Belmond (BEL) 10-Q 2012 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

or

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to              

Commission file number 001-16017

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda	98-0223493
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or	Identification No.)
organization)
22 Victoria Street P.O. Box HM 1179 Hamilton HMEX, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

441-295-2244

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  (See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

Large Accelerated Filer x	Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o	Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

As of November 1, 2012, 102,897,311 Class A common shares and 18,044,478 Class B common shares of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. were outstanding. All of the Class B shares are owned by a subsidiary of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	$’000		$’000
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	101,536		90,104
Restricted cash	20,057		13,214
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $662 and $602	47,179		44,599
Due from unconsolidated companies	10,077		10,754
Prepaid expenses and other	20,452		20,089
Inventories	44,674		44,499
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale	18,726		105,173
Real estate assets	29,905		32,021
Total current assets	292,606		360,453
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $297,148 and $269,237	1,147,743		1,107,657
Property, plant and equipment of consolidated variable interest entities	184,418		185,788
Investments in unconsolidated companies	65,686		60,012
Goodwill	162,497		161,460
Other intangible assets	18,762		19,465
Other assets	42,218		36,034
	1,913,930		1,930,869
Liabilities and Equity
Working capital loans	1,114		—
Accounts payable	27,793		28,998
Accrued liabilities	102,430		87,617
Deferred revenue	40,778		29,400
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale	266		3,262
Current portion of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases	51,023		77,058
Current portion of long-term debt of consolidated variable interest entities	1,795		1,784
Total current liabilities	225,199		228,119
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases	465,799		466,830
Long-term debt of consolidated variable interest entities	87,397		88,745
Liability for pension benefit	8,977		8,642
Other liabilities	24,214		26,145
Deferred income taxes	91,553		94,036
Deferred income taxes of consolidated variable interest entities	60,499		61,072
Liability for uncertain tax positions	4,833		4,755
	968,471		978,344
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
Equity
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred shares $0.01 par value (30,000,000 shares authorized, issued Nil)	—		—
Class A common shares $0.01 par value (240,000,000 shares authorized):
Issued - 102,893,231 (2011 - 102,625,857)	1,029		1,026
Class B common shares $0.01 par value (120,000,000 shares authorized):
Issued - 18,044,478 (2011 - 18,044,478)	181		181
Additional paid-in capital	979,670		975,330
Retained earnings	60,091		46,263
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(97,659	)	(72,289	)
Less: Reduction due to class B common shares owned by a subsidiary - 18,044,478	(181	)	(181	)
Total shareholders’ equity	943,131		950,330
Non-controlling interests	2,328		2,195
Total equity	945,459		952,525
	1,913,930		1,930,869

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Operations (unaudited)

	2012		2011
Three months ended September 30,	$’000		$’000
Revenue	159,975		174,175
Expenses:
Cost of services	72,762		80,650
Selling, general and administrative	50,781		56,813
Depreciation and amortization	10,549		11,184
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment	—		40,853
Total expenses	134,092		189,500
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	—		(18	)
Earnings/(losses) from operations	25,883		(15,343	)
Interest expense, net	(8,938	)	(12,703	)
Foreign currency, net	(57	)	(4,595	)
Net finance costs	(8,995	)	(17,298	)
Earnings/(losses) before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax	16,888		(32,641	)
Provision for income taxes	(6,590	)	(1,205	)
Earnings/(losses) before earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax	10,298		(33,846	)
Earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax provision of $761 and $985	1,759		2,229
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	12,057		(31,617	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $426 and $6,206	5,625		(18,450	)
Net earnings/(losses)	17,682		(50,067	)
Net losses attributable to non-controlling interests	43		146
Net earnings/(losses) attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	17,725		(49,921	)

	$	$
Basic earnings per share:
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	0.12	(0.31	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	0.05	(0.18	)
Basic net earnings/(losses) per share attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	0.17	(0.49	)
Diluted earnings per share:
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	0.11	(0.31	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	0.05	(0.18	)
Diluted net earnings/(losses) per share attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	0.17	(0.49	)
Dividends per share	—	—

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Operations (unaudited)

	2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,	$’000		$’000
Revenue	424,044		434,779
Expenses:
Cost of services	196,019		203,586
Selling, general and administrative	156,000		158,987
Depreciation and amortization	31,593		32,553
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment	—		40,853
Total expenses	383,612		435,979
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment	—		502
Earnings/(losses) from operations	40,432		(698	)
Interest expense, net	(22,556	)	(32,830	)
Foreign currency, net	(655	)	(2,525	)
Net finance costs	(23,211	)	(35,355	)
Earnings/(losses) before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax	17,221		(36,053	)
Provision for income taxes	(13,316	)	(5,819	)
Earnings/(losses) before earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax	3,905		(41,872	)
Earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax provision of $1,748 and $1,422	4,062		3,225
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	7,967		(38,647	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $21 and $6,206	5,993		(20,879	)
Net earnings/(losses)	13,960		(59,526	)
Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests	(132	)	(148	)
Net earnngs/(losses) attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	13,828		(59,674	)

	$	$
Basic earnings per share:
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	0.08	(0.38	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	0.06	(0.20	)
Basic net earnings/(losses) per share attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	0.13	(0.58	)
Diluted earnings per share:
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	0.08	(0.38	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	0.06	(0.20	)
Diluted net earnings/(losses) per share attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	0.13	(0.58	)
Dividends per share	—	—

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

	2012		2011
Three months ended September 30,	$’000		$’000
Net earnings/(losses)	17,682		(50,067	)
Other comprehensive income/(losses), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax provision of $641 and $Nil	(1,512	)	(49,292	)
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax provision/(benefit) of $469 and $(1,494)	94		(1,342	)
Change in pension liability, net of tax (benefit)/provision of $(145) and $Nil	(68	)	—
Total comprehensive income/(losses)	16,196		(100,701	)
Comprehensive losses attributable to non-controlling interests	44		143
Comprehensive income/(losses) attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd.	16,240		(100,558	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

	2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,	$’000		$’000
Net earnings/(losses)	13,960		(59,526	)
Other comprehensive income/(losses), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax provision of $222 and $Nil	(23,929	)	(25,196	)
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax provision/(benefit) of $56 and $(643)	(1,002	)	2,536
Change in pension liability, net of tax (benefit)/provision of $(145) and $Nil	(438	)	—
Total comprehensive losses	(11,409	)	(82,186	)
Comprehensive earnings attributable to non-controlling interests	(133	)	(142	)
Comprehensive losses attributable to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd	(11,542	)	(82,328	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows (unaudited)

	2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,	$’000		$’000
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings/(losses)	13,960		(59,526	)
Less: Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations, net of tax	5,993		(20,879	)
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	7,967		(38,647	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings/(losses) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	31,593		32,553
Amortization of finance costs	3,930		5,822
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment	—		40,853
Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated companies	(5,810	)	(4,647	)
Tax on earnings of unconsolidated companies	1,748		1,422
Share-based compensation	4,327		4,796
Change in deferred income tax	(6,224	)	(9,792	)
Gain from disposal of property, plant and equipment	—		(502	)
Increase/(decrease) in provisions for uncertain tax positions	78		(2,471	)
Other non-cash items	—		2,155
Effect of exchange rates on net earnings/losses	2,120		(3,787	)
Change in assets and liabilities net of effects from acquisition of subsidiaries:
Increase in receivables, prepaid expenses and other	(1,488	)	(8,158	)
Increase in due from unconsolidated companies	(1,663	)	(12,366	)
Increase in escrow and prepaid customer deposits	(565	)	(538	)
Increase in inventories	(210	)	(3,006	)
Decrease in real estate assets	2,116		11,908
Increase in payables, accrued liabilities, and deferred revenue	21,654		39,559
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations	59,573		55,154
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities from discontinued operations	4,721		(2,862	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	64,294		52,292
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(68,003	)	(39,731	)
Acquisitions and investments	(3,720	)	(5,761	)
Increase in restricted cash	(6,266	)	(6,552	)
Release of restricted cash	—		1,558
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	—		25,492
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations	(77,989	)	(24,994	)
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations	49,265		19,385
Net cash used in investing activities	(28,724	)	(5,609	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows (unaudited)

	2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,	$’000		$’000
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from working capital loans	1,086		—
Payments on working capital loans	—		(911	)
Issuance of common shares	—		—
Issuance costs of common shares	—		(157	)
Share options exercised	3		—
Issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs	79,954		120,016
Principal payments under long-term debt	(97,560	)	(191,949	)
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations	(16,517	)	(73,001	)
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued operations	—		—
Net cash used in financing activities	(16,517	)	(73,001	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(7,621	)	(5,146	)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	11,432		(31,464	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	90,104		150,117
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	101,536		118,653

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Statements of Condensed Consolidated Total Equity (unaudited)

	Preferred shares at par value $’000	Class A common shares at par value $’000	Class B common shares at par value $’000	Additional paid-in capital $’000		Retained earnings $’000		Accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) $’000		Common shares held by a subsidiary $’000		Non- controlling interests $’000		Total $’000
Balance, January 1, 2012	—	1,026	181	975,330		46,263		(72,289	)	(181	)	2,195		952,525
Issuance of class A common shares in public offering, net of issuance costs	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		—		—
Share based compensation	—	—	—	4,340		—		—		—		—		4,340
Share options exercised	—	3	—	—		—		—		—		—		3
Comprehensive income:
Net earnings on common shares	—	—	—	—		13,828		—		—		132		13,960
Other comprehensive loss	—	—	—	—		—		(25,370	)	—		1		(25,369	)
Balance, September 30, 2012	—	1,029	181	979,670		60,091		(97,659	)	(181	)	2,328		945,459
Balance, January 1, 2011	—	1,023	181	968,492		134,043		(38,585	)	(181	)	1,922		1,066,895
Issuance of class A common shares in public offering, net of issuance costs	—	—	—	(157	)	—		—		—		—		(157	)
Share based compensation	—	—	—	5,056		—		—		—		—		5,056
Share options exercised	—	3	—	—		—		—		—		—		3
Comprehensive loss:
Net losses on common shares	—	—	—	—		(59,674	)	—		—		148		(59,526	)
Other comprehensive loss	—	—	—	—		—		(22,654	)	—		(6	)	(22,660	)
Balance, September 30, 2011	—	1,026	181	973,391		74,369		(61,239	)	(181	)	2,064		989,611

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

8

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1. Basis of financial statement presentation

In this report Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. is referred to as the “Company”, and the Company and its subsidiaries are referred to collectively as “OEH”.

“FASB” means Financial Accounting Standards Board. “ASC” means the Accounting Standards Codification of the FASB and “ASU” means an Accounting Standards Update of the FASB.

(a)  Accounting policies

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of the management of the Company, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, operating results and cash flows have been included in these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s periodic filings, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.  See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2011 Form 10-K for additional information regarding significant accounting policies.

For interim income tax reporting purposes, the Company generally determines its best estimate of an annual effective tax rate and applies that rate on a year-to-date basis applicable to its ordinary income. The Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate excludes significant, unusual or infrequently occurring items, jurisdictions for which a reliable estimate cannot be made or where the estimated benefit of losses cannot be recognized, and certain other items excluded pursuant to the U.S. GAAP authoritative guidance.  The income tax expense (or benefit) related to all other items is individually computed and recognized when the items occur.

The accounting policies used in preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements are the same as those applied in the prior year, except for escrow and prepaid customer deposits described below and changes made to ASC-codified items as described below.

Escrow and prepaid customer deposits

During 2012, management determined that amounts previously reported within investing activities related to escrow and prepaid customer deposits should be presented in cash flows from operating activities based on the nature of these cash deposits in relation to Company’s business operations.  As a result, the statement of condensed consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 has been adjusted to reflect the impact of this change in presentation which resulted in a decrease to cash provided by operating activities and an increase to net cash provided by investing activities of $538,000.  The reclassification of escrow and prepaid deposits from cash flows provided by investing activities to cash flows provided by operating activities from continuing operations has no impact on changes in cash or cash equivalents on the condensed consolidated balance sheets or on the statements of condensed consolidated operations, comprehensive income or total equity for the periods presented.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

In September 2011, the FASB issued new guidance related to annual goodwill impairment assessments that gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. Under this guidance, if this option is selected, a company is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This guidance became effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

9

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance concerning the presentation of comprehensive income in the financial statements. Under the amendments to the existing guidance, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under either option, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The amendments eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in total equity. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and requires retrospective application. The FASB subsequently deferred the effective date of certain provisions of this standard pertaining to the reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income, pending the issuance of further guidance on that matter. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2012, and has presented total comprehensive income in separate statements of condensed consolidated comprehensive income.  There was no other impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance on fair value measurement and disclosure requirements.  The amendments in this update result in a convergence in the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements under U.S. GAAP with those required under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  Additional disclosure requirements in the update include: (1) for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs; (2) for an entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset that is different from the asset’s highest and best use, the reason for the difference; (3) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were determined; and (4) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  On January 1, 2012 the Company adopted this guidance, the impact of which did not materially affect the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Accounting pronouncements to be adopted

In December 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires companies to provide new disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements for financial instruments and derivatives. The provisions of this guidance are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and are required to be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

(b) Net earnings/(losses) per share

The weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings/(losses) per share was as follows:

	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011
	‘000	‘000	‘000	‘000
Basic	102,893	102,604	102,833	102,502
Effect of dilution	2,784	—	2,327	—
Diluted	105,677	102,604	105,160	102,502

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the share options below were excluded from the calculation of the diluted weighted average number of shares because the exercise prices were greater than the average market prices for the applicable periods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, all share options and share-based awards were excluded from the calculation of the diluted weighted average number of shares because OEH incurred a net loss in these periods and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

10

The total number of share options and share-based awards excluded from computing diluted earnings per share were as follows: 

	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011
Share options	1,241,150	2,542,300	1,241,150	2,542,300
Share-based awards	—	686,485	—	686,485
	1,241,150	3,228,785	1,241,150	3,228,785

The number of share options and share-based awards unexercised at September 30, 2012 was 4,025,349 (September 30, 2011 - 3,228,785).

