machinery and equipment due to technology phase out and replacement in 2003.
In 2004, we recognized an impairment charge of NT$461 million for packaging and testing assets to be disposed of to reduce the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value less cost of sale. The fair value of the assets to be disposed of was determined by the estimated net realizable value of the assets. We determined the estimated net realizable value of these assets to be disposed to be zero based on the condition and anticipated future cash flows of these assets. The impairment charge was mainly related to our decision to dispose certain machinery and equipments due to technology phase out and replacement in 2004.
Provision for Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowances
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately NT$2,309 million (US$72.7 million) of net deferred tax assets related principally to investment tax credits that expire at various dates through 2008, the unrealized loss on long-term investments and loss carryforwards. Valuation allowance was provided to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowances. In the event we determined that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to our deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made. Similarly, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment of our deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.
Employee Bonuses
Some of our employees are entitled to bonuses in accordance with applicable provisions of our articles of incorporation. Employee bonuses are determined at 10% of distributable retained earnings. Distributable retained earnings are calculated as retained earnings after various reserves are made in accordance with ROC law and our articles of incorporation and after appropriation for remuneration to directors are made. Employee bonuses may be granted in cash, shares or a combination of both. Under ROC GAAP, such bonuses are appropriated from retained earnings during the accounting period during which such shareholders’ approval is obtained. If such employee bonuses are settled through the issuance of our shares, the amount charged against retained earnings would be based on the par value of the common shares issued. Under US GAAP, the employee bonus expense is initially accrued at the end of the period when services are rendered, at 10% of the distributable retained earnings. When bonuses are
39
approved by the shareholders in the subsequent year, an additional compensation expense is recorded for the difference between the par value and the fair market value of shares granted to employees.
Goodwill
Goodwill arising from business combination is recognized under US GAAP as the difference between the fair market value of shares issued and the fair market value of net assets acquired. Before the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002, goodwill is amortized on a straight-line basis over its economic useful life. Actual life may differ from estimated life and may result in additional amortization expenses. Under US GAAP, we also assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill amounted to, after amortization, NT$4,874 million as of December 31, 2001 under US GAAP. We did not recognize any goodwill under ROC GAAP.
Effective January 1, 2002, SFAS No. 142 requires that we cease amortization of goodwill and perform an impairment review, at the “reporting unit” level, upon adoption and at least annually thereafter. Since we operate on an integrated basis, we have only one reporting unit. Based on the comparison of the fair value and carrying value of our company, we concluded that goodwill was not impaired as of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 and as of December 31, 2004.
Embedded Derivatives
Under US GAAP, the convertible or exchangeable option embedded in investments in convertible bonds or exchangeable bonds is separated from the host and accounted for as though it was a discrete derivative instrument. The derivative instrument is measured at fair value, with changes in the fair value reported in earnings.
We recorded a gain of NT$237 million in 2003 in relation to mark-to-market adjustments on the embedded derivatives. In 2004, the embedded derivatives were either sold or converted into common stocks and, as a result, we recorded a realized loss of NT$84 million with respect to such sale or conversion of the embedded derivatives.
Description of Revenue and Cost Items
Net Operating Revenues
We generate our net operating revenues primarily from semiconductor packaging and testing operations. Net operating revenues from our semiconductor packaging activities consist of our service fees and the cost of raw materials we purchase to provide semiconductor packaging services. Our net operating revenues do not include the cost of semiconductors, which are our customers’ property.
We price our packaging products on a per unit basis taking into account the complexity of the product, the prevailing market conditions, the order size, the strength and history of our relationship with the customer and our capacity utilization.
We charge our testing services based on the specific test and the time, usually measured in seconds, to run a test, taking into account the complexity of the semiconductor device and the customer’s test program.
We also generate net operating revenues from the provision of semiconductor turnkey services, which include packaging, testing and drop-shipment services.
Net operating revenues are recognized when services are rendered and the payment is realized or realizable. Our customers are generally invoiced at the time services are rendered, with varying terms of credit between 30 and 90 days from the time of billing.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our cost of goods sold consists principally of:
40
| • | cost of raw materials purchased for semiconductor packaging services; |
|
| • | direct labor costs; and |
|
| • | overhead including depreciation and maintenance of production equipment, indirect labor costs, indirect material costs, utilities and royalties. |
Due to the growth of substrate packaging products, our raw material costs as a percentage of total cost of goods sold have increased significantly because of high cost of substrate. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, our raw material costs were 48.7%, 52.9% and 54.7%, respectively, of our cost of goods sold. Due to our capacity expansion, depreciation expense has increased significantly. For 2002, 2003 and 2004, depreciation, included in overhead, was NT$4,450 million, NT$4,732 million and NT5,364 million (US$169.0 million), respectively, and was approximately 22.0%, 20.4% and 18.8%, respectively, of our cost of goods sold. The increases in depreciation expenses in 2002, 2003 and 2004 were the result of putting into operation additional 425, 388 and 130 wire bonders during 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Increasing depreciation expense increases our cost of goods sold and decreases our gross profit and gross margin. Although we may not expand our packaging capacity as aggressively as we did before the recent downturn in the semiconductor industry, we expect our depreciation costs to increase in absolute terms in the future.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of the following:
| • | Selling expenses. Selling expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses and other marketing expenses. |
|
| • | General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries for our executive, administrative, finance and human resource personnel, fees for professional services, and the cost of computers to support our operations. |
|
| • | Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, bonuses and related costs for product and technology development, technology license fees allocated to research and development, and depreciation on and maintenance of equipment and various materials used in our research and development processes. We expect our research and development expenses to grow as we hire additional staff and purchase additional equipment for research and development purposes. |
Results of Operations
The following table shows some of our results of operations data as a percentage of our net operating revenues for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | % | | | % | | | % | |
| | (audited) (consolidated) | |
Net operating revenues | | | 100.0 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 100.0 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 90.6 | | | | 85.0 | | | | 81.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 9.4 | | | | 15.0 | | | | 18.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling expenses | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 1.6 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 3.5 | | | | 2.3 | | | | 2.1 | |
Research and development expenses | | | 2.3 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 2.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | | 6.9 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 2.5 | | | | 9.2 | | | | 12.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Investment income (loss) | | | 0.3 | | | | (1.9 | ) | | | 0.9 | |
Net non-operating income (loss) | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 0.8 | | | | (2.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
41
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | % | | | % | | | % | |
| | (audited) (consolidated) | |
Income (loss) before income tax and minority interest | | | 1.3 | | | | 8.1 | | | | 10.9 | |
Income tax benefit | | | 0.6 | | | | 2.3 | | | | 1.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 1.9 | | | | 10.4 | | | | 12.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
2004 Compared to 2003
Net operating revenues.Net operating revenues increased by 28.6% from NT$27,411 million in 2003 to NT$35,252 million (US$1,110.7 million) in 2004. Net operating revenues from our packaging business increased by 27.3% from 2003 to 2004, whereas net operating revenues from our testing and other services increased by 39.6% in the same periods. These increases were primarily due to the general growth in the semiconductor industry and the increase in demand for personal computers, mobile phones and wireless networks. Due to market competition, the prices of our package products generally declined during 2003 and 2004.
Ball grid array package sales increased by 40.3% from NT$11,698 million in 2003 to NT$16,416 million (US$517.2 million) in 2004. The increase in ball grid array package sales was attributable to the increase in unit sales of ball grid array package products, which increased by 11.2% from 221.5 million units in 2003 to 246.3 million units in 2004. In 2004, ball grid array package products accounted for 46.6% of our net operating revenues, up from 42.7% in 2003.
Quad flat package sales increased by 9.3% from NT$8,635 million in 2003 to NT$9,436 million (US$297.3 million) in 2004. The increase in quad flat package sales was attributable to increase in unit sales of quad flat package products, which increased by 29.2% from 536.1 million units in 2003 to 692.9 million units in 2004. In 2004, quad flat package products accounted for 26.7% of our net operating revenues, down from 31.5% in 2003.
Small outline package sales increased by 20.3% from NT$3,160 million in 2003 to NT$3,800 million (US$119.7 million) in 2004. The increase in our small outline package sales was attributable to increase in unit sales of small outline package products, which increased by 0.3% from 631.7 million units in 2003 to 633.4 million units in 2004. In 2004, small outline package products accounted for 10.8% of our net operating revenues, down from 11.5% in 2003.
Gross profit and gross margin.Our gross profit increased by 55.1% from NT$4,114 million in 2003 to NT$6,381 million (US$201.0 million) in 2004. Our gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net operating revenues) increased from 15.0% in 2003 to 18.1% in 2004. Our cost of goods sold increased by 23.9% from NT$23,298 million in 2003 to NT$28,871 million (US$909.6 million) in 2004, primarily due to a greater emphasis on higher quality package and testing services as well as a continuing environment of rising variable costs such as for raw materials (in particular, the cost of substrate), labor and overhead. The increases in gross profit and gross margin were primarily due to higher equipment utilization, depreciation savings and cost control measures.
Operating expenses.Operating expenses increased by 28.5% from NT$1,593 million in 2003 to NT$2,048 million (US$64.5 million) in 2004. Operating expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues remained relatively the same at 5.8% in 2003 and 2004.
| • | Selling expenses.Selling expenses increased by 32% from NT$415 million in 2003 to NT$549 million (US$17.3 million) in 2004 mainly due to commission fees paid to Siliconware USA Inc. for sales of our products in North America. |
|
| • | General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by 20.7% from NT$618 million in 2003 to NT$747 million (US$23.5 million) in 2004 due primary to increased salaries paid to administrative personnel. |
42
| • | Research and development expenses.Research and development expenses increased by 34.6% from NT$559 million in 2003 to NT$753 million (US$23.7 million) in 2004 due to increased salaries paid to R&D personnel and cost for developing new products. |
Operating income and operating margin.We recorded an operating income of NT$2,521 million and an operating margin of 9.2% (operating income as a percentage of net operating revenues) in 2003 and generated operating income of NT$4,333 million (US$136.5 million) and operating margin of 12.3% in 2004. The increase in operating margin was primarily due to an increase of gross profit as a percentage of operating revenues.
Net non-operating loss.Our net non-operating loss increased by 59.4% from NT$318 million in 2003 to NT$508 million (US$16.0 million) in 2004. The increase in net non-operating loss was primarily due to higher other non-operating loss, offset by a decrease in investment loss. The increase in other non-operating loss in 2004 was due to a provision of NT$468 million for the estimated liabilities arising in connection with our VAT-related tax assessment and increase in the recognition of impairment loss on idle property, plants and equipment from NT$132 million in 2003 to NT$461 million in 2004. The decrease in investment loss was due to our investment in ChipMOS. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recognized an investment income of NT$247 million from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2003, whereas for the three months ended March 31, 2003, we recognized an investment loss of NT$366 million from ChipMOS’s financial results in 2002. If the investment loss and gain were recorded in their respective years, our net operative loss would have been different. Under US GAAP, there is no provision that allows us to delay recognition of ChipMOS’s income or loss.
Income tax benefit.We recognized an income tax benefit of NT$636 million and NT$457 million (US$14.4 million) in 2003 and 2004, respectively, primarily due to investment tax credits, the unrealized loss on long-term investments, and loss carryforward in both years. The decrease in income tax benefit was mainly due to the change in allowance taken in respect of deferred taxable assets. A valuation allowance has been provided against the deferred taxable assets to the extent that the tax benefit will more likely than not be realized.
Net income (loss).As a result of the factors discussed above, we recorded a net income of NT$2,839 million in 2003, compared with a net income of NT$4,282 million (US$134.9 million) in 2004.
2003 Compared to 2002
Net operating revenues.Net operating revenues increased by 22.9% from NT$22,299 million in 2002 to NT$27,411 million in 2003. Net operating revenues from our packaging business increased by 24.4% from 2003 to 2004, whereas net operating revenues from our testing and other services increased by 12.1% in the same periods. The unit sales of ball grid array packages, small outline packages, and other packages increased during the same periods, even though the prices of these products generally declined.
Ball grid array package sales increased by 36.4% from NT$8,576 million in 2002 to NT$11,698 million in 2003. The increase in ball grid array package sales was attributable to increases in unit sales of ball grid array package products. Unit sales of ball grid array packages increased by 42.4% from 155.5 million units in 2002 to 221.5 million units in 2003. In 2003, ball grid array package products accounted for 42.7% of our net operating revenues, up from 38.5% in 2002.
Quad flat package sales increased by 12.7% from NT$7,660 million in 2002 to NT$8,635 million in 2003. The increase in sales of our quad flat packages was primarily attributable to an increase in unit sales. Unit sales of quad flat packages increased by 15.6% from 463.9 million units in 2002 to 536.2 million units in 2003. In 2003, quad flat package products accounted for 31.5% of our net operating revenues, down from 34.3% in 2002.
Sales of small outline packages increased by 15.2% from NT$2,744 million in 2002 to NT$3,160 million in 2003. The increase in sales of our small outline packages was attributable to an increase in unit sales. Unit sales of small outline packages increased by 11.0% from 569.3 million units in 2002 to 631.7 million units in 2003. In 2003, small outline package products accounted for 11.5% of our net operating revenues, almost the same as in 2002.
43
Gross profit and gross margin.Our gross profit increased by 97.0% from NT$2,089 million in 2002 to NT$4,114 million in 2003. Our gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net operating revenues) increased from 9.4% in 2002 to 15.0% in 2003. Our cost of goods sold increased by 15.3% from NT$20,210 million in 2002 to NT$23,298 million in 2003, primarily due to increases in costs of raw materials for our increased production of ball grid array, small outline and quad flat packages. We experienced increases in gross profit and gross margin in 2003 because of an increase in unit sales, which led to higher utilization rates and lower unit costs.
Operating expenses.Operating expenses increased by 3.3% from NT$1,542 million in 2002 to NT$1,593 million in 2003. Operating expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues decreased 6.9% in 2002 to 5.8% in 2003.
| • | Selling expenses.Selling expenses slightly increased by 1.5% from NT$409 million in 2002 to NT$415 million in 2003. |
|
| • | General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses slightly decreased by 1.1% from NT$626 million in 2002 to NT$618 million in 2003. |
|
| • | Research and development expenses.Research and development expenses increased by 10.3% from NT$507 million in 2002 to NT$559 million in 2003 due to increase in salaries paid to R&D personnel and maintenance cost of equipment. |
Operating income and operating margin.We recorded an operating income of NT$547 million and an operating margin of 2.5% (operating income as a percentage of net operating revenues) in 2002 and generated operating income of NT$2,521 million and operating margin of 9.2% in 2003. The increase in operating margin was primarily due to increase of gross profit as a percentage operating revenues.
Net non-operating loss.Our net non-operating loss increased by 19.3% from NT$267 million in 2002 to NT$318 million in 2003. Our investment loss in 2003 was NT$533 million. This is largely attributable to investment loss in ChipMOS. In 2002, we recorded no investment loss for our investment in ChipMOS because ChipMOS did not provide its financial statements to us in time to enable us to recognize its financial results for 2002. The ROC SFB allowed us to delay the recognition of the loss of ChipMOS in our financial results until June 30, 2003. Thus, we recorded no investment income (loss) of ChipMOS in our financial results under ROC GAAP for 2002. The unaudited financial results of ChipMOS for 2002 were available to us in the first quarter of 2003, and we recorded an investment loss of NT$366 million in our financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2003. If this investment loss had been included in our results for 2002, our non-operating income (loss) for 2002 would have been reduced by the same amount. Under US GAAP, there is no provision that allows us to delay recognition of ChipMOS’s income or loss.
Income tax benefit.We recognized an income tax benefit of NT$145 million and NT$636 million in 2002 and 2003, respectively, because of the deferred tax benefit on tax credits primarily resulting from the purchases of certain machinery and equipment, expenditures on research and development and personnel training. A valuation allowance has been provided against the deferred tax assets to the extent that the tax benefit will more likely not be realized.
Net income (loss).As a result of the factors discussed above, we recorded a net income of NT$425 million in 2002, compared with a net income of NT$2,839 million in 2003.
Summary Unaudited Historical Quarterly Results of Operations
The unaudited unconsolidated financial data of our company shown below for the eight fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2004 was prepared under ROC GAAP governing interim financial reporting. The preparation of the unaudited financial data presented below differs from the preparation of the consolidated financial data and financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report because, pursuant to the “Rules Governing Preparation of the Financial Statements by Securities Issuers” issued by the ROC SFB, it does not consolidate the financial results of our subsidiaries: Siliconware Investment Company Ltd., SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited, Siliconware U.S.A. Inc., SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited and Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited. These treatments under ROC GAAP may differ from those proscribed by US GAAP and may result in differences in net income (loss) under each accounting standard. See “—US GAAP Reconciliation” for a description of other differences between ROC GAAP and US
44
GAAP. Accordingly, the unaudited unconsolidated financial data shown below are not indicative of the results of operations for our company on a consolidated basis and do not conform to US GAAP.
Our results of operations have varied and may continue to vary from quarter to quarter and are therefore not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year or for any future period. Our future revenues and results of operations may vary significantly due to a combination of factors, including the factors described in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Our operating results fluctuate significantly, which may affect the value of your investment.” In addition, we believe that you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons as an indication of our future performance.
We believe that we have included in the amounts stated below all necessary adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, to fairly represent our selected quarterly data. You should read our selected quarterly data in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | | June 30, | | | September 30, | | | December 31, | | | March 31, | | | June 30, | | | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2003 | | | 2003 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | | | 2004 | | | 2004 | | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (unaudited and unconsolidated) | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating revenues. | | | 5,601 | | | | 6,533 | | | | 7,200 | | | | 8,049 | | | | 8,248 | | | | 8,712 | | | | 8,946 | | | | 9,103 | |
Cost of goods sold | | | (5,084 | ) | | | (5,587 | ) | | | (5,876 | ) | | | (6,687 | ) | | | (6,688 | ) | | | (7,028 | ) | | | ( 7,259 | ) | | | (7,581 | ) |
Gross profit | | | 517 | | | | 946 | | | | 1,325 | | | | 1,362 | | | | 1,560 | | | | 1,684 | | | | 1,687 | | | | 1,522 | |
Operating expenses | | | (382 | ) | | | (383 | ) | | | (398 | ) | | | (408 | ) | | | (465 | ) | | | (499 | ) | | | (519 | ) | | | (538 | ) |
Operating income (loss) | | | 135 | | | | 564 | | | | 926 | | | | 954 | | | | 1,094 | | | | 1,185 | | | | 1,169 | | | | 984 | |
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
We need cash primarily for capacity expansion, equipment purchases and working capital. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements. Although we have historically been able to satisfy our working capital needs from cash flow from operations, our ability to expand our capacity has been largely dependent upon, and will continue to depend upon, our ability to finance these activities through the issuance of equity securities, long-term borrowings and the issuance of convertible and other debt securities. Our ability to meet our working capital needs from cash flow from operations will be affected by the demand for our services and products, which in turn may be affected by several factors. Many of these factors are outside of our control, such as economic downturns and declines in the average selling prices of our products caused by oversupply in the market. To the extent that we do not generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to meet our cash requirements, we may rely on external borrowings and securities offerings. We have not historically relied, and we do not plan to rely in the foreseeable future, on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to finance our operations or expansion.
Liquidity
As of December 31, 2004, our primary source of liquidity was NT$10,922 million (US$344.1 million) of cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2004, we had total availability under existing short-term lines of credit, short-term commercial paper and trade facilities of NT$6,027 million (US$189.9 million) available from seven domestic and foreign financial institutions, of which NT$1,111 million (US$35.0 million) were used as borrowings, letters of credit or guarantees. In 2004, none of our short-term facilities was used. All of our short-term facilities are revolving facilities with a term of one year, which may be extended for terms of one year each with lender’s consent. None of our current short-term commercial paper facilities have received a credit rating. As of December 31, 2004, we had no short-term borrowing outstanding under these short-term commercial paper facilities.
The following table sets forth our cash flows with respect to operating activities, investing activities, financing activities and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash for the periods indicated.
45
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (in millions) | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 5,006 | | | | 8,053 | | | | 8,767 | | | | 276.2 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (8,805 | ) | | | (4,228 | ) | | | (11,620 | ) | | | (366.1 | ) |
Net cash provide by financing activities | | | 3,467 | | | | 2,408 | | | | 1,659 | | | | 52.3 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | (8 | ) | | | — | | | | (86 | ) | | | (2.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (340 | ) | | | 6,233 | | | | (1,280 | ) | | | (40.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
In 2003, net cash provided by operations was NT$8,053 million compared to NT$8,767 million (US$276.2 million) in 2004. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of an increase in net income (post adjustment for non-cash related expenses) despite an offset due to an increase in foreign currency exchange gains on bonds payable. Our changes in accounts receivable decreased from NT$1,221 million in 2003 to NT$405 million in 2004 and our changes in accounts payable also decreased from NT$781 million in 2003 to a negative NT$35 million in 2004, partly offset by an increase in changes in other payables from NT$60 million in 2003 to NT$471 million in 2004. Our depreciation and amortization expenses increased from NT$5,185 million in 2003 to NT$6,153 million (US$193.9 million) in 2004. The increase in our depreciation and amortization expenses in 2004 compared to 2003 was due to additional equipment installed in connection with our capacity expansion program.
Net cash provided by operations was NT$5,006 million in 2002 compared to NT$8,053 million in 2003. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of increases in net income (post adjustment for non-cash related expenses) and gains in long-term investments accounted for under equity method. Our changes in accounts receivable increased from NT$441 million in 2002 to NT$1,221 million in 2003 and our changes in accounts payable also increased from NT$397 million in 2002 to NT$781 million in 2003. Our depreciation and amortization expenses increased from NT$4,902 million in 2002 to NT$5,185 million in 2003 due to additional equipment installed in connection with our capacity expansion program.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
In 2003, cash used in investing activities was NT$4,228 million compared to NT$11,620 million (US$366.1 million) in 2004. Net cash used in investing activities primarily reflected capital expenditures for property, plants and equipment. These capital expenditures were primarily funded with net cash provided by financing activities. We are sometimes required to prepay our purchases of land and equipment. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, we did not have any outstanding balance of any prepayments for purchases of land. Prepayments for purchases of equipment result from contractual agreements involving down payments to suppliers when we place an order for the equipment. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, outstanding balances of prepayments for purchases of equipment amounted to NT$2,327 million and NT$1,024 million (US$32.3 million), respectively. We have entered into agreements with third parties in connection with our expansion plans. As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding obligations of approximately NT$181 million (US$5.7 million) under these agreements. We do not have any written options on non-financial assets. We made short-term investments of NT$4,760 million in 2004, compared to nil in 2003.
Cash used in investing activities was NT$8,805 million in 2002 compared to NT$4,228 million in 2003. The primary usage of cash in investing activities were related to the acquisition of property and equipment of NT$4,885 million during 2003 and NT$6,445 million during 2002. The increase in capital expenditure is directly related to our increase in revenues and forecasted demand from customers. In 2002, we made short-term investments of NT$6,872 million, compared to compared to nil in 2003.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
In 2003, net cash provided by financing activities was NT$2,408 million as compared to cash provided by financing activities of NT$1,659 million (US$52.3 million) in 2004. In 2003, net cash provided by financing activities reflected primarily our long-term borrowings of NT$5,129 million and the repayment of long-term borrowings of NT$2,330 million. In 2004, cash provided by financing activities reflected primarily our long-term borrowings of NT$6,300 million, repayment of long-term borrowings of NT$9,149 million and proceeds from our issuance of NT$6,646 million (US$200.0 million) zero-coupon convertible bonds due 2009.
46
In 2002, net cash provided by financing activities was NT$3,467 million, which reflects the proceeds from issuance of NT$7,608 million (US$200.0 million) zero coupon convertible bonds due 2007, partially offset by our redemption of the remaining outstanding convertible bonds due 2004 in the amount of NT$4,469 million.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commitments with definitive payment terms which will require significant cash outlays in the future as of December 31, 2004.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period | |
| | | | | | Less Than 1 | | | | | | | | | | | More Than | |
Contractual Obligations | | Total | | | Year | | | 1-3 Years | | | 4-5 Years | | | 5 Years | |
| | | | | | (in NT$ millions) (consolidated) | | | | | |
Long-term debt(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Secured long-term loans | | $ | 3,154 | | | $ | 3,154 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Unsecured long-term loans | | | 5,165 | | | | 57 | | | $ | 5,108 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Secured bonds | | | 800 | | | | 800 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Operating leases(2) | | | 124 | | | | 34 | | | | 33 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 41 | |
Purchase obligations(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 9,243 | | | $ | 4,045 | | | $ | 5,141 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | | Excludes our payment obligations of convertible bonds of NT$11,533 million due to the number of bondholders that will elect conversion or early redemption of their bonds within the periods specified above cannot be determined. |
|
(2) | | Represents our obligations to make lease payments to use the land on which our facilities are located, primarily in Taichung and Hsinchu in Taiwan. |
|
(3) | | Represents the agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. |
Capital Resources
We have made, and expect to continue to make, substantial capital expenditures in connection with the expansion of our production capacity in Taichung, Hsinchu and Suzhou. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Capital Expenditures and Divestitures.” Our initial budget for capital expenditures for 2005 is approximately US$175.0 million. We believe that our cash on hand, existing credit facilities and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated capital requirements as well as our capital lease and debt service repayment obligations for 2005.
If our anticipated market outlook changes, we may need to adjust the amount of our capital expenditures upward or downward. As a result, we may need to invest in new capacity to improve our economies of scale and reduce our production cost, which would require us to raise additional capital. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital should it become necessary on terms acceptable to us or at all. The sale of additional equity or equity-linked securities may result in additional dilution to our shareholders.
As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding long-term borrowings (including current portion but excluding convertible bonds of NT$11,533 million) of NT$9,120 million (US$287.3 million) owed to foreign and domestic financial institutions. The interest rates of these long-term borrowings dollars are at fixed and variable rates, which were and as of December 31, 2004 ranged from 1.79% to 5.18% per year. We have pledged a substantial portion of our assets, with a carrying value of NT$1,964 million (US$61.9 million) as of December 31, 2004, to secure our obligations under two facilities. Our material long-term borrowings (excluding convertible bonds) as of December 31, 2004 consist of the following:
| • | A multiple-purpose credit facility entered into on December 26, 2001 in the aggregate principal amount of NT$3,470 million for the purposes of (i) refinancing certain of our long-term indebtedness at a lower interest |
47
| | rate and (ii) buying back the convertible bonds due 2004 in any amount at any time after the closing of the offering of our convertible bonds due 2007, or meeting our cash requirement in the event that holders of the convertible bonds due 2004 exercise their put options on July 21, 2002. This facility consists of: (i) secured corporate bonds due 2005 in the aggregate amount of NT$800 million issued between January 16, 2002 and January 18, 2002, which are guaranteed by several banks, including ABN-AMRO Rothschild, Taiwan branch, each with the maturity date of January 18, 2005, (ii) a medium-term loan facility in the amount of NT$1.17 billion, and (iii) a NIF commercial paper facility in the amount of NT$1.5 billion renewable until January 18, 2005, each for a period not to exceed 180 days. The extent to which we will draw on this facility will depend on interest rates, exchange rates and other relevant factors, including whether we should exhaust the proceeds of our convertible bonds due 2007 before we apply the proceeds of the credit facility in the event that certain of the holders of the convertible bonds due 2004 exercise their put options on July 21, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, we had drawn NT$1,015 million (US$32.0 million) from this facility to redeem our convertible bonds due 2004 and NT$2,455 million (US$77.3 million) for working capital purposes. |
|
| • | A multiple-purpose credit facility led by China Trust Commercial Bank entered into on July 14, 2004 in the aggregate principal amount of NT$5.0 billion for the purposes of refinancing certain of our long-term indebtedness at a lower interest rate. This facility is a mid-term credit facility. As of December 31, 2004, we had drawn NT$4.8 billion (US$151.2 million) from the credit facility to refinance our exiting indebtedness. |
In addition, we entered into a multiple-purpose credit facility led by Citibank on June 5, 2003 in the aggregate principal amount of NT$5.2 billion for the purposes of (i) refinancing certain of our long-term indebtedness at a lower interest rate and (ii) funding our operating capital. This facility is a mid-term credit facility. We had repaid all of the borrowings under the facility on August 30, 2004.
Our credit facilities for long-term borrowings include certain provisions that would trigger a requirement for early payment. Under the terms of our credit facilities for long-term borrowings, we are also required to comply with financial covenants, including current ratio and debt-equity ratio and other technical requirements. Our debt under these facilities may be accelerated if there is a default, including defaults triggered by failure to comply with these financial covenants and other technical requirements. As of December 31, 2004, we complied with all financial covenants of existing facilities.
Our long-term bonds payable consists of US$200 million zero coupon convertible bonds due 2007 that we issued in early 2002 and US$200 million zero coupon convertible bonds due 2009 that we issued in early 2004.
| • | On January 28, 2002, we issued convertible bonds in the amount of US$200 million due 2007, the proceeds of which were used to purchase raw materials and to finance the exercise of the put options by bondholders on July 21, 2002 with respect to, and for our repurchase of, certain convertible bonds due 2004, which we issued in 1997 and are no longer outstanding. The zero coupon convertible bonds due 2007 are convertible into our shares or ADSs. As of December 31, 2004, US$8.8 million of these convertible bonds had been converted. We had repurchased US$33.7 million of these convertible bonds and had redeemed US$7.2 million of these convertible bonds at the option of the bondholders. |
|
| • | On February 5, 2004, we issued another series of convertible bonds in the amount of US$200 million due 2009, the proceeds of which were used to purchase equipment and raw materials. The zero coupon convertible bonds due 2009 are convertible into our shares or ADSs. None of these convertible bonds had been converted as of December 31, 2004. These bonds are scheduled to mature in February 2009 and will be redeemable by us on February 5, 2008 at the option of the bondholder. |
Transactions with Related Parties
We have not extended any loans or credit to any of our directors, supervisors or executive officers, and we have not provided guarantees for borrowings by any of these persons. We have not entered into any fee-paying contract with any of these persons to provide services not within the capacity of director, supervisor or executive officer of our company.
48
We have, from time to time, purchased raw materials and sold our services and products to our affiliated companies. We believe that these transactions with related parties have been conducted either on arm’s-length terms or on terms more favorable to us than arm’s-length terms. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.”
Inflation/Deflation
The inflation rate in Taiwan was (0.2)% in 2002, (0.3)% in 2003 and 1.6% in 2004. We do not believe that inflation in Taiwan has had a material impact on our results of operations.
Taxation
The corporate income tax rate in Taiwan which applies to us is 25%. Based on our status as a company engaged in the semiconductor packaging business in Taiwan, we have been granted exemptions from income taxes in Taiwan because we used the proceeds raised through the offering of global depository receipts in 1995 to purchase packaging equipment. As permitted by Taiwan tax regulation, we can use these exemptions for five years from the date when we begin to generate income from the use of this packaging equipment. As a result, we began to use these exemptions in 1998. These tax exemptions resulted in tax savings of approximately NT$160 million in 2000. Because we incurred net loss for income tax return purposes in 2001 and 2002, we cannot take advantage of these tax exemptions for years 2001 and 2002. These tax exemptions expired at the end of 2002. The ROC government enacted new tax regulations applicable to several industries, including the semiconductor industry. The new regulations exclude certain products in the semiconductor industry, including some of our products, from these tax exemptions. We continue to use this tax exemption since 2004.
For example, our quad flat packaging products, certain fine pitch products and small outline packaging products would no longer be tax-exempt. However, our other products and services, including our substrate packaging products and testing services, are expected to continue to enjoy tax exemptions under the new regulations. We are also entitled to apply for exemptions from income taxes in 2003 from the proceeds of ADSs we issued in early 2000.
We also benefit from other tax incentives generally available to technology companies, including tax credits of no more than 35% for research and development and employee training expenses and tax credits ranging from 5% to 20% for investment in automation equipment and technology and certain qualifying investments. According to the amended Statute for Upgrading Industries and relevant regulations effective in 2002, the tax credit for research and development and employee training expenses is 30%. Historically, these tax incentives have resulted in decreases of income tax payable by approximately nil, NT$399 million and NT$436 million (US$13.7 million) in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, our effective income tax rates were 51.95%, 28.89% and 11.95%, respectively, as tax benefits more than offset income taxes payable. According to the ROC tax credit rules, we currently enjoy a tax credit of 11% for the purchase of equipment.
In 1997, the ROC Income Tax Law was amended to integrate the corporate income tax and shareholder dividend tax to eliminate the double taxation effect for resident shareholders of ROC companies. Under the amendment, all retained earnings generated beginning January 1, 1998 and not distributed to shareholders as dividends in the following year are assessed a 10% retained earnings tax. As a result, if we do not distribute all of our annual retained earnings as dividends in the following year, our effective tax rate would exceed 25%.
US GAAP Reconciliation
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ROC GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from US GAAP. The US GAAP information in note 28 to the consolidated financial statements summarize the principal differences between the amounts determined in accordance with our accounting policy, which is based on ROC GAAP, and determined in accordance with US GAAP together with reconciliation of net income and shareholders’ equity from a ROC GAAP basis to a US GAAP basis. The following table shows a comparison of our net income and stockholders’ equity according to ROC GAAP and US GAAP for the periods indicated.
Reconciliation of Consolidated Net Income
49
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (consolidated) | |
| | (in millions) | |
Net income as reported under ROC GAAP | | | 425 | | | | 2,839 | | | | 4,282 | | | | 134.9 | |
US GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensated absences | | | (7 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | 1 | | | | 0.0 | |
Compensation | | | — | | | | (341 | ) | | | (699 | ) | | | (22.0 | ) |
Treasury stock transfer to employee | | | — | | | | (154 | ) | | | (193 | ) | | | (6.1 | ) |
Goodwill amortization | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Impairment on long-term investments | | | (213 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on disposal of long-term investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | 0.0 | |
Embedded derivative | | | (53 | ) | | | 237 | | | | (84 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) |
Marketable securities | | | (6 | ) | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Equity investments: | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Timing differences | | | (362 | ) | | | 631 | | | | 398 | | | | 12.5 | |
Net income/(loss) variance between US GAAP and ROC GAAP | | | 22 | | | | (30 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | (0.3 | ) |
Accounting for income in preferred stock | | | (45 | ) | | | 87 | | | | (29 | ) | | | (0.9 | ) |
Technology and know-how contributed to a joint venture investee | | | (6 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total US GAAP adjustments | | | (670 | ) | | | 428 | | | | (615 | ) | | | (19.4 | ) |
Taxation effect | | | 22 | | | | (19 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income under US GAAP | | | (223 | ) | | | 3,248 | | | | 3,667 | | | | 115.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (consolidated) | |
| | (in millions) | |
Total shareholders’ equity as reported under ROC GAAP | | | 26,179 | | | | 29,698 | | | | 33,493 | | | | 1,055.2 | |
US GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensated absences | | | (20 | ) | | | (21 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | (0.6 | ) |
Compensation | | | — | | | | (341 | ) | | | (438 | ) | | | (13.8 | ) |
Impairment on long-term investments | | | (213 | ) | | | (213 | ) | | | (213 | ) | | | (6.7 | ) |
Embedded derivative | | | (53 | ) | | | 184 | | | | 100 | | | | 3.2 | |
Equity investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Timing differences | | | (372 | ) | | | 259 | | | | 658 | | | | 20.7 | |
Net income variance between US GAAP and ROC GAAP | | | 126 | | | | 97 | | | | 88 | | | | 2.8 | |
Accounting for income in preferred stock | | | (66 | ) | | | 29 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Technology and know-how contributed to a joint venture investee | | | (204 | ) | | | (210 | ) | | | (210 | ) | | | (6.6 | ) |
Marketable securities | | | (14 | ) | | | 2,072 | | | | 853 | | | | 26.9 | |
Acquisition of Siliconware Corp. | | | 4,873 | | | | 4,873 | | | | 4,873 | | | | 153.5 | |
Taxation effect | | | 26 | | | | 7 | | | | 7 | | | | 0.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity under US GAAP | | | 30,262 | | | | 36,434 | | | | 39,191 | | | | 1,234.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
50
The following are the most significant differences between ROC GAAP and US GAAP as they relate to our net income and shareholders’ equity. For other GAAP differences, please refer to note 28 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Employee Bonuses
Certain employees of our company are entitled to bonuses in accordance with applicable provisions of our articles of incorporation. Employee bonuses are determined at 10% of distributable retained earnings. Distributable retained earnings are calculated as retained earnings after various reserves in accordance with ROC regulations and our articles of incorporation and after appropriation for remuneration to directors. Employee bonuses may be granted in cash, shares or a combination of both. Under ROC GAAP, such bonuses are appropriated from retained earnings in the accounting period during which such shareholders’ approval is obtained. If such employee bonuses are in the form of our shares, the amount charged against retained earnings is based on the par value of the shares issued. Under US GAAP, any employee bonus expense is initially accrued at the end of the period when services are rendered, at 10% of the distributable retained earnings. When bonuses are approved by the shareholders in the subsequent year, an additional compensation expense is recorded for the difference between the par value and the fair market value of shares granted to employees. The difference between US GAAP and ROC GAAP in this area would result in adjustments to net income and shareholders’ equity as shown in the above schedules. In addition to the adjustments to net income and shareholders’ equity as shown in the above schedules, application of US GAAP on employee bonuses would also result in a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital.
Equity Investments
Under the equity method, our proportionate share of the income (loss) of the investee is generally recognized in the year the income (loss) is earned. However, under ROC GAAP, if financial statements of an investee are not sufficiently timely for us to apply the equity method in the current period and such equity interests are below certain materiality threshold, we are permitted to delay the recognition of income (loss) until the subsequent year. US GAAP, however, does not allow the investor company to delay recognition of its equity in the investee’s income or loss. The US GAAP adjustment deducts the delayed income from subsequent year’s net income and adds it back to the prior year to arrive at net income under US GAAP.
Our proportionate share of the income (loss) from an equity investee may differ if the equity investee’s net income (loss) under ROC GAAP differs from US GAAP. Any difference would be recognized if and when we sell the equity investment.
Under ROC GAAP, when an investment is made in non-accumulative, convertible preferred shares, investment income is recognized for the amount of actual dividends when dividends are declared. Investment loss is recognized to the extent that the investee’s net book value is less than our liquidation preference. Under US GAAP, we recognize the proportionate share of both the investee’s income and loss.
Under a joint venture agreement with Mosel Vitelic Inc., we contributed cash as well as technological know-how in exchange for an equity interest in ChipMOS. Under ROC GAAP, we recognized as initial cost of investment for cash and the value of know-how contributed. Under US GAAP, the technological know-how transfer is not valued and not recognized as cost of investment.
Taxation Effect
Under ROC GAAP, a 10% tax on undistributed earnings is recognized as a tax expense in the period when the amount of undistributed earnings is determined. In addition, the effect of the 10% tax on temporary differences is not recognized for ROC GAAP purposes. Under US GAAP, the 10% tax on undistributed earnings is accrued in the period during which related income is generated and the impact of the 10% tax is measured for both current and deferred tax perspectives.
Goodwill Acquired through Acquisition
51
The fair value of the net assets we received was used as the value of the consideration for the acquisition of the remaining interests in Siliconware Corp. on December 31, 2000 and reflected in the common stock and capital reserve in our balance sheet. As the consideration is equal to the fair value of the net assets received, no goodwill is recorded under ROC GAAP. Under US GAAP, the acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and the purchase price was determined using the market value of our shares issued in connection with the acquisition. The difference between the fair value of our shares issued in connection with the acquisition and the fair value of the net assets acquired results in goodwill. Goodwill is amortized on a straight-line basis over ten years.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we no longer amortize goodwill beginning 2002. We have elected to perform our annual impairment review in each fiscal year. We have completed our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2004 and concluded that there was no impairment.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
Before SFAS No. 35 “Asset Impairment” is effective on January 1, 2005, there was no specific standards under ROC GAAP that address impairment of long-lived assets. US GAAP, however, requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. During 2002, several of our investees accounted for under the equity method, including ChipMOS Technologies Inc., Artest Corporation and Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd., incurred significant losses since the dates of our investments and there was no indication of recovery in the near future. We concluded that the impairment loss was other than temporary. Accordingly, we recorded impairment charges totaling NT$213 million (US$6.7 million) on these long-term equity investments and wrote off the carrying value of the investments to their fair value in 2002.
Embedded Derivatives
Under ROC GAAP, investment in convertible or exchangeable bonds is carried at the lower of cost or market value. Under US GAAP, the convertible or exchangeable option is considered an embedded derivative instrument and must be separated from the host contract and accounted for as though it was a discrete derivative instrument. The derivative instrument is measured at fair value, with changes in the fair value reported in earnings. Such adjustments to the carrying amount of the embedded derivative would remain part of the carrying amount of that asset until the asset is sold, at which time the entire carrying amount of the embedded derivative would be recognized as the cost of the item sold in determining earnings. If an entity were unable to reliably identify and measure the embedded derivative instrument for separation from the host contract, the entire contract would have to be measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in earnings.
Stock Dividends
Under ROC GAAP, an issuance of stock dividends is recorded at par with a charge to retained earnings. Under US GAAP, if the ratio of distribution is less than 25% of shares of the same class outstanding, the fair value of the shares issued should be charged to retained earnings. This different treatment will result in, under US GAAP, a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital of NT$21,620 million (US$681.1 million) on December 31, 2004. This adjustment has no effect on our shareholders’ equity.
Marketable Securities
Under ROC GAAP, marketable equity securities and long-term equity investments in which the company owns less than 20% of the voting rights of a publicly listed investee company are carried at the lower of cost or market value, and debt securities at cost. The market value of listed stocks is determined by the average closing price during the last month of the accounting period. Under US GAAP FAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, debt and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are to be classified as either trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity securities. Debt securities that the company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and traded for short-term profit are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity or
52
trading are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The fair value of listed stock under US GAAP is generally determined by the closing price at the balance sheet date. For individual securities classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity, the company performs analysis to determine whether a decline in fair value below the cost is other than temporary. No such impairment has been identified during the periods presented.
Treasury Stock Transferred to Employees
Under ROC GAAP, treasury shares transferred to employees are recorded as capital contribution for the cash amount received from the employees. Under US GAAP, in addition to the capital contribution recorded for the cash amount received from the employees, compensation expense would be recorded, for the difference between the shares transfer price and the fair market value of the shares issued at the issuance date, during the period when such transfers were made.
Calculation of EPS
In calculating weighted average number of shares outstanding for EPS purposes under ROC GAAP, employee bonus shares have been treated as outstanding for all periods, in a manner similar to a stock split or dividend. Under US GAAP, employee bonus shares have been considered separately from the stock dividend or split and have been treated as outstanding from the date when they were issued. The numbers of employee bonus shares issued in 2002, 2003 and 2004 were nil, nil and 21,049,700 shares, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” The statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments that are within its scope as a liability. Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is to be implemented by reporting a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. We adopted the statement in accordance with the pronouncement. The statement had no material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF No. 03-06, “Participating Securities and Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” EITF 03-6 is intended to clarify what is a participating security and how to apply the two-class method of computing earnings per share once it is determined that a security is participating, including how to allocate undistributed earnings to such a security. ETIF 03-6 is effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004. As we currently do not issue securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in our dividends and earnings, the adoption of this pronouncement had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2004, the EITF delayed the effective date for the recognition and measurement guidance previously discussed under EITF Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-01”) as included in paragraphs 10-20 of the proposed statement. The proposed statement will clarify the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to investments in debt and equity securities, in particular investments within the scope of FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and investment accounted for under the cost method. We have evaluated the effects of this proposed statement on its financial position and results of operations and do not expect the adoption of the accounting provisions of EITF 03-01 to have a significant impact on the company.
In September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board reached a conclusion in EITF Issue No. 04-8 pertaining to including contingently convertible debt in fully diluted
53
earnings per share. Our zero-coupon convertible notes, which are convertible into its common stock, will be included in current and prior periods’ fully diluted earnings per share calculation. As we currently do not issue contingently convertible debt securities, the adoption of this pronouncement had no impact on our diluted earnings per share.
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, SFAS No. 151 required that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This standard does not effect our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” (FAS 123 (R)). FAS 123(R) requires employee stock options and rights to purchase shares under stock participation plans to be accounted for under the fair-value method, and eliminates the ability to account for these instruments under the intrinsic-value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, which was allowed under the original provisions of FAS 123. FAS 123(R) requires the use of an option-pricing model for estimating fair value, which is amortized to expenses over the requisite periods. The requirements of FAS 123(R) were effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has postponed the effective date of FAS 123(R), giving companies more time to develop their implementation strategies. Under the SEC’s rule, FAS 123(R) is now effective for public companies for annual, rather than interim, periods that begin after June 15, 2005. We plan to adopt FAS 123(R) beginning in fiscal 2006 and is currently evaluating the various transition methods allowed under FAS 123(R).
In December 31, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-Monetary Assets, an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,” effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 153 requires that exchanges of productive assets be accounted for at fair value unless fair value cannot be reasonably determined or the transaction lacks commercial substance. We are currently evaluating the effects on our financial statements.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
See “Item 4. Information on our Company — B. Business Overview — Research and Development” and “Item 4. Information on our Company — B. Business Overview — Intellectual Property.”
D. Trend Information
Please refer to “— A. Operating Results — Overview” for a discussion of the most significant recent trends in our production, sales and inventory, costs and selling prices since the end of 2004. In addition, please refer to discussions included in this Item for a discussion of known trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our net sales or operating revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported financial information not necessarily to be indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2004, we had unused letters of credit for imported machinery and equipment in the aggregate amount of approximately NT$222 million (US$7.0 million). See note 25 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. We do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts or enter into any other off-balance sheet arrangements.
