Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Description Of Business and Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
ORGANIZATION | ' |
ORGANIZATION |
|
Delta Investment Oil & Gas Inc. (“Delta” or “the Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on November 17, 1999. Our name was changed from Delta Mutual, Inc. to our present name on October 29, 2013, by a filing by the Company in Delaware of a Certificate of Ownership, providing for the merger of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Delta International Oil and Gas Inc., into the Company, and in the merger, changing the Company’s name to Delta International Oil& Gas Inc. |
|
The primary focus of the Company’s business is its South America Hedge Fund LLC (“SAHF”) subsidiary, which has investments in oil and gas concessions in Argentina and focuses on the energy sector, including the development and supply of energy and alternative energy sources in Latin America and North America. |
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION | ' |
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION |
|
The Company's financial statements include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries where its ownership is more than 50 percent of the common stock. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
USE OF ESTIMATES | ' |
USE OF ESTIMATES |
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates including, but not limited to, those related to such items as impairments of oil and gas properties, income tax exposures, accruals, depreciable/useful lives, allowance for doubtful accounts, and valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
EVALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS | ' |
EVALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS |
|
Oil and gas and mineral properties represent an important component of the Company’s total assets. Management reviews long-lived assets for potential impairment whenever significant events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If, impairment exists, the resulting write-down would be the difference between fair market value of the long-lived asset and the related net book value. |
INVESTMENTS | ' |
INVESTMENTS |
|
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates consist of the Company’s ownership interests in oil and gas development and exploration rights in Argentina, net of impairment losses if any. These investments were reclassified to unproved oil and gas properties after the Company was officially admitted into the joint ventures for each of the properties. |
|
The Company evaluates these investments for impairment when indicators of potential impairment are present. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, levels of oil and gas reserves, availability of pipeline (or other transportation) capacity and infrastructure and management of the operations in which the investments were made. The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate, in management’s judgment, that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, the Company compares fair value of the investment to its carrying value to determine whether impairment has occurred. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value and management considers the decline to be other than temporary, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as impairment in the consolidated financial statements. |
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES | ' |
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES |
|
The Company accounts for our oil and natural gas producing activities using the full cost method of accounting as prescribed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under this method, subject to a limitation based on estimated value, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration, and development of proved oil and natural gas properties, including internal costs directly associated with acquisition, exploration, and development activities, the costs of abandoned properties, dry holes, geophysical costs, and annual lease rentals are capitalized within a cost center. Costs of production and general and administrative corporate costs unrelated to acquisition, exploration, and development activities are expensed as incurred. |
|
Costs associated with unevaluated properties are capitalized as oil and natural gas properties but are excluded from the amortization base during the evaluation period. When we determine whether the property has proved recoverable reserves or not, or if there is an impairment, the costs are transferred into the amortization base and thereby become subject to amortization. |
|
The Company assesses all items classified as unevaluated property on at least an annual basis for inclusion in the amortization base. The Company assesses properties on an individual basis or as a group if properties are individually insignificant. The assessment includes consideration of the following factors, among others: intent to drill; remaining lease term; geological and geophysical evaluations; drilling results and activity; the assignment of proved reserves; and the economic viability of development if proved reserves are assigned. During any period in which these factors indicate that there would be impairment, or if proved reserves are assigned to a property, the cumulative costs incurred to date for such property are transferred to the amortizable base and are then subject to amortization. |
|
Capitalized costs included in the amortization base are depleted using the unit of production method based on proved reserves. Depletion is calculated using the capitalized costs included in the amortization base, including estimated asset retirement costs, plus the estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing proved reserves, net of estimated salvage values. |
|
Beginning December 31, 2009, full cost companies use the un-weighted arithmetic average first day of the month price for oil and natural gas for the 12-month period preceding the calculation date. Prior to December 31, 2009, companies used the price in effect at the end of each accounting period and had the option, under certain circumstances, to elect to use subsequent commodity prices if they increased after the end of the accounting quarter. |
|
Sales or other dispositions of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recorded unless the ratio of cost to proved reserves would significantly change. |
IMPAIRMENT | ' |
IMPAIRMENT |
|
The net book value of all capitalized oil and natural gas properties within a cost center, less related deferred income taxes, is subject to a full cost ceiling limitation which is calculated quarterly. Under the ceiling limitation, costs may not exceed an aggregate of the present value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10 percent using current prices, plus the lower of cost or market value of unproved properties included in the amortization base, plus the cost of unevaluated properties, less any associated tax effects. Any excess of the net book value, less related deferred tax benefits, over the ceiling is written off as expense. Impairment expense recorded in one period may not be reversed in a subsequent period even though higher oil and gas prices may have increased the ceiling applicable to the subsequent period. |
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION | ' |
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION |
|
The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement cost, and corresponding liability as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and the cost is subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. The Company records an asset retirement obligation to reflect our legal obligations related to future plugging and abandonment of our oil and natural gas wells and gas gathering systems. The Company estimates the expected cash flow associated with the obligation and discount the amount using a credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate. At least annually, the Company reassesses the obligation to determine whether a change in the estimated obligation is necessary. The Company evaluates whether there are indicators that suggest the estimated cash flows underlying the obligation have materially changed. Should those indicators suggest the estimated obligation may have materially changed on an interim basis (quarterly), the Company will update our assessment accordingly. Additional retirement obligations increase the liability associated with new oil and natural gas wells and gas gathering systems as these obligations are incurred. |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | ' |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided for by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The Company purchased oil field equipment during the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company did not provide any depreciation on this equipment for the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2012, as the equipment was not yet in service. |