2. Discontinued operations

At September 30, 2012, The Westcliff, Johannesburg, South Africa remained classified as held for sale. At December 31, 2011, Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, French Polynesia and Keswick Hall, Charlottesville, Virginia were classified as held for sale, and at June 30, 2012, The Observatory Hotel, Sydney, Australia was classified as held for sale along with The Westcliff. During the periods presented, The Observatory Hotel, Bora Bora Lagoon Resort and Keswick Hall were sold.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the results of operations of The Observatory Hotel, The Westcliff, Bora Bora Lagoon Resort and Keswick Hall have been presented as discontinued operations. In addition to these properties, discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 include the results of the operations of Hôtel de la Cité, Carcassonne, France, which was sold on August 1, 2011.

(a)          Properties sold: The Observatory Hotel, Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, Keswick Hall and Hôtel de la Cité

On August 8, 2012, OEH completed the sale of the property and operations of The Observatory Hotel in Sydney, Australia for a consideration of A$40,000,000 ($42,106,000), of which A$29,350,000 ($30,895,000) was paid in cash and A$10,650,000 ($11,211,000) was settled directly with the lender to repay the debt facility secured by the property. The hotel was a part of OEH’s hotels and restaurants segment. The disposal resulted in a gain on sale of $5,367,000 (including a $12,147,000 transfer of foreign currency translation amounts from accumulated other comprehensive loss), which is reported within earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax.

On June 1, 2012, OEH completed the sale of the shares of Bora Bora Lagoon Resort in French Polynesia for a cash consideration of $3,000,000. The hotel was a part of OEH’s hotels and restaurants segment. The disposal resulted in a gain on sale of $690,000 (including a $13,074,000 transfer of foreign currency translation amounts from accumulated other comprehensive loss), which is reported within earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax.

On January 23, 2012, OEH completed the sale of the property and operations of Keswick Hall in Charlottesville, Virginia for consideration of $22,000,000, of which $12,000,000 was paid in cash and $10,000,000 was settled directly with the lender as a reduction in the debt facility secured by the property. The hotel was a part of OEH’s hotels and restaurants segment. The disposal resulted in a gain of $2,066,000, which is reported within earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax.

On August 1, 2011, OEH completed the sale of the shares of Hôtel de la Cité in Carcassonne, France, for a cash consideration of €9,000,000 ($12,933,000). The hotel was a part of OEH’s hotels and restaurants segment. The disposal resulted in a gain on sale of $2,182,000 (including a $3,018,000 transfer of foreign currency translation amounts from accumulated other comprehensive loss), which is reported within earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax.

11

The following is a summary of net assets sold and the gain recorded on sale for The Observatory Hotel, Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, Keswick Hall and Hôtel de la Cité:

	The Observatory Hotel		Bora Bora Lagoon Resort		Keswick Hall		Hôtel de la Cité
	August 8, 2012		June 1, 2012		January 23, 2012		August 1, 2011
	$'000		$'000		$'000		$'000
Property, plant and equipment, net	48,096		15,827		18,590		13,147
Net working capital (deficit)/surplus	(299	)	(720	)	401		266
Net assets	47,797		15,107		18,991		13,413
Transfer of foreign currency translation gain	(12,147	)	(13,074	)	—		(3,018	)
	35,650		2,033		18,991		10,395
Consideration:
Cash	30,895		3,000		12,000		12,933
Reduction in debt facility on sale of hotel	11,211		—		10,000		—
Less: Working capital adjustment	(447	)	—		(430	)	—
Less: Costs to sell	(642	)	(277	)	(513	)	(356	)
	41,017		2,723		21,057		12,577
Gain on sale	5,367		690		2,066		2,182

(b)           Results of discontinued operations

On July 24, 2012, OEH entered into an agreement to sell The Westcliff hotel.  The sale is expected to complete in the fourth quarter of 2012. OEH will continue to operate The Westcliff for a period of not more than 12 months after completion.  OEH considers the hotel as non-core to the future business, with the sale releasing funds for debt reduction, cash reserves and reinvestment in other OEH properties. The hotel was included in the hotels and restaurants segment. This property has been reclassified as held for sale and its results have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods shown.

Summarized operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (including residual transactions relating to properties disposed of in prior periods which are recorded in “Other”) are as follows:

	Three months ended September 30, 2012
	The Observatory Hotel		The Westcliff	Bora Bora Lagoon Resort		Other		Total
	$’000		$’000	$’000		$’000		$’000
Revenue	1,204		2,404	—		(15	)	3,593
(Losses)/earnings before tax and gain/(loss) on sale	(406	)	192	(28	)	92		(150	)
Gain/(loss) on sale	5,367		—	(18	)	—		5,349
Earnings/(losses) before tax	4,961		192	(46	)	92		5,199
Tax benefit	426		—	—		—		426
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	5,387		192	(46	)	92		5,625

12

	Three months ended September 30, 2011
	The Observatory Hotel		The Westcliff		Bora Bora Lagoon Resort		Keswick Hall		Hôtel de la Cité		Other		Total
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Revenue	3,857		2,356		—		3,470		1,238		—		10,921
(Losses)/earnings before tax and gain on sale	(542	)	(183	)	(111	)	(51	)	193		(60	)	(754	)
Impairment	—		—		(2,150	)	(23,934	)	—		—		(26,084	)
Gain on sale	—		—		—		—		2,182		—		2,182
(Losses)/earnings before tax	(542	)	(183	)	(2,261	)	(23,985	)	2,375		(60	)	(24,656	)
Tax benefit/(provision)	—		—		—		7,001		(795	)	—		6,206
Net (losses)/earnings from discontinued operations	(542	)	(183	)	(2,261	)	(16,984	)	1,580		(60	)	(18,450	)

	Nine months ended September 30, 2012
	The Observatory Hotel		The Westcliff		Bora Bora Lagoon Resort		Keswick Hall		Total
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Revenue	9,188		6,929		—		412		16,529
Losses before tax and gain on sale	(1,034	)	(27	)	(166	)	(925	)	(2,152	)
Gain on sale	5,367		—		690		2,067		8,124
Earnings/(losses) before tax	4,333		(27	)	524		1,142		5,972
Tax benefit/(provision)	426		—		—		(405	)	21
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	4,759		(27	)	524		737		5,993

13

	Nine months ended September 30, 2011
	The Observatory Hotel		The Westcliff		Bora Bora Lagoon Resort		Keswick Hall		Hôtel de la Cité		Other		Total
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Revenue	12,207		6,988		—		10,764		3,782		—		33,741
Losses before tax and gain on sale	(838	)	(761	)	(286	)	(917	)	(303	)	(78	)	(3,183	)
Impairment	—		—		(2,150	)	(23,934	)	—		—		(26,084	)
Gain on sale	—		—		—		—		2,182		—		2,182
(Losses)/earnings before tax	(838	)	(761	)	(2,436	)	(24,851	)	1,879		(78	)	(27,085	)
Tax benefit/(provision)	—		—		—		7,001		(795	)	—		6,206
Net (losses)/earnings from discontinued operations	(838	)	(761	)	(2,436	)	(17,850	)	1,084		(78	)	(20,879	)

In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified and recorded a non-cash property, plant and equipment charge of $23,934,000 in respect of Keswick Hall. The carrying value was written down to the hotel's fair value.

Also in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified and recorded a non-cash property, plant and equipment charge of $2,150,000 in respect of Bora Bora Lagoon Resort. The carrying values of the assets were written down to the fair value to reflect the level of offers received at the time for the purchase of the hotel.

(c)           Assets and liabilities held for sale

Assets and liabilities of the properties classified as held for sale consist of the following:

	September 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	The Westcliff		Total		The Observatory Hotel		The Westcliff		Bora Bora Lagoon Resort		Keswick Hall		Total
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Current assets	87		87		373		87		45		3,260		3,765
Other assets	—		—		—		—		—		4,741		4,741
Property, plant and equipment	18,639		18,639		47,189		19,273		16,427		13,778		96,667
Total assets held for sale	18,726		18,726		47,562		19,360		16,472		21,779		105,173
Current liabilities	(266	)	(266	)	(1,212	)	(269	)	(843	)	(938	)	(3,262	)
Total liabilities held for sale	(266	)	(266	)	(1,212	)	(269	)	(843	)	(938	)	(3,262	)

3. Variable interest entities

OEH analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees and equity investments, to determine if an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). In that assessment, OEH’s analysis includes both quantitative and qualitative considerations. OEH bases its quantitative analysis on the forecast cash flows of the entity, and its qualitative analysis on a review of the design of the entity, organizational structure including decision-making ability, and relevant financial agreements. In accordance with the

14

guidance for the consolidation of a VIE, OEH also uses its quantitative and qualitative analysis to determine if OEH is the primary beneficiary of the VIE through the assessment of the powers to direct activities that most significantly impact economic performance of the VIE.

Charleston Place Hotel

OEH holds a 19.9% equity investment in Charleston Center LLC, owner of Charleston Place Hotel.  OEH has also made a number of loans to the hotel.  On evaluating its various variable interests in the hotel, OEH concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of this VIE because OEH is expected to absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses and residual gains and has the power to direct the activities that impact the VIE’s performance, based on the current organizational structure.

The carrying amount of consolidated assets and liabilities of Charleston Center LLC included within OEH’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000
Current assets	8,141	8,167
Property, plant and equipment	184,418	185,788
Goodwill	40,395	40,395
Other assets	1,963	2,185
Total assets	234,917	236,535
Current liabilities	6,520	6,101
Third-party debt, including $1,795 and $1,784 current portion	89,192	90,529
Other liabilities	14,590	14,139
Deferred income taxes	60,499	61,072
Total liabilities	170,801	171,841
Net assets (before amounts payable to OEH of $91,072 and $92,263)	64,116	64,694

The third-party debt of Charleston Center LLC is secured by its net assets and is non-recourse to its members, including OEH. The hotel’s separate assets are not available to pay the debts of OEH and the hotel’s separate liabilities do not constitute obligations of OEH.  This non-recourse obligation is presented separately on the condensed consolidated balance sheet of OEH.

4. Acquisitions

No acquisitions occurred during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

5. Real estate impairment

Real estate assets include condominiums and marina slips remaining to be sold at Porto Cupecoy on the Dutch side of St. Martin. OEH records impairment charges against the carrying value of real estate assets if the carrying value exceeds the fair value less costs to sell.  During the third quarter of 2011, OEH determined that the fair value less costs to sell of real estate assets was less than the carrying value, which resulted in the recognition of a non-cash impairment charge of $36,869,000 (computed using Level 3 inputs, namely the estimated selling prices and estimated selling costs based on OEH’s experience with sales of condominiums and marina slips already completed). This impairment charge resulted primarily from changes in the estimates of price and pace of future sales as a result of current market conditions. Additionally as part of an overall impairment calculation, property, plant and equipment at the Porto Cupecoy development with a carrying value of $1,677,000 were written down to a fair value of $Nil. See Note 7.

15

The total impairment charge at September 30, 2011 of $38,546,000 relates to the real estate and property development segment, and is reported within impairment of real estate assets, goodwill and property, plant and equipment in the statement of condensed consolidated operations. No corresponding impairment was recorded at September 30, 2012.

The determination of impairment incorporates various assumptions and uncertainties that OEH believes are reasonable and supportable considering all available evidence, such as the future cash flows, future sales prices and the related discount rate. However, these assumptions and uncertainties are, by their very nature, highly judgmental.  If the assumptions are not met, OEH may be required to recognize additional impairment losses.

6. Investments in unconsolidated companies

Investments in unconsolidated companies represent equity interests of 50% or less and in which OEH exerts significant influence, but does not have effective control of these unconsolidated companies and, therefore, accounts for these investments using the equity method. These investments include the rail and hotel joint venture operations in Peru, the Hotel Ritz, Madrid, Eastern and Oriental Express Ltd. and the Buzios land joint venture.

