Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Earnings Per Share [Abstract] | ' |
Principles of Consolidation | ' |
Principles of Consolidation |
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Unaudited Interim Financial Information | ' |
Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2014 and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are unaudited. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Accordingly, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the SEC on August 20, 2013. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013 included herein was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all disclosures, including notes, required by GAAP. |
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement of the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2014, its condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, its condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, and its condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, or any other future period. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates, judgments and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, goodwill, intangible assets, long-lived assets, contingencies, and income taxes. The Company bases these estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various other assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and recorded revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods. |
Accounting Policies | ' |
Accounting Policies |
The significant accounting policies are described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. There have been no significant changes in the accounting policies subsequent to June 30, 2013. |
Concentrations of Credit Risk | ' |
Concentrations of Credit Risk |
No client accounted for 10% or more of net revenue for the three or nine months ended March 31, 2014 or for the same period in fiscal year 2013. No client accounted for 10% or more of net accounts receivable as of March 31, 2014 or June 30, 2013. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, acquisition-related promissory notes, an interest rate swap, and a term loan. The fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents is determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets for its money market funds; and quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets for its U.S. municipal securities and certificates of deposits that mature within 90 days. The recorded values of the Company’s accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their current fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these accounts. The fair values of acquisition-related promissory notes approximate their recorded amounts as the interest rates on similar financing arrangements available to the Company at March 31, 2014 approximate the interest rates implied when these acquisition-related promissory notes were originally issued and recorded. The fair value of the interest rate swap is based upon fair value quotes from the issuing bank and the Company assesses the quotes for reasonableness by comparing them to the present values of expected cash flows. The present value approach is based on observable market interest rate curves that are commensurate with the terms of the interest rate swaps. The carrying value represents the fair value of the swaps, as adjusted for any non-performance risk associated with the Company at March 31, 2014. The Company believes that the fair value of the term loan approximates its recorded amount at March 31, 2014 as the interest rate on the term loan is variable and is based on market interest rates and after consideration of default and credit risk. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2012 the FASB issued an update to the accounting standard for intangibles. The revised standard update allows entities to use a qualitative approach to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. It permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying value. Otherwise, the quantitative impairment test is not required. The Company plans to adopt this accounting standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 and does not believe that the adoption will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
In February 2013 the FASB issued an update to the accounting standard for accumulated other comprehensive loss. The revised standard update requires entities to present information about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss by component either on the face of the statement where net loss is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. The Company’s adoption of the revised standard update in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 did not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
In July 2013 the FASB issued an update to the accounting standard for the financial presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. The revised standard update provides that a liability related to an unrecognized tax benefit would be presented as reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. The revised standard update becomes effective July 1, 2014 for the Company and it should be applied prospectively to unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date, although retrospective application is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders and Net Loss per Share | ' |
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, including potential dilutive shares of common stock assuming the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock units using the treasury stock method. |
Fair Value Measurements and Marketable Securities | ' |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received on sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The FASB has established a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). |
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the guidance for fair value measurement are described below: |
|
| | |
Level 1 — | | Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Pricing inputs are based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. The valuations are based on quoted prices of the underlying security that are readily and regularly available in an active market, and accordingly, a significant degree of judgment is not required. As of March 31, 2014, the Company used Level 1 assumptions for its money market funds. |
| |
Level 2 — | | Pricing inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. As of March 31, 2014, the Company used Level 2 assumptions for its U.S. municipal securities, certificates of deposit, acquisition-related promissory notes, term loan, and interest rate swap. |
| |
Level 3 — | | Pricing inputs are generally unobservable for the assets or liabilities and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the determination of fair value require management’s judgment or estimation of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. As of March 31, 2014, the Company did not have any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities. |
Marketable Securities | ' |
All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Investments with maturities greater than three months at the date of purchase are classified as marketable securities. The Company’s marketable securities have been classified and accounted for as available-for-sale. Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates the available-for-sale designation as of each balance sheet date. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders’ equity. |
Interest Rate Swap | ' |
To reduce the Company’s exposure to rising interest rates under the term loan, in February 2012, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to reduce its exposure to the financial impact of changing interest rates under its term loan. The Company does not speculate using derivative instruments. The Company entered into this derivative instrument arrangement solely for the purpose of risk management. The swap encompasses the principal balances scheduled to be outstanding as of January 1, 2014 and thereafter, such principal and notional amount totaling $85 million in January 2014 and amortizing to $35 million in November 2016. The effective date of the swap was April 9, 2012 with a maturity date of November 4, 2016. At March 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $81.3 million of notional amount outstanding in the swap agreement that exchanges a variable interest rate base (Eurodollar rate) for a fixed interest rate of 0.97% over the term of the agreement. This interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge of the interest rate risk attributable to forecasted variable interest payments. The effective portion of the fair value gains or losses on this swap are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Any hedge ineffectiveness will be immediately recognized in earnings in the current period. |
Segment Information | ' |
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its chief executive officer. The Company’s chief executive officer reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by information about operating segments, including net sales and operating (loss) income before depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense. |