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
See “Item 8. Operating and Financial Review and Prospectus — B. Liquidity and Capital Resources — Liquidity” for the tabular disclosure of our contractual obligations.
54
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following table shows information regarding all of our directors, supervisors and executive officers as of March 31, 2005. The business address of our directors, supervisors and executive officers is the same as our registered address.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Years | | Principal Business Activities |
| | | | | | | | with | | Performed Outside Our |
Name | | Age | | Position | | Us | | Company |
Bough Lin | | | 53 | | | Chairman | | | 22 | | | Director of Siliconware Investment Co., Ltd., Artest Corporation, King Yuan Electronics Co., Ltd., APTOS Corporation and SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited and supervisor of Integrated Technology Express Inc., V Inc. |
Chi Wen Tsai | | | 57 | | | Vice Chairman; President | | | 22 | | | Director of Siliconware USA, Inc. |
Li Ping Wang | | | 50 | | | Director; Senior Vice President | | | 22 | | | None |
Yen Chun Chang | | | 50 | | | Director; Senior Vice President | | | 22 | | | None |
Wen Jung Lin | | | 58 | | | Director | | | 16 | | | None |
Wen Chung Lin | | | 52 | | | Director; Chief Financial Officer | | | 21 | | | Director of Siliconware USA, Inc. |
Hsiu Li Liu | | | 50 | | | Director | | | 15 | | | None |
C.Y. Lin(1) | | | 52 | | | Director | | | 13 | | | None |
Johnson Tien(1) | | | 51 | | | Director; Senior Vice President | | | 9 | | | None |
Wen Lung Cheng | | | 57 | | | Supervisor | | | 4 | | | None |
Teresa Wang(1) | | | 49 | | | Supervisor | | | 14 | | | Director of Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation |
Jerome Tsai(2) | | | 52 | | | Supervisor | | | 8 | | | Director of ChipMOS Technologies Inc., Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. |
J. Y. Hung | | | 51 | | | Senior Vice President | | | 3 | | | None |
Tzu Fu Lee | | | 54 | | | Vice President | | | 6 | | | None |
Chien An Chen | | | 55 | | | Vice President | | | 14 | | | None |
Chien Hua Chen | | | 50 | | | Vice President | | | 6 | | | None |
Cliff Liao | | | 46 | | | Director of Management Information System Division | | | 2 | | | None |
Andy Chu | | | 56 | | | Director of Administrative Division | | | 5 | | | None |
Patrick Lin | | | 48 | | | Director of Operation Support Division | | | 4 | | | None |
Wen Hsien Chang | | | 55 | | | Director of Facility Division | | | 7 | | | None |
(1) | | Representing Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. |
|
(2) | | Representing Joinwin Investment Company Ltd. Mr. Tsai was officially appointed by Joinwin to be its representative on June 6, 2002. |
Bough Linis our Chairman. He has been our Director since 1984. Mr. Lin is also currently a director of Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation, APTOS Corporation, Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. and SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited and supervisor of Integrated Technology Express, Inc., as our representative on these companies’ boards. Mr. Lin also serves on the board of Siliconware USA, Inc. as a representative of SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited. Mr. Lin is also the chairman of Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation. In addition, Mr. Lin serves on the boards of Artest Corporation and Integrated Technology Express Inc. as a representative of Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. He graduated from National Chiao Tung University in Taiwan in 1973 with a Bachelor’s degree in electronic physics. In addition, Mr. Lin is a cousin of Messrs. Wen Chung Lin and Wen Jung Lin, who are also our Directors. Wen Lung Cheng, one of our supervisors, is the brother-in-law of our Chairman.
55
Chi Wen Tsaiis currently our Vice Chairman and President and has been our Director since 1984. Mr. Tsai is also a director of Siliconware USA, Inc. He received a Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from National Taipei Institute of Technology in Taiwan in 1969.
Li Ping Wanghas been our Director since 1984. She graduated from Hsin Min Commerce and Industry College in Taiwan in 1973.
Yen Chun Changis our Director and one of two officers of our manufacturing group. Mr. Chang received a Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Nan Tai College in Taiwan in 1976.
Wen Jung Linis our Director. He received a Bachelor’s degree in architecture from Feng Chia University in Taiwan in 1970. Mr. Lin is a cousin of Mr. Bough Lin, our Chairman. Mr. Lin is also a cousin of Mr. Wen Chung Lin, our Director.
Wen Chung Linhas been our Director since 1993. Mr. Lin is also our chief financial officer. Mr. Lin is also a director of Siliconware USA, Inc. Mr. Lin studied in the MBA program of Sanno College in Japan in 1984. Mr. Lin is a cousin of Mr. Bough Lin, our Chairman. Mr. Lin is also a cousin of Mr. Wen Jung Lin, our Director.
Hsiu Li Liuis our Director. She received a Bachelor’s degree in international trade from Ming Chuang College in Taiwan in 1975.
C.Y. Linhas been our Director since June 2002. Mr. Lin received his Bachelor’s degree in Electronic Engineering from Nan-Jeon College.
Johnson Tienhas been our Director since June 2002. Mr. Tien is our Senior Vice President in charge of the Hsinchu branch. He received a Bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from Chung-Yuan Christian University in 1976.
Wen Lung Chenghas been our supervisor since June 2002. Mr. Cheng received a Bachelor’s degree in bank and insurance from Tamkang University in Taiwan in 1969. He is the brother-in-law of Mr. Bough Lin, our Chairman.
Teresa Wanghas been our supervisor since June 2002. Ms. Wang is the chief financial officer of Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation. She received a Bachelor’s degree in accounting and statistics from Ming Chuang College in 1978.
Jerome Tsaihas been our supervisor since June 2002. He received Bachelor’s degree in statistics from National Cheng Kung University and a Master’s degree in technology management from National Chiao Tung University.
J. Y. Hunghas been a Senior Vice President since 2001. Before joining us, Mr. Hung was the general manager of Hua Tung Co. Mr. Hung holds a Master’s degree in industrial engineering from Cheng Kung University.
Tzu Fu Leehas been a Vice President of since 1999. Before joining us, Mr. Lee was an assistant manager at VLSI. Mr. Lee received a Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Ta Tung Institute of Technology
Chien An Chenhas been a Vice President of since 2000. Mr. Chen holds an MBA from University of War in England.
Chien Hua Chenhas been a Vice President of since 1999. Before joining us, Mr. Chen was the general manager of Ling Sheng Co. Mr. Chen holds a Master’s degree in electrical engineering from Arizona State University.
Kuo Jui Taihas been a Vice President of since 2003. Before joining us, Mr. Tai was the vice-general manager of You Li Co. Mr. Tai received a Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Chunyuan University.
56
Cliff Liaohas been our Director of Management Information System Division since 2003. Before joining us, Mr. Liao was the manager of Hewlett-Packard in Taiwan. Mr. Liao received a Bachelor’s degree in computer science and information engineering from Feng Chia University.
Andy Chuhas been our Director of Administrative Division since 2000. Before joining us, Mr. Chu was the director of Universal Scientific Industrial Co., Ltd. Mr. Chu received an MBA degree from Chaoyang University of Technology.
Patrick Linhas been our Director of Operation Support Division since 2001. Before joining us, Mr. Lin was the director of Orient Semiconductor Electronics, Ltd. Mr. Lin received a Bachelor’s degree in international trade from Tamkang University.
Wen Hsien Changhas been our Director of Facility Division since 1998. Mr. Chang majored in electronic engineering from National Taichung Industrial High School.
B. Compensation of Directors, Supervisors and Executive Officers
The aggregate compensation paid and in-kind benefits granted to our directors, supervisors and executive officers in 2004 was NT$168 million (US$5.3 million). According to our articles of incorporation, 2% of the balance of net income after the payment of income taxes, recovery of past losses and deduction of 10% as legal reserve may be provided as remuneration to our directors and supervisors. The remaining amount may be distributed or reserved in a ratio of 10% and 90% as bonuses to our employees and as dividends to our shareholders, respectively. In addition, in 2003 we granted a total of 2,950 options to purchase up to 2,950,000 shares under the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan to certain of our executive officers. Some of our executive officers receiving options are also directors of our company.
C. Board Practices
All of our directors and supervisors were elected on June 3, 2002 for a term of three years. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries have entered into a contract with any of our directors and supervisors by which our directors or supervisors are expected to receive benefits upon termination of their employment.
Audit Committee
At the date of this filing, we do not have any independent director to constitute an audit committee. Our shareholders’ meeting is scheduled to be held on June 13, 2005. We anticipate that three independent directors will be elected during the shareholders’ meeting, all of whom will serve on our audit committee. We require our audit committee members to be financially literate with accounting or related financial management expertise in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We are in the process of preparing the audit committee charter in accordance with Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and NASD Marketplace Rule 4350. We expect to be in compliance with the requirements thereunder by July 31, 2005.
Difference between NASDAQ Requirement and Home Country Practices
In general, corporate governance principles for Taiwanese companies are set forth in the Company Act of the Republic of China, or ROC Company Act, the ROC Securities and Exchange Act and, to the extent they are listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange, listing rules of the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Corporate governance principles under provisions of ROC law may differ in significant ways to corporate governance standards for U.S. NASDAQ-listed companies. Under the latest amendment to the NASD Marketplace Rule 4350(a)(1), foreign private issuers are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices in lieu of the requirements of Rule 4350. Under the amendment, foreign private issuers must disclose alternative home country practices they follow. The following are the requirements of Rule 4350 we do not follow and the home country practices we follow.
Under the Rule 4350(c)(1),a majority of the board of directors must comprise of independent directors.We plan to have three independent directors out of a total of nine directors on our board after our shareholders’ meeting to be
57
held on June 13, 2005. Our standards in determining director independence substantially comply with the NASDAQ requirements, which include detailed tests for determining director independence. In Taiwan, to strengthen corporate governance of Taiwanese companies, the government has proposed an amendment to the ROC Securities and Exchange Act to require public companies to have at least one-fourth of their board of directors be comprised of independent directors. Such proposal is currently being reviewed by the Legislative Yuan of the ROC.
Under Rule 4350(c)(2), the company is required to have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.We do not hold executive sessions of non-management directors as the election of independent directors is not required by the ROC Company Act. However, once our independent directors are elected, they will participate in committee meetings of which they are committee members. In particular, we expect our independent directors to serve on our audit committee. Our audit committee will meet regularly.
Rule 4350(c)(3) requires that compensation of the chief executive officer of the company must be determined, or recommended to the board, either by a majority of the independent director or an independent compensation committee.We currently follow the practice under ROC Company Act, which requires that the compensation of directors be approved by shareholders. In addition, we also follow Article 29 of the ROC Company Act, which provides that the compensation of executive officers of the company shall be decided by resolutions adopted by the majority of the board at a meeting satisfying a quorum of more than one-half of the directors.
Under Rule 4350(c)(4), director nominees must either be selected, or recommended for the Board’s selection, either by a majority of the independent directors or an independent nominations committee.The ROC Company Act expressly grants the power of nomination to the shareholders, as well as to the board of directors. Under the ROC Company Act and the interpretations thereof, candidates to serve as directors are nominated either by the board of directors prior to the shareholders’ meeting or by the shareholders during the election of the director. In addition, the Legislative Yuan of the ROC has approved an amendment to the ROC Company Act specially granting director nomination powers to holders of at least one percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of the company. Therefore, the requirement of a nominations committee is in conflict with the ROC Company Act. We currently follow the home country practice.
Under the Rule 4350(h), each issuer shall conduct a review of all related party transactions on an ongoing basis and all such transactions shall be approved by the company’s audit committee or another comparable independent body.Prior to the formation of our audit committee, our board of directors reviewed and approved the company’s related party transactions. After the formation of our audit committee, we will require that our audit committee review related party transactions in accordance with the NASDAQ requirement.
Under Rule 4350(i)(1)(A), each issuer shall require shareholder approval when a stock option or purchase plan is to be established or materially amended or other equity compensation arrangement made or materially amended, pursuant to which stock may be acquired by officers, directors, employees, or consultants.Under the corresponding domestic requirements in the ROC Company Act and the ROC Securities and Exchange Act, shareholders’ approval is required for the distribution of employee bonuses in the form of stock, while the board of director has authority, subject to the approval of the ROC SFB, to approve employee stock option plans and to grant options to employees pursuant to such plans. We follow the home country practice. ROC law provides for specific safeguards on employee stock option grants. Options granted under the plans are subject to certain statutory volume limitations. Under the ROC Company Act, the directors of a company may not receive stock options because they are not considered “employees” of the company.
D. Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had 10,003 full-time employees. Of these employees, 5,813 were engaged in packaging and testing production, 2,426 were engaged in engineering and other technical operations and 1,764 were engaged in finance, business management and administration. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, we had 9,123 and 9,160 full-time employees, respectively.
Employee salaries are reviewed once or twice a year. Salaries are adjusted based on industry standards, inflation and individual performance. As an incentive, additional bonuses in cash may be paid at the discretion of the
58
management based on the performance of individuals. In addition, ROC law requires that employees be given preemptive rights to subscribe to between 10% and 15% of any of our rights issues or share offerings.
In accordance with the newly enacted ROC Labor Pension Act, all ROC companies, including us, will be required, effective July 1, 2005, to contribute at least 6% of our employees’ monthly salary to the pension fund accounts of those employees who decide to participate in the “portable” pension schemes available under the Labor Pension Act. Under the ROC Labor Standards Act, which governed pension schemes prior to the Labor Pension Act, ROC companies were required to contribute at least 2% of such monthly income to the pension fund accounts. It is not yet clear how many employees will decide to participate in the portable pension schemes under the Labor Pension Act. However, we anticipate that our pension costs will increase as a result of this new legislation.
Our employees participate in our profit distribution under our articles of incorporation. Employees are entitled to receive bonus shares based on a percentage of our allocable surplus income. We paid employees stock in the aggregate amount of 21,049,700 shares and cash bonuses of NT$74 million in 2004.
In July 2002, we adopted the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan that authorizes the grant of options to our full-time regular employees, including those of our domestic and overseas subsidiaries, for purchase up to an aggregate of 40,000,000 shares of our common shares. The exercise price for the options would be the closing price of our common shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange on the day the options are granted, while the expiration date for such options is 5 years from the date of grant. In February and May 2003, we granted a total of 35,828 options to purchase up to 35,828,000 shares under the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, of which 2,950 options were granted to certain of our executive officers. Some of our executive officers receiving options are also directors of our company, and the options granted to our officers have an initial exercise price of NT$13.7. The options granted in February 2003 and May 2003 had an exercise price of NT$15.6 and NT$16.3 and a purchase price of nil. In August 2004, we adjusted the exercise price of the February 2003 and May 2003 options to NT$13.7 and NT$14.3, respectively, and the options will expire 5 year from the date of grant if not previously exercised.
| | | | |
Number of shares issuable | | | | |
upon exercise of options | | Expiration Date | | Exercise price |
32,356,000 | | February 2008 | | NT$13.7 |
3,472,000 | | May 2008 | | NT$14.3 |
Under the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, an option holder may exercise an increasing portion of his or her options starting two years after the grant of the options. According to the vesting schedule, 30%, 70% and 100% of such option holder’s options shall vest two, three and four years after the grant of the options, respectively. Upon termination of employment, the option holder shall exercise his or her vested options within one month, subject to exceptions provided therein, and otherwise after the termination, such options shall terminate. If termination of employment was due to death, the heirs of such option holder have one year starting from the date of the death to exercise his or her vested options. If termination of employment was due to retirement or occupational casualty, the option holder or his or her heirs may exercise all his or her options within certain period as provided. The options are generally not transferable or pledgeable by the option holders.
We do not have any collective bargaining arrangement with our employees, and we have never experienced a work stoppage caused by our employees. We believe we have good relations with our employees. We do not have any labor union.
E. Share Ownership
Each of our directors, supervisors and executive officers holds our shares either directly for their own account or indirectly as the representative of another legal entity on our board of directors. The following table sets forth the share ownership of our directors, supervisors and executive officers as of April 15, 2005, our most recent record date.
59
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Ordinary Shares | | | Per Share | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Issuable on | | | Exercise | | |
| | Number of | | | Percentage of | | | Exercise of | | | Price | | |
Name | | Shares Owned | | | Shares Owned | | | Option | | | (NT$) | | Exercisable Period |
Bough Lin | | | 44,479,265 | | | | 2.11 | % | | | 360,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Chi Wen Tsai | | | 34,049,299 | | | | 1.61 | % | | | 360,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Li Ping Wang | | | 46,241,103 | | | | 2.19 | % | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
Yen Chun Chang | | | 12,937,259 | | | | | * | | | 240,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb.2008 |
Wen Jung Lin | | | 6,358,026 | | | | | * | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
Wen Chung Lin | | | 32,961,477 | | | | 1.56 | % | | | 270,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Hsiu Li Liu | | | 12,179,960 | | | | | * | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
C.Y. Lin(1) | | | 29,717,353 | | | | 1.41 | % | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
Johnson Tien(1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 240,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb.2008 |
Wen Lung Cheng | | | 5,837,253 | | | | | * | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
Teresa Wang(1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
Jerome Tsai(2) | | | 2,750,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | 13.7 | | — |
J. Y. Hung | | | 142,700 | | | | | * | | | 240,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Tzu Fu Lee | | | 83,891 | | | | | * | | | 120,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Chien An Chen | | | 492,066 | | | | | * | | | 140,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Chien Hua Chen | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 60,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Kuo Jui Ta | | | 85,000 | | | | | * | | | 300,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Cliff Liao | | | 217,916 | | | | | * | | | 140,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Andy Chu | | | 0 | | | | | * | | | 140,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Patrick Lin | | | 74,200 | | | | | * | | | 200,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
Wen Hsien Chang | | | 6,628,286 | | | | | * | | | 140,000 | | | 13.7 | | Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2008 |
* | | Less than 1%. |
|
(1) | | Representing Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. |
|
(2) | | Representing Joinwin Investment Company Ltd. |
See “—D. Employees” for a description of the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major Shareholders
The following table presents information known to us concerning the record ownership of our shares as of December 31, 2002, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004 and April 15, 2005 (our most recent record date) by (i) the ten largest shareholders of our company (as of April 15, 2005) and (ii) all directors, supervisors and executive officers as a group. Other than Citibank, as the record owner of our American Depositary Shares, we are not aware that any of our shareholders beneficially own more than 5% of our shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2002 | | | December 31, 2003 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | April 15, 2005(6) | |
| | Number of | | | Percentage | | | Number of | | | Percentage | | | Number of | | | Percentage | | | Number of | | | Percentage | |
| | Shares | | | of Shares | | | Shares | | | of Shares | | | Shares | | | of Shares | | | Shares | | | of Shares | |
Name of beneficial owner | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | |
Citibank(1) | | | 99,194,619 | | | | 5.26 | % | | | 67,711,044 | | | | 3.59 | % | | | 151,548,541 | | | | 7.20 | % | | | 145,371,541 | | | | 6.89 | % |
JP Morgan Chase - -Emerging Market Growth Fund | | | 50,667,000 | | | | 2.69 | % | | | 17,932,000 | | | | 0.95 | % | | | 48,480,000 | | | | 2.30 | % | | | 28,280,000 | | | | 1.34 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bough Lin(2) | | | 70,080,423 | | | | 3.72 | % | | | 60,080,423 | | | | 3.19 | % | | | 44,479,265 | | | | 2.11 | % | | | 44,479,265 | | | | 2.11 | % |
Kuming Investment Company Ltd.(3) | | | 48,583,204 | | | | 2.58 | % | | | 34,687,655 | | | | 1.84 | % | | | 48,583,204 | | | | 2.31 | % | | | 53,441,524 | | | | 2.53 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Li Ping Wang(4) | | | 42,037,367 | | | | 2.23 | % | | | 42,037,367 | | | | 2.23 | % | | | 46,241,103 | | | | 20.20 | % | | | 46,241,103 | | | | 2.19 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chi Wen Tsai | | | 33,895,272 | | | | 1.8 | % | | | 31,645,272 | | | | 1.68 | % | | | 34,049,299 | | | | 1.62 | % | | | 34,049,299 | | | | 1.61 | % |
60
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2002 | | | December 31, 2003 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | April 15, 2005(6) | |
| | Number of | | | Percentage | | | Number of | | | Percentage | | | Number of | | | Percentage | | | Number of | | | Percentage | |
| | Shares | | | of Shares | | | Shares | | | of Shares | | | Shares | | | of Shares | | | Shares | | | of Shares | |
Name of beneficial owner | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | | | Owned | |
Chunghwa Post Co., Ltd. | | | 51,534,200 | | | | 2.73 | % | | | 59,678,200 | | | | 3.17 | % | | | 36,215,470 | | | | 1.72 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wen Chung Lin(5) | | | 26,187,167 | | | | 1.39 | % | | | 29,583,161 | | | | 1.57 | % | | | 32,961,477 | | | | 1.57 | % | | | 32,961,477 | | | | 1.56 | % |
Workers’ Retirement Fund Supervisory Committee | | | 25,772,255 | | | | 1.37 | % | | | 25,772,255 | | | | 1.37 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,118,480 | | | | 1.43 | % |
Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | | 27,015,776 | | | | 1.43 | % | | | 27,015,776 | | | | 1.43 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | 29,717,353 | | | | 1.41 | % |
Directors and Supervisors as a group | | | 243,002,272 | | | | 14.32 | % | | | 236,646,272 | | | | 12.55 | % | | | 227,718,995 | | | | 10.82 | % | | | 227,510,995 | | | | 10.78 | % |
(1) | | As record owner of our shares. |
|
(2) | | Mr. Lin is a cousin of Mr. Wen Chung Lin. |
|
(3) | | The president of Kuming Investment Company Ltd. is the husband of Ms. Li Ping Wang. |
|
(4) | | Ms. Wang’s husband also serves as the president of Kuming Investment Company Ltd. |
|
(5) | | Mr. Lin is a cousin of Mr. Bough Lin. |
|
(6) | | Our most recent record date. |
Except for holders of our ADSs, none of our major shareholders have different voting rights from those of other shareholders.
As of May 31, 2005, a total of 28,237,605 ADSs and 2,111,122,560 of our shares (including the shares represented by these ADSs) were outstanding. With certain limited exceptions, holders of common shares that are not ROC persons are required to hold these commons shares through a brokerage or custodial account in the ROC. As of May 31, 2005, 141,188,025 common shares were registered in the name of a nominee of Citibank, N.A., the depositary of our ADS facility. Citibank, N.A. has advised us that, as of May 31, 2005, 141,127,930 common shares were held of record by Cede & Co. We have no further information as to common shares held, or beneficially owned, by U.S. persons.
None of our major shareholders have different voting rights from those of other shareholders.
B. Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions Policies
We from time to time have engaged in a variety of transactions with our affiliates. We conduct transactions with our affiliates on terms substantially as favorable to us as would be obtainable at the time in a comparable arm’s-length transaction with non-affiliates.
ChipMOS Technologies Inc.
Prior to 2002, we provided packaging services to ChipMOS. These packaging services were rendered directly to ChipMOS’s customers through customer referrals from ChipMOS. For 2002 and 2004, we had no sales to ChipMOS. For 2003, we had total sales to ChipMOS of NT$102 million.
We are obligated under a joint venture agreement with Mosel Vitelic to severally guarantee up to 30% of ChipMOS’s indebtedness if ChipMOS requires a guarantee to secure financing. We currently do not guarantee any of ChipMOS’s indebtedness. Mr. Jerome Tsai, one of our Supervisors, is a director of ChipMOS.
Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation
We purchased semiconductor raw materials from Phoenix Precision Technology totaling NT$1,716 million, NT$2,610 million and NT$2,876 million (US$90.6 million) in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The purchase price and payment terms for such purchases were generally comparable to those provided by non-related parties. The
61
average payment period is approximately 30 days from the date of completion of service or purchase. As of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, we owed NT$195 million, NT$302 million and NT$231 million (US$7.3 million), respectively, in accounts payable, to Phoenix Precision Technology.
Mr. Bough Lin, our Chairman, is also the chairman of Phoenix Precision Technology. Two of our Supervisors, Ms. Teresa Wang and Mr. Jerome Tsai, are a director and a supervisor, respectively, of Phoenix Precision Technology.
CAESAR Technology Inc.
In 2002, we purchased machinery and equipment from CAESAR Technology totaling NT$60 million. CAESAR completed its liquidation in 2003.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Please refer to Item 18 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report on Form 20-F.
Litigation
We are not involved in any material litigation or other proceedings, the outcome of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our services.
Dividend Policy and Distributions
As for our policy on dividend distributions, see “Item 10. Additional Information — Memorandum and Articles of Association — Dividends and Distributions.” The following table sets forth the stock dividends per Share as a percentage of Shares outstanding paid during each of the years indicated in respect of Shares outstanding at the end of each such year, except as otherwise noted.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Total Number | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock | | | of Shares | | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding | |
| | Dividend Per | | | Issued as Stock | | | | | | | | | | | Shares | |
| | Share(1) | | | Dividend(2) | | | Stock Dividend Amount | | | at Year End | |
| | | | | | | | | | NT$(3) | | | US$(4) | | | | | |
| | (in thousands) | |
1995 | | | 40.0 | % | | | 70,048,800 | | | | 6,059,221 | | | | 234,581 | | | | 280,668,000 | |
1996 | | | 60.0 | % | | | 168,400,800 | | | | 6,432,911 | | | | 233,245 | | | | 457,800,000 | |
1997 | | | 40.0 | % | | | 183,120,000 | | | | 17,213,280 | | | | 618,738 | | | | 654,200,000 | |
1998 | | | 36.0 | % | | | 235,512,000 | | | | 11,752,049 | | | | 341,928 | | | | 904,162,000 | |
1999 | | | 23.0 | % | | | 207,957,260 | | | | 12,269,478 | | | | 378,805 | | | | 1,127,092,402 | |
2000 | | | 14.0 | % | | | 157,793,537 | | | | 5,964,596 | | | | 190,684 | | | | 1,449,882,870 | |
2001 | | | 14.5 | % | | | 235,421,212 | | | | 4,237,582 | | | | 122,793 | | | | 1,852,761,683 | |
2002(5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,853,668,683 | |
2003(6) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,876,625,683 | |
2004 | | | 13.5 | % | | | 189,447,578 | | | | 3,788,952 | | | | 119,375 | | | | 2,105,073,060 | |
(1) | | Our stock dividend is declared in NT dollar amount per Share. The number of Shares received by a shareholder equals to the NT dollar amount per share of dividend declared multiplied by the number of Shares owned by the shareholder and divided by the par value of NT$10 per Share. |
|
(2) | | Total number of Shares issued as stock dividends include Shares issued from retained earnings and from capital reserve. |
62
(3) | | The NT dollar amount of stock dividends paid is calculated based upon the closing price per Share on the Taiwan Stock Exchange on the date when the Shares issued as stock dividends commenced trading. |
|
(4) | | The US dollar amount of stock dividends paid is calculated based upon the noon buying rate announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on the date when shareholders possessed the right to ownership of the stock dividends. |
|
(5) | | We did not declare a dividend in 2002 because we incurred a net loss in 2001. |
|
(6) | | We did not declare a dividend in 2003 because our shareholders did not elect to declare such dividend, even though we generated net income in 2002. |
B. Significant Changes
Our net operating revenues on an unconsolidated basis for the first three months of 2005 amounted to NT$7,982 million, representing a 3.2% decrease from NT$8,248 million of our net operating revenues on an unconsolidated basis for the first three months of 2004. Our net operating revenues for the first three months of 2004 are not indicative of our financial performance on either an unconsolidated or a consolidated basis for the remaining months of 2004. In addition, we cannot predict whether the demand for our products and services will continue to improve in the near future.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
A. Offer and Listing Details
Market Price Information for Our Shares
Our shares have been listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange since April 7, 1993. The table below shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices and the average daily volume of trading activity on the Taiwan Stock Exchange for our shares and the highest and lowest of the daily closing values of the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Closing Price for | | | | | | | | |
| | Each Share(1) | | | | | | | Taiwan Stock Exchange Index | |
| | | | | | | | | | Average Daily | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Trading | | | | | | | |
Period | | High | | | Low | | | Volume | | | High | | | Low | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands | | | | | | | | | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | of shares) | | | | | | | | | |
2000 | | | 81.5 | | | | 17.8 | | | | 13,921 | | | | 10,202.20 | | | | 4,555.91 | |
2001 | | | 32.0 | | | | 14.0 | | | | 16,058 | | | | 6,104.24 | | | | 3,446.26 | |
2002 | | | 39.6 | | | | 15.3 | | | | 18,277 | | | | 6,462.30 | | | | 3,850.04 | |
2003 | | | 37.4 | | | | 15.3 | | | | 19,698 | | | | 6,182.20 | | | | 4,044.73 | |
First Quarter | | | 19.5 | | | | 15.6 | | | | 16,648 | | | | 5,141.80 | | | | 4,240.60 | |
Second Quarter | | | 22.5 | | | | 16.1 | | | | 20,649 | | | | 5,089.08 | | | | 4,044.73 | |
Third Quarter | | | 30.8 | | | | 23.1 | | | | 25,113 | | | | 5,809.43 | | | | 4,893.58 | |
Fourth Quarter | | | 36.9 | | | | 27.4 | | | | 15,990 | | | | 6,182.20 | | | | 5,560.55 | |
2004 | | | 42.4 | | | | 19.8 | | | | 20,556 | | | | 7,135.00 | | | | 5,255.06 | |
First Quarter | | | 42.4 | | | | 31.5 | | | | 20,997 | | | | 7,135.00 | | | | 5,907.15 | |
Second Quarter | | | 38.2 | | | | 21.5 | | | | 21,247 | | | | 6,916.31 | | | | 5,450.72 | |
Third Quarter | | | 27.5 | | | | 19.8 | | | | 19,258 | | | | 5,970.29 | | | | 5,255.06 | |
Fourth Quarter | | | 28.4 | | | | 22.6 | | | | 21,036 | | | | 6,160.96 | | | | 5,597.80 | |
November | | | 28.4 | | | | 24.2 | | | | 27,038 | | | | 6,088.12 | | | | 5,628.25 | |
December | | | 26.8 | | | | 24.0 | | | | 16,235 | | | | 6,160.96 | | | | 5,745.05 | |
2005 (up to May 31) | | | 70.8 | | | | 21.9 | | | | 20,048 | | | | 6,267.32 | | | | 5,565.41 | |
First Quarter | | | 29.6 | | | | 21.9 | | | | 21,717 | | | | 6,267.52 | | | | 5,734.87 | |
63
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Closing Price for | | | | | | | | |
| | Each Share(1) | | | | | | | Taiwan Stock Exchange Index | |
| | | | | | | | | | Average Daily | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Trading | | | | | | | |
Period | | High | | | Low | | | Volume | | | High | | | Low | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands | | | | | | | | | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | of shares) | | | | | | | | | |
January | | | 26.7 | | | | 21.9 | | | | 18,963 | | | | 6,183.15 | | | | 5,734.87 | |
February | | | 29.6 | | | | 25.0 | | | | 37,708 | | | | 6,233.53 | | | | 5,979.92 | |
March | | | 29.5 | | | | 26.1 | | | | 15,649 | | | | 6,267.52 | | | | 5,940.18 | |
Second Quarter (up to May 31) | | | 30.8 | | | | 26.1 | | | | 17,729 | | | | 6,048.37 | | | | 5,565.41 | |
April | | | 29.2 | | | | 26.1 | | | | 16,313 | | | | 6,048.37 | | | | 5,565.41 | |
May | | | 30.8 | | | | 26.4 | | | | 19,077 | | | | 6,011.56 | | | | 5,803.68 | |
Sources: | | Taiwan Stock Exchange Statistical Data 1999-2004, Taiwan Stock Exchange and Bloomberg. |
|
(1) | | As reported. |
There is no public market outside Taiwan for our shares. The Taiwan Stock Exchange has experienced significant fluctuations in the prices of listed securities and there are currently limits on the range of daily price movements.
Market Price Information for Our American Depositary Shares
Our ADSs have been listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s National Market since June 7, 2000. The table below shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices and the average daily volume of trading activity on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s National Market.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Closing Price | | | Average Daily | |
| | for Each ADS(1) | | | Trading Volume | |
Period | | High | | | Low | | | | | |
| | US$ | | | US$ | | | | | |
2000 (from June 7) | | | 5.62 | | | | 2.18 | | | | 431,433 | |
2001 | | | 4.30 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 247,542 | |
2002 | | | 5.48 | | | | 2.23 | | | | 394,006 | |
2003 | | | 5.27 | | | | 1.98 | | | | 730,026 | |
First Quarter | | | 2.60 | | | | 1.98 | | | | 253,110 | |
Second Quarter | | | 3.02 | | | | 2.09 | | | | 417,523 | |
Third Quarter | | | 4.29 | | | | 2.96 | | | | 768,707 | |
Fourth Quarter | | | 5.27 | | | | 3.59 | | | | 1,480,765 | |
2004 | | | 6.00 | | | | 2.83 | | | | 1,047,141 | |
First Quarter | | | 6.00 | | | | 4.24 | | | | 2,040,297 | |
Second Quarter | | | 5.21 | | | | 2.83 | | | | 1,052,894 | |
Third Quarter | | | 3.85 | | | | 2.84 | | | | 551,108 | |
Fourth Quarter | | | 4.40 | | | | 3.23 | | | | 544,267 | |
November | | | 4.40 | | | | 3.62 | | | | 716,548 | |
December | | | 4.18 | | | | 3.65 | | | | 445,147 | |
2005 (up to May 31) | | | 5.45 | | | | 3.32 | | | | 431,983 | |
First Quarter | | | 5.45 | | | | 3.32 | | | | 461,689 | |
January | | | 4.19 | | | | 3.32 | | | | 397,592 | |
February | | | 5.45 | | | | 3.90 | | | | 569,621 | |
March | | | 4.70 | | | | 4.11 | | | | 426,744 | |
Second Quarter (up to May 31) | | | 4.80 | | | | 4.10 | | | | 388,838 | |
April | | | 4.55 | | | | 4.10 | | | | 396,185 | |
May | | | 4.80 | | | | 4.28 | | | | 381,491 | |
Source: NASDAQ Stock Exchange. |
|
(1) As reported. |
64
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
Our shares are listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and our ADSs are quoted on the NASDAQ National Market.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
The following statements summarize the material elements of our capital structure and the more important rights and privileges of our shareholders conferred by Taiwan law and our articles of incorporation.
Objects and Purpose
The scope of business of our company as set forth in Article 2 of our articles of incorporation includes:
(a) The production, processing and purchase and sale of products, including integrated circuit, transistors, light emitting diode digital displays, light emitting diode display lamps, liquid crystal clock cores, photo diodes, hybrid circuits, thin film circuits and thick film circuits; and
(b) The import and export of the products mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
Directors
The ROC Company Act and our articles of incorporation provide that our board of directors is elected by shareholders and is responsible for the management of our services. Our board of directors is composed of nine
65
directors. The Chairman of our board is elected by our directors. The Chairman presides at all meetings of our board of directors and also has the authority to represent us. The term of office for our directors is three years and our directors are elected by our shareholders by means of cumulative voting. The next election for all of the directors and supervisors is expected to be held in June 2005. In addition, our shareholders also elect three supervisors whose duties include investigating our services and financial condition, inspecting corporate records, calling shareholders’ meetings when our board of directors does not or cannot convene a shareholders’ meeting or when such a meeting is necessary for our benefit, representing us in negotiations with our directors and notifying our board of directors to cease acting in contravention of law, our articles of incorporation or the resolutions of our shareholders’ meetings. The supervisors cannot concurrently serve as our directors or officers. A person may serve as our director or supervisor in his personal capacity or as the representative of one of our shareholder entities. A director or supervisor who serves as the representative of a legal entity may be removed or replaced at any time, and the replacement director or supervisor may serve the remainder of the term of office of the replaced director or supervisor.
According to the ROC Company Act, a director who has a personal interest in a matter to be discussed at the meeting of the board of directors, the outcome of which may impair the company’s interests, shall abstain from voting on such matter. Our articles of incorporation also provide that the traveling expenses for all directors and supervisors shall be determined at the board of directors’ meeting based on common practice regardless of the profit or loss to our company. In addition, according to our articles of incorporation, we should distribute 2.0% of the balance of our earnings after deduction of payment of all taxes and dues, deduction of any past losses and allocation of 10% of our net income as a legal reserve as remuneration to directors and supervisors. Our articles of incorporation do not impose a mandatory retirement age limit for our directors. Furthermore, our articles of incorporation do not impose a shareholding qualification for each director; however, our articles of incorporation require that our directors and supervisors should hold our issued shares at the ratios as required by the regulatory authority.
Shares
As of May 31, 2005, our authorized share capital was NT$26 billion, divided into 2.6 billion shares, of which NT$21,111,225,600, divided into 2,111,122,560 shares, were issued and outstanding. We issued US$200 million of convertible bonds due 2007 in January 2002, of which an aggregate amount of US$150.2 million remained outstanding as of May 31, 2005. We issued US$200 million of convertible bonds due 2009 in February 2004, none of which has been converted into shares. Other than our shares, ADSs and our convertible bonds, we do not have any other equity interests outstanding, including any preferential subscription rights, exchangeable debt securities or warrants as of May 31, 2005.
All shares presently issued are fully paid and in registered form, and existing shareholders are not obligated to contribute additional capital. The shares underlying the ADSs are fully paid, in registered form and will not be obligated by any capital calls. We generally are not permitted to directly acquire our shares, except under limited circumstances as permitted by ROC law.
According to our 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, options may be granted to our full-time regular employees, including those of our domestic and overseas subsidiaries, for purchase up to an aggregate of 40,000,000 shares. The exercise price for the options would be the closing price of our common shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange on the day the options are granted, while the expiration date for such options is 5 years from the date of grant. In February and May 2003, we granted a total of 35,828 options to purchase up to 35,828,000 shares under our 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, of which 2,950 options to purchase up to 2,950,000 shares were granted to our executive officers. Some of our executive officers receiving options are also directors of our company.
Under our 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, an option holder may exercise an increasing portion of his or her options starting two years after the grant of the options. According to the vesting schedule, 30%, 70% and 100% of such option holder’s options shall vest two, three and four years after the grant of the options, respectively. Upon termination of employment, the option holder shall exercise his or her vested options within one month, subject to exceptions provided therein, and otherwise after the termination, such options shall terminate. If termination of employment was due to death, the heirs of such option holder have one year starting from the date of the death to exercise his or her vested options. If termination of employment was due to retirement or occupational casualty, the option holder or his or her heirs may exercise all his or her options within certain period as provided. The options are generally not transferable or pledgeable by the option holders.
66
New Shares and Preemptive Rights
New shares may only be issued with the prior approval of our board of directors. If our issuance of any new shares will result in any change in our authorized share capital, we are required under ROC law to amend our articles of incorporation and obtain approval of our shareholders in a shareholders’ meeting. We must also obtain the approval of, or submit a registration with, the ROC SFB and the Ministry of Economic Affairs. According to the ROC Company Act, when a company issues capital stock for cash, 10% to 15% of the issue must be offered to its employees. In addition, if a listed company intends to offer new shares for cash, at least 10% of the issue must also be offered to the public pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Law. This percentage can be increased by a resolution passed at a shareholders’ meeting, which will reduce the number of new shares in which existing shareholders may have preemptive rights. Unless the percentage of the shares offered to the public is increased by a resolution, existing shareholders of the company have a preemptive right to acquire the remaining 75% to 80% of the issue in proportion to their existing shareholdings.
Shareholders
We only recognize persons registered in our register as our shareholders. We may set a record date and close our register of shareholders for specified periods to determine which shareholders are entitled to various rights pertaining to our shares.
Transfer of Shares
Under the ROC Company Act, a public company, such as us, may issue individual share certificates, one master certificate or scripless shares to evidence common shares. Shares in registered form are transferred by endorsement and delivery of the related share certificates. Transferees must have their names and addresses registered on our register in order to assert shareholders’ rights against us. Our shareholders are required to file their respective specimen seals with our share registrar, Chinatrust Commercial Bank.
Shareholders’ Meetings
We are required to hold an annual ordinary shareholders’ meeting once every fiscal year and within six months after the end of each fiscal year. Our board of directors may convene an extraordinary meeting whenever the directors think fit, and they must do so if requested in writing by shareholders holding not less than 3% of our paid-in share capital who have held these shares for more than a year. In addition, any of our supervisors may convene a shareholders’ meeting when our board of directors do not or cannot convene a shareholders’ meeting and/or when such a meeting is necessary for our benefit. At least 15 days advance written notice must be given of every extraordinary shareholders’ meeting and at least 30 days advance written notice must be given of every annual ordinary shareholders’ meeting. Unless otherwise required by law or by our articles of incorporation, voting for an ordinary resolution requires an affirmative vote of a simple majority of those present. A distribution of cash dividends would be an example of an ordinary resolution. The ROC Company Act also provides that in order to approve certain major corporate actions, including any amendment of our articles of incorporation, dissolution, merger or spin-off, the transfer of the whole of the business or assets to any other company which would have a significant impact in our operations, removing directors or the distribution of any stock dividend, a special resolution may be adopted by the holders of at least two-thirds of our shares represented at a meeting of shareholders at which holders of at least a majority of our issued and outstanding shares are present. However, if we are the controlling company and hold not less than 90% of our subordinate company’s outstanding shares, our merger with the subordinate company can be approved by a board resolution adopted by majority consent at a meeting with two-thirds of our directors present without shareholders’ approval.
Voting Rights
Except for treasury shares, each share is generally entitled to one vote. Except as otherwise provided for by law or by our articles of incorporation, a resolution can be adopted by the holders of a simple majority of the total issued and outstanding shares represented at a shareholders’ meeting. The quorum for a shareholders’ meeting to discuss the ordinary resolutions is a majority of the total issued and outstanding shares. The election of directors and supervisors
67
by our shareholders may be conducted by means of cumulative voting or other voting mechanisms adopted in our articles of incorporation. In all other matters, a shareholder must cast all his votes in the same manner when voting on any of these matters.
Our shareholders may be represented at an ordinary or extraordinary shareholders’ meeting by proxy if a valid proxy form is delivered to us five days before the commencement of the ordinary or extraordinary shareholders’ meeting. Voting rights attached to our shares exercised by our shareholders’ proxy are subject to the proxy regulation promulgated by the ROC SFB.
Any shareholder who has a personal interest in a matter to be discussed at our shareholders’ meeting, the outcome of which may impair our interests, shall not vote or exercise voting rights on behalf of another shareholder on such matter.
Any holder of our ADSs generally will not be able to exercise voting rights on the shares underlying its holding of ADSs on an individual basis.
Dividends and Distributions
We may distribute dividends in any year in which we have current or retained earnings (excluding reserves). Before distributing a dividend to shareholders, we must recover any past losses, pay all outstanding taxes and set aside a legal reserve equivalent to 10% of our net income until our legal reserve equals our paid-in capital.
At the shareholders’ annual ordinary meeting, our board of directors submits to the shareholders for their approval proposals for the distribution of a dividend or the making of any other distribution to shareholders from our net retained earnings or reserves. Dividends are paid to shareholders proportionately. Dividends may be distributed either in cash or in shares or a combination of cash and shares, as determined by the shareholders at such meeting. Distribution of stock dividends requires approvals from the ROC SFB and the Ministry of Economic Affairs, as necessary.
Beginning in 1999, our articles of incorporation provide that our earnings after payment of all income taxes and deduction of any past losses shall be distributed as follows:
| • | allocation of 10% of our net income as legal reserve; and |
|
| • | payment of 2% of the balance after deducting the 10% legal reserve as remuneration to our directors and supervisors. The remaining amount may be distributed or reserved in a ratio of 10% and 90%, respectively, to our employees as their bonuses and to our shareholders as their dividends. |
Before 1999, our articles of incorporation provided that our earnings after payment of all income taxes, deduction of any past losses, allocation of 10% of our net income as legal reserve and allocation of an interest on our capital at a rate not to exceed 3% shall be distributed as follows:
| • | 10% is distributable as bonus shares for employees. |
|
| • | 4% is set aside as remuneration of directors and supervisors. |
|
| • | 86% is allocated as a dividend to shareholders. |
In addition to permitting dividends to be paid out of net income, we are permitted under the ROC Company Act to make distributions to our shareholders of additional shares by capitalizing reserves, including the legal reserve and capital surplus of premiums from issuing stock and earnings from gifts received if we do not have losses. However, the capitalized portion payable out of our legal reserve is limited to 50% of the total accumulated legal reserve and is payable only if and to the extent the accumulated legal reserve exceeds 50% of our paid-in capital.
68
Acquisition of Our Shares by Us
An ROC company may not acquire its own common shares except under certain exceptions provided in the ROC Company Act or the ROC Securities and Exchange Law.
Under Article 28-2 of the Securities and Exchange Law, we may, by a board resolution adopted by majority consent at a meeting with two-thirds of our directors present, purchase up to 10% of our issued shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange or by a tender offer, in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the ROC SFB, for the following purposes:
| • | to transfer shares to our employees; |
|
| • | to transfer upon conversion of bonds with warrants, preferred shares with warrants, convertible bonds, convertible preferred shares or certificates of warrants issued by us; and |
|
| • | if necessary, to maintain our credit and our shareholders’ interests; provided that the shares so purchased shall be cancelled thereafter. |
In addition, we may not spend more than the aggregate amount of the retained earnings, the premium from issuing stock and the realized portion of the capital reserve to purchase our shares.
We may not pledge or hypothecate any purchased shares. In addition, we may not exercise any shareholders’ rights attaching to such shares. In the event that we purchase our shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange, our affiliates, directors, supervisors, managers and their respective spouses and minor children and/or nominees are prohibited from selling any of our shares during the period in which we purchase our shares.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of our liquidation, the assets remaining after payment of all debts, liquidation expenses, taxes and distributions to holders of preferred shares, if any, will be distributed pro rata to our shareholders in accordance with the ROC Company Act.