OEH’s Peru hotel joint venture has completed the sale of Las Casitas del Colca for $5,590,000 on April 17, 2012.  Additionally, on June 15, 2012, the Peru hotel joint venture opened Palacio Nazarenas, a 55-key hotel in Cuzco, Peru.

Summarized financial data for OEH’s unconsolidated companies are as follows:

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000
Current assets	78,005	70,536
Property, plant and equipment, net	350,043	344,576
Other assets	5,111	5,536
Total assets	433,159	420,648
Current liabilities	166,416	195,529
Long-term debt	47,940	17,346
Other liabilities	103,145	99,643
Total shareholders’ equity	115,658	108,130
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	433,159	420,648

	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011
	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000
Revenue	41,635	38,527	115,498	102,983
Earnings from operations before net finance costs	7,853	9,501	20,049	18,131
Net earnings	3,202	4,244	7,881	5,749

Included in unconsolidated companies are OEH’s hotel and rail joint ventures in Peru, under which OEH and the other 50% participant must contribute equally additional equity needed for the businesses.  If the other participant does not meet this obligation, OEH has the right to dilute the other participant and obtain a majority equity interest in the affected joint venture company.  OEH also has rights to purchase the other participant’s interests, which rights are exercisable in limited circumstances such as the other participant’s bankruptcy.

16

The carrying amounts that relate to OEH’s unconsolidated companies are as follows:

	Investment		Due from unconsolidated company		Guarantees		Shareholder loans		Total
	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000
Peru hotel joint venture	17,279	16,212	166	599	—	—	—	—	17,445	16,811
Peru rail joint venture	39,809	35,001	2,325	4,917	—	—	—	—	42,134	39,918
Hotel Ritz, Madrid	—	—	1,474	2,657	—	—	19,647	15,829	21,121	18,486
Eastern and Oriental Express Ltd.	3,145	3,298	6,112	2,581	—	—	—	—	9,257	5,879
Buzios land joint venture	5,343	5,393	—	—	—	—	—	—	5,343	5,393
	65,576	59,904	10,077	10,754	—	—	19,647	15,829	95,300	86,487

OEH’s maximum exposures to loss as a result of its involvement with its unconsolidated companies are as follows:

	Investment		Due from unconsolidated company		Guarantees		Shareholder loans		Total
	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000
Peru hotel joint venture	17,279	16,212	166	599	—	—	—	—	17,445	16,811
Peru rail joint venture	39,809	35,001	2,325	4,917	7,944	9,052	—	—	50,078	48,970
Hotel Ritz, Madrid	—	—	1,474	2,657	10,121	10,151	19,647	15,829	31,242	28,637
Eastern and Oriental Express Ltd.	3,145	3,298	6,112	2,581	—	3,000	—	—	9,257	8,879
Buzios land joint venture	5,343	5,393	—	—	—	—	—	—	5,343	5,393
	65,576	59,904	10,077	10,754	18,065	22,203	19,647	15,829	113,365	108,690

The maximum exposure to loss for the Peru rail joint venture and Hotel Ritz, Madrid exceeds the carrying amount related to OEH’s unconsolidated companies due to guarantees discussed below, which are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. As at September 30, 2012, OEH does not expect that it will be required to fund these guarantees relating to these joint venture companies.

The Company has guaranteed $7,944,000 and contingently guaranteed $11,429,000 of the debt obligations of the rail joint venture in Peru through 2016. The Company has also guaranteed the rail joint venture’s contingent obligations relating to the performance of its governmental rail concessions, currently in the amount of $6,453,000, through May 2013. The Company has contingently guaranteed, through 2018, $15,500,000 of debt obligations of the joint venture in Peru that operates four hotels and, through 2014, a further $2,706,000 of its debt obligations. The contingent guarantees for each Peruvian joint venture may only be enforced in the event there is a change in control of the relevant joint venture, which would occur only if OEH’s ownership of the economic and voting interests in the joint venture falls below 50%, an event which has not occurred.

Long-term debt obligations of the rail joint venture in Peru at September 30, 2012 totaling $7,944,000 have been classified within current liabilities of the joint venture in its stand-alone financial statements, as it was out of compliance with a debt service coverage ratio covenant in its loan facilities. Discussions with the lenders to bring the joint venture into compliance are continuing.

At September 30, 2012, long-term debt obligations totalling $82,980,000 of the Hotel Ritz, Madrid, in which OEH has a 50% equity investment, have been classified within current liabilities in the joint venture’s stand-alone financial statements as it was

17

out of compliance with the debt service coverage ratio covenant in its first mortgage loan facility. Discussions with the lender to bring the hotel into long-term compliance are continuing.  OEH and its joint venture partner have each guaranteed $9,649,000 of the debt obligations, and $472,000 of a working capital loan facility.

7. Property, plant and equipment

The major classes of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	$’000		$’000
Land and buildings	1,041,874		992,748
Machinery and equipment	189,947		181,467
Fixtures, fittings and office equipment	194,877		184,618
River cruise ship and canal boats	18,193		18,061
	1,444,891		1,376,894
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(297,148	)	(269,237	)
	1,147,743		1,107,657

The major classes of assets under capital leases included above are as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	$’000		$’000
Freehold and leased land and buildings	4,548		4,461
Machinery and equipment	914		828
Fixtures, fittings and office equipment	101		102
	5,563		5,391
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(1,317	)	(1,164	)
	4,246		4,227

The depreciation charge on property, plant and equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $10,425,000 (2011 - $11,732,000) and $31,225,000 (2011 - $34,613,000), respectively.

No property, plant and equipment impairments were recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified a non-cash property, plant and equipment impairment charge of $2,308,000 in respect of Casa de Sierra Nevada, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico. The carrying value was written down to the hotel's fair value.

As part of the overall impairment charge at Porto Cupecoy during the three months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified a non-cash property, plant and equipment impairment charge of $1,677,000 in respect of this property development. See Note 5.

As of September 30, 2012, the property, plant and equipment of Charleston Center LLC, a consolidated VIE, of $184,418,000 (December 31, 2011 - $185,788,000) is separately disclosed on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. See Note 3.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, OEH capitalized interest in the amount of $1,003,000 (2011 - $Nil) and $2,905,000 (2011 - $Nil), respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2011, capitalized interest amounted to $863,000. All amounts capitalized were recorded in property, plant and equipment.

18

New York hotel project

On March 18, 2011, OEH agreed to assign its purchase and development agreements previously made with the New York Public Library relating to the site of the Donnell branch of the Library adjacent to OEH's '21' Club restaurant to an affiliate (the “Assignee”) of Tribeca Associates, LLC and Starwood Capital Group Global LLC. The Assignee agreed to assume all the terms and obligations of the contracts and to reimburse all previous deposit payments made by OEH and a $2,000,000 contribution toward fees incurred by OEH. The transaction closed on April 7, 2011, resulting in gross proceeds received by OEH of $25,500,000. This transaction resulted in a gain, net of costs, of $502,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

8. Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Hotels and restaurants $’000	Trains and cruises $’000	Total $’000
Balance as of January 1, 2012	153,605	7,855	161,460
Foreign currency translation adjustment	939	98	1,037
Balance as at September 30, 2012	154,544	7,953	162,497

The gross goodwill amount at January 1, 2012 was $191,700,000 and the accumulated impairment losses recognized at that date was $30,240,000. All impairments to that date related to hotel and restaurant operations.

The assessment and, if required, the determination of goodwill impairment to be recognized uses a discounted cash flow analysis to compute the fair value of the reporting unit. When determining the fair value of a reporting unit, OEH is required to make significant judgments that OEH believes are reasonable and supportable considering all available internal and external evidence at the time.  However, these estimates and assumptions are, by their nature, highly judgmental. Fair value determinations are sensitive to changes in the underlying assumptions and factors including those relating to estimating future operating cash flows to be generated from the reporting unit which are dependent upon internal forecasts and projections developed as part of OEH’s routine, long-term planning process, available industry/market data (to the extent available), OEH’s strategic plans, estimates of long-term growth rates taking into account OEH’s assessment of the current economic environment and the timing and degree of any economic recovery, estimation of the useful life over which the cash flows will occur, and market participant assumptions. The assumptions with the most significant impact to the fair value of the reporting unit are those related to future operating cash flows which are forecast for a five-year period from management’s budget and planning process, the terminal value which is included for the period beyond five years from the balance sheet date based on the estimated cash flow in the fifth year and a terminal growth rate, and pre-tax discount rates.

Examples of events or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the underlying key assumptions and ultimately impact the estimated fair values of OEH’s reporting units may include such items as (i) a prolonged weakness in the general economic conditions in which the reporting units operate and therefore negatively impacting occupancy and room rates, (ii) an economic recovery that significantly differs from OEH’s assumptions in timing and/or degree, (iii) volatility in the equity and debt markets which could result in a higher discount rate, (iv) shifts or changes in future travel patterns from OEH’s significant demographic markets that have not been anticipated, (v) changes in competitive supply, (vi) political and security instability in countries where OEH operates and (vii) deterioration of local economies due to the uncertainty over currencies or currency unions and other factors which could lead to changes in projected cash flows of OEH’s properties as customers reduce their discretionary spending. If the assumptions used in the impairment analysis are not met or materially change, OEH may be required to recognize additional goodwill impairment losses which may be material to the financial statements.

There were no triggering events in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 that would have required OEH to assess the carrying value of goodwill.

19

9. Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30, 2012:

	Favorable lease assets $’000		Internet sites $’000	Trade names $’000	Total $’000
Carrying amount:
Balance as of January 1, 2012	13,460		1,609	7,100	22,169
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(438	)	62	—	(376	)
Balance as at September 30, 2012	13,022		1,671	7,100	21,793
Accumulated amortization:
Balance as of January 1, 2012	1,972		732	—	2,704
Charge for the year	267		101	—	368
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(70	)	29	—	(41	)
Balance as at September 30, 2012	2,169		862	—	3,031
Net book value:
As at September 30, 2012	10,853		809	7,100	18,762
As at December 31, 2011	11,488		877	7,100	19,465

Favorable lease intangible assets are amortized over the terms of the leases, which are between 19 and 60 years. Internet sites are amortized over 10 years. Trade names have an indefinite life and therefore are not amortized, but are assessed for impairment annually or when events indicate that impairment may have occurred.

Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $124,000 (2011 - $236,000) and $368,000 (2011 - $376,000), respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the years ending December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017 is $496,000.

10. Long-term debt and obligations under capital lease

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000
Loans from banks and other parties collateralized by property, plant and equipment payable over periods of one to 20 years, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.17% and 4.32%, respectively	511,736	538,730
Obligations under capital lease	5,086	5,158
	516,822	543,888
Less: Current portion	51,023	77,058
	465,799	466,830

20

In connection with the renovation of El Encanto hotel, OEH entered into a loan agreement in August 2011 for $45,000,000 to be drawn as construction progresses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, OEH borrowed $17,458,000 (December 31, 2011 - $Nil) under this facility.  The loan has a maturity of three years, with twoone-year extensions, at an annual interest rate based on monthly LIBOR plus 3.65%.

Also, on September 12, 2012, OEH drew a new loan facility of €35,000,000 ($44,400,000) to refinance €36,844,000 ($46,757,000) of long-term debt maturing in 2013 secured by the two Sicilian hotels.  The loan matures in three years and bears interest at a rate of EURIBOR plus 5% per annum. OEH has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the variable interest rate of the full amount on the loan at 5.59%.

At September 30, 2012, one of OEH’s subsidiaries had not complied with certain financial covenants in a loan facility. The $2,037,000 outstanding on this loan has been classified as current and OEH expects to rectify this non-compliance in the fourth quarter of 2012. In addition, two unconsolidated joint venture companies were out of compliance with certain financial covenants in their loan facilities. See Note 6.

Most of OEH’s loan facilities relate to specific hotel or other properties and are secured by a mortgage on the particular property.  In most cases, the Company is either the borrower or the subsidiary owning the property is the borrower, with the loan guaranteed by the Company.

The loan facilities generally place restrictions on the property-owning company’s ability to incur additional debt and limit liens, and restrict mergers and asset sales, and include financial covenants. Where the property-owning subsidiary is the borrower, the financial covenants relate to the financial performance of the property financed and generally include covenants relating to interest coverage, debt service, and loan-to-value and debt-to-EBITDA tests.  Most of the facilities under which the Company is the borrower or the guarantor also contain financial covenants which are based on the performance of OEH on a consolidated basis. The covenants include a quarterly interest coverage test and a quarterly net worth test.

The following is a summary of the aggregate maturities of consolidated long-term debt, including obligations under capital lease, at September 30, 2012:

Year ending December 31,	$’000
2013	48,486
2014	155,233
2015	216,129
2016	4,423
2017	13,971
2018 and thereafter	27,557
	465,799

The debt of Charleston Center LLC, a consolidated VIE, of $89,192,000 (December 31, 2011 - $90,529,000) is non-recourse to OEH and separately disclosed on the consolidated balance sheet.  See Note 3.