REVENUE RECOGNITION | ' |
REVENUE RECOGNITION |
|
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. We follow the “sales method” of accounting for oil and natural gas revenue, so we recognize revenue on all natural gas or crude oil sold to purchasers, regardless of whether the sales are proportionate to our ownership in the property. Actual sales of gas are based on sales, net of the associated volume charges for processing fees and for costs associated with delivery, transportation, marketing, and royalties in accordance with industry standards. Operating costs and taxes are recognized in the same period in which revenue is earned. Severance and ad valorem taxes are reflected as a component of lease operating expense. |
INCOME TAXES | ' |
INCOME TAXES |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred assets and liabilities are recognized based upon anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The Company establishes a valuation allowance to the extent that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be utilized against future taxable income. |
UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS | ' |
UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS |
|
The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions pursuant to ASC Topic 740-10-25 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which allows companies to recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. Those tax positions failing to qualify for initial recognition are recognized in the first interim period in which they meet the more likely than not standard, or are resolved through negotiation or litigation with the taxing authority, or upon expiration of the statute of limitations. De-recognition of a tax position that was previously recognized occurs when an entity subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained. |
|
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has approximately $75,000 and $100,000, respectively, of liabilities for uncertain tax positions. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company provided $100,000 for uncertain tax positions related to its investments in Argentina. Interpretation of taxation rules relating to investments in Argentina concessions may give rise to uncertain positions. In connection with the uncertain tax position, there was no interest or penalties recorded. |
|
The Company is subject to ongoing tax exposures, examinations and assessments in various jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Company may incur additional tax expense based upon the outcomes of such matters. In addition, when applicable, the Company will adjust tax expense to reflect the Company’s ongoing assessments of such matters, which require judgment and can materially increase or decrease its effective rate as well as impact operating results. |
|
The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The Company’s major taxing jurisdictions include the United States (including applicable states). |
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE | ' |
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
|
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common share and potential common share outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of outstanding common stock purchase warrants. For the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were 9,211,517 and 8,211,517, respectively of potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. |
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION | ' |
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION |
|
In 2013 and 2012, the functional currency for the Company’s primary foreign operations is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at balance sheet date rates of exchange and income, expense and cash flow items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. The functional currency in South America is the Argentine Peso. Translation adjustments are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. |
OTHER CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
OTHER CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") recently issued “Financial Reporting Release No. 60 Cautionary Advice About Critical Accounting Policies” (“FRR 60”), suggesting companies provide additional disclosures, discussion and commentary on their accounting policies considered most critical to its business and financial reporting requirements. FRR 60 considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in the application of the policy. For a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies, including the critical accounting policies, please refer to the accompanying notes to the financial statements. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION | ' |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to non-employees under ASC 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation" ("ASC 718"). The compensation cost of the awards is based on the grant date fair-value of these awards and recognized over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company issued 0 and 28,800 shares, respectively, and recorded compensation expense in the amount of $0 and $7,280, respectively. The Company uses the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to determine the fair-value of stock options issued for compensation. |
|
The Company accounts for non-employee share-based awards based upon ASC 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.” ASC 505-50 requires the costs of goods and services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments to be recognized using the fair value of the goods and services or the fair value of the equity award, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of the equity award is determined on the measurement date, which is the earlier of the date that a performance commitment is reached or the date that performance is complete. Generally, our awards do not entail performance commitments. When an award vests over time such that performance occurs over multiple reporting periods, we estimate the fair value of the award as of the end of each reporting period and recognize an appropriate portion of the cost based on the fair value on that date. When the award vests, we adjust the cost previously recognized so that the cost ultimately recognized is equivalent to the fair value on the date the performance is complete. |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company granted warrants to purchase 1,000,000 and 404,868, respectively of its common stock and recorded compensation expense of $60,938 and $109,561, respectively. The Company also recorded $18,999 in additions to oil and gas properties for the year ended December 31, 2012. |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL MEASUREMENTS | ' |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL MEASUREMENTS |
|
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. FASB ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: |
|
The Company utilizes the accounting guidance for fair value measurements and discloses for all financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis during the reporting period. |
|
The fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are defined as follows: |
|
Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets. |
Level 2 - Inputs other then quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable. |
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs about which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. |
|
As of December 31, 2013, there were no financial assets or liabilities that required disclosure. |
NEW FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS | ' |
NEW FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
|
Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02 – Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU No. 2013-02”) |
|
ASU No. 2013-02 requires disclosure of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present either on the face of the consolidated statements of operations or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net earnings but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified to net earnings in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts not reclassified in their entirety to net earnings, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU No. 2013-02 is effective prospectively for the Company for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this update will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. |