Other Rights of Shareholders
Under the ROC Company Act, dissenting shareholders are entitled to appraisal rights in the event of a spin-off or a merger and various other major corporate actions. Dissenting shareholders may request us to redeem all their shares at a fair price to be determined by mutual agreement. If no agreement can be reached, the valuation will be determined by a court. Subject to applicable law, dissenting shareholders may, among other things, exercise their appraisal rights by notifying us before the related shareholders’ meeting and/or by raising and registering their dissent at the shareholders’ meeting.
One or more shareholders who have held more than 3% of the issued and outstanding shares for more than one year may require our board of directors to call an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting by sending a written request to our board of directors.
Voting of Deposited Securities
A holder may direct the exercise of voting rights regarding the shares represented by the ADSs only pursuant to the deposit agreement as described below and applicable ROC law. See “Risk factors—Holders of our ADSs will not have the same voting rights as the holders of our shares, which may affect the value of your investment.”
Except as described below, a holder will not be able to exercise voting rights attaching to the shares on an individual basis. According to the ROC Company Act, a shareholder’s voting rights must, as to all matters brought to a vote of shareholders, other than the election of directors and/or supervisors, be exercised as to all shares held by the shareholder in the same manner. Accordingly, the voting rights of the shares represented by ADSs must be exercised
69
collectively in the same manner, except in the case of an election of directors and/or supervisors, which may be conducted by means of cumulative voting or other mechanisms adopted in our articles of incorporation. Pursuant to ROC Company Act and our articles of incorporation, the election of directors and/or supervisors is by means of cumulative voting.
By accepting and continuing to hold ADSs or any interest therein, a holder will authorize and direct the depositary to appoint our chairman or the chairman’s designee as his representative to exercise the voting rights attaching to the shares underlying the ADSs.
Once notified of a shareholders’ meeting, the depositary will, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, fix a record date for determining the owners entitled to receive information about this meeting. The depositary will mail to the owners:
| • | the notice of the meeting sent by us; and |
|
| • | a statement that the owners will be entitled to instruct the depositary or its nominee as to the exercise of the voting rights. |
If the depositary timely receives voting instructions from holders of at least 51% of the outstanding ADSs to vote in the same manner on a resolution, including election of directors and/or supervisors, the depositary will cause all of the shares underlying the outstanding ADSs to be voted in the manner instructed. If for any reason, other than our failure to provide timely notice to the depositary of a shareholders’ meeting, the depositary does not receive timely instructions from holders of at least 51% of all ADSs outstanding to vote in the same manner on a resolution, including a resolution for the election of directors and/or supervisors, the holders of all ADSs outstanding shall be deemed, subject to our satisfying the applicable requirements of the deposit agreement, to have authorized and directed the depositary to give a discretionary proxy to the chairman of our board of directors, or the chairman’s designee, to vote the shares on deposit in respect of their ADSs in his discretion, which may not be in the interest of the holders of ADSs.
An ADS holder will not be able to exercise cumulative voting rights on an individual basis in the elections of directors and/or supervisors under the deposit agreement. This means that if at least 51% of the votes represented by outstanding ADSs are cast for a particular director or supervisor for a particular open position in an election, the depositary shall, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, cause all of the shares underlying the outstanding ADSs to be voted in favor o f the director or supervisor.
By accepting and continuing to hold ADSs or any interest therein, a holder will be deemed to have agreed to the voting provisions set forth in the deposit agreement, as such provisions may be amended from time to time to comply with applicable ROC law.
There can be no assurance that a holder will receive notice of shareholders’ meetings sufficiently prior to the date established by the depositary for receipt of instructions to enable him to give timely voting instructions.
C. Material Contracts
Immunity Agreement with Motorola, Inc.
We entered into a license agreement with Motorola in November 1996 under which Motorola licensed to us the technology for ball grid array as well as any future technology relating to ball grid array. Under the terms of the agreement, we make royalty payments based on the number of pads or balls used in our packages. This agreement will expire in December 2010.
In April 2004, Motorola spun off its semiconductor product business into a subsidiary Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Motorola has assigned this agreement to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., and Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. has assumed all of its rights, duties and obligations under the agreement, in connection with the spin-off.
70
License Agreement with Flip Chip Technologies, L.L.C.
We entered into a license agreement with Flip Chip in November 1999, under which Flip Chip licensed to us the package design technology that enables us to attach silicon dies directly to substrates using solder bumping rather than wire bonding technology. This license will expire in November 2009.
Joint Venture Agreement with Mosel Vitelic, Inc.
We entered into a joint venture agreement with Mosel Vitelic in 1997 to create ChipMOS, a company concentrating on the packaging and testing of memory chips. Under the joint venture agreement, we must maintain a minimum 18% equity interest in ChipMOS for five years from the date of any initial public listing of ChipMOS. If ChipMOS requires guarantees of its indebtedness to obtain financing, we and Mosel Vitelic are required under the joint venture agreement to provide these guarantees in the ratios of 30% and 70%, respectively. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, we are entitled to nominate two of the seven board members of ChipMOS.
D. Exchange Controls
ROC Foreign Exchange Control Statute and regulations provide that all foreign exchange transactions must be executed by banks designated to handle such business by the Ministry of Finance or by the Central Bank of China. Current regulations favor trade-related foreign exchange transactions. Consequently, foreign currency earned from exports of merchandise and services may now be retained and used freely by exporters, and all foreign currency needed for the importation of merchandise and services may be purchased freely from the designated foreign exchange banks.
Aside from trade-related foreign exchange transactions, ROC companies and resident individuals may, without foreign exchange approval, remit outside the ROC foreign currency of up to US$50 million (or its equivalent) and US$5 million (or its equivalent), respectively, in each calendar year. In addition, ROC companies and resident individuals may, without foreign exchange approval, remit into the ROC foreign currency of up to US$50 million (or its equivalent) and US$5 million (or its equivalent), respectively, in each calendar year. Furthermore, any remittance of foreign currency into ROC by and ROC company or resident individual in a year will be offset by the amount remitted out of ROC by the company or individual (as applicable) within its annual quota and will not use up its annual inward remittance quota to the extent of such offset. The above limits apply to remittances involving a conversion of NT dollars to a foreign currency and vice versa. A requirement is also imposed on all enterprises to register medium- and long-term foreign debt with the Central Bank of China.
In addition, foreign persons may, subject to certain requirements but without foreign exchange approval of the Central Bank of China, remit outside and into the ROC foreign currencies of up to US$100,000 (or its equivalent) for each remittance. The above limit applies to remittances involving a conversion of NT dollars to a foreign currency and vice versa. The above limit does not, however, apply to the conversion of NT dollars into other currencies, including US dollars, in respect of the proceeds of sale of any underlying shares withdrawn from a depositary receipt facility.
E. Taxation
ROC Tax Considerations
The following summarizes the principal Taiwan tax consequences of owning and disposing of ADSs and shares for non-residents of Taiwan. Investors in our ADSs are advised to consult their own tax advisers as to United States, Taiwan or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of ADSs.
The following is a general summary of the principal ROC tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of ADSs representing common shares to a non-resident individual or entity. The summary description applies only to a holder that is:
| • | an individual who is not an ROC citizen, who owns ADSs and who is not physically present in the ROC for 183 days or more during any calendar year; or |
71
| • | a corporation or a non-corporate body that is organized under the laws of a jurisdiction other than the ROC for profit-making purposes and has no fixed place of business or other permanent establishment in the ROC. |
Holders of ADSs are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to their particular ROC tax consequences from owning the ADSs.
Dividends
Dividends declared by us out of our retained earnings and distributed to the holders are subject to ROC withholding tax, currently at the rate of 20%, on the amount of the distribution, in the case of cash dividends, or on the par value of the common shares in the case of stock dividends. However, a 10% ROC retained earnings tax paid by us on our undistributed after-tax earnings, if any, would provide a credit of up to 10% of the gross amount of any dividends declared out of those earnings that would reduce the 20% ROC tax imposed on those distributions.
It is currently unclear whether dividends paid by us out of our capital reserves are subject to ROC withholding tax.
Capital Gains
Under ROC law, capital gains on transactions in the common shares are currently exempt from income tax. In addition, transfers of ADSs are not regarded as a sale of an ROC security and, as a result, any gains on such transactions are not subject to ROC income tax.
Subscription Rights
Distributions of statutory subscription rights for common shares in compliance with ROC law are not subject to any ROC tax. Proceeds derived from sales of statutory subscription rights evidenced by securities are exempted from income tax but are subject to securities transaction tax at the rate of 0.3% of the gross amount received. Proceeds derived from sales of statutory subscription rights that are not evidenced by securities are subject to capital gains tax at the rate of:
| • | 35% of the gains realized if you are a natural person; or |
| • | 25% of the gains realized if you are an entity that is not a natural person. |
Subject to compliance with ROC law, we, at our sole discretion, can determine whether statutory subscription rights shall be evidenced by the issuance of securities.
Securities Transaction Tax
A securities transaction tax, at the rate of 0.3% of the sales proceeds, will be withheld upon a sale of common shares in the ROC. Transfers of ADSs are not subject to ROC securities transaction tax. Withdrawal of common shares from the deposit facility is not subject to ROC securities transaction tax.
Estate and Gift Tax
ROC estate tax is payable on any property within the ROC of a deceased who is an individual, and ROC gift tax is payable on any property within the ROC donated by an individual. Estate tax is currently payable at rates ranging from 2% of the first NT$600,000 to 50% of amounts over NT$100,000,000. Gift tax is payable at rates ranging from 4% of the first NT$600,000 to 50% of amounts over NT$45,000,000. Under ROC estate and gift tax laws, common shares issued by ROC companies are deemed located in the ROC regardless of the location of the holder. It is unclear whether a holder of ADSs will be considered to hold common shares for this purpose.
72
Tax Treaty
The ROC does not have a double taxation treaty with the United States. On the other hand, the ROC has double taxation treaties with Indonesia, Singapore, South Africa, Australia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Malaysia, Macedonia, Swaziland, Gambia, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Senegal and Sweden which may limit the rate of ROC withholding tax on dividends paid with respect to common shares in ROC companies. It is unclear whether ADS holders will be considered holders of common shares for the purposes of these treaties. Accordingly, if the holders may otherwise be entitled to the benefits of the relevant income tax treaty, the holders should consult their tax advisors concerning their eligibility for the benefits with respect to the ADSs.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations For U.S. Persons
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences for beneficial owners of our shares or ADSs that have purchased such shares or ADSs, that hold the shares or ADSs as capital assets, and that are U.S. holders and non-residents of the ROC. You are a U.S. holder if you are, for United States federal income tax purposes, any of the following:
| • | an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
| • | a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
|
| • | an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; |
|
| • | a trust that is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons; or |
|
| • | a trust that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. |
This summary is based on current law, which is subject to change, perhaps retroactively. It is for general purposes only and you should not consider it to be tax advice. In addition, it is also based in part on representations by the depositary and assumes that each obligation under the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. This summary does not represent a detailed description of all the U.S. federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances. In addition, it does not represent a detailed description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws including if you are:
| • | a dealer in securities or currencies; |
|
| • | a trader in securities if you elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities holdings; |
|
| • | a financial institution or an insurance company; |
|
| • | a tax-exempt organization; |
|
| • | a regulated investment company; |
|
| • | a real estate investment trust; |
|
| • | a person liable for alternative minimum tax; |
|
| • | a person holding shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction, constructive sale or straddle; |
73
| • | a person owning, actually or constructively, 10% or more of our voting stock; or |
|
| • | a U.S. holder whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar. |
We cannot assure you that a later change in law will not alter significantly the tax considerations that we describe in this summary.
If a partnership holds our shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding our shares or ADSs, you should consult your tax advisor.
You should consult your own tax advisor concerning the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences to you of the ownership and disposition of the shares or ADSs, as well as the consequences to you arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. person who is the beneficial owner of an ADS will be treated as the owner of the shares underlying its ADS. However, the U.S. Treasury has expressed concerns that parties involved in transactions in which depositary shares are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by the holders of ADSs. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of ROC taxes described below could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury. Deposits or withdrawals of shares by U.S. holders for ADSs generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Taxation of Dividends
Except as discussed below with respect to the passive foreign investment company rules, the amount of distributions (other than certain pro rata distributions of shares to all shareholders) you receive on your shares or ADSs, including net amounts withheld in respect of ROC withholding taxes, will generally be treated as dividend income to you if the distributions are made from our current and accumulated earnings and profits as calculated according to U.S. federal income tax principles. In determining the net amounts withheld in respect of ROC taxes, any reduction in the amount withheld on account of a ROC credit in respect of the 10% retained earnings tax imposed on us is not considered a withholding tax and will not be treated as distributed to you or creditable by you against your U.S. federal income tax. Such income will be includible in your gross income as ordinary income on the day you actually or constructively receive it, which in the case of an ADS will be the date received by the depositary. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date it is distributed. You will not be entitled to claim a dividend received deduction with respect to distributions you receive from us.
With respect to U.S. holders who are individuals, certain dividends received from a foreign corporation before January 1, 2009, on shares (or ADSs backed by such shares) that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. We believe that our ADSs, which are listed on the NASDAQ, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. There can be no assurance that our ADSs will continue to be regularly tradable on an established securities market in later years (or that our shares will be readily tradable on an established securities market in any given year). Individuals that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of the trading status of our shares or ADSs. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances.
The amount of any dividend paid in a currency other than the United States dollar, which we refer to as “foreign currency,” will equal the US dollar value of the foreign currency you receive, calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date you actually or constructively receive the dividend, which in the case of an ADS will be the date received by the depositary, regardless of whether the foreign currency is actually converted into US dollars. If the foreign currency received as a dividend is not converted into US dollars on the date of receipt, you will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its US dollar value on the date of receipt. Any gain or loss you realize if you subsequently
74
sell or otherwise dispose of the foreign currency will be ordinary income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
Subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code, you may be entitled to a credit or deduction against your federal income taxes for the net amount of any ROC taxes that are withheld from dividend distributions made to you. The election to receive a credit or deduction must be made annually, and applies to all foreign taxes for the applicable tax year. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends we pay with respect to shares or ADSs will generally be considered “passive income” (which also includes certain interest, royalties, rents, annuities or income from property transactions) or, for certain holders, “financial services income.” You may be subject to special rules if your foreign source income during the taxable year consists entirely of “qualified passive income” and if you have $300 or less, or $600 or less if you file a joint return, of creditable foreign taxes which you have paid or accrued during the taxable year. Furthermore, you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on shares or ADSs if you (1) have held shares or ADSs for less than a specified minimum period during which you are not protected from risk of loss or, (2) are obligated to make payments related to the dividends. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. We therefore urge you to consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your particular circumstances.
To the extent that the amount of any distribution you receive exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in your adjusted basis in the shares or ADSs and thereby increasing the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, you will recognize on a subsequent disposition of the shares or ADSs. The balance in excess of adjusted basis, if any, will be taxable to you as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange.
It is possible that pro rata distributions of shares to all shareholders may be made in a manner that is not subject to U.S. federal income tax. In the event that such distributions are tax-free, the basis of any new shares so received will be determined by allocating the U.S. holder’s basis in the old shares between the old shares and the new shares, based on their relative fair market values on the date of distribution. For U.S. tax purposes, any such tax-free share distribution and any distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits and distributions of shares generally would not result in foreign source income to you. Consequently, you may not be able to use the foreign tax credit associated with any ROC withholding tax imposed on such distributions unless you can use the credit against United States tax due on other foreign source income in the appropriate category for foreign tax credit purposes.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Except as discussed below with respect to the passive foreign investment company rules, when you sell or otherwise dispose of your shares or ADSs, you will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realized for the shares or ADSs and your basis in the shares or ADSs, determined in US dollars. For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, such gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S. source. If you are an individual, and the shares or ADSs being sold or otherwise disposed of are capital assets that you have held for more than one year, your gain recognized will be taxed at a maximum rate of 15%. Your ability to deduct capital losses is subject to limitations.
If you pay any ROC securities transaction tax, such tax is not treated as an income tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and therefore will not be a creditable foreign tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code, such tax may be deductible. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of these taxes.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Based on the composition of our income and valuation of our assets, including goodwill, we do not believe we were a passive foreign investment company for 2004 and do not expect to become one in the future, although there can be no assurance in this regard.
In general, a company is considered a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year if either:
75
| • | at least 75% of its gross income is passive income, which is income derived from certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities or property transactions; or |
|
| • | at least 50% of the value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. |
The 50% of value test is based on the average of the value of our assets for each quarter during the taxable year. If we own at least 25% by value of another company’s stock, we will be treated, for purposes of the passive foreign investment company rules, as owning our proportionate share of the assets and receiving our proportionate share of the income of that company.
In determining that we do not expect to be a passive foreign investment company, we are relying on our projected capital expenditure plans and projected revenue for the current year and for future years. In addition, our determination is based on a current valuation of our assets, including goodwill. In calculating goodwill, we have valued our total assets based on our total market value, which is based on the market value of our shares and is subject to change. In addition, we have made a number of assumptions regarding the amount of this value allocable to goodwill. We believe our valuation approach is reasonable. However, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service will challenge the valuation of our goodwill, which may also result in us being classified as a passive foreign investment company.
In addition, the determination of whether we are a passive foreign investment company is made annually. Accordingly, it is possible that we may become a passive foreign investment company in the current or any future taxable year due to changes in our asset or income composition. Because we have valued our goodwill based on the market value of our shares, a decrease in the price of our shares may result in our becoming a passive foreign investment company.
If we are a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year during which you hold our shares or ADSs, you will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” that you receive and any gain you realize from a sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of our shares or ADSs. Distributions you receive in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions you received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or your holding period for our shares or ADSs will be treated as excess distributions. Under these special tax rules:
| • | the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over your holding period for our shares or ADSs; |
|
| • | the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a passive foreign investment company, will be treated as ordinary income; and |
|
| • | the amount allocated to each other year will be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year. |
If you hold our shares or ADSs in any year in which we are a passive foreign investment company, you are required to file Internal Revenue Service Form 8621.
In certain circumstances, a U.S. holder, in lieu of being subject to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed above, may make an election to include gain on the stock of a passive foreign investment company as ordinary income under a mark-to-market method provided that such stock is regularly traded on a qualified exchange. Under this method, any difference between the stock’s fair market value and its adjusted basis at the end of the year is accounted for by either an inclusion in income or a deduction from income. Under current law, the mark-to-market election may be available to you because the ADSs are listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s National Market which constitutes a qualified exchange as designated in the Code, although there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be regularly traded. You should also note that only the ADSs and not the shares are listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s National Market. The shares are listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and must meet certain trading, listing, financial disclosure and other requirements to be treated as a qualified exchange under applicable U.S. Treasury
76
regulations for purposes of the mark-to-market election, and no assurance can be given that the shares will be “regularly traded” for purposes of the mark-to-market election.
If you make an effective mark-to-market election, you will include in income each year as ordinary income the excess of the fair market value of your passive foreign investment company shares or ADSs at the end of the year over your adjusted tax basis in the shares. You will be entitled to deduct as an ordinary loss each year the excess of your adjusted tax basis in the shares or ADSs over their fair market value at the end of the year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election.
Your adjusted tax basis in passive foreign investment company shares or ADSs will be increased by the amount of any income inclusion and decreased by the amount of any deductions under the mark-to-market rules. If you make a mark-to-market election, it will be effective for the taxable year for which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years, unless the shares or ADSs cease to be passive foreign investment company stock that is regularly traded on a qualified exchange or the Internal Revenue Service consents to the revocation of the election. You should consult your tax advisor about the availability of the mark-to-market election, and whether making the election would be advisable in your particular circumstances.
Alternatively, a U.S. holder of shares or ADSs in a passive foreign investment company can sometimes avoid the rules described above by electing to treat the company as a “qualified electing fund” under section 1295 of the Internal Revenue Code. This option is not available to you because we do not intend to comply with the requirements necessary to permit you to make this election.
U.S. holders who are individuals will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us prior to January 1, 2009, if we are a passive foreign investment company in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or in the preceding taxable year. You should consult your own tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding our shares or ADSs if we are considered a passive foreign investment company in any taxable year.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general, unless you are an exempt recipient such as a corporation, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of the shares or ADSs and to the proceeds from the sale of your shares or ADSs paid within the United States (and in some cases, outside of the United States). Additionally, if you fail to provide your taxpayer identification number, or fail either to report in full dividend and interest income or to make the necessary certifications, you will be subject to backup withholding.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided you furnish the required information to the Internal Revenue Service.
Inheritance and Gift Tax
Certain ROC inheritance and gift taxes may be imposed on holders of ADSs. You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the effect of such taxes on your particular situation.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
77
H. Documents on Display
We have filed this annual report on Form 20-F, including exhibits, with the SEC. As allowed by the SEC, in Item 19 of this annual report, we incorporate by reference certain information we filed with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this annual report.
You may read and copy this annual report, including the exhibits incorporated by reference in this annual report, at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the SEC’s regional offices in New York, New York, and Chicago, Illinois. You can also request copies of this annual report, including the exhibits incorporated by reference in this annual report, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference Room for information.
The SEC also maintains a website atwww.sec.govthat contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. Our annual report and some of the other information submitted by us to the SEC may be accessed through this website.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss related to adverse changes in market prices, including interest rates and foreign exchange rates, of financial instruments. We are exposed to various types of market risks, including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, in the normal course of business.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Substantial portions of our revenues and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the NT dollar. In 2004, sales in the amount of US$650.8 million were denominated in US dollars. In 2004, material purchases from our overseas vendors in the amounts of US$167.4 million and ¥3,332 million were denominated in US dollars and Japanese yen, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, we had certificates of deposit, bank deposits and accounts receivable denominated in US dollars of US$289.2 million. As of December 31, 2004, we also had accounts payable, bonds payable and other liabilities denominated in US dollars and the Japanese yen of US$389.9 million and of ¥1,512 million, respectively. However, we did not utilize any derivative financial instrument to hedge our currency exposure.
Interest Rate Risk
Our major market risk exposure is changing interest rates. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term debt obligations. We primarily enter into debt obligations to support general corporate purposes including capital expenditures and working capital needs. We have not entered into any interest rate swaps, caps or any contracts hedge to modify our exposure to interest rate movements.
The table below presents annual principal amounts due and related weighted average interest rates by year of maturity for our debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2004.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligations | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 and thereafter |
| | (in millions, except percentages) |
US$-denominated debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fix rate | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,181 | | | | 6,352 | | | — |
Interest rate | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | — |
78
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligations | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 and thereafter |
| | (in millions, except percentages) |
NT$-denominated debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable rate | | | 3,156 | | | | 1,600 | | | | 3,200 | | | | — | | | — |
Average interest rate | | | 2.1 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | — | | | — |
Fix rate | | | 800 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | — |
Interest rate | | | 3.6 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | — |
RMB-denominated debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable rate | | | 57 | | | | 308 | | | | — | | | | — | | | — |
Average interest rate | | | 4.9 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | — |
Fair value | | | 4,013 | | | | 1,908 | | | | 8,578 | | | | 5,868 | | | — |
Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None of these events occurred in any of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
See “Item 10. Additional Information” for a description of the rights of securities holders, which remain unchanged.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures within the meaning of Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file and furnish under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and regulations, except as disclosed in the following paragraphs.
In preparation for certain internal control reporting requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are currently performing the necessary system and process evaluation and testing required (and any necessary remediation) to comply with such section by the effective date for compliance. Our efforts to implement standardized internal control procedures and develop internal tests necessary to verify the proper application of the internal control procedures are a key area of focus for our board of directors and our senior management.
In the course of their audit, our independent auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers have identified certain weaknesses in our current internal accounting processes. The weaknesses that we have discovered did not relate to fraud or require any material adjustments to our accounts. Specifically, our auditors noted that we had weaknesses that would require us to: enhance our internal control environment, including closely implementing and observing our internal control policies by our staff, properly document certain transactions with our customers and accurately record certain loans that have been repaid.
79
In response to such findings, we undertook remedial measures to make improvements to such processes as soon as practicable. Our board of directors has been advised of these issues. Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we are in the process of conducting further evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting. We plan to implement enhanced processes and controls to address these and any other issues that might be identified through our review. As we are still in the evaluation process, we may identify other conditions that may result in weaknesses in the future; should we discover such conditions, we will take action to correct them. We are committed to taking appropriate steps for remediation, as needed.
Except as disclosed herein, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
At the date of this filing, we do not have any independent directors to constitute an audit committee. Our shareholders’ meeting is scheduled to be held on June 13, 2005. We anticipate that three independent directors will be elected during the shareholders’ meeting. At least one of the independent directors will be qualified as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A of the instruction to Form 20-F.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics which applies to our directors, employees and officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers (our principal accounting officer). No changes have been made to the code of ethics since its adoption and no waivers have been granted therefrom to our directors or employees. We have filed this code of ethics as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, which exhibit is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to this annual report, and a copy is available to any shareholder upon request.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PricewaterhouseCoopers has served as our independent public accountant for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, for which audited financial statements appear in this annual report.
The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers to us in 2003 and 2004.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (in thousand) | | | | | |
Audit Fees(1) | | $ | 6,905 | | | $ | 6,683 | | | $ | 210.6 | |
Audit-related Fees(2) | | | 3,903 | | | | 830 | | | | 26.1 | |
Tax Fees(3) | | | 850 | | | | 900 | | | | 28.4 | |
All Other Fees(4) | | | 22 | | | | 404 | | | | 12.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 11,680 | | | $ | 8,817 | | | $ | 277.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) | | Audit fees consist of fees billed for the annual audit of the company’s consolidated financial statements and the statutory financial statements of the company’s subsidiaries. They also include fees billed for other audit services, which are those services that only the external auditor reasonably can provide, and include the provision of comfort letters and consents and the review of documents filed with the SEC. |
|
(2) | | Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor, and include consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards; internal control reviews; review of security controls and operational effectiveness of systems; due diligence related to acquisitions; and employee benefit plan audits. |
80
(3) | | Tax fees include fees billed for tax compliance services, including the preparation of original and amended tax returns and claims for refund; tax consultations, such as assistance and representation in connection with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, transfer pricing, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities; tax planning services; and expatriate tax compliance, consultation and planning services. |
|
(4) | | All other fees include fees billed for forensic accounting and occasional training services. |
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
Prior to forming an audit committee, our board of directors is responsible for the oversight of our independent accountants’ work. The policy of our board of directors is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, as described above.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
None.
Item 16E. Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
We have elected to provide the financial statements and related information specified in Item 18.
Item 18. Financial Statements
The following is a list of the audited financial statements and reports of independent accountants included in this annual report beginning on page F-1.
| | |
| | Page |
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. | | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | F-2 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 | | F-4 |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | F-6 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | F-7 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | F-9 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-11 |
| | |
CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. | | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | F-74 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 | | F-75 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | F-77 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | F-79 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | F-80 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-82 |
81
Item 19. Exhibit Index
| | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description of Exhibits |
1.1 | | Articles of Incorporation of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. (English translation)(1) |
2.1 | | Form of the Second Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement among Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd., Citibank, N.A. and Holders and Beneficial owners of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder, including the form of American Depositary Receipts(2) |
4.1 | | Immunity Agreement with Motorola, Inc. (effective from November 5, 1996 to December 31, 2010)(3) |
4.2 | | License Agreement with Flip Chip Technologies, L.L.C. (effective from November 28, 1999 to November 27, 2009)(4) |
4.3 | | Joint Venture Agreement with Mosel Vitelic, Inc. (English translation)(5) |
*8.1 | | List of Significant Subsidiaries of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. |
11.1 | | Code of Ethics (6) |
*12.1 | | Certification of our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
*12.2 | | Certification of our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
*13.1 | | Certification by our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
*13.2 | | Certification by our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
*15.1 | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
* | | filed herewith. |
|
1 | | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Year 2001 Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 25, 2002. |
|
2 | | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-11812) filed with the SEC on April 29, 2000. |
|
3 | | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-11812) filed with the SEC on April 29, 2000. |
|
4 | | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-11812) filed with the SEC on April 29, 2000. |
|
5 | | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-11812) filed with the SEC on April 29, 2000. |
|
6 | | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 11.1 to our Year 2003 Form 20-F filed with the Commission on June 28, 2004. |
82
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
| | | | |
| | SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. |
| | | | |
| | By: | | /s/ Wen Chung Lin |
| | | | |
| | Name: Wen Chung Lin |
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
Date: June 10, 2005
83
INDEX TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | |
| | Page |
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. | | |
| | F-2 |
| | F-4 |
| | F-6 |
| | F-7 |
| | F-9 |
| | F-11 |
| | |
CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. | | |
| | F-74 |
| | F-75 |
| | F-77 |
| | F-79 |
| | F-80 |
| | F-82 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. As discussed in Note 8, the Company delayed recognition of investment income (loss) for certain investee companies under the equity method until the subsequent year. Accordingly, the investment amount s of $2,995,619 thousand and $2,748,559 thousand at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and the investment income of $247,238 thousand and investment loss of $365,669 thousand recognized for these investee companies for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were based on the investees’ financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which were audited by other independent accountants.
We conducted our audits in accordance with “Rules Governing Examination of Financial Statements by Certified Public Accountants”, generally accepted auditing standards in the Republic of China and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F - 2
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with the “Rules Governing the Preparation of Financial Statements of Securities Issuers” and accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China.
As discussed in Note 3, commencing from January 1, 2002, the Company delayed the recognition of investment income (loss) for ChipMos Technologies Inc. under the equity method until the subsequent year.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements.
![(PRICEWATERHOUSECOPPERS)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984800.gif)
Taichung, Taiwan
Republic of China
February 18, 2005 (except for the information in Note 28 for which the date is April 13, 2005)
F - 3
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | (Note 2) | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4) | | $ | 12,202,601 | | | $ | 10,922,393 | | | $ | 344,121 | |
Short-term investments (Note 5) | | | 7,989 | | | | 1,942,970 | | | | 61,215 | |
Notes receivable, net | | | 118,531 | | | | 72,083 | | | | 2,271 | |
Accounts receivable, net (Notes 6 and 23) | | | 5,311,273 | | | | 5,720,274 | | | | 180,223 | |
Other financial assets - current (Note 24) | | | 343,853 | | | | 407,087 | | | | 12,826 | |
Inventories (Note 7) | | | 1,896,966 | | | | 1,977,001 | | | | 62,287 | |
Deferred income tax assets - current (Note 20) | | | 463,150 | | | | 709,093 | | | | 22,341 | |
Other current assets - other | | | 550,913 | | | | 533,924 | | | | 16,822 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 20,895,276 | | | | 22,284,825 | | | | 702,106 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Long-term Investments (Note 8) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term investments under the equity method | | | 3,820,417 | | | | 3,952,489 | | | | 124,527 | |
Long-term investments under the cost method | | | 2,566,249 | | | | 2,863,849 | | | | 90,228 | |
Long-term investment in bonds | | | 641,350 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 7,028,016 | | | | 6,816,338 | | | | 214,755 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment (Notes 9, 24) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Land | | | 2,128,476 | | | | 2,128,476 | | | | 67,060 | |
Buildings | | | 5,368,157 | | | | 6,609,819 | | | | 208,249 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 30,072,783 | | | | 34,710,602 | | | | 1,093,592 | |
Utility equipment | | | 535,180 | | | | 696,662 | | | | 21,949 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 411,907 | | | | 507,134 | | | | 15,978 | |
Other equipment | | | 1,166,431 | | | | 1,417,708 | | | | 44,666 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 39,682,934 | | | | 46,070,401 | | | | 1,451,494 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | (17,607,422 | ) | | | (19,905,800 | ) | | | (627,152 | ) |
Construction in progress and prepayments for equipment | | | 2,326,759 | | | | 1,024,283 | | | | 32,271 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 24,402,271 | | | | 27,188,884 | | | | 856,613 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Refundable deposits | | | 15,733 | | | | 11,557 | | | | 364 | |
Deferred charges | | | 697,932 | | | | 826,984 | | | | 26,055 | |
Deferred income tax asset - noncurrent (Note 20) | | | 1,381,780 | | | | 1,600,223 | | | | 50,417 | |
Other assets — other (Note 10) | | | 236,733 | | | | 233,529 | | | | 7,357 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,332,178 | | | | 2,672,293 | | | | 84,193 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 54,657,741 | | | $ | 58,962,340 | | | $ | 1,857,667 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(Continued)
F - 4
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | (Note 2) | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable | | $ | 1,072,896 | | | $ | 984 | | | $ | 31 | |
Accounts payable (Note 23) | | | 2,139,759 | | | | 2,104,797 | | | | 66,314 | |
Income tax payable (Note 20) | | | 40,608 | | | | 36,352 | | | | 1,145 | |
Accrued expenses (Note 11) | | | 821,710 | | | | 1,077,473 | | | | 33,947 | |
Other payables (Note 12) | | | 1,492,501 | | | | 1,508,061 | | | | 47,513 | |
Current portion of long-term loans (Notes 13 and 14) | | | 10,342,339 | | | | 4,013,376 | | | | 126,445 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 219,848 | | | | 51,486 | | | | 1,622 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 16,129,661 | | | | 8,792,529 | | | | 277,017 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Long-term Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bonds payable (Note 13) | | | 800,000 | | | | 11,533,146 | | | | 363,363 | |
Long-term loans (Note 14) | | | 8,013,164 | | | | 5,106,346 | | | | 160,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 8,813,164 | | | | 16,639,492 | | | | 524,244 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Liabilities | | | 16,707 | | | | 37,276 | | | | 1,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 24,959,532 | | | | 25,469,297 | | | | 802,435 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock (Notes 1 and 16) | | | 18,851,737 | | | | 21,050,731 | | | | 663,224 | |
Capital reserve (Note 17) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additional paid in capital | | | 6,126,478 | | | | 6,339,617 | | | | 199,736 | |
Premium arising from merger | | | 1,951,563 | | | | 1,951,563 | | | | 61,486 | |
Others | | | 21,069 | | | | 14,652 | | | | 462 | |
Retained earnings (Note 18) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Legal reserve | | | 467,014 | | | | 750,886 | | | | 23,658 | |
Special reserve | | | 302,780 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Unappropriated earnings | | | 2,918,612 | | | | 4,320,831 | | | | 136,132 | |
Cumulative translation adjustments | | | 3,278 | | | | (141,053 | ) | | | (4,444 | ) |
Treasury stock (Note 19) | | | (944,322 | ) | | | (794,184 | ) | | | (25,022 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 29,698,209 | | | | 33,493,043 | | | | 1,055,232 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 25) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 54,657,741 | | | $ | 58,962,340 | | | $ | 1,857,667 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
See report of independent registered public accounting firm dated February 18, 2005.
F - 5
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Note 2) | |
Net Operating Revenues | | $ | 22,298,530 | | | $ | 27,411,427 | | | $ | 35,252,156 | | | $ | 1,110,654 | |
Cost of Goods Sold (Note 23) | | | (20,209,935 | ) | | | (23,297,669 | ) | | | (28,871,540 | ) | | | (909,626 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | 2,088,595 | | | | 4,113,758 | | | | 6,380,616 | | | | 201,028 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling expenses | | | (409,448 | ) | | | (415,433 | ) | | | (548,694 | ) | | | (17,287 | ) |
General and administrative expenses | | | (625,490 | ) | | | (618,397 | ) | | | (746,695 | ) | | | (23,525 | ) |
Research and development expenses | | | (506,981 | ) | | | (559,076 | ) | | | (752,473 | ) | | | (23,708 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (1,541,919 | ) | | | (1,592,906 | ) | | | (2,047,862 | ) | | | (64,520 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | 546,676 | | | | 2,520,852 | | | | 4,332,754 | | | | 136,508 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-operating Income and Gain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 191,551 | | | | 88,379 | | | | 157,015 | | | | 4,947 | |
Investment income accounted for under the equity method | | | 61,059 | | | | — | | | | 307,728 | | | | 9,695 | |
Gain on disposal of investments | | | — | | | | 344,385 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Others | | | 277,726 | | | | 448,763 | | | | 575,965 | | | | 18,146 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 530,336 | | | | 881,527 | | | | 1,040,708 | | | | 32,788 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-operating Expenses and Losses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expenses | | | (521,117 | ) | | | (375,111 | ) | | | (353,321 | ) | | | (11,132 | ) |
Investment loss accounted for under equity method | | | — | | | | (533,061 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Others (Note 12) | | | (276,064 | ) | | | (291,783 | ) | | | (1,194,922 | ) | | | (37,647 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (797,181 | ) | | | (1,199,955 | ) | | | (1,548,243 | ) | | | (48,779 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Tax | | | 279,831 | | | | 2,202,424 | | | | 3,825,219 | | | | 120,517 | |
Income Tax Benefit (Note 20) | | | 145,364 | | | | 636,292 | | | | 456,958 | | | | 14,397 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 425,195 | | | $ | 2,838,716 | | | $ | 4,282,177 | | | $ | 134,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share (in dollars) (Note 21) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic Earnings Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income tax | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 1.09 | | | $ | 1.86 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 1.40 | | | $ | 2.09 | | | $ | 0.07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted Earnings Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income tax | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.99 | | | $ | 1.42 | | | $ | 0.04 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 1.27 | | | $ | 1.63 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
See report of independent registered public accounting firm dated February 18, 2005.
F - 6
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (CONTINUED)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Stock Issued | | | | | | | Retained Earnings | | | Loss on Long- | | | Cumulative | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Special | | | Unappropriated | | | term | | | Translation | | | | | | | |
| | (Thousand) | | | Capital Stock | | | Capital Reserve | | | Legal Reserve | | | Reserve | | | Earnings | | | Investments | | | Adjustments | | | Treasury Stock | | | Total | |
| | | | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2002 | | | 1,885,174 | | | $ | 18,851,737 | | | $ | 8,087,905 | | | $ | 1,321,835 | | | $ | 269,154 | | | ($ | 1,166,494 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 45,388 | | | ($ | 1,363,135 | ) | | $ | 26,046,390 | |
Accumulated deficit offset by legal reserve | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (897,340 | ) | | | — | | | | 897,340 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Reversal of special reserve to unappropriated earnings | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (269,154 | ) | | | 269,154 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Adjustment for investee companies’ cumulative translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,705 | ) | | | — | | | | (9,705 | ) |
Adjustment to capital reserve due to non-proportional investment in investee’s increase in capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,242 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,242 | ) |
Adjustment for unrealized loss on long-term investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (302,780 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (302,780 | ) |
Net income | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 425,195 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 425,195 | |
Transfer of treasury stock to employees | | | | | | | — | | | | 450 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,244 | | | | 20,694 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | | 1,885,174 | | | $ | 18,851,737 | | | $ | 8,087,113 | | | $ | 424,495 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 425,195 | | | ($ | 302,780 | ) | | $ | 35,683 | | | ($ | 1,342,891 | ) | | $ | 26,178,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2003 | | | 1,885,174 | | | $ | 18,851,737 | | | $ | 8,087,113 | | | $ | 424,495 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 425,195 | | | ($ | 302,780 | ) | | $ | 35,683 | | | ($ | 1,342,891 | ) | | $ | 26,178,552 | |
Appropriation for legal reserve | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 42,519 | | | | — | | | | (42,519 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Appropriation for special reserve | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 302,780 | | | | (302,780 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Reversal of unrealized loss on long-term investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 302,780 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 302,780 | |
Long-term investment adjustments for investee company’s additional paid in capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | 617 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 617 | |
Long-term investment adjustments for investee company’s cummulative translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (32,405 | ) | | | — | | | | (32,405 | ) |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,838,716 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,838,716 | |
Transfer of treasury stock to employees | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,380 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 398,569 | | | | 409,949 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2003 | | | 1,885,174 | | | $ | 18,851,737 | | | $ | 8,099,110 | | | $ | 467,014 | | | $ | 302,780 | | | $ | 2,918,612 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,278 | | | ($ | 944,322 | ) | | $ | 29,698,209 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Continued)
F - 7
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF NEW TAIWAN DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital Stock Issued | | | | | | | Retained Earnings | | | Loss on Long- | | | Cumulative | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Special | | | Unappropriated | | | term | | | Translation | | | | | | | |
| | (Thousand) | | | Capital Stock | | | Capital Reserve | | | Legal Reserve | | | Reserve | | | Earnings | | | Investments | | | Adjustments | | | Treasury Stock | | | Total | |
| | | | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2004 | | | 1,885,174 | | | $ | 18,851,737 | | | $ | 8,099,110 | | | $ | 467,014 | | | $ | 302,780 | | | $ | 2,918,612 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,278 | | | ($ | 944,322 | ) | | $ | 29,698,209 | |
Appropriation for legal reserve | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 283,872 | | | | — | | | | (283,872 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Reversal of special reserve to unapppropriated earnings | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (302,780 | ) | | | 302,780 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Remuneration to directors and supervisors | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (57,153 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (57,153 | ) |
Employees’ cash bonus | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (73,674 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (73,674 | ) |
Employees’ stock bonus | | | 21,050 | | | | 210,497 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (210,497 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Cash dividends | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (663,066 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (663,066 | ) |
Stock dividends | | | 189,447 | | | | 1,894,476 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,894,476 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Conversion of Euro convertible bonds | | | 9,402 | | | | 94,021 | | | | 213,140 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 307,161 | |
Long-term investment adjustments for investee company’s additional paid in capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | (10,862 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (10,862 | ) |
Long-term investment adjustments for investee company’s cumulative translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (144,331 | ) | | | — | | | | (144,331 | ) |
Cash dividends for treasury stock held by subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,455 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,455 | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,282,177 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,282,177 | |
Transfer of treasury stock to employees | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,011 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 150,138 | | | | 145,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2004 | | $ | 2,105,073 | | | $ | 21,050,731 | | | $ | 8,305,832 | | | $ | 750,886 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,320,831 | | | $ | — | | | ($ | 141,053 | ) | | ($ | 794,184 | ) | | $ | 33,493,043 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
See report of independent registered public accounting firm dated February 18, 2005.