21

11. Other liabilities

The major balances in other liabilities are as follows:

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000
Interest rate swaps (see note 20)	5,214	7,511
Long-term accrued interest on subordinated debt at Charleston Place Hotel	14,590	14,139
Cash-settled stock appreciation rights plan	98	111
Deferred lease incentive	453	489
Contingent consideration on acquisition of Grand Hotel Timeo and Villa Sant’Andrea	3,859	3,895
	24,214	26,145

12. Income taxes

	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011
	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000
Provision for income taxes	6,590	1,205	13,316	5,819

The Company is incorporated in Bermuda, which does not impose an income tax. OEH’s effective tax rate is significantly affected by its mix of income and loss in various jurisdictions as there is significant variation in the income tax rates imposed and also by the effect of losses in jurisdictions for which it is expected that the tax benefit of losses will not be recognizable at year-end. As described in Note 1, OEH forecasts its effective tax rate for the year and that rate is applied to interim results. Other items, however, are computed individually and recognized when the items occur. The significant components of these other items which cause variations in OEH’s customary relationship between income tax expense and pre-tax income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 include the following:

	Three months ended			Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
	$’000	$’000		$’000		$’000
Exchange rate movements on deferred tax	49	(4,207	)	(1,278	)	(2,867	)
Deferred tax on derivatives	—	148		—		191
Changes in uncertain tax positions	76	(790	)	(180	)	(1,394	)
Changes in interest and penalties	18	76		258		(1,076	)
Other	322	—		48		—

22

13. Pensions

Components of net periodic pension benefit cost are as follows:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Service cost	—		—		—		—
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	288		237		862		831
Expected return on assets	(211	)	(225	)	(632	)	(788	)
Net amortization and deferrals	224		136		671		476
Net periodic benefit cost	301		148		901		519

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $512,000 (2011 - $469,000) and $1,484,000 (2011 - $1,401,000), respectively, of contributions were made to OEH’s defined benefit pension plan.  OEH anticipates contributing an additional $471,000 to fund the plan in 2012 for a total of $1,955,000.

14. Supplemental cash flow information and restricted cash

Interest and income taxes:

	2012	2011
Nine months ended September 30,	$’000	$’000
Cash paid for:
Interest	24,579	33,044
Income taxes	19,441	12,780

Restricted cash:

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	$’000	$’000
Cash deposits required to be held with banks to support OEH’s payment of interest and principal	15,923	9,606
Escrow deposits from purchasers of units at Porto Cupecoy which will be released to OEH as sales close	3,011	2,890
Prepaid customer deposits which will be released to OEH under its revenue recognition policy	1,123	718
	20,057	13,214

23

15. Accumulated other comprehensive loss

The accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive loss are as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	$’000		$’000
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (benefit) of $(255) and $(477)	(76,541	)	(52,611	)
Derivative financial instruments, net of tax (benefit) of $(914) and $(970)	(7,442	)	(6,440	)
Pension liability, net of tax provision of $2,016 and $2,161	(13,676	)	(13,238	)
	(97,659	)	(72,289	)

16. Share-based compensation plans

Equity awards

No awards were issued in the three months ended September 30, 2012 or in the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Under the 2009 Share Award and Incentive Plan, OEH granted on March 9, 2012:

• share options on 31,700 class A common shares vesting on March 9, 2015 at an exercise price of $9.95 per share,

• deferred shares without performance criteria on 3,300 class A common shares vesting on January 30, 2015 and 104,000 class A common shares vesting on March 9, 2015 at a purchase price of $0.01 per share, and

• deferred shares with performance criteria on up to 386,600 class A common shares vesting on March 9, 2015 at a purchase price of $0.01 per share.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to determine the estimated fair value of share options and the portion of deferred shares with performance criteria related to total shareholder return.  The Monte Carlo valuation model is used to determine the fair value of the portion of deferred shares with performance criteria related to earnings before tax.

The estimated fair value of share options and deferred shares at March 9, 2012 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was based on the following assumptions:

	Share options			Deferred shares with performance criteria
Expected share price volatility	58		%	59		%
Risk-free interest rate	1.69		%	0.47		%
Expected annual dividends per share	$	0.00		$	0.00
Expected life of awards	8 years			3 years

Under the 2009 Share Award and Incentive Plan, OEH granted on June 7, 2012:

• share options on 330,200 class A common shares vesting on June 7, 2015 at an exercise price of $8.42 per share, and

• deferred shares without performance criteria on 109,000 class A common shares vesting on June 7, 2015 at a purchase price of $0.01 per share.

The estimated fair value of share options at June 7, 2012 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was based on the following assumptions:

	Share options
Expected share price volatility	58		%
Risk-free interest rate	1.07		%
Expected annual dividends per share	$	0.00
Expected life of share options	8 years

24

Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s class A common share price and other factors.  The expected life is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options or awards are likely to be outstanding.  The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The total fair value of share-based compensation awards issued in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $Nil (2011 - $Nil) and $5,223,000 (2011 - $5,784,000), respectively.

The weighted-average fair value of the share options and share-based awards granted under the 2009 plan on the grant date was $Nil per share (2011 - $Nil) and $5.42 per share (2011 - $6.20) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The total compensation related to unvested awards outstanding at September 30, 2012, to be recognized over the period October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2015, was $9,461,000. OEH recognized equity compensation expense of $818,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2012 (2011 - $1,184,000) and $4,400,000 (2011 - $4,796,000) in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Liability awards

Previously awarded cash-settled stock appreciation rights have been recorded as other liabilities with a fair value of $98,000 at September 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - $111,000). See Note 11.

17. Fair values of financial instruments

Certain methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, working capital loans, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The fair value of OEH’s long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to OEH for debt of the same remaining maturities, and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The estimated fair values of OEH’s financial instruments (other than derivative financial instruments) as of September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	Carrying amount $’000	Fair value $’000	Carrying amount $’000	Fair value $’000
Cash and cash equivalents	101,536	101,536	90,104	90,104
Accounts receivable	47,179	47,179	44,599	44,972
Working capital loans	1,114	1,114	—	—
Accounts payable	27,793	27,793	28,998	28,998
Accrued liabilities	102,430	102,430	87,617	87,617
Long-term debt, including current portion, excluding obligations under capital leases	513,489	517,001	538,730	509,866
Long-term debt, including current portion, held by a consolidated VIE	89,192	90,711	90,529	89,525

25

18. Commitments and contingencies

Outstanding contracts to purchase property, plant and equipment were approximately $20,942,000 at September 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - $15,432,000). Additionally, outstanding contracts for project-related costs on the Porto Cupecoy development were approximately $194,000 at September 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - $499,000).

As part of the consideration for the acquisition in January 2010 of Grand Hotel Timeo and Villa Sant’Andrea, OEH agreed to pay the vendor a further €5,000,000 (equivalent to $7,064,000 at date of acquisition) if, by 2015, additional rooms are constructed at Grand Hotel Timeo and certain required permits are granted to expand and add a swimming pool to Villa Sant’Andrea. No amounts have been paid to the vendor during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012.  In the nine months ended September 30, 2011, €1,500,000 ($2,040,000) of this amount was paid to the vendor as the appropriate permits to add a swimming pool to Villa Sant’Andrea were obtained. See Note 11.

In May 2010, OEH settled litigation for infringement of its “Cipriani” trademark in Europe.  An amount of $3,947,000 was paid by the defendants to OEH on March 2, 2010 with the balance of $9,833,000 being payable in installments over five years with interest.  The remaining payments, totaling $6,368,000 at September 30, 2012, have not been recognized by OEH because of the uncertainty of collectability.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are parties to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. The outcome of each of these matters cannot be absolutely determined, and the liability that the relevant parties may ultimately incur with respect to any one of these matters in the event of a negative outcome may be in excess of amounts currently accrued for with respect to these matters.

19. Information concerning financial reporting for segments and operations in different geographical areas

OEH’s segment information has been prepared in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. OEH has three reporting segments, (i) hotels and restaurants, (ii) tourist trains and cruises, and (iii) real estate and property development, which are grouped into various geographical regions. At September 30, 2012, hotels are located in the United States, Caribbean, Mexico, Europe, southern Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia, a restaurant is located in New York, tourist trains operate in Europe, Southeast Asia and Peru, a river cruise ship operates in Myanmar and five canal boats in France, and real estate developments are located in the Caribbean and Southeast Asia. Segment performance is evaluated based upon segment net earnings before interest expense, foreign currency, tax (including tax on earnings from unconsolidated companies), depreciation and amortization (“segment EBITDA”). Segment information is presented in accordance with the accounting policies described in Note 1. The chief operating decision maker is the Interim Chief Executive Officer.

Financial information regarding these business segments is as follows:

		Three months ended		Nine months ended
		September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011
		$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000
Revenue:
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	83,560	89,045	170,198	180,409
	- North America	21,659	20,921	80,719	75,948
	- Rest of world	25,890	30,370	98,306	99,655
Hotel management/part ownership interests		1,395	1,324	4,073	4,082
Restaurants		2,078	2,518	9,886	9,956
		134,582	144,178	363,182	370,050
Tourist trains and cruises		23,262	26,122	55,698	57,539
Real estate		2,131	3,875	5,164	7,190
		159,975	174,175	424,044	434,779

26

		Three months ended				Nine months ended
		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
		$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Depreciation and amortization:
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	4,399		4,659		13,306		13,863
	- North America	2,452		2,260		7,190		6,797
	- Rest of world	2,261		2,684		6,812		7,691
Restaurants		191		191		596		573
		9,303		9,794		27,904		28,924
Tourist trains and cruises		1,085		1,057		3,137		2,945
Total segment depreciation and amortization		10,388		10,851		31,041		31,869
Unallocated corporate		161		333		552		684
		10,549		11,184		31,593		32,553
Segment EBITDA:
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	34,517		36,739		53,720		58,698
	- North America	1,813		1,168		15,899		12,231
	- Rest of world	4,240		5,346		23,108		21,214
Hotel management/part ownership interests		809		1,313		1,701		3,623
Restaurants		(642	)	(1,832	)	181		(2,093	)
		40,737		42,734		94,609		93,673
Tourist trains and cruises		8,047		8,951		15,736		14,237
Real estate		(1,648	)	(1,438	)	(4,677	)	(4,358	)
Impairment		—		(40,853	)	—		(40,853	)
Central overheads		(8,184	)	(10,321	)	(27,833	)	(26,699	)
(Loss)/gain on disposal		—		(18	)	—		502
		38,952		(945	)	77,835		36,502
Segment EBITDA/net earnings/(losses) reconciliation:
Segment EBITDA		38,952		(945	)	77,835		36,502
Less:
Depreciation and amortization		10,549		11,184		31,593		32,553
Interest expense, net		8,938		12,703		22,556		32,830
Foreign currency, net		57		4,595		655		2,525
Provision for income taxes		6,590		1,205		13,316		5,819
Share of provision for income taxes of unconsolidated companies		761		985		1,748		1,422
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations		12,057		(31,617	)	7,967		(38,647	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations		5,625		(18,450	)	5,993		(20,879	)
Net earnings/(losses)		17,682		(50,067	)	13,960		(59,526	)

27

		Three months ended			Nine months ended
		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
		$’000		$’000	$’000		$’000
Earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax:
Hotels and restaurants
Hotel management/part ownership interests		(106	)	280	(596	)	293
Tourist trains and cruises		1,865		1,949	4,658		2,932
		1,759		2,229	4,062		3,225
Capital expenditure:
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	3,350		2,305	14,439		13,936
	- North America	11,312		4,482	33,327		8,041
	- Rest of world	6,976		5,790	15,178		13,092
Restaurants		1,020		783	1,478		1,157
		22,658		13,360	64,422		36,226
Tourist trains and cruises		448		426	2,940		2,997
Real estate		1		—	32		—
Total segment capital expenditure		23,107		13,786	67,394		39,223
Unallocated corporate		72		77	609		508
		23,179		13,863	68,003		39,731

Financial information regarding geographic areas based on the location of properties is as follows:

	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011	September 30, 2012	September 30, 2011
	$’000	$’000	$’000	$’000
Revenue:
Europe	105,027	113,277	220,700	232,950
North America	25,868	27,314	95,769	93,094
Rest of world	29,080	33,584	107,575	108,735
	159,975	174,175	424,044	434,779

20. Derivatives and hedging activities

Risk management objective of using derivatives

OEH enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which is determined by interest rates. OEH’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of OEH’s known or expected cash receipts and payments principally related to its investments and borrowings.

Cash flow hedges of interest rate risk

OEH’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to add certainty and stability to its interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, OEH primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. An interest rate swap is a transaction between two parties in which each agrees to exchange, or swap, interest payments where the interest payment amounts are tied to different interest rates or indices for a specified period

28

of time and are based on a notional amount of principal. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, interest rate swaps were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable interest rate debt.

Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income/(loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecast transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings.

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, OEH had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives stated at their notional amounts that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	’000		’000
Interest Rate Swaps	A$	—	A$	10,800
Interest Rate Swaps	€	143,250	€	148,332
Interest Rate Swaps	$	107,234	$	117,765

Non-derivative financial instruments — net investment hedges

OEH uses certain of its debt denominated in foreign currency to hedge portions of its net investments in foreign operations against adverse movements in exchange rates. OEH’s designates its euro-denominated indebtedness as a net investment hedge of long-term investments in its euro-functional subsidiaries. These contracts are included in non-derivative hedging instruments.  The fair values of non-derivative hedging instruments were $43,741,000 at September 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - $45,919,000), both being liabilities of OEH.

Economic hedges of interest rate risk

Derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are used to manage OEH’s exposure to interest rate movements but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of the authoritative guidance. As of September 30, 2012, OEH had interest rate options with a notional amount of €77,250,000 and $54,040,000 (December 31, 2011 - €43,593,750 and $54,880,000).

The table below presents the fair value of OEH’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	Derivatives Instruments
		Fair value as of		Fair value as of
		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	Balance sheet location	$’000		$’000
Derivatives designated in a cash flow hedging relationship:
Interest Rate Swaps	Other assets	—		—
Interest Rate Swaps	Accrued liabilities	(3,942	)	(3,443	)
Interest Rate Swaps	Other liabilities	(5,214	)	(7,511	)
Total		(9,156	)	(10,954	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest Rate Options	Other Assets	10		60
Interest Rate Swaps	Accrued liabilities	—		—
Interest Rate Swaps	Other liabilities	—		—
Total		10		60

29

The table below (in which “OCI” means other comprehensive income) presents the effect of OEH’s derivative financial instruments on the statements of condensed consolidated operations and the statements of condensed consolidated comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments:
Beginning accumulated other comprehensive loss	(7,536	)	(4,867	)	(6,440	)	(8,745	)
Amount of loss recognized in OCI (effective portion)	(2,563	)	(6,801	)	(6,072	)	(6,036	)
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into interest income (effective portion)	3,126		3,965		5,126		7,929
Deferred tax on OCI movement	(469	)	1,494		(56	)	643
Change in fair value, net of tax	94		(1,342	)	(1,002	)	2,536
Ending accumulated other comprehensive loss	(7,442	)	(6,209	)	(7,442	)	(6,209	)
Amount of loss recognized in interest expense on derivatives (ineffective portion)	(65	)	(203	)	(218	)	(370	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Amount of (loss)/gain recognized in interest expense	(17	)	479		(50	)	524

At September 30, 2012, the amount recorded in other comprehensive income which is expected to be reclassified to interest expense in the next 12 months is $3,627,454.

Credit-risk-related contingent features

OEH has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain provisions under which, if OEH defaults on any of its indebtedness, OEH could also be declared in default in respect of its derivative obligations.  As of September 30, 2012, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest and an adjustment for non-performance risk, related to these agreements was $9,156,173.  If OEH breached any of these provisions, it would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $9,292,196.

Fair value measurements

Derivatives are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value.  The valuation process for the derivatives uses observable market data provided by third-party sources. Interest rate swaps are valued by using yield curves derived from observable interest rates to project future swap cash flows and then discount these cash flows back to present values. Interest rate caps are valued using a model that projects the probability of various levels of interest rates occurring in the future using observable volatilities. OEH incorporates credit valuation adjustments to reflect both its own and its respective counterparty’s non-performance risk in the fair value measurements.

30

In the determination of fair value of derivative instruments, a credit valuation adjustment is applied to OEH’s derivative exposures to take into account the risk of the counterparty defaulting with the derivative in an asset position and, when the derivative is in a liability position, the risk that OEH may default. The credit valuation adjustment is calculated by determining the total expected exposure of the derivatives (incorporating both the current and potential future exposure) and then applying each counterparty’s credit spread to the applicable exposure.  For interest rate swaps, OEH’s own credit spread is applied to the counterparty’s exposure to OEH and the counterparty’s credit spread is applied to OEH’s exposure to the counterparty, and then the net credit valuation adjustment is reflected in the determination of the fair value of the derivative instrument.  The credit spreads used as inputs in the fair values calculations represent implied credit default swaps obtained from a third-party credit data provider.  Some of the inputs into the credit valuation adjustment are not observable and, therefore, they are considered to be Level 3 inputs.  Where credit valuation adjustment exceeds 20% of the fair value of the derivatives, Level 3 inputs are assumed to have a significant impact on the fair value of the derivatives in their entirety and the derivative is classified as Level 3.  OEH reviews its fair value hierarchy classifications quarterly.  Transfers between levels are made at the fair value on the actual date of the transfer if the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer can be identified.

The following tables summarize the valuation of OEH’s financial liabilities by the fair value hierarchy at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	September 30, 2012
	Level 1 $’000	Level 2 $’000		Level 3 $’000	Total $’000
Assets at fair value:
Derivative financial instruments	—	10		—	10
Liabilities at fair value:
Derivative financial instruments	—	(9,156	)	—	(9,156	)
Net liabilities	—	(9,146	)	—	(9,146	)

	December 31, 2011
	Level 1 $’000	Level 2 $’000		Level 3 $’000	Total $’000
Assets at fair value:
Derivative financial instruments	—	60		—	60
Liabilities at fair value:
Derivative financial instruments	—	(10,954	)	—	(10,954	)
Net liabilities	—	(10,894	)	—	(10,894	)

31

There were no transfers in or out of Level 3 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The tables below present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of derivatives having fair value measurements based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:

	Beginning balance at	Transfers out of Level 3 $’000		Realized losses included in earnings $’000	Unrealizedgains included in othercomprehensive income $’000	Purchases, sales, issuances or settlements $’000	Ending balance at
	July 1, 2011						September 30, 2011
	$’000						$’000
Derivatives at fair value	215	(289	)	37	—	37	—

	Beginning balance at		Transfers out of Level 3 $’000		Realized losses included in earnings $’000	Unrealizedgains included inothercomprehensive income $’000	Purchases, sales, issuances or settlements $’000	Ending balance at
	January 1, 2011							September 30, 2011
	$’000							$’000
Derivatives at fair value	(277	)	(1,473	)	305	1,140	305	—

The transfers out of Level 3 in 2011 represented new swaps as at December 31, 2010 with a fair value close to zero where the credit valuation adjustment was previously greater than 20% of the fair value.

The amount of total losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 included in earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those liabilities still held was $Nil (2011 - $Nil) and $Nil (2011 - $Nil), respectively.

21. Related party transactions

OEH manages under long-term contract the tourist train owned by Eastern and Oriental Express Ltd., an equity method investee of the Company.  The amount due to OEH from Eastern and Oriental Express Ltd. at September 30, 2012 is $6,112,000 (December 31, 2011 - $2,581,000). In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, OEH earned management fees of $50,000 (2011 - $40,000) and $232,000 (2011 - $177,000), respectively. 

OEH manages under long-term contracts the Hotel Monasterio, Machu Picchu Sanctuary Lodge, Palacio Nazarenas and Hotel Rio Sagrado owned by its 50/50 joint venture with local Peruvian interests, as well as the 50/50 owned Peru Rail and Ferrocarril Transandino rail operations, and provides loans, guarantees and other credit accommodation to these joint ventures. See Note 6. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, OEH earned management and guarantee fees of $2,206,000 (2011 - $2,103,000) and $5,940,000 (2011 - $5,310,000), respectively. The amount due to OEH from its joint venture Peruvian operations at September 30, 2012 was $2,491,000 (December 31, 2011 - $5,516,000).

OEH manages under a long-term contract the Hotel Ritz in Madrid, Spain, in which OEH holds a 50% interest and which is accounted for under the equity method.  For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, OEH earned $247,000 (2011 - $293,000) in management fees, which are recorded in revenue, and $162,000 (2011 - $148,000) in interest income which is recorded in net finance costs.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, OEH earned $765,000 (2011 - $886,000) in management fees, which are recorded in revenue, and $502,000 (2011 - $398,000) in interest income which is recorded in net finance costs. The amount due to OEH from the Hotel Ritz at September 30, 2012 was $21,121,000  (December 31, 2011 - $18,486,000).

22. Subsequent events

On October 18, 2012, the Company received an unsolicited letter from The Indian Hotels Company Limited (“IHCL”) and certain other members of the Tata group of companies, and included in IHCL's SEC Schedule 13D/A filing of the same date, with an unsolicited proposal by those parties and a fund controlled by Montezemolo & Partners to acquire all outstanding shares of the Company.  The Board of Directors is evaluating the proposal carefully and expects to respond in due course in accordance with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

32

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-looking statements

Forward-looking statements concerning the operations, performance, financial condition, plans and prospects of OEH are based on the current expectations, assessments and assumptions of management, are not historical facts, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties.

Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate only to historic or current facts, and often use words such as “anticipate”, “target”, “expect”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”, “goal”, “believe” or other words of similar meaning.

Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those described in this Form 10-Q quarterly report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and in Item 1—Business, Item 1A—Risk Factors, Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, and Item 12—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K annual report.

Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements which are not guarantees of future performance. OEH undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Introduction

OEH has three business segments, namely (1) hotels and restaurants, (2) tourist trains and cruises and (3) real estate and property development.

Hotels consist of 35 deluxe hotels (excluding The Observatory Hotel which was sold on August 8, 2012, Bora Bora Lagoon Resort which was sold on June 1, 2012, Keswick Hall which was sold on January 23, 2012, and The Westcliff hotel which was classified as held for sale at September 30, 2012 and presented as discontinued operations), 30 of which are wholly or majority owned or, in the case of Charleston Place Hotel, owned by a consolidated variable interest entity. The owned hotels are referred to in this discussion as “owned hotels” of which 11 were located in Europe, six in North America and 13 in the Rest of the World. One owned hotel, El Encanto in California, is scheduled to re-open in early 2013 after renovation.

The other five hotels in which OEH has unconsolidated equity interests and which it operates under management contracts, are referred to in this discussion as “hotel management interests”. One of these hotels, Palacio Nazarenas in Peru, opened on June 15, 2012 after redevelopment. A sixth hotel, Las Casitas del Colca in Peru, was sold on April 17, 2012 for $5.6 million.

OEH currently owns and operates the stand-alone restaurant ‘21’ Club in New York, New York.

The hotel held for sale at September 30, 2012 was The Westcliff in Johannesburg, South Africa. The results of this property have been included as discontinued operations for all periods presented. OEH has entered into an agreement to sell The Westcliff and expects to complete the sale in the fourth quarter of 2012.

OEH’s tourist trains and cruises segment operates six tourist trains — four of which are owned and operated by OEH, one in which OEH has an equity interest and exclusive management contracts, and one in which OEH has an equity investment — and a river cruise ship and five canal boats.

OEH’s real estate projects are in St. Martin, French West Indies, and Koh Samui, Thailand.

Results of Operations

Three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to three months ended September 30, 2011

OEH’s operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, expressed as a percentage of revenue, are as follows:

33

	2012		2011
Three months ended September 30,	%		%
Revenue
Hotels and restaurants	84		83
Tourist trains and cruises	15		15
Real estate and property development	1		2
	100		100
Expenses
Cost of services	45		46
Selling, general and administrative	32		33
Depreciation and amortization	7		6
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment	—		23
Net finance costs	6		10
Earnings/(losses) before income taxes	10		(18	)
Provision for income taxes	(4	)	(1	)
Earnings from unconsolidated companies	1		1
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	7		(18	)
Net earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	4		(11	)
Net earnings/(losses)	11		(29	)

Segment EBITDA, defined as segment net earnings from continuing operations before interest, foreign currency, tax (including tax on unconsolidated companies), depreciation and amortization (“segment EBITDA”), of OEH’s operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is analyzed as follows (dollars in millions):

		2012		2011
Three months ended September 30,		$		$
Segment EBITDA:
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels:	- Europe	34.5		36.7
	- North America	1.8		1.2
	- Rest of the world	4.2		5.3
Hotel management and part-ownership interests		0.8		1.3
Restaurants		(0.6	)	(1.8	)
		40.7		42.7
Tourist trains and cruises		8.1		9.0
Real estate and property development		(1.6	)	(1.4	)
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment		—		(40.9	)
Central overheads		(8.2	)	(10.3	)
		39.0		(0.9	)

34

The foregoing segment EBITDA reconciles to net earnings/(losses) as follows (dollars in millions):

	2012		2011
Three months ended September 30,	$		$
Net earnings/(losses)	17.7		(50.1	)
Add:
Depreciation and amortization	10.5		11.2
Interest expense, net	8.9		12.7
Foreign currency, net	0.1		4.6
Provision for income taxes	6.6		1.2
Share of provision for income taxes of unconsolidated companies	0.8		1.0
(Earnings)/losses from discontinued operations, net of tax	(5.6	)	18.5
	39.0		(0.9	)

Operating information for OEH’s owned hotels for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Three months ended September 30,	2012	2011
Average Daily Rate (in dollars)
Europe	801	831
North America	317	292
Rest of the world	347	364
Worldwide	529	541
Rooms Available
Europe	87,957	88,412
North America	61,882	62,250
Rest of the world	101,384	100,648
Worldwide	251,223	251,310
Rooms Sold
Europe	60,935	63,648
North America	40,197	39,260
Rest of the world	44,538	49,372
Worldwide	145,670	152,280
Occupancy (percentage)
Europe	69	72
North America	65	63
Rest of the world	44	49
Worldwide	58	61
RevPAR (in dollars)
Europe	555	598
North America	206	184
Rest of the world	153	179
Worldwide	307	328

35

			Change %
Three months ended September 30,	2012	2011	Dollars		Local currency
Same Store RevPAR (in dollars)
Europe	555	598	(7	)%	2	%
North America	206	184	12	%	12	%
Rest of the world	153	179	(15	)%	(13	)%
Worldwide	307	328	(6	)%	—	%

Average daily rate is the average amount achieved for the rooms sold. RevPAR is revenue per available room, which is the rooms’ revenue divided by the number of available rooms. Same store RevPAR is a comparison based on the operations of the same units in each period, by excluding the effect of any hotel acquisitions in the period or major refurbishments where a property is closed for the whole of the period. There were no properties excluded from the same store data.