F - 8
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Note 2) | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 425,195 | | | $ | 2,838,716 | | | $ | 4,282,177 | | | $ | 134,914 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 4,575,422 | | | | 4,854,558 | | | | 5,727,223 | | | | 180,442 | |
Amortization | | | 326,266 | | | | 330,768 | | | | 425,383 | | | | 13,402 | |
Bad debts expense | | | — | | | | 4,834 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Provision for (recovery of) decline in market value of short-term investments | | | 6,360 | | | | (6,349 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | — | |
Provision for reserve for sales allowance | | | 29,262 | | | | 27,294 | | | | 36,082 | | | | 1,137 | |
Gain on disposal of investments and recovery of decline in market value of short-term investments | | | (51,626 | ) | | | (340,950 | ) | | | (69,584 | ) | | | (2,192 | ) |
Recovery of loss on obsolescence and decline in market value of inventory | | | (10,312 | ) | | | (109,910 | ) | | | (12,746 | ) | | | (402 | ) |
Long-term investment (income) loss under the equity method | | | (41,399 | ) | | | 313,010 | | | | (307,728 | ) | | | (9,695 | ) |
Impairment loss on long-term investments | | | 24,934 | | | | 189,454 | | | | 17,803 | | | | 561 | |
Cash dividend received from long-term investment under the equity method | | | — | | | | 12,684 | | | | 27,832 | | | | 877 | |
Loss on decline in market value upon reclassification of long-term / short-term investment | | | — | | | | 30,597 | | | | — | | | | — | |
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | | | (15,794 | ) | | | (39,395 | ) | | | 52,291 | | | | 1,647 | |
Provision for loss on idle assets | | | 17,243 | | | | 131,828 | | | | 460,539 | | | | 14,510 | |
Amortization of discount on commercial paper | | | 2,986 | | | | 2,762 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Amortization of discount on long-term notes | | | 17,487 | | | | 6,385 | | | | 2,367 | | | | 75 | |
Compensation interest on bonds payable | | | 285,977 | | | | 204,873 | | | | 172,127 | | | | 5,423 | |
Foreign currency exchange gain on bonds payable | | | (97,163 | ) | | | (163,751 | ) | | | (668,742 | ) | | | (21,070 | ) |
(Gain) loss on redemption of bonds payable | | | (16,798 | ) | | | — | | | | 8,117 | | | | 256 | |
Reversal of deferred credit account | | | — | | | | (23,506 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
(Increase) decrease in assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes receivable | | | 53,525 | | | | 8,706 | | | | 46,448 | | | | 1,463 | |
Accounts receivable | | | (441,191 | ) | | | (1,220,618 | ) | | | (405,172 | ) | | | (12,765 | ) |
Other financial assets - current | | | (61,381 | ) | | | 17,566 | | | | 14,937 | | | | 471 | |
Inventories | | | 41,427 | | | | (414,850 | ) | | | (68,977 | ) | | | (2,173 | ) |
Other current assets | | | (187,224 | ) | | | (128,401 | ) | | | 16,989 | | | | 535 | |
Deferred income tax assets | | | (196,413 | ) | | | (631,184 | ) | | | (464,386 | ) | | | (14,631 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable | | | (393,956 | ) | | | 1,071,607 | | | | (1,071,912 | ) | | | (33,772 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 397,210 | | | | 780,972 | | | | (34,962 | ) | | | (1,102 | ) |
Income tax payable | | | 48,879 | | | | (9,362 | ) | | | (4,256 | ) | | | (134 | ) |
Accrued expenses | | | 117,212 | | | | 106,157 | | | | 255,763 | | | | 8,058 | |
Other payables | | | 144,367 | | | | 60,611 | | | | 471,388 | | | | 14,851 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 18,556 | | | | 148,890 | | | | (168,362 | ) | | | (5,304 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | 3,775 | | | | (1,288 | ) | | | (4,987 | ) | | | (157 | ) |
Accrued pension liabilities | | | (16,627 | ) | | | — | | | | 31,008 | | | | 977 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 5,006,199 | | | | 8,052,708 | | | | 8,766,648 | | | | 276,202 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Continued)
F - 9
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Note 2) | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payment for pledged time deposits | | ($ | 423,000 | ) | | ($ | 44,800 | ) | | ($ | 503,500 | ) | | ($ | 15,863 | ) |
Refund of pledged time deposits | | | 3,320 | | | | 304,400 | | | | 425,300 | | | | 13,399 | |
Purchase of short-term investments | | | (6,872,467 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,759,999 | ) | | | (149,967 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of short-term investments | | | 6,821,740 | | | | 54,097 | | | | 2,830,000 | | | | 89,161 | |
Purchase of long-term investments | | | (1,329,915 | ) | | | (219,292 | ) | | | (265,156 | ) | | | (8,354 | ) |
Proceeds on capital reduction from equity investee | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16,900 | | | | 532 | |
Purchase of long-term investments in bonds | | | (346,350 | ) | | | (295,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from disposal of long-term investments | | | 129,877 | | | | 1,155,114 | | | | 736,118 | | | | 23,192 | |
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | | | (6,444,535 | ) | | | (4,884,707 | ) | | | (9,784,816 | ) | | | (308,280 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment | | | 79,875 | | | | 116,853 | | | | 259,587 | | | | 8,179 | |
Payment for deferred charges | | | (341,878 | ) | | | (380,103 | ) | | | (578,977 | ) | | | (18,241 | ) |
Payment for refundable deposits | | | (3,141 | ) | | | (2,094 | ) | | | (1,825 | ) | | | (57 | ) |
Proceeds from refundable deposits | | | 686 | | | | 4,995 | | | | 5,995 | | | | 189 | |
Acquisition of other assets | | | (79,792 | ) | | | (37,416 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from disposal of other assets | | | — | | | | 12 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (8,805,580 | ) | | | (4,227,941 | ) | | | (11,620,373 | ) | | | (366,110 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from short-term loans | | | 8,102,000 | | | | 2,875,700 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Repayment of short-term loans | | | (8,590,000 | ) | | | (3,177,700 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from issuance of commercial paper | | | 1,796,917 | | | | 2,397,441 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Repayment of commercial paper | | | (1,400,000 | ) | | | (2,900,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from long-term loans | | | 2,245,947 | | | | 5,128,639 | | | | 6,300,000 | | | | 198,488 | |
Repayment of long-term loans | | | (1,847,760 | ) | | | (2,329,760 | ) | | | (9,149,169 | ) | | | (288,254 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of bonds payable | | | 7,608,260 | | | | — | | | | 6,646,000 | | | | 209,389 | |
Proceeds from deposit-in | | | 250 | | | | 334 | | | | 110 | | | | 3 | |
Repayment of deposit-in | | | (90 | ) | | | (371 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Increase (decrease) in deferred credit accounts | | | — | | | | 4,028 | | | | (5,562 | ) | | | (175 | ) |
Redemption of bonds payable | | | (4,469,051 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,483,391 | ) | | | (46,736 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of treasury stock | | | 20,694 | | | | 409,877 | | | | 145,128 | | | | 4,572 | |
Remuneration to directors and supervisors | | | — | | | | — | | | | (57,153 | ) | | | (1,801 | ) |
Remuneration of employees’ cash bonuses and stockholders’ dividends | | | — | | | | — | | | | (736,712 | ) | | | (23,211 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 3,467,167 | | | | 2,408,188 | | | | 1,659,251 | | | | 52,276 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect on foreign currency exchange | | | (8,103 | ) | | | — | | | | (85,734 | ) | | | (2,701 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | (340,317 | ) | | | 6,232,955 | | | | (1,280,208 | ) | | | (40,334 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 6,309,963 | | | | 5,969,646 | | | | 12,202,601 | | | | 384,455 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | $ | 5,969,646 | | | $ | 12,202,601 | | | $ | 10,922,393 | | | $ | 344,121 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest (excluding capitalized interest) | | $ | 763,383 | | | $ | 170,287 | | | $ | 324,148 | | | $ | 10,213 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for income tax | | $ | 3,276 | | | $ | 5,279 | | | $ | 17,242 | | | $ | 543 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures of partial cash paid for investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | | $ | 5,868,868 | | | $ | 5,572,254 | | | $ | 9,320,818 | | | $ | 293,661 | |
Add: Payable at beginning of the year | | | 1,035,695 | | | | 482,790 | | | | 1,170,337 | | | | 36,873 | |
Notes payable at beginning of the year | | | 22,762 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Less: Payable at end of the year | | | (482,790 | ) | | | (1,170,337 | ) | | | (706,339 | ) | | | (22,254 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid | | $ | 6,444,535 | | | $ | 4,884,707 | | | $ | 9,784,816 | | | $ | 308,280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
See report of independent registered public accounting firm dated February 18, 2005.
F - 10
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
1. | History and Organization |
|
| Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. (the “Company” or “SPIL”) was incorporated as a company limited by shares under the Company Law of the Republic of China (the “ROC”) in May 1984 and was listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in April 1993. As of December 31, 2004, issued common stock was $21,050,731. The main activities of the Company are the assembly, testing and turnkey services of integrated circuits. As of December 31, 2004, SPIL has 10,613 employees. |
|
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
| The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the “Rules Governing the Preparation of Financial Statements of Securities Issues” and accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China. Accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The application of accounting principles in the United States would have affected the determination of consolidated net income expressed in New Taiwan dollars, for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004 and the determination of consolidated shareholders’ equity and consolidated financial position also expressed in New Taiwan dollars, as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 to the extent summarized in Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements. |
|
| The Company’s significant accounting policies are summarized as follows: |
|
| Consolidation |
|
| Pursuant to ROC Securities and Futures Bureau’s (“SFB”) (formally Securities and Futures Commission) regulations, if the total assets and the operating revenue of the subsidiary are less than 10% of the total non-consolidated assets and operating revenue of SPIL, the subsidiary’s financial statements may, at the option of SPIL, not be included in the consolidation. Irrespective of the above test, when the total combined assets or operating revenue of all such non-consolidated subsidiaries constitute more than 30% of SPIL’s non-consolidated assets or operating revenue, then each individual subsidiary with total assets or operating revenue greater than 3% of SPIL’s non-consolidated assets or operating revenue is included in the consolidation. SPIL’s consolidation policy is to consolidate all subsidiaries in which SPIL has majority voting ownership. |
|
| The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the following subsidiaries: |
|
| Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. (SIC), a 100% owned subsidiary of SPIL, was incorporated in September 1996 to engage in investment activities. As of December 31, 2004, the issued capital of SIC was NT$1,770,000. |
F - 11
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited (SPIL BVI), a 100% owned subsidiary of SPIL, was incorporated in April 2001 to engage in investment activities. As of December 31, 2004, the issued capital of SPIL BVI was US$57,800.
Siliconware USA, Inc. (SUI), a 100% owned subsidiary of SPIL BVI, was incorporated in October 1997 to engage as sales agent in North America. As of December 31, 2004, the issued capital of SUI was US$1,250.
SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited (SPIL Cayman), a 100% owned subsidiary of SPIL BVI, was incorporated in January 2002 to engage in investment activities. As of December 31, 2004, the issued capital of SPIL Cayman was US$30,050.
Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited (Siliconware Technology), a 100% owned subsidiary of SPIL Cayman, was incorporated in February 2002 to engage in the design and manufacture of transistor and electronic component. As of December 31, 2004, the issued capital of Siliconware Technology was US$30,000.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue, costs of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Translation of Foreign Currency Transactions on Subsidiaries’ Financial Statements
The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries and investee are translated into New Taiwan dollars using the spot rate as of each financial statement date for asset and liability accounts, average exchange rate for profit and loss accounts, spot rate for dividend and historical exchange rates for equity accounts. The cumulative translation effects for subsidiaries and investees using functional currencies other than the New Taiwan dollar are included in the cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity.
Foreign Currency Transactions
The accounts of the Company are maintained in New Taiwan dollars. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into New Taiwan dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Receivables, other monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into New Taiwan dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Exchange gains or losses
F - 12
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
are included in the current year’s results.
Convenience Translation into US Dollars
The Company maintains its accounting records and prepares its financial statements in New Taiwan (“NT”) dollars. The United States (“US”) dollar amounts disclosed in the 2004 financial statements are presented solely for the convenience of the reader and were translated at the rate of NT$ 31.74 (in dollars) to US$1.00 (in dollars), the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York noon buying exchange rate on December 31, 2004. Such translation amounts are unaudited and should not be construed that the NT dollar amounts represent, or have been, or could be, converted into US dollars at that or any other rate.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes cash deposits in banks, certificates of deposits and time deposits. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and with maturity dates that do not present significant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates.
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments are recorded at cost when acquired and are stated at the lower of aggregate cost or market value at the balance sheet date. The market value of listed stocks and close-end mutual funds is determined by the average closing price of the last month of the accounting period. The market value of open-end funds is determined by the equity per unit at the balance sheet date. The excess of aggregate cost over market value is recorded as a loss in the current year. In subsequent periods, recovery of market value is recognized as gain to the extent that the market value does not exceed the original cost of the investment.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based on the evaluation of collectibility and aging analysis of notes receivable, accounts receivables and other receivables.
Allowance for Sales Discounts
The allowance for sales discounts is provided based on the estimated allowance to be incurred and is recorded as deduction of accounts receivable.
Inventories
Inventories are recorded at cost when acquired and are stated at the lower of aggregate cost, based on weighted average method, or market value at the balance sheet date.
F - 13
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
The market values of raw materials and supplies are determined on the basis of replacement cost. The market values of finished goods and work in processes are determined on the basis of net realizable value. The allowance for loss on obsolescence and decline in market value is provided, when necessary.
Long-term Investments in Stocks
| A. | Long-term equity investments in which the Company owns less than 20% of the voting rights of the investee company are accounted for (a) at cost, if the investee company is not listed or (b) at the lower of cost or market value, if the investee company is listed. Allowance for the unrealized loss under this method is shown in stockholders’ equity. When it becomes evident that there has been a permanent impairment in value and the chance of recovery is minimal, loss is recognized in the current year’s income. If there is evidence that the Company has significant influence over the investee company, the investment is accounted for under the equity method. |
|
| B. | Long-term equity investments in which the Company owns at least 20% of the voting rights of the investee company are accounted for under the equity method, unless the Company cannot exercise significant influence over the investee company, in which case, the investment is accounted for as indicated in A above. The excess of the acquisition cost over the investee’s net book value is capitalized and amortized over 10 years. |
|
| C. | The Company delays recognition of investment income (loss) on long- term equity investments in which the Company owns less than 50% of the voting rights of the investee company, if the financial statements of the investee for the same period are not available in time. The Company consistently recognizes the investment income (loss) in the subsequent year based on prior year’s weighted average share holdings in the investee. However, if the investee meets certain criteria set by the ROC SFB in the “Rule Governing the Preparation of Financial Statements of Securities Issuers”, delay in recognition of income (loss) is not permitted. |
|
| D. | Unrealized gains and losses from transactions between the Company and investee companies accounted for under the equity method are deferred. Profit (loss) from sales of depreciable assets between the investee and the Company is amortized to income or expense over the assets’ economic service lives. Profit (loss) from other types of intercompany transactions is recognized when realized. |
|
| E. | When the Company’s proportional interest in an equity investee changes after the equity investee issues new shares, the effect of change in the Company’s holding ratio on long-term investment is adjusted first to capital reserve. If capital reserve amount is insufficient, the effect is then charged to retained earnings. |
F - 14
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
F. | The Company’s proportionate share of the foreign investee’s cumulative translation adjustments related to the translation of the foreign investee’s financial statements into New Taiwan dollars is recognized by the Company and is included in the stockholders’ equity as “Cumulative Translation Adjustment.” |
Long-term Investments in Bonds
Long-term investments in bonds are recorded at amortized cost, which is the par value after adjustment by the unamortized premium or discount.
Property, Plant and Equipment
A. | Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Interest incurred relating to the acquisition and construction of property, plant and equipment is capitalized and depreciated accordingly. |
B. | Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated economic service lives, plus one additional year as salvage value. Salvage value of fixed assets which are still in use after their estimated economic service lives are depreciated over their new estimated remaining service lives. The service lives of the fixed assets are 3 to 15 years, except for buildings, which are 35 to 55 years. |
C. | Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and improvements are treated as capital expenditures and are depreciated accordingly. When fixed assets are disposed of, their original cost and accumulated depreciation are written-off. Gain or loss on disposal of fixed assets is recorded as non-operating income or loss. |
D. | Idle assets are stated at the lower of book value or net realizable value and are reclassified to other assets. |
E. | According to the regulation of People Republic of China, depreciation for the property, plant and equipment of Siliconware Technology is provided on the straight-line method over 5 years with one-tenth of the cost as salvage value. |
Deferred Charges
The costs of computer software system purchased externally and tooling cost are recognized as deferred charges and amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of 2 to 5 years. Convertible bonds issuance costs are amortized over the period of the bonds.
F - 15
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
Land Use Right
The rental cost for Siliconware Technology to lease the land from the local government is recognized as land use right and amortized on the straight-line method over the contract period of 50 years.
Convertible Bonds
A. | The excess of the stated redemption price over the par value is recognized as interest expense and compensation interest payable using the effective interest method during the period from the issuance date to the last day of redemption period. |
B. | When a bondholder exercises its conversion rights, the book value of bonds is credited to common stock at an amount equal to the par value of the stock and the excess is credited to capital reserve; no gain or loss is recognized on bond conversion. |
C. | The related issuance costs for convertible bonds are recorded as deferred charges, and are amortized over the period of the bonds. |
D. | For convertible bonds with redemption options, the right of redemption becomes invalid if the bondholder failed to exercise its redemption right during the redemption period. The balance of the compensation interest payable is amortized over the period from the date following the redemption period to the maturity date using the effective interest method. |
E. | The convertible bonds with redemption options are classified into current or non-current liabilities based on the date of redemption. |
Retirement Plan
SPIL has a funded defined benefit pension plan covering all regular employees in accordance with the ROC Labor Standards Law. The net pension cost, which is computed based on an actuarial valuation, includes service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets and amortization of net asset/obligation at transition. The unrecognized net asset or obligation at transition is amortized equally over 15 years. The pension fund is managed by an independently administered pension fund committee.
SUI has established a 401(k) profit-sharing plan covering substantially all employees. The plan provides for voluntary salary reduction contributions by eligible participants in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as discretionary matching and profit sharing contributions from SUI. Profit-sharing and 401(k) matching contributions are determined annually by the SUI’s Board of
F - 16
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
Directors.
Siliconware Technology has a funded defined contribution plan covering certain employees who are qualified as permanent residents of Suzhou. According to the retirement plan, Siliconware Technology contributes monthly an amount equal to certain percentage of employees’ monthly salaries and wages to the Bureau of Social Insurance and recognizes as pension expense. The employees are entitled to the benefit after 15 years of service.
Income Tax
A. | In accordance with ROC FAS No. 22, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the income tax effect resulting from temporary differences and investment tax credits is recorded as income tax assets or liabilities using the assets and liability method. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are further classified into current or noncurrent items and are presented on the financial statements at net balance. Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is provided to the extent that it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will not be realized. |
B. | The Company adopted ROC FAS No. 12 “Accounting for Investment Tax Credits” in determining the investment tax credit. The investment tax credits relating to the acquisition cost of qualifying machinery and technology, qualifying research and development, qualifying personnel training and qualifying investments in significant technology companies are recognized as income tax adjustment in the period the tax credits arise. |
C. | Over or under provisions of prior years’ income tax liabilities are included in the current year’s income tax expense. |
D. | The Taiwan imputation tax system requires that any undistributed earnings be subject to an additional 10% corporate income tax which is recognized as expense at the time the stockholders resolve to retain the earnings. |
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when services are provided based on transaction terms and when collectibility is reasonably assured.
Research and Development
Costs incurred by the Company in research and development activities are expensed as incurred.
F - 17
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
Treasury Stock
A. | Treasury stock, representing issued stock reacquired by the Company for cash, is stated at cost, and is presented as a deduction under stockholders’ equity. |
B. | Upon subsequent disposal of the treasury stock, the excess of the proceeds from disposal over the book value, using the weighted average method, is credited to capital reserve. However, if the book value of the treasury stock exceeds the proceeds from disposal, the excess is first charged against capital reserve arised from treasury stock and the remainder, if any, is charged against retained earnings. |
3.Effects of Changes in Accounting Principle
None.
4.Cash and Cash Equivalents
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Cash | | | | | | | | |
Cash on hand | | $ | 2,271 | | | $ | 1,293 | |
Savings accounts | | | 785,758 | | | | 610,091 | |
Checking accounts | | | 334,673 | | | | (653,132 | ) |
Time deposits | | | 7,452,532 | | | | 7,498,947 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 8,575,234 | | | | 7,457,199 | |
Cash equivalent | | | | | | | | |
Bonds with re-purchase options | | | — | | | | 158,300 | |
Commercial paper | | | 3,627,367 | | | | 3,306,894 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 12,202,601 | | | $ | 10,922,393 | |
| | | | | | |
A. | As of December 31, 2004, checking account had a credit balance because the Company credited checking account based on the due date of the notes payable issued, while the notes payable were still uncashed. |
B. | As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the interest rates for time deposits ranged from 0.5% to 2.35%, and from 0.8% to 2.53%, respectively. |
F - 18
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
5.Short-term Investment
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Investment in stock | | $ | 8,001 | | | $ | — | |
Investment in bond fund | | | | | | | 1,942,970 | |
Less: Allowance for loss on decline in market value of short-term investments | | | (12 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 7,989 | | | $ | 1,942,970 | |
| | | | | | |
6.Accounts Receivable
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Accounts receivable | | $ | 5,377,198 | | | $ | 5,822,281 | |
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (56,556 | ) | | | (92,638 | ) |
Allowance for sales discounts | | | (9,369 | ) | | | (9,369 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,311,273 | | | $ | 5,720,274 | |
| | | | | | |
7.Inventories
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Raw materials and supplies | | $ | 1,644,032 | | | $ | 1,675,384 | |
Work in process | | | 183,949 | | | | 211,004 | |
Finished goods | | | 127,180 | | | | 136,062 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 1,955,161 | | | | 2,022,450 | |
Less: Allowance for loss on obsolescence and decline in market value of inventory | | | (58,195 | ) | | | (45,449 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,896,966 | | | $ | 1,977,001 | |
| | | | | | |
F - 19
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
8.Long-term Investments
1. Details of long-term investments were summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
Investee company | | Amount | | | % of ownership | | | Amount | | | % of ownership | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
Equity methods: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sigurd Microelectronics Corp. | | $ | 520,843 | | | | 27.36 | % | | $ | 617,264 | | | | 24.75 | % |
Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. | | | 120,563 | | | | 24.14 | % | | | 101,712 | | | | 24.14 | % |
ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | | 2,748,559 | | | | 28.73 | % | | | 2,995,619 | | | | 28.73 | % |
Universal Communication Technology Inc. | | | 266,888 | | | | 42.82 | % | | | 237,894 | | | | 42.82 | % |
Taiwan Hi-tech Corporation | | | 115,995 | | | | 38.53 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Artest Corporation | | | 47,569 | | | | 30.09 | % | | | — | | | | 30.09 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 3,820,417 | | | | | | | | 3,952,489 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost methods: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation | | | 1,129,402 | | | | 14.53 | % | | | 1,429,939 | | | | 18.03 | % |
ThaiLin Semiconductor Corp. | | | 216,420 | | | | 4.75 | % | | | 190,512 | | | | 3.15 | % |
King Yuan Electronics Co., Ltd. | | | 910,270 | | | | 9.45 | % | | | 910,270 | | | | 9.08 | % |
Others | | | 310,157 | | | | — | | | | 333,128 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,566,249 | | | | | | | | 2,863,849 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,386,666 | | | | | | | $ | 6,816,338 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. | The recognition of investment income (loss) for ChipMOS Technologies Inc. (“ChipMOS”), an investee accounted for under the equity method, was based on the financial statements of the investee for the same period in 2001 and before. Commencing from January 1, 2002, with the approval from ROC SFB, recognition of investment income (loss) has been delayed until the subsequent year for ChipMOS. Therefore, the Company recognized investment loss of NT$365,669 and investment income of NT$247,238 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, based on ChipMOS’ audited financial statement for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The Company did not recognize investment loss for ChipMos for the year ended December 31, 2002. |
3. | During 2002, the Company made an investment in Universal Communication Technology Inc. (“Universal”), an investee accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s investment in Universal consists of cumulative preferred stock and common stock, both with voting right. The holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate of 10% per annum. In the event of any liquidation of the investee, the holders of the preferred stock shall be entitled to receive, in preference to the holders of the common stock, an amount equal to original investment amount plus any undeclared and unpaid dividends. The recognition of investment income (loss) for Universal has been delayed until the subsequent year. Commencing from January 2003, the Company recognizes the |
F - 20
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| investment income (loss) for Universal based on the financial statements of the investee for the same period. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company recognized investment income of NT$0, NT$15,471 and NT$7,600 for preferred stock in accordance with the preference of the preferred stock of Universal. As for the common stock investment in Universal, no investment gain or loss were recognized in 2002. In 2003, the investment loss of $62,135 was recognized based on the audited financial statements of Universal for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. In 2004, the investment loss of $23,825 for common stock was recognized based on Universal’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
4. | Recognition of investment income (loss) has been consistently delayed until the subsequent year for Taiwan Hi-tech Corporation and Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. Accordingly, the combined investment (loss) income of NT$(14,972), NT$3,000 and NT$4,585 in these two companies for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, were based on the audited financial statements of the investee companies for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. |
5. | For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company recognized investment income of NT$69,166, NT$69,560 and NT$11,523, respectively, for other investees accounted for under equity method which was based on the investee companies’ audited financial statements in the respective periods. |
6. | For Artest Corporation, the Company owns non-cumulative preferred stock with voting right. According to ROC FAS No. 5, “Accounting For Long-term Investments”, the recognition of investment income (loss) for investments in preferred stock are based on the right to the earning distribution. Since the preferred stock is non-cumulative, investment income (loss) is recognized upon dividend declaration. No dividend was declared in 2001, 2002 and 2003. Therefore, no investment income was recognized in 2002, 2003 and 2004. However, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, Artest Corporation, has incurred significant losses since our investments and there is no indication of recovery in the near future, we concluded that the impairment loss was other than temporary. Accordingly, we recorded impairment charges of NT$24,934, NT$189,454 and NT$7,720 in 2002, 2003 and 2004 on this long-term equity investment to write off the carrying value of the investment to its fair value. As of December 31, 2004, the carrying amount of investment in Artest was written down to $0. |
F - 21
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
7. Details of long-term investments in bonds were summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | Amount | | | Market value | | | Amount | | | Market value | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
United Microelectronics Corporation exchangeable bonds | | $ | 346,350 | | | $ | 361,742 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation convertible bonds | | | 295,000 | | | | 588,968 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 641,350 | | | $ | 950,710 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the unamortized premium for long-term investments in bonds was $0.
The main terms of the issue of United Microelectronics Corporation exchangeable bonds were as follows:
(1) Maturity: May 10, 2007
(2) Interest rate: 0%
(3) | Redemption period: The bondholders may redeem the bonds on February 10, 2005 at 100% of the face value. |
(4) | Exchangeable period: The bondholders may exchange the bonds for the common share of AU Optronics Corp. from June 19, 2003 to April 10, 2007. |
(5) | Exchangeable ratio: The bondholders may exchange the bonds for common shares of AU Optronics Corp. at 5,838.389 shares per bond, denominated at US$ 10,000 per bond. |
The main terms of the issue of Phoenix Precision Technologies Corporation convertible bonds were as follows:
(1) | Maturity: May 26, 2008 |
(3) | Redemption period: The bondholders may redeem the bonds on May 26, 2006 at 104.57% of the principal amount, on May 26, 2007 at 106.14% of the principal amount, or on May 26, 2008 at the principal amount. |
F - 22
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
9.Property, Plant and Equipment
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2003 | |
| | Cost | | | Accumulated depreciation | | | Book value | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Land | | $ | 2,128,476 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,128,476 | |
Buildings | | | 5,368,157 | | | | ( 1,121,315 | ) | | | 4,246,842 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 30,072,783 | | | | ( 15,488,964 | ) | | | 14,583,819 | |
Utility equipment | | | 535,180 | | | | ( 231,821 | ) | | | 303,359 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 411,907 | | | | ( 220,281 | ) | | | 191,626 | |
Other equipment | | | 1,166,431 | | | | ( 545,041 | ) | | | 621,390 | |
Construction in progress and prepayments for equipment | | | 2,326,759 | | | | — | | | | 2,326,759 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 42,009,693 | | | | ($17,607,422 | ) | | $ | 24,402,271 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2004 | |
| | Cost | | | Accumulated depreciation | | | Book value | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Land | | $ | 2,128,476 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,128,476 | |
Buildings | | | 6,609,819 | | | | ( 1,384,875 | ) | | | 5,224,944 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 34,710,602 | | | | ( 17,251,132 | ) | | | 17,459,470 | |
Utility equipment | | | 696,662 | | | | ( 299,735 | ) | | | 396,927 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 507,134 | | | | ( 273,446 | ) | | | 233,688 | |
Other equipment | | | 1,417,709 | | | | ( 696,612 | ) | | | 721,097 | |
Construction in progress and prepayments for equipment | | | 1,024,282 | | | | — | | | | 1,024,282 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 47,094,684 | | | | ($19,905,800 | ) | | $ | 27,188,884 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, total interest expense amounted to NT$605,180, NT$414,607 and NT$364,347, respectively, of which NT$84,063, NT$39,496 and NT$11,026 was capitalized to property, plant and equipment, respectively. The interest rates used to calculate the capitalized interest were ranged from 4.04% to 4.94%, 2.92% to 4.54% and 0.73% in the respective periods.
F - 23
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
10.Other Assets - Others
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Land | | $ | 108,087 | | | $ | 108,087 | |
Land use right | | | 94,671 | | | | 86,961 | |
Others | | | 33,975 | | | | 38,481 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 236,733 | | | $ | 233,529 | |
| | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2004, SPIL designated one of its officers to purchase the parcel of land, Da-Pu-Chu No. 123-2, and registered the title of the land under the officer’s personal name. The land purchase has been completed and SPIL had made payments for the purchase. SPIL entered into a trust contract with the designated officer, which provides the land use right for nil consideration to SPIL. The trust contract prohibits the title owner from transferring the title of the land under any circumstances.
11.Accrued expenses
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
Accrued salaries | | $ | 476,586 | | | $ | 546,933 | |
Accrued interest | | | 23,242 | | | | 25,660 | |
Other accrued expenses | | | 321,882 | | | | 504,880 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 821,710 | | | $ | 1,077,473 | |
| | | | | | |
12.Other Payables
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Payables for equipment | | $ | 1,170,337 | | | $ | 706,339 | |
Accrued value-added tax payable | | | — | | | | 468,000 | |
Other payables | | | 322,164 | | | | 333,722 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,492,501 | | | $ | 1,508,061 | |
| | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2004, the Company recorded NT$468,000 of accrued value-added tax payable due to certain revenues previously applied zero percent of value-added tax were deemed taxable by the Tax Authority. The assessment is still in process and the Company believes the provision is sufficient to cover the liability arising from the tax assessment.
F - 24
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Euro convertible bonds payable | | $ | 6,804,000 | | | $ | 11,121,558 | |
Secured bonds payable | | | 800,000 | | | | 800,000 | |
Add: Compensation interest payable | | | 384,979 | | | | 411,588 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 7,988,979 | | | | 12,333,146 | |
Less: Current portion of long-term bonds payable | | | (7,188,979 | ) | | | (800,000 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 800,000 | | | $ | 11,533,146 | |
| | | | | | |
| A. | On January 28, 2002, the Company issued five-year (from January 28, 2002 to January 28, 2007) Euro Convertible bonds amounting to US$200,000 (in thousands) with zero interest rate on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. Main terms of the issue are as follows: |
| (1) | The Company may redeem the bonds at any time on or after July 29, 2004 and prior to December 29, 2006 at their principal amount together with accrued interest, if (i) the market price of the shares of the Company for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days is at least 130% of the conversion price or (ii) at least 90% in principal amount of the bonds has already been redeemed, repurchased and cancelled or converted. |
|
| (2) | Redemption at the option of the bondholders: |
|
| | The Company will, at the option of the bondholders, redeem such bonds on July 28, 2004 at 105.9185% of its principal amount, or on January 28, 2007 at 111.837% of its principal amount. |
|
| (3) | Conversion period: |
|
| | At any time between April 16, 2002 and December 29, 2006. |
|
| (4) | Conversion price and adjustment: |
|
| | The conversion price was established on the issuance date at NT$32.9 (in dollar) per share. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for bonus issues, right issues, distributions of cash and stock dividends and other dilution. As of |
F - 25
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | December 31, 2004, the conversion price was NT$29.91 (in dollar) per share. |
|
| (5) | As of December 31, 2004, the convertible bonds with the principal amount of US$8,840 (in thousands) has been converted into 9,402 thousand shares, which resulted in an increase of capital reserve in the amount of NT$213,140. Also, during 2004, the Company repurchased and cancelled the bonds with the principal amount of US$40,985 (in thousands) from open market and recognized a loss of NT$8,117, which was shown in other non-operating expenses and losses. |
| B. | On February 5, 2004, the Company issued five-year (from February 5, 2004 to February 5, 2009) Euro Convertible bonds amounting to US$200,000 (in thousands) with zero interest rate on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. Main terms of the issue are as follows: |
| (1) | The Company may redeem the bonds at any time on or after February 5, 2006 and prior to January 29, 2009 at their principal amount, if (i) the market price of the shares of the Company for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days is at least 120% of the conversion price or (ii) at least 90% in principal amount of the bonds has already been redeemed, repurchased and cancelled or converted. |
|
| (2) | Redemption at the option of the bondholders: |
|
| | The Company will, at the option of the bondholders, redeem such bonds on February 5, 2008 at the principal amount. |
|
| (3) | Conversion period: |
|
| | At any time between March 17, 2004 and January 29, 2009. |
|
| (4) | Conversion price and adjustment: |
|
| | The conversion price was established on the issuance date at NT$47.035 (in dollars) per share. The conversion price will be subject to adjustment for bonus issues, right issues, distributions of cash and stock dividends and other dilution. As of December 31, 2004, the conversion price was NT$42.76 (in dollars) per share. |
F - 26
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| C. | In January 2002, SPIL issued NT$800,000 of three-year secured bonds. The interest rate on these bonds is 2.7% per annum. Main terms of the bonds payables were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nature of bonds | | Issued date | | | Maturity date | | | Amount | | | Interest payment date | |
| | | | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
Secured bonds payable | | January 16, 2002 | | January 16, 2005 | | $ | 300,000 | | | January 16, each year |
Secured bonds payable | | January 17, 2002 | | January 17, 2005 | | | 300,000 | | | January 17, each year |
Secured bonds payable | | January 18, 2002 | | January 18, 2005 | | | 200,000 | | | January 18, each year |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 800,000 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | December 31, |
Nature of loans | | Repayment period | | 2003 | | 2004 |
| | | | NT$ | | NT$ |
Secured loans | | Repayable in 15 quarterly installments from March 2002 | | $ | 933,240 | | | $ | — | |
Secured loans | | Repayable in 8 semi-annual installments from April 2002 | | | 496,000 | | | | 236,000 | |
Secured loans | | Repayable in 7 semi-annual installments from June 2002 | | | 1,379,840 | | | — | |
Secured loans | | Repayable in January 2005 | | | 1,170,000 | | | | 1,170,000 | |
Credit loans | | Repayable in 4 semi-annual installments from December 2004 | | | 4,800,000 | | | — | |
Commercial papers | | Repayable in January 2005 | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 1,500,000 | |
Commercial papers | | Repayable in 7 semi-annual installments from April 2002 | | | 500,000 | | | | 250,000 | |
Commercial papers | | Repayable in 3 semi-annual installments from July 2006 | | | — | | | | 4,800,000 | |
Credit loans | | Repayable in October and November 2005 | | | 62,885 | | | | 57,376 | |
Credit loans | | Repayable in October and November 2006 | | | 328,638 | | | | 308,058 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 11,170,603 | | | | 8,321,434 | |
Less: Current portion of long-term loans | | | (3,153,360 | ) | | | (3,213,376 | ) |
Discount on commercial paper | | | (4,079 | ) | | | (1,712 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 8,013,164 | | | $ | 5,106,346 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rates | | | | | 1.72% ~ 4.54 | % | | | 1.79% ~ 5.18 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | The loan agreements require, among other things, the maintenance of specific financial covenants and consent by the banks on important transactions, such as merger, changes in operations and asset transfer. As of December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all such financial covenants. |
F - 27
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
15. | Pension Plan and Net Pension Cost |
| A. | Substantially all of the regular employees of SPIL are covered by SPIL’s pension plan. Under the funding policy of the plan, SPIL contributes monthly an amount equal to 5% of the employees’ monthly salaries and wages to the pension fund deposited with the Central Trust of China, the custodian. Pension benefits are generally based on service years (two units earned per year for the first 15 years of service, with one unit for each additional year of service with a maximum of 45 units). One unit represents the six-month average wages or salaries before the retirement of the employee. Retirement benefits are paid from the pension fund. |
|
| B. | The following tables set forth the actuarial assumptions, funded status and amounts recognized for SPIL’s defined benefit pension plan: |
| (1) | Assumptions used in actuarial calculations as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
Discount rate | | | 5.00 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | | 2.50 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term rate of compensation increase | | | 3.50 | % | | | 2.00 | % | | | 2.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected rate on plan assets | | | 5.00 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | | 2.50 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Vested benefit | | ($ | 6,524 | ) | | ($ | 13,499 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Vested benefit obligation | | ($ | 6,466 | ) | | ($ | 13,157 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated benefit obligation | | ($ | 659,704 | ) | | ($ | 779,075 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| (2) | Changes in benefit obligation during the years ended to December 31, 2003 and 2004: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Project benefit obligation at beginning of year | | ($ | 687,492 | ) | | ($ | 1,046,896 | ) |
Service cost | | | (100,276 | ) | | | (145,610 | ) |
Interest cost | | | (27,500 | ) | | | (26,172 | ) |
Loss on projected benefit obligation | | | (233,748 | ) | | | 175,500 | |
Benefit paid | | | 2,120 | | | | 1,683 | |
| | | | | | |
Projected benefit obligation at end of year | | ($ | 1,046,896 | ) | | ($ | 1,041,495 | ) |
| | | | | | |
F - 28
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| (3) | Changes in plan assets during the years ended to December 31, 2003 and 2004: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | $ | 551,988 | | | $ | 670,396 | |
Actual return on plan assets | | | 8,427 | | | | 8,526 | |
Employer contributions | | | 112,101 | | | | 131,586 | |
Benefits paid | | | (2,120 | ) | | | (1,683 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | | $ | 670,396 | | | $ | 808,825 | |
| | | | | | |
| (4) | Funded status at December 31, 2003 and 2004: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Fair value of plan assets | | $ | 670,396 | | | $ | 808,825 | |
Projected benefit obligation | | | (1,046,896 | ) | | | (1,041,495 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Funded status | | | (376,500 | ) | | | (232,670 | ) |
Unrecognized transition assets | | | (6,390 | ) | | | (5,477 | ) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss | | | 388,716 | | | | 207,249 | |
| | | | | | |
Prepaid pension expense | | $ | 5,826 | | | ($ | 30,898 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| (5) | Components of net periodic cost for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Service cost | | $ | 79,402 | | | $ | 100,276 | | | $ | 145,610 | |
Interest cost | | | 26,662 | | | | 27,500 | | | | 26,172 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (21,899 | ) | | | (22,080 | ) | | | (16,760 | ) |
Recognition of transition assets | | | (913 | ) | | | (913 | ) | | | (913 | ) |
Recognition of actuarial loss | | | 1,676 | | | | 3,819 | | | | 14,201 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic cost | | $ | 84,928 | | | $ | 108,602 | | | $ | 168,310 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (6) | Plan assets: |
|
| | As of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the plan assets consist of all cash deposited with the Central Trust of China. |
| A. | As of December 31, 2004, the authorized capital of the Company was NT$26,000,000, |
F - 29
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | represented by 2,600,000,000 common shares with par value of NT$10 (in dollars) per share. As of December 31, 2004, issued common stock was NT$21,050,731, represented by 2,105,073,100, shares. |
|
| B. | On June 11, 2004, the stockholders of the Company resolved to capitalize the dividend in the amount of NT$1,894,476 and the employee bonus in the amount of NT$210,497 by issuing 210,497 thousand new shares. The capital increase has been approved by SFB. |
|
| C. | The Company issued $1,500,000 American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), represented by 30,000,000 units of ADSs, in June 2000. Each ADS was issued in respect of five shares of common stock of the Company with an offering price of US$8.49 (in dollars) per ADS. Main terms and conditions of the ADSs are summarized as follows: |
| (1) | Voting Rights |
|
| | ADS holders will have no rights to vote directly in shareholders’ meetings with respect to the Deposited Shares. The Depositary shall provide voting instruction to the Chairman of the Company and vote on behalf of the Deposited shares evidenced by ADSs. If the Depositary receives voting instructions from holders of at least 51% of the outstanding ADSs to vote in the same direction on a resolution, the Depositary will cause the shares underlying the ADSs to be voted in the manner instructed. |
|
| (2) | Distribution of Dividends |
|
| | ADS holders are deemed to have the same rights as holders of common shares with respect to the distribution of dividends. |
| D. | In July 2002, the Board of directors of the Company resolved to issue up to 40,000 units of employee stock option. Each unit of employee stock option is entitled to subscribe 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company has to issue additional 40,000,000 shares of common stock if all of the employee stock options are exercised. The exercise price of the employee stock option is subject to adjustment for distribution of cash dividend or changes in capital stock in accordance with certain formula. The granted employee stock option expires in five years and will be exercisable in certain percentage annually after two years of service in accordance with the employee stock option plan. |
F - 30
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| (1) | For the year ended December 31, 2004, details of the employee stock option granted, exercised and cancelled and exercise price of the employee stock option were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | | | | | average | |
| | Available | | | Number | | | exercise price | |
| | for grant | | | of shares | | | (in NT dollars) | |
Outstanding options at January 1, 2002 | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Granted | | | 40,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Forfeited/cancelled | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding options at December 31, 2002 | | | 40,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Granted/cancelled | | | (40,000 | ) | | | 40,000 | | | | 15.66 | |
Forfeited | | | 2,489 | | | | (2,489 | ) | | | 15.60 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding options at December 31, 2003 | | | 2,489 | | | | 37,511 | | | | 15.67 | |
Granted | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Forfeited/cancelled | | | — | | | | (1,683 | ) | | | 13.76 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding options at December 31, 2004 | | | 2,489 | | | | 35,828 | | | | 13.76 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (2) | As of December 31, 2004, the details of the outstanding employee stock option were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | Options vested | |
| | | | | | Weighted | | | Weighted | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | average | | | average | | | | | | | average | |
Exercise price | | Number of | | | remaining | | | exercise price | | | Number of | | | exercise price | |
(in NT dollars) | | options | | | contractual life | | | (in NT dollars) | | | options | | | (in NT dollars) | |
$13.7 ~ $14.3 | | | 35,828 | | | 3.13 years | | $ | 13.76 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| A. | According to the Company Law of the ROC, the capital reserve arising from paid-in capital in excess of par on the issuance of stocks, from merger, from the conversion of convertible bonds or from donation shall be exclusively used to cover accumulated deficit or be transferred to capital. Other capital reserve shall be exclusively used to cover accumulated deficit. The capital reserve can only be used to cover accumulated deficit when the legal reserve is insufficient to cover the deficits. |
|
| B. | According to the Company Law of the ROC, the capital reserve arising from paid-in capital in excess of par on the issuance of stocks can only be transferred to capital once every year. The transfer of capital reserve to capital can not be made in the year the company issued new shares and the amount to be capitalized is subject to certain limitation. |
F - 31
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| A. | According to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, current year’s earnings before tax, if any, shall be distributed in the following order: |
| (1) | Offset prior years’ operating losses, if any; |
|
| (2) | Pay all taxes and dues; |
|
| (3) | Set aside 10% of the remaining amount after deducting (1) and (2) as legal reserve; |
|
| (4) | Set aside 2% of the remaining amount after deducting items (1), (2), and (3) as directors’ and supervisors’ remunerations. |
|
| (5) | After deducting items (1), (2), (3), and (4) above from the current year’s earnings, any portion of the remaining amount may be allocated as follows: 10% as employee bonus and 90% as stockholders’ dividend. |
|
| (6) | The distribution of (5) above shall be made in accordance with the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors and approved at the stockholders’ meeting. |
| B. | The appropriation for legal reserve can only be used to offset a deficit or increase capital. The legal reserve can be used to increase capital only when the reserve balance exceeds 50% of the capital stock, and the amount capitalized should be limited to 50% of the portion of the reserve in excess of 25% of the capital stock. |
|
| C. | In accordance with the ROC SFB regulation, in addition to legal reserve and prior to distribution of earnings, the Company should set aside a special reserve in an amount equal to the net change in the reduction of prior year’s stockholders’ equity, resulting from adjustments such as cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment and unrealized losses on long-term investments. Such special reserve is not available for dividend distribution. In the subsequent year(s), if the year-end balances of the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment and unrealized losses on long-term investments no longer result in a net reduction in the stockholders’ equity, the special reserve previously set aside will then be available for distribution. |
|
| D. | The Taiwan imputation tax system requires that any undistributed current earnings of a company derived on or after January 1, 1998 be subject to an additional 10% corporate income tax if the earnings are not distributed in the following year. This 10% additional tax on undistributed earnings paid by the Company can be used as tax credit by the stockholders, including foreign stockholders, against the |
F - 32
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | withholding tax on dividends. In addition, the domestic shareholders can claim a proportionate share in the Company’s corporate income tax as tax credit against its individual income tax liability effective 1998. As of December 31, 2004, the undistributed earnings derived on or after January 1, 1998 was NT$4,320,831. |
|
| E. | As of December 31, 2004, the balance of stockholders’ imputation tax credit account of the Company was NT$11,552. The rate of stockholders’ imputation tax credit to undistributed earnings is approximately 0.27%. However, the actual stockholders’ imputation rate is subject to change since the actual stockholders’ tax credit rate is based on the rate on the dividend allocation day. In 2004, the stockholders’ imputation rate on the distributed earnings is 0.72%. |
|
| F. | During 2004, the stockholders of the Company resolved to distribute cash dividends of NT$0.35 (in dollars) per share and stock dividends of NT$1 (in dollars) per share; while no dividend was resolved in 2003. |
|
| G. | As of February 18, 2005, the board of directors of SPIL has not resolved the distribution of the year 2004 earnings. Therefore, any information in relation to the year 2004 earnings will be posted to the website of the Taiwan Stock Exchanges after the Board’s resolution and the Shareholders’ approval is obtained. |
F - 33
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| H. | The year 2003’s earnings distribution for employee bonuses and directors’ and supervisors’ remunerations were as follow: |
| | | | |
| | The amount of the actual | |
| | earnings distributions approved | |
| | by the board of directors and the | |
| | shareholders in 2004 | |
| | NT$ | |
(a) The amount of the retained earnings distributed | | | | |
1.Employees’ cash bonuses | | $ | 73,674 | |
| | | |
2.Employees’ stock bonuses | | | | |
(i) Shares (in thousands of shares) | | | 21,050 | |
| | | |
(ii) Amounts | | $ | 210,497 | |
| | | |
(iii) As a percentage of outstanding common shares | | | 1.14 | % |
| | | |
3.Directors’ and supervisors’ remunerations | | $ | 57,153 | |
| | | |
(b) Information regarding earnings per common share | | | | |
1.Original earnings per common share (note 1) | | $ | 1.55 | |
| | | |
2.Adjusted earnings per common share (note 2) | | $ | 1.36 | |
| | | |
Note 1: | | Not retroactively adjusted by the common shares issued on capitalization of earnings in 2004. |
|
Note 2: | | Adjusted earnings per share = (Net income-Employees’ bonus-Remunerations to directors and supervisors)/Weighted average outstanding common shares. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | |
Reason for acquisition | | Beginning | | | Additions | | | Reductions | | | Ending | |
| | | | | | Number of shares (in thousand) | | | | | |
Transfer to employees | | | 31,505 | | | | — | | | | (22,957 | ) | | | 8,548 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2004 | |
Reason for acquisition | | Beginning | | | Additions | | | Reductions | | | Ending | |
| | Number of shares (in thousand) | |
Transfer to employees | | | 8,548 | | | | — | | | | (8,548 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| A. | According to the ROC Securities Exchange Act, the number of outstanding treasury shares shall not exceed 10% of the total shares of common stocks issued by the |
F - 34
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | company. The cost of the outstanding treasury stock shall not exceed the total of retained earnings, paid-in capital in excess of par value and capital reserve arising from donation. In addition, treasury stock shall not be used as collateral and shall not have the stockholders’ rights until transferred. |
|
| B. | As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company’s treasury stock amounted to NT$150,138 and NT$0, respectively, represented by 8,548,000 and 0 shares which should be sold to the Company’s employees within three years from the date of acquisition. Any unsold treasury stock after three years shall be considered unissued shares, and shall be charged against contributed capital and capital reserve. |
|
| C. | As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, Siliconware Investment Company Ltd., the subsidiary of the Company, held 27,016,000 and 29,717,000 shares with book value of NT$794,184 (in dollars) for both years and were presented as treasury stocks. |
20. | Income Tax |
|
| SPIL and its subsidiaries file separate income tax returns. Reconciliation between the income tax calculated on pre-tax financial statement income based on the statutory tax rate and the income tax benefit is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Income tax expense calculated at the statutory tax rate (25%) | | $ | 70,373 | | | $ | 550,877 | | | $ | 963,892 | |
Tax exempt income and other permanent differences | | | (149,813 | ) | | | 217,377 | | | | (367,301 | ) |
Investment tax credits | | | (281,438 | ) | | | (720,436 | ) | | | (1,434,949 | ) |
Tax on interest income separately taxed | | | 709 | | | | 873 | | | | 3,671 | |
Changes in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | | | 165,045 | | | | (677,818 | ) | | | 366,341 | |
Prior year’s under (over) provision | | | 47,074 | | | | (10,282 | ) | | | (3,935 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit for current year | | | (148,050 | ) | | | (639,409 | ) | | | (472,281 | ) |
Additional 10% tax on undistributed earnings | | | 2,686 | | | | 3,117 | | | | 15,323 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit | | | (145,364 | ) | | | (636,292 | ) | | | (456,958 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change of deferred tax assets | | | 196,413 | | | | 631,184 | | | | 464,386 | |
Prior year’s (under) over provision | | | (47,074 | ) | | | 10,282 | | | | 3,935 | |
Tax on interest income separately taxed | | | (709 | ) | | | (873 | ) | | | (3,671 | ) |
Prepaid income tax | | | (19,359 | ) | | | (7,725 | ) | | | (20,957 | ) |
Subsidiary’s tax payable | | | (3,088 | ) | | | (4,255 | ) | | | (6,565 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income tax refund receivable | | | ($19,181 | ) | | | ($7,679 | ) | | | ($19,830 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income tax payable carried over from prior year | | $ | 50,162 | | | $ | 40,608 | | | $ | 36,352 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F - 35
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| A. | For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, significant portion of the permanent differences derived from gain on disposal of investments and long-term investment income (loss) accounted for under the equity method and revenue from assembly of certain integrated circuit products which is exempted from income tax. |
|
| B. | As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Deferred tax assets - current | | $ | 535,402 | | | $ | 709,093 | |
Deferred tax liabilities - current | | | (46,880 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 488,522 | | | | 709,093 | |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | | | (25,372 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 463,150 | | | | 709,093 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets - noncurrent | | | 2,428,765 | | | | 2,873,539 | |
Deferred tax liabilities - noncurrent | | | (242,101 | ) | | | (390,402 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | 2,186,664 | | | | 2,483,137 | |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | | | (804,884 | ) | | | (882,914 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,381,780 | | | $ | 1,600,223 | |
| | | | | | |
F - 36
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| C. | The details of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | Amount | | | Tax effect | | | Amount | | | Tax effect | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Current | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Temporary differences | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on obsolescence and decline in market value of inventories decline in market value of spare part inventories | | $ | 75,468 | | | $ | 18,867 | | | $ | 54,195 | | | $ | 13,548 | |
Unrealized foreign currency exchange gain arising from bonds payable | | | (187,519 | ) | | | (46,880 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Compensation interest from bonds payable | | | 390,498 | | | | 97,625 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Unrealized loss on sales allowance | | | 56,556 | | | | 14,139 | | | | 92,638 | | | | 23,160 | |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss | | | 27,084 | | | | 6,771 | | | | 165,540 | | | | 41,385 | |
Investment tax credit | | | | | | | 398,000 | | | | | | | | 631,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 488,522 | | | | | | | | 709,093 | |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets-current | | | | | | | (25,372 | ) | | | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 463,150 | | | | | | | $ | 709,093 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Temporary difference | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on long-term investments | | $ | 664,403 | | | $ | 166,101 | | | $ | 628,009 | | | $ | 157,002 | |
Depreciation expense | | | (968,405 | ) | | | (242,101 | ) | | | (761,056 | ) | | | (190,264 | ) |
Unrealized foreign currency exchange gain arising from bonds payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | (800,556 | ) | | | (200,139 | ) |
Compensation interest from bonds payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 442,090 | | | | 110,523 | |
Unrealized loss on idle assets | | | 142,724 | | | | 35,681 | | | | 484,413 | | | | 121,103 | |
Loss carryforwards | | | 1,190,242 | | | | 297,560 | | | | 25,513 | | | | 6,378 | |
Investment tax credit | | | | | | | 1,929,423 | | | | | | | | 2,478,534 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,186,664 | | | | | | | | 2,483,137 | |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets-noncurrent | | | | | | | (804,884 | ) | | | | | | | (882,914 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,381,780 | | | | | | | $ | 1,600,223 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets relates primarily to unrealized compensation interest on bonds payable and allowance for investment tax credits received in connection with the Company’s investment in qualifying investments in significant technology companies and acquisition of qualifying machinery and equipment. |
|
| D. | The income tax returns of the Company through 2001 have been assessed and approved by the Tax Authority. However, the Company did not accept the reason |
F - 37
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | and result of the reassessment and has petitioned to the government against the decision of the Tax Authority of its 1999 and 2000 income tax returns. In addition, the Company did not accept the reason and result of the assessment of the Tax Authority and has requested for reassessment of its 2001 income tax return. The Company estimates the aforementioned petition or reassessment will not have a significant adverse impact to the Company. |
|
| E. | The income tax returns of SIC through 2002 have been approved by Tax Authority. |
|
| F. | According to the income tax regulation of the People Republic of China applied to qualifying foreign investment production enterprise, Siliconware Technology is entitled to two years’ exemption from income taxes followed by three years of a 50% tax reduction, commencing from the first cumulative profit-making year net of losses carried forward. In addition, any foreign investor of an enterprise with foreign investment which reinvests its share of profit obtained from the enterprise directly into that enterprise by increasing its registered capital, or uses the profit as capital investment to establish other enterprises with foreign investment to operate for a period of not less than five years shall, upon approval by the tax authorities of an application filed by the investor, be refunded forty percent of the income tax already paid in relation to the reinvested amount. As of December 31, 2004, Siliconware Technology was still suffering accumulated deficit. |
|
| G. | As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s unused portion of investment tax credits, under the “Statue for Up-Grading of Industries”, were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nature of investment tax credit | | Deductible amount | | | Unused amount | | | Expiration Years | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | | | |
Acquisition cost of qualifying machinery and equipment | | $ | 2,360,472 | | | $ | 2,311,409 | | | | 2005 to 2008 | |
Qualifying research and development expenditure | | | 573,760 | | | | 573,760 | | | | 2005 to 2008 | |
Qualifying investments in significant technology companies | | | 233,353 | | | | 224,365 | | | | 2005 to 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,167,585 | | | $ | 3,109,534 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
F - 38
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| H. | The Company is exempted from income tax for revenues arising from the assembly of certain integrated circuit products under the “Statute for Up-Grading of Industries”, for five years through December 2008. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2002 | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | average | | | | |
| | Income | | | outstanding | | | Earnings per share | |
| | Before tax | | | After tax | | | common stock | | | Before tax | | | After tax | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | (in thousand) | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 279,831 | | | $ | 425,195 | | | | 2,008,529 | | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | average | | | | |
| | Income | | | outstanding | | | Earnings per share | |
| | Before tax | | | After tax | | | common stock | | | Before tax | | | After tax | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | (in thousand) | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 2,202,424 | | | $ | 2,838,716 | | | | 2,020,464 | | | $ | 1.09 | | | $ | 1.40 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive effect of employee stock option | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,723 | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive effect of 2nd Euro convertible bonds | | | 52,384 | | | | 39,288 | | | | 233,574 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 2,254,808 | | | $ | 2,878,004 | | | $ | 2,266,761 | | | $ | 0.99 | | | $ | 1.27 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | average | | | | |
| | Income | | | outstanding | | | Earnings per share | |
| | Before tax | | | After tax | | | common stock | | | Before tax | | | After tax | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | (in thousand) | | | (in dollars) | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 3,825,219 | | | $ | 4,282,177 | | | | 2,052,285 | | | $ | 1.86 | | | $ | 2.09 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive effect of employee stock option | | | — | | | | — | | | | 25,631 | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive effect of 2nd Euro convertible bonds | | | (116,658 | ) | | | (134,373 | ) | | | 176,700 | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive effect of 3rd Euro convertible bonds | | | (286,427 | ) | | | (214,820 | ) | | | 156,174 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 3,422,134 | | | $ | 3,932,984 | | | $ | 2,410,790 | | | $ | 1.42 | | | $ | 1.63 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F - 39
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
The weighted average treasury stock held by SPIL and the subsidiary has been deducted in the calculation of weighted average outstanding common stock for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
22.PERSONNEL COSTS, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2002 | |
| | Operating costs | | | Operating expenses | | | Total | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Personnel costs | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payroll | | $ | 2,543,907 | | | $ | 759,584 | | | $ | 3,303,491 | |
Labor and health insurance | | | 176,355 | | | | 55,549 | | | | 231,904 | |
Pension expense | | | 67,222 | | | | 22,957 | | | | 90,179 | |
Others | | | 211,060 | | | | 35,627 | | | | 246,687 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,998,544 | | | $ | 873,717 | | | $ | 3,872,261 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | $ | 4,450,637 | | | $ | 124,785 | | | $ | 4,575,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | $ | 152,284 | | | $ | 129,207 | | | $ | 281,491 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2003 | |
| | Operating costs | | | Operating expenses | | | Total | |
Personnel costs | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payroll | | $ | 2,901,902 | | | $ | 777,646 | | | $ | 3,679,548 | |
Labor and health insurance | | | 199,009 | | | | 59,358 | | | | 258,367 | |
Pension expense | | | 85,843 | | | | 28,431 | | | | 114,274 | |
Others | | | 231,629 | | | | 43,782 | | | | 275,411 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,418,383 | | | $ | 909,217 | | | $ | 4,327,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | $ | 4,746,598 | | | $ | 107,960 | | | $ | 4,854,558 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | $ | 178,074 | | | $ | 94,748 | | | $ | 272,822 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-40
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, 2004 | |
| | Operating costs | | | Operating expenses | | | Total | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Personnel costs | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payroll | | $ | 3,490,892 | | | $ | 1,006,299 | | | $ | 4,497,191 | |
Labor and health insurance | | | 232,279 | | | | 70,448 | | | | 302,727 | |
Pension expense | | | 132,973 | | | | 41,254 | | | | 174,227 | |
Others | | | 347,540 | | | | 53,985 | | | | 401,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 4,203,684 | | | $ | 1,171,986 | | | $ | 5,375,670 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | $ | 5,586,033 | | | $ | 141,190 | | | $ | 5,727,223 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | $ | 270,576 | | | $ | 108,338 | | | $ | 378,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
23.Related Party Transactions
1. Name and Relationship with Related Parties:
| | |
Name of related parties | | Relationship with the Company |
ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | Investee company under the equity method |
Sigard Microelectronics Corp. | | Investee company under the equity method |
Universal Communication Technology Inc. | | Investee company under the equity method |
Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation | | Same chairman of the board |
2. Significant Transactions with Related Parties
(1)Sales to related parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | % of | | | | | | | % of | | | | | | | % of | |
| | Amount | | | net sale | | | Amount | | | net sale | | | Amount | | | net sale | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | 101,960 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The selling prices and collection terms offered to the related parties were generally comparable to those offered to non-related parties. The collection period is approximately three months from the date of sale.
F-41
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(2) Purchases of inventory from related parties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | % of net | | | | | | | % of net | | | | | | | % of net | |
| | Amount | | | purchase | | | Amount | | | purchase | | | Amount | | | purchase | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation | | $ | 1,716,348 | | | | 16 | | | $ | 2,610,008 | | | | 19 | | | $ | 2,875,934 | | | | 18 | |
Others | | | 428 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,716,776 | | | | 16 | | | $ | 2,610,008 | | | | 19 | | | $ | 2,875,934 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The purchase price and payment term provided by related parties were generally comparable to those provided by non-related parties. The average payment period is approximately three months from the date of purchase.
(3) Accounts Receivable
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | % of | | | | | | | % of | |
| | | | | | accounts | | | | | | | accounts | |
| | Amount | | | receivable | | | Amount | | | receivable | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | | 4,634 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(4) Accounts payable
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | % of | | | | | | | % of | |
| | | | | | accounts | | | | | | | accounts | |
| | Amount | | | payable | | | Amount | | | payable | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation | | $ | 301,496 | | | | 14 | | | $ | 231,044 | | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-42
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
24.Assets Pledged as Collaterals
As of December 31, 2003 and 2004 the following assets have been pledged as collateral against certain obligations of the Company:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | | |
Assets | | 2003 | | | 2004 | | | Subject of collateral |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | |
Buildings | | $ | 1,377,197 | | | $ | 1,144,896 | | | Long-term loans and bonds payable |
Machinery and other equipment | | | 4,903,444 | | | | 818,788 | | | Loan-term loans |
Time deposits (shown in other financial assets — current) | | | 172,000 | | | | 250,200 | | | Guarantees for custom duties and income tax liabilities |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,452,641 | | | $ | 2,213,884 | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
25.Commitments and Contingencies
| A. | As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s unused letters of credit for imported machinery and equipment were approximately NT$222,220. |
|
| B. | The Company entered into agreements with third parties to construct the plant for expansion of operations amounting to NT$1,068,035. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has outstanding obligations of approximately NT$181,172 related to these contracts. |
|
| C. | The Company entered into contracts with six foreign companies for the use of certain technologies and patents related to packaging system of integrated circuit products. The Company agreed to pay royalty fees based on the total number of certain products sold. Four contracts are valid through December 2007, November 2009, December 2010 and January 2011, respectively. For the other two contracts, one is valid through when all patents included in the contract expired, the other is valid until both parties agree to terminate the contract. |
|
| D. | The Company’s value-added tax payables are currently under the Tax Authority’s assessments. The Company has recorded NT$468,000 accrued value-added tax payables and believes the amount is sufficient to cover the liabilities arising from the tax assessments. Please refer to Note 12. |
F-43
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
26.Other
1. Disclosure on Financial Instruments:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | Book value | | | Fair value | | | Book value | | | Fair value | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
Non-derivative financial instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial assets with book value equal to fair value | | $ | 17,991,992 | | | $ | 17,991,992 | | | $ | 17,156,995 | | | $ | 17,156,995 | |
Short-term investment | | | 7,989 | | | | 7,771 | | | | 1,942,970 | | | | 1,950,180 | |
Long-term investment in stocks | | | 6,386,666 | | | | 9,292,064 | | | | 6,816,338 | | | | 8,465,122 | |
Long-term investment in bonds | | | 641,350 | | | | 950,710 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 25,027,997 | | | $ | 28,242,537 | | | $ | 25,916,303 | | | $ | 27,572,297 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities with book value equal to fair value | | $ | 8,761,492 | | | $ | 8,761,492 | | | $ | 8,764,904 | | | $ | 8,764,904 | |
Bonds payable | | | 7,988,979 | | | | 8,938,741 | | | | 11,533,146 | | | | 11,245,337 | |
Long-term loans | | | 8,013,164 | | | | 8,013,164 | | | | 5,106,346 | | | | 5,106,346 | |
(Prepaid pension expense)/ accrued pension cost | | | ( 5,826 | ) | | | 376,500 | | | | 30,898 | | | | 232,670 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 24,757,809 | | | $ | 26,089,897 | | | $ | 25,435,294 | | | $ | 25,349,257 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Financial assets and liabilities with book value approximate to fair value include cash and cash equivalents, notes receivable, accounts receivable, other financial assets - current, refundable deposits, short-term loans, notes payable, accounts payable, income tax payable, accrued expenses, other payables, current portion of long-term loans and other current liabilities. |
|
| (2) | The fair value of short-term and long-term investments in stock and long-term investment in bonds is based on the market value of short-term and long-term investments. If the market value of short-term and long-term investments is unavailable, the net equities of the investee companies or other financial information is used as fair value. |
|
| (3) | The fair value of bonds payable is based on market value. |
|
| (4) | The book value of long-term loans is used as fair value because the loans bear floating interest rate. |
|
| (5) | The fair value of prepaid pension expense and accrued pension cost is equal to the funded status as shown in the actuarial report measured at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. |
F-44
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
2. Eliminated transactions between parent company and subsidiaries
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Name of the counter party and amount | |
| | Siliconware Precision | | | Siliconware Investment | | | SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding | | | | |
Transactions | | Industries Co., Ltd | | | Company Ltd. | | | Limited | | | Siliconware USA Inc. | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
For the year ended December 31, 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eliminate long-term investment and stockholders’ equity | | ($ | 2,113,283 | ) | | $ | 951,947 | | | $ | 1,161,336 | | | $ | — | |
Eliminate subsidiary’s long-term investment on parent company | | | 794,184 | | | | (794,184 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Eliminate accrued expense and accounts receivable | | | 22,686 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (22,686 | ) |
Eliminate commission expense and revenue | | | (269,981 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 269,981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eliminate long-term investment and stockholders’ equity | | ($ | 2,278,920 | ) | | $ | 957,052 | | | $ | 1,321,868 | | | $ | — | |
Eliminate subsidiary’s long-term investment on parent company | | | 794,184 | | | | (794,184 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Eliminate accrued expense and accounts receivable | | | 42,259 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (42,259 | ) |
Eliminate commission expense and revenue | | | (288,869 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 288,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eliminate long-term investment and stockholders’ equity | | ($ | 2,586,396 | ) | | $ | 932,002 | | | $ | 1,654,394 | | | $ | — | |
Eliminate subsidiary’s long-term investment on parent company | | | 758,684 | | | | (758,684 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Eliminate accrued expense and accounts receivable | | | 42,078 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (42,078 | ) |
Eliminate commission expense and revenue | | | (414,501 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 414,501 | |
F-45
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
27.Segment Information
| A. | Operation in Different Industries |
|
| | The Company principally operates in one industry. The Company’s operation involves assembly, testing and turnkey services of integrated circuits. |
|
| B. | Operations in Different Geographic Areas |
|
| | The Company has no significant foreign operations. Therefore, ROC FAS No. 20, “Segmental Information Disclosure”, is not applicable. |
|
| C. | Export Sales |
|
| | Sales by geographic region are identified by the location where the revenue is generated. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geographic areas | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
U.S. and Canada | | $ | 11,525,085 | | | $ | 14,774,924 | | | $ | 20,001,396 | |
Others | | | 650,365 | | | | 760,995 | | | | 1,123,749 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 12,175,450 | | | $ | 15,535,919 | | | $ | 21,125,145 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| D. | Major Customers |
|
| | A major customer is identified as the party that accounts for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales in any given year. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | % of | | | | | | | % of | | | | | | | % of | |
Customers | | Amount | | | net sale | | | Amount | | | net sale | | | Amount | | | net sale | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
Customer A | | $ | 2,895,828 | | | | 13 | | | $ | 3,652,541 | | | | 13 | | | $ | 4,065,553 | | | | 12 | |
Customer B | | | 3,680,731 | | | | 17 | | | | 3,533,487 | | | | 13 | | | | 3,002,669 | | | | 9 | |
Customer C | | | 1,147,536 | | | | 5 | | | | 2,619,265 | | | | 10 | | | | 4,068,676 | | | | 12 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 7,724,095 | | | | 35 | | | $ | 9,805,293 | | | | 36 | | | $ | 11,136,898 | | | | 33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-46
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
28.US GAAP Reconciliation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with “Rules Governing the Preparation of Financial Statements of Securities Issuers” and accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China (“ROC GAAP”), which differ in certain material respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“US GAAP”). Such differences involve methods for measuring the amounts shown in the financial statements, as well as additional disclosures required by US GAAP.
The following is a summary of the material adjustments to net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity, which would be required in reconciling the significant differences between ROC GAAP and US GAAP:
F-47
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
Reconciliation of consolidated net income:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Net income as reported under ROC GAAP | | $ | 425,195 | | | $ | 2,838,716 | | | $ | 4,282,177 | | | $ | 134,914 | |
US GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensated absences | | | (7,000 | ) | | | (1,400 | ) | | | 800 | | | | 25 | |
Compensation | | | — | | | | (341,324 | ) | | | (699,072 | ) | | | (22,025 | ) |
Impairment on long-term investments | | | (212,569 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Embedded derivative | | | (52,891 | ) | | | 236,792 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Realized loss on disposal / conversion of embedded derivative | | | — | | | | — | | | | (84,048 | ) | | | (2,648 | ) |
Adjustment to the gain on disposal of available for sale marketable securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,431 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
Trading marketable securities | | | (5,536 | ) | | | 5,536 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Treasury stock transferred to employee | | | — | | | | (154,342 | ) | | | (192,498 | ) | | | (6,065 | ) |
Equity investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Timing difference | | | (362,521 | ) | | | 630,697 | | | | 398,686 | | | | 12,561 | |
Net income (loss) variance between US GAAP and ROC GAAP | | | 21,855 | | | | (29,515 | ) | | | (8,322 | ) | | | (262 | ) |
Accounting for income (loss) in preferred stock | | | (45,270 | ) | | | 87,291 | | | | (28,885 | ) | | | (910 | ) |
Technology and know-how contributed to a joint venture investee | | | (6,000 | ) | | | (6,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (669,932 | ) | | | 427,735 | | | | (614,770 | ) | | | (19,369 | ) |
Taxation effect | | | 21,774 | | | | (18,571 | ) | | | (260 | ) | | | (8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income under US GAAP | | ($ | 222,963 | ) | | $ | 3,247,880 | | | $ | 3,667,147 | | | $ | 115,537 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Earnings (loss) per share under US GAAP (in dollars) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | ($ | 0.11 | ) | | $ | 1.61 | | | $ | 1.78 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | ($ | 0.11 | ) | | $ | 1.43 | | | $ | 1.52 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 2,008,528 | | | | 2,020,463 | | | | 2,060,474 | | | | 2,060,474 | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock option | | | — | | | | 12,723 | | | | 25,631 | | | | 25,631 | |
2nd Euro convertible bonds | | | — | | | | 233,574 | | | | 176,700 | | | | 176,700 | |
3rd Euro convertible bonds | | | — | | | | — | | | | 156,174 | | | | 156,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 2,008,528 | | | | 2,266,760 | | | | 2,418,979 | | | | 2,418,979 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-48
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
Reconciliation of consolidated shareholders’ equity
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Total shareholders’ equity as reported under | | $ | 26,178,552 | | | $ | 29,698,209 | | | $ | 33,493,043 | | | $ | 1,055,232 | |
ROC GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensated absences | | | (19,700 | ) | | | (21,100 | ) | | | (20,300 | ) | | | (640 | ) |
Compensation | | | — | | | | (341,324 | ) | | | (437,841 | ) | | | (13,795 | ) |
Impairment on long-term investments | | | (212,569 | ) | | | (212,569 | ) | | | (212,569 | ) | | | (6,697 | ) |
Embedded derivative | | | (52,891 | ) | | | 183,900 | | | | 99,852 | | | | 3,146 | |
Available for sale marketable securities | | | (14,201 | ) | | | 2,072,151 | | | | 852,678 | | | | 26,865 | |
Equity investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Timing difference | | | (371,530 | ) | | | 259,167 | | | | 657,853 | | | | 20,726 | |
Net income (loss) variance between US GAAP and ROC GAAP | | | 126,247 | | | | 96,732 | | | | 88,411 | | | | 2,785 | |
Accounting for income (loss) in preferred stock | | | (65,943 | ) | | | 28,885 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Technology and know-how contributed to a joint venture investee | | | (204,417 | ) | | | (210,417 | ) | | | (210,417 | ) | | | (6,629 | ) |
Acquisition of Siliconware Corp. | | | 4,873,500 | | | | 4,873,500 | | | | 4,873,500 | | | | 153,544 | |
Taxation effect | | | 25,428 | | | | 6,858 | | | | 6,598 | | | | 208 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity under US GAAP | | $ | 30,262,476 | | | $ | 36,433,992 | | | $ | 39,190,808 | | | $ | 1,234,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Movements in shareholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Balance at January 1, | | $ | 30,262,476 | | | $ | 36,433,992 | | | $ | 1,147,889 | |
Net income under US GAAP | | | 3,247,880 | | | | 3,667,147 | | | | 115,537 | |
Employee stock bonus | | | — | | | | 471,729 | | | | 14,862 | |
Adjustment for investee companies’ capital reserve | | | 617 | | | | (10,862 | ) | | | (342 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustment on long-term investment | | | (24,869 | ) | | | (144,331 | ) | | | (4,547 | ) |
Change in fair value of available for sale marketable securities | | | 2,383,597 | | | | (1,218,042 | ) | | | (38,376 | ) |
Conversion of Euro convertible bonds | | | — | | | | 307,161 | | | | 9,677 | |
Treasury stock | | | 564,291 | | | | 337,625 | | | | 10,637 | |
Cash Dividends | | | — | | | | (663,066 | ) | | | (20,890 | ) |
Cash dividends for treasury stock held by subsidiaries | | | — | | | | 9,455 | | | | 298 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, | | $ | 36,433,992 | | | $ | 39,190,808 | | | $ | 1,234,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-49
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
The balance sheet accounts under US GAAP is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Current Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 9,017,750 | | | $ | 10,722,351 | | | $ | 337,818 | |
Short-term investments | | | 3,192,840 | | | | 2,143,012 | | | | 67,518 | |
Notes receivable, net | | | 118,531 | | | | 72,083 | | | | 2,271 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 5,311,273 | | | | 5,720,274 | | | | 180,223 | |
Inventories | | | 1,896,966 | | | | 1,977,001 | | | | 62,287 | |
Other current assets | | | 1,383,907 | | | | 1,672,166 | | | | 52,683 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 20,921,267 | | | | 22,306,887 | | | | 702,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term investments | | | 9,245,865 | | | | 8,092,145 | | | | 254,951 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 24,402,271 | | | | 27,188,884 | | | | 856,613 | |
Intangible assets | | | 4,873,500 | | | | 4,873,500 | | | | 153,544 | |
Other assets | | | 2,313,045 | | | | 2,656,829 | | | | 83,706 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 61,755,948 | | | $ | 65,118,245 | | | $ | 2,051,614 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 16,492,085 | | | | 9,250,669 | | | | 291,451 | |
Long-term liabilities | | | 8,813,164 | | | | 16,639,492 | | | | 524,244 | |
Other liabilities | | | 16,707 | | | | 37,276 | | | | 1,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 25,321,956 | | | | 25,927,437 | | | | 816,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 36,433,992 | | | | 39,190,808 | | | | 1,234,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 61,755,948 | | | $ | 65,118,245 | | | $ | 2,051,614 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The significant reconciliation of balance sheet accounts under ROC GAAP to the amounts determined under US GAAP is as follows:
(1) Compensated Absences
Under ROC GAAP, the Company is not required to accrue for unused vacation at the end of each year. However, under US GAAP, unused vacation that can be carried over to the next year has to be accrued for at each balance sheet date to properly match the expense with the period in which the employee provided the services.
F-50
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(2) Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income impact of | | For the years ended December 31, | |
compensation adjustment | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
US GAAP adjustment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Remuneration to directors | | $ | — | | | $ | 57,153 | | | $ | 74,258 | | | $ | 2,340 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee bonuses accrual | | | — | | | | 284,171 | | | | 363,583 | | | | 11,455 | |
Adjustment to fair market value | | | — | | | | — | | | | 261,231 | | | | 8,230 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total employee bonuses | | | — | | | | 284,171 | | | | 624,814 | | | | 19,685 | |
| | �� | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net income adjustment relating to compensation | | $ | — | | | $ | 341,324 | | | $ | 699,072 | | | $ | 22,025 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | December 31, | |
impact of compensation adjustment | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
US GAAP adjustment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Remuneration to directors | | $ | — | | | $ | 57,153 | | | $ | 74,258 | | | $ | 2,340 | |
Employee bonuses | | | — | | | | 284,171 | | | | 363,583 | | | | 11,455 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity adjustment relating to compensation | | $ | — | | | $ | 341,324 | | | $ | 437,841 | | | $ | 13,795 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(i) Remuneration to Directors
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation require a cash remuneration payment to its directors. Under ROC GAAP, such payments are charged directly to retained earnings in the period shareholders approve such payment. Under US GAAP, such cash payments should be recorded as compensation expense in the period when services are rendered.
(ii) Employee Bonuses
Certain employees of the Company are entitled to bonuses in accordance with applicable provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. Employee bonuses are determined at 10% of distributable retained earnings. Distributable retained earnings are calculated as retained earnings after various reserves in accordance with ROC regulations and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and after appropriation for remuneration to directors. Employee bonuses may be granted in cash, shares, or a combination of both. Under ROC GAAP, such bonuses are appropriated from retained earnings in the period shareholders’ approval is obtained. If such employee bonuses are settled through the issuance of shares of the Company, the amount charged against retained earnings is based on the par
F-51
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
value of the common shares issued. Under US GAAP, employee bonus expense is initially accrued at the end of the period when services are rendered, at 10% of the distributable retained earnings. When bonuses are approved by the shareholders in the subsequent year, an additional compensation expense is recorded for the difference between the par value and the fair market value of shares granted to employees. The difference between US GAAP and ROC GAAP in this area would result in adjustments to net income and shareholders’ equity as shown in the above schedules. In 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company resolved to retain the 2002 earnings after setting aside the legal reserve and special reserve and not to pay employee bonuses. In 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company resolved to distribute employee bonuses of NT$284,171 from 2003 earnings. In addition to the adjustments to net income and shareholders’ equity as shown in the above schedules, application of US GAAP on employee bonuses would also result in a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital of NT$4,074 million and NT$4,335 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
(3) Equity Investments
Under both ROC and US GAAP, investments representing at least twenty percent of the voting interest of each investee for which the Company exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies are generally accounted for under the equity method. However, there are the following differences in applying equity accounting under ROC and US GAAP.
(i) Timing difference
Under the equity method, the Company’s proportionate share of the income (loss) of the investee is generally recognized in the year the income (loss) is earned. However, under ROC GAAP, if financial statements of an investee are not sufficiently timely for the Company to apply the equity method currently and such equity interests are below certain materiality threshold, the Company is permitted to delay the recognition of income (loss) until the subsequent year. Under US GAAP, there are no provisions that allow the investor company to delay recognition of its equity in the investees’ income or loss. The US GAAP adjustment deducts the delayed income from subsequent year’s net income and adds it back to prior year to arrive at net income
F-52
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
under US GAAP.
| (ii) | Net income (loss) variance between US GAAP and ROC GAAP |
|
| | The Company’s proportionate share of the income (loss) from an equity investee may differ if the equity investee’s net income (loss) under ROC GAAP differs from US GAAP, resulting differences in the carrying amount of the equity investment reported under ROC GAAP and US GAAP. The differences between ROC GAAP and US GAAP for the equity investees include, but are not limited to, accounting for compensation, joint venture accounting, investment in marketable securities, deferred tax and compensated absences. Such differences would be recognized when the Company sells the equity investment. |
|
| (iii) | Accounting for income in preferred stock |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, when an investment is made in non-accumulative, convertible preferred shares, investment income is recognized for the amount of actual dividends when dividend is declared. Investment loss is recognized to the extent the investee’s net book value is less than the Companies liquidation preference. Under US GAAP, if the preferred shareholders own at least 20% of the voting rights, the investment is accounted for under the equity method. An equity investor recognizes its proportionate share of both the investee’s income and losses. |
|
| (iv) | Technology and know-how contributed to a joint venture investee |
|
| | In 1997, the Company established a joint venture, ChipMOS. Both SPIL and its joint venture partner contributed cash as well as “technological know-how” to the joint venture. The Company contributed cash in the amount of NT$1.4 billion. The technological know-how contributed had not been carried on the Company’s balance sheet and was valued at NT$0.1 billion, a deemed value agreed to by both parties. |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, the Company recognized as initial cost of investment for NT$1.5 billion for cash and the value of know-how |
F-53
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| contributed. The value of know-how was recognized as a deferred gain under other liabilities and was amortized over a period during which know-how transfer was completed and implemented. |
|
| Under US GAAP, generally, an investor initially records its joint venture investment at cost (i.e. the amount of cash contributed or net book value of noncash assets contributed) and a gain should not be recognized on receipt of an interest in a joint venture if some or all of the investors’ interest was received for know-how contributed. Therefore, under US GAAP, the Company initially recorded its joint venture investment at NT$1.4 billion, the amount of cash contributed, and did not recognize the deemed value for know-how contributed. In addition, the excess of the Company’s cost of investment of NT$1.4 billion over the Company’s proportionate share of fair value of ChipMOS’ identifiable net assets is being amortized over a period of 5 years under US GAAP. Effective January 1, 2002, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142 requires that we cease amortization for the difference between the cost of an investment accounted for under the equity method and the amount of underlying equity in net assets of the investee. The difference between the cost of the investment and the amount of underlying equity in net assets of ChipMOS was fully written off in 2002. |
(4) | Taxation Effect |
|
| Under ROC GAAP, a 10% tax on undistributed earnings is recognized as a tax expense in the period when the amounts of undistributed earnings is determined. In addition, the effect of the 10% tax on temporary differences is not recognized for ROC GAAP purpose. Under US GAAP, the 10% tax on undistributed earnings is accrued in the period during which related income is generated and the impact of the 10% tax is measured for both current and deferred tax perspectives. |
|
| Separately, under US GAAP, deferred taxation is recognized for US GAAP adjustments that are taxable or tax-deductible. Such adjustments relate to the equity investment adjustments in preferred stock of Artest and accruals for compensated absences. |
F-54
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(5) | Earnings Per Share (EPS) |
|
| In calculating weighted average number of shares outstanding for EPS purposes under ROC GAAP, employee bonus shares have been treated as outstanding for all periods, in a manner similar to a stock split or dividend. Under US GAAP, employee bonus shares have been considered separately from the stock dividend or split and have been treated as outstanding from the date when they were issued. The numbers of employee bonus shares issued in 2002, 2003 and 2004 were 0 shares, 0 shares and 21,049,700 shares, respectively. |
|
(6) | Marketable Securities |
|
| Under ROC GAAP, marketable equity securities and long-term equity investments in which the Company owns less than 20% of the voting rights of a publicly listed investee company are carried at the lower of cost or market value, and debt securities at cost. The market value of listed stocks is determined by the average closing price during the last month of the accounting period. Under US GAAP FAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, debt and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are to be classified as either trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity securities. Debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and traded for short-term profit are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The fair value of listed stock under US GAAP is generally determined by the closing price at the balance sheet date. For individual securities classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity, the Company performs analysis to determine whether a decline in fair value below the cost is other than temporary. No such impairment has been identified during the periods presented. |
|
(7) | Goodwill Acquired from Merger |
|
| In connection with acquisition of Siliconware Corporation in 2000, the Company recorded net assets and goodwill of NT$5,415, respectively, based on independent appraisal report. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill was amortized on straight-line basis over ten years. Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill and performed the annual impairment analysis using a fair value approach. As of December 31, 2004, the net carrying amount of goodwill was NT$4,874 and no impairment of goodwill has been identified during 2002 to 2004. |
|
(8) | Stock Dividends |
|
| Under ROC GAAP, an issuance of stock dividend is recorded at par with a |
F-55
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| charge to retained earnings. Under US GAAP, if the ratio of distribution is less than 25 percent of shares of the same class outstanding, the fair value of the shares issued should be charged to retained earnings. This different treatment will result in, under US GAAP, a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital of NT$19,268,573 and NT$21,619,660 at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. These adjustments have no effect on shareholders’ equity. |
|
(9) | Impairment of Long-lived Assets |
|
| ROC has newly released an accounting standard to account for impairment of long-lived assets which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending on December 31, 2005 and interim periods within the fiscal year. Prior to the adoption of this new accounting standard, the Company applies US GAAP to evaluate whether long-lived assets are subject to impairment. Under US GAAP, long-lived assets are required to review for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. The estimate of fair value is generally based on quoted market prices or on the best available information, including prices for similar assets and the results of using other valuation techniques. During 2002, certain investees accounted for under the equity method, including ChipMOS Technologies Inc., Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd., and Artest Corporation, have incurred significant losses since our investments and there is no indication of recovery in the near future, we concluded that the impairment loss was other than temporary. Accordingly, we recorded impairment charges totaling NT$212,569 on these long-term equity investments to write off the carrying value of the investments to their fair value. |
F-56
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(10) | Embedded Derivative |
|
| Under ROC GAAP, investment in convertible/exchangeable bond is carried at amortized cost, which is the par value after adjustment by the unamortized premium or discount. Under US GAAP, the convertible or exchangeable option is considered an embedded derivative instrument and must be separated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument if (i) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract; (ii) the contract that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not remeasured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur; and (iii) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be a derivative instrument. The bifurcated derivative would be measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur. Such adjustments to the carrying amount of the embedded derivative would remain part of the carrying amount of that asset until the asset is sold, at which point the entire carrying amount of the embedded derivative would be recognized as the cost of the item sold in determining earnings. If an entity were unable to reliably identify and measure the embedded derivative instrument for separation from the host contract, the entire contract would have to be measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in earnings. |
F-57
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| (11) | Stock-based Compensation |
|
| | The Company has elected to measure stock-based compensation expense using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (APB 25), as interpreted, with pro-forma disclosures of net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share, as if the fair-value method of accounting defined in FAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (FAS 123) were used. FAS 123 establishes a fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. Under the fair-value method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. Had the Company determined the stock-based compensation expense for the Company’s stock options based upon the fair-value as determined by Black-Scholes option-pricing model at the grant date for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company’s net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share would have been as the pro-forma amount indicated as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | ($222,963 | ) | | $ | 3,247,880 | | | $ | 3,667,147 | | | $ | 115,537 | |
Less: Stock compensation expense | | | — | | | | (91,244 | ) | | | (95,870 | ) | | | (3,020 | ) |
Pro forma | | | ($222,963 | ) | | $ | 3,156,636 | | | $ | 3,571,277 | | | $ | 112,517 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Basic earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | ($0.11 | ) | | $ | 1.61 | | | $ | 1.77 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma | | | ($0.11 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | ($0.11 | ) | | $ | 1.43 | | | $ | 1.51 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma | | | ($0.11 | ) | | $ | 1.39 | | | $ | 1.47 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F - 58
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
The fair value of the Company’s stock options used to compute the 2003 and 2004 pro forma net income and earnings per share disclosures is the estimated present value at grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| | | | |
Volatility | | | 59.96% ~67.12 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.70% ~3.04 | % |
Expected holding period | | 3 -5 years |
Dividend yield | | | 0 | % |
No options granted in year 2002.
| (12) | Treasury Stock Transferred to Employee |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, treasury shares transferred to employees are recorded as capital contribution for the cash amount received from the employees. Under US GAAP, in addition to the capital contribution recorded for the cash amount received from the employees, compensation expense would be recorded, for the difference between the shares transfer price and the fair market value of the shares issued at the issuance date, during the period when such transfers were made. |
29.Additional disclosure required by US GAAP
| (1) | Risks and Uncertainties |
|
| | The Company is a provider of subcontract IC assembly and testing services. The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from precision dicing of silicon wafers into individual ICs, mounting and wirebonding ICs to lead frames, and sealing ICs in molded plastic packages. The Company’s other products include a variety of turnkey services, including the grinding of wafers to specified thickness, function testing of packaged ICs, and drop shipment to customers of the IC manufactures. The Company distributes its products on a global basis but mainly to customers in Taiwan of 40% and North America of 57%. The Company’s largest customer accounted for 13% and 12% for 2003 and 2004, respectively, and its five largest customers accounted for 49% and 45% of the Company’s total sales in 2003 and 2004, respectively. |
|
| | In 2003 and 2004, significant portion of the Company’s net operating revenue were denominated in U.S. dollars. On the other hand, in 2003 and 2004, significant portion the Company’s purchase were incurred in U.S. dollars and |
F - 59
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
in Japanese Yen. The Company’s capital expenditures are generally denominated in U.S. dollars and Japanese Yen. The Company did not hedge any portion of the resulting net foreign exchange position and would be affected by the fluctuations in U.S. dollar, the Japanese Yen and other currencies.
Substantially all of the Company’s accounts receivables are due from companies in high technology industries located primarily in Asia and North America. Further, the five largest receivables amounted to NT$2,428,722 and NT$2,481,758 as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Receivables are generally due within 90 days.
Other factors that could affect the Company’s future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from historical results include, but are not limited to, dependence on the highly cyclical nature of both the semiconductor and the personal computer industries, competitive pricing and declines in average selling prices, availability of manufacturing capacity, dependence on raw materials and competition.
| (2) | Impairment of Long-lived Assets |
|
| | Property, plant and equipment are subject to review for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount of an asset may be impaired. Measurement of an impairment loss for assets that the Company expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. Idle assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment held for disposal were NT$131,828 and NT$460,539, respectively. These assets held for disposal consist of die bonder, auto-molding machine, laser marker, die saw and bar code workstation, which were mainly used for production purposes. The factors leading to disposal include, among others, obsolete technology, low efficiency and high repair cost. The Company periodically reviews the status of idle assets and disposes such assets as buyers are identified. The impairment losses on assets held for disposal for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were NT$17,243, NT$131,828 and NT$460,539, respectively. The impairment charge in 2004 |
F - 60
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | was mainly related to the Company’s decision to dispose certain machinery and equipment due to technology phase out and replacement. |
|
| (3) | Maturity of Long-term Liabilities |
|
| | Aggregate maturities for the Company’s bonds payable and long-term loans as of December 31, 2004 are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
Years ending December 31, | | Amounts | |
| | NT$ | | | US$ | |
2005 | | $ | 4,013,376 | | | $ | 126,445 | |
2006 | | | 1,908,058 | | | | 60,115 | |
2007 | | | 8,381,146 | | | | 264,056 | |
2008 | | | 6,352,000 | | | | 200,126 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 20,654,580 | | | $ | 650,742 | |
| | | | | | |
| (4) | Cash and Cash Flow Statement |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, all certificates of deposit are classified as cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less. Summarized cash flow information under US GAAP would be presented as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 8,052,708 | | | $ | 8,766,648 | | | $ | 276,202 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (4,236,201 | ) | | | (8,635,564 | ) | | | (272,072 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 2,408,188 | | | | 1,659,251 | | | | 52,276 | |
Effect on foreign exchange | | | — | | | | (85,734 | ) | | | (2,701 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 6,224,695 | | | | 1,704,601 | | | | 53,705 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | | | 2,793,055 | | | | 9,017,750 | | | | 284,113 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | | $ | 9,017,750 | | | $ | 10,722,351 | | | $ | 337,818 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F - 61
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| (5) | Comprehensive Income |
|
| | Comprehensive income under ROC GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and accumulated other comprehensive income balances as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 are summarized as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Net income | | $ | 2,838,716 | | | $ | 4,282,177 | | | $ | 134,914 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative translation adjustment on equity investment | | | (32,405 | ) | | | (144,331 | ) | | | (4,547 | ) |
Remuneration to directors and supervisors | | | — | | | | (57,153 | ) | | | (1,801 | ) |
Employees’ cash bonus | | | — | | | | (73,674 | ) | | | (2,321 | ) |
Adjustment for unrealized loss on long-term investment | | | 302,780 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Adjustment for investee companies’ capital reserve | | | 617 | | | | (10,862 | ) | | | (342 | ) |
Resale of treasury stock | | | 409,949 | | | | 145,127 | | | | 4,572 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 3,519,657 | | | $ | 4,141,284 | | | $ | 130,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income balances | | $ | 3,278 | | | | ($141,053 | ) | | | ($4,444 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustment on equity investment | | | 15,063 | | | | 15,063 | | | | 475 | |
Adjustment for investee companies’ capital reserve | | | 617 | | | | (10,245 | ) | | | (323 | ) |
Remuneration to directors and supervisors | | | — | | | | (57,153 | ) | | | (1,801 | ) |
Employees’ cash bonus | | | — | | | | (73,674 | ) | | | (2,321 | ) |
Resale of treasury stock | | | 61,643 | | | | 206,770 | | | | 6,514 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | $ | 80,601 | | | | ($ 60,292 | ) | | | ($1,900 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (6) | Employers’ disclosure about pension benefit |
|
| | Additional disclosures under FAS132(R) regarding pension benefits are as follows: |
| A. | Estimated future benefit payments: |
|
| | The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Amounts | |
| | NT$ | | | US$ | |
2005 | | $ | 12,124 | | | $ | 382 | |
2006 | | | 1,804 | | | | 57 | |
2007 | | | 3,091 | | | | 97 | |
2008 | | | 6,723 | | | | 212 | |
2009 | | | 13,251 | | | | 417 | |
Year 2010 to 2014 | | | 184,810 | | | | 5,823 | |
F - 62
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| B. | Contributions |
|
| | The Company expects to contribute NT$ 12,124 to its pension plan in 2005. |
| (7) | Indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others |
|
| | In July 1997, the Company entered a joint venture agreement with Mosel Vitelic, the primarily shareholders of ChipMOS, to establish ChipMOS. Under the joint venture agreement, if ChipMOS requires guarantees of its indebtedness to obtain financing, SPIL and Mosel Vitelic are required to provide these guarantees in the ratios of 30% and 70%, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, SPIL had not provided any guarantees with respect to ChipMOS’s indebtedness. |
|
| (8) | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
| | In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” The statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments that are within its scope as a liability. Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is to be implemented by reporting a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. We adopted the statement in accordance with the pronouncement. The statement had no material impact on our results of operations or financial position. |
|
| | In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF No. 03-06, “Participating Securities and Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” EITF 03-6 is intended to clarify what is a participating security and how to apply the two-class method of computing earnings per share once it is determined that a security is participating, including how to |
F - 63
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
allocate undistributed earnings to such a security. ETIF 03-6 is effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004. As the Company currently does not issue securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the Company, the adoption of this pronouncement had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2004, the EITF delayed the effective date for the recognition and measurement guidance previously discussed under EITF Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-01”) as included in paragraphs 10-20 of the proposed statement. The proposed statement will clarify the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to investments in debt and equity securities, in particular investments within the scope of FASB Statement No. 115,“Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and investment accounted for under the cost method. The Company has evaluated the effect of this proposed statement on its financial position and results of operations and does not expect the adoption of the accounting provision of EITF 03-01 will have a significant impact on the Company.