Overview

The net earnings attributable to OEH for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $17.7 million ($0.17 per common share) on revenue of $160.0 million, compared with net losses of $49.9 million ($0.49 per common share) on revenue of $174.2 million in the prior year third quarter. OEH’s decreased revenue reflects the continued economic uncertainties in the Eurozone and the weakening of the euro and other currencies against the U.S. dollar. Revenue has also been adversely impacted by the partial closure of one of the Company's hotels for renovations during the quarter. RevPAR of owned hotels on a same store basis decreased from $328 in the third quarter of 2011 to $307 in the third quarter of 2012, a 6% decrease when measured in U.S. dollars, but flat when measured in local currency. Occupancy decreased from 61% for the third quarter of 2011 to 58% for the third quarter of 2012. Average daily rate decreased to $529 in the third quarter of 2012, compared to $541 for the same period in the prior year.

The net earnings from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $12.1 million, an increase of $43.7 million compared with net losses of $31.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011. There were no impairments recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to an impairment charge of $40.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Revenue

		2012	2011
Three months ended September 30,		$’000	$’000
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	83,560	89,045
	- North America	21,659	20,921
	- Rest of the world	25,890	30,370
Hotel management/part ownership interests		1,395	1,324
Restaurants		2,078	2,518
		134,582	144,178
Tourist trains and cruises		23,262	26,122
Real estate		2,131	3,875
		159,975	174,175

Total revenue decreased by $14.2 million, or 8%, from $174.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $160.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

36

Owned Hotels:  The change in revenue at owned hotels is analyzed on a regional basis as follows:

Europe

Revenue decreased by $5.4 million, or 6%, from $89.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $83.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, due to the weakening of the euro and the Russian ruble against the U.S. dollar. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $8.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Average daily rate in U.S. dollars decreased from $831 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $801 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, but increased by 6% in local currency. Occupancy decreased by three percentage points from 72% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 69% in the three months ended September 30, 2012. On a same store basis, RevPAR in local currency increased by 2%, although in U.S. dollars OEH experienced a decrease of 7%.

North America

Revenue increased by $0.8 million, or 4%, from $20.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $21.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 led by Maroma Resort and Spa and The Inn at Perry Cabin. Same store RevPAR increased 12% from $184 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $206 in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Average daily rate increased from $292 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $317 in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy increased by two percentage points, from 63% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 65% in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Rest of the World

Revenue decreased by $4.5 million, or 15%, from $30.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $25.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Exchange rate movements across the region caused revenue to decrease by $1.0 million compared to the same period in 2011. Same store RevPAR in U.S. dollars for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased 15% from $179 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $153 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a 13% decrease when measured in local currency. Average daily rate decreased by 5% from $364 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $347 in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy decreased by five percentage points from 49% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 44% in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Revenue at OEH’s hotels in South America collectively decreased by $4.1 million, or 23%, from $17.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $13.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. $4.9 million of this decrease relates to Copacabana Palace, which was partially closed during the three months ended September 30, 2012 for major renovation works. Same store RevPAR in U.S. dollars for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased 27% (the same in local currency) from $205 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $150 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy decreased by nine percentage points from 52% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 43% for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Southern Africa revenue decreased by $1.0 million from $4.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $3.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $0.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Same store RevPAR in U.S. dollars for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased 17% (a 6% decrease in local currency) from $133 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $111 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy decreased by five percentage points from 32% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 27% for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Revenue for the Asian properties increased by $0.7 million, or 9%, from $7.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $8.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012, with revenue growth of $0.5 million coming from The Governor’s Residence due to the recent surge in tourism in Myanmar. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $0.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Same store RevPAR in U.S. dollars for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $21, or 12% (the same in local currency) from $176 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $197 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy increased by two percentage points from 60% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 62% in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Hotel Management and Part-Ownership Interests: Revenue increased by $0.1 million from $1.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $1.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

37

Restaurants: Revenue decreased by $0.4 million, or 16%, from $2.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $2.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012, as the summer closure was one week longer in 2012 than in 2011.

Trains and Cruises: Revenue decreased by $2.8 million, or 11%, from $26.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $23.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. U.K.-based trains contributed $1.9 million of this decrease as passenger numbers were impacted by the Olympic Games, which diverted attention and kept visitors away from other London attractions, and a weak economic climate affected charter business. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $0.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011.

Real Estate: Two condominiums were delivered at Porto Cupecoy generating revenue of $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared with six condominiums delivered in the prior year comparative period generating revenues of $3.9 million. Sales contracts were signed on a further four units in the three months ended September 30, 2012, bringing cumulative sales to 122, or 66% of the total number of units, of which 115 have been transferred to customers. In addition, revenue of $0.7 million was generated from the sale of the final two units at Keswick estate which did not form part of the sale of the hotel property in early 2012.

Cost of services

Cost of services decreased by $7.9 million from $80.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $72.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Cost of services was 45% of revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to 46% of revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2011. Exchange rate movements caused cost of services to decrease by $4.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $6.0 million from $56.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $50.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012.  Exchange rate movements caused these expenses to decrease by $2.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 32% of revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 33% of revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.7 million from $11.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $10.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Exchange rate movements caused depreciation and amortization to decrease by $0.7 million compared to the same period in 2011.

38

Segment EBITDA

		2012		2011
Three months ended September 30,		$’000		$’000
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	34,517		36,739
	- North America	1,813		1,168
	- Rest of the world	4,240		5,346
Hotel management/part ownership interests		809		1,313
Restaurants		(642	)	(1,832	)
		40,737		42,734
Tourist trains and cruises		8,047		8,951
Real estate		(1,648	)	(1,438	)
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		—		(18	)
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment		—		(40,853	)
Central overheads		(8,184	)	(10,321	)
		38,952		(945	)

The European hotels collectively reported segment EBITDA of $34.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $36.7 million in the same period in 2011. This $2.2 million decrease in segment EBITDA results mainly from the weakening of the euro, the British pound and the Russian ruble against the U.S. dollar, which has resulted in a decrease to segment EBITDA of $3.3 million. As a percentage of European hotels revenue, the European segment EBITDA margin remained flat at 41% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Segment EBITDA in the North American hotels region increased by 50% from $1.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, to $1.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. This segment EBITDA growth is mainly from Charleston Place Hotel which contributed $0.6 million, due primarily to increases in average daily rate. Maroma Resort and Spa and The Inn at Perry Cabin also showed segment EBITDA improvements, partly offset by pre-opening expenses at El Encanto. As a percentage of North American hotels revenue, the North American segment EBITDA margin increased from 6% in 2011 to 8% in 2012.

Segment EBITDA in the Rest of the World hotels region decreased by 21% from $5.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, to $4.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease is attributable to the partial closure of the Copacabana Palace due to renovation works carried out during the three months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of Rest of the World hotels revenue, the segment EBITDA margin for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased to 16% from 18% for the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Central overheads decreased by $2.1 million, or 20%, from $10.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $8.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The variance includes decreases in compensation costs of $0.8 million and legal and professional fees of $0.9 million. As a percentage of revenue, central overheads decreased from 6% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to 5% in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment

In the three months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified a non-cash real estate asset impairment charge of $36.9 million in respect of its Porto Cupecoy development project. OEH determined that the fair value of real estate assets was less than the carrying value. The charge was computed using Level 3 inputs, namely the estimated selling prices and estimated selling costs based on OEH's recent experience with sales of condominiums and marina slips already completed. This impairment charge resulted primarily from changes in estimates of the price and pace of future sales as a result of current market conditions. Additionally as part of an overall impairment calculation, property, plant and equipment at the Porto Cupecoy development with a carrying value of $1.7 million was written down to a fair value of $Nil. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements.

39

Also during the three months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified non-cash property, plant and equipment impairment charges of $2.3 million in respect of Casa de Sierra Nevada, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico. The carrying values were written down to the hotel's fair value based on management's best estimate. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements.

There were no impairments in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Earnings from operations before net finance costs

Earnings from operations increased by $41.2 million from a loss of $15.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to earnings of $25.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012, due to the factors described above.

Net finance costs

Net finance costs were $17.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The three months ended September 30, 2011 included a foreign exchange loss of $4.6 million compared to a foreign exchange loss of $0.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Net interest expense decreased by $3.8 million, or 30%, from $12.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $8.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Net interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 included swap and loan termination costs of $3.5 million related to loan facilities in Brazil and Italy, compared with $1.8 million of similar costs related to the Sicilian properties for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Additionally, $1.0 million of interest was capitalized at El Encanto in the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared with $Nil in the prior year comparative period. The remaining reduction in interest expense was due to lower interest rates and a reduction of debt over the last 12 months.

Provision for income taxes

The provision for income taxes increased by $5.4 million, from a charge of $1.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to a charge of $6.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012.  The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2012 includes a deferred tax benefit of $Nil arising from fixed asset timing differences following movements in exchange rates compared to a $4.2 million tax benefit in the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Earnings from unconsolidated companies

Earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax, decreased by $0.4 million from $2.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 to $1.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012, due mainly to increased losses from the Hotel Ritz joint venture in Madrid, Spain. The tax provision associated with earnings from unconsolidated companies was $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Earnings from discontinued operations

The earnings from discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $5.6 million compared with losses of $18.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.  Earnings from discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 include a gain of $5.4 million on the disposal of The Observatory Hotel, which was sold on August 8, 2012. Earnings from The Westcliff for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.2 million.

The results of discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011 include net earnings of $1.6 million from Hôtel de la Cité, which was sold in August 2011, offset by losses of $17.0 million from Keswick Hall, which was sold in January 2012, $2.3 million from Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, which was sold in June 2012, $0.5 million from The Observatory Hotel and $0.2 million from The Westcliff. The losses from Keswick Hall and Bora Bora Lagoon Resort include an impairment charge of $23.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as the carrying value of the assets was written down to each hotel's fair value.

Nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2011

OEH’s operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, expressed as a percentage of revenue, are as follows:

40

	2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,	%		%
Revenue
Hotels and restaurants	86		85
Tourist trains and cruises	13		13
Real estate and property development	1		2
	100		100
Expenses
Cost of services	46		47
Selling, general and administrative	37		37
Depreciation and amortization	7		7
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment	—		9
Net finance costs	5		8
Earnings/(losses) before income taxes	5		(8	)
Provision for income taxes	(3	)	(1	)
Earnings from unconsolidated companies	1		1
Net earnings/(losses) from continuing operations	3		(8	)
Earnings/(losses) from discontinued operations	1		(5	)
Net earnings/(losses)	4		(13	)

Segment EBITDA of OEH’s operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is analyzed as follows (dollars in millions):

		2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,		$		$
Segment EBITDA:
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels:	- Europe	53.7		58.7
	- North America	16.0		12.3
	- Rest of the world	23.1		21.2
Hotel management and part-ownership interests		1.7		3.6
Restaurants		0.2		(2.1	)
		94.7		93.7
Tourist trains and cruises		15.7		14.3
Real estate and property development		(4.7	)	(4.4	)
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment		—		0.5
Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment		—		(40.9	)
Central overheads		(27.8	)	(26.7	)
		77.9		36.5

41

The foregoing segment EBITDA reconciles to net earnings/(losses) as follows (dollars in millions):

	2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,	$		$
Net earnings/(losses)	14.0		(59.5	)
Add:
Depreciation and amortization	31.6		32.6
Interest expense, net	22.6		32.8
Foreign currency, net	0.7		2.5
Provision for income taxes	13.3		5.8
Share of provision for income taxes of unconsolidated companies	1.7		1.4
(Earnings)/losses from discontinued operations, net of tax	(6.0	)	20.9
	77.9		36.5

Operating information for OEH’s owned hotels for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Nine months ended September 30,	2012	2011
Average Daily Rate (in dollars)
Europe	743	765
North America	376	348
Rest of the world	366	356
Worldwide	486	483
Rooms Available
Europe	223,163	222,244
North America	189,464	189,855
Rest of the world	301,870	298,863
Worldwide	714,497	710,962
Rooms Sold
Europe	128,728	132,135
North America	126,724	124,979
Rest of the world	160,775	160,783
Worldwide	416,227	417,897
Occupancy (percentage)
Europe	58	59
North America	67	66
Rest of the world	53	54
Worldwide	58	59
RevPAR (in dollars)
Europe	429	455
North America	252	229
Rest of the world	195	192
Worldwide	283	284

42

			Change %
Nine months ended September 30,	2012	2011	Dollars		Local currency
Same Store RevPAR (in dollars)
Europe	429	455	(6	)%	2	%
North America	252	229	10	%	10	%
Rest of the world	195	192	2	%	3	%
Worldwide	283	284	—	%	4	%

There were no properties excluded from the same store RevPAR data.