In September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board reached a conclusion in EITF Issue No. 04-8 pertaining to including contingently convertible debt in fully diluted earnings per share. The Company’s zero-coupon convertible notes, which are convertible into its common stock, will be included in current and prior periods’ fully diluted earnings per share calculation. As the Company currently does not issue contingently convertible debt securities, the adoption of this pronouncement had no impact on our diluted earnings per share.
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, SFAS No. 151 required that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This standard does not effect the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of
F - 64
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” (FAS 123 (R)). FAS 123(R) requires employee stock options and rights to purchase shares under stock participation plans to be accounted for under the fair-value method, and eliminates the ability to account for these instruments under the intrinsic-value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, which was allowed under the original provisions of FAS 123. FAS 123(R) requires the use of an option-pricing model for estimating fair value, which is amortized to expenses over the requisite periods. The requirements of FAS 123(R) were effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has postponed the effective date of FAS 123(R), giving companies more time to develop their implementation strategies. Under the SEC’s rule, FAS 123(R) is now effective for public companies for annual, rather than interim, periods that begin after June 15, 2005. The Company plans to adopt FAS 123(R) beginning in fiscal 2006 and is currently evaluating the various transition methods allowed under FAS 123(R).
In December 31, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-Monetary Assets, an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,” effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 153 requires that exchanges of productive assets be accounted for at fair value unless fair value cannot be reasonably determined or the transaction lacks commercial substance. The Company is currently evaluating the effects on the Company’s financial statements.
F - 65
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
29. | SPECIAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS |
| A. | Significant Transaction Information |
| (1) | Loans to third parties attributed to financial activities: |
|
| | For the year ended December 31, 2004 : None. |
|
| (2) | Endorsement and guarantee provided to third parties: |
|
| | For the year ended December 31, 2004 : None. |
|
| (3) | The ending balance of securities are summarized as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2004 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | | | | | Market value | | |
| | | | | | The relationship of the issuers | | | | shares | | | | | | % of | | per share | | |
Investor | | Type of securities | | Name of securities | | with the Company | | General ledger accounts | | (in thousands) | | Book value | | ownership | | (in dollars) | | |
|
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 177,000 | | | $ | 932,002 | | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 9.50 | | | Note (1-5) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | Sigurd Microelectronics Corp. Company Ltd. | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 35,121 | | | | 617,264 | | | | 24.75 | % | | | 21.32 | | | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 6,760 | | | | 101,712 | | | | 24.14 | % | | | 13.47 | | | Note (2) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 254,863 | | | | 2,995,619 | | | | 28.73 | % | | | 11.59 | | | Note (2) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 57,800 | | | | 1,654,394 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 28.62 | | | Note (1-5) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Preferred stock | | Universal Communication Technology Inc. | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 7,600 | | | | 76,000 | | | | 9.87 | % | | | 10.00 | | | Note (3) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Common stock | | Universal Communication Technology Inc. | | Investee accounted for under the equity method | | Long-term investment | | | 25,375 | | | | 161,894 | | | | 32.95 | % | | | 2.83 | | | Note (1) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation | | Same chairman of the board | | Long-term investment | | | 94,030 | | | | 1,382,794 | | | | 17.44 | % | | | 18.23 | | | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | ThaiLin Semiconductor Corp. Company Ltd. | | — | | Long-term investment | | | 6,691 | | | | 190,512 | | | | 3.15 | % | | | 22.28 | | | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | King Yuan Electronics Co., Ltd. | | — | | Long-term investment | | | 69,738 | | | | 910,270 | | | | 9.08 | % | | | 21.95 | | | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Stock | | Others | | — | | Long-term investment | | | 130 | | | | 3,891 | | | | — | | | | — | | | Note (4) |
F-66
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2004 |
| | | | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | | | Market value |
| | | | | | The relationship of the issuers | | | | shares | | | | | | % of | | per share |
Investor | | Type of securities | | Name of securities | | with the Company | | General ledger accounts | | (in thousands) | | Book value | | ownership | | (in dollars) |
|
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | JPMorgan Fleming Taiwan Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 15,997 | | | $ | 237,051 | | | — | | $ | 14.86 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | JPMorgan Fleming First Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 2,980 | | | | 40,558 | | | — | | | 13.70 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | ABN AMRO Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 26,811 | | | | 391,836 | | | — | | | 14.67 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | ABN AMRO Selected Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 44,388 | | | | 488,295 | | | — | | | 11.03 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | The First Global Investment Trust Duo Li Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 12,420 | | | | 200,000 | | | — | | | 16.22 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | The First Global Investment Trust Duo Li-2 Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 6,370 | | | | 90,230 | | | — | | | 14.25 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Mutual fund | | Fuhwa Bond Fund | | — | | Short-term investment | | | 38,287 | | | | 495,000 | | | — | | | 12.97 | |
| |
Note (1): | The market value is not available, therefore, the net equity per share based on the audited financial statements as of December 31, 2003 was used. |
| |
Note (2): | The market value is not available and recognition of investment income (loss) is delayed until the subsequent year, therefore, the net equity per share as of December 31, 2003 was used. |
| |
Note (3): | The market value is not available, therefore, the redemption price was used. |
| |
Note (4): | Combined amount for individual security less than $100,000. |
| |
Note (5): | The amount has been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
F-67
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(4) Securities for which total buying or selling exceeding the lower of NT$100,000 or 20 percent of the capital stock:
For the year ended December 31, 2004:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | The | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Name of | | relationship | | Beginning balance | | Addition | | Disposal | | Ending balance |
| | | | General | | the | | of the issuers | | Number of | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | ledger | | counter | | with the | | shares | | | | | | shares | | | | | | shares | | | | | | | | | | Gain (loss) | | shares | | |
Investor | | Name of the securities | | accounts | | party | | Company | | (in thousands) | | Amount | | (in thousands) | | Amount | | (in thousands) | | Sale price | | Book value | | from disposal | | (in thousands) | | Amount |
|
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Sigurd Microelectronics, Corp. stock | | Long-term investment | | — | | — | | | 29,174 | | | $ | 520,843 | | | | 2,042 | | | $ | 77,602 | | | | 2,000 | | | $ | 100,746 | | | $ | 35,412 | | | $ | 65,334 | | | | 35,121 | | | $ | 617,264 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | United Microelectronics Corporation bond | | Long-term investment | | — | | — | | | 1,000 | | | | 346,350 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,000 | | | | 364,884 | | | | 346,350 | | | | 18,534 | | | | — | | | — |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited stock | | Long-term investment | | — | | — | | | 41,300 | | | | 1,321,868 | | | | 16,500 | | | | 540,050 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 57,800 | | | | 1,654,394 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation stock | | Long-term investment | | — | | — | | | 67,610 | | | | 1,087,794 | | | | 23,047 | | | | 295,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 94,030 | | | | 1,382,794 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation bond | | Long-term investment | | — | | — | | | 2,950 | | | | 295,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,950 | | | | 295,000 | | | | 295,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | — |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | JPMorgan Fleming Taiwan Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 86,851 | | | | 1,285,000 | | | | 70,854 | | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 1,047,949 | | | | 2,051 | | | | 15,997 | | | | 237,051 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | JPMorgan Fleming First Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,308 | | | | 290,000 | | | | 18,328 | | | | 250,000 | | | | 249,442 | | | | 558 | | | | 2,980 | | | | 40,558 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | ABN AMRO Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110,942 | | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 84,131 | | | | 1,230,000 | | | | 1,228,164 | | | | 1,836 | | | | 26,811 | | | | 391,836 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | ABN AMRO Selected Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 53,506 | | | | 588,000 | | | | 9,117 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 99,705 | | | | 295 | | | | 44,388 | | | | 488,295 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | The First Global Investment Trust Duo Li-2 Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,492 | | | | 290,000 | | | | 14,122 | | | | 200,000 | | | | 199,770 | | | | 230 | | | | 6,370 | | | | 90,230 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | The First Global Investment Trust Duo Li Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,420 | | | | 200,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,420 | | | | 200,000 | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Fuhwa Bond Fund | | Short-term investment | | — | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 38,287 | | | | 495,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 38,287 | | | | 495,000 | |
F-68
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(5) | Acquisition of real estate with an amount exceeding the lower of NT$100,000 or 20 percent of the capital stock: |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Related party as counter party | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Original | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | owner which | | The | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | sold the | | relationship of | | | | | | The bases or | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Relationship | | property to | | the original | | Date of the | | | | reference used | | Purpose and | | |
| | Date of | | Transaction | | Status of | | | | with the | | the counter | | owner with | | original | | | | in deciding the | | status of the | | |
Name of the properties | | transaction | | amount | | payment | | Counter party | | Company | | party | | the Company | | transaction | | Amount | | price | | acquisition | | Other commitment |
|
Construction in progress | | December 2003 | | $ | 354,430 | | | $ | 325,737 | | | Chin-Biau Construction Corporation Ltd. | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $— | | As specified in contract | | For operating use | | Payment made according to construction progress |
Construction in progress | | January 2004 | | | 206,300 | | | | 185,670 | | | Chung-Rui Construction Corporation Ltd. | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | As specified in contract | | For operating use | | Payment made according to construction progress |
Construction in progress | | August 2004 | | | 207,000 | | | | 155,700 | | | Sheng-Hui Construction Corporation Ltd. | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | As specified in contract | | For operating use | | Payment made according to construction progress |
(6) | Disposal of real estate with an amount exceeding the lower of NT$100,000 or 20 percent of the capital stock: |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2004: None. |
(7) | Related party transactions with purchases and sales amounts exceeding the lower of NT$100,000 or 20 percent of the capital stock: |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Description of and | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | reasons for | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | difference in | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | transaction terms | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | compared to non- | | Notes or accounts receivable/payable |
| | | | | | Description of the transaction | | | | related party | | | | % of notes or |
| | | | | | | | | | | | % of net | | | | transactions | | | | accounts |
| | | | Relationship with the counter | | | | | | | | purchase / | | | | Unit | | Credit | | | | receivable / |
Purchase / sales company | | Name of the counter parties | | parties | | Purchase / sales | | Amount | | sales | | Credit terms | | price | | terms | | Amount | | payable |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | Phoenix Precision Technology Corporation | | Same chairman of the board | | Purchase | | $ | 2,875,934 | | | | 18 | % | | Three months | | $— | | — | | Accounts payable $231,044 | | | 13 | % |
F-69
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
(8) | Receivables from related parties exceeding the lower of NT$100,000 or 20 percent of the capital stock: As of December 31, 2004: None. |
|
(9) | Transaction of derivative financial instruments: |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2004: None. |
F-70
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
B. | Related information on investee companies |
|
(1) | Basic information on investee companies: |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Income (loss) | | |
| | | | | | | | Original investments as of | | The Company / majority owned subsidiary owns | | Net income | | recognized by | | |
| | | | | | | | December 31, | | December 31, | | Shares | | % of | | | | | | (loss) of | | the Company | | |
Investor | | Name of investee | | Location | | Main activities | | 2004 | | 2003 | | (in thousands) | | ownership | | Book value | | investee | | Note(5) | | |
|
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Taipei | | Investment activities | | $ | 1,770,000 | | | $ | 1,770,000 | | | $ | 177,000 | | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 932,002 | | | $ | 7,309 | | | $ | 7,309 | | | Note (2-8) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | Sigurd Microelectronics Company Ltd. | | Chu-Tung, Hsin-Chu | | Testing and assembly of integrated circuits | | | 325,395 | | | | 266,031 | | | | 35,121 | | | | 24.75 | % | | | 617,264 | | | | 393,494 | | | | 89,614 | | | Note (1) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | Double Win Enterprise Co., Ltd. | | Ping-Chen city, Tao Yuan | | SMT process and hand insert | | | 152,100 | | | | 169,000 | | | | 6,760 | | | | 24.14 | % | | | 101,712 | | | | 21,121 | | | | 4,410 | | | Note (1) Note (3) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | ChipMOS Technologies Inc. | | Science-based Industrial Park, Hsin-Chu | | Testing and assembly of integrated circuits | | | 2,332,768 | | | | 2,332,768 | | | | 254,863 | | | | 28.73 | % | | | 2,995,619 | | | | 860,557 | | | | 247,238 | | | Note (1) Note (3) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | Taiwan Hi-Tech Corporation | | Science-based Industrial Park, Hsin-Chu | | Plating of IC lead frame | | | — | | | | 186,728 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 493 | | | | 95 | | | Note (1) Note (3) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | British Virgin Islands | | Investment activities | | | 1,976,769 | | | | 1,436,719 | | | | 57,800 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 1,654,394 | | | | (108,446 | ) | | | (108,446 | ) | | Note (2-8) |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd | | Universal Communication Technology Inc. | | Hsin-Chu | | RF IC test | | | 329,750 | | | | 329,750 | | | | 32,975 | | | | 42.82 | % | | | 237,894 | | | | (61,026 | ) | | | (16,225 | ) | | Note (1) |
Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Artest Corporation Company Ltd. | | Sunnyvale, CA USA | | Testing and development of integrated circuits | | | 165,048 | | | | 165,048 | | | | 6,000 | | | | 30.09 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | Note (4) |
Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Taiwan Hi-Tech Corporation | | Science-based Industrial Park, Hsin-Chu | | Plating of IC lead frame | | | — | | | | 46,392 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 493 | | | | — | | | Note (3) Note (4) |
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | Siliconware USA, Inc. Company Ltd. | | San Jose, CA USA | | Sales solicitation, marketing, ordering and collection for sales in North America | | | 68,464 | | | | 68,464 | | | | 1,250 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 61,597 | | | | 16,300 | | | | — | | | Note (6-8) |
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited | | Cayman Islands, British West India | | Investment activities | | | 998,954 | | | | 458,904 | | | | 30,050 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 756,445 | | | | (135,981 | ) | | | — | | | Note (6-8) |
SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited | | Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited | | Suzhou Jiangsu, China | | Designing and manufacturing of transistor and electronic component | | | 997,280 | | | | 457,230 | | | | 30,000 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 755,987 | | | | (135,340 | ) | | | — | | | Note (7-8) |
F-71
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| Note (1): The Company’s investee accounted for under the equity method. |
|
| Note (2): The Company’s majority owned subsidiary. |
|
| Note (3): Recognition of investment income (loss) is delayed until the subsequent year. |
|
| Note (4): An investee accounted for under the equity method of Siliconware Investment Company Ltd., a majority owned subsidiary of the Company. |
|
| Note (5): Amortization of premium or discount is not included. |
|
| Note (6): An investee accounted for under the equity method of SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited, a majority owned subsidiary of the Company. |
|
| Note (7): An investee accounted for under the equity method of SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited. |
|
| Note (8): The amount has been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) | The ending balance of securities held by investee companies: |
|
| As of December 31, 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2004 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Market | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | | | | | | value per | | | |
| | Type of | | | | The relationship of the | | | | shares | | | Book value | | | % of | | | share | | | |
Investor | | securities | | Name of securities | | issuers with the Company | | General ledger accounts | | (in thousands) | | | Note (2) | | | ownership | | | (in dollars) | | | |
|
Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Stock | | Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. | | The Company | | Long-term investment | | | 29,717 | | | $ | 794,184 | | | | 1.41 | % | | | 25.53 | | | Note (3) |
Siliconware Investment Company Ltd. | | Stock | | Others | | — | | Long-term investment | | | 41,055 | | | | 386,464 | | | | — | | | | — | | | Note (1) |
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | Stock | | Siliconware USA, Inc. | | Indirect subsidiary of the Company | | Long-term investment | | | 1,250 | | | | 61,597 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 40.56 | | | Note (2 - 3) |
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | Stock | | SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited | | Indirect subsidiary of the Company | | Long-term investment | | | 30,050 | | | | 756,445 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 25.17 | | | Note (2 - 3) |
SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited | | Stock | | Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited | | Indirect subsidiary of the Company | | Long-term investment | | | 30,000 | | | | 755,987 | | | | 100.00 | % | | | 25.20 | | | Note (2 - 3) |
| Note (1): Combined amount for individual security less than $100,000. |
|
| Note (2): The market value is not available, therefore, the net equity per share as of December 31, 2004 was used. |
|
| Note (3): The amount has been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(3) | Securities for which total buying or selling amount exceeding the lower of NT$100,000 or 20 percent of the capital stock: |
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2004: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Beginning balance | | | Addition | | | Disposal | | | Ending balance | |
| | | | | | | | The | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | relationship | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Name of | | | of the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Gain | | | | | | | |
| | | | the | | | issuers with | | | Number of | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | | | | | | | (loss) | | | Number of | | | | |
| | | | counter | | | the | | | shares | | | Amount | | | shares | | | | | | | shares | | | | | | | | | | | from | | | shares | | | Amount | |
Name of the securities | | General ledger accounts | | party | | | Company | | | (in thousands) | | | (Note 1) | | | (in thousands) | | | Amount | | | (in thousands) | | | Sale price | | | Book value | | | disposal | | | (in thousands) | | | (Note 2) | |
|
SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited | | Long-term investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,550 | | | $ | 389,030 | | | | 16,500 | | | $ | 540,050 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | 30,050 | | | $ | 756,445 | |
Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited | | Long-term investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,500 | | | | 387,890 | | | | 16,500 | | | | 540,050 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,000 | | | | 755,987 | |
F-72
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
| Note (1): Issue new shares which are funded by cash. |
|
| Note (2): The amount has been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
C. | Information of investment in Mainland China |
|
| (1) Information of investment in Mainland China: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The | | | The ceiling of | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | investment | | | investment in | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The | | | | | | | balance | | | Mainland China | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investment | | | | | | | investment | | | | | | | approved by | | | according to | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ownership | | | income (loss) | | | | | | | income (loss) | | | Accumulated | | | Investment | | | Investment | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | held by the | | | recognized by | | | Ending | | | remitted back | | | remittance | | | Commissions, | | | Commissions, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | remittance as | | | Remitted or | | | remittance as | | | Company | | | the Company | | | balance of | | | as of | | | from Taiwan | | | Ministry of | | | Ministry of | |
Name of investee in | | | | | | | | Investment | | | of December | | | (collected) | | | of December | | | (direct or | | | during | | | the | | | December 31, | | | to Mainland | | | Economic | | | Economic | |
Mainland China | | Main activities of investee | | Capital | | | method | | | 31, 2003 | | | this period | | | 31, 2004 | | | indirect) | | | the period | | | investment | | | 2004 | | | China | | | Affairs | | | Affairs | |
|
Siliconware Technology | | Designing and manufacturing | | $ | 949,800 | | | Note(1) | | $ | 427,410 | | | $ | 522,390 | | | $ | 949,800 | | | | 100.00 | % | | ($ | 135,340) | | | $ | 755,987 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 949,800 | | | $ | 1,583,000 | | | $ | 8,198,609 | |
(Suzhou) Limited | | of transistor and electronic | | Note(2) | | | | | | Note(2) | | Note(2) | | Note(2) | | | | | | Note(3) | | | Note(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | component | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Note 1: The Company set up a subsidiary in Cayman Island to invest in Mainland China. |
|
| Note 2: Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into New Taiwan dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the balance sheet date. |
|
| Note 3: The amount has been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
| (2) Material transactions occurred directly between the Company and its Mainland China investee companies and material transactions occurred indirectly between the Company and its Mainland China investee companies via enterprises in other areas: None. |
F-73
| | |
| | MOORE STEPHENS |
| | |
| | CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS |
| | |
| | ![(CHINESE CHARACTERS)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984802.gif) |
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. and subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, all expressed in New Taiwan dollars. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the Republic of China and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of net income (loss) for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, and the determination of shareholders’ equity and financial position as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, to the extent summarized in Note 22.
![-s- Moore Stephens](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984801.gif)
Moore Stephens
March 3, 2005
Taipei, Taiwan
Republic of China
F-74
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan and U.S. Dollars, Except Par Value)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | (Note 3) | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 2) | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 2,818,156 | | | | 88,873 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (Note 17) | | | 282,378 | | | | 146,746 | | | | 4,628 | |
Short — term investments — net (Notes 2 and 4) | | | 437,446 | | | | 2,815,127 | | | | 88,777 | |
Notes receivable | | | 7,522 | | | | 62,205 | | | | 1,962 | |
Accounts receivable — net of allowance for doubtful receivables and sales return allowances of NT$43,180 in 2003 and NT$262,399 in 2004 (Notes 2 and 5) | | | 961,884 | | | | 1,825,845 | | | | 57,579 | |
Receivables from related parties (Notes 2, 5, 7 and 16): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes and accounts — net of allowance for doubtful receivables and sales return allowances of NT$12,823 in 2003 and NT$13,353 in 2004 | | | 1,307,321 | | | | 1,419,319 | | | | 44,760 | |
Others receivable — net of allowance for doubtful receivables of NT$39,606 in 2003 and NT$5,914 in 2004 | | | 679,853 | | | | 31,575 | | | | 996 | |
Other receivable — net of allowance for doubtful receivables of NT$1,679 in 2003 and NT$10,385 in 2004 (Notes 2 and 5) | | | 1,082,700 | | | | 169,680 | | | | 5,350 | |
Other financial assets | | | 339,700 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Inventories — net (Notes 2 and 6) | | | 310,483 | | | | 607,213 | | | | 19,149 | |
Deferred income tax — net (Notes 2 and 15) | | | 184,946 | | | | 590,475 | | | | 18,621 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 16) | | | 365,509 | | | | 121,991 | | | | 3,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Current Assets | | | 7,115,404 | | | | 10,608,332 | | | | 334,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LONG — TERM INVESTMENTS (Notes 2 and 7) | | | 1,288,350 | | | | 663,040 | | | | 20,909 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Notes 2, 8, 11 and 12) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Land | | | — | | | | 530,862 | | | | 16,741 | |
Buildings and auxiliary equipment | | | 2,749,442 | | | | 4,251,564 | | | | 134,076 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 14,529,479 | | | | 22,159,513 | | | | 698,818 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 241,949 | | | | 502,681 | | | | 15,852 | |
Transportation equipment | | | 12,404 | | | | 21,667 | | | | 683 | |
Tools | | | 930,834 | | | | 1,359,212 | | | | 42,864 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 1,238 | | | | 50,574 | | | | 1,595 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total cost | | | 18,465,346 | | | | 28,876,073 | | | | 910,629 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | (10,282,138 | ) | | | (14,451,706 | ) | | | (455,746 | ) |
Construction in progress and advance payment | | | 746,492 | | | | 2,289,058 | | | | 72,188 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Property, Plant and Equipment | | | 8,929,700 | | | | 16,713,425 | | | | 527,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
INTANGIBLE ASSETS — NET (Notes 2 and 9) | | | 45,038 | | | | 102,297 | | | | 3,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee dormitory building — net of accumulated depreciation of NT$41,484 in 2003 and NT$50,611 in 2004 (Note 2) | | | 120,861 | | | | 112,208 | | | | 3,538 | |
Refundable deposits | | | 12,674 | | | | 14,858 | | | | 468 | |
Idle assets | | | — | | | | 27,011 | | | | 852 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Other Assets | | | 133,535 | | | | 154,077 | | | | 4,858 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | 17,512,027 | | | | 28,241,171 | | | | 890,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-75
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan and U.S. Dollars, Except Par Value)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | (Note 3) | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank loans (Note 10) | | | 1,314,045 | | | | 800,593 | | | | 25,247 | |
Notes Payable | | | — | | | | 49,072 | | | | 1,548 | |
Accounts payable | | | 312,045 | | | | 526,003 | | | | 16,588 | |
Payables to related parties (Note 16): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 17,586 | | | | 17,428 | | | | 550 | |
Others | | | 19,757 | | | | 61,031 | | | | 1,925 | |
Payables to contractors and equipment suppliers (Note 16) | | | 166,910 | | | | 312,561 | | | | 9,857 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 560,956 | | | | 916,889 | | | | 28,908 | |
Current portion of long—term liabilities (Notes 11 and 12) | | | 650,090 | | | | 3,026,974 | | | | 95,464 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 3,041,389 | | | | 5,710,551 | | | | 180,087 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LONG—TERM LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long—term bonds payable (Note 11) | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 333,195 | | | | 10,507 | |
Long—term loans (Note 12) | | | 2,161,372 | | | | 4,601,747 | | | | 145,120 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Long—Term Liabilities | | | 3,361,372 | | | | 4,934,942 | | | | 155,627 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income tax — net (Notes 2 and 15) | | | 368,035 | | | | 546,050 | | | | 17,220 | |
Accrued pension cost (Notes 2 and 13) | | | 42,866 | | | | 102,674 | | | | 3,238 | |
Deferred credits | | | 91,785 | | | | 626,196 | | | | 19,748 | |
Guarantee deposits | | | 593 | | | | 1,124 | | | | 35 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Other Liabilities | | | 503,279 | | | | 1,276,044 | | | | 40,241 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 6,906,040 | | | | 11,921,537 | | | | 375,955 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minority Interests | | | — | | | | 3,204,177 | | | | 101,046 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 18) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Notes 2 and 14) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock — NT$10 par value | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Authorized — 970,000 thousand shares | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued — 887,227 thousand shares in 2003 and 2004 | | | 8,872,272 | | | | 8,872,272 | | | | 279,794 | |
Capital surplus | | | 2,097,822 | | | | 2,325,224 | | | | 73,328 | |
Retained earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Appropriated as legal reserve | | | 424,007 | | | | 424,007 | | | | 13,371 | |
Unappropriated earnings (accumulated deficits) | | | (788,093 | ) | | | 1,534,667 | | | | 48,397 | |
Unrealized loss on long—term investments | | | — | | | | (805 | ) | | | (25 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustments | | | (619 | ) | | | (3,634 | ) | | | (115 | ) |
Treasury stock | | | 598 | | | | (36,274 | ) | | | (1,144 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Shareholders’ Equity | | | 10,605,987 | | | | 13,115,457 | | | | 413,606 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 17,512,027 | | | | 28,241,171 | | | | 890,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-76
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan and U.S. Dollars, Except Earnings (loss) Per Share)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (Note 3) | |
NET REVENUES (Notes 2 and 16) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Related parties | | | 3,665,384 | | | | 4,693,771 | | | | 4,847,570 | | | | 152,872 | |
Third parties | | | 2,860,481 | | | | 3,774,894 | | | | 10,020,307 | | | | 315,998 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Net Revenues | | | 6,525,865 | | | | 8,468,665 | | | | 14,867,877 | | | | 468,870 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
COST OF REVENUE (Note 16) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Related parties | | | 3,004,306 | | | | 3,405,646 | | | | 3,236,183 | | | | 102,055 | |
Third parties | | | 3,707,400 | | | | 3,505,392 | | | | 7,508,045 | | | | 236,773 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Cost of Revenue | | | 6,711,706 | | | | 6,911,038 | | | | 10,744,228 | | | | 338,828 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) | | | (185,841 | ) | | | 1,557,627 | | | | 4,123,649 | | | | 130,042 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING EXPENSES (Note 16) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | 326,753 | | | | 295,033 | | | | 295,777 | | | | 9,328 | |
General and administrative | | | 180,396 | | | | 219,101 | | | | 480,596 | | | | 15,156 | |
Marketing | | | 66,898 | | | | 127,990 | | | | 323,300 | | | | 10,195 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Operating Expenses | | | 574,047 | | | | 642,124 | | | | 1,099,673 | | | | 34,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS | | | (759,888 | ) | | | 915,503 | | | | 3,023,976 | | | | 95,363 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-OPERATING INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sales of investments (Note 2) | | | 50,370 | | | | 91,017 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Rental (Note 16) | | | 35,473 | | | | 24,960 | | | | 28,467 | | | | 898 | |
Interest | | | 36,864 | | | | 50,844 | | | | 31,463 | | | | 992 | |
Subsidy income | | | 8,982 | | | | 12,057 | | | | 6,100 | | | | 192 | |
Investments income recognized by equity method — net (Notes 2 and 7) | | | — | | | | 22,364 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment (Note 2) | | | 37,698 | | | | 100,101 | | | | 45,520 | | | | 1,435 | |
Other | | | 9,964 | | | | 36,042 | | | | 163,096 | | | | 5,143 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Non-Operating Income | | | 179,351 | | | | 337,385 | | | | 274,646 | | | | 8,660 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-OPERATING EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss on sales of investments (Note 2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,561 | | | | 207 | |
Interest | | | 241,096 | | | | 237,357 | | | | 257,144 | | | | 8,109 | |
Allowance for loss on short-term investments (Note 4) | | | 168,604 | | | | 24,902 | | | | 52,274 | | | | 1,648 | |
(Forward)
F-77
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan and U.S. Dollars, Except Earnings (loss) Per Share)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Note 3) | |
Investments loss recognized by equity method — net (Notes 2 and 7) | | | 93,199 | | | | — | | | | 29,160 | | | | 920 | |
Impairment loss for long — term investments (Notes 2 and 7) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 264,236 | | | | 8,332 | |
Financing cost | | | 17,108 | | | | 14,623 | | | | 15,369 | | | | 485 | |
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment (Note 2) | | | 640 | | | | 16,283 | | | | 21,447 | | | | 676 | |
Foreign exchange loss — net (Note 2) | | | 60,846 | | | | 93,940 | | | | 141,496 | | | | 4,462 | |
Other | | | 12,887 | | | | 10,776 | | | | 43,278 | | | | 1,365 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Non-Operating Expenses | | | 594,380 | | | | 397,881 | | | | 830,965 | | | | 26,204 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX AND MINORITY INTERESTS | | | (1,174,917 | ) | | | 855,007 | | | | 2,467,657 | | | | 77,819 | |
INCOME TAX BENEFIT (EXPENSE) (Notes 2 and 15) | | | (97,862 | ) | | | 5,550 | | | | 132,599 | | | | 4,182 | |
INCOME FOR MINORITY INTERESTS | | | — | | | | — | | | | (305,151 | ) | | | ( 9,623 | ) |
PRE-ACQUISITION EARNINGS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27,655 | | | | 872 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | | (1,272,779 | ) | | | 860,557 | | | | 2,322,760 | | | | 73,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding of 887,227 thousand shares in 2002, 2003 and 2004 | | | (1.43 | ) | | | 0.97 | | | | 2.62 | | | | 0.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding — retroactively adjusted | | | ( 1.43 | ) | | | 0.97 | | | | 2.62 | | | | 0.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-78
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars, Except Number of Shares)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | CAPITAL SURPLUS (Notes 2 and 14) | | | RETAINED EARNINGS (Note 14) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | UNREALIZED | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unappropriated | | | | | | | CUMULATIVE | | | | | | | LOSS ON | | | | |
| | CAPITAL STOCK ISSUED | | | | | | | Gain on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Earnings | | | | | | | TRANSLATION | | | | | | | LONG-TERM | | | TOTAL | |
| | Shares | | | | | | | Additional Paid-in | | | Disposal of | | | Long-term | | | | | | | | | | | (Accumulated | | | | | | | ADJUSTMENT | | | TREASURY | | | INVESTMENT | | | SHAREHOLDERS' | |
| | (Thousand) | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Properties | | | investments | | | Total | | | Legal Reserve | | | Deficits) | | | Total | | | (Note 2) | | | STOCK | | | (Note 2) | | | EQUITY | |
| | | | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2002 | | | 887,227 | | | | 8,872,272 | | | | 2,084,757 | | | | 6,132 | | | | — | | | | 2,090,889 | | | | 424,007 | | | | (374,200 | ) | | | 49,807 | | | | (687 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,012,281 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss in 2002 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,272,779 | ) | | | (1,272,779 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,272,779 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustment of equity method for long-term investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,057 | | | | 1,057 | | | | — | | | | (7,210 | ) | | | (7,210 | ) | | | — | | | | 598 | | | | — | | | | (5,555 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reversal of gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,132 | ) | | | — | | | | (6,132 | ) | | | — | | | | 6,132 | | | | 6,132 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (47 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (47 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2002 | | | 887,227 | | | | 8,872,272 | | | | 2,084,757 | | | | — | | | | 1,057 | | | | 2,085,814 | | | | 424,007 | | | | (1,648,057 | ) | | | (1,224,050 | ) | | | (734 | ) | | | 598 | | | | — | | | | 9,733,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income in 2003 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 860,557 | | | | 860,557 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 860,557 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustment of equity method for long-term investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,008 | | | | 12,008 | | | | — | | | | (593 | ) | | | (593 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,415 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 115 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 115 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | | 887,227 | | | | 8,872,272 | | | | 2,084,757 | | | | — | | | | 13,065 | | | | 2,097,822 | | | | 424,007 | | | | (788,093 | ) | | | (364,086 | ) | | | (619 | ) | | | 598 | | | | — | | | | 10,605,987 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income in 2004 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,322,760 | | | | 2,322,760 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,322,760 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustment of equity method for long-term investment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 227,402 | | | | 227,402 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 227,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,015 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,015 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (36,872 | ) | | | — | | | | (36,872 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on market value decline of long-term equity investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (805 | ) | | | (805 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2004 | | | 887,227 | | | | 8,872,272 | | | | 2,084,757 | | | | — | | | | 240,467 | | | | 2,325,224 | | | | 424,007 | | | | 1,534,667 | | | | 1,958,674 | | | | (3,634 | ) | | | (36,274 | ) | | | (805 | ) | | | 13,115,457 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-79
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan and U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Note 3) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (1,272,779 | ) | | | 860,557 | | | | 2,322,760 | | | | 73,250 | |
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 2,688,374 | | | | 2,614,137 | | | | 3,353,537 | | | | 105,756 | |
Amortization | | | 129,901 | | | | 52,287 | | | | 104,150 | | | | 3,285 | |
Investment loss(gain) — net | | | 93,199 | | | | (22,364 | ) | | | 293,396 | | | | 9,253 | |
Allowance for loss on short-term investments | | | 168,604 | | | | 24,902 | | | | 52,274 | | | | 1,649 | |
Loss on sales of investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,561 | | | | 207 | |
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment — net | | | (37,058 | ) | | | (100,009 | ) | | | (60,997 | ) | | | (1,924 | ) |
Deferred income tax — net | | | 78,682 | | | | (10,223 | ) | | | (174,527 | ) | | | (5,504 | ) |
Accrued pension cost | | | 6,988 | | | | 16,672 | | | | 22,619 | | | | 713 | |
Deferred credits | | | — | | | | 91,785 | | | | 534,412 | | | | 16,853 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes receivable and accounts receivable | | | (215,841 | ) | | | (579,354 | ) | | | (420,188 | ) | | | (13,251 | ) |
Other receivables | | | (133,663 | ) | | | (1,145,191 | ) | | | 1,630,417 | | | | 51,416 | |
Inventories | | | 6,876 | | | | (145,105 | ) | | | (55,812 | ) | | | (1,760 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (214,406 | ) | | | 206,779 | | | | 286,919 | | | | 9,048 | |
Notes Payable and accounts payable | | | 25,267 | | | | 184,279 | | | | (12,914 | ) | | | (407 | ) |
Other Payables | | | 1,098 | | | | 16,098 | | | | (611,407 | ) | | | (19,281 | ) |
Income tax payable | | | (35,731 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 119,438 | | | | 187,476 | | | | 222,988 | | | | 7,032 | |
Minority Interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | 139,575 | | | | 4,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | | 1,408,949 | | | | 1,550,473 | | | | 7,633,763 | | | | 240,737 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | 157,013 | | | | 396,234 | | | | 146,632 | | | | 4,624 | |
Decrease (increase) in short-term investments | | | (73,600 | ) | | | 630,683 | | | | (1,976,291 | ) | | | (62,324 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 218,757 | | | | 424,644 | | | | 382,177 | | | | 12,053 | |
Long-term investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 869,421 | | | | 27,417 | |
Acquisitions of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term investments | | | (1,271,038 | ) | | | (33,024 | ) | | | (140,788 | ) | | | (4,440 | ) |
Property, plant and equipment | | | (1,963,825 | ) | | | (2,161,675 | ) | | | (7,568,722 | ) | | | (238,686 | ) |
Intangible assets | | | (26,387 | ) | | | (46,205 | ) | | | (89,795 | ) | | | (2,832 | ) |
Employee dormitory building | | | (310 | ) | | | — | | | | (475 | ) | | | (15 | ) |
Decrease (increase) in refundable deposits | | | (43 | ) | | | (338,835 | ) | | | 52,160 | | | | 1,645 | |
Decrease (increase) in other financial assets | | | — | | | | (339,700 | ) | | | 339,700 | | | | 10,713 | |
Cash inflow from acquisition of subsidiary (Note 19) | | | | | | | — | | | | 94,337 | | | | 2,975 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | | | (2,959,433 | ) | | | (1,128,178 | ) | | | (7,891,644 | ) | | | (248,870 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-80
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
(In Thousands of New Taiwan and U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Note 3) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payments on: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank loans | | | — | | | | (718,586 | ) | | | (863,204 | ) | | | (27,222 | ) |
Commercial papers | | | — | | | | (159,427 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Long-term loans | | | — | | | | (352,133 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank loans | | | 965,869 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Commercial papers | | | 159,427 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Long-term loans | | | 1,214,184 | | | | — | | | | 2,784,163 | | | | 87,801 | |
Increase(Decrease) in guarantee deposits | | | 132 | | | | 132 | | | | (584 | ) | | | (18 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | | | 2,339,612 | | | | (1,230,014 | ) | | | 1,920,375 | | | | 60,561 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS | | | 789,128 | | | | (807,719 | ) | | | 1,662,494 | | | | 52,428 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF THE YEAR | | | 1,174,253 | | | | 1,963,381 | | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 36,445 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF THE YEAR | | | 1,963,381 | | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 2,818,156 | | | | 88,873 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax paid | | | 56,766 | | | | 469 | | | | 834 | | | | 26 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid (excluding the amounts of NT$30,549 capitalized in 2003 and NT$34,972 capitalized in 2004) | | | 243,652 | | | | 237,567 | | | | 259,947 | | | | 8,198 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term loans | | | 352,160 | | | | 650,090 | | | | 3,026,974 | | | | 95,458 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit balances of long-term investments presented as part of other receivables from related parties | | | (1,755 | ) | | | 2,336 | | | | 5,429 | | | | 171 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification of property, plant, and equipment into long-term investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 648,248 | | | | 20,443 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification of property, plant, and equipment into other assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36,846 | | | | 1,162 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification of long-term investment into short-term investment | | | — | | | | 218,099 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
PARTIAL CASH PAID FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for acquisition of property, plant and equipment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total acquisitions | | | 1,763,818 | | | | 2,169,835 | | | | 7,633,275 | | | | 240,721 | |
Decrease (increase) in payables to contractors and equipment suppliers | | | 200,007 | | | | (8,160 | ) | | | (64,553 | ) | | | (2,035 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,963,825 | | | | 2,161,675 | | | | 7,568,722 | | | | 238,686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-81
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | GENERAL |
|
| ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (ChipMOS Taiwan) was incorporated on July 28, 1997 as a joint venture company of Mosel Vitelic Inc. (MVI) and Siliconware Precision Industries Co. Ltd. (SPIL). Its operations, which began on August 12, 1997, consist of research, development, manufacturing, testing, and assembly of integrated circuits, LCD and other Flat-Panel Display Driver Semiconductors. ChipMOS Taiwan also provides semiconductor testing and assembly services on a turnkey basis, in which ChipMOS Taiwan purchases fabricated wafers and sells tested and assembled semiconductors to application and system manufacturers. |
|
| On January 12, 2001, the holders of an aggregate of 583,419 thousand common shares of ChipMOS Taiwan executed a Purchase and Subscription Agreement whereby they transferred their shares to ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (ChipMOS Bermuda) in exchange for 58,342 thousand newly issued common shares of ChipMOS Bermuda. The selling shareholders, who previously held in an aggregate 70.25% of the outstanding common shares of ChipMOS Taiwan, thus, became the holders of the entire outstanding common shares of ChipMOS Bermuda. As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS Bermuda owned 70.34% of the outstanding common shares of ChipMOS Taiwan. |
![(FLOW CHART)](https://capedge.com/proxy/20-F/0001145549-05-001031/u99848u9984803.gif)
F-82
| As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan owned 100% of the outstanding shares of both ChipMOS Japan Inc. (ChipMOS Japan) and ChipMOS USA Inc. (ChipMOS USA), 68.04% of CHANTEK ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. (CHANTEK), 30.08% of ThaiLin Semiconductor Corp. (ThaiLin), 56.10 % of ChipMOS Logic TECHNOLOGIES INC. (ChipMOS Logic) and 67.83% of FIRST SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (FST). |
|
| ChipMOS Japan was incorporated in Japan in June 1999, and ChipMOS USA was incorporated in the United States of America in October 1999. The two companies engage in sales and customer services and all the expenses incurred from these activities are charged to current income. ChipMOS Japan began generating revenue in 2000, while ChipMOS USA began generating revenue in 2001. |
|
| CHANTEK was incorporated in Taiwan in May 1989, and is listed on the GreTai Securities Market in Taiwan. It provides semiconductor assembly services for low-density volatile and non-volatile memory semiconductors, consumer semiconductors and microcontroller semiconductors. ChipMOS Taiwan acquired its 34% ownership interest in CHANTEK on September 16, 2002. On April 1, 2004, PlusMOS was merged into CHANTEK in a stock-for-stock merger pursuant to which shareholders of PlusMOS received 1.1 common shares of CHANTEK in exchange for one common share of PlusMOS. The merger was approved by the shareholders of CHANTEK and PlusMOS in December 2003. Upon consummation of this merger, ChipMOS Taiwan became the controlling shareholder of CHANTEK. Under applicable accounting principles, we are required to consolidate CHANTEK subsequent to its merger with PlusMOS. ChipMOS Taiwan increased its ownership in CHANTEK during 2004 and held 68.04% interest as of December 31, 2004. |
|
| ChipMOS Logic was incorporated in Taiwan on January 28, 2004, with ChipMOS Taiwan holding 62.5% interest and ThaiLin holding 37.5% interest. On March 29, 2004, ChipMOS Logic issued additional shares to institutional investors. As a result, ChipMOS Taiwan’s interest in ChipMOS Logic was diluted to 44.44% and ThaiLin’s interest was diluted to 26.67%. ChipMOS Logic is engaged in logic testing services. On April 30, 2004, WORLD WIDE TEST Technologies Inc. (WWT) merged into ChipMOS Logic, with ChipMOS Logic as the surviving entity, in a stock-for-stock merger pursuant to which shareholders of WWT received one common share of ChipMOS Logic in exchange for 10 common shares of WWT. As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan and ThaiLin owned approximately 56.10% and 24.62%, respectively, of ChipMOS Logic. |
|
| ThaiLin was incorporated on May 15, 1996 and is listed on the GreTai Securities Market in Taiwan. ThaiLin is engaged in wafer and semiconductor testing services. On December 31, 2002, ChipMOS Taiwan acquired an equity interest of 41.8% in ThaiLin. As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS held a 30.08% equity interest in ThaiLin. |
|
| FST was incorporated in the United States of America in June 1998 and engaged in IC logic testing services. ChipMOS Taiwan acquired its 67.83% ownership interest in FST on November 1, 2004 and held 67.83% as of December 31, 2004. |
|
| Chantek International Investment Ltd. (Chantek International), a 99.99% owned subsidiary of CHANTEK, was incorporated in Taiwan on June 11, 1998. Chantek International is engaged in investment. |
F-83
| Hua Shen Investment Company (Hua Shen), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ChipMOS Logic, was incorporated in Taiwan on July 24, 1998. Hua Shen Investment is engaged in investment. |
|
2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
| Basis of presentation |
|
| The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ChipMOS Taiwan and major subsidiaries, including CHANTEK, ThaiLin, ChipMOS Logic and FST, in which ChipMOS Taiwan (hereinafter, referred to individually or collectively as the “Company”) holds a controlling interest or voting interests in excess of 50% in accordance with the requirements of ROC Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS No. 7”) and the regulations of the Taiwan Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
| The consolidated total assets were NT$28,239,715 thousand as of December 31, 2004 after the Company consolidated all subsidiaries including aforementioned companies, together with ChipMOS Japan, ChipMOS USA, CHANTEK International and Hua Shen. The difference between consolidated assets for consolidation of all and major subsidiaries are too nominal, thus it was not included in the consolidated financial statement. |
|
| The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with Guidelines for Securities Issuers’ Financial Reporting, Commercial Accounting Law, accounting principles generally accepted in Republic of China (ROC), other relevant laws and regulations. The Company significant accounting policies are summarized as follows: |
|
| Classification in the balance sheet |
|
| A year is used to classify assets/liabilities as current or non-current in the balance sheet. |
|
| Cash equivalents |
|
| Commercial papers acquired under resale agreements with original maturity dates of less than three months are classified as cash equivalents. |
|
| Short-term investments |
|
| Short-term investments are stated at the lower of cost or market value. An allowance of losses is provided when the carrying value of the investments exceeds the total market value with the related provision for losses charged to income for the current year. Any recovery of the market value to the extent of the original carrying value is recognized as income. |
F-84
| Costs of investments sold are determined using the weighted-average method. |
|
| Allowance for doubtful receivables |
|
| Allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based on evaluation of the collectibility of the receivables evaluated based upon the overall financial condition and payment history of the individual customers as well as the age of the receivables. |
|
| Allowances for sales returns and discounts |
|
| Allowances for sales returns and discounts are provided based on the sales returns from the past experience; such provisions are deducted from sales and the related costs of products are deducted from cost of products sold. |
|
| Inventories |
|
| Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual weighted average cost) or market value. Market value represents replacement cost for raw materials and net realizable value for other inventories. |
|
| Long-term investments |
|
| Investments in shares of stock of companies wherein the company exercises significant influence on their operating or financial decisions are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment are initially carried at cost and subsequently adjusted for the proportionate equity of the company in the net income or net loss of the investees. |
|