Overview

The net earnings attributable to OEH for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $13.8 million ($0.13 per common share) on revenue of $424.0 million, compared with net losses of $59.7 million ($0.58 net loss per common share) on revenue of $434.8 million for the same period in the prior year. OEH’s decreased revenue reflects the continued economic uncertainties in the Eurozone and the weakening of the euro and other currencies against the U.S. dollar. Revenue has also been affected by the partial closure of one of the Company's hotels for renovations during the third quarter of 2012. RevPAR of owned hotels on a same store basis decreased from $284 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $283 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, flat when measured in U.S. dollars but a 4% increase when measured in local currency. Occupancy decreased by one percentage point, from 59% in the first nine months of 2011 to 58% in the first nine months of 2012. Average daily rate increased to $486 in the first nine months of 2012, compared to $483 for the same period in the prior year.

The net earnings from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $8.0 million, an increase of $46.6 million compared with net losses of $38.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There were no impairments recorded in continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to an impairment charge of $40.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Revenue

		2012	2011
Nine months ended September 30,		$’000	$’000
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	170,198	180,409
	- North America	80,719	75,948
	- Rest of the world	98,306	99,655
Hotel management/part ownership interests		4,073	4,082
Restaurants		9,886	9,956
		363,182	370,050
Tourist trains and cruises		55,698	57,539
Real estate		5,164	7,190
		424,044	434,779

Total revenue decreased by $10.8 million, or 2%, from $434.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $424.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

43

Owned Hotels:  The change in revenue at owned hotels is analyzed on a regional basis as follows:

Europe

Revenue decreased by $10.2 million, or 6%, from $180.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $170.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, mainly due to the weakening of European currencies against the U.S. dollar. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $14.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Average daily rate decreased from $765 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $743 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy decreased by one percentage point from 59% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to 58% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. On a same store basis, RevPAR in local currency increased by 2%, although it decreased by 6% in U.S. dollars.

North America

Revenue increased by $4.8 million, or 6%, from $75.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $80.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, generated by revenue growth at the majority of properties led by Charleston Place Hotel, where revenue grew by $2.5 million. Same store RevPAR increased by 10% from $229 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $252 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Average daily rate increased from $348 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $376 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy increased by one percentage point, from 66% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to 67% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Rest of the World

Revenue decreased by $1.4 million, or 1%, from $99.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $98.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  Exchange rate movements across the region caused revenue to decrease by $2.7 million compared to the same period in 2011. Same store RevPAR in U.S. dollars for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased 2% from $192 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $195 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of 3% when measured in local currency. Average daily rate increased by 3% from $356 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $366 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy decreased by one percentage point from 54% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to 53% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Revenue at OEH’s hotels in South America collectively decreased by $2.8 million, or 4%, from $63.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $61.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to Copacabana Palace which was partially closed for renovations during the third quarter of 2012 and was responsible for $5.5 million of the revenue decrease. This was offset by a $2.1 million increase at Hotel das Cataratas. Same store RevPAR for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased 1% from $248 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $245 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy remained flat at 59% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Southern Africa revenue decreased by $1.1 million from $15.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $14.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $1.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Same store RevPAR for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by 1% in U.S. dollars, but increased by 10% in local currency.

Revenue for the Asian properties increased by $2.7 million, or 13%, from $20.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $23.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, with revenue growth coming principally from Napasai and The Governor’s Residence, which together contributed $2.2 million of growth. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Same store RevPAR in U.S. dollars for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $22, or 14%, from $157 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $179 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Occupancy increased by one percentage point from 59% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to 60% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Hotel Management and Part-Ownership Interests: Revenue was flat at $4.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Restaurants: Revenue decreased by $0.1 million, or 1%, from $10.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $9.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

44

Trains and Cruises: Revenue decreased by $1.8 million, or 3%, from $57.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $55.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Growth of $1.0 million from the Venice Simplon-Orient-Express was offset by a $2.3 million decrease in revenue from U.K.-based trains as passenger numbers were impacted by the Olympic Games, which diverted attention and kept visitors away from other London attractions, and a weak economic climate affected charter business. Exchange rate movements caused revenue to decrease by $1.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011.

Real Estate: Five condominiums were delivered at Porto Cupecoy generating revenue of $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Sales contracts were signed on a further 11 units in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. In addition, revenue of $0.7 million was generated from the sale of the final two units at Keswick estate which did not form part of the sale of the hotel property.

Cost of services

Cost of services decreased by $7.6 million from $203.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $196.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Cost of services was 46% of revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to 47% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Exchange rate movements caused cost of services to decrease by $8.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $3.0 million from $159.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $156.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Exchange rate movements caused these expenses to decrease by $4.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 37% of revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $1.0 million from $32.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $31.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Exchange rate movements caused depreciation and amortization to decrease by $1.6 million compared to the same period in 2011.

Segment EBITDA

		2012		2011
Nine months ended September 30,		$’000		$’000
Hotels and restaurants
Owned hotels	- Europe	53,720		58,698
	- North America	15,899		12,231
	- Rest of the world	23,108		21,214
Hotel management/part ownership interests		1,701		3,623
Restaurants		181		(2,093	)
		94,609		93,673
Tourist trains and cruises		15,736		14,237
Real estate		(4,677	)	(4,358	)
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment		—		502
Impairment of real assets and property, plant and equipment		—		(40,853	)
Central overheads		(27,833	)	(26,699	)
		77,835		36,502

The European hotels collectively reported segment EBITDA of $53.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $58.7 million in the same period in 2011. This decrease in segment EBITDA results mainly from the weakening of

45

European currencies against the U.S. dollar, which has resulted in a decrease to segment EBITDA of $4.8 million. As a percentage of European hotels revenue, the European segment EBITDA margin decreased slightly from 33% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to 32% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Segment EBITDA in the North American hotels region increased by 30%, from $12.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $15.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. With the exception of El Encanto which is still under construction, there was segment EBITDA growth across all properties due primarily to increases in average daily rate. As a percentage of North American hotels revenue, the North American segment EBITDA margin increased from 16% in 2011 to 20% in 2012.

Segment EBITDA in the Rest of the World hotels region increased by 9%, from $21.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $23.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  Growth was $4.0 million across all the properties excluding Copacabana Palace, where EBITDA decreased by $2.2 million due to partial closure of the hotel for renovations during the current period. As a percentage of Rest of the World hotels revenue, the segment EBITDA margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased to 24%, compared to 21% for the same period in 2011.

Central overheads increased by $1.1 million, or 4%, from $26.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $27.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The variance includes compensation cost increases of $0.2 million, receivable write-offs of $0.5 million and premises costs of $0.2 million. As a percentage of revenue, central overheads increased from 6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to 7% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Impairment of real estate assets and property, plant and equipment

In the nine months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified a non-cash real estate asset impairment charge of $36.9 million in respect of its Porto Cupecoy development project. OEH determined that the fair value of real estate assets was less than the carrying value. The charge was computed using Level 3 inputs, namely the estimated selling prices and estimated selling costs based on OEH's recent experience with sales of condominiums and marina slips already completed. This impairment charge resulted primarily from changes in estimates of the price and pace of future sales as a result of current market conditions. Additionally as part of an overall impairment calculation, property, plant and equipment at the Porto Cupecoy development with a carrying value of $1.7 million was written down to a fair value of $Nil. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, OEH identified non-cash property, plant and equipment impairment charges of $2.3 million in respect of Casa de Sierra Nevada, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico. The carrying values were written down to the hotel's fair value based on management's best estimate. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements.

There were no impairments in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Earnings from operations before net finance costs

Earnings from operations increased by $41.1 million from a loss of $0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to earnings of $40.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to the factors described above.

Net finance costs

Net finance costs were $35.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $23.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The nine months ended September 30, 2011 included a foreign exchange loss of $2.5 million compared to a foreign exchange loss of $0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Net interest expense decreased by $10.2 million, or 31%, from $32.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $22.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included swap and loan termination costs of $3.5 million related to loan facilities in Brazil and Italy, compared with $1.8 million of similar costs related to the Sicilian properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Additionally, $2.9 million of interest was capitalized at El Encanto in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared with $Nil in the prior year comparative period. The remaining reduction in interest expense was due to lower interest rates and a reduction of debt over the last 12 months.

Provision for income taxes

The provision for income taxes increased by $7.5 million, from a charge of $5.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to a charge of $13.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  The provision for income

46

taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 includes a deferred tax benefit of $1.3 million arising from fixed asset timing differences following movements in exchange rates compared to a $2.9 million tax benefit in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 also includes a tax charge of $0.1 million in respect of changes in uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties compared to a $2.5 million tax benefit in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Earnings from unconsolidated companies

Earnings from unconsolidated companies, net of tax, increased by $0.9 million from $3.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $4.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, driven mainly by increases in earnings from the rail joint venture in Peru. The tax provision associated with earnings from unconsolidated companies was $1.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Earnings from discontinued operations

The earnings from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $6.0 million compared with losses of $20.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Earnings from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 include a gain of $5.4 million on the disposal of The Observatory Hotel, which was sold on August 8, 2012, a gain of $0.7 million on the disposal of Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, which was sold on June 1, 2012, and a gain of $2.1 million on the disposal of Keswick Hall, which was sold on January 23, 2012. Earnings from The Westcliff for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $Nil.

The results of discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 include net earnings of $1.1 million from Hôtel de la Cité, which was sold in August 2011, offset by losses of $17.9 million from Keswick Hall, $2.4 million from Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, $0.8 million from The Observatory Hotel and $0.8 million from The Westcliff. The losses from Keswick Hall and Bora Bora Lagoon Resort include an impairment charge of $23.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as the carrying value of the assets was written down to each hotel's fair value. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

OEH had cash and cash equivalents of $101.5 million at September 30, 2012, $11.4 million more than the $90.1 million at December 31, 2011. In addition, OEH had restricted cash of $20.1 million (December 31, 2011 - $13.2 million).  At September 30, 2012, there were undrawn amounts available to OEH under committed short-term lines of credit of $3.3 million (December 31, 2011 - $4.4 million) and undrawn amounts available to OEH under secured revolving credit facilities of $Nil (December 31, 2011 - $Nil), bringing total cash availability at September 30, 2012 to $104.8 million, excluding the restricted cash of $20.1 million.

Current assets less current liabilities, including the current portion of long-term debt, resulted in a working capital balance of $67.4 million at September 30, 2012, a decrease from $132.3 million at December 31, 2011.  The main factors that contributed to the decrease in working capital were increases in accrued liabilities and deferred revenues, as well as a decrease in discontinued operations assets held for sale.

Cash Flow

Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $64.3 million compared to $52.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Earnings from continuing operations of $8.0 million were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, while losses from continuing operations of $38.6 million were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were adversely affected by an impairment charge of $40.9 million related to the Porto Cupecoy development and Casa Sierra Nevada along with higher interest expense. The interest expense was $3.5 million higher in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to swap and loan termination costs related to loan facilities in Brazil and Italy. Further, the interest expense has been reduced by $2.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due to the capitalization of interest which was begun in in the fourth quarter of 2011 related to the El Encanto property.

47

Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities increased by $23.1 million to $28.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were the result of the assignment of the New York hotel development project for gross proceeds of $25.5 million.

Capital expenditure of $68.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included capital expenditure of $28.9 million at El Encanto, $7.3 million at Copacabana Palace, $3.9 million at Hotel Splendido, $3.6 million at the Sicilian hotels and $2.9 million at La Samanna.

Financing Activities. Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $16.5 million compared to $73.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $56.5 million.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 €30.0 million ($43.5 million) of debt secured on La Residencia, maturing in September 2011, was refinanced with a €18.0 million ($26.1 million) facility maturing in 2014. In addition, an $88 million loan secured by the Brazilian properties was refinanced with a $115.0 million loan which includes a $15.0 million capital expenditure facility to assist with the planned refurbishment of the main building of the Copacabana Palace. The remaining debt payments were scheduled repayments on existing debt.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the €36.8 million ($46.8 million) of debt secured on the Sicilian hotels was refinanced with a €35.0 million ($44.4 million) facility maturing in 2015. In addition, $3.1 million of debt secured on the Miraflores Park Hotel was refinanced with a $10.1 million facility with tranches maturing in 2014 and 2022. There was a draw of $8.0 million of the $15.0 million capital expenditure facility for Brazil, a draw of $17.5 million on the El Encanto debt and a repayment of $11.2 million for the Observatory Hotel.