| The company will discontinue its recognition of its equity in the net loss of the investees when the carrying value of the investment (including advances) is reduced to zero. However, in cases where the company guarantees the obligations or is committed to provide further financial support to an investee company, or if the investee’s losses are temporary and evidence sufficiently shows imminent return to profitability in the foreseeable future, then, the company continues to recognize its share in the net loss of the investees. The resulting credit balances of the long-term investments are presented as part of other receivable from related parties. |
|
| Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating the investees’ financial statements into the functional currency of the company are recorded as cumulative translation adjustments in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. |
|
| Gains or losses on transactions with investee companies wherein the company owned at least 20% of the outstanding common stock but less than a controlling interest are deferred in proportion to ownership percentage until realized through a subsequent transaction with a third party. The entire amount of gains or losses on sales to majority-owned subsidiaries is |
F-85
| deferred until such gains or losses are realized through the subsequent sale of the related products to third parties. |
|
| Other stock investments (listed stocks or stocks traded over the counter) are accounted for using the cost method. These investments are stated at cost fewer declines in market value, which is considered temporary, and a credit is made to an allowance for decline in value with a corresponding debit to shareholders’ equity. The allowance is then reduced for any subsequent recovery of the market value to the extent of the balance of the allowance. However, if the decline in value is considered irrecoverable, the decline in values is recorded as a charge to income. |
|
| Cash dividends are recognized as income in the year received but are accounted for as a reduction in the carrying value of the long-term investments if the dividends are received in the same year that the related investments are acquired. Stock dividends are recognized only as an increase in the number of shares held on the ex-dividend date. |
|
| The costs of investments sold are determined using the weighted average method. |
|
| Property, plant and equipment and non-operating properties |
|
| Property, plant and equipment and non-operating properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major additions, renewals and betterment are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed currently. |
|
| The initial estimate of the service lives of the property, plant and equipment is as follows: Machinery and equipment, 1 to 9 years; buildings and auxiliary equipment, 1 to 55 years; furniture and fixtures, 1 to 9 years; tooling, 1 to 5 years; transportation equipment, 5 to 6 years; and leasehold improvements, 1 to 10 years. The foregoing service lives plus one year to represent the estimated salvage value are used to depreciate the property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method. The carrying value of property, plant and equipment, which were fully depreciated using the foregoing service lives, but are still being used by the Company are depreciated over their remaining estimated service lives. |
|
| Upon sale or disposal of items of properties, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is credited or charged to current income. |
|
| Goodwill |
|
| Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the group’s interest in the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of a subsidiary, associate or jointly controlled entity at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful economic life. |
|
| Goodwill arising on the acquisition of an associate or a jointly controlled entity is included within the carrying amount of the associate or jointly controlled entity. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries is presented separately in the balance sheet. |
F-86
| Intangible assets |
|
| Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the following periods: Technology know-how, 5 years; technology license fee, and deferred charges, 3 to 5 years; bond issuance cost are amortized using the average method. |
|
| Revenue recognition |
|
| Sales are recognized when titles of products and risks of ownerships are transferred to customers, primarily upon shipment. |
|
| Pension costs |
|
| Pension costs are recorded based on actuarial calculations. Unrecognized net transition obligation is amortized over 15 years. |
|
| Income tax |
|
| The Company adopts inter-period income tax allocation method. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for the tax effects of deductible temporary differences, unused tax credits, and operating loss carry forwards and those of taxable temporary differences are recognized as deferred income tax liabilities. Valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets that are not certain to be realized. A deferred tax asset or liability is classified as current or non-current based on the classification of the related asset or liability. However, if a deferred asset or liability cannot be related to an asset or liability in the financial statements, then it is classified as current or non-current based on the expected reversal dates of the temporary difference. |
|
| Any tax credit arising from the purchase of machinery, equipment and technology, research and development expenditures, personnel training, investments in important technology-based enterprise are recognized by the flow-through method. |
|
| Adjustments of prior years’ tax liabilities are added to or deducted from the current year’s tax provision. |
|
| Income taxes (10%) on unappropriated earnings generated are recorded as expense in the year when the stockholders have effectively resolved that earnings shall be retained. |
F-87
| Derivative financial instruments |
|
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (forward contracts), entered into for purposes other than trading, are recorded as follows: the differences in the New Taiwan dollar amounts translated using the spot rates as of the contract date and the amounts translated using the contracted forward rates are amortized over the terms of the forward contracts using the straight-line method. At the balance sheet dates, the receivables or payables arising from forward contracts are restated using the prevailing spot rates and the resulting differences are recognized in income. Also, the receivables and payables related to the forward contract are netted and the resulting net amount is presented as either an asset or liability. |
|
| The aggregate amount of the foreign currency to be acquired or sold under European option contracts, entered into as hedge of anticipated transactions, is not recorded as assets or liabilities. The amounts received on options written and the amounts paid on options purchased are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the contract. The gains arising from the exercise of the options or the losses arising from options not exercised are recognized as adjustments to the carrying values when the hedged transaction occurs. |
|
| Foreign-currency transactions |
|
| Foreign-currency transactions, except derivative financial instruments, are recorded in New Taiwan dollars at the rates of exchange in effect when the transactions occur. Gains or losses resulting from the application of different foreign exchange rates when cash in foreign currency is converted into New Taiwan dollars, or when foreign-currency receivables or payables are settled, are credited or charged to income in the year of conversion or settlement. On the balance sheet dates, the balances of foreign-currency assets and liabilities are restated at the prevailing exchange rates and the resulting differences are charged to current income except those foreign currency denominated investments in shares of stock where such differences are accounted for as translation adjustments under stockholders’ equity. |
|
| Reclassifications |
|
| Certain accounts in 2002 and 2003 have been reclassified to conform to 2004 classifications. |
|
3. | TRANSLATION INTO U.S. DOLLAR AMOUNTS |
|
| The Company maintains its accounts and expresses its consolidated financial statements in New Taiwan dollars. For convenience purposes, U.S. dollar amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been translated from New Taiwan dollars at the mid-price of the USD as quoted by Bank of Taiwan as of December 31, 2004, which was NT$31.71 to US$1.00. The convenience translations should not be construed as representations that the New Taiwan dollar amounts have been, or could in the future be, converted into U.S. dollars at this or any other rate of exchange. |
F-88
4. | SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Stocks | | | 478,810 | | | | 494,593 | | | | 15,597 | |
Open-ended funds | | | 118,172 | | | | 2,570,442 | | | | 81,061 | |
Corporate bonds | | | 33,970 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Allowance for loss on short-term investments | | | (193,506 | ) | | | (249,908 | ) | | | (7,881 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 437,446 | | | | 2,815,127 | | | | 88,777 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market value | | | 437,446 | | | | 2,817,587 | | | | 88,855 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| The market value of open-ended funds is based on the market price at year-end. During 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan sold its investment in common stock of ProMOS Technologies Inc. (ProMOS) at a gain of NT$10,316 thousand and later acquired 7,559 thousand shares of ProMOS at NT$104,173 thousand. |
|
| As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan held 7,780 thousand (2003: 13,396 thousand) shares of common stock of MVI 7,559 thousand shares of common stock of ProMOS and ChipMOS Logic held 1,357 thousand shares of common stock of SPIL. |
|
| The investment in corporate bonds is Kolin Euro Convertible bonds with a par value of USD 1,000 thousand (NT$ 33,750 thousand) in 2003. |
|
5. | ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL RECEIVABLES |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of year | | | 30,000 | | | | 44,856 | | | | 97,288 | | | | 3,068 | |
Additions | | | 25,821 | | | | 52,432 | | | | 194,763 | | | | 6,143 | |
Write offs | | | (10,965 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of year | | | 44,856 | | | | 97,288 | | | | 292,051 | | | | 9,211 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-89
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Finished goods | | | 5,829 | | | | 25,876 | | | | 816 | |
Work in process | | | 141,300 | | | | 155,501 | | | | 4,904 | |
Raw materials | | | 204,900 | | | | 536,910 | | | | 16,932 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 352,029 | | | | 718,287 | | | | 22,652 | |
Less — allowance for losses | | | (41,546 | ) | | | (111,074 | ) | | | (3,503 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 310,483 | | | | 607,213 | | | | 19,149 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| The changes in the inventory valuation allowance are summarized as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of year | | | 100,933 | | | | 86,608 | | | | 41,546 | | | | 1,310 | |
Additions | | | — | | | | — | | | | 150,231 | | | | 4,738 | |
Write offs | | | (14,325 | ) | | | (45,062 | ) | | | (67,002 | ) | | | (2,113 | ) |
| | | — | | | | — | | | | (13,701 | ) | | | (432 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of year | | | 86,608 | | | | 41,546 | | | | 111,074 | | | | 3,503 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-90
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | Carrying | | | % of | | | Carrying | | | % of | |
| | Value | | | Ownership | | | Value | | | Ownership | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | US$ | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Equity method: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS Japan | | | (530 | ) | | | 100 | | | | 179 | | | | 6 | | | | 100 | |
ChipMOS USA | | | (6,883 | ) | | | 100 | | | | (1,984 | ) | | | (63 | ) | | | 100 | |
PlusMOS Inc. (PlusMOS) | | | 83,358 | | | | 25 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
CHANTEK | | | 80,696 | | | | 34 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
ThaiLin | | | 707,174 | | | | 36 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Advanced Micro Chip Technology Co., Ltd. (AMCT) | | | 28,272 | | | | 31 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Ultima Technology Corp. (Ultima Technology) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 374,625 | | | | 11,814 | | | | 30 | |
Chantek International | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,588 | | | | 618 | | | | 100 | |
Hua Shen | | | — | | | | — | | | | 922 | | | | 29 | | | | 100 | |
Cost method: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
G-Link Technology Corp., Taiwan | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,709 | | | | 306 | | | | 2 | |
DigiMedia Technology Co., Ltd. | | | — | | | | — | | | | 81,480 | | | | 2,569 | | | | 19 | |
Best Home Corp. Ltd. (Best Home) | | | 89,850 | | | | 19 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19 | |
Sun Fund Securities Ltd. (Sun Fund) | | | 299,000 | | | | 17 | | | | 165,950 | | | | 5,233 | | | | 17 | |
CDIB High Tech Investment Inc. (CDIB) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,000 | | | | 284 | | | | 2 | |
Vigour Technology Corp. (Vigour) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | |
Integrated Silicon Solution Inc. | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,587 | | | | 50 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,280,937 | | | | | | | | 661,056 | | | | 20,846 | | | | | |
Credit balances of long-term investments (presented as part of other receivables from related parties) (Note 16) | | | 7,413 | | | | | | | | 1,984 | | | | 63 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,288,350 | | | | | | | | 663,040 | | | | 20,909 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The equity in net income or loss of investee companies which is based on audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
ChipMOS Japan | | | 791 | | | | 445 | | | | 704 | | | | 22 | |
ChipMOS USA | | | 1,011 | | | | 1,776 | | | | 4,584 | | | | 145 | |
PlusMOS | | | (1,712 | ) | | | 32,386 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ThaiLin | | | (2,368 | ) | | | 29,127 | | | | — | | | | — | |
CHANTEK | | | (90,921 | ) | | | (36,618 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
AMCT | | | — | | | | (4,752 | ) | | | (24,953 | ) | | | (787 | ) |
Hua Shen | | | — | | | | — | | | | (84 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Chantek International | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,411 | ) | | | (298 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (93,199 | ) | | | 22,364 | | | | (29,160 | ) | | | (920 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-91
| Certain changes on the shareholders’ equity of investee companies result in the adjustments on ChipMOS Taiwan’s equity according to its ownership to the respective accounts, which in 2003 decreased unappropriated earnings by NT$593 thousand and in 2003 and 2004 increased capital surplus by NT$12,008 thousand and NT$227,402 thousand respectively. |
|
| CHANTEK sold 3,846 thousand shares of AMCT during the year. The gain from disposal of each investment was NT$8,803 thousand. |
|
| In October 2004 AMCT was liquidated. |
|
| The difference between the costs of the investment and ChipMOS Taiwan’s proportionate share in the net assets of the investees at the date of acquisition is amortized using the straight-line method over five years. |
|
| In 2003, ChipMOS Taiwan reclassified its investment in Ultima Electronics Corp. (Ultima) from long-term investments to short-term investments, which were revalued at lower of cost or market value at transferal. |
|
| In 2004, Sun Fund and CDIB reduced their issued capital by 17% and 50% respectively. A loss of NT$49,833 thousand was recognized in respect of the reduction in capital in Sun Fund. The investments of NT$9,000 thousand were returned to ThaiLin in respect of the reduction in capital in CDIB. |
|
| Impairment losses of NT$89,850 thousand, NT$83,217 thousand and NT$41,336 thousand have been recognized in 2004 in respect of investments in Best Home, Sun Fund and Vigour. |
|
| On May 5, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan acquired a 30% interest in Ultima Technology for US$11,250 thousand (NT$374,625 thousand). In accordance with ROC SFAS 5, ChipMOS Taiwan deferred its recognition of the proportionate share of income (loss) of Ultima Technology to the subsequent year. |
|
| The summarized financial information for equity investees is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
ChipMOS USA: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | 2,214 | | | | 3,021 | | | | 95 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | 7,491 | | | | 9,333 | | | | 294 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 16,207 | | | | 14,323 | | | | 203 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 381 | | | | 16 | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS Japan: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | 5,689 | | | | 5,324 | | | | 168 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | 654 | | | | 1,280 | | | | 40 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 6,882 | | | | 6,425 | | | | 203 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(Forward)
F-92
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
PlusMOS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | 496,625 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | 125,405 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 282,689 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 5,911 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
CHANTEK: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | 486,134 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | 1,202,037 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 865,308 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 287,963 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
ThaiLin: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | 757,823 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | 1,938,859 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 586,527 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 90,995 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
AMCT: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | 42,165 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | 91,007 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 49,928 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 2,016 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Hua Shen: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | — | | | | 3,900 | | | | 123 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Chantek International: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | — | | | | 26,359 | | | | 831 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | — | | | | 103 | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
ChipMOS USA: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 22,864 | | | | 36,765 | | | | 1,159 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 22,864 | | | | 36,765 | | | | 1,159 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 1,776 | | | | 4,584 | | | | 145 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
ChipMOS Japan: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 11,851 | | | | 15,212 | | | | 480 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 11,851 | | | | 15,212 | | | | 480 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 445 | | | | 704 | | | | 22 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(Forward)
F-93
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
PlusMOS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 2,089,052 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | 1,799,229 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 289,823 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 129,546 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
CHANTEK: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 882,468 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | 956,362 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross loss | | | (73,894 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | (132,963 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
ThaiLin: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 923,173 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | 776,358 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 146,815 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 54,187 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
AMCT: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 104,409 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | 115,835 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross loss | | | (11,426 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | (16,466 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Hua Shen: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | — | | | | 24,522 | | | | 773 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross loss | | | — | | | | (24,521 | ) | | | (773 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | (25,442 | ) | | | (802 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Chantek International: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | — | | | | 17,301 | | | | 546 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | — | | | | 26,501 | | | | 836 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross loss | | | — | | | | (9,200 | ) | | | (290 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | (11,189 | ) | | | (353 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
8. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET |
|
| Accumulated depreciation consists of the following: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Buildings and auxiliary equipment | | | 963,720 | | | | 1,315,342 | | | | 41,480 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 8,361,731 | | | | 11,840,591 | | | | 373,402 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 188,884 | | | | 305,968 | | | | 9,649 | |
Transportation equipment | | | 7,837 | | | | 13,944 | | | | 440 | |
Tools | | | 758,728 | | | | 969,819 | | | | 30,584 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 1,238 | | | | 6,042 | | | | 191 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 10,282,138 | | | | 14,451,706 | | | | 455,746 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2004, certain of the above buildings and machinery were mortgaged as |
F-94
| collateral for the bonds and the long-term loans (Notes 11 and 12). |
9. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS - NET |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Cost | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Technology knowhow | | | 750,000 | | | | 750,000 | | | | 23,652 | |
Technology license fee | | | 41,890 | | | | 67,081 | | | | 2,115 | |
Software | | | 109,089 | | | | 173,899 | | | | 5,484 | |
Bond issuance costs | | | 57,205 | | | | 28,526 | | | | 900 | |
Goodwill | | | — | | | | 2,099 | | | | 67 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 958,184 | | | | 1,021,605 | | | | 32,218 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Technology knowhow | | | (750,000 | ) | | | (750,000 | ) | | | (23,652 | ) |
Technology license fee | | | (19,953 | ) | | | (51,480 | ) | | | (1,623 | ) |
Software | | | (94,308 | ) | | | (102,459 | ) | | | (3,231 | ) |
Bond issuance costs | | | (48,885 | ) | | | (15,369 | ) | | | (485 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | (913,146 | ) | | | (919,308 | ) | | | (28,991 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Carrying value | | | 45,038 | | | | 102,297 | | | | 3,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Pursuant to a Joint Venture Agreement entered into between MVI and SPIL on July 28, 1997, MVI and SPIL contributed, as payment for their subscription to shares of stock of ChipMOS Taiwan, technologies related to testing and packaging integrated circuits at an agreed valuation of NT$750,000 thousand. |
|
10. | BANK LOANS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Unsecured loan: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Working capital loans | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NT$50,000 thousand, repayable by January 2005, annual interest at 1.65 - 1.9% | | | — | | | | 50,000 | | | | 1,576 | |
NT$52,000 thousand, repayable by April 2005, annual interest at 4.595% | | | — | | | | 52,000 | | | | 1,640 | |
NT$60,000 thousand, repayable by March 2005, annual interest at 4.5% | | | — | | | | 60,000 | | | | 1,892 | |
NT$65,000 thousand, repayable by October 2005, annual interest at 1.5% | | | — | | | | 65,000 | | | | 2,050 | |
NT$755,000 thousand, repayable by March 2004, annual interest at 1.65%~3.00% | | | 755,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
F-95
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Loan for imports of machinery | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EUR$72 thousand and JPY$1,749,463 repayable by September 2004, annual interest at 0.57%~2.87% | | | 559,045 | | | | — | | | | — | |
JPY$1,826,874 thousand, repayable by June 2005, annual interest at 0.5986% - 1.1628% | | | — | | | | 565,052 | | | | 17,819 | |
EUR$82 thousand repayable by April 2005, annual interest at 2.71% - 2.8052% | | | — | | | | 3,541 | | | | 112 | |
Secured loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Working capital loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NT$5,000 thousand, repayable by October 2005, annual interest at 1.5%, collateralized by land and buildings (Note 12) | | | — | | | | 5,000 | | | | 158 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,314,045 | | | | 800,593 | | | | 25,247 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Unused credit lines as of December 31, 2004 aggregated approximately NT$2,169,593 thousand, which will expire from January 2005 to October 2005. |
|
11. | LONG-TERM BONDS PAYABLE |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Long-Term Bonds Payable | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 37,843 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible bonds | | | — | | | | 333,195 | | | | 10,507 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: current portion | | | — | | | | 1,200,000 | | | | (37,843 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,200,000 | | | | 333,195 | | | | 10,507 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| On August 3, 2004, ThaiLin issued a NT$1,000,000 thousand secured convertible bonds due on August 3, 2009 with zero interest rates. Those bonds have been convertible since September 3, 2004 at conversion price NT$17.1 for each share. As of December 31, 2004, NT$574,900 thousand of the bonds had been converted. The compensation interest rates applicable are as follows: |
|
| Redemption within one month to three years: 1.50% per annum; |
|
| Redemption after three years until 40 days before the due date: Nil |
|
| ChipMOS Taiwan on January 26, 2000 issued secured bonds with face value of NT$1,200,000 thousand. Those bonds are due on January 26, 2005 and bear annual interest at 5.95% that are payable annually. |
F-96
| Under the guaranteed facility agreement for the long-term bonds, ChipMOS Taiwan is required to maintain certain financial ratios. |
|
| On June 8, 2004, a supplemental agreement was signed between ChipMOS Taiwan and Taishin International Commercial Bank to remove the restrictive covenant pursuant to which ChipMOS Taiwan was required to ensure that MVI and SPIL maintain a percentage of direct or indirect ownership in ChipMOS Taiwan of at least 28.8% and 18%, respectively and pursuant to which ChipMOS Taiwan was required to notify the banks in writing and get approval in advance in cases where additional shares were issued in connection with an initial public offering of its shares, if either MVI’s or SPIL’s ownership would have dropped below the respective percentage level as a result of the initial public offering. |
|
| ChipMOS Taiwan was in compliance with the financial ratio requirements as of December 31, 2004. |
|
| As of December 31, 2004, certain buildings with an aggregate net book value of NT$438,761 thousand was mortgaged as collateral for the long-term bonds. |
|
12. | LONG-TERM LOANS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 |
| | 2003 | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Bank loans, collateralized by equipment and building, repayable semi-annually from November 2000 to December 2004, interest at floating rate (5.375% as of December 31) | | | 276,500 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Bank loans, repayable quarterly from November 2004 to February 2007, interest at fixed rate (3.4% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 270,000 | | | | 8,515 | |
Bank loans, repayable semi-annually from March 2005 to September 2006, interest at floating rate (3.3% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 200,000 | | | | 6,307 | |
(Forward)
F-97
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 |
| | 2003 | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Syndicated bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable semi-annually from September 2004 to September 2007, interest at floating rate (4.275% and 4.375% as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively) | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,714,280 | | | | 54,061 | |
Syndicated bank loans, repayable semi-annually from September 2004 to September 2007, interest at floating rate (4.40% and 4.50% as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively) | | | 500,000 | | | | 428,570 | | | | 13,515 | |
Syndicated bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly from June 2004 to March 2008, interest at floating rate (3.7% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 1,845,000 | | | | 58,184 | |
Research and development subsidy loan, collateralized by time deposits in amounts of NT42,450 thousand, repayable quarterly from July 2003 to July 2006, with zero interest rate | | | 34,962 | | | | 18,522 | | | | 584 | |
Research and development subsidy loan, repayable quarterly from January 2006 to April 2010, interest at fixed rate (1% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 29,120 | | | | 918 | |
Bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly from December 2004 to September 2007, interest at floating rate (3.65% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 180,000 | | | | 5,676 | |
Bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly form August 2005 to August 2009, interest at floating rate. (4% and 3.7% as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively) | | | — | | | | 35,695 | | | | 1,126 | |
General loans collateralized repayable quarterly from August 2005 to August 2009, interest at floating rate (3.7%as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 58,715 | | | | 1,852 | |
Bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly form August 2005 to August 2009, interest at floating rate. (3.7% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 285,000 | | | | 8,988 | |
General loans due and deferred for 5 years, repayable in July 2009, interest at floating rate (3.7% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 43,500 | | | | 1,372 | |
Bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly from April 2001 to January 2006, interest at floating rate (5.655% and 5.755% as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively) | | | — | | | | 17,500 | | | | 551 | |
(Forward)
F-98
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 |
| | 2003 | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly from February 2005 to November 2008, interest at floating rate (2.8% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 350,000 | | | | 11,037 | |
Syndicated bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly April 2005 to January 2011, interest at floating rate (3.088% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 620,000 | | | | 19,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Syndicated bank loans collateralized by equipment, repayable quarterly December 2003 to September 2008, interest at floating rate (3.088% as of December 31, 2004) | | | — | | | | 320,417 | | | | 10,106 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
General loans, repayable from April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2007. Payable in 42 monthly installments, commencing on October 1, 2003. Effective interest rate was 9.658% | | | — | | | | 12,402 | | | | 391 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,811,462 | | | | 6,428,721 | | | | 202,735 | |
Less: current portion | | | (650,090 | ) | | | (1,826,974 | ) | | | (57,615 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,161,372 | | | | 4,601,747 | | | | 145,120 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
According to the agreement signed by ChipMOS Taiwan with Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) in respect to the research and development subsidy loan, ChipMOS Taiwan is obligated to pay the IDB a certain percentage (2%) of sales of the product developed for 3 years after completing the project.
Under the syndicated bank loan facility agreement, ChipMOS Taiwan is required to:
(1) | Ensure that ChipMOS Bermuda and SPIL maintain a percentage of direct ownership in ChipMOS Taiwan of at least 50% of outstanding shares and have control over its operation. |
(2) | Maintain certain financial ratios. |
|
| ChipMOS Taiwan was in compliance with the financial ratio requirements as of December 31, 2004. |
As of December 31, 2004, certain fixed assets and idle assets with an aggregate net book value of NT$7,950,502 thousand and NT$14,406 thousand and time deposits in an aggregate amount of NT$54,120 thousand were mortgaged as collateral for the long-term and short- term loans.
Future minimum principal payments under the Company long-term loans as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
F-99
| | | | | | | | |
| | Amount | |
| | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
2005 | | | 1,826,974 | | | | 57,615 | |
2006 | | | 2,012,415 | | | | 63,463 | |
2007 | | | 1,746,467 | | | | 55,076 | |
2008 | | | 516,087 | | | | 16,275 | |
2009 and thereafter | | | 326,778 | | | | 10,306 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 6,428,721 | | | | 202,735 | |
| | | | | | |
13. | PENSION PLAN |
|
| ChipMOS Taiwan, ThaiLin, ChipMOS Logic and CHANTEK have established defined benefit pension plans for all of their regular employees, which provide benefits based on the length of service and the average monthly salary for the six months period immediately before retirement. |
|
| ChipMOS Taiwan, ThaiLin, ChipMOS Logic and CHANTEK make monthly contributions, equal to 2% of salaries and wages, to a pension fund that is administered by a pension fund monitoring committee and deposited in its name in the Central Trust of China in the Republic of China. |
|
| Certain pension information is as follows: |
|
| a. Net pension cost |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Service cost | | | 21,323 | | | | 32,102 | | | | 56,065 | | | | 1,768 | |
Interest cost | | | 3,529 | | | | 4,275 | | | | 8,038 | | | | 253 | |
Projected return on plan assets | | | (2,802 | ) | | | (2,581 | ) | | | (5,304 | ) | | | (167 | ) |
Amortization | | | 27 | | | | 689 | | | | (143 | ) | | | (5 | ) |
Unrecognized net (gain)/loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | 655 | | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 22,077 | | | | 34,485 | | | | 59,311 | | | | 1,870 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| b. | Reconciliation of the fund status of the plan and accrued pension cost |
F-100
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested benefit obligation | | | — | | | | — | | | | (374 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Nonvested accumulated benefit obligation | | | (55,647 | ) | | | (81,658 | ) | | | (169,835 | ) | | | (5,356 | ) |
Additional benefits based on future salaries | | | (66,501 | ) | | | (86,321 | ) | | | (143,915 | ) | | | (4,538 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Projected benefit obligation | | | (122,148 | ) | | | (167,979 | ) | | | (314,124 | ) | | | (9,906 | ) |
Plan assets at fair value | | | 66,005 | | | | 84,821 | | | | 174,349 | | | | 5,498 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets | | | (56,143 | ) | | | (83,158 | ) | | | (139,775 | ) | | | (4,408 | ) |
Unrecognized net transition obligation | | | 511 | | | | 484 | | | | 3,043 | | | | 96 | |
Unrecognized net loss | | | 29,438 | | | | 39,808 | | | | 34,058 | | | | 1,074 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrued pension cost | | | (26,194 | ) | | | (42,866 | ) | | | (102,674 | ) | | | (3,238 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
c. Actuarial assumptions
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 |
| | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 |
Discount rate | | 3.5% | | 3.25% | | 3.25% |
Future salary increase rate | | 3.5% | | 3.25% | | 3.25% |
Expected rate of return on plan assets | | 3.5% | | 3.25% | | 3.25% |
d. Changes in pension fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Contributions | | | 15,332 | | | | 17,813 | | | | 55,177 | | | | 1,740 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payment of benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Under ROC Company Law, the capital surplus can only be used to offset deficits, except that capital surplus generated from (1) donations (donated capital) or (2) the excess of the issue price over the par value of capital stock (including stocks issued for new capital and mergers, and the purchase of treasury stock) can be transferred to capital as stock dividends when no deficit remains and shareholders approve such distribution.
ChipMOS Taiwan’s Articles of Incorporation provides that the following may be appropriated, from the accumulated net income after deducting any previously accumulated deficit and 10% legal reserve, subject to shareholder approval: (a) 10% as bonus to employees,
F-101
(b) not more than 2% as remuneration to directors and supervisors, (c) a special reserve, if deemed necessary, and (d) dividends to shareholders.
These appropriations and the disposition of the remaining net income shall be resolved by the shareholders in the following year and given effect in the financial statements of that year.
The aforementioned appropriation for legal reserve shall be made until the reserve equals aggregate par value of ChipMOS Taiwan’s outstanding capital stock. The reserve can only be used to offset a deficit; or, when its balance has reaches 50% of the aggregate par value of the outstanding capital stock of ChipMOS Taiwan, up to 50% thereof can be distributed as stock dividend.
Under the Integrated Income Tax System that became effective on January 1, 1998, ROC resident individual shareholders are allowed a tax credit for the income paid by ChipMOS Taiwan on earnings generated from the effective date. An Imputation Credit Account (ICA) is maintained by ChipMOS Taiwan for such income tax and the tax credit allocated to each shareholder. The maximum credit available for allocation to each resident shareholder cannot exceed the balance shown in the ICA on the date of distribution of dividends.
15. | INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) |
a. A reconciliation of income tax expense — current before tax credits and income tax expense on income before income tax at statutory rate is shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Income tax expense on “income before income tax” at statutory rate | | | (293,729 | ) | | | 213,742 | | | | 674,082 | | | | 21,258 | |
Tax effects of adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Permanent difference | | | 58,879 | | | | (17,042 | ) | | | (19,795 | ) | | | (624 | ) |
Temporary difference | | | (72,383 | ) | | | (9,000 | ) | | | (251,779 | ) | | | (7,941 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) — current before tax credits | | | (307,233 | ) | | | 187,700 | | | | 402,508 | | | | 12,693 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-102
b. Income tax expense (benefit) consists of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) - current before tax credits | | | — | | | | 187,700 | | | | 402,508 | | | | 12,693 | |
Separate and foreign income tax | | | 4,217 | | | | 1,309 | | | | 86 | | | | 3 | |
Income tax credits | | | — | | | | (187,700 | ) | | | (355,923 | ) | | | (11,224 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax for the current year | | | 4,217 | | | | 1,309 | | | | 46,671 | | | | 1,472 | |
Net change of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax credits | | | 119,312 | | | | 48,014 | | | | (70,003 | ) | | | (2,208 | ) |
Temporary difference | | | 77,295 | | | | 8,127 | | | | (128,593 | ) | | | (4,055 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | | 181,633 | | | | (66,405 | ) | | | (560,053 | ) | | | (17,662 | ) |
Loss carry forward | | | (299,558 | ) | | | 41 | | | | 584,122 | | | | 18,421 | |
Adjustment of prior year’s taxes | | | 14,963 | | | | 3,364 | | | | (4,743 | ) | | | (150 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 97,862 | | | | (5,550 | ) | | | (132,599 | ) | | | (4,182 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS Taiwan under Science Park Regulations is entitled to an exemption from ROC income taxes for a period of four years on income attributable to the expansion of its production capacity as a result of purchases of equipment funded by capital increases. Such tax exemption will expire on December 31, 2005.
c. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net current deferred income tax assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss | | | 8,613 | | | | 16,599 | | | | 523 | |
Unrealized loss provision on sales allowance | | | 6,385 | | | | 9,455 | | | | 298 | |
Loss of market price decline and obsolete and slow-moving inventories | | | 10,387 | | | | 27,768 | | | | 876 | |
Tax credits | | | 143,905 | | | | 241,141 | | | | 7,605 | |
Loss carry forward | | | — | | | | 504,365 | | | | 15,906 | |
Others | | | 15,656 | | | | 74,065 | | | | 2,335 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 184,946 | | | | 873,393 | | | | 27,543 | |
Less: valuation allowance | | | — | | | | (282,918 | ) | | | (8,922 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 184,946 | | | | 590,475 | | | | 18,621 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net non-current deferred income tax assets (liabilities): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax credits for investment in machinery and equipment and R&D expenditures | | | 647,607 | | | | 763,336 | | | | 24,073 | |
Loss carry forwards | | | 811,485 | | | | 756,419 | | | | 23,854 | |
Depreciation differences | | | (590,007 | ) | | | (555,627 | ) | | | (17,522 | ) |
Other | | | 3,108 | | | | 140,985 | | | | 4,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 872,193 | | | | 1,105,113 | | | | 34,851 | |
Less: Valuation allowance | | | (1,240,228 | ) | | | (1,651,163 | ) | | | (52,071 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (368,035 | ) | | | (546,050 | ) | | | (17,220 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-103
The rate at which deferred income tax components are measured was 25% as of December 31, 2003 and 2004.
d. Integrated income tax information
ChipMOS Taiwan, the balances of the ICA were NT$94,153 thousand and NT$94,239 thousand as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
ChipMOS Taiwan, the imputation credit allocated to each shareholder shall be based on the balance in the ICA on the date of distribution of dividends. Tax creditable ratio was 6.14% for 2004.
e. The balance and year of expiry of unused investment tax credits and loss carry forwards as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Machinery & | | | R&D | | | Loss Carry | |
Year of Expiry | | Equipment | | | Expenditure | | | Forwards | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
2005 | | | 30,912 | | | | 87,959 | | | | 160,086 | |
2006 | | | 173,613 | | | | 72,947 | | | | 526,362 | |
2007 | | | 337,568 | | | | 60,073 | | | | 412,593 | |
2008 | | | 239,809 | | | | 1,596 | | | | 79,013 | |
2009 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 82,730 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 781,902 | | | | 222,575 | | | | 1,260,784 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The deferred tax assets related to the investment tax credits on R&D expenditures and purchases of machinery and equipment will expire from 2005 to 2008. Under ROC tax regulations, tax credits can be utilized to reduce current income tax obligations only to the extent of 50% of such income tax obligations except in the year when such tax credit will expire, in which case, the entire amount of expiring tax credit may be utilized to reduce the current income tax obligation. However, tax credits generated in the current year have to be utilized before prior year tax credit can be utilized to reduce current year income tax obligations. The foregoing limitation on the utilization of tax credits, the expiry dates of the tax credits, the level of tax credits expected to be generated from future operations and the level of non-taxable income attributable to the four-year income tax holiday on capacity expansion led management to conclude that it is unlikely that these investment tax credits will be fully realized. Loss carry forwards can be used to deduct current income tax obligation up to the extent of taxable income and will be expired after 5 years if not fully utilized by the Company. Accordingly, a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is recognized as of December 31, 2003 and 2004.
F-104
The tax authorities through 2000 have assessed the income tax returns of ChipMOS Taiwan, ThaiLin and CHANTEK, 2001 and 2002, respectively.
According to ROC tax law, unappropriated earnings generated in 1998 and thereafter are subject to a tax of 10% in the year when the shareholders resolve that such earnings shall be retained. The retained earnings (accumulated deficit) of ChipMOS Taiwan as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 were generated during and after 1998.
16. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
The Company engages in business transactions with the following related parties:
| | |
Name | | Relationship |
ChipMOS Bermuda | | A major shareholder |
SPIL | | A major shareholder |
MVI | | An indirect major shareholder |
ChipMOS Japan | | A 100% owned subsidiary |
ChipMOS USA | | A 100% owned subsidiary |
PlusMOS | | A 25% owned investee. It merged with CHANTEK in April 2004. |
ThaiLin | | A 30% owned investee. It became a subsidiary of ChipMOS Taiwan in 2004. |
CHANTEK | | A 68% owned investee. It became a subsidiary of ChipMOS Taiwan in April 2004. |
Ultima | | A 4% owned investee; the chairman of ChipMOS Taiwan was a member of board of directors of Ultima (resigned in June 2003). |
ProMOS Technology Inc. (ProMOS) | | An investee of MVI |
DenMOS Technology Inc. (DenMOS) | | An investee of MVI |
Best Home | | A 19% owned investee; ChipMOS Taiwan is a major shareholder. |
Sun Fund | | A 17% owned investee; ChipMOS Taiwan is a major shareholder. |
ChipMOS Far East Ltd. (Far East) | | A subsidiary of ChipMOS Bermuda |
AMCT | | A 100% owned investee. It was liquidated in October 2004. |
Chantek International | | The chairman of ChipMOS Taiwan is a member of board of directors of Chantek International. |
Mou–Fu Investment Ltd. (Mou-Fu) | | An investee of MVI |
The significant transactions with the aforementioned parties, other than those disclosed in other notes, are summarized as follows:
F-105
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
During the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MVI | | | 2,285,348 | | | | 1,680,986 | | | | 14,274 | | | | 450 | |
Ultima | | | 1,218,265 | | | | 745,562 | | | | — | | | | — | |
PlusMOS | | | 9,010 | | | | 19,642 | | | | 16,751 | | | | 528 | |
ProMOS | | | — | | | | 1,748,326 | | | | 4,231,658 | | | | 133,449 | |
ThaiLin | | | — | | | | 1,722 | | | | — | | | | — | |
CHANTEK | | | — | | | | 469 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Far East | | | — | | | | 234 | | | | 17,845 | | | | 563 | |
SPIL | | | — | | | | 345 | | | | — | | | | — | |
AMCT | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | — | |
DenMOS | | | 152,761 | | | | 496,480 | | | | 567,042 | | | | 17,882 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 3,665,384 | | | | 4,693,771 | | | | 4,847,570 | | | | 152,872 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MVI | | | 8,800 | | | | 4,800 | | | | 4,800 | | | | 151 | |
DenMOS | | | 693 | | | | 922 | | | | 455 | | | | 15 | |
ThaiLin | | | 2,212 | | | | 8,118 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ProMOS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,057 | | | | 443 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 11,705 | | | | 13,840 | | | | 19,312 | | | | 609 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ThaiLin | | | — | | | | 10,571 | | | | — | | | | — | |
DenMOS | | | — | | | | 2,647 | | | | — | | | | — | |
CHANTEK | | | — | | | | 900 | | | | — | | | | — | |
PlusMOS | | | — | | | | 27 | | | | 41 | | | | 1 | |
Far East | | | — | | | | 16 | | | | 4,455 | | | | 140 | |
ChipMOS USA | | | — | | | | 1,343 | | | | 526 | | | | 17 | |
Ultima | | | 305 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
ProMOS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 507 | | | | 16 | |
AMCT | | | — | | | | — | | | | 126 | | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 305 | | | | 15,504 | | | | 5,655 | | | | 178 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMCT | | | — | | | | 4,758 | | | | 10,732 | | | | 338 | |
Far East | | | — | | | | 4,654 | | | | 89,599 | | | | 2,826 | |
PlusMOS | | | — | | | | 522 | | | | — | | | | — | |
MVI | | | — | | | | 12 | | | | 637,089 | | | | 20,091 | |
ChipMOS USA | | | — | | | | — | | | | 149 | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 9,946 | | | | 737,569 | | | | 23,260 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subcontract expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SPIL | | | — | | | | 101,847 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Far East | | | — | | | | 11,804 | | | | 214,127 | | | | 6,753 | |
ThaiLin | | | — | | | | 33,515 | | | | — | | | | — | |
(Forward)
F-106
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
CHANTEK | | | 2,719 | | | | 230 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,719 | | | | 147,396 | | | | 214,127 | | | | 6,753 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Administrative expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MVI | | | 4,550 | | | | 4,387 | | | | 1,950 | | | | 61 | |
Mou-Fu | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,275 | | | | 72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 4,550 | | | | 4,387 | | | | 4,225 | | | | 133 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service fee | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS USA | | | 20,046 | | | | 22,864 | | | | 32,175 | | | | 1,015 | |
ChipMOS Japan | | | 9,498 | | | | 11,851 | | | | 15,045 | | | | 474 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 29,544 | | | | 34,715 | | | | 47,220 | | | | 1,489 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Rental expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MVI | | | 2,811 | | | | 2,586 | | | | 2,218 | | | | 70 | |
CHANTEK | | | — | | | | 7,699 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ThaiLin | | | — | | | | 8,125 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,811 | | | | 18,410 | | | | 2,218 | | | | 70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fee for stock registry service | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sun Fund | | | 540 | | | | 540 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Mou-Fu | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,977 | | | | 62 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 540 | | | | 540 | | | | 1,977 | | | | 62 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PlusMOS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 88 | | | | 3 | |
MVI | | | — | | | | — | | | | 148 | | | | 5 | |
ProMOS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,027 | | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,263 | | | | 40 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
At the end of year | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes and accounts receivable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MVI | | | 13,952 | | | | 1,098 | | | | 35 | |
Ultima | | | 216,242 | | | | — | | | | — | |
PlusMOS | | | 5,506 | | | | — | | | | — | |
DenMOS | | | 123,932 | | | | 120,043 | | | | 3,786 | |
CHANTEK | | | 431 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ProMOS | | | 959,561 | | | | 1,303,250 | | | | 41,099 | |
ThaiLin | | | 107 | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
(Forward)
F-107
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
SPIL | | | 315 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Far East | | | 98 | | | | 8,281 | | | | 261 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,320,144 | | | | 1,432,672 | | | | 45,181 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other receivable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS Bermuda | | | 640,950 | | | | 3,733 | | | | 118 | |
ChipMOS USA | | | 16,787 | | | | 15,378 | | | | 485 | |
MVI | | | 424 | | | | 420 | | | | 13 | |
ChipMOS Japan | | | 6,444 | | | | 5,937 | | | | 187 | |
Ultima | | | 104 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ThaiLin | | | 690 | | | | — | | | | — | |
CHANTEK | | | 19,693 | | | | — | | | | — | |
DenMOS | | | 375 | | | | 885 | | | | 28 | |
Far East | | | 1,855 | | | | 7,776 | | | | 245 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
ProMOS | | | 11,271 | | | | 5,344 | | | | 169 | |
AMCT | | | 28,279 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 726,872 | | | | 39,473 | | | | 1,245 | |
Credit balances of long-term investments (Note 7) | | | (7,413 | ) | | | (1,984 | ) | | | (63 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 719,459 | | | | 37,489 | | | | 1,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prepayments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS USA | | | — | | | | 621 | | | | 20 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other payable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ChipMOS USA | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,507 | | | | 48 | |
MVI | | | 730 | | | | 356 | | | | 11 | |
ChipMOS Japan | | | 927 | | | | 915 | | | | 29 | |
PlusMOS | | | 142 | | | | — | | | | — | |
CHANTEK | | | 102 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Sun Fund | | | 45 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Far East | | | 11,566 | | | | 32,641 | | | | 1,029 | |
ThaiLin | | | 5,045 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ChipMOS Bermuda | | | — | | | | 23,783 | | | | 750 | |
Mou-Fu | | | — | | | | 1,829 | | | | 58 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 19,757 | | | | 61,031 | | | | 1,925 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CHANTEK | | | 242 | | | | — | | | | — | |
ThaiLin | | | 12,710 | | | | — | | | | — | |
SPIL | | | 4,634 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Far East | | | — | | | | 17,428 | | | | 550 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 17,586 | | | | 17,428 | | | | 550 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Payables to contractors and equipment suppliers | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CHANTEK | | | 714 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-108
The payment terms for purchases from related parties are the same as those from other suppliers.
The collection term for MVI and Ultima is 90 days after month end, ProMOS is 75 days after month end while other related parties have the normal collection terms. The selling price is on the same basis as those to other customers.
As of October 11, 2002, ChipMOS Taiwan signed an agreement entrusting Best Home with the construction for a central kitchen. ChipMOS Taiwan has paid NT$216,000 thousand in advance to Best Home for the purpose of acquiring a place and equipment. However, ChipMOS Taiwan entered into a contract to transfer the claim to Prudent Holdings Group Ltd. on December 17, 2003 and collected on November 19, 2004.
As of December 31, 2003, ChipMOS Taiwan provided commercial paper acquired under repurchase agreements as collateral for a loan amounting NT$600,000 thousand (excluding the interest) obtained by Ultima.
On April 7, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan entered into a semiconductor packaging technology license agreement with ChipMOS Bermuda. Under the agreement, ChipMOS Taiwan agreed to pay a license fee of US$20,000 thousand in installments of US$250 thousand in every three months over 20 years, starting from March 30, 2005.
As of April 7, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan entered into a technology transfer agreement with ChipMOS Bermuda for a period of 20 years, starting from effective day. The total price was US$19,700 thousand, recorded as deferred credits. As of December 31, 2004, the unamortized amount was NT$626,195 thousand.
In 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan acquired 255 thousand shares of ChipMOS Logic from CHANTEK International at the cost of NT$2,527 thousand.
In 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan purchased machineries from ProMOS and AMCT at the cost of NT$46,284 thousand and NT$84,027 thousand respectively. ChipMOS Taiwan also sold machineries to Far East with the proceeds amounted to NT$5,574 thousand and recognized gain on disposal of properties amounted to NT$2,834 thousand.
17. | RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Time deposits (matures from January 2005 to November 2005) | | | 282,378 | | | | 146,746 | | | | 4,628 | |
Time deposits are pledged as collateral for the Company’s customs duties payable, letter of credit, and research and development subsidy loans.
F-109
18. | SIGNIFICANT COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 |
a. As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan leases parcels of land from the Hsinchu and Tainan Science Based Industrial Park (SBIP) under several agreements expiring on various dates from 2002 to 2017, with renewal options.