Capital Commitments

There were $20.9 million of capital commitments outstanding as of September 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011- $15.4 million). Additionally, outstanding contracts for project-related costs on the Porto Cupecoy development amounted to $0.2 million at September 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - $0.5 million).

OEH agreed in January 2010 to pay the vendor of the two Sicilian hotels a further $7.1 million if, by 2015, additional rooms are constructed at Grand Hotel Timeo and certain required permits are granted to add additional rooms and add a swimming pool to Villa Sant’Andrea.  In February 2011, OEH paid $2.0 million of the contingent liability as the appropriate permits to add a swimming pool to Villa Sant’Andrea were granted.  OEH has provided $3.9 million for the expected remaining liability for this contingency.

Indebtedness

At September 30, 2012, OEH had $516.8 million (December 31, 2011 - $543.9 million) of consolidated debt, including the current portion and excluding debt held by consolidated variable interest entities, largely collateralized by OEH assets with a number of commercial bank lenders which is repayable over periods of 1 to 20 years with a weighted average interest rate of 4.17%.  See Note 10 to the Financial Statements regarding the maturity of long-term debt.

Debt of consolidated variable entities at September 30, 2012 comprised $89.2 million (December 31, 2011 - $90.5 million), including the current portion, of debt obligations of Charleston Center LLC, owner of the Charleston Place Hotel in which OEH has a 19.9% equity investment.

Including debt of consolidated variable entities, approximately 49% of the outstanding principal was drawn in European euros and the balance primarily in U.S. dollars. At September 30, 2012, 49% of borrowings of OEH were in floating interest rates.

Liquidity

During the three months ending December 31, 2012, OEH will have approximately $11.6 million of scheduled debt repayments including capital lease payments, of which $0.4 million relates to debt held by consolidated variable interest entities.

Additionally, OEH’s capital commitments at September 30, 2012 amounted to $20.9 million.  OEH expects to incur costs of a further $0.9 million to complete its Porto Cupecoy development, funded by sales proceeds as units are delivered to purchasers.

48

OEH expects to fund its working capital requirements, debt service and capital expenditure commitments for the foreseeable future from cash resources, operating cash flow, available committed borrowing facilities, issuing new debt or equity securities, rescheduling loan repayments or capital commitments, and disposing of non-core assets and developed real estate. When assessing cash and cash equivalents within OEH, management considers the availability of those cash resources held at local business units to meet the strategic needs of OEH.

During 2011, for example, two loans totaling $131.5 million were refinanced with two new loans totaling $126.1 million, both of which mature in three years. The $5.4 million repayment on the two loans was funded out of cash resources. In addition, OEH signed a new $45.0 million loan facility providing partial funding for the completion of El Encanto, scheduled to reopen in early 2013.  The loan has a term of three years, with two one-year extensions.  Also in 2011, total gross proceeds of $41.9 million were received upon the assignment of purchase and development agreements relating to OEH’s proposed New York hotel project in April 2011, and upon the exercise of a call option in December 2011 by the assignee for excess development rights over the ‘21’ Club restaurant. Also in 2011, OEH completed the sale of the property and operations of Hôtel de la Cité in Carcassonne, France for a cash consideration of €9.0 million ($12.9 million).

During 2012, OEH completed the sale of Keswick Hall, Virginia for gross proceeds of $22.0 million, repaying associated debt of $10.0 million, and the sale of Bora Bora Lagoon Resort, French Polynesia for gross proceeds of $3.0 million.  On August 8, 2012, OEH completed the sale of The Observatory Hotel, Sydney for gross proceeds of A$40.0 million ($42.1 million), of which A$10.7 million ($11.2 million) was used to repay a bank loan secured by the hotel.  In June 2012, OEH refinanced a $13.3 million facility secured by Napasai, Koh Samui, extending the maturity from 2012 to 2015. Also, on September 12, 2012, OEH drew a new loan facility of €35.0 million ($44.4 million) to refinance €36.8 million ($46.8 million) of long-term debt maturing in 2013 secured by the two Sicilian hotels.

OEH has several loan facilities with commercial banks, most of which relate to specific hotel or other properties and are secured by a mortgage on the particular property. In most cases, the Company is either the borrower or the subsidiary owning the property is the borrower and the loan is guaranteed by the Company.

The loan facilities generally place restrictions on the property-owning company’s ability to incur additional debt and limit liens, and to effect mergers and asset sales, and include financial covenants. Where the property-owning subsidiary is the borrower, the financial covenants relate to the financial performance of the property financed and generally include covenants relating to interest coverage, debt service, and loan-to-value and debt-to-EBITDA ratio tests. Most of the facilities under which the Company is the borrower or the guarantor also contain financial covenants which are based on OEH’s performance on a consolidated basis. The covenants include a quarterly interest coverage test and a quarterly net worth test.

At September 30, 2012, one OEH subsidiary was out of compliance with financial covenants in a $2.0 million loan facility. This non-compliance is expected to be rectified in the fourth quarter of 2012.  In addition, two unconsolidated joint venture companies were out of compliance as follows:

• the unconsolidated Peru rail joint venture in which OEH has a 50% interest was out of compliance with a debt service coverage ratio covenant in a loan of $7.9 million, which is guaranteed by OEH. Discussions with the banks are ongoing to bring the joint venture back into compliance; and

• the Hotel Ritz, Madrid, 50% owned by OEH, was out of compliance at December 31, 2011 with the debt service coverage ratio in its first mortgage loan facility amounting to $83.0 million at September 30, 2012.  Although the loan is otherwise non-recourse to and not credit-supported by OEH or its joint venture partner in the hotel, they have each provided separate partial guarantees of $9.6 million, as of September 30, 2012, while discussions continue with the lender as to how to bring the hotel into long-term compliance.

OEH recognizes the risk that a property-specific or group consolidated loan covenant could be breached.  In order to minimize this risk, OEH regularly prepares cash flow projections which are used to forecast covenant compliance under all loan facilities.  If there is any likelihood of potential non-compliance with a covenant, OEH takes proactive steps to meet with the lending bank to seek an amendment to, or a waiver of, the financial covenant at risk.  Obtaining an amendment or waiver may result in an increase in the borrowing costs.

Many of OEH’s bank loan facilities include cross-default provisions under which a failure to pay principal or interest by the borrower or guarantor under other indebtedness in excess of a specified threshold amount would cause a default under the facilities.  Under OEH’s largest loan facility, the specified cross-default threshold amount is $25.0 million.

49

As discussed above in “Results of Operations,” OEH has experienced decreased revenues and segment EBITDA reflecting the continued economic uncertainties in the Eurozone and the weakening of the euro and other currencies against the U.S. dollar.

In order to assure that OEH has sufficient liquidity in the future, OEH’s cash flow projections and available funds are discussed with the Company’s board of directors and OEH’s advisors to consider the most appropriate way to develop OEH’s capital structure and generate additional sources of liquidity. The options available to OEH will depend on the current economic and financial environment and OEH’s continued compliance with financial covenants. Some currently identified options are dependent on third parties, while others are within the control of OEH. Options currently available to OEH include increasing the leverage on certain under-leveraged assets, issuing equity or debt instruments and disposing of non-core assets and sales of developed real estate. Specifically, OEH is expected to complete the sale of The Westcliff hotel in the fourth quarter of 2012, and is in the advanced stages of refinancing under-leveraged assets. Both these actions are expected to contribute significant unrestricted cash resources to OEH which can be utilized as required.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

As of September 30, 2012, OEH had adopted all the relevant standards that impacted the accounting for annual goodwill impairment assessments, presentation of comprehensive income and fair value measurement and disclosure, as reported in Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

Accounting pronouncements to be adopted

In December 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires companies to provide new disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements for financial instruments and derivatives. The provisions of this guidance are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and are required to be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

For a discussion of these, see under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K annual report.

50

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

OEH is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.  These exposures are monitored and managed as part of OEH’s overall risk management program, which recognizes the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to mitigate material adverse effects on consolidated earnings and cash flows.  OEH does not hold market rate sensitive financial instruments for trading purposes.

The market risk relating to interest rates arises mainly from the financing activities of OEH. Earnings are affected by changes in interest rates on borrowings, principally based on U.S. dollar LIBOR and EURIBOR, and on short-term cash investments. If interest rates increased by 10%, with all other variables held constant, annual net finance costs of OEH would have increased by approximately $0.8 million on an annual basis based on borrowings at September 30, 2012.

OEH’s properties match foreign currency earnings and costs to provide a natural hedge against currency movements. In addition, a significant proportion of the guests at OEH hotels located outside of the United States originate from the United States. When a foreign currency in which OEH operates devalues against the U.S. dollar, OEH has considerable flexibility to increase prices in local currency, or vice versa. Management believes that when these factors are combined, OEH does not face a material exposure to its net earnings from currency movements, although the reporting of OEH’s revenue and costs translated into U.S. dollars can, from period to period, be materially affected.

OEH management uses a sensitivity analysis to assess the potential impact on net earnings of changes in foreign currency financial instruments from hypothetical changes in the foreign currency exchange rates. The primary assumption used in this model is a hypothetical 10% weakening or strengthening of the foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. At September 30, 2012, as a result of this analysis, OEH management determined that the impact on foreign currency financial instruments of a 10% weakening of foreign currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar would decrease OEH’s net earnings by approximately $2.1 million consisting of Russian ruble $0.8 million, Mexican peso $0.4 million and Thai baht $0.9 million.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of its interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of OEH’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(e)) as of September 30, 2012. OEH previously reported a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(f)) relating to the accounting for income taxes in Item 9A — Controls and Procedures of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Specifically, OEH did not maintain effective controls over the preparation and review of the calculations and related supporting documentation for certain tax assets and liabilities and the current and deferred income tax expense recorded in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This material weakness was not remediated during the first nine months of 2012 and, accordingly, the Company’s management has concluded that OEH’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2012.

Remediation Plan for Material Weakness Related to Accounting for Income Taxes

During the first nine months of 2012, OEH has taken steps to remediate this material weakness, including designing a standardized form of internal tax report for each reporting entity within OEH, hiring additional resources in the preparation and review of the provision of income taxes, and delivering technical tax training to accounting personnel at local business units.  The Company will take further actions to improve internal controls over OEH’s accounting for income taxes and generally to strengthen its controls, including the following:

• improve policies, procedures and formal communications between the tax department and the financial reporting group relating to tax account reconciliation, analysis and review,

• undertake certain year-end tax analysis and reporting activities in periods earlier in the year in order to provide additional analysis and reconciliation time during the financial close period,

• continue to improve communications with subsidiary finance and accounting personnel regarding the requirements for tax jurisdiction-specific information, and

• enhance the training of tax accounting personnel, particularly with respect to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

51

OEH anticipates the actions described above will strengthen OEH’s internal control over financial reporting relating to the accounting for income taxes and will, over time, address the related material weakness identified as of December 31, 2011.  However, because the remedial actions have only recently been undertaken and remain to be fully implemented, the Company’s management anticipates it will not be able to conclude that the material weakness has been remediated until, at the earliest, the end of OEH’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the changes to internal controls made as part of the remediation of the material weakness described above, there have been no changes in OEH’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, OEH’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. Exhibits

The index to exhibits appears below, on the page immediately following the signature page to this report.

52

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.
By:	/s/ Martin O’Grady
	Martin O’Grady
	Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

Dated: November 5, 2012

53

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1    -    Memorandum of Association and Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K/A Current Report on June 15, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2    -     Bye-Laws of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K Current Report on June 15, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.3    -     Rights Agreement dated as of June 1, 2000, and amended and restated as of April 12, 2007, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent, filed as Exhibit 1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated April 23, 2007, for the Company’s preferred share purchase rights, and incorporated herein by reference.

3.4    -     Amendment No. 1 dated December 10, 2007 to amended and restated Rights Agreement (Exhibit 3.3), filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K Current Report on December 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.5    -     Amendment No. 2 dated May 27, 2010 to amended and restated Rights Agreement (Exhibit 3.3), filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K Current Report on May 27, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

31    -     Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.

32    -     Section 1350 Certification.

101  -     Interactive Data File.

54

Exhibit 31

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, Philip R. Mengel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the quarter ended September 30, 2012;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 5, 2012	/s/ Philip R. Mengel
	Philip R. Mengel
	Director and Interim Chief Executive Officer

55

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, Martin O'Grady, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the quarter ended September 30, 2012;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 5, 2012	/s/ Martin O'Grady
	Martin O'Grady
	Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

56

Exhibit 32

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Section 1350 Certification

The undersigned hereby certify that this report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.

/s/ Philip R. Mengel	/s/ Martin O'Grady
Philip R. Mengel	Martin O'Grady
Director and Interim Chief Executive Officer	Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 5, 2012

A signed original of this written certification has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

57