The future minimum lease payments under the above-mentioned leases as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
| | | | |
Year | | Amount |
| | NT$ | | US$ |
| | (In Thousands) |
2005 | | 16,226 | | 512 |
2006 | | 16,226 | | 512 |
2007 | | 16,226 | | 512 |
2008 | | 16,226 | | 512 |
Thereafter | | 146,032 | | 4,605 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total minimum lease payments | | 210,936 | | 6,653 |
| | | | |
b. The Company has unused letters of credit aggregating approximately US$3,270 thousand, JPY$3,169,899 thousand, EUR$28 thousand and GBP$9 thousand as of December 31, 2004.
c. In 2004, tax authorities have assessed and increase the 2000 income taxes of ChipMOS Taiwan by NT$30,526 thousand. ChipMOS Taiwan has filed an appealing for the assessment.
d. On April 20, 1999, ChipMOS Taiwan entered into a semiconductor packaging technology license agreement with TESSERA INC. Under this agreement, ChipMOS Taiwan agreed to pay a license fee of US$500 thousand and a royalty fee at a certain percentage of the net sales of certain products. ChipMOS Taiwan paid the total license fee of US$500 thousand (NT$15,888 thousand) in 1999 and amortized the amount over 5 years using the straight-line method. ChipMOS Taiwan also paid US$500 thousand (NT$15,870 thousand) in 2004 as the cumulative production and sales quantity of products bearing Tessera Compliant Chip packages did not meet the commitment schedule as set in the agreement.
e. ChipMOS Taiwan acquired testing and assembly technology for tape carrier packages under a licensing agreement with Sharp Corporation. The term of the agreement is for five years beginning February 10, 2000. Sharp licensed to the company tape carrier package-related technology and intellectual property rights. The company in turn pays
F-110
a royalty fee to Sharp ranging from 3% to 5% of the service fee paid to the company by its customers minus the material cost incurred from providing tape carrier package-related services over the licensing agreement. Sharp has granted the company a grace period, which expired in September 2004, during which the company may defer the payment of a portion of the royalty fee due to Sharp until the expiry of the grace period or until the amount of deferred royalty fee exceeds JPY150.9 million. We have incurred royalty payment obligations of JPY22 million and JPY16 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 to Sharp which was paid in October 2004.
19. | NOTES TO THE CASH FLOW STATEMENT |
Acquisition of subsidiaries
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net assets acquired: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and bank balances | | | — | | | | 280,910 | | | | 8,859 | |
Current Assets | | | — | | | | 1,528,849 | | | | 48,213 | |
Long term investment | | | — | | | | 106,488 | | | | 3,358 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | | 3,691,657 | | | | 116,419 | |
Intangible assets | | | — | | | | 71,614 | | | | 2,258 | |
Other assets | | | — | | | | 205,831 | | | | 6,491 | |
Current liabilities | | | — | | | | (1,813,210 | ) | | | (57,181 | ) |
Long term liabilities | | | — | | | | (845,343 | ) | | | (26,659 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | — | | | | (38,303 | ) | | | (1,208 | ) |
Minority interest | | | — | | | | (2,206,550 | ) | | | (69,585 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 981,943 | | | | 30,966 | |
Goodwill on acquisition | | | — | | | | (51,623 | ) | | | (1,628 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 930,320 | | | | 29,338 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Satisfied by: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | | — | | | | 186,573 | | | | 5,884 | |
Reclassification to interest in subsidiary | | | — | | | | 743,747 | | | | 23,455 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 930,320 | | | | 29,338 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
An analysis of the net inflow of cash and cash equivalents in respect of the acquisition of subsidiary is as follows:
F-111
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Cash and bank balances acquired | | | — | | | | 280,910 | | | | 8,859 | |
Less: cash consideration | | | — | | | | (186,573 | ) | | | (5,884 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 94,337 | | | | 2,975 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
20. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
|
| ChipMOS Taiwan had entered into forward exchange contracts or foreign currency options for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, to hedge its exchange rate risk on foreign-currency assets or liabilities and anticipated transactions. Information on the derivative transactions is as follows: |
| a. | Forward, exchange contracts |
|
| | As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, There were no outstanding forward contracts. Net exchange gains on forward exchange contracts were NT$4,710 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
| b. | European options |
|
| | ChipMOS Taiwan expects to receive U.S. dollars from its export sales and to pay Japanese yen for its importation of materials, machinery, and equipment. It has entered into foreign currency option contracts with banks to hedge exchange rate risks. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, ChipMOS |
|
| | Taiwan had no outstanding foreign currency option contracts. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan didn’t realize premium income. |
|
| c. | Interest Rate Risks |
|
| | ChipMOS Taiwan has entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk by exchanging a quarto stepping interest rate for a floating rate and keeps records when transactions are settled. The difference of the interests is calculated quarterly and is credited or charged to the income in the current period. The benefit of interest rate swaps recognized as non-operating income in 2004 is NT$151 thousand. |
As of December 31, 2004, ChipMOS Taiwan has the following interest rate swap agreements:
| | | | | | |
Derivatives | | Notional Amount | | Effective Date | | Termination Date |
IRS | | NT$500,000 thousand | | July 28, 2004 | | July 30, 2007 |
IRS | | NT$300,000 thousand | | October 13, 2004 | | October 15, 2007 |
| 1) | Credit risk. The banks with which ChipMOS Taiwan has entered into the above contracts are reputable and, therefore, ChipMOS Taiwan does not expected to be |
F-112
| | exposed to significant credit risks. |
|
| 2) | Market risk and hedge strategy. ChipMOS Taiwan is exposed to market risks arising from changes in currency exchange rates due to U.S. dollar denominated accounts receivable, Yen denominated accounts payable and U.S. dollar denominated debt. In order to manage these exposures, ChipMOS Taiwan entered into forward contracts and option contracts occasionally. |
|
| 3) | Liquidity and cash requirements. The cash flow requirements with respect to ChipMOS Taiwan’s forward contracts are limited to the periodic premium payments and the net differences of the contracted settlement rates. On the other hand, call/put options may not have to be exercised at all in cases where the strike price is higher/lower than the related market price at exercise dates. |
| e. | The estimated fair values of the Company Taiwan’s financial instruments are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2003 | | | December 31, 2004 | |
| | Carrying | | | | | | | Carrying | | | | |
| | Value | | | Fair Value | | | Value | | | Fair Value | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Non-derivative financial instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 2,818,156 | | | | 2,818,156 | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | 282,378 | | | | 282,378 | | | | 146,746 | | | | 146,746 | |
Short-term investments | | | 437,446 | | | | 437,446 | | | | 2,815,127 | | | | 2,817,587 | |
Notes receivable | | | 7,522 | | | | 7,522 | | | | 62,205 | | | | 62,205 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 961,884 | | | | 961,884 | | | | 1,825,845 | | | | 1,825,845 | |
Receivables from related parties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes and accounts | | | 1,307,321 | | | | 1,307,321 | | | | 1,419,319 | | | | 1,419,319 | |
Others | | | 679,853 | | | | 679,853 | | | | 31,575 | | | | 31,575 | |
Other receivable | | | 1,082,700 | | | | 1,082,700 | | | | 169,680 | | | | 169,680 | |
Long-term investments | | | 1,288,350 | | | | 2,294,089 | | | | 663,040 | | | | 669,708 | |
Refundable deposits | | | 352,674 | | | | 352,674 | | | | 14,858 | | | | 14,858 | |
Other financial assets | | | 399,700 | | | | 399,700 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank loans | | | 1,314,045 | | | | 1,314,045 | | | | 800,593 | | | | 800,593 | |
Notes payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 49,072 | | | | 49,072 | |
Accounts payable | | | 312,045 | | | | 312,045 | | | | 526,003 | | | | 526,003 | |
Payable to related parties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade | | | 17,586 | | | | 17,586 | | | | 17,428 | | | | 17,428 | |
Others | | | 19,757 | | | | 19,757 | | | | 61,031 | | | | 61,031 | |
Payables to contractors and equipment suppliers | | | 166,910 | | | | 166,910 | | | | 312,561 | | | | 312,561 | |
Long-term loans (including current portion) | | | 2,811,462 | | | | 2,811,462 | | | | 6,428,721 | | | | 6,428,721 | |
(Forward)
F-113
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2003 | | | December 31, 2004 | |
| | Carrying | | | | | | | Carrying | | | | |
| | Value | | | Fair Value | | | Value | | | Fair Value | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Convertible bonds (including current portion) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 333,195 | | | | 333,195 | |
Long-term bonds payable (including current portion) | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,008,970 | | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,200,000 | |
Guarantee deposits | | | 593 | | | | 593 | | | | 1,124 | | | | 1,124 | |
| Fair values of financial instruments were determined as follows: |
|
| 1) | Short-term financial instruments – market values. |
|
| 2) | Short-term investments – market values. |
|
| 3) | Long-term investments – market value for listed companies and net equity value for the others. |
|
| 4) | Refundable deposits and guarantee deposits – future values. |
|
| 5) | Long-term liabilities – based on forecasted cash flows discounted at current interest rates of similar long-term liabilities. Bonds payable are discounted at present value, using an annual interest rate of 5.95%. Other long-term liabilities are their carrying values as they use floating interest rates. |
| The fair values of non-financial instruments were not included in the fair values disclosed above. Accordingly, the sum of the fair values of the financial instruments listed above does not equal the fair value of the Company. |
|
21. | SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION |
|
| The Company engages mainly in the research and development, manufacturing, assembly, testing and turnkey of semiconductors. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, the Company’s chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews these segment results by Testing, Assembly, Testing and Assembly for LCD and other Flat-Panel Display Driver Semiconductors and Turnkey when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company. Financial segment information required by SFAS No. 131 is as follows: |
| a. | The Company provides semiconductor testing, assembly, turnkey services and LCD and other flat-panel display driver semiconductors services. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2002 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Segment | | | Corporate & | | | Consolidated | |
| | Testing | | | Assembly | | | Turnkey | | | LCD | | | Totals | | | Other assets | | | Totals | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Revenues from customers | | | 2,331,057 | | | | 1,415,196 | | | | 1,787,838 | | | | 991,774 | | | | 6,525,865 | | | | — | | | | 6,525,865 | |
Cost of revenues | | | 2,684,654 | | | | 1,394,291 | | | | 1,766,985 | | | | 865,776 | | | | 6,711,706 | | | | — | | | | 6,711,706 | |
Segment gross profit | | | (353,597 | ) | | | 20,905 | | | | 20,853 | | | | 125,998 | | | | (185,841 | ) | | | — | | | | (185,841 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,055,221 | | | | 443,718 | | | | — | | | | 310,239 | | | | 2,809,178 | | | | 9,097 | | | | 2,818,275 | |
Segment assets | | | 5,724,785 | | | | 2,035,886 | | | | — | | | | 2,209,521 | | | | 9,970,192 | | | | 6,433,868 | | | | 16,404,060 | |
Expenditure for segment assets | | | 531,434 | | | | 68,421 | | | | — | | | | 1,164,630 | | | | 1,764,485 | | | | — | | | | 1,764,485 | |
F-114
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Segment | | | Corporate & | | | Consolidated | |
| | Testing | | | Assembly | | | Turnkey | | | LCD | | | Totals | | | Other assets | | | Totals | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Revenues from customers | | | 3,072,739 | | | | 314,744,581 | | | | 1,075,319 | | | | 1,683,490 | | | | 8,468,665 | | | | — | | | | 8,468,665 | |
Cost of revenues | | | 2,614,901 | | | | 373,944,573 | | | | 1,061,109 | | | | 1,155,322 | | | | 6,911,038 | | | | — | | | | 6,911,038 | |
Segment gross profit | | | 457,838 | | | | 60,314,814 | | | | 14,210 | | | | 528,168 | | | | 1557,627 | | | | — | | | | 1,557,627 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 1,886,241 | | | | 27,454,3382 | | | | — | | | | 451,710 | | | | 2,651,801 | | | | 14,623 | | | | 2,666,424 | |
Segment assets | | | 4,656,948 | | | | 5,94,361 | | | | — | | | | 2,150,940 | | | | 8,929,700 | | | | 7,690,240 | | | | 16,619,940 | |
Expenditure for segment assets | | | 1,382,018 | | | | 399,888 | | | | — | | | | 387,929 | | | | 2,169,835 | | | | — | | | | 2,169,835 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Segment | | | Corporate & | | | Consolidated | |
| | Testing | | | Assembly | | | Turnkey | | | LCD | | | Bumping | | | Totals | | | Other assets | | | Totals | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Revenues from customers | | | 5,950,174 | | | | 5,734,592 | | | | 473,588 | | | | 2,655,201 | | | | 54,322 | | | | 14,867,877 | | | | — | | | | 14,867,877 | |
Cost of revenues | | | 3,744,781 | | | | 4,795,074 | | | | 466,676 | | | | 1,615,799 | | | | 121,898 | | | | 10,744,228 | | | | — | | | | 10,744,228 | |
Segment gross profit | | | 2,205,393 | | | | 939,518 | | | | 6,912 | | | | 1,039,402 | | | | (67,576 | ) | | | 4,123,649 | | | | — | | | | 4,123,649 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,445,481 | | | | 410,721 | | | | — | | | | 578,835 | | | | 22,650 | | | | 3,457,687 | | | | — | | | | 3,457,687 | |
Segment assets | | | 12,352,842 | | | | 4,634,992 | | | | — | | | | 2,961,478 | | | | 504,130 | | | | 20,453,442 | | | | 7,394,399 | | | | 27,847,841 | |
Expenditure for segment assets | | | 4,698,036 | | | | 1,028,155 | | | | — | | | | 1,380,372 | | | | 526,712 | | | | 7,633,275 | | | | — | | | | 7,633,275 | |
| | In providing turnkey services, the Company purchases fabricated wafers and sells tested and assembled semiconductors to application and system manufacturers. The process of conducting testing and assembling for the fabricated wafer is at a very limited level, which only uses a very small portion of facility capacity. Therefore, the Company allocated no specific assets to the turnkey segment and accordingly, no related depreciation and amortization was allocated. |
|
| | The corporate and other assets constitute the total current assets, long-term investments, long-term restricted cash equivalents, intangible assets of bond issuance costs, employee dormitory building and refundable deposits. |
|
| b. | The Company has no significant foreign operations. |
|
| c. | Net revenues: |
F-115
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Area | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | | 5,755,406 | | | | 7,061,812 | | | | 12,182,691 | |
Export | | | 770,459 | | | | 1,406,853 | | | | 2,685,186 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 6,525,865 | | | | 8,468,665 | | | | 14,867,877 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| d. | Net sales to customers representing at least 10% of net total sales: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
Customer | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | | | NT$ | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
MVI | | | 2,285,348 | | | | 35 | | | | 1,680,986 | | | | 20 | | | | 14,274 | | | | — | |
Ultima | | | 1,218,265 | | | | 19 | | | | 745,562 | | | | 9 | | | | 453,698 | | | | 3 | |
ProMOS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,748,326 | | | | 21 | | | | 4,231,658 | | | | 29 | |
22. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED BY CHIPMOS TAIWAN AND ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES |
|
| The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Republic of China (“ROC GAAP”), which differ in the following respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”): |
| a. | Bonuses to employees, directors and supervisors |
|
| | According to ROC regulations and the Articles of Incorporation of ChipMOS Taiwan, a portion of distributable earnings should be appropriated as bonuses to employees and remuneration to directors and supervisors. The remuneration to directors and supervisors is paid in cash, while bonuses to employees may be granted in cash or stock or both. These appropriations, including stock bonuses, which are valued at par value of NT$10, are charged against retained earnings under ROC GAAP, after such appropriations are formally approved by the shareholders in the following year. |
|
| | Under U.S. GAAP, such bonuses and remuneration are charged to income currently and included in operating expenses as compensation expenses. Since the amount and form of such bonuses and remuneration are not finally determinable until approved by the shareholders, the total amount of such bonuses and remuneration is initially accrued based on the amount to be paid as provided by ChipMOS Taiwan’s Articles of Incorporation. The percentage to be paid in stock is determined at the next shareholders’ meeting in the following year. The number of shares to be issued is determined by dividing the amount to be paid in stock by the par value of the shares. Any difference between the initially accrued amount (the cash portion plus the par value of the shares) and the fair market value of the bonuses settled (the cash portion plus the fair value of the shares) is recognized in the year of approval by the shareholders. |
|
| b. | Marketable securities |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, marketable equity securities are carried at the lower of aggregate cost |
F-116
| | or market value, and debt securities at cost, with only unrealized losses recognized when losses are irrecoverable. Under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, debt and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are to be classified as either trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity securities. Debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and traded for short-term profit are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity; however, unrealized losses relating to declines in fair value deemed to be other than temporary are recorded in earnings. The adjustment below relates to the Company’s equity securities that are classified as trading and available-for-sale securities under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| c. | Long-term investments |
|
| | Under both ROC and U.S. GAAP, investments in shares of companies wherein the Company owns over 20% of the outstanding common stock and exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee companies are generally accounted for under the equity method. However, there are differences in applying equity accounting under ROC and U.S. GAAP. The Company’s proportionate share of the income (loss) from an equity investee may differ if the equity investee’s net income (loss) under ROC GAAP differs from that under U.S. GAAP. The differences between ROC GAAP and U.S. GAAP for the equity investees have been adjusted and included in the reconciliation below. |
|
| | Under the equity method, the Company’s proportionate share of the income (loss) of the investee is generally recognized in the year the income (loss) is earned. However, under ROC GAAP, if audited financial statements of an investee are not available for the Company to apply the equity method due to time constraints and such equity interests are below certain materiality threshold, the Company is permitted to delay the recognition of income (loss) until the subsequent year. Under US GAAP, there are no provisions that allow the investor company to delay recognition of its equity in the investees’ income or loss. The US GAAP represents the current period’s proportionate share of loss of long-term investment. |
|
| d. | Technologies transferred in payment of capital stock |
|
| | As discussed in Note 9, MVI and SPIL contributed, as payment to their subscription in the shares of stock of ChipMOS Taiwan, technologies relating to the testing and assembly of semiconductors at an agreed value of NT$750,000 thousand. Under ROC GAAP, such technology transfers in payment of capital stock are recorded as an intangible asset, and amortized by systematic charges to income over the periods estimated to be benefited. As permitted under ROC GAAP, ChipMOS Taiwan uses a 5 years amortization period. Under U.S. GAAP, the technology contribution cannot be recognized due to the unavailability of a fair value for the technologies. Therefore, the carrying value of the technologies has been adjusted to zero under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| e. | Start-up costs |
F-117
| | ROC GAAP requires start-up costs to be deferred and amortized in a systematic manner over the periods of the expected benefit. Start-up costs include all costs incurred prior to production readiness. On the other hand, U.S. GAAP primarily requires that start-up costs be expensed as incurred. |
|
| f. | Depreciation of fixed assets and employee dormitory building |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, the estimated life of a building can be as long as 55 years based on the ROC Internal Revenue Code. For U.S. GAAP purpose, building lives are estimated to be 25 years. |
|
| g. | Transfer of building and facilities from MVI |
|
| | ChipMOS Taiwan purchased building and facilities from MVI in 1997. The actual costs of assets purchased from MVI were based on MVI’s book value of such building and facilities on a specified cut-off date plus an additional payment of NT$173,174 thousand representing compensation to MVI. ChipMOS Taiwan capitalized, allowed under ROC GAAP such additional payment of NT $173,174 thousand. Under U.S. GAAP, assets acquired are recorded at amounts that do not exceed their fair values. Also, generally under U.S. GAAP, the transferee should evaluate the assets transferred from related parties with significant influence at the predecessor’s basis. Therefore, the assets transferred from MVI were evaluated at MVI’s predecessor cost basis and the NT$173,174 thousand was deducted from the capital surplus and building and facilities for U.S. GAAP. |
|
| h. | Inventory |
|
| | As discussed in paragraphs e. f. and g., the amortization of start-up costs, the depreciation on fixed assets and employee dormitory building, and the depreciation on the assets transferred from MVI were reconciled for U.S. GAAP purposes. Some of such expenses were recorded in the manufacturing expenses and therefore affect ending inventory balances under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| i. | Capital surplus |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, the following items are treated as capital surplus: (a) premium on issuance of common stocks; and (b) gain, net of applicable income tax, on disposal of properties. Under U.S. GAAP, item (a) is the same as in ROC GAAP; and item (b) is recorded as part of net income, which is then included as a component of retained earnings. However, starting in 2001, the treatment of item (b) under ROC GAAP has become the same as under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| j. | Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
| | Under U.S. GAAP, impairment losses for assets to be held and used are recorded in current period earnings and create a new cost basis for related assets going forward, and |
F-118
| | cannot be reversed subsequently. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the recoverability test is performed by comparing undiscounted net cash flows of the assets to the net book value of the assets. If the recoverability test indicates that impairment has occurred, the impairment loss is the amount of the asset’s net book value in excess of the related fair value. Under ROC GAAP, there is no requirement to provide for impairment of long-lived assets. Based on an assessment by the Company there were no impairment losses for 2004. |
|
| k. | Derivative financial instruments |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, there are no specific rules related to accounting for derivative financial instruments, nor criteria for hedge accounting. Therefore, companies have the flexibility in choosing when to recognize derivative financial instruments and when to follow hedge accounting versus fair value accounting for such instruments. U.S. GAAP has restrictive rules on hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 138 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000, and establish accounting and reporting standards for all derivative financial instruments. The Company adopted those statements on January 1, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 138 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company did not apply hedge accounting and derivatives have historically been, and continue to be, recorded on the balance sheets at fair value, with the changes in fair values recorded through current period earnings. In addition, the Company has no embedded derivatives from January 1 to December 31, 2004. The reconciling adjustments for all periods presented reflect those reconciliations from hedge accounting under ROC GAAP to non-hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. |
|
| l. | Earnings per share (EPS) |
|
| | In calculating the weighted average number of shares outstanding for EPS purposes under ROC GAAP, employee bonus shares have been treated as outstanding for all periods in a manner similar to a stock split or stock dividend. Under U.S. GAAP, employee bonus shares have been considered separately from the stock dividend or split and have been treated as outstanding from the date of shareholder approval. |
|
| m. | Interest capitalization |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP, interests on borrowings during construction conceptually should be capitalized in the assets that are constructed or produced for a company’s own use. However, if equity capital is raised during a year, no capitalization interest is recorded for the amount of property acquired up to the equity capital raised in that year. Under |
F-119
| | U.S. GAAP, SFAS No. 34 “Capitalization of Interest Cost”, interest is generally capitalized on assets until they are available and ready for use. |
|
| n. | Goodwill |
|
| | Under ROC GAAP goodwill arises as the difference between acquisition cost and the equity of the subsidiary and is amortized using a systematic method, whereas under U.S. GAAP such goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to impairment tests. |
|
| o. | Pension expenses |
|
| | SFAS No. 87, “Accounting for Pensions”, and the SFAS No. 88, “Employer’s Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits”, were effective no later than the beginning of the first period for which an U.S. GAAP reconciliation is required for foreign issuers. A portion of the unrecognized net transition obligation on the adoption date is to be allocated directly to equity. The Company started to adopt SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 88 in 1997 and 2002, respectively. ROC SFAS No. 18, which is similar in many respects to SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 88, was effective in 1996. However, the treatment of certain expenses that comply with ROC SFAS No. 18 is different from SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 88. |
The following reconciles net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity under ROC GAAP as reported in the accompanying financial statements to net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity amounts determined under U.S. GAAP, giving effect to adjustments for the differences listed above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) based on ROC GAAP | | | (1,272,779 | ) | | | 860,557 | | | | 2,322,760 | | | | 73,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of technology transfer in payment of capital stocks | | | 95,833 | | | | 18,334 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Amortization of start-up costs | | | 14,699 | | | | 14,796 | | | | 9,916 | | | | 312 | |
Depreciation of fixed assets and employee dormitory building | | | (14,270 | ) | | | (14,206 | ) | | | (14,444 | ) | | | (455 | ) |
Transfer of building and facilities from MVI | | | 15,634 | | | | 2,104 | | | | 1,299 | | | | 41 | |
Marketable securities-trading | | | (31,139 | ) | | | 1,916 | | | | 10,567 | | | | 334 | |
Interest capitalization | | | 43,329 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Depreciation of interest capitalization | | | (4,254 | ) | | | (5,728 | ) | | | (19,793 | ) | | | (624 | ) |
Equity accounting for long-term investment | | | — | | | | (3,867 | ) | | | (3,358 | ) | | | (106 | ) |
Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustment on income taxes | | | (38,217 | ) | | | (3,825 | ) | | | 5,755 | | | | 181 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net income (loss) | | | 81,615 | | | | 9,524 | | | | (10,058 | ) | | | (317 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Forward)
F-120
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Net income (loss) based on U.S. GAAP | | | (1,191,164 | ) | | | 870,081 | | | | 2,312,702 | | | | 72,933 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share | | | (1.34 | ) | | | 0.98 | | | | 2.61 | | | | 0.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of weighted average shares outstanding under U.S. GAAP | | | 881,467 | | | | 887,227 | | | | 887,227 | | | | 887,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity based on ROC GAAP | | | 10,605,987 | | | | 13,115,457 | | | | 413,606 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Technology transfer in payment of capital stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Original cost | | | (750,000 | ) | | | (750,000 | ) | | | (23,652 | ) |
Accumulated amortization of technology transfer in payment of capital stocks | | | 750,000 | | | | 750,000 | | | | 23,652 | |
Start-up costs | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Original cost | | | (73,329 | ) | | | (61,124 | ) | | | (1,928 | ) |
Accumulated depreciation of start-up costs | | | 53,554 | | | | 51,193 | | | | 1,614 | |
Net effect on inventories | | | (206 | ) | | | (134 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Depreciation of fixed assets and employee dormitory building | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation of fixed assets and employee dormitory building | | | (71,239 | ) | | | (85,648 | ) | | | (2,701 | ) |
Net effects on inventories | | | 252 | | | | 217 | | | | 7 | |
Transfer of building and facilities from MVI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Original cost | | | (173,174 | ) | | | (173,174 | ) | | | (5,461 | ) |
Depreciation and gain on disposal of building and facilities from MVI | | | 166,789 | | | | 168,076 | | | | 5,300 | |
Net effects on inventories | | | (34 | ) | | | (22 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Marketable securities — trading | | | (3,576 | ) | | | 6,991 | | | | 221 | |
Pension expenses | | | (1,898 | ) | | | (1,898 | ) | | | (60 | ) |
Interest capitalization | | | 118,757 | | | | 118,757 | | | | 3,745 | |
Depreciation of interest capitalization | | | (12,183 | ) | | | (31,976 | ) | | | (1,008 | ) |
Long-term investments | | | (14,087 | ) | | | (16,376 | ) | | | (516 | ) |
Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustment on income taxes | | | (2,297 | ) | | | 3,458 | | | | 109 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in shareholders’ equity | | | (12,671 | ) | | | (21,660 | ) | | | (683 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity based on U.S. GAAP | | | 10,593,316 | | | | 13,093,797 | | | | 412,923 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-121
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Changes in shareholders’ equity based on U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of the year | | | 11,072,313 | | | | 9,801,202 | | | | 10,593,316 | | | | 334,069 | |
Reversal of unrealized loss (gain) on available-for-sale securities | | | (153,621 | ) | | | (79,277 | ) | | | 5,618 | | | | 177 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities | | | 79,277 | | | | (5,618 | ) | | | (805 | ) | | | (25 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustments | | | (47 | ) | | | 115 | | | | (7,564 | ) | | | (239 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustment for long-term investments | | | (5,556 | ) | | | 6,813 | | | | 190,530 | | | | 6,008 | |
Net income (loss) for the year | | | (1,191,164 | ) | | | 870,081 | | | | 2,312,702 | | | | 72,933 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of the year | | | 9,801,202 | | | | 10,593,316 | | | | 13,093,797 | | | | 412,923 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
A reconciliation of the significant balance sheet accounts to the approximate amounts determined under U.S. GAAP is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 7,115,404 | | | | 10,608,332 | | | | 334,542 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marketable securities - trading | | | (3,576 | ) | | | 6,991 | | | | 220 | |
Effect of inventory adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Start-up costs | | | (206 | ) | | | (134 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Depreciation of fixed assets and employee dormitory building | | | 252 | | | | 217 | | | | 7 | |
Transfer of building and facilities from MVI | | | (34 | ) | | | (22 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | | 7,111,840 | | | | 10,615,384 | | | | 334,764 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term investments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 1,288,350 | | | | 663,040 | | | | 20,909 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative translation adjustments | | | — | | | | (4,549 | ) | | | (144 | ) |
Adjustment for investment income | | | (8,469 | ) | | | (11,827 | ) | | | (372 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale security | | | (5,618 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | | 1,274,263 | | | | 646,664 | | | | 20,393 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment - net | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 8,929,700 | | | | 16,713,425 | | | | 527,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Start-up costs | | | (19,775 | ) | | | (9,931 | ) | | | (313 | ) |
Depreciation of fixed assets | | | (62,969 | ) | | | (75,747 | ) | | | (2,388 | ) |
Transfer of building and facilities from MVI | | | (6,385 | ) | | | (5,098 | ) | | | (161 | ) |
(Forward)
F-122
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest capitalization | | | 106,574 | | | | 86,781 | | | | 2,736 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | | 8,947,145 | | | | 16,709,430 | | | | 526,945 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 133,535 | | | | 154,077 | | | | 4,858 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation of employee dormitory building | | | (8,270 | ) | | | (9,901 | ) | | | (312 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | | 125,265 | | | | 144,176 | | | | 4,546 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 503,279 | | | | 1,276,044 | | | | 40,241 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension expenses | | | 1,898 | | | | 1,898 | | | | 60 | |
Effect of U.S. GAAP adjustment on income taxes | | | 2,297 | | | | (3,458 | ) | | | (109 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | | 507,474 | | | | 1,274,484 | | | | 40,192 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
As a result of the adjustments presented above, the approximate amounts of total assets under U.S. GAAP were NT$17,503,551 thousand and NT$28,217,951 thousand as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
The following U.S. GAAP condensed statements of operation for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 have been derived from the audited financial statements and reflect the adjustments presented above. Certain accounts have been reclassified to conform to U.S. GAAP. Reversal of allowance for doubtful receivables, gain (loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment and loss on lease rescission are included as operating expenses.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 6,525,865 | | | | 8,468,665 | | | | 14,867,877 | | | | 468,870 | |
Cost of revenue | | | 6,700,265 | | | | 6,911,268 | | | | 10,746,166 | | | | 338,889 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit (loss) | | | (174,400 | ) | | | 1,557,397 | | | | 4,121,711 | | | | 129,981 | |
Operating expenses | | | 397,700 | | | | 541,145 | | | | 1,095,053 | | | | 34,533 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (572,100 | ) | | | 1,016,252 | | | | 3,026,658 | | | | 95,448 | |
Non-operating income (expenses) — net | | | (482,985 | ) | | | (147,896 | ) | | | (574,814 | ) | | | (18,127 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income tax | | | (1,055,085 | ) | | | 868,356 | | | | 2,451,844 | | | | 77,321 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (1,191,164 | ) | | | 870,081 | | | | 2,312,702 | | | | 72,933 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-123
23. ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY U.S. GAAP
| a. | Recent accounting pronouncements |
|
| | The Company is required by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 74 to make certain disclosures about the effect that recently issued accounting standards will have on the financial statements adopted for future periods. |
|
| | In June 2002 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. This standard requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including certain costs incurred in a restructuring).” SFAS No. 146 is applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities after December 31, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003, which has not had a material impact on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | In January 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (FIN 46), FIN 46 clarifies when a company should consolidate in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of a variable interest entity. FIN 46 provides general guidance as to the definition of a variable interest entity and requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated if a company absorbs the majority of the variable interest entity’s expected losses, or is entitled to receive a majority of the variable interest entity’s residual returns, or both. In December 2004, FASB issued a revised Interpretation of FIN 46 (FIN 46-R), which supercedes FIN 46 and clarifies and expands current accounting guidance for variable interest entities. FIN 46 and FIN 46-R are effective immediately for all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2004, and for variable interest entities created prior to February 1, 2004, no later than the end of the first reporting period after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46-R did not have a material impact on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. |
|
| | In April 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. In particular, this Statement clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative and when a derivative contains a financing component that |
F-124
| | warrants special reporting in the statement of cash flows. This Statement is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial reporting and disclosures. |
|
| | In May 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 changes the accounting for certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, could be classified as equity or “mezzanine” equity by now requiring those instruments to be classified as liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) in the statement of financial position. Further, SFAS No. 150 requires disclosure regarding the terms of those instruments and settlement alternatives. The guidance in SFAS No. 150 generally is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and is otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. We have evaluated SFAS No. 150 and determined that it does not have an impact on our financial reporting and disclosures. |
|
| | In December 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 132 - revised, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”. This Statement revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefits plans. This Statement requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The required information should be provided separately for pension plans and for other postretirement benefit plans. This Statement also requires new disclosures for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2003. The Statement was effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. The Company adopted this Statement for the year ended December 31, 2003. (Refer to Note d, pension plans). |
|
| | In December 2003, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”, which supercedes SAB 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”. SAB 104’s primary purpose is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements and revises the SEC’s “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” that have been codified in Topic 13. SAB 104 was effective immediately and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial reporting and disclosures. |
|
| | In April 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections”. Under SFAS No. 4, all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt were required to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. This Statement eliminates SFAS No. 4 and, thus, the exception to applying Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 30 to all gains and losses related to extinguishments |
F-125
of debt. As a result, gains and losses from extinguishments of debt should be classified as extraordinary items. The adoption of SFAS 145 did not have a material impact on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
This FASB has issued SFAS No. 147, “Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions”, which is effective for certain transactions arising on or after October 1, 2002. SFAS No. 147 will have no impact on the Company.
The FASB has issued SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosures”. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148. The Company currently accounts for stock-based employee compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations. Accordingly, the alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation mandated by SFAS No. 148 are not applicable to the Company.
FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others - an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34”, was issued in November 2002. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FIN 45 does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantor’s recognized liability over the term of the related guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor’s fiscal year end. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company has made the disclosures requirement required by FIN 45.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R (SFAS 123R) “Share-Based Payment”. Under previous practice, the reporting entity could account for share-based payment under the provisions of Accounting Principles
F-126
| Board Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and disclose share-based compensation as if accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (SFAS No. 123), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, a public entity is required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 123R, effective with year ending December 31, 2005. Adoption of the standard is currently expected to reduce future earnings by an amount consistent with the reductions shown in the disclosures in 28h below provided under the provisions of SFAS No. 123. Application of this pronouncement require significant judgment regarding the assumptions used in the selected option pricing model, including stock price volatility and employee exercise behavior. Most of these inputs are either highly dependent on the current economic environment at the date of grant or forward-looking over the expected term of the award. As a result, the actual impact of adoption on future earnings could differ significantly from our current estimates. |
|
b. | Marketable securities |
|
| On December 31, 2003 and 2004, certain investments carried at cost under ROC GAAP were revalued for purposes of U.S. GAAP presentation: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (ROC GAAP) | | | (U.S. GAAP) | |
| | Carrying Value | | | Fair Value | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | (In Thousands) | |
Investment in trading securities (Note 4) | | | 437,446 | | | | 2,815,127 | | | | 433,870 | | | | 2,822,118 | |
The Company uses the weighted-average cost method for trading securities when determining the cost basis.
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of short-term investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2004.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2004 | |
| | Less than 12 months | | | 12 months or greater | |
| | | | | | | | | | Unrealized | | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized | |
| | Fair value | | | losses/(gains) | | | Fair value | | | losses/(gains) | |
| | NT$ | | | US$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock | | | 228,012 | | | | 7,191 | | | | 24,165 | | | | 762 | | | | 19,449 | | | | 613 | | | | 222,967 | | | | 7,031 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Open-ended funds | | | 2,574,657 | | | | 81,194 | | | | (4,215 | ) | | | (133 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,802,669 | | | | 88,385 | | | | 19,950 | | | | 629 | | | | 19,449 | | | | 613 | | | | 222,967 | | | | 7,031 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-127
c. | Income tax expense (benefit) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Income tax current payable | | | 4,217 | | | | 1,309 | | | | 86 | | | | 3 | |
Deferred income tax | | | 116,899 | | | | (6,398 | ) | | | (133,697 | ) | | | (4,216 | ) |
Adjustment of prior years’ income taxes | | | 14,963 | | | | 3,364 | | | | (4,743 | ) | | | (150 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 136,079 | | | | (1,725 | ) | | | (138,354 | ) | | | (4,363 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation between the income tax calculated on pre-tax financial statement income based on statutory tax rate and the income tax expense (benefit), which conforms to U.S. GAAP as follows:
F-128
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Tax on pretax income at ROC statutory rate (25%) | | | (263,771 | ) | | | 217,079 | | | | 670,129 | | | | 21,133 | |
SBIP tax exemption (5%) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax on pretax income at SBIP statutory rate | | | (263,771 | ) | | | 217,079 | | | | 670,129 | | | | 21,133 | |
Other tax and assessed additional income tax | | | 4,217 | | | | 1,309 | | | | 86 | | | | 3 | |
Tax effect of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-exempt income | | | (3,149 | ) | | | (1,469 | ) | | | (426,870 | ) | | | (13,462 | ) |
Permanent differences | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non - taxable gain on sales of investment | | | 2,820 | | | | (22,571 | ) | | | (12,557 | ) | | | (396 | ) |
Non-deductible investment loss(gain) | | | 65,902 | | | | 6,613 | | | | (12,246 | ) | | | (386 | ) |
Others | | | 6,478 | | | | — | | | | (714 | ) | | | (23 | ) |
Temporary differences | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50,418 | | | | 1,590 | |
Tax credits - utilized | | | — | | | | (187,700 | ) | | | (355,923 | ) | | | (11,224 | ) |
- deferred | | | 119,312 | | | | 48,014 | | | | (70,003 | ) | | | (2,208 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | | 181,633 | | | | (66,405 | ) | | | (560,053 | ) | | | (17,662 | ) |
Loss carry forward | | | 7,674 | | | | 41 | | | | 584,122 | | | | 18,421 | |
Adjustment of prior year’s income tax | | | 14,963 | | | | 3,364 | | | | (4,743 | ) | | | (149 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 136,079 | | | | (1,725 | ) | | | (138,354 | ) | | | (4,363 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-129
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | (In Thousands) | |
Deferred income tax assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss | | | 8,613 | | | | 16,599 | | | | 523 | |
Loss of market price decline and obsolescence and slow-moving inventories | | | 10,387 | | | | 27,768 | | | | 876 | |
Sales allowance | | | 6,385 | | | | 9,455 | | | | 298 | |
Tax credits for investment in machinery and equipment and R&D expenditures | | | 143,905 | | | | 241,141 | | | | 7,604 | |
Loss carry forward | | | — | | | | 504,365 | | | | 15,906 | |
Others | | | 15,656 | | | | 74,065 | | | | 2,336 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 184,946 | | | | 873,393 | | | | 27,543 | |
Valuation allowance | | | — | | | | (282,918 | ) | | | (8,922 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 184,946 | | | | 590,475 | | | | 18,621 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-current | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax credits for investment in machinery and equipment and R & D expenditures | | | 647,607 | | | | 763,336 | | | | 24,073 | |
Loss carry forward | | | 811,485 | | | | 756,419 | | | | 23,854 | |
Transferred assets from MVI | | | 1,605 | | | | 1,280 | | | | 40 | |
Start-up costs | | | 4,995 | | | | 2,516 | | | | 79 | |
Others | | | 3,108 | | | | 140,985 | | | | 4,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,468,800 | | | | 1,664,536 | | | | 52,492 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (1,240,228 | ) | | | (1,651,163 | ) | | | (52,070 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 228,572 | | | | 13,373 | | | | 422 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income tax liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-current | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation differences | | | (572,260 | ) | | | (534,270 | ) | | | (16,849 | ) |
Interest capitalization | | | (26,644 | ) | | | (21,695 | ) | | | (684 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | (598,904 | ) | | | (555,965 | ) | | | (17,533 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (185,386 | ) | | | 47,883 | | | | 1,510 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-130
d. | Pension plans |
|
| In accordance with to SFAS No. 132 - Revised “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Post-retirement Benefits”, pension information is disclosed below: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | | 21,323 | | | | 32,102 | | | | 51,970 | | | | 1,639 | |
Interest cost | | | 3,529 | | | | 4,275 | | | | 7,599 | | | | 240 | |
Projected return on plan assets | | | (2,802 | ) | | | (2,581 | ) | | | (4,892 | ) | | | (154 | ) |
Net amortization and deferral: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrecognized net transition obligation | | | 28 | | | | 28 | | | | (477 | ) | | | (15 | ) |
Unrecognized net loss | | | — | | | | 695 | | | | 809 | | | | 25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost | | | 22,078 | | | | 34,519 | | | | 55,009 | | | | 1,735 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in benefit obligation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of year | | | 70,572 | | | | 122,148 | | | | 167,979 | | | | 5,297 | |
Service cost | | | 21,323 | | | | 32,102 | | | | 51,970 | | | | 1,639 | |
Interest cost | | | 3,529 | | | | 4,275 | | | | 7,599 | | | | 240 | |
Actuarial loss (gain) | | | 26,724 | | | | 9,454 | | | | 20,751 | | | | 654 | |
Acquisition of subsidiary | | | — | | | | — | | | | 65,825 | | | | 2,076 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation at end of year | | | 122,148 | | | | 167,979 | | | | 314,124 | | | | 9,906 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in plan assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | | 49,610 | | | | 66,005 | | | | 135,893 | | | | 4,285 | |
Actual return on plan assets | | | 1,306 | | | | 1,003 | | | | 1,796 | | | | 57 | |
Employer contribution | | | 15,089 | | | | 17,813 | | | | 32,160 | | | | 1,014 | |
Transferred from the merge company | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,500 | | | | 142 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 66,005 | | | | 84,821 | | | | 174,349 | | | | 5,498 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds status | | | (56,143 | ) | | | (83,158 | ) | | | (139,775 | ) | | | (4,408 | ) |
Unrecognized actuarial loss (gain) | | | 28,043 | | | | 38,352 | | | | 48,918 | | | | 1,543 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net amount recognized (recognized as accrued pension cost) | | | (28,100 | ) | | | (44,806 | ) | | | (90,857 | ) | | | (2,865 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actuarial assumptions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount rate | | | 3.5 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rate of compensation increase | | | 3.5 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | 3.5 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 3.25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company has no other post-retirement or post-employment benefit plans. The company expects to contribute NT$33,164 thousand to its pension plans during 2005. The plan assets are all invested in the Central Trust of China.
F-131
e. | Statements of cash flows |
|
| ROC SFAS No. 17, “Statement of Cash Flows” has been applied. Its objectives and principles are similar to those set out in the SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”. The principle differences between the standards relate to classification. Cash flows from changes in short-term investments, refundable deposits, other assets and guarantee deposits and bonus to directors and supervisors are included as operating activities under SFAS No. 95. Summarized cash flow data by operating, investing and financing activities in accordance with SFAS No. 95 are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Net cash inflow (outflow) from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | | 1,335,128 | | | | 1,842,453 | | | | 5,764,200 | | | | 181,779 | |
Investing activities | | | (3,042,493 | ) | | | (1,816,260 | ) | | | (6,169,297 | ) | | | (194,554 | ) |
Financing activities | | | 2,496,613 | | | | (1,435,656 | ) | | | 2,067,591 | | | | 65,203 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in cash and cash equivalents | | | 789,248 | | | | (1,409,463 | ) | | | 1,662,494 | | | | 52,428 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year | | | 1,775,877 | | | | 2,565,125 | | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 36,445 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year | | | 2,565,125 | | | | 1,155,662 | | | | 2,818,156 | | | | 88,873 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
f. | Statements of comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31 | |
| | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) based on U.S. GAAP | | | (1,191,164 | ) | | | 870,081 | | | | 2,312,702 | | | | 72,933 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reversal of unrealized loss (gain) on available-for-sale security | | | (153,621 | ) | | | (79,277 | ) | | | 5,618 | | | | 177 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale security | | | 79,277 | | | | (5,618 | ) | | | (805 | ) | | | (25 | ) |
Translation adjustment | | | (47 | ) | | | 115 | | | | (7,564 | ) | | | (239 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | (1,265,555 | ) | | | 785,301 | | | | 2,309,951 | | | | 72,846 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Components in other comprehensive income (loss) refer to investments in Ultima. Under ROC laws, those losses and gains are not subject to income tax. Therefore, no tax expense or benefit is allocated to such investments.
F-132
g. | Statements of accumulated comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Unrealized | | | | | | | Accumulated | |
| | Gain (Loss) on | | | | | | | Other | |
| | Long-term | | | Translation | | | Comprehensive | |
| | Investments | | | Adjustment | | | Income (Loss) | |
| | NT$ | | | NT$ | | | NT$ | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
Balance, as of January 1, 2002 | | | 153,621 | | | | (687 | ) | | | 152,934 | |
Addition in 2002 | | | (74,344 | ) | | | (47 | ) | | | (74,391 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance, as of December 31, 2002 | | | 79,277 | | | | (734 | ) | | | 78,543 | |
Addition in 2003 | | | (84,895 | ) | | | 115 | | | | (84,780 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance, as of December 31, 2003 | | | (5,618 | ) | | | (619 | ) | | | (6,237 | ) |
Addition in 2004 | | | 4,813 | | | | (7,564 | ) | | | (2,751 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, as of December 31, 2004 | | | (805 | ) | | | (8,183 | ) | | | (8,988 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-133